AU2016264794B2

AU2016264794B2 - A composition and method for treating substrates

Info

Publication number: AU2016264794B2
Application number: AU2016264794A
Authority: AU
Inventors: Aravindakshan Perincheery; Abhishek Rastogi
Original assignee: Unilever PLC
Current assignee: Unilever PLC
Priority date: 2015-05-20
Filing date: 2016-04-25
Publication date: 2019-04-11
Anticipated expiration: 2036-04-25
Also published as: BR112017024402A2; EP3298116A1; ZA201706716B; WO2016184643A1; AU2016264794A1; CN107532113A; TR201909933T4; EP3298116B1

Abstract

The present invention relates to a composition and a method for treating substrates, such as fabrics; particularly for improved stain and soil removal and better cleaning upon the subsequent wash without the use of a cleaning implement. It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a stable composition that provides improved cleaning upon subsequent wash. It has been found that oily and particulate soil removal can be achieved by depositing a starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid, an anionic surfactant and methyl cellulose at a pH of 1 to 4.5 onto a fabric.

Description

A COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR TREATING SUBSTRATES

Field of the invention

The present invention relates to a composition and a method for treating substrates, such as fabrics; particularly for improved stain and soil removal and better cleaning upon the subsequent wash without the use of a cleaning implement.

Background of the invention

Stains run the gamut from food spills to household substances and can be of different types; mainly aqueous, oily, particulate and bleachable. Stains are something that people try to avoid, yet they are unavoidable. Nonetheless, people still prefer to wear clothes with lesser stains or no stains at all. In fact, people prefer to avoid stains not just on clothes but in general in kitchens, bathrooms and also on various household surfaces.

Consequently, improved stain removal is one of the constant goals of the detergent industry. There is always an interest to improve the detergency effect, especially on fabric stains. Fabric stains such as collar stains, are tough to remove during main wash. They are better removed when a cleaning implement is used. However cleaning using an implement requires more time and effort.

US2005-0215449 discloses a textile care agent containing a copolymer of unsaturated carboxylic acids and/or their salts with carbohydrates, as well as a washing method for washing textiles using the textile care agent in an ordinary household washing machine. The invention further concerns the use of the textile care agent to reduce creasing, improve ironing properties, and decrease pilling. This document does not disclose methyl cellulose or the pH values of the present invention for the purpose of providing easier cleaning on the subsequent wash.

W003/010268 discloses a laundry cleaning composition comprising a graft polymer benefit agent and at least one additional laundry cleaning ingredient, the graft polymer benefit agent comprising a polysaccharide backbone and a plurality of graft chains extending from said backbone, each of said 20 plurality of graft chains having a degree of polymerisation between 5 and 250, preferably between 5 and 50 or between 25 and- 250 wherein said graft polymer is substantially free of cross-linking and has a

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

-2degree of substitution of grafts across a bulk sample in the range of from 0.02 to

1.0.This composition has a basic pH, a pH of 7 to 11.

US3558499 (Atlas Chem IND, 1971), discloses Built detergent compositions containing an anti-redeposition agent selected from the group consisting of graft copolymers of a polymerizable monomer and a water soluble or water dispersible polymeric material or a physical blend of a polymerized monomer and a water soluble or water dispersible polymeric material, vinyl monomer as used herein is included vinyl monomers capable of free radical catalyzed polymerization. In general, and in accordance with the present invention built detergent compositions contain (1) from about g 10% to about 25% of a suitable detergent compound, (2) from about 60% to about 89.9% of builders and (3) from about 0.10% to about 10% of an anti-redeposition agent. As set forth above, such formulations may also contain minor amounts of perfume, and other suitable modifiers.

WO 01/88075 (Unilever, 2001), discloses Anionic, hydrophobic polysaccharides useful as soil release agents in detergent compositions are graft copolymers of a polysaccharide having anionic substituents with an ethylenically unsaturated monomer, the copolymer having a polysaccharide backbone carrying grafted hydrophobic vinyl polymeric groups derived from the ethylenically unsaturated monomer, and anionic substituents. The polymers exhibit enhanced release of both oily and particulate soil from both polyester and cotton.

US5049302 (BASF, 1991), discloses A stable liquid detergent composition having improved clay soil detergency, clay soil anti-redeposition, oily soil anti-redeposition and soil release properties is disclosed. The detergent composition is comprised of an anionic surfactant, a nonionic surfactant, a hydrotrope, a graft copolymer of polyalkylene oxide and an ester monomer, and a nonionic cellulosic anti-redeposition agent. The graft copolymer is comprised of (a) a polyalkylene oxide based upon an alkylene oxide having from 2 to 4 carbon atoms having a molecular weight of 300 to 100,000 and, (b) at least one vinyl ester derived from a saturated monocarboxylic acid containing 1 to 6 carbon atoms, and/or methyl or ethyl ester of acrylic or meth-acrylic acid in a weight ratio of (a):(b) of from 1:0.2 to 1:10. The nonionic cellulosic anti-redeposition agent is preferably hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. There is a synergism between the nonionic antiredeposition agent and the graft polyol which imparts improved clay soil detergency, clay anti-deposition and oily soil anti-redeposition properties to the detergent composition.

-32016264794 21 Mar 2019

The present invention seeks to provide improved stain removal especially of oily and particulate soils.

The present invention seeks to provide improved cleaning upon subsequent wash.

The present invention seeks to provide a stable composition; especially a composition that does not phase separate.

Surprisingly, it has been found that oily and particulate soil removal can be achieved by depositing a starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid, an anionic surfactant and methyl cellulose at a pH of 1 to 4.5 onto a fabric. Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is thought that this forms an invisible layer on the treated fabric which prevents the deep penetration of soils. This layer acts as a sacrificial layer which gets easily dissolved at high pH during the next-wash, thereby completely removing the soil along with it.

Summary of the invention

Accordingly, in a first aspect, the invention provides a composition for treating a substrate, the said composition comprising 4 to 20% by weight of a starch-graftpolymethacrylic acid, 1 to 10% by weight of an anionic surfactant and 0.25 to 5% by weight of methyl cellulose wherein the pH of the composition is between 1 and 4.5.

In a second aspect, the invention provides a method for treating a substrate comprising the steps in sequence of applying the composition according to the invention onto a substrate and allowing the substrate to dry.

In a third aspect, the invention provides use of the composition according to the invention for improved stain and soil removal upon the subsequent wash.

For the avoidance of doubt, the improved cleaning upon the subsequent wash benefit is also referred to as next time cleaning benefit.

In another aspect, there is provided a composition for treating a substrate, the said composition comprising:

a 4 to 20% by weight of a starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid;

b 1 to 10% by weight of an anionic surfactant; and

2016264794 21 Mar 2019

-3Ac 0.25 to 5% by weight of methyl cellulose;

wherein the pH of the composition is between 1 and 4.5, wherein the start-graft-polymethacrylic acid has a grafting level of at least 10% by weight.

These and other aspects, features and advantages will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from a reading of the following detailed description and the

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

-4appended claims. For the avoidance of doubt, any feature of one aspect of the present invention may be utilised in any other aspect of the invention. The word “comprising” is intended to mean “including” but not necessarily “consisting of” or “composed of.” In other words, the listed steps or options need not be exhaustive. It is noted that the examples given in the description below are intended to clarify the invention and are not intended to limit the invention to those examples per se. Similarly, all percentages are weight/weight percentages unless otherwise indicated. Except in the operating and comparative examples, or where otherwise explicitly indicated, all numbers in this description indicating amounts of material or conditions of reaction, physical properties of materials and/or use are to be understood as modified by the word “about”. Numerical ranges expressed in the format from x to y are understood to include x and y. When for a specific feature multiple preferred ranges are described in the format from x to y, it is understood that all ranges combining the different endpoints are also contemplated.

Detailed description of the invention

The present invention provides a composition for treating a substrate, comprising a starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid, an anionic surfactant and methyl cellulose. The balance of the composition is made up to 100% by weight with water. The pH of the composition is between 1 and 4.5.

Starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid

The starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid of the present invention is derived from maize or tapioca starch by graft copolymerisation with methacrylic acid.

Starch has active sites for grafting. Such sites are -OH and -CH2OH moieties. The level of grafting is defined as a percentage weight of polymethacrylic acid present in graft copolymer.

The starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid of the invention has preferably a grafting level of at least 10%, more preferably at least 15%, yet more preferably at least 20%, most preferably at least 25% by weight of the starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid.

In the composition of the present invention, the starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid is present in a concentration of 4 to 20%, preferably not more than 18%, more preferably

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

-5not more than 15% but typically not less than 5%, preferably not less than 10% by weight of the composition.

More than 20% of starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid is not desired in the composition as the viscosity of the composition increases.

Anionic surfactant

The composition of the present invention comprises an anionic surfactant. Preferably any non-soap anionic surfactant known in the art for use in laundry detergents may be used herein.

Preferred anionic surfactants are water-soluble salts, particularly alkali metal, ammonium and alkylolammonium salts of organic sulphur reaction products, particularly alkyl sulphonates and alkyl suphates.

Non-limiting examples of the anionic surfactants include any of the common anionic surfactants such as sodium lauryl ether sulphate, sodium dodecyl sulphate, sodium alpha olefin sulphate and sodium dodecyl benzene sulphonate.

In the composition of the present invention, the anionic surfactant is present in a concentration of 1 to 10%, preferably not more than 8%, more preferably not more than 6%, still more preferably not more than 5% but typically not less than 2%, preferably not less than 3% by weight of the composition.

Since the composition of the present invention is a leave-on product, a surfactant concentration of more than 10% is not desired as a concentration above 10% may cause irritation to the skin.

Anionic surfactant of the present invention may be combined with another surfactant generally chosen from non-ionic surfactants.

Non-ionic surfactants are well-known in the art. They normally consist of a watersolubilising polyalkoxylene (preferably from 3 to10 ethoxy and/or propoxy groups) or a mono- or di-alkanolamide group in chemical combination with an organic hydrophobic group derived from, for example, fatty alcohols with from 9 to 15 carbon atoms

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

-6(optionally branched, e.g. methyl branched), alkylphenols (preferably from 12 to 20 carbon atoms) in which the alkyl group contains from about 6 to about 12 carbon atoms, dialkylphenols in which each alkyl group contains from 6 to 12 carbon atoms, primary, secondary or tertiary aliphatic alcohols (or alkyl-capped derivatives thereof) monocarboxylic acids having from 10 to about 24 carbon atoms in the alkyl group and polyoxypropylenes.

Fatty acid mono- and dialkanolamides in which the alkyl group of the fatty acid radical contains from 10 to about 20 carbon atoms and the alkyloyl group having from 1 to 3 carbon atoms are also common. In any of the mono- and dialkanolamide derivatives, optionally, there may be a polyoxyalkylene moiety joining the latter groups and the hydrophobic part of the molecule.

In all polyalkoxylene containing surfactants, the polyalkoxylene moiety usually consists of an average of from 2 to 20 groups of ethylene oxide, propylene oxide groups or mixtures thereof. The latter class includes those described in European Patent Specification EP-A-0,225,654, especially for use as all or part of the liquid phase, incorporated herein by reference.

Especially preferred are those ethoxylated non-ionics which are condensation products of fatty alcohols with from 9 to 15 carbon atoms condensed with 3 to 12 moles of ethylene oxide (generally understood to be an average value), Tween 20, Span 60 and Toximul 8241.

When present in the composition, the ratio of non-ionic surfactant to anionic surfactant is preferably not more than 5:1, more preferably not more than 4:1, yet more preferably not more than 3:1, most preferably not more than 2:1.

Methyl cellulose

It is found that the addition of a lower alkyl cellulose, preferably methyl cellulose improves the removal of fatty soils upon the next wash.

Methyl cellulose used in the present invention has a methyl content between 27.5% to 31.5%. Methyl cellulose is present in the composition of the present invention in a concentration of 0.25 to 5%, preferably not more than 4%, still more preferably not

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

-7more than 3% but typically not less than 0.4%, preferably not less than 1%, more preferably not less than 2% by weight of the composition.

More than 5% of methyl cellulose is not desired in the composition as the viscosity of the composition increases, thereby not being suitable for direct application.

The viscosity of the compositions according to the invention is preferably less than 1000 mPa.s (25°C and 20s'¹), more preferably between 50 to 1000, when measured with a TA instrument rheometer AR-1000, with a cone and plate set-up, acrylic/steel 4 cm diameter, 2° angle, truncation gap 52-56 micrometer, in steady flow operation.

Further optional polymers

For best cleaning performance upon the subsequent wash, especially for improved cleaning of soils and stains it is preferred that the composition further comprises a further polymer.

It is found that the addition of a second polymer improves the removal of soils and stains upon the next wash. The most preferred are soil release polymers such as the Repel-O-Tex range of Rhodia (trade mark) i.e. SF2, PF594, Crystal, notably Repel-OTex SF2, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, Texcare SRN 170 of Clariant, pluronics and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose.

When present in the composition, the additional polymer is present in a concentration of 0.1% to 5% by weight of the composition.

pH of the composition

The pH of the composition is between 1 and 4.5, preferably between 2 and 3.5, more preferably between 2.5 and 3.5. The best results are obtained when the pH of the composition is less than 4.

Water

The composition of the present invention is an aqueous composition comprising water. The composition is made upto 100 percent by adding water. The composition preferably comprises 65 to 95% by weight of water.

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

-8Optional ingredients

The composition may further comprise softening agents as commonly used in fabric softening compositions, antimicrobial agents, silicone oils and co-solvents like 2phenoxyethanol (commercially available as ex Dow Chemicals as Dowanol EPtrademark) to improve stability and dispersibility, hydrotropes and preservatives.

Process for treating a fabric

In a second aspect, the invention relates to a method for treating a substrate comprising the steps in sequence of applying the composition according to the invention onto a substrate and allowing the substrate to dry.

The composition may be applied by any known method such as by using wipes, spray, including spray guns, atomizers, or other direct application.

It is preferred that the surface is not rinsed after the application of the composition and before drying.

Use of the composition

In a third aspect, the invention relates to the use of the composition according to the invention for improved stain and soil removal upon the subsequent wash.

Product Format

The product is typically packed in a bottle, preferably a plastic bottle at volumes of between 250 ml and 5 L, more preferably between 250 ml and 1.5 L. Common supermarket size bottles are 250 ml, 500 ml, 750ml, 1 L and 1.5 L. The bottles may optionally have a measuring cup attached, or a measuring scale indicator in the cap, to enable the consumer to dose the right amount.

Also considered in the context of the present invention for the purpose of direct application, such as direct application onto a fabric, is a product format in the form of a bottle with a trigger spray dispenser comprising the composition according to the invention. Trigger spray dispenser bottles typically have a volume of between 250 ml and 1.5 L. Common volumes include 400 ml, 500 ml, 750 ml, and 1 L.

Larger containers for industrial scale use are also included the scope of this invention.

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

-9The invention will now be illustrated by means of the following non-limiting examples.

Examples

Materials

	Chemical /Material	Grade	Manufacturer/ Supplier
Modified starch	Starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid	Lab	Synthesized as per mentioned procedure
Surfactant	Sodium Linear Ether sulphate (SLES); Galaxy LES-70	Commercial (70wt% paste)	Galaxy Surfactant
Sodium dodecylbenzenesulphonate (SDBS); 289957	Technical grade	Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS); 74255	Dust free pellets >99%	Sigma-Aldrich
Alpha Olefin Sulfonate (AOS); Alfodet P46	Commercial (70wt% paste)	Godrej Industries
Ethoxylated Alcohol, NI(EO)n(Galaxy MW-253)	Commercial (100 wt%)	Galaxy Surfactant
Ethoxylated Alcohol, NI(EO)n(Galaxy MW-257)	Commercial (100 wt%)	Galaxy Surfactant
C12-15 EO9 (Biosoft N25-9)	Commercial (100 wt%)	Stepan Company, Northfield, IL
Tween 20 (P1379 )	Lab grade 97%	Sigma-Aldrich
Span 60 (S7010)	Lab grade >95%	Sigma-Aldrich
Makon TD-18	Commercial (100 wt%)	Stepan Company, Northfield, IL
Toximul 8241	Commercial (100 wt%)	Stepan Company, Northfield, IL

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

	Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) (C9002)	Lab grade >99%	Sigma-Aldrich
Cetrimonium bromide (CTAB) (V800113)	AR >99%	Sigma-Aldrich
Soil release polymer	Methyl cellulose (M0512)	Lab grade	Sigma-Aldrich

Preparation of starch-qraft-polymethacrylic acid:

Tapioca starch was slurried with urea solution in a 500 ml three neck round bottom flask and was mixed for 60 minutes with an overhead stirrer at room temperature. Ferrous ammonium sulfate was added to the slurry and was mixed for 5 minutes. Then, methacrylic acid was added to the slurry and was mixed for 10 minutes. The grafting reaction was initiated with the addition of H2O2 to the slurry. The reaction was continued for 60 minutes. Homo-polymer (PMAA) was removed from grafted starch by repeated water washing and starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid was dried at room temperature for 48 hours.

Preparation of the composition:

A slurry of starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid was prepared by dispersing pre-calculated amount of starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid in desired volume of water. The starch-graftpolymethacrylic acid was cooked at 80 °C temperature for 30 minutes and cooled to room temperature. The pH of the cooked polymer was adjusted to 8 with the addition of 1 M KOH solution. A pre-calculated amount of anionic surfactant was added to the cooked starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid and was mixed at 2000 rpm for 5 minutes. Subsequently, pH of the solution was adjusted to 3.5 with the addition of 1 M HCI solution while mixing at 4000 rpm. A pre-calculated amount of methyl cellulose solution was added to the slurry and was mixed for 15 minutes at 4000 rpm.

Test for stability:

The compositions were stored in 50 ml tarson tube at room temperature. If phase separation was observed after 2 days, the composition was considered unstable. If there was no phase separation, the composition was considered stable.

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

-11 Collar treatment and soiling:

Half of ten cotton shirt collars were treated with the 5g of the sample formulation. The other halves were kept untreated and were used as the control. Post drying, these collars were given to auto-rickshaw drivers for a full day’s use.

Washing and Evaluation of collars:

Post-soiling, the collars were cut into two halves. The control (untreated) and the treated halves were washed separately in different TL machines using 1.5 g/L Surf Excel, top-load matic (commercial detergent for automatic vertical axis top load washing machines, ex Hindustan Unilever Limited) at 24 FH (2:1). After drying, the collars were evaluated by trained panelists on the scale of 0 to 10. Lesser the score of collar better is the cleaning.

An average collar line score of less than 1 was considered to be good as it implied that there was no visible collar line.

Example 1: Effect of each component of the composition on stability and cleaning performance

In this example, the composition according to the invention (Ex1) is compared to comparative compositions (Comp 1 to Comp 9) with at least one of the components of the composition missing.

Set	Starchgraftpolyme thacryl ic acid (wt%)	*Anio nic surfac tant (wt%)	Methyl cellulo se (wt%)	Water (wt%)	pH	Stability	Average collar line score
Control	-	-	-	-	-	-	2.2
Comp 1	5	-	-	95	3.5	No	1.2
Comp 2	-	1	-	99	3.5	Yes	1.9
Comp 3	-	-	0.25	99.75	3.5	Yes	1.6
Comp 4	5	1	-	94	3.5	Yes	1.2
Comp 5	5	-	0.25	94.75	3.5	No	1.0

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

Comp 6	-	1	0.25	98.75	3.5	Yes	1.5
Ex 1	5	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes	0.8
Comp 7	10	-	-	90	3.5	No	1.2
Comp 8	-	5	-	95	3.5	Yes	1.8
Comp 9	-	-	2	98	3.5	Yes	1.4

*SLES

The above table shows that the composition according to the invention provides superior cleaning and is stable when compared to any of the comparative examples. Comp 7 to Comp 9 additionally show that the desired benefit is not achieved even at increased levels of each of the ingredients.

Example 2: Effect of concentration of Starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid on stability and cleaning performance

This example demonstrates the effect of concentration of starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid on stability and cleaning performance. The example compositions Ex 2 to Ex 4 are compared with comparative examples Comp 10 to Comp 12 comprising starch-graftpolymethacrylic acid in a concentration outside the scope of the invention.

Set	Starchg raftpolymet hacrylic acid (wt%)	*Anio nic surfac tant (wt%)	Methyl cellulo se (wt%)	Water (wt%)	pH	Stabilit y	Average collar line score
Contr ol	Exp.
Comp 10	0	1	0.25	98.75	3.5	Yes	2.1	1.7
Comp 11	1	1	0.25	97.75	3.5	Yes	2.2	1.5
Comp 12	2.5	1	0.25	96.25	3.5	Yes	2.2	1.3
Ex 2	5	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes	2.2	0.8
Ex 3	10	1	0.25	89.75	3.5	Yes	2.1	0.8
Ex 4	20	1	0.25	78.75	3.5	Yes	2.1	0.7

*SLES

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

-13The table above shows that best results for collar line cleaning is obtained at a starchgraft-polymethacrylic acid concentration within the scope of the present invention.

Example 3: Effect of polymethacrylic acid grafting level on stability and cleaning performance

This example demonstrates the effect of polymethacrylic acid grafting level on stability and cleaning performance. Comp 13 to Comp 15 are comparative examples with a polymethacrylic acid grafting level outside the scope of the invention and Ex 5 and Ex 6 are examples of the invention comprising a polymethacrylic acid grafting level within the scope of the invention.

Set	Starch-graftpolymethacryli c acid	*Anioni c surf act ant (wt%)	Methyl cellulo se (wt%)	Water (wt%)	pH	Stabili ty	Average collar line score
wt%	Grafti ng level %	Co ntr ol	Ex P-
Comp 13	5	0	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No	2.1	1.7
Comp 14	5	4.8	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No	2.2	1.6
Comp 15	5	8.5	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes	2.1	1.3
Ex 5	5	15.2	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes	2.2	0.8
Ex 6	5	21	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes	2.1	0.8

*SLES

The table above shows that a stable composition with superior collar line cleaning is obtained only with a polymethacrylic acid grafting level within the scope of the present invention.

Example 4: Effect of concentration of surfactant on stability and cleaning performance In this example, compositions according to the invention comprising different concentrations of anionic surfactant (Ex 7 to Ex 10) are compared with comparative compositions having anionic surfactant in a concentration outside the scope of the present invention (Comp 16 and Comp 17).

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

Set	Starchg raftpolymet hacrylic acid (wt%)	*Anio nic surfac tant (wt%)	Methyl cellulo se (wt%)	Water (wt%)	pH	Stabilit y	Average collar line score
Contr ol	Exp.
Comp 16	5	0	0.25	94.75	3.5	No	2.2	1.2
Comp 17	5	0.5	0.25	94.25	3.5	No	2.1	1.1
Ex 7	5	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes	2.2	0.8
Ex 8	5	2	0.25	92.75	3.5	Yes	2.2	0.8
Ex 9	5	5	0.25	89.75	3.5	Yes	2.1	0.8
Ex 10	5	10	0.25	84.75	3.5	Yes	2.2	0.7

*SLES

It is inferred from the results of the above table that a stable composition with superior cleaning performance is obtained at a anionic surfactant concentration according to the invention.

Example 5: Effect of concentration of methyl cellulose on stability and cleaning performance

This example demonstrates the effect of concentration of methyl cellulose on stability and cleaning performance. The example compositions Ex 11 to Ex 15 are compared with comparative examples Comp 18 and Comp 19 comprising methyl cellulose in a concentration outside the scope of the invention.

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

Set	Starchg raftpolymet hacrylic acid (wt%)	*Anio nic surfac tant (wt%)	Methyl cellulo se (wt%)	Water (wt%)	pH	Stabilit y	Average collar line score
Contr ol	Exp.
Comp 18	5	1	0	94	3.5	Yes	2.1	1.2
Comp 19	5	1	0.2	93.8	3.5	Yes	2.2	1.1
Ex 11	5	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes	2.2	0.8
Ex 12	5	1	0.4	93.6	3.5	Yes	2.2	0.8
Ex 13	5	1	1	93	3.5	Yes	2.1	0.75
Ex 14	5	1	2	92	3.5	Yes	2.2	0.8
Ex 15	5	1	5	89	3.5	Yes	2.1	0.7

*SLES

The table above shows that best results for collar line cleaning is obtained at a methyl cellulose concentration within the scope of the present invention.

Example 6: Effect of pH of the composition on stability and cleaning performance

In this example, the effect of the pH of the composition according to the invention (Ex 16 and Ex 19) on cleaning performance is compared to comparative compositions having a pH outside the scope of the invention (Comp 20 to Comp 22).

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

Set	Starchg raftpolymet hacrylic acid (wt%)	*Anio nic surfac tant (wt%)	Methyl cellulo se (wt%)	Water (wt%)	pH	Stabilit y	Average collar line score
Contr ol	Exp.
Ex 16	5	1	0.25	93.75	1	Yes	2.1	0.8
Ex 17	5	1	0.25	93.75	2.5	Yes	2.2	0.8
Ex 18	5	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes	2.1	0.8
Ex 19	5	1	0.25	93.75	4.5	Yes	2.1	0.9
Comp 20	5	1	0.25	93.75	5	Yes	2.1	1.5
Comp 21	5	1	0.25	93.75	6	Yes	2.2	1.6
Comp 22	5	1	0.25	93.75	9	Yes	2.2	1.7

*SLES

The table above shows that best results for collar line cleaning is obtained at a pH range according to the invention.

Example 7: Effect of different anionic surfactant and other surfactants of other types on stability

This example demonstrates the effect of different anionic surfactants according to the invention (Ex 23 to Ex 26) and the effect of using other surfactants instead of an anionic surfactant (Comp 23 to Comp 32) on stability.

Set	Starchg raftpolymet hacrylic acid (wt%)	Surfactant	Methyl cellulo se (wt%)	Water (wt%)	pH	Stabilit y
Type	wt%
Ex 23	5	Anionic	SDBS	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes
Ex 24	5	SDS	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes
Ex 25	5	SLES	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes
Ex 26	5	AOS	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	Yes

WO 2016/184643

PCT/EP2016/059151

Comp 23	5	Nonionic	EO3	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No
Comp 24	5		EO5	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No
Comp 25	5		EO7	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No
Comp 26	5		EO9	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No
Comp 27	5		Tween 20	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No
Comp 28	5		Span 60	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No
Comp 29	5		Makon TD-18	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No
Comp 30	5		Toximul 8241	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No
Comp 31	5	Cationic	CPC	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No
Comp 32	5		CTAB	1	0.25	93.75	3.5	No

The table above shows that a stable composition is obtained by any anionic surfactant according to the invention. It is also noted that a stable composition is not obtained by the use of other surfactants like cationic and non-ionic.

Example 8: Effect of non-ionic surfactants on the stability

This example illustrates the effect of the ratio of anionic to the optional non-ionic surfactant on stability. Non-ionic surfactants are added additionally to the composition of the invention.

Set	Stare hg raftpoly meth acryli c acid (wt%)	*Anioni c surfacta nt (wt%)	Non-ionic Surfactant	Meth yi cellul ose (wt% )	Wate r (wt%)	pH	Stabi lity
Type	(wt%)
Ex 27	5	1	C12-EO7	0.5	0.25	93.25	3.5	Yes
Ex 28	5	1		1	0.25	92.75	3.5	Yes
Ex 29	5	1		2	0.25	91.75	3.5	Yes
Ex 30	5	1		5	0.25	88.75	3.5	Yes

-182016264794 21 Mar 2019

Com p 33	5	1		10	0.25	83.75	3.5	No
Ex 31	5	1	Tween 20	0.5	0.25	93.25	3.5	Yes
Ex 32	5	1	1	0.25	92.75	3.5	Yes
Ex 33	5	1	2	0.25	91.75	3.5	Yes
Com p 34	5	1	5	0.25	88.75	3.5	No
Com p 35	5	1	10	0.25	83.75	3.5	No
Ex 34	5	1	Toximul 8241	0.5	0.25	93.25	3.5	Yes
Ex 35	5	1	1	0.25	92.75	3.5	Yes
Ex 36	5	1	2	0.25	91.75	3.5	Yes
Com p 36	5	1	5	0.25	88.75	3.5	No
Com p 37	5	1	10	0.25	83.75	3.5	No

*SDBS

The above table shows that a stable composition is not obtained at all ratios of anionic surfactant and non-ionic surfactant.

The reference in this specification to any prior publication (or information derived from it), or to any matter which is known, is not, and should not be taken as, an acknowledgement or admission or any form of suggestion that that prior publication (or information derived from it) or known matter forms part of the common general knowledge in the field of endeavour to which this specification relates.

Claims

1 A composition for treating a substrate, the said composition comprising:

a 4 to 20% by weight of a starch-graft-polymethacrylic acid;

b 1 to 10% by weight of an anionic surfactant; and c 0.25 to 5% by weight of methyl cellulose;

2 A composition according to claim 1, wherein the anionic surfactant is selected from sodium lauryl ether sulphate, sodium dodecyl sulphate, sodium alpha olefin sulphate and sodium dodecyl benzene sulphonate.

3 A composition according to claim 1 or claim 2, wherein the composition further comprises a non-ionic surfactant.

4 The composition according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the composition further comprises water.

5 A method for treating a substrate comprising the steps in sequence of a applying the composition according to any one of claims 1 to 5 onto the substrate; and b allowing the substrate to dry.

6 Use of the composition according to any one of claims 1 to 5 for improved stain and soil removal upon the subsequent wash.