WO2019153346A1

WO2019153346A1 - In-vitro diagnosis device control method and device, computer device and storage medium

Info

Publication number: WO2019153346A1
Application number: PCT/CN2018/076510
Authority: WO
Inventors: 姚言义; 于怀博; 张震; 郑文洋
Original assignee: 深圳迎凯生物科技有限公司
Priority date: 2018-02-12
Filing date: 2018-02-12
Publication date: 2019-08-15

Abstract

An in-vitro diagnosis device control method and device, a computer device and a storage medium. Said method comprises: acquiring and sending a voice control signal (S100); receiving a semantic analysis result fed back according to the voice control signal (S200); acquiring a state detection result of an in-vitro diagnosis device, the state detection result comprising a state detection result of the test condition of the in-vitro diagnosis device (S300); and generating a control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and sending the control instruction to an instruction execution component of the in-vitro diagnosis device (S400). The method enables an input to be rapid and effective by means of voice control, and realizes, in combination with the detection results of the operation state and the condition state of the in-vitro diagnosis device, the control of the in-vitro diagnosis device by generating the control instructions, saving the time for control, reducing the generation of invalid control instructions.

Description

In vitro diagnostic device control method, device, computer device and storage medium

Technical field

The present application relates to the field of in vitro diagnostic device control technologies, and in particular, to an in vitro diagnostic device control method, apparatus, computer device, and storage medium.

Background technique

With the development of biotechnology and advances in automation technology, more and more in vitro diagnostic devices have emerged. Traditional in vitro diagnostics require users (mainly medical personnel, such as inspection and analysis personnel in hospital laboratory) to input through touch screen, mouse, hard keys, etc. before, during, and after the test, as well as during maintenance and maintenance. Control instructions for operational control of in vitro diagnostic equipment. For example, before starting a new test, the in vitro diagnostic equipment generally needs to start the diagnostic test when the set test items, samples, reagents, consumables, equipment status, etc. meet the test conditions, and the user needs to check and confirm the test conditions each time, and The test is performed by inputting an in vitro diagnostic device control command. This control method requires the user to perform the operation beside the detection in vitro diagnostic device, and the control method is single. It is also difficult for the user to perform other operations while controlling the in vitro diagnostic device, and the required preparation time is long, and the control efficiency of the in vitro diagnostic device is not high.

Summary of the invention

Based on this, it is necessary to provide an in vitro diagnostic device control method, apparatus, computer device and storage medium capable of improving control efficiency for the problem of low control efficiency.

An in vitro diagnostic device control method comprising:

Acquiring and transmitting a voice control signal;

Receiving a semantic analysis result according to the feedback of the voice control signal;

Obtaining a state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device, the state detection result including a test condition state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device;

And generating a control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and transmitting the control instruction to the instruction execution component of the in vitro diagnostic device.

An in vitro diagnostic device control device comprising:

a voice acquisition and sending module, configured to acquire and send a voice control signal;

a semantic analysis result receiving module, configured to receive a semantic analysis result according to the feedback of the voice control signal;

a device state detection module, configured to acquire a state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device, where the state detection result includes a test condition state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device;

And a control module, configured to generate a control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and send the control instruction to an instruction execution component of the in vitro diagnostic device.

A computer device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and operable on the processor, the processor executing the computer program to implement the following steps:

Acquiring and transmitting a voice control signal;

And generating a control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and sending the control instruction to the in vitro diagnostic device.

A computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the following steps:

Acquiring and transmitting a voice control signal;

The above-mentioned in vitro diagnostic device control method, device, computer device and storage medium, through the voice control signal and the semantic analysis result, achieve the same control effect through the voice control and the traditional manual input control command, but the voice control is compared with the manual control input. It is more rapid and effective, and the state of the test condition of the in vitro diagnostic device is detected to ensure that the in vitro diagnostic device can start the test normally, and combines the detection state of the in vitro diagnostic device with the condition state, thereby generating a control command. The control of the in vitro diagnostic device is realized. During the whole control process, the user issues a voice control command and combines the state detection result, which saves the time required for the control and effectively reduces the generation of the invalid control command, thereby realizing the high efficiency of the in vitro diagnostic device control. .

DRAWINGS

1 is an application environment diagram of a method for controlling an in vitro diagnostic device according to an embodiment of the present application;

2 is a schematic flow chart of a method for controlling an in vitro diagnostic device according to an embodiment of the present application;

3 is a schematic flow chart of a method for controlling an in vitro diagnostic device according to another embodiment of the present application;

4 is a schematic flow chart of a method for controlling an in vitro diagnostic device according to another embodiment of the present application;

5 is a schematic flow chart of a method for controlling an in vitro diagnostic device according to another embodiment of the present application;

6 is a schematic diagram of a control process of an in vitro diagnostic device in another application example of the present application;

7 is a structural block diagram of an apparatus for controlling an in vitro diagnostic device according to an embodiment of the present application;

8 is a structural block diagram of an apparatus for controlling an in vitro diagnostic device according to an embodiment of the present application;

Figure 9 is a diagram showing the internal structure of a computer device in an embodiment of the present application.

Detailed ways

In order to make the objects, technical solutions, and advantages of the present application more comprehensible, the present application will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It is understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the application and are not intended to be limiting.

The in vitro diagnostic device control method provided by the present application can be applied to an application environment as shown in FIG. 1. The terminal 102 communicates with the server 104 through the network through the network to ensure the implementation of the entire voice control process. The terminal 102 can be, but is not limited to, a communication module integrated in the in vitro diagnostic device, a terminal disposed in the in vitro diagnostic device, a personal computer, a notebook computer, a smart phone, a tablet computer, and a portable wearable device, and the server 104 can use a separate server. Or a server cluster consisting of multiple servers.

In an embodiment, as shown in FIG. 2, an in vitro diagnostic device control method is provided. The method is applied to the terminal in FIG. 1 as an example, and includes the following steps:

In step S100, a voice control signal is acquired and transmitted.

The voice control signal refers to a control command of the in vitro diagnostic device that is sent by the user within a certain range and can be recognized. Specifically, the voice control instruction may be a pre-test preparation instruction, such as sample application and loading, reagent loading, consumables addition, etc.; test start-stop instruction, such as start test, stop test, pause test, resume test, etc.; test process control instruction, Such as the insertion of emergency tests, automatic retests, etc.; and in vitro diagnostic equipment status query instructions, such as application information viewing, test results search, calibration results review. The operation of the in vitro diagnostic equipment through voice control not only frees the user's hands, but also controls other in vitro diagnostic equipment while parallelizing other operations, such as sample preparation, consumable loading, etc., and also expands the range of physical distance controlled by the in vitro diagnostic equipment, so that the user does not need to be outside the body. The in vitro diagnostic equipment can be operated by voice control commands next to the diagnostic equipment, which can generally reach 4 to 5 meters, and supports the user to control the in vitro diagnostic equipment at a relatively long distance. It is simple, effective, easy to use, and enriches the control of the in vitro diagnostic equipment. The method improves the device control efficiency and improves the human-computer interaction experience. In addition, the input and output interactive peripherals such as the prompt light, the buzzer and the hard keys on the traditional in vitro diagnostic device can be appropriately reduced, thereby simplifying the peripheral components of the device, Reduce the size of the equipment and save costs.

Step S200: Receive a semantic analysis result according to the feedback of the voice control signal.

The semantic analysis result refers to the analysis result that is easy to be recognized after analyzing and processing the voice control signal. Since the acquired voice control signal is obtained by the collected user, it is generally not easy to be directly recognized. Therefore, by processing the acquired voice control instruction and feeding it back to the in vitro diagnostic device, the processed semantic analysis result can be passed through the binary. The in vitro diagnostic device such as code, text, voice, etc. can provide feedback in the form of recognition, which may be a computer language directly recognized by the in vitro diagnostic device, such as a binary code, or a voice, text, etc. that is easily processed into a computer language after preliminary processing. form.

Step S300: Acquire a state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device, where the state detection result includes a test condition state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device.

The state of the in vitro diagnostic device may include hardware state, software state, mechanical state, liquid circuit module state, optical module state, temperature control module state, and other device intrinsic condition states, and consumable state, sample state, etc., according to the number of tests and items. Change the condition status. The test condition state refers to a state in which the in vitro diagnostic device satisfies both the good inherent condition state and the changing condition state that meets the set requirement, thereby ensuring the state condition that the test starts smoothly. Specifically, the hardware status refers to whether the hardware condition of the in vitro diagnostic device supports normal operation, and the software status may include whether the communication process of the in vitro diagnostic device, the running process of the program, etc., is normal operation, and the mechanical state refers to whether the mechanical component can operate normally, and the state detection It also includes whether the power supply, circuit, temperature control module, optical module, liquid circuit module, etc. of the in vitro diagnostic device are working normally, and the test conditions may specifically include the preconditions that the in vitro diagnostic device needs to reach before starting the test, for example, before the test is started. The project reagents and test samples must be loaded first to check whether the inherent condition conditions of the equipment meet the requirements, whether the consumables required for testing and testing meet the requirements, and whether the project reagents and test samples are loaded according to the preset requirements, when each of the in vitro diagnostic equipments After the status reaches the preset requirement, the control device starts up and starts testing.

Step S400, generating a control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and transmitting the control instruction to the instruction execution component of the in vitro diagnostic device.

The semantic analysis result corresponds to the action to be performed by the in vitro diagnostic device, and the state detection result determines whether the action to be performed can be smoothly performed, and combines the semantic analysis result and the state detection result to generate a control command and sends the control command to the instruction execution component of the in vitro diagnostic device. , the instruction execution component can be smoothly operated according to the control requirements.

The above-mentioned in vitro diagnostic device control method achieves the same control effect through the voice control and the traditional manual input control command through the voice control signal and the semantic analysis result, but the voice control is faster and more effective than the manual control input. The test conditions of the diagnostic equipment are detected to ensure that the in vitro diagnostic equipment can start the test normally, combined with the detection results of the in vitro diagnostic equipment and the condition state, thereby realizing the control of the in vitro diagnostic device by generating a control command, the entire control During the process, the user issues a voice control command and combines the state detection result, which saves the time required for the control and effectively reduces the generation of the invalid control command, thereby realizing the high efficiency of the in vitro diagnostic device control.

As shown in FIG. 3, in an embodiment, step S100 includes:

Step S120: Acquire a voice control signal, and send the voice control signal to a voice processing platform having a semantic analysis function.

The semantic analysis function refers to a function that can analyze and process the acquired voice control signals to obtain a clearer and more easily identifiable signal.

In one embodiment, the voice processing platform includes a third-party voice processing platform, and the third-party voice processing platform includes an Internet-based intelligent voice service platform and/or a third-party self-deployable local algorithm platform.

The third party refers to a client independent of the terminal and the in-vitro diagnostic device. The third-party voice processing platform can be an Internet-based intelligent voice service platform or a self-deployed local algorithm platform provided by a third party. The third-party voice service platform often The AI (Artificial Intelligence) voice technology is used to provide a more accurate and fast voice recognition service, and the voice recognition technology is used to perform intelligent analysis and processing on the collected voice information. Artificial intelligence is a technical science that studies and develops theories, methods, techniques, and application systems for simulating, extending, and extending human intelligence. It can realize various theories and methods for effective communication between humans and computers in natural language. Voice control instructions obtained through the user's voice may have irregular input, syntax ambiguity, etc., by using a third-party voice processing platform carrying artificial intelligence processing functions, from a computer language perspective, a natural language with potential ambiguity The input is converted into some unambiguous computer statement. The third-party voice service platform may specifically be a "Baidu voice technology platform" or a "Keida Xunfei voice open platform". The voice instructions of the user can be transmitted to the third-party voice service platform by wire or wirelessly. The wired or wireless transmission mode may be connected to a third-party voice processing platform through a network cable or a wireless communication technology such as WIFI (WIreless-FIdelit), Bluetooth, 3G, 4G, 5G, etc. After the intelligent semantic analysis is completed, The results of the analysis are transmitted to the in vitro diagnostic device either by wire or wirelessly.

Specifically, the Internet-based intelligent voice service platform can provide real-time semantic analysis results for the in-vitro diagnostic device in a networked state, compared with a conventional method of relying on the device to collect voice signals and matching the set semantic results. The intelligent voice service platform based on Internet has the characteristics of more accurate and efficient processing results. The self-deployed local algorithm platform provided by the third party deploys the third-party voice processing technology to the local platform, so that the same accurate semantic analysis result can be obtained without being connected to the network. It can be understood that, in other embodiments, the Internet-based intelligent voice service platform and the self-deployed local algorithm platform provided by the third party can be simultaneously included, and the voice is performed through the Internet-based intelligent voice service platform during normal networking. Processing, when the network is disconnected, automatically switches to a self-deployed local algorithm platform provided by a third party, which avoids the situation that the device cannot be used normally due to network failure.

In an embodiment, step S400 includes:

Step S420, obtaining a state requirement that matches the semantic analysis result.

The user can issue different voice control commands for different in vitro diagnostic device states. For example, the in vitro diagnostic device is in a medium state before the test is started, and different voice control commands can be executed only when the in vitro diagnostic device is in the corresponding state. For example, only when the test has started, the stop and pause instructions are valid instructions, so it is necessary to obtain the corresponding state requirements according to the semantic analysis result.

Step S440, when the state detection result satisfies the state requirement, generate a control instruction corresponding to the semantic analysis result, and send the control instruction to the instruction execution component.

When the state detection result satisfies the state requirement, the voice control instruction corresponding to the semantic analysis result may be executed by the operation, and the control instruction corresponding to the semantic analysis result is generated, where the control instruction refers to an instruction that the in vitro diagnostic device can directly recognize and execute. Control commands are sent to the in vitro diagnostic device to complete control of the in vitro diagnostic device.

After step S400, the method further includes:

Step S460: When the state detection result does not satisfy the state requirement, the state detection result is fed back through the voice prompt.

When the status detection result such as hardware status, software status, mechanical status, liquid path module status, optical module status, consumable status, sample status, temperature control module status, etc. does not meet the preset requirements, the in vitro diagnostic device does not work properly. In order to meet the needs of the user to know the status of the in vitro diagnostic device in time, the voice detection state detection result is used, for example, the voice of the current in vitro diagnostic device state can be played, such as “in vitro diagnostic device operation failure”, and of course, can also be displayed through the screen. , text reminders, indicators and other ways to feedback status detection results.

As shown in FIG. 4, in an embodiment, before step S420, the method further includes:

Step S412, matching the semantic analysis result with the in vitro diagnostic device status.

Step S414, when there is no in vitro diagnostic device status corresponding to the semantic analysis result, the signal error information is controlled by the voice feedback voice.

When there is no in vitro diagnostic device state corresponding to the semantic analysis result, that is, when the semantic analysis result of the detected feedback does not belong to the control instruction type corresponding to the in vitro diagnostic device, the voice control signal is determined as an error message and the voice feedback is passed. Give the user so that the user can adjust it in time.

Step S416, when there is an in vitro diagnostic device state corresponding to the semantic analysis result, determining an in vitro diagnostic device status requirement that matches the semantic analysis result.

As shown in FIG. 5, in an embodiment, step S460 includes:

Step S462, when detecting that there is a fault in the in vitro diagnostic device, feedback the cause of the fault through voice;

The fault refers to a situation in which the inherent condition of the hardware module, the software module, the mechanical module, the liquid path module, the optical module, the temperature control module, and the like of the in vitro detection device is abnormal. The fault may specifically include failure of mechanical components of the in vitro diagnostic device, such as collision failure of the sampling needle, fluid circuit device failure, optical device failure, power failure, circuit connection failure, data loss, network connection failure, communication failure, program operation failure When the fault of the corresponding part is detected, the user does not need to view the interface display by voice feedback, and the user promptly prompts the voice of the in vitro diagnostic device by the voice prompt. Specifically, taking the hardware fault of the device as an example, when detecting the hardware fault of the in vitro diagnostic device, further detecting which type of hardware fault belongs to, and obtaining the most accurate fault cause that can be clearly determined, the most accurate fault will be obtained. The reason is feedback to the user through voice prompts, so that corresponding maintenance measures can be taken in time.

In step S464, when the fault cancellation method corresponding to the fault cause is preset, the fault cancellation method is fed back.

For the possible causes of faults in the in vitro diagnostic equipment, pre-set various types of fault solutions. When the specific fault causes of the in vitro diagnostic equipment are detected, the solutions corresponding to the fault causes are matched from the preset solutions. And feedback solutions. Specifically, it can be through a voice feedback solution, or through a feedback solution such as a display screen, or a combination of voice and display feedback solutions.

Step S466, when it is detected that the test condition does not meet the preset requirement, the prompt is corrected by the voice feedback operation.

The test condition does not meet the preset requirements, which means that the condition of the change condition does not meet the requirements, and can be corrected by adjustment, including the state of the consumables, the state of the sample, etc., and the change condition condition according to the number of tests and the item does not reach the pre-test required. Set the conditions to indicate that the test conditions need to be adjusted, and the prompts are corrected by the voice feedback operation. For example, according to the detection result, the in vitro diagnostic device plays a voice prompting the user that the in vitro diagnostic device cannot be tested and the corresponding correction operation, for example: “There is no corresponding reagent, and the test cannot be started now, please replenish the reagent in time”.

In an embodiment, after step S400, the method further includes:

In step S500, the execution state of the control command is detected, and the execution state is fed back through the voice prompt.

When the in vitro diagnostic device executes the control instruction, the user's voice control instruction is an effective instruction, the execution state of the detection control instruction is detected, and the execution state is feedback through the voice prompt, so that the user knows the control result in time.

In step S600, the execution result is obtained, and when it is detected that the execution result satisfies the preset condition, the result is performed through the voice prompt feedback.

When the in vitro diagnostic device executes the control instruction and reaches a certain level, that is, when the preset condition is met, for example, the execution state is detected as the item detection is completed, the corresponding execution result may be obtained, and the execution result is fed back to the user. Specifically, the execution result may be Including whether it is completed, it may also include corresponding detection data after execution, and may also prompt at the same time. For example, after a certain sample test has been completed, the in vitro diagnostic device prompts the test completion and the test result.

In one embodiment, the voice control instructions further include an in vitro diagnostic device status query instruction.

Traditional in vitro diagnostic equipment needs to input the interface and then view the interface feedback information of the interface to obtain the status of the in vitro diagnostic equipment. Through the voice control command query, the user can know the current state of the in vitro diagnostic device without viewing the interface display, and can perform related operations according to the voice prompt. For example, voice query: "Is there a reagent for HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) test project?" Voice feedback: "HIV reagent is not loaded yet!" Voice query: "Is there a fault at the device?" Feedback: "The equipment is in a fault state, please contact the manufacturer's service personnel in time!" Voice inquiry: "Is the test result of Zhang San?" Voice feedback: "Zhang San's test is not over, please continue to wait!".

As shown in FIG. 6, in a specific application example, the in vitro diagnostic device control method is applied to an in vitro diagnostic device.

When the user is in the voice signal recognition range, the user's voice information is collected and transmitted by the communication module to the third-party voice service platform through wireless, and the third-party voice service platform uses the voice recognition technology to intelligently collect the collected voice information. Analytical processing, after the intelligent semantic analysis is completed, the analysis results are transmitted back to the in vitro diagnostic device wirelessly. For example, the user can initiate a voice command: “Start Test”. When the device status detection result and the semantic analysis result are combined, the device can start the test process automatically, and the device automatically plays the voice prompt to prompt the user control to take effect, for example: “ The test has been started. When the device fails to complete the user's instruction due to a problem such as a device failure, the device automatically plays a voice prompting the user device for failure to test. For example: "There is no corresponding reagent, and the test cannot be started now. Please replenish the reagent in time. ". Users can also implement device control through other user input methods, including voice control, touch screen and buttons. Moreover, the user can operate the in vitro diagnostic device through voice input while performing other work. For example, when a traditional device needs to manually maintain the device, it needs to stop the operation multiple times. The switch interface checks the interface feedback information to confirm the action of the next maintenance device. The device that uses the voice control can obtain the device maintenance status while manually maintaining the device. Real-time feedback, and can perform other actions through the voice synchronization control device when manually maintaining the device, enriching the means of device control, and supporting the user to synchronize other work. For example, during manual maintenance of the needle detection, attention is paid to the real-time voice prompts of the device, and the device is operated by voice commands to cooperate with the manual maintenance device. Voice command: “Start needle syringe” corresponds to the control needle to start liquid injection, cooperate with the user to manually maintain the needle detection; voice command: “Close needle syringe” corresponds to control needle stop injection, cooperate with user manual maintenance needle detection; voice real-time Feedback: “The needle syringe has started to inject liquid”, the user can observe whether the current needle is dredged, optimize the operation flow and improve work efficiency.

It should be understood that although the various steps in the flowcharts of FIGS. 2-5 are sequentially displayed as indicated by the arrows, these steps are not necessarily performed in the order indicated by the arrows. Except as explicitly stated herein, the execution of these steps is not strictly limited, and the steps may be performed in other orders. Moreover, at least some of the steps in Figures 2-5 may include multiple sub-steps or multiple stages, which are not necessarily performed at the same time, but may be performed at different times, these sub-steps or stages The order of execution is not necessarily performed sequentially, but may be performed alternately or alternately with at least a portion of other steps or sub-steps or stages of other steps.

As shown in FIG. 7, in an embodiment, an in vitro diagnostic device control apparatus is provided, including:

The voice acquiring and sending module 200 is configured to acquire and send a voice control signal.

The semantic analysis result receiving module 400 is configured to receive a semantic analysis result fed back according to the voice control signal;

The device state detecting module 600 is configured to obtain a state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device, where the state detection result includes a test condition state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device;

The control module 800 is configured to generate a control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and send the instruction execution component to which the control instruction is sent.

The above-mentioned in vitro diagnostic device control device achieves the same control effect through the voice control and the conventional manual input control command through the voice control signal and the semantic analysis result, but the voice control is faster and more effective than the manual control input, and is passed through the external body. The test conditions of the diagnostic equipment are detected to ensure that the in vitro diagnostic equipment can start the test normally, combined with the detection results of the in vitro diagnostic equipment and the condition state, thereby realizing the control of the in vitro diagnostic device by generating a control command, the entire control During the process, the user issues a voice control command and combines the state detection result, which saves the time required for the control and effectively reduces the generation of the invalid control command, thereby realizing the high efficiency of the in vitro diagnostic device control.

In one embodiment, the voice acquisition and transmission module 200 is further configured to acquire a voice control signal and send the voice control signal to a voice processing platform having a semantic analysis function.

In an embodiment, the control module 800 is further configured to acquire a state requirement that matches the semantic analysis result, and when the state detection result satisfies the state requirement, generate a control instruction corresponding to the semantic analysis result, and send the control instruction to the instruction execution component. .

As shown in FIG. 8, in one embodiment, the in vitro diagnostic device control device further includes a feedback module 900 that feeds back the state detection result by voice prompt when the state detection result does not satisfy the state requirement.

In an embodiment, the control module 800 is further configured to match the semantic analysis result with the in-vitro diagnostic device state; when there is no in vitro diagnostic device state corresponding to the semantic analysis result, the signal error message is controlled by the voice feedback voice; When there is an in vitro diagnostic device state corresponding to the semantic analysis result, the in vitro diagnostic device status requirement matching the semantic analysis result is determined.

In an embodiment, the feedback module 900 is further configured to: when the fault is detected by the external diagnostic device, the fault is caused by the voice feedback; and when the fault cancellation method corresponding to the fault cause is preset, the feedback fault is released. Method; when it is detected that the test condition does not meet the preset requirement, the prompt is corrected by the voice feedback operation.

In an embodiment, the feedback module 900 is further configured to detect an execution state of the control instruction, and feedback the execution state by using a voice prompt to obtain an execution result. When it is detected that the execution result meets the preset condition, the execution result is reported by the voice prompt.

For specific definitions of the in vitro diagnostic device control device, reference may be made to the above definition of the in vitro diagnostic device control method, and details are not described herein again. Each of the above-described in vitro diagnostic device control devices may be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, and combinations thereof. Each of the above modules may be embedded in or independent of the processor in the computer device, or may be stored in a memory in the computer device in a software form, so that the processor invokes the operations corresponding to the above modules.

In one embodiment, a computer device is provided, which may be a terminal, and its internal structure diagram may be as shown in FIG. The computer device includes a processor, memory, network interface, display screen, and input device connected by a system bus. The processor of the computer device is used to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium, an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system and a computer program. The internal memory provides an environment for operation of an operating system and computer programs in a non-volatile storage medium. The network interface of the computer device is used to communicate with an external terminal via a network connection. The computer program is executed by the processor to implement an in vitro diagnostic device control method. The display screen of the computer device may be a liquid crystal display or an electronic ink display screen, and the input device of the computer device may be a touch layer covered on the display screen, or may be a button, a trackball or a touchpad provided on the computer device casing. It can also be an external keyboard, trackpad or mouse.

It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the structure shown in FIG. 9 is only a block diagram of a part of the structure related to the solution of the present application, and does not constitute a limitation of the computer device to which the solution of the present application is applied. The specific computer device may It includes more or fewer components than those shown in the figures, or some components are combined, or have different component arrangements.

In one embodiment, a computer apparatus is provided comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, the processor performing the following steps when executing the computer program:

Acquiring and transmitting a voice control signal;

Receiving semantic analysis results according to feedback of voice control signals;

Obtaining a state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device, and the state detection result includes a test condition state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device;

Based on the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, a control instruction is generated, and the control instruction is sent to the instruction execution component of the in vitro diagnostic device.

The above computer device for implementing the in vitro diagnostic device control method achieves the same control effect through the voice control and the traditional manual input control command through the voice control signal and the semantic analysis result, but the voice control is more than the manual control input. Fast and effective, through the detection of the test conditions of the in vitro diagnostic equipment, etc., to ensure that the in vitro diagnostic equipment can start the test normally, combined with the detection results of the in vitro diagnostic equipment and the condition state, thereby realizing the in vitro diagnosis by generating control commands In the control of the device, during the whole control process, the user issues a voice control command and combines the state detection result, which saves the time required for control and effectively reduces the generation of invalid control commands, thereby realizing the high efficiency of the control of the in vitro diagnostic device.

In one embodiment, the processor further implements the following steps when executing the computer program:

Obtaining a voice control signal and transmitting the voice control signal to a voice processing platform having a semantic analysis function. In one embodiment, the voice processing platform includes a third-party voice processing platform, and the third-party voice processing platform includes an intelligent voice based on the Internet. A self-deployable local algorithm platform provided by the service platform and/or third parties.

Obtaining status requirements that match the results of the semantic analysis;

When the state detection result satisfies the state requirement, a control instruction corresponding to the semantic analysis result is generated, and the control instruction is sent to the instruction execution unit.

When the state detection result does not satisfy the state requirement, the state detection result is fed back through the voice prompt.

Matching the results of the semantic analysis with the state of the in vitro diagnostic device;

When there is no in vitro diagnostic device status corresponding to the semantic analysis result, the signal error information is controlled by the voice feedback voice;

When there is an in vitro diagnostic device state corresponding to the semantic analysis result, the in vitro diagnostic device status requirement that matches the semantic analysis result is determined.

When the fault of the in vitro diagnostic device is detected, the cause of the failure is fed back through the voice;

When the fault cancellation method corresponding to the preset cause of the fault is matched, the fault cancellation method is fed back;

When it is detected that the test condition does not meet the preset requirement, the prompt is corrected by the voice feedback operation.

The execution state of the control instruction is detected, and the execution state is fed back through the voice prompt; the execution result is obtained, and when the execution result is found to satisfy the preset condition, the result is performed by the voice prompt feedback.

In one embodiment, a computer readable storage medium is provided having stored thereon a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the following steps:

Acquiring and transmitting a voice control signal;

The above storage medium for implementing the in vitro diagnostic device control method achieves the same control effect through the voice control and the traditional manual input control command through the voice control signal and the semantic analysis result, but the voice control is more than the manual control input. Fast and effective, through the detection of the test conditions of the in vitro diagnostic equipment, etc., to ensure that the in vitro diagnostic equipment can start the test normally, combined with the detection results of the in vitro diagnostic equipment and the condition state, thereby realizing the in vitro diagnosis by generating control commands In the control of the device, during the whole control process, the user issues a voice control command and combines the state detection result, which saves the time required for control and effectively reduces the generation of invalid control commands, thereby realizing the high efficiency of the control of the in vitro diagnostic device.

In one embodiment, the computer program is executed by the processor to also implement the following steps:

Acquiring a voice control signal and transmitting the voice control signal to a voice processing platform having a semantic analysis function. In one embodiment, the voice processing platform includes a third-party voice processing platform, and the third-party voice processing platform includes an Internet-based intelligent network. A self-deployable local algorithm platform provided by the voice service platform and/or a third party.

Obtaining status requirements that match the results of the semantic analysis;

Detecting the execution status of the control instruction and feeding back the execution status through the voice prompt;

The execution result is obtained, and when it is detected that the execution result satisfies the preset condition, the result is performed by the voice prompt feedback.

A person skilled in the art can understand that all or part of the process of implementing the above embodiment method can be completed by a computer program to instruct related hardware, and the computer program can be stored in a non-volatile computer readable storage medium. The computer program, when executed, may include the flow of an embodiment of the methods as described above. Any reference to a memory, storage, database or other medium used in the various embodiments provided herein may include non-volatile and/or volatile memory. Non-volatile memory can include read only memory (ROM), programmable ROM (PROM), electrically programmable ROM (EPROM), electrically erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), or flash memory. Volatile memory can include random access memory (RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration and not limitation, RAM is available in a variety of formats, such as static RAM (SRAM), dynamic RAM (DRAM), synchronous DRAM (SDRAM), double data rate SDRAM (DDRSDRAM), enhanced SDRAM (ESDRAM), synchronization chain. Synchlink DRAM (SLDRAM), Memory Bus (Rambus) Direct RAM (RDRAM), Direct Memory Bus Dynamic RAM (DRDRAM), and Memory Bus Dynamic RAM (RDRAM).

The technical features of the above embodiments may be arbitrarily combined. For the sake of brevity of description, all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are not described. However, as long as there is no contradiction in the combination of these technical features, It is considered to be the range described in this specification.

The above embodiments are merely illustrative of several embodiments of the present application, and the description thereof is more specific and detailed, but is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that a number of variations and modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present application. Therefore, the scope of the invention should be determined by the appended claims.

Claims

An in vitro diagnostic device control method, the method comprising:

Acquiring and transmitting a voice control signal;

Receiving a semantic analysis result according to the feedback of the voice control signal;

Obtaining a state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device, the state detection result including a test condition state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device;

And generating a control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and transmitting the control instruction to the instruction execution component of the in vitro diagnostic device.
The in vitro diagnostic device control method according to claim 1, wherein the acquiring and transmitting the voice control signal comprises:

Acquiring a voice control signal and transmitting the voice control signal to a voice processing platform having a semantic analysis function.
The in vitro diagnostic device control method according to claim 2, wherein the speech processing platform comprises a third party speech processing platform.
The in vitro diagnostic device control method according to claim 3, wherein the third-party voice processing platform comprises an Internet-based intelligent voice service platform or a self-deployable local algorithm platform provided by a third party.
The in-vitro diagnostic device control method according to claim 3, wherein the third-party voice processing platform comprises an internet-based intelligent voice service platform and a third-party self-deployable local algorithm platform, wherein the voice control signal is acquired, and Transmitting the voice control signal to a voice processing platform having a semantic analysis function includes:

Acquiring a voice control signal;

Sending the voice control signal to an internet-based intelligent voice service platform when detecting that the network connection state is normal;

When it is detected that the network connection status is abnormal, the voice control signal is sent to a self-deployable local algorithm platform provided by a third party.
The in vitro diagnostic device control method according to claim 1, wherein the generating the control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and transmitting the control instruction to the instruction execution component of the in vitro diagnostic device comprises:

Obtaining a status requirement that matches the semantic analysis result;

And when the state detection result satisfies the state requirement, generating a control instruction corresponding to the semantic analysis result, and sending the control signal to the instruction execution component;

And after the generating the control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and sending the control instruction to the instruction execution component, the method further includes:

When the state detection result does not satisfy the state requirement, the state detection result is fed back through a voice prompt.
The in vitro diagnostic device control method according to claim 6, wherein before the obtaining the state requirement that matches the semantic analysis result, the method further includes:

Matching the semantic analysis result with the state of the in vitro diagnostic device;

When there is no in vitro diagnostic device status corresponding to the semantic analysis result, the signal error information is controlled by voice feedback;

When there is an in vitro diagnostic device state corresponding to the semantic analysis result, an in vitro diagnostic device status requirement that matches the semantic analysis result is determined.
The in vitro diagnostic device control method according to claim 6, wherein when the operation detection result does not satisfy the status requirement, the feedback result by the voice prompt feedback comprises:

When it is detected that the in vitro diagnostic device has a fault, the cause of the fault is fed back through the voice;

When the fault cancellation method corresponding to the fault cause is preset, the fault cancellation method is fed back;

When it is detected that the test condition does not meet the preset requirement, the prompt is corrected by the voice feedback operation.
The in vitro diagnostic device control method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the generating a control instruction based on the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and transmitting the control instruction to the in vitro diagnostic device After the instruction execution component, it also includes:

Detecting an execution status of the control instruction, and feeding back the execution status by using a voice prompt;

The execution result is obtained, and when it is detected that the execution result satisfies the preset condition, the execution result is fed back through the voice prompt.
An in vitro diagnostic device control device, the device comprising:

a voice acquisition and sending module, configured to acquire and send a voice control signal;

a semantic analysis result receiving module, configured to receive a semantic analysis result according to the feedback of the voice control signal;

a device state detection module, configured to acquire a state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device, where the state detection result includes a test condition state detection result of the in vitro diagnostic device;

And a control module, configured to generate a control instruction according to the semantic analysis result and the state detection result, and send the control instruction to an instruction execution component of the in vitro diagnostic device.
The in vitro diagnostic device control apparatus according to claim 10, wherein the speech acquisition and transmission module is further configured to acquire a speech control signal and transmit the speech control signal to a speech processing platform having a semantic analysis function.
The in vitro diagnostic device control apparatus according to claim 11, wherein the speech processing platform comprises a third party speech processing platform.
The in vitro diagnostic device control apparatus according to claim 12, wherein the third-party voice processing platform comprises an Internet-based intelligent voice service platform or a self-deployable local algorithm platform provided by a third party.
The in vitro diagnostic device control device according to claim 12, wherein the third-party voice processing platform comprises an Internet-based intelligent voice service platform and a self-deployable local algorithm platform provided by a third party, the voice acquisition and transmission module, The method further includes: when the network connection status is normal, the voice control signal is sent to the Internet-based intelligent voice service platform, and when the network connection status is abnormal, the voice control signal is sent. A self-deployable local algorithm platform provided by a third party.
The in vitro diagnostic device control apparatus according to claim 10, further comprising a feedback module, configured to detect an execution state of the control instruction, and feed back the execution state through a voice prompt to obtain an execution result, when the execution is detected When the result meets the preset condition, the execution result is fed back through the voice prompt.
The in vitro diagnostic device control device according to claim 15, wherein the control module comprises:

a status requirement matching unit, configured to obtain a status requirement that matches the semantic analysis result;

And a control instruction generating and transmitting unit configured to generate a control instruction corresponding to the semantic analysis result when the state detection result satisfies the state requirement, and send the control signal to the instruction execution unit.

The feedback module is further configured to: when the state detection result does not meet the state requirement, feed back the state detection result by using a voice prompt.
The in vitro diagnostic device control apparatus according to claim 16, wherein the state requirement matching unit is further configured to match the semantic analysis result with an in vitro diagnostic device state, when there is no in vitro diagnosis corresponding to the semantic analysis result In the device state, the voice control signal error information is fed back through the feedback module, and when there is an in vitro diagnostic device state corresponding to the semantic analysis result, the in vitro diagnostic device state requirement matching the semantic analysis result is determined.
The in vitro diagnostic device control method according to claim 16, wherein the feedback module is further configured to: when a fault is detected in the in vitro diagnostic device, feedback a fault cause by a voice, and match a preset corresponding to the fault cause When the fault is removed, the fault cancellation method is fed back, and when the test condition is detected to not meet the preset requirement, the prompt is corrected by the voice feedback operation.
A computer apparatus comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and operable on the processor, the processor executing the computer program to implement the method of any one of claims 1 to 9. step.
A computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program, the computer program being executed by a processor to perform the steps of the method of any one of claims 1 to 9.