WO2015179071A1 - Tabular format transaction editor - Google Patents
Tabular format transaction editor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2015179071A1 WO2015179071A1 PCT/US2015/027849 US2015027849W WO2015179071A1 WO 2015179071 A1 WO2015179071 A1 WO 2015179071A1 US 2015027849 W US2015027849 W US 2015027849W WO 2015179071 A1 WO2015179071 A1 WO 2015179071A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- inputs
- tabular format
- computer
- runtime code
- code
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/30—Creation or generation of source code
- G06F8/35—Creation or generation of source code model driven
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/30—Creation or generation of source code
- G06F8/34—Graphical or visual programming
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/30—Creation or generation of source code
- G06F8/38—Creation or generation of source code for implementing user interfaces
Definitions
- This disclosure generally relates to the field of computing devices. More particularly, the disclosure relates to computer code generation.
- Computer code is typically generated manually by computer programmers.
- the computer code is required to provide functionality to perform a task or resolve a problem in a certain field of knowledge.
- Specialists in that field of knowledge are often unfamiliar with the intricacies of computer programming and have to rely on computer programmers to interpret their specifications to produce computer code.
- previous configurations do not generate production ready code for an application without utilizing an intermediary that manually generates the code for an application that is customized for the user.
- Such previous configurations are limited to systems that most users are unfamiliar with and often have difficulty utilizing.
- a process receives a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor. Further, the process generates, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
- a computer program product includes a computer useable medium having a computer readable program.
- the computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to receive a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor. Further, the computer readable program when executed on the computer causes the computer to generate, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
- an apparatus comprises a computing device that receives a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor and generates runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
- Figure 1 illustrates a tabular format transaction editor configuration.
- Figure 2 illustrates an example of a graphical representation of the transaction editor illustrated in Figure 1 .
- Figure 3 illustrates an example of a display screen generated by the code generation engine for the application illustrated in Figure 1 according to the tabular format inputs provided in the graphical representation illustrated in Figure 2.
- Figure 4 illustrates a process that may be utilized to generate the application illustrated in Figure 1 via the tabular format transaction editor illustrated in Figure 1 .
- Figure 5 illustrates a block diagram of a station or system that performs code generation.
- a method, system, apparatus, and computer program product may be utilized to provide a tabular transaction editor.
- the tabular transaction editor receives inputs and generates runtime code based upon the inputs so that an application is generated.
- the application is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
- An example of a tabular transaction editor is a spreadsheet program. Users such as business analysts may be unfamiliar with the intricacies of computer programming, but are often quite familiar with utilization of a spreadsheet program. For instance, many business analysts utilize spreadsheets programs as their main application to perform various tasks on a regular basis.
- the tabular format transaction editor allows a user to provide inputs to a tabular transaction editor that the user is familiar with, e.g., a spreadsheet program, and then generate production ready code for an application, e.g., a portal, from the tabular transaction editor.
- the application may then be operated by an application user independently of the tabular transaction editor.
- a business analyst may provide inputs to a spreadsheet program to generate a portal webpage that displays the status of an application user account associated with a business entity.
- the business analyst may implement the portal webpage to operate independently of the spreadsheet program.
- the business analyst generates the production ready code for the portal webpage with the spreadsheet program such that the portal webpage may then be deployed to a server for operation.
- the portal webpage may operate independently of the spreadsheet program after deployment to the server.
- business analysts and other professionals are able to utilize the tabular format transaction editor to generate production ready code for an application without having any computer code writing knowledge.
- Business analysts and other professionals do not have to utilize intermediaries and wait for extended periods of time for such intermediaries to prepare production ready code for them.
- the applications e.g., portals, may be generated according to a familiar format for business analysts and other professionals, e.g., a tabular format, without business analysts and other professionals having to write any code in a computer programming language format.
- spreadsheet program is provided as an example of a tabular format transaction editor
- other programs that utilize a tabular format may be utilized instead of a spreadsheet program.
- other types of applications other than portal webpages may be generated from the tabular format transaction editor. Examples of such other applications include databases, shells for applications, testing applications, etc.
- FIG 1 illustrates a tabular format transaction editor configuration 100.
- a user 102 provides a variety of inputs to a tabular format transaction editor 104.
- the tabular format transaction editor 104 may be a spreadsheet program or a variety of other types of programmable editors that have a tabular format.
- the tabular format has a plurality of rows, columns, and/or rows and columns that are referred to as cells.
- the user 102 provides input to the tabular format transaction editor 104 in the various cells.
- a user 102 such as a business analyst may provide inputs in a familiar format such as the tabular format provided by a spreadsheet program. Those tabular format inputs are then provided to a code generation engine 106.
- the code generation engine 106 generates an intermediary set of code between the tabular format transaction editor 104 code and an operating system.
- the intermediary set of code is represented as metadata.
- Various other formats may be utilized for the intermediary set of code.
- the code generation engine 106 may then utilize a processor to translate the tabular format inputs into the intermediate set of code.
- the intermediary set of code may be platform independent or specific to a given platform. Accordingly, the code generation engine 106 may receive tabular format inputs in a variety of different computer programming language formats from a variety of different types of computing devices.
- a computing device may be a personal computer, laptop, notebook computer, smartphone, tablet device, etc.
- an application 108 that is production ready is generated without the user 102 having to manually generate any computer code.
- the code generation engine 106 automatically generates the code for the application 108.
- the code generation engine 106 also compiles the code for the application 108 into a machine readable format.
- the code generation engine 106 may compile the code for the application 108 into particular machine readable code for a particular operating system or may compile a variety of sets of machine readable code for different operating systems.
- the code generation engine 106 may receive a command from the user 102 to compile the code or may automatically compile the code.
- the application 108 may then be deployed through a network 1 10 to a server 1 12.
- the application 108 may be deployed via a command from the user 102 or automatically after generation of the application 108.
- a web portal may be generated and deployed to the server 1 12 for operation.
- the tabular format inputs provided by the user 102 may vary for different applications.
- the tabular format inputs may be database fields for a database application whereas the tabular format inputs may be list of properties for a server application.
- the tabular format inputs represent the components of the application.
- the components of the application may be the graphical components that are represented in the application.
- Figure 2 illustrates an example of a graphical representation 200 of the transaction editor 104 illustrated in Figure 1 .
- the graphical representation 200 provides a spreadsheet format in which the user 102, e.g., a business analyst, illustrated in Figure 1 may provide inputs to generate a product order web portal.
- the graphical representation 200 provides categories such as screen details and field list.
- a variety of other types of application components may be utilized as the application components may customized for the particular user 102.
- the screen details include some information that may or may not be displayed to the user 102, e.g., version, authentication, server, etc. Further, the screen details include some information that is displayed to the user such as ScreenDisplayLabel. This particular example as a ScreenDisplayLabel of Product Order Entry. Accordingly, the display screen will display the label Product Order Entry.
- ScreenDisplayLabel This particular example as a ScreenDisplayLabel of Product Order Entry. Accordingly, the display screen will display the label Product Order Entry.
- the field list provides the user 102 with the ability to arrange various fields and other data that is displayed by the application 108.
- the user 102 may assign a particular sequence for display to the fields and other data. Further, the user may assign positions of the fields and other data through logical rows and/or logical columns. Logical rows are illustrated for illustrative purposes. For example, the user 102 may assign fields such as ProductID, ProductName, Quantity, and Price to a first logical row. Further, the user 102 may then assign fields such as Button. Ok and Button. Cancel to a second logical row. Various properties such as Content, Condition, and FieldLabel may then be specified. [0031] Accordingly, the user 102 may automatically generate the application 108 without having any computer programming language knowledge. The user 102 may construct an application 108 by arranging and determining parameters in a tabular format.
- Figure 3 illustrates an example of a display screen 300 generated by the code generation engine 106 for the application 108 illustrated in Figure 1 according to the tabular format inputs provided in the graphical representation 200 illustrated in Figure 2.
- the display screen 300 is labeled Product Order Entry as specified by the tabular format input for ScreenDisplayLabel.
- the display screen 300 illustrates a variety of fields such as Product ID, Product Name, Quantity, and Price in a first logical row as specified by the tabular format input.
- the field names are specified by the FieldLabel component illustrated in Figure 2. Some fields may require input from the user whereas other fields may automatically derive a parameter for display.
- the ProductID field has a mandatory condition. Accordingly, the Product ID field requires an input from an application user.
- the ProductName field has a derived condition. Accordingly, the ProductName may be automatically determined based upon the ProductID inputted by the application user.
- the display screen 300 also displays buttons such an Ok button and a Cancel button according to the tabular format input for a second logical row. The application user marks buttons for these components as a button parameter was utilized for these components in the tabular format inputs.
- the display screen 300 is an example of a display screen for the application 108.
- the application 108 may be operated independently of the tabular format transaction editor 104.
- the user 102 e.g., a business analyst, may provide the tabular inputs in the transaction editor 104 to automatically generate the code for the application 108 via the code generation engine 106.
- the application 108 may then be operated by an application user independently of the transaction editor 104.
- the tabular format transaction editor 104 allows the user 102 to generate code by positioning application components into a virtual matrix, e.g., the tabular format. Further, the tabular format transaction editor 104 may be utilized to link a variety of different tabular formats, e.g., spreadsheets, together.
- the display screen 300 may illustrate only a portion of a product entry web portal.
- the product entry web portal may have a variety of web pages that are linked together.
- the tabular format transaction editor 104 allows the user 102 to construct each page of the web portal and then link those web portal pages together.
- Such linking may be performed by tabular format inputs, e.g., reference fields within the various tabular formats.
- Various spatial relationships and database operations, e.g., joins, sorts, etc., may be performed on the various tabular formats.
- Figure 4 illustrates a process 400 that may be utilized to generate the application 108 illustrated in Figure 1 via the tabular format transaction editor 104 illustrated in Figure 1 .
- the process 400 receives a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor.
- the process 400 generates, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
- the processes described herein may be implemented in a general, multi-purpose or single purpose processor. Such a processor will execute instructions, either at the assembly, compiled or machine-level, to perform the processes. Those instructions can be written by one of ordinary skill in the art following the description of the figures corresponding to the processes and stored or transmitted on a computer readable medium. The instructions may also be created using source code, intermediary language or any other known computer-aided design tool.
- a computer readable medium may be any medium capable of carrying those instructions and include a CD-ROM, DVD, magnetic or other optical disc, tape, silicon memory (e.g., removable, nonremovable, volatile or non-volatile), packetized or non-packetized data through wireline or wireless transmissions locally or remotely through a network.
- a computer is herein intended to include any device that has a general, multi-purpose or single purpose processor as described above.
- the transaction editor configurations described herein are device-independent as they may be utilized to generate code for a variety of types of computing devices such as personal computers, laptops, tablet devices, smartphones, kiosks, set top boxes, etc.
- FIG. 5 illustrates a block diagram of a station or system 500 that performs code generation.
- the station or system 500 is implemented utilizing a general purpose computer or any other hardware equivalents.
- the station or system 500 comprises a processor 502, a memory 506, e.g., random access memory (“RAM”) and/or read only memory (ROM), a code generation module, a data storage device 510 that stores the code generation module 508, and various input/output devices 504, e.g., audio/video outputs and audio/video inputs, storage devices, including but not limited to, a tape drive, a floppy drive, a hard disk drive or a compact disk drive, a receiver, a transmitter, a speaker, a display, an image capturing sensor, e.g., those used in a digital still camera or digital video camera, a clock, an output port, a user input device such as a keyboard, a keypad, a mouse, and the like, or a microphone for capturing speech commands.
- RAM random access memory
- the code generation module 508 may be implemented as one or more physical devices that are coupled to the processor 502.
- the code generation module 508 may include a plurality of modules.
- the code generation module 508 may be represented by one or more software applications or a combination of software and hardware where the software is loaded from a storage medium such as a storage device, e.g., a magnetic or optical drive, diskette, or non- volatile memory and operated by the processor 502 in the memory 506 of the computer.
- the code generation module 508 and associated data structures of the present disclosure may be stored on a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage device, e.g., RAM memory, magnetic or optical drive or diskette and the like.
- the station or system 500 may be utilized to implement any of the configurations.
- the code generation module 508 is integrated as part of the processor 502.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Stored Programmes (AREA)
- User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)
Abstract
A process receives a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor. Further, the process generates, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor. In one aspect of the disclosure, a process is provided. The process receives a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor. Further, the process generates, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
Description
TABULAR FORMAT TRANSACTION EDITOR
BACKGROUND
[0001 ] 1 . Field
[0002] This disclosure generally relates to the field of computing devices. More particularly, the disclosure relates to computer code generation.
[0003] 2. General Background
[0004] Computer code is typically generated manually by computer programmers. The computer code is required to provide functionality to perform a task or resolve a problem in a certain field of knowledge. Specialists in that field of knowledge are often unfamiliar with the intricacies of computer programming and have to rely on computer programmers to interpret their specifications to produce computer code.
[0005] As an example, many business analysts often utilize computers to perform business calculations for various business tasks. Such business analysts are familiar with utilizing computers, but not generating code to perform business tasks. When various business tasks are required, such business analysts often utilize various intermediaries to write code for a computer application for those tasks. As a result, many resources are expended to obtain production ready code for the business analysts through various intermediaries.
[0006] Business analysts or any other professionals needing production ready code to generate applications to perform tasks often have to wait for intermediary computer programmers to generate code and then possibly wait yet again if any modifications are needed to the applications generated by the code. Such delays lead to inefficiencies for the performance of tasks.
[0007] Accordingly, previous configurations do not generate production ready code for an application without utilizing an intermediary that manually generates the code for an application that is customized for the user. Such
previous configurations are limited to systems that most users are unfamiliar with and often have difficulty utilizing.
SUMMARY
[0008] In one aspect of the disclosure, a process is provided. The process receives a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor. Further, the process generates, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
[0009] In another aspect of the disclosure, a computer program product includes a computer useable medium having a computer readable program. The computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to receive a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor. Further, the computer readable program when executed on the computer causes the computer to generate, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
[0010] In yet another aspect of the disclosure, an apparatus is provided. The apparatus comprises a computing device that receives a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor and generates runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[001 1 ] The above-mentioned features of the present disclosure will become more apparent with reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals denote like elements and in which:
[0012] Figure 1 illustrates a tabular format transaction editor configuration.
[0013] Figure 2 illustrates an example of a graphical representation of the transaction editor illustrated in Figure 1 .
[0014] Figure 3 illustrates an example of a display screen generated by the code generation engine for the application illustrated in Figure 1 according to the tabular format inputs provided in the graphical representation illustrated in Figure 2.
[0015] Figure 4 illustrates a process that may be utilized to generate the application illustrated in Figure 1 via the tabular format transaction editor illustrated in Figure 1 .
[0016] Figure 5 illustrates a block diagram of a station or system that performs code generation.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017]A method, system, apparatus, and computer program product may be utilized to provide a tabular transaction editor. The tabular transaction editor receives inputs and generates runtime code based upon the inputs so that an application is generated. The application is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
[0018] An example of a tabular transaction editor is a spreadsheet program. Users such as business analysts may be unfamiliar with the intricacies of computer programming, but are often quite familiar with utilization of a spreadsheet program. For instance, many business analysts utilize spreadsheets programs as their main application to perform various tasks on a regular basis.
[0019] The tabular format transaction editor allows a user to provide inputs to a tabular transaction editor that the user is familiar with, e.g., a spreadsheet program, and then generate production ready code for an application, e.g., a portal, from the tabular transaction editor. The application may then be operated by an application user independently of the tabular transaction editor. For example, a business analyst may provide inputs to a spreadsheet program to generate a portal webpage that displays the status of an application user account associated with a business entity. After generating the code from the spreadsheet program, the business analyst may implement
the portal webpage to operate independently of the spreadsheet program. In other words, the business analyst generates the production ready code for the portal webpage with the spreadsheet program such that the portal webpage may then be deployed to a server for operation. The portal webpage may operate independently of the spreadsheet program after deployment to the server.
[0020] As a result, business analysts and other professionals are able to utilize the tabular format transaction editor to generate production ready code for an application without having any computer code writing knowledge. Business analysts and other professionals do not have to utilize intermediaries and wait for extended periods of time for such intermediaries to prepare production ready code for them. The applications, e.g., portals, may be generated according to a familiar format for business analysts and other professionals, e.g., a tabular format, without business analysts and other professionals having to write any code in a computer programming language format.
[0021] Although a spreadsheet program is provided as an example of a tabular format transaction editor, other programs that utilize a tabular format may be utilized instead of a spreadsheet program. Further, other types of applications other than portal webpages may be generated from the tabular format transaction editor. Examples of such other applications include databases, shells for applications, testing applications, etc.
[0022] Figure 1 illustrates a tabular format transaction editor configuration 100. A user 102 provides a variety of inputs to a tabular format transaction editor 104. The tabular format transaction editor 104 may be a spreadsheet program or a variety of other types of programmable editors that have a tabular format. The tabular format has a plurality of rows, columns, and/or rows and columns that are referred to as cells. The user 102 provides input to the tabular format transaction editor 104 in the various cells.
[0023] Accordingly, a user 102 such as a business analyst may provide inputs in a familiar format such as the tabular format provided by a spreadsheet
program. Those tabular format inputs are then provided to a code generation engine 106. The code generation engine 106 generates an intermediary set of code between the tabular format transaction editor 104 code and an operating system. In one embodiment, the intermediary set of code is represented as metadata. Various other formats may be utilized for the intermediary set of code. After the user 102 provides inputs to the tabular format transaction editor 104, the user 102 may then provide a command to the code generation engine 106 to generate the intermediary set of code.
[0024] The code generation engine 106 may then utilize a processor to translate the tabular format inputs into the intermediate set of code. The intermediary set of code may be platform independent or specific to a given platform. Accordingly, the code generation engine 106 may receive tabular format inputs in a variety of different computer programming language formats from a variety of different types of computing devices. A computing device may be a personal computer, laptop, notebook computer, smartphone, tablet device, etc.
[0025] As a result, an application 108 that is production ready is generated without the user 102 having to manually generate any computer code. The code generation engine 106 automatically generates the code for the application 108. In one embodiment, the code generation engine 106 also compiles the code for the application 108 into a machine readable format. The code generation engine 106 may compile the code for the application 108 into particular machine readable code for a particular operating system or may compile a variety of sets of machine readable code for different operating systems. The code generation engine 106 may receive a command from the user 102 to compile the code or may automatically compile the code.
[0026] In one embodiment, the application 108 may then be deployed through a network 1 10 to a server 1 12. The application 108 may be deployed via a command from the user 102 or automatically after generation of the application 108. As an example, a web portal may be generated and deployed to the server 1 12 for operation.
[0027] The tabular format inputs provided by the user 102 may vary for different applications. For example, the tabular format inputs may be database fields for a database application whereas the tabular format inputs may be list of properties for a server application. The tabular format inputs represent the components of the application. For instance, the components of the application may be the graphical components that are represented in the application.
[0028] Figure 2 illustrates an example of a graphical representation 200 of the transaction editor 104 illustrated in Figure 1 . The graphical representation 200 provides a spreadsheet format in which the user 102, e.g., a business analyst, illustrated in Figure 1 may provide inputs to generate a product order web portal. The graphical representation 200 provides categories such as screen details and field list. A variety of other types of application components may be utilized as the application components may customized for the particular user 102.
[0029] The screen details include some information that may or may not be displayed to the user 102, e.g., version, authentication, server, etc. Further, the screen details include some information that is displayed to the user such as ScreenDisplayLabel. This particular example as a ScreenDisplayLabel of Product Order Entry. Accordingly, the display screen will display the label Product Order Entry.
[0030] The field list provides the user 102 with the ability to arrange various fields and other data that is displayed by the application 108. For example, the user 102 may assign a particular sequence for display to the fields and other data. Further, the user may assign positions of the fields and other data through logical rows and/or logical columns. Logical rows are illustrated for illustrative purposes. For example, the user 102 may assign fields such as ProductID, ProductName, Quantity, and Price to a first logical row. Further, the user 102 may then assign fields such as Button. Ok and Button. Cancel to a second logical row. Various properties such as Content, Condition, and FieldLabel may then be specified.
[0031] Accordingly, the user 102 may automatically generate the application 108 without having any computer programming language knowledge. The user 102 may construct an application 108 by arranging and determining parameters in a tabular format.
[0032] Figure 3 illustrates an example of a display screen 300 generated by the code generation engine 106 for the application 108 illustrated in Figure 1 according to the tabular format inputs provided in the graphical representation 200 illustrated in Figure 2. The display screen 300 is labeled Product Order Entry as specified by the tabular format input for ScreenDisplayLabel. Further, the display screen 300 illustrates a variety of fields such as Product ID, Product Name, Quantity, and Price in a first logical row as specified by the tabular format input. The field names are specified by the FieldLabel component illustrated in Figure 2. Some fields may require input from the user whereas other fields may automatically derive a parameter for display. For example, the ProductID field has a mandatory condition. Accordingly, the Product ID field requires an input from an application user. The ProductName field has a derived condition. Accordingly, the ProductName may be automatically determined based upon the ProductID inputted by the application user. The display screen 300 also displays buttons such an Ok button and a Cancel button according to the tabular format input for a second logical row. The application user marks buttons for these components as a button parameter was utilized for these components in the tabular format inputs.
[0033] The display screen 300 is an example of a display screen for the application 108. The application 108 may be operated independently of the tabular format transaction editor 104. In other words, the user 102, e.g., a business analyst, may provide the tabular inputs in the transaction editor 104 to automatically generate the code for the application 108 via the code generation engine 106. The application 108 may then be operated by an application user independently of the transaction editor 104.
[0034] The tabular format transaction editor 104 allows the user 102 to generate code by positioning application components into a virtual matrix, e.g., the tabular format. Further, the tabular format transaction editor 104 may be utilized to link a variety of different tabular formats, e.g., spreadsheets, together. For example, the display screen 300 may illustrate only a portion of a product entry web portal. The product entry web portal may have a variety of web pages that are linked together. The tabular format transaction editor 104 allows the user 102 to construct each page of the web portal and then link those web portal pages together. Such linking may be performed by tabular format inputs, e.g., reference fields within the various tabular formats. Various spatial relationships and database operations, e.g., joins, sorts, etc., may be performed on the various tabular formats.
[0035] Figure 4 illustrates a process 400 that may be utilized to generate the application 108 illustrated in Figure 1 via the tabular format transaction editor 104 illustrated in Figure 1 . At a process block 402, the process 400 receives a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor. Further, at a process block 404, the process 400 generates, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
[0036] The processes described herein may be implemented in a general, multi-purpose or single purpose processor. Such a processor will execute instructions, either at the assembly, compiled or machine-level, to perform the processes. Those instructions can be written by one of ordinary skill in the art following the description of the figures corresponding to the processes and stored or transmitted on a computer readable medium. The instructions may also be created using source code, intermediary language or any other known computer-aided design tool. A computer readable medium may be any medium capable of carrying those instructions and include a CD-ROM, DVD, magnetic or other optical disc, tape, silicon memory (e.g., removable, nonremovable, volatile or non-volatile), packetized or non-packetized data through wireline or wireless transmissions locally or remotely through a network. A computer is herein intended to include any device that has a
general, multi-purpose or single purpose processor as described above. The transaction editor configurations described herein are device-independent as they may be utilized to generate code for a variety of types of computing devices such as personal computers, laptops, tablet devices, smartphones, kiosks, set top boxes, etc.
[0037] Figure 5 illustrates a block diagram of a station or system 500 that performs code generation. In one embodiment, the station or system 500 is implemented utilizing a general purpose computer or any other hardware equivalents. Thus, the station or system 500 comprises a processor 502, a memory 506, e.g., random access memory ("RAM") and/or read only memory (ROM), a code generation module, a data storage device 510 that stores the code generation module 508, and various input/output devices 504, e.g., audio/video outputs and audio/video inputs, storage devices, including but not limited to, a tape drive, a floppy drive, a hard disk drive or a compact disk drive, a receiver, a transmitter, a speaker, a display, an image capturing sensor, e.g., those used in a digital still camera or digital video camera, a clock, an output port, a user input device such as a keyboard, a keypad, a mouse, and the like, or a microphone for capturing speech commands.
[0038] It should be understood that the code generation module 508 may be implemented as one or more physical devices that are coupled to the processor 502. For example, the code generation module 508 may include a plurality of modules. Alternatively, the code generation module 508 may be represented by one or more software applications or a combination of software and hardware where the software is loaded from a storage medium such as a storage device, e.g., a magnetic or optical drive, diskette, or non- volatile memory and operated by the processor 502 in the memory 506 of the computer. As such, the code generation module 508 and associated data structures of the present disclosure may be stored on a computer readable medium such as a computer readable storage device, e.g., RAM memory, magnetic or optical drive or diskette and the like.
[0039] The station or system 500 may be utilized to implement any of the configurations. In one embodiment, the code generation module 508 is integrated as part of the processor 502.
[0040] It is understood that the processes, systems, apparatuses, and computer program products described herein may also be applied in other types of processes, systems, apparatuses, and computer program products. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the various adaptations and modifications of the embodiments of the processes, systems, apparatuses, and computer program products described herein may be configured without departing from the scope and spirit of the present processes and systems. Therefore, it is to be understood that, within the scope of the appended claims, the present processes, systems, apparatuses, and computer program products may be practiced other than as specifically described herein.
Claims
1 . A method comprising:
receiving a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor; and
generating, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the tabular format transaction editor is a spreadsheet computer program.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising running the runtime code to display a portal based upon the plurality of inputs.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the runtime code is generated by translating the plurality of inputs into commands associated with an intermediary programming language and translating the commands associated with the intermediary programming language into operating system commands, the intermediary programming language being platform independent.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the runtime code is generated without the plurality of inputs having commands provided in a programming language format.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of inputs defines a set of display properties such that the runtime code displays a display according to the set of display properties.
7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating metadata based upon the plurality of inputs.
8. The method of claim 7, further comprising deploying the metadata to a server.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the server compiles the runtime code from the metadata.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the runtime code is utilized to display a test display.
1 1 . A computer program product comprising a computer useable medium having a computer readable program, wherein the computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to:
receive a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor; and
generate, with a processor, runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
12. The computer program product of claim 1 1 , wherein the tabular format transaction editor is a spreadsheet computer program.
13. The computer program product of claim 1 1 , wherein the computer is further caused to run runtime code to display a portal based upon the plurality of inputs.
14. The computer program product of claim 1 1 , wherein the runtime code is generated by translating the plurality of inputs into commands associated with an intermediary programming language and translating the commands associated with the intermediary programming language into operating system commands, the intermediary programming language being platform independent.
15. The computer program product of claim 1 1 , wherein the runtime code is generated without the plurality of inputs having commands provided in a programming language format.
16. The computer program product of claim 1 1 , wherein the plurality of inputs defines a set of display properties such that the runtime code displays a display according to the set of display properties.
17. The computer program product of claim 1 1 , wherein the computer is further caused to generate metadata based upon the plurality of inputs.
18. The computer program product of claim 17, wherein the computer is further caused to deploy the metadata to a server.
19. An apparatus comprising:
a computing device that receive a plurality of inputs in a tabular format transaction editor and generates runtime code that utilizes the plurality of inputs and is operable independently of the tabular format transaction editor.
20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the tabular format transaction editor is a spreadsheet computer program.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP15796529.4A EP3146450A4 (en) | 2014-05-21 | 2015-04-27 | Tabular format transaction editor |
CA2949210A CA2949210C (en) | 2014-05-21 | 2015-04-27 | Tabular format transaction editor |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14/284,371 US9348561B2 (en) | 2014-05-21 | 2014-05-21 | Tabular format transaction editor |
US14/284,371 | 2014-05-21 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2015179071A1 true WO2015179071A1 (en) | 2015-11-26 |
Family
ID=54554512
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/027849 WO2015179071A1 (en) | 2014-05-21 | 2015-04-27 | Tabular format transaction editor |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9348561B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3146450A4 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2949210C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2015179071A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160026616A1 (en) * | 2014-07-28 | 2016-01-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Presenting dataset of spreadsheet in form based view |
US9696967B2 (en) | 2015-11-09 | 2017-07-04 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Generation of an application from data |
US9891890B2 (en) | 2015-11-09 | 2018-02-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Generation of an application from template |
US10216494B2 (en) | 2016-12-03 | 2019-02-26 | Thomas STACHURA | Spreadsheet-based software application development |
CA3084152C (en) * | 2017-12-03 | 2023-10-17 | Thomas Stachura | Spreadsheet-based software application development |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5119465A (en) * | 1989-06-19 | 1992-06-02 | Digital Equipment Corporation | System for selectively converting plurality of source data structures through corresponding source intermediate structures, and target intermediate structures into selected target structure |
US20030106040A1 (en) * | 2001-08-16 | 2003-06-05 | Rubin Michael H. | Parser, code generator, and data calculation and transformation engine for spreadsheet calculations |
US6631497B1 (en) * | 1999-07-19 | 2003-10-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Binding data from data source to cells in a spreadsheet |
US20040148307A1 (en) * | 1999-12-02 | 2004-07-29 | Rempell Steven H | Browser based web site generation tool and run time engine |
US20040260691A1 (en) * | 2003-06-23 | 2004-12-23 | Desai Arpan A. | Common query runtime system and application programming interface |
US20090006409A1 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Metadata-based application deployment |
US20120102010A1 (en) * | 2009-04-24 | 2012-04-26 | Arnd Brueggerhoff | Computer system and method for creating at least one machine-readable file for a medical treatment apparatus |
US20130132927A1 (en) * | 2011-11-17 | 2013-05-23 | Emil Burns Kraft | Business content authoring and distribution |
Family Cites Families (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7487122B2 (en) * | 2000-12-06 | 2009-02-03 | Lipper Iii Arthur | Dynamic security price and value comparator and indexer |
US6976226B1 (en) * | 2001-07-06 | 2005-12-13 | Palm, Inc. | Translating tabular data formatted for one display device to a format for display on other display devices |
US7523395B1 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2009-04-21 | Oracle International Corporation | Web application generator for spreadsheet calculators |
US7299223B2 (en) * | 2003-07-16 | 2007-11-20 | Oracle International Corporation | Spreadsheet to SQL translation |
US9009582B2 (en) * | 2004-11-19 | 2015-04-14 | Google Inc. | Converting spreadsheet applications to web-based applications |
US20070220415A1 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2007-09-20 | Morgan Mao Cheng | Excel spreadsheet parsing to share cells, formulas, tables or entire spreadsheets across an enterprise with other users |
US20090089653A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Auto-generation and syndication of tables as forms |
US20090158139A1 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2009-06-18 | Morris Robert P | Methods And Systems For Generating A Markup-Language-Based Resource From A Media Spreadsheet |
US8584084B2 (en) * | 2008-11-12 | 2013-11-12 | Autodesk, Inc. | System for library content creation |
US8689095B2 (en) * | 2009-02-09 | 2014-04-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Grid presentation in web-based spreadsheet services |
US8645911B2 (en) * | 2009-04-20 | 2014-02-04 | Exigen Properties, Inc. | Systems, methods and machine readable mediums for defining and executing new commands in a spreadsheet software application |
CN102566901A (en) * | 2011-11-18 | 2012-07-11 | 珠海金山办公软件有限公司 | Method of controlling electronic forms on handheld touch devices |
US8640022B2 (en) * | 2011-12-08 | 2014-01-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Integration of spreadsheet objects on web page |
US9639516B2 (en) * | 2012-11-08 | 2017-05-02 | Solibri, Inc. | System and method for express spreadsheet visualization for building information modeling |
-
2014
- 2014-05-21 US US14/284,371 patent/US9348561B2/en active Active
-
2015
- 2015-04-27 WO PCT/US2015/027849 patent/WO2015179071A1/en active Application Filing
- 2015-04-27 CA CA2949210A patent/CA2949210C/en active Active
- 2015-04-27 EP EP15796529.4A patent/EP3146450A4/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5119465A (en) * | 1989-06-19 | 1992-06-02 | Digital Equipment Corporation | System for selectively converting plurality of source data structures through corresponding source intermediate structures, and target intermediate structures into selected target structure |
US6631497B1 (en) * | 1999-07-19 | 2003-10-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Binding data from data source to cells in a spreadsheet |
US20040148307A1 (en) * | 1999-12-02 | 2004-07-29 | Rempell Steven H | Browser based web site generation tool and run time engine |
US20030106040A1 (en) * | 2001-08-16 | 2003-06-05 | Rubin Michael H. | Parser, code generator, and data calculation and transformation engine for spreadsheet calculations |
US20040260691A1 (en) * | 2003-06-23 | 2004-12-23 | Desai Arpan A. | Common query runtime system and application programming interface |
US20090006409A1 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Metadata-based application deployment |
US20120102010A1 (en) * | 2009-04-24 | 2012-04-26 | Arnd Brueggerhoff | Computer system and method for creating at least one machine-readable file for a medical treatment apparatus |
US20130132927A1 (en) * | 2011-11-17 | 2013-05-23 | Emil Burns Kraft | Business content authoring and distribution |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP3146450A4 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20150339106A1 (en) | 2015-11-26 |
CA2949210A1 (en) | 2015-11-26 |
US9348561B2 (en) | 2016-05-24 |
CA2949210C (en) | 2020-01-07 |
EP3146450A1 (en) | 2017-03-29 |
EP3146450A4 (en) | 2018-01-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11614922B2 (en) | Integration of learning models into a software development system | |
EP3352085B1 (en) | Cloud connected automated testing | |
US10606566B2 (en) | Integration of learning models into a software development system | |
US11537368B2 (en) | Integrating machine learning models into an interpreted software development environment | |
US10354225B2 (en) | Method and system for process automation in computing | |
US10430180B2 (en) | System and method for resilient automation upgrade | |
CA2949210C (en) | Tabular format transaction editor | |
US8601438B2 (en) | Data transformation based on a technical design document | |
US9098497B1 (en) | Methods and systems for building a search service application | |
US11803523B2 (en) | Ingesting and processing content types | |
US20150160938A1 (en) | Automation in rule engine in an integration development environment | |
Benouda et al. | Automatic code generation within MDA approach for cross-platform mobiles apps | |
Blanco et al. | A holistic approach for cross-platform software development | |
CN115328791A (en) | Test case component processing method and device, equipment, medium and product thereof | |
US20140359258A1 (en) | Declarative Configuration Elements | |
Shinde et al. | Template-based code generation framework for data-driven software development | |
US9898262B2 (en) | User interface event orchestration | |
CN112667202B (en) | Software design method and device combining MDA and BPMN | |
Nestor Ribeiro et al. | An automated model based approach to mobile UI specification and development | |
US20240118877A1 (en) | System and method for decomposing monolith applications into software services | |
Vitello et al. | Mobile application development exploiting science gateway technologies | |
US12124820B1 (en) | Grid layout setting method for multi device responsive page and computer-readable medium for performing the same | |
CN112380281B (en) | Platform layer code generation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
Lenka et al. | Automated Testing Tool: QTP | |
Smiley et al. | Evolving an industrial analytics product line architecture |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 15796529 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2949210 Country of ref document: CA |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2015796529 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2015796529 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |