WO2015050504A1 - Method For Predicting Clinical Toxicity And Outcome - Google Patents

Method For Predicting Clinical Toxicity And Outcome Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2015050504A1
WO2015050504A1 PCT/SG2014/000467 SG2014000467W WO2015050504A1 WO 2015050504 A1 WO2015050504 A1 WO 2015050504A1 SG 2014000467 W SG2014000467 W SG 2014000467W WO 2015050504 A1 WO2015050504 A1 WO 2015050504A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
genotype
tyrosine kinase
receptor tyrosine
kinase inhibitor
risk
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/SG2014/000467
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Min-Han Tan
Ying Hsia CHU
Johnathan LAI
Puah Hoon TAN
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Agency for Science Technology and Research Singapore
Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd
Original Assignee
Agency for Science Technology and Research Singapore
Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Agency for Science Technology and Research Singapore, Singapore Health Services Pte Ltd filed Critical Agency for Science Technology and Research Singapore
Priority to US15/026,957 priority Critical patent/US20160251725A1/en
Priority to CN201480066303.1A priority patent/CN105917000A/en
Publication of WO2015050504A1 publication Critical patent/WO2015050504A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/68Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
    • C12Q1/6876Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
    • C12Q1/6883Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
    • C12Q1/6886Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/106Pharmacogenomics, i.e. genetic variability in individual responses to drugs and drug metabolism
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/156Polymorphic or mutational markers
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q2600/00Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
    • C12Q2600/158Expression markers

Definitions

  • the present invention relates stem cells.
  • the present invention relates to a method for culturing and maintaining a pluripotent stem cell in an undifferentiated state.
  • Cancer therapy includes surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and radiation therapy.
  • Targeted therapy is directed against cancer-specific molecules and signaling pathways within the tumor.
  • drugs used in targeted therapy include drugs that inhibit angiogenesis and drugs that induce apoptosis.
  • An example of a class of drugs used in targeted therapy is tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) .
  • TKIs tumor response and individual survival vary among patients and therefore the therapeutic benefits of TKIs are not universal but individualized.
  • life quality-compromising and potentially lethal toxicities are common. These include diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, mucositis, hypertension, leucopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Toxicities lead to dose interruption, dose reduction and prevent patients from benefitting fully from the drug. Toxicity presentation and severity, like survival, are also not universal but vary greatly among patients.
  • a method for determining the sensitivity of a patient with cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy comprising: a) isolating - a nucleic acid sample from a biological sample obtained from the said patient; b) screening said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof ; and c) determining the sensitivity of a patient with renal cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy based on the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof, wherein said sensitivity is selected from
  • kits for use according to the method as described herein comprising components for the screening of said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof .
  • subject refers to living, multicellular vertebrate organisms, a category that includes both human and veterinary subjects for example, mammals, birds and primates.
  • nucleic acid refers to a deoxyribonucleotide or ribonucleotide polymer in either single or double stranded form, and unless otherwise limited, encompassing known analogues of natural nucleotides that hybridize to nucleic acids in a manner similar to naturally occurring nucleotides .
  • polymorphism refers to a variant in a sequence of a gene, usually carried from one generation to another in a population. Polymorphisms can be those variations (nucleotide sequence differences) that, while having a different nucleotide sequence, produce functionally equivalent gene products, such as those variations generally found between individuals, different ethnic groups, geographic locations.
  • polymorphism also encompasses variations that produce gene products with altered function, i.e., variants in the gene sequence that lead to gene products that are not functionally equivalent. This term also encompasses variations that produce no gene product, an inactive gene product, or increased or increased activity gene product.
  • Polymorphisms can be referred to, for instance, by the nucleotide position at which the variation exists, by the change in amino acid sequence caused by the nucleotide variation, or by a change in some other characteristic of the nucleic acid molecule or protein that is linked to the variation (e.g., an alteration of a secondary structure such as a stem-loop, or an alteration of the binding affinity of the nucleic acid for associated molecules, such as polymerases, RNases, and so forth) .
  • a change in some other characteristic of the nucleic acid molecule or protein that is linked to the variation e.g., an alteration of a secondary structure such as a stem-loop, or an alteration of the binding affinity of the nucleic acid for associated molecules, such as polymerases, RNases, and so forth.
  • SNP Single Nucleotide Polymorphism
  • a method for determining the sensitivity of a patient with cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy may comprise: isolating a nucleic acid sample from a biological sample obtained from the said patient; screening said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof; and determining the sensitivity of a patient with renal cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy based on the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll2>8503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof, wherein said sensitivity is selected from one or more of neutropenia, diarrhea
  • SNP single nucleotide polymorphism
  • the cancer may be selected from the group consisting of renal cancer, neuroendocrine cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, brain cancer, lung cancer, hematological malignancies, melanoma and sarcomas . ⁇
  • the renal cancer is metastatic renal cell carcinoma (m CC) .
  • the patient may suffer from mRCC.
  • the patient suffers from mRCC and undergoes receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment.
  • the biological sample is obtained from the group consisting of frozen tissue, tissue biopsies, circulating cells, bodily fluids and cheek swab.
  • the biological sample may be non-neoplastic or neoplastic.
  • the bodily fluids may be selected from the group consisting of blood, saliva, ascites, effusions and urine.
  • the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be a multikinase inhibitor for receptor tyrosine kinase including but not limited to sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, tivozantinib or combinations thereof.
  • the patient is a mammal or a human.
  • the human may be an ethnic Asian, or an ethnic Caucasian, or an ethnic African.
  • the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsll28503 and rsl045642, and (b) determining the risk of diarrhea based on the screening result obtained in step (a) .
  • the risk of diarrhea during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC genotype than a CT or TT genotype.
  • the risk of diarrhea during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC genotype than a CT or TT genotype .
  • the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rs2032582, rsl045642, rsll28503 and rs2231142, and (b) determining the risk of neutropenia based on the screening result obtained in step (a) .
  • the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a TT genotype than a CC or CT genotype.
  • the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a AA or AG or GG genotype than a AT or GT or TT genotype.
  • the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC or CT genotype than a TT genotype.
  • the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC or CT genotype than a TT genotype.
  • step (b) with respect to rs2231142, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC or AC genotype than a AA genotype.
  • step (b) with respect to the three SNPs including rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNP sites than for a TTT/TTT genotype.
  • the method may further comprise: (a) screening for the SNP genotype of rsll28503, and (b) determining the risk of early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
  • step (b) with respect to rsll28503, the risk of early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC or CT genotype than a TT genotype .
  • the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, and (b) determining the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor, tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
  • step (b) with respect to rsl045642, the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a TT genotype than a CC or CT genotype .
  • step (b) with respect to rs2032582, the risk of primary tumo r resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a TT genotype than a AA or AG or GG or AT or GT genotype .
  • step (b) with respect to the three SNPs including rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy may be higher for a TTT/TTT genotype than for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNP sites.
  • the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, and (b) determining overall survival, based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
  • step (b) with respect to the three SNPs including rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, overall survival during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, may be lower for a TTT/TTT genotype than for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNPs .
  • the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP geiiotype selected from the group consisting of rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, and (b) determining progression- free survival, based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
  • step (b) with respect to the three SNP genotypes rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, progression- free survival during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be lower for a TTT/TTT genotype than for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNPs.
  • kits for use in accordance with the method as described herein comprising components for the screening of said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof.
  • the toxicities analyzed included leucopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome and early toxicity- necessitated treatment termination.
  • Blood cell counts from the electronic medical system and the physician notes from the first sunitinib cycle were assessed for leucopenia ( ⁇ 3000/ ⁇ 1_) , neutropenia ( ⁇ 2000/ L) , thrombocytopenia ( ⁇ 150000/ L) , hand-foot syndrome (documented physical examination finding) and diarrhea (documented patient complaints) .
  • Progression free survival was defined as the time from the date of suitinib initiation to the date of sunitinib termination if suitinib was terminated due to radiological or clinical evidence of progressive disease, toxicities or death.
  • Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of sunitinib initiation to the date of death, or to the date of the last follow up for censored cases .
  • SNPs were genotyped, as listed in Table 1, in 4 genes: sunitinib targets FLT3 and VEGFR2 , and multi-drug effluxers ABCG2 and ABCB1. These polymorphisms were selected based on minor allele frequency higher than 0.1 in Han Chinese, previously reported associations with sunitinib toxicities (Table 2) , and presumed function in sunitinib pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics . Primers for genotyping the SNPs and the BIM deletion are provided in Table 3.
  • n VAF° ism wt/ t/ var/
  • VEGFR2 0.160 rs2305948 V297I 94 64 30 0 1191 C/T (T)
  • VEGFR2 1191 Any toxicity (n 183) van Erp et
  • OS overall survival
  • PFS progression-free survival
  • HFS hand-foot syndrome
  • ABCB1 haplotype composed of 3435 C/T, 1236 T/C and 2677 G/TA.
  • AGCCCACTG3' S GAG GAG3' (SEQ EQ ID NO. 1) ID NO. 2)
  • Germline DNA was obtained from peripheral blood,, formalin- fixed tissue of benign kidney from nephrectomy and immortalized lymphocytes. The labeling on blood tubes and tissue slides were de- identified by a third party before being used for DNA extraction or cell immortalization. Genotyping was done by PCR amplification of the flanking region of each SNP followed by direct sequencing.
  • Genotype associations with ⁇ toxicity events or responsive tumor were first analyzed using univariate logistic regression. Genotypes generating P ⁇ 0.20 were further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression including patient age, gender, baseline ECOG status and starting dose as covariates . Progression- free survival and overall survival were estimated by means of Kaplan-Meier method, while the associations of genotypes and patient characteristics with PFS and OS were analyzed using two- tailed log rank test. The effects of genotypes on the progression- free survival and overall survival were then evaluated using multivariate Cox regression model by including genotypes and patient characteristics with P ⁇ 0.05 in univariate analysis.
  • the demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of the 97 patients included in this study are listed in Table 4.
  • the polymorphism frequencies of the 6 SNPs are listed in Table 1. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium held for all the 6 SNPs (P>0.05) . After verifying pairwise linkage disequilibrium for ABCBl 3435C/T, ABCBl 1236C/T and ABCBl 2677G/TA by Chi-square test (P ⁇ 0.05 in each pair) and phasing with PLINK, haplotype ⁇ was the most common haplotype and was found in 51 patients, among whom 8 were homozygous carriers. A complete list of haplotypes and their frequencies is provided in Table 5.
  • the VEGFR2 1191C/T genotype was not associated with the toxicity endpoints.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Oncology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)

Abstract

A method for determining the sensitivity of a patient with cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is provided. The method comprising screening a nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype selected from the group consisting of rs1933437, rs1045642, rs1128503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof; and determining the sensitivity of a patient with renal cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy based on the identity of the SNP genotype. The sensitivity is selected from one or more of neutropenia, diarrhea, tumor response, early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination, overall survival and progression-free survival.

Description

METHOD FOR PREDICTING CLINICAL TOXICITY AND OUTCOME
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates stem cells. In particular the present invention relates to a method for culturing and maintaining a pluripotent stem cell in an undifferentiated state.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Cancer therapy includes surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy and radiation therapy. Targeted therapy is directed against cancer-specific molecules and signaling pathways within the tumor. Accordingly, drugs used in targeted therapy include drugs that inhibit angiogenesis and drugs that induce apoptosis. An example of a class of drugs used in targeted therapy is tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) .
[0003] However, tumor response and individual survival vary among patients and therefore the therapeutic benefits of TKIs are not universal but individualized. In addition, despite its effectiveness in prolonging survival, life quality-compromising and potentially lethal toxicities are common. These include diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, mucositis, hypertension, leucopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Toxicities lead to dose interruption, dose reduction and prevent patients from benefitting fully from the drug. Toxicity presentation and severity, like survival, are also not universal but vary greatly among patients.
[0004] Therefore, there is a need to provide a method for determining the sensitivity of a patient with cancer to TKI therapy and a need to provide a method of identifying the most appropriate TKI therapy regimen for a patient . There is also a need for a kit to be used in such methods . SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] In a first aspect, there is provided a method for determining the sensitivity of a patient with cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, comprising: a) isolating - a nucleic acid sample from a biological sample obtained from the said patient; b) screening said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof ; and c) determining the sensitivity of a patient with renal cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy based on the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof, wherein said sensitivity is selected from one or more of neutropenia, diarrhea, tumor response, early toxicity- necessitated treatment termination, overall survival and progression- free survival...
[0006] In a second aspect, there is provided a use of the method as described herein to identify the most appropriate receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy regimen for a patient with renal cancer.
[0007] In a third aspect, there is provided a kit for use according to the method as described herein, comprising components for the screening of said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof .
DEFINITIONS
[0008] The following words and terms used herein shall have the meaning indicated:
[0009] The term subject refers to living, multicellular vertebrate organisms, a category that includes both human and veterinary subjects for example, mammals, birds and primates.
[0010] The term nucleic acid refers to a deoxyribonucleotide or ribonucleotide polymer in either single or double stranded form, and unless otherwise limited, encompassing known analogues of natural nucleotides that hybridize to nucleic acids in a manner similar to naturally occurring nucleotides .
[0011] The term polymorphism refers to a variant in a sequence of a gene, usually carried from one generation to another in a population. Polymorphisms can be those variations (nucleotide sequence differences) that, while having a different nucleotide sequence, produce functionally equivalent gene products, such as those variations generally found between individuals, different ethnic groups, geographic locations. The term polymorphism also encompasses variations that produce gene products with altered function, i.e., variants in the gene sequence that lead to gene products that are not functionally equivalent. This term also encompasses variations that produce no gene product, an inactive gene product, or increased or increased activity gene product.
[0012] Polymorphisms can be referred to, for instance, by the nucleotide position at which the variation exists, by the change in amino acid sequence caused by the nucleotide variation, or by a change in some other characteristic of the nucleic acid molecule or protein that is linked to the variation (e.g., an alteration of a secondary structure such as a stem-loop, or an alteration of the binding affinity of the nucleic acid for associated molecules, such as polymerases, RNases, and so forth) .
[0013] The term Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) refers to a single base (nucleotide) difference in a specific location in the DNA sequence among individuals in a population. A subset of SNPs give rise to changes in the encoded amino acid sequence; these are referred to as coding SNPs, or cSNPs .
[0014] The invention illustratively described herein may suitably be practiced in the absence of "any element or elements, limitation or limitations, not specifically disclosed herein. Thus, for example, the terms "comprising", "including", "containing", etc. shall be read expansively and without limitation. Additionally, the terms and expressions employed herein have been used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions of excluding any equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, but it is recognized that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention claimed. Thus, it should be understood that although the present invention has been specifically disclosed by preferred embodiments and optional features, modification and variation of the inventions embodied therein herein disclosed may be resorted to by those skilled in the art, and that such modifications and variations are considered to be within the scope of this invention.
[0015] The invention has been described broadly and generically herein. Each of the narrower species and subgeneric groupings falling within the generic disclosure also form part of the invention. This includes the generic description of the invention with a proviso or negative limitation removing any subject matter from the genus, regardless of whether or not the excised material is specifically recited herein.
[0016] Other embodiments are within the following claims and non- limiting examples. In addition, where features or aspects of the invention are described in terms of Markush groups, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is also thereby described in terms of any individual member or subgroup of members of the Markush group .
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017] The invention will be . better understood with reference to the detailed description- when considered in conjunction with the non-limiting examples and the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0018] Fig. 1 shows (A) Patients grouped according to the ABCB1 3435C/T, 1236C/T, 2677G/T haplotype; median progression-free survival for homozygous carriers of the TTT haplotype was 2.4 months and for other cases was 8.4 months (P= 0.001). (B) Patients grouped according to the ABCB1 3435C/T, 1236C/T, 2677G/TA haplotype; median overall survival for homozygous carriers of the TTT haplotype was 4.6 months and for other cases was 19.6 months
(P= 0.005) .
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
[0019] In a first aspect there is provided a method for determining the sensitivity of a patient with cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. The method may comprise: isolating a nucleic acid sample from a biological sample obtained from the said patient; screening said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof; and determining the sensitivity of a patient with renal cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy based on the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll2>8503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof, wherein said sensitivity is selected from one or more of neutropenia, diarrhea, tumor response, early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination, overall survival and progression-free survival.
[0020] In one embodiment, the cancer may be selected from the group consisting of renal cancer, neuroendocrine cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, brain cancer, lung cancer, hematological malignancies, melanoma and sarcomas .■
[0021] In another embodiment, the renal cancer is metastatic renal cell carcinoma (m CC) . In some embodiments the patient may suffer from mRCC. Alternatively, the patient suffers from mRCC and undergoes receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment.
[0022] In some embodiments, the biological sample is obtained from the group consisting of frozen tissue, tissue biopsies, circulating cells, bodily fluids and cheek swab.
[0023] The biological sample may be non-neoplastic or neoplastic.
[0024] In one embodiment the bodily fluids may be selected from the group consisting of blood, saliva, ascites, effusions and urine.
[0025] The receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be a multikinase inhibitor for receptor tyrosine kinase including but not limited to sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, tivozantinib or combinations thereof.
[0026] In some embodiments the patient is a mammal or a human. The human may be an ethnic Asian, or an ethnic Caucasian, or an ethnic African.
[0027] In another embodiment, for determining the risk of diarrhea during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsll28503 and rsl045642, and (b) determining the risk of diarrhea based on the screening result obtained in step (a) . In some embodiments, in step (b) , with respect to rsll28503, the risk of diarrhea during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC genotype than a CT or TT genotype. In some embodiments, in step (b) , with respect to rsl045642, the risk of diarrhea during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC genotype than a CT or TT genotype .
[0028] In some embodiments, for determining the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rs2032582, rsl045642, rsll28503 and rs2231142, and (b) determining the risk of neutropenia based on the screening result obtained in step (a) . In step (b) , with respect to r.sl933437, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a TT genotype than a CC or CT genotype. In step (b) , with respect to rs2032582, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a AA or AG or GG genotype than a AT or GT or TT genotype. In step (b) , with respect to rsl045642, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC or CT genotype than a TT genotype. In step (b) , with respect to rsll28503, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC or CT genotype than a TT genotype. In step (b) , with respect to rs2231142, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC or AC genotype than a AA genotype. In step (b) , with respect to the three SNPs including rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNP sites than for a TTT/TTT genotype.
[0029] In some embodiments, for determining the risk of early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method may further comprise: (a) screening for the SNP genotype of rsll28503, and (b) determining the risk of early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
[0030] In step (b) , with respect to rsll28503, the risk of early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a CC or CT genotype than a TT genotype .
[0031] In some embodiments, for determining the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, and (b) determining the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor, tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
[0032] In step (b) , with respect to rsl045642, the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a TT genotype than a CC or CT genotype .
[0033] In step (b) , with respect to rs2032582, the risk of primary tumo r resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be higher for a TT genotype than a AA or AG or GG or AT or GT genotype .
[0034] In step (b) , with respect to the three SNPs including rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy may be higher for a TTT/TTT genotype than for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNP sites.
[0035] In some embodiments, for determining overall survival, during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, and (b) determining overall survival, based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) . [0036] In step (b) , with respect to the three SNPs including rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, overall survival during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, may be lower for a TTT/TTT genotype than for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNPs .
[0037] In some embodiments, for determining progression-free survival, during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method may further comprise: (a) screening for at least one SNP geiiotype selected from the group consisting of rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, and (b) determining progression- free survival, based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
[0038] In step (b) , with respect to the three SNP genotypes rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, progression- free survival during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment may be lower for a TTT/TTT genotype than for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNPs.
[0039] In another aspect, there is provided the use of the method as described herein to identify the most appropriate receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy regimen for a patient with renal cancer .
[0040] In another aspect, there is provided a kit for use in accordance with the method as described herein, comprising components for the screening of said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
[0041] Example 1
[0042] Evaluation of genetic markers for determining toxicity, response and survival in patients with cancer
[0043] Materials and Methods [0044] Patients and treatment
[0045] A total of 97 mRCC patients receiving sunitinib between 2006 and 2014 at National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS) were included in this retrospective study, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Singapore Health Services) . The majority of patients (79/97) received sunitinib at a starting dose of 37.5 mg daily over 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2 week break. This attenuation from the drug label-recommended dosage of 50mg daily was established as routine at NCCS after severe to life- threatening toxicities were frequently noted in early use of sunitinib when initiated at 50mg daily. Twelve patients in this study received a starting dose of 50mg daily. Six patients started with 25mg daily due to advanced age or patients' aversion to expected toxicities.
[0046] Follow-up and data collection
[0047] Sunitinib toxicities and tumor response were evaluated by independent physicians in every treatment cycle based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria version 1.1. Laboratory assessments of serum creatinine, total bilirubin, albumin, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, hemoglobin, leucocytes and platelets, and clinical examinations for mucositis, hand-foot syndrome, fatigue and diarrhea were conducted at baseline (before starting sunitinib) , and at two time points in each cycle: after 4 weeks of daily sunitinib, and after 2 weeks of sunitinib-free rest (before starting the next cycle) . Patient characteristics were also collected including age, gender, ethnicity, body weight and height, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) prognostic score was calculated for each patient with available data. All the collected data were de-identified by a third party before being used in statistical analysis. The follow- up period ended at the end of April, 2014. [0048] Toxicity definitions
[0049] The toxicities analyzed included leucopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome and early toxicity- necessitated treatment termination. Blood cell counts from the electronic medical system and the physician notes from the first sunitinib cycle were assessed for leucopenia (<3000/μ1_) , neutropenia (<2000/ L) , thrombocytopenia (<150000/ L) , hand-foot syndrome (documented physical examination finding) and diarrhea (documented patient complaints) . Early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination was defined as interruption of the first or second treatment cycle consented by the patient and the physician based on recognition of intolerable or life-threatening toxicities without evidence of progressive disease and failure to resume treatment as far as the patient was followed. For patients experiencing any toxicity grade ≥2, cycle interruptions were frequently required; in such cases, a resumed treatment with 25% dose reduction would be applied for safety and life quality considerations .
[0050] Survival endpoint definition
[0051] Progression free survival was defined as the time from the date of suitinib initiation to the date of sunitinib termination if suitinib was terminated due to radiological or clinical evidence of progressive disease, toxicities or death. Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of sunitinib initiation to the date of death, or to the date of the last follow up for censored cases .
[0052] Genotyping
[0053] 6 SNPs were genotyped, as listed in Table 1, in 4 genes: sunitinib targets FLT3 and VEGFR2 , and multi-drug effluxers ABCG2 and ABCB1. These polymorphisms were selected based on minor allele frequency higher than 0.1 in Han Chinese, previously reported associations with sunitinib toxicities (Table 2) , and presumed function in sunitinib pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics . Primers for genotyping the SNPs and the BIM deletion are provided in Table 3.
[0054] Table 1. Polymorphisms genotyped and allele frequencies
Genotype
Polymorph , distribution
, rs number Variation n VAF° ism wt/ t/ var/
wt var var
VEGFR2 0.160 rs2305948 V297I 94 64 30 0 1191 C/T (T)
FLT3 738 0.279 rsl933437 M227T 95 47 43 5 T/C (C)
ABCB1 0.360 rsll28503 G412G 93 35 49 9 1236 T/C (C)
0.375
ABCB1 ( ) ;
rs2032582 A8.93S/T 96 25 44b 27c 2677 G/TA 0.135
(A)
ABCB1 0.385 rsl045642 I1145I 96 34 50 12 3435 C/T (Γ)
ABCG2 421 0.274 rs2231142 '~ Q141 95 50 38 7 C/A (A)
Patients successfully genotyped.
include 34 GT and 10 AG individuals,
include 2 AA, 12 AT and 13 TT individuals
Variant allele frequencies .
[0055] Table 2. Previous analyses on the 6 SNPs selected for this study.
SNP Significantly Cohort size Publication
associated
outcomes
VEGFR2 1191 Any toxicity (n= 183) van Erp et
C/T grade>2 al., 2009
increased with T
allele.
FLT3 738 T/C Leucopenia (n= 188) van Erp et
increased with Γ al., 2009
allele .
ABCB1 1236 T/C Poorer PFS and (n= 88) Beuselinck et
OS with the TT al., 2013 genotype .
Less dose (n= 96) Beuselinck et reductions with al., 2014 the TT genotype .
ABCB1 2677G/TA Less dose (n= 96) Beuselinck et reductions with al., 2014
TT or TA
genotypes .
ABCB1 HFS increased (n= 219) van Erp et haplotypea with TTT al., 2009
haplotype .
PFS increased (n= 136) van der Veldt with TCG et al. , 2011 haplotype .
ABCG2 421 C/A More (n= 65) Kim et al . ,
thrombocytopenia 2013
, neutropenia,
and HFS with the
AA genotype .
Abbreviations : OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; HFS, hand-foot syndrome .
ABCB1 haplotype composed of 3435 C/T, 1236 T/C and 2677 G/TA.
[0056] Table 3. Primers for genotyping
Gene Polymorphism rs Number Forward Reverse Primer
Primer
VEGFR2 1191 C/T rs2305948 5' TCTTGGTCATC 5' AAACCCAGTCTGG
AGCCCACTG3' (S GAG GAG3' (SEQ EQ ID NO. 1) ID NO. 2)
FLT3 738 T/C rsl933437 5' GCAGCTGTAAA 5' TGCATTCCCTGCC
GAAGAAAGTCCAG CAGTT3' (SEQ ID 3' (SEQ ID NO. 4)
NO. 3)
ABCB1 1236 T/C rsll28503 5' GTCTGTGAAT 5' GGTCATAGAGCCT
TGCCTTGAA3' CTGCATC3' (SEQ (SEQ ID NO. ID NO. 6) 5)
ABCBl 2677 G/TA rs2032582 5' GTACCCATCAT 5' TTAGTTTGACTC
TGCAATAGCA3' ACCTTCCCAG3' (SEQ ID NO. (SEQ ID NO. 8) 7)
ABCB1 3435 C/T rsl045642 5' GAGCCCATCCT 5'CATTAGGCAGTGA
GTTTGACTGC3' CTCGATGAAGGC3' (SEQ ID NO. (SEQ ID NO. 10) 9) ABCG2 421 C/A rs2231142 5 ' GGATGATGTTG 5' CCAGACCTAACTC
TGATGGGCACTC3 TTGAATGACCCTG3 ' \
' (SEQ ID NO. (SEQ ID NO. 12)
11)
BIM BIM i2dela - (1) 5' CTTAGCGT 5' GCTCCTCTGTGAG
AATG GCCAGCCTG3'
TCGTCAGGG3 ' (SEQ ID NO. 15)
(SEQ ID NO.
13)
(2)5'AGGCTTCA
GTGAGGTAAATCA
C3' (SEQ ID
NO. 14)
a a 2,903-bp deletion polymorphism in intron 2 of BIM associated with resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors .
[0057] Germline DNA was obtained from peripheral blood,, formalin- fixed tissue of benign kidney from nephrectomy and immortalized lymphocytes. The labeling on blood tubes and tissue slides were de- identified by a third party before being used for DNA extraction or cell immortalization. Genotyping was done by PCR amplification of the flanking region of each SNP followed by direct sequencing.
[0058] Statistical analysis
[0059] Genotype associations with toxicity events or responsive tumor were first analyzed using univariate logistic regression. Genotypes generating P<0.20 were further analyzed using multivariate logistic regression including patient age, gender, baseline ECOG status and starting dose as covariates . Progression- free survival and overall survival were estimated by means of Kaplan-Meier method, while the associations of genotypes and patient characteristics with PFS and OS were analyzed using two- tailed log rank test. The effects of genotypes on the progression- free survival and overall survival were then evaluated using multivariate Cox regression model by including genotypes and patient characteristics with P<0.05 in univariate analysis. Only those patients for whom sunitinib was the first line treatment for mRCC were included in progression-free survival and overall survival analyses. In all analyses, missing data were kept missing except for baseline ECOG status, which was replaced with the median value. As this was designed as a validation study of previously observed correlations rather than an exploratory evaluation, multiple testing correction was not done.
[0060] .Results
[0061] Patient characteristics and genotype frequencies
[0062] The demographic and baseline clinical characteristics of the 97 patients included in this study are listed in Table 4. The polymorphism frequencies of the 6 SNPs are listed in Table 1. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium held for all the 6 SNPs (P>0.05) . After verifying pairwise linkage disequilibrium for ABCBl 3435C/T, ABCBl 1236C/T and ABCBl 2677G/TA by Chi-square test (P< 0.05 in each pair) and phasing with PLINK, haplotype ΤΓΤ was the most common haplotype and was found in 51 patients, among whom 8 were homozygous carriers. A complete list of haplotypes and their frequencies is provided in Table 5.
[0063] Table 4. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics (n = 97)
Characteristic No. *o
Median age when initiating 58
sunitinib, years
Range 18 - 79
Gender
Male 75 77.3
Female 22 22.7
Ethnicity
Chinese 86 88.7
Malay 7 7.2
Indian 4 4.1
Baseline ECOG performance status
0 27 27.8
1 51 52.6
2 13 13.4 3 6 6.2
Median body surface area, m2 1.63
Range 1.18 - 1.92
Line of therapy
First line 81 83 .5
Second or third line 16 16 .5
Starting sunitinib dose, mg daily
<37.5 6 6. 2
37,5 79 81 .4
50 12 12 .4
Baseline chemistry and hematology (n < 97 because of missing data)
Median aspartate transaminase, 23
U/L (n = 93)
Range 11 - 70
Median alanine transaminase, U/L 20
(n = 93)
Range 8 - 135
Median creatinine, μΜ (n = 96) 104
Range 33 - 649
Median hemoglobin, g/dL (n = 96) 11.5
Range 5.9 - 15.8
Median leukocyte, K^L (n = 96) 7.3
Range 1.4 - 24.1
Median thrombocyte, K^L (n = 96) ' 280
Range 117 - 799
[0064] Table 5. ABCB1 haplotype frequencies estimated with and without assuming associations (n = 92)
3435 1236 2677 Without
With association
C/T T/C G/TA association
C C A 0.028 0.096
C C G 0.114 0.222
C C T 0.083 0.000
C T A 0.049 0.029
C T G 0.199 0.214
C T T 0.146 0.059
T C A 0.017 0.000
T C G 0.070 0.037
T C T 0.051 0.008
T T A 0.030 0.000 τ Τ G 0.122 0.032 τ Τ Τ 0 .089 0.303
[0065] Correlation of genotypes to toxicities
[0066] Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for associations between genetic markers and clinical outcomes are listed in Table 6. Of note, the FLT3 738 TT genotype was associated with an 8.0 -fold increase of the risk of leucopenia (P= 0.03) and a 2.7-fold increase of the risk of neutropenia (P= 0.04) . The ABCB1 1236 T allele was correlated to a 3 -fold decrease of the risk of neutropenia (P= 0.03), a 25-fold decrease of the risk of diarrhea (P= 0.0005) and a 10-fold decrease of the risk of early toxicity- necessitated treatment termination (P= 0.04) . The ABCB1 3435 T allele was associated with a 10 -fold decrease of the risk of neutropenia (P= 0.01) and a 3 -fold decrease of the risk of diarrhea (P= 0.02). The ABCB1 2677 T allele was correlated to a 3-fold decrease of the risk of neutropenia (P= 0.04) . The ABCB1 3435, 1236, 2677 TTT haplotype was correlated to a 10 -fold decrease of the risk of neutropenia (P= 0.03). The ABCG2 421 A allele was associated with a 3 -fold decrease of the risk of neutropenia (P= 0.03) . No genotypes were correlated with thrombocytopenia or hand- foot syndrome. The VEGFR2 1191C/T genotype was not associated with the toxicity endpoints.
[0067] Table 6. Factors associated with toxicities of sunitinib. Only those with multivariate P≤ 0.O5 are listed.
Figure imgf000018_0001
Figure imgf000019_0001
Figure imgf000020_0001
c ABCBl 3435C/T, 1236C/T, 2677G/TA haplotype.
[0068] Correlation of genotypes to tumor response and patient survival
[0069] Primary sunitinib resistance, defined as progressive disease as the best response observed, was more common in carriers of the ABCBl 3435 TT genotype (P= 0.02), ABCBl 2677 TT genotype (P= 0.01) and the ABCBl 3435, 1236, 2677 TTT haplotype (P= 0.004) (Table 7) . T 2014/000467
20
Median progression- free survival of the 81 patients who received sunitinib as the first-line therapy was 8.1 months and median overall survival was 19.5 months. As in Table 8, after including starting dose as covariate based on univariate P<0.05, the ABCB1 3435, 1236, 2677 TTT haplotype was correlated with inferior progression- free survival (P= 0.001) and overall survival (P= 0.005) . Survival curves depicting the correlations are provided in Figure 1.
[0070] Table 7. Factors associated with the clinical benefit of sunitinib (best response being partial response or stable disease) (n=90) . Only those with multivariate P≤ 0.05 are listed.
Figure imgf000021_0001
67
21 a Including age, gender, starting dose and baseline ECOG status as covariates.
b Number of cases with PR or SD as the best response observed / total number of cases in the group.
0 ABCBl 3435C/T, 1236C/T, 2677G/TA haplotype.
[0071] Table 8. Survival analyses in mRCC patients receiving sunitinib as first-line treatment (n=81) . Only those with multivariate P≤ 0.05 are listed.
Figure imgf000022_0001
Figure imgf000023_0001

Claims

A method for determining the sensitivity of a patient with cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, comprising:
a) isolating a nucleic acid sample from a biological sample obtained from the said patient; b) screening said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof; and c) determining the sensitivity of a patient with renal cancer to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy based on the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof, wherein said sensitivity is selected from one or more of neutropenia, diarrhea, tumor response, early toxicity- necessitated treatment termination, overall survival and progression-free survival.
The method according to claim 1, wherein the cancer is renal cancer, neuroendocrine cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, liver cancer, brain cancer, lung cancer, hematological malignancies, melanoma and sarcomas.
The method according to claim 2, wherein the renal cancer is metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) .
The method according to claim 2, wherein the patient suffers from mRCC or wherein the patient suffers from mRCC and undergoes receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. The method according to claim 1, wherein the biological sample is obtained from the group consisting of frozen tissue, tissue biopsies, circulating cells, bodily fluids and cheek swab.
The method according to claim 5, wherein the biological sample, is non-neoplastic .
The method according to claim 5 , wherein the biological sample is neoplastic.
The method according to claim 4, wherein the bodily fluids are selected from the group consisting of blood, saliva, ascites, effusions and urine.
The method according to claim 1, wherein the receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor is a multikinase inhibitor for receptor tyrosine kinase including but not limited to sunitinib, pazopanib, axitinib, sorafenib, regorafenib, tivozantinib or combinations thereof .
The method according to claim 1, wherein the patient is a mammal or a human.
The method according claim 10, wherein the human is an ethnic Asian, or an ethnic Caucasian, or an ethnic African.
The method according to claim 1, for determining the risk of diarrhea during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method further comprising: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsll28503 and rsl045642, and (b) determining the risk of diarrhea based on the screening result obtained in step (a) .
The method according to claim 12, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rsll28503, the risk of diarrhea during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a CC genotype than a CT or TT genotype .
The method according to claim 12, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rsl045642, the risk of diarrhea during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a CC genotype than a CT or TT genotype .
15. The method according to claim 1, for determining the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method further comprising: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rs2032582, rsl045642, rsll28503 and rs2231142, and (b) determining the risk of neutropenia based on the screening
. result obtained in step (a) .
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rsl933437, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a TT genotype than a CC or CT genotype .
17. The method according to claim 15, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rs2032582, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a AA or AG or GG genotype than a AT or GT or TT genotype .
18. The method according to claim 15, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rsl045642, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a CC or CT genotype than a TT genotype .
19. The method according to claim 15, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rsll28503, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a CC or CT genotype than a TT genotype.
20. The method according to claim 15, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rs2231142, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a CC or AC genotype than a AA genotype .
21. The method according to claim 15, wherein in step (b) , with respect to the three SNPs including rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, the risk of neutropenia during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNP sites than for a TTT/TTT genotype. The method according to claim 1, for determining the risk of early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method comprising: (a) screening for the SNP genotype of rsll28503, and (b) determining the risk of early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
The method according to claim 22, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rsll28503, the risk of early toxicity-necessitated treatment termination during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a CC or CT genotype than a TT genotype .
The method according to claim 1, for determining the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method comprising: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, and (b) determining the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
The method according to claim 24, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rsl045642, the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a TT genotype than a CC or CT genotype .
The method according to claim 24, wherein in step (b) , with respect to rs2032582, the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is higher for a TT genotype than a AA or AG or GG or AT or GT genotype .
The method according to claim 24, wherein in step (b) , with respect to the three SNPs including rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, the risk of primary tumour resistance to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is higher for a TTT/TTT genotype than for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNP sites.
The method according to claim 1, for determining overall survival, during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method comprising: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, and (b) determining overall survival, based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
The method according to claim 28, wherein in step (b) , with respect to the three SNPs including rsl045S42, rs2032582 and rsll28503, overall survival during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is lower for a TTT/TTT genotype than for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNPs.
The method according to claim 1, for determining progression- free survival, during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, the method comprising: (a) screening for at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, and (b) determining progression- free survival, based on the genotyping result obtained in step (a) .
The method according to claim 30, wherein in step (b) , with respect to the three SNP genotypes rsl045642, rs2032582 and rsll28503, progression- free survival during receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment is lower for a TTT/TTT genotype than for allele combinations other than T allele homozygosity at all of the three SNPs.
Use of the method according to claim 1 to identify the most appropriate receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy regimen for a patient with renal cancer.
A kit for use according to the method of claim 1, comprising components for the screening of said nucleic acid sample to determine the identity of at least one SNP genotype selected from the group consisting of rsl933437, rsl045642, rsll28503, rs2032582 and rs2231142 and any combination thereof.
PCT/SG2014/000467 2013-10-03 2014-10-03 Method For Predicting Clinical Toxicity And Outcome Ceased WO2015050504A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US15/026,957 US20160251725A1 (en) 2013-10-03 2014-10-03 Method for predicting clinical toxicity and outcome
CN201480066303.1A CN105917000A (en) 2013-10-03 2014-10-03 Method for predicting clinical toxicity and outcome

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
SG2013074398 2013-10-03
SG201307439-8 2013-10-03

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2015050504A1 true WO2015050504A1 (en) 2015-04-09

Family

ID=52778986

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/SG2014/000467 Ceased WO2015050504A1 (en) 2013-10-03 2014-10-03 Method For Predicting Clinical Toxicity And Outcome

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20160251725A1 (en)
CN (1) CN105917000A (en)
WO (1) WO2015050504A1 (en)

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012103060A1 (en) * 2011-01-27 2012-08-02 Glaxo Wellcome Manufacturing Pte Ltd Method of administration and treatment

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2012103060A1 (en) * 2011-01-27 2012-08-02 Glaxo Wellcome Manufacturing Pte Ltd Method of administration and treatment

Non-Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BEUSELINCK B ET AL.: "Single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib.", BR J CANCER., vol. 108, no. 4, 5 March 2013 (2013-03-05), pages 887 - 900 *
CUSATIS G ET AL.: "Pharmacogenetics of ABCG2 and adverse reactions to gefitinib.", J NATL CANCER INST., vol. 98, no. 23, 6 December 2006 (2006-12-06), pages 1739 - 42 *
GARCIA-DONAS J ET AL.: "Single nucleotide polymorphism associations with response and toxic effects in patients with advanced renal- cell carcinoma treated with first-line sunitinib: a multicentre, observational, prospective study.", LANCET ONCOL., vol. 12, no. 12, November 2011 (2011-11-01), pages 1143 - 50 *
KIM HR ET AL.: "Pharmacogenetic determinants associated with sunitinib-induced toxicity and ethnic difference in Korean metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.", CANCER CHEMOTHER PHARMACOL., vol. 72, no. 4, October 2013 (2013-10-01), pages 825 - 35 *
VAN DER VELDT AA ET AL.: "Genetic polymorphisms associated with a prolonged progression-free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib.", CLIN CANCER RES., vol. 17, no. 3, 1 February 2011 (2011-02-01), pages 620 - 9 *
VAN ERP NP ET AL.: "Pharmacogenetic pathway analysis for determination of sunitinib- induced toxicity.", J CLIN ONCOL., vol. 27, no. 26, 10 September 2009 (2009-09-10), pages 4406 - 12 *
YUASA T ET AL.: "Biomarkers to predict response to sunitinib therapy and prognosis in metastatic renal cell cancer.", CANCER SCI., vol. 102, no. 11, November 2011 (2011-11-01), pages 1949 - 57 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20160251725A1 (en) 2016-09-01
CN105917000A (en) 2016-08-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sun et al. Sequence variants at 22q13 are associated with prostate cancer risk
Metz et al. Ultradeep sequencing detects GNAQ and GNA11 mutations in cell‐free DNA from plasma of patients with uveal melanoma
Queirolo et al. Association of CTLA-4 polymorphisms with improved overall survival in melanoma patients treated with CTLA-4 blockade: a pilot study
CA2993142A1 (en) Gene signature for immune therapies in cancer
Lake et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism array analysis of uveal melanomas reveals that amplification of CNKSR3 is correlated with improved patient survival
Min-Shan Ko et al. ALPK1 genetic regulation and risk in relation to gout
CN103328971B (en) Method for Determining the Response of Acute Myeloid Leukemia to Farnesyltransferase Inhibitor Therapy
US20160040239A1 (en) Methods for predicting cardiovascular risks and responsiveness to statin therapy using snps
Permuth‐Wey et al. STAT3 polymorphisms may predict an unfavorable response to first‐line platinum‐based therapy for women with advanced serous epithelial ovarian cancer
JP2016515800A (en) Gene signatures for prognosis and treatment selection of lung cancer
JP2022528182A (en) A composition for diagnosing or predicting a glioma, and a method for providing information related thereto.
Gentiluomo et al. Genetic variability of the ABCC2 gene and clinical outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients
Fernandes et al. Association of slow acetylation profile of NAT2 with breast and gastric cancer risk in Brazil
US10982285B2 (en) Biomarkers for the identification of prostate cancer and methods of use
De Ameida Melo et al. CYP2D6 gene polymorphisms in Brazilian patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant tamoxifen and its association with disease recurrence
Wu et al. Effect of hENT1 polymorphism G-706C on clinical outcomes of gemcitabine-containing chemotherapy for Chinese non-small-cell lung cancer patients
Arif et al. Genetic association analysis implicates six MicroRNA-related SNPs with increased risk of breast cancer in Australian caucasian women
US20160244845A1 (en) Method for determining the prognosis of pancreatic cancer
Drain et al. ABCB1 (MDR1) rs1045642 is associated with increased overall survival in plasma cell myeloma
TWI479024B (en) Method for determining p1/p2 blood type and detection kit thereof
Krawczyk et al. Predictive value of ERCC1 single-nucleotide polymorphism in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy for locally-advanced and advanced non-small cell lung cancer—a pilot study
Feng et al. Polymorphisms of the ribonucleotide reductase M1 gene and sensitivity to platin-based chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer
US20160251725A1 (en) Method for predicting clinical toxicity and outcome
US20110218212A1 (en) Predictive markers for egfr inhibitors treatment
KR101378540B1 (en) BRCA1 Haplotype Markers Associated with Survival of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patient and Used Thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14851241

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 15026957

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 14851241

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1