WO2021032425A1 - Imposing quality requirements on 3d models with support structures - Google Patents

Imposing quality requirements on 3d models with support structures Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2021032425A1
WO2021032425A1 PCT/EP2020/071377 EP2020071377W WO2021032425A1 WO 2021032425 A1 WO2021032425 A1 WO 2021032425A1 EP 2020071377 W EP2020071377 W EP 2020071377W WO 2021032425 A1 WO2021032425 A1 WO 2021032425A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
quality
degree
model
attributed
added
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/EP2020/071377
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Simon Tanaka
Christian Stahl
Daniel Weiss
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sirona Dental Systems GmbH
Dentsply Sirona Inc
Original Assignee
Sirona Dental Systems GmbH
Dentsply Sirona Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sirona Dental Systems GmbH, Dentsply Sirona Inc filed Critical Sirona Dental Systems GmbH
Priority to JP2022511111A priority Critical patent/JP7559051B2/en
Priority to KR1020227008816A priority patent/KR20220047626A/en
Priority to CN202080058366.8A priority patent/CN114269546B/en
Priority to CA3150405A priority patent/CA3150405A1/en
Priority to BR112022002468A priority patent/BR112022002468A2/en
Priority to US17/634,827 priority patent/US20220297385A1/en
Priority to AU2020331649A priority patent/AU2020331649B2/en
Publication of WO2021032425A1 publication Critical patent/WO2021032425A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00—Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/40—Structures for supporting 3D objects during manufacture and intended to be sacrificed after completion thereof
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00—Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/20—Apparatus for additive manufacturing; Details thereof or accessories therefor
    • B29C64/245—Platforms or substrates
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
    • B29C—SHAPING OR JOINING OF PLASTICS; SHAPING OF MATERIAL IN A PLASTIC STATE, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; AFTER-TREATMENT OF THE SHAPED PRODUCTS, e.g. REPAIRING
    • B29C64/00—Additive manufacturing, i.e. manufacturing of three-dimensional [3D] objects by additive deposition, additive agglomeration or additive layering, e.g. by 3D printing, stereolithography or selective laser sintering
    • B29C64/30—Auxiliary operations or equipment
    • B29C64/386—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33Y—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y30/00—Apparatus for additive manufacturing; Details thereof or accessories therefor
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B33—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY
    • B33Y—ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, i.e. MANUFACTURING OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL [3D] OBJECTS BY ADDITIVE DEPOSITION, ADDITIVE AGGLOMERATION OR ADDITIVE LAYERING, e.g. BY 3D PRINTING, STEREOLITHOGRAPHY OR SELECTIVE LASER SINTERING
    • B33Y50/00—Data acquisition or data processing for additive manufacturing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B19/02—Program-control systems electric
    • G05B19/18—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of program data in numerical form
    • G05B19/4097—Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of program data in numerical form characterised by using design data to control NC machines, e.g. CAD/CAM
    • G05B19/4099—Surface or curve machining, making three-dimensional [3D] objects, e.g. desktop manufacturing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Neural networks
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/49—Nc machine tool, till multiple
    • G05B2219/49023—3-D printing, layer of powder, add drops of binder in layer, new powder
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N1/00—Scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, e.g. facsimile transmission; Details thereof
    • H04N1/40—Picture signal circuits
    • H04N1/409—Edge or detail enhancement; Noise or error suppression

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an additive manufacturing method and apparatus.
  • the present invention more particularly relates to a method of additively manufacturing a 3D model including support structures.
  • a 3D object is printed layer-by-layer through light-based curing of a liquid printing medium i.e., a liquid photocurable resin, which is selectively cured under the influence of UV radiation.
  • a liquid printing medium i.e., a liquid photocurable resin
  • the 3D objects are preferably pulled by means of a platform, upside-down out of the liquid photocurable material filled in a vat.
  • Other variations of additive manufacturing are also known to those skilled in the art.
  • the support structures After the 3D printing, the cleaning, the thermal and/or photochemical curing of the 3D object, the support structures must be mechanically removed.
  • the removal process is time- consuming and potentially leads to a change in the geometry of the 3D obj ect e.g. when finishing with a rotary tool.
  • dental components such as dental restorations, drilling templates, dental models, and the like with high quality requirements on shape accuracy, the consequences of mechanical post-processing can become critical.
  • An objective of the present invention is to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art and provide a method of imposing quality requirements on a 3D model including support structures to be built by an additive manufacturing apparatus. This objective has been achieved through the method as defined in claim 1.
  • the dependent claims relate to further developments.
  • the present invention provides a method of imposing quality requirements on a 3D model including support structures to be built by an additive manufacturing apparatus which comprises a platform for holding the 3D object corresponding to the 3D model.
  • the method comprises: a step of defining the surface geometry and the orientation of the 3D model with respect to the platform, wherein the surface geometry includes surface segments; a step of attributing a degree of quality to the surface segments respectively against post-processing for the subsequent removal of the support structures; a step of calculating, based on the defined orientation, the surface geometry and the degree of quality attributed, the positions on the surface segments where the support structure may be added; and a step of adding the support structure to the 3D model based on the calculated positions and the degree of quality attributed.
  • a major advantageous effect of the present invention is that, the support structures can be avoided or reduced as much as possible at such locations which, compared to other locations of the 3D object to be 3D printed, have an increased need for protection against mechanical post-processing.
  • surface artefacts, surface damages, deformations due to mechanical post-processing can be avoided or reduced in sensitive surface segments of the 3D model, and the need for investing manual extra work for a precise removal of the support structures can be obviated or reduced as much as possible.
  • the time required for manual post processing of the 3D printed object can be reduced, and costs can be saved.
  • the method steps are performed entirely or at least partly through a computer algorithm.
  • the computer algorithm preferably comprises a neural network capable of recognizing features of the 3D model to be built by the additive manufacturing apparatus.
  • the steps are further performed preferably based on the recognized features.
  • the neural network can be trained with real or simulated 3D models to recognize the surface segments which are sensitive against post-processing.
  • a user is optionally allowed to manually mark, on a display of the 3D model, one or more surface segments respectively with a desired degree of quality, or also to define the number of degrees of qualities that can be selectively attributed.
  • the degree of quality comprises at least a low degree of quality and a high degree of quality.
  • the low degree of quality implies that the respective surface segment is not worth protecting in post-processing.
  • the high degree of quality implies that the respective surface segment is worth protecting in post-processing.
  • One or more intermediate degrees of quality may also be additionally employed to improve the results.
  • a quantity which indicates a measure of the need of that surface segment to be supported through a support structure is optionally assigned.
  • a larger value of the quantity indicates a stronger need for support.
  • the quantity is preferably a scalar quantity which is a function of the inclination of the surface segment with respect to the building direction.
  • the scalar quantity is preferably equal to the inner product of the normal vector of the surface segment and the unit vector opposite to the building direction.
  • no support structure is added to the 3D model at a position that falls into a surface segment whose normal vector has a positive component in the building direction. That means such surface segments which point away from the building platform are not suitable for the attachment of a supporting structure.
  • the calculating step optionally, first, the positions of all local minima of the 3D model are found with respect to the building direction, and the support structures corresponding to the positions at the local minima are added to the 3D model regardless of the attributed degree of quality. Thereby the risk of misprints can be prevented or reduced as much as possible.
  • the assignment of the quantity to the surface segment is optionally updated such that the quantity is equal to a first constant for a surface segment at whose position a support structure has been added, and such that the quantities of the neighboring surface segments are reduced through a factor which is a function depending on the three- dimensional distance vector from the surface segment to which the support structure has been added to the neighboring surface segment, wherein the function is unity if the three- dimensional distance vector has no positive component in building direction.
  • the function preferably asymptotically approaches unity with increasing magnitude of the three- dimensional distance vector.
  • the updated quantities of the surface segments are grouped in descending order into groups corresponding to the attributed degree of quality in ascending order.
  • a support structure is added at the surface segment with the largest updated quantity.
  • the steps are repeated for each group until the updated highest quantities drop below predetermined levels respectively associated with the groups.
  • the support structures for which the calculated positions fall into in the surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality are optionally not added to the 3D model. Thereby the surface segments which are sensitive against post processing can be protected.
  • the support structures for which the calculated positions fall into in the surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality are alternatively optionally displaced to nearby surface segments which have been attributed a low degree of quality.
  • the surface geometry of the 3D model is preferably represented through tri angulation.
  • Such tri angulation is convenient for the calculations.
  • other type of meshes with different geometries may be used.
  • the present invention also provides a computer algorithm having computer-readable codes for causing a CAD module to carry out the method steps.
  • the present invention also provides a computer readable storage which stores the computer algorithm.
  • Fig. 1 - is an enlarged view of the detail A in Fig. 2, which shows a support structure added to a surface segment on the 3D model;
  • Fig. 2 - shows the support structures added to the 3D model.
  • Fig. 2 shows a part of a 3D object (1) according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the 3D object (1) is partly built with an additive manufacturing apparatus.
  • the building direction is the z direction.
  • the additive manufacturing apparatus has a platform (3) for holding the 3D object (1).
  • the 3D object (1) includes support structures (2) attached to the platform (3).
  • the 3D object (1) corresponds to a 3D model (1) to which quality requirements have been imposed through the method of the present invention.
  • the method steps are performed through a computer algorithm.
  • the computer algorithm preferably comprises a neural network capable of recognizing features of the 3D model.
  • the method steps are further performed based on these recognized features.
  • the method steps will be described in the following.
  • the surface geometry and the orientation of the 3D model (1) is defined with respect to the platform (3).
  • the surface geometry includes a plurality of surface segments.
  • the surface geometry of the 3D model (1) is represented through tri angulation such that the surface segments are triangles (not shown). Other representations may be alternatively used.
  • a degree of quality (L;H) is attributed to the surface segments respectively indicating the sensitivity and the need of protection against post-processing during any subsequent removal of the support structures (2).
  • the degree of quality (L;H) comprises preferably at least a low degree of quality (L) and a high degree of quality (H). Further degrees of quality may be optionally added.
  • the user is allowed to mark, on a display of the 3D model (1), one or more surface segments respectively with a desired degree of quality (L;H).
  • the attributing step can be performed entirely by the computer algorithm, without intervention of the user, based on the recognized features.
  • the thick lines on the surface segments of the 3D model (1) indicate a high degree of quality attributed.
  • Other surface segments of the 3D model (1) indicate a low degree of quality attributed.
  • the calculating step based on the defined orientation, the surface geometry, and the degree of quality (L;H) attributed, the positions on the surface segments where the support structure (2) may be added are calculated. The calculation step will be explained in more detail with the help of Fig. 1 which is an enlarged view of the detail A in Fig. 2. In the calculating step, as shown in Fig.
  • the I th surface segment is assigned a quantity s t which indicates a measure of the need of the i th surface segment to be supported through a support structure (2).
  • i denotes an integer.
  • the larger value of s t indicates a stronger need for support.
  • the quantity s t is a scalar quantity which is a function of the inclination of the resurface segment with respect to the building direction.
  • S j rq e_ z , where “ ⁇ ” denotes the inner product, tz denotes the normal vector of the i th surface segment, and e_ z denotes the vertical unit vector directed towards the platform (3).
  • No support structure (2) is added to the 3D model (1) at a position that falls into a surface segment with s t ⁇ 0, i.e., whose normal vector has a positive component in the building direction.
  • the calculation step as shown in Fig. 2, first, the positions of all local minima (m) of the 3D model (1) are found.
  • the support structure (2) are added to the 3D model (1) based on the calculated positions and the degree of quality (L;H) attributed.
  • the support structures (2) corresponding to the positions at the local minima (m) are added to the 3D model (1) regardless of the value of the attributed degree of quality (L; H).
  • the function /(f) is asymptotically approaching unity with increasing magnitude of .
  • the dotted area in Fig. 1 indicates the range of the factor / (f ) in the building direction.
  • /(f) is preferably defined through the function 1 — Exp [— r 2 /c 2 2 ].
  • Flere r is the magnitude of f.
  • the constant c 2 is a positive constant for the normalization.
  • / (f ) is unity if f has no positive component in building direction.
  • the curly bracket indicates at least part of the range of application of the factor / (r) in the building direction.
  • the constant c is preferably equal to zero.
  • the updated S j quantities of the surface segments are grouped in descending order into groups corresponding to the attributed degree of quality. And the groups are further arranged in an ascending order.
  • a support structure (2) is added at the surface segment with the largest updated s t quantity.
  • the procedure is cyclically repeated until the updated highest s t quantities drop below predetermined levels c 3 associated with the groups respectively.
  • c 3 are constants and define how strongly the 3D model (1) is to be supported. A stronger suppression of support structures (2) on surface segments with higher degree of quality attributed can be achieved by selecting the constant c 3 higher for the higher degree of quality.
  • the total number of added support structures (2) can be influenced by the parameter c 2.
  • the support structures (2) for which the calculated positions fall into surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality (H) are not added to the 3D model (1).
  • the support structures (2) for which the calculated positions fall into surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality (H) are displaced to nearby surface segments which have been attributed a low degree quality (L).

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method of imposing quality requirements on a 3D model (1) including support structures (2) to be built by an additive manufacturing apparatus comprising: a platform (3) for holding the 3D object corresponding to the 3D model (1), the method comprising: a step of defining the surface geometry and the orientation of the 3D model (1) with respect to the platform (3), wherein the surface geometry includes surface segments; characterized by further comprising: a step of attributing a degree of quality (L;H) to the surface segments respectively against post-processing for the subsequent removal of the support structures (2); a step of calculating, based on the defined orientation, the surface geometry and the degree of quality (L;H) attributed, the positions on the surface segments where the support structure (2) may be added; and a step of adding the support structure (2) to the 3D model (1) based on the calculated positions and the degree of quality (L;H) attributed.

Description

IMPOSING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS ON 3D MODELS WITH SUPPORT STRUCTURES
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an additive manufacturing method and apparatus. The present invention more particularly relates to a method of additively manufacturing a 3D model including support structures.
BACKGROUND ART OF THE INVENTION
In additive manufacturing, a 3D object is printed layer-by-layer through light-based curing of a liquid printing medium i.e., a liquid photocurable resin, which is selectively cured under the influence of UV radiation. In a commonly known variation of additive manufacturing, the 3D objects are preferably pulled by means of a platform, upside-down out of the liquid photocurable material filled in a vat. Other variations of additive manufacturing are also known to those skilled in the art.
During the 3D printing, enough support structures must be attached to the 3D object. The locations on the surface of the 3D object where the support structures must be attached depend on the geometry of the 3D object to be 3D printed and the orientation of the 3D object with respect to the platform.
It is generally known in the art which points of a given geometry require support structures for a given orientation of the 3D object. For instance, US 2015/0151492 A1 discloses a method of generating support structures for a 3D object to be additively manufactured.
After the 3D printing, the cleaning, the thermal and/or photochemical curing of the 3D object, the support structures must be mechanically removed. The removal process is time- consuming and potentially leads to a change in the geometry of the 3D obj ect e.g. when finishing with a rotary tool. For dental components such as dental restorations, drilling templates, dental models, and the like with high quality requirements on shape accuracy, the consequences of mechanical post-processing can become critical.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
An objective of the present invention is to overcome the disadvantages of the prior art and provide a method of imposing quality requirements on a 3D model including support structures to be built by an additive manufacturing apparatus. This objective has been achieved through the method as defined in claim 1. The dependent claims relate to further developments.
The present invention provides a method of imposing quality requirements on a 3D model including support structures to be built by an additive manufacturing apparatus which comprises a platform for holding the 3D object corresponding to the 3D model. The method comprises: a step of defining the surface geometry and the orientation of the 3D model with respect to the platform, wherein the surface geometry includes surface segments; a step of attributing a degree of quality to the surface segments respectively against post-processing for the subsequent removal of the support structures; a step of calculating, based on the defined orientation, the surface geometry and the degree of quality attributed, the positions on the surface segments where the support structure may be added; and a step of adding the support structure to the 3D model based on the calculated positions and the degree of quality attributed.
A major advantageous effect of the present invention is that, the support structures can be avoided or reduced as much as possible at such locations which, compared to other locations of the 3D object to be 3D printed, have an increased need for protection against mechanical post-processing. Thereby surface artefacts, surface damages, deformations due to mechanical post-processing can be avoided or reduced in sensitive surface segments of the 3D model, and the need for investing manual extra work for a precise removal of the support structures can be obviated or reduced as much as possible. Thereby also the time required for manual post processing of the 3D printed object can be reduced, and costs can be saved.
According to the present invention, the method steps are performed entirely or at least partly through a computer algorithm. The computer algorithm preferably comprises a neural network capable of recognizing features of the 3D model to be built by the additive manufacturing apparatus. The steps are further performed preferably based on the recognized features. The neural network can be trained with real or simulated 3D models to recognize the surface segments which are sensitive against post-processing. Despite the use of a computer algorithm, in the attributing step a user is optionally allowed to manually mark, on a display of the 3D model, one or more surface segments respectively with a desired degree of quality, or also to define the number of degrees of qualities that can be selectively attributed.
According to the present invention, the degree of quality comprises at least a low degree of quality and a high degree of quality. The low degree of quality implies that the respective surface segment is not worth protecting in post-processing. The high degree of quality implies that the respective surface segment is worth protecting in post-processing. One or more intermediate degrees of quality may also be additionally employed to improve the results.
According to the present invention, specifically in the calculating step, to each surface segment a quantity which indicates a measure of the need of that surface segment to be supported through a support structure is optionally assigned. A larger value of the quantity indicates a stronger need for support. The quantity is preferably a scalar quantity which is a function of the inclination of the surface segment with respect to the building direction. The scalar quantity is preferably equal to the inner product of the normal vector of the surface segment and the unit vector opposite to the building direction. Preferably no support structure is added to the 3D model at a position that falls into a surface segment whose normal vector has a positive component in the building direction. That means such surface segments which point away from the building platform are not suitable for the attachment of a supporting structure. According to the present invention, in the calculating step optionally, first, the positions of all local minima of the 3D model are found with respect to the building direction, and the support structures corresponding to the positions at the local minima are added to the 3D model regardless of the attributed degree of quality. Thereby the risk of misprints can be prevented or reduced as much as possible. According to the present invention, specifically in the calculating step the assignment of the quantity to the surface segment is optionally updated such that the quantity is equal to a first constant for a surface segment at whose position a support structure has been added, and such that the quantities of the neighboring surface segments are reduced through a factor which is a function depending on the three- dimensional distance vector from the surface segment to which the support structure has been added to the neighboring surface segment, wherein the function is unity if the three- dimensional distance vector has no positive component in building direction. The function preferably asymptotically approaches unity with increasing magnitude of the three- dimensional distance vector. Thereafter, the updated quantities of the surface segments are grouped in descending order into groups corresponding to the attributed degree of quality in ascending order. Finally, commencing from the group of the lowest degree of quality to the group of the highest degree of quality, a support structure is added at the surface segment with the largest updated quantity. The steps are repeated for each group until the updated highest quantities drop below predetermined levels respectively associated with the groups. According to the present invention, the support structures for which the calculated positions fall into in the surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality, are optionally not added to the 3D model. Thereby the surface segments which are sensitive against post processing can be protected.
According to the present invention, the support structures for which the calculated positions fall into in the surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality are alternatively optionally displaced to nearby surface segments which have been attributed a low degree of quality. Thereby the surface segments which are sensitive against post processing can be protected.
According to the present invention, the surface geometry of the 3D model is preferably represented through tri angulation. Such tri angulation is convenient for the calculations. Alternatively, other type of meshes with different geometries may be used.
The present invention also provides a computer algorithm having computer-readable codes for causing a CAD module to carry out the method steps. The present invention also provides a computer readable storage which stores the computer algorithm.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
In the subsequent description, further aspects and advantageous effects of the present invention will be described in more detail by using exemplary embodiments and by referring to the drawings, wherein
Fig. 1 - is an enlarged view of the detail A in Fig. 2, which shows a support structure added to a surface segment on the 3D model;
Fig. 2 - shows the support structures added to the 3D model.
The reference numbers shown in the drawings denote the elements as listed below and will be referred to in the subsequent description of the exemplary embodiments:
1. 3D model / 3D Object
2. Support structure
3. Platform
L; H: Degree of quality
L: Low degree of quality H: High degree of quality m: Local minima i : Integer
S . Scalar Quantity t : Normal vector of the ith surface segment e_z: Vertical unit vector directed towards the platform z: Vertical direction cx, c2, c3 Constants /(r ): Function (factor) f : Three-dimensional distance vector r: Magnitude of f
Fig. 2 shows a part of a 3D object (1) according to an embodiment of the present invention. The 3D object (1) is partly built with an additive manufacturing apparatus. The building direction is the z direction. The additive manufacturing apparatus has a platform (3) for holding the 3D object (1). The 3D object (1) includes support structures (2) attached to the platform (3). The 3D object (1) corresponds to a 3D model (1) to which quality requirements have been imposed through the method of the present invention. The method steps are performed through a computer algorithm. The computer algorithm preferably comprises a neural network capable of recognizing features of the 3D model. The method steps are further performed based on these recognized features. The method steps will be described in the following. In a defining step, the surface geometry and the orientation of the 3D model (1) is defined with respect to the platform (3). The surface geometry includes a plurality of surface segments. The surface geometry of the 3D model (1) is represented through tri angulation such that the surface segments are triangles (not shown). Other representations may be alternatively used. In an attributing step, a degree of quality (L;H) is attributed to the surface segments respectively indicating the sensitivity and the need of protection against post-processing during any subsequent removal of the support structures (2). The degree of quality (L;H) comprises preferably at least a low degree of quality (L) and a high degree of quality (H). Further degrees of quality may be optionally added. In the attributing step, the user is allowed to mark, on a display of the 3D model (1), one or more surface segments respectively with a desired degree of quality (L;H). Alternatively, the attributing step can be performed entirely by the computer algorithm, without intervention of the user, based on the recognized features. As shown in the exemplary embodiment in Fig. 2, the thick lines on the surface segments of the 3D model (1) indicate a high degree of quality attributed. Other surface segments of the 3D model (1) indicate a low degree of quality attributed. In the calculating step, based on the defined orientation, the surface geometry, and the degree of quality (L;H) attributed, the positions on the surface segments where the support structure (2) may be added are calculated. The calculation step will be explained in more detail with the help of Fig. 1 which is an enlarged view of the detail A in Fig. 2. In the calculating step, as shown in Fig. 1, the Ith surface segment is assigned a quantity st which indicates a measure of the need of the ith surface segment to be supported through a support structure (2). i denotes an integer. The larger value of st indicates a stronger need for support. The quantity st is a scalar quantity which is a function of the inclination of the resurface segment with respect to the building direction. To be specific, Sj = rq e_z , where “·” denotes the inner product, tz denotes the normal vector of the ith surface segment, and e_z denotes the vertical unit vector directed towards the platform (3). No support structure (2) is added to the 3D model (1) at a position that falls into a surface segment with st < 0, i.e., whose normal vector has a positive component in the building direction. In the calculation step, as shown in Fig. 2, first, the positions of all local minima (m) of the 3D model (1) are found. In an adding step, the support structure (2) are added to the 3D model (1) based on the calculated positions and the degree of quality (L;H) attributed. In the adding step, first, the support structures (2) corresponding to the positions at the local minima (m) are added to the 3D model (1) regardless of the value of the attributed degree of quality (L; H). Next, in the calculating step, the assignment of the quantity st to the ith surface segment is updated (reassigned) such that st = cx for a surface segment at whose position a support structure (2) has been added, and such that the st quantities of the neighboring surface segments are reduced through a factor, namely a function /(f) wherein f is the three-dimensional distance vector from the surface segment to which the support structure (2) has been added to the neighboring surface segment. The function /(f) is asymptotically approaching unity with increasing magnitude of . The dotted area in Fig. 1 indicates the range of the factor / (f ) in the building direction. For example, /(f) is preferably defined through the function 1 — Exp [— r2/c2 2]. Flere r is the magnitude of f. The constant c2 is a positive constant for the normalization. And / (f ) is unity if f has no positive component in building direction. The curly bracket indicates at least part of the range of application of the factor / (r) in the building direction. The constant c is preferably equal to zero. Next, in the calculating step, the updated Sjquantities of the surface segments are grouped in descending order into groups corresponding to the attributed degree of quality. And the groups are further arranged in an ascending order. Next, commencing from the group of the lowest degree of quality (L) to the group of the highest degree of quality (H), a support structure (2) is added at the surface segment with the largest updated st quantity. The procedure is cyclically repeated until the updated highest st quantities drop below predetermined levels c3 associated with the groups respectively. c3 are constants and define how strongly the 3D model (1) is to be supported. A stronger suppression of support structures (2) on surface segments with higher degree of quality attributed can be achieved by selecting the constant c3 higher for the higher degree of quality. Furthermore, the total number of added support structures (2) can be influenced by the parameter c2.
In an alternative embodiment the support structures (2) for which the calculated positions fall into surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality (H) are not added to the 3D model (1).
In another alternative embodiment, the support structures (2) for which the calculated positions fall into surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality (H) are displaced to nearby surface segments which have been attributed a low degree quality (L).

Claims

1. A method of imposing quality requirements on a 3D model (1) including support structures (2) to be built by an additive manufacturing apparatus comprising: a platform (3) for holding the 3D object corresponding to the 3D model (1), the method comprising: a step of defining the surface geometry and the orientation of the 3D model (1) with respect to the platform (3), wherein the surface geometry includes surface segments; characterized by further comprising: a step of attributing a degree of quality (L;H) to the surface segments respectively against post-processing for the subsequent removal of the support structures (2); a step of calculating, based on the defined orientation, the surface geometry and the degree of quality (L;H) attributed, the positions on the surface segments where the support structure (2) may be added; and a step of adding the support structure (2) to the 3D model (1) based on the calculated positions and the degree of quality (L;H) attributed.
2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the steps are performed through a computer algorithm that comprises a neural network capable of recognizing features of the 3D model (1), wherein the steps are further performed based on the recognized features.
3. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 2, characterized in that in the attributing step a user can manually mark, on a display of the 3D model (1), one or more surface segments respectively with a desired degree of quality (L;H).
4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, characterized in that the degree of quality (L;H) comprises at least a low degree of quality (L) and a high degree of quality (H).
5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that the support structures (2) for which the calculated positions fall into surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality (H) are not added to the 3D model (1).
6. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that in the adding step the support structures (2) for which the calculated positions fall into surface segments which have been attributed a high degree of quality (H) are displaced to nearby surface segments which have been attributed a low degree of quality (L).
7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that in the calculation step, first, the positions of all local minima (m) of the 3D model (1) are found; and in the adding step the support structures (2) corresponding to the positions at the local minima (m) are added to the 3D model (1) regardless of the attributed degree of quality (L;H).
8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, characterized in that in the calculating step, the ith surface segment is assigned a quantity s£ which indicates a measure of the need of the ith surface segment to be supported through a support structure (2), wherein a larger value of st indicates a stronger need for support.
9. The method according to claim 8, characterized in that the quantity st is a scalar quantity which is a function of the inclination of the
Figure imgf000011_0001
surface segment with respect to the building direction.
10. The method according to claim 9, characterized in that no support structure (2) is added to the 3D model (1) at a position that falls into a surface segment whose normal vector has a positive component in the building direction.
11. The method according to claim 10, characterized in that in the calculating step, the assignment of the quantity st to the ith surface segment is updated such that st = cx for a surface segment at whose position a support structure (2) has been added, and that the st quantities of the neighboring surface segments are reduced through a factor / (f ) wherein r is the three-dimensional distance vector from the surface segment to which the support structure (2) has been added to the neighboring surface segment, wherein /(f) is unity if r has no component in building direction; the updated ^quantities of the surface segments are grouped in descending order into respective groups corresponding to the attributed degree of quality in ascending order; commencing from the group of the lowest degree of quality (L) to the group of the highest degree of quality (H), a support structure (2) is added at the surface segment with the largest updated s£ quantity; and the procedure is repeated until the updated highest st quantities in each group drop below predetermined levels c3 associated with the groups respectively, wherein each c3 is a constant.
12. The method according to claim 11, characterized in that the function /(f) asymptotically approaches unity with increasing magnitude of r.
13. The method according to claim 12, characterized in that the function /(f) is defined through 1 — e cz2 where c2 is a positive constant.
14. The method according to any one of claims 12 to 13, characterized in that ct = 0.
15. A program comprising computer readable codes for causing a CAD/CAM module to carry out the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 14.
16. A computer readable storage which stores the program according to claim 15.
PCT/EP2020/071377 2019-08-19 2020-07-29 Imposing quality requirements on 3d models with support structures Ceased WO2021032425A1 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2022511111A JP7559051B2 (en) 2019-08-19 2020-07-29 Imposing quality requirements on 3D models with supporting structures
KR1020227008816A KR20220047626A (en) 2019-08-19 2020-07-29 Giving quality requirements to 3D models with support structures
CN202080058366.8A CN114269546B (en) 2019-08-19 2020-07-29 Imposing quality requirements on 3D models with support structures
CA3150405A CA3150405A1 (en) 2019-08-19 2020-07-29 Imposing quality requirements on 3d models with support structures
BR112022002468A BR112022002468A2 (en) 2019-08-19 2020-07-29 IMPOSING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS ON 3D MODELS WITH SUPPORT STRUCTURES
US17/634,827 US20220297385A1 (en) 2019-08-19 2020-07-29 Imposing quality requirements on 3d models with support structures
AU2020331649A AU2020331649B2 (en) 2019-08-19 2020-07-29 Imposing quality requirements on 3D models with support structures

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP19192326.7 2019-08-19
EP19192326.7A EP3782802B1 (en) 2019-08-19 2019-08-19 Imposing quality requirements on 3d models with support structures

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2021032425A1 true WO2021032425A1 (en) 2021-02-25

Family

ID=67659295

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2020/071377 Ceased WO2021032425A1 (en) 2019-08-19 2020-07-29 Imposing quality requirements on 3d models with support structures

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US20220297385A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3782802B1 (en)
JP (1) JP7559051B2 (en)
KR (1) KR20220047626A (en)
CN (1) CN114269546B (en)
AU (1) AU2020331649B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112022002468A2 (en)
CA (1) CA3150405A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2021032425A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3868330A1 (en) * 2020-02-19 2021-08-25 Ivoclar Vivadent AG Method for producing a dental restoration
US11772195B2 (en) * 2020-04-21 2023-10-03 The Boeing Company Additive manufacturing system and method using multiple beam orientations
US11766745B2 (en) * 2020-04-21 2023-09-26 The Boeing Company System and method of determining support locations for additively manufactured build parts
JP2024003384A (en) * 2022-06-27 2024-01-15 セイコーエプソン株式会社 information processing equipment
CN120858020A (en) * 2023-01-09 2025-10-28 阿莱恩技术有限公司 Method for generating a support structure for an additively manufactured object

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150151492A1 (en) 2013-12-03 2015-06-04 Autodesk, Inc. Generating support material for three-dimensional printing

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB0719747D0 (en) * 2007-10-10 2007-11-21 Materialise Nv Method and apparatus for automatic support generation for an object made by means of a rapid prototype production method
JP5615667B2 (en) * 2010-11-01 2014-10-29 株式会社キーエンス Setting data creation device for 3D modeling apparatus, setting data creation method for 3D modeling apparatus, setting data creation program for 3D modeling apparatus, and computer-readable recording medium
US20140303942A1 (en) * 2013-04-05 2014-10-09 Formlabs, Inc. Additive fabrication support structures
US9688024B2 (en) * 2013-08-30 2017-06-27 Adobe Systems Incorporated Adaptive supports for 3D printing
WO2015092376A1 (en) * 2013-12-17 2015-06-25 Renishaw Plc Improvements in or relating to the building of supports in additive manufacturing
US9844917B2 (en) * 2014-06-13 2017-12-19 Siemens Product Lifestyle Management Inc. Support structures for additive manufacturing of solid models
JP6538434B2 (en) * 2015-06-17 2019-07-03 ローランドディー．ジー．株式会社 Support placement determination device, 3D modeling system, and support placement determination method
JP6480311B2 (en) * 2015-11-18 2019-03-06 富士フイルム株式会社 Support member design apparatus, method, program, structure forming apparatus, and structure manufacturing method
US10948896B2 (en) * 2015-12-18 2021-03-16 Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp. Penalty function on design variables for designing variables for designing cost beneficially additive manufacturable structures
CN105643943B (en) * 2016-03-31 2019-01-04 周宏志 A kind of generation method and its system of increasing material manufacturing support
US10395372B2 (en) * 2016-06-28 2019-08-27 University Of Cincinnati Systems, media, and methods for pre-processing and post-processing in additive manufacturing
EP3507077B1 (en) * 2016-09-01 2021-04-14 3D Systems, Inc. Improved additive manufacturing of a three-dimensional object
DE102016222555A1 (en) * 2016-11-16 2018-05-17 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method for additive production of a component and computer-readable medium
US10861225B2 (en) * 2018-08-10 2020-12-08 Intel Corporation Neural network processing for multi-object 3D modeling
US11884004B2 (en) * 2018-11-09 2024-01-30 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Systems and methods for support removal in stereolithographic additive manufacturing
EP3937001A1 (en) * 2020-07-09 2022-01-12 ABB Schweiz AG Post-processing 3d printed components

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20150151492A1 (en) 2013-12-03 2015-06-04 Autodesk, Inc. Generating support material for three-dimensional printing

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ANONYMOUS: "STL (file format) - Wikipedia", 7 December 2016 (2016-12-07), XP055451450, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=STL_(file_format)&oldid=75%203510333> [retrieved on 20180215] *
SWAELENS BART ET AL: "Support Generation for Rapid Prototyping", PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RAPID PROTOTYPING, UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, 04-07/06/1995, UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON, DAYTON, OHIO, USA, 1 June 1995 (1995-06-01), pages 115 - 121, XP008173950 *
TIAN OOI: "Meshmixer Supports - How to Generate Supports with Meshmixer | All3DP", 5 November 2018 (2018-11-05), XP055665272, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:https://all3dp.com/2/meshmixer-supports-how-to-generate-supports-with-meshmixer/> [retrieved on 20200205] *
TONG WU ET AL: "Enhanced STL", THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, SPRINGER, BERLIN, DE, vol. 29, no. 11-12, 17 December 2005 (2005-12-17), pages 1143 - 1150, XP019418889, ISSN: 1433-3015 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20220297385A1 (en) 2022-09-22
JP2022545247A (en) 2022-10-26
CN114269546B (en) 2024-02-13
JP7559051B2 (en) 2024-10-01
AU2020331649A1 (en) 2022-03-03
EP3782802B1 (en) 2022-01-05
BR112022002468A2 (en) 2022-07-19
AU2020331649B2 (en) 2025-12-18
EP3782802A1 (en) 2021-02-24
KR20220047626A (en) 2022-04-18
CN114269546A (en) 2022-04-01
CA3150405A1 (en) 2021-02-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU2020331649A1 (en) Imposing quality requirements on 3D models with support structures
CN102105908B (en) Method and device for production of master pattern tool
CN113261034B (en) Method for determining layer thickness of 3D models for additive manufacturing
EP0354637A2 (en) CAD/CAM stereolithographic data conversion
WO1989010255A1 (en) Reducing stereolithographic part distortion through isolation of stress
CN117565402B (en) 3D printing control execution method and system and 3D printing equipment
CN112512729A (en) Method for determining a build specification for an additive manufacturing method
Ma et al. Catmull-Clark surface fitting for reverse engineering applications
Harmatys et al. Assessment of the accuracy of standards manufactured by SLA additive technology
CN120134631B (en) A method for adjusting inkjet uniformity in light-curing 3D printing using a cylinder
RU2815067C2 (en) Method of creating 3d model with support structures, as well as computer-readable data medium for method implementation
AU2020333212B2 (en) Method of determining the orientation of a three-dimensional model for additive manufacturing
CN112265265A (en) Three-dimensional printing data z-axis compensation method based on slices
RU2819300C2 (en) Method of determining orientation of three-dimensional model for additive manufacturing
JP2018049335A (en) Data generation apparatus, modeling apparatus, modeling method, and program
Miedzińska et al. Numerical modelling of resins used in stereolitography rapid prototyping
US20240025122A1 (en) Method for arranging support structures
US20250339248A1 (en) Method of producing a dental restoration
US20250268690A1 (en) Fem analysis for the production of dental restorations
CN121892832A (en) Laser focusing method and related equipment thereof
Rodríguez Improving the Modeling of the Plantar Surface via Bezier Networks and Laser Projection
Geiger et al. Data processing for additive fabricators
Podany Evaluation of rapid prototyping technologies for use in the production of art and artifact study copies
HK1006793B (en) Stereolithographic supports
HK1006793A1 (en) Stereolithographic supports

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20744072

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 3150405

Country of ref document: CA

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2022511111

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112022002468

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2020331649

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20200729

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20227008816

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01E

Ref document number: 112022002468

Country of ref document: BR

Free format text: APRESENTAR A TRADUCAO SIMPLES DA FOLHA DE ROSTO DA CERTIDAO DE DEPOSITO E DA CESSAO DA PRIORIDADE EP 19192326.7 OU DECLARACAO CONTENDO, OBRIGATORIAMENTE, TODOS OS DADOS IDENTIFICADORES DESTA CONFORME O ART. 15 DA PORTARIA 39/2021. O DOCUMENTO APRESENTADO NAO ESTA TRADUZIDO.

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112022002468

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20220209

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20744072

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Ref document number: 1020227008816

Country of ref document: KR