WO2016120728A2 - Method of improving channel quality feedback - Google Patents

Method of improving channel quality feedback Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016120728A2
WO2016120728A2 PCT/IB2016/000266 IB2016000266W WO2016120728A2 WO 2016120728 A2 WO2016120728 A2 WO 2016120728A2 IB 2016000266 W IB2016000266 W IB 2016000266W WO 2016120728 A2 WO2016120728 A2 WO 2016120728A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
transmission mode
channel quality
determining
indicator
matrix
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/IB2016/000266
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2016120728A3 (en
Inventor
Qinglin Luo
Min Zhang
Tao Yang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Alcatel Lucent SAS
Original Assignee
Alcatel Lucent SAS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Alcatel Lucent SAS filed Critical Alcatel Lucent SAS
Publication of WO2016120728A2 publication Critical patent/WO2016120728A2/en
Publication of WO2016120728A3 publication Critical patent/WO2016120728A3/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0023Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff characterised by the signalling
    • H04L1/0026Transmission of channel quality indication
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/06Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
    • H04B7/0613Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
    • H04B7/0615Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
    • H04B7/0619Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
    • H04B7/0621Feedback content
    • H04B7/0632Channel quality parameters, e.g. channel quality indicator [CQI]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/06Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
    • H04B7/0613Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission
    • H04B7/0615Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal
    • H04B7/0619Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station using simultaneous transmission of weighted versions of same signal using feedback from receiving side
    • H04B7/0636Feedback format
    • H04B7/0641Differential feedback
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/02Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
    • H04B7/04Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
    • H04B7/06Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the transmitting station
    • H04B7/0686Hybrid systems, i.e. switching and simultaneous transmission
    • H04B7/0689Hybrid systems, i.e. switching and simultaneous transmission using different transmission schemes, at least one of them being a diversity transmission scheme
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/0001Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
    • H04L1/0036Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff arrangements specific to the receiver
    • H04L1/0039Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff arrangements specific to the receiver other detection of signalling, e.g. detection of TFCI explicit signalling
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L5/00Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
    • H04L5/003Arrangements for allocating sub-channels of the transmission path
    • H04L5/0048Allocation of pilot signals, i.e. of signals known to the receiver
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L1/00Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
    • H04L1/20Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received using signal quality detector

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to mobile communication technology, and particularly to a method of improving channel quality feedback.
  • 3D MIMO promises to increase the quality of transmission by pointing the radio beam in a 3-dimentional way to a user equipment (UE) so as to focus the power more on the intended UE and avoid interference to other UEs.
  • 3 GPP RANI has decided to continue the study of full-dimensional MIMO in LTE Release 13 discussion, targeting at identifying the need for supporting full-dimensional MIMO scheme with 8/16/64 TX ports.
  • CSI channel state information
  • High-level signaling enhancement need to be proposed and evaluated. The performance of the solutions should be achieved with minimum cost of system/standardization complexity.
  • the channel reciprocity can be exploited for realizing the high potential of the 3D MIMO.
  • the channel state information (CSI) is obtained from an uplink channel sounding signal, and no CSI quantization is needed thus the performance loss due to quantization error can be avoided.
  • Simulation results show that TDD 3D MIMO, which is based on channel reciprocity, (non-codebook based precoding) can generally outperform codebook based 3D MIMO by assuming ideal channel quality indicator (CQI) feedback.
  • CQI channel quality indicator
  • the CQI feedback from a TDD UE has to be corrected with a factor determined by the eNB according to its estimation of the relative gain of TMx over TM2, where the 'TMx' means TM7, TM8, TM9, or TM10, and any other transmission modes developed by 3 GPP in future.
  • each UE has more opportunity to be allocated with multiple layers on one hand, and on the other hand high order multi-user transmission will be supported for more efficient use of the radio resources. All these features lead to a fully dynamic gain gap between TMx and TM2 depending on UE's receiving capability, thus it becomes very difficult to estimate/compensate such a gap at the eNB side without any extra UE feedback.
  • TDD CQI non-codebook based CQI
  • a CQI correction factor would be feedback to improve the current TM2 non-codebook based feedback scheme.
  • multiple alternative methods are proposed to measure and feedback the additional factor for correcting the traditional CQI for a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system.
  • a method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system comprising: transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a differential indicator to an eNB, the differential indicator indicating a relative gain of another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2.
  • the differential indicator is determined by comparing DMRS based channel quality of the another transmission mode with channel quality of the transmission mode TM2.
  • determining a DMRS based channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode based on DMRS in a previous TTI determining a channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2; determining number of antenna ports under the another transmission mode; determining a transmission mode offset level according to the DMRS based channel quality indicator, the channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2 and the number of the antenna ports; and determining the differential indicator according to the transmission mode offset level.
  • the another transmission mode at least includes transmission mode TM7, TM8, TM9 and TM10.
  • a method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system comprising: transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and at least one differential indicator to an eNB, wherein each differential indicator is used to indicate a relative receiving gain for a data stream configured for a the user equipment, respectively.
  • the normalization factor is determined according to a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2, a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
  • a method, in an eNB, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system comprising: receiving a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a differential indicator from a user equipment, wherein the differential indicator is used to indicate a relative gain of another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 or a relative receiving gain for a data stream configured for the user equipment; determining SINR for the transmission mode TM2 according to the channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2; determining an ideal SINR for the another transmission mode according to number of the antenna ports under the another transmission mode and the SINR for the transmission mode TM2; determining an ideal channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode according to the ideal SINR; correcting the ideal channel quality indicator with the differential indicator to determine a channel quality indicator the of the another transmission mode.
  • a method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system comprising: transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a first indication message to an eNB, wherein the first indication message is used to indicate a left autocorrelation receiver matrix, and the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
  • the first indication message includes: a receiver matrix indicator and at least one differential indicator, wherein each differential indicator is used to indicate a relative eigen power for a data stream configured for the user equipment, respectively.
  • determining number of antenna ports under another transmission mode determining the relative eigen power as a quotient of an eigen power of a receiver matrix under the another transmission mode for the data stream and a normalization factor; determining a offset level of a channel quality indicator of a receiver according to the number of the antenna ports and the relative eigen power; and determining the differential indicator according to the offset level.
  • the normalization factor is determined according to a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2, a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
  • a method, in an eNB, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system comprising: receiving a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a first indication message from a user equipment, wherein the first indication message is used to indicate a left autocorrelation receiver matrix, and the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix; obtaining a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and a channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode based on channel reciprocity; determining a SINR relative gain of the another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 according to the left autocorrelation receiver matrix, the channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and the channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode; determining SINR of the transmission mode TM2 according to the channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2; determining SINR of the another transmission mode according to the SINR relative gain
  • a CQI differential can be feedback to indicate the gain difference between TMx and TM2.
  • one indicator can be feedback to help the eNB to reconstruct the CQI for TMx.
  • the schemes according to the present invention will achieve significant gain for high order 3D TDD SU-MIMO or MU-MIMO.
  • Figure 1 shows a flowchart of an exemplary method for deriving a CQI differential indicator according to an embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 2 shows a flowchart of an exemplary method for deriving a CQI differential indicator according to a further embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 3 shows a flowchart of a method for improving channel quality feedback in an eNB in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system according to one embodiment of the present invention
  • Figure 4 shows a flowchart of an exemplary method for deriving a CQI differential indicator according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • Figure 5 shows a flowchart of a method for improving channel quality feedback in an eNB in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • 3 GPP specifications would be followed to define the channel quality indicator as indication of the receiving SINR before, so that the 10% BLER receiving target can be met.
  • multiple alternative schemes are proposed in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system to improve the measurement and the report of the CQIs.
  • H represents the MIMO channel
  • W represents the TMx precoder
  • S represents the signals
  • i oci represents the other cell interference
  • N represents the noise
  • G represents the user receiver
  • Y represents received signals.
  • the TMx denotes TM7, TM8, TM9 and TM10 following the definition of 3GPP TS36.213, and other potential new transmission modes that would be defined in future.
  • the system is assumed as a multi-user MIMO system, and the single-user MIMO is treated as a special case of multi-user MIMO. If user 1 is taken among the K users as the representative user for analysis (the following description would be based on user 1), then its received signal can be written as:
  • MUI multiple user interference
  • OCI represents the other cell interference
  • Noise represents noise
  • a TM2 Rk > TM2 , k ⁇ !' - ' ⁇ (autocorrelation matrix for a channel under transmission mode TM2) is used by the UE to calculate TDD CQI feedback, although ideally a TMx k ' TMx (autocorrelation matrix for a channel under transmission mode TMx) should be used.
  • the TDD eNB needs to compensate this with a factor.
  • this factor is normally obtained from an open-loop link adaptation (OLLA) mechanism based on higher layer ACK/NACKs from the UE. But since OLLA needs time to converge, it is ineffective for scenarios where the precoder changes rapidly, i.e.,
  • the SINR gain gap between TMx and TM2 can be written as:
  • both hTMc and TM 2 are perfectly known at the TDD eNB side owing to the TDD channel reciprocity.
  • the only unknown parameter to the eNB is the left side covariance R G t of the user receiver, which is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
  • a UE can measure and feedback a TM2 CQI, and simultaneously feedback a CQI differential indicator for indicating the gain of TMx over TM2.
  • the eNB will derive the TMx CQI based on this TM2 CQI and this extra indicator.
  • such a gain can be measured by the UE in a predefined way and feedback to the eNB for CQI fine-tuning.
  • it can based on the following proposal:
  • eNB can derive the CQI differential by comparing the DMPvS based channel quality and the TM2 based channel quality.
  • an exemplary method of deriving a CQI differential indicator would be described.
  • step SI 01 UE determines a DMRS based CQI of another transmission mode TMx based on the DMRS in the previous TTI. Specifically, UE can measure the effective receiving SINR, which is denoted as SINR 1 DMRS , based on the DMRS in the previous TTI. After then, this value is converted to a corresponding DMRS based CQI.
  • SINR 1 DMRS the effective receiving SINR
  • step SI 02 UE determines the CQI of the transmission mode TM2.
  • step SI 03 UE determines the number of antenna ports under another transmission mode TMx. This could be obtained by high layer configuration information, for example.
  • step S I 04 UE will determine a transmission mode offset level for the current data stream (i.e., for the current rank) based on the DMRS based CQI, the CQI of the transmission mode TM2 and the number of the antenna ports.
  • Transmission mode offset level of the current rank TM2 CQI index + 10*logl0(Number of TX Antenna Ports)- DMRS CQI index for the current rank
  • step SI 05 UE determines the CQI differential indicator according to the obtained transmission mode offset level. This could be obtained by the mapping relationship as shown in Table 1. Table 1 shows a mapping relationship between the CQI differential value and the offset level.
  • step S I 06 UE will use 2-bits CQI differential indicator to report to the eNB the CQI differential value for the current user and the current data stream, which indicates the offset level of CQI l TM2 in the transmission mode TX2 relative to CQI l DMRS of another transmission mode.
  • Scheme 2 would be discussed in the following. Different from scheme 1 , scheme 2 does not rely on the measurement for DMRS.
  • a UE can measure and feedback a TM2 CQI.
  • the UE will simultaneously feedback a single or multiple CQI differential indicator(s) for indicating the per data stream (i.e., rank) relative receiving gain ?
  • I patty factor ⁇ is the eigen power for rank i
  • ⁇ ⁇ is the element corresponding to rank i in the leading diagonal of an equivalent channel matrix.
  • the equivalent channel matrix is with respect to the receiver of the UE. Therefore, for one rank, there is a relative receiving gain, and there is a CQI differential indicator.
  • the eNB will derive the TMx CQI based on the TM2 CQI and the CQI differential indicator(s).
  • the feedback number of CQI differential indicators is determined by the number of ranks scheduled for the UE by the eNB.
  • Parameter p norm in the relative receiving gain ⁇ I P norm is a power normalization factor. For example, it could be determined with regard to the TM2 equivalent channel power in order to facilitate the CQI differential indicator derivation and feedback based on the existing LTE/LTE-A CQI table.
  • step S201 the equivalent receiving power of transmission mode TM2 is converted into a normalization factor, that is:
  • l 'TM 2 is a channel autocorrelation matrix in the transmission mode TM2.
  • Roi is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
  • step S202 the relative receiving gain I P norm is determined for the current data stream, rank i, for example.
  • step S203 SINR for the transmission mode TM2 is determined.
  • step S204 the number of the antenna ports under another transmission mode TMx is determined. This could be obtained by high layer configuration information, for example.
  • step S205 the CQI offset level of the receiver for the current data stream (i.e., for the current rank) is determined according to SINR, the number of the antenna ports and the relative receiving gain.
  • step S206 UE will determine the CQI differential indicator according to the CQI offset level. This could be obtained by the mapping relationship shown in Table 2.
  • Table 2 shows the mapping relationship between the CQI differential value of the receiver and the offset level.
  • step S207 UE uses 2-bit CQI differential indicator to report the offset level of CQi l lM2 of TM2 relative to CQl 1 TMx of another transmission mode for the current user and the current data stream/rank considering the power boosting by the receiver to the eNB.
  • Figure 3 shows a flowchart of a method of improving the channel quality feedback in an eNB in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the eNB is responsible for reconstructing TMx CQI from theTM2 CQI and the CQI differential by following the procedure given below:
  • the eNB receives a TM2 CQI and a differential indicator from UE, which indicates a relative gain of another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 or indicates a relative receiving gain for the data stream configured for the UE.
  • step S302 the eNB determines the SINR for the transmission mode TM2 according to the CQI of the transmission mode TM2.
  • step S303 the eNB determines the ideal SINR for another transmission mode according to the number of the antenna ports under the another transmission mode and the SINR for the transmission mode TM2.
  • step S304 the eNB determines the ideal channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode according to the ideal SINR.
  • step S305 the eNB corrects the ideal channel quality indicator with the differential indicator to determine a channel quality indicator of another transmission mode.
  • a UE can measure and feedback a TM2 CQI.
  • a first indication message would be feedback simultaneously, which is used to indicate the left autocorrelation receiver matrix R G i in equation 2.
  • the eNB will derive the TMx CQI based on this TM2 CQI and the above first indication message.
  • the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is reduced into a scalar, and will not impact the value of ⁇ 5/ ⁇ 3 ⁇ 4 in equation 1 , and thus does not need feedback.
  • a simple TM2 CQI would be sufficient for single antenna TDD UEs to achieve optimum performance.
  • v Gi is the eigen vector of G 1 and is the eigen power of G 1 .
  • the eigen vector v Gi can be quantized and feedback as a receiver matrix indicator (RMI).
  • the on-leading diagonal elements (i.e., eigen power for different data streams, i.e. ranks) of ⁇ 2 Gi can be quantized and feedback.
  • a UE can measure and feedback a TM2 CQI.
  • the UE will simultaneously feedback a receiver matrix indicator (RMI) for indicating the receiver matrix eigen vector, and a single or multiple CQI differential indicators for indicating the relative eigen power I P norm .
  • RMI receiver matrix indicator
  • CQI differential indicators for indicating the relative eigen power I P norm .
  • I P norm is the eigen power for rank i, and is the element corresponding to rank i in the leading diagonal of the receiver matrix. Therefore, for one rank, there is a relative eigen power, and there is a CQI differential indicator.
  • the eNB will derive the TMx CQI based on the TM2 CQI and the CQI differential indicator(s).
  • the number of RMIs and CQI differential feedbacks is determined by the number of ranks scheduled for the UE by the eNB.
  • Parameter p norm in the relative eigen power ⁇ I P norm is a power normalization factor. For example, it could be determined with regard to the TM2 equivalent channel power in order to facilitate the CQI differential indicator derivation and feedback based on the existing LTE/LTE-A CQI table.
  • step S401 the equivalent receiving power of transmission mode TM2 is converted into a normalization factor, that is:
  • l 'TM 2 is a channel autocorrelation matrix in the transmission mode TM2.
  • Roi is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
  • step S402 the relative eigen power I P norm is determined for the current data stream, rank i, for example.
  • step S403 the number of the antenna ports under another transmission mode TMx is determined. This could be obtained by high layer configuration information, for example.
  • step S404 the CQI offset level of the receiver is determined according to the number of the antenna ports and the relative eigen power.
  • step S405 the UE will determine the CQI differential indicator according to the CQI offset level. This could be obtained by the mapping relationship shown in Table 3.
  • Table 3 shows the mapping relationship between the CQI differential value of the receiver and the offset level. TMx CQI differential value Offset level
  • step S406 UE uses 2-bit CQI differential indicator to indicate the CQI differential value, so as to report the offset level of ⁇ 3 ⁇ 4 ,TM2 of TM2 relative to CQI 1 TMx of another transmission mode for the current user and the current data stream/rank considering the power boosting by the receiver to the eNB.
  • the parameter is the eigen power for rank i.
  • Table 3 shows a mapping relationship between the 2-bit receiver CQI differential value and the offset level.
  • Figure 5 shows a flowchart of a method of improving the channel quality feedback in an eNB in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system according to a further embodiment of the present invention.
  • step S501 the eNB receives a TM2 CQI and a first indication message from UE, which indicates a left autocorrelation receiver matrix, and wherein the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
  • step S502 the eNB obtains a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and a channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode based on channel reciprocity.
  • step S503 the eNB determines the SINR relative gain of the another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 according to the left autocorrelation receiver matrix, the channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and the channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode.
  • step S504 the eNB determines the SINR of the transmission mode TM2 according to the TM2 CQI.
  • step S505 the eNB determines the SINR of another transmission mode according to the SINR relative gain and the SINR of the transmission mode TM2.
  • step S506 the eNB determines the CQI of another transmission mode based on the SINR of the another transmission mode.
  • the disclosure introduces some additional indicators to correct the current TM2 CQI, so as to enhance the CQI of non-codebook based systems.
  • the enhancement will enable more adaptive resource scheduling for higher order spatial multiplexing and higher order MU-MIMO.
  • the performance of non-codebook based systems such as LTE/LTE-A TDD systems will be improved and the link performance will be more stable.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Radio Transmission System (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention provides a method of improving channel quality feedback. According to an embodiment of the present invention, it is proposed a method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising: transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a differential indicator to an eNB, the differential indicator indicating a relative gain of another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2. Through the present invention, an accurate CQI feedback is realized for a 3D MIMO TDD system. Meanwhile, the link adaptation for the TDD system according to the present invention does not rely on the open-loop link adaptation mechanism.

Description

Method of Improving Channel Quality Feedback
Field of the invention
The present disclosure relates to mobile communication technology, and particularly to a method of improving channel quality feedback.
Background of the invention
3D MIMO promises to increase the quality of transmission by pointing the radio beam in a 3-dimentional way to a user equipment (UE) so as to focus the power more on the intended UE and avoid interference to other UEs. 3 GPP RANI has decided to continue the study of full-dimensional MIMO in LTE Release 13 discussion, targeting at identifying the need for supporting full-dimensional MIMO scheme with 8/16/64 TX ports. Candidate solutions and the related requirements for UE channel state information (CSI) feedback and high-level signaling enhancement need to be proposed and evaluated. The performance of the solutions should be achieved with minimum cost of system/standardization complexity.
For a TDD system, the channel reciprocity can be exploited for realizing the high potential of the 3D MIMO. The channel state information (CSI) is obtained from an uplink channel sounding signal, and no CSI quantization is needed thus the performance loss due to quantization error can be avoided. Simulation results show that TDD 3D MIMO, which is based on channel reciprocity, (non-codebook based precoding) can generally outperform codebook based 3D MIMO by assuming ideal channel quality indicator (CQI) feedback. But it was found that since the TDD CQI (non-PMI based CQI) in LTE/LTE-A is based on the assumption of a TM2 transmission, the CQI feedback from a TDD UE has to be corrected with a factor determined by the eNB according to its estimation of the relative gain of TMx over TM2, where the 'TMx' means TM7, TM8, TM9, or TM10, and any other transmission modes developed by 3 GPP in future.
However, with the increasing of the number of antennas and especially the introduction of the complex 2D antenna array in 3D MIMO, each UE has more opportunity to be allocated with multiple layers on one hand, and on the other hand high order multi-user transmission will be supported for more efficient use of the radio resources. All these features lead to a fully dynamic gain gap between TMx and TM2 depending on UE's receiving capability, thus it becomes very difficult to estimate/compensate such a gap at the eNB side without any extra UE feedback.
There is no disclosed approach yet on how to enhance the design and feedback of non-codebook based CQI (TDD CQI) for 3D MIMO. In previous 3D MIMO evaluations, the ideal TDD CQI which is calculated by assuming knowing the downlink precoder at the UE side is assumed. This is unrealistic for practical systems.
In codebook based CQI study, researchers have mentioned that except the codebook based CQI solution, it is also possible to design a non-codebook based CQI solution which means to let the UE to determine the CQI based on DMRS measurement. The obvious drawback of such an approach is that the equivalent channel obtained from DMRS measurement represents the equivalent channel for the previous TTI. It may become outdated for the next TTI with scheduling immediately changing.
Summary of the invention
In this disclosure, it is proposed that a CQI correction factor would be feedback to improve the current TM2 non-codebook based feedback scheme. Herein, multiple alternative methods are proposed to measure and feedback the additional factor for correcting the traditional CQI for a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system.
According to a first aspect of the present invention, it is proposed a method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising: transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a differential indicator to an eNB, the differential indicator indicating a relative gain of another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2.
Advantageously, the differential indicator is determined by comparing DMRS based channel quality of the another transmission mode with channel quality of the transmission mode TM2.
Advantageously, determining a DMRS based channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode based on DMRS in a previous TTI; determining a channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2; determining number of antenna ports under the another transmission mode; determining a transmission mode offset level according to the DMRS based channel quality indicator, the channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2 and the number of the antenna ports; and determining the differential indicator according to the transmission mode offset level.
Advantageously, the another transmission mode at least includes transmission mode TM7, TM8, TM9 and TM10.
According to a second aspect of the present invention, it is proposed a method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising: transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and at least one differential indicator to an eNB, wherein each differential indicator is used to indicate a relative receiving gain for a data stream configured for a the user equipment, respectively.
Advantageously, determining SINR for the transmission mode TM2; determining number of antenna ports under another transmission mode; determining the relative receiving gain as a quotient of an eigen power of an equivalent channel matrix under the another transmission mode for the data stream and a normalization factor; determining a offset level of a channel quality indicator of a receiver according to the SINR, the number of the antenna ports and the relative receiving gain; and determining the differential indicator according to the offset level.
Advantageously, the normalization factor is determined according to a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2, a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
According to a third aspect of the present invention, it is proposed a method, in an eNB, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising: receiving a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a differential indicator from a user equipment, wherein the differential indicator is used to indicate a relative gain of another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 or a relative receiving gain for a data stream configured for the user equipment; determining SINR for the transmission mode TM2 according to the channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2; determining an ideal SINR for the another transmission mode according to number of the antenna ports under the another transmission mode and the SINR for the transmission mode TM2; determining an ideal channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode according to the ideal SINR; correcting the ideal channel quality indicator with the differential indicator to determine a channel quality indicator the of the another transmission mode.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention, it is proposed a method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising: transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a first indication message to an eNB, wherein the first indication message is used to indicate a left autocorrelation receiver matrix, and the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
Advantageously, the first indication message includes: a receiver matrix indicator and at least one differential indicator, wherein each differential indicator is used to indicate a relative eigen power for a data stream configured for the user equipment, respectively.
Advantageously, determining number of antenna ports under another transmission mode; determining the relative eigen power as a quotient of an eigen power of a receiver matrix under the another transmission mode for the data stream and a normalization factor; determining a offset level of a channel quality indicator of a receiver according to the number of the antenna ports and the relative eigen power; and determining the differential indicator according to the offset level.
Advantageously, the normalization factor is determined according to a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2, a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, it is proposed a method, in an eNB, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising: receiving a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a first indication message from a user equipment, wherein the first indication message is used to indicate a left autocorrelation receiver matrix, and the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix; obtaining a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and a channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode based on channel reciprocity; determining a SINR relative gain of the another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 according to the left autocorrelation receiver matrix, the channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and the channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode; determining SINR of the transmission mode TM2 according to the channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2; determining SINR of the another transmission mode according to the SINR relative gain and the SINR of the transmission mode TM2; and determining a channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode based on the SINR of the another transmission mode.
Multiple schemes for improving the CQI in a non-codebook based MIMO system. For example, a CQI differential can be feedback to indicate the gain difference between TMx and TM2. For example, one indicator can be feedback to help the eNB to reconstruct the CQI for TMx.
The advantages of those schemes are in that: 1) It enables accurate CQI feedback for 3D MIMO TDD systems; 2) The link adaptation of such TDD systems will no longer rely on the open-loop link adaptation mechanism which has been proved to be inefficient and difficult to converge, especially for high-order SU-MIMO or multi-user MIMO systems; 3) The eNB can predict the channel quality of next TTI. Through the present invention, the link performance will be improved and will be more stable.
In sum, the schemes according to the present invention will achieve significant gain for high order 3D TDD SU-MIMO or MU-MIMO.
Brief description of drawings
Other features, objects and advantages of the invention will become more apparent upon review of the following detailed description of non-limiting embodiments taken with reference to the drawings in which:
Figure 1 shows a flowchart of an exemplary method for deriving a CQI differential indicator according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 2 shows a flowchart of an exemplary method for deriving a CQI differential indicator according to a further embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 3 shows a flowchart of a method for improving channel quality feedback in an eNB in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system according to one embodiment of the present invention;
Figure 4 shows a flowchart of an exemplary method for deriving a CQI differential indicator according to an embodiment of the present invention; and
Figure 5 shows a flowchart of a method for improving channel quality feedback in an eNB in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system according to another embodiment of the present invention.
In the drawings, identical or like reference numerals denote identical or corresponding components or features throughout the different figures.
Detailed description of embodiments
In this disclosure, 3 GPP specifications would be followed to define the channel quality indicator as indication of the receiving SINR before, so that the 10% BLER receiving target can be met. Herein, multiple alternative schemes are proposed in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system to improve the measurement and the report of the CQIs.
Before discussing the schemes in detail, the LTE-A downlink would be modeled into the following equation:
Y = G(HWS + I0CI + N) ;
where H represents the MIMO channel, W represents the TMx precoder, S represents the signals, ioci represents the other cell interference, N represents the noise, G represents the user receiver, and Y represents received signals. In this invention, the TMx denotes TM7, TM8, TM9 and TM10 following the definition of 3GPP TS36.213, and other potential new transmission modes that would be defined in future.
Without loss of generality, the system is assumed as a multi-user MIMO system, and the single-user MIMO is treated as a special case of multi-user MIMO. If user 1 is taken among the K users as the representative user for analysis (the following description would be based on user 1), then its received signal can be written as:
Define
R*≡H1WkWk HH? ,
^oci ^oci^oci '
Rn≡nnH
then the ideal equivalent channel SINR for CQI selection can be written as:
Figure imgf000010_0001
In the above equation, MUI represents multiple user interference, OCI represents the other cell interference and Noise represents noise.
A TM2 Rk>TM2 , k ~ !' - '^ (autocorrelation matrix for a channel under transmission mode TM2) is used by the UE to calculate TDD CQI feedback, although ideally a TMx k'TMx (autocorrelation matrix for a channel under transmission mode TMx) should be used. The TDD eNB needs to compensate this with a factor. Presently, this factor is normally obtained from an open-loop link adaptation (OLLA) mechanism based on higher layer ACK/NACKs from the UE. But since OLLA needs time to converge, it is ineffective for scenarios where the precoder changes rapidly, i.e.,
1) multi-user scenario where the precoder may change per TTI with user-pairing; 2) rank adaptation scenario where the precoder may change per TTI with rank adaptation.
By assuming that the TDD MU-MIMO scheme is a zero-forcing scheme which is generally the case for most practical systems, the MUI term in the nominator can be eliminated. Then the SINR gain gap between TMx and TM2 can be written as:
^SINR = SINR\,TMx I SINR\,TM2
E{tr(GlRl TM2G" )}
= E{tr{RlJMxRGi )}
E{tr{Rl TM2RGi )} where
R Gl ≡ Gi Gi (2)
R R
In this equation, both hTMc and ™2 are perfectly known at the TDD eNB side owing to the TDD channel reciprocity. The only unknown parameter to the eNB is the left side covariance RGt of the user receiver, which is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
Based on the observation from (1), the following proposal is proposed:
Proposal 1 :
For a general TMx 3D MIMO system, a UE can measure and feedback a TM2 CQI, and simultaneously feedback a CQI differential indicator for indicating the gain of TMx over TM2. The eNB will derive the TMx CQI based on this TM2 CQI and this extra indicator.
In practical systems, such a gain can be measured by the UE in a predefined way and feedback to the eNB for CQI fine-tuning. For example, it can based on the following proposal:
Herein, eNB can derive the CQI differential by comparing the DMPvS based channel quality and the TM2 based channel quality. In the following, an exemplary method of deriving a CQI differential indicator would be described.
As shown in Figure 1 , in step SI 01 , UE determines a DMRS based CQI of another transmission mode TMx based on the DMRS in the previous TTI. Specifically, UE can measure the effective receiving SINR, which is denoted as SINR1 DMRS , based on the DMRS in the previous TTI. After then, this value is converted to a corresponding DMRS based CQI.
In step SI 02, UE determines the CQI of the transmission mode TM2.
In step SI 03, UE determines the number of antenna ports under another transmission mode TMx. This could be obtained by high layer configuration information, for example.
Then, in step S I 04, UE will determine a transmission mode offset level for the current data stream (i.e., for the current rank) based on the DMRS based CQI, the CQI of the transmission mode TM2 and the number of the antenna ports.
For example, this could be obtained by the following equation:
Transmission mode offset level of the current rank = TM2 CQI index + 10*logl0(Number of TX Antenna Ports)- DMRS CQI index for the current rank
Lastly, in step SI 05, UE determines the CQI differential indicator according to the obtained transmission mode offset level. This could be obtained by the mapping relationship as shown in Table 1. Table 1 shows a mapping relationship between the CQI differential value and the offset level.
TMx CQI differential value Offset level
0 < 0
1 1
2 2 3 >3
Table 1 Mapping transmission mode CQI differential value to offset level
Then, in step S I 06, UE will use 2-bits CQI differential indicator to report to the eNB the CQI differential value for the current user and the current data stream, which indicates the offset level of CQIl TM2 in the transmission mode TX2 relative to CQIl DMRS of another transmission mode.
Scheme 2 would be discussed in the following. Different from scheme 1 , scheme 2 does not rely on the measurement for DMRS.
In this scheme, for a general TMx 3D MIMO system, a UE can measure and feedback a TM2 CQI. In the present invention, the UE will simultaneously feedback a single or multiple CQI differential indicator(s) for indicating the per data stream (i.e., rank) relative receiving gain ? I p„orm■ Herein, is the eigen power for rank i, and λί is the element corresponding to rank i in the leading diagonal of an equivalent channel matrix. Herein, the equivalent channel matrix is with respect to the receiver of the UE. Therefore, for one rank, there is a relative receiving gain, and there is a CQI differential indicator. The eNB will derive the TMx CQI based on the TM2 CQI and the CQI differential indicator(s).
In practice, the feedback number of CQI differential indicators is determined by the number of ranks scheduled for the UE by the eNB.
Parameter pnorm in the relative receiving gain ^ I Pnorm is a power normalization factor. For example, it could be determined with regard to the TM2 equivalent channel power in order to facilitate the CQI differential indicator derivation and feedback based on the existing LTE/LTE-A CQI table.
In the following, an exemplary method of deriving a CQI differential indicator would be described.
As shown in Figure.2, in step S201 , the equivalent receiving power of transmission mode TM2 is converted into a normalization factor, that is:
Pm = E{tr(RlJM2RGi )}
In the above equation, l'™2 is a channel autocorrelation matrix in the transmission mode TM2. Roi is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
Then, in step S202, the relative receiving gain I Pnorm is determined for the current data stream, rank i, for example.
In step S203, SINR for the transmission mode TM2 is determined.
In step S204, the number of the antenna ports under another transmission mode TMx is determined. This could be obtained by high layer configuration information, for example.
Then, in step S205, the CQI offset level of the receiver for the current data stream (i.e., for the current rank) is determined according to SINR, the number of the antenna ports and the relative receiving gain.
For example, it could be obtained by the following equation:
Receiver CQI offset level of the current rank i =
CQI level for (TM2 SINR + 10*logl0(Number of TX Ports)) - CQI level for (TM2 SINR +10*logl 0( 42 /^on» )).
Then, in step S206, UE will determine the CQI differential indicator according to the CQI offset level. This could be obtained by the mapping relationship shown in Table 2. Table 2 shows the mapping relationship between the CQI differential value of the receiver and the offset level.
Figure imgf000014_0001
Table 2 Mapping transmission mode CQI differential value to offset level Then, in step S207, UE uses 2-bit CQI differential indicator to report the offset level of CQil lM2 of TM2 relative to CQl1 TMx of another transmission mode for the current user and the current data stream/rank considering the power boosting by the receiver to the eNB.
Figure 3 shows a flowchart of a method of improving the channel quality feedback in an eNB in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system according to an embodiment of the present invention. The eNB is responsible for reconstructing TMx CQI from theTM2 CQI and the CQI differential by following the procedure given below:
CQITM2 >SINRTM2 + ideal ArrayGain , flftR^ > CQI ^ ^ ) CQITMx
It will be described in detail with respect to Fig.3. As shown in Fig.3, in step S301 , the eNB receives a TM2 CQI and a differential indicator from UE, which indicates a relative gain of another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 or indicates a relative receiving gain for the data stream configured for the UE.
In step S302, the eNB determines the SINR for the transmission mode TM2 according to the CQI of the transmission mode TM2.
In step S303, the eNB determines the ideal SINR for another transmission mode according to the number of the antenna ports under the another transmission mode and the SINR for the transmission mode TM2.
In step S304, the eNB determines the ideal channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode according to the ideal SINR.
In step S305, the eNB corrects the ideal channel quality indicator with the differential indicator to determine a channel quality indicator of another transmission mode.
In the following, scheme 3 is further proposed according to equation 2.
Scheme 3 :
For a general TMx 3D MIMO system, a UE can measure and feedback a TM2 CQI. In scheme 3, a first indication message would be feedback simultaneously, which is used to indicate the left autocorrelation receiver matrix RGi in equation 2. The eNB will derive the TMx CQI based on this TM2 CQI and the above first indication message.
For a single antenna UE, the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is reduced into a scalar, and will not impact the value of Δ5/Λ¾ in equation 1 , and thus does not need feedback. Hence, a simple TM2 CQI would be sufficient for single antenna TDD UEs to achieve optimum performance.
For UEs with larger number of antennas, by writing the receiver matrix into its SVD decomposition, it will become:
Where vGi is the eigen vector of G1 and is the eigen power of G1 . The eigen vector vGi can be quantized and feedback as a receiver matrix indicator (RMI). The on-leading diagonal elements (i.e., eigen power for different data streams, i.e. ranks) of ∑2 Gi can be quantized and feedback.
In the following, the scheme would be discussed in detail.
For a general TMx 3D MIMO system, a UE can measure and feedback a TM2 CQI. In this scheme 3, the UE will simultaneously feedback a receiver matrix indicator (RMI) for indicating the receiver matrix eigen vector, and a single or multiple CQI differential indicators for indicating the relative eigen power I Pnorm . Herein, is the eigen power for rank i, and is the element corresponding to rank i in the leading diagonal of the receiver matrix. Therefore, for one rank, there is a relative eigen power, and there is a CQI differential indicator. The eNB will derive the TMx CQI based on the TM2 CQI and the CQI differential indicator(s).
Herein, the number of RMIs and CQI differential feedbacks is determined by the number of ranks scheduled for the UE by the eNB.
Parameter pnorm in the relative eigen power ^ I Pnorm is a power normalization factor. For example, it could be determined with regard to the TM2 equivalent channel power in order to facilitate the CQI differential indicator derivation and feedback based on the existing LTE/LTE-A CQI table.
In the following, an exemplary method of deriving a CQI differential indicator would be described.
As shown in Figure.4, in step S401 , the equivalent receiving power of transmission mode TM2 is converted into a normalization factor, that is:
Firstly, the equivalent receiving power of TM2 is converted into a normalization factor:
Pnorm = E{HR^TM2RG }
In the above equation, l'™2 is a channel autocorrelation matrix in the transmission mode TM2. Roi is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
Then, in step S402, the relative eigen power I Pnorm is determined for the current data stream, rank i, for example. In step S403, the number of the antenna ports under another transmission mode TMx is determined. This could be obtained by high layer configuration information, for example.
In step S404, the CQI offset level of the receiver is determined according to the number of the antenna ports and the relative eigen power.
For example, it could be obtained by the following equation:
Receiver CQI offset level of the current rank i =
CQI level for 10*logl0(Number of TX Ports) - CQI level for 10*logl 0( 42 / >-» ).
Then, in step S405, the UE will determine the CQI differential indicator according to the CQI offset level. This could be obtained by the mapping relationship shown in Table 3. Table 3 shows the mapping relationship between the CQI differential value of the receiver and the offset level. TMx CQI differential value Offset level
0 < 0
1 1
2 2
3 >3
Table 3 Mapping transmission mode CQI differential value to offset level
Then, in step S406, UE uses 2-bit CQI differential indicator to indicate the CQI differential value, so as to report the offset level of <¾ ,TM2 of TM2 relative to CQI1 TMx of another transmission mode for the current user and the current data stream/rank considering the power boosting by the receiver to the eNB.
Herein, the parameter is the eigen power for rank i. Table 3 shows a mapping relationship between the 2-bit receiver CQI differential value and the offset level.
Figure imgf000018_0001
Table 2 Mapping transmission mode CQI differential value to offset level
Figure 5 shows a flowchart of a method of improving the channel quality feedback in an eNB in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system according to a further embodiment of the present invention.
In step S501 , the eNB receives a TM2 CQI and a first indication message from UE, which indicates a left autocorrelation receiver matrix, and wherein the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
In step S502, the eNB obtains a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and a channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode based on channel reciprocity.
In step S503, the eNB determines the SINR relative gain of the another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 according to the left autocorrelation receiver matrix, the channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and the channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode.
In step S504, the eNB determines the SINR of the transmission mode TM2 according to the TM2 CQI.
In step S505, the eNB determines the SINR of another transmission mode according to the SINR relative gain and the SINR of the transmission mode TM2.
In step S506, the eNB determines the CQI of another transmission mode based on the SINR of the another transmission mode.
In sum, the disclosure introduces some additional indicators to correct the current TM2 CQI, so as to enhance the CQI of non-codebook based systems. The enhancement will enable more adaptive resource scheduling for higher order spatial multiplexing and higher order MU-MIMO. With the CQI enhancement, the performance of non-codebook based systems such as LTE/LTE-A TDD systems will be improved and the link performance will be more stable.
It shall be appreciated that the foregoing embodiments are merely illustrative but will not limit the invention. Any technical solutions without departing from the spirit of the invention shall fall into the scope of invention, including that different technical features, methods appearing in different embodiments are used to combine to advantage. Besides, any reference numerals in the claims shall not be taken as limiting the claims where they appear. Furthermore it will be apparent that the term "comprise" will not preclude another element(s) or step(s), and the term "a/an" preceding an element will not preclude "a plurality of such elements.

Claims

1. A method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality- feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising:
transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a differential indicator to an eNB, the differential indicator indicating a relative gain of another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2.
2. A method according to claim 1 , characterized in that, the differential indicator is determined by comparing DMRS based channel quality of the another transmission mode with channel quality of the transmission mode TM2.
3. A method according to claim 2, characterized in that:
determining a DMRS based channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode based on DMRS in a previous TTI;
determining a channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2; determining number of antenna ports under the another transmission mode;
determining a transmission mode offset level according to the DMRS based channel quality indicator, the channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2 and the number of the antenna ports; and
determining the differential indicator according to the transmission mode offset level.
4. A method according to claim 1 , characterized in that, the another transmission mode at least includes transmission mode TM7, TM8, TM9 and TM10.
5. A method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising:
transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and at least one differential indicator to an eNB, wherein each differential indicator is used to indicate a relative receiving gain for a data stream configured for the user equipment, respectively.
6. A method according to claim 5, characterized in that,
determining SINR for the transmission mode TM2;
determining number of antenna ports under another transmission mode; determining the relative receiving gain as a quotient of an eigen power of an equivalent channel matrix under the another transmission mode for the data stream and a normalization factor;
determining a offset level of a channel quality indicator of a receiver according to the SINR, the number of the antenna ports and the relative receiving gain; and
determining the differential indicator according to the offset level.
7. A method according to claim 6, characterized in that, the normalization factor is determined according to a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2, a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
8. A method according to claim 6, characterized in that, the another transmission mode at least includes transmission mode TM7, TM8, TM9 and TM10.
9. A method, in an eNB, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising:
receiving a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a differential indicator from a user equipment, wherein the differential indicator is used to indicate a relative gain of another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 or a relative receiving gain for a data stream configured for the user equipment;
determining SINR for the transmission mode TM2 according to the channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2;
determining an ideal SINR for the another transmission mode according to number of the antenna ports under the another transmission mode and the SINR for the transmission mode TM2;
determining an ideal channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode according to the ideal SINR;
correcting the ideal channel quality indicator with the differential indicator to determine a channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode.
10. A method according to claim 9, characterized in that, the another transmission mode at least includes transmission mode TM7, TM8, TM9 and TM10.
11. A method, in a user equipment, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising:
transmitting a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a first indication message to an eNB, wherein the first indication message is used to indicate a left autocorrelation receiver matrix, and the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
12. A method according to claim 11 , characterized in that, the first indication message includes: a receiver matrix indicator and at least one differential indicator, wherein each differential indicator is used to indicate a relative eigen power for a data stream configured for the user equipment, respectively.
13. A method according to claim 12, characterized in that,
determining number of antenna ports under another transmission mode; determining the relative eigen power as a quotient of an eigen power of a receiver matrix under the another transmission mode for the data stream and a normalization factor;
determining a offset level of a channel quality indicator of a receiver according to the number of the antenna ports and the relative eigen power; and
determining the differential indicator according to the offset level.
14. A method according to claim 13, characterized in that, the normalization factor is determined according to a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2, a receiver matrix and its transport matrix.
15. A method, in an eNB, of improving channel quality feedback in a non-codebook based 3D MIMO system, the method comprising:
receiving a channel quality indicator of a transmission mode TM2 and a first indication message from a user equipment, wherein the first indication message is used to indicate a left autocorrelation receiver matrix, and the left autocorrelation receiver matrix is a product of a receiver matrix and its transport matrix;
obtaining a channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and a channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode based on channel reciprocity;
determining a SINR relative gain of the another transmission mode relative to the transmission mode TM2 according to the left autocorrelation receiver matrix, the channel autocorrelation matrix under the transmission mode TM2 and the channel autocorrelation matrix under another transmission mode;
determining SINR of the transmission mode TM2 according to the channel quality indicator of the transmission mode TM2;
determining SINR of the another transmission mode according to the SINR relative gain and the SINR of the transmission mode TM2; and
determining a channel quality indicator of the another transmission mode based on the SINR of the another transmission mode.
PCT/IB2016/000266 2015-01-30 2016-01-26 Method of improving channel quality feedback Ceased WO2016120728A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN201510052051.3A CN105991176B (en) 2015-01-30 2015-01-30 A method for improving channel quality feedback
CN201510052051.3 2015-01-30

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016120728A2 true WO2016120728A2 (en) 2016-08-04
WO2016120728A3 WO2016120728A3 (en) 2016-10-13

Family

ID=55586342

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2016/000266 Ceased WO2016120728A2 (en) 2015-01-30 2016-01-26 Method of improving channel quality feedback

Country Status (3)

Country Link
CN (1) CN105991176B (en)
TW (1) TW201637390A (en)
WO (1) WO2016120728A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108631844B (en) * 2017-03-24 2021-05-18 电信科学技术研究院 Method, terminal and network side equipment for acquiring channel state information

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8249518B2 (en) * 2003-12-29 2012-08-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Network controlled feedback for MIMO systems
JP4487768B2 (en) * 2004-12-27 2010-06-23 日本電気株式会社 Radio transmission apparatus and transmission power adjustment method thereof
CN1960568A (en) * 2005-11-03 2007-05-09 北京三星通信技术研究有限公司 Method for reducing data transmission delay of switching sectors
CN101741523B (en) * 2009-12-11 2012-09-19 中国科学技术大学 Method for limiting feedback of feedback code word space threshold of multi-user multi-aerial system
KR101780503B1 (en) * 2010-10-06 2017-09-21 언와이어드 플래넷 인터내셔널 리미티드 Apparatus and method for transmitting and receiving data
EP2509364B1 (en) * 2011-04-08 2013-12-11 Alcatel Lucent Transmission method and mobile station to carry out the method
EP2627116A1 (en) * 2012-02-13 2013-08-14 Alcatel Lucent Method for selecting a feedback mode for a wireless transmission, first network node, and second network node thereof
US9591429B2 (en) * 2012-05-11 2017-03-07 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for managing machine-type communications
US8873665B2 (en) * 2012-11-21 2014-10-28 Intel Mobile Communications GmbH Communication devices and methods for receiving data
WO2014123386A1 (en) * 2013-02-08 2014-08-14 Lg Electronics Inc. Method and apparatus for reporting downlink channel state
US20140301298A1 (en) * 2013-04-05 2014-10-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for transmission restriction and efficient signaling

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2016120728A3 (en) 2016-10-13
CN105991176A (en) 2016-10-05
TW201637390A (en) 2016-10-16
CN105991176B (en) 2019-10-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8615052B2 (en) Enhanced channel feedback for multi-user MIMO
US10374678B2 (en) Channel state information feedback method and apparatus
CN103444115B (en) Enhanced node B and method for precoding with reduced quantization error
KR101682260B1 (en) Techniques for channel state information feedback in wireless communication system
KR101752824B1 (en) Method and apparatus for feedback in multi user-multiple input multiple output system
US8923427B2 (en) Codebook sub-sampling for frequency-selective precoding feedback
US9847825B2 (en) Codebook based channel information feedback method, device and system
KR101723263B1 (en) Method of feeding back mu-cqi in a communication system, transmission point device, and user equipment
US9866360B2 (en) User equipment apparatus and method for feeding back channel state information in a wireless communication system
US9985700B2 (en) Channel state feedback enhancement in downlink multiuser superposition transmission
US8593989B2 (en) Method and device for determining CQI value in coordinated multi-point transmission/reception
EP2828984B1 (en) Artificial interference injection for channel state information reporting
WO2012110863A1 (en) Method of determining a channel state in coordinated multipoint transmission
KR20130006682A (en) Method and apparatus for information feedback and pre-coding
US8718157B2 (en) Dual indicator scheme for channel state information feedback
KR20110093560A (en) Multiple input / output communication method and system for exchanging cooperative rank information for neighbor cell
US9686005B2 (en) Method and apparatus for feeding back channel estimation in multi-input multi-output system
EP2557718A1 (en) Method and device for performing hierarchy feedback with space information assisted
WO2017076347A1 (en) Method and terminal for use in quantized feedback of channel status information
US9048970B1 (en) Feedback for cooperative multipoint transmission systems
WO2016120728A2 (en) Method of improving channel quality feedback
CN114208050B (en) Adaptive kronecker product MIMO precoding for multi-antenna network entities and wireless communication devices and corresponding methods
US20140307838A1 (en) Receiver
KR101806311B1 (en) Network mimo communication system of using regularized beamforing
WO2013113975A1 (en) Signaling of reference symbol interference characteristics for advanced ue receivers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16710807

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 16710807

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2