WO2023217263A1 - 数据处理方法、装置、设备及介质 - Google Patents
数据处理方法、装置、设备及介质 Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2023217263A1 WO2023217263A1 PCT/CN2023/093805 CN2023093805W WO2023217263A1 WO 2023217263 A1 WO2023217263 A1 WO 2023217263A1 CN 2023093805 W CN2023093805 W CN 2023093805W WO 2023217263 A1 WO2023217263 A1 WO 2023217263A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- pruning
- neural network
- network
- sub
- original
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Neural networks
- G06N3/04—Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Neural networks
- G06N3/04—Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology
- G06N3/0464—Convolutional networks [CNN, ConvNet]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Neural networks
- G06N3/04—Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology
- G06N3/0495—Quantised networks; Sparse networks; Compressed networks
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Neural networks
- G06N3/08—Learning methods
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
- G06N3/02—Neural networks
- G06N3/08—Learning methods
- G06N3/082—Learning methods modifying the architecture, e.g. adding, deleting or silencing nodes or connections
Definitions
- the present disclosure relates to the field of computer technology, and in particular, to a data processing method, device, equipment and medium.
- intelligent mobile terminals are developing rapidly to meet people's various application needs.
- its main implementation technology includes data processing based on trained neural network model data in video processing language recognition, image recognition and understanding, game vision and other application fields.
- data processing based on trained neural network model data in video processing language recognition, image recognition and understanding, game vision and other application fields.
- redundant convolution kernels or redundant convolution kernels in each layer of the neural network are removed through pruning.
- Neuron a neural network with smaller computing resources and storage resources on mobile terminals.
- the present disclosure provides a data processing method, device, equipment and medium.
- Embodiments of the present disclosure provide a data processing method, which includes:
- the candidate network layers in the original neural network are pruned separately according to multiple preset pruning rates to obtain multiple corresponding sub-neural networks
- test data set is input into the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks respectively for processing. Based on the output data sets of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks, the reference corresponding to the original neural network is obtained. Performance indicators, and multiple test performance indicators corresponding to multiple sub-neural networks;
- the method further includes:
- the plurality of pruning rates are set according to the network compression requirement, wherein the difference between the plurality of pruning rates is positively related to the network compression degree.
- pruning is performed according to multiple preset pruning rates to obtain corresponding multiple sub-neural networks, including:
- the preset first pruner is used to perform pruning processing, wherein the norm interval of the first regional distribution is greater than A preset interval threshold, and the minimum norm value of the first regional distribution is zero;
- the preset second pruner is used to perform pruning processing, wherein the norm variance of the second regional distribution is greater than A preset variance threshold, and the minimum norm value of the second regional distribution is not zero.
- the test data set includes: multimedia data, where the multimedia data is one or more combinations of audio data, video data, and image data.
- test data set is input into the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks respectively for processing, based on the output data of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks.
- Set to obtain the reference performance indicators corresponding to the original neural network and multiple test performance indicators corresponding to multiple sub-neural networks including:
- the test image data set is respectively input into the original neural network and each of the sub-neural networks for processing, and the output image data set based on the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks is combined with the test image data set.
- the pixel processing results between obtain the peak signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to the original neural network as the reference performance index, and each The peak signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to the sub-neural network is used as the test performance index;
- the test audio data set is input into the original neural network and each of the sub-neural networks for processing, and the recognition text data set based on the output of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks is combined with the test audio data
- the comparison results between the annotated text of the set are obtained, and the accuracy rate corresponding to the original neural network is obtained as the reference performance index, and the accuracy rate corresponding to each of the sub-neural networks is obtained as the test performance index.
- the method further includes:
- channel dependence characteristics include: adjacent network layers have at least one of additive data operations and multiplied data operations;
- the method further includes:
- the pruned target network layer in the original neural network is determined to generate a target neural network to process the target data set.
- determining the target network layer to be pruned in the original neural network based on the parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer parameters under different pruning rates includes:
- the target network layer to be pruned in the original neural network is determined according to the target pruning rate and the maximum pruning rate corresponding to the maximum parameter redundancy of each candidate network layer.
- An embodiment of the present disclosure also provides a data processing device, which includes:
- the pruning processing module is used to prune the candidate network layers in the original neural network according to multiple preset pruning rates to obtain multiple corresponding sub-neural networks;
- a processing and acquisition module configured to input test data sets into the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks for processing, and obtain the output data sets based on the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks.
- a determination module configured to analyze the parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer parameters in the original neural network under different pruning rates based on the performance loss of the multiple test performance indicators relative to the reference performance indicator.
- An embodiment of the present disclosure also provides an electronic device, the electronic device including: a processor; a memory for storing executable instructions; wherein the executable instructions can be read from the memory by the processor, and executed to implement the data processing method provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure.
- Embodiments of the present disclosure also provide a computer-readable storage medium, the storage medium stores a computer program, and the computer program is used to execute the data processing method provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure.
- Embodiments of the present disclosure also provide a computer program product.
- the computer program product includes a computer program/instruction. When the computer program/instruction is executed by a processor, the above method is implemented.
- An embodiment of the present disclosure also provides a computer program, including: instructions, which when executed by a processor cause the processor to execute the data processing method provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figure 1 is a schematic flowchart of a data processing method provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure
- Figure 2 is a schematic flow chart of another data processing method provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figure 3 is a schematic diagram of the relationship between pruning rate and performance indicators provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure
- Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of another relationship between pruning rate and performance indicators provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- Figure 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a data processing device provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the term “include” and its variations are open-ended, ie, “including but not limited to.”
- the term “based on” means “based at least in part on.”
- the term “one embodiment” means “at least one embodiment”; the term “another embodiment” means “at least one additional embodiment”; and the term “some embodiments” means “at least some embodiments”. Relevant definitions of other terms will be given in the description below.
- pruning solutions result in different network processing performance after pruning. Some pruning solutions result in poor network processing performance, resulting in unreliable results of subsequent data processing.
- Figure 1 is a schematic flowchart of a data processing method provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the method can be executed by a data processing device, where the device can be implemented using software and/or hardware, and can generally be integrated in electronic equipment.
- the method includes:
- Step 101 Perform pruning on the candidate network layers in the original neural network according to multiple preset pruning rates to obtain multiple corresponding sub-neural networks.
- the redundant convolution kernels of each convolution layer in the neural network can be pruned while ensuring the accuracy of the neural network ( That is, structured pruning) or neurons on the convolution kernel (that is, unstructured pruning), thereby obtaining a "slim model" that takes up less computing resources and storage resources, accelerating the reasoning process of the neural network, and assisting the neural network. Deployment at the edge of the network.
- the original neural network is a neural network model that needs to be pruned.
- the neural network model can be obtained through training, and the neural network model can be set according to the application scenario and/or user needs, etc., This embodiment is not limiting.
- the relative importance of all neurons in the original neural network is sorted through specific evaluation criteria, and then relatively unimportant neurons in the network are pruned according to a preset pruning rate, thereby compressing the network.
- the candidate network layers in the original neural network are pruned according to multiple preset pruning rates to obtain multiple corresponding sub-neural networks; , the original neural network includes multiple candidate network layers.
- the original neural network includes four convolution layers, namely convolution layer one Conv1, convolution layer two Conv2, convolution layer three Conv3 and convolution layer four Conv4. Then you can use convolution layer one Conv1, convolution layer two Conv2, convolution layer three Conv3 and convolution layer four Conv4 as candidate network layers of the original neural network, or use convolution layer one Conv1 and convolution layer two Conv2 as Candidate network layer, select settings according to application scenario needs.
- the corresponding pruning rate is set in advance according to the importance of each candidate network layer; the pruning rate refers to the percentage of convolution kernels pruned out of the candidate network layer.
- the pruning rate refers to the percentage of convolution kernels pruned out of the candidate network layer.
- candidate network layer A has N convolutions. kernel, the pruning rate is p%. Therefore, candidate network layer A needs to prune N times p% convolution kernels.
- each candidate network layer is preset with multiple different pruning rates, so that after pruning each candidate network layer according to the preset multiple different pruning rates, each candidate network layer can be obtained.
- Multiple sub-neural networks corresponding to the candidate network layer for example, ten pruning rates are preset, and each pruning rate differs by 10%, ranging from 10%, 20%, 30% to 100%. , thereby processing the candidate network layers such as the convolutional layer Conv1 based on ten different pruning rates, so that ten sub-neural networks corresponding to the convolutional layer Conv1 can be obtained.
- Example instructions are as follows:
- a norm calculation is performed on the weight distribution in the candidate network layer. If it is determined according to the calculation result that the weight distribution belongs to the candidate network layer of the preset first regional distribution, then the preset first clipping is used. The brancher performs pruning processing, in which the norm interval of the first regional distribution is greater than the preset interval threshold, and the minimum norm value of the first regional distribution is zero. If it is determined according to the calculation results that the weight distribution belongs to the preset second The candidate network layer of the regional distribution is pruned using the preset second pruner, wherein the norm variance of the second regional distribution is greater than the preset variance threshold, and the minimum norm value of the second regional distribution is not is zero.
- the relevant pruner is called according to multiple preset pruning rates to directly prune the candidate network layers of the original neural network to obtain multiple sub-neural networks.
- Step 102 Input the test data set into the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks respectively for processing. Based on the output data sets of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks, obtain the reference performance indicators corresponding to the original neural network and the corresponding sub-neural networks. Multiple test performance indicators.
- test data set can be selected and set according to the application scenario, such as multimedia data
- multimedia data is one or more combinations of audio data, video data, and image data.
- the reference performance index refers to the performance value obtained by analyzing the output data set obtained after the original neural network processes the test data set
- the test performance index refers to the test data set of the sub-neural network after pruning rate processing. The performance values obtained by analyzing the output data set obtained after processing.
- the sub-neural networks after pruning at different pruning rates have different accuracy losses in processing the test data set, that is, different performance losses.
- the pruning rate is 30% after pruning the candidate network layer.
- the reference performance indicators and test performance indicators obtained by test data sets in different scenarios are different. Therefore, the test data sets are respectively input into the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks for processing. Based on the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks, There are many ways to obtain the output data set of the sub-neural network, the reference performance indicators corresponding to the original neural network, and the multiple test performance indicators corresponding to the multiple sub-neural networks. The selection can be based on the application scenario, etc., and this embodiment is not limited. , examples are as follows:
- the test image number is The data sets are input into the original neural network and each sub-neural network for processing respectively. Based on the pixel processing results between the output image data set and the test image data set of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks, the peak signal corresponding to the original neural network is obtained.
- the noise ratio is used as the reference performance index, and the peak signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to each sub-neural network is used as the test performance index.
- test audio data set is input into the original neural network and each sub-neural network for processing, and the recognized text data set based on the output of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks is compared with Test the comparison results between the annotated texts of the audio data set, obtain the accuracy corresponding to the original neural network as the reference performance index, and obtain the accuracy corresponding to each sub-neural network as the test performance index.
- Step 103 Analyze the parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer parameters in the original neural network under different pruning rates based on the performance losses of multiple test performance indicators relative to the reference performance indicators.
- the multiple test performance indicators are calculated relative to the reference performance.
- the performance loss of the indicator can be used to obtain the parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer parameters in the original neural network under different pruning rates.
- a performance indicator curve corresponding to the candidate network layer and the multiple pruning rates is drawn, and the candidate network layer parameters at different pruning rates are analyzed based on the performance indicator curve. Parameter redundancy below.
- the data processing solution provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure performs pruning processing on the candidate network layers in the original neural network according to multiple preset pruning rates to obtain corresponding multiple sub-neural networks, and input the test data sets respectively.
- the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks are processed, and based on the output data sets of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks, the reference performance indicators corresponding to the original neural network and multiple test performance indicators corresponding to the multiple sub-neural networks are obtained.
- the performance loss of each test performance index relative to the reference performance index is analyzed, and the parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer parameters in the original neural network under different pruning rates is analyzed. Redundancy.
- parameter redundancy is obtained based on the actual data set and the reliability of subsequent pruning is improved, thereby improving the high accuracy of the neural network after pruning and improving the efficiency and accuracy of data processing.
- the pruned target network layer in the original neural network is determined based on the parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer parameters under different pruning rates, so as to generate the target neural network to process the target data set.
- the target network layer refers to the pruned target network layer determined based on the adjusted pruning rate after re-adjusting the pruning rate of the candidate network layer according to the parameter redundancy.
- the target neural network refers to the original pruning rate. The neural network after pruning the target network layer in the neural network.
- the slope of The maximum pruning rate corresponding to the maximum parameter redundancy determines the target network layer to be pruned in the original neural network.
- the maximum pruning rate of each candidate network layer is determined based on parameter redundancy, and the target network layer to be pruned in the original neural network is directly determined based on the maximum pruning rate.
- the performance loss between the test performance indicators obtained by the sub-neural network processing the test data set obtained from different pruning rates and the reference performance indicators obtained by the original neural network processing the test data set is analyzed.
- Parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer Redundancy thereby obtaining the relative parameter redundancy of the specified candidate network layer in the original neural network under the specified pruning rate, and the parameter redundancy is calculated based on the actual test data set, which has high reliability sex.
- different pruners are selected for different weight distribution layers; at the same time, candidate network layers with channel dependencies are calculated comprehensively for each pruning rate.
- Candidate network layers that should be pruned and then calculate the parameter redundancy of each candidate network layer separately, and finally use the average parameter redundancy of these layers as the parameter redundancy of all layers to achieve channel dependency-aware parameter redundancy. The remaining calculation is described in detail below in conjunction with Figure 2.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic flowchart of another data processing method provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure. Based on the above embodiment, this embodiment further optimizes the above data processing method. As shown in Figure 2, the method includes:
- Step 201 Obtain the network compression requirements, and set multiple pruning rates according to the network compression requirements.
- the difference between the multiple pruning rates is positively related to the network compression degree.
- the audio processing platform has relatively high requirements for network compression, so it is necessary to set more pruning rates for pruning attempts, which requires more accurate parameters. redundancy, thereby further improving the processing accuracy of the final target neural network;
- the image processing platform has relatively low demand for network compression, so it is necessary to set a relatively small number of pruning rates for pruning attempts to improve the original neural network Adjust efficiency.
- the data difference between multiple pruning rates is positively related to the network compression degree, that is to say, The greater the difference between multiple pruning rates, the greater the network compression; the smaller the difference between multiple pruning rates, the smaller the network compression.
- Step 202 detect whether there is an associated network layer with channel dependency characteristics in the original neural network, where the channel dependence characteristics include: adjacent network layers have at least one of additive data operations and multiplied data operations, if There are associated network layers, and all associated network layers with channel-dependent characteristics are set as one candidate network layer.
- a convolution kernel with a p% pruning rate of the nth candidate network layer is selected according to a certain convolution kernel evaluation criterion, that is, N*p% convolution kernels are pruned, and the rest of the original neural network All layers remain unchanged, and the performance of the original neural network on the test data set is B when directly tested.
- the pruning performance loss of the nth candidate network layer under p% pruning rate is defined as S.
- S The larger S, the better The greater the accuracy loss caused by pruning of the candidate network layer, the greater the pruning sensitivity of the candidate network layer.
- the more sensitive the pruning is it means that the candidate network layer contains more important convolution kernels/features.
- Figure it can be considered that the smaller the parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer, therefore, the parameter redundancy is negatively correlated with pruning sensitivity.
- multiple performance indicators are parameter redundancies corresponding to candidate network layers and multiple pruning rates respectively, including: obtaining the number of layers of all associated network layers with channel dependency characteristics in the candidate network layer, and Multiple performance indicators are averaged over the number of layers to obtain the parameter redundancy corresponding to each associated network layer and multiple pruning rates.
- Conv1 and Conv2 analyze the parameter redundancy of Conv1 and Conv2 at the pruning rate p%, first consider Conv1 and Conv2 comprehensively and select N*p% to be Cut off the convolution kernel, then calculate the first parameter redundancy and the second parameter redundancy based on cutting these convolution kernels in Conv1, and finally calculate the average of the first parameter redundancy and the second parameter redundancy. value as Conv1 and Parameter redundancy of Conv2 at compression rate p%.
- Step 203 Perform norm calculation on the weight distribution in the candidate network layer. If it is determined according to the calculation result that the weight distribution belongs to the candidate network layer with the preset first regional distribution, use the preset first pruner to perform pruning processing. , wherein the norm interval of the first regional distribution is greater than the preset interval threshold, and the minimum norm value of the first regional distribution is zero.
- Step 204 If it is determined according to the calculation results that the weight distribution belongs to the candidate network layer of the preset second regional distribution, use the preset second pruner to perform pruning processing, wherein the norm variance of the second regional distribution is greater than the preset second region distribution. Set the variance threshold, and the minimum norm value of the second regional distribution is not zero.
- pruning strategies usually use L1 norm/L2 norm to evaluate the importance of convolution kernels.
- Norm-based evaluation criteria usually rely on two assumptions that are not always true: (1) the range of the filter. The number distribution is wide and the variance is large; (2) The minimum norm of the filter should be very small and close to 0. Specifically, when the norm deviation of the filter is very small, that is to say, the norm distribution of the filter is very dense, then it will be more difficult to find a suitable threshold to achieve the desired target sparsity rate. At the same time, when the minimum norm of the filter is very large, it means that all filters in the candidate network layer are very important. At this time, selection based on the norm will lose accuracy.
- the norm-based evaluation criterion is no longer applicable.
- the weight distribution of the candidate network layer will first be analyzed before pruning, and the weight distribution conforms to the first regional distribution.
- the preset first pruner for pruning processing that is, use the one-shot pruning algorithm with the first norm.
- the norm of the first regional distribution is greater than the preset range and the minimum value is Zero, where the preset range is set according to the needs of the application scenario; for candidate network layers whose weight distribution conforms to the second regional distribution, the preset second pruner is used for pruning, that is, the filter through the geometric median is used to prune A one-time branch pruning algorithm, the norm variance of the second region is greater than the preset threshold and the minimum value is not zero.
- the preset threshold is set according to the needs of the application scenario.
- Step 205 Input the test image data set into the original neural network and each sub-neural network for processing. Based on the pixel processing results between the output image data set of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks and the test image data set, obtain the same result as the original neural network.
- the peak signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to the neural network is used as the reference performance index, and the peak signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to each sub-neural network is used as the test performance index.
- the test data set is a test image data set.
- the test image data set is input into the original neural network and each sub-neural network respectively for processing to obtain the output image data set.
- the peak signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to the original neural network is obtained as the reference performance index
- the peak signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to each sub-neural network is used as the test performance index.
- the reference performance index corresponding to the original neural network and the test performance index corresponding to the sub-neural network are used to determine the candidate network layer in the original neural network based on the performance loss of the test performance index relative to the reference performance index.
- Step 206 The test audio data set is input into the original neural network and each sub-neural network for processing, and the comparison results between the recognized text data set output by the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks and the annotated text of the test audio data set are compared , obtain the accuracy corresponding to the original neural network as the reference performance index, and the accuracy corresponding to each sub-neural network as the test performance index.
- the test data set is a test audio data set.
- the test audio data set is input into the original neural network and each sub-neural network respectively for processing to obtain a recognition text data set.
- the corresponding accuracy rate of the original neural network is obtained as a reference performance index, and compared with each sub-neural network The corresponding accuracy rate is used as the test performance indicator.
- the reference performance index corresponding to the original neural network and the test performance index corresponding to the sub-neural network are used to determine the candidate network layer in the original neural network based on the performance loss of the test performance index relative to the reference performance index.
- Step 207 Draw performance index curves corresponding to candidate network layers and multiple pruning rates based on the performance losses of multiple test performance indicators relative to the reference performance indicators, calculate the slope of each pruning rate in the performance index curve, and change the slope according to the slope change Determine the maximum pruning rate of the candidate network layer, where the performance index corresponding to the maximum pruning rate represents the maximum parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer parameters.
- Step 208 Determine the target network layer to be pruned in the original neural network based on the target pruning rate and the maximum pruning rate corresponding to the maximum parameter redundancy of each candidate network layer.
- the performance index curve corresponding to the candidate network layer and multiple pruning rates is drawn according to the parameter redundancy, that is, multiple pruning rates are used as the abscissa, and the parameter redundancy, that is, multiple
- the performance loss of the test performance index relative to the reference performance index is used as the ordinate to draw the performance index curve, so that the slope of each pruning rate can be obtained, and the maximum pruning rate of the candidate network layer is determined based on the slope change, such as the pruning rate when the slope change is the largest.
- the branch rate is the maximum pruning rate of the candidate network layer, and the performance index corresponding to the maximum pruning rate indicates the maximum parameter redundancy corresponding to the candidate network layer parameters.
- the target network layer to be pruned in the original neural network is determined according to the target pruning rate and the maximum pruning rate corresponding to the maximum parameter redundancy of each candidate network layer, so as to generate the target neural network to process the target data set.
- the target pruning rate can also be determined based on the specific scenario, and the maximum parameter redundancy of each candidate network layer can be used to determine the pruned target network layer in the original neural network to generate
- the target neural network processes the target data set, so that the obtained target neural network is more in line with personalized needs and further improves data processing efficiency and accuracy.
- relevant tools can be used to Select the network layer to analyze the performance loss of the preset pruning rate.
- the analysis principle is to perform structured pruning on the set candidate network layers with the preset pruning rate, and then test the pruned sub-neural network.
- the data set is processed for performance verification, as the performance loss under the current pruning rate of the candidate network layer.
- the analysis results are shown in Figure 3.
- the performance loss of manager conv1 for the pruning rate of 0.3 is relatively large, and the parameter redundancy at this time is relatively small.
- Another example is that individual layers are extremely insensitive to pruning. You can consider removing them in the original neural network design, or increasing their pruning rate. For example, the performance index of conv3 has almost no change when the pruning rate is 0.1-0.9. That is to say, the performance loss of conv3 is relatively small when the pruning rate is 0.1-0.9, that is, the parameter redundancy of conv3 is relatively large when the pruning rate is 0.1-0.9.
- the attention module is used to make the original neural network focus on more important spatial features by modeling spatial dependencies, showing excellent performance.
- Figure 4 after analyzing the parameter redundancy of the attention module, it can be seen that the parameters of the three convolutional layers c1-c3 are relatively high in parameter redundancy at each pruning rate, thus proving that it has The high parameter redundancy directly reduces the three convolutional layers c1-c3 to one convolutional layer, and finally shows no loss in performance after retraining the original neural network.
- the data processing solution provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure obtains the network compression requirements, sets multiple pruning rates according to the network compression requirements, where the difference between the multiple pruning rates is positively related to the network compression degree, and detects whether the original neural network There is an associated network layer with channel dependency characteristics, where the channel dependency characteristics include: adjacent network layers have at least one of additive data operations and multiplied data operations. If there is an associated network layer, it will have channel dependency. All associated network layers of the feature are set as a candidate network layer, and the norm calculation is performed on the weight distribution in the candidate network layer.
- the first pruner performs pruning processing, in which the norm interval of the first regional distribution is greater than the preset interval threshold, and the minimum norm value of the first regional distribution is zero. If it is determined according to the calculation results that the weight distribution belongs to the preset Assuming the candidate network layer of the second regional distribution, use the preset second pruner to perform pruning processing, wherein the norm variance of the second regional distribution is greater than the preset variance threshold, and the norm variance of the second regional distribution is The minimum value of the number is not zero.
- the test image data set is input into the original neural network and each sub-neural network for processing.
- the performance indicator curve corresponding to the candidate network layer and multiple pruning rates is drawn, and each performance indicator curve is calculated.
- the slope of the pruning rate determines the maximum pruning rate of the candidate network layer based on the slope change.
- the performance index corresponding to the maximum pruning rate represents the maximum parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer parameters.
- each candidate The maximum pruning rate corresponding to the maximum parameter redundancy of the network layer determines the target network layer to be pruned in the original neural network.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a data processing device provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the device can be implemented by software and/or hardware, and can generally be integrated in electronic equipment. As shown in Figure 5, the device includes:
- the pruning processing module 301 is used to perform pruning processing on each candidate network layer in the original neural network according to multiple preset pruning rates to obtain corresponding multiple sub-neural networks;
- the processing and acquisition module 302 is used to input test data sets into the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks for processing, and obtain all the output data sets based on the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks.
- the analysis module 303 is configured to analyze the parameter redundancy of the candidate network layer parameters in the original neural network under different pruning rates based on the performance loss of the multiple test performance indicators relative to the reference performance indicators.
- test data set includes: multimedia data, and the multimedia data is one or more combinations of audio data, video data, and image data.
- the device also includes:
- a setting module configured to set the plurality of pruning rates according to the network compression requirement, wherein the difference between the plurality of pruning rates is positively related to the network compression degree.
- the pruning processing module 301 is specifically used to:
- the preset first pruner is used to perform pruning processing, wherein the norm interval of the first regional distribution is greater than A preset interval threshold, and the minimum norm value of the first regional distribution is zero;
- the preset second pruner is used to perform pruning processing, wherein the norm variance of the second regional distribution is greater than A preset variance threshold, and the minimum norm value of the second regional distribution is not zero.
- processing acquisition module 302 is specifically used to:
- the test image data set is input into the original neural network and each of the sub-neural networks respectively.
- the network performs processing, and based on the pixel processing results between the output image data set of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks and the test image data set, a peak signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to the original neural network is obtained.
- the reference performance index and the peak signal-to-noise ratio corresponding to each of the sub-neural networks as the test performance index;
- the test audio data set is input into the original neural network and each of the sub-neural networks for processing, and the recognition text data set based on the output of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks is combined with the test audio data
- the comparison results between the annotated text of the set are obtained, and the accuracy rate corresponding to the original neural network is obtained as the reference performance index, and the accuracy rate corresponding to each of the sub-neural networks is obtained as the test performance index.
- the device also includes:
- a detection module for detecting whether there is an associated network layer with channel dependency characteristics in the original neural network, wherein the channel dependence characteristics include: adjacent network layers have additive data operations and multiplied data operations. at least one of;
- An association setting module configured to set all associated network layers with channel-dependent characteristics as one of the candidate network layers if the associated network layer exists.
- the device also includes:
- Obtain calculation module used to obtain the number of layers of all associated network layers with channel dependency characteristics in the candidate network layer, average the multiple performance indicators for the number of layers, and obtain the relationship between each associated network layer and multiple The pruning rate corresponds to the parameter redundancy respectively.
- the device also includes a determining module for:
- the pruned target network layer in the original neural network is determined to generate a target neural network to process the target data set.
- the determination module is specifically used for:
- the target network layer to be pruned in the original neural network is determined according to the target pruning rate and the maximum pruning rate corresponding to the maximum parameter redundancy of each candidate network layer.
- the data processing device provided by the embodiments of the present disclosure can execute the data processing method provided by any embodiment of the present disclosure, and has functional modules and beneficial effects corresponding to the execution method.
- the data processing solution provided by the embodiment of the present disclosure prunes the candidate network layers in the original neural network respectively according to multiple preset pruning rates.
- Process to obtain the corresponding multiple sub-neural networks input the test data set into the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks for processing, and obtain the reference performance corresponding to the original neural network based on the output data sets of the original neural network and multiple sub-neural networks indicators, as well as multiple test performance indicators corresponding to multiple sub-neural networks.
- Based on the performance loss of multiple test performance indicators relative to the reference performance indicators analyze the parameter redundancy of candidate network layer parameters in the original neural network under different pruning rates.
- Spend Using the above technical solution, parameter redundancy is obtained based on the actual test data set, and the reliability of subsequent pruning is improved, thereby improving the high accuracy of the neural network after pruning and improving the efficiency and accuracy of data processing.
- An embodiment of the present disclosure also provides a computer program product, which includes a computer program/instruction.
- a computer program product which includes a computer program/instruction.
- FIG. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present disclosure.
- the electronic device 400 in the embodiment of the present disclosure may include, but is not limited to, mobile phones, laptops, digital broadcast receivers, PDAs (personal digital assistants), PADs (tablets), PMPs (portable multimedia players), vehicle-mounted terminals ( Mobile terminals such as car navigation terminals) and fixed terminals such as digital TVs, desktop computers, etc.
- the electronic device shown in FIG. 6 is only an example and should not be used in connection with the embodiments of the present disclosure. any limitations on its functions and scope of use.
- the electronic device 400 may include a processing device (eg, central processing unit, graphics processor, etc.) 401 , which may be loaded into a random access device according to a program stored in a read-only memory (ROM) 402 or from a storage device 408 .
- the program in the memory (RAM) 403 executes various appropriate actions and processes.
- various programs and data required for the operation of the electronic device 400 are also stored.
- the processing device 401, ROM 402 and RAM 403 are connected to each other via a bus 404.
- An input/output (I/O) interface 405 is also connected to bus 404.
- the following devices may be connected to the I/O interface 405: input devices 406 including, for example, a touch screen, touch pad, keyboard, mouse, camera, microphone, accelerometer, gyroscope, etc.; including, for example, a liquid crystal display (LCD), speakers, vibration An output device 407 such as a computer; a storage device 408 including a magnetic tape, a hard disk, etc.; and a communication device 409.
- the communication device 409 may allow the electronic device 400 to communicate wirelessly or wiredly with other devices to exchange data.
- FIG. 6 illustrates electronic device 400 with various means, it should be understood that implementation or availability of all illustrated means is not required. More or fewer means may alternatively be implemented or provided.
- embodiments of the present disclosure include a computer program product including a computer program carried on a non-transitory computer-readable medium, the computer program containing program code for performing the method illustrated in the flowchart.
- the computer program may be downloaded and installed from the network via communication device 409, or from storage device 408, or from ROM 402.
- the processing device 401 When the computer program is executed by the processing device 401, the above-mentioned functions defined in the data processing method of the embodiment of the present disclosure are performed.
- the computer-readable medium mentioned above in the present disclosure may be a computer-readable signal medium or a computer-readable storage medium, or any combination of the above two.
- the computer-readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus or device, or any combination thereof.
- computer More specific examples of readable storage media may include, but are not limited to: electrical connections with one or more wires, portable computer disks, hard drives, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), erasable programmable Read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage device, magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the above.
- a computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium that contains or stores a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
- a computer-readable signal medium may include a data signal propagated in baseband or as part of a carrier wave, carrying computer-readable program code therein. Such propagated data signals may take many forms, including but not limited to electromagnetic signals, optical signals, or any suitable combination of the above.
- a computer-readable signal medium may also be any computer-readable medium other than a computer-readable storage medium that can send, propagate, or transmit a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device .
- Program code embodied on a computer-readable medium may be transmitted using any suitable medium, including but not limited to: wire, optical cable, RF (radio frequency), etc., or any suitable combination of the above.
- the client and server can communicate using any currently known or future developed network protocol such as HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol), and can communicate with digital data in any form or medium.
- Data communications e.g., communications network
- communications networks include local area networks (“LAN”), wide area networks (“WAN”), the Internet (e.g., the Internet), and end-to-end networks (e.g., ad hoc end-to-end networks), as well as any currently known or developed in the future network of.
- the above-mentioned computer-readable medium may be included in the above-mentioned electronic device; it may also exist independently without being assembled into the electronic device.
- the computer-readable medium carries one or more programs.
- the electronic device receives the user's information display triggering operation during the playback of the video; obtains the At least two target information associated with the video; display the first target information among the at least two target information in the information display area of the playback page of the video, wherein the size of the information display area is smaller than the Play the size of the page; receive the user's first switching trigger operation, and switch the first target information displayed in the information display area to the second target information among the at least two target information.
- Computer program code for performing the operations of the present disclosure may be written in one or more programming languages, including but not limited to object-oriented programming languages—such as Java, Smalltalk, C++, and Includes conventional procedural programming languages—such as "C” or similar programming languages.
- the program code may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server.
- the remote computer can be connected to the user's computer through any kind of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or it can be connected to an external computer (such as an Internet service provider through Internet connection).
- LAN local area network
- WAN wide area network
- Internet service provider such as an Internet service provider through Internet connection
- each block in the flowchart or block diagram may represent a module, segment, or portion of code that contains one or more logic functions that implement the specified executable instructions.
- the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures. For example, two blocks shown one after another may actually execute substantially in parallel, or they may sometimes execute in the reverse order, depending on the functionality involved.
- each block of the block diagram and/or flowchart illustration, and combinations of blocks in the block diagram and/or flowchart illustration can be implemented by special purpose hardware-based systems that perform the specified functions or operations. , or can be implemented using a combination of specialized hardware and computer instructions.
- the units involved in the embodiments of the present disclosure can be implemented in software or hardware. Among them, the name of a unit does not constitute a limitation on the unit itself under certain circumstances.
- FPGAs Field Programmable Gate Arrays
- ASICs Application Specific Integrated Circuits
- ASSPs Application Specific Standard Products
- SOCs Systems on Chips
- CPLD Complex Programmable Logical device
- a machine-readable medium may be a tangible medium that may contain or store a program for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
- the machine-readable medium may be a machine-readable signal medium or a machine-readable storage medium.
- Machine-readable media may include, but are not limited to, electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor systems, devices or devices, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
- machine-readable storage media would include one or more wire-based electrical connections, laptop disks, hard drives, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), optical storage device, magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the above.
- RAM random access memory
- ROM read only memory
- EPROM or flash memory erasable programmable read only memory
- CD-ROM portable compact disk read-only memory
- magnetic storage device or any suitable combination of the above.
- the present disclosure provides an electronic device, including:
- Memory used to store executable instructions
- the executable instructions can be read from the memory by the processor and executed to implement any of the data processing methods provided by this disclosure.
- the present disclosure provides a computer-readable storage medium, the storage medium stores a computer program, the computer program is used to execute any of the data provided by the present disclosure Approach.
- the present disclosure provides a computer program, including: instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to execute any of the data provided by the present disclosure. Approach.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Image Analysis (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (13)
- 一种数据处理方法,包括:对原始神经网络中的候选网络层,按照预设的多个剪枝率分别进行剪枝处理,以获取对应的多个子神经网络;将测试数据集分别输入所述原始神经网络和多个所述子神经网络进行处理,基于所述原始神经网络和多个所述子神经网络的输出数据集,获取所述原始神经网络对应的参考性能指标,以及多个所述子神经网络对应的多个测试性能指标;根据所述多个测试性能指标相对于所述参考性能指标的性能损失,分析所述原始神经网络中的候选网络层参数在不同剪枝率下的参数冗余度。
- 根据权利要求1所述的数据处理方法,还包括:获取网络压缩需求;根据所述网络压缩需求设置所述多个剪枝率,其中,所述多个剪枝率之间的差异与网络压缩度正相关。
- 根据权利要求1所述的数据处理方法,其中,所述按照预设的多个剪枝率分别进行剪枝处理,以获取对应的多个子神经网络,包括:对所述候选网络层中的权重分布进行范数计算;如果根据计算结果确定所述权重分布属于预设的第一区域分布的候选网络层,则使用预设的第一剪枝器进行剪枝处理,其中,所述第一区域分布的范数区间大于预设的区间阈值,且所述第一区域分布的范数最小值为零;如果根据计算结果确定所述权重分布属于预设的第二区域分布的候选网络层,则使用预设的第二剪枝器进行剪枝处理,其中,所述第二区域分布的范数方差大于预设的方差阈值,且所述第二区域分布的范数最小值不为零。
- 根据权利要求1所述的数据处理方法,其中,所述测试数据集包括:多媒体数据,其中,所述多媒体数据为音频数据、视频数据、图 像数据中的一种或者多种组合。
- 根据权利要求4所述的数据处理方法,其中,所述将测试数据集分别输入所述原始神经网络和多个所述子神经网络进行处理,基于所述原始神经网络和多个所述子神经网络的输出数据集,获取所述原始神经网络对应的参考性能指标,以及多个所述子神经网络对应的多个测试性能指标,包括:将测试图像数据集分别输入所述原始神经网络和每个所述子神经网络进行处理,基于所述原始神经网络和多个所述子神经网络的输出图像数据集与所述测试图像数据集之间的像素处理结果,获取与所述原始神经网络对应的峰值信噪比作为所述参考性能指标,以及与每个所述子神经网络对应的峰值信噪比作为所述测试性能指标;或者,将测试音频数据集分别输入所述原始神经网络和每个所述子神经网络进行处理,基于所述原始神经网络和多个所述子神经网络的输出的识别文字数据集与所述测试音频数据集的标注文字之间的对比结果,获取与所述原始神经网络对应的准确率作为所述参考性能指标,以及与每个所述子神经网络对应的准确率作为所述测试性能指标。
- 根据权利要求1所述的数据处理方法,还包括:检测所述原始神经网络中是否存在具有通道依赖特征的关联网络层,其中,所述通道依赖特征包括:相邻的网络层具有相加的数据操作和相乘的数据操作中的至少一种;如果存在所述关联网络层,将所述具有通道依赖特征的所有关联网络层设置为一个所述候选网络层。
- 根据权利要求1-6任一项所述的数据处理方法,还包括:根据所述候选网络层参数在不同剪枝率下的参数冗余度,确定所述原始神经网络中被剪枝的目标网络层,以生成目标神经网络对目标数据集进行处理。
- 根据权利要求7所述的数据处理方法,其中,所述根据所述候选 网络层参数在不同剪枝率下的参数冗余度,确定所述原始神经网络中被剪枝的目标网络层,包括:根据所述多个测试性能指标相对于所述参考性能指标的性能损失,绘制所述候选网络层与所述多个剪枝率对应的性能指标曲线;计算所述性能指标曲线中每个剪枝率的斜率,根据斜率变化确定所述候选网络层的最大剪枝率,其中,所述最大剪枝率对应的性能指标表示所述候选网络层参数的最大参数冗余度;根据目标剪枝率、每个所述候选网络层的所述最大参数冗余度对应的所述最大剪枝率,确定所述原始神经网络中被剪枝的目标网络层。
- 一种数据处理装置,包括:剪枝处理模块,用于对原始神经网络中的候选网络层,按照预设的多个剪枝率分别进行剪枝处理,以获取对应的多个子神经网络;处理获取模块,用于将测试数据集分别输入所述原始神经网络和多个所述子神经网络进行处理,基于所述原始神经网络和多个所述子神经网络的输出数据集,获取所述原始神经网络对应的参考性能指标,以及多个所述子神经网络对应的多个测试性能指标;分析模块,用于根据所述多个测试性能指标相对于所述参考性能指标的性能损失,分析所述原始神经网络中的候选网络层参数在不同剪枝率下的参数冗余度。
- 一种电子设备,所述电子设备包括:处理器;用于存储可执行指令的存储器;其中所述可执行指令能够由所述处理器从所述存储器中读取,并执行以实现上述权利要求1-8中任一项所述的数据处理方法。
- 一种计算机可读存储介质,所述计算机可读存储介质存储有计算机程序,所述计算机程序用于执行上述权利要求1-8中任一项所述的数据处理方法。
- 一种计算机程序产品,所述计算机程序产品包括计算机程序, 所述计算机程序被处理器执行时实现如权利要求1-8中任一项所述的数据处理方法。
- 一种计算机程序,包括:指令,所述指令当由处理器执行时使所述处理器执行根据权利要求1-8中任一项所述的数据处理方法。
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US18/859,935 US20250292059A1 (en) | 2022-05-13 | 2023-05-12 | Data processing method and apparatus, device, and medium |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202210524932.0 | 2022-05-13 | ||
| CN202210524932.0A CN117114073B (zh) | 2022-05-13 | 2022-05-13 | 数据处理方法、装置、设备及介质 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2023217263A1 true WO2023217263A1 (zh) | 2023-11-16 |
Family
ID=88729783
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2023/093805 Ceased WO2023217263A1 (zh) | 2022-05-13 | 2023-05-12 | 数据处理方法、装置、设备及介质 |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20250292059A1 (zh) |
| CN (1) | CN117114073B (zh) |
| WO (1) | WO2023217263A1 (zh) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN118821893A (zh) * | 2024-09-19 | 2024-10-22 | 浙江大华技术股份有限公司 | 一种网络剪枝方法、装置、终端及计算机可读存储介质 |
| CN119741724A (zh) * | 2025-03-05 | 2025-04-01 | 杰软科技(集团)有限公司 | 基于ocr的实验数据分析方法、装置及电子设备 |
Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111931930A (zh) * | 2020-08-03 | 2020-11-13 | Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 | 模型剪枝方法、装置及电子设备 |
| CN113255910A (zh) * | 2021-05-31 | 2021-08-13 | 浙江宇视科技有限公司 | 卷积神经网络的剪枝方法、装置、电子设备和存储介质 |
| US20210264278A1 (en) * | 2020-02-24 | 2021-08-26 | Adobe Inc. | Neural network architecture pruning |
| WO2022057262A1 (zh) * | 2020-09-17 | 2022-03-24 | 苏州浪潮智能科技有限公司 | 图像识别方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质 |
| CN114282670A (zh) * | 2022-01-14 | 2022-04-05 | 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 | 神经网络模型的压缩方法、设备和存储介质 |
Family Cites Families (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20200272905A1 (en) * | 2019-02-26 | 2020-08-27 | GE Precision Healthcare LLC | Artificial neural network compression via iterative hybrid reinforcement learning approach |
| CN110633747A (zh) * | 2019-09-12 | 2019-12-31 | 网易(杭州)网络有限公司 | 目标检测器的压缩方法、装置、介质以及电子设备 |
| CN112101547B (zh) * | 2020-09-14 | 2024-04-16 | 中国科学院上海微系统与信息技术研究所 | 一种对网络模型的剪枝方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质 |
| CN112906889A (zh) * | 2021-03-03 | 2021-06-04 | 中国科学院计算技术研究所 | 一种用于压缩深度神经网络模型的方法和系统 |
| CN113627389B (zh) * | 2021-08-30 | 2024-08-23 | 京东方科技集团股份有限公司 | 一种目标检测的优化方法及设备 |
-
2022
- 2022-05-13 CN CN202210524932.0A patent/CN117114073B/zh active Active
-
2023
- 2023-05-12 US US18/859,935 patent/US20250292059A1/en active Pending
- 2023-05-12 WO PCT/CN2023/093805 patent/WO2023217263A1/zh not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20210264278A1 (en) * | 2020-02-24 | 2021-08-26 | Adobe Inc. | Neural network architecture pruning |
| CN111931930A (zh) * | 2020-08-03 | 2020-11-13 | Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 | 模型剪枝方法、装置及电子设备 |
| WO2022057262A1 (zh) * | 2020-09-17 | 2022-03-24 | 苏州浪潮智能科技有限公司 | 图像识别方法、装置及计算机可读存储介质 |
| CN113255910A (zh) * | 2021-05-31 | 2021-08-13 | 浙江宇视科技有限公司 | 卷积神经网络的剪枝方法、装置、电子设备和存储介质 |
| CN114282670A (zh) * | 2022-01-14 | 2022-04-05 | 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 | 神经网络模型的压缩方法、设备和存储介质 |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN118821893A (zh) * | 2024-09-19 | 2024-10-22 | 浙江大华技术股份有限公司 | 一种网络剪枝方法、装置、终端及计算机可读存储介质 |
| CN119741724A (zh) * | 2025-03-05 | 2025-04-01 | 杰软科技(集团)有限公司 | 基于ocr的实验数据分析方法、装置及电子设备 |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US20250292059A1 (en) | 2025-09-18 |
| CN117114073A (zh) | 2023-11-24 |
| CN117114073B (zh) | 2026-02-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN114004313B (zh) | 故障gpu的预测方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质 | |
| CN112907628A (zh) | 视频目标追踪方法、装置、存储介质及电子设备 | |
| CN117131281B (zh) | 舆情事件处理方法、装置、电子设备和计算机可读介质 | |
| CN113934938A (zh) | 信息展示的方法、装置、可读介质和电子设备 | |
| WO2023217263A1 (zh) | 数据处理方法、装置、设备及介质 | |
| CN110347875B (zh) | 一种视频场景分类方法、装置、移动终端及存储介质 | |
| CN111460214B (zh) | 分类模型训练方法、音频分类方法、装置、介质及设备 | |
| CN115052188A (zh) | 一种视频剪辑方法、装置、设备及介质 | |
| WO2023000782A1 (zh) | 获取视频热点的方法、装置、可读介质和电子设备 | |
| CN112241761A (zh) | 模型训练方法、装置和电子设备 | |
| CN110956127A (zh) | 用于生成特征向量的方法、装置、电子设备和介质 | |
| CN114697763B (zh) | 一种视频处理方法、装置、电子设备及介质 | |
| CN112906551B (zh) | 视频处理方法、装置、存储介质及电子设备 | |
| CN111582456B (zh) | 用于生成网络模型信息的方法、装置、设备和介质 | |
| CN115631514B (zh) | 基于掌静脉指纹的用户识别方法、装置、设备与介质 | |
| CN118784342A (zh) | 访问设备异常检测方法、装置、电子设备与计算机介质 | |
| CN117055904A (zh) | 内容理解模型的自动化迭代部署方法、装置、设备及介质 | |
| CN116738184A (zh) | 一种应用程序故障分析方法、装置、电子设备及存储介质 | |
| CN116011553A (zh) | 一种数据处理方法、装置、设备和存储介质 | |
| CN113033770A (zh) | 神经网络模型的测试方法、装置和电子设备 | |
| CN114399355B (zh) | 基于用户转化率的信息推送方法、装置和电子设备 | |
| CN116312619B (zh) | 语音活动检测模型生成方法、装置、介质及电子设备 | |
| CN116343905B (zh) | 蛋白质特征的预处理方法、装置、介质及设备 | |
| CN112070163B (zh) | 图像分割模型训练和图像分割方法、装置、设备 | |
| WO2025185276A1 (zh) | 音频处理方法、装置、存储介质及电子设备 |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 23803031 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 18859935 Country of ref document: US |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| 32PN | Ep: public notification in the ep bulletin as address of the adressee cannot be established |
Free format text: NOTING OF LOSS OF RIGHTS PURSUANT TO RULE 112(1) EPC (EPO FORM 1205 DATED 07/03/2025) |
|
| WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 18859935 Country of ref document: US |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 23803031 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |