WO2024030253A1 - Methods of solvent extraction having reduced crud or improved phase disengagement times - Google Patents
Methods of solvent extraction having reduced crud or improved phase disengagement times Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2024030253A1 WO2024030253A1 PCT/US2023/028055 US2023028055W WO2024030253A1 WO 2024030253 A1 WO2024030253 A1 WO 2024030253A1 US 2023028055 W US2023028055 W US 2023028055W WO 2024030253 A1 WO2024030253 A1 WO 2024030253A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- aqueous phase
- phase
- ppm
- agent
- disengagement
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D11/00—Solvent extraction
- B01D11/04—Solvent extraction of solutions which are liquid
- B01D11/0492—Applications, solvents used
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B15/00—Obtaining copper
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B3/00—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes
- C22B3/04—Extraction of metal compounds from ores or concentrates by wet processes by leaching
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22B—PRODUCTION AND REFINING OF METALS; PRETREATMENT OF RAW MATERIALS
- C22B7/00—Working up raw materials other than ores, e.g. scrap, to produce non-ferrous metals and compounds thereof; Methods of a general interest or applied to the winning of more than two metals
- C22B7/006—Wet processes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
- B01D—SEPARATION
- B01D11/00—Solvent extraction
- B01D11/04—Solvent extraction of solutions which are liquid
- B01D11/0446—Juxtaposition of mixers-settlers
Definitions
- This disclosure relates to methods of solvent extraction, including methods having improved phase disengagement times, or reduced crud.
- Solvent extraction which may be referred to as liquid-liquid extraction or partitioning, may be used to separate a compound based on solubility, such as the solubilities of the compounds’ parts.
- solubility such as the solubilities of the compounds’ parts.
- solvent extraction relies on two liquids with no, or limited, solubility in each other, such as water and an organic liquid.
- Solvent extraction processes usually include extraction and a stripping reaction.
- a solvent and an aqueous phase are separated in a settler
- the phase continuity and/or the time of phase separation which may be referred to as the phase disengagement time, can be operating parameters that inform the efficiency of extraction processes, such as copper extraction processes.
- reducing disengagement time and/or improving phase separation could have a number of advantages, such as reducing environmental impact through improved phase separation, reducing operating costs caused by extractant losses while reducing maintenance, and/or improving revenue.
- Solvent extraction plants typically suffer from an accumulation of solids, which is commonly referred to as “crud”.
- the crud may be composed mainly of silica.
- the presence of crud can influence a number of parameters, such as the continuity of organic-aqueous phases, emulsion stability, and, therefore, phase disengagement time.
- the presence of crud also can increase the cost of operation, possibly due to the loss of organic phases.
- the removal of crud from a settler or other part of a solvent extraction process or apparatus can be difficult and/or laborious, and can require the shutdown of a plant, which can further increase losses.
- embodiments of the methods provided herein can reduce the environmental impact of solvent extraction, reduce operating costs, and/or free up plant capacity.
- methods of solvent extraction having reduced phase disengagement times include providing an aqueous phase; contacting the aqueous phase and an organic phase; contacting the aqueous phase and a phase disengagement agent (i) before the contacting of the aqueous phase and the organic phase, or (ii) after the contacting of the aqueous phase and the organic phase; and separating the aqueous phase and the organic phase.
- the separating of the aqueous phase and the organic phase may be completed at a phase disengagement time that at least 2 %, at least 3 %, at least 4 %, at least 5 %, at least 10 %, at least 15 %, at least 20 %, at least 25 %, at least 30 %, at least 35 %, at least 40 %, at least 45 %, at least 50 %, at least 60 %, at least 70 %, at least 80 %, at least 90 %, about 2 % to about 90 %, about 2 % to about 80 %, about 2 % to about 70 %, about 2 % to about 60 %, about 2 % to about 50 %, about 2 % to about 45 %, about 2 % to about 40 %, about 2 % to about 35 %, about 2 % to about 30 %, about 2 % to about 25 %, about 2 % to about 20 %, about 2 % to about 15 %, about 2 % to about 10
- the methods include providing an aqueous phase; contacting the aqueous phase and a crud reducing agent; and removing at least a portion of the first amount of silica from the aqueous phase to form a treated aqueous phase comprising a second amount of silica.
- the second amount of silica may be at least 2 %, at least 5 %, at least 10 %, at least 15 %, at least 20 %, at least 25 %, or at least 50 % less than the first amount of silica.
- the methods also may include contacting the treated aqueous phase and an organic phase; and separating the treated aqueous phase and the organic phase.
- FIG. 1 depicts a plot of phase disengagement times observed for embodiments of aqueous phases including various concentrations of an embodiment of a non-ionic surface active agent.
- FIG. 2 depicts a plot of phase disengagement times observed for embodiments of aqueous phases including various concentrations of an embodiment of a non-ionic surface active agent.
- FIG. 3 depicts the performance of an embodiment of a non-ionic surface active agent at two different concentrations.
- FIG. 4 depicts phase disengagement times observed for one embodiment of a non-ionic surface active agent at various concentrations in an embodiment of an aqueous phase.
- FIG. 5 depicts phase disengagement times observed for one embodiment of a surface active agent at various concentrations in an embodiment of an aqueous phase.
- FIG. 6 depicts phase disengagement times observed for one embodiment of a surface active agent.
- FIG. 7 depicts a plot of particle size of an aqueous phase containing an embodiment of a surface active agent.
- FIG. 8 depicts a plot of colloidal silica particle size versus colloidal silica concentration.
- FIG. 9 depicts a calibration curve derived to assist a series of tests described herein.
- FIG. 10 depicts a plot of phase disengagement times observed for a series of tests.
- FIG. 11 depicts a plot of phase disengagement times after centrifugation of embodiments of aqueous phases.
- FIG. 12 depicts a plot of copper extraction efficiency versus various concentrations of an embodiment of a surface active agent.
- FIG. 13 depicts a plot of copper extraction efficiency versus various concentrations of two embodiments of a surface active agent.
- FIG. 14 depicts a plot of copper extraction efficiency versus silica concentration.
- FIG. 15 depicts copper extraction efficiencies for several embodiments of surface active agents.
- FIG. 16 depicts a plot of phase engagement time versus concentration of an embodiment of a surface active agent.
- FIG. 17 depicts a plot of phase engagement time versus concentration of an embodiment of a surface active agent.
- FIG. 18 depicts an ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV-Vis) analysis of an embodiment of an aqueous phase.
- UV-Vis ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy
- FIG. 19 depicts an embodiment of a calibration curve used in certain tests described herein.
- the methods exhibit improved phase disengagement times. In some embodiments, the methods reduce or eliminate crud.
- the methods include providing an aqueous phase, contacting the aqueous phase and an organic phase, and separating the aqueous phase and the organic phase.
- the contacting of the aqueous phase and the organic phase, and the separating of the aqueous phase and the organic phase may be achieved by any known technique, including solvent extraction techniques known in the art.
- the methods include contacting an aqueous phase and a phase disengagement agent (i) before the contacting of the aqueous phase and an organic phase, or (ii) after the contacting of the aqueous phase and an organic phase.
- an aqueous phase may be contacted with all or a portion of an amount of a phase disengagement agent before and/or after the contacting of the aqueous phase and an organic phase (e.g., an aqueous phase may be contacted with (i) a first portion of a phase disengagement agent before the contacting of the aqueous phase and an organic phase, and (ii) a second portion of a phase disengagement agent after the contacting of the aqueous phase and an organic phase).
- the contacting of an aqueous phase and an organic phase includes mixing the aqueous phase and organic phase.
- Any mixing apparatus may be used to mix the aqueous phase and the organic phase.
- the mixing may occur for a mixing time, which may be a predetermined mixing time, and the contacting of the aqueous phase and the phase disengagement agent may occur before the mixing time commences, or after at least 25 %, at least 50 %, at least 60 %, at least 70 %, at least 80 %, or at least 90 %, or after 100 % of the mixing time has transpired.
- an aqueous phase and an organic phase may be subjected to mixing for a predetermined mixing time of one minute, and the aqueous phase and the phase disengagement agent are contacted 30 seconds after the onset of mixing.
- the methods include subjecting an aqueous phase to leaching prior to the contacting of the aqueous phase and an organic phase, and the aqueous phase and the phase disengagement agent are (i) contacted after the leaching, or (ii) contacted after the leaching and before the contacting of the aqueous phase and the organic phase.
- leaching refers to and includes (i) a process or portion of a process that includes extracting a substance from a medium by dissolving the substance with a solvent or lixiviant, and (ii) bioleaching (e.g., microbial leaching), which generally includes extracting a material, such as a metal from an ore, with an organism.
- the separating of the aqueous phase and the organic phase is completed (i.e., complete phase separation (with no bubbles visible), see Example 2) at a phase disengagement time that is at least 2 %, at least 3 %, at least 4 %, at least 5 %, at least 10 %, at least 15 %, at least 20 %, at least 25 %, at least 30 %, at least 35 %, at least 40 %, at least 45 %, at least 50 %, at least 60 %, at least 70 %, at least 80 %, at least 90 %, about 2 % to about 90 %, about 2 % to about 80 %, about 2 % to about 70 %, about 2 % to about 60 %, about 2 % to about 50 %, about 2 % to about 45 %, about 2 % to about 40 %, about 2 % to about 35 %, about 2 % to about 30 %, about 2 % to about 25 %, about 2 %
- the contacting of the aqueous phase with a phase disengagement agent may reduce the time to separate the aqueous phase and the organic phase i.e., the phase disengagement time) to 75 seconds or less (a reduction of at least 25 %), 70 seconds or less (a reduction of at least 30 %), etc.
- aqueous phase may be contacted with any effective amount of a phase disengagement agent.
- a phase disengagement agent is present at an amount, relative to the aqueous phase, of about 5 ppm to about 1,000 ppm, 100 ppm to about 1,000 ppm, about 100 ppm to about 700 ppm, about 100 ppm to about 600 ppm, about 200 ppm to about 600 ppm, about 300 ppm to about 600 ppm, about 100 ppm to about 500 ppm, about 100 ppm to about 400 ppm, or about 100 ppm to about 300 ppm.
- the methods provided herein include providing an aqueous phase, contacting the aqueous phase and a crud reducing agent; and removing at least a portion of the first amount of silica from the aqueous phase to form a treated aqueous phase that includes a second amount of silica.
- the methods also may include contacting the treated aqueous phase and an organic phase, and separating the treated aqueous phase and the organic phase.
- the contacting of a treated aqueous phase and an organic phase, as described herein, may include mixing the aqueous phase and the organic phase.
- the crud reducing agent may ease and/or facilitate the elimination or reduction of crud in the aqueous phase.
- a crud reducing agent may increase the average particle size of silica-containing aggregates, thereby permitting sedimentation, increasing the rate of sedimentation, or a combination thereof.
- the first amount of silica may be present in the aqueous phase in the form of particles having a first average particle size, as measured by dynamic light scattering, and after the contacting of the aqueous phase and the crud reducing agent (e.g., at least 5 seconds, at least 10 seconds, or at least 20 seconds after the contacting of the aqueous phase and the crud reducing agent), the first amount of silica may be present in the aqueous phase in the form of particles having a second average particle size, as measured by dynamic light scattering, and the second average particle size may be at least 2 times, at least 3 times, at least 4 times, at least 5 times, or at least 10 times greater than the first average particle size.
- the removing of at least a portion of the first amount of silica from the aqueous phase to form a treated aqueous phase that includes a second amount of silica may be achieved by any known technique, including conventional solid-liquid separation techniques.
- the technique may be an active technique, a passive technique, or a combination thereof.
- a “passive technique” relies on gravity to achieve sedimentation, whereas an “active technique” relies on at least one force other than gravity.
- the removing of at least a portion of the first amount of silica may include centrifuging the aqueous phase, which is an “active technique”.
- the sedimentation, as described herein, may occur and/or have an increased rate due, at least in part, to an increased particle size of silica-containing aggregates. After sedimentation has reached a desired level, the silica, e.g., silica-containing aggregates, may be removed by any known technique, such as decanting.
- the first amount of silica in the aqueous phase is about 0.5 g/L to about 3 g/L, about 0.5 g/L to about 2 g/L, or about 0.5 g/L to about 1.5 g/L.
- the second amount of silica is at least 2 %, at least 5 %, at least 10 %, at least 15 %, at least 20 %, at least 25 %, at least 30 %, at least 35 %, at least 40 %, at least 45 %, at least 50 %, at least 60 %, at least 70 %, at least 80 %, at least 85 %, at least 90 %, at least 95 %, or at least 99 % less than the first amount of silica.
- the second amount of silica is 0 g/L to about 0.02 g/L.
- an aqueous phase generally may be contacted with any effective amount of a crud reducing agent.
- an effective amount may include a concentration less than or equivalent to the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of a crud reducing agent.
- the crud reducing agent is present in the aqueous phase at an amount of about 0.1 ppm to about 200 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 180 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 160 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 140 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 120 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 100 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 80 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 60 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 40 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 20 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 12 ppm, about 1 ppm to about 10 ppm
- the centrifuging of an aqueous phase may include subjecting the aqueous phase to an effective gravitational force equivalent (g-force), such as up to 20,000, up to 15,000, or up to 10,000.
- g-force effective gravitational force equivalent
- the centrifuging of an aqueous phase includes subjecting the aqueous phase to a g-force of about 10 to about 8,000, about 100 to about 8,000, about 1,000 to about 8,000, about 2,000 to about 5,000, or about 3,000 to about 4,500.
- the centrifuging of the aqueous phase may occur for an effective period, which may depend on one or more factors, such as incoming volume, type of centrifuge, operating parameters of the centrifuge, etc.
- the centrifuging of the aqueous phase may occur for a period of about 10 seconds to about 500 seconds, about 10 seconds to about 400 seconds, about 10 seconds to about 300 seconds, about 10 seconds to about 200 seconds, 10 about 10 seconds to about 120 seconds, about 20 seconds to about 100 seconds, or about 30 seconds to about 60 seconds.
- phase disengagement agents and crud reducing agents may include any compound that is effective to achieve the limitations described herein.
- the phase disengagement agent or the crud reducing agent includes a surface active agent (e.g., a surfactant).
- the surface active agent may include an anionic surface active agent, a non-ionic surface active agent, a cationic surface active agent, or a combination thereof.
- the phase disengagement agent or the crud reducing agent comprises one or more non-ionic surface active agents.
- the phase disengagement agent or the crud reducing agent consists of or consists essentially of one or more non-ionic surface active agents, where “consisting essentially of’ means no other surface active agents are present that affect phase disengagement time or silica removal.
- the phase disengagement agent and the crud reducing agent are the same, and in some embodiments the phase disengagement agent and the crud reducing agent are different.
- the surface active agent has a hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) that is equal to or greater than 10. In some embodiments, the surface active agent has a HLB of about 10 to about 18, about 12 to about 18, about 12 to about 17, about 13 to about 16, or about 14.5 to about 15.5.
- HLB hydrophilic-lipophilic balance
- the surface active agent has a weight average molecular weight (M w ) of about 0.2 kDa to about 100 kDa, about 0.5 kDa to about 100 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 80 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 60 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 40 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 20 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 10 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 5 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 2 kDa, about 1 kDa to about 2 kDa, about 1 kDa to about 1.5 kDa, or about 1.2 kDa to about 1.4 kDa.
- M w weight average molecular weight
- the surface active agent includes a polysorbate, a polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, a polyethylene glycol sorbitan monolaurate, a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer, or a combination thereof.
- the non-ionic surface active agent has a structure according to the following formula: wherein x is 2 to 150, and y is 5 to 100.
- x is 70 to 90 and y is 20 to 40; x is 125 to 145 and y is 40 to 60; x is 85 to 105 and y is 50 to 70; x is 5 to 15 and y is 15 to 25; x is 10 to 20 and y is 20 to 40; x is 20 to 30 and y is 35 to 45; x is 30 to 40 and y is 45 to 55; x is 2 to 5 and y is 25 to 35; x is 15 to 25 and y is 50 to 70; x is 2 to 10 and y is 50 to 70; or wherein x and y are selected from the following table:
- phase disengagement agent and/or the crud reducing agent does not include a thiocarbonyl functional group
- aqueous phase does not include a compound comprising a thiocarbonyl functional group
- the phase disengagement agent and/or the crud reducing agent does not include a thiocarbonyl functional group
- the aqueous phase does not include a compound comprising a thiocarbonyl functional group
- the aqueous phases provided herein include water. In some embodiments, the aqueous phases provided herein include water and a material to be extracted. In some embodiments, the aqueous phases provided herein include water, a material to be extracted, and silica.
- the aqueous phase may include one or more suspended solids; therefore, in some instances, the aqueous phase may be referred to as a “slurry”.
- a slurry As a result, limitations such as “providing an aqueous phase” and “contacting the aqueous phase and a crud reducing agent” read on providing a slurry and contacting the slurry and a crud reducing agent.
- An aqueous phase also may include an acid, such as sulfuric acid.
- the water of the aqueous phases provided herein may include deionized water.
- the water may be present in the aqueous phases at any effective amount.
- water is present in an aqueous phase at a concentration and/or amount that is greater than the concentration and/or amount of each of the other components that may be present in the aqueous phase.
- the water is present in an aqueous phase at an amount of about 40 % to about 99.999 %, about 50 % to about 99.999 %, about 60 % to about 99.999 %, about 75 % to about 99.999 %, about 80 % to about 99.999 %, about 85 % to about 99.999 %, about 90 % to about 99.999 %, about 95 % to about 99.999 %, about 98 % to about 99.999 %, or about 99 % to about 99.999 %, by weight.
- Silica may be present at any amount.
- silica is present in the aqueous phase (e.g., prior to contacting an aqueous phase and a crud reducing agent) at an amount of about 0.5 g/L to about 3 g/L, about 0.5 g/L to about 2 g/L, or about 0.5 g/L to about 1.5 g/L.
- the silica may present, at least initially (e.g., prior to contact an aqueous phase and a crud reducing agent), in the aqueous phase in the form of particles having a first average particle size, as measured by dynamic light scattering.
- An aqueous phase may have an acidic pH.
- the aqueous phase has a pH that is less than or equal to 3, less than or equal to 2.5, or about 2.
- a pH of an aqueous phase may be modified, such as by reducing the pH.
- the “material to be extracted” may include an element and/or compound that is extractable with the methods provided herein.
- the material to be extracted includes one or more metals.
- the one or more metals may include one or more rare earth metals, one or more precious metals, or a combination thereof.
- the one or more metals may include copper, iron, uranium, nickel, cobalt, vanadium, molybdenum, germanium, palladium, or a combination thereof.
- the metal is copper.
- the one or more metals may be present in the form of one or more metal-containing compounds, such as one or more metal oxides, one or more metal sulfides, one or more metal salts, such as CuSCh, FeSO4, or a combination thereof.
- Each material to be extracted such as each of the one or more metals (for example, copper), may be present in the aqueous phase (before the aqueous phase and an organic phase are contacted) at an amount of about 1 g/L to about 20 g/L, about 1 g/L to about 15 g/L, about 1 g/L to about 10 g/L, about 2 g/L to about 8 g/L, or about 3 g/L to about 6 g/L- Organic Phase
- the organic phases provided herein include an organic liquid. In some embodiments, the organic phases provided herein include an organic liquid and an extraction reagent. Typically, an organic liquid is present in an organic phase at a concentration and/or amount that is greater than the concentration and/or amount of each of the other components that may be present in the organic phase.
- organic liquid refers to a compound that (i) is in the liquid phase at 20 °C and 1 atmosphere, (ii) has no or limited (i.e., ⁇ 10 mg/L) solubility in water, and (iii) has a chemical formula featuring carbon and hydrogen, wherein carbon and hydrogen, in total, constitute at least 70 %, at least 80 %, at least 90 %, at least 95 %, or 100 % of the molecular weight of the compound.
- Non-limiting examples of organic liquids include alkanes, alkenes, and alkynes, each of which may be linear, branched, cyclic (e.g., aromatic), or a combination thereof.
- the organic liquid includes an oil, such as kerosene, diesel, or other fuel oil.
- the organic liquid is present in the organic phase at an amount of about 75 % to about 100 %, about 75 % to about 98 %, about 80 % to about 95 %, or about 85 % to about 95 %, by volume.
- any extraction reagent known in the art may be included in an organic phase, including those that are commercially available.
- the extraction reagent includes an aromatic moiety.
- the extraction reagent includes an aromatic substituted oxime.
- An extraction reagent may be present at any effective amount.
- the extraction reagent is present in the organic phase at an amount of about 2 % to about 30 %, about 2 % to about 25 %, about 2 % to about 20 %, about 5 % to about 20 %, or about 5 % to about 15 %, by volume.
- Embodiment 1 method of solvent extraction, the method comprising:
- (C) providing an aqueous phase comprising water, a material to be extracted, and silica; contacting the aqueous phase and an organic phase, wherein the organic phase comprises an organic liquid and optionally an extraction reagent; contacting the aqueous phase and a phase disengagement agent (i) before the contacting of the aqueous phase and the organic phase, or (ii) after the contacting of the aqueous phase and the organic phase; and separating the aqueous phase and the organic phase; or
- active technique such as centrifugation
- Embodiment 2 The method of Embodiment 1, wherein the separating of the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) and the organic phase is completed at a phase disengagement time that is at least 2 %, at least 3 %, at least 4 %, at least 5 %, at least 10 %, at least 15 %, at least 20 %, at least 25 %, at least 30 %, at least 35 %, at least 40 %, at least 45 %, at least 50 %, at least 60 %, at least 70 %, at least 80 %, at least 90 %, about 2 % to about 90 %, about 2 % to about 80 %, about 2 % to about 70 %, about 2 % to about 60 %, about 2 % to about 50 %, about 2 % to about 45 %, about 2 % to about 40 %, about 2 % to about 35 %, about 2 % to about 30 %, about 2 % to about 25 %, about 2
- Embodiment 4 The method of Embodiment 3, wherein the mixing occurs for a mixing time, which may be a predetermined mixing time, and the contacting of the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) and the phase disengagement agent occurs before the mixing time commences, or after at least 25 %, at least 50 %, at least 60 %, at least 70 %, at least 80 %, or at least 90 %, or after 100 % of the mixing time has transpired.
- a mixing time which may be a predetermined mixing time
- the contacting of the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) and the phase disengagement agent occurs before the mixing time commences, or after at least 25 %, at least 50 %, at least 60 %, at least 70 %, at least 80 %, or at least 90 %, or after 100 % of the mixing time has transpired.
- Embodiment 5 The method of any of Embodiments 1 to 3, further comprising subjecting the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) to leaching prior to the contacting of the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) and the organic phase, wherein the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) and the phase disengagement agent are contacted after the leaching and before the contacting of the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) and the organic phase.
- Embodiment 6 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the phase disengagement agent comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of a surface active agent.
- Embodiment 7 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein (i) the phase disengagement agent does not include a thiocarbonyl functional group, (ii) the aqueous phase does not include a compound comprising a thiocarbonyl functional group, or (iii) the phase disengagement agent does not include a thiocarbonyl functional group, and the aqueous phase does not include a compound comprising a thiocarbonyl functional group.
- Embodiment 8 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the phase disengagement agent is present at an amount, relative to the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase), of about 5 ppm to about 1,000 ppm, 100 ppm to about 1,000 ppm, about 100 ppm to about 700 ppm, about 100 ppm to about 600 ppm, about 200 ppm to about 600 ppm, about 300 ppm to about 600 ppm, about 100 ppm to about 500 ppm, about 100 ppm to about 400 ppm, or about 100 ppm to about 300 ppm.
- Embodiment 9 A method of solvent extraction, the method comprising providing an aqueous phase comprising water, a material to be extracted, and a first amount of silica; contacting the aqueous phase and a crud reducing agent; and removing at least a portion of the first amount of silica from the aqueous phase to form a treated aqueous phase comprising a second amount of silica, wherein the removing of at least a portion of the first amount of silica from the aqueous phase comprises an active technique, such as centrifugation, a passive technique, or a combination thereof.
- an active technique such as centrifugation, a passive technique, or a combination thereof.
- Embodiment 10 The method of Embodiment 1 or 9, wherein the second amount of silica is at least 2 %, at least 5 %, at least 10 %, at least 15 %, at least 20 %, at least 25 %, at least 30 %, at least 35 %, at least 40 %, at least 45 %, at least 50 %, at least 60 %, at least 70 %, at least 80 %, at least 85 %, at least 90 %, at least 95 %, or at least 99 % less than the first amount of silica.
- Embodiment 11 The method of Embodiment of 1, 9 or 10, further comprising contacting the treated aqueous phase and an organic phase, wherein the organic phase comprises an organic liquid and optionally an extraction reagent; and separating the treated aqueous phase and the organic phase.
- Embodiment 12 The method of Embodiment 11, wherein the contacting of the treated aqueous phase and the organic phase comprises mixing the treated aqueous phase and organic phase.
- Embodiment 13 The method of any one of Embodiments 1 or 9 to 12, wherein the removing of the at least a portion of the first amount of silica from the aqueous phase comprises centrifuging and decanting the aqueous phase.
- Embodiment 14 The method of any one of Embodiments 1 or 9 to 13, wherein the crud reducing agent comprises, consists of, or consists essentially of a surface active agent.
- Embodiment 15 The method of any one of Embodiments 1 or 9 to 14, wherein (i) the crud reducing agent does not include a thiocarbonyl functional group, (ii) the aqueous phase does not include a compound comprising a thiocarbonyl functional group, or (iii) the crud reducing agent does not include a thiocarbonyl functional group, and the aqueous phase does not include a compound comprising a thiocarbonyl functional group.
- Embodiment 16 The method of any one of Embodiments! or 9 to 15, wherein after the contacting of the aqueous phase and the crud reducing agent, the crud reducing agent is present in the aqueous phase at an amount (i) that is less than or equivalent to the critical micelle concentration (CMC) of a crud reducing agent, or (ii) of about 0.1 ppm to about 200 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 180 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 160 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 140 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 120 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 100 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 80 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 60 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 40 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 20 ppm, about 0.1 ppm to about 12 ppm, about 1 ppm to about 10 ppm, about 2 ppm to
- Embodiment 17 The method of any one of Embodiments 1 or 9 to 16, wherein the centrifuging of the aqueous phase comprises subjecting the aqueous phase to a gravitational force equivalent (g-force) up to 20,000, up to 15,000, or up to 10,000; for example, about 10 to about 8,000, about 100 to about 8,000, about 1,000 to about 8,000, about 2,000 to about 5,000, or about 3,000 to about 4,500.
- g-force gravitational force equivalent
- Embodiment 18 The method of any one of Embodiments 1 or 9 to 17, wherein the centrifuging of the aqueous phase occurs for an effective period, which may depend on one or more factors, such as incoming volume, type of centrifuge, operating parameters of the centrifuge, etc.
- Embodiment 19 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the water is present in the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) at a concentration and/or amount that is greater than the concentration and/or amount of each of the other components that may be present in the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase).
- Embodiment 20 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the water is present in the aqueous phase at an amount of about 40 % to about 99.999 %, about 50 % to about
- Embodiment 21 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) has a pH that is less than or equal to 3, less than or equal to 2.5, or about 2.
- Embodiment 22 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the material to be extracted comprises one or more metals.
- Embodiment 23 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the one or more metals comprise (i) one or more rare earth metals, one or more precious metals, or a combination thereof; (ii) copper, iron, uranium, nickel, cobalt, vanadium, molybdenum, germanium, palladium, or a combination thereof; or (iii) copper.
- the one or more metals comprise (i) one or more rare earth metals, one or more precious metals, or a combination thereof; (ii) copper, iron, uranium, nickel, cobalt, vanadium, molybdenum, germanium, palladium, or a combination thereof; or (iii) copper.
- Embodiment 24 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the one or more metals are present in the form of one or more metal-containing compounds, such as one or more metal oxides, one or more metal sulfides, one or more metal salts, such as CuSO4, FeSCh, or a combination thereof.
- one or more metal-containing compounds such as one or more metal oxides, one or more metal sulfides, one or more metal salts, such as CuSO4, FeSCh, or a combination thereof.
- Embodiment 25 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein each of the one or more metals is present in the aqueous phase (before the aqueous phase (or treated aqueous phase) and an organic phase are contacted) at an amount of about 1 g/L to about 20 g/L, about 1 g/L to about 15 g/L, about 1 g/L to about 10 g/L, about 2 g/L to about 8 g/L, or about 3 g/L to about 6 g/L.
- Embodiment 26 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein (i) the silica is present in the aqueous phase at an amount of about 0.5 g/L to about 3 g/L, about 0.5 g/L to about 2 g/L, or about 0.5 g/L to about 1.5 g/L, or (ii) the first amount of silica in the aqueous phase is about 0.5 g/L to about 3 g/L, about 0.5 g/L to about 2 g/L, about 0.5 g/L to about 1.5 g/L-
- Embodiment 27 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein (i) the silica is present in the aqueous phase in the form of particles, or (ii) the first amount of silica is present in the aqueous phase in the form of particles having a first average particle size, as measured by dynamic light scattering.
- Embodiment 28 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein, after the contacting of the aqueous phase and the crud reducing agent (e. ., at least 5 seconds, at least 10 seconds, or at least 20 seconds after the contacting of the aqueous phase and the crud reducing agent), the first amount of silica is present in the aqueous phase in the form of particles having a second average particle size, as measured by dynamic light scattering, wherein the second average particle size is at least 2 times, at least 3 times, at least 4 times, at least 5 times, or at least 10 times greater than the first average particle size of Embodiment 27.
- the second average particle size is at least 2 times, at least 3 times, at least 4 times, at least 5 times, or at least 10 times greater than the first average particle size of Embodiment 27.
- Embodiment 29 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the surface active agent is a non-ionic surface active agent.
- Embodiment 30 The method of Embodiment 29, wherein the non-ionic surface active agent comprises a polysorbate, a polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, or a combination thereof.
- Embodiment 31 The method of Embodiment 29, wherein the non-ionic surface active agent comprises polyethylene glycol sorbitan monolaurate.
- Embodiment 32 The method of Embodiment 29, wherein the non-ionic surface active agent comprises a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer.
- Embodiment 33 The method of Embodiment 29, wherein the non-ionic surface active agent has a structure according to the following formula: wherein x is 2 to 150, and y is 5 to 100.
- Embodiment 34 The method of Embodiment 33, wherein x and y are selected from the following table:
- Embodiment 35 The method of any one of Embodiments 29 to 34, wherein the non- ionic surface active agent has an HLB that is equal to or greater than 10; for example, about 10 to about 18, about 12 to about 18, about 12 to about 17, about 13 to about 16, or about 14.5 to about 15.5.
- Embodiment 36 The method of any one of Embodiments 29 to 34, wherein the non- ionic surface active agent has an HLB that is equal to or greater than 10; for example, about 10 to about 18, about 12 to about 18, about 12 to about 17, about 13 to about 16, or about 14.5 to about 15.5.
- the nonionic surface active agent has a weight average molecular weight (M w ) of about 0.2 kDa to about 100 kDa, about 0.5 kDa to about 100 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 80 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 60 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 40 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 20 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 10 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 5 kDa, about 0.2 kDa to about 2 kDa, about 1 kDa to about 2 kDa, about 1 kDa to about 1.5 kDa, or about 1.2 kDa to about 1.4 kDa.
- M w weight average molecular weight
- Embodiment 37 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the organic liquid is present in the organic phase at an amount of about 75 % to about 100 %, about 75 % to about 98 %, about 80 % to about 95 %, or about 85 % to about 95 %, by volume.
- Embodiment 38 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the extraction reagent is present in the organic phase at an amount of about 2 % to about 30 %, about 2 % to about 25 %, about 2 % to about 20 %, about 5 % to about 20 %, or about 5 % to about 15 %, by volume.
- Embodiment 39 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the organic liquid comprises an alkane, an alkene, an alkyne, or combination thereof, each of which may be linear, branched, cyclic, or a combination thereof.
- Embodiment 40 The method of any of the preceding embodiments, wherein the organic liquid includes an oil, such as kerosene, diesel, or other fuel oil.
- an oil such as kerosene, diesel, or other fuel oil.
- the present disclosure may address one or more of the problems and deficiencies of known methods and processes. However, it is contemplated that various embodiments may prove useful in addressing other problems and deficiencies in a number of technical areas. Therefore, the present disclosure should not necessarily be construed as limited to addressing any of the particular problems or deficiencies discussed herein.
- the terms “includes,” “is,” “containing,” “having,” and “comprises” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to.”
- the methods can also “consist essentially of’ or “consist of’ the various steps or components, unless stated otherwise.
- a is intended to include plural alternatives, e.g., at least one.
- a surface active agent is meant to encompass one, or mixtures or combinations of more than one surface active agent, organic liquid, and the like, unless otherwise specified.
- This range should be interpreted as encompassing about 5 % and about 15 %, and further encompasses “about” each of 6 %, 7 %, 8 %, 9 %, 10 %, 11 %, 12 %, 13 %, and 14 %, including any ranges and sub-ranges between any of these values.
- the term “about” means plus or minus 10 % of the numerical value of the number with which it is being used.
- the organic phases were prepared using the following procedure. By considering the densities of kerosene (0.8 g mL' 1 ) and of the extraction reagent (0.95 g mL' 1 ), 288 g of kerosene and 38 g of extraction reagent were mixed to reach a final ratio of 10 v/v%.
- the extraction reagent may include a commercially-available extraction reagent. Although kerosene is present in the organic phase of this example, other organic liquids may be used, such as diesel oil, fuel oil, etc.
- aqueous phases used in this example and those that follow were prepared following the following procedure.
- a stock aqueous phase was prepared by diluting 9.52 g CuSO4 * 5 H2O and 6.03 g FeSO4 * 7 H2O in aqueous H2SO4 to a final volume of 400 mL and pH 2.
- These CuSO4 and FeSCU quantities were calculated so that the final concentration of Cu and Fe ions in suspension would respectively be 6 and 3 g L 1 .
- the pH after dissolving the salts was greater than 2, so the pH was adjusted to 2 by using IM H2SO4.
- the final volume was reached by adding aqueous H2SO4 at pH 2.
- the colloidal silica used in this example was a commercially available product, and had a diameter of about 44 nm, as measured by dynamic light scattering.
- Stock surface active agent preparation Concentrated stock solutions (e.g. 10 to 20 wt.%) of surface active agent were prepared to facilitate their addition in small quantities to the aqueous phase. At such small quantities, the increase in the aqueous volume was negligible (i.e. less than 0.25 % increase) and not expected to affect the phase disengagement time in the following examples.
- Example 1 The aqueous and organic phases of Example 1 were mixed in this example.
- the mixing ratio of this example was as follows:
- step (1) the aqueous phase (8 mL) was added to a 20 mL glass vial, (2)(a) the silica (16 pL (50 %), to reach a final concentration of 1,000 ppm in the aqueous phase) and the (2)(b) surface active agent were dispersed in the aqueous phase, (3) the organic phase (8 mL) was slowly added to the aqueous phase, (4) the aqueous and organic phases were mixed with an overhead mixer at 1700 rpm for 3 minutes, and (5) the time for full phase separation was measured.
- surface active agent addition was also tested immediately after step (4).
- a number of surface active agents were tested, including the following non-ionic surface active agents: polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate; polyethylene glycol sorbitan monolaurate; and a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer. Also tested were the following anionic surface active agents: sodium dodecyl sulfate, and lignosulfonate.
- demulsification time may be evaluated based on the time needed for an arbitrary volume of one of the phases to separate from the emulsion. For example, it is often assumed as the time needed for half of the water phase to separate from the emulsion (see, e.g., Delgado-Linares, J. G. et al. (2016). Breaking of water-in-crude oil emulsions. 6. Estimating the demulsifier performance at optimum formulation from both the required dose and the attained instability. Energy & Fuels, 30(7), 5483-5491).
- phase disengagement conditions were used, each having advantages and disadvantages, but yielding similar results.
- the criteria were selected based on the literature: (i) the time needed to reach the impeller height (i.e., similar to Delgado-Linares, J.G. et al., ca. 50 % total water volume), (ii) the time needed to reach the original interface height (some bubbles were expected to still be present), and (iii) the time needed to achieve complete phase separation (with no bubbles visible)(see, e.g., Seo, S. et al. (2021). Characterisation of Parameters Influencing the Phase Separation in Copper Solvent Extraction Systems Using Oxime-Type Extractants for the Field Operation. Metals, 11(11), 1785).
- a control test was conducted in which no surface active agent was added to the aqueous phase. Tests were then conducted with aqueous phases containing polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate at concentrations of 125 ppm, 175 ppm, 200 ppm, 250 ppm, 275 ppm, 300 ppm, and 500 ppm. The results achieved at these concentrations of polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate are depicted at FIG. 1.
- the dashed line of FIG. 1 represents the control condition (i.e., the time needed for the 0 ppm surface active agent condition to reach the original interface height).
- phase disengagement time depicts the phase disengagement time versus polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate concentration, and demonstrate that when the concentration of polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate was less than about 300 ppm, the phase disengagement time was significantly lower than that of the control condition (i.e., 0 ppm polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate).
- concentrations greater than about 270 ppm the formation of a solids stabilized emulsion, known as crud, at the aqueous/organic interface was observed, and this layer prevented full phase separation. At concentrations of about 250 ppm or less, no crud was observed.
- FIG. 2 The dashed line of FIG. 2 represents the control condition (i.e., the time needed for the 0 ppm surface active agent condition to reach the original interface height).
- the plots of FIG. 2 indicate that polyethylene glycol sorbitan monolaurate performed similarly to the foregoing surface active agent (see FIG. 1).
- FIG. 3 depicts the performance of polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate agent at concentrations of 187 ppm and 250 ppm.
- Tests also were conducted with aqueous phases containing a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer at the concentrations depicted at FIG. 4.
- the data of FIG. 4 indicate that the polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer was effective in the tests at concentrations of about 100 ppm to at least about 620 ppm. It was believed that the polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer may facilitate operation upon varying conditions (e.g., temperature, pH, silica concentration, etc.).
- Tests also were conducted with sodium dodecyl sulfonate at the concentrations depicted at FIG. 6.
- the tests with sodium dodecyl sulfonate were initially conducted with a magnetic stirrer.
- the results of this example indicated that the tested non-ionic surface active agents — i.e., polyethylene glycol sorbitan monolaurate, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate, and a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer — effectively reduced the phase disengagement time.
- polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate and the polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer were more effective than polyethylene glycol sorbitan monolaurate at reducing phase disengagement time.
- the polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer was effective at a wider concentration range than the other surface active agents, but polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate generated a faster phase disengagement.
- a test was conducted on an aqueous phase that included 1,000 ppm of colloidal silica, and was like that of Example 1.
- the particle size of the aqueous phase of this example was measured at various points during 350 seconds after the addition of 5 ppm the polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer. The results of this test were plotted, and are depicted at FIG. 7.
- the particle size was measured using dynamic light scattering. At time 0 seconds, 5 ppm of a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer was added to the aqueous phase, and aggregates larger than 1 pm started forming immediately. Typically, sedimentation starts as soon as aggregates reach about 1 pm.
- the colloidal silica concentration was measured using dynamic light scattering.
- the count rate measured in kilo counts per second (kcps) was translated to colloidal silica concentration by making a calibration curve using known amounts of colloidal silica and measuring the count rate.
- Silica removal efficiency was measured using a dynamic light scattering device. The following parameters were used: measurement angle of 90°, temperature of 25 °C, run duration of 10 s, and one measurement was performed per sample given the good stability of the small silica particles. The attenuation was set to 11 (i.e., no attenuation).
- colloidal silica was first dispersed at varying concentrations, from 0 to 1000 ppm, in deionized water. As the mean count rate was proportional to the intensity of the scattered light, which in turn was proportional to particle size and concentration, the particle size at different concentrations was first measured in order to validate the method.
- FIG. 8 shows that the particle size did not change with concentration, also for standard aqueous samples after phase disengagement, indicating no aggregation at any concentration.
- FIG. 8 depicts colloidal silica particle size (intensity based, zetaaverage) as a function of colloidal silica concentration. Measurements were performed in deionized water (control) and after mixing and phase disengagement. All samples had a poly dispersity index (PDI) around or below ca. 0.2. Then, the calibration curve was obtained by correlating the mean count rate to the known colloidal silica concentrations of the control suspensions (FIG. 9).
- PDI poly dispersity index
- the observed trend was used to calculate the colloidal silica concentration of the suspensions after the addition of surface active agent and phase disengagement.
- the minimum control concentration tested was 44 ppm.
- the manufacturer of the devices specified that, at best, the device may detect concentrations as low as 0.1 ppm
- Centrifugation was used in some tests to aid silica removal from the aqueous phases, which occurred before the aqueous phases were contacted with an organic phase.
- the following parameters were applied: To aqueous phases containing 1,000 ppm silica, the following amounts of the polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer were added, and then the samples were subjected to centrifugation.
- phase disengagement time generally increases with increasing silica content, but complete phase disengagement time was faster when a surface active agent, such as a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer, was used in combination with silica concentrations greater than 400 ppm.
- a surface active agent such as a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer
- silica concentrations greater than 400 ppm This conclusion is demonstrated by the results of FIG. 10.
- Each aqueous phase tested had a concentration of a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer of 250 ppm.
- the control sample did not include a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer. At greater silica concentrations, longer phase disengagement times were observed when no additive was used, but the opposite was observed when a polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer was used.
- the data of FIG. 11 were collected with aqueous phases originally containing 1,000 ppm silica, and subjected to the following centrifugation conditions: 7,000 G force, 30 seconds.
- a test also was conducted to determine whether relatively high surface active agent doses may reduce copper extraction efficiency. As depicted at FIG. 12, this particular test indicated that, at least in some instances, increased surface active agent doses can lower extraction efficiency.
- the data of FIG. 12 were collected from aqueous phases originally containing 1,000 ppm silica, and subjected to the following centrifugation conditions: 7,000 G force for 30 seconds.
- FIG. 15 depicts copper extraction efficiency versus nonionic surface active agent type and concentration, as measured by UV-Vis.
- the effect of low additive concentration on the phase disengagement times (after centrifugation) are depicted at FIG. 16 (for the polyethylene glycol polypropylene glycol block copolymer) and FIG. 17 (for polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate).
- the initial colloidal silica concentration was 1,000 ppm, and for both surface active agents, a concentration of about 10 ppm was sufficient to reduce the phase disengagement time to levels similar to that of 0 ppm silica.
- the extraction efficiency measurements were conducted as follows: a stock solution containing 6 g/L of Cu 2+ and 3 g/L of Fe 2+ was measured using UV-Vis. The stock was diluted and re-measured several times, as depicted at FIG. 18. In view of the known concentration after the dilution, the absorbance values at a given wavelength were used according to the Beer- Lambert Law, and this was used to estimate the concentration of the aqueous phase after phase disengagement (see FIG. 19).
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Extraction Or Liquid Replacement (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US19/100,321 US20260042035A1 (en) | 2022-08-02 | 2023-07-18 | Methods of Solvent Extraction Having Reduced Crud or Improved Phase Disengagement Times |
| PE2025000294A PE20250793A1 (en) | 2022-08-02 | 2023-07-18 | Solvent extraction methods that have reduced impurity or improved phase separation times |
| MX2025001299A MX2025001299A (en) | 2022-08-02 | 2025-01-30 | Methods of solvent extraction having reduced crud or improved phase disengagement times |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US202263394491P | 2022-08-02 | 2022-08-02 | |
| US63/394,491 | 2022-08-02 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2024030253A1 true WO2024030253A1 (en) | 2024-02-08 |
Family
ID=87569888
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2023/028055 Ceased WO2024030253A1 (en) | 2022-08-02 | 2023-07-18 | Methods of solvent extraction having reduced crud or improved phase disengagement times |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20260042035A1 (en) |
| CL (1) | CL2025000317A1 (en) |
| MX (1) | MX2025001299A (en) |
| PE (1) | PE20250793A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2024030253A1 (en) |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5043070A (en) * | 1989-11-13 | 1991-08-27 | Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University | Magnetic solvent extraction |
| CN107245586A (en) * | 2017-06-22 | 2017-10-13 | 开封大学 | Extraction vanadium extraction technology |
| CN113501549A (en) * | 2021-07-09 | 2021-10-15 | 福建富仕新材料有限责任公司 | Extraction method of ferric trichloride |
-
2023
- 2023-07-18 WO PCT/US2023/028055 patent/WO2024030253A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2023-07-18 PE PE2025000294A patent/PE20250793A1/en unknown
- 2023-07-18 US US19/100,321 patent/US20260042035A1/en active Pending
-
2025
- 2025-01-30 MX MX2025001299A patent/MX2025001299A/en unknown
- 2025-01-31 CL CL2025000317A patent/CL2025000317A1/en unknown
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5043070A (en) * | 1989-11-13 | 1991-08-27 | Board Of Control Of Michigan Technological University | Magnetic solvent extraction |
| CN107245586A (en) * | 2017-06-22 | 2017-10-13 | 开封大学 | Extraction vanadium extraction technology |
| CN113501549A (en) * | 2021-07-09 | 2021-10-15 | 福建富仕新材料有限责任公司 | Extraction method of ferric trichloride |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| DELGADO-LINARESJ. G. ET AL.: "Breaking of water-in-crude oil emulsions. 6. Estimating the demulsifier performance at optimum formulation from both the required dose and the attained instability.", ENERGY & FUELS, vol. 30, no. 7, 2016, pages 5483 - 5491 |
| SEO, S. ET AL.: "Characterisation of Parameters Influencing the Phase Separation in Copper Solvent Extraction Systems Using Oxime-Type Extractants for the Field Operation.", METALS, vol. 11, no. 11, 2021, pages 1785 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CL2025000317A1 (en) | 2025-07-04 |
| MX2025001299A (en) | 2025-03-07 |
| PE20250793A1 (en) | 2025-03-14 |
| US20260042035A1 (en) | 2026-02-12 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Mohamed et al. | Reversibility and inhibition of asphaltene precipitation in Brazilian crude oils | |
| Huang et al. | Efficient and sustainable regeneration of bifunctional ionic liquid for rare earth separation | |
| EP3033611B1 (en) | Method of tracing chemical quantities using encapsulated fluorescent dyes | |
| Bingjia et al. | Cloud point extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous solution with silicone surfactants | |
| US9474990B2 (en) | Processes for recovering organic solvent extractant from solid-stabilized emulsions formed in hydrometallurgical solvent extraction circuits | |
| CN106467754B (en) | The method of metal is removed from hydrocarbon ils | |
| US20260042035A1 (en) | Methods of Solvent Extraction Having Reduced Crud or Improved Phase Disengagement Times | |
| Salman et al. | Removal of-copper ions-from aqueous solution using liquid-surfactant-membrane technique | |
| Qi et al. | Efficient recovery of phenol from phenolic wastewater by emulsion liquid membrane | |
| CN109867341A (en) | Flocculant is used in a kind of processing of petrochemical wastewater | |
| Xin et al. | Amphiphilic modification of oleic imidazoline for corrosion inhibition and demulsification performances investigation | |
| Tutkun et al. | Extraction of germanium from acidic leach solutions by liquid membrane technique | |
| AU2019298222A1 (en) | Hydrometallurgical solvent extraction methods | |
| Bahrami et al. | Response surface methodology optimization of supramolecular dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction‐solidified floating organic drop of brilliant green and its spectrophotometric determination | |
| US11648512B2 (en) | Enhanced emulsion liquid membranes for extraction of pollutants from water | |
| WO2025171000A1 (en) | Methods of solvent extraction having reduced crud or improved phase disengagement times | |
| Abbasi et al. | HCl-induced emulsion and sludge formation affected by asphaltene type | |
| Hussein et al. | Optimising the chemical demulsification of water-in-crude oil emulsion using the Taguchi method | |
| Al-Khateeb et al. | Phenol extraction from wastewater using emulsion liquid membrane: extraction, stripping and breakage studies | |
| Rivera‐Contreras et al. | Proposal of the possible surfactant role in the mass transfer process of naproxen recovered from aqueous solutions using emulsion liquid membranes | |
| Huang et al. | Phase separation in solvent extraction of cobalt from acidic sulfate solution using synergistic mixture containing dinonylnaphthalene sulfonic acid and 2-ethylhexyl 4-pyridinecarboxylate ester | |
| WO2025170997A1 (en) | Methods of reducing or removing solids from liquids | |
| CN116144394A (en) | Inferior crude oil demulsifier and preparation method thereof | |
| Sun et al. | The Promotion Effect of Ionic Liquids on Polymer-Driven Recovered Water by Microwave Treatment | |
| CN114935551A (en) | Method for testing copper ion content in copper wire drawing liquid |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 23754036 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: MX/A/2025/001299 Country of ref document: MX |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: MX/A/2025/001299 Country of ref document: MX |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 23754036 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |











