WO2016141359A1 - Composite ceramic coatings for anti-corrosion protection - Google Patents

Composite ceramic coatings for anti-corrosion protection Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016141359A1
WO2016141359A1 PCT/US2016/021066 US2016021066W WO2016141359A1 WO 2016141359 A1 WO2016141359 A1 WO 2016141359A1 US 2016021066 W US2016021066 W US 2016021066W WO 2016141359 A1 WO2016141359 A1 WO 2016141359A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
layer
composite ceramic
coating
zinc
composite
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2016/021066
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
George Kenneth RICE
Miguel Jose Yacaman
Ekaterina VINOGRADOVA
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
University of Texas System
University of Texas at Austin
Original Assignee
University of Texas System
University of Texas at Austin
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by University of Texas System, University of Texas at Austin filed Critical University of Texas System
Priority to US15/555,176 priority Critical patent/US10683582B2/en
Priority to MX2017011338A priority patent/MX2017011338A/en
Publication of WO2016141359A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016141359A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D9/00Electrolytic coating other than with metals
    • C25D9/04Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials
    • C25D9/08Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials by cathodic processes
    • C25D9/10Electrolytic coating other than with metals with inorganic materials by cathodic processes on iron or steel
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D3/00Electroplating: Baths therefor
    • C25D3/02Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions
    • C25D3/22Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of zinc
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D3/00Electroplating: Baths therefor
    • C25D3/02Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions
    • C25D3/56Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of alloys
    • C25D3/565Electroplating: Baths therefor from solutions of alloys containing more than 50% by weight of zinc
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D5/00Electroplating characterised by the process; Pretreatment or after-treatment of workpieces
    • C25D5/34Pretreatment of metallic surfaces to be electroplated
    • C25D5/36Pretreatment of metallic surfaces to be electroplated of iron or steel

Definitions

  • Hot-dip galvanizing is one of the most commonly used methods for protecting steel surfaces against corrosion. Another common corrosion protection method is to apply anti-corrosive paint to steel surfaces. Although hot-dip galvanized steel resists corrosion well in numerous environments, there has recently been concern of health damage to the human body caused by zinc exposure. Regarding anti-corrosive paint, the hexavalent chromium used in the production of such paint presents an environmental and health hazard. There is a need for an anti-corrosion technology that does not involve the use of hazardous chemicals or processes.
  • Fig. 1 is a flow diagram of an example method for forming and applying a composite ceramic coating.
  • Fig. 2 is a schematic drawing of an embodiment of a metal object having a composite ceramic coating.
  • Fig. 3 is a light-optical micrograph of a cross-section of an example composite ceramic coating formed on a steel plate.
  • Fig. 4 is a scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of the interface between carbon steel and the zinc layer.
  • SEM scanning electron microscopy
  • EDS energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
  • Fig. 5 is an X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the composite ceramic coating.
  • Fig. 6 is a model of the crystal structure of Zn 3 Si 4 Oio(OH) 2 .
  • Fig. 7 includes images of specimens in Q-FOG racks prior to and after salt spray testing.
  • Fig. 8 includes images of multiple samples (Samples 1 -9) tested in the salt spray testing and evaluation of the degree of rusting in accordance with ASTM D 610-01 .
  • Fig. 9 includes optical micrographs of the coated samples (specimens 1 -6) after the salt spray testing.
  • the composite ceramic coating comprises a hydrous zinc silicate layer that is applied to a metal object, such as a steel object, using an electrolytic process.
  • the composite ceramic coating is extremely resistant to corrosion and has a crystalline structure that is extremely stable.
  • the composite ceramic coating includes a composite ceramic layer that comprises both metal, such as zinc (Zn), and silicon (Si).
  • Fig. 1 is a flow diagram of an example method for preparing and applying a composite ceramic coating.
  • a metal object to be coated is pre-processed.
  • the object can comprise any object that would benefit from anti-corrosion protection.
  • the object can comprise a low-carbon steel object.
  • pre-processing comprises cleaning and/or polishing the surface of the object to improve adhesion of materials that are to be applied to the object.
  • the roughness of the surface of the object can be increased to improve mechanical adhesion.
  • the object is electrolytically plated with Zn or a Zn alloy, such as Zn-Ni, Zn-Fe, and Zn-Sn.
  • Zn or a Zn alloy such as Zn-Ni, Zn-Fe, and Zn-Sn.
  • Zn or Zn alloy such as Zn-Ni, Zn-Fe, and Zn-Sn.
  • Zn or Zn alloy layer is approximately 4 to 25 pm thick. In other embodiments, the Zn or Zn alloy layer is approximately 200 to 300 pm thick.
  • a composite plating solution can be prepared by separately preparing a Zn solution (block 14) and an Si solution (block 16).
  • the Zn solution can be prepared by placing Zn flakes in a container with water (H 2 0) and adding pellets of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) over a period of time (e.g., 1 hour) at an elevated temperature (e.g., 80°C) to cause a reaction. The reaction is continued for an extended period of time (e.g., 48 hours) and produces a solution of sodium zincate:
  • a Zn solution have been specifically identified, it is noted that, in other embodiments, a plating solution can comprise another metal material, such as aluminum (Al), nickel (Ni), tin (Sn), titanium (Ti), beryllium (Be), or copper (Cu).
  • the Si solution can be prepared by placing chunks of a high purity Si mineral, which is commercially available as "Si metal,” in a container with H 2 O and adding pellets of NaOH over a period of time (e.g., 1 hour) to cause a reaction. The reaction is continued for an extended period of time (e.g., 6 hours) and produces a clear and colorless solution of sodium silicate:
  • the sodium silicate solution can be diluted with water to a SG of approximately 1 .3.
  • the Zn solution i.e., sodium zincate solution
  • the Si solution i.e., sodium silicate solution
  • the composite plating solution block 18
  • one part of the Zn solution is mixed with two parts of the Si solution to form the composite plating solution having an Si/Zn ratio of approximately 2 to 5. This ratio enables efficient plating.
  • the composite plating solution can then be placed in a plating container in which the metal object is to be plated with the solution (block 20).
  • a metal (e.g., Zn) anode and the metal object (cathode) can be added to the composite solution (block 22).
  • the composite plating solution can be heated and a current can be applied to the solution for several minutes to form a composite ceramic layer (block 24).
  • a current of approximately 1 to 4 amps e.g., 1 amps
  • a current of approximately 0.5 to 1 amp is applied to the composite plating solution for approximately 15 to 30 minutes at a temperature of approximately 30 to 40°C.
  • a composite ceramic layer comprising hydrous zinc silicate is electrolytically deposited on the surface of the object over the Zn/Zn alloy layer.
  • the hydrous zinc silicate layer has a thickness of approximately 40 to 300 pm. In other embodiments, the hydrous zinc silicate layer has a thickness of approximately 260 to 300 pm.
  • Fig. 2 schematically illustrates a coated metal object 30 of the type that can be produced using the method of Fig. 1 .
  • a composite ceramic coating 32 has been applied to a metal object 34 having a steel body.
  • the coating 32 includes a first or inner metal layer 36 formed directly on the metal object and a second or outer composite ceramic layer 38 formed directly on the inner metal layer.
  • the inner metal layer 36 is a layer of Zn or a Zn alloy and the outer composite ceramic layer 38 is a layer of hydrous zinc silicate and the coating 32 comprises no other materials.
  • Fig. 3 shows an actual example of a steel object coated in the manner described in relation to Fig. 1.
  • the composite ceramic coating includes a first or inner metal layer comprising Zn and a second or outer composite ceramic layer comprising hydrous zinc silicate.
  • the Zn layer is approximately 49 pm thick and the hydrous zinc silicate layer is approximately 140 pm.
  • Fig. 4A shows the SEM micrograph of the interface between the carbon steel and zinc layer.
  • Figs. 4B-4D depict the element distribution maps: Zn (Fig. 4B), Fe (Fig. 4C) and 0 (Fig. 4D).
  • the SEM micrographs indicate that there is an inter-diffusion of Zn atoms onto the steel structure. Due to this inter-diffusion, an interface having a composition of Fe x Zn y is produced.
  • valves of x and y depend on the exact deposition conditions and can be controlled with the temperature of the deposition.
  • the Fe x Zn y layer composition changes with the thickness.
  • the images in Figs. 4B- 4D reveal the presence of a clear boarder between iron of the steel and Zn of the inner layer of the coating.
  • XRD X-ray diffraction
  • Fig. 5 shows the XRD pattern of the composite ceramic coating.
  • the peak positions and intensities in the pattern indicate that the sample is composed of hydrous zinc silicate, Zn 3 Si 4 Oio(OH) 2 .
  • the structure of the silicate is composed of S12O5 sheets with zinc sandwiched between sheets in octahedral sites.
  • Fig. 6 shows a model of the crystal structure of Zn 3 Si 4 Oio(OH) 2 .
  • the salt spray (fog) test is a standardized test method used to evaluate corrosion resistance of coated samples. Five hundred hours of salt spray testing was conducted in accordance with the ASTM B1 17-1 1 standard in a Q-FOG cyclic corrosion tester. During an ASTM B1 17 test, specimens are exposed to a continuous fog of a 5 wt. % solution of sodium chloride (greater concentration than sea water, which is only 1 .8% to maximum 3%) at an elevated temperature of 35°C. The justification for these extreme conditions is that a coating system that will resist these test conditions should also perform well in aggressive service environments. Five hundred hours of salt fog testing is roughly equivalent to 2.5 years in a coastal environment. Nine test specimens were used and no previous treatment was performed prior to the testing.
  • the specimens included six steel plates coated with the composite ceramic coating of this disclosure (specimens 1 -6), two Zn-coated samples (specimens 7-8), and one uncoated carbon steel plate (specimen 9).
  • Fig. 7 shows images of the specimens in their Q-FOG racks prior to and after salt spray testing.
  • the images labeled "A” contained (from bottom to top) samples 1 , 2, 3, 4, and 5 and the images labeled "B" contained (from bottom to top) samples 6, 7, 8, and 9.
  • the thicknesses of the composite ceramic coatings were measured on polished cross-sections by using an Olympus DSX500 opto-digital microscope. The results of the thickness measurements are presented in the Table 1 .
  • Table 1 Thickness of the Ceramic-Zinc Coatings
  • Fig. 8 The results of the salt spray testing for specimens 1 -9 are illustrated in Fig. 8.
  • Fig. 9 includes optical micrographs of the coated samples (specimens 1 -6) after the salt spray testing (R a is the mean surface roughness).
  • R a is the mean surface roughness.
  • SAE Society of Automotive Engineers
  • the obtained results demonstrate that the composite ceramic coated plates have excellent corrosion protection compared to the uncoated and Zn-coated plates, which suggests that the coating will be able to withstand harsh operating environments, particularly those that promote the rapid onset of red rust.
  • the best anticorrosion performance was obtained for the specimens 5 and 6, which had the highest coating thickness. Notably, however, thinner layers can still be used for less demanding applications, such as those in which the rate of corrosion is lower.
  • Micro-hardness measurements were performed on the outer layer of the composite ceramic coating and it was determined that its average hardness was approximately 58 HV, which is within range of hardness reported for electrodeposited Zn. Pull-off strength testing was also performed and showed very good adhesion of the hydrous zinc silicate to the Zn layer on the steel surface with an average value of stress at break of approximately 3.40 MPa. These hardness and adhesion results indicate that the material is resistant to mechanical scratches.
  • Tribological testing was additionally performed and indicated that the composite ceramic coating is effective in promoting the lubrication performance of engine oil by reducing the coefficient of friction by up to 10%.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Other Surface Treatments For Metallic Materials (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

In some embodiments, an anti-corrosive composite ceramic coating includes an inner metal layer formed on the surface of a metal object to be protected and an outer composite ceramic layer formed on the inner metal layer.

Description

COMPOSITE CERAMIC COATINGS
FOR ANTI-CORROSION PROTECTION
Background
Hot-dip galvanizing is one of the most commonly used methods for protecting steel surfaces against corrosion. Another common corrosion protection method is to apply anti-corrosive paint to steel surfaces. Although hot-dip galvanized steel resists corrosion well in numerous environments, there has recently been concern of health damage to the human body caused by zinc exposure. Regarding anti-corrosive paint, the hexavalent chromium used in the production of such paint presents an environmental and health hazard. There is a need for an anti-corrosion technology that does not involve the use of hazardous chemicals or processes.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following Figures. Matching reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the Figures, which are not necessarily drawn to scale.
Fig. 1 is a flow diagram of an example method for forming and applying a composite ceramic coating.
Fig. 2 is a schematic drawing of an embodiment of a metal object having a composite ceramic coating.
Fig. 3 is a light-optical micrograph of a cross-section of an example composite ceramic coating formed on a steel plate.
Fig. 4 is a scanning electron microscopy (SEM)/energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis of the interface between carbon steel and the zinc layer.
Fig. 5 is an X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the composite ceramic coating. Fig. 6 is a model of the crystal structure of Zn3Si4Oio(OH)2.
Fig. 7 includes images of specimens in Q-FOG racks prior to and after salt spray testing.
Fig. 8 includes images of multiple samples (Samples 1 -9) tested in the salt spray testing and evaluation of the degree of rusting in accordance with ASTM D 610-01 .
Fig. 9 includes optical micrographs of the coated samples (specimens 1 -6) after the salt spray testing.
Detailed Description
As described above, there is a need for an anti-corrosion technology that does not involve the use of hazardous chemicals or processes. Disclosed herein are composite ceramic coatings that can provide anti-corrosion protection to metal without such hazards. In some embodiments, the composite ceramic coating comprises a hydrous zinc silicate layer that is applied to a metal object, such as a steel object, using an electrolytic process. The composite ceramic coating is extremely resistant to corrosion and has a crystalline structure that is extremely stable.
In the following disclosure, various specific embodiments are described. It is to be understood that those embodiments are example implementations of the disclosed inventions and that alternative embodiments are possible. All such embodiments are intended to fall within the scope of this disclosure.
As expressed above, disclosed herein are composite ceramic coatings that can be formed on metal using an electrolytic process. In some embodiments, the composite ceramic coating includes a composite ceramic layer that comprises both metal, such as zinc (Zn), and silicon (Si).
Fig. 1 is a flow diagram of an example method for preparing and applying a composite ceramic coating. Beginning with block 10 of Fig. 1 , a metal object to be coated is pre-processed. The object can comprise any object that would benefit from anti-corrosion protection. For example, the object can comprise a low-carbon steel object. In some embodiments, pre-processing comprises cleaning and/or polishing the surface of the object to improve adhesion of materials that are to be applied to the object. In other embodiments, the roughness of the surface of the object can be increased to improve mechanical adhesion.
Turning next to block 12, the object is electrolytically plated with Zn or a Zn alloy, such as Zn-Ni, Zn-Fe, and Zn-Sn. This results in a layer of Zn or a Zn alloy being deposited on the surface of the object in similar manner to conventional galvanization. In some embodiments, the Zn or Zn alloy layer is approximately 4 to 25 pm thick. In other embodiments, the Zn or Zn alloy layer is approximately 200 to 300 pm thick.
Once the Zn or Zn alloy layer has been deposited, the object can be coated with a composite ceramic material. A composite plating solution can be prepared by separately preparing a Zn solution (block 14) and an Si solution (block 16). In some embodiments, the Zn solution can be prepared by placing Zn flakes in a container with water (H20) and adding pellets of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) over a period of time (e.g., 1 hour) at an elevated temperature (e.g., 80°C) to cause a reaction. The reaction is continued for an extended period of time (e.g., 48 hours) and produces a solution of sodium zincate:
Zn + 2NaOH + 2H2O→ Na2Zn(OH)4 + H2
In some embodiments, the resulting sodium zincate solution has molar ratio of approximately Zn:NaOH:H20 = 1 : 1 :6. Although a Zn solution have been specifically identified, it is noted that, in other embodiments, a plating solution can comprise another metal material, such as aluminum (Al), nickel (Ni), tin (Sn), titanium (Ti), beryllium (Be), or copper (Cu).
In some embodiments, the Si solution can be prepared by placing chunks of a high purity Si mineral, which is commercially available as "Si metal," in a container with H2O and adding pellets of NaOH over a period of time (e.g., 1 hour) to cause a reaction. The reaction is continued for an extended period of time (e.g., 6 hours) and produces a clear and colorless solution of sodium silicate:
Si + 2NaOH + H2O→ Na2SiO3 + 2H2
In some embodiments, the sodium silicate solution has a molar ratio of approximately Si:NaOH:H20 = 6: 1 : 10 and a specific gravity (SG) of approximately 1 .8 to 2.0. The sodium silicate solution can be diluted with water to a SG of approximately 1 .3.
With reference back to Fig. 1 , the Zn solution (i.e., sodium zincate solution) can be mixed with the Si solution (i.e., sodium silicate solution) to form a composite plating solution (block 18). In some embodiments, one part of the Zn solution is mixed with two parts of the Si solution to form the composite plating solution having an Si/Zn ratio of approximately 2 to 5. This ratio enables efficient plating.
The composite plating solution can then be placed in a plating container in which the metal object is to be plated with the solution (block 20). A metal (e.g., Zn) anode and the metal object (cathode) can be added to the composite solution (block 22). Next the composite plating solution can be heated and a current can be applied to the solution for several minutes to form a composite ceramic layer (block 24). In some embodiments, a current of approximately 1 to 4 amps (e.g., 1 amps) is applied to the composite plating solution for approximately 1 to 30 minutes (e.g., 5 minutes) at a temperature of approximately 25 to 90°C (e.g., 60°C). In other embodiments, a current of approximately 0.5 to 1 amp is applied to the composite plating solution for approximately 15 to 30 minutes at a temperature of approximately 30 to 40°C. During this time, a composite ceramic layer comprising hydrous zinc silicate is electrolytically deposited on the surface of the object over the Zn/Zn alloy layer. In some embodiments, the hydrous zinc silicate layer has a thickness of approximately 40 to 300 pm. In other embodiments, the hydrous zinc silicate layer has a thickness of approximately 260 to 300 pm.
Fig. 2 schematically illustrates a coated metal object 30 of the type that can be produced using the method of Fig. 1 . As shown in Fig. 2, a composite ceramic coating 32 has been applied to a metal object 34 having a steel body. As indicated in this figure, the coating 32 includes a first or inner metal layer 36 formed directly on the metal object and a second or outer composite ceramic layer 38 formed directly on the inner metal layer. In some embodiments, the inner metal layer 36 is a layer of Zn or a Zn alloy and the outer composite ceramic layer 38 is a layer of hydrous zinc silicate and the coating 32 comprises no other materials.
Fig. 3 shows an actual example of a steel object coated in the manner described in relation to Fig. 1. As can be seen in Fig. 3, the composite ceramic coating includes a first or inner metal layer comprising Zn and a second or outer composite ceramic layer comprising hydrous zinc silicate. In this example, the Zn layer is approximately 49 pm thick and the hydrous zinc silicate layer is approximately 140 pm.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was performed using a Hitachi SU1510 variable pressure electron microscope at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV. The results of the study are presented in the Fig. 4. The image in Fig. 4A shows the SEM micrograph of the interface between the carbon steel and zinc layer. The images in Figs. 4B-4D depict the element distribution maps: Zn (Fig. 4B), Fe (Fig. 4C) and 0 (Fig. 4D). The SEM micrographs indicate that there is an inter-diffusion of Zn atoms onto the steel structure. Due to this inter-diffusion, an interface having a composition of FexZny is produced. The valves of x and y depend on the exact deposition conditions and can be controlled with the temperature of the deposition. The FexZny layer composition changes with the thickness. The images in Figs. 4B- 4D reveal the presence of a clear boarder between iron of the steel and Zn of the inner layer of the coating.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of the composite ceramic coating was collected using a Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer with Cu Ka radiation (λ = 1 .5406 A) between 2Θ of 2 to 75° at a power settings of 40 kV and 44 mA. Fig. 5 shows the XRD pattern of the composite ceramic coating. The peak positions and intensities in the pattern indicate that the sample is composed of hydrous zinc silicate, Zn3Si4Oio(OH)2. The structure of the silicate is composed of S12O5 sheets with zinc sandwiched between sheets in octahedral sites. Fig. 6 shows a model of the crystal structure of Zn3Si4Oio(OH)2.
The salt spray (fog) test is a standardized test method used to evaluate corrosion resistance of coated samples. Five hundred hours of salt spray testing was conducted in accordance with the ASTM B1 17-1 1 standard in a Q-FOG cyclic corrosion tester. During an ASTM B1 17 test, specimens are exposed to a continuous fog of a 5 wt. % solution of sodium chloride (greater concentration than sea water, which is only 1 .8% to maximum 3%) at an elevated temperature of 35°C. The justification for these extreme conditions is that a coating system that will resist these test conditions should also perform well in aggressive service environments. Five hundred hours of salt fog testing is roughly equivalent to 2.5 years in a coastal environment. Nine test specimens were used and no previous treatment was performed prior to the testing. The specimens included six steel plates coated with the composite ceramic coating of this disclosure (specimens 1 -6), two Zn-coated samples (specimens 7-8), and one uncoated carbon steel plate (specimen 9). Fig. 7 shows images of the specimens in their Q-FOG racks prior to and after salt spray testing. The images labeled "A" contained (from bottom to top) samples 1 , 2, 3, 4, and 5 and the images labeled "B" contained (from bottom to top) samples 6, 7, 8, and 9. The thicknesses of the composite ceramic coatings were measured on polished cross-sections by using an Olympus DSX500 opto-digital microscope. The results of the thickness measurements are presented in the Table 1 . Table 1 : Thickness of the Ceramic-Zinc Coatings
Figure imgf000010_0001
The results of the salt spray testing for specimens 1 -9 are illustrated in Fig. 8. Fig. 9 includes optical micrographs of the coated samples (specimens 1 -6) after the salt spray testing (Ra is the mean surface roughness). As can be appreciated from these figures, the specimens having the composite ceramic coatings remained free of rust after 500 hours of exposure. This significantly exceeds the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) requirement of 96 hours of salt spray without red rust. The obtained results demonstrate that the composite ceramic coated plates have excellent corrosion protection compared to the uncoated and Zn-coated plates, which suggests that the coating will be able to withstand harsh operating environments, particularly those that promote the rapid onset of red rust. The best anticorrosion performance was obtained for the specimens 5 and 6, which had the highest coating thickness. Notably, however, thinner layers can still be used for less demanding applications, such as those in which the rate of corrosion is lower.
Micro-hardness measurements were performed on the outer layer of the composite ceramic coating and it was determined that its average hardness was approximately 58 HV, which is within range of hardness reported for electrodeposited Zn. Pull-off strength testing was also performed and showed very good adhesion of the hydrous zinc silicate to the Zn layer on the steel surface with an average value of stress at break of approximately 3.40 MPa. These hardness and adhesion results indicate that the material is resistant to mechanical scratches.
Cyclic voltammetry tests were also performed and indicated that the composite ceramic coating effectively protects the coated steel from the electrochemical attack by aggressive ions from solution, thereby providing an effective anticorrosion performance.
Tribological testing was additionally performed and indicated that the composite ceramic coating is effective in promoting the lubrication performance of engine oil by reducing the coefficient of friction by up to 10%.

Claims

CLAIMS Claimed are:
1 . An anti-corrosive composite ceramic coating comprising:
an inner metal layer formed on the surface of a metal object to be protected; and
an outer composite ceramic layer formed on the inner metal layer.
2. The coating of claim 1 , wherein the inner metal layer is a zinc or zinc alloy layer.
3. The coating of claim 1 , wherein the inner metal layer is approximately 4 to 300 pm thick.
4. The coating of claim 1 , wherein the composite ceramic layer contains zinc and silicon.
5. The coating of claim 1 , wherein the composite ceramic layer is a hydrous zinc silicate layer.
6. The coating of claim 5, wherein the hydrous zinc silicate layer is made
Figure imgf000012_0001
7. The coating of claim 1 , wherein the composite ceramic layer is approximately 40 to 300 pm thick.
8. A coated metal object protected by an anti-corrosive composite ceramic coating, the coated metal object comprising:
a steel body having a surface; and
an anti-corrosive composite ceramic coating formed on body, the coating including an inner metal layer formed on the surface and an outer composite ceramic layer formed on the inner metal layer.
9. The object of claim 8, wherein the inner metal layer is a zinc or zinc alloy layer.
10. The object of claim 8, wherein the composite ceramic layer is a hydrous zinc silicate layer.
1 1 . A method for forming an anti-corrosive coating on a metal object, the method comprising:
electrolytically plating the surface of the object with a metal to form an inner layer; and
electrolytically depositing a composite ceramic layer on top of the inner layer.
12. The method of claim 1 1 , wherein electrolytically plating the surface of the object comprises electrolytically plating the surface with zinc or a zinc alloy.
13. The method of claim 1 1 , wherein electrolytically depositing a composite ceramic layer comprises electrolytically depositing a hydrous zinc silicate layer on top of the inner layer.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein electrolytically depositing a composite ceramic layer further comprises mixing a zinc solution with a silicon solution to form a composite plating solution.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the composite plating solution has an Si:Zn ratio of approximately 2:5.
16. The method of claim 14, wherein electrolytically depositing a composite ceramic layer further comprises applying a current of approximately 0.5 to 4 amps to the composite plating solution.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein electrolytically depositing a composite ceramic layer further comprises heating the composite plating solution to a temperature of approximately 25 to 90°C.
18. The method of claim 1 1 , further comprising pre-processing the metal object before electrolytically plating the surface of the object.
19. The method of claim 19, wherein pre-processing comprises cleaning and polishing the surface of the object
20. The method of claim 18, wherein pre-processing comprises increasing the roughness of the surface of the metal object.
PCT/US2016/021066 2015-03-04 2016-03-04 Composite ceramic coatings for anti-corrosion protection Ceased WO2016141359A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/555,176 US10683582B2 (en) 2015-03-04 2016-03-04 Composite ceramic coatings for anti-corrosion protection
MX2017011338A MX2017011338A (en) 2015-03-04 2016-03-04 Composite ceramic coatings for anti-corrosion protection.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201562128126P 2015-03-04 2015-03-04
US62/128,126 2015-03-04

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016141359A1 true WO2016141359A1 (en) 2016-09-09

Family

ID=56848739

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2016/021066 Ceased WO2016141359A1 (en) 2015-03-04 2016-03-04 Composite ceramic coatings for anti-corrosion protection

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US10683582B2 (en)
MX (1) MX2017011338A (en)
WO (1) WO2016141359A1 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4013488A (en) * 1974-03-14 1977-03-22 Rederiaktiebolaget Nordstjernan Process for improving the anti-corrosion properties of steel coated with nickel or cobalt
US5068134A (en) * 1988-06-20 1991-11-26 Zaclon Corporation Method of protecting galvanized steel from corrosion
US20020012804A1 (en) * 1997-01-31 2002-01-31 Heimann Robert L. Electrolytic process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4571328A (en) 1982-09-24 1986-02-18 Teknico Industries, Inc. Aqueous hydrides
US4507713A (en) 1983-10-11 1985-03-26 Allied Corporation Wide frequency multi-phase undervoltage detection circuit
JPH0235967A (en) * 1988-07-26 1990-02-06 Kawasaki Steel Corp Pretreatment of stainless steel
JPH03260095A (en) * 1990-03-10 1991-11-20 Nkk Corp Zinc-based composite electroplated steel sheet with excellent corrosion resistance and its manufacturing method
US20050031894A1 (en) * 2003-08-06 2005-02-10 Klaus-Peter Klos Multilayer coated corrosion resistant article and method of production thereof
US20050287376A1 (en) * 2004-06-25 2005-12-29 Rochester Thomas H Corrosion protection of zinc surfaces
CN112322097B (en) * 2012-08-29 2025-08-26 赫普有限公司 Anticorrosion zinc primer coating composition comprising hollow glass spheres and conductive pigments
CN104447834B (en) * 2014-11-25 2017-03-22 廊坊师范学院 Preparation method for nano methyl zinc silicate

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4013488A (en) * 1974-03-14 1977-03-22 Rederiaktiebolaget Nordstjernan Process for improving the anti-corrosion properties of steel coated with nickel or cobalt
US5068134A (en) * 1988-06-20 1991-11-26 Zaclon Corporation Method of protecting galvanized steel from corrosion
US20020012804A1 (en) * 1997-01-31 2002-01-31 Heimann Robert L. Electrolytic process for treating a conductive surface and products formed thereby

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
YURIEVA, TM ET AL.: "Non-hydrothermal synthesis ot copper-, zinc and copper-zinc hydrosilicates.", MATERIALS RESEARCH INNOVATIONS., vol. 5, 2001, pages 3 - 11, XP055308735 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20180051386A1 (en) 2018-02-22
US10683582B2 (en) 2020-06-16
MX2017011338A (en) 2018-06-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Su et al. Effect of additives on the properties of phosphate conversion coating on electrogalvanized steel sheet
Wang et al. Duplex Ni–P–ZrO2/Ni–P electroless coating on stainless steel
Popoola et al. Surface characterization, mechanical properties and corrosion behaviour of ternary based Zn–ZnO–SiO2composite coating of mild steel
US5283131A (en) Zinc-plated metallic material
Fayomi et al. Investigation on microstructural, anti-corrosion and mechanical properties of doped Zn–Al–SnO2 metal matrix composite coating on mild steel
CN103339296A (en) Substrate with corrosion-resistant coating and method for its production
Kathavate et al. Role of nano ZnO particles in the electrodeposition and growth mechanism of phosphate coatings for enhancing the anti-corrosive performance of low carbon steel in 3.5% NaCl aqueous solution
AU604526B2 (en) Zn-based composite-plated metallic material and plating method
Fayomi et al. Anti-corrosion properties and structural characteristics of fabricated ternary coatings
Sugimura et al. Long-term corrosion protection of arc spray Zn-Al-Si coating system in dilute chloride solutions and sulfate solutions
Gang et al. Study on lanthanum salt conversion coating modified with citric acid on hot dip galvanized steel
Offoiach et al. Production and microstructural characterization of Ni matrix composite electrodeposits containing either micro-or nano-particles of Al
Hino et al. Effects of silica nanoparticle co-deposition on macrothrowing power of zinc-nickel alloy plating from an acid sulfate bath
US10683582B2 (en) Composite ceramic coatings for anti-corrosion protection
Xing et al. Microstructure and corrosion resistance of Zn-Based coatings: a comparative study
Mahieu et al. The properties of electrodeposited Zn-Co coatings
DK2770088T3 (en) Extremely corrosion resistant steel blanks and method of making them
Popoola et al. Surface modification, strengthening effect and electrochemical comparative study of Zn-Al2O3-CeO3 and Zn-TiO2-CeO3 coating on mild steel
Dutra et al. Corrosion Resistance of Zn and Zn-Ni electrodeposits: Morphological characterization and phases identification
Abdalla et al. Corrosion resistance of zinc phosphate coating formed on steel surface with different concentrations of zinc sulphate
Asgari et al. The role of texture and microstructure in optimizing the corrosion behaviour of zinc hot-dip coated steel sheets
JP4661627B2 (en) Surface-treated zinc-based plated metal material and method for producing the same
Neife et al. High-temperature thermal treatment of co-deposition of Zn-10ZnO-25Ant hill particulate composite coating on mild steel
Seker et al. Structural and Morphological Analysis of Electrogalvanized Coating on Sheet Metal
Li et al. Effect of zinc–phosphate–molybdate conversion precoating on performance of cathode epoxy electrocoat on AZ91D alloy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16759632

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: MX/A/2017/011338

Country of ref document: MX

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 16759632

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1