WO2019150738A1 - Dispositif de surveillance de système électrique - Google Patents

Dispositif de surveillance de système électrique Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2019150738A1
WO2019150738A1 PCT/JP2018/044010 JP2018044010W WO2019150738A1 WO 2019150738 A1 WO2019150738 A1 WO 2019150738A1 JP 2018044010 W JP2018044010 W JP 2018044010W WO 2019150738 A1 WO2019150738 A1 WO 2019150738A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
power system
system monitoring
failure
data
monitoring device
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2018/044010
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
亮 坪田
英佑 黒田
昌洋 谷津
博夫 堀井
Original Assignee
株式会社日立製作所
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社日立製作所 filed Critical 株式会社日立製作所
Publication of WO2019150738A1 publication Critical patent/WO2019150738A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/24—Arrangements for preventing or reducing oscillations of power in networks
    • H02J3/241—The oscillation concerning frequency
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J13/00—Circuit arrangements for providing remote indication of network conditions, e.g. an instantaneous record of the open or closed condition of each circuitbreaker in the network; Circuit arrangements for providing remote control of switching means in a power distribution network, e.g. switching in and out of current consumers by using a pulse code signal carried by the network
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H02—GENERATION; CONVERSION OR DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC POWER
    • H02J—CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS OR SYSTEMS FOR SUPPLYING OR DISTRIBUTING ELECTRIC POWER; SYSTEMS FOR STORING ELECTRIC ENERGY
    • H02J3/00—Circuit arrangements for ac mains or ac distribution networks
    • H02J3/24—Arrangements for preventing or reducing oscillations of power in networks
    • H02J3/242—Arrangements for preventing or reducing oscillations of power in networks using phasor measuring units [PMU]
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E40/00—Technologies for an efficient electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y02E40/70—Smart grids as climate change mitigation technology in the energy generation sector
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/22—Flexible AC transmission systems [FACTS] or power factor or reactive power compensating or correcting units

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a system monitoring device that determines whether or not stable power system operation is possible.
  • Non-patent Document 3 “Bonneville Power Administration Technical Operations System Operating Limit Methodology Horizon Operations Horizon Version 3” (Non-patent Document 3).
  • OTDF Outage Transfer Distribution Factor
  • OTDF is one of the power transmission fluctuation indicators due to power system failure, and its definition is “the MW change in a branch flow for 1 MW exchange bewethew twoway”.
  • Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 7-298498 is a background art of this technology. According to this publicity, “based on online data from the electric power system, the severity of each failure is determined by the phase angle of the generator for a plurality of assumed failure cases, and the failure case selection means 112 exceeds the threshold. “Select an assumed failure case”.
  • the system stabilization device described in Patent Document 1 calculates a failure in which the phase angle or phase angle change of the generator in each of the assumed failure cases exceeds a predetermined threshold as a severe failure case.
  • a failure in which the power transmission amount fluctuation index OTDF due to a failure is a predetermined value or more is regarded as a failure that affects the power transmission limit.
  • Neither method nor apparatus takes into account the fact that the number of severe cases exceeding a predetermined threshold increases when the system becomes severe due to the use of a fixed threshold, and the calculation time increases.
  • the control amount of a control apparatus changes dynamically when a system
  • the severeness which is a parameter
  • a severe index calculation unit that calculates an index
  • a priority fault selection unit that divides the assumed fault into two or more groups having different priorities whose stability is determined based on a reference value calculated in advance and the severe index, and the facility information
  • the measurement information a stability determination unit that determines stability in order from an assumed failure belonging to a group having a high priority among the assumed failures, and the reference value using the facility information and the measurement information
  • an overall configuration of the power system monitoring apparatus that outputs a priority fault selection result and a stability determination result of the assumed fault from the system model data and the assumed fault data will be described with reference to FIG. 2 will be used to explain the hardware configuration of the power system and the power system monitoring device.
  • FIG. 1 is an example of the overall configuration diagram of the power system monitoring apparatus 100 of the present embodiment.
  • the system model data D1 held by the system model database, the assumed failure data D2 held by the assumed failure database, and the control amount vs. reference database are shown in FIG. Control amount to be stored vs. reference data D7, reference change unit 111, severe index calculation unit 110, reference data D3, severe index data D4, priority failure selection unit 112, priority failure data D5, non-priority failure data D6, and stability determination
  • Control amount to be stored vs. reference data D7 reference change unit 111, severe index calculation unit 110, reference data D3, severe index data D4, priority failure selection unit 112, priority failure data D5, non-priority failure data D6, and stability determination
  • the input data of the power system monitoring apparatus 100 is composed of system model data D1, assumed fault data D2, and control amount versus reference data D7.
  • the reference changing unit 111 of the power system monitoring apparatus 100 performs stability analysis and statistical processing using the system model data D1 and the control amount versus reference data D7, outputs the reference data D3, and outputs the reference data D3 to the reference history display unit 114.
  • the severe index calculation unit 110 of the power system monitoring apparatus 100 performs stability analysis using the system model data D1 and the assumed failure data D2, and calculates a severe index that is an index of the deterioration of the system stability of the assumed failure from the result. Then, the severe index data D4 is output.
  • the priority fault selection unit 112 of the power system monitoring apparatus 100 uses the reference data D3 and the severe index data D4 to select a priority fault whose stability is determined in advance of the assumed fault, and the priority fault data D5 and the non-priority Fault data D6 is output.
  • the stability determination unit 113 of the power system monitoring apparatus 100 receives the priority failure data D5, the non-priority failure data D6, and the system model data D1, performs stability analysis on the priority failure and the non-priority failure, and can stabilize the failure. The result is output as determination result data and transmitted to the stability display unit 115.
  • FIG. 2 is an example of the hardware configuration of the power system monitoring device 100 and the overall configuration diagram of the power system.
  • the power system 1, the power system monitoring device 100, the measuring device 10, the power source 3 (for example, a generator), the load, and the bus 2 It is the figure which showed the example of the hardware constitutions of the power transmission line 4 and the transformer 9.
  • the electric power system 1 is connected via a branch (line) 4 and a node (bus line) 2, respectively, a power source 3, a transformer 9, a measuring device 10, a load, and other measuring devices and controllable although not shown in the figure. It is composed of one or a plurality of devices (battery, chargeable / dischargeable secondary battery, EV storage battery, flywheel, etc.).
  • examples of the power source 3 include a distributed power source such as a solar power generator and a wind power generator in addition to a large power source such as a thermal power generator, a hydroelectric power generator, and a nuclear power generator.
  • the example of the measuring device 10 is a device (VT, PT, or CT) that measures any one or more of the node voltage V, the branch current I, the power factor ⁇ , the active power P, and the reactive power Q. And a function of transmitting data including a data measurement location identification ID and a built-in time stamp of the measurement device (such as a telemeter (TM)).
  • a device that measures power information (voltage phasor information) with absolute time using GPS, a phase measurement device (PMU: Phaser Measurement Units), or other measurement devices may be used.
  • the measurement device 10 is written to be in the power system 1, the measurement device 10 may be installed on a power source 3, a transformer 9, and a bus or power transmission line connected to the measurement device 10.
  • the measurement data is the data measured by the measurement device 10 and is received by the power system monitoring device 100 via the communication network 900.
  • the measurement data may include a unique number for identifying the data and a time stamp.
  • a CPU Central Processing Unit
  • a memory 103 a random access memory
  • an input unit 104 such as a keyboard and a mouse
  • a display unit 105 such as a display device
  • various databases for example, a computer device and a calculation server
  • the display unit 105 may be configured to use a printer device, an audio output device, or the like instead of the display device or together with the display device.
  • the input unit 104 can be configured to include at least one of a keyboard switch, a pointing device such as a mouse, a touch panel, and a voice instruction device.
  • the communication unit 106 includes a circuit and a communication protocol for connecting to the communication network 900.
  • the CPU 102 reads a predetermined computer program from the program database 130 and executes it.
  • the CPU 102 may be configured as one or a plurality of semiconductor chips, or may be configured as a computer device such as a calculation server.
  • the memory 103 is configured as, for example, a RAM (Random Access Memory), and stores a computer program read from the program database 130, and stores calculation result data and image data necessary for each process.
  • the screen data stored in the memory 103 is sent to the display unit 105 and displayed. An example of the displayed screen will be described later.
  • FIG. 3 is an example of a configuration diagram showing the contents of the program data of the system monitoring device.
  • a state estimation calculation program P1 for example, a reference change program P2, a severe index calculation program P3, a priority failure selection program P4, and a stability determination program P5 are stored.
  • the CPU 102 reads out the calculation programs (state estimation calculation program P1, reference change program P2, severe index calculation program P3, priority failure selection program P4, and stability determination program P5 read from the program database 130 into the memory 103. ) To perform a plausible system state calculation, reference data change, severe index calculation, priority fault selection, stability determination, data search in various databases, and the like.
  • a memory 103 is a memory for temporarily storing temporary calculation data and calculation result data such as display image data, reference data, severe index data, and stability determination result data.
  • the CPU 102 generates necessary image data and displays it.
  • 105 for example, a display screen).
  • the electric power system monitoring apparatus 100 stores five databases roughly divided. Excluding the program database 130, the system model database 131, the contingency database 132, the control amount vs. reference database 133, and the reference history database 134 will be described.
  • the system model database 131 includes system configuration, line impedance, ground capacitance, active power, reactive power, voltage, voltage phase angle, current, power factor, data necessary for system configuration and state estimation (such as threshold value of bat data) ), Generator data, and other data necessary for tidal current calculation and state estimation. Data with time stamp or PMU data may be used. The result of estimating and calculating the active power, reactive power, voltage, voltage phase angle, current, and power factor of each node, branch, generator, load, and control device of the plausible system is also stored as system measurement data. In addition, when inputting manually, it inputs and memorize
  • the assumed failure database 132 includes a list that is stored using the input unit 104 and that combines failure locations and failure aspects as possible failure cases in the power system. Other elements include failure removal timing and the like in the list.
  • FIG. 4 is an image of the contingency database.
  • the control amount vs. reference database 133 stores data in which an arbitrary control amount and reference correspond one-to-one.
  • FIG. 5 is an image of the control amount versus the reference database. A plurality of data sets may be provided and switched using the input unit 104.
  • the reference history database 134 stores the reference data calculated by the reference change program P2, the severe index of each contingency, and the control amount necessary for stabilizing each contingency calculated by the stability determination along with the time. Has been. An image of the reference history data is shown in FIG. Thereby, the operator can confirm the operation of the power system monitoring device and determine whether or not the reference changing unit 111 and the severe index calculating unit 110 need to be corrected.
  • FIG. 7 is an example of a flowchart showing the entire processing of the power system monitoring apparatus.
  • the system model data D1, the assumed failure data D2, and the control amount versus reference data D7 are read from the system model database.
  • severe index data D4 is calculated using the system model data D1 and the assumed failure data D2.
  • the reference data D3 is changed using the system model data D1 and the control amount versus reference data D7, sent to the display unit, and stored in the reference history database.
  • priority failure data D5 and non-priority failure D6 are determined using severe index data D4 and reference data D3.
  • the stability calculation is performed using the system model data D1 and the priority failure data D5 to determine the stability, and the control amount is sent to the reference history database and sent to the display unit. Finally, the stability is calculated by using the system data and the non-priority fault to determine the stability, and the result is stored in the reference history database and sent to the display unit.
  • step S1 the system model data D1 and the assumed failure data D2 are read from the system model database 131 and the assumed failure database 132.
  • the data may be corrected using the input unit 104 and the display unit 105.
  • step S2 the severe index calculation program P3 is read from the program database 130 into the memory and executed, and the severe index is calculated for each assumed failure using the system model data D1 and the assumed failure data D2.
  • the maximum value of the phase difference angle ⁇ of the generator after a certain time after the failure is taken as a severe index.
  • FIG. 8 shows an image when the fluctuation of the phase difference angle ⁇ of the generator is calculated as a severe index in step S2.
  • the horizontal axis in FIG. 8 is time, and the vertical axis is the phase difference angle of the generator.
  • the figure shows the results of phase difference angle fluctuation calculation of three generators G1, G2, G3.
  • Times t (0), t (1), and t (2) are a simulation start time, a disturbance occurrence time, and a severe index calculation time, respectively.
  • ⁇ (G1, t), ⁇ (G2, t), and ⁇ (G3, t) are the phase difference angles of G1, G2, and G3 at time t, respectively.
  • phase difference angle of each generator starts to fluctuate. If the phase difference angle of the generator is significantly separated from other generators as a result of shaking, the generator will step out and the power system may become unstable. In general, the more unstable the grid state, the shorter the time until step-out. Therefore, the phase difference angle of each generator, ⁇ (G1, t (2)), ⁇ (G2, The maximum value of t (2)) and ⁇ (G3, t (2)) can be used as a severe index of failure. In the figure, ⁇ (G3, t (2)) is a severe index of this failure.
  • the maximum value of ⁇ (G2, t (0)), ⁇ (G3, t (2)) ⁇ ⁇ (G3, t (0)) may be used as a severe index.
  • an average value or a weighted average based on the capacity of the generator may be used.
  • step S3 the reference change program P2 is read from the program database 130 into the memory and executed, the reference data D3 is calculated using the system model data D1, and stored in the reference history database 134.
  • the reference data D3 is calculated using the system model data D1, and stored in the reference history database 134.
  • FIG. 9 is an example of a flowchart illustrating the reference data change process.
  • FIG. 9 shows a method of reading the control amount vs. reference data D7, changing the reference data D3, and storing it in the reference history database 134 through steps S7 to S10.
  • step S7 the control amount versus reference data D7 is read from the control amount versus reference database 133.
  • step S8 the control amount of the generator of each contingency that can be stabilized in the previous stability determination steps S5 and S6 is read and the sum is calculated.
  • step S9 a reference for the control amount sum obtained in step S8 in the control amount versus reference database 133 is read.
  • step S10 the reference data D3 obtained in step S9 is transmitted to the priority failure selection unit 112 and stored in the reference history database 134.
  • S2 is executed first for S2 and S3, but S3 may be executed first, or S2 and S3 may be executed in parallel.
  • step S4 priority failure is selected using the severe failure severity index data D4 obtained in step S2 and the reference data D3 obtained in step S3, and priority failure data D5 and non-priority are selected.
  • Output as failure data D6 As a method, for example, a severe index of an assumed failure and a reference are numerically compared, an assumed failure exceeding the reference is output as priority failure data, and an assumed failure below the reference is output as non-priority failure data.
  • the threshold ⁇ th and ⁇ (G3, t (2)) are compared. In FIG. 8, since the phase difference angle ⁇ (G3, t (2)) of the generator G3 at time t (2) is larger than the threshold value ⁇ th, this failure is added to the priority failure data.
  • step S5 the priority fault stability is determined using the system model data D1 read in step S1 and the priority fault data D5 output in step S4, and the priority fault stability determination result is output.
  • a method for determining the stability of an assumed failure see, for example, Yuji Sekine “Power System Transient Analysis” pp. This is performed in accordance with a calculation method called transient calculation described in 377-392.
  • the transient calculation is performed in consideration of the control. Do. If the power system becomes stable after the failure, it is determined that the failure can be stabilized. If the power system becomes unstable after the failure, it is determined that the failure cannot be stabilized.
  • the control amount such as the generator is stored in the reference history database 134.
  • step S6 the system model data D1 read in step S1 and the non-priority fault data D6 output in step S4 are used to determine the stability of the non-priority fault and output the non-priority fault stability determination result.
  • the stability determination method is the same as that in step S5. At this time, if there is control of the generator or the like, the control amount is stored in the reference history database 134.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a screen that displays a power system stability determination result.
  • the first line is a heading of the contingency, and the name and outline of the contingency are displayed in each column.
  • the second line indicates whether or not a priority failure has occurred.
  • a round mark indicates a priority failure, and a cross indicates a non-priority failure.
  • From the third line the results of various stability determinations are displayed. If it is stable, “stable” is displayed. If it is unstable, “unstable” is displayed together with an outline of the unstable portion. As shown in FIG.
  • the stability determination can be determined by indicating the stability determination result in a blank for a failure for which the stability determination has not ended. If all priority faults have been determined and there are no unstable faults, the operator can focus on other tasks during the non-priority fault stability determination.
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating an example of a screen that displays a history of reference data.
  • the horizontal axis is time, and the vertical axis is a reference value.
  • the change of the reference data is shown on the screen of the power system monitoring device 100, so that when the reference is inappropriately changed due to a measurement error or the like, the operator can easily detect and correct the abnormality.
  • the reference value not only the reference value but also the value related to the reference change may be displayed as the second vertical axis.
  • a value related to the reference change for example, in Example 1, there is a control amount sum at the time of the previous stability determination.
  • the control amount vs. reference data D7 is created by the operator with reference to the history data. For example, first, a severe index is arranged for each control amount, and a standard is selected so that the top 10% is statistically selected. Next, the standard is corrected so as to have an arbitrary margin based on the experience of the operator.
  • priority faults and non-priority faults are divided into two stages, but a plurality of criteria may be set and priority may be set in multiple stages. For example, set two criteria, divide high priority failure, medium priority failure, low priority failure and failure into three stages, judge stability from failure with high priority, and display the judgment result You can do it.
  • the number of failures extracted by screening can be dynamically adjusted.
  • the number of severe failures selected when the system is severe can be reduced, and the power system monitoring device can be realized in which the operator can quickly determine the stability determination result of the power system.
  • FIG. 12 is an example of an overall configuration diagram of the power system monitoring apparatus 100 according to the second embodiment, and control amount data D8 is added instead of the control amount versus reference data D7.
  • Input data of the power system monitoring apparatus 100 includes system model data D1, assumed failure data D2, and control amount data D8.
  • An example of the control amount data D8 is shown in FIG.
  • the minimum control amount that can be stabilized for each contingency obtained by the stability analysis is stored in the memory.
  • FIG. 14 shows an example of processing of the reference changing unit 111 of the power system monitoring apparatus that does not use the control amount versus reference database 133 of the second embodiment.
  • step S11 a representative value is calculated from the control amount of the generator of each contingency at the time of stability determination at time t ⁇ T. For example, the median value of the control amount is taken.
  • step S12 the output of each generator after the failure at time t is obtained. For example, the frequency fluctuation is calculated from the gain and load characteristics of the governor of the generator using [Equation 1], and the generator output fluctuation is calculated from the frequency fluctuation using [Equation 2].
  • GC indicates an index of a generator that continues system connection after a failure.
  • K GC is the output variation rate with respect to the frequency variation of the generator to continue grid connection after a failure
  • K L is the output variation rate with respect to the frequency fluctuation of the power system load.
  • P CONTROLLED is a representative value of the control amount of the generator obtained in step S11.
  • ⁇ F is a frequency variation.
  • ⁇ P GC is the output fluctuation of each generator, and the output of each generator in step S12 is obtained using this value.
  • step S13 a P- ⁇ curve is created for each generator. As a method for creating a P- ⁇ curve, for example, Y.C.
  • step S14 the fluctuation of the generator phase difference angle before and after the failure at time t is obtained using the P- ⁇ curve.
  • the P- ⁇ curve has the shape shown in FIG. 15, and there are two phase difference angles corresponding to the output of the generator. Since a large value is an unstable point, a small value is a corresponding phase difference angle.
  • step S15 a representative value of phase difference angle fluctuation before and after the failure is obtained from ⁇ (t) of each generator. For example, the third quartile of ⁇ (t) is obtained and set as ⁇ q (t).
  • step S16 the reference is changed using the representative value ⁇ q (t) of the phase difference fluctuation before and after the failure obtained in step S15. For example, a difference from the previous ⁇ q (t ⁇ T) is added as a reference.
  • ⁇ (t) of each generator increases.
  • a typical ⁇ (t) variation of each assumed failure is calculated, and the failure is selected as a priority failure by biasing a severe index that increases as the system becomes severe by changing the standard. Can be narrowed down to more severe ones. Further, it is not necessary to create the control amount vs. reference database of the first embodiment, and it can be easily implemented as compared with the first embodiment.
  • Power system 2 Busbar 3: Power supply 4: Transmission line 7: Circuit breaker (relay) 9: Transformer 10: Measuring device 100: Power system monitoring device 101: Communication bus line 102: CPU (Central Processing Unit) 103: memory 104: input unit 105: display unit 106: communication unit 110: severe index calculation unit 111: reference change unit 112: priority failure selection unit 113: stability determination unit 114: reference history display unit 115: stability display unit 130: Program database 131: System model database 132: Contingency failure database 133: Control amount vs. reference database 134: Reference history database 900: Communication network

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Power Engineering (AREA)
  • Supply And Distribution Of Alternating Current (AREA)
  • Remote Monitoring And Control Of Power-Distribution Networks (AREA)

Abstract

Le but de la présente invention est de mettre en œuvre un dispositif de surveillance de système électrique grâce auquel un opérateur peut déterminer plus rapidement un résultat de décision de stabilité d'un système électrique. Pour aborder ce problème, le dispositif de surveillance de système électrique comprend : une unité de calcul d'indice de contrainte qui calcule des indices de contrainte d'au moins deux défauts supposés dans le système électrique en utilisant des informations d'installation sur le système électrique et des informations de mesure obtenues périodiquement ; une unité de sélection de défaut antérieur qui divise les défauts supposés en au moins deux groupes de priorités différentes en utilisant une valeur de référence pré-calculée et les indices de contrainte ; une unité de décision de stabilité qui décide, dans l'ordre, la stabilité à partir des défauts supposés appartenant à un groupe de plus haute priorité parmi les défauts supposés en utilisant les informations d'installation et les informations de mesure ; et une unité de changement de référence qui change la valeur de référence en utilisant les informations d'installation et les informations de mesure.
PCT/JP2018/044010 2018-02-05 2018-11-29 Dispositif de surveillance de système électrique WO2019150738A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018017818A JP6996998B2 (ja) 2018-02-05 2018-02-05 電力系統監視装置
JP2018-017818 2018-02-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2019150738A1 true WO2019150738A1 (fr) 2019-08-08

Family

ID=67479299

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2018/044010 WO2019150738A1 (fr) 2018-02-05 2018-11-29 Dispositif de surveillance de système électrique

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6996998B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2019150738A1 (fr)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007288878A (ja) * 2006-04-14 2007-11-01 Hitachi Ltd 電力系統安定度判定方法及び装置
WO2018020933A1 (fr) * 2016-07-27 2018-02-01 株式会社日立製作所 Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de stabilité

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2007288878A (ja) * 2006-04-14 2007-11-01 Hitachi Ltd 電力系統安定度判定方法及び装置
WO2018020933A1 (fr) * 2016-07-27 2018-02-01 株式会社日立製作所 Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de stabilité

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6996998B2 (ja) 2022-01-17
JP2019135886A (ja) 2019-08-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP6244255B2 (ja) 電圧安定度監視装置および方法
JP6412822B2 (ja) 電力系統電圧無効電力監視制御装置及び方法
US9450409B2 (en) Converter station power set point analysis system and method
JP6427090B2 (ja) 発電量予測装置、発電量予測方法、系統安定化装置、並びに系統安定化方法
US11256278B2 (en) Power system stabilization device and power system stabilization method
Hajian et al. A chance-constrained optimization approach for control of transmission voltages
JP2008154378A (ja) 潮流計算方法及びその装置
Loud et al. Hydro-Québec's challenges and experiences in on-line DSA applications
Khoshkhoo et al. Survey of power system restoration documents issued from 2016 to 2021
WO2019150738A1 (fr) Dispositif de surveillance de système électrique
CN116540038A (zh) 一种电容器组的绝缘状态监测方法和装置
WO2019207935A1 (fr) Système de commande de système d'alimentation et procédé de commande de système d'alimentation
Austria et al. Integrated approach to transfer limit calculations
EP3651296A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de support opérationnel de système dans un système d'alimentation et système de commande de protection de surveillance de zone étendue
Pavani et al. Support vector machine based transient stability identification in distribution system with distributed generation
Leelaruji et al. Computing sensitivities from synchrophasor data for voltage stability monitoring and visualization
Ahmad et al. Contingency analysis and reliability evaluation of Bangladesh power system
US11916394B2 (en) Renewable energy system stabilization system and system stabilization support method
JP2022016046A (ja) 電力系統安定化システム
WO2019097672A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de surveillance de système de distribution d'énergie, procédé de surveillance de système de distribution d'énergie et programme
JP4160535B2 (ja) 電力系統安定化装置および電力系統安定化処理プログラム
US20220029421A1 (en) Control apparatus, control method, and computer-readable medium
WO2024195195A1 (fr) Système de gestion de ligne électrique et procédé de gestion de ligne électrique
Rocha‐Doria et al. Design and implementation of a real‐time monitoring tool for power engineering education
US20240143861A1 (en) Actor-based distribution computation for partitioned power system simulation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18903051

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18903051

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1