WO2015145802A1 - Asset management system and asset management method - Google Patents

Asset management system and asset management method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015145802A1
WO2015145802A1 PCT/JP2014/072060 JP2014072060W WO2015145802A1 WO 2015145802 A1 WO2015145802 A1 WO 2015145802A1 JP 2014072060 W JP2014072060 W JP 2014072060W WO 2015145802 A1 WO2015145802 A1 WO 2015145802A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
asset
classification
information
program
condition
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2014/072060
Other languages
French (fr)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
貴志 住吉
裕也 小松
Original Assignee
株式会社日立システムズ
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 株式会社日立システムズ filed Critical 株式会社日立システムズ
Publication of WO2015145802A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015145802A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q90/00Systems or methods specially adapted for administrative, commercial, financial, managerial or supervisory purposes, not involving significant data processing

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an asset management system and an asset management method for managing and operating an asset such as a road social infrastructure maintained and managed by a local government using a computer system.
  • the present invention relates to an asset management system and an asset management method capable of predicting repairs and updates.
  • the asset management system which is a computer system that manages and operates road social infrastructure maintained and managed by local governments, predicts the degree of asset deterioration based on inspection results and calculates the total repair cost (life cycle cost). Have.
  • this method of predicting the degree of asset deterioration in the asset management system it is necessary to set the prediction coefficient to a logical and reasonable one.
  • this deterioration level prediction requires a lot of noise in the inspection results of assets and the inspection results may not be sufficiently obtained. Often outsourced.
  • Patent Document 1 is cited as a document that describes a technology related to asset management of structures such as bridges according to the prior art.
  • This Patent Document 1 includes input means for inputting inspection data on the deterioration state of a structure, calculation means for calculating a deterioration curve indicating the degree of deterioration with respect to the elapsed years from the input inspection data, input inspection data, An asset management system including display means for displaying a deterioration curve is described.
  • the calculation means extracts the elapsed data classification step for extracting the inspection data for each predetermined elapsed age section, the average deterioration degree calculating step for calculating the average of the deterioration degrees classified for each elapsed age section, By executing a deterioration curve calculation step of calculating a deterioration curve using the least square method from the average deterioration degree calculated for each year section, it is possible to predict deterioration of asset management of a structure such as a bridge.
  • a small local government is required for asset management and longevity plans for road social infrastructure, and this small local government may not have sufficient budget and personnel. For this reason, in small local governments, a person who is not an expert in statistical data processing of an asset management system often selects a deterioration prediction method (formula or coefficient). In this case, since it is difficult for a person in charge of a small local government to effectively select a deterioration prediction method (formula or coefficient), the business is stagnant and an outsourcing cost increases when ordering outside.
  • Patent Document 1 classifies inspection data for each structure type and part to determine the progress of deterioration, and calculates a deterioration curve by the least square method from the degree of deterioration classified and averaged for a certain number of elapsed years.
  • a structure deterioration curve calculation system is described, it is not assumed that consistency cannot be obtained with the obtained deterioration curve, and there is a function to check consistency, a classification method and deterioration to ensure consistency. Since there is no user interface for repeating trial and error while changing the model, there is a problem that business support by a person (user) who is not an expert cannot be performed.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide an asset management system and an asset management method that can promote the spread of asset management and long-life plans by a function that supports statistical data processing by a user who is not an expert.
  • the present invention represents an asset database for storing asset information including an infrastructure asset name and a plurality of attribute information, an infrastructure asset name, an inspection year for checking the asset, and an asset state.
  • Inspection database for storing inspection information of soundness level, asset classification condition list for storing classification condition information including an attribute name to which the asset belongs and a plurality of attribute conditions for the asset, and an algorithm / formula for predicting deterioration of the asset
  • a deterioration prediction model list for storing deterioration prediction information including coefficients
  • a restriction condition list for storing constraint information including a plurality of constraint conditions for assets and the relationship of the plurality of constraint conditions, algorithms and mathematical formulas for users
  • Document template for storing a plurality of standard documents including tags for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model including coefficients
  • the document template Document template element list that stores elements of referenced algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients, a classification result table that stores classification result information including asset names for combinations of a plurality of attributes that
  • the asset classification program includes: A first step of acquiring an asset classification condition by a combination of an attribute name and an attribute value condition specified from the asset classification condition list; A second step of acquiring asset information from the asset database based on the asset classification condition acquired in the first step; A third step of generating intermediate data in which a label is added to the asset information acquired in the second step based on the asset classification condition acquired in the second step; A fourth step of determining whether or not the next asset information is present in the asset classification condition list, and returning to the second step when it is determined that the asset classification condition list is present; When it is determined that there is no next asset information in the fourth step, it is determined whether there is a next asset classification condition, and when it is determined that there is a fifth step, the fifth step returns to the first step; When it is determined that there is no next asset classification condition in the fifth step, the asset information having the same label is grouped from the intermediate data, and the sixth step of storing in the classification result table is executed, whereby
  • the parameter estimation program includes: A seventh step of acquiring classification result information from the classification result table classified by the asset classification program; An eighth step of acquiring a set of elapsed years and soundness levels corresponding to the asset name from the inspection database using the asset name included in the classification result information acquired in the seventh step as a key; A ninth step of estimating the parameters of the deterioration prediction model from the set of elapsed years and soundness obtained in the eighth step based on the algorithm formula of the deterioration prediction model; Determining whether or not there is next classification result information in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, a tenth step of returning to the seventh step;
  • the third feature is that the eleventh step of storing the parameter estimated from the ninth step in the estimated parameter table is executed.
  • the constraint condition determination program includes: A twelfth step of acquiring constraint condition information from the constraint condition list; Among the label groups stored in the classification result table, a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values described in the lower-level constraint conditions included in the constraint condition information acquired in step 12 is obtained from the estimated parameters in the estimated parameter table.
  • the present invention provides the asset management system according to the fourth feature, wherein the combination program is: A 21st step of enumerating valid / invalid combination patterns of each element of the asset classification condition list and the deterioration prediction model list; A 22nd step of obtaining the next combination from the combination set listed in the 21st step and setting whether the combination is valid or invalid;
  • a fifth feature is that the asset classification program, the parameter estimation program, and the constraint condition determination program are executed based on the setting of validity or invalidity in the twenty-second step.
  • the present invention provides an asset database for storing asset information including infrastructure asset names and a plurality of attribute information, an infrastructure asset name, an inspection year for inspecting the asset, and a health check indicating the state of the asset. It includes an inspection database for storing information, an asset classification condition list for storing classification condition information including attribute names to which the asset belongs and a plurality of attribute conditions for the asset, and algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients for predicting asset deterioration Deterioration prediction model list for storing deterioration prediction information, restriction condition list for storing constraint information including relations between multiple constraints and multiple constraints on assets, and deterioration including algorithms, formulas and coefficients for users
  • a document template for storing a plurality of standard documents including tags for explaining a prediction model derivation method, and an altem referenced by the document template
  • Document template element list for storing elements of rhythms, mathematical formulas and coefficients
  • a classification result table for storing classification result information including asset names for combinations of a plurality of attributes as classification results, and a plurality
  • the present invention provides the asset management method according to the sixth feature, wherein the arithmetic device is an asset classification program, A first step of acquiring an asset classification condition by a combination of an attribute name and an attribute value condition specified from the asset classification condition list; A second step of acquiring asset information from the asset database based on the asset classification condition acquired in the first step; A third step of generating intermediate data in which a label is added to the asset information acquired in the second step based on the asset classification condition acquired in the second step; A fourth step of determining whether or not the next asset information is present in the asset classification condition list, and returning to the second step when it is determined that the asset classification condition list is present; When it is determined that there is no next asset information in the fourth step, it is determined whether there is a next asset classification condition, and when it is determined that there is a fifth step, the fifth step returns to the first step; When it is determined that there is no next asset classification condition in the fifth step, the asset information having the same label is grouped from the intermediate data, and the sixth step of storing
  • the present invention provides the asset management method according to the seventh feature, wherein the arithmetic device is a parameter estimation program, A seventh step of acquiring classification result information from the classification result table classified by the asset classification program; An eighth step of acquiring a set of elapsed years and soundness levels corresponding to the asset name from the inspection database using the asset name included in the classification result information acquired in the seventh step as a key; A ninth step of estimating the parameters of the deterioration prediction model from the set of elapsed years and soundness obtained in the eighth step based on the algorithm formula of the deterioration prediction model; Determining whether or not there is next classification result information in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, a tenth step of returning to the seventh step; The eighth feature is that the eleventh step of storing the parameter estimated in the ninth step in the estimated parameter table is executed.
  • the present invention provides the asset management method according to the eighth feature, wherein the arithmetic device is a constraint condition determination program.
  • the present invention provides the asset management method according to the ninth feature, wherein the arithmetic device is a combination program.
  • a tenth feature is that the asset classification program, the parameter estimation program, and the constraint condition determination program are executed based on the setting of validity or invalidity in the twenty-second step.
  • An asset management system and an asset management method include an asset classification program for storing, in a classification result table, classification condition information for classifying an asset, and a deterioration prediction for each asset based on the classification result information.
  • a document output program that replaces the information based on the information and outputs it to the document table, and executes an asset classification program, a parameter estimation program, and a constraint determination program based on an input instruction input by a user (person in charge)
  • the document output program Supports statistical data processing by non-professional users by reading the standard document of the plate, replacing the tags described in the standard document based on the constraint information, and executing the user interface program that outputs to the document table This function can promote the spread of asset management and long-life plans.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of an asset management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the contents of the asset database according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the contents of the inspection database according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the contents of the asset classification condition list according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an operation flow of the asset classification program according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of intermediate data created by the asset classification program according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram for explaining the classification result according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an operation flow of the parameter estimation program according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of an asset management system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the contents of the asset database according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the contents of the inspection database according
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining a deterioration prediction model list according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining the parameter estimation method of the parameter estimation program according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining the estimation parameters according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 12 is a diagram showing an operation flow of the constraint condition determination program according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining a constraint condition list according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 14 is a diagram showing the contents of the discrimination result database according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 15 is a diagram showing an example of a user interface screen according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 16 is a diagram showing an example of a document template according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 17 is a diagram for explaining document template elements according to the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 18 is a diagram showing an operation flow of the combination program according to the present embodiment.
  • the asset management system includes an arithmetic device 11 that is a general CPU (Central Processing Unit), a storage device 12 that is a hard disk or a DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory), a keyboard, and the like.
  • the input device 13 and an output device 14 such as a display are connected by a bus.
  • the storage device 12 includes a program group indicated by reference numerals 21 to 26, a data group indicated by reference numerals 31 to 37, and reference numerals 41 to 44.
  • the calculation result group shown is configured to be stored. The present invention is not limited to these configurations.
  • a network input / output device may be provided in place of the input device 13 and the output device 14 and data input / output may be performed via an external device such as a client terminal via the network. good.
  • the present invention may be configured such that a part or all of the data of the storage device 12 is arranged in an external storage device and data is read / written via a network.
  • the data group indicated by the reference numerals 31 to 37 has the following database and the like.
  • An asset database 31 that stores asset information such as road social infrastructure maintained and managed by local governments.
  • An inspection database 32 that stores asset information (for example, road pavement name) such as infrastructure, inspection year for inspection of the asset, and inspection information such as soundness indicating the state of the asset.
  • An attribute name for example, traffic volume, precipitation amount, speed limit
  • Asset classification condition list 33 for storing classification condition information including (4)
  • a deterioration prediction model list 34 storing deterioration prediction information including algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients for predicting deterioration of assets.
  • a plurality of constraints on the asset for example, attribute “traffic volume / precipitation / restricted speed” for the soundness value for a predetermined number of years) and a relationship between the plurality of constraints (for example, the attribute “traffic for the year of soundness 1)
  • a constraint condition list 35 that stores constraint condition information including a magnitude relationship with respect to “amount”.
  • a document template 36 for storing a plurality of standard documents for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model including an algorithm, a mathematical formula, and a coefficient to the user.
  • a document template element list 37 for storing elements such as algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients referred to by the document template 36.
  • the calculation result group indicated by the reference numerals 41 to 44 has the following table and the like.
  • a classification result table 41 that stores classification result information including asset names for a plurality of attributes (for example, combinations of traffic volume, precipitation, and speed limit) that are classification results.
  • An estimation parameter table 42 that stores estimation parameters for estimating a degradation state for a plurality of attributes (for example, traffic volume, precipitation amount, speed limit) of the classification result table 41.
  • a determination result table 43 that stores determination result information for determining whether the relationship between the estimation parameter table 42 of the deterioration prediction model and the plurality of estimation parameters satisfies consistency.
  • a document table 44 for storing a plurality of documents for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model for a user created with reference to the document template 36 and the document template element list 37.
  • the program groups indicated by the reference numerals 21 to 26 are various programs for the computer to execute the asset management method according to the present embodiment, and include the following programs.
  • An asset classification program 21 that stores, in the classification result table 41, classification result information obtained by classifying assets having the same label group based on classification condition information.
  • a parameter estimation program 22 that estimates parameters for performing deterioration prediction for each asset based on the classification result information classified by the asset classification program 21.
  • a constraint condition determination program 23 that stores the determination result information determined based on the constraint condition information stored in the constraint condition list 35 in the determination result table 43.
  • a document output program 24 that reads the document template 36, replaces the tag described in the document template 36, and outputs it to the document table 44. (5) The screen shown in FIG.
  • a user interface program 25 that reads a standard document of the document template 36 by executing the program 24, replaces a tag described in the document template 36, and outputs it to the document table 44.
  • the program group is read into the arithmetic unit 11 as necessary and the contents are executed.
  • the asset database 31, the inspection database 32, the asset classification condition list 33, the deterioration prediction model list 34, the constraint condition list 35, and the document template element list 37 are assumed to be tables of a relational database management system generally used in this embodiment. However, the present invention is not limited to these.
  • the asset database 31 stores one record for each asset target managed by the asset management system according to the present embodiment. For example, as shown in FIG. It is composed of the service year that indicates the year in which it was in service, the traffic volume (cars / day), the annual precipitation (mm), the speed limit (Km / h), and other item information when the asset is paved.
  • the service name “Pavement 1-1” is stored as “1977”, the traffic volume is “3000 cars / day”, the annual precipitation is “1200 mm”, and the speed limit is “20 Km / h”. .
  • the inspection database 32 includes item information such as an infrastructure name (for example, a road pavement name), an inspection year in which the asset is inspected, and a soundness level indicating the state of the asset.
  • an infrastructure name for example, a road pavement name
  • an inspection year in which the asset is inspected is stored as “2012”
  • the soundness value is stored as “7.7”.
  • the asset classification condition list 33 stores a plurality of attribute values for classifying assets, and stores, for example, the values of the following attributes.
  • the plurality of attribute value conditions indicate conditions that the field values of the asset database 31 for classifying the assets into classifications 1, 2, and 3 should satisfy, and X is a variable.
  • the restriction condition list 35 includes “restriction target 1” indicating values related to the classification parameters, “restriction target 2” indicating attribute names of the asset database 31, “restriction target 1”, and “restriction target 1”. “Relation” indicating the condition to be satisfied by “Constrained Object 2” (for example, “Forward” indicates that the magnitude relationship of each value is the same, and for “Reverse”, the magnitude relationship of each value is mismatched.
  • the constraint condition information is stored.
  • the relationship between the “years until the soundness level 1” in the restriction condition 1 and the “traffic volume” in the restriction condition 2 is “reverse” (the restriction condition 1 “up to the soundness degree 1”).
  • “Years” and constraint 2 “traffic volume” are in a conflicting relationship. For example, if “traffic volume” is small, “years to soundness level 1” becomes longer, and if “traffic volume” is large, “health level is 1” That the number of years is reduced).
  • the document template 36 stores a plurality of standard document information for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model including an algorithm, a mathematical expression, and a coefficient to the user.
  • the document template 36 includes “deterioration prediction model selection method” and “asset classification” as “degradation prediction model derivation methods”, and “deterioration prediction model selection” is “deterioration prediction model”.
  • a description of “list @ name” (@ indicates an arbitrary list name) and “deterioration prediction model @”, and details of “asset classification” are described.
  • the classification result table 41 stores classification result information that is an asset name for a combination of a plurality of attribute value conditions that are classification results. As shown in FIG. 7, this classification result table 41 has “asset names” for a plurality of “labels” as fields. For example, for the combination of “traffic volume 1” “precipitation 1” “restricted speed 1” Asset names “pavement 12-1, pavement 12-2...” Are stored.
  • the estimation parameter table 42 is for storing the parameters a and b of the algorithm of the deterioration prediction model estimated based on the asset classification. As shown in FIG. 11, a plurality of attributes (for example, a plurality of “labels” and “parameters” are stored as fields for estimating a deterioration state with respect to traffic volume, precipitation amount, and speed limit.
  • the discrimination result table 43 stores the estimation parameters of the deterioration prediction model and discrimination result information that discriminates whether or not they satisfy the consistency, and as shown in FIG. 14, “not satisfied” as discrimination result information. Alternatively, “satisfied” is stored.
  • the computing device 11 performs the above-described asset classification program 21, parameter estimation program 22, and constraint condition determination program 23 according to the operation of the input device 13 while the user refers to the display of the output device 14.
  • the user interface program 25, and the combination program 26 asset deterioration is predicted and asset repair and update are predicted.
  • the asset management system executes the following steps shown in FIG. 5 by starting the asset classification program 21 when the asset management system is activated or when the user activates the asset management system 21 at an arbitrary timing. Operates to store the classification result information as shown in the classification result table 41 of FIG. (1) Step S101 for acquiring the specified asset classification condition (combination of attribute name and attribute value condition) from the asset classification condition list 33. (2) Step S102 for acquiring asset information from the asset database 31. (3) Step S103 for generating intermediate data in which a label is added to the asset information acquired in Step S102 based on the asset classification condition acquired in Step S102.
  • This intermediate data is assigned to each asset as a classification result, and the asset information identified by the asset “Pavement 1-1” shown in FIG. 2 is classified using # 1 of the asset classification condition list 33 (FIG. 4).
  • the ⁇ traffic volume> of the asset “Pavement 1-1” is 3000 units / day, and the label “traffic volume 1” is set to satisfy “X ⁇ 5000” of ⁇ attribute value condition 1>. Created.
  • Step S104 that determines whether or not there is next asset information and returns to Step S102 when it is determined that there is.
  • step S104 determines whether or not there is next asset classification condition.
  • step S105 returns to step S101.
  • a label group in which asset information with the same label is grouped from the intermediate data is classified Step S106 for storing the result information in the classification result table 41.
  • the classification result information shown in FIG. 7 stored by executing these steps stores an “asset name” list corresponding to a plurality of “labels” (“label group”) as a field of the classification result.
  • the classification result information shown in FIG. 7 includes a combination condition of “traffic volume 1”, “precipitation 1” and “limit speed 1” (traffic volume is 5000 vehicles / day or less and precipitation is 500 mm / day or less and Assets that are categorized as an attribute value condition with a speed limit of 20 km / h or less are asset names “pave 12-1, pave 12-2...”, “Traffic volume 1” and “precipitation 1” Assets classified as “Limited speed 2” combined conditions (attribute value condition with traffic volume of 5000 vehicles / day or less, precipitation of 500 mm / day or less and speed limit of 20 to 40 km / h), asset name “Pavement” 18-1, pavement 18-2, etc.
  • Step S201 for obtaining classification result information from the classification result table 41 classified by the asset classification program 21.
  • Step S202 The “asset name” included in the classification result information acquired in step S201 and the “asset name” stored in the inspection database 32 are combined to acquire a set R of “elapsed years” and “soundness”.
  • the “soundness” acquired in step S202 is the value of the “soundness” field of the inspection database 32, and the “elapsed years” is the number of years from the service of the asset to the inspection.
  • the value of the “service year” field obtained by combining with the “asset name” of the asset database 31 from the value of the “field”.
  • the method of acquiring “elapsed years” and “soundness” according to the present invention is not limited to the above-described method, and for example, an “elapsed year” field is stored in the inspection database 32 and the values are directly stored. It may be a technique used as an elapsed year.
  • Step S203 for estimating the parameters of the deterioration prediction model from the algorithm expression of the deterioration prediction model and the combination (set R) of “elapsed years” and “soundness” obtained by the above-described steps.
  • Step S204 that determines whether or not there is a next classification and returns to Step S204 when it is determined that there is.
  • Step S205 for storing each parameter estimated in Step S203 in the estimated parameter table 42.
  • the contents of the degradation prediction model list 34 for performing the algorithm estimation in step S203 include, for example, “least squares method” and “maximum likelihood estimation ( (Maximum likelihood estimation) ”.
  • the above-described parameter estimation method obtains a circle in the graph.
  • the curves in the graph in which the combinations of the elapsed years and the soundness are plotted are the curves when the coefficients a and b of the mathematical formula are obtained by the least square method.
  • the estimation parameter table 42 estimated in step S203 is for storing the parameters a and b of the deterioration prediction model algorithm estimated based on the asset classification.
  • the estimation parameter table 42 has a plurality of “label groups” and “parameters” (numerical values of coefficients) as fields, and a plurality of attributes (for example, traffic / precipitation) of the classification result table 41.
  • a plurality of “labels” and “parameters” are stored as fields for estimating a deterioration state with respect to (quantity / speed limit).
  • Step S301 for obtaining constraint condition information from the constraint condition list 35 (FIG. 13).
  • Step S302 for obtaining. In this step 302, for example, when the constraint condition 2 is “precipitation”, # 1, # 4, and # 7 in FIG.
  • Step S305 in which, when it is determined in step S304 that the constraint condition acquired in S301 satisfies the “relationship” condition of constraint condition 1, the determination result is set to “constraint condition”.
  • Step S306 in which, when it is determined in step S304 that the constraint condition acquired in S301 does not satisfy the “relation” condition of the constraint condition 1, the determination result is set to “do not satisfy the constraint condition”.
  • step S307 It is determined whether or not there is a next label group, and when it is determined that there is, step S307 returns to step S303.
  • step S308 returns to step S301 when it is determined whether there is a next constraint condition.
  • Step S309 in which determination result information is stored in the determination result table 43 (FIG. 14) when it is determined in step S308 that there is no next constraint condition.
  • Whether or not the constraint condition in step S304 is satisfied is determined by, for example, obtaining the value (Bn) from the asset database 31 when the constraint condition 2 is precipitation, and whether these values have a reciprocal relationship. (I.e., if Ai >> ⁇ Aj at any i, j, is Bi ⁇ > Bj (compound order))?
  • the asset management system can easily obtain the estimation parameter of the deterioration prediction model and the determination result information for determining whether both satisfy the consistency, using the asset database 31 and the inspection database 32. Can do.
  • the user interface program 25 displays a user interface screen on the output device 14 for the user.
  • the user interface screen displayed by the user interface program 25 includes an asset classification condition list display column 53, a deterioration prediction model list display column 54, and a constraint condition list display column 55 arranged at the top of the screen.
  • the contents of the asset classification condition list 33, the deterioration prediction model list 34, and the constraint condition list 35 are displayed in the respective columns 53 to 55, and the calculation start button 61, the document output button 62, and the determination result are displayed at the bottom of the screen.
  • a display field 73 and a document display field 74 are arranged.
  • the user interface program 25 executes the asset classification program 21, the parameter estimation program 22, and the constraint condition determination program 23 in order when the calculation start button 61 is pressed by the user. At this time, each program operates as follows only for items specified by the user as valid in the asset classification condition list display field 53, the deterioration prediction model list display field 54, and the constraint condition list display field 55.
  • the constraint condition determination program 23 is (1) The contents of the output discrimination result table 43 are displayed in the discrimination result display field 73.
  • the user refers to the discrimination result display field 73 and specifies the items in the asset classification condition list display field 53, the deterioration prediction model list display field 54, and the constraint condition list display field 55, and then presses the calculation start button 61 By repeatedly pressing the button, an appropriate estimation parameter is obtained.
  • the document output button 62 the document output program 24 reads the document template 36, replaces the tags described in the document template 36, and outputs the contents of the document table 44 in the document display column 74.
  • the combination button 63 the combination program 26 is executed.
  • the document template 36 read by the document output program 24 includes “deterioration prediction model list @ name” and “deterioration prediction model @ description” including “deterioration prediction model list”, asset classification conditions and classification. It has item information of “asset classification” including the result and parameters of each classification.
  • the document template 36 is a portion in which the tag in FIG. 1 is surrounded by ⁇ >, and this tag describes a table identifier and an attribute identifier, and refers to a value of an arbitrary table (database, list, intermediate result). Can do.
  • the table identifier is “asset classification condition” and the attribute identifier “attribute name”, and the value of the attribute name field of the asset classification condition list 33 is output.
  • this document template 36 an arbitrary sentence other than the contents described in the table can be defined, selected according to the execution result of the program, and reflected in the document template.
  • a sentence is selected with reference to the document template element list 37.
  • the document template element list 37 includes item information such as a reference table, a tag name, a condition (expression), and a sentence (element) as shown in FIG.
  • the ⁇ reference table> is set as “deterioration prediction”.
  • Model list is extracted, and records # 1, # 2, and # 3 whose ⁇ tag name> is“ name ”are extracted, and records that satisfy the conditions indicated in the ⁇ condition> field of each record are extracted as“ deterioration prediction models ”. If it is included in the deterioration prediction model list 34 indicated by “list”, the value of the ⁇ sentence> field is output.
  • Step S601 for listing valid / invalid combination patterns of each element of the asset classification condition list 33 and the deterioration prediction model list 34. Since the asset classification condition list 33 in this step S601 can designate valid / invalid for each item, the number of combination patterns is 2 to the power of the number of items, and only one of the items in the degradation prediction model list 34 is valid and the others are invalid. Therefore, the number of combination patterns is equal to the number of items, and thus the total number of combinations is “2 (the number of items in the asset classification condition list)” ⁇ (the number of items in the degradation prediction model list 34). Execute.
  • Step S602 that acquires the next combination from the combination set listed in step S601 and sets whether the combination is valid or invalid.
  • the asset classification program 21, the parameter estimation program 22, the constraint condition determination program 23, and the document output program 24 are executed and obtained by executing the document output program 24.
  • An estimated parameter, discrimination result information, and document information are stored in the estimation parameter table 42, discrimination result table 43, and document table 44, respectively (step S603).
  • Step S604 in which it is determined whether or not there is a next combination, and when it is determined that there is a next combination, the process returns to Step S602.
  • Step S604 When it is determined in step S604 that there is no next combination (determination that all the combination processes are completed), each information (estimated parameter, determination result) stored in the estimated parameter table 42, the determination result table 43, and the document table 44 Information, document information) is applied with consistency criteria, and the combination with the highest consistency is selected (step S605).
  • Step S606 that adopts the estimated parameter, discrimination result information, and document information of the combination selected in step S605 and stores them in the estimation parameter table 42, discrimination result table 43, and document table 44, respectively.
  • the consistency criterion in step S605 includes, for example, the number of items that the determination result information does not satisfy the constraint condition of the attribute value condition, the number of lines of document information, the number of characters, the amount of recorded information (consumed memory), or a combination thereof. It is assumed that the consistency is high when the number of items that do not satisfy this constraint is small or the document size is small.
  • the asset management system adopts the combination estimation parameter, the determination result information, and the document information selected in step S605 of the combination program 26, and reflects them in the user interface of FIG.
  • this asset management system does not require the user to select the asset classification condition list 33 or the deterioration prediction model list 34, and uses the result of automatically performing selection that is considered highly consistent. Supports statistical data processing by non-expert users and promotes the spread of asset management and long-life plans.
  • the present invention not only estimates the parameters of a deterioration prediction model for road social infrastructure maintained by local governments, but also provides a reasonable statistical model while classifying, estimating and verifying data with insufficient quantity and accuracy from various viewpoints. Can be used for computer systems that need to

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Road Repair (AREA)

Abstract

Provided is an asset management system for supporting statistical data processing by a non-expert. In the asset management system, an operating device executes: an asset classifying program for storing classification condition information classifying an asset on the basis of an asset name and attribute information in a classification result table; a parameter estimation program for estimating a parameter for performing asset-by-asset deterioration prediction on the basis of the classified classification result information; a restriction condition discrimination program for storing, in a discrimination result table, discrimination result information discriminated on the basis of the restriction condition information stored in the restriction condition list; a document output program for obtaining and outputting an estimation parameter by executing the above programs on the basis of an input instruction; and a user interface program for reading a standard document of a document template and outputting to a document table a document to which the estimation parameter has been applied by substituting a tab.

Description

アセットマネジメントシステム及びアセットマネジメント方法Asset management system and asset management method
 本発明は、自治体が維持して管理する道路系社会インフラ(Social infrastructure)等の資産をコンピュータシステムにより管理及び運用するアセットマネジメントシステム及びアセットマネジメント方法に係り、特に資産の劣化予測を行って資産の補修や更新を予測することができるアセットマネジメントシステム及びアセットマネジメント方法に関する。 The present invention relates to an asset management system and an asset management method for managing and operating an asset such as a road social infrastructure maintained and managed by a local government using a computer system. The present invention relates to an asset management system and an asset management method capable of predicting repairs and updates.
 一般に自治体が維持管理する道路系社会インフラを管理及び運用するコンピュータシステムであるアセットマネジメントシステムは、点検結果に基づき資産の劣化度合いを予測し、トータルの補修費用(ライフサイクルコスト)を計算する機能を有する。このアセットマネジメントシステムの資産の劣化度合いを予測する方法は、予測係数を論理的かつ合理的なものに設定する必要がある。しかしながら、この劣化度合い予測は、資産の点検結果に多くのノイズが含まれることと、点検結果が十分に得られないことがあるため、専門的な知識を要し、コンサルタント業者などの専門家に委託されることが多い。 In general, the asset management system, which is a computer system that manages and operates road social infrastructure maintained and managed by local governments, predicts the degree of asset deterioration based on inspection results and calculates the total repair cost (life cycle cost). Have. In this method of predicting the degree of asset deterioration in the asset management system, it is necessary to set the prediction coefficient to a logical and reasonable one. However, this deterioration level prediction requires a lot of noise in the inspection results of assets and the inspection results may not be sufficiently obtained. Often outsourced.
 従来技術による橋梁などの構造物のアセットマネジメントに関する技術が記載された文献としては、下記の特許文献1が挙げられる。この特許文献1には、構造物の劣化状況の点検データを入力する入力手段と、入力された点検データから経過年数に対する劣化度を示す劣化曲線を算出する演算手段と、入力された点検データと劣化曲線を表示する表示手段とを備えるアセットマネジメントシステムが記載されている。この技術は、前記演算手段が、点検データを所定の経過年数区間ごとに抽出する経過年数分類ステップと、経過年数区間ごとに分類された劣化度の平均を算出する平均劣化度算出ステップと、経過年数区間ごとに算出された平均劣化度より最小二乗法を用いて劣化曲線を算出する劣化曲線算出ステップを実行することによって、橋梁などの構造物のアセットマネジメントの劣化予測を行うことができる。 The following Patent Document 1 is cited as a document that describes a technology related to asset management of structures such as bridges according to the prior art. This Patent Document 1 includes input means for inputting inspection data on the deterioration state of a structure, calculation means for calculating a deterioration curve indicating the degree of deterioration with respect to the elapsed years from the input inspection data, input inspection data, An asset management system including display means for displaying a deterioration curve is described. In this technique, the calculation means extracts the elapsed data classification step for extracting the inspection data for each predetermined elapsed age section, the average deterioration degree calculating step for calculating the average of the deterioration degrees classified for each elapsed age section, By executing a deterioration curve calculation step of calculating a deterioration curve using the least square method from the average deterioration degree calculated for each year section, it is possible to predict deterioration of asset management of a structure such as a bridge.
特開2008-291440号公報JP 2008-291440 A
 一般に道路系社会インフラのアセットマネジメントや長寿命化計画が小さな地方自治体にも求められ、この小さな地方自治体は、予算や人員が十分でないことがある。このため、小さな地方自治体は、アセットマネジメントシステムを統計データ処理の専門家ではない担当者が劣化予測方式(数式や係数)を選定することが多い。この場合、小さな地方自治体の担当者が劣化予測方式(数式や係数)を有効に選定することが困難であるため、業務が停滞し、外部に発注する際には外部委託コストの増加を招く。 Generally, a small local government is required for asset management and longevity plans for road social infrastructure, and this small local government may not have sufficient budget and personnel. For this reason, in small local governments, a person who is not an expert in statistical data processing of an asset management system often selects a deterioration prediction method (formula or coefficient). In this case, since it is difficult for a person in charge of a small local government to effectively select a deterioration prediction method (formula or coefficient), the business is stagnant and an outsourcing cost increases when ordering outside.
 前述の特許文献1記載技術は、点検データを構造形式や部位ごとに分類して劣化進行判定を行い、一定の経過年数ごとに分類し平均化した劣化度から最小二乗法により劣化曲線を算出する構造物劣化曲線算出システムが記載されているが、得られた劣化曲線に対する整合性が取れないケースを想定しておらず、整合性をチェックする機能や、整合性を取るために分類方法や劣化モデルなどを変更しながら試行錯誤を繰り返すためのユーザインタフェースがないため、専門家ではない担当者(利用者)による業務サポートを行うことができないという課題があった。 The technique described in Patent Document 1 described above classifies inspection data for each structure type and part to determine the progress of deterioration, and calculates a deterioration curve by the least square method from the degree of deterioration classified and averaged for a certain number of elapsed years. Although a structure deterioration curve calculation system is described, it is not assumed that consistency cannot be obtained with the obtained deterioration curve, and there is a function to check consistency, a classification method and deterioration to ensure consistency. Since there is no user interface for repeating trial and error while changing the model, there is a problem that business support by a person (user) who is not an expert cannot be performed.
 本発明の目的は、専門家ではない利用者による統計データ処理をサポートする機能によりアセットマネジメントや長寿命化計画の普及を促進することができるアセットマネジメントシステム及びアセットマネジメント方法を提供することである。 An object of the present invention is to provide an asset management system and an asset management method that can promote the spread of asset management and long-life plans by a function that supports statistical data processing by a user who is not an expert.
 前記目的を達成するため本発明は、インフラの資産名及び複数の属性情報を含む資産情報を格納する資産データベースと、インフラの資産名と該資産の点検を行う点検年次と資産の状態を表す健全度の点検情報を格納する点検データベースと、資産が属する属性名と該資産に対する複数の属性条件を含む分類条件情報を格納する資産分類条件リストと、資産の劣化を予測するためのアルゴリズム・数式・係数を含む劣化予測情報を格納する劣化予測モデルリストと、資産に対する複数の制約条件及び複数制約条件の関係を含む制約条件情報を格納する制約条件リストと、利用者に対してアルゴリズムと数式と係数を含む劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するためのタグを含む複数の標準文書を格納する文書テンプレートと、該文書テンプレートに参照されるアルゴリズムと数式と係数の要素を格納する文書テンプレート要素リストと、分類結果である複数の属性の組み合わせに対する資産名を含む分類結果情報を格納する分類結果テーブルと、該分類結果テーブルの複数の属性に対する劣化状態を推定するための推定パラメータを格納する推定パラメータテーブルと、該推定パラメータテーブル及び複数の推定パラメータの関係が整合性を満たしているかを判別した判別結果情報を格納する判別結果テーブルと、前記文書テンプレート及び文書テンプレート要素リストを参照して作成された利用者に対する劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するための複数の標準文書を格納する文書テーブルとを記憶する記憶装置と、
前記記憶装置を参照して資産の劣化予測を行い資産の補修や更新を予測する演算装置と、
 資産分類条件リスト表示欄と劣化予測モデルリスト表示欄と制約条件リスト表示欄と資産分類条件リストと劣化予測モデルリストと制約条件リストと計算開始ボタンと文書出力ボタンと判別結果表示欄と文書表示欄とを表示する表示装置と、
 を備えるアセットマネジメントシステムであって、
 前記演算装置が、
資産を資産名及び属性情報に基づいて分類した分類条件情報を分類結果テーブルに格納する資産分類プログラムと、
 該資産分類プログラムが分類した分類結果情報に基づいて資産毎の劣化予測を行うためのパラメータを推定するパラメータ推定プログラムと、
 制約条件リストに格納された制約条件情報に基づいて判別した判別結果情報を判別結果テーブルに格納する制約条件判別プログラムと、
 文書テンプレートの標準文書を読み込み、標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換えて文書テーブルに出力する文書出力プログラムと、
 利用者が入力した入力指示に基づいて資産分類プログラムとパラメータ推定プログラムと制約条件判別プログラムとを実行して推定パラメータを得、文書出力プログラムにより文書テンプレートの標準文書を読み込み、標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換え、文書テーブルに出力するユーザインタフェースプログラムとを実行することを第1の特徴とする。
To achieve the above object, the present invention represents an asset database for storing asset information including an infrastructure asset name and a plurality of attribute information, an infrastructure asset name, an inspection year for checking the asset, and an asset state. Inspection database for storing inspection information of soundness level, asset classification condition list for storing classification condition information including an attribute name to which the asset belongs and a plurality of attribute conditions for the asset, and an algorithm / formula for predicting deterioration of the asset A deterioration prediction model list for storing deterioration prediction information including coefficients, a restriction condition list for storing constraint information including a plurality of constraint conditions for assets and the relationship of the plurality of constraint conditions, algorithms and mathematical formulas for users, Document template for storing a plurality of standard documents including tags for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model including coefficients, and the document template Document template element list that stores elements of referenced algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients, a classification result table that stores classification result information including asset names for combinations of a plurality of attributes that are classification results, and a plurality of classification result tables An estimation parameter table for storing an estimation parameter for estimating a deterioration state for an attribute of the attribute, and a discrimination result table for storing discrimination result information for discriminating whether or not the relationship between the estimation parameter table and the plurality of estimation parameters satisfies consistency A storage device for storing a plurality of standard documents for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model for a user created by referring to the document template and the document template element list;
An arithmetic device that predicts asset repair and update by referring to the storage device and predicting asset deterioration;
Asset classification condition list display field, deterioration prediction model list display field, constraint condition list display field, asset classification condition list, deterioration prediction model list, restriction condition list, calculation start button, document output button, discrimination result display field, and document display field And a display device for displaying
An asset management system comprising:
The arithmetic unit is
An asset classification program for storing classification condition information obtained by classifying assets based on asset names and attribute information in a classification result table;
A parameter estimation program for estimating parameters for performing deterioration prediction for each asset based on the classification result information classified by the asset classification program;
A constraint condition determination program for storing determination result information determined based on the constraint condition information stored in the constraint condition list in a determination result table;
A document output program that reads the standard document of the document template, replaces the tags described in the standard document based on the constraint condition information, and outputs to the document table;
Based on the input instructions input by the user, the asset classification program, parameter estimation program, and constraint condition determination program are executed to obtain the estimated parameters, the document output program reads the standard document of the document template, and is described in the standard document A first feature is to execute a user interface program that replaces a tag based on constraint condition information and outputs the tag to a document table.
 また、本発明は、第1の特徴のアセットマネジメントシステムにおいて、前記資産分類プログラムが、
前記資産分類条件リストから指定された属性名及び属性値条件の組み合わせによる資産分類条件を取得する第1ステップと、
 該第1ステップにより取得した資産分類条件に基づいて資産データベースから資産情報を取得する第2ステップと、
 該第2ステップにより取得した資産分類条件に基づき該第2ステップにより取得した資産情報にラベルを追加付与した中間データを生成する第3ステップと、
 前記資産分類条件リストに次の資産情報が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記第2ステップに戻る第4ステップと、
 第4ステップにより次の資産情報がないと判定したとき、次の資産分類条件が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記第1ステップに戻る第5ステップと、
 該第5ステップにより次の資産分類条件がないと判定したとき、前記中間データからラベルが同一である資産情報をグループ化し、分類結果テーブルに格納する第6ステップを実行することによって、分類結果テーブルに分類結果情報を格納するように動作することを第2の特徴とする。
In the asset management system according to the first aspect of the present invention, the asset classification program includes:
A first step of acquiring an asset classification condition by a combination of an attribute name and an attribute value condition specified from the asset classification condition list;
A second step of acquiring asset information from the asset database based on the asset classification condition acquired in the first step;
A third step of generating intermediate data in which a label is added to the asset information acquired in the second step based on the asset classification condition acquired in the second step;
A fourth step of determining whether or not the next asset information is present in the asset classification condition list, and returning to the second step when it is determined that the asset classification condition list is present;
When it is determined that there is no next asset information in the fourth step, it is determined whether there is a next asset classification condition, and when it is determined that there is a fifth step, the fifth step returns to the first step;
When it is determined that there is no next asset classification condition in the fifth step, the asset information having the same label is grouped from the intermediate data, and the sixth step of storing in the classification result table is executed, whereby the classification result table The second feature is that it operates to store the classification result information.
 また、本発明は、第2の特徴のアセットマネジメントシステムにおいて、前記パラメータ推定プログラムが、
前記資産分類プログラムが分類した分類結果テーブルから分類結果情報を取得する第7ステップと、
 該第7ステップにより取得した分類結果情報に含まれる資産名をキーとして点検データベースから該資産名に対応した経過年数及び健全度の集合を取得する第8ステップと、
 劣化予測モデルのアルゴリズム式に基づいて前記第8ステップにより取得した経過年数及び健全度の集合から劣化予測モデルのパラメータを推定する第9ステップと、
 分類結果テーブルに次の分類結果情報があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記第7ステップに戻る第10ステップと、
 前記第9ステップより推定したパラメータを推定パラメータテーブルに格納する第11ステップを実行することを第3の特徴とする。
In the asset management system according to the second aspect of the present invention, the parameter estimation program includes:
A seventh step of acquiring classification result information from the classification result table classified by the asset classification program;
An eighth step of acquiring a set of elapsed years and soundness levels corresponding to the asset name from the inspection database using the asset name included in the classification result information acquired in the seventh step as a key;
A ninth step of estimating the parameters of the deterioration prediction model from the set of elapsed years and soundness obtained in the eighth step based on the algorithm formula of the deterioration prediction model;
Determining whether or not there is next classification result information in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, a tenth step of returning to the seventh step;
The third feature is that the eleventh step of storing the parameter estimated from the ninth step in the estimated parameter table is executed.
 また、本発明は、第3の特徴のアセットマネジメントシステムにおいて、前記制約条件判別プログラムが、
 制約条件リストから制約条件情報を取得する第12ステップと、
 分類結果テーブルに格納したラベル群のうち、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件情報に含まれる下位の制約条件に記載された属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を推定パラメータテーブルの推定パラメータから求める第13ステップと、
 該第13ステップにより求めた属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を取得する第14ステップと、
 該第14ステップにより取得したラベル群が第12ステップにより取得した制約条件において上位の制約条件との関係条件を満たすか否かを判定する第15ステップと、
 該第15ステップにおいて、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件が上位の制約条件との関係を満たしていると判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たす」と設定する第16ステップと、
 該第15ステップにおいて、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件が上位の制約条件との関係を満たしていないと判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たさない」と設定する第17ステップと、
 分類結果テーブルに次のラベル群があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記第14ステップに戻る第18ステップと、
 該第18ステップにおいて次のラベル群がないと判定したとき、次の制約条件があるか否かを判定しあると判定したときに前記第12ステップに戻る第19ステップと、
 該第19ステップにおいて次の制約条件がないと判定したとき、判別結果情報を判別結果テーブルに格納する第20ステップを実行することを第4の特徴とする。
In the asset management system according to the third aspect of the present invention, the constraint condition determination program includes:
A twelfth step of acquiring constraint condition information from the constraint condition list;
Among the label groups stored in the classification result table, a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values described in the lower-level constraint conditions included in the constraint condition information acquired in step 12 is obtained from the estimated parameters in the estimated parameter table. 13th step;
A fourteenth step of obtaining a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values obtained in the thirteenth step;
A fifteenth step for determining whether or not the label group acquired in the fourteenth step satisfies the relational condition with the upper constraint condition in the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step;
In the fifteenth step, when it is determined that the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step satisfies the relationship with the upper constraint condition, the sixteenth step of setting the determination result as “constraint condition”;
In the fifteenth step, when it is determined that the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step does not satisfy the relationship with the upper constraint condition, the seventeenth step of setting the determination result as “does not satisfy the constraint condition”;
It is determined whether or not there is a next label group in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, an eighteenth step of returning to the fourteenth step;
A 19th step for returning to the twelfth step when it is determined that there is a next constraint when it is determined in the 18th step that there is no next label group;
A fourth feature is that when it is determined in the nineteenth step that there is no next constraint condition, a twentieth step of storing the determination result information in the determination result table is executed.
 本発明は、第4の特徴のアセットマネジメントシステムにおいて、前記組合せプログラムが、
 前記資産分類条件リストと劣化予測モデルリストの各要素の有効無効組合せパターンを列挙する第21ステップと、
 該第21ステップにより列挙した組合せ集合から次の組合せを取得し、その組合せが有効か無効かを設定する第22ステップと、
 該第22ステップによる有効か無効かの設定に基づいて資産分類プログラムとパラメータ推定プログラムと制約条件判別プログラムとを実行することを第5の特徴とする。
The present invention provides the asset management system according to the fourth feature, wherein the combination program is:
A 21st step of enumerating valid / invalid combination patterns of each element of the asset classification condition list and the deterioration prediction model list;
A 22nd step of obtaining the next combination from the combination set listed in the 21st step and setting whether the combination is valid or invalid;
A fifth feature is that the asset classification program, the parameter estimation program, and the constraint condition determination program are executed based on the setting of validity or invalidity in the twenty-second step.
 更に、本発明は、インフラの資産名及び複数の属性情報を含む資産情報を格納する資産データベースと、インフラの資産名と該資産の点検を行う点検年次と資産の状態を表す健全度の点検情報を格納する点検データベースと、資産が属する属性名と該資産に対する複数の属性条件を含む分類条件情報を格納する資産分類条件リストと、資産の劣化を予測するためのアルゴリズム・数式・係数を含む劣化予測情報を格納する劣化予測モデルリストと、資産に対する複数の制約条件及び複数制約条件の関係を含む制約条件情報を格納する制約条件リストと、利用者に対してアルゴリズムと数式と係数を含む劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するためのタグを含む複数の標準文書を格納する文書テンプレートと、該文書テンプレートに参照されるアルゴリズムと数式と係数の要素を格納する文書テンプレート要素リストと、分類結果である複数の属性の組み合わせに対する資産名を含む分類結果情報を格納する分類結果テーブルと、該分類結果テーブルの複数の属性に対する劣化状態を推定するための推定パラメータを格納する推定パラメータテーブルと、該推定パラメータテーブル及び複数の推定パラメータの関係が整合性を満たしているかを判別した判別結果情報を格納する判別結果テーブルと、前記文書テンプレート及び文書テンプレート要素リストを参照して作成された利用者に対する劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するための複数の標準文書を格納する文書テーブルとを記憶する記憶装置と、該記憶装置を参照して資産の劣化予測を行い資産の補修や更新を予測する演算装置と、資産分類条件リスト表示欄と劣化予測モデルリスト表示欄と制約条件リスト表示欄と資産分類条件リストと劣化予測モデルリストと制約条件リストと計算開始ボタンと文書出力ボタンと判別結果表示欄と文書表示欄とを表示する表示装置とを備えるコンピュータシステムを用いたアセットマネジメント方法であって、
 前記演算装置に、
資産を資産名及び属性情報に基づいて分類した分類条件情報を分類結果テーブルに格納する資産分類プログラムと、
 該資産分類プログラムが分類した分類結果情報に基づいて資産毎の劣化予測を行うためのパラメータを推定するパラメータ推定プログラムと、
 制約条件リストに格納された制約条件情報に基づいて判別した判別結果情報を判別結果テーブルに格納する制約条件判別プログラムと、
 文書テンプレートの標準文書を読み込み、標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換えて文書テーブルに出力する文書出力プログラムと、
 利用者が入力した入力指示に基づいて資産分類プログラムとパラメータ推定プログラムと制約条件判別プログラムとを実行して推定パラメータを得、文書出力プログラムにより文書テンプレートの標準文書を読み込み、標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換え、文書テーブルに出力するユーザインタフェースプログラムとを実行させることを第6の特徴とする。
Furthermore, the present invention provides an asset database for storing asset information including infrastructure asset names and a plurality of attribute information, an infrastructure asset name, an inspection year for inspecting the asset, and a health check indicating the state of the asset. It includes an inspection database for storing information, an asset classification condition list for storing classification condition information including attribute names to which the asset belongs and a plurality of attribute conditions for the asset, and algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients for predicting asset deterioration Deterioration prediction model list for storing deterioration prediction information, restriction condition list for storing constraint information including relations between multiple constraints and multiple constraints on assets, and deterioration including algorithms, formulas and coefficients for users A document template for storing a plurality of standard documents including tags for explaining a prediction model derivation method, and an altem referenced by the document template Document template element list for storing elements of rhythms, mathematical formulas and coefficients, a classification result table for storing classification result information including asset names for combinations of a plurality of attributes as classification results, and a plurality of attributes for the classification result table An estimation parameter table for storing an estimation parameter for estimating a deterioration state, a determination result table for storing determination result information for determining whether the relationship between the estimation parameter table and the plurality of estimation parameters satisfies consistency, and A storage device for storing a document table for storing a plurality of standard documents for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model for a user created by referring to a document template and a document template element list, and referring to the storage device A computing device that predicts asset deterioration and repairs and updates assets, Production classification condition list display field, deterioration prediction model list display field, constraint condition list display field, asset classification condition list, deterioration prediction model list, restriction condition list, calculation start button, document output button, discrimination result display field, and document display field An asset management method using a computer system comprising a display device for displaying
In the arithmetic unit,
An asset classification program for storing classification condition information obtained by classifying assets based on asset names and attribute information in a classification result table;
A parameter estimation program for estimating parameters for performing deterioration prediction for each asset based on the classification result information classified by the asset classification program;
A constraint condition determination program for storing determination result information determined based on the constraint condition information stored in the constraint condition list in a determination result table;
A document output program that reads the standard document of the document template, replaces the tags described in the standard document based on the constraint condition information, and outputs to the document table;
Based on the input instructions input by the user, the asset classification program, parameter estimation program, and constraint condition determination program are executed to obtain the estimated parameters, the document output program reads the standard document of the document template, and is described in the standard document A sixth feature is to execute a user interface program that replaces a tag based on constraint condition information and outputs the tag to a document table.
 また、本発明は、第6の特徴のアセットマネジメント方法において、前記演算装置が資産分類プログラムに、
前記資産分類条件リストから指定された属性名及び属性値条件の組み合わせによる資産分類条件を取得する第1ステップと、
 該第1ステップにより取得した資産分類条件に基づいて資産データベースから資産情報を取得する第2ステップと、
 該第2ステップにより取得した資産分類条件に基づき該第2ステップにより取得した資産情報にラベルを追加付与した中間データを生成する第3ステップと、
 前記資産分類条件リストに次の資産情報が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記第2ステップに戻る第4ステップと、
 第4ステップにより次の資産情報がないと判定したとき、次の資産分類条件が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記第1ステップに戻る第5ステップと、
 該第5ステップにより次の資産分類条件がないと判定したとき、前記中間データからラベルが同一である資産情報をグループ化し、分類結果テーブルに格納する第6ステップを実行することによって、分類結果テーブルに分類結果情報を格納するように動作させることを第7の特徴とする。
Further, the present invention provides the asset management method according to the sixth feature, wherein the arithmetic device is an asset classification program,
A first step of acquiring an asset classification condition by a combination of an attribute name and an attribute value condition specified from the asset classification condition list;
A second step of acquiring asset information from the asset database based on the asset classification condition acquired in the first step;
A third step of generating intermediate data in which a label is added to the asset information acquired in the second step based on the asset classification condition acquired in the second step;
A fourth step of determining whether or not the next asset information is present in the asset classification condition list, and returning to the second step when it is determined that the asset classification condition list is present;
When it is determined that there is no next asset information in the fourth step, it is determined whether there is a next asset classification condition, and when it is determined that there is a fifth step, the fifth step returns to the first step;
When it is determined that there is no next asset classification condition in the fifth step, the asset information having the same label is grouped from the intermediate data, and the sixth step of storing in the classification result table is executed, whereby the classification result table The seventh feature is that the operation is performed so as to store the classification result information.
 また、本発明は、第7の特徴のアセットマネジメント方法において、前記演算装置がパラメータ推定プログラムに、
前記資産分類プログラムが分類した分類結果テーブルから分類結果情報を取得する第7ステップと、
 該第7ステップにより取得した分類結果情報に含まれる資産名をキーとして点検データベースから該資産名に対応した経過年数及び健全度の集合を取得する第8ステップと、
 劣化予測モデルのアルゴリズム式に基づいて前記第8ステップにより取得した経過年数及び健全度の集合から劣化予測モデルのパラメータを推定する第9ステップと、
 分類結果テーブルに次の分類結果情報があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記第7ステップに戻る第10ステップと、
 前記第9ステップより推定したパラメータを推定パラメータテーブルに格納する第11ステップを実行させることを第8の特徴とする。
Further, the present invention provides the asset management method according to the seventh feature, wherein the arithmetic device is a parameter estimation program,
A seventh step of acquiring classification result information from the classification result table classified by the asset classification program;
An eighth step of acquiring a set of elapsed years and soundness levels corresponding to the asset name from the inspection database using the asset name included in the classification result information acquired in the seventh step as a key;
A ninth step of estimating the parameters of the deterioration prediction model from the set of elapsed years and soundness obtained in the eighth step based on the algorithm formula of the deterioration prediction model;
Determining whether or not there is next classification result information in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, a tenth step of returning to the seventh step;
The eighth feature is that the eleventh step of storing the parameter estimated in the ninth step in the estimated parameter table is executed.
 また、本発明は、第8の特徴のアセットマネジメント方法において、前記演算装置が制約条件判別プログラムに、
 制約条件リストから制約条件情報を取得する第12ステップと、
 分類結果テーブルに格納したラベル群のうち、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件情報に含まれる下位の制約条件に記載された属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を推定パラメータテーブルの推定パラメータから求める第13ステップと、
 該第13ステップにより求めた属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を取得する第14ステップと、
 該第14ステップにより取得したラベル群が第12ステップにより取得した制約条件において上位の制約条件との関係条件を満たすか否かを判定する第15ステップと、
 該第15ステップにおいて、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件が上位の制約条件との関係を満たしていると判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たす」と設定する第16ステップと、
 該第15ステップにおいて、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件が上位の制約条件との関係を満たしていないと判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たさない」と設定する第17ステップと、
 分類結果テーブルに次のラベル群があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記第14ステップに戻る第18ステップと、
 該第18ステップにおいて次のラベル群がないと判定したとき、次の制約条件があるか否かを判定しあると判定したときに前記第12ステップに戻る第19ステップと、
 該第19ステップにおいて次の制約条件がないと判定したとき、判別結果情報を判別結果テーブルに格納する第20ステップを実行させることを第9の特徴とする。
Further, the present invention provides the asset management method according to the eighth feature, wherein the arithmetic device is a constraint condition determination program.
A twelfth step of acquiring constraint condition information from the constraint condition list;
Among the label groups stored in the classification result table, a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values described in the lower-level constraint conditions included in the constraint condition information acquired in step 12 is obtained from the estimated parameters in the estimated parameter table. 13th step;
A fourteenth step of obtaining a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values obtained in the thirteenth step;
A fifteenth step for determining whether or not the label group acquired in the fourteenth step satisfies the relational condition with the upper constraint condition in the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step;
In the fifteenth step, when it is determined that the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step satisfies the relationship with the upper constraint condition, the sixteenth step of setting the determination result as “constraint condition”;
In the fifteenth step, when it is determined that the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step does not satisfy the relationship with the upper constraint condition, the seventeenth step of setting the determination result as “does not satisfy the constraint condition”;
It is determined whether or not there is a next label group in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, an eighteenth step of returning to the fourteenth step;
A 19th step for returning to the twelfth step when it is determined that there is a next constraint when it is determined in the 18th step that there is no next label group;
A ninth feature is that when it is determined in the nineteenth step that there is no next restriction condition, the twentieth step of storing the determination result information in the determination result table is executed.
 本発明は、第9の特徴によるアセットマネジメント方法において、前記演算装置が組合せプログラムに、
 前記資産分類条件リストと劣化予測モデルリストの各要素の有効無効組合せパターンを列挙する第21ステップと、
 該第21ステップにより列挙した組合せ集合から次の組合せを取得し、その組合せが有効か無効かを設定する第22ステップと、
 該第22ステップによる有効か無効かの設定に基づいて資産分類プログラムとパラメータ推定プログラムと制約条件判別プログラムとを実行することを第10の特徴とする。
The present invention provides the asset management method according to the ninth feature, wherein the arithmetic device is a combination program.
A 21st step of enumerating valid / invalid combination patterns of each element of the asset classification condition list and the deterioration prediction model list;
A 22nd step of obtaining the next combination from the combination set listed in the 21st step and setting whether the combination is valid or invalid;
A tenth feature is that the asset classification program, the parameter estimation program, and the constraint condition determination program are executed based on the setting of validity or invalidity in the twenty-second step.
 本発明によるアセットマネジメントシステム及びアセットマネジメント方法は、演算装置が、資産を分類した分類条件情報を分類結果テーブルに格納する資産分類プログラムと、分類結果情報に基づいて資産毎の劣化予測を行うためのパラメータを推定するパラメータ推定プログラムと、制約条件リストに格納された制約条件情報に基づく判別結果情報を判別結果テーブルに格納する制約条件判別プログラムと、文書テンプレートの標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換えて文書テーブルに出力する文書出力プログラムと、利用者(担当者)が入力した入力指示に基づいて資産分類プログラムとパラメータ推定プログラムと制約条件判別プログラムとを実行して推定パラメータを得、文書出力プログラムにより文書テンプレートの標準文書を読み込み、標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換え、文書テーブルに出力するユーザインタフェースプログラムとを実行することによって、専門家ではない利用者による統計データ処理をサポートする機能によりアセットマネジメントや長寿命化計画の普及を促進することができる。 An asset management system and an asset management method according to the present invention include an asset classification program for storing, in a classification result table, classification condition information for classifying an asset, and a deterioration prediction for each asset based on the classification result information. A parameter estimation program for estimating parameters, a constraint condition determination program for storing discrimination result information based on the constraint condition information stored in the constraint condition list in a discrimination result table, and a tag described in the standard document of the document template as a constraint condition A document output program that replaces the information based on the information and outputs it to the document table, and executes an asset classification program, a parameter estimation program, and a constraint determination program based on an input instruction input by a user (person in charge) The document output program Supports statistical data processing by non-professional users by reading the standard document of the plate, replacing the tags described in the standard document based on the constraint information, and executing the user interface program that outputs to the document table This function can promote the spread of asset management and long-life plans.
図1は、本発明の実施形態によるアセットマネジメントシステムの構成を示す図である。FIG. 1 is a diagram showing a configuration of an asset management system according to an embodiment of the present invention. 図2は、本実施形態による資産データベースの内容を示す図である。FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the contents of the asset database according to the present embodiment. 図3は、本実施形態による点検データベースの内容を示す図である。FIG. 3 is a diagram showing the contents of the inspection database according to the present embodiment. 図4は、本実施形態による資産分類条件リストの内容を示す図である。FIG. 4 is a diagram showing the contents of the asset classification condition list according to the present embodiment. 図5は、本実施形態による資産分類プログラムの動作フローを示す図である。FIG. 5 is a diagram showing an operation flow of the asset classification program according to the present embodiment. 図6は、本実施形態による資産分類プログラムにより作成される中間データ例を示す図である。FIG. 6 is a diagram showing an example of intermediate data created by the asset classification program according to the present embodiment. 図7は、本実施形態による分類結果を説明するための図である。FIG. 7 is a diagram for explaining the classification result according to the present embodiment. 図8は、本実施形態によるパラメータ推定プログラムの動作フローを示す図である。FIG. 8 is a diagram showing an operation flow of the parameter estimation program according to the present embodiment. 図9は、本実施形態による劣化予測モデルリストを説明するための図である。FIG. 9 is a diagram for explaining a deterioration prediction model list according to the present embodiment. 図10は、本実施形態によるパラメータ推定プログラムのパラメータ推定方法を説明するための図である。FIG. 10 is a diagram for explaining the parameter estimation method of the parameter estimation program according to the present embodiment. 図11は、本実施形態による推定パラメータを説明するための図である。FIG. 11 is a diagram for explaining the estimation parameters according to the present embodiment. 図12は、本実施形態による制約条件判別プログラムの動作フローを示す図である。FIG. 12 is a diagram showing an operation flow of the constraint condition determination program according to the present embodiment. 図13は、本実施形態による制約条件リストを説明するための図である。FIG. 13 is a diagram for explaining a constraint condition list according to the present embodiment. 図14は、本実施形態による判別結果データベースの内容を示す図である。FIG. 14 is a diagram showing the contents of the discrimination result database according to the present embodiment. 図15は、本実施形態によるユーザインタフェース画面例を示す図である。FIG. 15 is a diagram showing an example of a user interface screen according to the present embodiment. 図16は、本実施形態による文書テンプレート例を示す図である。FIG. 16 is a diagram showing an example of a document template according to the present embodiment. 図17は、本実施形態による文書テンプレート要素を説明するための図である。FIG. 17 is a diagram for explaining document template elements according to the present embodiment. 図18は、本実施形態による組合せプログラムの動作フローを示す図である。FIG. 18 is a diagram showing an operation flow of the combination program according to the present embodiment.
 次に、本発明によるアセットマネジメント方法を適用したアセットマネジメントシステムの一実施形態を図面を参照して詳細に説明する。
 [構成]
 本実施形態によるアセットマネジメントシステムは、図1に示す如く、一般的なCPU(Central Processing Unit)である演算装置11と、ハードディスクやDRAM(Dynamic Random Access Memory)である記憶装置12と、キーボード等の入力装置13と、ディスプレイ等の出力装置14とをバス接続するように構成され、前記記憶装置12は、符号21~26で示すプログラム群と符号31~37で示すデータ群と符号41~44で示す計算結果群とを格納するように構成されている。
 尚、本発明はこれら構成に限定されるものではなく、例えば入力装置13や出力装置14の代わりにネットワーク入出力装置を設け、クライアント端末などの外部装置とネットワーク経由でデータ入出力を行っても良い。更に、本発明は、記憶装置12の一部あるいは全てのデータを外部の記憶装置に配置し、ネットワーク経由でデータの読み書きを行うように構成しても良い。
Next, an embodiment of an asset management system to which an asset management method according to the present invention is applied will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
[Constitution]
As shown in FIG. 1, the asset management system according to the present embodiment includes an arithmetic device 11 that is a general CPU (Central Processing Unit), a storage device 12 that is a hard disk or a DRAM (Dynamic Random Access Memory), a keyboard, and the like. The input device 13 and an output device 14 such as a display are connected by a bus. The storage device 12 includes a program group indicated by reference numerals 21 to 26, a data group indicated by reference numerals 31 to 37, and reference numerals 41 to 44. The calculation result group shown is configured to be stored.
The present invention is not limited to these configurations. For example, a network input / output device may be provided in place of the input device 13 and the output device 14 and data input / output may be performed via an external device such as a client terminal via the network. good. Furthermore, the present invention may be configured such that a part or all of the data of the storage device 12 is arranged in an external storage device and data is read / written via a network.
 前記符号31~37で示すデータ群は、次のデータベース等を有する。
 (1)自治体が維持管理する道路系社会インフラ等の資産情報を格納する資産データベース31。
 (2)インフラ等の資産名(例えば、道路の舗装名)と該資産の点検を行う点検年次と資産の状態を表す健全度等の点検情報を格納する点検データベース32。
 (3)資産(例えば、道路の舗装)が属する属性名(例えば、交通量・降水量・制限速度)と該資産に対する複数の属性条件(例えば、交通量の値、降水量の値、制限速度の値)を含む分類条件情報を格納する資産分類条件リスト33。
 (4)資産の劣化を予測するためのアルゴリズム・数式・係数を含む劣化予測情報を格納する劣化予測モデルリスト34。
 (5)資産に対する複数の制約条件(例えば、所定年数の健全度の値に対する属性「交通量・降水量・制限速度」)及び複数制約条件の関係(例えば、健全度1の年数に対する属性「交通量」に対する大小関係)とを含む制約条件情報を格納する制約条件リスト35。
 (6)利用者に対してアルゴリズム・数式・係数を含む劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するための複数の標準文書を格納する文書テンプレート36。
 (7)前記文書テンプレート36に参照されるアルゴリズム・数式・係数等の要素を格納する文書テンプレート要素リスト37。
The data group indicated by the reference numerals 31 to 37 has the following database and the like.
(1) An asset database 31 that stores asset information such as road social infrastructure maintained and managed by local governments.
(2) An inspection database 32 that stores asset information (for example, road pavement name) such as infrastructure, inspection year for inspection of the asset, and inspection information such as soundness indicating the state of the asset.
(3) An attribute name (for example, traffic volume, precipitation amount, speed limit) to which the asset (for example, road pavement) and a plurality of attribute conditions for the asset (for example, traffic value, precipitation value, speed limit) Asset classification condition list 33 for storing classification condition information including
(4) A deterioration prediction model list 34 storing deterioration prediction information including algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients for predicting deterioration of assets.
(5) A plurality of constraints on the asset (for example, attribute “traffic volume / precipitation / restricted speed” for the soundness value for a predetermined number of years) and a relationship between the plurality of constraints (for example, the attribute “traffic for the year of soundness 1) A constraint condition list 35 that stores constraint condition information including a magnitude relationship with respect to “amount”.
(6) A document template 36 for storing a plurality of standard documents for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model including an algorithm, a mathematical formula, and a coefficient to the user.
(7) A document template element list 37 for storing elements such as algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients referred to by the document template 36.
 前記符号41~44で示す計算結果群は、次のテーブル等を有する。
 (1)分類結果である複数の属性(例えば、交通量・降水量・制限速度の組み合わせ)に対する資産名を含む分類結果情報を格納する分類結果テーブル41。
 (2)前記分類結果テーブル41の複数の属性(例えば、交通量・降水量・制限速度)に対して劣化状態を推定するための推定パラメータを格納する推定パラメータテーブル42。
 (3)劣化予測モデルの推定パラメータテーブル42及び複数の推定パラメータの関係が整合性を満たしているかを判別した判別結果情報を格納する判別結果テーブル43。
 (4)前記文書テンプレート36及び文書テンプレート要素リスト37を参照して作成された利用者に対する劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するための複数の文書を格納する文書テーブル44。
The calculation result group indicated by the reference numerals 41 to 44 has the following table and the like.
(1) A classification result table 41 that stores classification result information including asset names for a plurality of attributes (for example, combinations of traffic volume, precipitation, and speed limit) that are classification results.
(2) An estimation parameter table 42 that stores estimation parameters for estimating a degradation state for a plurality of attributes (for example, traffic volume, precipitation amount, speed limit) of the classification result table 41.
(3) A determination result table 43 that stores determination result information for determining whether the relationship between the estimation parameter table 42 of the deterioration prediction model and the plurality of estimation parameters satisfies consistency.
(4) A document table 44 for storing a plurality of documents for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model for a user created with reference to the document template 36 and the document template element list 37.
 前記符号21~26で示すプログラム群は、本実施形態によるアセットマネジメント方法をコンピュータが実行するための各種プログラムであって、次のプログラムを有する。
 (1)同一のラベル群を有する資産を分類条件情報に基づいて分類した分類結果情報を分類結果テーブル41に格納する資産分類プログラム21。
 (2)該資産分類プログラム21が分類した分類結果情報に基づいて資産毎の劣化予測を行うためのパラメータを推定するパラメータ推定プログラム22。
 (3)制約条件リスト35に格納された制約条件情報に基づいて判別した判別結果情報を判別結果テーブル43に格納する制約条件判別プログラム23。
 (4)文書テンプレート36を読み込み、文書テンプレート36に記載されたタグを置き換えて文書テーブル44に出力する文書出力プログラム24。
 (5)図15に示す画面を表示し、利用者が入力した入力指示に基づいて資産分類プログラム21とパラメータ推定プログラム22と制約条件判別プログラム23を実行し、適切な推定パラメータを得、文書出力プログラム24の実行により文書テンプレート36の標準文書を読み込み、文書テンプレート36に記載されたタグを置き換え、文書テーブル44に出力するユーザインタフェースプログラム25。
 (6)資産分類条件リスト33と劣化予測モデルリスト34の各リストの各要素の組合せ集合が有効か無効かを判定し、判定結果に基づいて資産分類プログラム21とパラメータ推定プログラム22と制約条件判別プログラム23と文書出力プログラム24を実行し、該文書出力プログラム24の実行による得られる推定パラメータと判別結果情報と文書情報を推定パラメータテーブル42と判別結果テーブル43と文書テーブル44にそれぞれ保存する組み合わせプログラム26。
The program groups indicated by the reference numerals 21 to 26 are various programs for the computer to execute the asset management method according to the present embodiment, and include the following programs.
(1) An asset classification program 21 that stores, in the classification result table 41, classification result information obtained by classifying assets having the same label group based on classification condition information.
(2) A parameter estimation program 22 that estimates parameters for performing deterioration prediction for each asset based on the classification result information classified by the asset classification program 21.
(3) A constraint condition determination program 23 that stores the determination result information determined based on the constraint condition information stored in the constraint condition list 35 in the determination result table 43.
(4) A document output program 24 that reads the document template 36, replaces the tag described in the document template 36, and outputs it to the document table 44.
(5) The screen shown in FIG. 15 is displayed, and the asset classification program 21, the parameter estimation program 22, and the constraint condition determination program 23 are executed based on the input instruction input by the user to obtain appropriate estimation parameters and output the document. A user interface program 25 that reads a standard document of the document template 36 by executing the program 24, replaces a tag described in the document template 36, and outputs it to the document table 44.
(6) It is determined whether the combination set of each element of the asset classification condition list 33 and the deterioration prediction model list 34 is valid or invalid, and the asset classification program 21, the parameter estimation program 22, and the constraint condition determination based on the determination result A combination program that executes the program 23 and the document output program 24 and stores the estimated parameter, the determination result information, and the document information obtained by executing the document output program 24 in the estimated parameter table 42, the determination result table 43, and the document table 44, respectively. 26.
 尚、前記プログラム群は必要に応じて演算装置11に読み込まれその内容が実行される。資産データベース31と点検データベース32と資産分類条件リスト33と劣化予測モデルリスト34と制約条件リスト35と文書テンプレート要素リスト37は、本実施例では一般的に用いられる関係データベース管理システムのテーブルを想定しているが、本発明はこれらに限定されるものではない。 The program group is read into the arithmetic unit 11 as necessary and the contents are executed. The asset database 31, the inspection database 32, the asset classification condition list 33, the deterioration prediction model list 34, the constraint condition list 35, and the document template element list 37 are assumed to be tables of a relational database management system generally used in this embodiment. However, the present invention is not limited to these.
 [データ群の説明]
 前記資産データベース31は、本実施形態によりアセットマネジメントシステムが管理する資産対象1つにつき1レコードを格納するものであって、例えば、図2に示す如く、資産を一意に特定する資産名と該資産が供用された年次を表す供用年次と該資産が舗装の場合の交通量(台/日)と年間降水量(mm)と制限速度(Km/h)他の項目情報とから成り、例えば、資産名「舗装1-1」の供用年次が「1977」年、交通量が「3000台/日」、年間降水量が「1200mm」、制限速度が「20Km/h」の如く格納される。
[Explanation of data group]
The asset database 31 stores one record for each asset target managed by the asset management system according to the present embodiment. For example, as shown in FIG. It is composed of the service year that indicates the year in which it was in service, the traffic volume (cars / day), the annual precipitation (mm), the speed limit (Km / h), and other item information when the asset is paved. The service name “Pavement 1-1” is stored as “1977”, the traffic volume is “3000 cars / day”, the annual precipitation is “1200 mm”, and the speed limit is “20 Km / h”. .
 前記点検データベース32は、図3に示す如く、インフラ等の資産名(例えば、道路の舗装名)と、該資産の点検を行う点検年次と、資産の状態を表す健全度の各項目情報を点検情報として格納するものであって、例えば、資産名「舗装1-1」の資産の点検年次が「2012」年、健全度の値が「7.7」の如く格納される。 As shown in FIG. 3, the inspection database 32 includes item information such as an infrastructure name (for example, a road pavement name), an inspection year in which the asset is inspected, and a soundness level indicating the state of the asset. For example, the inspection year of the asset with the asset name “Pavement 1-1” is stored as “2012” and the soundness value is stored as “7.7”.
 前記資産分類条件リスト33は、図4に示す如く、資産を分類するための複数の属性の値を格納するものであって、例えば、次の属性の値が格納されている。
 (1)属性名「交通量」の属性値条件1が「X<5000」(交通量が5000台/日未満)、属性条件値2が「5000<=X」(交通量が5000台/日以上)であること。
 (2)属性名「降水量」の属性値条件1が「X<500」(降水量が500mm/日未満)、属性値条件2が「500<=X<1000」(降水量が500mm/日以上1000mm/日未満)であり、属性値条件3が「1000<=X」(降水量が1000mm以下)であること。
 (3)属性名「制限速度」の属性値条件1が「0<=X<20」(制限速度が20km/h以下)、属性値条件2が「20<=X<40」(制限速度が20km/h以上40km/h以下)、属性値条件3が「40<=X」(制限速度が40km/h未満)であること。
 前記複数の属性値条件は、資産を分類1,2,3に分類するための資産データベース31のフィールドの値が満たすべき条件を示し、Xは変数である。
As shown in FIG. 4, the asset classification condition list 33 stores a plurality of attribute values for classifying assets, and stores, for example, the values of the following attributes.
(1) The attribute value condition 1 of the attribute name “traffic volume” is “X <5000” (traffic volume is less than 5000 cars / day), the attribute condition value 2 is “5000 <= X” (traffic volume is 5000 cars / day) Or more).
(2) The attribute value condition 1 of the attribute name “precipitation” is “X <500” (precipitation is less than 500 mm / day), and the attribute value condition 2 is “500 <= X <1000” (precipitation is 500 mm / day). And less than 1000 mm / day), and attribute value condition 3 is “1000 <= X” (precipitation is 1000 mm or less).
(3) The attribute value condition 1 of the attribute name “limit speed” is “0 <= X <20” (the limit speed is 20 km / h or less), and the attribute value condition 2 is “20 <= X <40” (the limit speed is 20 km / h or more and 40 km / h or less) and the attribute value condition 3 is “40 <= X” (the speed limit is less than 40 km / h).
The plurality of attribute value conditions indicate conditions that the field values of the asset database 31 for classifying the assets into classifications 1, 2, and 3 should satisfy, and X is a variable.
 劣化予測モデルリスト34は、資産の劣化を予測するためのアルゴリズムと数式と係数を含む劣化予測情報を格納するものであって、例えば図9に示す如く、アルゴリズム「最小二乗法(least squares method)」の数式が「y=aX+10」であり、係数がaであることを格納している。 The deterioration prediction model list 34 stores deterioration prediction information including an algorithm for predicting the deterioration of assets, mathematical formulas, and coefficients. For example, as shown in FIG. 9, the algorithm “least squares method (least squares method)” is used. “Y = aX + 10” and the coefficient is a.
 制約条件リスト35は、図13に示す如く、分類のパラメータに関連する値を示す「制約対象1」と、資産データベース31の属性名を示す「制約対象2」と、「制約対象1」と「制約対象2」の満たすべき条件を示す「関係」(例えば「順行」はそれぞれの値の大小関係が一致していること、「反行」であればそれぞれの値の大小関係が不一致であることを示す。)を含む制約条件情報を格納する。
 この制約条件リスト35は、例えば、制約条件1の「健全度1までの年数」と、制約条件2の「交通量」との関係が、「反行」(制約条件1「健全度1までの年数」と制約条件2「交通量」が相反する関係に有り、例えば、「交通量」が少なければ「健全度1までの年数」が長くなり、「交通量」が多ければ「健全度1までの年数」が少なくなる関係)であることを格納している。
As shown in FIG. 13, the restriction condition list 35 includes “restriction target 1” indicating values related to the classification parameters, “restriction target 2” indicating attribute names of the asset database 31, “restriction target 1”, and “restriction target 1”. “Relation” indicating the condition to be satisfied by “Constrained Object 2” (for example, “Forward” indicates that the magnitude relationship of each value is the same, and for “Reverse”, the magnitude relationship of each value is mismatched. The constraint condition information is stored.
In this restriction condition list 35, for example, the relationship between the “years until the soundness level 1” in the restriction condition 1 and the “traffic volume” in the restriction condition 2 is “reverse” (the restriction condition 1 “up to the soundness degree 1”). “Years” and constraint 2 “traffic volume” are in a conflicting relationship. For example, if “traffic volume” is small, “years to soundness level 1” becomes longer, and if “traffic volume” is large, “health level is 1” That the number of years is reduced).
 文書テンプレート36は、利用者に対してアルゴリズムと数式と係数を含む劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するための複数の標準文書情報を格納する。この文書テンプレート36は、例えば、図16に示す如く、「劣化予測モデルの導出方法」として「劣化予測モデルの選定」及び「資産分類」があり、「劣化予測モデルの選定」が「劣化予測モデルリスト@名」(@は任意のリスト名を示す)及び「劣化予測モデル@」の説明と、「資産分類」の詳細が記載されている。 The document template 36 stores a plurality of standard document information for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model including an algorithm, a mathematical expression, and a coefficient to the user. For example, as shown in FIG. 16, the document template 36 includes “deterioration prediction model selection method” and “asset classification” as “degradation prediction model derivation methods”, and “deterioration prediction model selection” is “deterioration prediction model”. A description of “list @ name” (@ indicates an arbitrary list name) and “deterioration prediction model @”, and details of “asset classification” are described.
 文書テンプレート要素リスト37は、前記文書テンプレート36に参照されるアルゴリズム・数式・係数等の要素を記載したものである。この文書テンプレート要素リスト37は、図17に示す如く、参照テーブルと、タグ名と、条件(式)と、文(要素)との各項目情報を有し、例えば、参照テーブル「劣化予測モデルリスト」のタグ名が「**」に対して条件が「#=1」の文(要素)が「回帰曲線(2次式)」であることを記載している。 The document template element list 37 describes elements such as algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients that are referred to by the document template 36. 17, the document template element list 37 includes item information of a reference table, a tag name, a condition (expression), and a sentence (element). For example, the document template element list 37 includes a reference table “deterioration prediction model list”. The tag name “**” indicates that the sentence (element) whose condition is “# = 1” is “regression curve (quadratic expression)”.
 分類結果テーブル41は、分類結果である複数の属性値条件の組み合わせに対する資産名である分類結果情報を格納するものである。この分類結果テーブル41は、図7に示す如く、フィールドとして、複数の「ラベル」に対する「資産名」を有し、例えば、「交通量1」「降水量1」「制限速度1」の組み合わせに対する資産名「舗装12-1、舗装12-2・・・」を格納する。 The classification result table 41 stores classification result information that is an asset name for a combination of a plurality of attribute value conditions that are classification results. As shown in FIG. 7, this classification result table 41 has “asset names” for a plurality of “labels” as fields. For example, for the combination of “traffic volume 1” “precipitation 1” “restricted speed 1” Asset names “pavement 12-1, pavement 12-2...” Are stored.
 推定パラメータテーブル42は、資産の分類に基づいて推定した劣化予測モデルのアルゴリズムのパラメータa及びbを格納するためのものであって、図11に示す如く、前記分類結果テーブル41の複数の属性(例えば、交通量・降水量・制限速度)に対して劣化状態を推定するためのフィールドとして複数の「ラベル」及び「パラメータ」を格納する。 The estimation parameter table 42 is for storing the parameters a and b of the algorithm of the deterioration prediction model estimated based on the asset classification. As shown in FIG. 11, a plurality of attributes ( For example, a plurality of “labels” and “parameters” are stored as fields for estimating a deterioration state with respect to traffic volume, precipitation amount, and speed limit.
 判別結果テーブル43は、劣化予測モデルの推定パラメータ及びそれらが整合性を満たしているかを判別した判別結果情報を格納するものであって、図14に示す如く、判別結果情報として「満たしていない」又は「満たしている」を格納する。 The discrimination result table 43 stores the estimation parameters of the deterioration prediction model and discrimination result information that discriminates whether or not they satisfy the consistency, and as shown in FIG. 14, “not satisfied” as discrimination result information. Alternatively, “satisfied” is stored.
 [動作]
 次に、本実施形態によるアセットマネジメントシステムの動作を説明する。本実施形態によるアセットマネジメントシステムは利用者が出力装置14のディスプレイを参照しながら入力装置13による操作に応じて演算装置11が、前述した資産分類プログラム21とパラメータ推定プログラム22と制約条件判別プログラム23と文書出力プログラム24とユーザインタフェースプログラム25と組合せプログラム26の各機能を実行することによって、資産の劣化予測を行い資産の補修や更新を予測するものであって、次に各プログラムの動作を説明する。
[Operation]
Next, the operation of the asset management system according to the present embodiment will be described. In the asset management system according to the present embodiment, the computing device 11 performs the above-described asset classification program 21, parameter estimation program 22, and constraint condition determination program 23 according to the operation of the input device 13 while the user refers to the display of the output device 14. By executing the functions of the document output program 24, the user interface program 25, and the combination program 26, asset deterioration is predicted and asset repair and update are predicted. Next, the operation of each program will be described. To do.
 [資産分類プログラム21動作]
 まず、本実施形態によるアセットマネジメントシステムは、資産分類プログラム21をアセットマネジメントシステムの起動時や利用者が任意のタイミングにより起動して図5に示す次のステップを実行することによって、資産分類プログラム21は、図7の分類結果テーブル41に示す如き分類結果情報を格納するように動作する。
 (1)資産分類条件リスト33から指定された資産分類条件(属性名、属性値条件の組み合わせ)を取得するステップS101。
 (2)資産データベース31から資産情報を取得するステップS102。
 (3)該ステップS102により取得した資産分類条件に基づきステップS102により取得した資産情報にラベルを追加付与した中間データを生成するステップS103。
[Operation of asset classification program 21]
First, the asset management system according to the present embodiment executes the following steps shown in FIG. 5 by starting the asset classification program 21 when the asset management system is activated or when the user activates the asset management system 21 at an arbitrary timing. Operates to store the classification result information as shown in the classification result table 41 of FIG.
(1) Step S101 for acquiring the specified asset classification condition (combination of attribute name and attribute value condition) from the asset classification condition list 33.
(2) Step S102 for acquiring asset information from the asset database 31.
(3) Step S103 for generating intermediate data in which a label is added to the asset information acquired in Step S102 based on the asset classification condition acquired in Step S102.
 この中間データは、分類結果をラベルとして各資産に付与し、図2に示す資産「舗装1-1」で識別される資産情報について資産分類条件リスト33(図4)の#1を用いて分類する場合、当該資産「舗装1-1」の〈交通量〉は3000台/日であり〈属性値条件1〉の「X<5000」を満たすためにラベル「交通量1」を設定するように作成される。 This intermediate data is assigned to each asset as a classification result, and the asset information identified by the asset “Pavement 1-1” shown in FIG. 2 is classified using # 1 of the asset classification condition list 33 (FIG. 4). In this case, the <traffic volume> of the asset “Pavement 1-1” is 3000 units / day, and the label “traffic volume 1” is set to satisfy “X <5000” of <attribute value condition 1>. Created.
 (4)次の資産情報が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記ステップS102に戻るステップS104。
 (5)該ステップS104により次の資産がないと判定したとき、次の資産分類条件が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記ステップS101に戻るステップS105。
 (6)該ステップS105により次の資産分類条件がないと判定したとき(全ての資産分類条件の処理が完了後)、前記中間データからラベルが同一である資産情報をグループ化したラベル群を分類結果情報として分類結果テーブル41に格納するステップS106。
(4) Step S104 that determines whether or not there is next asset information and returns to Step S102 when it is determined that there is.
(5) When it is determined in step S104 that there is no next asset, it is determined whether or not there is a next asset classification condition. When it is determined that there is a next asset, step S105 returns to step S101.
(6) When it is determined in step S105 that there is no next asset classification condition (after processing of all asset classification conditions is completed), a label group in which asset information with the same label is grouped from the intermediate data is classified Step S106 for storing the result information in the classification result table 41.
 これらステップを実行したことによって格納された図7に示す分類結果情報は、分類結果のフィールドとして複数の「ラベル」(「ラベル群」)に対応した「資産名」リストを格納する。例えば、図7に示した分類結果情報は、「交通量1」と「降水量1」と「制限速度1」の組み合わせ条件(交通量が5000台/日以下且つ降水量が500mm/日以下且つ制限速度が20km/h以下の属性値条件)に分類される資産が、資産名「舗装12-1、舗装12-2・・・」であり、「交通量1」と「降水量1」と「制限速度2」の組み合わせ条件(交通量が5000台/日以下且つ降水量が500mm/日以下且つ制限速度が20~40km/hの属性値条件)に分類される資産が、資産名「舗装18-1、舗装18-2・・・」であり、「交通量1」と「降水量1」と「制限速度3」の組み合わせ条件(交通量が5000台/日以下且つ降水量が500mm/日以下且つ制限速度が40km/h以上の属性値条件)に分類される資産が、資産名「舗装14-1、舗装14-2・・・」として格納される。 The classification result information shown in FIG. 7 stored by executing these steps stores an “asset name” list corresponding to a plurality of “labels” (“label group”) as a field of the classification result. For example, the classification result information shown in FIG. 7 includes a combination condition of “traffic volume 1”, “precipitation 1” and “limit speed 1” (traffic volume is 5000 vehicles / day or less and precipitation is 500 mm / day or less and Assets that are categorized as an attribute value condition with a speed limit of 20 km / h or less are asset names “pave 12-1, pave 12-2...”, “Traffic volume 1” and “precipitation 1” Assets classified as “Limited speed 2” combined conditions (attribute value condition with traffic volume of 5000 vehicles / day or less, precipitation of 500 mm / day or less and speed limit of 20 to 40 km / h), asset name “Pavement” 18-1, pavement 18-2, etc. ”, and a combination condition of“ traffic volume 1 ”,“ precipitation 1 ”and“ limit speed 3 ”(traffic volume is 5000 vehicles / day or less and precipitation is 500 mm / Attribute value condition that is less than a day and speed limit is 40km / h or more) That assets, asset name "paving 14-1, paving 14-2..." Is stored as.
 [パラメータ推定プログラム22の動作]
 次に、本実施形態によるアセットマネジメントシステムは、パラメータ推定プログラム22をアセットマネジメントシステムの起動時や利用者が任意のタイミングにより起動し、図8に示す如く、次のステップを実行する。
 (1)前記資産分類プログラム21が分類した分類結果テーブル41から分類結果情報を取得するステップS201。
 (2)該ステップS201により取得した分類結果情報に含まれる「資産名」と点検データベース32に格納された「資産名」を結合し、「経過年数」と「健全度」の集合Rを取得するステップS202。
[Operation of Parameter Estimation Program 22]
Next, in the asset management system according to the present embodiment, the parameter estimation program 22 is activated when the asset management system is activated or by a user at an arbitrary timing, and the following steps are executed as shown in FIG.
(1) Step S201 for obtaining classification result information from the classification result table 41 classified by the asset classification program 21.
(2) The “asset name” included in the classification result information acquired in step S201 and the “asset name” stored in the inspection database 32 are combined to acquire a set R of “elapsed years” and “soundness”. Step S202.
 このステップS202により取得した「健全度」は、点検データベース32の「健全度」フィールドの値であり、「経過年数」は資産の供用から点検までの年数であり、点検データベース32の「点検年次」フィールドの値から資産データベース31の「資産名」と結合して得られる「供用年次」フィールドの値を減算した値である。尚、本発明による「経過年数」と「健全度」を取得する手法は、前述の手法に限られるものではなく、例えば点検データベース32に「経過年度」フィールドを格納しておき、その値を直接経過年数として用いる手法であっても良い。 The “soundness” acquired in step S202 is the value of the “soundness” field of the inspection database 32, and the “elapsed years” is the number of years from the service of the asset to the inspection. The value of the “service year” field obtained by combining with the “asset name” of the asset database 31 from the value of the “field”. Note that the method of acquiring “elapsed years” and “soundness” according to the present invention is not limited to the above-described method, and for example, an “elapsed year” field is stored in the inspection database 32 and the values are directly stored. It may be a technique used as an elapsed year.
 (3)劣化予測モデルのアルゴリズム式と前述の各ステップによって得られた「経過年数」と「健全度」の組み合わせ(集合R)から、劣化予測モデルのパラメータを推定するステップS203。
 (4)次の分類があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記ステップS204に戻るステップS204。
 (5)前記ステップS203より推定した各パラメータを推定パラメータテーブル42に格納するステップS205。
(3) Step S203 for estimating the parameters of the deterioration prediction model from the algorithm expression of the deterioration prediction model and the combination (set R) of “elapsed years” and “soundness” obtained by the above-described steps.
(4) Step S204 that determines whether or not there is a next classification and returns to Step S204 when it is determined that there is.
(5) Step S205 for storing each parameter estimated in Step S203 in the estimated parameter table 42.
 前記ステップS203によるアルゴリズムの推定を行うための劣化予測モデルリスト34の内容は、例えば、図9に示す如く、処理手順であるアルゴリズムとして「最小二乗法(least squares method)」や「最尤推定(Maximum likelihood estimation)」がある。この「最小二乗法」の数式は、「y=aX+10」「y=aX+bX+10」が設定され、「最尤推定」の数式は、「P(X,Y)=n(X,Y)/n(X)」が設定される。本例においては、図10に示すグラフにおいて、劣化予測モデルのアルゴリズムが最小二乗法且つ数式が「y=aX+bX+10」のとき、前述のパラメータの推定手法は、グラフ内の○印が得られた経過年数と健全度の組合せをプロットしたグラフ内の曲線が数式の係数a,bを最小二乗法により求めた場合の曲線である。 The contents of the degradation prediction model list 34 for performing the algorithm estimation in step S203 include, for example, “least squares method” and “maximum likelihood estimation ( (Maximum likelihood estimation) ”. In this “least square method”, “y = aX + 10” and “y = aX 2 + bX + 10” are set, and the “maximum likelihood estimation” equation is “P (X, Y) = n (X, Y) / n (X) "is set. In this example, in the graph shown in FIG. 10, when the algorithm of the deterioration prediction model is the least square method and the mathematical expression is “y = aX 2 + bX + 10”, the above-described parameter estimation method obtains a circle in the graph. The curves in the graph in which the combinations of the elapsed years and the soundness are plotted are the curves when the coefficients a and b of the mathematical formula are obtained by the least square method.
 前記ステップS203による推定する推定パラメータテーブル42は、資産の分類に基づいて推定した劣化予測モデルのアルゴリズムのパラメータa及びbを格納するためのものである。この推定パラメータテーブル42は、図11に示す如く、フィールドとして複数の「ラベル群」及び「パラメータ」(係数の数値)を有し、前記分類結果テーブル41の複数の属性(例えば、交通量・降水量・制限速度)に対して劣化状態を推定するためのフィールドとして複数の「ラベル」及び「パラメータ」を格納する。 The estimation parameter table 42 estimated in step S203 is for storing the parameters a and b of the deterioration prediction model algorithm estimated based on the asset classification. As shown in FIG. 11, the estimation parameter table 42 has a plurality of “label groups” and “parameters” (numerical values of coefficients) as fields, and a plurality of attributes (for example, traffic / precipitation) of the classification result table 41. A plurality of “labels” and “parameters” are stored as fields for estimating a deterioration state with respect to (quantity / speed limit).
 [制約条件判別プログラム23の動作]
 更に、本実施形態によるアセットマネジメントシステムは、制約条件判別プログラム23をアセットマネジメントシステムの起動時や利用者が任意のタイミングにより起動し、制約条件判別プログラム23が、図12に示す次のステップを実行する。
 (1)制約条件リスト35(図13)から制約条件情報を取得するステップS301。
 (2)分類結果テーブル41に格納したラベル群のうち、ステップS301にて取得した制約条件情報に含まれる制約条件2(下位の制約条件)に記載された属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を求めるステップS302。このステップ302は、例えば、制約条件2が「降水量」の場合、図11における#1,#4,#7は降水量のみ異なり交通量と制限速度は同じであるため、このような降水量のみ異なり交通量と制限速度が同じラベル群を求める。
 (3)該ステップS302により求めた属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を取得するステップS303。
 (4)該ステップS303により取得したラベル群がステップS301により取得した制約条件において制約条件1(上位の制約条件)との「関係」条件を満たすか否かを判定するステップS304。
[Operation of Restriction Condition Determination Program 23]
Furthermore, the asset management system according to the present embodiment starts the constraint condition determination program 23 when the asset management system is started or by the user at an arbitrary timing, and the constraint condition determination program 23 executes the next step shown in FIG. To do.
(1) Step S301 for obtaining constraint condition information from the constraint condition list 35 (FIG. 13).
(2) Among the label groups stored in the classification result table 41, a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values described in the constraint condition 2 (subordinate constraint conditions) included in the constraint condition information acquired in step S301. Step S302 for obtaining. In this step 302, for example, when the constraint condition 2 is “precipitation”, # 1, # 4, and # 7 in FIG. 11 differ only in precipitation, and the traffic volume and the speed limit are the same. Only different label groups with the same traffic volume and speed limit are obtained.
(3) Step S303 of acquiring a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values obtained in Step S302.
(4) Step S304 for determining whether or not the label group acquired in Step S303 satisfies the “relationship” condition with the constraint condition 1 (upper constraint condition) in the constraint condition acquired in Step S301.
 このステップS304による取得ラベル群の制約条件1の「関係」の条件を満たすか否かの判別は、例えば、ラベル群#1,#4,#7に対して、制約条件1が健全度1までの年数、関係が反行の場合、制約条件1の値として健全度1までの年数を数式(1=aX+bX+10)のXを解くことによって判定する。 In step S304, whether or not the “relationship” condition of the constraint condition 1 of the acquired label group is satisfied is determined, for example, for the label group # 1, # 4, and # 7. If the relationship is reciprocal, the number of years up to soundness level 1 is determined by solving X in the mathematical formula (1 = aX 2 + bX + 10) as the value of constraint condition 1.
 (5)前記ステップS304においてS301により取得した制約条件が制約条件1の「関係」条件を満たしていると判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たす」と設定するステップS305。
 (6)前記ステップS304においてS301により取得した制約条件が制約条件1の「関係」条件を満たしていないと判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たさない」と設定するステップS306。
 (7)次のラベル群があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記ステップS303に戻るステップS307。
 (8)該ステップS307において次のラベル群がないと判定したとき、次の制約条件があるか否かを判定しあると判定したときに前記ステップS301に戻るステップS308。
 (9)該ステップS308において次の制約条件がないと判定したとき、判別結果情報を判別結果テーブル43(図14)に格納するステップS309。
(5) Step S305 in which, when it is determined in step S304 that the constraint condition acquired in S301 satisfies the “relationship” condition of constraint condition 1, the determination result is set to “constraint condition”.
(6) Step S306 in which, when it is determined in step S304 that the constraint condition acquired in S301 does not satisfy the “relation” condition of the constraint condition 1, the determination result is set to “do not satisfy the constraint condition”.
(7) It is determined whether or not there is a next label group, and when it is determined that there is, step S307 returns to step S303.
(8) When it is determined in step S307 that there is no next label group, step S308 returns to step S301 when it is determined whether there is a next constraint condition.
(9) Step S309 in which determination result information is stored in the determination result table 43 (FIG. 14) when it is determined in step S308 that there is no next constraint condition.
 前記ステップS304における制約条件を満たしているか否かの判定は、例えば、制約条件2が降水量のとき、資産データベース31からその値(Bn)を得、それらの値が反行の関係にあるか(すなわち任意のi,jにおいてAi><AjならばBi<>Bj(複号同順)であるか)を判定することによって、行われる。 Whether or not the constraint condition in step S304 is satisfied is determined by, for example, obtaining the value (Bn) from the asset database 31 when the constraint condition 2 is precipitation, and whether these values have a reciprocal relationship. (I.e., if Ai >> <Aj at any i, j, is Bi <> Bj (compound order))?
 このように、本実施形態によるアセットマネジメントシステムは、資産データベース31及び点検データベース32を用いて、劣化予測モデルの推定パラメータ及び両者が整合性を満たしているかを判別した判別結果情報を容易に得ることができる。 As described above, the asset management system according to the present embodiment can easily obtain the estimation parameter of the deterioration prediction model and the determination result information for determining whether both satisfy the consistency, using the asset database 31 and the inspection database 32. Can do.
 前記ユーザインタフェースプログラム25は、出力装置14に利用者にユーザインタフェース画面を表示する。このユーザインタフェースプログラム25が表示するユーザインタフェース画面は、図15に示す如く、画面上部に配置された資産分類条件リスト表示欄53と、劣化予測モデルリスト表示欄54と、制約条件リスト表示欄55とを配置し、これら各々の欄53~55に資産分類条件リスト33と劣化予測モデルリスト34と制約条件リスト35の内容を表示し、画面下側に計算開始ボタン61と文書出力ボタン62と判別結果表示欄73と文書表示欄74とを配置する。ユーザインタフェースプログラム25は、ユーザインタフェース画面の資産分類条件リスト表示欄53と劣化予測モデルリスト表示欄54と制約条件リスト表示欄55のいずれかにあるいずれかの項目が利用者により指定されたとき、指定された項目の有効又は無効を選択する。 The user interface program 25 displays a user interface screen on the output device 14 for the user. As shown in FIG. 15, the user interface screen displayed by the user interface program 25 includes an asset classification condition list display column 53, a deterioration prediction model list display column 54, and a constraint condition list display column 55 arranged at the top of the screen. The contents of the asset classification condition list 33, the deterioration prediction model list 34, and the constraint condition list 35 are displayed in the respective columns 53 to 55, and the calculation start button 61, the document output button 62, and the determination result are displayed at the bottom of the screen. A display field 73 and a document display field 74 are arranged. When any item in the asset classification condition list display field 53, the deterioration prediction model list display field 54, or the constraint condition list display field 55 on the user interface screen is designated by the user, the user interface program 25 Select whether to enable or disable the specified item.
 このユーザインタフェースプログラム25は、利用者により計算開始ボタン61が押されたとき、前述の資産分類プログラム21とパラメータ推定プログラム22と制約条件判別プログラム23を順に実行する。このとき各プログラムは、資産分類条件リスト表示欄53と劣化予測モデルリスト表示欄54と制約条件リスト表示欄55において利用者が有効と指定した項目のみを処理対象とし、次のように動作する。
 制約条件判別プログラム23が、
 (1)出力された判別結果テーブル43の内容を判別結果表示欄73に表示する。
 (2)利用者が判別結果表示欄73を参照して資産分類条件リスト表示欄53と劣化予測モデルリスト表示欄54と制約条件リスト表示欄55の各項目の指定に続いて計算開始ボタン61の押下を繰り返すことによって、適切な推定パラメータを得る。
 (3)利用者が文書出力ボタン62を押すことにより、文書出力プログラム24が、文書テンプレート36を読み込み、文書テンプレート36に記載されたタグを置き換えて出力する文書テーブル44の内容を文書表示欄74に表示し、利用者が組合せボタン63を押すと、組合せプログラム26を実行する。
The user interface program 25 executes the asset classification program 21, the parameter estimation program 22, and the constraint condition determination program 23 in order when the calculation start button 61 is pressed by the user. At this time, each program operates as follows only for items specified by the user as valid in the asset classification condition list display field 53, the deterioration prediction model list display field 54, and the constraint condition list display field 55.
The constraint condition determination program 23 is
(1) The contents of the output discrimination result table 43 are displayed in the discrimination result display field 73.
(2) The user refers to the discrimination result display field 73 and specifies the items in the asset classification condition list display field 53, the deterioration prediction model list display field 54, and the constraint condition list display field 55, and then presses the calculation start button 61 By repeatedly pressing the button, an appropriate estimation parameter is obtained.
(3) When the user presses the document output button 62, the document output program 24 reads the document template 36, replaces the tags described in the document template 36, and outputs the contents of the document table 44 in the document display column 74. When the user presses the combination button 63, the combination program 26 is executed.
 前記文書出力プログラム24が読み込む文書テンプレート36は、図16に示す如く、「劣化予測モデルリスト@名」及び「劣化予測モデル@説明」を含む「劣化予測モデルの選定」と、資産分類条件と分類結果と各分類のパラメータを含む「資産分類」との項目情報を有する。文書テンプレート36は、図1中のタグが<>で囲まれた部分であり、このタグはテーブル識別子と属性識別子が記述され、任意のテーブル(データベース、リスト、中間結果)の値を参照することができる。例えば、タグ<*資産分類条件:属性名>の場合、テーブル識別子は「資産分類条件」、属性識別子「属性名」であり、資産分類条件リスト33の属性名フィールドの値を出力する。*は複数の値をリストとして出力することを示す。この文書テンプレート36は、テーブルに記載された内容以外の任意の文を定義しておき、プログラムの実行結果に応じて選択し、文書テンプレートに反映させることもできる。ここでは<劣化予測モデルリスト@名>のように@が含まれるタグについて、文書テンプレート要素リスト37を参照して文を選択する。 As shown in FIG. 16, the document template 36 read by the document output program 24 includes “deterioration prediction model list @ name” and “deterioration prediction model @ description” including “deterioration prediction model list”, asset classification conditions and classification. It has item information of “asset classification” including the result and parameters of each classification. The document template 36 is a portion in which the tag in FIG. 1 is surrounded by <>, and this tag describes a table identifier and an attribute identifier, and refers to a value of an arbitrary table (database, list, intermediate result). Can do. For example, in the case of tag ** asset classification condition: attribute name>, the table identifier is “asset classification condition” and the attribute identifier “attribute name”, and the value of the attribute name field of the asset classification condition list 33 is output. * Indicates that a plurality of values are output as a list. As this document template 36, an arbitrary sentence other than the contents described in the table can be defined, selected according to the execution result of the program, and reflected in the document template. Here, for a tag including @ as in <deterioration prediction model list @name>, a sentence is selected with reference to the document template element list 37.
 この文書テンプレート要素リスト37は、図17に示す如く、参照テーブルと、タグ名と、条件(式)と、文(要素)との各項目情報を有する。この文書テンプレート要素リスト37は、図示の例では、参照テーブル「劣化予測モデルリスト」のタグ名に対する条件が「#=1」の文(要素)が「回帰曲線(1次式)」であることが記載されている。文書出力プログラム24は、フィールドが、〈参照テーブル〉と〈タグ名〉と〈条件〉と〈文〉であり、<劣化予測モデルリスト@名>というタグの場合、〈参照テーブル〉として「劣化予測モデルリスト」を抽出し、〈タグ名〉が「名」であるレコード#1,#2,#3を抽出し、各レコードの〈条件〉フィールドで示された条件を満たすレコードが「劣化予測モデルリスト」が示す劣化予測モデルリスト34に含まれている場合、〈文〉フィールドの値を出力する。 The document template element list 37 includes item information such as a reference table, a tag name, a condition (expression), and a sentence (element) as shown in FIG. In the illustrated example of the document template element list 37, a sentence (element) whose condition for the tag name of the reference table “deterioration prediction model list” is “# = 1” is “regression curve (linear expression)”. Is described. In the document output program 24, when the fields are <reference table>, <tag name>, <condition>, and <sentence>, and the tag <deterioration prediction model list @name>, the <reference table> is set as “deterioration prediction”. Model list ”is extracted, and records # 1, # 2, and # 3 whose <tag name> is“ name ”are extracted, and records that satisfy the conditions indicated in the <condition> field of each record are extracted as“ deterioration prediction models ”. If it is included in the deterioration prediction model list 34 indicated by “list”, the value of the <sentence> field is output.
  [組合せプログラム26動作]
 前記利用者が組合せボタン63の押下により起動される組合せプログラム26は、図18に示す如く、次の動作を実行する。
 (1)資産分類条件リスト33と劣化予測モデルリスト34の各リストの各要素の有効無効組合せパターンを列挙するステップS601。
 このステップS601における資産分類条件リスト33が項目ごとに有効無効を指定できるため、組合せパターン数は2の項目数乗となり、劣化予測モデルリスト34の項目はいずれか1つのみ有効で他は無効とするため、組合せパターン数は項目数に等しくなり、従って、組合せ総数は「2の(資産分類条件リストの項目数)乗」×(劣化予測モデルリスト34の項目数)となる。
を実行する。
[Combination program 26 operation]
The combination program 26 activated by the user pressing the combination button 63 executes the following operation as shown in FIG.
(1) Step S601 for listing valid / invalid combination patterns of each element of the asset classification condition list 33 and the deterioration prediction model list 34.
Since the asset classification condition list 33 in this step S601 can designate valid / invalid for each item, the number of combination patterns is 2 to the power of the number of items, and only one of the items in the degradation prediction model list 34 is valid and the others are invalid. Therefore, the number of combination patterns is equal to the number of items, and thus the total number of combinations is “2 (the number of items in the asset classification condition list)” × (the number of items in the degradation prediction model list 34).
Execute.
 (2)該ステップS601により列挙した組合せ集合から次の組合せを取得し、その組合せが有効か無効かを設定するステップS602。
 (3)該ステップS602による有効無効の設定に基づき、前述の資産分類プログラム21とパラメータ推定プログラム22と制約条件判別プログラム23と文書出力プログラム24を実行し、該文書出力プログラム24の実行による得られる推定パラメータと判別結果情報と文書情報を推定パラメータテーブル42と判別結果テーブル43と文書テーブル44にそれぞれ保存するステップS603。
 (4)次の組み合わせがあるか否かを判定し、次の組み合わせがあると判定したときに前記ステップS602に戻るステップS604。
(2) Step S602 that acquires the next combination from the combination set listed in step S601 and sets whether the combination is valid or invalid.
(3) Based on the validity / invalidity setting in step S602, the asset classification program 21, the parameter estimation program 22, the constraint condition determination program 23, and the document output program 24 are executed and obtained by executing the document output program 24. An estimated parameter, discrimination result information, and document information are stored in the estimation parameter table 42, discrimination result table 43, and document table 44, respectively (step S603).
(4) Step S604 in which it is determined whether or not there is a next combination, and when it is determined that there is a next combination, the process returns to Step S602.
 (5)ステップS604により次の組み合わせがないと判定(全ての組合せ処理完了と判定)したとき、前記推定パラメータテーブル42と判別結果テーブル43と文書テーブル44に保存した各情報(推定パラメータ、判別結果情報、文書情報)に対して整合性基準を適用し、整合性の最も高い組合せを選択するステップS605。
 (6)該ステップS605により選択した組合せの推定パラメータと判別結果情報と文書情報を採用し、推定パラメータテーブル42と判別結果テーブル43と文書テーブル44にそれぞれ保存するステップS606。
(5) When it is determined in step S604 that there is no next combination (determination that all the combination processes are completed), each information (estimated parameter, determination result) stored in the estimated parameter table 42, the determination result table 43, and the document table 44 Information, document information) is applied with consistency criteria, and the combination with the highest consistency is selected (step S605).
(6) Step S606 that adopts the estimated parameter, discrimination result information, and document information of the combination selected in step S605 and stores them in the estimation parameter table 42, discrimination result table 43, and document table 44, respectively.
 前記ステップS605における整合性基準は、例えば、判別結果情報が属性値条件の制約条件を満たさないとした項目数、文書情報の行数・文字数・記録情報量(消費メモリ)、あるいはその組合せなどが挙げられ、この制約条件を満たさない項目数が少ないものや文書のサイズが小さいものが整合性が高いと仮定する。 The consistency criterion in step S605 includes, for example, the number of items that the determination result information does not satisfy the constraint condition of the attribute value condition, the number of lines of document information, the number of characters, the amount of recorded information (consumed memory), or a combination thereof. It is assumed that the consistency is high when the number of items that do not satisfy this constraint is small or the document size is small.
 本実施形態によるアセットマネジメントシステムは、本組合せプログラム26のステップS605により選択した組合せの推定パラメータと判別結果情報と文書情報を採用し、出力装置14を通して図15のユーザインタフェースに反映させる。これによって、このアセットマネジメントシステムは、利用者が資産分類条件リスト33や劣化予測モデルリスト34を選択する必要がなく、整合性が高いと考えられる選択を自動的に行った結果を利用することによって、専門家ではない利用者による統計データ処理をサポートし、アセットマネジメントや長寿命化計画の普及を促進することができる。 The asset management system according to the present embodiment adopts the combination estimation parameter, the determination result information, and the document information selected in step S605 of the combination program 26, and reflects them in the user interface of FIG. As a result, this asset management system does not require the user to select the asset classification condition list 33 or the deterioration prediction model list 34, and uses the result of automatically performing selection that is considered highly consistent. Supports statistical data processing by non-expert users and promotes the spread of asset management and long-life plans.
 本発明は自治体が維持管理する道路系社会インフラ向けの劣化予測モデルのパラメータ推定のみならず、数量や精度が不十分であるデータを様々な観点で分類と推定と検証をしながら妥当な統計モデルを求める必要があるコンピュータシステムに利用することができる。 The present invention not only estimates the parameters of a deterioration prediction model for road social infrastructure maintained by local governments, but also provides a reasonable statistical model while classifying, estimating and verifying data with insufficient quantity and accuracy from various viewpoints. Can be used for computer systems that need to
11 演算装置、12 記憶装置、13 入力装置、14 出力装置、
21 資産分類プログラム、22 パラメータ推定プログラム、
23 制約条件判別プログラム、24 文書出力プログラム、
25 ユーザインタフェースプログラム、26 組合せプログラム、
31 資産データベース、32 点検データベース、33 資産分類条件リスト、
34 劣化予測モデルリスト、35 制約条件リスト、36 文書テンプレート、
37 文書テンプレート要素リスト、41 分類結果テーブル、
42 推定パラメータテーブル、43 判別結果テーブル、44 文書テーブル、
53 資産分類条件リスト表示欄、54 劣化予測モデルリスト表示欄、
55 制約条件リスト表示欄、61 計算開始ボタン、62 文書出力ボタン、
63 組合せボタン、73 判別結果表示欄、74 文書表示欄
 
11 arithmetic units, 12 storage units, 13 input units, 14 output units,
21 asset classification program, 22 parameter estimation program,
23 constraint condition determination program, 24 document output program,
25 user interface programs, 26 combination programs,
31 asset database, 32 inspection database, 33 asset classification condition list,
34 degradation prediction model list, 35 constraint condition list, 36 document template,
37 document template element list, 41 classification result table,
42 Estimated parameter table, 43 Discrimination result table, 44 Document table,
53 asset classification condition list display field, 54 deterioration prediction model list display field,
55 constraint list display field, 61 calculation start button, 62 document output button,
63 Combination buttons, 73 Discrimination result display field, 74 Document display field

Claims (10)

  1.  インフラ(Social infrastructure)の資産名及び複数の属性情報を含む資産情報を格納する資産データベースと、インフラの資産名と該資産の点検を行う点検年次と資産の状態を表す健全度の点検情報を格納する点検データベースと、資産が属する属性名と該資産に対する複数の属性条件を含む分類条件情報を格納する資産分類条件リストと、資産の劣化を予測するためのアルゴリズム・数式・係数を含む劣化予測情報を格納する劣化予測モデルリストと、資産に対する複数の制約条件及び複数制約条件の関係を含む制約条件情報を格納する制約条件リストと、利用者に対してアルゴリズムと数式と係数を含む劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するためのタグを含む複数の標準文書を格納する文書テンプレートと、該文書テンプレートに参照されるアルゴリズムと数式と係数の要素を格納する文書テンプレート要素リストと、分類結果である複数の属性の組み合わせに対する資産名を含む分類結果情報を格納する分類結果テーブルと、該分類結果テーブルの複数の属性に対する劣化状態を推定するための推定パラメータを格納する推定パラメータテーブルと、該推定パラメータテーブル及び複数の推定パラメータの関係が整合性を満たしているかを判別した判別結果情報を格納する判別結果テーブルと、前記文書テンプレート及び文書テンプレート要素リストを参照して作成された利用者に対する劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するための複数の標準文書を格納する文書テーブルとを記憶する記憶装置と、
     前記記憶装置を参照して資産の劣化予測を行い資産の補修や更新を予測する演算装置と、
     資産分類条件リスト表示欄と劣化予測モデルリスト表示欄と制約条件リスト表示欄と資産分類条件リストと劣化予測モデルリストと制約条件リストと計算開始ボタンと文書出力ボタンと判別結果表示欄と文書表示欄とを表示する表示装置と、
     を備えるアセットマネジメントシステムであって、
     前記演算装置が、
     資産を資産名及び属性情報に基づいて分類した分類条件情報を分類結果テーブルに格納する資産分類プログラムと、
     該資産分類プログラムが分類した分類結果情報に基づいて資産毎の劣化予測を行うためのパラメータを推定するパラメータ推定プログラムと、
     制約条件リストに格納された制約条件情報に基づいて判別した判別結果情報を判別結果テーブルに格納する制約条件判別プログラムと、
     文書テンプレートの標準文書を読み込み、標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換えて文書テーブルに出力する文書出力プログラムと、
     利用者が入力した入力指示に基づいて資産分類プログラムとパラメータ推定プログラムと制約条件判別プログラムとを実行して推定パラメータを得、文書出力プログラムにより文書テンプレートの標準文書を読み込み、標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換え、文書テーブルに出力するユーザインタフェースプログラムとを実行するアセットマネジメントシステム。
    Asset database for storing asset information including asset name and multiple attribute information of infrastructure (Social infrastructure), infrastructure asset name, inspection year for checking the asset, and health check information indicating the state of the asset Degradation prediction including an inspection database to be stored, an asset classification condition list storing classification condition information including attribute names to which the asset belongs and a plurality of attribute conditions for the asset, and an algorithm / formula / coefficient for predicting the deterioration of the asset A deterioration prediction model list for storing information, a restriction condition list for storing constraint information including a plurality of constraint conditions for the asset and the relationship between the plurality of constraint conditions, and a deterioration prediction model including an algorithm, a mathematical expression, and a coefficient for the user Document template for storing a plurality of standard documents including tags for explaining a derivation method, and the document Document template element list for storing elements of algorithms, mathematical formulas, and coefficients referred to in the template, a classification result table for storing classification result information including asset names for combinations of a plurality of attributes as classification results, and the classification result table A determination parameter table for storing an estimation parameter for estimating a deterioration state for a plurality of attributes of the image, and a determination result information for determining whether a relationship between the estimation parameter table and the plurality of estimation parameters satisfies consistency A storage device for storing a result table and a document table for storing a plurality of standard documents for describing a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model for a user created by referring to the document template and the document template element list;
    An arithmetic device that predicts asset repair and update by referring to the storage device and predicting asset deterioration;
    Asset classification condition list display field, deterioration prediction model list display field, constraint condition list display field, asset classification condition list, deterioration prediction model list, restriction condition list, calculation start button, document output button, discrimination result display field, and document display field And a display device for displaying
    An asset management system comprising:
    The arithmetic unit is
    An asset classification program for storing classification condition information obtained by classifying assets based on asset names and attribute information in a classification result table;
    A parameter estimation program for estimating parameters for performing deterioration prediction for each asset based on the classification result information classified by the asset classification program;
    A constraint condition determination program for storing determination result information determined based on the constraint condition information stored in the constraint condition list in a determination result table;
    A document output program that reads the standard document of the document template, replaces the tags described in the standard document based on the constraint condition information, and outputs to the document table;
    Based on the input instructions input by the user, the asset classification program, parameter estimation program, and constraint condition determination program are executed to obtain the estimated parameters, the document output program reads the standard document of the document template, and is described in the standard document An asset management system that executes a user interface program that replaces tags based on constraint information and outputs them to a document table.
  2.  前記資産分類プログラムが、
     前記資産分類条件リストから指定された属性名及び属性値条件の組み合わせによる資産分類条件を取得する第1ステップと、
     該第1ステップにより取得した資産分類条件に基づいて資産データベースから資産情報を取得する第2ステップと、
     該第2ステップにより取得した資産分類条件に基づき該第2ステップにより取得した資産情報にラベルを追加付与した中間データを生成する第3ステップと、
     前記資産分類条件リストに次の資産情報が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記第2ステップに戻る第4ステップと、
     第4ステップにより次の資産情報がないと判定したとき、次の資産分類条件が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記ステップ第1ステップに戻る第5ステップと、
     該第5ステップにより次の資産分類条件がないと判定したとき、前記中間データからラベルが同一である資産情報をグループ化し、分類結果テーブルに格納する第6ステップを実行することによって、分類結果テーブルに分類結果情報を格納するように動作する請求項1記載のアセットマネジメントシステム。
    The asset classification program is
    A first step of acquiring an asset classification condition by a combination of an attribute name and an attribute value condition specified from the asset classification condition list;
    A second step of acquiring asset information from the asset database based on the asset classification condition acquired in the first step;
    A third step of generating intermediate data in which a label is added to the asset information acquired in the second step based on the asset classification condition acquired in the second step;
    A fourth step of determining whether or not the next asset information is present in the asset classification condition list, and returning to the second step when it is determined that the asset classification condition list is present;
    When it is determined that there is no next asset information in the fourth step, it is determined whether there is a next asset classification condition, and when it is determined that there is, a fifth step that returns to the first step of the step;
    When it is determined that there is no next asset classification condition in the fifth step, the asset information having the same label is grouped from the intermediate data, and the sixth step of storing in the classification result table is executed, whereby the classification result table The asset management system according to claim 1, wherein the asset management system is operable to store the classification result information in.
  3.  前記パラメータ推定プログラムが、
     前記資産分類プログラムが分類した分類結果テーブルから分類結果情報を取得する第7ステップと、
     該第7ステップにより取得した分類結果情報に含まれる資産名をキーとして点検データベースから該資産名に対応した経過年数及び健全度の集合を取得する第8ステップと、
     劣化予測モデルのアルゴリズム式に基づいて前記第8ステップにより取得した経過年数及び健全度の集合から劣化予測モデルのパラメータを推定する第9ステップと、
     分類結果テーブルに次の分類結果情報があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記第7ステップに戻る第10ステップと、
     前記第9ステップより推定したパラメータを推定パラメータテーブルに格納する第11ステップを実行する請求項2記載のアセットマネジメントシステム。
    The parameter estimation program is
    A seventh step of acquiring classification result information from the classification result table classified by the asset classification program;
    An eighth step of acquiring a set of elapsed years and soundness levels corresponding to the asset name from the inspection database using the asset name included in the classification result information acquired in the seventh step as a key;
    A ninth step of estimating the parameters of the deterioration prediction model from the set of elapsed years and soundness obtained in the eighth step based on the algorithm formula of the deterioration prediction model;
    Determining whether or not there is next classification result information in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, a tenth step of returning to the seventh step;
    The asset management system according to claim 2, wherein the eleventh step of storing the parameter estimated from the ninth step in an estimated parameter table is executed.
  4.  前記制約条件判別プログラムが、
     制約条件リストから制約条件情報を取得する第12ステップと、
     分類結果テーブルに格納したラベル群のうち、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件情報に含まれる下位の制約条件に記載された属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を推定パラメータテーブルの推定パラメータから求める第13ステップと、
     該第13ステップにより求めた属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を取得する第14ステップと、
     該第14ステップにより取得したラベル群が第12ステップにより取得した制約条件において上位の制約条件との関係条件を満たすか否かを判定する第15ステップと、
     該第15ステップにおいて、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件が上位の制約条件との関係を満たしていると判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たす」と設定する第16ステップと、
     該第15ステップにおいて、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件が上位の制約条件との関係を満たしていないと判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たさない」と設定する第17ステップと、
     分類結果テーブルに次のラベル群があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記第14ステップに戻る第18ステップと、
     該第18ステップにおいて次のラベル群がないと判定したとき、次の制約条件があるか否かを判定しあると判定したときに前記第12ステップに戻る第19ステップと、
     該第19ステップにおいて次の制約条件がないと判定したとき、判別結果情報を判別結果テーブルに格納する第20ステップを実行する請求項3記載のアセットマネジメントシステム。
    The constraint condition determination program is
    A twelfth step of acquiring constraint condition information from the constraint condition list;
    Among the label groups stored in the classification result table, a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values described in the lower-level constraint conditions included in the constraint condition information acquired in step 12 is obtained from the estimated parameters in the estimated parameter table. 13th step;
    A fourteenth step of obtaining a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values obtained in the thirteenth step;
    A fifteenth step for determining whether or not the label group acquired in the fourteenth step satisfies the relational condition with the upper constraint condition in the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step;
    In the fifteenth step, when it is determined that the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step satisfies the relationship with the upper constraint condition, the sixteenth step of setting the determination result as “constraint condition”;
    In the fifteenth step, when it is determined that the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step does not satisfy the relationship with the upper constraint condition, the seventeenth step of setting the determination result as “does not satisfy the constraint condition”;
    It is determined whether or not there is a next label group in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, an eighteenth step of returning to the fourteenth step;
    A 19th step for returning to the twelfth step when it is determined that there is a next constraint when it is determined in the 18th step that there is no next label group;
    The asset management system according to claim 3, wherein when it is determined in the nineteenth step that there is no next restriction condition, a twentieth step of storing the determination result information in the determination result table is executed.
  5.  前記組合せプログラムが、
     前記資産分類条件リストと劣化予測モデルリストの各要素の有効無効組合せパターンを列挙する第21ステップと、
     該第21ステップにより列挙した組合せ集合から次の組合せを取得し、その組合せが有効か無効かを設定する第22ステップと、
     該第22ステップによる有効か無効かの設定に基づいて資産分類プログラムとパラメータ推定プログラムと制約条件判別プログラムとを実行する請求項4記載のアセットマネジメントシステム。
    The combination program is
    A 21st step of enumerating valid / invalid combination patterns of each element of the asset classification condition list and the deterioration prediction model list;
    A 22nd step of obtaining the next combination from the combination set listed in the 21st step and setting whether the combination is valid or invalid;
    5. The asset management system according to claim 4, wherein the asset classification program, the parameter estimation program, and the constraint condition determination program are executed based on the setting of validity or invalidity in the twenty-second step.
  6.  インフラの資産名及び複数の属性情報を含む資産情報を格納する資産データベースと、インフラの資産名と該資産の点検を行う点検年次と資産の状態を表す健全度の点検情報を格納する点検データベースと、資産が属する属性名と該資産に対する複数の属性条件を含む分類条件情報を格納する資産分類条件リストと、資産の劣化を予測するためのアルゴリズム・数式・係数を含む劣化予測情報を格納する劣化予測モデルリストと、資産に対する複数の制約条件及び複数制約条件の関係を含む制約条件情報を格納する制約条件リストと、利用者に対してアルゴリズムと数式と係数を含む劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するためのタグを含む複数の標準文書を格納する文書テンプレートと、該文書テンプレートに参照されるアルゴリズムと数式と係数の要素を格納する文書テンプレート要素リストと、分類結果である複数の属性の組み合わせに対する資産名を含む分類結果情報を格納する分類結果テーブルと、該分類結果テーブルの複数の属性に対する劣化状態を推定するための推定パラメータを格納する推定パラメータテーブルと、該推定パラメータテーブル及び複数の推定パラメータの関係が整合性を満たしているかを判別した判別結果情報を格納する判別結果テーブルと、前記文書テンプレート及び文書テンプレート要素リストを参照して作成された利用者に対する劣化予測モデル導出方法を説明するための複数の標準文書を格納する文書テーブルとを記憶する記憶装置と、該記憶装置を参照して資産の劣化予測を行い資産の補修や更新を予測する演算装置と、資産分類条件リスト表示欄と劣化予測モデルリスト表示欄と制約条件リスト表示欄と資産分類条件リストと劣化予測モデルリストと制約条件リストと計算開始ボタンと文書出力ボタンと判別結果表示欄と文書表示欄とを表示する表示装置とを備えるコンピュータシステムを用いたアセットマネジメント方法であって、
     前記演算装置に、
     資産を資産名及び属性情報に基づいて分類した分類条件情報を分類結果テーブルに格納する資産分類プログラムと、
     該資産分類プログラムが分類した分類結果情報に基づいて資産毎の劣化予測を行うためのパラメータを推定するパラメータ推定プログラムと、
     制約条件リストに格納された制約条件情報に基づいて判別した判別結果情報を判別結果テーブルに格納する制約条件判別プログラムと、
     文書テンプレートの標準文書を読み込み、標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換えて文書テーブルに出力する文書出力プログラムと、
     利用者が入力した入力指示に基づいて資産分類プログラムとパラメータ推定プログラムと制約条件判別プログラムとを実行して推定パラメータを得、文書出力プログラムにより文書テンプレートの標準文書を読み込み、標準文書に記載されたタグを制約条件情報に基づいて置き換え、文書テーブルに出力するユーザインタフェースプログラムとを実行させるアセットマネジメント方法。
    An asset database that stores asset information including infrastructure asset names and multiple attribute information, and an inspection database that stores infrastructure asset names, inspection years for checking the assets, and health check information indicating the state of the assets And an asset classification condition list that stores classification condition information including the attribute name to which the asset belongs and a plurality of attribute conditions for the asset, and deterioration prediction information including an algorithm, a mathematical expression, and a coefficient for predicting the deterioration of the asset. Describes a degradation prediction model list, a constraint list that stores constraint conditions including multiple constraints and multiple constraint conditions for assets, and a method for deriving a degradation prediction model that includes algorithms, formulas, and coefficients for users A document template for storing a plurality of standard documents including a tag to be used, an algorithm and a mathematical expression referred to by the document template, Document template element list that stores a number of elements, a classification result table that stores classification result information including asset names for combinations of a plurality of attributes that are classification results, and estimates degradation states for a plurality of attributes of the classification result table An estimation parameter table for storing an estimation parameter for determining, a determination result table for storing determination result information for determining whether the relationship between the estimation parameter table and the plurality of estimation parameters satisfies consistency, the document template, and the document A storage device for storing a document table for storing a plurality of standard documents for explaining a method for deriving a deterioration prediction model for a user created with reference to the template element list, and asset deterioration with reference to the storage device A computing device that makes predictions to predict asset repairs and updates, and asset classification condition lists Display field, deterioration prediction model list display field, constraint condition list display field, asset classification condition list, deterioration prediction model list, constraint condition list, calculation start button, document output button, discrimination result display field, and document display field An asset management method using a computer system comprising a display device,
    In the arithmetic unit,
    An asset classification program for storing classification condition information obtained by classifying assets based on asset names and attribute information in a classification result table;
    A parameter estimation program for estimating parameters for performing deterioration prediction for each asset based on the classification result information classified by the asset classification program;
    A constraint condition determination program for storing determination result information determined based on the constraint condition information stored in the constraint condition list in a determination result table;
    A document output program that reads the standard document of the document template, replaces the tags described in the standard document based on the constraint condition information, and outputs to the document table;
    Based on the input instructions input by the user, the asset classification program, parameter estimation program, and constraint condition determination program are executed to obtain the estimated parameters, the document output program reads the standard document of the document template, and is described in the standard document An asset management method for executing a user interface program that replaces a tag based on constraint information and outputs the tag to a document table.
  7.  前記演算装置が資産分類プログラムに、
     前記資産分類条件リストから指定された属性名及び属性値条件の組み合わせによる資産分類条件を取得する第1ステップと、
     該第1ステップにより取得した資産分類条件に基づいて資産データベースから資産情報を取得する第2ステップと、
     該第2ステップにより取得した資産分類条件に基づき該第2ステップにより取得した資産情報にラベルを追加付与した中間データを生成する第3ステップと、
     前記資産分類条件リストに次の資産情報が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記第2ステップに戻る第4ステップと、
     第4ステップにより次の資産情報がないと判定したとき、次の資産分類条件が有るか否かを判定し、有ると判定したときに前記第1ステップに戻る第5ステップと、
     該第5ステップにより次の資産分類条件がないと判定したとき、前記中間データからラベルが同一である資産情報をグループ化し、分類結果テーブルに格納する第6ステップを実行することによって、分類結果テーブルに分類結果情報を格納するように動作させる請求項6記載のアセットマネジメント方法。
    The computing device is an asset classification program,
    A first step of acquiring an asset classification condition by a combination of an attribute name and an attribute value condition specified from the asset classification condition list;
    A second step of acquiring asset information from the asset database based on the asset classification condition acquired in the first step;
    A third step of generating intermediate data in which a label is added to the asset information acquired in the second step based on the asset classification condition acquired in the second step;
    A fourth step of determining whether or not the next asset information is present in the asset classification condition list, and returning to the second step when it is determined that the asset classification condition list is present;
    When it is determined that there is no next asset information in the fourth step, it is determined whether there is a next asset classification condition, and when it is determined that there is a fifth step, the fifth step returns to the first step;
    When it is determined that there is no next asset classification condition in the fifth step, the asset information having the same label is grouped from the intermediate data, and the sixth step of storing in the classification result table is executed, whereby the classification result table The asset management method according to claim 6, wherein the asset management method is operated so as to store classification result information.
  8.  前記演算装置がパラメータ推定プログラムに、
     前記資産分類プログラムが分類した分類結果テーブルから分類結果情報を取得する第7ステップと、
     該第7ステップにより取得した分類結果情報に含まれる資産名をキーとして点検データベースから該資産名に対応した経過年数及び健全度の集合を取得する第8ステップと、
     劣化予測モデルのアルゴリズム式に基づいて前記第8ステップにより取得した経過年数及び健全度の集合から劣化予測モデルのパラメータを推定する第9ステップと、
     分類結果テーブルに次の分類結果情報があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記第7ステップに戻る第10ステップと、
     前記第9ステップより推定したパラメータを推定パラメータテーブルに格納する第11ステップを実行させる請求項7記載のアセットマネジメント方法。
    The arithmetic device is a parameter estimation program,
    A seventh step of acquiring classification result information from the classification result table classified by the asset classification program;
    An eighth step of acquiring a set of elapsed years and soundness levels corresponding to the asset name from the inspection database using the asset name included in the classification result information acquired in the seventh step as a key;
    A ninth step of estimating the parameters of the deterioration prediction model from the set of elapsed years and soundness obtained in the eighth step based on the algorithm formula of the deterioration prediction model;
    Determining whether or not there is next classification result information in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, a tenth step of returning to the seventh step;
    The asset management method according to claim 7, wherein the eleventh step of storing the parameter estimated from the ninth step in an estimated parameter table is executed.
  9.  前記演算装置が制約条件判別プログラムに、
     制約条件リストから制約条件情報を取得する第12ステップと、
     分類結果テーブルに格納したラベル群のうち、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件情報に含まれる下位の制約条件に記載された属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を推定パラメータテーブルの推定パラメータから求める第13ステップと、
     該第13ステップにより求めた属性の値のみが異なるラベル群の集合を取得する第14ステップと、
     該第14ステップにより取得したラベル群が第12ステップにより取得した制約条件において上位の制約条件との関係条件を満たすか否かを判定する第15ステップと、
     該第15ステップにおいて、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件が上位の制約条件との関係を満たしていると判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たす」と設定する第16ステップと、
     該第15ステップにおいて、第12ステップにより取得した制約条件が上位の制約条件との関係を満たしていないと判定したとき、判別結果を「制約条件を満たさない」と設定する第17ステップと、
     分類結果テーブルに次のラベル群があるか否かを判定し、あると判定したときに前記第14ステップに戻る第18ステップと、
     該第18ステップにおいて次のラベル群がないと判定したとき、次の制約条件があるか否かを判定しあると判定したときに前記第12ステップに戻る第19ステップと、
     該第19ステップにおいて次の制約条件がないと判定したとき、判別結果情報を判別結果テーブルに格納する第20ステップを実行させる請求項8記載のアセットマネジメント方法。
    The arithmetic unit is a constraint condition determination program,
    A twelfth step of acquiring constraint condition information from the constraint condition list;
    Among the label groups stored in the classification result table, a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values described in the lower-level constraint conditions included in the constraint condition information acquired in step 12 is obtained from the estimated parameters in the estimated parameter table. 13th step;
    A fourteenth step of obtaining a set of label groups that differ only in the attribute values obtained in the thirteenth step;
    A fifteenth step for determining whether or not the label group acquired in the fourteenth step satisfies the relational condition with the upper constraint condition in the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step;
    In the fifteenth step, when it is determined that the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step satisfies the relationship with the upper constraint condition, the sixteenth step of setting the determination result as “constraint condition”;
    In the fifteenth step, when it is determined that the constraint condition acquired in the twelfth step does not satisfy the relationship with the upper constraint condition, the seventeenth step of setting the determination result as “does not satisfy the constraint condition”;
    It is determined whether or not there is a next label group in the classification result table, and when it is determined that there is, an eighteenth step of returning to the fourteenth step;
    A 19th step for returning to the twelfth step when it is determined that there is a next constraint when it is determined in the 18th step that there is no next label group;
    The asset management method according to claim 8, wherein when it is determined in the nineteenth step that there is no next constraint condition, a twentieth step of storing the determination result information in the determination result table is executed.
  10.  前記演算装置が組合せプログラムに、
     前記資産分類条件リストと劣化予測モデルリストの各要素の有効無効組合せパターンを列挙する第21ステップと、
     該第21ステップにより列挙した組合せ集合から次の組合せを取得し、その組合せが有効か無効かを設定する第22ステップと、
     該第22ステップによる有効か無効かの設定に基づいて資産分類プログラムとパラメータ推定プログラムと制約条件判別プログラムとを実行させる請求項9記載のアセットマネジメント方法。
    The arithmetic unit is a combination program,
    A 21st step of enumerating valid / invalid combination patterns of each element of the asset classification condition list and the deterioration prediction model list;
    A 22nd step of obtaining the next combination from the combination set listed in the 21st step and setting whether the combination is valid or invalid;
    The asset management method according to claim 9, wherein the asset classification program, the parameter estimation program, and the constraint condition determination program are executed based on the setting of validity or invalidity in the twenty-second step.
PCT/JP2014/072060 2014-03-25 2014-08-22 Asset management system and asset management method WO2015145802A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2014-062714 2014-03-25
JP2014062714A JP6235947B2 (en) 2014-03-25 2014-03-25 Asset management system and asset management method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015145802A1 true WO2015145802A1 (en) 2015-10-01

Family

ID=54194382

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2014/072060 WO2015145802A1 (en) 2014-03-25 2014-08-22 Asset management system and asset management method

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP6235947B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2015145802A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115391419A (en) * 2022-08-12 2022-11-25 杭州易靓好车互联网科技有限公司 Asset quality statistical method and device

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006323741A (en) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-30 Kajima Corp Asset management support system, asset management support method, program and recording medium
JP2007140608A (en) * 2005-11-14 2007-06-07 Yamaguchi Univ Structure repair construction plan support system
JP2008291440A (en) * 2007-05-22 2008-12-04 Hokkaido Electric Power Co Inc:The Structure deterioration curve computing system and life cycle cost evaluation method
JP2012241325A (en) * 2011-05-16 2012-12-10 Toyota Motor Corp Residential house maintenance system
JP2014016691A (en) * 2012-07-06 2014-01-30 Hitachi Ltd Equipment maintenance and management support system, and method for the same

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2006323741A (en) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-30 Kajima Corp Asset management support system, asset management support method, program and recording medium
JP2007140608A (en) * 2005-11-14 2007-06-07 Yamaguchi Univ Structure repair construction plan support system
JP2008291440A (en) * 2007-05-22 2008-12-04 Hokkaido Electric Power Co Inc:The Structure deterioration curve computing system and life cycle cost evaluation method
JP2012241325A (en) * 2011-05-16 2012-12-10 Toyota Motor Corp Residential house maintenance system
JP2014016691A (en) * 2012-07-06 2014-01-30 Hitachi Ltd Equipment maintenance and management support system, and method for the same

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115391419A (en) * 2022-08-12 2022-11-25 杭州易靓好车互联网科技有限公司 Asset quality statistical method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP6235947B2 (en) 2017-11-22
JP2015185041A (en) 2015-10-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ngo et al. Factor-based big data and predictive analytics capability assessment tool for the construction industry
Gong et al. Inside out: The interrelationships of sustainable performance metrics and its effect on business decision making: Theory and practice
US7886028B2 (en) Method and system for system migration
Ouenniche et al. An ordinal game theory approach to the analysis and selection of partners in public–private partnership projects
Govan et al. The resource-based view on project risk management
Kim et al. Discriminant analysis for predicting ranges of cost variance in international construction projects
Ferreira et al. An integrated framework based on the ECSI approach to link mould customers' satisfaction and product design
Kordi et al. Mapping of social sustainability attributes to stakeholders’ involvement in construction project life cycle
CN103733194A (en) Dynamically organizing cloud computing resources to facilitate discovery
Dotoli et al. Modeling and management of a hospital department via Petri nets
US20120150753A1 (en) Quantitative valuation of real estate based on qualitative assessment thereof
JP2008544407A (en) Technical methods and tools for capability-based multiple family of systems planning
Hwang et al. Job satisfaction of project managers in green construction projects: Influencing factors and improvement strategies
CN116050947A (en) Method, device, computer equipment and storage medium for evaluating vehicle dispatching effect
Roy et al. Comparing driving cycle development methods based on markov chains
Zakaria et al. User Centric Software Quality Model For Sustainability
Shafaat et al. Early warning system for highway construction projects using GA-SVM
Sahu et al. Supply chain performance appraisement, benchmarking and decision-making: empirical study using grey theory and grey-MOORA
WO2015145802A1 (en) Asset management system and asset management method
Niu et al. An activity-based integrated land-use transport model for urban spatial distribution simulation
Foroughi A note on “A new method for ranking discovered rules from data mining by DEA”, and a full ranking approach
KR102094595B1 (en) Method and system forforecasing dynamic trust index
US20230086930A1 (en) Intellectual-property analysis platform
Lauderdale et al. Estimating vote-specific preferences from roll-call data using conditional autoregressive priors
Kazemian et al. Forecasting Iran national health expenditures: General model and conceptual framework

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14886719

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 14886719

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1