WO2024256673A1 - Method of securely performing a processing operation and a function in the homomorphic domain - Google Patents
Method of securely performing a processing operation and a function in the homomorphic domain Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2024256673A1 WO2024256673A1 PCT/EP2024/066634 EP2024066634W WO2024256673A1 WO 2024256673 A1 WO2024256673 A1 WO 2024256673A1 EP 2024066634 W EP2024066634 W EP 2024066634W WO 2024256673 A1 WO2024256673 A1 WO 2024256673A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- processing unit
- function
- secure element
- ciphertexts
- execution
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/008—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols involving homomorphic encryption
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/60—Protecting data
- G06F21/602—Providing cryptographic facilities or services
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L2209/00—Additional information or applications relating to cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication H04L9/00
- H04L2209/12—Details relating to cryptographic hardware or logic circuitry
- H04L2209/127—Trusted platform modules [TPM]
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L2209/00—Additional information or applications relating to cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication H04L9/00
- H04L2209/16—Obfuscation or hiding, e.g. involving white box
Definitions
- the present invention relates to the field of secure computation in a whitebox environment and more particularly to methods and devices for an efficient implementation of computation in the homomorphic domain.
- a first application of cryptography is to provide mechanisms to protect data, such as messages exchanged on a communication channel, from being accessed by an unauthorized user.
- a plaintext piece of data may be protected by converting it into a ciphertext that may only be deciphered, i.e. , converted back into the original data by someone or some device owning a secret key required for performing the deciphering operation.
- a drawback of such an encryption of a sensitive data into an encrypted data is that usually the encrypted data must be deciphered before any computation may be performed using the sensitive data. Therefore, such sensitive data is efficiently protected by encryption during its storage or its transfer from one entity to another, but it may not be protected when it shall be used as an input to any operation.
- Public key cryptography can also be used for authenticating the issuer of a message. Such an issuer can generate a signature based on said message using his private key. The recipient of the message can then use the public key of the alleged issuer for verifying that the signature was generated using the associated private key ie that the issuer of the message is indeed who he claims to be.
- An example of widely used public key cryptosystem is Rivest-Shamir-Adelman (RSA) cryptosystem.
- RSA Rivest-Shamir-Adelman
- user sensitive data, secret key or private key must remain secret, otherwise an attacker may use sensitive data for fraudulent purposes such as stealing digital money or generating forged signatures of a message as if he was the true owner of the private key.
- HSM Hardware security modules
- Cryptographic processes are then executed in an environment where not all users or devices can be trusted.
- a context is usually called a white-box attack context.
- sensitive data such as private keys
- Binary code of such processes is completely accessible and editable by the attacker that can analyze the binary code of the cryptography application and, for example, memory pages or registers used for temporary storage during the execution.
- Such manipulation may, for example, be performed using debuggers and hardware emulation tools.
- SE secure elements
- a major drawback of secure elements is their much lower resources than those of the untrusted device hosting it, both in terms of computational power and memory.
- HE HE
- calculations may be performed on encrypted values, to produce results that are the same, after decryption, as if the calculation had been performed on corresponding plaintext values.
- HE provides for the application of an arithmetic circuit to a set of ciphertexts and the result is an encrypted value that would be the same as if it had been evaluated on the underlying plaintext.
- the encryption scheme allows for computations using arbitrary functions and is capable of evaluation of any circuit.
- He enables to perform almost any operation using sensitive data or secret cryptographic keys without exposing them to an attacker, as long as the data remain encrypted in the homomorphic domain.
- this invention therefore relates to a method of secure performing, by a system comprising a processing unit and a secure element and on request by a requesting device, at least one processing operation and a function whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion, said method comprising :
- Such a method enables to perform securely most of the computation process on the processing unit while preventing any increase of the noise level in encrypted data above a predetermined level. It also prevents an unacceptable increase of the computation cost due to the execution of functions whose execution time or memory footprint for example would be too high in the homomorphic domain.
- the function whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion may be a function having an execution time by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain greater than a predetermined threshold.
- the function whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion may alternatively be a function for which an acceptable delay between the beginning of its execution and the availability of the result of its execution at the secure element is lower than a predetermined threshold depending on a transmission time from the processing unit to the secure element.
- the function whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion may also be a function whose execution is only allowed on a device fulfilling a predetermined security level and wherein the secure element fulfills said predetermined security level and the processing unit fulfills a security level lower than said predetermined security level.
- outsourcing the execution of the function to the secure element enables to guarantee that the required security level will be enforced.
- the predetermined criterion may be a maximum size of the first ciphertexts.
- the first ciphertexts to be used as inputs to the execution of the function have a size that is too large, due to their homomorphic encryption.
- Outsourcing the execution of the function to the secure element enables to decrypt the first ciphertexts in cleartext before the execution of the function, which leads to a much lower memory footprint of the execution of the function.
- the method according to the first aspect may comprise :
- the computation may be resumed on the processing unit in the homomorphic domain, after the execution of the function.
- the result of the execution of the function may also be sent to another recipient, encrypted in a way such that this recipient will be able to decrypt it.
- Said function may perform an equality test, a comparison or a decision tree algorithm.
- Said function may be encoded as bytecode and encrypted using an encryption algorithm. It enables to make the content of the function unreadable outside the secure element.
- the HE encryption algorithm may be a TFHE scheme and the processing unit may send to said secure element said generated first ciphertexts and said function packed in the information bits of an integer packet of a predetermined size.
- Said requesting unit may be said secure element or a distant server.
- Said secure element may be among a Hardware Security Module (HSM), a Tamper Resistant Enclave (TRE), an eSE, a Sim, an eSim, an iSim, a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), a Confidential Computing (CC) device.
- HSM Hardware Security Module
- TRE Tamper Resistant Enclave
- eSE eSE
- Sim eSim
- iSim iSim
- TEE Trusted Execution Environment
- CC Confidential Computing
- this invention therefore relates also to a computer program product directly loadable into the memory of at least one computer, comprising software code instructions for performing the steps of the methods according to the first aspect when said product is run on the computer.
- this invention therefore relates also to a system comprising a processing unit and a secure element and configured for performing on request by a requesting device, at least one processing operation and a function whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion wherein:
- processing unit is configured for :
- said secure element is configured for :
- this invention therefore relates also to a processing unit of said system according to the third aspect configured for performing on request by a requesting device, at least one processing operation and a function whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion and comprising a memory and a processor configured to perform at least one processing operation, in the homomorphic domain, on data encrypted using a homomorphic encryption algorithm, to generate first ciphertexts, to determine that execution of said function, taking as inputs said first ciphertexts is to be outsourced to a secure element, and an interface to send to said secure element said generated first ciphertexts and said function.
- this invention therefore relates also to a secure element of said system according to the third aspect configured for performing on request by a requesting device, at least one processing operation and a function whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion and comprising a memory and a processor configured to decrypt said first ciphertexts into first cleartexts and to apply said function to said first cleartexts to generate a second cleartext.
- one or more embodiments comprise the features hereinafter fully described and particularly pointed out in the claims.
- Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of a system comprising a processing unit and a secure element according to an embodiment of the present invention
- Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of a processing unit according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- Figure 3 is a schematic illustration of the main idea of the present invention.
- Figure 4 illustrates schematically a method of secure execution of the computation process according to an embodiment of the present invention
- Figure 5 illustrates schematically a method of secure execution of the computation process according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- HE HE
- homomorphic used as adjectives are used to qualify data encrypted by an encryption operation of a Homomorphic Encryption scheme or to qualify operations performed on such encrypted data.
- the invention aims at executing both securely and efficiently a computation process comprising at least one processing operation and the execution of a function whose execution in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion.
- the execution of this computation process is requested by a requesting device to a system 100 that comprises a processing unit and a secure element.
- the processing unit 101 , the secure element 102 and the requesting device 103 may be three separate devices connected by a network 104.
- the processing unit may be a server with large CPU and memory resources
- the secure element may be a tamper resistant Hardware Security Module (HSM) or a Confidential Computing (CC) device connected to the processing unit
- the requesting device may be a remote device with lower resources than the processing unit such as a mobile telephone, a tablet, or a personal computer.
- HSM Hardware Security Module
- CC Confidential Computing
- the system 100 may be a single device hosting both the processing unit and the secure element.
- the system may be a digital device with computing means, such as a mobile phone or a computer and the secure element may be a Tamper Resistant Enclave (TRE), an eSE, a Sim, an eSim, an iSim or a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE).
- TRE Tamper Resistant Enclave
- eSE eSE
- Sim Sim
- eSim an eSim
- iSim iSim
- TEE Trusted Execution Environment
- the requesting device may be the secure element itself.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of a processing unit 101 , for example, a mobile telephone, tablet, or personal computer.
- the processing unit 101 may include a processor 201 connected via a bus 202 to a random access memory (RAM) 203, a read-only memory (ROM) 204, and/or a non-volatile memory (NVM) 205.
- the processing unit 101 further includes a communication input/output interface 206 by which the processing unit 101 may be connected to the network 104.
- Such a communication interface may be used to connect the processing unit 101 to various forms of wireless networks, e.g., wide-area networks, WiFi networks, or mobile telephony networks.
- the processing unit 101 may connect to networks via wired network connections such as Ethernet.
- the processing unit 101 may also include input/output means 207 providing interfaces to the user of the processing unit 101 , such as one or more screens, loudspeakers, a mouse, tactile surfaces, a keyboard etc...
- the method according to the invention aims at enabling the requesting device to take advantage of the processing power of the processing unit, and of interfaces of the system, for executing the computation process introduced here above. It may be needed for example to execute the computation process on the processing unit rather than on the secure element because the available memory on the secure element is insufficient or because a particular input/output interface is needed for executing a particular step of the computation process and is available only at the processing unit.
- the at least one processing operation comprised in the computation process shall be performed in the HE domain.
- Said data, to be used as input to the processing operation may be HE- encrypted by the requesting device and then transmitted, under an HE-encrypted format, to the processing unit.
- the encrypted data may be transferred to the processing unit through its interfaces: for example from a distant server through a network interface or from a more local device through an interface such as USB.
- the processing unit can perform the at least one processing operation without requiring any decryption of the HE-encrypted data, which ensures the confidentiality of the processed data.
- HE computation have two major drawbacks : the increase of the noise in the processed data as HE computations are performed and the increase of the computation cost in the HE domain compared to similar computations in cleartext. Both may turn HE computing into an impractical solution for some processed combining multiple and/or heavy computations.
- the main idea of the invention is to offload the computation process from the processing unit to the secure element when a function F, whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion, has to be applied; to have this function F then executed by the secure element in cleartext to produce an output z; and to do so before the noise level in the data processed in the HE domain becomes too high.
- the execution of the function F by the secure element in cleartext instead of having it executed in the HE domain by the processing unit enables at the same time to decrease the execution cost of the function, and to reset the noise added to the processed data by the execution of the at least one processing operations in the HE domain by the processing unit.
- the invention is an alternative to existing solutions based on homomorphic computation accelerators which shorten the execution time of homomorphic computations but use for doing so dedicated circuits and therefore have a much higher cost.
- the function F whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion may be a function having an execution time by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain greater than a predetermined threshold.
- the predetermined criterion may be a maximum size of the n ciphertexts yi to y n , used as inputs to the function F, resulting from previous processing operations 1 to n on encrypted inputs xi to x n , all ciphertexts being HE-encrypted with a secret key sk and n being a non-zero integer. In such cases, the cost of executing it in the homomorphic domain would be too high and is decreased by executing it in clear text in the secure element.
- the execution of the function by the processing unit may lead to results arriving too late at the secure element because the time needed to transfer the results from the processing unit to the secure element.
- the function F may then be a function for which an acceptable delay between the beginning of its execution and the availability of the result of its execution at the secure element is lower than a predetermined threshold depending on the transmission time from the processing unit to the secure element. In such a case, outsourcing it to the secure element enables to avoid a long transmission time of the function result between the processing unit and the secure element and makes the result available at the secure element much faster after the execution of the function.
- the function whose execution by the processing unit in the homomorphic domain does not fulfill a predetermined criterion may be a function whose execution is only allowed on a device fulfilling a predetermined security level and the secure element may fulfill this predetermined security level whereas the processing unit may fulfill a security level lower than the required security level.
- a first step S1 the processing unit performs the at least one processing operation part of the computation process whose execution is requested by the requesting device. These processing operations are performed in the homomorphic domain, on data encrypted using a homomorphic encryption algorithm. This processing ultimately generates first ciphertexts, which are HE-encrypted.
- the data used as input to the processing of this first step is transferred to the processing unit already HE-encrypted. Thanks to the properties of homomorphic encryption, the processing unit is able to apply a processing to this HE-encrypted data without any prior decryption; and the processing unit does not gain any knowledge of the processed data when it performs the one or more processing operations.
- the HE-encrypted data may be provided by the requesting device, or by the secure element of the system when it is separate from the requesting device.
- the processing unit determines that it should outsource to the secure element the execution of the function F, taking as inputs said first ciphertexts.
- the outsourcing of the execution of the function F is triggered by a command inserted in the code of the computation process at the time code compiling. It is indeed possible to predict in advance that when the execution of the computation process reaches the function F, it will need to stop being executed in the HE domain and will require an execution in cleartext by the secure element, both for fulfilling the predetermined criterion, and to decrease the noise level in the first cyphertexts.
- Such a command may be detected by the requesting device before the start of the execution of the computation process and the requesting device may instruct the processing unit to execute the processing operations of the computation process only up to the execution of the function F.
- the processing unit may assess itself the need for outsourcing the execution of the function F to the secure element, based on estimations of the compliance of the execution of function F in the HE domain with the predetermined criterion and of the noise level in the HE-encrypted data (the first ciphertexts) produced by the processing operations it has already executed.
- the secure element may help assessing the noise level in HE-encrypted data, for example by deciphering a ciphertext and evaluating the noise level in it.
- a third step S3 the processing unit sends to the secure element the generated first ciphertexts and the function F.
- the function F may be encoded in different ways among the data transmitted by the processing unit to the secure element.
- the function F is just specified by its name such that the secure element may look out for it in library using an API.
- the processing unit sends to the secure element the code of the function F itself.
- the function F is then encoded as bytecode.
- the function F may be encrypted using a secret key encryption algorithm such as AES, or a public key encryption algorithm such as RSA or ECC and using an encryption key such that the corresponding decryption key is stored at the secure element.
- AES secret key encryption algorithm
- ECC public key encryption algorithm
- the processing unit nor any attacker intercepting the communication between the processing unit and the secure element may gain knowledge of what the function F really is.
- it may be HE-encrypted, for example using a TFHE scheme (Fast Fully Homomorphic Encryption over the Torus). By doing so, the encrypted code of the function F cannot even be distinguished from the first ciphertexts.
- the bytecode of the function F may be split into several bytecode blocks and the function F may be reconstructed from these several bytecode blocks, for example by concatenating them or by performing arithmetic operations between these blocks such as additions. Such a split would make it even more difficult for an attacker to understand which code corresponds to the function F and what it does.
- the data transferred from the processing unit to the secure element may be encoded as an integer packet of a predetermined size, divided into protection bits, noise bits and information bits.
- the processing unit may send to the secure element the generated first ciphertexts and the function F code packed together in the information bits of the integer packet.
- the function F code and the first ciphertexts are grouped together in the part of the integer packet dedicated to the information bits and the function F code cannot by guessed by its position in the data sent to the secure element.
- a fourth step S4 the secure element decrypts the first ciphertexts into first cleartexts. By doing so, the noise generated in the first ciphertexts by the execution of the processing operations in the HE-domain is cancelled. If needed, the secure element may also decrypt the function F.
- a fifth step S5 the secure element applies the function F to these first cleartexts and generates a second cleartext.
- the computing process may not be completed yet. Additional processing by the processing unit may be required. In such a case, in order to keep the processed data protected, such a processing should be performed again in the homomorphic domain. Therefore, during a sixth step S6, the secure element may HE-encrypt the second cleartext generated at the fifth step.
- Such an encryption may be a homomorphic encryption with the same encryption key as the one used to encrypt the encrypted data processed by the processing unit in the first step S1. It produces a second ciphertext.
- the secure element may then send the second ciphertext to the processing unit 101 , or to another processing unit of the system, such as a coprocessor.
- the computing process may be completed.
- the second cleartext is the final result of the computing process.
- the secure element may encrypt the second cleartext and send it to the requesting device or a storage device.
- Such an encryption may be homomorphic or not. It may use an encryption key such that the corresponding decryption key is known by the requesting device.
- the secure element may use interfaces of the processing unit, such as the communication interface 207, as a relay.
- the methods and devices according to the invention enable a secure implementation of the computation process, taking advantage of the resources and interfaces of the system outside of the secure element, without exposing the processed data outside of the secure element. It also enables to cope efficiently with the increase of the noise level in homomorphically encrypted data and with operations which might prove difficult to perform at a reasonable cost in the homomorphic domain.
- loT devices with a low security level such as smartphones used as low cost point-of-sales, could be securely used to perform any operation without enabling an attacker to gain any information from reverse engineering of the loT device
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Bioethics (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Storage Device Security (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP24732696.0A EP4728689A1 (en) | 2023-06-15 | 2024-06-14 | Method of securely performing a processing operation and a function in the homomorphic domain |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP23315248.7A EP4478654A1 (en) | 2023-06-15 | 2023-06-15 | Method of securely performing a processing operation and a function in the homomorphic domain |
| EP23315248.7 | 2023-06-15 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2024256673A1 true WO2024256673A1 (en) | 2024-12-19 |
Family
ID=88018126
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2024/066634 Ceased WO2024256673A1 (en) | 2023-06-15 | 2024-06-14 | Method of securely performing a processing operation and a function in the homomorphic domain |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| EP (2) | EP4478654A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2024256673A1 (en) |
Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20220067179A1 (en) * | 2020-08-10 | 2022-03-03 | Sap Se | Executing encrypted data using secure enclave |
-
2023
- 2023-06-15 EP EP23315248.7A patent/EP4478654A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2024
- 2024-06-14 EP EP24732696.0A patent/EP4728689A1/en active Pending
- 2024-06-14 WO PCT/EP2024/066634 patent/WO2024256673A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20220067179A1 (en) * | 2020-08-10 | 2022-03-03 | Sap Se | Executing encrypted data using secure enclave |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| COPPOLINO LUIGI ET AL: "PriSIEM: Enabling privacy-preserving Managed Security Services", JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, ACADEMIC PRESS, NEW YORK, NY, US, vol. 203, 21 April 2022 (2022-04-21), XP087063576, ISSN: 1084-8045, [retrieved on 20220421], DOI: 10.1016/J.JNCA.2022.103397 * |
| CRAIG GENTRY: "Fully Homomorphic Encryption Using Ideal Lattices", PROCEEDINGS OF THE FORTY-FIRST ANNUAL ACM SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY OF COMPUTING (STOC '09, 2009, pages 169 - 178, XP055030186, DOI: 10.1145/1536414.1536440 |
| ILARIA CHILLOTTI ET AL: "Programmable Bootstrapping Enables Efficient Homomorphic Inference of Deep Neural Networks", vol. 20210127:133406, 25 January 2021 (2021-01-25), pages 1 - 18, XP061051918, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/091.pdf> [retrieved on 20210125] * |
| R. L. RIVESTL. ADLEMANM. L. DERTOUZOS: "On data banks and privacy homomorphisms", FOUNDATIONS OF SECURE COMPUTATION, 1978 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP4478654A1 (en) | 2024-12-18 |
| EP4728689A1 (en) | 2026-04-22 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US12101415B2 (en) | Method of RSA signature or decryption protected using a homomorphic encryption | |
| US11063743B2 (en) | Method of RSA signature of decryption protected using assymetric multiplicative splitting | |
| US11870913B2 (en) | Method for generating a digital signature of an input message | |
| Patel et al. | Integrated ECC and Blowfish for smartphone security | |
| US12273436B2 (en) | Method for testing if a data element belongs to a list of reference data elements | |
| Cordova et al. | Comparative analysis on the performance of selected security algorithms in cloud computing | |
| Khatarkar et al. | A survey and performance analysis of various RSA based encryption techniques | |
| Singh et al. | Securing RJSON data between Middleware and Smart phones through Java Script based Cryptographic Algorithms | |
| EP4478654A1 (en) | Method of securely performing a processing operation and a function in the homomorphic domain | |
| EP3267618B1 (en) | Equality check implemented with secret sharing | |
| EP4730692A1 (en) | Method for protecting a software code implementing a cryptographic algorithm against cloning attacks | |
| EP3931999A1 (en) | Method secured against side-channel attacks with a new masking scheme protecting linear operations of a cryptographic algorithm | |
| US20230138384A1 (en) | Method for securely performing a public key algorithm | |
| CN116055221B (en) | Data secure transmission method, device, equipment and medium | |
| Costea et al. | Secure software licensing: Models, constructions, and proofs | |
| Shi et al. | Enhancing Private Signing Key Protection in Digital Currency Transactions Using Obfuscation | |
| Naveenkumar et al. | Implementation of RSA Algorithm for Cryptography in Hardware Security | |
| Singh | Mitigating the Integrity Issues in Cloud Computing Utilizing Cryptography Algorithms | |
| Goyal | A Study on Encryption and Decryption System | |
| Weiwei et al. | An Approach to the Sensitive Information Protection for Mobile Code | |
| Haunts | Final Summary | |
| Moharir et al. | A Heterogeneous Abstract Machine for Encrypted and Unencrypted Computation |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 24732696 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2024732696 Country of ref document: EP |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2024732696 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20260115 |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2024732696 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20260115 |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2024732696 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20260115 |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2024732696 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20260115 |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2024732696 Country of ref document: EP |