WO2014189729A1 - Rule-based constraint interaction in geometric models - Google Patents
Rule-based constraint interaction in geometric models Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2014189729A1 WO2014189729A1 PCT/US2014/037944 US2014037944W WO2014189729A1 WO 2014189729 A1 WO2014189729 A1 WO 2014189729A1 US 2014037944 W US2014037944 W US 2014037944W WO 2014189729 A1 WO2014189729 A1 WO 2014189729A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- constraints
- dimensions
- rigid
- data processing
- processing system
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/17—Mechanical parametric or variational design
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2111/00—Details relating to CAD techniques
- G06F2111/04—Constraint-based CAD
Definitions
- PLM product lifecycle management
- PDM systems manage PLM and other data. Improved systems are desirable.
- a method includes receiving a geometric model including a plurality of curves.
- the method includes creating a rigid sketch group that includes some or all of the plurality of curves and receiving a user selection of first option rules or second option rules.
- the method includes editing the rigid sketch group according to the selected first option rules or second option rules.
- the method includes displaying the geometric model by the data processing system, including displaying the edited rigid sketch group.
- Figure 1 depicts a block diagram of a data processing system in which an embodiment can be implemented
- Figure 2 illustrates a flowchart of a process in accordance with disclosed embodiments
- Figures 3-8 illustrate exemplary geometric models in the form of 2D sketches, including a plurality of curves, in accordance with disclosed embodiments.
- FIGURES 1 through 8, discussed below, and the various embodiments used to describe the principles of the present disclosure in this patent document are by way of illustration only and should not be construed in any way to limit the scope of the disclosure. Those skilled in the art will understand that the principles of the present disclosure may be implemented in any suitably arranged device. The numerous innovative teachings of the present application will be described with reference to exemplary non-limiting embodiments.
- a variational system describes the parameters of and relationships between features in an object model or set of curves in terms of geometric constraints and dimensions. Such systems then use a "solver” process to process these constraints and dimensions, along with a multitude of ancillary constraints and dimensions required to maintain design intent, and the entire model is solved simultaneously,
- Disclosed embodiments introduce rule-based constraint interaction in geometric models, and in particular, can use rules enabling interaction between a rigid constraint and other sketch constraints. While the embodiments discussed below are described in terms of 2D sketch geometries, the disclosed techniques can be applied to 3D geometries, and in particular to 3D geometries that, are located in a common plane.
- a typical 2D sketch contains curves, dimensions, and geometric constraints.
- One constraint type is a "rigid" set constraint.
- a rigid constraint ensures that the curves that are participating in the constraint are frozen together as a rigid set of curves. The curves will not change shape and the curves will not move relative to each other.
- a rigid constraint can be created on a set of curves that may already have other constraints (parallel, coincident etc.) as well as dimensions (reference, driving, or automatic).
- Disclosed embodiments describe techniques for managing a geometric model, 2D or 3D, using rules governing interaction between a rigid constraint and other sketch constraints. These rules can prevent jumping of curves, preserve as much intent as possible (avoid deleting constraints and dimensions if possible).
- a "rigid set” describes a number of curves that are collected in a group that cannot move relative to each other.
- the constraint that is used to do this is called a “rigid set constraint.”
- a “rigid sketch group” consists of rigid constraint and geometries of that constraint.
- Hybrid constraints and dimensions refers to constraints that a user might place on a rigid set, after it, is created to control the position or orientation of the set, but which only reference geometry of the set.
- the types of hybrid constraints and dimensions must, be Fixed, Horizontal, Vertical, Horizontal Dimension, Vertical Dimension, or Constant Angle. These constraints could also be ignored because they only reference geometry from the set. Note that, many operations described herein are performed on “constraints or dimensions;” such processes can be performed on any appropriate constraint, any appropriate dimension, or both, and the disclosed processes can handle each of these similarly.
- Internal constraints and dimensions refer to constraints that cannot exist external to the rigid set when they only reference a rigid set geometry. Examples include Constant Length, Radius Dimension, Diameter Dimension, Equal Length, Equal Radius, Coincident, Concentric, Point on Curve, Tangent, Parallel, Perpendicular, Collinear, Parallel Dimension, Perpendicular Dimension, etc.
- “External” constraints and dimensions refer to constraints that cannot be ignored because they reference geometry from the rigid set and geometry not in the rigid set.
- “Ignored” constraints and dimensions refer to constraints or dimensions that are removed from the variational solver and saved until the group is activated or ungrouped, when they are reapplied. Typically, all Internal and most Hybrid constraints and dimensions become ignored when there is a rigid set constraint. Ignored constraints are not visible to the user.
- Preserved constraints and dimensions refer to constraints or dimensions that are not ignored and are used to drive the sketch with the rigid set. Typically, External and some Hybrid constraints/dimensions are preserved.
- FIG. 1 depicts a block diagram of a data processing system in which an embodiment can be implemented, for example, as a PDM system particularly configured by software or otherwise to perform the processes as described herein, and in particular as each one of a plurality of interconnected and communicating systems as described herein.
- the data processing system depicted includes a processor 102 connected to a level two cache/bridge 104, which is connected in turn to a local system bus 106.
- Local system bus 106 may be, for example, a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) architecture bus.
- PCI peripheral component interconnect
- main memory 108 main memory
- graphics adapter 1 10 may be connected to display 1 1 1.
- Peripherals such as local area network (LAN) / Wide Area Network / Wireless (e.g. WiFi) adapter 1 12, may also be connected to local system bus 106, Expansion bus interface 1 14 connects local system bus 106 to input/output (I O) bus 1 16. I/O bus 1 16 is connected to keyboard/mouse adapter 1 18, disk controller 120, and I/O adapter 322.
- LAN local area network
- WiFi Wide Area Network / Wireless
- Disk controller 120 can be connected to a storage 126, which can be any suitable machine usable or machine readable storage medium, including but not limited to nonvolatile, hard-coded type mediums such as read only memories (ROMs) or erasable, electrically programmable read only memories (EEPROMs), magnetic tape storage, and user-recordable type mediums such as floppy disks, hard disk drives and compact disk read only memories (CD-ROMs) or digital versatile disks (DVDs), and other known optical, electrical, or magnetic storage devices.
- ROMs read only memories
- EEPROMs electrically programmable read only memories
- CD-ROMs compact disk read only memories
- DVDs digital versatile disks
- Audio adapter 124 Also connected to I/O bus 116 in the example shown is audio adapter 124, to which speakers (not shown) may be connected for playing sounds.
- Keyboard/mouse adapter 1 18 provides a connection for a pointing device (not, shown), such as a mouse, trackball, traekpointer, touchscreen, etc.
- a data processing system in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure includes an operating system employing a graphical user interface.
- the operating system permits multiple display windows to be presented in the graphical user interface simultaneously, with each display window providing an interface to a different application or to a different instance of the same application.
- a cursor in the graphical user interface may be manipulated by a user through the pointing device. The position of the cursor may be changed and/ or an event, such as clicking a mouse button, generated to actuate a desired response.
- One of various commercial operating systems such as a version of Microsoft WindowsTM, a product of Microsoft Corporation located in Redmond, Wash, may be employed if suitably modified.
- the operating system is modified or created in accordance with the present disclosure as described.
- LAN/ WAN/Wireless adapter 1 12 can be connected to a network 130 (not a part of data processing system 100), which can be any public or private data processing system network or combination of networks, as known to those of skill in the art, including the Internet.
- Data processing system 100 can communicate over network 130 with server system 140, which is also not part of data processing system 100, but can be implemented, for example, as a separate data processing system 100.
- Disclosed embodiments provide systems and methods that, manage constraints between geometries in a PDM system.
- disclosed techniques can apply rules to manage interactions between rigid constraints and other constraints.
- Figure 2 illustrates a flowchart of a process in accordance with disclosed embodiments that may be performed, for example, by one or more PLM or PDM systems, referred to genetically as "the system” below.
- This process and the related actions are described in terms of 2D sketch geometries, such as lines and other curves, but can be applied to other geometries, including 3D geometries, as well.
- the process illustrated in Fig. 2 includes a number of processes and subprocesses that may not each be performed in every case.
- option rules indicate that the system will preserve dimensions and constraints when possible and prevent new conflicts.
- the first, option rules can be the default rules. When the first option rules are used, external constraints or dimensions that conflict are deleted or made only of reference (not applied). External constraints or dimensions that do not conflict are preserved. Hybrid constraints or dimensions are ignored. Internal constraints or dimensions are ignored.
- Second option rules indicate that the system is to preserve all dimensions and constraints.
- preserve external constraints can be chosen. In this case, external constraints or dimensions are preserved, even if they conflict. Hybrid constraints or dimensions are ignored. Internal constraints or dimensions are ignored.
- the system can receive a geometric model including a plurality of curves (205).
- "Receiving,” as used herein, can include loading from storage, receiving from another device or process, or receiving via an interaction with a user.
- the system can create a rigid sketch group from the plurality of curves (210). As part of this process, the system can display the geometric model to a user and receive a user selection of curves.
- the rigid sketch group can include some or all of the plurality of curves.
- the system can set, the type of the selected curves to "rigid". The system can apply one or more of the definitions and options discussed above.
- the system receives a user selection of option rules (215). This can be a selection of the first option rules or the second option rules. This step can include applying the selected option rules to the geometric model.
- Figure 3 illustrates an exemplary geometric model 300 in the form of a 2D sketch, including a plurality of curves.
- lines 310 and 320 are being added to the model 300 as "floating" lines. They have respective constraints - line 310 has constraint pO with reference to line 312, and line 320 has constraint pi with reference to line 322.
- the system can constrain an existing rigid sketch group (220).
- the system can receive, for example from a user, one or more dimensions or constraints on the rigid group members after the rigid group is created. If the constraint matches an ignored constraint, the system can create the new constraint and delete the ignored one. In such a case, the new constraint can "silently" replace the duplicate ignored constraint without notice to the user.
- any hybrid constraints or dimensions can be ignored. Typically only one or two constraints from this set are ever desirable as preserved constraints or dimensions.
- the system can receive a user selection of a replacement constraint or dimension for any hybrid constraint or dimension they wish to preserve, and the system will mark it as preserved.
- the original Hybrid dimensions might have expressions that cannot easily transfer to the replacement. In these cases, the user can reference that original expression in the replacement dimension.
- the system can edit the rigid sketch group (225). This step can be performed according to the selected option rules. This process can include receiving a user input of an edit to be made to the rigid set of the geometric model. When the system receives a user indication that an edit process will be performed, the current set of preserved constraints or dimensions is cached for use later on. This can include External, Hybrid, and even (conflicting) Internal constraints or dimensions if these were created after the rigid group.
- the system can receive a user edit to a selected set of curves such that the Presen'ed constraints/dimensions move to a new category. For example, external can become internal, when adding an additional curve to the rigid set, because now both objects that, are referenced belong to the group.
- any conflicting External constraints/dimensions are in the preserved cache, they survive as preserved. Note that, if there was a pre-existing conflict, it, will persist after this edit. All other conflicting External constraints/dimensions can be deleted or made only of reference (not applied). If any Hybrid constraints/dimensions are in the Preserved cache, they survive as Preserved. All other Hybrid constraints/dimensions can be ignored. All Internal constraints/dimensions are ignored, whether or not they were in the Preserved cache.
- the second option rules are selected, if any hybrid constraints/dimensions are in the preserved cache, they survive as preserved. All internal constraints/dimensions are ignored, whether or not they were in the preserved cache. All external constraints/dimensions are preserved whether or not they were in the preserved cache and whether or not they conflict with the rigid constraint.
- the system can receive a user change of the option state; e.g., the user can switch from the first option rules discussed above to the second option rules discussed above, and the edit process is performed based on the option state at the time the edit is received.
- the system can activate the rigid sketch group (230). At activation, the currently presen'ed constraints are remembered for use when deactivating the group, whether or not a user dialog is used to activate the group. The system maintains the location and orientation of the curves in the rigid set on activation. That is, no curves of the rigid set should "jump" (translate or rotate) when the group activates.
- the system can perform an UNDO operation. For example, the user creates a rigid set. User then adds an interna] dimension with an incompatible value or a parallel constraint between two non-parallel lines. On activation, the system checks to see if the constraint is valid and preserves the respective constraints only if they are valid. An UNDO operation can reverse the Activation and restore the deleted constraints/dimensions
- Ignored hybrid constraints are also checked to see if they conflict with the Presen'ed constraints. If there is a conflict, the preserved constraint wins and the ignored hybrid constraint is deleted or made of reference, as appropriate.
- the system can store or display the geometric model (235), including any rigid sketch group, constraints, dimensions, or other data discussed herein.
- the stored or displayed geometric model can reflect any edits or other changes as discussed herein.
- the system can receive a user input to make a rigid sketch group the active sketch group.
- the user gets access to the internal data of the group and any new curves will be added to the group.
- it, will be possible to create new constraints and dimensions with or between objects that are outside the group.
- the group now behaves as an active sketch group. Curves can be created and edited. The changes can be applied to the members, because the curves now behave like regular sketch curves that are part of a group.
- Figure 4 illustrates an example of a geometric model 400 in the shape of a torso of a figure. This figure illustrates that the individual curves 402 (and others) in the model are constrained relative to each other, then the system can make the curve set rigid.
- the curves in the model as illustrated in Fig, 4 are designated as a rigid sketch group 404 as described above.
- Figure 5 illustrates an example of a geometric model 500, corresponding to the torso model 400, that includes additional rigid sketch groups.
- Each arm, each leg, and the head are all maintained as rigid sketch groups, and are then constrained to rotate about the pivot points of the torso rigid sketch group. As legs, arms, and head rotate about the pivot, points, they remain rigid.
- This sketch only contains 7 constraints. The torso is fixed and the legs, arms and head can rotate around their pivot points as rigid objects.
- Figure 6 illustrates an example of a geometric model 600, corresponding to the model 500, as may be displayed to a user when a rigid sketch group is active.
- the user has selected the torso rigid sketch group as the active group.
- the system responds by activating the torso rigid sketch group and displaying the internal constraints and allowing the user to make modifications.
- Figure 7 illustrates an example of a geometric model 700, corresponding to the model 600, after a user modification to lengthen the torso.
- the user has selected the torso rigid sketch group 704 as the active group and changed the height/length dimension of the torso.
- the remainder of the torso rigid sketch group remains rigid.
- the other rigid sketch groups representing the arms, legs, and head remain rigid and constrained to the pivot points.
- Figure 8 illustrates an example of a geometric model 800, corresponding to the model 700, illustrating that the arm, leg, and head rigid sketch groups can rotate about the pivot points on the torso rigid sketch group. As they do, each rigid sketch group remains rigid.
- machine usable/readable or computer usable/readable mediums include: nonvolatile, hard-coded type mediums such as read only memories (ROMs) or erasable, electrically programmable read only memories (EEPROMs), and user-recordable type mediums such as floppy disks, hard disk drives and compact disk read only memories (CD-ROMs) or digital versatile disks (DVDs).
- ROMs read only memories
- EEPROMs electrically programmable read only memories
- user-recordable type mediums such as floppy disks, hard disk drives and compact disk read only memories (CD-ROMs) or digital versatile disks (DVDs).
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP14731463.7A EP3000061A1 (en) | 2013-05-22 | 2014-05-14 | Rule-based constraint interaction in geometric models |
CN201480029292.XA CN105229646B (en) | 2013-05-22 | 2014-05-14 | The rule-based constraint interaction in geometrical model |
JP2016515360A JP6203384B2 (en) | 2013-05-22 | 2014-05-14 | Rule-based constraint interaction in geometric models |
US14/890,934 US9697303B2 (en) | 2013-05-22 | 2014-05-14 | Rule-based constraint interaction in geometric models |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
IN587/KOL/2013 | 2013-05-22 | ||
IN587KO2013 | 2013-05-22 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2014189729A1 true WO2014189729A1 (en) | 2014-11-27 |
Family
ID=50977096
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2014/037944 WO2014189729A1 (en) | 2013-05-22 | 2014-05-14 | Rule-based constraint interaction in geometric models |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9697303B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3000061A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP6203384B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN105229646B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2014189729A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109154951A (en) * | 2016-05-13 | 2019-01-04 | 西门子产品生命周期管理软件公司 | Modeling method and system |
US11244084B2 (en) | 2019-04-18 | 2022-02-08 | Applied Software Technology, Inc. | Spool sheet generation |
US10902580B2 (en) * | 2019-04-18 | 2021-01-26 | Applied Software Technology, Inc. | Auto-dimensioning REVIT models |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090259442A1 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2009-10-15 | Mallikarjuna Gandikota | System and method for geometric editing |
US20100010655A1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2010-01-14 | Lcdesign, Inc. | Assembly connection method for attaching virtual parts in a computer aided design software environment |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0789382B2 (en) | 1991-03-14 | 1995-09-27 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション | Method and apparatus for generating shape model |
US5251290A (en) * | 1991-03-25 | 1993-10-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Modeling method for sorting dependencies among geometric entities |
JP3045909B2 (en) | 1993-12-01 | 2000-05-29 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Graphic processing method |
JPH09179994A (en) | 1995-12-26 | 1997-07-11 | Nkk Corp | Design system |
-
2014
- 2014-05-14 US US14/890,934 patent/US9697303B2/en active Active
- 2014-05-14 WO PCT/US2014/037944 patent/WO2014189729A1/en active Application Filing
- 2014-05-14 JP JP2016515360A patent/JP6203384B2/en active Active
- 2014-05-14 CN CN201480029292.XA patent/CN105229646B/en active Active
- 2014-05-14 EP EP14731463.7A patent/EP3000061A1/en active Pending
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090259442A1 (en) * | 2008-04-14 | 2009-10-15 | Mallikarjuna Gandikota | System and method for geometric editing |
US20100010655A1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2010-01-14 | Lcdesign, Inc. | Assembly connection method for attaching virtual parts in a computer aided design software environment |
Non-Patent Citations (3)
Title |
---|
EGGLI L ET AL: "Inferring 3D models from freehand sketches and constraints", COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN, ELSEVIER PUBLISHERS BV., BARKING, GB, vol. 29, no. 2, 1 February 1997 (1997-02-01), pages 101 - 112, XP004070873, ISSN: 0010-4485, DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4485(96)00039-5 * |
SOHRT W ET AL: "Interaction with constraints in 3D modeling", SMA '91 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST ACM SYMPOSIUM ON SOLID MODELING FOUNDATIONS AND CAD/CAM APPLICATIONS, ACM, 2 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 701 - NEW YORK USA, 5 June 1991 (1991-06-05), pages 387 - 396, XP040054129, ISBN: 978-0-89791-427-7, DOI: 10.1145/112515.112570 * |
VAN DER MEIDEN H A ET AL: "A non-rigid cluster rewriting approach to solve systems of 3D geometric constraints", COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN, ELSEVIER PUBLISHERS BV., BARKING, GB, vol. 42, no. 1, 1 January 2010 (2010-01-01), pages 36 - 49, XP026786549, ISSN: 0010-4485, [retrieved on 20090317] * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP3000061A1 (en) | 2016-03-30 |
US20160117418A1 (en) | 2016-04-28 |
JP2016522500A (en) | 2016-07-28 |
CN105229646A (en) | 2016-01-06 |
CN105229646B (en) | 2019-09-10 |
US9697303B2 (en) | 2017-07-04 |
JP6203384B2 (en) | 2017-09-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9348966B2 (en) | Blend behavior in a variational system | |
US9697303B2 (en) | Rule-based constraint interaction in geometric models | |
US8723863B2 (en) | Data processing system with construction geometry | |
US9400853B2 (en) | System and method for identifying under-defined geometries due to singular constraint schemes | |
US8983802B2 (en) | Notch re-blend in an object model | |
US8704824B2 (en) | Integrated history-free and history-based modeling | |
US9330204B2 (en) | CAD system and method for wireframe coupling | |
EP2553616B1 (en) | System and method for constraining curves in a cad system | |
CN105229643A (en) | Amendment is tied and free curvilinear net | |
US20150339410A1 (en) | Cad components with overlay data | |
US20140089817A1 (en) | Distributed systems and methods for collaborative creation and modification of geometric models | |
US9690878B2 (en) | Geometric modeling with mutually dependent blends | |
US20120278277A1 (en) | Object-based models in document management | |
EP3149633B1 (en) | Intelligent constraint selection for positioning tasks | |
JP6338696B2 (en) | How to generate and edit large constraint networks |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201480029292.X Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 14731463 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 14890934 Country of ref document: US |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2014731463 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2016515360 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |