CA1067335A - Method of treating hay and product - Google Patents

Method of treating hay and product

Info

Publication number
CA1067335A
CA1067335A CA253,815A CA253815A CA1067335A CA 1067335 A CA1067335 A CA 1067335A CA 253815 A CA253815 A CA 253815A CA 1067335 A CA1067335 A CA 1067335A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
hay
culture
storage
fresh cut
drying
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA253,815A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Martin C. Nold
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1067335A publication Critical patent/CA1067335A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Fodder In General (AREA)

Abstract

METHOD OF TREATING HAY AND PRODUCT

ABSTRACT OF DISCLOSURE:

A method of treating hay having high moisture content to preserve the hay against spoilage and to maintain its nutritive properties by applying a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus to the hay, and the resulting treated product. The bacteria is desirably added to the fresh cut hay in the field by spraying onto the hay as it is gathered from swaths or windrows for baling or stacking or for chopping and storage as ensilage.

Description

~ `~
~.~6q33~

This invention relates to a me~hod of treating hay having high moisture content, i.e., more than about 18%, to preserve the hay against spoilage and to maintain its palatability and nutritive values, and the resulting treated hay product.
BACKGROUND OF INVENTION:
Hay is a green forage crop grown ànd harvested for the feeding of livestock animals. Hay may be any one, or a mixture, of several grasses and plants, e.g. timothy; clovers, alfalfa;
brome grass; Sudan grass; millet; milo; corn fodder and stover; -~
pea hay; soybean hay; pinto hay; oat, wheat, barley or rye hay; -sunflower fodder; cane; beet tops; and the like. As used herein, "hay" is intended to encompass any one or a mixture of these forage plants and residues. -~;
Ideally, the hay should be relatively dry, i.e., less than about 17% moisture, when put away for storage, whether . . .
bs1ed or stacked or chopped, whether loose or compacted. If stored under higher moisture conditions, hay is subject to heating, sometimes resulting in spontaneous combustion; It is ~ ~
subject to spoilage, injurious mold growth and the like. It ~-;~ Z0 is also subject to loss of palatability and animal acceptance;
loss of protein, total digestable nutrients ~TDN) and other intrinsive nutritive values; and like degradation as an animal `:
~ feed. High moisture hay is dificult to grind and di-f~icult i~ to handle in mechanical equipment. Hay ordinarily loses about i 40% o~ its nutritive value between mowing and feeding due to drying and storage during the curing process.
¦~ Drying of hay is ordinarily accomplished in the field by depositing the mowed hay in swaths or windrows, with or without conditioning by breaking the stalk structure to hasten drying, and leaving for several days. ~lowever, this method of drying is subject to the vagaries o the weather. Artificial drying . ~' ~ ";":':' is expensive in time, labor and fuel, making this method gener-ally uneconomical.
THFJ PRIOR ART:
It has been proposed to preserve high moisture hay by treating in the field with an organic acid, such as proprionic acid, along with a mold inhibitor. This method has limitations - ~
as to moisture content of the hay and results as to maintenance ~ -of nutritive values are at this date inconclusive. -United States Patents No. 3,343,962 and No. 3,497,359 - -disclose supplementing livestock feed with a cultured whey ~ -product containing Lactobacillus acido~hilus in the form of a semi-solid slurry or dry powder mixed~ ith a carrier. According to one form of practice, the slurry is mixed with a grain carrier :
in the proportion of 10 pounds of slurry to 9 pounds of grain ~ ~-carrier and dried. As an alternative, it is suggested that a less dense slurry may be fed directly to animals, or may be sprayed directly into various binder and foodstuffs at concen-trations of 1-3~ or may be sprayed directly or in a water solution onto the leaves of a variety of vegetation for the purpose of leaf feeding, i.e., in the form of living plants~
According to the methods of these patents, the feed supplement-ation is the result of the addition of substantial quantities ; o the cultured whey product and no suggestion of preservation of the carriers is made.
:
5UMMARY OF THE INVENTION: ~
The present invention is based upon the discovery that the addition of a small amount o~ Lactoba lus acidophilus ~ -~ to freshly cut hay, as defirled, permits the harvesting and t~` storage of the hay at higher than usual moisture content without ~ ~¦ 30 the usual resulting degradation of the hay and without the -normal loss of nutritive value due to curing. Broadly stated, the invention is directed to the method of treating high moisture , -:
hay to preserve the same and to maintain its nutritive values, which method comprises applying a dilute culture of Lactobacillus ~ ~-acidophilus to the hay and admixing therewith prior to storage.
The cultured whey products of Patents No. 3,343,962 and No.
3,4~7,359 represent one form in which the Lactobacillus acidophilus may be applied to the hay, but the invention is not restricted to the use of any particular form of Lactobacillus -acidophilus culture.
DESCRIPTION O~ THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT:
In carrying out the invention, the Lactobacillus acido~
philus organisms are applied to the hay from an aqueous carrier. --Desirably, the organisms are applied to the hay as it is collected from swaths or windrows in the fields preparatory to baling, stacking or chopping. Alternatively, the organlsms may be applied~to the hay as it leaves the swather or windroweT -prior to partial drying in the -field. In the case of hay to be chopped for ensilage, the organisms may be deposited after chopping as the hay is blown to the silo or other storage area.
Desirably, the Lactobacillus acidophilus organisms are applied to the hay in concentration between about ~5 to 90 billion cells per ton of hay. For example, one gallon of a . .
Lactobacillus ~ concentrate containing about 1.4 :
billion cells per cc is diluted with about 12 gallons of water and distributed over the hay in the -form of a fine spray mist ; ~ at;the rate o abou~ 15-25 ounces per ton of hay. Typically with hay at about 30% moisture, about 20 ounces per ton of hay ~ should be applied. At higher moisture contents, a greater !;~ proportion of the organism should be applied.
~ Under ideal conditions, untreated hay is left in the field `j~ 30 for drying from about 2-1/2 to 5 days. Under adverse weather .., . :
and climatic conditions, this time may be much longer. Utilizing ;
the treatment of the present invention under ideal conditions, ~
4 ;

.. ~.. . . , " . . , .: ... . . ~. . ~ , : .: ., . - ... . .

~S~6733S
the hay may be gathered within less than 2~ to 36 hours and, under adverse conditions, within 48 to 72 hours.
Because the suspension of organisms is applied to a loose uncompacted mass as a pressurized spray, the suspension tends ~-to penetrate and become distributed through the whole mass.
When applied to chopped hay, thorough mixing is assured as the ~ -result of the agitation inherent in ~he transport o-f the chopped ;
hay to the storage chamber. ~ -It has been found that as a result of the Lactobacillus : , acidophilus treatment there is a reduction in heating in the newly formed baled or stacked mass of hay. There is a reduction of mold formation. The structure of the hay is maintained as indicated by a reduction of leaf loss through shattering and crushing. The hay may be preserved in storage at a higher moisture content than currently possible. The treated cured and stored hay is more easily ground mechanically. In con-trolled animal feeding tests, it has been found that the initial nutritive values of the hay are maintained at a higher level in the form of higher protein, higher total digestive nutrients Z0 and other nutritive values. The treated hay has higher palat-ability, as indicated by animal acceptance.
The lnvention is further described by the following illus-trative example.
A 130 acre stand of hay in Faulk County, South Dakota, grown from an alfalfa-western wheat grass-slender wheat grass mixture was mowed and windrowed. The hay was passed through a Gehl conditioner and redeposited on the field The weather and l ~ general climatic conditions were generally fair to ideal. On :~
i,' the following day the fresh cut hay was collected and baled.
The baler was fitted with a 15 gallon liquid supply tank which was pressurized with carbon dioxide and connected to multiple l spray nozzles situated over the windrow intake area. A dilute `' - 5 -. ,~

, . . .: . ~ . . .,: . , , :
.. . . .
. . , ~ , ......... . ,, , ; , , . : .

Lactobacillus acidophilus suspension was prepared in the proportion of 1 gallon of concentrate containing 1.4 billion organisms per cc to 12 gallons of water.
The moisture content of certain of the windrows was deter-mined to be about 30%. The Lactobacillus acidophilus suspension was applied to this hay at the rate o~ 20 ounces per ton to apply about 65 billion cells per ton of hay. The moisture content of other windrows was dekermined to be about 37% and the organism was applied at the same 20 ounce per ton rate. ~
The moisture content of still other windrows was determined to -be about 42% and the organism was applied at the rate of about 23 ounces, or about 75 million organisms per ton. The hay was formed into rolled bales 5 feet wide by 5 feet in diameter and the bales were marked O
The 37% moisture hay was fed in a controlled test to a group of animals composed of 5 adult cows, 1 bull, 3 yearlings and 5 nursing calves. The animals were fed free choice, that is, the feed was available to the animals day and night without limitation. As a control, the animals were fed untreated hay ~ ~
as similar to the treated hay as possible under field conditions. ; ~ -Over a period of 13 days 2880 pounds of the untreated hay was , . .
consumed by the animals. Of this, 2718 pounds were eaten and -162 pounds was regarded as waste, rejected by the animals, scattered on the ground, etc. The average untreated hay con-sumption was 209 pounds per day.
The same animal group was then fed 2918 pounds of hay treated as described over a period of 15-1/2 days. Of this, 2859 pounds were eaten and 59 pounds were waste. An average of 184.5 pounds of the treated hay was eaten per day. The maintained nutritive value of the treated hay, increased value as compared with the untreated hay, is indicated by the lower consumption of the treated hay. The nutritive requirements of '' ''' , ~C367~3S :~ ~

the animals were satisfied on a free choice basis with a lesser total amount of hay. The greater palatability of the treated hay is indicated by the markedly reduced amount of waste, It is apparent that many modifications and variations of this invention as hereinbefore set forth may be made without ;
departing from the spirit and scope thereof. The specific ~
embodiments described are given by way of example only and the -invention is limited only by the terms of the appended claims. ~

, : . :. .

;l ~ '' '' :

. . ..

. ~ .~. .
. ,, ~ ,1~ ' , .

Claims (8)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A method of treating freshly harvested high mois-ture hay to preserve the same during open storage without drying to storage condition, and maintain its nutritive values, which method comprises applying a dilute culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus to the hay in open air prior to storage, said culture being applied in concentration between about 45 to 90 billion organisms per ton of hay.
2. A method according to claim 1, in which said hay has a moisture content of more than about 18%.
3. A method according to claim 1, in which said culture is applied to fresh cut hay by spraying in aqueous suspension.
4. A method according to claim 1, in which said culture is applied to fresh cut hay as said hay is gathered from windrows in the field.
5. A method according to claim 1, in which said culture is applied to fresh cut hay as said hay is deposited in the field for partial drying.
6. A method according to claim 3, in which said culture is applied as a pressurized fine spray mist.
7. A method according to claim 1, in which said hay is copped prior to storage.
8. A method according to claim 7, in which said culture is applied to said hay after chopping.
CA253,815A 1975-06-23 1976-06-01 Method of treating hay and product Expired CA1067335A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US58971175A 1975-06-23 1975-06-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1067335A true CA1067335A (en) 1979-12-04

Family

ID=24359164

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA253,815A Expired CA1067335A (en) 1975-06-23 1976-06-01 Method of treating hay and product

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CA (1) CA1067335A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Pitt Silage and Hay Preservation NRAES 5
Rotz et al. Changes in forage quality during harvest and storage
Dawson et al. The effects of wilting grass before ensiling on silage intake
Knapp et al. Anhydrous Ammonia and Propionic Acid as Hay Preservatives 1
Rotz How to maintain forage quality during harvest and storage
Kumar Year Round Green Fodder Production and Conservation for Sustainable Dairy Farming in India
US2940857A (en) Preservation of silage
Rotz Postharvest changes in alfalfa quality
US3184314A (en) Method for the preservation of silage
CA1067335A (en) Method of treating hay and product
Rotz Mechanization: planning and selection of equipment
Johnson et al. Quality of alfalfa hay chemically treated at cutting to hasten field drying
Montgomery et al. Corn silage supplementation for maximum intake and milk production
Henderson Silage making: Biotechnology on the farm
Rotz et al. Hay harvest and storage
Mahanna et al. Hay Additive Review:" Where We've Been, Where We're Going"
Silanikove et al. Preservation and storage of green panic (Panicum maximum) as moist hay with urea
Bogdanova et al. Influence of lactic acid and cellulolytic bacteria on the physicochemical parameters of alfalfa silage
Musgrave et al. Preservation and storage of forage crops
Bareeba Forage conservation and utilization
GB2087208A (en) Silage additive composition
Sheaffer et al. Hay preservation
EP0475684A1 (en) Forage composition
SU1068092A1 (en) Method of preserving plants
Collins et al. Harvesting and Storage of Cool‐Season Grass Hay and Silage