BR102016022319A2 - METHOD AND AUTOMATED SYSTEM FOR REAL-TIME FEEDBACK AUDITING AND PERFORMANCE OF OIL WELL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS - Google Patents

Abstract

automated method and system for real-time auditing and feedback of oil well construction performance. The present invention relates to a method and system applied to oil well construction operations for the purpose of measuring the performance of the various operations surrounding the construction of a well and providing real-time information on the execution of the wells. for decision making. In addition, the system presents, at all times, the guidelines to be followed by the operators acting on the drilling rig, so that they perform the operations consistently, that is, not at a slower or faster than the determined speed, but effectively. at the set speed. Thus, there is no deterioration in safety due to maneuvers performed at too high speeds, nor delays and losses due to maneuvers performed at speeds below the predetermined ones.

Description

(54) Title: METHOD AND SYSTEM

AUTOMATED FOR REAL-TIME AUDITING AND POSITIONING (FEEDBACK) OF THE PERFORMANCES OF OIL WELL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS (51) Int. Cl .: E21B 44/00 (52) CPC: E21B 44/00 (73) Owner (s): ROBSON NUNES OLIVEIRA DE BIAGGI, JOSÉ FRANCISCO TOESCA BALDASSIM (72) Inventor (s): ROBSON NUNES OLIVEIRA DE BIAGGI; JOSÉ FRANCISCO TOESCA BALDASSIM (74) Attorney (s): VILLAGE MARCAS E PATENTES LTDA (57) Summary: METHOD AND AUTOMATED SYSTEM FOR AUDITING AND POSITIONING (FEEDBACK) IN REAL TIME OF THE PERFORMANCES OF OIL CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. The present invention relates to a method and system applied to oil well construction operations with the objective of measuring the performance of the various operations surrounding the construction of a well and providing, in real time, information on the execution for decision making. Furthermore, the system presents, at all times, the guidelines to be followed by the operators working on the drilling rig, so that they perform the operations consistently, that is, not at a speed lower or higher than the determined one, but rather, effectively , at the established speed. Thus, there is no deterioration in safety due to maneuvers carried out at too high speeds, nor delays and losses due to maneuvers carried out at speeds lower than the predetermined ones.

1/26 “AUTOMATED AUDIT METHOD AND SYSTEM

REAL-TIME POSITIONING (FEEDBACK) OF PERFORMANCES

OPERATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF OIL WELLS ”

Field of Invention [001] The present invention is related to the area of hydrocarbon extraction, more specifically with the construction of oil wells, on land or sea platforms. More particularly, it refers to the field of drilling management systems where it is necessary to continuously evaluate the process for decision-making in order to optimize drilling by obtaining high rates of performance in the execution of operations. Description of the State of the Art [002] Obtaining hydrocarbons depends on an extensive chain of processes until they are transformed into the most diverse types of inputs and products. [003] One of these processes is that of drilling.

[004] The widely used method for drilling is rotary. For this, a rotary drilling rig is used, which has its scheme represented in figure 1.

[005] In this method, drilling is performed by rotating a drill bit 18 with a certain weight applied to it, a fact that promotes drilling through crushing and shearing. The combined effect of the weight on the drill and its rotation on the formation causes fragmentation of the rock, promoting the advance of the well depth.

[006] The process consists of descending by rotating a drilling column with an ultra-resistant material at its end. This drill column is made up of several tubular elements connected to each other. As mentioned earlier, drill bit 18 is located at the bottom end of the drill string. Then there is a set of drilling tools called “bottom hole assembly” or BHA 17. BHA consists of engines, stabilizers, turbines, profiling tools, etc. Above the BHA there is an extensive column that goes up to the surface, composed of pipes threaded together, called “drillpipes” (drill pipes) 10. With the main objective of bringing these generated cuttings to the surface, it is injected into the column drilling fluid that passes through the drill and returns through the annular space

5/50

2/26 between the drilling column and the well walls. This fluid is pumped by the Mud Pump 7 through the Drilling Fluid Hose 6, the fluid being inserted into the drilling column through the injection head 9. In older systems the injection head, also known as as “swivel” (swivel support). In more modern systems, this element has been replaced by a complete system capable of supplying torque to the drilling column as well as performing the injection of the fluid in it. This system is called the “top drive” 9 and will be detailed below. As the element that connects to the top of the drilling column can be a “top drive” or a “swivel”, it is very common to refer to it as a “traveling block”, or simply a block. Therefore, as the rock is destroyed and the cuttings generated are removed by means of the pumped fluid, the deepening of the well is observed.

[007] The weight applied to the drill bit results from the weight of the drill column itself. However, the total column weight is much greater than is necessary for the best drilling performance and that which is supported by the drill and / or column components. Thus, the drilling column works suspended so that only a part of it is under compression and the rest under tension due to the action of a load support system, which is used for the maneuvers of the column and to control the weight effectively applied to the drill. This weight on the drill is called WOB (Weight on Bit). The total weight of the column is measured using the column weight sensor 8, which consists of a load cell installed in the portion of the drill cable 2 that is attached to the anchor 38.

[008] This support system consists of crane 3, crowning block 4, mast 1, catarina 5, drilling cable 2, anchor 38 and the “top drive” itself 9. When the crane collects the cable, the catarina is pulled up.

[009] When the cable is released, the catarina goes down. In this way, the catarina can be moved vertically from platform 11 to the top of mast 1. [010] As the block is attached to the catarina, it also follows its movement and, consequently, the drilling column connected to the block also moves. moves.

[011] Therefore, each movement of the block has its magnitude added to the position of the drill, for example, if the block moves one meter down on the mast, it means that there was an increase of one meter in the depth of the drill and

6/50

3/26 vice versa. Thus, as the displacement of the block also generates the displacement of the column, its position along the mast is used as an indirect measure of the position the drill is in, that is, the position of the block is a parameter used for the depth reference. the bit depth, consequently, the depth of the well (hole depth). The position measurement of the block is made by an incremental encoder 21 that can be installed directly on the crane axis on land platforms or, in the case of a marine platform, to a device that linearly releases and collects a steel cable attached to the block, called “ geolograph ”22.

[012] The rotation can be transmitted to the bit by turning the drill column itself or by just turning the bit through bottom motors or turbines. [013] These elements take advantage of the hydraulic energy of the fluid that is pumped through the column to generate the rotation movement.

[014] In the case of older platforms, a technique based on a tube with a square section, called “Kelly System”, was used to transmit the rotation to the column, which was coupled to the tubes of the drilling column. [015] Thus, a rotating table on the platform fits this square section of Kelly and transmits the rotation to the entire system. However, this mechanism is practically no longer used, as most operations use “Top Drive” systems, as mentioned earlier.

[016] The “Top Drive” is basically an engine capable of generating the rotation of the column, at the same time coupling the fluid pumping circuit with the drilling column and supporting the entire load. This element slides on vertical rails that are attached to the mast of the platform and is suspended by means of a steel cable whose retraction is done by a crane.

[017] It is evident that for the drilling operation to take place, many other systems and subsystems are involved, however, these cited up to now are the central elements that characterize the basics of the drilling operation. Thus, it is characterized that the operational part of drilling parameters is basically concentrated in the operation of the “Top Drive”, since it is through it that the necessary maneuvers are carried out for the drilling to occur, that is, controlling its vertical position in the mast, the weight on the drill and the rotation of the column - and the torque, as a result.

7/50

4/26 [018] The professional responsible for operating the “top drive is called a sounder. [019] This is not the decision-making agent of the operation, but what must control the drilling rig so that the parameters established by the drilling engineers in conjunction with the directional drill are put into practice. [020] In addition to the drilling itself, it is necessary to carry out a multitude of adjacent operations. Among them, for the scope of this invention, in addition to drilling itself, we highlight drilling column maneuvers, connections of drilling column elements, coating or 'Riser', coating descents, BOP descents and ascents , which will have their relevance mentioned below after a brief explanation of the operation flow.

[021] Oil wells are drilled in stages or phases. Each phase has a smaller diameter than its predecessor phase. When a phase is completed, the casing 'of that phase must be performed. Thus, a metal pipe with a smaller diameter than the well is inserted. The annular space between the outer wall of the liner and the wall of the well 19 is filled with cement.

[022] In maritime operations there is a need to use an extensive piping, called “Riser '15, which runs from the surface to the bottom of the sea and serves as a conductor for drilling in order to isolate the marine environment from equipment, fluids and waste operations. In its lower portion, the "Riser" is connected to an element used to control the well stability called BOP 14 (blowout preventer). This equipment is positioned at the head of the well that is at the bottom of the sea 13.

[023] The magnitudes of depths achieved in operations are in the thousands of meters. Thus, it would be impossible to have drilling columns previously assembled for such operations. Thus, the drilling column, or cladding or "Riser", is obtained by joining several tubular elements of sizes smaller than the size of the mast. Therefore, the realization of these joints consists of performing repetitive processes that take a very significant amount of time within the well construction process. [024] When a tubular section is connected to another, this activity is called a connection. After a connection there is a maneuver, where the connected section must be inserted into the well, that is, the borehole must take the block from the highest position of the

8/50

5/26 mast to the lowest position in case of insertion in the well and vice versa in case of removal of column from the well. A new section must be connected and the column maneuver operation repeated until it reaches the bottom of the well or the surface, depending on the nature of the operation. For the connection to be made, it is necessary to disconnect between the drilling column and the block. For that, the portion of the column that is inside the well is suspended in this time interval by a wedge (slips) 95. This wedge surrounds the circular section of the tube that is at the platform level and performs the locking of it, keeping all suspended the drill column for a section of tubing to be inserted or removed. [025] Each of these sections, made up of a group of drillpipes, is called a "stand". The number of drillpipes to form a stand depends on the size of the platform mast, but as a rule, it consists of three drillpipes previously connected to each other.

[026] This cycle described above can be of three types:

a) If each tubular section is a “drillpipe”, the current operation can be a “trip” or drilling. In the case of "trip", it can be "trip-in" (if new columns are being inserted in the column) or "trip-ouf '(if there is a removal of" stands "from the column). In the case of drilling, the cycle also includes a connection, however, this connection is different from the “trip” connection that will be covered in more detail below. Still with respect to drilling, the movement of the block from the top of the mast to the level of the platform occurs by drilling a portion of formation equivalent to the amplitude of this vertical displacement of the block, that is, by drilling a “stand”;

b) If each tubular section is a lining, the operation is called Lining Down;

c) If each tubular section is a "Riser", the operation is called Descending or Ascending "Riser", depending on the direction of movement.

[027] Therefore, among the operations cited as relevant to the scope of this invention, they are all about carrying out pipe movement or connecting pipe sections. Thus, the proposed method will aim to audit the speeds of connections, maneuvers and other activities of the “trip’ ’, drilling, coating and“ Riser ”operations, providing real-time feedback to operators, enabling continuous assessment for instant proactive actions,

9/50

6/26 as well as management tools for the system administrator, responsible for the client's performance of operations.

[028] In addition to these types of operations mentioned above, there are operations that are not related to the movement of the block, therefore, they cannot have their performance measured through the maneuvering speeds. However, there may be contractual specifications for maximum execution times for such activities. Thus, in addition, the method provides for monitoring the time spent on these operations.

[029] The document US6892812B2, published on 11/27/2003, is known from the state of the art, which refers to an Automated Method and System to determine the good state of operation and carry out the evaluation of the process, aiming to determine the state of drilling or other operations in an appropriate manner, including storing a plurality of states for proper operation, with mechanical and hydraulic data being received for the operation satisfactorily. Based on the mentioned mechanical and hydraulic data, one of the states is automatically selected as the well's operating state. The evaluation of the process can be done based on the well's state of operation.

[030] The document US20140277752A1, published on 09/18/2014, refers to Drilling Guidance System and Methods for Filtering Data, which describes methods and integrated systems to optimize drilling operations that include recording data, analyzing data data at intervals and analyze those intervals to determine whether the performance data at each time interval is of sufficient quality to use the interval data in a performance optimization process. Quality assessment may involve evaluating data against a set of standards or given intervals. The performance optimization process can use data mapping and / or modeling to make recommendations for the performance optimization process.

[031] Document US20130066471A1, published on 14/03/2013, pertaining to Drilling Guidance Systems and Methods with Decision Trees for Learning and Application Modes, which describes methods and integrated systems to optimize drilling operations for interrelated way,

10/50

7/26 including global search engines and local search engines to find an ideal value for at least one controllable drilling parameter, as well as decision trees to select algorithms related to learning mode and application mode to generate operational recommendations based on in global and local search results. Operational recommendations are used to optimize the purpose of the function, reduce malfunctions and improve drilling efficiency.

[032] Document US20090132458A1, published on 05/21/2009, referring to Intelligent Drilling Advisor, which describes a method, an apparatus and a program for the implementation and integration of performance data of penetration indicators, in order to guide the drilling operations personnel based on knowledge of land properties and well sensor in real time.

[033] Document US2014011677A1, referring to a Method and System for Enhanced Drilling Operations using Historical and Real-Time Drilling Data, which describes methods and systems for improved drilling operations through the use of real-time drilling data for predict wear, pore pressure, rotational friction coefficient, permeability, and cost in real time and to adjust drilling parameters in real time based on the predictions obtained. The prediction in real time is done by processing the drilling data through a multilayer neural network. [034] Tool wear prediction in real time is done using real-time drilling data to predict a tool efficiency factor and detect changes in the efficiency factor of these tools over time. [035] These predictions can be used to adjust drilling parameters in the real-time drilling operation. The methods and systems can also include the determination of several hydraulic parameters along the bore and a rotational friction coefficient. Historical data can be used in combination with real-time data to assist the system and identify security concerns.

[036] Document US8145462B2, published on 12/01/2005, concerning a Field Synthesis System and Method to Optimize Drilling Operations, which describes profiles of drilling wells and the displacement parameters of multiple cavities located in the vicinity the location of a well hole

11/50

Desired 8/26. Well profiles and drilling parameter data from displacement wells are synthesized to determine the main drilling contexts, including geological trends, mechanical properties and different profiles. The performance of one or more drilling devices and drilling parameters are then simulated within the drilling contexts of the selected wells. The simulation information is used to select an optimized drilling device or parameter for drilling the selected well.

[037] The document US7142986B2, published on 08/03/2003, refers to a System for Real Time Drilling Optimization, which includes obtaining previously acquired data, consulting a remote data store for current data, determining parameters of optimized drilling, and storing parameters optimized for a next segment in the remote data storage system. Determining optimized drilling parameters can include current data with previously acquired data, predicting drilling conditions for the next segment and, optimizing drilling parameters for the next segment.

Summary of the Invention [038] Unlike the state of the art documents, the present invention aims to provide instant feedback (immediate positioning) of the operations, at the operational level, which is not presented strategically in the previous documents.

[039] In addition, the use of interfaces for operators is seen as being unprecedented in relation to the state of the art. In the case of the sounder interface, the main element is the ruler where the sounder must follow the position of the block for maneuvers and the chronometer with the sub-phases of the connections.

[040] The present invention aims, therefore, to obtain instant feedback and immediate positioning, for the correct people, with regard to the performance of activities performed in oil well construction operations.

[041] The system referring to the invention will acquire data from the column weight sensors and the position of the block for the measurement of performances. In addition, the system must provide an interface to the probe so that it follows the definitions

12/50

9/26 established automatically by the system or by an administrator responsible for the performance of the operation. The probe interface will show what position the block must be at all times during maneuvers. It will also show a stopwatch with reference times for each sequential sub-step during connections. In addition, the probe interface will have historical data on the connections and maneuvers carried out, as well as an alarm and message console registered by the administrator.

[042] Drilling optimization techniques are widely studied and applied in operations around the world. These include well planning, geological characteristics, equipment specifications and limitations, drilling parameters to be used etc., however, the total time spent on drilling operations includes a significant portion of activities that do not consist of drilling itself, but yes in adjacent activities.

[043] These adjacent activities have had their performances scarcely explored historically. As there are cutting edge technologies operating in conjunction with technologically outdated tools, the procedures in this segment have always been far from being as optimized as possible. Still, the need to search for reserves in increasingly extreme environments, such as ultra-deep waters and difficult-to-access reservoirs, has brought the cost of operations to extremely high levels, a fact that has driven the search for process optimization in the oil industry. However, in the scope of drilling, for example, the search has been focused more on drilling techniques themselves, with improved materials and drill design, more efficient and resistant motors, more accurate profiling tools and more accurate data sensing. complexes etc. In this way, the maneuvers necessary for drilling to take place have been neglected and, to date, there are no methodology and / or systems to analyze the performance of these activities in real time. [044] There are approaches in the sense of measuring such performances in a manual or semi-automated way, however the objectives are aimed at managerial application with a character after the occurrence of operations. Thus, in the operational scope, with the data coming from these existing approaches, there is no longer enough time for the attempt to improve, since the audited operation has already been concluded, with the aggravation that the operators end up having no clear and objective references

13/50

10/26 of the points that must be approached differently to avoid degradation of the performance of operations.

[045] Therefore, the purpose of this invention is to perform the performance audit and immediately provide performance feedback so that both the performance administrator and the operators involved can glimpse exactly how the operation they are performing is going on, making it possible to carry out proactive and instant actions, such as speeding up or slowing down to compensate for possible deviations from pre-established goals, generating consistency, security and saving resources.

Brief description of the figures [046] Figure 1 - Schematic of a rotary drilling rig with its main elements relevant to the scope of this invention;

Figure 2 - Block diagram of the system, with its entities and interrelations;

Figure 3 - Flowchart of BHA “Run” type BHA operation processes;

Figure 4 - Flowchart of the “Casing Run” Coating Race operation processes;

Figure 5 - Flowchart of the “Riser Run” type of drilling operation;

Figure 6 - Diagram of the probe interface;

Figure 7 - Relationship between motivation and ability to perform tasks.

Detailed description of the invention [047] The present invention refers to a method, implemented through a computer system to provide real-time auditing and positioning (feedback) of the performance of oil well drilling operations. For a better understanding of the system, figure 2 illustrates a block diagram of the main entities of the system, as well as their interrelations.

[048] To apply the method, it is initially necessary for an agent to configure the operations 26. This agent is responsible for the performance of operations on the platform, and will be referred to hereinafter by an administrator. [049] The administrator performs the configuration of operations 26, which can be of four types: BHA “Run” 27 - BHA Run, “Casing Run” 28 - Run of BHA

14/50

11/26

Coating, “Riser Run” 29 - Drilling Riser Run, or time operation 30.

[050] For each type of operation, specific attributes must be inserted so that the algorithms can be applied and the performance measured is effectively related to the operation that is in progress. In addition, the contractual or reference performance parameters must be configured for each stage of the operation. [051] To determine the current state of the operation, that is, whether it is in connection or maneuvering / drilling, data from the column 8 weight sensor is used. There is a measured weight threshold that indicates whether the column is suspended by the load support system or if it is seated on a wedge (slips) at the base of the platform. This threshold is given by the weight of the block added to the parameter “Slips Threshold’ (wedge limit), which is an applied margin referring to the weight of a pipe section (stand). In this way, if [0041] the weight measured by the sensor is above the sum of the weight of the block with the value of "slips threshold ', it means that the column is suspended. Otherwise, it means that the column is seated on the wedge and the load-bearing system is only lifting the block or block with only one section of tubes. These two states are called “out-of-slips” (out of wedge) and “in-slips (in wedge) respectively. [052] Therefore, if the state is “in-slips”, it is assumed for the system that the current state is a connection. If it is "out-of-slips", the state determined for the system can be maneuvering or drilling, depending on the depth and type of operation. [053] The four types of operations are detailed below, as well as their sub-operations.

[054] 1 - BHA “Run” Operation - BHA Run: a BHA “Run” operation is basically an operation where there will be a BHA run for different purposes, for example, for the drilling of a new phase from the well. [055] In it, the drill is first inserted into the well together with the rest of the BHA, constituting a heterogeneous stage of the operation that cannot be measured by repetitive and similar maneuvers, since the BHA is formed by several components with very different characteristics and private individuals. Therefore, the assembly of the BHA is an operation that generally does not have a performance specification, but may have its time measured for historical reference. Then, it is necessary to make the BHA 17 reach the bottom of the well so that the

15/50

12/26 drilling starts. This descent, called “Trip-in”, occurs through the inclusion of “drillpipes” (drilling tubes) 10 in the drilling column, constituting stages with repetitive maneuver and connection processes. There is differentiation of parameters for descending the column within a coated phase of the well and within an uncoated phase, also called an open well. Thus, there is “Trip-in” in a coated well and “Trip-in” in an open well. The point that delimits the boundary between the coated well and the open well is the end of the coating of the last coated section. [056] This point is called “casing shoe” 20, and is also referred to as a shoe or “shoe”. When the drill reaches the bottom of the well, the “trip-in” process ends and drilling begins.

[057] During this stage, only the connection time has its performance measured by the system, since the movement of the block refers to the rate of penetration of the rock (ROP - Rate of Penetration), which is dependent on the nature of the formation that is being drilled, among other variants. The parameters that can be changed in order to cause effects on the penetration rate are the weight on the drill (WOB), the rotation (RPM), the flow and the torque.

[058] In this context, the RPM and flow parameters are generally not modified with high frequency, making monitoring and control a task that requires a smaller number of iterations on the part of the control agent. The torque is, in fact, a combined response of the other parameters, therefore, there is no direct action on the torque, but on the other parameters, except when there is a torque limitation on the part of the operator.

[059] WOB is the parameter that requires the largest number of iterations by the driller. Professionals and systems with a focus on drilling optimization work to control WOB at all times, which leads drillers to seek the correct movement of the block to obtain the desired WOB. However, this task depends on the degree of experience of the driller and on his dedication to constantly maintaining the parameters adjusted as predetermined. In this context, the present invention proposes an unprecedented improvement, since the WOB predictive analysis algorithm combined with the ROP, allows the precise displacement of the block necessary to generate a certain weight on the drill to be precisely calculated. Consequently, drilling optimization control is brought to the same maneuver control interface that is

16/50

13/26 made available to the sounder. Therefore, during drilling the optimization method of this invention informs the driller which position the block should be in to generate the desired WOB to promote the best penetration rates.

[060] It is worth mentioning that the connection that occurs during drilling, despite being between "drillpipes", is different from the connection that occurs during "trip-in". The difference is that during the “trip-in” - insertion of the drilling column -, there is no pumping of drilling fluid. In connection with drilling, you must first stop the mud pumps, drain the pressure in the pipes and then connect a new drillpipe and pressurize everything again with fluid pumping. Thus, this connection, called the wet connection, takes longer than the “trip” connection, called the dry connection.

[061] Upon reaching the final depth, drilling is ended and the “trip-out” process begins, which is the removal of the drilling column from the well. In a similar way to “trip-in”, there is “trip-out” in an open pit and in a coated pit. When the top of the BHA reaches the surface, the "trip-out" process ends and the BHA disassembly process begins, which is an operation analogous to the assembly of the BHA, with only its measured time as a reference.

[062] Figure 3 illustrates a flowchart of the processes and the identification metrics for each stage of the “BHA Run” type operation.

[063] After the start of BHA “Run” 39, the drill depth is monitored indirectly through incremental measurements of the block position in conjunction with the measured weight. If the bit depth (Bit Depth - BD) is less than the length of the BHA (Bit Depth <BHA Length? - 40), the ongoing process is the assembly of the BHA 41, in which the execution time is measured . When the drill depth exceeds the length of the BHA, the assembly of the BHA is completed and “Trip-in” starts in a coated well 43 until the drill depth is less than the end of the coating - shoe depth (Depth of the shoe). Drill <Shoe Depth? - 42).

[064] After exceeding the “Shoe” depth, as long as the drill depth is less than the initial depth of the well (Drill Depth <Initial depth of the well? - 44), the ongoing process is “trip-in” in the well open 45. When the drill depth equals the initial well depth, the “trip-in 'process ends and drilling begins 46.

17/50

14/26 [065] As long as the distance between the drill and the bottom of the well (Bit to Bottom) is less than a “stand” - tube section - 47 (Bit to Bottom> 1 stand? - 47), follow the drilling process. When this distance between the drill and the bottom of the well is greater than a “stand”, it is understood that the process of pulling the column started, because the well reached its objective or for some other reason, such as a failure for example . Thus, as long as the drill depth is greater than the shoe depth - "shoe '' 48 (Drill Depth> Shoe Depth? - 48), the current process is open pit trip-out 49. When the depth of the drill becomes smaller than the depth of the shoe, it starts “trip-out” in a coated well 50 until the top of the BHA reaches the surface (Drill Depth> BHA Length? - 51), ie , the drill depth is equal to the length of BHA 51. Finally, disassembly of BHA 52 occurs until the depth of the drill is equal to the configured initial depth (Drill Depth> Initial Drill Depth? - 53), concluding the operation 54 with all elements out of the well.

[066] 2 - Operation “Casing Run - Coating Run: an operation of the type“ Casing Run '' consists of inserting a coating in a previously drilled section of the well. It is a set of interconnected tubes or screens, forming an extensive tubing called “Casing’ 16. The diameter of this tubing is less than the diameter of the section to be coated. In this way, an annular space between the liner and the well wall is free to be filled later with cement or not.

[067] Figure 4 illustrates a flowchart of the processes and the identification metrics for each stage of the “Casing Run” type operation.

[068] Operation 55 begins with the lowering of the liner 57 until the depth is equal to the total liner size (Drill Depth <Total Liner Length? - 56). When the entire casing is inserted into the well, it must be conducted until its lower end reaches the total depth of the well section previously drilled. For that, “drillpipes’ ’are used in the same way as in the BHA operation“ Run ”. This column formed of "drillpipes '' used in the" Casing Run "operation is called the settlement column. While the coating depth is less than the shoe depth (Drill depth <Depth of

18/50

15/26 shoe? - 58), there is a trip-in of the settlement column in a coated well 59.

Below the “shoe depth’ ’, there is a trip-in of the open pit settlement column while the coating depth is less than that of the well (Drill Depth <Depth of Well? - 60).

[069] When the coating is at the planned location, cementing operation 62 begins. After cementation is complete, the depth of the settlement column must be updated in system 65 (Drill Depth Updated? 64), since the entire extension of the lining will definitely be cemented in the well. After disconnection between the laying column and the cemented lining, the laying column “trip-out” starts until the surface is reached (Drill Depth> Initial Drill Depth - 67) and the operation is completed 68 .

[070] 3 - Operation “Riser Run - Drilling Riser Run: a“ Riser Run ”operation consists of descending or ascending thick gauge piping from the platform to the bottom of the sea and vice versa, that is, it contemplates the entire vertical extent of the water slide. This operation can also be called a BOP “run, as BOP 14 is taken to the head of the well lifted by the“ Riser ”. Therefore, there may be a "Riser" descent or "Riser" rise, since the BOP needs to undergo periodic maintenance or in case of problems, it must be removed for corrective maintenance.

[071] Figure 5 illustrates a flow chart of the “Riser Run” type operation.

[072] Operation 69 starts. If it is a “Riser 'descent operation? - 70), as long as the depth does not reach the total length of the“ Riser ”(Drill Depth <Total Riser Length? - 71) the “Riser '72 descent operation takes place. If it is a "Riser" ascent operation, as long as the depth is greater than zero (Drill Depth> Zero? - 73), the "Riser '74 ascent operation occurs. When the depths are reached, operation 75 is completed. [073] 4 - Time operation: a time operation consists of an operation that may have subsequent steps listed to be performed and that is not related to the execution of maneuvers / drilling and connections. This type of operation can be registered with a time limit and this progress is also given in real time to the operators and the audited times comprise information from management reports.

19/50

16/26 [074] The operations of the four types presented are configured in an orderly manner with respect to the chronology in which they will occur, forming a list. The definition of the current operation 31 must occur for the first operation. The effective start of the operation is given by the administrator through the administrator interface 35 or by the probe through the probe interface 36. If there are no operations configured, there is an option to start a generic operation that can later be retroactively framed in a configured operation.

[075] When the command to start the operation is given, the monitoring and control process 32 begins. This module uses a real-time database 25 that is fed by a signal acquisition and conditioning system 24. [ 076] This system is capable of directly acquiring the analog signal from the column 8 weight sensor and the digital signal from encoder 21 for the position of the block. Furthermore, it is able to perform data acquisition indirectly, through the industrial network of the platform, in the industrial protocols Wits, Witsml, Frofibus, Modbus and Profinet.

[077] All professionals involved in the processes have a score, which is calculated at all times, to compose an overall average score for each individual. The Scores for Professionals module 34 is responsible for this calculation and for storing all this information in the database 33.

[078] The sounder interface, with its diagram illustrated by figure 6, is a key part of the process, as this is where action instructions are given to the central operator of the operation, the sounder.

[079] The Start / End / Next button 76 allows the sounder to give the command to start the operation shown in box 77 (Current Operation). When starting, the legend of the operation started has its visual modified to indicate that the current operation is in progress. The button 76 will then display the caption “End”, which will serve as an instrument for finalizing the operation. When the current operation is finished, box 77 is blank and button 76 starts to display the caption “Next”, which allows the probe to pass the operation that is in box 78 (Next Operation) to box 77. When this occurs, an operation immediately ahead in the list of configured operations enters the next operation box and button 76 starts to display the caption “start” again, closing the cycle that is repeated for each operation. These processes can occur manually in case of any data inconsistency or poor calibration of sensors, however, all these

20/50

17/26 transitions between operations must occur automatically, according to the depths previously registered during the configuration of the operations.

[080] Item 79 shows the accumulated score of the operation and item 80 shows the instant score.

[081] A ruler that represents the position of block 83 is the central element and consists of the most relevant innovation proposal. The system calculates what should be the ideal position that the block should be at all times, both in maneuvers and in drilling, and represents through a target 85 positioned and in vertical movement on the ruler. The actual current position of the block is read by the system and represented by a crosshair 84. As the driller controls the position of the block by pushing it up or down, it will have reference to the ideal position at all times. In this way, the score of the operation is calculated with an algorithm that verifies how far from the ideal position the block is at each moment. [082] During maneuvers, there is naturally a faster displacement than in drilling, which must be followed by the drill, without the system worrying about the weight reference in the drill. In drilling, the system applies the predictive algorithm that analyzes the penetration rate and the weight on the drill, resulting in the displacement of the block to be achieved so that the best penetration rate is achieved. In this way, this displacement is replicated to the probe interface, that is, target 85 goes to the position determined by the algorithm, inducing the probe to take the block to the same position.

[083] During connections, ruler 83 becomes a stopwatch with a reference time. The greater the difference between the reference time and the time actually performed, the lower the score assigned. In this way, both a much faster connection than desired and a much slower one will have degradation in the performance indicators. The performance degradation in the case of delay is negative for obvious reasons, since it consumes more time and, consequently, more resources. However, if it is carried out with time too short of the ideal, time is saved, however, there is an unnecessary insertion of risk in the operation. Therefore, the great advantage of this approach is the consistency of the operation to maximize performance without deteriorating security.

21/50

18/26 [084] As the maneuvers and connections are carried out, historical graphs are being filled out. The history of connection times 81 is displayed graphically by means of bars, as well as the history of maneuver times 82.

[085] There is also, in the probe interface, a message box 86 that displays alarms and messages registered by the administrator. Alarms are indexed by depth or by time. Thus, they are displayed at the appropriate time of the operation with a request for confirmation by the surveyor.

[086] Chart 87 aggregates all members of the team who are participating in the operation at the moment. Each individual 88 is properly identified and has his cumulative individual score 89 displayed.

[087] During a connection, there are predetermined subphases whose sequence must be followed obeying the average execution time of each subphase. For this purpose, the platform interface 37 is used. A scheme of continuous flow of steps performed and to be performed is presented in real time to the platformers so that they can identify at all times how the performance is in that connection in relation to the ideal performance. It is worth mentioning that this same philosophy of providing an interface to those involved, with a complex activity broken down into several smaller activities, with the status of realization progressively updated in real time, is also applied to the time operations mentioned in the scope of this invention.

[088] The administrator interface 35 also contains the historical information of connections and maneuvers that are present in the probe interface. There is a display of the accumulated and instantaneous scores of the operations, counter of joints inserted or removed from the well, total number of joints to be inserted or removed from the well, total time elapsed from the operation and the VTR, which will be explained below.

[089] The VTR - variation in the yield rate - is a coefficient that can be applied to the payment of the charter rates of the operator (service contractor) and the platform (contracted), through the performance contract. The calculation metric varies from contract to contract, but basically, it is a matter of applying a reduction in the amount receivable by the platform, referring to the charter, if the performance is below a certain threshold or, applying a bonus in the amount receivable if performance is above a certain threshold. As a rule, there are three reference levels for the VTR: A maximum Vmax threshold, from which

22/50

19/26 there is no more bonus increase with the VTR assuming its maximum value, a reference level Vzero, which is the standard value of the contracted charter and a minimum value Vmin, below which the VTR assumes its minimum value and there is no more decrease. Thus, the VTR will gradually increase (linearly or according to a specific metric) as the performance goes from Vmin to Vmax, as stipulated in the contract. Therefore, the ideal is for the platform to always operate at Vmax, avoiding being below to have your bonus maximized and also avoiding being above, because in this condition you would be applying unnecessary wear on your equipment, degrading the security of the operation and overloading your team without any benefit.

[090] Therefore, the display of the VTR in real time, guarantees the administrator total control over the maximization of the client's operational and, consequently, financial income. In addition, the VTR calculated systematically can be used to converge the information of the VTR's calculated by the contractor and contractor of the service in case both use the system or, in the case of only one of them use, serve as a solid argumentation base with clear and objective data to be shown in case of divergence of information. [091] Still in the administrator interface, the message box is also present as in the probe interface, however, with the additional possibility of inserting message texts to be shown to the probe. Therefore, the flow of messages is only in the direction of the administrator to the probe, as it is not desirable that the probe has its focus on the execution of the hindered operation for typing messages. The probe should only confirm the awareness of messages and alarms when they are inserted, where such confirmation is given only by a touch or click on the message / alarm.

[092] In the administrator interface, it is also possible to perform the following actions: configure operations, configure messages and alarms, start operation, end operation, register team members, register team shifts and generate management reports.

[093] An important tool to be highlighted in this interface is the course correction of the operation. In this, there is a graphical plot of the development of the ongoing operation versus the planned development over time. The administrator can simulate increasing or decreasing the reference speeds to be applied

23/50

20/26 to correct the course of the operation. As these are graphical representations, when applying a coefficient in the maneuver and connection speeds, the system presents, based on the speed simulation, where the graph lines will meet in the future if a new reference speed is applied. There are three lines plotted on the graph. One of them, called Tempo Optimo, represents the planned evolution of the operation without delays or advances. The second, called Executed, represents what has actually been executed to date. The third, called Projection, represents the projection of the execution of the operation if the new calculated parameters are applied.

[094] In this way, it is possible to gradually correct a delayed or early operation so that it is completed within the planned deadline.

[095] There are three possible modes of operation for the correction tool: manual, semi-automatic and automatic.

[096] In manual correction mode, the administrator manually applies an acceleration or deceleration factor to the reference speeds of the current operation. Thus, the system informs the time and the number of maneuvers and / or connections that will be necessary for the effective correction of the course of the operation if the new parameters are applied. There is also graphic illustration with plotting the Tempo Optimo, Executada e Projecção lines. Exemplifying the manual mode, the administrator simulates an increase of 10% of the reference speeds. The system calculates the time and the number of connections and maneuvers necessary for the delay to be corrected and displays it to the administrator, who decides whether or not to apply such change.

[097] Being in semi-automatic mode, the administrator informs the system of the number of connections and maneuvers that he wants the course of the operation to be corrected gradually. The system calculates all parameters that must be applied for such correction to occur within the configured range of maneuvers and connections. There is also a graphic illustration identical to that previously mentioned in manual mode. Exemplifying the semi-automatic mode, it is possible to define that the administrator defines that the speed correction is done so that the operation is corrected in 10 connections and / or maneuvers. In this way, the system will automatically calculate what speeds should be applied for the correction

24/50

21/26 happen smoothly, gradually and linearly during the execution of the next 10 connections and / or maneuvers.

[098] Being in automatic mode, the administrator configures a delay and a maximum acceptable advance for the operation, as well as a correction interval that can be defined in time or in the number of maneuvers and connections. [099] At all times, the system compares what was planned with what was actually executed, and if there is a greater advance or delay than established, the system automatically applies correction factors to the speeds of the operation so that the error is gradually corrected within the established interval, no need for administrator action until automatic mode is disabled. Exemplifying the automatic mode, the administrator defines that the limits of delays and advances is 5 minutes and that the correction to be applied occurs in 10 connections and / or maneuvers or in 30 minutes. Thus, whenever a delay or advance exceeds 5 minutes, the system calculates all parameters so that in 10 connections and / or maneuvers (or 30 minutes) the operation is automatically corrected.

[100] In all operating modes, speed increments are limited by the operational safety limits of the equipment involved. Thus, if the system calculates a value above this limit, the security limit value will be effectively applied.

[101] In the entire oil and gas industry, there is no optimization approach with the same focus and providing the same benefits as those proposed in this invention, effectively promoting consistency and safety in operations.

[102] The approach with providing instant feedback to the correct agents of the operation promotes motivation and helps each individual to enter the so-called engagement cycle. This cycle consists of the elements Motivation, Activity and Feedback.

[103] Thus, as operations and their audit fail today, each individual has the activity to perform, however, for the closing of the cycle, motivation and feedback are lacking.

[104] When the cycle is closed with the right feedback and due motivation, a habit is generated. In this way, each individual begins to perform his

25/50

22/26 activity based on a good habit, from correct and constantly audited feedback.

[105] For behavioral change to occur, three elements must be present at the same time: motivation, skill and trigger.

[106] Figure 7 presents a graph that illustrates the relationship between skill and motivation for performing tasks with the generation of habits. On the vertical axis 90, the individual's level of motivation is represented, with a low level in the lower portion and high level in the upper portion. In the horizontal axis 91, the level of skill is represented, that is, the degree of difficulty perceived by the individual according to his preparation for a given action. To the left is the greatest degree of difficulty needed to perform the task and to the right is the lowest degree of difficulty.

[107] This relationship constitutes a trade-off, that is, an increase in difficulty requires a higher level of motivation and vice versa. [0091] Thus, it is possible to draw a threshold from which actions are carried out with effective change of behavior and generation of habits. This threshold is called action line 92.

[108] Thus, actions positioned in region 94, that is, below the line of action, fail even with the presence of triggers. The actions positioned in region 93, above the action line, are carried out and generate habit when there is a trigger for execution. Based on this context, it is evident that for the generation of the habit, two paths are possible: to increase the level of motivation or to reduce the level of difficulty. However, before addressing the difficulty or motivation, one must be sure that the triggers of the desired habits are actually being applied.

[109] Triggers are elements that signal to individuals something they usually know they have to do, but a reminder that effectively starts the process is paramount. Examples of triggers are beeps, lights, visual instructions, messages, etc.

[110] Historically, common sense leads us to think that, guaranteed the triggers, the next item to be attacked would be to increase the level of motivation, however, measuring motivation is something complicated, as well as keeping this level always high. Still, there is great difficulty in obtaining something that causes motivation in all individuals, since what motivates one person may not motivate another. Therefore, contradictory to common sense, the second point to attack is to make the action

26/50

23/26 easier, at least apparently. Therefore, simplicity matters more than motivation when it comes to behavior change.

[111] A very simple technique for making complex tasks seem simpler is to fragment a complex task into several smaller, sequential tasks to be performed from a list. In fact, this makes the global task simpler by the fact that the agent executing the task stops worrying about the next steps and focuses as much as possible on what he is currently doing. In addition, the simple fact of looking at several simple tasks creates a feeling that the global action is simpler than it appeared before it was fragmented.

[112] In this way, the present invention proposes the simplification of operations by means of a system that presents an interface with clear and direct instructions, segmenting operations into subphases whenever possible, with the appropriate triggers presented at the appropriate moments. As a result of this mechanism, individuals observe all their tasks above the action line 92 and build the desired good habits.

[113] Even though motivation is more complex to deal with, the methodology of this invention also acts on the question of motivation, as the third point to be attacked.

[114] Studies based on positive psychology point out that motivation is a fundamental part for a good performance of functions. The PERMA approach, developed by Marti Sligman of the University of Pennsylvania, addresses this theme, and served as a basis for implementing the tools of this invention. The acronym PERMA stands for: P - "Positive emotion" - positive emotion -, E - "Engagemenf 'commitment -, R -" Relationship "- affinity, M -" Meaning "- meaning -, and A" Achievement "- achievement.

[115] The issue of positive emotion "P" comes from the feeling of progress during operations. When visualizing a good result of progress and having this measure readily available, the individual experiences a state of happiness and satisfaction.

[116] Engagement “E” comes from closing the engagement cycle, with all three elements of this cycle being present.

[117] The question of the “R” relationship is included in the scoring system of individuals in the operation. The feeling of ranking and social confrontation generates enthusiasm

27/50

24/26 among those involved, promoting healthy disputes that are beneficial to the team.

[118] It is not just a search for the top of the ranking, but the human being in general bothers to be seen outside the average pattern of his social cycle. In this way, an individual with a performance that is negatively different from the team, will strive to improve their performance and not be exposed.

[119] Understanding what “M” is doing and feeling that choices are important to the success of the operation also contributes to engagement. Therefore, the operators' choices have a direct influence on the result of the operation.

[120] Finally, the achievement of the achieved goal “A” and recognition are also essential for maintaining motivation. It is very common for individuals to feel forgotten within a group, for reasons of less affinity with managers or introspective personality among other reasons. With the system applying equal metrics to everyone at all times, the sense of fairness among team members also contributes to global success.

[121] Another study that provides basic elements for this application is the psychological concept of flow state, designed by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, former head of the psychology department at the University of Chicago and former president of the American Psychological Association. In this state of flux, the individual enters a level of concentration in which he starts to act in a way that he gets to “forget” his real worldly experience to focus on the activity being performed. In this way, the perception of the passage of time is differentiated, reducing the feeling of tiredness and increasing performance, since the individual is acting based on his habits. Thus, an individual who enters the state of flow with good habits generated by a cycle of engagement, promotes work with a level of excellence.

[122] There are three basic conditions for entering the flow state: “Clear Goals” Clear goals -, “Balanced and perceived challenges” - balanced and noticeable challenges - and “Clear and immediately feedback” - clear and immediate positioning. All of these conditions are provided by the proposed invention, because with the gamification system where the sounder must follow the position of the block, through the target and the sight on the ruler displayed in its interface, it has a clearly defined objective.

28/50

25/26 [123] With a level of execution speed established within a reasonable level of difficulty versus the skill of each individual involved in the operation, activities are obtained that do not present too low or too high levels of difficulty, because in both cases types, there is a degradation of motivation, because with high levels of difficulty, a lot of anxiety is generated and for very easy tasks there is boredom. Still, being in the state of maximum attention, with no pressure on the execution of tasks due to the established speed being reasonable, there is an increase in the safety levels of the operations.

[124] With the instant feedback system for operations performances, everyone has access to their results at all times. Therefore, all conditions for the individual to enter the flow state are provided.

[125] Another benefit of instant feedback, specifically the fact that targeted feedback is to the right person, helps to exclude the common communication failure that occurs in traditional optimization attempts. [0107] In general, there is a drilling optimization team analyzing the operation remotely from an office. This team contacts the directional punch on the platform to discuss decision making. After dialogues that are often divergent, a point is reached and the actions must be communicated to the surveyor. This process already takes precious time from the operation, and often, what was to be applied at the beginning of the discussion is no longer the best thing to do.

[126] Another aggravating factor is the fact of subordination, as, as a rule, the drill is not subordinate to the directional drill, therefore, there may be divergence to accept orders. Thus, with a system pointing out how each process should be carried out, there is an impersonal procedure that eliminates any divergence caused by problems of subordination conflicts and / or relationship affinity.

[127] Additionally, it should be noted that the agent responsible for the performance of the operation is not available to be auditing the drill at all times, since he has other duties. Therefore, without a constant audit, the performance of the operation is dependent on the driller's behavior. Thus, with the absence of a full-time audit, there is a tendency for natural relaxation on the part of the driller and the others involved in the operation,

29/50

26/26 causing degradation in performance, a fact that is suppressed with the proposition of the present invention.

30/50

1/7

Claims (26)

1) METHOD, in which the administrator performs the configuration of operations (26), which can be of four types: BHA “Run” (27) - BHA Race, “Casing Run Coating Race (28),“ Riser Run ” - Drill Riser Race (29), or time operation (30); the BHA operation is an operation where there is a BHA run; first of all, the BHA is inserted into the well, constituting a heterogeneous stage of the operation that cannot be measured by repetitive and similar maneuvers, since the BHA is formed by several components with very distinct and particular characteristics; then, it is necessary to make the BHA (17) reach the bottom of the well for the drilling to begin; this descent is due to the inclusion of drilling tubes (10) in the drilling column, constituting stages with repetitive maneuver and connection processes; the point that delimits the boundary between coated well and open well in BHA (17) is the end of the coating of the last coated section; this point is shoe (20), and when the drill reaches the bottom of the well, the “Trip-in” process (20) ends and drilling begins; during this stage, only the connection time has its performance measured by the system, since the movement of the block refers to the rate of penetration of the rock; the parameters that can be changed in order to cause effects on the penetration rate are the weight on the drill (WOB), the rotation (RPM), the flow and the torque, characterized by a computational operation that comprises: - provide auditing and positioning - feedback - in real time of the performance of oil well drilling operations; - instant positioning of operations transferred to the operational level, through interfaces; - application of the method includes an agent that performs the configuration of operations (26), this agent being responsible for the performance of operations on the platform, referred to as administrator, operating in real time and; - use of interfaces for drillers; - a ruler should be used in the sounder interface where the sounder must follow the position of the block for maneuvers and the stopwatch with the connection sub-phases. 2) METHOD, according to claim 1, characterized by the predictive analysis algorithm of WOB conjugated to ROP, allowing it to be precisely 31/50 2/7 calculated the displacement of the block necessary to generate a certain weight on the drill; consequently, the drilling optimization control is brought to the same maneuver control interface that is available to the driller; during drilling, the optimization method tells the driller which position the block should be in to generate the desired WOB to promote the best penetration rates. 3) METHOD, according to claims 1 and 2, characterized by providing identification of the stages of an operation of the type BHA “Run” - BHA Run (39); after the start of the BHA Race (39), monitor the drill depth indirectly through incremental measurements of the position of the block in conjunction with the measured weight; if the drill depth is less than the length of the BHA (40), the ongoing process is the assembly of the BHA (41), in which the execution time is measured; when the drill depth exceeds the length of the BHA, the assembly of the BHA is completed and the drilling column begins to be inserted into a coated well 43 until the drill depth is less than the end of the coating, or the shoe depth ( 42). 4) METHOD, according to claims 1 and 3, characterized in that when the drill depth is equal to the initial depth of the well, the drilling column insertion process ends and drilling begins (46). 5) METHOD, according to claims 1 and 4, characterized for the time that the distance between the drill and the bottom of the well is less than a "stand" (47), follows the drilling process; when this distance between the drill and the bottom of the well is greater than a “stand” (47), the process of pulling the column started; thus, as long as the drill depth is greater than the shoe depth (48), the current process is removal of the drilling tool in an open pit (49); when the drill depth becomes less than the shoe depth, the removal of the drilling tool in a coated well (50) begins until the top of the BHA reaches the surface, that is, the drill depth is equal to BHA length (51); disassembly of the BHA (52) occurs until the drill depth is equal to the configured initial depth, concluding the operation (54) with all the elements outside the well. 6) METHOD, according to claim 1, characterized by providing identification of the phases of an operation “Casing Run” - Coating Race 32/50 3/7 (28), which consists of the insertion of a coating in a previously drilled section of the well, through a set of interconnected tubes, forming an extensive pipe (16). 7) METHOD, according to claims 1 and 5, characterized by starting the operation (55) with the lowering of the coating (57) until the depth is equal to the total size of the coating (56); when the entire lining is inserted into the well, it must be conducted until its lower end reaches the total depth of the well section previously drilled; while the depth of the coating is less than the depth of the depth shoe (58), there is an insertion of the settlement column in a coated well (59); below the depth shoe (58) there is an insertion of the settlement column in an open pit (61) while the depth of the coating is less than that of the well (60); when the coating is at the planned location, the cementing operation (62) begins; after cementation is complete, the depth of the settlement column must be updated in the system (64) and; after disconnection between the laying column and the cemented lining, removal of the laying column (66) begins until the surface (67) is reached and the operation is completed (68). 8) METHOD, according to claim 1, characterized by providing identification of the phases of an operation of the type, “Riser Run - Drilling Riser Race, which is an operation that consists in the descent or ascent of thick pipe of the platform to the bottom of the sea and vice versa, that is, it contemplates the entire vertical extent of the water slide; the operation (69) starts and, if it is a tube lowering operation (70), while the depth does not reach the total length of the tube (71), the lowering operation (72) occurs; if it is a pipe rise operation, as long as the depth is greater than zero (73), the pipe rise operation (74) occurs; when the depths are reached, the operation is completed (75). 9) METHOD, according to claim 1, characterized by providing an audit in the Tempo operation (30), which may have subsequent steps listed to be performed and which is not related to the execution of maneuvers / drilling and connections; this type of operation can be registered with a time limit and this 33/50 4/7 progress is also given in real time for operators and the audited times comprise information from management reports. 10) METHOD, according to claims 1 and 9, characterized by, when the command to start the time operation, the monitoring and control process (32) begins; this module uses a real-time database (25) which is fed by a signal acquisition and conditioning system (24); this system directly acquires the analog signal from the column weight sensor (8) and the digital signal from the encoder (21) for the position of the block; also, data acquisition is optionally indirect, through the platform's industrial network, in the industrial protocols Wits, Witsml, Frofibus, Modbus and Profinet. 11) METHOD, according to claim 10, characterized by the operations of the four types presented being configured in an orderly manner with respect to the chronology in which they will occur, forming a list; for the first operation, the definition of the current operation (31) must occur; the effective start of the operation is given by the administrator through the administrator interface (35) or by the sounder through the sounder interface (36); if there are no configured operations, there is an option to start a generic operation that can later be retroactively framed in a configured operation. 12) METHOD, according to claims 1, 9, 10 and 11, characterized by all professionals involved in the processes having a score, which is calculated at all times, to compose an overall average score for each individual; the Professional Scores module (34) is responsible for this calculation and for storing all this information in the database (33). 13) SYSTEM, for the method of claims 1 to 12, characterized by the action instructions given to the central operator of the operation, the sounder, include: - ideal position of the block (83); - predictive algorithm; - historical graphs; - sounder interface with message box (86); - subphases of connections and time operations and; - administrator interface (35). 14) SYSTEM, according to claim 13, characterized by the system calculating which should be the ideal position that the block must be, at all times, both 34/50 5/7 in maneuvers as in drilling, and represent through a target (85) positioned and in vertical movement on the ruler; the actual current position of the block is read by the system and represented by a crosshair (84); as the driller controls the position of the block, driving a higher or lower speed of ascent or descent, it will have reference to the ideal position at all times; in this way, the score of the operation is calculated with an algorithm that checks how far from the ideal position the block is at each moment; during maneuvers, there is naturally a faster displacement than in drilling, which must be followed by the drill, without the system worrying about the weight reference in the drill. 15) SYSTEM, according to claims 13 and 14, characterized in that in drilling, the system applies the predictive algorithm that analyzes the penetration rate and the weight on the drill, resulting in the displacement of the block to be that the best penetration rate is achieved; thus, this displacement is replicated to the probe interface, that is, the target (85) goes to the position determined by the algorithm, inducing the probe to take the block to the same position. 16) SYSTEM, according to claim 15, characterized in that during connections, the ruler (83) turns into a stopwatch with a reference time and with proportional divisions that represent the sub-phases of the connection in the order that they must be executed. 17) SYSTEM, according to claim 15, characterized by the fact that as the maneuvers and connections are carried out, historical graphs are being filled in, with the history of connection times (81) being displayed graphically by means of bars, as well as the history of maneuver times (82). 18) SYSTEM, according to claim 13, characterized in that in the sounder interface there is a message box (86) that displays alarms and messages registered by the administrator. 19) SYSTEM, according to claim 13, characterized by a table (87) that aggregates all members of the team that are participating in the operation at the moment, with each individual (88) being properly identified and having their individual score accumulated (89) displayed. 20) SYSTEM, according to claim 13, characterized in that during a connection, there are predetermined subphases whose sequence must be followed 35/50 6/7 obeying an average execution time for each sub-phase; for this, an interface of the platformers (37) is used, and a scheme of continuous flow of steps performed and to be performed is presented in real time to the platformers so that they can identify at all times how is the performance at that time. connection in relation to the ideal performance. 21) SYSTEM, according to claim 13, characterized by the administrator interface (35) also containing the historical information of connections and maneuvers that are present in the driller interface, displaying the accumulated and instantaneous scores of the operations, counter of inserted joints or removed from the well, total number of joints to be inserted or removed from the well, total time elapsed from the operation and the VTR. 22) SYSTEM, according to claim 13, characterized in that in the administrator interface it is also possible to carry out the following actions: configure operations, configure messages and alarms, start operation, end operation, register team members, register team shifts and generate management reports. 23) SYSTEM, according to claims 13 and 22, characterized in that, in the administrator interface, it is possible to correct the course of the operation by the administrator, where it is possible to perform the course correction in manual, semi-automatic mode or automatic. 24) SYSTEM, according to claim 23, characterized in that, being in manual correction mode, the administrator manually applies an acceleration or deceleration factor at the reference speeds of the operation in progress and the system informs the number of maneuvers and connections to be necessary for the effective correction of the course of the operation if the new parameters are applied, including with graphic illustration, where there is a plot of the planned line of the operation, of the line effectively executed so far and of the projection in case of change of speed parameters. 25) SYSTEM, according to claim 24, characterized in that, in semi-automatic mode, the administrator informs the system of the number of connections and maneuvers that he wants the course of the operation to be corrected gradually, and the system calculates all the parameters that must be applied for such correction to occur within the range of maneuvers and connections 36/50 7/7 configured; there is also a graphic illustration, with plotting of the planned line of the operation, of the line actually executed so far and the projection of the correction within the configured interval. 26) SYSTEM, according to claim 25, characterized in that, being in automatic mode, the administrator configures a delay and a maximum acceptable advance for the operation, as well as a correction interval given in number of maneuvers and connections; at all times the system compares what was planned with what was actually executed, and if there is a greater advance or delay than established, the system automatically applies correction factors to the speed of the operation so that the error is gradually corrected within the established interval, without the need for administrator until the automatic mode is deactivated. 37/50 1/7