WO2018004419A1 - A steel for a tool holder - Google Patents

A steel for a tool holder Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2018004419A1
WO2018004419A1 PCT/SE2017/050603 SE2017050603W WO2018004419A1 WO 2018004419 A1 WO2018004419 A1 WO 2018004419A1 SE 2017050603 W SE2017050603 W SE 2017050603W WO 2018004419 A1 WO2018004419 A1 WO 2018004419A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
steel
volume
amount
steel according
retained austenite
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/SE2017/050603
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Petter Damm
Lena RÅHLEN
Amanda Forsberg
Victoria Bergqvist
Riccardo Zanchetta
Original Assignee
Uddeholms Ab
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Uddeholms Ab filed Critical Uddeholms Ab
Priority to US16/314,240 priority Critical patent/US11085108B2/en
Priority to CN201780040527.9A priority patent/CN109415793B/en
Priority to JP2018563659A priority patent/JP6956117B2/en
Priority to RU2019102410A priority patent/RU2738219C2/en
Priority to CA3029542A priority patent/CA3029542C/en
Priority to MX2018016214A priority patent/MX2018016214A/en
Priority to EP17820638.9A priority patent/EP3478867B1/en
Priority to ES17820638T priority patent/ES2903082T3/en
Priority to BR112018076330-6A priority patent/BR112018076330B1/en
Priority to KR1020197002582A priority patent/KR102401049B1/en
Publication of WO2018004419A1 publication Critical patent/WO2018004419A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/58Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with more than 1.5% by weight of manganese
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D6/00Heat treatment of ferrous alloys
    • C21D6/004Heat treatment of ferrous alloys containing Cr and Ni
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D6/00Heat treatment of ferrous alloys
    • C21D6/02Hardening by precipitation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/06Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing aluminium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C38/00Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/46Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with vanadium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D2211/00Microstructure comprising significant phases
    • C21D2211/001Austenite
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D2211/00Microstructure comprising significant phases
    • C21D2211/002Bainite
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21DMODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D2211/00Microstructure comprising significant phases
    • C21D2211/008Martensite

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a steel for a tool holder.
  • the invention relates to a steel suitable for the manufacturing of large tool holders for indexable insert cutting tools.
  • tool holder means the body on which the active tool portion is mounted at the cutting operation.
  • Typical cutting tool bodies are milling and drill bodies, which are provided with active cutting elements of high speed steel, cemented carbide, cubic boron nitride (CBN) or ceramic.
  • the material in such cutting tool bodies is usually steel, within the art of designated holder steel.
  • the cutting operation takes place at high cutting speeds, which implies that the cutting tool body may become very hot, and therefore it is important that the material has a good hot hardness and resistance to softening at elevated temperatures.
  • the material must have good mechanical properties, including a good toughness and fatigue strength.
  • Cutting tool bodies are tough hardened, while the surfaces against which the clamping elements are applied can be induction hardened. Therefore the material shall be possible to harden by induction hardening.
  • Certain types of the cutting tool bodies such as certain drill bodies with soldered cemented carbide tips, are coated with PVD or subjected to nitriding after hardening in order to increase the resistance against chip wear in the chip flute and on the drill body. The material shall therefore be possible to coat with PVD or to subject to nitriding on the surface without any significant reduction of the hardness.
  • low and medium alloyed engineering steels like 1.2721, 1.2738 and SS2541 have been used as material for cutting tool bodies.
  • hot work tool steel As a material for cutting tool holders.
  • WO 97/49838 and WO 2009/116933 disclose the use of a hot work tool steels for cutting tool holders.
  • two popular hot work tool steels used for cutting tool bodies are provided by Uddeholms AB and sold under the names UDDEHOLM BURE ® and UDDEHOLM BALDER ® .
  • the nominal compositions of said steels are given in Table 1 (wt. %).
  • These types of hot work tool steels possess very good properties for the intended use as cutting tool holders.
  • these steels have a combination of high hot strength and good machinability.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a steel for tool holders having an improved property profile.
  • a further object is to provide a steel for tool holders having uniform properties also in large dimensions and being optimized for large tool holders.
  • the impact toughness, the chemical and microstructural homogeneity and a low content of non-metallic inclusions are important parameters and the hot strength is of minor interest since large tool holders have a significant lower working temperature than smaller tool holders.
  • good welding properties are necessary such that the steels can be welded without preheating and postheating.
  • the steel of the invention consists of in weight % (wt. %):
  • the steel has a bainitic microstructure comprising up to 20 volume % retained austenite and up to 20 volume % martensite.
  • the steel may fulfil the following requirements:
  • the steel may also fulfil at least one of the following requirements:
  • the steel comprises:
  • the microstructure may be adjusted such that the amount of retained austenite is 4 - 15 volume % and/or the amount of martensite is 2 - 16 volume %.
  • the amount of retained austenite is 4 - 12 volume % and/or the amount of martensite is 4 - 12 volume %. More preferably the amount of retained austenite is 5 - 9 volume % and/or the amount of martensite is 5 - 10 volume %.
  • the hardness of may be 38-42 HRC and/or a 360-400 HBW10/3000 and the steel may have a mean hardness in the range of 360-400 HBW10/3000, wherein the steel has a thickness of at least 100 mm and the maximum deviation from the mean Brinell hardness value in the thickness direction measured in accordance with ASTM El 0-01 is less than 10 %, preferably less than 5 %, and wherein the minimum distance of the centre of the indentation from the edge of the specimen or edge of another indentation shall be at least two and a half times the diameter of the indentation and the maximum distance shall be no more than 4 times the diameter of the indentation.
  • the steel may have a cleanliness fulfilling the following maximum requirements with respect to micro-slag according to ASTM E45-97, Method A:
  • Carbon is effective for improving the strength and the hardness of the steel. However, if the content is too high the steel may be difficult to work after cooling from hot working and repair welding becomes more difficult.
  • C should be present in a minimum content of 0.07 %, preferably at least 0.08, 0.9, or 0.10 %.
  • the upper limit for carbon is 0.13 % and may be set to 0.12, 0.11 or 0.10 %. A preferred range is 0.08 - 0.12 %, a more preferred range is 0.085 - 0. 11 %. Silicon (0.10 - 0.45 %)
  • Silicon is used for deoxidation. Si is present in the steel in a dissolved form. Si is a strong ferrite former and increases the carbon activity and therefore the risk for the formation of undesired carbides, which negatively affect the impact strength. Silicon is also prone to interfacial segregation, which may result in decreased toughness and thermal fatigue resistance. Si is therefore limited to 0.45%.
  • the upper limit may be 0.40, 0.35, 0.34, 0.33, 0.32, 0.31, 0.30, 0.29 or 0.28 %.
  • the lower limit may be 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18 or 0.20%. Preferred ranges are 0.15 - 0.40 % and 0.20 - 0.35 %.
  • Manganese contributes to improving the hardenability of the steel. If the content is too low then the hardenability may be too low. At higher sulphur contents manganese prevents red brittleness in the steel. Manganese shall therefore be present in a minimum content of 1.5 %, preferably at least 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.8, 1.9 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 or 2.4 %.
  • the steel shall contain maximum 3.1 %, preferably maximum 3.0, 2.9, 2.8 or 2.7 %. A preferred range is 2.3-2.7 %.
  • Chromium is to be present in a content of at least 2.4 % in order to provide a good hardenability in larger cross sections during the heat treatment. If the chromium content is too high, this may lead to the formation of high-temperature ferrite, which reduces the hot-workability.
  • the lower limit may be 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8 or 2.9 %.
  • the upper limit is 3.6 % and may be 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2 or 3.1 %. A preferred range is 2.7 - 3.3 %.
  • Nickel gives the steel a good hardenability and toughness. Nickel is also beneficial for the machinability and polishability of the steel. If the nickel content exceeds 2.0 % the hardenability may be unnecessary high.
  • the upper limit may therefore be 1.9, 1.8, 1.7, 1.6, 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2 or 1.1 %.
  • the lower limit may be 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 %. A preferred range is 0.85 - 1.15 %.
  • Mo is known to have a very favourable effect on the hardenability. Molybdenum is essential for attaining a good secondary hardening response. The minimum content is 0.1 %, and may 0.15, 0.2, 0.25 or 0.3 %. Molybdenum is a strong carbide forming element and also a strong ferrite former. The maximum content of molybdenum is therefore 0.7 %. Preferably Mo is limited to 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.50, 0.45 or 0.4 %. A preferred range is 0.2 - 0.3 %.
  • Aluminium may be used for deoxidation in combination with Si and Mn.
  • the lower limit may be set to 0.001, 0.003, 0.005 or 0.007%) in order to ensure a good deoxidation.
  • the upper limit is restricted to 0.06%> for avoiding precipitation of undesired phases such as A1N.
  • the upper limit may be 0.05, 0.04, 0.035, 0.03, 0.02 or 0.015%.
  • Vanadium forms evenly distributed primary precipitated carbides and carbonitrides of the type V(N,C) in the matrix of the steel.
  • This hard phase may also be denoted MX, wherein M is mainly V but Cr and Mo may be present and X is one or more of C, N and B. Vanadium may therefore optionally be present to enhance the tempering resistance. However, at high contents the machinability and toughness deteriorates. The upper limit may therefore be 0.15, 0.1, 0.08, 0.06 or 0.05 %.
  • Nitrogen may optionally be adjusted to 0.006 - 0.06 %> in order to obtain a desired type and amount of hard phase, in particular V(C,N).
  • V(C,N) vanadium rich carbonitrides
  • V(C,N) will form. These will be partly dissolved during the austenitizing step and then precipitated during the tempering step as particles of nanometer size.
  • the thermal stability of vanadium carbonitrides is considered to be better than that of vanadium carbides, hence the tempering resistance of the tool steel may be improved and the resistance against grain growth at high austenitizing temperatures is enhanced.
  • the lower limit may be 0.011, 0.012, 0.013, 0.014, 0.015, 0.016, 0.017, 0.018, 0.019 or 0.02%.
  • the upper limit may be 0.06, 0.05, 0.04 or 0.03 %.
  • Co is an optional element. Co causes the solidus temperature to increase and therefore provides an opportunity to raises the hardening temperature, which may be 15 - 30 °C higher than without Co. During austenitization it is therefore possible to dissolve larger fraction of carbides and thereby enhance the hardenability. Co also increases the M s temperature. However, large amount of Co may result in a decreased toughness and wear resistance. The maximum amount is 8 % and, if added, an effective amount may be 2 - 6 %, in particular 4 to 5 %. However, for practical reasons, such as scrap handling, deliberate additions of Co is not made. The maximum impurity content may then be set to 1 %, 0.5%, 0.3 %, 0.2% or 0.1%.
  • molybdenum may be replaced by twice as much with tungsten because of their chemical similarities.
  • tungsten is expensive and it also complicates the handling of scrap metal.
  • the maximum amount is therefore limited to 1 %, 0.7, 0.5, 0.3 or 0.15 %.
  • no deliberate additions are made.
  • Niobium is similar to vanadium in that it forms carbonitrides of the type M(N,C) and may in principle be used to replace part of the vanadium but that requires the double amount of niobium as compared to vanadium.
  • Nb results in a more angular shape of the M(N,C). The maximum amount is therefore 0.05 %, 0.03 or 0.01 %.
  • B may optionally be used in order to further increase the hardness of the steel.
  • the amount is limited to 0.01%, preferably ⁇ 0.005%).
  • a preferred range for the optional addition of B is 0.001 - 0.004 %.
  • These elements may be added to the steel in the claimed amounts for modifying the non-metallic inclusion and/or in order to further improve the machinability, hot workability and/or weldability.
  • P, S and O are the main non-metallic impurities, which have a negative effect on the mechanical properties of the steel.
  • P may therefore be limited to 0.05, 0.04, 0.03 0.02 or 0.01 %.
  • S is limited to 0.003 may be limited toO.0025, 0.0020, 0.0015, 0.0010, 0.0008 or 0.0005 %.
  • O may be limited to 0.0015, 0.0012, 0.0010, 0.0008, 0.0006 or 0.0005 %.
  • the impurity amount of Cu may be limited to 0.35, 0.30, 0.25, 0.20, 0.15 or 0.10 %.
  • Hydrogen is known to have a deleterious effect on the properties of the steel and to cause problems during processing.
  • the molten steel is subjected to vacuum degassing.
  • the upper limit is 0.0005 %> (5 ppm) and may be limited to 4, 3, 2.5, 2, 1.5 or 1 ppm.
  • the tool steel having the claimed chemical composition can be produced by
  • ESR Electro Slag Remelting
  • Austenitizing may be performed at an austenitizing temperature (T A ) in the range of 850 to 950°C, preferably 880 - 920 °C.
  • T A austenitizing temperature
  • a typical T A is 900 °C with a holding time of 30 minutes followed by slow cooling.
  • the cooling rate is defined by the time the steel subjected to the temperature range 800 °C to 500 °C, (tsoo / soo)-
  • the cooling time in this interval, tsoo / soo should normally lie in the interval of 4000 - 20000 s in order to get the desired bainitic micro structure with minor amounts of retained austenite and martensite.
  • the maximum deviation from the mean Brinell hardness value in the thickness direction is less than 10 %, preferably less than 5 %, wherein the distance of the center of the indentation from the edge of the specimen or edge of another indentation shall be at least two and a half times the diameter of the indentation and the maximum shall be no more than 4 times the diameter of the indentation.
  • the steels of the present invention have a uniform hardness because the composition has been optimized in order to reduce the meso-segregations, which may be formed in all type of ingots having a thickness of at least 100 mm.
  • Meso-segregations are commonly referred to as A-type segregations, V-type segregations and Channel-type segregations and may form in all ingots having a thickness of at least 100 mm.
  • the segregated regions have an elongated shape and a non-constant thickness of the order of 10 mm.
  • the amount of meso-segregation increases with increasing size of the ingot and with increasing amount of heavy alloying elements like Mo (10.2 g/cm 3 ) and W (19.3 g/cm 3 ).
  • the size of these segregations makes the homogenisation difficult and results in a banded structure in the forged and/or hot rolled product.
  • the size of the bandings in the microstructure depends on the degree of reduction. A high degree of reduction leads to a smaller width of the bandings.
  • a steel having the following composition was produced by EAF- melting, ladle refining and vacuum degassing (VD) followed by ESR remelting under protective atmosphere (in wt. %):
  • the steel was cast into ingots and subjected hot working in order to produce blocks having a cross section size of 1013x346 mm.
  • the steel was austenitized at 900 °C for 30 minutes and hardened by slow cooling, The time for cooling (tsoo / soo) was about 8360 seconds. This resulted in a mean hardness of 365 HBWio/3ooo-
  • the maximum deviation from the mean Brinell hardness value in the thickness direction was found to be less than 4 % as measured in accordance with ASTM ElO-01, wherein the minimum distance of the center of the indentation from the edge of the specimen or edge of another indentation was 3 times the diameter of the indentation.
  • the mean impact energy in the LT direction was measured using a standard Charpy-V test in accordance with SS-EN IS0148-1/ASTM E23. The mean value of 6 samples was 32 J. The amount of retained austenite was estimated to be about 7 vol. %.
  • the cleanliness of steel was examined with respect to micro-slag according to ASTM E45-97, Method A. The result is shown in Table 1.
  • the steel of the present invention is particular useful in large tool holders requiring a high toughness and a uniform hardness.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
  • Cutting Tools, Boring Holders, And Turrets (AREA)
  • Milling Processes (AREA)
  • Drilling Tools (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a steel for a tool holder. The steel comprises the following main components (in wt. %): C 0.07-0.13 Si 0.10-0.45 Mn 1.5-3.1 Cr 2.4-3.6 Ni 0.5-2.0 Mo 0.1-0.7 Al 0.001-0.06 S < 0.003 The steel has a bainitic microstructure comprising up to 20 volume % retained austenite and up to 20 volume % martensite.

Description

A STEEL FOR A TOOL HOLDER
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates to a steel for a tool holder. In particular, the invention relates to a steel suitable for the manufacturing of large tool holders for indexable insert cutting tools.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The term tool holder means the body on which the active tool portion is mounted at the cutting operation. Typical cutting tool bodies are milling and drill bodies, which are provided with active cutting elements of high speed steel, cemented carbide, cubic boron nitride (CBN) or ceramic. The material in such cutting tool bodies is usually steel, within the art of designated holder steel. The cutting operation takes place at high cutting speeds, which implies that the cutting tool body may become very hot, and therefore it is important that the material has a good hot hardness and resistance to softening at elevated temperatures. To withstand the high pulsating loads, which certain types of cutting tool bodies, such as milling bodies are subjected to, the material must have good mechanical properties, including a good toughness and fatigue strength. To improve the fatigue strength, compressive stresses are commonly introduced in the surface of the cutting tool body. The material should therefore have a good ability to maintain said applied compressive stresses at high temperatures, i.e. a good resistance against relaxation. Cutting tool bodies are tough hardened, while the surfaces against which the clamping elements are applied can be induction hardened. Therefore the material shall be possible to harden by induction hardening. Certain types of the cutting tool bodies, such as certain drill bodies with soldered cemented carbide tips, are coated with PVD or subjected to nitriding after hardening in order to increase the resistance against chip wear in the chip flute and on the drill body. The material shall therefore be possible to coat with PVD or to subject to nitriding on the surface without any significant reduction of the hardness. Traditionally, low and medium alloyed engineering steels like 1.2721, 1.2738 and SS2541 have been used as material for cutting tool bodies.
It is also known to use hot work tool steel as a material for cutting tool holders. WO 97/49838 and WO 2009/116933 disclose the use of a hot work tool steels for cutting tool holders. Presently, two popular hot work tool steels used for cutting tool bodies are provided by Uddeholms AB and sold under the names UDDEHOLM BURE® and UDDEHOLM BALDER®. The nominal compositions of said steels are given in Table 1 (wt. %).
Table 1
Figure imgf000003_0001
These types of hot work tool steels possess very good properties for the intended use as cutting tool holders. In particular, these steels have a combination of high hot strength and good machinability.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
The object of the present invention is to provide a steel for tool holders having an improved property profile.
A further object is to provide a steel for tool holders having uniform properties also in large dimensions and being optimized for large tool holders.
For large tool holders the impact toughness, the chemical and microstructural homogeneity and a low content of non-metallic inclusions are important parameters and the hot strength is of minor interest since large tool holders have a significant lower working temperature than smaller tool holders. In addition, good welding properties are necessary such that the steels can be welded without preheating and postheating.
The foregoing objects, as well as additional advantages are achieved to a significant measure by providing a steel having a composition and microstructure as set out in the claims. In particular, the high and uniform hardness in combination with a high toughness results in a steel with good chock resistance and a minimum risk for unexpected failure, leading to a safer tool holder and a prolonged tool life. The invention is defined in the claims.
The steel of the invention consists of in weight % (wt. %):
C 0.07-0.13
Si 0.10-0.45
Mn 1.5-3.1
Cr 2.4-3.6
Ni 0.5-2.0
Mo 0.1-0.7
Al 0.001-0.06
S < 0.003
optionally
N 0.006-0.06
V 0.01-0.2
Co <8
W < 1
Nb <0.05
Ti <0.05
Zr <0.05
Ta <0.05
B <0.01
Ca <0.01 Mg <0.01
REM < 0.2
balance Fe apart from impurities and the steel has a bainitic microstructure comprising up to 20 volume % retained austenite and up to 20 volume % martensite.
The steel may fulfil the following requirements:
C 0.08-0.12
Si 0.10-0.4
Mn 2.0-2.9
Cr 2.4-3.6
Ni 0.7-1.2
Mo 0.15-0.55
Al 0.001 -0.035
optionally
N 0.006-0.03
V 0.01-0.08
Cu < 1
Co < 1
W <0.1
Nb <0.03
Ti <0.03
Zr <0.03
Ta <0.03
B < 0.001
Ca < 0.001
Mg <0.01
REM < 0.1
H < 0.0005
and retained austenite 2-20 vol. %. The steel may also fulfil at least one of the following requirements:
C 0.08-0.11
Si 0.15-0.35
Mn 2.2-2.8
Cr 2.5-3.5
Ni 0.85 - 1.15
Mo 0.20-0.45
optionally
N 0.01-0.03
V 0.01 -0.06
Co <0.3
Nb <0.01
Ti <0.01
Zr <0.01
Ta <0.01
REM <0.05
H < 0.0003
and retained austenite 5-10 vol. %. a particular preferred embodiment the steel comprises:
C 0.08-0.11
Si 0.1-0.4
Mn 2.2-2.8
Cr 2.5 -3.5
Ni 0.7-1.2
Mo 0.15-0.45
The microstructure may be adjusted such that the amount of retained austenite is 4 - 15 volume % and/or the amount of martensite is 2 - 16 volume %. Preferably the amount of retained austenite is 4 - 12 volume % and/or the amount of martensite is 4 - 12 volume %. More preferably the amount of retained austenite is 5 - 9 volume % and/or the amount of martensite is 5 - 10 volume %.
The hardness of may be 38-42 HRC and/or a 360-400 HBW10/3000 and the steel may have a mean hardness in the range of 360-400 HBW10/3000, wherein the steel has a thickness of at least 100 mm and the maximum deviation from the mean Brinell hardness value in the thickness direction measured in accordance with ASTM El 0-01 is less than 10 %, preferably less than 5 %, and wherein the minimum distance of the centre of the indentation from the edge of the specimen or edge of another indentation shall be at least two and a half times the diameter of the indentation and the maximum distance shall be no more than 4 times the diameter of the indentation.
The steel may have a cleanliness fulfilling the following maximum requirements with respect to micro-slag according to ASTM E45-97, Method A:
Figure imgf000007_0001
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The importance of the separate elements and their interaction with each other as well as the limitations of the chemical ingredients of the claimed alloy are briefly explained in the following. All percentages for the chemical composition of the steel are given in weight % (wt. %) throughout the description. The amount of hard phases is given in volume % (vol. %). Upper and lower limits of the individual elements can be freely combined within the limits set out in the claims. Carbon (0.07 - 0.13 %)
Carbon is effective for improving the strength and the hardness of the steel. However, if the content is too high the steel may be difficult to work after cooling from hot working and repair welding becomes more difficult. C should be present in a minimum content of 0.07 %, preferably at least 0.08, 0.9, or 0.10 %. The upper limit for carbon is 0.13 % and may be set to 0.12, 0.11 or 0.10 %. A preferred range is 0.08 - 0.12 %, a more preferred range is 0.085 - 0. 11 %. Silicon (0.10 - 0.45 %)
Silicon is used for deoxidation. Si is present in the steel in a dissolved form. Si is a strong ferrite former and increases the carbon activity and therefore the risk for the formation of undesired carbides, which negatively affect the impact strength. Silicon is also prone to interfacial segregation, which may result in decreased toughness and thermal fatigue resistance. Si is therefore limited to 0.45%. The upper limit may be 0.40, 0.35, 0.34, 0.33, 0.32, 0.31, 0.30, 0.29 or 0.28 %. The lower limit may be 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18 or 0.20%. Preferred ranges are 0.15 - 0.40 % and 0.20 - 0.35 %.
Manganese (1.5 - 3.1 %)
Manganese contributes to improving the hardenability of the steel. If the content is too low then the hardenability may be too low. At higher sulphur contents manganese prevents red brittleness in the steel. Manganese shall therefore be present in a minimum content of 1.5 %, preferably at least 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.8, 1.9 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 or 2.4 %. The steel shall contain maximum 3.1 %, preferably maximum 3.0, 2.9, 2.8 or 2.7 %. A preferred range is 2.3-2.7 %.
Chromium (2 4 - 3 6 %)
Chromium is to be present in a content of at least 2.4 % in order to provide a good hardenability in larger cross sections during the heat treatment. If the chromium content is too high, this may lead to the formation of high-temperature ferrite, which reduces the hot-workability. The lower limit may be 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8 or 2.9 %. The upper limit is 3.6 % and may be 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2 or 3.1 %. A preferred range is 2.7 - 3.3 %.
Nickel (0.5 - 2.0 %)
Nickel gives the steel a good hardenability and toughness. Nickel is also beneficial for the machinability and polishability of the steel. If the nickel content exceeds 2.0 % the hardenability may be unnecessary high. The upper limit may therefore be 1.9, 1.8, 1.7, 1.6, 1.5, 1.4, 1.3, 1.2 or 1.1 %. The lower limit may be 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 or 0.9 %. A preferred range is 0.85 - 1.15 %.
Molybdenum (0.1 - 0.7 %)
Mo is known to have a very favourable effect on the hardenability. Molybdenum is essential for attaining a good secondary hardening response. The minimum content is 0.1 %, and may 0.15, 0.2, 0.25 or 0.3 %. Molybdenum is a strong carbide forming element and also a strong ferrite former. The maximum content of molybdenum is therefore 0.7 %. Preferably Mo is limited to 0.65, 0.6, 0.55, 0.50, 0.45 or 0.4 %. A preferred range is 0.2 - 0.3 %.
Aluminium (0.001 - 0.06 %)
Aluminium may be used for deoxidation in combination with Si and Mn. The lower limit may be set to 0.001, 0.003, 0.005 or 0.007%) in order to ensure a good deoxidation. The upper limit is restricted to 0.06%> for avoiding precipitation of undesired phases such as A1N. The upper limit may be 0.05, 0.04, 0.035, 0.03, 0.02 or 0.015%.
Vanadium (0.01 - 0.2 %)
Vanadium forms evenly distributed primary precipitated carbides and carbonitrides of the type V(N,C) in the matrix of the steel. This hard phase may also be denoted MX, wherein M is mainly V but Cr and Mo may be present and X is one or more of C, N and B. Vanadium may therefore optionally be present to enhance the tempering resistance. However, at high contents the machinability and toughness deteriorates. The upper limit may therefore be 0.15, 0.1, 0.08, 0.06 or 0.05 %.
Nitrogen (0.006 - 0.06 %)
Nitrogen may optionally be adjusted to 0.006 - 0.06 %> in order to obtain a desired type and amount of hard phase, in particular V(C,N). When the nitrogen content is properly balanced against the vanadium content, vanadium rich carbonitrides V(C,N) will form. These will be partly dissolved during the austenitizing step and then precipitated during the tempering step as particles of nanometer size. The thermal stability of vanadium carbonitrides is considered to be better than that of vanadium carbides, hence the tempering resistance of the tool steel may be improved and the resistance against grain growth at high austenitizing temperatures is enhanced. The lower limit may be 0.011, 0.012, 0.013, 0.014, 0.015, 0.016, 0.017, 0.018, 0.019 or 0.02%. The upper limit may be 0.06, 0.05, 0.04 or 0.03 %.
Cobalt (< 8 %)
Co is an optional element. Co causes the solidus temperature to increase and therefore provides an opportunity to raises the hardening temperature, which may be 15 - 30 °C higher than without Co. During austenitization it is therefore possible to dissolve larger fraction of carbides and thereby enhance the hardenability. Co also increases the Ms temperature. However, large amount of Co may result in a decreased toughness and wear resistance. The maximum amount is 8 % and, if added, an effective amount may be 2 - 6 %, in particular 4 to 5 %. However, for practical reasons, such as scrap handling, deliberate additions of Co is not made. The maximum impurity content may then be set to 1 %, 0.5%, 0.3 %, 0.2% or 0.1%.
Tungsten (< 1 %)
In principle, molybdenum may be replaced by twice as much with tungsten because of their chemical similarities. However, tungsten is expensive and it also complicates the handling of scrap metal. The maximum amount is therefore limited to 1 %, 0.7, 0.5, 0.3 or 0.15 %. Preferably no deliberate additions are made.
Niobium (< 0.05%)
Niobium is similar to vanadium in that it forms carbonitrides of the type M(N,C) and may in principle be used to replace part of the vanadium but that requires the double amount of niobium as compared to vanadium. However, Nb results in a more angular shape of the M(N,C). The maximum amount is therefore 0.05 %, 0.03 or 0.01 %.
Preferably no deliberate additions are made.
Ti, Zr and Ta These elements are carbide formers and may be present in the alloy in the claimed ranges for altering the composition of the hard phases. However, normally none of these elements are added. Boron (< 0.01%)
B may optionally be used in order to further increase the hardness of the steel. The amount is limited to 0.01%, preferably < 0.005%). A preferred range for the optional addition of B is 0.001 - 0.004 %.
Ca, Mg and REM (Rare Earth Metals)
These elements may be added to the steel in the claimed amounts for modifying the non-metallic inclusion and/or in order to further improve the machinability, hot workability and/or weldability.
Impurity elements
P, S and O are the main non-metallic impurities, which have a negative effect on the mechanical properties of the steel. P may therefore be limited to 0.05, 0.04, 0.03 0.02 or 0.01 %. S is limited to 0.003 may be limited toO.0025, 0.0020, 0.0015, 0.0010, 0.0008 or 0.0005 %. O may be limited to 0.0015, 0.0012, 0.0010, 0.0008, 0.0006 or 0.0005 %.
Cu is not possible to extract from the steel. This drastically makes the scrap handling more difficult. For this reason, copper is not used. The impurity amount of Cu may be limited to 0.35, 0.30, 0.25, 0.20, 0.15 or 0.10 %.
Hydrogen (< 0.0005 %)
Hydrogen is known to have a deleterious effect on the properties of the steel and to cause problems during processing. In order to avoid problems related to hydrogen the molten steel is subjected to vacuum degassing. The upper limit is 0.0005 %> (5 ppm) and may be limited to 4, 3, 2.5, 2, 1.5 or 1 ppm.
Steel production The tool steel having the claimed chemical composition can be produced by
conventional metallurgy including melting in an Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) and further ladle refining and vacuum treatment and casting into ingots. The steel ingots are then subjected to Electro Slag Remelting (ESR), preferably under protective atmosphere, in order to further improve the cleanliness and the microstructural homogeneity.
The steel is subjected to hardening before being used. Austenitizing may be performed at an austenitizing temperature (TA) in the range of 850 to 950°C, preferably 880 - 920 °C. A typical TA is 900 °C with a holding time of 30 minutes followed by slow cooling. The cooling rate is defined by the time the steel subjected to the temperature range 800 °C to 500 °C, (tsoo/soo)- The cooling time in this interval, tsoo/soo, should normally lie in the interval of 4000 - 20000 s in order to get the desired bainitic micro structure with minor amounts of retained austenite and martensite. This will normally result in hardness in the range of 38-42 HRC and/or a Brinell hardness of 360-400 HBWio/3000- The Brinell hardness HBW10/3000 is measured with a 10 mm diameter tungsten carbide ball and a load of 3000 kgf (29400N).
When the steel has a thickness of at least 100 mm then the maximum deviation from the mean Brinell hardness value in the thickness direction, measured in accordance with ASTM ElO-01 , is less than 10 %, preferably less than 5 %, wherein the distance of the center of the indentation from the edge of the specimen or edge of another indentation shall be at least two and a half times the diameter of the indentation and the maximum shall be no more than 4 times the diameter of the indentation. The steels of the present invention have a uniform hardness because the composition has been optimized in order to reduce the meso-segregations, which may be formed in all type of ingots having a thickness of at least 100 mm. Meso-segregations are commonly referred to as A-type segregations, V-type segregations and Channel-type segregations and may form in all ingots having a thickness of at least 100 mm. The segregated regions have an elongated shape and a non-constant thickness of the order of 10 mm. The amount of meso-segregation increases with increasing size of the ingot and with increasing amount of heavy alloying elements like Mo (10.2 g/cm3) and W (19.3 g/cm3). The size of these segregations makes the homogenisation difficult and results in a banded structure in the forged and/or hot rolled product. The size of the bandings in the microstructure depends on the degree of reduction. A high degree of reduction leads to a smaller width of the bandings.
EXAMPLE
In this example, a steel having the following composition was produced by EAF- melting, ladle refining and vacuum degassing (VD) followed by ESR remelting under protective atmosphere (in wt. %):
C 0.10
Si 0.27
Mn 2.42
Cr 3.00
Ni 0.99
Mo 0.29
V 0.03
Al 0.017
P 0.014
s 0.001
balance iron and impurities.
The steel was cast into ingots and subjected hot working in order to produce blocks having a cross section size of 1013x346 mm.
The steel was austenitized at 900 °C for 30 minutes and hardened by slow cooling, The time for cooling (tsoo/soo) was about 8360 seconds. This resulted in a mean hardness of 365 HBWio/3ooo- The maximum deviation from the mean Brinell hardness value in the thickness direction was found to be less than 4 % as measured in accordance with ASTM ElO-01, wherein the minimum distance of the center of the indentation from the edge of the specimen or edge of another indentation was 3 times the diameter of the indentation. The mean impact energy in the LT direction was measured using a standard Charpy-V test in accordance with SS-EN IS0148-1/ASTM E23. The mean value of 6 samples was 32 J. The amount of retained austenite was estimated to be about 7 vol. %. The cleanliness of steel was examined with respect to micro-slag according to ASTM E45-97, Method A. The result is shown in Table 1.
Figure imgf000014_0001
Table 1. Result of cleanliness measurement.
This example demonstrate that a large steel block having high and uniform hardness, a high toughness and a high purity could be produced by re-melting in an ESR unit under protective atmosphere.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
The steel of the present invention is particular useful in large tool holders requiring a high toughness and a uniform hardness.

Claims

1. A steel consisting of in weight % (wt. %):
C 0.07-0.13
Si 0.10-0.45
Mn 1.5-3.1
Cr 2.4-3.6
Ni 0.5-2.0
Mo 0.1-0.7
Al 0.001-0.06
S < 0.003
optionally
N 0.006-0.06
V 0.01-0.2
Co <8
W < 1
Nb <0.05
Ti <0.05
Zr <0.05
Ta <0.05
B <0.01
Ca <0.01
Mg <0.01
REM < 0.2 balance Fe apart from impurities wherein the steel has a bainitic microstructure comprising up to 20 volume % retained austenite and up to 20 volume % martensite.
2. A steel according to claim 1 fulfilling the following requirements: C 0.08-0.12
Si 0.10-0.4
Mn 2.0-2.9
Cr 2.4-3.6
Ni 0.7-1.2
Mo 0.15-0.55
Al 0.001 -0.035 optionally
N 0.006-0.03
V 0.01 -0.08
Cu < 1
Co < 1
W <0.1
Nb <0.03
Ti <0.03
Zr <0.03
Ta <0.03
B < 0.001
Ca < 0.001
Mg <0.01
REM < 0.1
H < 0.0005
and
retained austenite 2-20 vol. %
3. A steel according to claim 1 or 2 fulfilling at least one of the following requirements:
C 0.08-0.11
Si 0.15-0.35 Mn 2.2-2.8
Cr 2.5-3.5
Ni 0.85 - 1.15
Mo 0.20-0.45
optionally
N 0.01-0.03
V 0.01 -0.06
Co <0.3
Nb <0.01
Ti <0.01
Zr <0.01
Ta <0.01
REM <0.05
H < 0.0003
and
retained austenite 5-10 vol. %.
A steel according to any of the preceding claims comprising:
C 0.08-0.11
Si 0.1-0.4
Mn 2.2-2.8
Cr 2.5-3.5
Ni 0.7-1.2
Mo 0.15-0.45
A steel according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the amount of retained austenite is 4 - 15 volume % and/or the amount of martensite is 2 - 16 volume %.
A steel according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the amount of retained austenite is 4 - 12 volume % and/or the amount of martensite is 4 - 12 volume %. A steel according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the amount of retained austenite is 5 - 9 volume % and/or the amount of martensite is 5 - 10 volume %.
A steel according to any of the preceding claims having a hardness of 38-42 HRC and/or a 360-400 HBWio/sooo-
A steel according to any of the preceding claims having a mean hardness in the range of 360-400 HBW10/3000, wherein the steel has a thickness of at least 100 mm and the maximum deviation from the mean Brinell hardness value in the thickness direction measured in accordance with ASTM El 0-01 is less than 10 %, preferably less than 5 %, and wherein the minimum distance of the centre of the indentation from the edge of the specimen or edge of another indentation shall be at least two and a half times the diameter of the indentation and the maximum distance shall be no more than 4 times the diameter of the indentation.
A steel according to any of the preceding claims having a cleanliness fulfilling the following maximum requirements with respect to micro-slag according to ASTM E45-97, Method A:
A A B B C C D D
T H T H T H T H
.0 0 1.5 1.0 0 0 1.5 1.0
PCT/SE2017/050603 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 A steel for a tool holder WO2018004419A1 (en)

Priority Applications (10)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/314,240 US11085108B2 (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 Steel for a tool holder
CN201780040527.9A CN109415793B (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 Steel for tool holder
JP2018563659A JP6956117B2 (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 Tool holder steel
RU2019102410A RU2738219C2 (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 Steel for tool holder
CA3029542A CA3029542C (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 A steel for a tool holder
MX2018016214A MX2018016214A (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 A steel for a tool holder.
EP17820638.9A EP3478867B1 (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 A steel for a tool holder
ES17820638T ES2903082T3 (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 Steel for tool holders
BR112018076330-6A BR112018076330B1 (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 STEEL FOR A TOOL HOLDER
KR1020197002582A KR102401049B1 (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 Steel for tool holders

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SE1650948-1 2016-06-30
SE1650948 2016-06-30

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2018004419A1 true WO2018004419A1 (en) 2018-01-04

Family

ID=60787569

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SE2017/050603 WO2018004419A1 (en) 2016-06-30 2017-06-07 A steel for a tool holder

Country Status (13)

Country Link
US (1) US11085108B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3478867B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6956117B2 (en)
KR (1) KR102401049B1 (en)
CN (1) CN109415793B (en)
BR (1) BR112018076330B1 (en)
CA (1) CA3029542C (en)
ES (1) ES2903082T3 (en)
MX (1) MX2018016214A (en)
PT (1) PT3478867T (en)
RU (1) RU2738219C2 (en)
TW (1) TWI756226B (en)
WO (1) WO2018004419A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113667893B (en) * 2021-08-10 2022-06-21 北京科技大学 Wear-resistant TBM cutter ring and preparation method and application thereof

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5139737A (en) * 1989-12-06 1992-08-18 Dadio Tokushuko Kabushiki Kaisha Steel for plastics molds superior in weldability
JPH07173541A (en) * 1993-12-17 1995-07-11 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Production of high strength electric resistance welded pipe for machine structural use
JPH0813088A (en) * 1994-06-27 1996-01-16 Daido Steel Co Ltd Steel for plastic molding die excellent in machinability and weldability
WO1997049838A1 (en) 1996-06-25 1997-12-31 Uddeholm Tooling Aktiebolag Use of a steel for cutting tool holders
EP0882808A1 (en) * 1997-06-04 1998-12-09 Thyssen France SA Manufacturing process for steels, suitable for big-sized moulds
RU2005120086A (en) * 2005-06-28 2007-01-10 Ооо"Красс" (Ru) HIGH-STRENGTH LOW CARBON MARTENSITAL WELDABLE STEEL AND HEAT TREATMENT METHOD
WO2009116933A1 (en) 2008-03-18 2009-09-24 Uddeholm Tooling Aktiebolag Steel, process for the manufacture of a steel blank and process for the manufacture of a component of the steel
JP2010229453A (en) * 2009-03-26 2010-10-14 Jfe Steel Corp High strength thick steel plate having excellent toughness to one layer large heat input welding affected zone and method of manufacturing the same
US20150299835A1 (en) 2008-05-06 2015-10-22 Industeel Creusot High-characteristic steel for large-size parts

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0813088B2 (en) * 1990-09-18 1996-02-07 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Image reader
JPH04297548A (en) 1991-03-27 1992-10-21 Kobe Steel Ltd High strength and high toughness non-heat treated steel and its manufacture
US6478898B1 (en) 1999-09-22 2002-11-12 Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd. Method of producing tool steels
JP4268317B2 (en) 2000-06-09 2009-05-27 新日本製鐵株式会社 Ultra-high-strength steel pipe excellent in low temperature toughness of welded portion and manufacturing method thereof
FR2838138B1 (en) * 2002-04-03 2005-04-22 Usinor STEEL FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF PLASTIC INJECTION MOLDS OR FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF WORKPIECES FOR METAL WORKING
FR2838137A1 (en) 2002-04-03 2003-10-10 Usinor STEEL FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF MOLDS FOR INJECTION MOLDING OF PLASTIC MATERIALS OR FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF TOOLS FOR THE WORKING OF METALS
JP3968011B2 (en) 2002-05-27 2007-08-29 新日本製鐵株式会社 High strength steel excellent in low temperature toughness and weld heat affected zone toughness, method for producing the same and method for producing high strength steel pipe
FR2847271B1 (en) * 2002-11-19 2004-12-24 Usinor METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING AN ABRASION RESISTANT STEEL SHEET AND OBTAINED SHEET
JP5565696B2 (en) 2009-09-18 2014-08-06 日立金属株式会社 Die steel excellent in hole workability and method for producing the same
FR2958660B1 (en) * 2010-04-07 2013-07-19 Ascometal Sa STEEL FOR MECHANICAL PIECES WITH HIGH CHARACTERISTICS AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME.
CA2899570C (en) 2013-03-15 2019-04-30 Jfe Steel Corporation Thick, tough, high tensile strength steel plate and production method therefor
KR101555097B1 (en) 2013-12-06 2015-09-23 주식회사 포스코 Die steel for plastic injection molding and manufacturing method using the same
JP6225965B2 (en) 2014-09-05 2017-11-08 Jfeスチール株式会社 Soft nitriding steel and parts, and methods for producing them

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5139737A (en) * 1989-12-06 1992-08-18 Dadio Tokushuko Kabushiki Kaisha Steel for plastics molds superior in weldability
JPH07173541A (en) * 1993-12-17 1995-07-11 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd Production of high strength electric resistance welded pipe for machine structural use
JPH0813088A (en) * 1994-06-27 1996-01-16 Daido Steel Co Ltd Steel for plastic molding die excellent in machinability and weldability
WO1997049838A1 (en) 1996-06-25 1997-12-31 Uddeholm Tooling Aktiebolag Use of a steel for cutting tool holders
EP0882808A1 (en) * 1997-06-04 1998-12-09 Thyssen France SA Manufacturing process for steels, suitable for big-sized moulds
RU2005120086A (en) * 2005-06-28 2007-01-10 Ооо"Красс" (Ru) HIGH-STRENGTH LOW CARBON MARTENSITAL WELDABLE STEEL AND HEAT TREATMENT METHOD
WO2009116933A1 (en) 2008-03-18 2009-09-24 Uddeholm Tooling Aktiebolag Steel, process for the manufacture of a steel blank and process for the manufacture of a component of the steel
US20150299835A1 (en) 2008-05-06 2015-10-22 Industeel Creusot High-characteristic steel for large-size parts
JP2010229453A (en) * 2009-03-26 2010-10-14 Jfe Steel Corp High strength thick steel plate having excellent toughness to one layer large heat input welding affected zone and method of manufacturing the same

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP3478867A4

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US11085108B2 (en) 2021-08-10
EP3478867A1 (en) 2019-05-08
RU2019102410A3 (en) 2020-07-30
JP6956117B2 (en) 2021-10-27
CA3029542C (en) 2024-02-20
BR112018076330B1 (en) 2022-06-14
EP3478867A4 (en) 2019-07-24
RU2019102410A (en) 2020-07-30
CN109415793A (en) 2019-03-01
TWI756226B (en) 2022-03-01
CA3029542A1 (en) 2018-01-04
RU2738219C2 (en) 2020-12-09
JP2019527292A (en) 2019-09-26
PT3478867T (en) 2022-01-12
KR102401049B1 (en) 2022-05-20
MX2018016214A (en) 2019-04-22
US20190226059A1 (en) 2019-07-25
KR20190071670A (en) 2019-06-24
EP3478867B1 (en) 2021-10-27
BR112018076330A2 (en) 2019-03-26
CN109415793B (en) 2021-11-30
TW201819651A (en) 2018-06-01
ES2903082T3 (en) 2022-03-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11131012B2 (en) Hot work tool steel
WO2018182480A1 (en) Hot work tool steel
AU2014377770B2 (en) Stainless steel and a cutting tool body made of the stainless steel
EP3692180A1 (en) Stainless steel, a prealloyed powder obtained by atomizing the steel and use of the prealloyed powder
US20160355909A1 (en) Stainless steel for a plastic mould and a mould made of the stainless steel
WO2018056884A1 (en) Hot work tool steel
CA3029542C (en) A steel for a tool holder
WO2021251892A1 (en) Hot work tool steel
EP2896713B1 (en) Stainless steel and a cutting tool body made of the stainless steel

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 17820638

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2018563659

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 3029542

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112018076330

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20197002582

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2017820638

Country of ref document: EP

Effective date: 20190130

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112018076330

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20181217