WO2022239060A1 - システム検証装置、システム検証方法、及び、システム検証プログラム - Google Patents

システム検証装置、システム検証方法、及び、システム検証プログラム Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022239060A1
WO2022239060A1 PCT/JP2021/017693 JP2021017693W WO2022239060A1 WO 2022239060 A1 WO2022239060 A1 WO 2022239060A1 JP 2021017693 W JP2021017693 W JP 2021017693W WO 2022239060 A1 WO2022239060 A1 WO 2022239060A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
function
production environment
status
value
processing system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/JP2021/017693
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
祐一郎 石塚
浩亮 坂田
亮介 佐藤
侑一 須藤
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
NTT Inc
Original Assignee
Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp filed Critical Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp
Priority to JP2023520581A priority Critical patent/JP7633560B2/ja
Priority to US18/288,535 priority patent/US20240211379A1/en
Priority to PCT/JP2021/017693 priority patent/WO2022239060A1/ja
Publication of WO2022239060A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022239060A1/ja
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Prevention of errors by analysis, debugging or testing of software
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/30—Monitoring
    • G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/30—Monitoring
    • G06F11/34—Recording or statistical evaluation of computer activity, e.g. of down time, of input/output operation ; Recording or statistical evaluation of user activity, e.g. usability assessment
    • G06F11/3466—Performance evaluation by tracing or monitoring
    • G06F11/3476—Data logging
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/36—Prevention of errors by analysis, debugging or testing of software
    • G06F11/3698—Environments for analysis, debugging or testing of software
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/60—Software deployment
    • G06F8/65—Updates

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a system verification device, a system verification method, and a system verification program.
  • Non-Patent Document 1 discloses a technique for migrating a system from a test environment to a production environment.
  • the present invention has been made in view of the circumstances described above, and an object of the present invention is to provide a technology that allows easy implementation of system upgrades in the production environment.
  • a system verification apparatus includes a management unit that manages a function status related to the execution status of functions of the processing system using log data of a processing system built in a verification environment, and a value based on the function status. a determining unit that determines whether the value satisfies the application condition value to the production environment; and a renewal unit that switches the function of the processing system to the production environment when the value based on the function status satisfies the application condition value to the production environment. , provided.
  • a system verification apparatus includes a management unit that manages a function status related to the execution status of functions of the processing system using log data of a processing system built in a production environment, and a value based on the function status. a judgment unit for judging whether or not satisfies the discontinued use condition value in the production environment; and a renaming unit that returns to .
  • a system verification method comprises the steps of: a system verification device managing a function status related to the execution status of a function of the processing system using log data of a processing system constructed in a verification environment; determining whether the value based on the status satisfies the conditional value for applicability to the production environment; and switching the function of the processing system to the production environment if the value based on the function status satisfies the conditional value for applicability to the production environment. Step and do.
  • a system verification method comprises the steps of: a system verification device managing a function status related to the execution status of a function of the processing system using log data of a processing system built in a production environment; determining whether a status-based value satisfies a discontinued use condition value in a production environment; and a step of reverting to the functionality of the old version.
  • a system verification program causes a computer to function as the system verification device.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing the whole.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a configuration example of functional blocks of the system verification device 1.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an operation example 1 of the system verification device 1.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a processing image of operation example 1.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a notification example in operation example 1.
  • FIG. FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an operation example 2 of the system verification device 1.
  • FIG. FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a processing image of Operation Example 2.
  • FIG. FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating a notification example in Operation Example 2.
  • FIG. FIG. 9 is a diagram showing an example of management of function status.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram showing a hardware configuration example of the system verification device 1. As shown in FIG.
  • the present invention accumulates and manages the processing contents of the system and the results of execution in the verification environment (influence on other devices, normal execution rate, etc.), and the conditions that the actual results are prescribed in advance (the conditions that the development organization approves the verification) etc.) is satisfied, a system verification device is disclosed that performs a predetermined process.
  • a pre-defined process for example, by registering the process of applying the system to the production environment and updating (Patent No. 5052472, etc.), the system can be automatically updated when the conditions are met. can.
  • the present invention accumulates and manages the results of executing the system in the production environment (normal execution rate, processing time, etc.), and the conditions prescribed in advance by the actual results (such as conditions where the development organization makes continuous use NG).
  • a system verification device that performs a predetermined operation when the conditions are satisfied. For example, by registering system recovery processing as the predetermined operation, the system can be automatically recovered when the conditions are met.
  • the above system verification device it is possible for the operator to easily check the quality of the system and automatically apply it to the production environment.
  • the system can be automatically restored when there is an abnormality in quality. It is no longer necessary to coordinate between the development organization and the operation organization for each renewal, and a reduction in the amount of work involved in verification and operation can be expected.
  • the system verification device has a function of managing the status of each function in the verification environment of the system, and a function of managing the status of each function in the verification environment of the system and and a function of managing the status of each function.
  • the status of each function is the normal execution rate of each function.
  • users of the system verification device 1 (developers of the development organization, verifiers of the verification organization, operators of the operation organization, etc.) appropriately execute the system in the verification environment. For example, an operation for system proficiency is assumed.
  • a log file is generated in the verification environment system as a history of function execution of the system.
  • the system verification device 1 calculates and manages the normal execution rate and the like for each function of the system based on the log files and code files of the system. Then, when the normal execution rate of each function satisfies a predetermined conditional expression (when sufficient quality is ensured), the system verification device 1 executes a predetermined process to Apply/update the function that satisfies the conditional expression to the production environment.
  • the user of the system verification device 1 appropriately executes the system in the production environment. For example, normal operation of the system is assumed. At this time, a log file is generated in the production environment system as a history of function execution of the system. The system verification device 1 calculates and manages the normal execution rate and processing time of each function in the production environment based on the log files and code files of the system. Then, when the normal execution rate of each function, the processing time, and the like satisfy a predetermined conditional expression (when abnormal deterioration in quality is observed), the system verification apparatus 1 The function that satisfies the conditional expression is restored by executing the process specified by the conditional expression.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a configuration example of functional blocks of the system verification device 1 according to this embodiment.
  • the system verification device 1 includes a system status manager 10 .
  • the system status management unit 10 has a function of managing the status of each function of the verification environment processing system developed and modified by the developer.
  • the system status management unit 10 also has a function of managing the status of each function of the production environment processing system in which the service is in actual operation.
  • the system status management unit 10 includes, for example, a management unit 11, a determination unit 12, a renewal unit 13, a message definition file DB 14, a function status DB 15, and a conditional expression DB 16. , provided.
  • the names of these functional units may be expressed as processing unit, execution unit, control unit, processing execution unit, storage unit, and the like.
  • a plurality of functional units may be integrated into a single functional unit, or a single functional unit may be divided into a plurality of functional units.
  • the management unit 11 has a function of managing the function status related to the execution status of the functions of the system using the log files and code files of the system built in the verification environment. Also, the management unit 11 has a function of managing the function status related to the execution status of the functions of the system using log files and code files of the system constructed in the production environment.
  • the determination unit 12 has a function of determining whether the value based on the function status satisfies the application condition value for the production environment. Further, the determination unit 12 has a function of determining whether or not the value based on the function status satisfies the discontinued use condition value in the production environment.
  • the update unit 13 has a function to switch the system function to the production environment by executing a predetermined process when the value based on the function status satisfies the application condition value to the production environment. In addition, when the value based on the function status satisfies the discontinued use condition value in the production environment, the updating unit 13 executes a predetermined process to restore the function of the system to the function of the old version. ) function.
  • the message definition file DB 14 has a function of storing message definition files that define key information for obtaining predetermined messages from log files and code files.
  • the function status DB 15 has a function of storing function statuses related to the execution status of system functions.
  • the conditional expression DB 16 has a function of storing applicable condition values to the production environment and discontinued use condition values in the production environment.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an operation example 1 of the system verification device 1. As shown in FIG. It is assumed that the user of the system verification device 1 is properly running the system in the verification environment. For example, an operation for system proficiency is assumed.
  • Step S101 First, the operator of the system verification device 1 creates and determines in advance application conditions (applicable condition values to the production environment) that serve as criteria for application to the production environment. Then, the system verification device 1 registers the determined applicable conditions as a conditional expression list in the conditional expression DB 16 .
  • the operator of the system verification device 1 has the degree of impact on the production environment automatically calculated by scanning the code of the function, and the normal execution rate of the function calculated from the execution result of the function. , is registered as a conditional expression list.
  • “Low” is set for the impact when the function code is read-only, such as HTTP GET only.
  • the function code includes write processing such as "registration”, “delete”, and “update”, such as HTTP POST, "high” is set.
  • a value corresponding to the degree of impact is set in the normal execution rate. For example, when the degree of influence is “low”, “90% or more” is set. If the degree of influence is “high”, “95% or more” is set.
  • Step S102 the system verification device 1 determines whether or not the function of the system in the verification environment has been executed.
  • the system verification device 1 refers to the log file generated by the system, and determines that the function has been executed when a log indicating the execution of the function is newly added to the log file.
  • the system verification device 1 proceeds to step S103 if the function is executed, and repeats step S102 until the function is executed if the function is not executed.
  • Step S103 Each time the system functions are executed in the verification environment, the system verification device 1 acquires, calculates, and updates values corresponding to the application conditions of the conditional expression list.
  • the management unit 11 of the system verification device 1 acquires the log file of the system and the code file of the executed function from the system of the verification environment. Then, the management unit 11 acquires the acquisition target message defined in the message definition file from the log file or code file. After that, the management unit 11 updates the value corresponding to the application condition of the conditional expression list based on the acquisition target message. For example, when function A is executed, the execution count and normal execution count included in the function status of function A are updated as shown in FIG.
  • the management unit 11 updates the function status of each executed function, and stores the updated function status in the function status DB 15. to manage.
  • Step S104 Each time the function status is updated, the system verification device 1 checks whether the updated function status satisfies the application conditions of the conditional expression list.
  • the determination unit 12 of the system verification device 1 calculates the current normal execution rate [%] of the function A by dividing the number of normal executions included in the function status of the updated function A by the number of executions. . After that, as shown in FIG. 4, the determination unit 12 compares the current normal execution rate EX1 of the function A with the normal execution rate EX2 of the function A registered in the conditional expression list.
  • the determination unit 12 determines that the application condition, which is the criterion for application to the production environment, is satisfied for the function A, and proceeds to step S104.
  • the determination unit 12 determines that the function A does not meet the application criteria for application to the production environment, and returns to step S102.
  • Step S105 If the adaptation condition is satisfied, the system verification device 1 introduces the system into the operational environment.
  • the updating unit 13 of the system verification device 1 may apply By executing predetermined processing such as switching processing of setting information of the disclosed program, the functions that satisfy the application conditions are applied and updated to the production environment.
  • the verification environment is built on a LAN environment common to the production environment, and the update unit 13 rewrites the system address setting to the address setting of the production environment, thereby applying the function that satisfies the application condition to the production environment. ⁇ Update.
  • the updating unit 13 displays a switching confirmation message as shown in FIG. You may make it apply to an environment.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an operation example 2 of the system verification device 1. As shown in FIG. It is assumed that the user of the system verification device 1 is properly running the system in the production environment. For example, normal operation of the system is assumed.
  • Step S201 First, the operator of the system verification device 1 creates and determines in advance an application condition (non-continuous usage condition value in the production environment) that serves as an application criterion for functional recovery in the production environment. Then, the system verification device 1 registers the determined applicable conditions as a conditional expression list in the conditional expression DB 16 .
  • the operator of the system verification device 1 registers, as a conditional expression list, a processing time divergence value that indicates how much the latest processing time of a function exceeds the past average processing time. do.
  • Step S202 the system verification device 1 determines whether or not the function of the system in the production environment has been executed.
  • the system verification device 1 refers to the log file generated by the system, and determines that the function has been executed when a log indicating the execution of the function is newly added to the log file.
  • the system verification device 1 proceeds to step S203 if the function is executed, and repeats step S202 until the function is executed if the function is not executed.
  • Step S203 Each time the system functions are executed in the production environment, the system verification device 1 acquires, calculates, and updates values corresponding to the application conditions of the conditional expression list.
  • the management unit 11 of the system verification device 1 acquires the log file of the system and the code file of the executed function from the production environment system. Then, the management unit 11 acquires the acquisition target message defined in the message definition file from the log file or code file. After that, the management unit 11 updates the value corresponding to the application condition of the conditional expression list based on the acquisition target message. For example, when function A is executed, the average processing time and the latest processing time included in the function status of function A are updated as shown in FIG.
  • the management unit 11 updates the function status of each executed function each time each function of the system is executed in the production environment, and stores the updated function status in the function status DB 15. to manage.
  • Step S204 Each time the function status is updated, the system verification device 1 checks whether the updated function status satisfies the application conditions of the conditional expression list.
  • the determination unit 12 of the system verification device 1 divides the latest processing time included in the function status of the function A after updating by the average processing time, thereby obtaining the divergence value [%] of the current processing time of the function A. Calculate Thereafter, as shown in FIG. 7, the determination unit 12 compares the deviation value DI1 of the processing time of the function A at the present time with the deviation value DI2 of the processing time of the function A registered in the conditional expression list. do.
  • step S204 determines that the function A satisfies the application condition, which is the application criterion for functional recovery in the production environment.
  • step S204 determines that the function A does not satisfy the application condition that serves as the application criterion for functional recovery in the production environment.
  • Step S205 If the adaptation condition is satisfied, the system verification device 1 introduces the system into the operational environment.
  • the updating unit 13 of the system verification device 1 preliminarily By executing the specified processing, the functions that satisfy the applicable conditions are restored.
  • the update unit 13 restores the function that satisfies the application condition by inputting a command to switch the connection destination of the function to the function of the old version.
  • the updating unit 13 displays a switching confirmation message as shown in FIG. may be executed.
  • the operator of the system verification device 1 checks execution messages, end messages, etc., in log files and code files in order to determine whether execution of functions, termination of execution, etc., is included in log files and code files.
  • a character string included in is defined in advance.
  • the system verification device 1 records the defined character string in the message definition file and registers the message definition file in the message definition file DB 14 .
  • the operator of the system verification device 1 has "executed” as an execution message, a processing ID as linking information, a "normal end” or “abnormal end” as an end message, and a normal end message
  • record a character string such as "normal termination” as a message and "post” as an impact determination message.
  • the management unit 11 of the system verification device 1 scans the log data of the log files in the system and the code data of the code files, the management unit 11 reads the character strings recorded in the message definition file to replace the character strings. Depending on whether or not it is included, information necessary for managing the function status, such as "executed”, “finished”, “completed normally”, etc., is detected in log files and code files.
  • the management unit 11 performs log From the log information in the file, obtain target messages such as the ID of the executed function, execution result (normal end or abnormal end), execution start time, and execution end time.
  • the function status includes, for example, the number of function executions, the number of normal executions, the latest execution time, the degree of influence, the average processing time, the latest processing time, the cumulative processing time, and the like.
  • the number of executions and the number of normal executions are calculated for each function execution unit, function update unit, or system update unit. Specifically, if the execution end time of a function included in the log file acquired by regular execution is newer than the latest time accumulated in the function status of the function, add 1 to the execution count of the function status. do. Also, if the execution of the function has ended normally, 1 is added to the number of times of normal execution.
  • search for the message "Function A was executed” in the log file and if the execution time of function A has not already been checked, add it to the number of executions. Also, if the result code corresponding to the message indicates normal termination, it is added to the number of normal executions.
  • the latest execution time is the execution end time of the function contained in the log file.
  • the degree of impact is also calculated for each function execution unit, each function update unit, or each system update unit.
  • the code file of the executed function is searched, and if it has the register/update/delete function, it is set to "high", and if it does not have it, it is set to "low". For example, in the case of REST format, if "POST" is included in the code file, it will be “high”, and if "POST” is not included, it will be “low”.
  • the impact of each function is updated when the execution time of the executed function is updated.
  • the code file is, for example, the source code of the function before compilation, or the source code included in the file of the function if the function can be executed without compiling.
  • the average processing time, latest processing time, and cumulative processing time are also calculated for each function execution unit, function update unit, or system update unit. Specifically, if the execution end time of the function included in the log file acquired by regular execution is newer than the latest time accumulated in the function status of the function, the execution end time and the execution end time The associated execution start time is acquired, and a value obtained by subtracting the execution start time from the execution end time is set as the latest processing time. Also, the cumulative processing time is updated by adding the latest processing time to the cumulative processing time of the function status. Also, a value obtained by dividing the cumulative processing time by the number of times of execution is defined as the average processing time.
  • the system verification apparatus 1 includes the management unit 11 that manages the function status related to the execution status of the functions of the processing system using the log data of the processing system constructed in the verification environment, and the function status and a determining unit 12 for determining whether the value based on the function status satisfies the application condition value to the production environment, and if the value based on the function status satisfies the application condition value to the production environment, the function of the processing system is transferred to the production environment. and a updating unit 13 for switching.
  • the system verification device 1 uses the log data of the processing system built in the production environment to manage the function status related to the execution status of the functions of the processing system; a determining unit 12 for determining whether a value based on the function status satisfies the discontinued use condition value in the production environment; and if the value based on the function status satisfies the discontinued use condition value in the production environment, the processing system and a renewal unit 13 for returning the function of the old version to the function of the old version.
  • the system verification device By using the above system verification device, it is possible for the operator to easily check the quality of the system and automatically apply it to the production environment. That is, as long as the user (operator) of the system verification device performs an operation for proficiency, the system verification device automatically applies the system to the production environment.
  • the system verification device 1 of this embodiment described above includes, for example, a CPU 901, a memory 902, a storage 903, a communication device 904, an input device 905, and an output device 906, as shown in FIG. It can be realized using a general-purpose computer system.
  • Memory 902 and storage 903 are storage devices.
  • each function of the system verification apparatus 1 is realized by the CPU 901 executing a predetermined program loaded on the memory 902 .
  • the system verification device 1 may be implemented by one computer.
  • the system verification device 1 may be implemented by multiple computers.
  • the system verification device 1 may be a virtual machine implemented on a computer.
  • a program for the system verification device 1 can be stored in computer-readable recording media such as HDD, SSD, USB memory, CD, and DVD.
  • the program for system verification device 1 can also be distributed via a communication network.
  • System verification device 10 System status management unit 11: Management unit 12: Judgment unit 13: Renewal unit 14: Message definition file DB 15: Function status DB 16: Conditional expression DB 901: CPU 902: Memory 903: Storage 904: Communication device 905: Input device 906: Output device

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
  • Stored Programmes (AREA)
PCT/JP2021/017693 2021-05-10 2021-05-10 システム検証装置、システム検証方法、及び、システム検証プログラム Ceased WO2022239060A1 (ja)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2023520581A JP7633560B2 (ja) 2021-05-10 2021-05-10 システム検証装置、システム検証方法、及び、システム検証プログラム
US18/288,535 US20240211379A1 (en) 2021-05-10 2021-05-10 System verification apparatus, system verification method and program
PCT/JP2021/017693 WO2022239060A1 (ja) 2021-05-10 2021-05-10 システム検証装置、システム検証方法、及び、システム検証プログラム

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2021/017693 WO2022239060A1 (ja) 2021-05-10 2021-05-10 システム検証装置、システム検証方法、及び、システム検証プログラム

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022239060A1 true WO2022239060A1 (ja) 2022-11-17

Family

ID=84028488

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2021/017693 Ceased WO2022239060A1 (ja) 2021-05-10 2021-05-10 システム検証装置、システム検証方法、及び、システム検証プログラム

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20240211379A1 (https=)
JP (1) JP7633560B2 (https=)
WO (1) WO2022239060A1 (https=)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005250732A (ja) * 2004-03-03 2005-09-15 Fujitsu Ltd バージョンアップ制御プログラムおよびバージョンアップ制御方法
JP2006099393A (ja) * 2004-09-29 2006-04-13 Sharp Corp ファームウェア管理装置、ファームウェア管理プログラム、電子機器、記録媒体、及びファームウェア管理方法
JP2010231488A (ja) * 2009-03-27 2010-10-14 Fujitsu Ltd 監視システム、監視プログラム及び監視方法
JP2016189087A (ja) * 2015-03-30 2016-11-04 ビッグローブ株式会社 基盤ソフト運用管理システム、基盤ソフト運用管理装置、制御方法およびプログラム
JP2020030506A (ja) * 2018-08-21 2020-02-27 三菱電機株式会社 制御システムの検証システム及びパッチ適用判定装置

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4232767B2 (ja) * 2005-03-14 2009-03-04 セイコーエプソン株式会社 ソフトウェア認証システムおよびソフトウェア認証プログラム、並びにソフトウェア認証方法
WO2010116586A1 (ja) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-14 株式会社野村総合研究所 動作検証装置、動作検証方法、および動作検証システム
JP5968451B2 (ja) * 2012-09-28 2016-08-10 株式会社日立製作所 計算機システム、及びプログラム
US20180285247A1 (en) * 2017-03-29 2018-10-04 The Travelers Indemnity Company Systems, methods, and apparatus for automated code testing
US10705880B2 (en) * 2017-09-22 2020-07-07 Vmware, Inc. Cluster updating using temporary update-monitor pod
US11055081B2 (en) * 2018-09-17 2021-07-06 International Business Machines Corporation Recommending software project dependency upgrades
JP6951375B2 (ja) * 2019-03-11 2021-10-20 株式会社東芝 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及びプログラム

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2005250732A (ja) * 2004-03-03 2005-09-15 Fujitsu Ltd バージョンアップ制御プログラムおよびバージョンアップ制御方法
JP2006099393A (ja) * 2004-09-29 2006-04-13 Sharp Corp ファームウェア管理装置、ファームウェア管理プログラム、電子機器、記録媒体、及びファームウェア管理方法
JP2010231488A (ja) * 2009-03-27 2010-10-14 Fujitsu Ltd 監視システム、監視プログラム及び監視方法
JP2016189087A (ja) * 2015-03-30 2016-11-04 ビッグローブ株式会社 基盤ソフト運用管理システム、基盤ソフト運用管理装置、制御方法およびプログラム
JP2020030506A (ja) * 2018-08-21 2020-02-27 三菱電機株式会社 制御システムの検証システム及びパッチ適用判定装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP7633560B2 (ja) 2025-02-20
US20240211379A1 (en) 2024-06-27
JPWO2022239060A1 (https=) 2022-11-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP5444368B2 (ja) アプリケーション復元ポイント
US10019256B2 (en) Systems and methods for incremental software development
KR102055024B1 (ko) 클라이언트측 최소 다운로드 및 시뮬레이션 페이지 네비게이션 기능
CN100377532C (zh) 管理系统和管理方法
US20170371639A1 (en) Updating live system with static changes
JP2021002317A (ja) アプリケーションをアップグレードするための方法、装置、デバイスならびに記憶媒体
US20120130906A1 (en) Deployment mechanism for non-versioning business process artifacts
JP2014142678A (ja) 仮想サーバ移行計画作成方法およびシステム
WO2016016975A1 (ja) 開発支援システム
CN106648564A (zh) 一种用于采集业务数据的方法和装置
US20130086572A1 (en) Generation apparatus, generation method and computer readable information recording medium
US11467918B2 (en) System and method for resilient backup generation
EP3974965B1 (en) Adaptive hot reload for class changes
CN111949287B (zh) 软件升级方法和装置
CN106484312A (zh) 一种虚拟机磁盘数据迁移方法及装置
US20220326927A1 (en) Abort installation of firmware bundles
CN116382694A (zh) 一种提升容器环境下Maven工程编译速度的方法
JP6468098B2 (ja) 情報処理プログラム、装置、及び方法
JP2019020798A (ja) 情報処理装置およびプログラム
US11424982B2 (en) Remediation of a system to new desired state using configuration dependency graph
JP7633560B2 (ja) システム検証装置、システム検証方法、及び、システム検証プログラム
US20140067919A1 (en) Storage medium, method and device
US8707307B2 (en) Creating jobs by replacing execution attributes within job definition when a job activation request is received with execution attributes based on predetermined conditions being satisfied
JP6045707B2 (ja) ライセンス管理装置、ライセンス管理方法、及びプログラム
CN111737964B (zh) 表格动态处理方法、设备及介质

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 21941794

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2023520581

Country of ref document: JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 18288535

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 21941794

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1