WO2019117855A1 - Active backdriving for a robotic arm - Google Patents
Active backdriving for a robotic arm Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2019117855A1 WO2019117855A1 PCT/US2017/065636 US2017065636W WO2019117855A1 WO 2019117855 A1 WO2019117855 A1 WO 2019117855A1 US 2017065636 W US2017065636 W US 2017065636W WO 2019117855 A1 WO2019117855 A1 WO 2019117855A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- joint
- movable joint
- signal
- frequency
- robotic arm
- Prior art date
Links
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims description 53
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 40
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 32
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 29
- 238000001356 surgical procedure Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000012636 effector Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000002324 minimally invasive surgery Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004043 responsiveness Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000000056 organ Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 206010002091 Anaesthesia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 210000001015 abdomen Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000037005 anaesthesia Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002357 laparoscopic surgery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005461 lubrication Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036407 pain Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002980 postoperative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002432 robotic surgery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037390 scarring Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001954 sterilising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004659 sterilization and disinfection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000451 tissue damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000827 tissue damage Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012800 visualization Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/30—Surgical robots
- A61B34/35—Surgical robots for telesurgery
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/30—Surgical robots
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/30—Surgical robots
- A61B34/37—Master-slave robots
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/70—Manipulators specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/77—Manipulators with motion or force scaling
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/50—Supports for surgical instruments, e.g. articulated arms
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1628—Programme controls characterised by the control loop
- B25J9/1641—Programme controls characterised by the control loop compensation for backlash, friction, compliance, elasticity in the joints
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1679—Programme controls characterised by the tasks executed
- B25J9/1689—Teleoperation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B34/00—Computer-aided surgery; Manipulators or robots specially adapted for use in surgery
- A61B34/30—Surgical robots
- A61B2034/302—Surgical robots specifically adapted for manipulations within body cavities, e.g. within abdominal or thoracic cavities
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/06—Measuring instruments not otherwise provided for
- A61B2090/064—Measuring instruments not otherwise provided for for measuring force, pressure or mechanical tension
- A61B2090/065—Measuring instruments not otherwise provided for for measuring force, pressure or mechanical tension for measuring contact or contact pressure
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/06—Measuring instruments not otherwise provided for
- A61B2090/064—Measuring instruments not otherwise provided for for measuring force, pressure or mechanical tension
- A61B2090/066—Measuring instruments not otherwise provided for for measuring force, pressure or mechanical tension for measuring torque
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/50—Supports for surgical instruments, e.g. articulated arms
- A61B2090/508—Supports for surgical instruments, e.g. articulated arms with releasable brake mechanisms
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/50—Supports for surgical instruments, e.g. articulated arms
- A61B90/57—Accessory clamps
- A61B2090/571—Accessory clamps for clamping a support arm to a bed or other supports
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B46/00—Surgical drapes
- A61B46/10—Surgical drapes specially adapted for instruments, e.g. microscopes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/41—Servomotor, servo controller till figures
- G05B2219/41078—Backlash acceleration compensation when inversing, reversing direction
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to the field of robotic surgery, and more specifically to new and useful systems and methods for assisting backdriving of a robotic arm.
- MIS Minimally-invasive surgery
- laparoscopic procedures typically involve creating a number of small incisions in the patient (e.g., in the abdomen), and introducing one or more surgical instruments (e.g , end effector, at least one camera, etc.) through the incisions into the patient.
- the surgical procedures may then be performed using the introduced surgical instruments, with the visualization aid provided by the camera.
- MIS provides multiple benefits, such as reduced patient scarring, less patient pain, shorter patient recovery periods, and lower medical treatment costs associated with patient recovery.
- MIS may be performed with robotic systems that include one or more robotic arms for manipulating surgical instruments based on commands from an operator.
- a robotic arm may, for example, support at its distal end various devices such as surgical end effectors, imaging devices, cannulae for providing access to the patient’s body cavity and organs, etc.
- the robotic arm and surgical instruments may be controlled to perform minimally-invasive surgery'.
- a robotic arm in a robotic surgical system includes one or more joints enabling movement of the robotic arm.
- at least one joint may be driven by an actuator assembly including a motor, a gear train, one or more sensors, etc.
- the actuator assembly may furthermore be backdriven, such as due to a user exerting a manual force on the robotic arm to reposition the joint and/or other joints of the robotic arm.
- the one or more joints in the robotic arm may experience high friction when being backdriven, thereby requiring a greater force to overcome the high friction and backdrive the actuator assemblies. This may, for example, make it difficult for a user to manually reposition the arm.
- a method for assisting movement of a robotic surgical arm having at least one movable joint may include generating a modulated signal comprising a first oscillating waveform having a first frequency and being modulated by a second oscillating waveform having a second frequency, and driving an actuator in the at least one movable joint based on the modulated signal to at least partially compensate for friction in the at least one movable joint.
- the second frequency may be higher than the first frequency.
- the method may include detecting movement of the at least one movable joint, generating a second signal different from the modulated signal, and driving the actuator in the at least one movable joint based on the second signal to at least partially compensate for friction in the joint.
- a robotic surgical system may include at least one robotic arm comprising at least one movable joint and an actuator configured to drive the at least one movable joint, and a controller configured to generate a modulated signal, wherein the actuator is configured to drive the at least one movable joint based on the modulated signal to at least partially compensate for friction in the at least one movable joint.
- the modulated signal may include a first oscillating waveform having a first frequency and being modulated by a second oscillating waveform having a second frequency, where the second frequency is higher than the first frequency.
- the system may include at least one sensor configured to detect movement of the at least one movable joint. Upon detection of joint movement, the control system may be configured to generate a second signal different from the modulated signal, and the actuator may be configured to drive the at least one movable joint based on the second signal to at least partially compensate for friction in the joint.
- the first and/or second oscillating waveforms for the modulated signal may be, for example, a sine wave.
- the first frequency of the first oscillating waveform may be between about 1 Hz and about 5 Hz (e.g., about 2 Hz).
- the second frequency of the second oscillating waveform may be less than or equal to about 200 Hz (e.g., about 100 Hz).
- first and/or second signals may be based on a dynamic friction model (e.g., Couloumb friction model, viscous friction model), such that, for example, the second signal may be generally proportional to the velocity of the at least one movable joint to continue to at least partially compensate for friction in the joint.
- a dynamic friction model e.g., Couloumb friction model, viscous friction model
- the actuator may also be driven to at least partially compensate for a gravitational force acting upon the at least one movable joint.
- friction compensation and gravity compensation may be concurrently performed to assist a user manipulating the arm with ease (e.g., a user desiring to manually manipulate the robotic arm, leave the robotic arm temporarily, and continue manually manipulating the robotic arm and without complications caused by gravity and/or friction within the robotic arm.
- FIG. 1 A depicts an example of an operating room arrangement with a robotic surgical system and a surgeon console.
- FIG. IB is a schematic illustration of one exemplary variation of an instrument driver on a robotic arm.
- FIG. 2A is a schematic illustration of another exemplary variation of an instrument driver on a robotic arm, coupled to a patient table.
- FIG. 2B is an overview schematic of an exemplary control system setup for controlling actuation of the joint modules of one exemplary variation of a robotic arm.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of an exemplary variation of a control system for assisting movement (e.g., backdriving) of a robotic arm.
- FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary ' friction model describing frictional force F as a function of relative velocity V of a. moving object in contact with another object.
- FIG. 5 is a flowchart of an exemplary variation of a method for assisting movement of a robotic arm with friction compensation.
- FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate an exemplary modulated signal that may be used to control an actuator in a movable joint in the robotic arm when the joint is substantially not moving, in one variation of a friction compensation mode.
- FIG 7 illustrates exemplary vari ations of the second signal that may be used to control an actuator in a movable joint in the robotic arm, after the movable joint is determined to be moving.
- a robotic system 150 may include one or more robotic arms 160 located at a surgical platform (e.g., table, bed, cart, etc.), where end effectors or surgi cal tools are attached to the distal ends of the robotic arms 160 for executing a surgical procedure.
- a robotic system 150 may include, as shown in the exemplary schematic of FIG. IB, at least one robotic arm 160 coupled to a surgical platform, and an instrument driver 170 generally attached to a distal end of the robotic arm 160.
- a cannula 180 coupled to the end of the instrument driver 170 may receive and guide a surgical instrument 190 (e.g., end effector, camera, etc.).
- the robotic ami 160 may include a plurality of links that are actuated so as to position and orient the instalment driver 170, which actuates the surgical instrument 190.
- a sterile drape 152 or other sterile barrier may be interposed between non-sterile components (e.g., robotic arm 160 and instrument driver 170) and sterile components (e.g., cannula 180) to help maintain a sterile field for the patient (e.g., to protect against contamination from non-sterile components).
- a user may use a user console 100 to remotely manipulate the robotic arms 160 and/or surgical instruments (e.g., tele-operation).
- the user console 100 may be located in the same procedure room as the robotic system 150, as shown in FIG. 1 A. In other embodiments, the user console 100 may be located in an adjacent or nearby room, or tele-operated from a remote location in a different building, city, or country, etc.
- the user console 100 comprises a seat 110, foot-operated controls 120, one or more handheld user interface devices 122, and at least one user display 130 configured to display, for example, a view of the surgical site inside a patient.
- a user located in the seat 1 10 and viewing the user display 130 may manipulate the foot-operated controls 120 and/or handheld user interface devices 122 to remotely control the robotic arms 160 and/or surgical instruments.
- the patient is prepped and draped in a sterile fashion, and anesthesia is achieved.
- Initial access to the surgical site may be performed (e.g., with an incision in the patient).
- initial positioning and/or preparation of the robotic system may be performed.
- a surgeon or other user in the user console 100 may utilize the foot-operated controls 120 and/or user interface devices 122 to manipulate various end effectors and/or imaging systems to perform the procedure.
- Manual assistance may also be provided at the procedure table by sterile-gowned personnel, who may perform tasks including but not limited to retracting organs, or performing manual repositioning or tool exchange involving one or more robotic arms 160.
- Non-sterile personnel may also be present to assist the surgeon at the user console 100.
- the robotic system 150 and/or user console 100 may be configured or set in a state to facilitate one or more post-operative procedures, including but not limited to robotic system 150 cleaning and/or sterilization, and/or healthcare record entry- or printout, whether electronic or hard copy, such as via the user console 100
- the robotic arms 160 are shown with a table-mounted system, but in other embodiments, the robotic arms may be mounted in a cart, ceiling or sidewall, or other suitable support surface.
- the communication between the robotic system 150, the user console 100, and any other displays may be via wired and/or wireless connection(s). Any wired connections may ⁇ be optionally built into the floor and/or walls or ceiling.
- the communication between the user console 100 and the robotic system 150 may be wired and/or wireless, and may be proprietary and/or performed using any of a variety of data communication protocols.
- the user console 100 does not include an integrated display 130, but may provide a video output that can be connected to output to one or more generic displays, including remote displays accessible via the internet or network.
- the video output or feed may also be encrypted to ensure privacy and all or portions of the video output may be saved to a server or electronic healthcare record system.
- additional user consoles 100 may be provided, for example to control additional surgical instruments, and/or to take control of one or more surgical instruments at a primary' user console. This will permit, for example, a surgeon to take over or illustrate a technique during a surgical procedure with medical students and physicians-in- training, or to assist during complex surgeries requiring multiple surgeons acting simultaneously or in a coordinated manner.
- one or more robotic arms in a robotic surgical system may be located at a surgical platform, such as a table, bed, cart, etc.
- a robotic arm 200 may be coupled to a table 250 via a coupling arrangement 260.
- the coupling arrangement 260 may enable the robotic arm 200 to pivot or move laterally relative to the surface of the table 250 (in and out of the page, as shown in the orientation of FIG. 2A).
- the coupling arrangement 260 may, for example, include a pin 252 coupled to the table 250, and a coupling link L0 rotatably coupled to the pin 252 so as to form a pivot joint or pin joint.
- the coupling arrangement 260 may further include an actuator (e.g., motor and gear train) configured to enable powered movement of the robotic arm 200 relative to the table 250 via an actuatable joint around pin 252.
- the coupling arrangement 260 may include at least one position sensor, such as an encoder coupled to an actuator in the coupling arrangement 260 or another suitable angle sensor, configured to measure the position or orientation of the robotic arm 200 relative to the table 250.
- one or more brakes may be included in the coupling arrangement 260 so as to selectively arrest relative movement of the robotic arm 200 relative to the table 250.
- the robotic arm 200 is primarily described herein as being coupled to the table 250 via a pivotable coupling arrangement, it should be understood that in other variations, the robotic arm 200 may additionally or alternatively be coupled to the patient table with other kinds of mechanisms, including but not limited to mechanisms facilitating longitudinal or lateral movement, such as tracks, pin-in-slot, or other suitable mechanisms. Furthermore, the methods described herein may be used to assist backdriving in other variations of roboti c arms (e.g., different structures, different coupling arrangements to a surface, etc.).
- the robotic arm 200 may include multiple links (arm segments), and a multiple actuated joint modules that drive or regulate relative movement between adjacent links.
- Each joint module may include an actuator, a gear train (e.g., harmonic drive), encoder, torque sensor, force sensor, and/or other suitable actuator, transmission, etc. for moving arm links, and/or suitable sensors for detecting positional and/or torque feedback. Such feedback may, for example, be used to provide input into control schemes operating the robotic arm.
- One or more joint modules may include one or more brakes (e.g , drum brake) that may arrest relative movement of adjacent links and/or hold or lock relative positions of adjacent links, such as for holding the robotic ar in a particular pose or configuration.
- one exemplary' variation of a robotic arm 200 may include at least seven joint modules actuating joints J1-J7 in the robotic arm 200, where J1-J7 includes pivot joints and/or roil joints.
- JI may enable relative pivot movement between a first link LI and a second link L2.
- J2 may enable relative roll movement between the second link L2 and a third link L3.
- J3 may enable relative pivot movement between the third link L3 and a fourth link L4.
- J4 may enable relative roll movement between the fourth link L4 and a fifth link L5.
- .15 may enable relative pivot movement between the fifth link L5 and a sixth link L6.
- J6 may enable relative roil movement between the sixth link L6 and a seventh link L7 J7 may enable relative pivot movement between the seventh link L7 and an eighth link L8.
- the combination of pivot joints Jl, J3, J5, and J7 and roll joints J2, J4, and J6 may enable a robotic arm that has at least seven degrees of freedom and is movable into various configurations including those described herein.
- the robotic arm shown in FIG. 2 is exemplary' only, and the methods described herein may be used to control any suitable kind of robotic arm.
- Other exemplary variations of a robotic arm are described in U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 15/706,536 entitled“ROBOTIC ARMS” and filed September 15, 2017, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference. Control system
- the robotic arm may be generally controlled by a control system that governs actions of the robotic arm.
- the control system may control multiple robotic arms, if the robotic-assisted surgical system includes more than one robotic arm.
- the control system may include one or more processors 220 (e.g., a microprocessor, microcontroller, application-specific integrated circuit, field programmable gate array, and/or other logic circuitry).
- the processor 220 which may be located on the robotic arm itself, in a cart-carried unit, or other suitable structure, may be communicatively linked to a console 210 (e.g., a user interface).
- the processor 220 may be configured to execute instructions for performing any combination of aspects of the methods, and/or combinations of the methods described herein.
- the control system may further include a set of one or more motor controllers (e.g., 230a-230g), each of which is communicatively coupled to the processor 220 and dedicated to control and operate at least one actuator in a respective joint module in the robotic arm (e.g., 240a-240g).
- control sy stem may be configured to generate at least one modulated signal for controlling movement of a joint module in a robotic arm.
- at least one actuator in the robotic arm may be configured to drive (e.g., apply a first load on) a respective movable joint in accordance with the modulated signal to at least partially compensate for friction in the movable joint.
- the modulated signal may include a first oscillating waveform having a first frequency and being modulated by a second oscillating waveform having a second frequency, wherein the second frequency is higher than the first frequency.
- the first frequency of the first oscillating waveform may be at least partially based on a desired promptness of response to detection of an external force (e.g., user-applied force) on the movable joint in the robotic arm.
- the second oscillating waveform which may have an amplitude to increase the magnitude of the modulated signal to a suitable level (e.g., for helping the external force overcome friction ), may have a second frequency that is selected at least in part to avoid generating audible humming.
- the first oscillating waveform may have a frequency of between about 1 Hz and about 5Hz
- the second oscillating waveform may have a frequency of less than or equal to about 200 Hz
- the first oscillating waveform has a frequency of about 2 Hz
- control system may additionally or alternatively generate a signal with which at least one actuator is configured to drive (e.g., apply a second load on) a respective movable joint to at least partially compensate for a gravitational force acting upon the moveable joint.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of another variation of a control system 300 for a robotic arm 310.
- the control system 300 may include at least one processor 320 configured to execute instructions for generating motor command signals via one or more signal generators 350, where the motor command signals may be used by one or more motor controllers 330 to drive one or more respective joints in the robotic arm 310.
- the processor 320 and signal generator(s) 350 may, for example, be configured to generate motor command signals based on a gravity compensation model 342 and/or a friction compensation model 344 stored in (and received from) memory 340, as further described below.
- the memory 340 may, for example, be local or remote storage media (e.g., RAMs, ROMs, flash memory, EEPROMs, optical devices such as CD or DVT), hard drives, floppy drives, etc.).
- control system inputs for the gravity compensation model 342and/or friction compensation model 344 may be provided by one or more sensors 312 in the robotic arm (e.g., encoder, torque sensor, force sensor, accelerometer, etc. in at least one joint module or other suitable portion of the robotic arm 310), as described in further detail below.
- a gravity compensation control mode the control system commands one or more actuators in the robotic arm such that the robotic arm holds itself in a particular pose without drifting downward due to gravity .
- the control system determines the gravity force acting on at least a portion of the links in the robotic arm (e.g., based on a gravity compensation model 342).
- the control system actuates at least one joint module to counteract the determined gravity force such that the robotic arm can maintain the current pose.
- the control system may perform calculations based on measured joint angles between adjacent links, known kinematic and/or dynamic properties of the robotic arm and instrument driver, and/or known characteristics of the actuator (e.g., gear ratio, motor torque constants), detected force(s) on joints, etc.
- the robotic arm may include at least one accelerometer or other suitable sensor(s) configured to determine the direction of the applied gravitational force on the arm.
- the control system may algorithmically determine what force at each joint module is needed to compensate for gravity force acting on that joint module.
- the controller may utilize a forward kinematic algorithm, an inverse dynamic algorithm, or any suitable algorithm (e.g., in accordance with a gravity compensation model 342).
- the control system may then generate a set of commands to provide the actuators in the joint modules with an appropriate level of current which holds the robotic arm in the same pose.
- the gravity compensation mode may be used alone or in combination with other control modes (e.g., friction compensation mode described below).
- FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary friction model describing frictional force F as a function of relative velocity V of a moving object in contact with another object. More specifically, FIG. 4 depicts a friction model including Coulomb friction and linear viscous friction, with Stribeck effect.
- the starting static friction force Fm is higher than the friction force occurring immediately after relative movement commences. After sliding begins and while velocity V is within a certain velocity regime, friction decreases with increasing velocity in what is termed the Stribeck effect.
- Coulomb friction force F c which corresponds to the minimum of the curve describing the Stribeck effect, originates from the shear resistance between the contacting portions of the two objects.
- a viscous friction force is generally linear with respect to the velocity V.
- Both a positive region (corresponding to velocity in a first direction) and a negative region (corresponding to velocity in a second direction opposite to the first direction) of the friction model are depicted in the schematic of FIG. 4
- an external force must be applied to the moving component such that the external force generally exceeds the frictional force as summarized in the schematic of FIG. 4.
- the robotic arm may be operated in a friction compensation mode, or active backdrive mode, that helps to generate enough force to overcome frictional force resisting movement of the robotic arm.
- a friction compensation mode or active backdrive mode
- a user may wish to directly or manually manipulate (e.g., pull or push) one or more of the arm links to arrange the robotic arm in a particular pose. These actions backdrive the actuators of the robotic arm.
- the user due to friction caused by mechanical aspects such as high gear ratios in the joint modules, in some variations, the user must apply a signifi cant amount of force in order to overcome the fri ction and successfully move the robotic arm.
- the friction compensation mode enables the robotic arm to assist a user in moving at least a portion of the robotic arm, by determining the presence and direction of a user-applied force acting on at least one joint module (either directly or indirectly as the result of force on one or more arm links) to backdrive the actuator in that joint module, and then actively driving appropriate joint modules in the direction needed to achieve the pose desired by the user.
- the control system for the robotic arm may actuate one or more joint modules in the same direction as the user-applied force to help the user overcome static or dynamic friction.
- the user may manually manipulate the robotic arm with less perceived friction.
- the friction compensation mode may, in some variations, be used alone or in combination with other modes (e.g., gravity compensation mode).
- a method for assisting movement of a robotic arm may include generating a modulated signal 510, and driving an actuator in at least one movable joint in the robotic arm based on the modulated signal 520 to at least partially compensate for friction in the at least one movable joint, and detecting movement of the at least one movable joint 530.
- the method may further include generating a second signal 540 generally proportional to a velocity of the at least one movable joint, driving the actuator in the at least one movable joint based on the second signal 550 (e.g , after movement of the joint commences).
- the modulated signal and/or the second signal may correlate to command current for driving the actuator in the movable joint, such that the modulated signal and/or the second signal help compensate for friction forces resisting the movement of the robotic arm.
- the method may, for example, be implemented by a control system 300 described above with reference to FIG. 3.
- the control system 300 may simultaneously operate the robotic arm in gravity compensation mode and/or other suitable control modes.
- generating a modulated signal 510 e.g., via a processor and signal generator
- driving an actuator based on the modulated signal 520 may help provide compensation for static friction, in that the modulated signal may be used to drive an actuator for a movable joint while the movable joint is stationary (not moving).
- the modulated signal 610 may be a multi-component dithering command signal, in that it may be described by at least two waveform components.
- the modulated signal 610 may comprise or be defined by a first oscillating waveform 612 having a first frequency and being modulated by a second oscillating wavefor 614 having a second frequency, where the second frequency is higher than the first frequency.
- first oscillating waveform 612 and/or the second oscillating waveform 614 may be a sine wave, though in other variations the first oscillating waveform 612 and/or second oscillating waveform 614 may be a square wave or other suitable oscillating wuveform.
- the modulated signal 610 including a low frequency wavefomi component and a high frequency waveform component may provide advantages or benefits not otherwise provided by either waveform component individually.
- a signal including only the low frequency waveform e.g., similar to the waveform 612 shown in FIG. 6B
- the lower frequency waveform alone may decrease the responsiveness of friction compensation upon detection of an external force (e.g., user-applied force) on the movable joint in the robotic arm.
- an actuator driving a joint based on a lower frequency waveform will have fewer opportunities per second to successfully assist a user in moving the joint (compared to an actuator driving a joint based on a higher frequency waveform).
- driving an actuator for a movable joint with a low frequency signal may be unsuitable for friction compensation, as there may be a delay or sluggishness associated with any attempt to overcome static friction.
- a modulated signal 610 that includes both low frequency and the high frequency components, as described herein, may be advantageous.
- a modulated signal may provide responsiveness for friction compensation, without generating diffi cult-to-overcome dynamic torques.
- the magnitude of the high frequency component may be low (because the high frequency component is modulated on top of the low frequency component, which may have a magnitude suitable for providing most of the friction compensation) and result in low acceleration and thus reduced dynamic effects among arm joints that are more controllable or manageable (and more easily overcome).
- the frequency (or period), magnitude, offset, and/or other parameters or characteristics of the modulated signal may be individually tuned for one or more actuators in each joint module of a robotic arm.
- such characteristics of the modulated signal may be determined based on, for example, static friction and/or dynamic friction within a joint (e.g., due to friction among moving components in an actuator, friction in a gear train coupled to output of an actuator, friction between arm links, etc.).
- weight e.g., based on dimensions and/or material choice of robotic arm components
- tightness of mechanical fit between moving components degree of lubrication, and/or orientation of the joint (e.g., relative to gravitational force) of the joint, etc.
- frequency of the slower (lower frequency) waveform component of the modulated signal may generally correspond to the responsiveness to detection of force (e.g., user-applied) on the movable joint in the robotic arm.
- force e.g., user-applied
- frequency of the slower (lower frequency) waveform component of the modulated signal may generally correspond to the responsiveness to detection of force (e.g., user-applied) on the movable joint in the robotic arm.
- the slower component of the modulated signal has a higher frequency
- the modulated signal 610 has a frequency of about 2 Hz
- the actuator being driven based on the modulated signal 610) in that movable joint to assist the user in overcoming static friction.
- Particular values of frequency for the low frequency waveform component may be determined, for example, from usability and user studies.
- the frequency of the slower waveform component of the modulated signal may be between about 0.5 Hz and about 5 Hz, between about 1 Hz and about 3 Hz, or about 2 Hz.
- a low frequency waveform e.g., sine wave
- having a frequency of less than about 2 Hz may be sufficient to avoid causing user inconvenience.
- frequency of the faster (higher frequency) waveform component of the modulated signal may generally correspond to enabling static friction to be overcome without moving the joint.
- an actuator driven with a high frequency signal produces a high frequency torque, which may then overcome static friction without moving the joint.
- the frequency of the faster waveform component may be selected to avoid generating audible noise (e.g., humming) and/or to avoid exciting one or more resonant frequencies in the robotic arm.
- the frequency of the faster waveform component may be less than or equal to about 200 Hz, less than or equal to about 150 Fiz, less than or equal to about 125 Hz, or about 100 Hz As another example, in some variations, the frequency of the faster waveform component may be between about 50 Hz and about 100 Hz to reduce or avoid audible noise.
- magnitude or amplitude of the modulated signal e.g., magnitude of the slower waveform component and/or the faster waveform component
- the modulated signal 610 may have a maximum magnitude that is generally the sum of the peak amplitudes of the slower waveform component and the faster waveform component where the peaks of the two waveform components coincide.
- Increasing the magnitude of the modulated signal thus increases the magnitude of the actuator force that is available to help overcome the static friction of the movable joint.
- the magnitude of the modulated signal may be such that the modulated signal is confi gured to drive the actuator in a movable joint with a force within the static friction band in both directions (e.g., -Fm ⁇ driving force resulting from signal ⁇ Fm).
- the joint when the movable joint is being controlled by a modulated command current signal in friction compensation mode, the joint may be primed to nearly, but not quite, overcome friction in either actuator direction.
- the modulated signal may provide partial friction compensation.
- An external force (such as that manually applied by a user) may, in combination with the active driving force provided based on the modulated signal, be sufficient to overcome static friction.
- the magnitude of the faster waveform component may be low' relative to the magnitude of the slower waveform component.
- the faster waveform component may have a magni tude that is a fraction of the magnitude of the slower waveform component.
- the magnitudes of the components of the modulated signal may be depend on particul ar characteristics of the hardware and application thereof, such as motor capability and arm joint dynamics. These magnitudes may, for example, be tuned
- the magnitude or amplitude of the modulated signal may modulated.
- the magnitude or amplitude of the slower, low frequency waveform component and/or the magnitude or amplitude of the faster, high frequency waveform component may vary over time (e.g., in response to varying static friction thresholds, etc.).
- the magnitude of the slower waveform component and/or faster waveform component of the modulated signal may be determined based on measurements of the static friction force Fm.
- the static friction force may be measured in one or more various suitable manners. For example, the static friction force may be measured during design and development processes and/or manufacturing.
- the static friction force may be measured during a calibration check (e.g., upon installation of the robotic system in an operating room, periodically after installation of the robotic system in an operating room, after use of the robotic arm for a predetermined number of performed surgi cal procedures, and/or before use of the robotic arm in every surgical procedure, etc.).
- static friction of a joint may be determined by using a calibrated torque measurement device (e.g., a dynamometer, etc.) to backdrive the joint, where the empirically determined static friction force may be derived from the torque required (as measured by the torque measurement device) to make the joint begin moving.
- the static friction force may be measured during a surgical procedure, which may allow for adjustment of the amplitude (and/or other suitable aspect) of the modulated signal during the procedure.
- the amount of static friction may be measured by placing the arm in a gravity compensation mode (e.g., as described above) and slowly increase or decrease current to a joint-driving actuator until joint motion is detected. The amount of current required to move the joint may then be compared to known or predetermined backdrive parameters (e.g , determined during a previous check, etc.) to assess whether the amount of static friction has changed.
- One or more amplitude parameters may be automatically or manually (e.g , based on user input) adjusted in response to detecting a change in the amount of static friction in the joint. It should be understood that within a robotic arm having multiple movable joints, the static friction force for different movable joints may be measured at different times and accordingly, the signals used to perform friction compensation in different movable joints may be adjusted at different times. Furthermore, in a robotic surgical system including multiple robotic arms, the signals used to perform friction compensation in different robotic arms may be adjusted at different times.
- an offset of the modulated may be used to account for an unbalanced backdrive force that is required for a certain joint. For example, if the static friction in a joint is greater in a first direction than in a second direction different (e.g., opposite) from the first direction, then a greater magnitude signal may be required to help overcome or compensate for static friction for movement in the first direction than in the second direction.
- the modulated signal may include an offset such that it drives the actuator to have greater torque/force in the first direction than in the second direction.
- such an offset in the modulated signal may be due to an offset in the slower, low frequency waveform component of the modulated signal.
- an offset may additionally or alternatively be due to an offset in the faster, high frequency waveform component of the modulated signal.
- the method may further include detecting movement of at least one movable joint 503 in the robotic arm.
- movement of a joint in the robotic arm may be detected by one or more sensors in an actuator for the joint.
- movement of a joint may be detected by an encoder configured to measure rotational position and/or velocity of an actuator in the joint, such as a change in rotational position or velocity of the actuator when the user begins to backdrive the movable joint in a particular direction.
- a joint module includes a gear transmission (e.g., including an input coupled to a motor shaft and an output coupled to the moving portion of the joint), measured slop in the transmission, or measured rotational discrepancy or relative rotational changes between the input and the output of the transmission (e.g., via one or more encoders), may be used to determine movement of the joint.
- a joint module including a gear transmission with high stiffness any excessive motor current, or a measured motor current exceeding a predetermined threshold, may i ndi cate movement of the joint.
- sensors in the joint may additionally or alternatively be used to determine when the joint begins to move (e.g., due to the combination of user-applied force and friction compensation force provided by the modulated signal command current).
- movement of the joint may, for example, be identified when a change in rotational position exceeds a predetermined threshold (e.g., more than zero, or more than a predetermined number of degrees or radians) and/or when a change in velocity exceeds a predetermined threshold (e.g., more than zero, or more than a predetermined number of degrees or radians per second).
- movement of a joint may be detected by one or more force sensors, torque sensors, accelerometers, and/or other suitable sensors in or proximate the joint.
- movement of a joint (or a user’s desire to move the joint) may be detected based on user contact with one or more arm links, such as with a touch or proximity sensor (e.g., capacitive sensor) located on an external surface of an arm link where the user would typically grasp the robotic arm when manipulating the arm.
- a touch or proximity sensor e.g., capacitive sensor
- the control system may additionally or alternatively monitor the velocity and/or position of the joint modules or arm links (e.g., with force or torque sensors, accelerometers, etc.) in order to determine the presence, magnitude, and direction of a user-applied force on one or more joint modules or arm links.
- the joint modules or arm links e.g., with force or torque sensors, accelerometers, etc.
- control system may incorporate one or more pre-defmed parameters to help distinguish between movement that is accidental (e.g., a brief bump of a robotic arm) and a sudden intended shift in arm position. If an accidental movement is identified, then the control system may, in some variations, correct or reestablish arm position to help distinguish between movement that is accidental (e.g., a brief bump of a robotic arm) and a sudden intended shift in arm position. If an accidental movement is identified, then the control system may, in some variations, correct or reestablish arm position to
- the control system may determine that the joint movement is accidental. In such an instance, the control system may continue to direct a modulated signal to the actuator in the joint module as if such accidental movement never occurred. Conversely, if duration of an external force on a joint is extended and is more than a predetermined threshold (e.g., at least 0.25 seconds, at least 0.5 seconds, or at least 1 second, etc.), then the control system may determine that the joint movement is intentional. In such instances, the control system may proceed to generate a second signal and drive the actuator based on the second signal as described below'.
- a predetermined threshold e.g., at least 0.25 seconds, at least 0.5 seconds, or at least 1 second, etc.
- the method may further include generating a second signal 540 (e.g., with a signal generator) and driving the actuator in the movable joint based on the second signal 550.
- a second signal 540 e.g., with a signal generator
- the multi-component, modulated dithering signal described above may cease and be replaced by the second signal.
- the second signal may be different than the modulated dithering signal.
- a second signal may be associated with at least partial compensation for friction after the joint in the robotic arm begins moving. Accordingly, the second signal may be used to drive the actuator in the moving joint and continue to assist the user as the user continues to move and manipulate the joint in the robotic arm.
- the second signal may be based on different friction models (e.g., Coulomb model, Coulomb and viscous model, Coulomb and viscous model with Stribeck effect as shown in FIG. 4, a simplified version of any of the preceding models, or any suitable friction model), in that the second signal may generate a force that generally tracks (but is less than) the modeled friction force opposing the movement of the joint.
- the second signal may be generally proportional to angular or rotational velocity of the movable joint.
- an actuator of a joint may be generally driven with a greater level of current to compensate for friction where the user moves the joint more quickly (or with less current where the user moves the joint more slowly).
- the direction of current (positive or negative) may change where the user changes the rotational di rec ti on of the j oint.
- FIG. 7 illustrates exemplary variations of the second signal that may be used to control an actuator in a movable joint in the robotic arm, after the movable joint is determined to be moving.
- the second signal 710 may be based on a simplified friction model that is generally linearly proportional to velocity of the joint.
- the second signal 720 may be based on a moderately detailed friction model that is generally linear and approximates a model for Coulomb friction and viscous friction model with Stribeck effect.
- the second signal 730 may be based on an even more detailed friction model that is curvilinear and more closely approximates a model for Coulomb friction and viscous friction with Stribeck effect.
- the magnitude of the second signal relative to velocity may, for example, be tuned based on measurements of dynamic friction force (e.g., during design and development processes, during manufacturing, during a calibration check, in real-time or near real-time, etc. similar to that described above for measurement of static friction force).
- the actuator in one or more movable joints may be driven to simultaneously compensate for both gravity and friction, by operating the robotic arm in both the gravity compensation mode and the friction compensation mode described above.
- the second signal may be generated to help compensate for imperfect gravity compensation, in addition to helping compensate for dynamic or viscous friction.
- the friction model on which the second signal is based may be artificially tuned (e.g., in magnitude) to increase the overall applied load on the joint if the calculated force for gravity compensation is determined (e.g , with one or more sensors detecting additional backdriving due to gravitational force, etc.) to be insufficient for gravity compensation.
- the friction model may be artificially tuned to decrease the overall applied load on the joint if the calculated force for the gravity compensation is determined to be excessive for gravity compensation.
- an offset of the modulated signal described herein may be used to help overcome static friction (e.g , offset of the low frequency waveform component of the modulated signal) may additionally or alternatively be applied to help compensate for imperfect gravity compensation.
- the method may further include detecting a change in movement of the at least one movable joint 560 of the robotic arm.
- the method may revert to generating a different kind of signal for driving the actuator of that joint. For example, upon detecting non-movement of the joint (e.g., when the user has stopped manipulating the joint of the robotic arm), the method may return to generating a modulated signal 510 and driving an actuator in the joint based on the modulated signal 520, which may again prepare the movable joint to be
- the control system may simultaneously drive the actuator to help compensate for gravity. Accordingly, in some variations, the combination of gravity compensation and friction compensation may assist a user desiring to manually manipulate the robotic arm, leave the robotic arm temporarily, and continue manually manipulating the robotic arm with ease (and without complications caused by gravity and/or friction within the robotic arm).
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Robotics (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Manipulator (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (8)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP17934358.7A EP3684284A4 (en) | 2017-12-11 | 2017-12-11 | Active backdriving for a robotic arm |
JP2020525972A JP7047091B2 (en) | 2017-12-11 | 2017-12-11 | Active back drive for robot arm |
AU2017443223A AU2017443223B2 (en) | 2017-12-11 | 2017-12-11 | Active backdriving for a robotic arm |
CA3079347A CA3079347C (en) | 2017-12-11 | 2017-12-11 | Active backdriving for a robotic arm |
PCT/US2017/065636 WO2019117855A1 (en) | 2017-12-11 | 2017-12-11 | Active backdriving for a robotic arm |
BR112020008591-0A BR112020008591B1 (en) | 2017-12-11 | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD COMPRISING INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTROL AID MOVEMENT OF A ROBOTIC SURGICAL ARM AND ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM | |
CN201780097631.1A CN111655185B (en) | 2017-12-11 | 2017-12-11 | Active back drive of a robotic arm |
KR1020207013788A KR102422334B1 (en) | 2017-12-11 | 2017-12-11 | Active Back-Drive for Robot Arms |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/065636 WO2019117855A1 (en) | 2017-12-11 | 2017-12-11 | Active backdriving for a robotic arm |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2019117855A1 true WO2019117855A1 (en) | 2019-06-20 |
Family
ID=66820524
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2017/065636 WO2019117855A1 (en) | 2017-12-11 | 2017-12-11 | Active backdriving for a robotic arm |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP3684284A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP7047091B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR102422334B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN111655185B (en) |
AU (1) | AU2017443223B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA3079347C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2019117855A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2021013975A1 (en) * | 2019-07-25 | 2021-01-28 | Franka Emika Gmbh | Verification of a mass model of a robot manipulator |
WO2024038264A1 (en) * | 2022-08-15 | 2024-02-22 | Cmr Surgical Limited | Control of a surgical robot arm |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR102479904B1 (en) * | 2020-10-21 | 2022-12-21 | 주식회사 뉴로메카 | Friction compensation system and friction compensation method of multi-degree-of-freedom robots |
TWI764377B (en) * | 2020-11-16 | 2022-05-11 | 達明機器人股份有限公司 | System and method for safely compensating weight of robot |
CN114714364B (en) * | 2022-05-26 | 2023-05-09 | 成都卡诺普机器人技术股份有限公司 | Robot joint friction force compensation adjustment method and robot friction force compensation method |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060041249A1 (en) | 1999-04-07 | 2006-02-23 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Friction compensation in a minimally invasive surgical apparatus |
US20090248038A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Intuitive Surgical Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Force and torque sensing in a surgical robot setup arm |
US20140005667A1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2014-01-02 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Closed feedback control for electrosurgical device |
US20150133961A1 (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-14 | Seiko Epson Corportion | Robotic surgical apparatus and fluid ejecting apparatus for robotic surgical apparatus |
US20170245955A1 (en) * | 2012-08-03 | 2017-08-31 | Stryker Corporation | Robotic System and Method for Reorienting a Surgical Instrument Moving Along a Tool Path |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP4134812B2 (en) * | 2003-05-20 | 2008-08-20 | 株式会社安川電機 | Robot controller |
DE102004048706A1 (en) * | 2004-10-06 | 2006-04-20 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for determining a dither frequency superimposed PWM signal for controlling a solenoid valve |
US7819859B2 (en) * | 2005-12-20 | 2010-10-26 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Control system for reducing internally generated frictional and inertial resistance to manual positioning of a surgical manipulator |
US7872845B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2011-01-18 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Control system |
EP2394799B1 (en) * | 2009-02-03 | 2016-08-31 | Olympus Corporation | Manipulator |
EP2602676A1 (en) * | 2011-12-08 | 2013-06-12 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Determination of friction components of a drive system |
KR102023910B1 (en) * | 2012-11-23 | 2019-09-23 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Robot and friction compensation method for the robot |
KR102157281B1 (en) * | 2013-03-29 | 2020-09-17 | 파나소닉 아이피 매니지먼트 가부시키가이샤 | Servo adjustment method for motor drive device |
US10451180B2 (en) * | 2015-07-21 | 2019-10-22 | Aisin Aw Co., Ltd. | Control device |
JP6641152B2 (en) * | 2015-10-22 | 2020-02-05 | 株式会社Soken | Valve device |
WO2017210516A1 (en) * | 2016-06-03 | 2017-12-07 | Covidien Lp | Robotic surgical assemblies and instrument drive units thereof |
CN107097233A (en) * | 2017-04-17 | 2017-08-29 | 珞石(山东)智能科技有限公司 | A kind of industrial robot dragging teaching method of non-moment sensor |
-
2017
- 2017-12-11 CN CN201780097631.1A patent/CN111655185B/en active Active
- 2017-12-11 WO PCT/US2017/065636 patent/WO2019117855A1/en unknown
- 2017-12-11 EP EP17934358.7A patent/EP3684284A4/en active Pending
- 2017-12-11 JP JP2020525972A patent/JP7047091B2/en active Active
- 2017-12-11 AU AU2017443223A patent/AU2017443223B2/en active Active
- 2017-12-11 KR KR1020207013788A patent/KR102422334B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2017-12-11 CA CA3079347A patent/CA3079347C/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060041249A1 (en) | 1999-04-07 | 2006-02-23 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Friction compensation in a minimally invasive surgical apparatus |
US20170027655A1 (en) * | 1999-04-07 | 2017-02-02 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Friction Compensation in a Minimally Invasive Surgical Apparatus |
US20090248038A1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2009-10-01 | Intuitive Surgical Inc., A Delaware Corporation | Force and torque sensing in a surgical robot setup arm |
US20140005667A1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2014-01-02 | Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. | Closed feedback control for electrosurgical device |
US20170245955A1 (en) * | 2012-08-03 | 2017-08-31 | Stryker Corporation | Robotic System and Method for Reorienting a Surgical Instrument Moving Along a Tool Path |
US20150133961A1 (en) * | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-14 | Seiko Epson Corportion | Robotic surgical apparatus and fluid ejecting apparatus for robotic surgical apparatus |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP3684284A4 |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2021013975A1 (en) * | 2019-07-25 | 2021-01-28 | Franka Emika Gmbh | Verification of a mass model of a robot manipulator |
WO2024038264A1 (en) * | 2022-08-15 | 2024-02-22 | Cmr Surgical Limited | Control of a surgical robot arm |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA3079347A1 (en) | 2019-06-20 |
CN111655185B (en) | 2023-12-05 |
JP7047091B2 (en) | 2022-04-04 |
CA3079347C (en) | 2022-09-06 |
KR102422334B1 (en) | 2022-07-20 |
AU2017443223A1 (en) | 2020-05-07 |
CN111655185A (en) | 2020-09-11 |
KR20200074150A (en) | 2020-06-24 |
BR112020008591A2 (en) | 2020-10-20 |
JP2021502264A (en) | 2021-01-28 |
EP3684284A4 (en) | 2020-09-16 |
AU2017443223B2 (en) | 2020-12-03 |
EP3684284A1 (en) | 2020-07-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11678943B2 (en) | Active backdriving for a robotic arm | |
AU2017443223B2 (en) | Active backdriving for a robotic arm | |
US10898284B2 (en) | System and method for providing surgical instrument force feedback | |
US11712805B2 (en) | Control modes and processes for positioning of a robotic manipulator | |
AU2017442655B2 (en) | Control modes and processes for positioning of a robotic manipulator | |
JP6530422B2 (en) | Constant load spring with active bias | |
US8306656B1 (en) | Method and system for performing medical procedure | |
WO2017095768A1 (en) | Methods, systems, and devices for control of surgical tools in a robotic surgical system | |
CN109922750B (en) | Repositioning system for remotely controllable manipulators and related methods | |
US20230112334A1 (en) | Hardstop detection and handling for surgical tool | |
EP4027925A1 (en) | System and method of dithering to maintain grasp force | |
BR112020008591B1 (en) | COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD COMPRISING INSTRUCTIONS TO CONTROL AID MOVEMENT OF A ROBOTIC SURGICAL ARM AND ROBOTIC SURGICAL SYSTEM | |
WO2017208395A1 (en) | Manipulator system | |
WO2022221204A1 (en) | Controlled resistance in backdrivable joints | |
JP2023508628A (en) | Engaging and/or homing a surgical tool in a surgical robotic system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 17934358 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 3079347 Country of ref document: CA |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2017934358 Country of ref document: EP Effective date: 20200421 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2017443223 Country of ref document: AU Date of ref document: 20171211 Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2020525972 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20207013788 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
REG | Reference to national code |
Ref country code: BR Ref legal event code: B01A Ref document number: 112020008591 Country of ref document: BR |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 112020008591 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20200429 |