WO2018144546A1 - Methods for increasing efficiency of gene editing in cells - Google Patents

Methods for increasing efficiency of gene editing in cells Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018144546A1
WO2018144546A1 PCT/US2018/016152 US2018016152W WO2018144546A1 WO 2018144546 A1 WO2018144546 A1 WO 2018144546A1 US 2018016152 W US2018016152 W US 2018016152W WO 2018144546 A1 WO2018144546 A1 WO 2018144546A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
cell
nuclease
nucleic acid
gene
perv
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2018/016152
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
George M. Church
Luhan Yang
Original Assignee
President And Fellows Of Harvard College
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by President And Fellows Of Harvard College filed Critical President And Fellows Of Harvard College
Priority to US16/482,294 priority Critical patent/US20190352670A1/en
Priority to CN201880021225.1A priority patent/CN110546267B/en
Publication of WO2018144546A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018144546A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/87Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
    • C12N15/90Stable introduction of foreign DNA into chromosome
    • C12N15/902Stable introduction of foreign DNA into chromosome using homologous recombination
    • C12N15/907Stable introduction of foreign DNA into chromosome using homologous recombination in mammalian cells
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07KPEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/435Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
    • C07K14/475Growth factors; Growth regulators
    • C07K14/50Fibroblast growth factor [FGF]
    • C07K14/503Fibroblast growth factor [FGF] basic FGF [bFGF]
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/11DNA or RNA fragments; Modified forms thereof; Non-coding nucleic acids having a biological activity
    • C12N15/111General methods applicable to biologically active non-coding nucleic acids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N9/00Enzymes; Proenzymes; Compositions thereof; Processes for preparing, activating, inhibiting, separating or purifying enzymes
    • C12N9/14Hydrolases (3)
    • C12N9/16Hydrolases (3) acting on ester bonds (3.1)
    • C12N9/22Ribonucleases RNAses, DNAses
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2310/00Structure or type of the nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/10Type of nucleic acid
    • C12N2310/20Type of nucleic acid involving clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats [CRISPRs]
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2800/00Nucleic acids vectors
    • C12N2800/80Vectors containing sites for inducing double-stranded breaks, e.g. meganuclease restriction sites

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates generally to gene editing.
  • dsDNA double- stranded DNA
  • NHEJ Non-Homologous End Joining
  • Indels non-specific insertions and deletions
  • HDR homology directed repair
  • DSBs DNA double strand break
  • NHEJ error-prone non-homologous end joining
  • TALENs Transcription activator- like effector nucleases
  • the CRISPR type II system has been used to edit the genomes of a broad spectrum of species (see, e.g., Friedland et al, 2013; Mali et al, 2013; Hwang et al, 2013; Jiang et al, 2013; Jinek et al, 2013; Cong et al, 2013; Yin et al, 2014).
  • CRISPR is particularly customizable because the active form consists of an invariant Cas9 protein and an easily programmable single guide RNA (sgRNA). Jinek et al, 2012.
  • the Streptococcus pyogenes (Sp) CRISPR is the most well-characterized and widely used.
  • the Cas9-gRNA complex first probes DNA for the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence (-NGG for Sp Cas9), after which Watson-Crick base -pairing between the sgRNA and target DNA proceeds in a ratchet mechanism to form an R-loop.
  • PAM protospacer-adjacent motif
  • the Cas9 protein Following formation of a ternary complex of Cas9, sgRNA, and target DNA, the Cas9 protein generates two nicks in the target DNA, creating a blunt double-strand break (DSB) that is repaired by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway or template- directed homologous recombination (HR).
  • CRISPR methods are disclosed, for example, in US 9,023,649 and US 8,697,359. The development of CRISPR/Cas9 nucleases has enormously expanded our ability to engineer genetic changes in cells (Mali et al, 2013).
  • deaminases may be used to modify certain nucleotides as is known in the art. Deaminases are used for modifying the DNA of a cell.
  • Some cells react negatively to genome editing resulting in DNA damage in terms of gene editing rates or survival rates.
  • CRISPR/Cas9 CRISPR/Cas9
  • the genetically modified cells may generate animals, such as pigs, which can be used as potential sources of organs for transplantation.
  • aspects of the present disclosure are directed to the methods of increasing the efficiency of nuclease-mediated gene editing in cells.
  • aspects of the present disclosure are directed to a method of inhibiting apoptosis in a genetically modified cell including providing exogenous PFTa or bFGF to the cell before, during or after genetic modification of the cell.
  • the genetic modification results in breaks of a plurality of target nucleic acid sequences within the cell.
  • PFTa and bFGF are provided to the cell during genetic modification of the cell.
  • the disclosure provides a method of inhibiting apoptosis in a genetically modified cell is provided including providing exogenous PFTa or bFGF to the cell during genetic modification of the cell, wherein the genetic modification results in breaks of a plurality of target nucleic acid sequences within the cell.
  • PFTa or bFGF are provided to the cell from within a medium in which the cell is placed.
  • the cell is genetically modified to include a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a nuclease, which when expressed cuts a target nucleic acid sequence.
  • the nuclease is a Cas nuclease, a Cas nickase, a nuclease null Cas bound to a nuclease, a zinc finger nuclease, a meganuclease or a TALEN.
  • the cell is a prokaryotic cell or a eukaryotic cell.
  • the cell is a stem cell, an embryonic stem cell, a pluripotent stem cell, a zygote, or a germ line cell.
  • the cell is a somatic cell or a primary cell.
  • the cell is an animal cell.
  • the cell is a porcine cell.
  • the plurality of target nucleic acid sequences comprises a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene.
  • the PERV gene comprises a pol gene.
  • one or more copies of the pol gene are inactivated.
  • all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
  • aspects of the present disclosure provide an engineered or genetically modified cell including an exogenous nucleic acid sequence encoding a programmable nuclease, which when expressed cuts a target nucleic acid sequence, and exogenous PFTa or bFGF.
  • the nuclease is a Cas nuclease, a Cas nickase, a nuclease null Cas bound to a nuclease, a zinc finger nuclease, a meganuclease or a TALEN.
  • the cell is a prokaryotic cell or a eukaryotic cell.
  • the cell is a stem cell, an embryonic stem cell, a pluripotent stem cell, a zygote, or a germ line cell.
  • the cell is a somatic cell or a primary cell.
  • the cell is an animal cell.
  • the cell is a porcine cell.
  • the plurality of target nucleic acid sequences comprises a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene.
  • the PERV gene comprises a pol gene.
  • one or more copies of the pol gene are inactivated.
  • all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph of data showing that treatment with PFTa and bFGF prevents senescence and allows isolation of 100% PERV-free clonal cell lines.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph of data showing PERV targeting efficiency in individual expanded clones from a population of PFFF3 treated with PFTa and bFGF during genetic modification.
  • the present disclosure provides methods to limit, reduce, inhibit, or eliminate a negative effect, such as toxicity, associated with genome editing in cells, such as primary cells, where DNA damage can lead to the negative effect.
  • a negative effect such as toxicity
  • nuclease-based genome editing such as with a CRISPR/Cas system
  • This present disclosure provides methods of limiting, reducing, inhibiting, or eliminating this toxicity and improving gene targeting frequencies in target cells by using small molecule p53 inhibitors, such as PFTa (pifithrin a) and bFGF (basis fibroblast growth factor). See Grandela et al. (2007). p53 is required for etoposide-induced apoptosis of human embryonic stem cells.
  • porcine endogenous retroviral (PERV) elements are genetically modified within porcine cells for the purpose of generating porcine cell lines and animals that lack active PERVs and are useful resources for xenotransplantation therapies.
  • Inactivating PERVs allows xenotransplantation to be a strategy to provide organs for human transplantation insofar as immunological incompatibility is reduced that may otherwise result from cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous viruses (PERVs).
  • PERVs infect, propagate, and evolve in human primary cells over time.
  • the present disclosure provides methods of large scale genome editing, such as in primary cells, to inactivate all PERVs, such as in a primary porcine fibroblast cell line, to prevent PERV transmission to human cells, and wherein the genetically modified cells are treated with PFTa or bFGF to improve or increase gene editing rates or cell survival rates compared to genome edited cells which have not been treated with PFTa or bFGF.
  • the present disclosure involves methods of genetic engineering used to inactivate PERVs, such as in primary porcine cell lines.
  • Such cells are treated with PFTa and bFGF so as to limit, reduce, inhibit, or eliminate negative effects of such genome modification.
  • the invention further includes porcine cell lines and tissues, embryos, and animals generated from these treated cells, that lack active PERVs and are thus suitable resources for xenotransplantation.
  • aspects of the present disclosure are not limited to any particular genome modification. Instead, genome modification of porcine endogenous retroviral (PERV) elements in porcine cells, such as primary porcine cells, is exemplary with the use of PFTa and bFGF.
  • the present disclosure is directed to methods of increasing gene targeting frequencies by treating a cell with PFTa or bFGF, wherein the cell is genetically modified to include a gene editing system or is otherwise genetically modified.
  • the genetically modified cell comprises an expression construct encoding a programmable DNA nuclease or a meganuclease.
  • the cells are contacted with a small molecule p53 inhibitor such as PFTa or bFGF.
  • a "programmable DNA nuclease” as used herein means a DNA nuclease that can be engineered to recognize and cleave a desired sequence in the genome of the cell.
  • Examples of a programmable DNA nuclease include a class 2 clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) nucleases, a zinc finger nuclease (ZFN), and a Transcription Activator-Like Effector nuclease (TALEN). Each of these types of programmable DNA nucleases is well known in the art.
  • CRISPR regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeat
  • ZFN zinc finger nuclease
  • TALEN Transcription Activator-Like Effector
  • CRISPR Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats
  • Cas CRISPR associated proteins
  • CRISPR/Cas CRISPR/Cas
  • a CRISPR nuclease include a CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) nuclease, a CRISPR from Prevotella and Francisella 1 nuclease (Cpf 1), a Class 2 candidate 1 nuclease (C2cl), a Class 2 candidate 2 nuclease (C2c2), and a Class 2 candidate 3 nuclease (C2c3).
  • Cas9 nucleases exist in many bacteria, including S. pyogenes, S. thermophilus, S. aureus, and Neisseria meningitidis.
  • a "Cas9 nuclease” includes a Cas9 nuclease with native (or wild-type) nuclease activity, as well as modified versions of a Cas9 nuclease, such as SpCas9-HFl ("high fidelity variant number 1;” Kleinstiver et al. , 2016), eSpCas9 ("enhanced specificity Cas9;” Slaymaker et al. , 2016), Cas9 nickases (e.g.
  • nuclease-deficient or nuclease-null Cas9 fused to a nuclease domain (e.g., Fokl).
  • nuclease domain e.g., Fokl
  • meganucleases include I-Scel meganuclease and I-Crel meganuclease, as well as engineered derivatives thereof (e.g. , Thermes et al. , 2002; Arnould et al. , 2011).
  • genomic DNA such as multiplex modification of DNA
  • a cell e.g., primary cell, stem cell, somatic cell, germ line cell, zygote
  • guide RNAs ribonucleic acids
  • an enzyme having nuclease activity expressed by the cell such as a DNA binding protein having nuclease activity
  • a target location on the DNA deoxyribonucleic acid
  • the enzyme cuts the DNA and an exogenous donor nucleic acid is inserted into the DNA, such as by homologous recombination.
  • the DNA is genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA, or exogenous DNA.
  • aspects of the present disclosure include cycling or repeating steps of DNA modification in a cell to create a cell having multiple modifications of DNA within the cell.
  • Modifications can include insertion of exogenous donor nucleic acids.
  • Modifications can include deletion of endogenous nucleic acids.
  • nucleic acid sequences can be modulated (e.g., inactivated) by a single step of introducing into a cell, which expresses an enzyme, and nucleic acids encoding a plurality of RNAs, such as by co-transformation, wherein the RNAs are expressed and wherein each RNA in the plurality guides the enzyme to a particular site of the DNA, the enzyme cuts the DNA.
  • a single step of introducing into a cell which expresses an enzyme
  • nucleic acids encoding a plurality of RNAs such as by co-transformation, wherein the RNAs are expressed and wherein each RNA in the plurality guides the enzyme to a particular site of the DNA, the enzyme cuts the DNA.
  • the cell expressing the enzyme has been genetically altered to express the enzyme such as by introducing into the cell a nucleic acid encoding the enzyme and which can be expressed by the cell.
  • aspects of the present disclosure include cycling the steps of introducing RNA into a cell which expresses the enzyme, introducing exogenous donor nucleic acid into the cell, expressing the RNA, forming a co-localization complex of the RNA, the enzyme and the DNA, and enzymatic cutting of the DNA by the enzyme. Insertion of a donor nucleic acid into the DNA is also provided herein. Cycling or repeating of the above steps results in multiplexed genetic modification of a cell at multiple loci, i.e., a cell having multiple genetic modifications.
  • DNA binding proteins or enzymes within the scope of the present disclosure include a protein that forms a complex with the guide RNA and with the guide RNA guiding the complex to a double stranded DNA sequence wherein the complex binds to the DNA sequence.
  • the enzyme can be an RNA guided DNA binding protein, such as an RNA guided DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR System that binds to the DNA and is guided by RNA.
  • the RNA guided DNA binding protein is a Cas protein, such as a Cas9 protein.
  • This aspect of the present disclosure may be referred to as co- localization of the RNA and DNA binding protein to or with the double stranded DNA.
  • a DNA binding protein-guide RNA complex may be used to cut multiple sites of the double stranded DNA so as to create a cell with multiple genetic modifications, such as disruption of one or more (e.g., all) copies of a gene.
  • a method of making multiple alterations to target DNA in a cell expressing an enzyme that forms a co-localization complex with RNA complementary to the target DNA and that cleaves the target DNA in a site specific manner including (a) introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs complementary to the target DNA and which guide the enzyme to the target DNA, wherein the one or more RNAs and the enzyme are members of a co-localization complex for the target DNA, wherein the one or more RNAs and the enzyme co-localize to the target DNA, the enzyme cleaves the target DNA to produce altered DNA in the cell, and repeating step (a) multiple times to produce multiple alterations to the DNA in the cell.
  • a method of inactivating expression of one or more target nucleic acid sequences in a cell comprises introducing into a cell one or more ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequences that comprise a portion that is complementary to all or a portion of each of the one or more target nucleic acid sequences, and a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a Cas protein; and maintaining the cells under conditions in which the Cas protein is expressed and the Cas protein binds and inactivates the one or more target nucleic acid sequences in the cell.
  • RNA ribonucleic acid
  • a method of modulating one or more target nucleic acid sequences in a cell comprises introducing into the cell a nucleic acid sequence encoding an RNA complementary to all or a portion of a target nucleic acid sequence in the cell; introducing into the cell a nucleic acid sequence encoding an enzyme that interacts with the RNA and cleaves the target nucleic acid sequence in a site specific manner; and maintaining the cell under conditions in which the RNA binds to complementary target nucleic acid sequence forming a complex, and wherein the enzyme binds to a binding site on the complex and modulates the one or more target nucleic acid sequences.
  • the introducing step can comprise transfecting the cell with the one or more RNA sequences and the nucleic acid sequence that encodes the Cas protein.
  • the one or more RNA sequences, the nucleic acid sequence that encodes the Cas protein, or a combination thereof are introduced into a genome of the cell.
  • the expression of the Cas protein is induced.
  • the cell is a primary cell.
  • the cell is from an embryo.
  • the cell can be a stem cell, zygote, or a germ line cell.
  • the stem cell is an embryonic stem cell or pluripotent stem cell.
  • the cell is a somatic cell.
  • the somatic cell is a eukaryotic cell or prokaryotic cell.
  • the eukaryotic cell can be an animal cell, such as from a pig, mouse, rat, rabbit, dog, horse, cow, non-human primate, human.
  • the stem cell to be genetically modified can be an embryonic stem cell (ESC) or a somatic stem cell such as hiPSC, a hematopoietic stem cell, a neural stem cell, or a mesenchymal stem cell.
  • ESC embryonic stem cell
  • somatic stem cell such as hiPSC, a hematopoietic stem cell, a neural stem cell, or a mesenchymal stem cell.
  • the genetically modified stem cell is human.
  • the stem cell is that of a non-human mammal, such as a non-human primate, a mouse, a pig or a rat.
  • the one or more target nucleic acid sequences can comprise a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene.
  • PERV porcine endogenous retrovirus
  • the PERV gene can comprise a pol gene.
  • the methods described herein can inactivate, modulate, or effect one or more copies of the pol gene. In some embodiments, all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
  • the genetically modified cell also comprises an RNA sequence such as an sgRNA (single guide RNA) complementary to a target nucleic acid sequence of the cell genome.
  • the genetically modified cell may comprise multiple such sgRNAs, each complementary to a different target nucleic acid sequence of the cell genome.
  • the expression construct encoding the CRISPR nuclease also includes a nucleic acid encoding one or more sgRNAs.
  • one or more sgRNAs can be provided using one or more separate expression constructs. Types of sgRNAs are well known in the art (e.g., US 2014/0356959; US 2015/0259704).
  • the one or more RNA sequences can be about 10 to about 1000 nucleotides.
  • the one or more RNA sequences can be about 15 to about 200 nucleotides.
  • the one or more RNAs is a guide RNA.
  • the one or more RNAs is a tracrRNA-crRNA fusion.
  • an engineered cell comprises one or more endogenous viral genes; and one or more exogenous nucleic acid sequences that comprise a portion that is complementary to all or a portion of one or more target nucleic acid sequences of the one or more endogenous viral genes; wherein each of the one or more endogenous viral genes of the cell are modulated.
  • an engineered cell can comprise a plurality of endogenous retroviral genes; and one or more exogenous nucleic acid sequences that comprise a portion that is complementary to all or a portion of one or more target nucleic acid sequences of the plurality of endogenous viral genes; wherein each of the plurality of endogenous viral genes of the cell are modulated.
  • the engineered cells described herein can comprise a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene.
  • the PERV gene can comprise a pol gene.
  • modulation of the pol gene inactivates one or more copies of the pol gene. For example, all or substantially all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
  • Methods of delivering exogenous nucleic acids to cells include plasmid vectors, viral vectors (e.g. , lenti-, adeno-, and adeno-associated viral vectors), and ribonucleoproteins. Plasmid donors with >1 kb homology arms for small changes (1-100 bp) are particularly useful. See Shui et al , 2016. Nucleic acids can also be delivered by electroporation, injection, or lipofection. The nucleic acid encoding the programmable DNA nuclease or meganuclease can be provided in separate expression constructs or the same expression construct.
  • PFFF3 porcine female fetal fibroblast
  • gRNAs CRISPR guide RNAs
  • the second and the third gRNAs were identical except for the nucleotide two bases before the PAM sequence.
  • the region of PERV pol targeted by the second gRNAs in PFFF3 contained an allele that was not apparent in the consensus sequence. Therefore, a third gRNA was designed to target this minor allele.
  • the sequences of the three sgRNAs used to target a conserved region of PERV pol in PFFF3 are as follows:
  • Stable expression of Cas9 and the three sgRNAs was achieved by integrating a piggyBac transposon carrying these elements into the PFFF3 genome.
  • the PFFF3 cell line was established expressing a Piggybac-Cas9/3gRNAs construct.
  • Cas9 and 2 gRNAs were carried in the same vector. Cas9 expression was induced by addition of doxycycline.
  • PFFF3 After treatment with CRISPR-Cas9 and the three gRNAs for twelve days, it was observed that in the population of PFFF3 cells, 37% of the PERV pol loci had acquired inactivating mutations.
  • the PFFF3 population displayed 37% targeting efficiency of the PERV pol locus by Cas9.
  • the targeting efficiency in single cell clones derived from the 37% PERV-free population exhibited a bimodal distribution wherein clones had low editing efficiencies while other clones had high editing efficiencies. In some clones, 100% of the PERVs had been targeted and mutated. This bimodal distribution resembled results achieved in Yang, L. et al. Genome-wide inactivation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Science 350, 1101-1104 (2015). According to the present disclosure, 100% PERV-free PFFF3 cell lines were unable to be isolated. The targeting efficiency of the PFFF3 population decreased over time in culture.
  • 100% PERV-free PFFF3 clones did not expand to colonies because the primary cells were sensitive to DNA damage resulting from simultaneous DNA cleavage by Cas9 and a resultant abundance of DNA double-strand breaks and became senescent or apoptotic under the conditions of stress caused by Cas9-induced DNA cleavage.
  • Methods described herein where cells are treated with PFTa and/or bFGF mitigate the stress from multiplex DNA damage and support clonal expansion of 100% PERV-free cells.
  • Such DNA damage decreases targeting efficiency of the PFFF3 population over time and results in the inability to obtain 100% PERV-free PFFF3 clonal cell lines.
  • Methods described herein are directed to inhibiting senescence and/or apoptosis pathways with small-molecule drugs so as to increase the targeting efficiency of the PFFF3 population and enhance viability of the highly edited clones.
  • Treatment of the genomically modified PFFF3 cells described herein with the combination of PFTa and bFGF during genetic modification prevented senescence and allowed isolation of 100% PERV-free clonal cell lines. (See Fig. 1).
  • Treatment of the genomically modified PFFF3 cells described herein with the combination of PFTa and bFGF during genetic modification increased the average targeting efficiency of the resulting PFFF3 population.
  • Treatment with SV40 large T antigen also resulted in increased average targeting efficiency.
  • the distribution of the targeting efficiencies of single cell clones treated with PFTa and bFGF was approximately bimodal, and 100% PERV-free PFFF3 clonal cell lines were isolated.
  • the eradication of pol activity was validated by RNA-seq with confirmation that all pol transcripts had been mutated.
  • the 100% PERV-free PFFF3 cell line was tested for off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9.
  • Karyotype analysis of 100% PERV-free PFFF3 indicated normal chromosomal structure.
  • RNAseq analysis showed that the transcription profile of 100% PERV-free PFFF3 closely resembled that of WT PFFF3. Additionally, off-target mutations were not observed in the transcripts of 100% PERV-free PFFF3.
  • CRISPR-Cas9 had not introduced detectable off-target damage in the 100% PERV-free PFFF3. Genome-wide inactivation of PERVs had not altered global gene expression profiles.
  • PERV pol as described herein eliminated in vitro transmission of PERVs from PFFF3 to human cells.
  • WT and 100% PERV-free PFFF3 cells were co-cultured with HEK293 cells for 7 days.
  • PERV pol, gag, and env sequences were detected in the HEK293 cells that had been cultured with WT PFFF3, indicating transmission of PERVs to the human cells.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

The present disclosure provides methods of improving nuclease-mediated gene targeting frequencies in cells using PFTα or bFGF.

Description

METHODS FOR INCREASING EFFICIENCY OF
GENE EDITING IN CELLS
RELATED APPLICATION DATA
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/453,051 filed on February 1, 2017, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTERESTS
This invention was made with government support under P50 HG005550-05 awarded by the National Institutes of Health (National Human Genome Research Institute). The government has certain rights in the invention.
TECHNICAL FIELD
This disclosure relates generally to gene editing.
BACKGROUND
Methods of genome editing in cells exist where the genome is cut, such as by using a nuclease, at one or more locations. Genome editing via sequence-specific nucleases is known. A nuclease-mediated double- stranded DNA (dsDNA) break in the genome can be repaired by two main mechanisms: Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ), which frequently results in the introduction of non-specific insertions and deletions (indels), or homology directed repair (HDR), which incorporates a homologous strand as a repair template. When a sequence-specific nuclease is delivered along with a homologous donor DNA construct containing the desired mutations, gene targeting efficiencies are increased by 1000-fold compared to just the donor construct alone.
Alternative methods have been developed to accelerate the process of genome modification by directly injecting DNA or mRNA of site-specific nucleases into a cell, such as an embryo cell, to generate a DNA double strand break (DSB) at a specified locus. DSBs induced by these site- specific nucleases can then be repaired by either error-prone non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) resulting, for example, in mutant mice and rats carrying deletions or insertions at the cut site. If a donor plasmid with homology to the ends flanking the DSB is co-injected, high-fidelity homologous recombination can produce animals with targeted integrations. Such genome editing methods include zinc finger nucleases (ZNFs) or TAL effector nucleases such as Transcription activator- like effector nucleases (TALENs).
The CRISPR type II system has been used to edit the genomes of a broad spectrum of species (see, e.g., Friedland et al, 2013; Mali et al, 2013; Hwang et al, 2013; Jiang et al, 2013; Jinek et al, 2013; Cong et al, 2013; Yin et al, 2014). CRISPR is particularly customizable because the active form consists of an invariant Cas9 protein and an easily programmable single guide RNA (sgRNA). Jinek et al, 2012. Of the various CRISPR orthologs, the Streptococcus pyogenes (Sp) CRISPR is the most well-characterized and widely used. The Cas9-gRNA complex first probes DNA for the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence (-NGG for Sp Cas9), after which Watson-Crick base -pairing between the sgRNA and target DNA proceeds in a ratchet mechanism to form an R-loop. Following formation of a ternary complex of Cas9, sgRNA, and target DNA, the Cas9 protein generates two nicks in the target DNA, creating a blunt double-strand break (DSB) that is repaired by the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) pathway or template- directed homologous recombination (HR). CRISPR methods are disclosed, for example, in US 9,023,649 and US 8,697,359. The development of CRISPR/Cas9 nucleases has enormously expanded our ability to engineer genetic changes in cells (Mali et al, 2013).
According to certain aspects, deaminases may be used to modify certain nucleotides as is known in the art. Deaminases are used for modifying the DNA of a cell.
Some cells, however, react negatively to genome editing resulting in DNA damage in terms of gene editing rates or survival rates. There is, therefore, a need for improved methods of engineering genetic changes in cells, such as when using CRISPR/Cas9, for example, where the genetically modified cells may generate animals, such as pigs, which can be used as potential sources of organs for transplantation.
SUMMARY
Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to the methods of increasing the efficiency of nuclease-mediated gene editing in cells. Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to a method of inhibiting apoptosis in a genetically modified cell including providing exogenous PFTa or bFGF to the cell before, during or after genetic modification of the cell. According to one aspect, the genetic modification results in breaks of a plurality of target nucleic acid sequences within the cell. According to one aspect, PFTa and bFGF are provided to the cell during genetic modification of the cell. The disclosure provides a method of inhibiting apoptosis in a genetically modified cell is provided including providing exogenous PFTa or bFGF to the cell during genetic modification of the cell, wherein the genetic modification results in breaks of a plurality of target nucleic acid sequences within the cell. According to one aspect, PFTa or bFGF are provided to the cell from within a medium in which the cell is placed. According to one aspect, the cell is genetically modified to include a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a nuclease, which when expressed cuts a target nucleic acid sequence. According to one aspect, the nuclease is a Cas nuclease, a Cas nickase, a nuclease null Cas bound to a nuclease, a zinc finger nuclease, a meganuclease or a TALEN. According to one aspect, the cell is a prokaryotic cell or a eukaryotic cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a stem cell, an embryonic stem cell, a pluripotent stem cell, a zygote, or a germ line cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a somatic cell or a primary cell. According to one aspect, the cell is an animal cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a porcine cell. According to one aspect, the plurality of target nucleic acid sequences comprises a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene. According to one aspect, the PERV gene comprises a pol gene. According to one aspect, one or more copies of the pol gene are inactivated. According to one aspect, all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
Aspects of the present disclosure provide an engineered or genetically modified cell including an exogenous nucleic acid sequence encoding a programmable nuclease, which when expressed cuts a target nucleic acid sequence, and exogenous PFTa or bFGF. According to one aspect, the nuclease is a Cas nuclease, a Cas nickase, a nuclease null Cas bound to a nuclease, a zinc finger nuclease, a meganuclease or a TALEN. According to one aspect, the cell is a prokaryotic cell or a eukaryotic cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a stem cell, an embryonic stem cell, a pluripotent stem cell, a zygote, or a germ line cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a somatic cell or a primary cell. According to one aspect, the cell is an animal cell. According to one aspect, the cell is a porcine cell. According to one aspect, the plurality of target nucleic acid sequences comprises a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene. According to one aspect, the PERV gene comprises a pol gene. According to one aspect, one or more copies of the pol gene are inactivated. According to one aspect, all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a graph of data showing that treatment with PFTa and bFGF prevents senescence and allows isolation of 100% PERV-free clonal cell lines. FIG. 2 is a graph of data showing PERV targeting efficiency in individual expanded clones from a population of PFFF3 treated with PFTa and bFGF during genetic modification.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The present disclosure provides methods to limit, reduce, inhibit, or eliminate a negative effect, such as toxicity, associated with genome editing in cells, such as primary cells, where DNA damage can lead to the negative effect. For example, nuclease-based genome editing, such as with a CRISPR/Cas system, can result in toxicity that severely limits gene editing in target cells. This present disclosure provides methods of limiting, reducing, inhibiting, or eliminating this toxicity and improving gene targeting frequencies in target cells by using small molecule p53 inhibitors, such as PFTa (pifithrin a) and bFGF (basis fibroblast growth factor). See Grandela et al. (2007). p53 is required for etoposide-induced apoptosis of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Research 1, 116-128 and Qin et al. (2007). Regulation of Apoptosis and Differentiation by p53 in Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry 282, 5842-5852 each of which are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
According to one aspect, porcine endogenous retroviral (PERV) elements are genetically modified within porcine cells for the purpose of generating porcine cell lines and animals that lack active PERVs and are useful resources for xenotransplantation therapies. Inactivating PERVs allows xenotransplantation to be a strategy to provide organs for human transplantation insofar as immunological incompatibility is reduced that may otherwise result from cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous viruses (PERVs). PERVs infect, propagate, and evolve in human primary cells over time. The present disclosure provides methods of large scale genome editing, such as in primary cells, to inactivate all PERVs, such as in a primary porcine fibroblast cell line, to prevent PERV transmission to human cells, and wherein the genetically modified cells are treated with PFTa or bFGF to improve or increase gene editing rates or cell survival rates compared to genome edited cells which have not been treated with PFTa or bFGF.
In particular, the present disclosure involves methods of genetic engineering used to inactivate PERVs, such as in primary porcine cell lines. Such cells are treated with PFTa and bFGF so as to limit, reduce, inhibit, or eliminate negative effects of such genome modification. The invention further includes porcine cell lines and tissues, embryos, and animals generated from these treated cells, that lack active PERVs and are thus suitable resources for xenotransplantation.
It is to be understood that aspects of the present disclosure are not limited to any particular genome modification. Instead, genome modification of porcine endogenous retroviral (PERV) elements in porcine cells, such as primary porcine cells, is exemplary with the use of PFTa and bFGF. The present disclosure is directed to methods of increasing gene targeting frequencies by treating a cell with PFTa or bFGF, wherein the cell is genetically modified to include a gene editing system or is otherwise genetically modified.
The genetically modified cell comprises an expression construct encoding a programmable DNA nuclease or a meganuclease. The cells are contacted with a small molecule p53 inhibitor such as PFTa or bFGF. A "programmable DNA nuclease" as used herein means a DNA nuclease that can be engineered to recognize and cleave a desired sequence in the genome of the cell. Examples of a programmable DNA nuclease include a class 2 clustered regularly-interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR) nucleases, a zinc finger nuclease (ZFN), and a Transcription Activator-Like Effector nuclease (TALEN). Each of these types of programmable DNA nucleases is well known in the art.
Described herein is the use of the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR associated (Cas) proteins (CRISPR/Cas) system to achieve highly efficient and simultaneous targeting of multiple nucleic acid sequences in cells. Particular examples of a CRISPR nuclease include a CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) nuclease, a CRISPR from Prevotella and Francisella 1 nuclease (Cpf 1), a Class 2 candidate 1 nuclease (C2cl), a Class 2 candidate 2 nuclease (C2c2), and a Class 2 candidate 3 nuclease (C2c3). "Cas9 nucleases" exist in many bacteria, including S. pyogenes, S. thermophilus, S. aureus, and Neisseria meningitidis. A "Cas9 nuclease" includes a Cas9 nuclease with native (or wild-type) nuclease activity, as well as modified versions of a Cas9 nuclease, such as SpCas9-HFl ("high fidelity variant number 1;" Kleinstiver et al. , 2016), eSpCas9 ("enhanced specificity Cas9;" Slaymaker et al. , 2016), Cas9 nickases (e.g. , Cong et al., 2013; Mali et al., 2013) and nuclease-deficient or nuclease-null Cas9 (e.g. , Jinek et al. , 2012) fused to a nuclease domain (e.g., Fokl). Examples of meganucleases include I-Scel meganuclease and I-Crel meganuclease, as well as engineered derivatives thereof (e.g. , Thermes et al. , 2002; Arnould et al. , 2011).
Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to the modification of genomic DNA, such as multiplex modification of DNA, in a cell (e.g., primary cell, stem cell, somatic cell, germ line cell, zygote) using one or more guide RNAs (ribonucleic acids) to direct an enzyme having nuclease activity expressed by the cell, such as a DNA binding protein having nuclease activity, to a target location on the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) wherein the enzyme cuts the DNA and an exogenous donor nucleic acid is inserted into the DNA, such as by homologous recombination. According to one aspect, the DNA is genomic DNA, mitochondrial DNA, viral DNA, or exogenous DNA. Aspects of the present disclosure include cycling or repeating steps of DNA modification in a cell to create a cell having multiple modifications of DNA within the cell. Modifications can include insertion of exogenous donor nucleic acids. Modifications can include deletion of endogenous nucleic acids.
Multiple nucleic acid sequences can be modulated (e.g., inactivated) by a single step of introducing into a cell, which expresses an enzyme, and nucleic acids encoding a plurality of RNAs, such as by co-transformation, wherein the RNAs are expressed and wherein each RNA in the plurality guides the enzyme to a particular site of the DNA, the enzyme cuts the DNA. According to this aspect, many alterations or modification of the DNA in the cell are created in a single cycle.
According to one aspect, the cell expressing the enzyme has been genetically altered to express the enzyme such as by introducing into the cell a nucleic acid encoding the enzyme and which can be expressed by the cell. In this manner, aspects of the present disclosure include cycling the steps of introducing RNA into a cell which expresses the enzyme, introducing exogenous donor nucleic acid into the cell, expressing the RNA, forming a co-localization complex of the RNA, the enzyme and the DNA, and enzymatic cutting of the DNA by the enzyme. Insertion of a donor nucleic acid into the DNA is also provided herein. Cycling or repeating of the above steps results in multiplexed genetic modification of a cell at multiple loci, i.e., a cell having multiple genetic modifications.
According to certain aspects, DNA binding proteins or enzymes within the scope of the present disclosure include a protein that forms a complex with the guide RNA and with the guide RNA guiding the complex to a double stranded DNA sequence wherein the complex binds to the DNA sequence. According to one aspect, the enzyme can be an RNA guided DNA binding protein, such as an RNA guided DNA binding protein of a Type II CRISPR System that binds to the DNA and is guided by RNA. According to one aspect, the RNA guided DNA binding protein is a Cas protein, such as a Cas9 protein. This aspect of the present disclosure may be referred to as co- localization of the RNA and DNA binding protein to or with the double stranded DNA. In this manner, a DNA binding protein-guide RNA complex may be used to cut multiple sites of the double stranded DNA so as to create a cell with multiple genetic modifications, such as disruption of one or more (e.g., all) copies of a gene.
According to certain aspects, a method of making multiple alterations to target DNA in a cell expressing an enzyme that forms a co-localization complex with RNA complementary to the target DNA and that cleaves the target DNA in a site specific manner is provided including (a) introducing into the cell a first foreign nucleic acid encoding one or more RNAs complementary to the target DNA and which guide the enzyme to the target DNA, wherein the one or more RNAs and the enzyme are members of a co-localization complex for the target DNA, wherein the one or more RNAs and the enzyme co-localize to the target DNA, the enzyme cleaves the target DNA to produce altered DNA in the cell, and repeating step (a) multiple times to produce multiple alterations to the DNA in the cell.
In some aspects, a method of inactivating expression of one or more target nucleic acid sequences in a cell comprises introducing into a cell one or more ribonucleic acid (RNA) sequences that comprise a portion that is complementary to all or a portion of each of the one or more target nucleic acid sequences, and a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a Cas protein; and maintaining the cells under conditions in which the Cas protein is expressed and the Cas protein binds and inactivates the one or more target nucleic acid sequences in the cell.
In other aspects, a method of modulating one or more target nucleic acid sequences in a cell comprises introducing into the cell a nucleic acid sequence encoding an RNA complementary to all or a portion of a target nucleic acid sequence in the cell; introducing into the cell a nucleic acid sequence encoding an enzyme that interacts with the RNA and cleaves the target nucleic acid sequence in a site specific manner; and maintaining the cell under conditions in which the RNA binds to complementary target nucleic acid sequence forming a complex, and wherein the enzyme binds to a binding site on the complex and modulates the one or more target nucleic acid sequences.
In the methods described herein, the introducing step can comprise transfecting the cell with the one or more RNA sequences and the nucleic acid sequence that encodes the Cas protein. In some embodiments, the one or more RNA sequences, the nucleic acid sequence that encodes the Cas protein, or a combination thereof are introduced into a genome of the cell. In some embodiments, the expression of the Cas protein is induced.
Materials and methods of genome editing having utility in methods described herein include Certo et al. (2012). Coupling endonucleases with DNA end-processing enzymes to drive gene disruption. Nature Methods 9, 973-975; Chavez et al. (2015). Highly efficient Cas9-mediated transcriptional programming. Nature Methods 12, 326-328; Chen et al. (2011). High-frequency genome editing using ssDNA oligonucleotides with zinc-finger nucleases. Nature Methods 8, 753- 755; Chu et al. (2015). Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9- induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells. Nature Biotechnology 33, 543-548; Cong et al, "Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems," Science, 2013, 339(6121): p. 819- 23; Fu et al. (2014). Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nature Biotechnology 32, 279-284; Jinek et al, "A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity," Science, 2012. 337(6096): p. 816-21; Jinek et al, "RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells," elife, 2013. 2: p. e00471; Mali et al. (2013). RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826; Mali et al, "CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering," Nature Biotechnology 31, 833-838 (2013); Maruyama et al. (2015). Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining. Nature Biotechnology 33, 538-542.
In the methods described, eukaryotic cells or prokaryotic cells are envisioned as being useful in the methods described herein. According to one aspect, the cell is a primary cell. According to one aspect, the cell is from an embryo. The cell can be a stem cell, zygote, or a germ line cell. In embodiments where the cell is a stem cell, the stem cell is an embryonic stem cell or pluripotent stem cell. In other embodiments, the cell is a somatic cell. In embodiments, where the cell is a somatic cell, the somatic cell is a eukaryotic cell or prokaryotic cell. The eukaryotic cell can be an animal cell, such as from a pig, mouse, rat, rabbit, dog, horse, cow, non-human primate, human.
The stem cell to be genetically modified can be an embryonic stem cell (ESC) or a somatic stem cell such as hiPSC, a hematopoietic stem cell, a neural stem cell, or a mesenchymal stem cell. In some variations, the genetically modified stem cell is human. In other variations, the stem cell is that of a non-human mammal, such as a non-human primate, a mouse, a pig or a rat. Methods of obtaining and growing various types of stem cells are well known the in the art (e.g., Takahashi et al, 2007; Yu et al, 2007; Robinton & Daley, 2012; Drawnel et al, 2014; Li et al, 2015; US 2012/0087933; US 2014/0377865; US 2015/0299712; US 2015/0307841; US 2016/0032250; US 2016/0060594).
The one or more target nucleic acid sequences can comprise a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene. For example, the PERV gene can comprise a pol gene. The methods described herein can inactivate, modulate, or effect one or more copies of the pol gene. In some embodiments, all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
In some embodiments, the genetically modified cell also comprises an RNA sequence such as an sgRNA (single guide RNA) complementary to a target nucleic acid sequence of the cell genome. The genetically modified cell may comprise multiple such sgRNAs, each complementary to a different target nucleic acid sequence of the cell genome. In some variations in which the programmable DNA nuclease is a CRISPR nuclease, the expression construct encoding the CRISPR nuclease also includes a nucleic acid encoding one or more sgRNAs. In other variations, one or more sgRNAs can be provided using one or more separate expression constructs. Types of sgRNAs are well known in the art (e.g., US 2014/0356959; US 2015/0259704).
The one or more RNA sequences can be about 10 to about 1000 nucleotides. For example, the one or more RNA sequences can be about 15 to about 200 nucleotides. According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a guide RNA. According to one aspect, the one or more RNAs is a tracrRNA-crRNA fusion.
In some aspects an engineered cell comprises one or more endogenous viral genes; and one or more exogenous nucleic acid sequences that comprise a portion that is complementary to all or a portion of one or more target nucleic acid sequences of the one or more endogenous viral genes; wherein each of the one or more endogenous viral genes of the cell are modulated.
In another aspect, an engineered cell can comprise a plurality of endogenous retroviral genes; and one or more exogenous nucleic acid sequences that comprise a portion that is complementary to all or a portion of one or more target nucleic acid sequences of the plurality of endogenous viral genes; wherein each of the plurality of endogenous viral genes of the cell are modulated.
The engineered cells described herein can comprise a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene. For example, the PERV gene can comprise a pol gene. In some aspects, modulation of the pol gene inactivates one or more copies of the pol gene. For example, all or substantially all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
Methods of delivering exogenous nucleic acids to cells are well known in the art and include plasmid vectors, viral vectors (e.g. , lenti-, adeno-, and adeno-associated viral vectors), and ribonucleoproteins. Plasmid donors with >1 kb homology arms for small changes (1-100 bp) are particularly useful. See Shui et al , 2016. Nucleic acids can also be delivered by electroporation, injection, or lipofection. The nucleic acid encoding the programmable DNA nuclease or meganuclease can be provided in separate expression constructs or the same expression construct.
The following examples are intended to illustrate but not limit this disclosure.
EXAMPLE I
Inactivation of PERVs in an Immortalized Porcine Cell Line
All 62 copies of active PERVs in an immortalized porcine cell line (PK-15) were inactivated using CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing technology as described in Yang, L. et al. Genome- wide inactivation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Science 350, 1101-1104 (2015) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Materials and methods useful in the present disclosure are described in or can be derived from Yang, L. et al. Genome-wide inactivation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Science 350, 1101-1104 (2015). EXAMPLE II
Inactivation of PERVs in Primary Porcine Cells
A primary porcine female fetal fibroblast (PFFF3) cell line was obtained. This primary cell line can be cloned via SCNT to produce porcine embryos bearing the same genotype as the PFFF3 somatic cell. All PERVs in PFFF3 were inactivated using multiplex modification. The PERV-free clonal PFFF3 cell lines were isolated and viable embryos were cloned from the isolated cells. The embryos are implanted in sows to mature PERV-free pigs.
To map and characterize the functional PERVs present in the PFFF3 cell line, the genome of PFFF3 was sequenced and assembled with whole-genome sequencing and Dovetail assembly. Using qPCR, we identified copies of PERV A, copies of PERV B, and no copies of PERV C. Copies of subtype A and of B contained the intact reverse transcriptase (pol) gene. These results were validated with ddPCR. To target these PERVs for inactivation, three CRISPR guide RNAs (gRNAs) specific to the catalytic core of PERV pol were designed. The first gRNA was designed to target one strand of the DNA, the second and third gRNAs, the other strand. The second and the third gRNAs were identical except for the nucleotide two bases before the PAM sequence. The region of PERV pol targeted by the second gRNAs in PFFF3 contained an allele that was not apparent in the consensus sequence. Therefore, a third gRNA was designed to target this minor allele. The sequences of the three sgRNAs used to target a conserved region of PERV pol in PFFF3 are as follows:
PERV sgRNA 1
ggtaccctcctccagtacgtgg
PERV sgRNA2
ggtcatccacgtactggaggagg
PERV sgRNA3
ggtcatccacgtactggatgagg.
Stable expression of Cas9 and the three sgRNAs was achieved by integrating a piggyBac transposon carrying these elements into the PFFF3 genome. The PFFF3 cell line was established expressing a Piggybac-Cas9/3gRNAs construct. Cas9 and 2 gRNAs were carried in the same vector. Cas9 expression was induced by addition of doxycycline.
After treatment with CRISPR-Cas9 and the three gRNAs for twelve days, it was observed that in the population of PFFF3 cells, 37% of the PERV pol loci had acquired inactivating mutations. The PFFF3 population displayed 37% targeting efficiency of the PERV pol locus by Cas9. The targeting efficiency in single cell clones derived from the 37% PERV-free population exhibited a bimodal distribution wherein clones had low editing efficiencies while other clones had high editing efficiencies. In some clones, 100% of the PERVs had been targeted and mutated. This bimodal distribution resembled results achieved in Yang, L. et al. Genome-wide inactivation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs). Science 350, 1101-1104 (2015). According to the present disclosure, 100% PERV-free PFFF3 cell lines were unable to be isolated. The targeting efficiency of the PFFF3 population decreased over time in culture.
EXAMPLE III
Treating PERV-free PFFF3 Cells with as PFTa or bFGF
Without wishing to be bound by scientific theory, 100% PERV-free PFFF3 clones did not expand to colonies because the primary cells were sensitive to DNA damage resulting from simultaneous DNA cleavage by Cas9 and a resultant abundance of DNA double-strand breaks and became senescent or apoptotic under the conditions of stress caused by Cas9-induced DNA cleavage. Methods described herein where cells are treated with PFTa and/or bFGF mitigate the stress from multiplex DNA damage and support clonal expansion of 100% PERV-free cells. Such DNA damage decreases targeting efficiency of the PFFF3 population over time and results in the inability to obtain 100% PERV-free PFFF3 clonal cell lines. Methods described herein are directed to inhibiting senescence and/or apoptosis pathways with small-molecule drugs so as to increase the targeting efficiency of the PFFF3 population and enhance viability of the highly edited clones. Treatment of the genomically modified PFFF3 cells described herein with the combination of PFTa and bFGF during genetic modification prevented senescence and allowed isolation of 100% PERV-free clonal cell lines. (See Fig. 1). Treatment of the genomically modified PFFF3 cells described herein with the combination of PFTa and bFGF during genetic modification increased the average targeting efficiency of the resulting PFFF3 population. (See Fig. 2). Treatment with SV40 large T antigen also resulted in increased average targeting efficiency. The distribution of the targeting efficiencies of single cell clones treated with PFTa and bFGF was approximately bimodal, and 100% PERV-free PFFF3 clonal cell lines were isolated. The eradication of pol activity was validated by RNA-seq with confirmation that all pol transcripts had been mutated.
EXAMPLE IV
Off Target Effects
The 100% PERV-free PFFF3 cell line was tested for off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9. Karyotype analysis of 100% PERV-free PFFF3 indicated normal chromosomal structure. RNAseq analysis showed that the transcription profile of 100% PERV-free PFFF3 closely resembled that of WT PFFF3. Additionally, off-target mutations were not observed in the transcripts of 100% PERV-free PFFF3. CRISPR-Cas9 had not introduced detectable off-target damage in the 100% PERV-free PFFF3. Genome-wide inactivation of PERVs had not altered global gene expression profiles.
EXAMPLE V
Eliminating In Vitro Transmission of PERVs from PFFF3 Cells to Human Cells
The genome-wide disruption of PERV pol as described herein eliminated in vitro transmission of PERVs from PFFF3 to human cells. No reverse transcriptase (RT) activity in the cell culture supernatant of the 100% PERV-free PFFF3 was detected, indicating that these cells produced few or no PERV particles. WT and 100% PERV-free PFFF3 cells were co-cultured with HEK293 cells for 7 days. PERV pol, gag, and env sequences were detected in the HEK293 cells that had been cultured with WT PFFF3, indicating transmission of PERVs to the human cells. However, in HEK293 co-cultured with 100% PERV-free PFFF3, the presence of pol, gag, or env sequences was not observed above background levels, indicating that the inactivation of all PERVs in PFFF3 had eliminated transmission to human cells. From the combination of DNA and RNA genotype analysis as well as expression and infectivity analysis, the activity of PERV pol was eradicated, whose reverse transcription is essential for PERV proliferation and infection, thereby eliminating the risk of PERV transmission to human cells. Embryos from the 100% PERV-free PFFF3 may be cloned to generate a PERV-free pig, such as using the methods described in Vajta G., Lewis I. M., Hyttel P., Handm G. A., Trounson A. O. Somatic cell cloning without micromanipulators. Cloning 3:89-95 (2001) hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Claims

1. A method of inhibiting apoptosis in a genetically modified cell comprising providing exogenous PFTa or bFGF to the cell before, during or after genetic modification of the cell.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein PFTa and bFGF are provided to the cell during genetic modification of the cell.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein PFTa or bFGF are provided to the cell from within a medium in which the cell is placed.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the cell is genetically modified to include a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a nuclease, which when expressed cuts a target nucleic acid sequence.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the nuclease is a Cas nuclease, a Cas nickase, a nuclease null Cas bound to a nuclease, a zinc finger nuclease, a meganuclease or a TALEN.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the cell is a prokaryotic cell or a eukaryotic cell.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the cell is a stem cell, an embryonic stem cell, a pluripotent stem cell, a zygote, or a germ line cell.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the cell is a somatic cell or a primary cell.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the cell is an animal cell.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the cell is a porcine cell.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of target nucleic acid sequences comprises a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the PERV gene comprises a pol gene.
The method of claim 12, wherein one or more copies of the pol gene are inactivated.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
15. An engineered cell comprising an exogenous nucleic acid sequence encoding a programmable nuclease, which when expressed cuts a target nucleic acid sequence, and
exogenous PFTa or bFGF.
16. The engineered cell of claim 15 wherein the nuclease is a Cas nuclease, a Cas nickase, a nuclease null Cas bound to a nuclease, a zinc finger nuclease, a meganuclease or a TALEN.
17. The engineered cell of claim 15 wherein the cell is a prokaryotic cell or a eukaryotic cell.
18. The engineered cell of claim 15 wherein the cell is a stem cell, an embryonic stem cell, a pluripotent stem cell, a zygote, or a germ line cell.
19. The engineered cell of claim 15 wherein the cell is a somatic cell or a primary cell.
20. The engineered cell of claim 15 wherein the cell is an animal cell.
21. The engineered cell of claim 15 wherein the cell is a porcine cell.
22. The engineered cell of claim 15, wherein the plurality of target nucleic acid sequences comprises a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene.
23. The engineered cell of claim 22, wherein the PERV gene comprises a pol gene.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein one or more copies of the pol gene are inactivated.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
26. The method of claim 1 wherein the genetic modification results in breaks of a plurality of target nucleic acid sequences within the cell.
27. A method of increasing gene editing rates in a genetically modified cell comprising providing exogenous PFTa or bFGF to the cell before, during or after genetic modification of the cell.
28. The method of claim 27 wherein PFTa and bFGF are provided to the cell during genetic modification of the cell.
29. The method of claim 27 wherein PFTa or bFGF are provided to the cell from within a medium in which the cell is placed.
30. The method of claim 27 wherein the cell is genetically modified to include a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a nuclease, which when expressed cuts a target nucleic acid sequence.
31. The method of claim 30 wherein the nuclease is a Cas nuclease, a Cas nickase, a nuclease null Cas bound to a nuclease, a zinc finger nuclease, a meganuclease or a TALEN.
32. The method of claim 27 wherein the cell is a prokaryotic cell or a eukaryotic cell.
33. The method of claim 27 wherein the cell is a stem cell, an embryonic stem cell, a pluripotent stem cell, a zygote, or a germ line cell.
34. The method of claim 27 wherein the cell is a somatic cell or a primary cell.
35. The method of claim 27 wherein the cell is an animal cell.
36. The method of claim 27 wherein the cell is a porcine cell.
37. The method of claim 27, wherein the plurality of target nucleic acid sequences comprises a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene.
38. The method of claim 37, wherein the PERV gene comprises a pol gene.
39. The method of claim 38, wherein one or more copies of the pol gene are inactivated.
40. The method of claim 39, wherein all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
41. A method of increasing cell survival rate of a genetically modified cell comprising providing exogenous PFTa or bFGF to the cell before, during or after genetic modification of the cell.
42. The method of claim 41 wherein PFTa and bFGF are provided to the cell during genetic modification of the cell.
43. The method of claim 41 wherein PFTa or bFGF are provided to the cell from within a medium in which the cell is placed.
44. The method of claim 41 wherein the cell is genetically modified to include a nucleic acid sequence that encodes a nuclease, which when expressed cuts a target nucleic acid sequence.
45. The method of claim 44 wherein the nuclease is a Cas nuclease, a Cas nickase, a nuclease null Cas bound to a nuclease, a zinc finger nuclease, a meganuclease or a TALEN.
46. The method of claim 41 wherein the cell is a prokaryotic cell or a eukaryotic cell.
47. The method of claim 41 wherein the cell is a stem cell, an embryonic stem cell, a pluripotent stem cell, a zygote, or a germ line cell.
48. The method of claim 41 wherein the cell is a somatic cell or a primary cell.
49. The method of claim 41 wherein the cell is an animal cell.
50. The method of claim 41 wherein the cell is a porcine cell.
51. The method of claim 41, wherein the plurality of target nucleic acid sequences comprises a porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) gene.
52. The method of claim 51, wherein the PERV gene comprises a pol gene.
53. The method of claim 52, wherein one or more copies of the pol gene are inactivated.
54. The method of claim 53, wherein all copies of the pol gene in the cell are inactivated.
PCT/US2018/016152 2017-02-01 2018-01-31 Methods for increasing efficiency of gene editing in cells WO2018144546A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/482,294 US20190352670A1 (en) 2017-02-01 2018-01-31 Methods for Increasing Efficiency of Gene Editing in Cells
CN201880021225.1A CN110546267B (en) 2017-02-01 2018-01-31 Method for improving editing efficiency of cell genes

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201762453051P 2017-02-01 2017-02-01
US62/453,051 2017-02-01

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018144546A1 true WO2018144546A1 (en) 2018-08-09

Family

ID=63040187

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2018/016152 WO2018144546A1 (en) 2017-02-01 2018-01-31 Methods for increasing efficiency of gene editing in cells

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20190352670A1 (en)
CN (1) CN110546267B (en)
WO (1) WO2018144546A1 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3359661A4 (en) * 2015-10-08 2019-05-15 President and Fellows of Harvard College Multiplexed genome editing
US11236313B2 (en) 2016-04-13 2022-02-01 Editas Medicine, Inc. Cas9 fusion molecules, gene editing systems, and methods of use thereof
US11597924B2 (en) 2016-03-25 2023-03-07 Editas Medicine, Inc. Genome editing systems comprising repair-modulating enzyme molecules and methods of their use
US11667911B2 (en) 2015-09-24 2023-06-06 Editas Medicine, Inc. Use of exonucleases to improve CRISPR/CAS-mediated genome editing
US11680268B2 (en) 2014-11-07 2023-06-20 Editas Medicine, Inc. Methods for improving CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome-editing
US11866726B2 (en) 2017-07-14 2024-01-09 Editas Medicine, Inc. Systems and methods for targeted integration and genome editing and detection thereof using integrated priming sites
US12058986B2 (en) 2017-04-20 2024-08-13 Egenesis, Inc. Method for generating a genetically modified pig with inactivated porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) elements

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140011279A1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2014-01-09 Kyoto University Method of efficiently establishing induced pluripotent stem cells

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2005089411A2 (en) * 2004-03-17 2005-09-29 Revivicor, Inc. Tissue products from animals lacking functional alpha 1,3 galactosyl transferase
JP5376478B2 (en) * 2009-08-07 2013-12-25 国立大学法人京都大学 Efficient method for establishing induced pluripotent stem cells
WO2013176197A1 (en) * 2012-05-22 2013-11-28 国立大学法人 東京大学 Method for producing antigen-specific t cells
WO2018083606A1 (en) * 2016-11-01 2018-05-11 Novartis Ag Methods and compositions for enhancing gene editing

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140011279A1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2014-01-09 Kyoto University Method of efficiently establishing induced pluripotent stem cells

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
HAIMOVITZ-FRIEDMAN ET AL.: "Protein Kinase C Mediates Basic Fibroblast Growth Factor Protection of Endothelial Cells against Radiation-induced Apoptosis", CANCER RESEARCH, vol. 54, no. 10, 15 May 1994 (1994-05-15), pages 2591 - 2597, XP055529424 *
YANG ET AL.: "Genome-wide inactivation of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs", SCIENCE, vol. 350, no. 6264, 27 November 2015 (2015-11-27), pages 1101 - 1104, XP055372260 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11680268B2 (en) 2014-11-07 2023-06-20 Editas Medicine, Inc. Methods for improving CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome-editing
US11667911B2 (en) 2015-09-24 2023-06-06 Editas Medicine, Inc. Use of exonucleases to improve CRISPR/CAS-mediated genome editing
EP3359661A4 (en) * 2015-10-08 2019-05-15 President and Fellows of Harvard College Multiplexed genome editing
US10375938B2 (en) 2015-10-08 2019-08-13 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Multiplexed genome editing
US10925263B2 (en) 2015-10-08 2021-02-23 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Multiplexed genome editing
US10959413B2 (en) 2015-10-08 2021-03-30 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Multiplexed genome editing
US11064684B2 (en) 2015-10-08 2021-07-20 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Multiplexed genome editing
US11597924B2 (en) 2016-03-25 2023-03-07 Editas Medicine, Inc. Genome editing systems comprising repair-modulating enzyme molecules and methods of their use
US11236313B2 (en) 2016-04-13 2022-02-01 Editas Medicine, Inc. Cas9 fusion molecules, gene editing systems, and methods of use thereof
US12049651B2 (en) 2016-04-13 2024-07-30 Editas Medicine, Inc. Cas9 fusion molecules, gene editing systems, and methods of use thereof
US12058986B2 (en) 2017-04-20 2024-08-13 Egenesis, Inc. Method for generating a genetically modified pig with inactivated porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) elements
US11866726B2 (en) 2017-07-14 2024-01-09 Editas Medicine, Inc. Systems and methods for targeted integration and genome editing and detection thereof using integrated priming sites

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN110546267A (en) 2019-12-06
CN110546267B (en) 2024-09-13
US20190352670A1 (en) 2019-11-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20190352670A1 (en) Methods for Increasing Efficiency of Gene Editing in Cells
JP7420439B2 (en) Multiplex genome editing
Liang et al. Enhanced CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise genome editing by improved design and delivery of gRNA, Cas9 nuclease, and donor DNA
Kalds et al. Sheep and goat genome engineering: from random transgenesis to the CRISPR era
Chen et al. Highly efficient mouse genome editing by CRISPR ribonucleoprotein electroporation of zygotes
Heo et al. CRISPR/Cas9 nuclease-mediated gene knock-in in bovine-induced pluripotent cells
CN107002093B (en) Methods and compositions for targeted genetic modification, and methods of use of these compositions
JP6688231B2 (en) Methods and compositions for modifying target loci
Waaijers et al. Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome with CRISPR/Cas9
Waddington et al. A broad overview and review of CRISPR-Cas technology and stem cells
US10428327B2 (en) Compositions and methods for enhancing homologous recombination
Lin et al. Electroporation-mediated genome editing of livestock zygotes
Wu et al. Generation and validation of PAX7 reporter lines from human iPS cells using CRISPR/Cas9 technology
Yuan et al. A transgenic core facility’s experience in genome editing revolution
Deleidi et al. Genome editing in pluripotent stem cells: research and therapeutic applications
Wong et al. Gene targeting and genome editing
Blair et al. Establishment of genome-edited human pluripotent stem cell lines: from targeting to isolation
US20240218358A1 (en) Prime editing-based gene editing composition with enhanced editing efficiency and use thereof
Guan et al. Generation of site-specific mutations in the rat genome via CRISPR/Cas9
KR102515727B1 (en) Composition and method for inserting specific nucleic acid sequence into target nucleic acid using overlapping guide nucleic acid
Homanics Gene-edited CRISPy critters for alcohol research
Barkova et al. Innovative Approaches to Genome Editing in Chickens
Getachew et al. Genome editing of induced pluripotent stem cells using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes to model genetic ocular diseases
KR20190023602A (en) Genetic Engineering of Gametogenic factor and the Use thereof
Adikusuma Development and Applications of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 18747365

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 18747365

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1