WO2024030133A1 - System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable media for performing end-to-end application onboarding - Google Patents
System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable media for performing end-to-end application onboarding Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2024030133A1 WO2024030133A1 PCT/US2022/039513 US2022039513W WO2024030133A1 WO 2024030133 A1 WO2024030133 A1 WO 2024030133A1 US 2022039513 W US2022039513 W US 2022039513W WO 2024030133 A1 WO2024030133 A1 WO 2024030133A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- application bundle
- testing
- production
- application
- bundle
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/60—Software deployment
- G06F8/61—Installation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Prevention of errors by analysis, debugging or testing of software
- G06F11/3604—Analysis of software for verifying properties of programs
- G06F11/3608—Analysis of software for verifying properties of programs using formal methods, e.g. model checking, abstract interpretation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Prevention of errors by analysis, debugging or testing of software
- G06F11/3698—Environments for analysis, debugging or testing of software
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/44—Arrangements for executing specific programs
- G06F9/455—Emulation; Interpretation; Software simulation, e.g. virtualisation or emulation of application or operating system execution engines
Definitions
- This description relates to a system, method, and non-transitory computer-readable media performing end-to-end application onboarding, method of using the same.
- Newly developed software or applications go through an onboarding process that includes at least one of quality testing, verification, and certification.
- the onboarding process improves the software adoption process.
- the onboarding process used to deliver and integrate applications is a difficult and time consuming process.
- the onboarding process involves many issues. Coordination among parties involved in the onboarding process decreases the efficiency and consumes more amount of time. Understanding infrastructure and a lack of automated deployments causes delays to market. With manual integration, communication, and integration with multiple teams, such as Cloud, Network, Security, and Infrastructure managers leads to increases cost. A lack of automated testing and security standardization leads to comprised quality.
- a method for providing end-to-end application onboarding includes uploading an application bundle of a vendor to a pre-production system, requesting pre-production testing of the application bundle, in response to the application bundle passing the pre-production testing, receiving an indication of approval of the application bundle, in response to receiving the indication of approval of the application bundle, performing quality assurance testing of the application bundle in at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, in response to the application bundle passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, promoting the application bundle to the production environment, and in response to the application bundle not passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, passing the application bundle to the vendor for editing.
- a device for providing end-to-end application onboarding includes a memory storing computer-readable instructions, and a processor connected to the memory, wherein the processor is configured to execute the computer-readable instructions to upload an application bundle of a vendor to a pre-production system, request pre-production testing of the application bundle, in response to the application bundle passing the pre- production testing, receive an indication of approval of the application bundle, in response to receiving the indication of approval of the application bundle, perform quality assurance testing of the application bundle in at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, in response to the application bundle passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, promote the application bundle to the production environment, and in response to the application bundle not passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, pass the application bundle to the vendor for editing.
- a non-transitory computer-readable media having computer- readable instructions stored thereon, which when executed by a processor causes the processor to perform operations including uploading an application bundle of a vendor to a pre-production system, requesting pre-production testing of the application bundle, in response to the application bundle passing the pre-production testing, receiving an indication of approval of the application bundle, in response to receiving the indication of approval of the application bundle, performing quality assurance testing of the application bundle in at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, in response to the application bundle passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre- production test environment isolated from the production environment, promoting the application bundle to the production environment, and in response to the application bundle not passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, passing the application bundle to the vendor for editing.
- FIG. 1 illustrates an end-to-end application onboarding system according to at least one embodiment.
- FIG. 2 is a flow diagram for end-to-end application onboarding according to at least one embodiment.
- Fig. 3 illustrates the Create Bundle/In Design Phase according to at least one embodiment.
- FIG. 4 illustrates the Sandbox Deployment and QA Phase according to at least one embodiment.
- Fig. 5 illustrates the Staging Deployment and QA Phase according to at least one embodiment.
- Fig. 6 illustrates the Production Stage according to at least one embodiment.
- Fig. 7 is a flowchart of a method for providing end-to-end application onboarding according to at least one embodiment.
- FIG. 8 is a high-level functional block diagram of a processor-based system 800 according to at least one embodiment.
- Embodiments described herein describes examples for implementing different features of the provided subject matter. Examples of components, values, operations, materials, arrangements, or the like, are described below to simplify the present disclosure. These are, of course, examples and are not intended to be limiting. Other components, values, operations, materials, arrangements, or the like, are contemplated.
- the formation of a first feature over or on a second feature in the description that follows include embodiments in which the first and second features are formed in direct contact and include embodiments in which additional features are formed between the first and second features, such that the first and second features are unable to make direct contact.
- the present disclosure repeats reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed.
- spatially relative terms such as “beneath,” “below,” “lower,” “above,” “upper” and the like, are used herein for ease of description to describe one element or feature’s relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures.
- the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the FIGS.
- the apparatus is otherwise oriented (rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein likewise are interpreted accordingly.
- Embodiments described herein describes examples for implementing different features of the provided subject matter. Examples of components, values, operations, materials, arrangements, or the like, are described below to simplify the present disclosure. These are, of course, examples and are not intended to be limiting. Other components, values, operations, materials, arrangements, or the like, are contemplated.
- the formation of a first feature over or on a second feature in the description that follows include embodiments in which the first and second features are formed in direct contact and include embodiments in which additional features are formed between the first and second features, such that the first and second features are unable to make direct contact.
- the present disclosure repeats reference numerals and/or letters in the various examples. This repetition is for the purpose of simplicity and clarity and does not in dictate a relationship between the various embodiments and/or configurations discussed.
- spatially relative terms such as “beneath,” “below,” “lower,” “above,” “upper” and the like, are used herein for ease of description to describe one element or feature’s relationship to another element(s) or feature(s) as illustrated in the figures.
- the spatially relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in use or operation in addition to the orientation depicted in the FIGS.
- the apparatus is otherwise oriented (rotated 90 degrees or at other orientations) and the spatially relative descriptors used herein likewise are interpreted accordingly.
- Embodiments described herein provide an integrated process for performing end-to- end application onboarding. Deploying telecom applications and services presents many problems. For example, a failure to understand the infrastructure and a lack of automated deployments causes a delay to market. Manual integration involves communication and integration with multiple teams like Cloud, Network, Security, and Infrastructure, which leads to increases costs. Further, a lack of automated testing and security standardization leads to comprised quality. Embodiments described herein providing an integrated process for performing end-to-end application onboarding enable application vendors to create an application bundle, submit the application bundle for review, and register an approved application bundle on the service catalog.
- Advantages include providing an integrated process integrated process for performing end-to-end application onboarding enable an application vendor to create application bundles and onboard the applications using an end to end flow for the application bundle from application bundle creation to promotion of the application bundle to production through the approval cycles.
- the an integrated process integrated process for performing end-to-end application onboarding takes less time and reduces human errors because the process is automated. Vendors are also able to provide details to downstream systems automatically.
- Fig. 1 illustrates an end-to-end application onboarding system 100 according to at least one embodiment.
- an end-to-end application onboarding system 110 is coupled to one or more Servers 120 through a network 130.
- One or more Servers 120 provide environments for supporting end-to-end application onboarding.
- one or more Servers 120 provide storage devices for storing application bundles of vendors, storage devices for storing non-production artifactories, and non-production systems, such as a service designer, a sandbox testing environment, and a staging testing environment.
- one or more Servers 120 provide other non -production support systems, such as Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems (such as Katana), and Release Manager/Ticketing System (such as QZEN).
- ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
- QZEN Release Manager/Ticketing System
- one or more Servers 120 provide production systems, such as a production artifactory, a production service catalog service, and other productions systems, such as a Marketplace where applications are selected for use by different users. These are discussed in further detail with reference to the following figures.
- End-to-end application onboarding system 110 includes a display 112 that presents a graphical user interface (GUI) 114.
- GUI graphical user interface
- FIG. 2 is a flow diagram for end-to-end application onboarding 200 according to at least one embodiment.
- a Vendor 210 an Application Approver 212, and a Release Manager 214 have access to the end-to-end application onboarding system.
- a Service Designer 220 is provided for
- the onboarding process is divided into a Non-Production (Pre-Production) Stage 230 and a Production Stage 240.
- the Non-Production Stage 230 includes a Non-Production Artifactory 231, an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System 232 (e.g., Katana), a Sandbox Environment 233 (e.g., Symphony Sandbox), a Staging Environment 234 (e.g., Symphony Staging), and a Release Management/Ticketing System 235 (e.g., QZEN).
- the Production Stage 240 includes a Production Artifactory 242, a Production Service Catalog System 244 (e.g., Symphony), and Other Production Systems 246 (e.g., Marketplace).
- the environments in the Non-Production Stage 230 are isolated from the environments in the Production Stage 240.
- the Vendor 210, Application Approver 212, and Release Manager 214 are able to communicate with upstream and downstream systems.
- the end-to-end application onboarding system 200 integrates the steps in the life cycle of an application bundle, such as development, pre-production sandbox testing, staging testing, and production.
- an application bundle is submitted and a determination is made whether to perform sandbox testing and staging testing, or to skip sandbox testing and perform staging testing.
- the Sandbox Deployment and Quality Assurance (AQ) Phase 260 the application is tested in a Sandbox Environment 233 that simulates the production environment.
- the Sandbox Environment and QA Phase 260 isolates untested code from the production environment.
- the Staging Deployment and QA Phase 270 uses a Staging Environment 234 where an application is tested on a near-production level, but in a non-production environment, to verify that the application bundle will behave correctly after deployment.
- the Production Phase 280 is where the application bundle is promoted after approved in the Staging Deployment and QA Phase 270.
- Non-Production Artifactory 231 and Production Artifactory 242 house and manage the artifacts, binaries, packages, files, containers, and components of the application bundle in the Non-Production Stage 230 and in the Production Stage 240, respectively.
- Release management/Ticketing System 235 such as QZEN, is provided where the release of the product goes through a series of checks before it can be promoted to the next phase.
- the Production Service Catalog System 244 is where the application bundle is provided in the Production Stage 240.
- Other Production Systems 246 handle other production calls in the Production Stage, such as calls to promote the application bundle to the Marketplace.
- the end-to-end application onboarding system 200 triggers deployment of the application bundle to the Sandbox Deployment and QA Phase 260 or the Staging Deployment and QA Phase 270. If the Application Approver 212 and the Release Manager 214 are not provided, then the Vendor uses QZEN 235 to trigger deployment of the application bundle. The Vendor 212 communicates with the Sandbox Environment 233 and the Staging Environment 234 to get the infrastructure aligned for the Sandbox Deployment and QA Phase 260 and the Staging Deployment and QA Phase 270.
- the end-to-end application onboarding system 200 provides a continuous delivery and integration framework through the ERP system 232, e.g., Katana.
- the end-to-end application onboarding system 200 passes the application bundle through the ERP system 232 to the Sandbox Deployment and QA Phase 260 and to the Staging Deployment and QA Phase 270.
- Fig. 3 illustrates the Create Bundi e/In Design Phase 300 according to at least one embodiment.
- BPMN Business Process Model and Notation
- DWS Device Repository Web Service
- the onboarding process is divided into a Non-Production (Pre-Production) Stage 330 and a Production Stage 340.
- the Non-Production Stage 330 includes a NonProduction Artifactory 331, an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System 332 (e.g., Katana), a Sandbox Environment 333 (e.g., Symphony Sandbox), a Staging Environment 334 (e.g., Symphony Staging), and a Release Management/Ticketing System 335 (e.g., QZEN).
- the Production Stage 340 includes a Production Artifactory 342, a Production Service Catalog System 344 (e.g., Symphony), and Other Production Systems 346 (e.g., Marketplace).
- the In Design Phase 300 is triggered as soon as an application bundle enters draft status. There are 2 options: 1) a new bundle/version is created or 2) a rejected bundle is edited for the first time. As soon an application bundle is created or uploaded 350, the In Design Phase 300 is triggered and the workflow configuration of the Vendor 310 of the application bundle is fetched from a database. Fig. 3 also shows the Application Approver 312 and the Release Manager 314. The workflow configuration indicates whether the current application bundle is eligible for deployment in the Sandbox Deployment and QA Phase or not.
- the application bundle is submitted 354 via the Service Designer 320, and the application bundle is uploaded 360 to the 360 to the Non-Production Artifactory 331 (e.g., JFROG).
- a request for pre-deployment testing is generated 364 where Non-Production scans are performed. For example, in at least one embodiment SONAR and XRAY are run on the artifacts of the uploaded application bundle.
- the Application Approver 312 or Release Manager 314 access the Service Designer 320 to either approve the application bundle or reject the application bundle. In response to the application bundle being rejected, a notification will be sent to the Vendor 310.
- the Vendor 310 is able to edit the application bundle or create a new application bundle and begin again.
- the application bundle is promoted to the next stage, which is either the Sandbox Deployment and QA Phase or the Staging Deployment and QA Phase.
- the sandbox testing is able to be skipped and the application bundle sent to the Staging Deployment and QA Phase.
- the workflow is able to be flexibly and uniquely configured by a Vendor 310.
- a Vendor 310 may not go through testing via the Release Managem ent/Ticketing System 335 , such as QZEN.
- the ability to configure the flow enables to the Vendor 310 to select configuration without any changes in code.
- Fig. 4 illustrates the Sandbox Deployment and QA Phase 400 according to at least one embodiment.
- the Sandbox Deployment and QA Phase 400 involves the Non-Production Stage 430, which includes a Non-Production Artifactory 431, an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System 432 (e.g., Katana), a Sandbox Environment 433 (e.g., Symphony Sandbox), a Staging Environment 434 (e.g., Symphony Staging), and a Release Management/Ticketing System 435 (e.g., QZEN).
- ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
- a Sandbox Environment 433 e.g., Symphony Sandbox
- Staging Environment 434 e.g., Symphony Staging
- a Release Management/Ticketing System 435 e.g., QZEN
- Fig. 4 also shows the Application Approver 412 and the Release Manager 414.
- the Service Designer 420 sends the Sandbox Environment 433 a request for automated testing 456.
- the application bundle is scanned automatically for AQ testing via input to the ERP System by the Vendor 410 through the Service Designer 420.
- the Vendor sets up a deployment configuration 458 at the Service Designer and deploys the application bundle 460 to the Sandbox Environment 433.
- the Service Designer 420 sends a request for automated tests 462.
- the Vendor performs manual QA testing 464.
- An indication of approval or rejection is provided to the Vendor 410.
- the Vendor updates the workflow at the Service Designer to either reject the application bundle or return the application bundle for editing 470.
- the Vendor 410 is presented with a new “kebab menu” for selecting ‘Self Certification’ in the listing of the application bundles.
- the Vendor 410 provides self-certification and QZEN input 466 to the Service Designer 420, wherein the Application Approver 412 then reviews and promotes the application bundle 468 and the application bundle is copied to the Staging Deployment and QA Phase.
- Fig. 5 illustrates the Staging Deployment and QA Phase 500 according to at least one embodiment.
- the Staging Deployment and QA Phase 500 involves the Non-Production Stage 530, which includes a Non-Production Artifactory 531, an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System 532 (e.g., Katana), a Sandbox Environment 533 (e.g., Symphony Sandbox), a Staging Environment 534 (e.g., Symphony Staging), and a Release Management/Ticketing System 535 (e.g., QZEN).
- ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
- Sandbox Environment 533 e.g., Symphony Sandbox
- Staging Environment 534 e.g., Symphony Staging
- a Release Management/Ticketing System 535 e.g., QZEN
- the Service Designer 520 Upon beginning the Staging Deployment and QA Phase 500, the Service Designer 520 provides values to the Release Management/Ticketing System 535 (e.g., QZEN) along with a release request 540. At the Release Management/Ticketing System 535, one or more internal approval workflows are triggered and multiple approvals are determined 542, e.g., department manager, technical manager, etc. The status of Approval is In Progress.
- the Release Management/Ticketing System 535 e.g., QZEN
- the Release Management/Ticketing System 535 returns an indication of Approval 544 or Re-Planning 546, and the Vendor 510 is notified accordingly via the Service Designer 520.
- the Approval 544 or Re-Planning 546 status is received via API polling.
- the Vendor updates workflow at the Service Designer 520 to either reject the application bundle or return the application bundle 548 to the Vendor 510 to repeat the process to obtain certification.
- a Service Catalog Entry is created 550 for staging at the Service Designer 520 that is sent to the Staging Environment 534.
- Release manager 514 through the Service Designer 520, triggers deployment of the application bundle 552 to the Staging Environment 534 or manually deploys the application bundle 554 to the Staging Environment 534.
- an API from the Release Management/Ticketing System 535 is executed to update the status to deployed and then QA testing begins.
- the Release Manager 514 triggers QA testing 556 via input 562 to the ERP System 532 through the Service Designer 520. Once automatic QA testing is triggered 556, the technical parameters are analyzed according to a configuration file 558, e.g., a configuration input.yaml file.
- the Service Designer 520 sends a request for automated QA testing to the ERP System 532.
- the Release Manager 514 triggers manual QA testing 564 via the Service Designer 520.
- the Service Designer 520 sends a request for manual QA testing 566 to the Release Management/Ticketing System 535.
- a manual QA testing workflow is executed 568.
- Internal acceptance workflows are executed 570 at the Release Management/Ticketing System 535 and multiple approvals are determined, e.g., department manager, technical manager, etc.
- the status of the application bundle from the Release Management/Ticketing System 535 is polled to determine whether the application bundle is approved or is rejected.
- the Release Management/Ticketing System 535 provides self-certification 572 or rejection 576 to the Service Designer 520.
- the Release Manager 514 promotes the application bundle 574 to the Production Stage through the Service Designer 520 or the Application Approver 512 rejects the application bundle and updates the workflow 578 at the Service Designer 520 to either reject the application bundle or return the application bundle to the Vendor 510.
- Fig. 6 illustrates the Production Stage 600 according to at least one embodiment.
- Fig. 6 again shows the Vendor 610, the Application Approver 612, and the Release Manager 614.
- Fig. 6 also shows the Non-Production (Pre-Production) Stage 630 and the Production Stage 640.
- the Non-Production Stage 630 includes a Non-Production Artifactory 631, an Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System 632 (e.g., Katana), a Sandbox Environment 633 (e.g., Symphony Sandbox), a Staging Environment 634 (e.g., Symphony Staging), and a Release Management/Ticketing System 635 (e.g., QZEN).
- ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
- Sandbox Environment 633 e.g., Symphony Sandbox
- Staging Environment 634 e.g., Symphony Staging
- QZEN Release Management/Ticketing System
- the Production Stage 640 includes a Production Artifactory 642, a Production Service Catalog System 644 (e.g., Symphony), and Other Production Systems 646 (e.g., Marketplace).
- the Service Designer 620 promotes the application bundle 650 through the ERP System 632.
- the ERP System 632 creates an application bundle 652 which is passed to the Production Artifactory 642.
- the Service Designer 620 creates a service catalog entry 654 at the Production Service Catalog System 644.
- Service Designer 620 provides production-related calls 656 to the Other Production Systems 646, where the application bundle is promoted to the Marketplace. Values are passed to other downstream systems.
- the Service Designer 620 then ends the process 658.
- Fig. 7 is a flowchart 700 of a method for providing end-to-end application onboarding according to at least one embodiment.
- a workflow configuration is obtained S712.
- the application bundle is submitted S714.
- a beta version of the application bundle is then created S716.
- the application bundle is uploaded to non-productions artifactory S718, e.g., to JFrog.
- a pre-deployment scan is performed S720.
- a determination is made whether the application bundle is accepted or rejected S722.
- process ends S798 After being rejected the vendor edits the application bundle, creates a new application bundle, and begins again, or abandons the effort.
- a Deploy phase 730 is entered and a service catalog entry is created for the sandbox S732. Deployment is triggered S736. QA testing is then triggered S740. Deployment is then completed S742.
- the process After deployment is completed S742, the process enters the QZEN flow 750 where self-certification is initiated S752. After self-certification is received S754, a determination is made whether the application bundle is accepted or rejected S756. In response to being rejected S758, the process ends S798. In response to being approved S760, the application bundle is copied to staging S762. A release request is then created S764. QZEN status is checked S766. In response to QZEN being rejected S768, process ends S798.
- the process enters a Deploy phase 770 and a service catalog entry is created for the staging S774.
- the application bundle is copied to staging S776 and a service catalog entry is created for the staging S774.
- Deployment is then triggered S780.
- Post-Deployment QA testing is triggered S784.
- the Deployment is completed S786.
- a determination is made whether the application bundle is accepted or rejected S788.
- the process ends S798.
- the application bundle is moved to the Production Stage S794. The process then ends S798.
- At least one embodiment of providing end-to-end application onboarding includes uploading an application bundle of a vendor to a pre-production system, requesting pre- production testing of the application bundle, in response to the application bundle passing the pre-production testing, receiving an indication of approval of the application bundle, in response to receiving the indication of approval of the application bundle, performing quality assurance testing of the application bundle in at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, in response to the application bundle passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, promoting the application bundle to the production environment, and in response to the application bundle not passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, passing the application bundle to the vendor for editing.
- Fig. 8 is a high-level functional block diagram of a processor-based system 800 according to at least one embodiment.
- processing circuitry 800 provides end-to-end application onboarding.
- Processing circuitry 800 implements the end-to-end application onboarding using processor 802.
- Processing circuitry 800 also includes a non-transitory, computer- readable storage medium 804 that is used to implement end-to-end application onboarding.
- Storage medium 804 is encoded with, i.e., stores, instructions 806, i.e., computer program code that are executed by processor 802 causes processor 802 to perform operations for end-to-end application onboarding.
- Execution of instructions 806 by processor 802 represents (at least in part) a network visualization application which implements at least a portion of the methods described herein in accordance with one or more embodiments (hereinafter, the noted processes and/or methods).
- Processor 802 is electrically coupled to computer-readable storage medium 804 via a bus 808.
- Processor 802 is electrically coupled to an Input/output (VO) interface 810 by bus 808.
- a network interface 812 is also electrically connected to processor 802 via bus 808.
- Network interface 812 is connected to a network 814, so that processor 802 and computer- readable storage medium 804 connect to external elements via network 814.
- Processor 802 is configured to execute instructions 806 encoded in computer-readable storage medium 804 to cause processing circuitry 800 to be usable for performing at least a portion of the processes and/or methods.
- processor 802 is a Central Processing Unit (CPU), a multi-processor, a distributed processing system, an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), and/or a suitable processing unit.
- CPU Central Processing Unit
- ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit
- Processing circuitry 800 includes VO interface 810.
- VO interface 810 is coupled to external circuitry.
- VO interface 810 includes a keyboard, keypad, mouse, trackball, trackpad, touchscreen, and/or cursor direction keys for communicating information and commands to processor 802.
- Processing circuitry 800 also includes network interface 812 coupled to processor 802.
- Network interface 812 allows processing circuitry 800 to communicate with network 814, to which one or more other computer systems are connected.
- Network interface 812 includes wireless network interfaces such as Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access (WiMAX), General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), or Wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA); or wired network interfaces such as Ethernet, Universal Serial Bus (USB), or Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 864.
- Processing circuitry 800 is configured to receive information through VO interface 810.
- the information received through VO interface 810 includes one or more of instructions, data, design rules, libraries of cells, and/or other parameters for processing by processor 802.
- the information is transferred to processor 802 via bus 808.
- Processing circuitry 800 is configured to receive information related to a User Interface (UI) 8221 through VO interface 810.
- the information is stored in computer-readable medium 804 as UI 822.
- UI
- one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media 804 having stored thereon instructions (in compressed or uncompressed form) that may be used to program a computer, processor, or other electronic device) to perform processes or methods described herein.
- the one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media 804 include one or more of an electronic storage medium, a magnetic storage medium, an optical storage medium, a quantum storage medium, or the like.
- the computer-readable storage media may include, but are not limited to, hard drives, floppy diskettes, optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), erasable programmable ROMs (EPROMs), electrically erasable programmable ROMs (EEPROMs), flash memory, magnetic or optical cards, solid-state memory devices, or other types of physical media suitable for storing electronic instructions.
- the one or more non-transitory computer-readable storage media 804 includes a Compact Disk-Read Only Memory (CD-ROM), a Compact Disk- Read/Write (CD-R/W), and/or a Digital Video Disc (DVD).
- CD-ROM Compact Disk-Read Only Memory
- CD-R/W Compact Disk- Read/Write
- DVD Digital Video Disc
- storage medium 804 stores computer program code 806 configured to cause processing circuitry 800 to perform at least a portion of the processes and/or methods for end-to-end application onboarding.
- storage medium 804 also stores information, such as algorithm which facilitates performing at least a portion of the processes and/or methods for end-to-end application onboarding. Accordingly, in at least one embodiment, the processor circuitry 800 performs a method for end-to-end application onboarding.
- the process of uploading an application bundle of a vendor to a pre- production system, requesting pre-production testing of the application bundle, in response to the application bundle passing the pre-production testing, receiving an indication of approval of the application bundle, in response to receiving the indication of approval of the application bundle, performing quality assurance testing of the application bundle in at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, in response to the application bundle passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, promoting the application bundle to the production environment, and in response to the application bundle not passing the quality assurance testing in the at least one pre-production test environment isolated from the production environment, passing the application bundle to the vendor for editing provides at least the advantages of enabling an application vendor to create application bundles and onboard the applications using an end to end flow for the application bundle from application bundle creation to promotion of the application bundle to production through the approval cycles.
- the an integrated process integrated process for performing end-to-end application onboarding takes less time and reduces human errors because the process is automated. Vendors are also able to
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2022/039513 WO2024030133A1 (en) | 2022-08-05 | 2022-08-05 | System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable media for performing end-to-end application onboarding |
| US17/997,554 US20250094315A1 (en) | 2022-08-05 | 2022-08-05 | System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable media for performing end-to-end application onboarding |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2022/039513 WO2024030133A1 (en) | 2022-08-05 | 2022-08-05 | System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable media for performing end-to-end application onboarding |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2024030133A1 true WO2024030133A1 (en) | 2024-02-08 |
Family
ID=89849511
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2022/039513 Ceased WO2024030133A1 (en) | 2022-08-05 | 2022-08-05 | System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable media for performing end-to-end application onboarding |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20250094315A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2024030133A1 (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20140282456A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Cloud Technology Partners, Inc. | Methods, systems and computer-readable media for code profiling and migration effort estimation |
| US9110496B1 (en) * | 2011-06-07 | 2015-08-18 | Interactive TKO, Inc. | Dynamic provisioning of a virtual test environment |
| US9658833B2 (en) * | 2007-12-20 | 2017-05-23 | Hsbc Technology & Services (Usa) Inc. | Automated methods and systems for developing and deploying projects in parallel |
| US9992080B2 (en) * | 2013-08-21 | 2018-06-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Using discovered virtual-infrastructure attributes to automatically generate a service-catalog entry |
| US10318285B1 (en) * | 2017-08-16 | 2019-06-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Deployment of infrastructure in pipelines |
| US20220050674A1 (en) * | 2020-08-17 | 2022-02-17 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Tenant declarative deployments with release staggering |
-
2022
- 2022-08-05 WO PCT/US2022/039513 patent/WO2024030133A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2022-08-05 US US17/997,554 patent/US20250094315A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9658833B2 (en) * | 2007-12-20 | 2017-05-23 | Hsbc Technology & Services (Usa) Inc. | Automated methods and systems for developing and deploying projects in parallel |
| US9110496B1 (en) * | 2011-06-07 | 2015-08-18 | Interactive TKO, Inc. | Dynamic provisioning of a virtual test environment |
| US20140282456A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Cloud Technology Partners, Inc. | Methods, systems and computer-readable media for code profiling and migration effort estimation |
| US9992080B2 (en) * | 2013-08-21 | 2018-06-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Using discovered virtual-infrastructure attributes to automatically generate a service-catalog entry |
| US10318285B1 (en) * | 2017-08-16 | 2019-06-11 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Deployment of infrastructure in pipelines |
| US20220050674A1 (en) * | 2020-08-17 | 2022-02-17 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Tenant declarative deployments with release staggering |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20250094315A1 (en) | 2025-03-20 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US11119897B2 (en) | System and method of handling complex experiments in a distributed system | |
| US9477581B2 (en) | Integrated system and method for validating the functionality and performance of software applications | |
| US7761851B2 (en) | Computer method and system for integrating software development and deployment | |
| CN105359102B (en) | Advanced customer support service-advanced support cloud portal | |
| CN101512507B (en) | Dynamically configure, allocate and deploy computing systems | |
| WO2015179705A1 (en) | Enhanced compliance verification system | |
| CN103279419A (en) | Automation version verifying method and system based on B/S structural system | |
| CN114143235B (en) | NFV automatic testing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113378534A (en) | Method and system for automatically generating special equipment inspection report based on form model | |
| CN107797791A (en) | Requirement management systems and method under a kind of quick research and development pattern | |
| CN111208975A (en) | Concurrent execution service | |
| CN118475920A (en) | Algorithm testing method, algorithm testing platform and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN113360975A (en) | View construction method and device of building information model and storage medium | |
| CN110244934B (en) | Method and device for generating product requirement documents and test information | |
| CN110750435A (en) | Test case management method and device | |
| US8739132B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for assessing layered architecture principles compliance for business analytics in traditional and SOA based environments | |
| CN114489999A (en) | Method and device for processing pipeline task, processor and electronic equipment | |
| WO2024030133A1 (en) | System, method, and non-transitory computer-readable media for performing end-to-end application onboarding | |
| US20180336121A1 (en) | Computer implemented method and system for software quality assurance testing by intelligent abstraction of application under test (aut) | |
| CN115905009B (en) | Automated testing method, electronic device, and storage medium based on retrospective comparison | |
| CN115687078B (en) | Test case evaluation methods, apparatus, equipment, media and procedures products | |
| CN103995776A (en) | Automatic version verification method based on B/S structure system | |
| CN112416413B (en) | Patch deployment method, deployment device, and readable storage medium | |
| CN104765602B (en) | The Quantitatively Selecting method of nonfunction requirement implementation strategy | |
| CN116301730A (en) | A method and device for generating an application program based on a SaaS platform |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 17997554 Country of ref document: US |
|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 22954163 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 17997554 Country of ref document: US |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 22954163 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |