WO2018013620A1 - Methods for analyzing respirable particles in bulk materials - Google Patents

Methods for analyzing respirable particles in bulk materials Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018013620A1
WO2018013620A1 PCT/US2017/041613 US2017041613W WO2018013620A1 WO 2018013620 A1 WO2018013620 A1 WO 2018013620A1 US 2017041613 W US2017041613 W US 2017041613W WO 2018013620 A1 WO2018013620 A1 WO 2018013620A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
particles
respirable
chemical composition
particle
bulk material
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2017/041613
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
James W. BARBER
Feng Peng
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
United States Gypsum Co
Original Assignee
United States Gypsum Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by United States Gypsum Co filed Critical United States Gypsum Co
Priority to MX2018015716A priority Critical patent/MX2018015716A/en
Priority to CA3030571A priority patent/CA3030571C/en
Publication of WO2018013620A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018013620A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00—Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/10—Investigating individual particles
    • G01N15/14—Optical investigation techniques, e.g. flow cytometry
    • G01N15/1468—Optical investigation techniques, e.g. flow cytometry with spatial resolution of the texture or inner structure of the particle
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
    • G01N23/22—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by measuring secondary emission from the material
    • G01N23/2206—Combination of two or more measurements, at least one measurement being that of secondary emission, e.g. combination of secondary electron [SE] measurement and back-scattered electron [BSE] measurement
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
    • G01N1/28—Preparing specimens for investigation including physical details of (bio-)chemical methods covered elsewhere, e.g. G01N33/50, C12Q
    • G01N1/40—Concentrating samples
    • G01N1/4005—Concentrating samples by transferring a selected component through a membrane
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00—Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/10—Investigating individual particles
    • G01N15/14—Optical investigation techniques, e.g. flow cytometry
    • G01N15/1456—Optical investigation techniques, e.g. flow cytometry without spatial resolution of the texture or inner structure of the particle, e.g. processing of pulse signals
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
    • G01N23/20—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by using diffraction of the radiation by the materials, e.g. for investigating crystal structure; by using scattering of the radiation by the materials, e.g. for investigating non-crystalline materials; by using reflection of the radiation by the materials
    • G01N23/20091—Measuring the energy-dispersion spectrum [EDS] of diffracted radiation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
    • G01N23/22—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by measuring secondary emission from the material
    • G01N23/225—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by measuring secondary emission from the material using electron or ion
    • G01N23/2251—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by measuring secondary emission from the material using electron or ion using incident electron beams, e.g. scanning electron microscopy [SEM]
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00—Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/06—Investigating concentration of particle suspensions
    • G01N15/0606—Investigating concentration of particle suspensions by collecting particles on a support
    • G01N15/0618—Investigating concentration of particle suspensions by collecting particles on a support of the filter type
    • G01N15/0625—Optical scan of the deposits
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00—Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N2015/0042—Investigating dispersion of solids
    • G01N2015/0061—Investigating dispersion of solids in solids, e.g. petrography
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N15/00—Investigating characteristics of particles; Investigating permeability, pore-volume or surface-area of porous materials
    • G01N15/10—Investigating individual particles
    • G01N15/14—Optical investigation techniques, e.g. flow cytometry
    • G01N2015/1497—Particle shape
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
    • G01N23/20—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by using diffraction of the radiation by the materials, e.g. for investigating crystal structure; by using scattering of the radiation by the materials, e.g. for investigating non-crystalline materials; by using reflection of the radiation by the materials
    • G01N23/20008—Constructional details of analysers, e.g. characterised by X-ray source, detector or optical system; Accessories therefor; Preparing specimens therefor
    • G01N23/2005—Preparation of powder samples therefor

Definitions

  • This invention provides methods for accurate and rapid detection of respirable particles in bulk materials.
  • respirable particles which are smaller than 20 microns are referred to respirable particles because these particles can be dispersed into the air. These particles can be then inhaled by workers, which should be avoided. Thus, there is a need to analyze a powder sample and provide an accurate estimate whether the sample comprises respirable particles and the percentage of such particles in the sample.
  • the second step requires the sample to be dispersed in alcohol and transferred to a silver membrane and the mass of crystalline silica determined for the ⁇ 10 ⁇ fraction. A determination is also provided for the ⁇ 5 ⁇ fraction.
  • GCS Globally Harmonized System
  • SWeRF Size-Weighted Potential Respirable Fraction
  • SWeRFcs Size-Weighted Potential Respirable Fraction of Crystalline Silica
  • the method is to be used for comparing the potential health risks of bulk materials.
  • the method does not predict how a material will disperse in air, but quantifies the respirable fraction.
  • the particles that present a larger health risk are weighed more in the calculation.
  • the advantage of the method is it provides an unambiguous characterization of the bulk material.
  • the term "potential" is used to indicate that the standard does not analyze airborne particles.
  • the standard describes a method using sedimentation and a calculation method based on particle size distribution (PSD).
  • PSD particle size distribution
  • the calculation can only be used after the results are validated using the sedimentation data.
  • the calculation method requires that the particles have the same density or in the case of mixture with different materials that they have the same PSD.
  • a plot is made to compare the sedimentation PSD with the Stokes' Law and the convention described in CSN EN 481 (European Standards EN 481 "Workplace atmospheres - size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particles").
  • CSN EN 481 European Standards EN 481 "Workplace atmospheres - size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particles"
  • the dynamic form factor is neglected where in the sedimentation method, the dynamic form factor is assumed to be equal in air and liquid.
  • This invention provides a method for detecting respirable participles in a bulk material comprising particles.
  • the method comprises:
  • each particle in the profile is characterized by its shape, size and chemical composition
  • the morphology and chemical composition of the particles can be analyzed by a computer-controlled scanning electron microscope interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEMD EDS).
  • SEMD EDS energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer
  • the method may comprise a step of resuspending the particles of the bulk material, such as gypsum or calcium carbonate, in a medium (water or organic solvent), and filtering the suspension through a filter with a nominal pore size sufficiently small to retain the particles in the respirable size range.
  • the particles can be retained on a filter.
  • the morphology and chemical composition of the particles are analyzed by an automated SEMD EDS.
  • Various bulk materials can be analyzed, including mixtures of inorganic compounds.
  • the present method can be used to analyze respirable particles, such as for example silica (S1O2), smaller than 20 microns.
  • the present method can be also used to analyze respirable particles, such as for example silica (S1O2), smaller than 10 microns.
  • Fig. 1 is a diagram of methods for respirable particle analysis.
  • Fig. 2A is a plot for a bulk material comprising a small respirable faction.
  • Fig. 2B are calculations in connection with the plot of Fig. 2A.
  • Fig. 3A is a plot for bulk material which does not comprise detectable respirable silica.
  • Fig. 3B are calculations in connection with the plot of Fig. 3A.
  • Fig. 4A is a plot of a bulk material comprising a respirable fraction.
  • Fig. 4B are calculations in connection with the plot of Fig. 4A.
  • Fig. 5 is a scan of gypsum spiked with 0.5% of quartz.
  • Fig. 6 is a scan of gypsum spiked with 0.1 % of quartz.
  • Fig. 7 is a plot with three calibration points.
  • Fig. 8 is a scan of selenite comprising quartz.
  • Fig. 9 is a first plot of filler Microwhite 100.
  • Fig. 10 is a first plot of filler Pulpro-20.
  • Fig. 11 is a plot of filler #3.
  • Fig. 12 is a second plot of filler Microwhite 100.
  • Fig. 13 is a second plot of filler Pulpro-20.
  • Fig. 14 is a plot of filler Snowhite 21.
  • Fig. 15 is a plot of filler S-200.
  • Fig. 16 is a plot of filler Marblehill.
  • Fig. 17 is a plot of filler G260 RM 71778.
  • Fig. 18 is an example of ESPRIT's Feature analysis workspace: a fraction of the filter area is imaged by SEM and converted to binary image, in which particles of interest (bright feature in the left frame) are identified for further EDS analysis (right frame).
  • Fig. 19 is an example of automated particle analysis workspace: EDS composition analyses of particles marked in Fig. 18 are in progress; note that results from particle sizing are tabulated below the field image.
  • Fig. 20 is the particle analysis workspace: an example EDS X-ray spectrum acquired for one particle (most likely dolomite) identified in Fig. 18; note that results from EDS are tabulated below the spectrum.
  • Fig. 21 is a histogram of size (as AED) frequency of particles with Si relative intensity >5% (cf. Table 4).
  • Fig. 22 reports Si contents in particles (with relative intensity >%5) as a function of size.
  • the method comprises the following two steps.
  • step one a sample is analyzed for particle size distribution and density. This step determines the total proportion of respirable particles in the sample.
  • step two the amount of crystalline silica (also known as silicon dioxide or quartz) in the sample is determined.
  • Various matrices can be analyzed by this method, including gypsum, cement, mica, calcium carbonate, sand, etc. The method is illustrated in Fig. 1 in comparison to other methods.
  • Step one can be performed by using a Quantachrome Pycnometer for a density measurement, followed by an analysis with a particle size analyzer (such as for example, Horiba LA-950V2) and the SWeRF equation which is validated for individual matrices.
  • a particle size analyzer such as for example, Horiba LA-950V2
  • the SWeRF equation which is validated for individual matrices.
  • the mass of silica in the respirable fraction can be estimated by using a scanning electron microscope which eliminates the need for X-Ray Diffraction Instrument.
  • a scanning electron microscope interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer can be used to analyze particles for their morphology, including shape and size, and also a chemical (elemental composition) of the particles. See Fig. 1 in which the present method is compared to other methods.
  • a scanning electron microscope is used for crystalline identification and morphology. This analysis can be conducted with computer software which captures data for each particle individually, including the particle's shape, size and chemical composition.
  • the SWeRF equations are evaluated using the CIC particle size analysis and RJ Lee Total Crystalline Silica.
  • a typical graphic output for plotting the PSD for the SWeRF calculation is shown in Fig 2A.
  • the plot indicates the DuPont Richmond FGD (trimodal PSD) has a small respirable fraction (1 .6 %).
  • the RJ Lee and SWeRFcs estimate are in agreement and report 0.01 % respirable silica.
  • the Dayton Power Light FGD illustrates a scenario where the PSD and SWeRF equations indicate no respirable fraction (monomodal PSD) and therefore no respirable silica.
  • the RJ Lee data is indicating total crystalline silica of 0.2 % and ⁇ 10 ⁇ respirable silica of 0.2 %.
  • the Montreal Recycle material illustrates a scenario where the PSD (bimodal) and SWeRF equations indicate a small respirable fraction in contrast to the RJ Lee data indicating a respirable silica fraction of 1.3 %. This is significantly higher than the 0.8 %
  • SWeRF estimate This could require the sedimentation verification for SWeRF.
  • Table 1 is a summary of several different types of raw materials and how the SWeRF estimates correlate with the RJ Lee respirable silica.
  • Table 3 lists the particle size distribution for the carbonates.
  • RUN VOLUME (cc) ; DENSITY (g/cc) i RUN VOLUME (cc) 1 DENSITY (g/cc) ! RUN ! VOLUME (cc) DENSITY (g/cc)
  • Figs. 9-17 provide plots supporting the data in Table 3.
  • a sample of bulk material is dispersed and resuspended in a suitable medium.
  • the sample can be resuspended in water or in an organic solvent, including, but not limited to, isopropanol or ethanol.
  • an organic solvent including, but not limited to, isopropanol or ethanol.
  • a bulk material suspended in a medium can be subjected to filtration through a membrane filter with pore sizes suitable for retaining particles in the respirable size range.
  • the respirable size range can be less than 20 pm in some applications, whereas in other applications, it can be less than 10 pm. This method can be performed with 0.4-pm pore-sized polycarbonate filter to ensure all particles in the respirable size range are captured.
  • particles retained on the membrane filter by filtration are air-dried and coated with a thin layer of carbon before being subjected to analysis.
  • an analysis of respirable particles is conducted by a scanning electron microscope (abbreviated as SEM) interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (abbreviated as EDS).
  • SEM scanning electron microscope
  • EDS energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer
  • One suitable instrumental setup for the present method includes a computer-controlled scanning electron microscope (SEM) interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS). This technique can be used to obtain accurate morphological (size, shape, etc.) and (elemental) compositional characterizations of thousands of individual particles.
  • SEM scanning electron microscope
  • EDS energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer
  • Morphology filters can be used to select a subset of detected particles for further EDS compositional analyses—only particles in the respirable size range (e.g., ⁇ 10 pm) can be selected if needed. This allows an adequate sampling and counting of deposited particles on the filter in a time-efficient manner.
  • Figs. 18D20 Results of this analysis are shown in Figs. 18D20.
  • Fig. 18 depicts a fraction of the filter area imaged by SEM and converted to a binary image, in which particles of interest (bright feature in the left frame) are identified for further EDS analysis (right frame).
  • Fig. 19 provides the EDS composition analysis of particles marked in Fig. 18. The results from particle sizing are tabulated below the field image in Fig. 19.
  • Fig. 20 is an example of the EDS X-ray spectrum acquired for one particle (most likely dolomite) identified in Fig. 18. The results from the EDS analysis are tabulated below the spectrum in Fig.20.
  • each particle is characterized by its morphological parameters (such as shape and size) and chemical composition.
  • a sample comprising 10% (by weight) respirable silica mixed in gypsum is analyzed for morphology and chemical composition of individual particles.
  • a profile for this sample is shown in Table 4 below.
  • the raw dataset may include the following morphological characteristics of a particle: the area, aspect ratio, volume and diameter.
  • the particle's chemical characteristics are represented by its elemental composition. This is particularly important for identifying different particle types (e.g., gypsum, quartz, calcium carbonate).
  • each particle was analyzed for the presence of calcium (Ca), sulfur (S) and silicon (Si).
  • Fig. 21 presents the frequency distribution of sizes (as area equivalent diameter, AED) of particles with values of Si X-ray relative intensity >5%, for the same sample as in Table 4. Another way to present these data is to show the Si contents in particles as a function of particle size (Fig. 22).
  • the present method may also include a step of further characterizing and grouping particles according to a combination of particle characteristics listed (but not limited to) in Table 4.
  • particle characteristics listed (but not limited to) in Table 4.
  • normalized X-ray counts net counts divided by particle size
  • S1O2 crystalline and amorphous S1O2.
  • Additional data analyses can be conducted with a specifically complied code program to selectively group particles according to their characteristics, including shape, size, chemical composition and any combinations of parameters from the raw dataset.
  • a small amount of weighed bulk material was well-mixed and suspended in known volume (50-100 ml) of deionized water or isopropanol depending on the water solubility of the material.
  • An aliquot (generally ⁇ 10 ml) was pressure filtered through 25-mm diameter, 0.4-pm pore-sized polycarbonate filter. Particles deposited on the membrane filter were air-dried and coated with a thin layer of carbon before being subject to instrument analysis.
  • a sample comprising 10% (mass concentration) respirable silica mixed in gypsum (micronizing mill was used to homogenize the mixture) was prepared. 8.4 mg of the mixture was suspended in 50 ml isopropanol; and 3 ml of the suspension was filtered through 25-mm diameter, 0.4-pm pore-sized polycarbonate filter, resulting in 0.504 mg of material retained on a deposition area of 3.14 cm 2 .
  • Example 2 The sample was analyzed as described in Example 1 and the particle analysis data was tabulated in Table 4 and were also presented in Figs. 21 and 22.
  • respirable silica ⁇ 10 pm were included in the calculation as respirable silica, and density value of 2.65 g/cm 3 was used to estimate a particle mass, assuming a prolate spheroid particle shape. Knowing the fraction of the deposition area analyzed by SEM-EDS, the mass concentration of respirable silica determined by the analysis was 9.8%, which is consistent with that of the prepared sample mixture.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Dispersion Chemistry (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
  • Silicon Compounds (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)

Abstract

Provided is a method for detecting respirable participles in a bulk material comprising particles. The method comprises: analyzing morphology of the particles; analyzing chemical composition of the particles; creating a profile of the particles, wherein each particle in the profile is characterized by its shape, size and chemical composition; selecting particles from the profile which match the size and chemical composition of a respirable particle; and calculating a percentage of the respirable particles in the bulk material.

Description

METHODS FOR ANALYZING RESPIRABLE PARTICLES IN BULK MATERIALS
Technical Field
This invention provides methods for accurate and rapid detection of respirable particles in bulk materials.
Background Many compounds used by the building construction industry are bulk materials, including, but not limited to, gypsum, calcined gypsum, mica, cement, calcium carbonate and sand. These dry compounds comprise a population of particles of different sizes.
Particles which are smaller than 20 microns are referred to respirable particles because these particles can be dispersed into the air. These particles can be then inhaled by workers, which should be avoided. Thus, there is a need to analyze a powder sample and provide an accurate estimate whether the sample comprises respirable particles and the percentage of such particles in the sample.
The standard procedure for respirable silica requires the sample in analysis to be treated with acid to eliminate most of the sample matrix. The
remaining material is examined for crystalline silica. The weight of crystalline silica is determined using X-ray Diffraction or FTIR. This number is reported as Total
Crystalline Silica. The second step requires the sample to be dispersed in alcohol and transferred to a silver membrane and the mass of crystalline silica determined for the < 10 μ fraction. A determination is also provided for the < 5 μ fraction.
The criteria in the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) have the fine fraction of silica classified as specific target organ toxicity in this case, the lung.
Generic cut-off values for products containing a fine fraction of crystalline silica trigger a need for a method for the quantification of the fine fraction of crystalline silica in bulk materials. The European Union has promoted an analysis for silica in bulk materials which culminated in the publication of a new standard for measuring the amounts of respirable particles in bulk materials. The standard has two parts:
1. Determination of Size-Weighted Potential Respirable Fraction (SWeRF); and 2. Size-Weighted Potential Respirable Fraction of Crystalline Silica (SWeRFcs)
The method is to be used for comparing the potential health risks of bulk materials. The method does not predict how a material will disperse in air, but quantifies the respirable fraction. The particles that present a larger health risk are weighed more in the calculation. The advantage of the method is it provides an unambiguous characterization of the bulk material. The term "potential" is used to indicate that the standard does not analyze airborne particles.
The standard describes a method using sedimentation and a calculation method based on particle size distribution (PSD). The calculation can only be used after the results are validated using the sedimentation data. The calculation method requires that the particles have the same density or in the case of mixture with different materials that they have the same PSD. A plot is made to compare the sedimentation PSD with the Stokes' Law and the convention described in CSN EN 481 (European Standards EN 481 "Workplace atmospheres - size fraction definitions for measurement of airborne particles"). However, in this calculation method, the dynamic form factor is neglected where in the sedimentation method, the dynamic form factor is assumed to be equal in air and liquid. Thus, there remains a need for accurate and rapid detection of respirable particles in a bulk material.
Summary
At least some of these needs are addressed by the present methods which are based on analyzing particles for their morphology and chemical composition and creating a profile for a sample in which each particle is characterized by its morphology and chemical composition.
This invention provides a method for detecting respirable participles in a bulk material comprising particles. The method comprises:
- analyzing morphology of the particles;
- analyzing chemical composition of the particles;
- creating a profile of the particles, wherein each particle in the profile is characterized by its shape, size and chemical composition;
- selecting particles from the profile which match the size and
chemical composition of a respirable particle; and
- calculating a percentage of the respirable particles in the bulk
material.
In this method, the morphology and chemical composition of the particles can be analyzed by a computer-controlled scanning electron microscope interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEMD EDS). The method may comprise a step of resuspending the particles of the bulk material, such as gypsum or calcium carbonate, in a medium (water or organic solvent), and filtering the suspension through a filter with a nominal pore size sufficiently small to retain the particles in the respirable size range. In the method, the particles can be retained on a filter. The morphology and chemical composition of the particles are analyzed by an automated SEMD EDS. Various bulk materials can be analyzed, including mixtures of inorganic compounds.
The present method can be used to analyze respirable particles, such as for example silica (S1O2), smaller than 20 microns. The present method can be also used to analyze respirable particles, such as for example silica (S1O2), smaller than 10 microns.
Brief Description of the Drawings
Fig. 1 is a diagram of methods for respirable particle analysis.
Fig. 2A is a plot for a bulk material comprising a small respirable faction. Fig. 2B are calculations in connection with the plot of Fig. 2A.
Fig. 3A is a plot for bulk material which does not comprise detectable respirable silica.
Fig. 3B are calculations in connection with the plot of Fig. 3A.
Fig. 4A is a plot of a bulk material comprising a respirable fraction.
Fig. 4B are calculations in connection with the plot of Fig. 4A.
Fig. 5 is a scan of gypsum spiked with 0.5% of quartz.
Fig. 6 is a scan of gypsum spiked with 0.1 % of quartz.
Fig. 7 is a plot with three calibration points.
Fig. 8 is a scan of selenite comprising quartz.
Fig. 9 is a first plot of filler Microwhite 100.
Fig. 10 is a first plot of filler Pulpro-20.
Fig. 11 is a plot of filler #3.
Fig. 12 is a second plot of filler Microwhite 100.
Fig. 13 is a second plot of filler Pulpro-20.
Fig. 14 is a plot of filler Snowhite 21.
Fig. 15 is a plot of filler S-200.
Fig. 16 is a plot of filler Marblehill.
Fig. 17 is a plot of filler G260 RM 71778.
Fig. 18 is an example of ESPRIT's Feature analysis workspace: a fraction of the filter area is imaged by SEM and converted to binary image, in which particles of interest (bright feature in the left frame) are identified for further EDS analysis (right frame).
Fig. 19 is an example of automated particle analysis workspace: EDS composition analyses of particles marked in Fig. 18 are in progress; note that results from particle sizing are tabulated below the field image.
Fig. 20 is the particle analysis workspace: an example EDS X-ray spectrum acquired for one particle (most likely dolomite) identified in Fig. 18; note that results from EDS are tabulated below the spectrum.
Fig. 21 is a histogram of size (as AED) frequency of particles with Si relative intensity >5% (cf. Table 4). Fig. 22 reports Si contents in particles (with relative intensity >%5) as a function of size.
Detailed Description Provided is a method for examining the respirable fraction in bulk materials.
The method comprises the following two steps. In step one, a sample is analyzed for particle size distribution and density. This step determines the total proportion of respirable particles in the sample. In step two, the amount of crystalline silica (also known as silicon dioxide or quartz) in the sample is determined. Various matrices can be analyzed by this method, including gypsum, cement, mica, calcium carbonate, sand, etc. The method is illustrated in Fig. 1 in comparison to other methods.
Step one can be performed by using a Quantachrome Pycnometer for a density measurement, followed by an analysis with a particle size analyzer (such as for example, Horiba LA-950V2) and the SWeRF equation which is validated for individual matrices. In step two, the mass of silica in the respirable fraction can be estimated by using a scanning electron microscope which eliminates the need for X-Ray Diffraction Instrument. In further embodiments, a scanning electron microscope interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer can be used to analyze particles for their morphology, including shape and size, and also a chemical (elemental composition) of the particles. See Fig. 1 in which the present method is compared to other methods.
In the present method, a scanning electron microscope is used for crystalline identification and morphology. This analysis can be conducted with computer software which captures data for each particle individually, including the particle's shape, size and chemical composition.
In one embodiment of the method, the SWeRF equations are evaluated using the CIC particle size analysis and RJ Lee Total Crystalline Silica. A typical graphic output for plotting the PSD for the SWeRF calculation is shown in Fig 2A. The plot indicates the DuPont Richmond FGD (trimodal PSD) has a small respirable fraction (1 .6 %). Using the SWeRF and SWeRFcs equations as shown in the Table of Fig 2B, the RJ Lee and SWeRFcs estimate are in agreement and report 0.01 % respirable silica. As shown in Fig. 3A and the Table of Fig. 3B, the Dayton Power Light FGD illustrates a scenario where the PSD and SWeRF equations indicate no respirable fraction (monomodal PSD) and therefore no respirable silica. The RJ Lee data is indicating total crystalline silica of 0.2 % and < 10 μ respirable silica of 0.2 %.
As shown in Fig. 4A and the Table of Fig. 4B, the Montreal Recycle material illustrates a scenario where the PSD (bimodal) and SWeRF equations indicate a small respirable fraction in contrast to the RJ Lee data indicating a respirable silica fraction of 1.3 %. This is significantly higher than the 0.8 %
SWeRF estimate. This could require the sedimentation verification for SWeRF.
Table 1 is a summary of several different types of raw materials and how the SWeRF estimates correlate with the RJ Lee respirable silica.
As shown in Table 1 , in some examples (Dayton Power FGD, Rodemacher Fly Ash) there are two outputs. This occurs when the SDS gives a range for the density. For example, the Rodemacher SDS provided a density range of 2200- 2800 kg/m3. The calculation for SWeRF was performed twice (2200 and 2800 kg/m3).
Figure imgf000009_0001
Figure imgf000010_0001
The XRD experiment on gypsum spiked with 0.5 % and 0.1 % quartz shows excellent initial sensitivity, as shown in Figs. 5 and 6. Even though this only is three calibration points (Fig. 7), a scan of selenite indicates the material is 0.056 % quartz (Fig. 8).
Various carbonates which can be used as a filler were tested for SWeRF and SWeRFcs by the method described above. These values are provided in Table 2 below. See also Figs. 9-17 for supporting plots. Table 2 Estimated Respirable Fractions
j SWeRF = SWeRFcs = !
2016-148 #1 80388-CP Filler 7.34 0.09
2016-148 #2 arblewhite 310 8.30 0.030
2016-148 #3 70283-BP-U 7.02 0.052
2016-159 #1 62303- icrowhite 100 Sylacauga j 9.63 0.12
2016-159 #2 66342-Pulpro-20 6.69 0.37
2016-159 #3 63305-Snowhite 21 8.73 0.33
2016-159 #4 70999 S-200 8.21 0.020
! 2016-159 #5 60208 icrowhite 100 arblehill : 9.07 0.027
2016-182 #1 G260 R 71778 7.75 0.024
Table 3 lists the particle size distribution for the carbonates.
Table 3.
SMI
Omya BP- j Marblewhite Imerys CP-
LU 310 Filler
RUN j VOLUME (cc) j DENSITY (g/cc) i RUN i VOLUME (cc) ; DENSITY (g/cc) ; RUN VOLUME (cc) ; DENSITY (g/cc)
1 0.3353 2.9871 : l 0.3569 2.8116 1 0.3603 2.7781
2 0.3332 3.0063 2 0.4005 2.5052 2 0.3588 2.7903
3 0.3366 2.9757 3 0.3612 2.7779 3 0.3603 2.7789
4 0.3354 2.9858 4 0.3621 2.7711 4 0.3639 2.7507
5 0.3392 2.9528 5 0.3642 2.7551 5 0.3667 2.7299
6 0.3384 2.9596 6 0.3646 2.7523 6 0.3689 2.7135
7 0.3397 2.9485 7 0.3659 2.7420 7 0.3707 2.7005
8 0.3391 2.9534 8 0.3257 3.0811 8 0.3727 2.6863
9 0.3413 2.9347 9 0.3703 2.7096 9 0.3745 2.6734
10 0.3405 2.9414 10 0.3700 2.7121 10 0.3722 2.6894 average 0.3379 2.9645 average 0.3641 2.7618 average 0.3669 2.7291 std. dev. 0.0026 0.0231 std. dev. 0.0181 0.1400 : std. dev. 0.0058 0.0430
Table 3 cont'd
Imerys Imerys
Microwhite Microwhite
100- 100- 1 Huber
Sylacauga 1 Marblehil II i j G260
RUN ! VOLUME ( cc) 1 DENSITY (g/cc) j RUN j VOLUME {< cc) 1 DENSITY (g/cc) i RUN VOLUME (cc) ; DENSITY (g/cc)
1 0.3666 2.7324 1 0.3694 2.7272 1 0.3683 2.7211
2 0.3670 2.7295 2 0.3711 2.7141 2 0.3689 2.7172
3 0.3700 2.7073 3 0.3741 2.6927 3 0.3691 2.7159
4 0.3702 2.7058 4 0.3768 2.6735 4 0.3699 2.7098
5 0.3705 2.7042 5 0.3789 2.6587 5 0.3688 2.7174
6 0.3731 2.6853 6 0.3804 2.6483 6 0.3714 2.6985
7 0.3731 2.6849 7 0.3822 2.6354 7 0.3682 2.7220
8 0.3742 2.6775 0.3815 2.6406 0.3709 2.7026
9 0.3729 2.6864 9 0.3820 2.6370 9 0.3675 2.7274
10 0.3744 2.6759 10 0.3789 2.6582 10 0.3683 2.7215 average 0.3712 2.6989 average 0.3775 2.6686 • average 0.3691 2.7153 std. dev. 0.0028 0.0204 ! std. dev. 0.0046 0.0327 ! std. dev. 0.0012 0.0091
Omya
JaJack S- j Snowhite Omya
200 21 i Pulpro 20
RUN VOLUME (cc) ; DENSITY (g/cc) i RUN VOLUME (cc) 1 DENSITY (g/cc) ! RUN ! VOLUME (cc) DENSITY (g/cc)
1 0.3581 2.7958 1 0.3615 2.8165 1 0.3596 2.8497
2 0.3572 2.8031 2 0.3609 2.8212 2 0.3555 2.8826
3 0.3595 2.7851 3 0.3643 2.7949 3 0.3583 2.8598
4 0.3594 2.7854 4 0.3647 2.7913 4 0.3713 2.7598
5 0.3631 2.7573 5 0.3676 2.7693 5 0.3574 2.8677
6 0.3618 2.7672 6 0.3680 2.7663 6 0.3593 2.8518
7 0.3607 2.7758 7 0.3701 2.7512 7 0.3594 2.8513
8 0.3597 2.7831 8 0.3701 2.7508 8 0.3649 2.8083
9 0.3630 2.7583 9 0.3694 2.7562 9 0.3597 2.8487
10 0.3619 2.7668 10 0.3714 2.7415 10 0.3619 2.8320 average 0.3604 2.7778 ; average 0.3668 2.7759 j average 0.3607 2.8412 std. dev. 0.0020 0.0154 : std. dev. ; 0.0037 0.0284 std. dev. 0.0045 0.0348
Figs. 9-17 provide plots supporting the data in Table 3.
The data in Table 3 indicate that 5 carbonates out of all carbonates listed in Table 2 meet the new silica limit. A person of skill will also readily
understand that the final contribution to the product of the respirable fraction
depends on the formulation level.
Further embodiments provide a method in which particles are analyzed individually to measure concentrations of respirable particles (such as for example, silica, silcate minerals, asbestos, and any other particles that may be hazardous to a human if inhaled) in a bulk material for safety assessment.
In this method, a sample of bulk material is dispersed and resuspended in a suitable medium. The sample can be resuspended in water or in an organic solvent, including, but not limited to, isopropanol or ethanol. The choice of a medium depends on the water solubility for a particular material to be analyzed. For materials soluble in water, an organic solvent is used.
A bulk material suspended in a medium can be subjected to filtration through a membrane filter with pore sizes suitable for retaining particles in the respirable size range. The respirable size range can be less than 20 pm in some applications, whereas in other applications, it can be less than 10 pm. This method can be performed with 0.4-pm pore-sized polycarbonate filter to ensure all particles in the respirable size range are captured.
In one application of the present method, particles retained on the membrane filter by filtration are air-dried and coated with a thin layer of carbon before being subjected to analysis.
In the present method, an analysis of respirable particles is conducted by a scanning electron microscope (abbreviated as SEM) interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (abbreviated as EDS). In this analysis, individual particles in a sample are analyzed for two different properties:
a) morphological characteristics, including the particle's size and
shape; and
b) chemical (elemental) composition.
One suitable instrumental setup for the present method includes a computer-controlled scanning electron microscope (SEM) interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS). This technique can be used to obtain accurate morphological (size, shape, etc.) and (elemental) compositional characterizations of thousands of individual particles.
Morphology filters can be used to select a subset of detected particles for further EDS compositional analyses— only particles in the respirable size range (e.g., <10 pm) can be selected if needed. This allows an adequate sampling and counting of deposited particles on the filter in a time-efficient manner.
Results of this analysis are shown in Figs. 18D20. Fig. 18 depicts a fraction of the filter area imaged by SEM and converted to a binary image, in which particles of interest (bright feature in the left frame) are identified for further EDS analysis (right frame).
Fig. 19 provides the EDS composition analysis of particles marked in Fig. 18. The results from particle sizing are tabulated below the field image in Fig. 19.
Fig. 20 is an example of the EDS X-ray spectrum acquired for one particle (most likely dolomite) identified in Fig. 18. The results from the EDS analysis are tabulated below the spectrum in Fig.20.
In the present method, a large number of particles can be accurately analyzed for each particle's morphology and chemical composition. The present method creates a multi-dimensional raw dataset (or a profile) of the particles for the sample. In this method, each particle is characterized by its morphological parameters (such as shape and size) and chemical composition.
In one application of the present method, a sample comprising 10% (by weight) respirable silica mixed in gypsum is analyzed for morphology and chemical composition of individual particles. A profile for this sample is shown in Table 4 below. As can be seen from Table 4, the raw dataset may include the following morphological characteristics of a particle: the area, aspect ratio, volume and diameter. In addition, the particle's chemical characteristics are represented by its elemental composition. This is particularly important for identifying different particle types (e.g., gypsum, quartz, calcium carbonate). In this example, each particle was analyzed for the presence of calcium (Ca), sulfur (S) and silicon (Si).
Table 4. Selected output parameters from a computer-controlled SEM-EDS analysis, for a sample made with known quantities of gypsum and respirable silica mixed together.
Figure imgf000015_0001
P4939 2.60 1.63 9.93 2.09 1.82 28.59 25.13 46.28
P4940 0.23 1.74 0.26 0.05 0.54 5.51 6.09 88.40
P4969 1.33 1.82 3.64 0.76 1.30 11.06 11.18 77.76
P4973 3.20 1.56 13.54 2.72 2.02 24.57 21.71 53.72
P4975 2.01 1.40 6.71 1.70 1.60 44.10 43.48 12.42
P4979 0.17 1.52 0.16 0.03 0.46 37.26 42.31 20.43
P4990 0.15 1.35 0.13 0.03 0.43 20.18 17.71 62.11
P4998 0.45 1.17 0.72 0.19 0.76 44.35 44.08 11.57
P5008 0.30 1.42 0.40 0.09 0.62 9.42 7.65 82.93
P5011 0.43 1.86 0.67 0.14 0.74 15.32 15.67 69.02
P5020 1.11 1.48 2.77 0.65 1.19 6.84 5.40 87.76
P5024 8.51 1.41 58.72 11.18 3.29 11.26 10.60 78.14
P5025 0.18 1.23 0.18 0.04 0.48 14.14 14.23 71.63
P5031 0.37 1.85 0.53 0.10 0.68 18.05 18.92 63.03
P5036 0.36 1.28 0.50 0.12 0.67 32.83 30.99 36.18
P5043 0.30 1.84 0.40 0.08 0.62 13.98 15.15 70.87
P5047 0.14 1.46 0.12 0.03 0.42 17.67 16.55 65.78
P5058 0.20 1.68 0.21 0.05 0.50 42.49 42.56 14.95
P5073 0.16 1.58 0.15 0.03 0.45 12.31 10.66 77.03
P5076 0.49 1.75 0.82 0.15 0.79 9.93 10.71 79.36
P5090 10.24 1.95 77.40 15.98 3.61 47.22 41.82 10.95 a Aspect ratio = length/width, dimensionless; a measure of sphericity of a particle— 1 for spheres,
irregular particles.
b Particle volumes estimated for two different shapes (later to be used for mass approximation with density values for different composition.
c Only relevant elements are shown; due to the use of polycarbonate filter membrane for sample preparation, oxygen (O) was not included in semi-quantification, and gypsum was represented by the elemental presence of Ca and S. Silica was represented by Si.
The large amount of information obtained for morphology and chemical makeup of particles affords a plethora of ways in which the raw data can be analyzed. The following example (Fig. 21 ) presents the frequency distribution of sizes (as area equivalent diameter, AED) of particles with values of Si X-ray relative intensity >5%, for the same sample as in Table 4. Another way to present these data is to show the Si contents in particles as a function of particle size (Fig. 22).
The present method may also include a step of further characterizing and grouping particles according to a combination of particle characteristics listed (but not limited to) in Table 4. For example, normalized X-ray counts (net counts divided by particle size) can be used to differentiate crystalline and amorphous S1O2.
Additional data analyses can be conducted with a specifically complied code program to selectively group particles according to their characteristics, including shape, size, chemical composition and any combinations of parameters from the raw dataset.
The invention will be now described in more detail by the following non-limiting Examples.
Example 1.
A small amount of weighed bulk material was well-mixed and suspended in known volume (50-100 ml) of deionized water or isopropanol depending on the water solubility of the material. An aliquot (generally <10 ml) was pressure filtered through 25-mm diameter, 0.4-pm pore-sized polycarbonate filter. Particles deposited on the membrane filter were air-dried and coated with a thin layer of carbon before being subject to instrument analysis.
An automated, computer-controlled particle analysis was conducted by a scanning electron microscope (SEM) interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS). The automated particle analysis was used to provide morphological (size, shape, etc.) and (elemental) compositional characterizations of individual particles, results of which are shown in Figs. 18-20. Morphology filters were used to select a subset of detected particles for further EDS compositional analyses. In this example, only particles in the respirable size range (<10 /jm) were selected. Example 2.
A sample comprising 10% (mass concentration) respirable silica mixed in gypsum (micronizing mill was used to homogenize the mixture) was prepared. 8.4 mg of the mixture was suspended in 50 ml isopropanol; and 3 ml of the suspension was filtered through 25-mm diameter, 0.4-pm pore-sized polycarbonate filter, resulting in 0.504 mg of material retained on a deposition area of 3.14 cm2.
The sample was analyzed as described in Example 1 and the particle analysis data was tabulated in Table 4 and were also presented in Figs. 21 and 22.
In this analysis, particles containing >10% Si (relative intensity) and
<10 pm were included in the calculation as respirable silica, and density value of 2.65 g/cm3 was used to estimate a particle mass, assuming a prolate spheroid particle shape. Knowing the fraction of the deposition area analyzed by SEM-EDS, the mass concentration of respirable silica determined by the analysis was 9.8%, which is consistent with that of the prepared sample mixture.

Claims

CLAIMS: What is claimed is:
1. A method for detecting respirable participles in a bulk material comprising particles, the method comprising:
- analyzing morphology of the particles;
- analyzing chemical composition of the particles;
- creating a profile of the particles, wherein each particle in the profile is characterized by its shape, size and chemical composition;
- selecting particles from the profile which match the size and chemical composition of a respirable particle; and
- calculating a percentage of the respirable particles in the bulk material.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the morphology and chemical composition of the particles are analyzed by a scanning electron microscope interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the method comprises a step of
resuspending the particles of the bulk material in a medium selected from water and/or organic solvent, and filtering the suspension through a filter with a nominal pore size sufficiently small to retain the particles in the respirable size range.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the particles are retained on a filter, and wherein the morphology and chemical composition of the particles are analyzed by a scanning electron microscope interfaced with an energy dispersive X-ray
spectrometer.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bulk material is a mixture of inorganic compounds.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respirable particles are smaller than 20 microns.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respirable particles are smaller than 10 microns.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the bulk material is selected from the group consisting of gypsum and calcium carbonate.
9. The method of claim 3, wherein the filter is a polycarbonate filter.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the respirable particles comprise silica (S1O2).
PCT/US2017/041613 2016-07-12 2017-07-12 Methods for analyzing respirable particles in bulk materials Ceased WO2018013620A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
MX2018015716A MX2018015716A (en) 2016-07-12 2017-07-12 Methods for analyzing respirable particles in bulk materials.
CA3030571A CA3030571C (en) 2016-07-12 2017-07-12 Methods for analyzing respirable particles in bulk materials

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201662361273P 2016-07-12 2016-07-12
US62/361,273 2016-07-12
US15/642,533 US10502700B2 (en) 2016-07-12 2017-07-06 Methods for analyzing respirable particles in bulk materials
US15/642,533 2017-07-06

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018013620A1 true WO2018013620A1 (en) 2018-01-18

Family

ID=60940989

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2017/041613 Ceased WO2018013620A1 (en) 2016-07-12 2017-07-12 Methods for analyzing respirable particles in bulk materials

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US10502700B2 (en)
MX (1) MX2018015716A (en)
WO (1) WO2018013620A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2018018026A1 (en) * 2016-07-22 2018-01-25 Invisage Technologies, Inc. Quantum film pixels with low readout noise
PT3779403T (en) * 2018-03-29 2024-07-10 Hitachi High Tech Corp Charged particle beam device
CA3098154A1 (en) * 2018-04-24 2019-10-31 First Frontier Pty Ltd System and method for performing automated analysis of air samples

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013217157A1 (en) * 2013-08-28 2015-03-05 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products Gmbh Analysis method for the determination of types and concentrations of biological particles
US20150219547A1 (en) * 2014-02-06 2015-08-06 Jeol Ltd. Particle Analysis Instrument and Computer Program

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1223400C (en) * 2000-03-17 2005-10-19 Pq控股公司 Process for the preparation of zeolites and zeolite mixtures with enhanced cation exchange properties
US9067824B1 (en) * 2010-02-17 2015-06-30 Roman Cement, Llc Modification of pozzolanic chemistry through blending
WO2012088617A1 (en) * 2010-12-30 2012-07-05 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria (Usm) Controlled combustion system

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013217157A1 (en) * 2013-08-28 2015-03-05 Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products Gmbh Analysis method for the determination of types and concentrations of biological particles
US20150219547A1 (en) * 2014-02-06 2015-08-06 Jeol Ltd. Particle Analysis Instrument and Computer Program

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
HORWELL C J ET AL: "Characterization of respirable volcanic ash from the SoufriÃre Hills volcano, Montserrat, with implications for human health hazards", BULLETIN OF VOLCANOLOGY ; OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF VOLCANOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH'S INTERIOR (IAVCEI), SPRINGER, BERLIN, DE, vol. 65, no. 5, 31 January 2003 (2003-01-31), pages 346 - 362, XP019941686, ISSN: 1432-0819, DOI: 10.1007/S00445-002-0266-6 *
HUFFMAN GERALD P ET AL: "CCSEM investigation of respirable quartz in air samples collected during power plant maintenance activities", FUEL, vol. 95, 28 November 2011 (2011-11-28), pages 365 - 370, XP028889873, ISSN: 0016-2361, DOI: 10.1016/J.FUEL.2011.11.037 *
LE BLOND J S ET AL: "Production of potentially hazardous respirable silica airborne particulate from the burning of sugarcane", ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, PERGAMON, GB, vol. 42, no. 22, 1 July 2008 (2008-07-01), pages 5558 - 5568, XP022833471, ISSN: 1352-2310, [retrieved on 20080319], DOI: 10.1016/J.ATMOSENV.2008.03.018 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US10502700B2 (en) 2019-12-10
CA3030571A1 (en) 2018-01-18
US20180017510A1 (en) 2018-01-18
MX2018015716A (en) 2019-04-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11860151B2 (en) Method for the extraction and the determination of microplastics in samples with organic and inorganic matrices
Pye et al. Particle size analysis of sediments, soils and related particulate materials for forensic purposes using laser granulometry
Casuccio et al. The use of computer controlled scanning electron microscopy in environmental studies
Hagendorfer et al. Size-fractionated characterization and quantification of nanoparticle release rates from a consumer spray product containing engineered nanoparticles
Wang-Li et al. Techniques for measuring particle size distribution of particulate matter emitted from animal feeding operations
Germani et al. Automated scanning electron microscopy for atmospheric particle analysis
Ilić et al. Size and shape particle analysis by applying image analysis and laser diffraction–Inhalable dust in a dental laboratory
Ribalta et al. Health risk assessment from exposure to particles during packing in working environments
US10502700B2 (en) Methods for analyzing respirable particles in bulk materials
Morgeneyer et al. STEM imaging to characterize nanoparticle emissions and help to design nanosafer paints
Morgeneyer et al. Experimental study of the aerosolization of fine alumina particles from bulk by a vortex shaker
Boué-Bigne Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy and multivariate statistics for the rapid identification of oxide inclusions in steel products
Tedla et al. Characterization of 3D printing filaments containing metal additives and their particulate emissions
Agashkov et al. Analysis of disperse composition of the dust in air of working zone of feed mills
Brame et al. Characterization and workplace exposure assessment of nanomaterial released from a carbon nanotube-enabled anti-corrosive coating
CA3030571C (en) Methods for analyzing respirable particles in bulk materials
Drake et al. Evaluation of two portable lead-monitoring methods at mining sites
Krupka et al. Physicochemical characterization of Capstone depleted uranium aerosols III: morphologic and chemical oxide analyses
Johnson et al. QEMSCAN® automated mineralogical analysis of PM2. 5 and PM4: A preliminary study of underground coal mine dust from Poland and Slovenia
Elmes The characterisation of airborne particulate matter by automated mineralogy: The potential of the mineral liberation analyser for the monitoring of mine-derived emissions
Bok-Badura et al. A novel method for simultaneous determination of selected elements in dolomite and magnesia by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy with slurry sample introduction
Tuoriniemi New single particle methods for detection and characterization of nanoparticles in environmental samples
Hossain et al. Determination of particle size distribution of used black tea leaves by scanning electron microscope
Castellano et al. An overview of the characterization of occupational exposure to nanoaerosols in workplaces
Ro et al. Assessment of homogeneity of candidate reference material at the nanogram level and investigation on representativeness of single particle analysis using electron probe X-ray microanalysis

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17743139

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 3030571

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 17743139

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1