WO2024258431A1 - Integration of time-attributed geological context into subsurface models and seismic interpretations - Google Patents
Integration of time-attributed geological context into subsurface models and seismic interpretations Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2024258431A1 WO2024258431A1 PCT/US2023/068624 US2023068624W WO2024258431A1 WO 2024258431 A1 WO2024258431 A1 WO 2024258431A1 US 2023068624 W US2023068624 W US 2023068624W WO 2024258431 A1 WO2024258431 A1 WO 2024258431A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- age
- attributed
- geometries
- target age
- subsurface
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. for interpretation or for event detection
- G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V20/00—Geomodelling in general
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/38—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for water-covered areas
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/40—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/10—Aspects of acoustic signal generation or detection
- G01V2210/14—Signal detection
- G01V2210/142—Receiver location
- G01V2210/1423—Sea
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/66—Subsurface modeling
Definitions
- This disclosure relates generally to the field of geological modeling of the subsurface and more particularly to the field of integrating contextual information into subsurface models and seismic interpretations for hydrocarbon recovery, geological storage, or mineral extraction operations.
- Seismic data may be utilized to model subsurface formations for hydrocarbon recovery. Seismic data may be interpreted to identify geological features in the subsurface formation such as faults, tops, geological bodies, etc. In some instances, attributes of the geological features, such as lithologies, porosity, depositional environment, etc. may not be apparent when interpreting seismic data. These attributes may be available in contextual information that is external to the seismic data. Integrating the contextual information into the seismic interpretations may provide an accurate model of the subsurface formations that may be further utilized in the hydrocarbon recovery and/or storage operations.
- the ability to automate the process of providing context to certain geobodies in seismic data and allow it to be performed globally and throughout a basin’s sedimentary pile in a consistent manner may be beneficial to reservoir de-risking and decision making in hydrocarbon recovery, geological storage, and/or mineral extraction operations.
- FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram depicting an example seismic data system for obtaining seismic data of a subsurface formation, according to some implementations.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart depicting example operations for integrating geological context into a subsurface model, according to some implementations.
- FIG 3 is an illustration of a seismic profile, according to some implementations.
- FIG. 4 is an illustration of a schematic workflow for integrating contextual information into a subsurface model, according to some implementations.
- FIG. 5 is an illustration depicting sampling of contextual information, according to some implementations.
- FIG. 6 is an illustration depicting the filling of a subsurface model with contextual information, according to some implementations.
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram depicting an example computer, according to some embodiments.
- In-context interpretation is key for avoiding the pitfalls of misidentification of geological features in seismic data.
- the contextual information of certain geological features in seismic data may affect subsurface models for exploration and production operations of hydrocarbons and/or storage capabilities of subsurface formations. For example, carbonate build-ups can often be mistaken for volcanic features of basement.
- Some implementations may contextualize seismic interpretations by integrating independently derived, spatially enabled, and time-attributed geological data, interpretations, models, etc. (i.e., contextual information datasets).
- Example implementations may integrate seismic data (or other geology data such as surface geology data, well data, etc. or a combination of the like) with contextual information datasets such as depositional environments, paleo-climate, physio-chemical properties of rocks, etc. which may generally be modeled for a given set of geological time and a regional spatial extent, often in map domain.
- the integration of the two data sources may enable seismic data to be contextualized. This integration may provide a means to support a better understanding of subsurface properties for reservoir modeling, seismic inversion, machine learning predictions, etc. and eventually make more informed subsurface operation decisions.
- Subsurface models may utilize specific stratigraphic subdivisions (i.e., age schemes), such as local chronostratigraphy, lithostratigraphy, etc., which may make it difficult to compare projects in a standardized manner.
- age schemes may often reflect a coarse stratigraphic subdivision which may force the subsurface model’s resolution to be compromised at an early stage and often focus on one single rock property (such as lithology) while many more properties (such as age, total organic content (TOC), porosity, depositional environment, paleo-climatic conditions, chemistry, physical properties, etc.) may be integrated.
- Example implementations relate to converting the age scheme of age-attributed geometries within a subsurface model to integrate contextual information into the subsurface model.
- the age-attributed geometries of a subsurface model may be generated manually and/or automatically through interpretation of the seismic data. For example, methods, such as a densified seismic interpretation based on age mode (dense horizon method), may generate the subsurface model with age-attributed geometries.
- the subsurface model geometries (such as geometrical objects including points, lines, surfaces, etc. that may represent the position of geological objects such as stratigraphic horizons) may be utilized as an age attributed input, where the age attributes may be defined by a geological age of an age scheme.
- Some implementations may obtain a contextual information dataset that includes independently derived, spatially enabled, and/or time-attributed geological data, interpretations, models, etc.
- the age attributes of the contextual information dataset may be defined by a target age scheme that differs from the age scheme of the age-attributed geometries.
- Some implementations may convert the age-attributed geometries to target age-attributed geometries based on the target age scheme of the contextual information dataset.
- incremental target age- attributed geometries may be interpolated between target age- attributed geometries in the subsurface using a geometrical projection method (such as parallel projection) and the age intervals present in the target age scheme as interpolation distance increments.
- the subsurface model may be contextualized by joining the target age-attributed geometries of the subsurface model with one or more layers of the contextual information dataset by utilizing the respective spatial relationship and/or geological age.
- the contextualization of the subsurface model may generate a context volume.
- the contextual information dataset may be in the map domain.
- the target age-attributed geometries may be converted or projected to a map domain such that it may be joined with the contextual information dataset.
- the context volume may include additional, and possibly higher, resolution geological time attributed contextual data (such as lithological rock facies, depositional environment, paleo-climate output, organic matter content, other chemical or physical properties, etc.) of related age (relevant either to a given horizon age or relevant to span an interval) such that more informed subsurface operation decisions may be made based on the context volume.
- geological time attributed contextual data such as lithological rock facies, depositional environment, paleo-climate output, organic matter content, other chemical or physical properties, etc.
- the context volume may be used to perform a subsurface operation in one or more subsurface formation.
- a subsurface operation may be initiated, modified, or stopped based on the sediment package classifications.
- subsurface operations may include completion of the wellbore, updating drilling operations, perforating, fracking, logging operations, additional sampling of the subsurface formation, wellbore placement in the subsurface formation, etc.
- the context volume may indicate geological features of a hydrocarbon reservoir. Accordingly, the position of a wellbore may be adjusted to maximize recovery of these hydrocarbons.
- FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram depicting an example seismic data system for obtaining seismic data of a subsurface formation, according to some implementations.
- FIG. 1 includes a seismic data system 100 in an offshore environment.
- a system configured to collect and process seismic data similar to seismic data system 100 may be located onshore.
- a body of water 101 over a first geological layer 102 is bounded at a water surface 103 by a water-air interface and at a water bottom 104 by a water-earth interface. Beneath the water bottom 104 is a subsurface formation that may include one or more formation layers such as first geological layer 102 and second geological layer 132.
- a seismic vessel 105 is located on the water surface 103 and includes a signal processor 106.
- the signal processor 106 may include a seismic data processor, navigation control, seismic source control, seismic sensor control, and recording equipment.
- the signal processor 106 may be local or remote to the seismic vessel 105.
- the signal processor 106 may activate a seismic source 107 to actuate at selected times.
- the seismic source 107 emits seismic waves.
- Seismic streamers 108 contain seismic sensors to detect the reflected waves initiated by the seismic source 107 and reflected from interfaces in the environment.
- the seismic streamers 108 may contain seismic sensors such as hydrophones 109 and/or water particle motion sensors such as geophones 110.
- the hydrophones 109 and geophones 110 are typically co-located in pairs or pairs of sensor arrays at regular intervals along the seismic streamers 108.
- the seismic source 107 may be activated at periodic intervals to emit seismic waves in the vicinity of the seismic streamers 108 with the hydrophones 109 and the geophones 110. Each time the seismic source 107 is activated, an acoustic/seismic wave may travel upwardly or downwardly in spherically expanding wave fronts. In this example system, the traveling waves are depicted as ray paths normal to the expanding wave fronts. The downwardly traveling wave from the seismic source 107 traveling along a ray path 113 may reflect off the earth-water interface at the water bottom 104 and then travel upwardly along ray path 114, where the wave may be detected by the hydrophones 109 and geophones 110.
- Such a reflection at the water bottom 104, as in ray path 114, may contain information about the water bottom 104 and hence may be retained for further processing. Additionally, the downwardly traveling wave traveling along ray path 113 may transmit through the water bottom 104 and travel along ray path 115 before reflecting off a layer boundary 116 (i.e., horizon). This wave may then travel upwardly along ray path 117, transmit through the water bottom 104, and travel upwardly along ray path 124 until it is detected by the hydrophones 109 and geophones 110.
- the reflection detected by the hydrophones 109 and geophones 110 may be represented as one or more seismic traces.
- Seismic traces may contain useful information about the first geological layer 102.
- the traces of the waves traveling along ray path 114 and ray path 124 may be traces of primary reflection waves.
- a portion of the wave traveling upwardly along ray path 117 may be reflected by the water bottom 104 and travel downwardly along the ray path 125.
- the wave traveling downwardly along ray path 125 may then be reflected by the layer boundary 116 again, travel upwardly along the ray path 126 until it transmits through the water bottom 104, and travel upwardly along the ray path 137 until it is detected by the hydrophones 109 and geophones 110.
- the reflection detected by the hydrophones f09 and geophones 110 may also be represented as one or more seismic traces.
- the seismic traces of the waves traveling along ray path 137 may be traces of seismic multiples, which have reflected off of the layer boundary 116 and the water bottom 104.
- the seismic data detected by the hydrophones 109 and geophones 110 may be transmitted to the signal processor 106.
- the seismic data processor of the signal processor 106 may interpret seismic data to generate a subsurface model with one or more geometries.
- the age attributes of the geometries may be defined by a geological age of an age scheme and the signal processor 106 may perform operations, such as converting the age attributes of the geometries to a target age attribute, integrating contextual information into the subsurface model, and performing a subsurface operation.
- FIG. 2 is a flowchart depicting example operations for integrating geological context into a subsurface model, according to some implementations.
- FIG. 2 includes a flowchart 200 for converting age-attributed geometries of an age scheme to target age-attribute geometries of a target age scheme, and joining contextual data with the target age-attributed geometries to contextualize the subsurface models and/or the seismic data.
- the operations of the flowchart 200 are described in reference to seismic data.
- the operation may also include other geology data such as surface geology data, well data, etc.
- Operations of flowchart 200 of FIG. 2 are described in reference to the signal processor 106 of FIG. 1. Additionally, the operations of flowchart 200 are described in reference to FIGS. 3-6. Operations of the flowchart 200 start at block 202.
- the signal processor 106 may obtain geology data of a subsurface formation.
- the geology data may include seismic data, well data, surface geology data, etc. and/or a combination of the like.
- the signal processor 106 may obtain seismic data from a seismic data system (such as seismic data system 100 of FIG. 1).
- the seismic data may be a function of depth, such as true vertical thickness (TVT), and/or two way time (TWT).
- TVT true vertical thickness
- TWT two way time
- the signal processor 106 may generate a subsurface model of a subsurface formation including one or more age-attributed geometries defined by a first age scheme.
- the seismic data may be interpreted to generate the subsurface model.
- Interpretation of the seismic data may include interpreting one or more geometries of the surfaces (horizons) as part of the generation of the subsurface model.
- the subsurface model may be generated without seismic data.
- the subsurface model may be based on a cross-section built from surface geology data.
- the interpretation may include geometrical objects including points, lines, surfaces, etc. that may represent the geometries of geological features such as geological boundaries (e.g., tops, faults, stratigraphic interfaces, etc.).
- FIG 3 is an illustration of a seismic profile, according to some implementations.
- FIG. 3 includes a seismic profile 300 of seismic data.
- the uninterpreted seismic profile 302 may represent raw seismic data prior to interpretation.
- the interpreted seismic profile 304 may represent the same seismic data as uninterpreted seismic profile 302, but with interpreted geometries (for example, interpretation by dense horizons) such as identifying geometric objects representing geological features including horizon 308, geological feature 310, etc.
- subsurface geometries may also be obtained from automatic interpretation methods using a relative geological age model.
- subsurface geometries may be obtained with a dense horizon interpretation.
- the geological age attributes of the geometrical object interpreted in the subsurface model may be manually defined.
- a user may define the respective age attributes from a first age scheme.
- the age may come from a stratigraphic term of the user’s choice where distinct surfaces may be defined at given ages.
- the geological age attributes of the geometries may be defined as numerical values.
- the geological age attributes may be expressed in millions of years, thousands of years, etc.
- the geological age attributes may be manually assigned to each of the geometries and/or may be defined from local chronostratigraphic terms (e.g., top Cretaceous, top Jurassic, etc.), lithostratigraphic terms (e.g., formation names, groups, etc.), etc.
- well data of the subsurface formations with proxies for the age may be available.
- a user may assign an age to the surfaces in the well data.
- the ages of the respective surfaces may be defined by a scheme, which may then be converted into a numerical age via a conversion dictionary.
- the conversion dictionary may convert the ages in a local scheme to numerical ages.
- FIG. 4 is an illustration of a schematic workflow for integrating contextual information into a subsurface model, according to some implementations.
- the workflow 400 begins at step 1 402.
- a subsurface model 401 is an example schematic representation of an extensional fault block along cross section 404, where formation X 405 was deposited between time Y (i.e., older), and time X (i.e., younger), as defined by absolute geological ages in age scheme I 426.
- the formation X 405 may be interpreted to be the region between tops X 406 and top Y 408, and terminates at fault 410 in the subsurface model.
- top X 406, top Y 408, and/or fault 410 may be identified as geometries (i.e., geometncal objects) within the seismic data when generating the subsurface model 401, each of the geometries may be defined with respective age attributes from age scheme 1 426.
- Such ages may be converted into other age terms (i.e., schemes) for the purpose of eventually linking to age-attributed geological contextual information, as described below.
- the subsurface model generated by dense horizon may also include known age constraints.
- the subsurface model with the known age constraints generated in dense horizon may represent a local geological age scheme that may be converted to a target age scheme (described in block 216).
- the dense geometries may be utilized as an input to generate denser interpolated geometries to reflect the time increments from the target age scheme.
- the signal processor 106 may select one or more age-attributed geometries to process for the integration of the contextual information dataset. For example, top X 406 and top Y 408 of FIG. 4 may be selected. One or more subsurface geometries may be selected for the integration of the contextual data. For example, the number of subsurface geometries selected may depend on the time resolution of the contextual information dataset or the intent of the user.
- the signal processor 106 may obtain a contextual information dataset of a target age scheme. For example, with reference to FIG. 4, contextual information dataset 438 may be obtained.
- the contextual information dataset may be obtained for reasons such as the intent of the user, the resolution of the contextual information dataset, the resolution of the age- attributed geometries, etc.
- only a portion of the contextual information dataset may be obtained.
- a portion of layers (described below) from a contextual information dataset may be obtained.
- contextual information dataset 438 may include layers from ages ta to tx, where t a is the oldest and tx is the youngest.
- the age attributes of the contextual information datasets may be defined by an age scheme.
- the age attributes of the contextual information dataset 438 may be defined by age scheme II 428, age scheme III 430, or age scheme IV 432 of FIG 4.
- the selection of the of a given contextual information dataset may condition the target age scheme automatically.
- the respective age scheme (age scheme II 428) may automatically become the target age scheme.
- the respective age scheme may also be manually selected as the target age scheme when the contextual information dataset is obtained.
- the signal processor 106 may convert each respective age-attributed geometry to a target age-attributed geometry .
- the age attribute assigned to each geometry may be converted to an age attribute of the target age scheme.
- the age attributes may be converted by using the numerical age equivalent of the geometries in both the original age scheme and the target age scheme using the most appropriate, recent, and/or updated scheme (and potentially associated uncertainty on the age).
- methods that include ordering relations between geometries in a preferred hierarchy may be utilized to convert each age attribute of the geometnes.
- the target age scheme may be manually selected and/or defined automatically based on the requirement from the contextual information dataset to integrate to the subsurface model. For example, if contextual information dataset 438 is selected for integration and uses age scheme II 428, then age scheme II 428 automatically becomes the target age scheme. Additionally, at step 2 424, the age attributes (defined by age scheme I 426) of top X 406 and top
- Y 408 of FIG. 4 may be converted to the target age scheme (age scheme II 428).
- the target age scheme may include several additional age intervals that may be identified (i.e., incremental target age-attributed geometries 412, 414, 416, and 418). The incremental geometries may need to be interpolated geometrically onto the subsurface model based on their respective relative age interpolation used a created geometry field between the original geometries.
- the signal processor 106 may determine if there are two or more target age-attributed geometries. If there are two or more target age-attributed geometries, the operations continue to block 214. Otherwise, operations proceed to block 218.
- the signal processor 106 may generate a geometry field for regions between target age-attributed geometries.
- the geometry field may use defining lines to define its geometry. Additionally, the geometry field may include one or more boundary lines (such as a fault, unconformity, etc.) to limit the extent of the calculation. For example, top X 406 and top
- Y 408 in the target age scheme may be utilized as the defining lines for the geometry field, and fault 410 may be utilized as the boundary line for the geometry field.
- the generation of the geometry field may return the proportional distance between two geometries (such as top X 406 and top Y 408) along the projection guidelines.
- Projection methods such as parallel projection, similar projection, proportional stratigraphic layering, etc. may be utilized to generate the geometry field.
- Parallel projection may project a horizon parallel to itself along guideline projection lines which may be perpendicular to the original surface. Similar projection may project a distance along a vertical guiding line or guiding lines oblique to the surface.
- Proportional stratigraphic layering may be utilized for complex geometrical relationships (i.e., geometric shapes are not parallel) between two geometries, such as non-parallel curved layers (with non-constant curvatures).
- projection lines 420, 422 may be generated via a proportional projection method and may define the relationship between the defining lines (top X 406 and top Y 408).
- the signal processor 106 may interpolate incremental target age- attributed geometries for each identified subsurface from the target age scheme.
- different geometries may be recognizable through different age schemes.
- incremental target age-attributed geometries 412, 414, 416, and 418 may be recognizable in age scheme II 428, but not in age scheme I 426.
- the geometry field may be populated with incremental target age-attributed geometries using a distance increment proportional to the time increment between the two original defining geometnes (defining lines).
- the region between the target age-attributed geometries that are the defining lines may be populated with incremental target age- attributed geometries 412, 414, 416, and 418 via projection lines 420, 422.
- the incremental target age-attributed geometries and defining lines may be connected through the absolute (i.e., numerical) age of the respective geometries.
- the geometrical interpretation may also integrate more complex geological rules (such as physical rules of sediment deposition providing a geometrical output) to fill the stratigraphic basin space for a given interval.
- complex geological rules such as physical rules of sediment deposition providing a geometrical output
- the contextual information dataset obtained in block 208 does not have a higher resolution than the subsurface model, then incremental target age- attributed geometries may not be generated.
- the age scheme of the contextual information dataset does not present any other surfaces within the defining lines of the geometry field.
- the signal processor 106 may join the contextual information dataset with the target age-attributed geometries.
- the target age-attributed geometries and/or the incremental target age-attributed geometries generated for each increment of geology time in the target age scheme may be linked to the contextual information dataset.
- the target age-atributed geometries (top X 406 and top Y 408) and/or the incremental target age-atributed geometries (incremental target age-atributed geometries 412, 414, 416, and 418) may be joined at step 4 436 of FIG. 4.
- the contextual information dataset may be generated and stored in the form of maps to reflect the contextual information visualized as projected on the Earth’s surface.
- Each of the target age-atributed geometries may be projected to the Earth’s surface to generate a geospatial object such as a point, a line, a polygon, etc. in a map domain.
- the target age-atributed geometries may be proj ected to the map domain using vertical projection.
- Each time-atributed geometry projected from the subsurface of the Earth may be joined with one or more layers of the contextual information at the Earth’s surface at a spatial intersection on the Earth’s surface for a time of interest.
- one or more layers of the contextual information dataset may by joined with one or more target-age- atributed geometries.
- contextual information may be sampled at the location of the intersection of a given geometric object with the surface map.
- the contextual information can be sampled at a distance from the projected subsurface profile/surface.
- using a sampling distance may allow uncertainty /likelihood of a given type of contextual information and inform the user on possible alternative context as provided by the external data source.
- This method may return a likely probability of occurrence of a given geological context along a line representing the projected geometries of a given age. It may allow alternative interpretations to be proposed as well as extend the area for identification of contextual data type transition (e.g., facies transition).
- FIG. 5 is an illustration depicting sampling of contextual information, according to some implementations.
- the contextual data 500 includes a map 502 representing a contextual information dataset.
- the line of section 506 from A to A’ may be the location of the seismic profile.
- the sampling frame 508 around the line of section 506 may represent the sampling distance of contextual information to be integrated to the subsurface model for a given geological age or a stack of geological ages.
- the arrows, such as arrow 510 on the map 502 may represent a normal projection of the contextual data to the profile. In some implementations, the projection may also be defined at a certain angle based on structural trends and/or input from geostatistics.
- the contextual information dataset in map 502 for a given geological age may be sampled using a sampling frame 508, such as a rectangle frame, covering a given distance from the line of section 506.
- Contextual information within the sampling frame 508 may be projected to the line of section 506 using a normal projection orientation depicted by arrows such as arrow 510.
- the chart 504 may represent the likely relative proportion of the sampled contextual data as projected along the line of section 506 for that given surface.
- the chart 504 has ay-axis 512 that represents the relative probability of occurrence of the sampled contextual data in the seismic profile.
- section 514 is a likely unimodel context
- section 516 is a likely mixed context
- section 516 is a likely unimodel context
- section 518 is a likely mixed context.
- the contextual information dataset may then be transferred to the incremental target age-attributed subsurface geometries and be represented/visualized in the subsurface model.
- the signal processor 106 may fill the subsurface model with the one or more contextual datasets to generate a context volume.
- one or more layers of the contextual information dataset 438 may be integrated into the subsurface model 401 at step 450.
- the contextual information dataset joined with each respective target-age attributes geometry may include attributes associated with the respective geometry. Attributes may include lithology, facies, climate context, etc.
- the subsurface model may be filled with attributes at the respective locations to contextualize the interpreted seismic data.
- the contextual information dataset may apply to the target age-attributed subsurface geometries in the subsurface model.
- the contextual information dataset may apply to geometrical regions located between pairs of geometries (such as surfaces).
- contextual data including stratigraphic information e.g., carbonate, sandstone
- FIG. 6 is an illustration depicting the filling of a subsurface model with contextual information, according to some implementations.
- FIG. 6 includes a seismic dataset 600 with an interpreted seismic reflection profile 602 and a contextualized interpreted seismic reflection profile 604.
- Features 610, 612, and 614 are interpreted geometries that indicate the possible location of tropical carbonate buildups.
- Surfaces 620, 622, 624, 626 are age-attributed seismic surfaces.
- Contextual information dataset includes maps 640, 642, 644, 646, and 648 (such as contextual information dataset 438 of FIG. 4).
- the maps 640-648 may represent chance maps of occurrences of tropical carbonate (map 640 having the greatest chance and map 648 having the lowest chance) as predicted from paleo-climate modeling for different ages.
- the features 610, 612, and 614 may be converted to a target age scheme (the age scheme of maps 640-648) and spatio-temporally joined with the maps 640-648.
- the maps 640-648 may be integrated into the subsurface model to provide insight into attributes (such as temperature, salinity, etc.) of the features 610, 612, and/or 614 that may indicate if carbonate build ups are present in the subsurface formations.
- Individual parameters and/or a combination of parameters may be utilized to measure a carbonate likelihood.
- One or more individual attributes may be utilized to provide a measure of carbonate likelihood.
- the information, such as the attributes, in addition to the seismic data may then be utilized in a machine learning model to determine whether the features may be carbonate build ups.
- the signal processor 106 may perform a subsurface operation based on the context volume.
- a decision regarding a subsurface operation may be made based on the context volume or the context volume may be utilized in another workflow (such as a machine learning prediction algonthm).
- Implementations described herein may automize part of the process related to the integration of contextual data such as geoscientific knowledge contained in external data sources into subsurface models. This may save interpretation time, improve consistency, and allow for faster exploration and production decision making.
- contextual information is integrated into the subsurface models, it may allow more informed strategic decisions. For example, the positioning of an extraction and/or an injection well may be determined based on the context volume. Alternatively, the decision may be to acquire additional data types such as new seismic data or drill an exploration well.
- Integration of contextual information may support seismic processing and/or reprocessing, inversion, seismic time/depth migration, etc. as at least part of the contextual information dataset, such as knowledge of the lithologic properties of rock, may improve the results obtained in processing and/or reprocessing, inversion, and seismic time/depth migration.
- the integration of contextual information dataset may also represent a useful pre-requisite to the development of further machine learning algorithms involving seismic data.
- FIG. 7 is a block diagram depicting an example computer, according to some embodiments.
- FIG. 7 depicts a computer 700 for integrating contextual information with seismic data.
- the computer 700 includes a processor 701 (possibly including multiple processors, multiple cores, multiple nodes, and/or implementing multi-threading, etc.).
- the computer 700 includes memory 707.
- the memory 707 may be system memory or any one or more of the above already described possible realizations of machine-readable media.
- the computer 700 also includes a bus 703 and a network interface 705.
- the computer 700 can communicate via transmissions to and/or from remote devices via the network interface 705 in accordance with a network protocol corresponding to the type of network interface, whether wired or wireless and depending upon the carrying medium.
- a communication or transmission can involve other layers of a communication protocol and or communication protocol suites (e.g., transmission control protocol, Internet Protocol, user datagram protocol, virtual private network protocols, etc.).
- the computer 700 also includes a signal processor 711 and a controller 715 which may perform the operations described herein.
- the signal processor 711 may process geology data and convert age attributes of a geometry in a subsurface model from an age scheme to a target age scheme.
- the signal processor 711 may also integrate one or more contextual information datasets with the target age-attributed geometries to fill the subsurface model with the contextual information to generate a context volume.
- the controller 715 may perform a subsurface operation based on the context volume.
- the signal processor 711 and the controller 715 can be in communication. Any one of the previously described functionalities may be partially (or entirely) implemented in hardware and/or on the processor 701.
- the functionality may be implemented with an application specific integrated circuit, in logic implemented in the processor 701, in a co-processor on a peripheral device or card, etc. Further, realizations may include fewer or additional components not illustrated in FIG. 7 (e.g., video cards, audio cards, additional network interfaces, peripheral devices, etc.).
- the processor 701 and the network interface 705 are coupled to the bus 703. Although illustrated as being coupled to the bus 703, the memory 707 may be coupled to the processor 701.
- Implementation #1 A method comprising: obtaining geology data of a subsurface formation; generating a subsurface model of the subsurface formation, the subsurface model including one or more age-attributed geometries of a first age scheme; obtaining a first contextual information dataset of a target age scheme; converting each of the one or more age- attributed geometries to a target age-attributed geometry based on the target age scheme; integrating the first contextual information dataset into the subsurface model, via the one or more target age-attributed geometries, to generate a context volume; and performing a subsurface operation based on the context volume.
- Implementation #2 The method of implementation #1, further comprising: generating, via a projection method, a geometry field in the subsurface model for a first region between a first target age-attributed geometry and a second target age-attributed geometry; generating one or more incremental target age-attributed geometries based on the first region; and integrating the first contextual information dataset into the subsurface model via the one or more incremental target age-attributed geometries.
- Implementation #3 The method of implementation #2, wherein the projection method includes a proportional stratigraphic laying method, a parallel projection method, and a similar projection method.
- Implementation #4 The method of any one or more of implementations #1-3, further comprising: projecting the one or more target age-attnaded geometries to a map domain; joining the one or more target age-attributed geometries with one or more layers of the first contextual information dataset based on a geological age and a spatial intersection; obtaining one or more attributes corresponding to the target age-attributed geometry based on the one or more layers; and integrating the one or more attributes into the subsurface model.
- Implementation #5 The method of implementation #4, wherein the one or more layers of the first contextual information dataset is in the map domain.
- Implementation #6 The method of implementation #4, wherein the one or more attributes include lithology, facies, and climate context.
- Implementation #7 The method of any one or more of implementations #1-6, wherein the first contextual information dataset may span between multiple target age-attributed geometries.
- Implementation #8 The method of any one or more of implementations #1-7, wherein the one or more age-attributed geometries represent geological features in the subsurface formation and include a point, a line, and a surface, and wherein the geological features include a top, a fault, and a stratigraphic interface.
- Implementation #9 The method of any one or more of implementations #1-8, wherein the first contextual information dataset includes information including lithological rock facies, depositional environment, paleo-climate output, and organic matter content.
- Implementation #10 A non-transitory, computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable by a processor to perform operations comprising: obtaining geology data of a subsurface formation; generating a subsurface model of the subsurface formation, the subsurface model including one or more age-attributed geometries of a first age scheme; obtaining a first contextual information dataset of a target age scheme; converting each of the one or more age-attributed geometries to a target age-attributed geometry based on the target age scheme; integrating the first contextual information dataset into the subsurface model, via the one or more target age-attributed geometries, to generate a context volume; and performing a subsurface operation based on the context volume.
- Implementation #11 The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of implementation #10, further comprising: generating, via a projection method, a geometry field in the subsurface model for a first region between a first target age-attributed geometry and a second target age-attributed geometry; generating one or more incremental target age-attributed geometries based on the first region; and integrating the first contextual information dataset into the subsurface model via the one or more incremental target age-attributed geometries.
- Implementation #12 The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of implementation #11, wherein the projection method includes a proportional stratigraphic laying method, a parallel projection method, and a similar projection method.
- Implementation #13 The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of any one or more of implementations #10-12, further comprising; projecting the one or more target age- attributed geometries to a map domain; joining the one or more target age-attributed geometries with one or more layers of the first contextual information dataset based on a geological age and a spatial intersection; obtaining one or more attributes corresponding to the target age-attributed geometry based on the one or more layers; and integrating the one or more attributes into the subsurface model.
- Implementation #14 The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of implementation #13, wherein the one or more layers of the first contextual information dataset is in the map domain.
- Implementation #15 The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of any one or more of implementations #10-14, wherein the geology' data includes seismic data, well data, and surface geology data.
- Implementation #16 The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of any one or more of implementations #10-15, wherein the one or more age-attributed geometries represent geological features in the subsurface formation and include a point, a line, and a surface, and wherein the geological features include a top, a fault, and a stratigraphic interface.
- Implementation #17 The non-transitory, computer-readable medium of any one or more of implementations #10-16, wherein the first contextual information dataset includes information including lithological rock facies, depositional environment, paleo-climate output, and organic matter content.
- Implementation #18 A system comprising: a processor; and a computer-readable medium having instructions stored thereon that are executable by the processor to cause the processor to, obtain geology data of a subsurface formation; generate a subsurface model of the subsurface formation, the subsurface model including one or more age-attributed geometries of a first age scheme; obtain a first contextual information dataset of a target age scheme; convert each of the one or more age-attributed geometries to a target age-attributed geometry based on the target age scheme; integrate the first contextual information dataset into the subsurface model, via the one or more target age-attributed geometries, to generate a context volume; and perform a subsurface operation based on the context volume.
- Implementation #19 The system of implementation #18, wherein the instructions comprise instructions that are executable by the processor to cause the processor to, generate, via a projection method, a geometry field in the subsurface model for a first region between a first target age-attributed geometry and a second target age-attributed geometry; generate one or more incremental target age-attnaded geometries based on the first region; and integrate the first contextual information dataset into the subsurface model via the one or more incremental target age-attributed geometries.
- Implementation #20 The system of implementation #18 or #19, wherein the instructions comprise instructions that are executable by the processor to cause the processor to, project the one or more target age-attributed geometries to a map domain; joining the one or more target age-attributed geometries with one or more layers of the first contextual information dataset based on a geological age and a spatial intersection; obtaining one or more attributes corresponding to the target age-attributed geometry based on the one or more layers; and integrating the one or more attributes into the subsurface model.
- the term “or” is inclusive unless otherwise explicitly noted. Thus, the phrase “at least one of A, B, or C” is satisfied by any element from the set ⁇ A, B, C ⁇ or any combination thereof, including multiples of any element.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB2512779.6A GB2641862A (en) | 2023-06-15 | 2023-06-16 | Integration of time-attributed geological context into subsurface models and seismic interpretations |
| NO20250982A NO20250982A1 (en) | 2023-06-15 | 2025-08-21 | Integration of time-attributed geological context into subsurface models and seismic interpretations |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US18/335,524 US20240418887A1 (en) | 2023-06-15 | 2023-06-15 | Integration of time-attributed geological context into subsurface models and seismic interpretations |
| US18/335,524 | 2023-06-15 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2024258431A1 true WO2024258431A1 (en) | 2024-12-19 |
Family
ID=93845116
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2023/068624 Ceased WO2024258431A1 (en) | 2023-06-15 | 2023-06-16 | Integration of time-attributed geological context into subsurface models and seismic interpretations |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20240418887A1 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2641862A (en) |
| NO (1) | NO20250982A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2024258431A1 (en) |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20200326455A1 (en) * | 2016-07-15 | 2020-10-15 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Determining a numerical age for geological events within a scheme |
| US20200393586A1 (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2020-12-17 | John A. BABCOCK | Lowstand erosional seismic stratigraphy |
| US20220066064A1 (en) * | 2020-09-02 | 2022-03-03 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Method and system for predicting formation top depths |
| US20220390634A1 (en) * | 2021-06-04 | 2022-12-08 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Method for generating a geological age model from incomplete horizon interpretations |
| US20230161062A1 (en) * | 2021-11-19 | 2023-05-25 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Multimodal approach to target stratigraphic plays through seismic sequence stratigraphy, rock physics, seismic inversion and machine learning |
Family Cites Families (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8213261B2 (en) * | 2008-05-22 | 2012-07-03 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method for geophysical and geological interpretation of seismic volumes in the domains of depth, time, and age |
| US8447525B2 (en) * | 2010-07-29 | 2013-05-21 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Interactive structural restoration while interpreting seismic volumes for structure and stratigraphy |
| US20120215628A1 (en) * | 2011-02-22 | 2012-08-23 | Williams Ralph A | Chronostratigraphic Modeling and Mapping System and Method |
| GB2531976B (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2020-12-16 | Logined Bv | Stratigraphic function |
| FR3027944A1 (en) * | 2014-10-29 | 2016-05-06 | Services Petroliers Schlumberger | GENERATING STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS FOR SUBTERRANEAN FORMATION USING STRATIGRAPHIC IMPLICIT FUNCTION |
| FR3039679B1 (en) * | 2015-07-30 | 2018-08-10 | Services Petroliers Schlumberger | ASSIGNMENT OF SEDIMENTARY SEQUENCES |
| US10545251B2 (en) * | 2015-10-29 | 2020-01-28 | Shell Oil Company | Computer system and method for generating attribute renderings from a seismic data volume |
| FR3043227A1 (en) * | 2015-11-04 | 2017-05-05 | Services Petroliers Schlumberger | |
| US11249208B2 (en) * | 2016-10-14 | 2022-02-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Geologic structural model generation |
| US11644589B2 (en) * | 2017-05-23 | 2023-05-09 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Analogue facilitated seismic data interpretation system |
| WO2020237001A1 (en) * | 2019-05-21 | 2020-11-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Geologic model and property visualization system |
| US12461263B2 (en) * | 2022-09-22 | 2025-11-04 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Graph based multi-survey horizon optimization |
| WO2024192162A1 (en) * | 2023-03-14 | 2024-09-19 | Bp Corporation North America Inc. | Systems and methods for efficiently performing stochastic inversion methods in seismic exploration applications |
-
2023
- 2023-06-15 US US18/335,524 patent/US20240418887A1/en active Pending
- 2023-06-16 WO PCT/US2023/068624 patent/WO2024258431A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2023-06-16 GB GB2512779.6A patent/GB2641862A/en active Pending
-
2025
- 2025-08-21 NO NO20250982A patent/NO20250982A1/en unknown
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20200326455A1 (en) * | 2016-07-15 | 2020-10-15 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Determining a numerical age for geological events within a scheme |
| US20200393586A1 (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2020-12-17 | John A. BABCOCK | Lowstand erosional seismic stratigraphy |
| US20220066064A1 (en) * | 2020-09-02 | 2022-03-03 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Method and system for predicting formation top depths |
| US20220390634A1 (en) * | 2021-06-04 | 2022-12-08 | Landmark Graphics Corporation | Method for generating a geological age model from incomplete horizon interpretations |
| US20230161062A1 (en) * | 2021-11-19 | 2023-05-25 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Multimodal approach to target stratigraphic plays through seismic sequence stratigraphy, rock physics, seismic inversion and machine learning |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| NO20250982A1 (en) | 2025-08-21 |
| US20240418887A1 (en) | 2024-12-19 |
| GB2641862A (en) | 2025-12-17 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA3122686C (en) | Automated reservoir modeling using deep generative networks | |
| US11048000B2 (en) | Seismic image data interpretation system | |
| Penna et al. | Carbonate and igneous rock characterization through reprocessing, FWI imaging, and elastic inversion of a legacy seismic data set in Brazilian presalt province | |
| US10120092B2 (en) | System and method for analysis of depositional settings of subsurface reservoirs | |
| US20190345815A1 (en) | Systematic Evaluation of Shale Plays | |
| WO2021130512A1 (en) | Device and method for predicting values of porosity lithofacies and permeability in a studied carbonate reservoir based on seismic data | |
| EP3253946B1 (en) | Seismic attributes derived from the relative geological age property of a volume-based model | |
| US12247484B2 (en) | Field data acquisition and virtual training system | |
| Maleki et al. | Quantitative integration of 3D and 4D seismic impedance into reservoir simulation model updating in the Norne Field | |
| EP4695633A2 (en) | Seismic survey framework | |
| Grana et al. | The link between seismic inversion, rock physics, and geostatistical simulations in seismic reservoir characterization studies | |
| Othman et al. | Three‐dimensional static reservoir modelling of Kareem sandstone reservoir, Tawilla Oil Field, at the southern region of Gulf of Suez, Egypt | |
| US20240418887A1 (en) | Integration of time-attributed geological context into subsurface models and seismic interpretations | |
| Avseth et al. | 3D subsurface modeling of multi-scenario rock property and AVO feasibility cubes—An integrated workflow | |
| US12560733B2 (en) | Identifying geological structural style in seismic reflections | |
| Kiswaka et al. | Cretaceous deposits of the northern part of the southern offshore Tanzania: depositional system, seismic manifestation, well data expressions and their implications on petroleum system elements | |
| US20250052921A1 (en) | Determining thickness of glacial channels from seismic surveys | |
| US12601850B2 (en) | Seismic multi-horizon tracking framework | |
| US12339930B2 (en) | Sequence stratigraphic interpretation of seismic data | |
| US20250298942A1 (en) | The accuracy of reservoir facies and petrophysical property models using multiple information sources through quantile machine learning techniques | |
| Elhossainy et al. | Problem of unexpected water production with water saturation less than 40%: A case study from Alam El Bueib Formation, Safir Oil Field, Shushan Basin, Western Desert, Egypt | |
| Qunhu et al. | Advanced crossplot analysis through physics-informed velocity prediction: a machine learning solution for reservoir characterization in the Guantao Formation of the Bohai Bay Basin, China | |
| Cossa et al. | New Geosteering Technology Boosts Wellbore Data and Seismic Properties Integration: A Case History from Norway | |
| Gerritsen et al. | Modeling Spatial and Structural Uncertainty in the Subsurface | |
| Kean | Multidisciplinary, crossfunctional geophysical integration in the Campos Basin |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 23941806 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 202512779 Country of ref document: GB Kind code of ref document: A Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20230616 |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2512779.6 Country of ref document: GB |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2512779.6 Country of ref document: GB |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |