WO2014186311A1 - Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same - Google Patents

Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014186311A1
WO2014186311A1 PCT/US2014/037762 US2014037762W WO2014186311A1 WO 2014186311 A1 WO2014186311 A1 WO 2014186311A1 US 2014037762 W US2014037762 W US 2014037762W WO 2014186311 A1 WO2014186311 A1 WO 2014186311A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
biomarkers
subject
kidney function
ckd
level
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2014/037762
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Regis Perichon
Jeffrey Edmond Cobb
Meredith V. BROWN
Adam Kennedy
Original Assignee
Metabolon, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to AU2014265669A priority Critical patent/AU2014265669B2/en
Priority to CN201480027332.7A priority patent/CN105209909B/en
Priority to EP14797070.1A priority patent/EP2997366B1/en
Priority to EP18183240.3A priority patent/EP3410115A1/en
Application filed by Metabolon, Inc. filed Critical Metabolon, Inc.
Priority to BR112015028253A priority patent/BR112015028253A2/en
Priority to US14/889,930 priority patent/US10539575B2/en
Priority to ES14797070T priority patent/ES2702123T3/en
Priority to EP19176215.2A priority patent/EP3546940B1/en
Priority to JP2016514016A priority patent/JP6595984B2/en
Priority to MX2015015561A priority patent/MX365061B/en
Priority to CA2911204A priority patent/CA2911204C/en
Publication of WO2014186311A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014186311A1/en
Priority to HK16106343.3A priority patent/HK1218331A1/en
Priority to HK16110994.7A priority patent/HK1222905A1/en
Priority to US16/700,098 priority patent/US20200103417A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
    • G01N33/6893—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids related to diseases not provided for elsewhere
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/5308—Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for analytes not provided for elsewhere, e.g. nucleic acids, uric acid, worms, mites
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/64—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving ketones
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/68—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving proteins, peptides or amino acids
    • G01N33/6803—General methods of protein analysis not limited to specific proteins or families of proteins
    • G01N33/6848—Methods of protein analysis involving mass spectrometry
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48—Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/70—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving creatine or creatinine
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2570/00—Omics, e.g. proteomics, glycomics or lipidomics; Methods of analysis focusing on the entire complement of classes of biological molecules or subsets thereof, i.e. focusing on proteomes, glycomes or lipidomes
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
    • G01N2800/34—Genitourinary disorders
    • G01N2800/347—Renal failures; Glomerular diseases; Tubulointerstitial diseases, e.g. nephritic syndrome, glomerulonephritis; Renovascular diseases, e.g. renal artery occlusion, nephropathy
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
    • G01N2800/50—Determining the risk of developing a disease
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
    • G01N2800/52—Predicting or monitoring the response to treatment, e.g. for selection of therapy based on assay results in personalised medicine; Prognosis
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2800/00—Detection or diagnosis of diseases
    • G01N2800/56—Staging of a disease; Further complications associated with the disease

Definitions

  • the invention generally relates to biomarkers for kidney function and methods based on the same biomarkers.
  • GFR glomerular filtration rate
  • cystatin C More recently serum levels of cystatin C have been used to assess kidney function, but the utility of this measure of kidney function is limited by the variability of cystatin C serum levels among individuals. Thus, there is a need for a convenient and more accurate test than the currently available kidney function assessment tests to reduce the number of false negative and false positive diagnoses.
  • kidney function e.g., serum creatinine, cystatin C and eGFR measurements, BUN, urine albumin
  • BUN cystatin C and eGFR measurements
  • urine albumin are not sufficiently sensitive and/or accurate to detect early kidney disease or to monitor its progression, especially at the earliest stages of CKD when individuals are
  • a blood- or urine-based test to assess and/or monitor a patient's renal function by measuring the level of one or more biomarker metabolites in patients with risk factors for CKD would be clinically useful.
  • the biomarkers could comprise a test that quantitatively measures the level of a panel of biomarker metabolites whereby the increase or decrease in the level of each biomarker in the panel relative to a standard reference level are indicative of kidney function.
  • Such biomarker test panels could replace or supplement current kidney function test results and enable physicians to better assess kidney function initially and/or to monitor kidney function in patients over time. Such a test could also be useful in assessing the effect of therapeutic interventions to slow kidney function decline.
  • the present invention provides a method of assessing or aiding in the assessment of kidney function, comprising analyzing a biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from the listed biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N-acetylalanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl- methyladenosine, 3 -methyl glutaryl carnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N- acetylmethionine, N6-
  • the present invention provides a method of assessing kidney function in response to a composition, comprising analyzing a biological sample from a subject treated with a composition to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from the listed biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N-acetylalanine, N6- carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl-methyladenosine, 3- methylglutarylcarnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N-acetylmethionine, N6-ace
  • the present invention provides a method of classifying or aiding in the classification of a subject according to level of kidney function (e.g., normal, mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced, end- stage kidney failure) comprising analyzing a biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from the listed biomarkers:
  • level of kidney function e.g., normal, mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced, end- stage kidney failure
  • the invention provides a method of monitoring kidney function in a subject, the method comprising: analyzing a first biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from the listed biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N- acetylalanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl- methyladenosine, 3-methylglutarylcarnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N- acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine
  • the invention provides a Kidney Function
  • the present invention provides a method of diagnosing or aiding in the diagnosis of CKD, comprising analyzing a biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1 , 2, 3, and/or 4 and comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to CKD-positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to determine whether the subject has CKD.
  • the methods described herein may be used in combination with other methods (or the results thereof) useful in the assessment of kidney function in a subject.
  • clinical parameters such as BUN, SCr, and/or urine albumin measurements
  • markers of kidney function such as ⁇ -2 microglobulin, ⁇ -TRACE, 2-mannopyranosyl tryptophan (2-MPT)
  • patient information such as, for example, family history of CKD or other risk factors can be used with the biomarkers.
  • the methods described herein may be used to assess kidney function and/or diagnose CKD in patients with GFR estimates of 40-80 ml/min/1.73 m 2 .
  • a biomarker panel comprised of pseudouridine, C- glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function and/or diagnose CKD in a subject.
  • FIG. 1 is an example of an algorithm for patient management illustrating where the metabolite biomarker test (Novel biomarker(s) test) would be useful to integrate into clinical practice. Patients with eGFR and/or urine albumin scores in the range for an uncertain diagnosis (as indicated in the hashed box) would receive the metabolite biomarker test.
  • Novel Biomarker Test refers to a Metabolite
  • Al albumin- to-creatinine ratio ⁇ 30 mg/g;
  • A2 albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30-300 mg/g;
  • A3 albumin-to-creatinine ratio >300 mg/g.
  • CKD chronic kidney disease;
  • eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate; SCr, serum creatinine.
  • FIG. 2 is an example of an algorithm for patient management when undergoing drug therapy showing the use of the metabolite biomarker test.
  • the level of kidney function would be assessed using the metabolite biomarker test, and recommendations for the drug therapy regimen could be made based on the results.
  • Biomarker Test refers to Metabolite Biomarker Kidney Function Test.
  • FIG. 3A is a graphical illustration of the distribution of patient serum samples based on the level of C-glycosyltryptophan measured in the sample as described in Example 2.
  • FIG. 3B is a graphical illustration of a ROC curve generated using the exemplary biomarker C-glycosyltryptophan to distinguish CKD from Normal as described in Example 2.
  • FIG, 4 A is a graphical illustration of the distribution of patient serum samples based on the level of N-acetyl threonine measured in the sample as described in Example 2.
  • FIG. 4B is a graphical illustration of a ROC curve generated using the exemplary biomarker N-acetylthreonine to distinguish CKD from Normal as described in Example 2.
  • FIG. 5A is a graphical illustration of the distribution of patient serum samples based on the level of pseudouridine measured in the sample as described in Example 2.
  • FIG. 5B is a graphical illustration of a ROC curve generated using the exemplary biomarker pseudouridine to distinguish CKD from Normal as described in Example 2.
  • FIG. 6 A is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 1 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
  • FIG. 6B is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 2 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
  • FIG. 6C is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 3 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
  • FIG. 6D is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 4 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
  • FIG. 6E is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 5 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Biomarkers of kidney function methods of assessing or aiding in the assessment of kidney function, methods for diagnosing or aiding in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD); methods for classifying subjects according to level of kidney function; methods of monitoring kidney function; methods of determining susceptibility to CKD; methods of assessing kidney function in response to a
  • composition as well as other methods based on biomarkers of kidney function are described herein.
  • groups also referred to as "panels" of biomarker metabolites that can be used to assess or aid in the assessment of kidney function are identified.
  • Biomarker means a compound, preferably a metabolite, that is differentially present (i.e., increased or decreased) in a biological sample from a subject or a group of subjects having a first phenotype (e.g., having a disease) as compared to a biological sample from a subject or group of subjects having a second phenotype (e.g., not having the disease).
  • a biomarker may be differentially present at any level, but is generally present at a level that is increased by at least 5%, by at least 10%, by at least 15%, by at least 20%, by at least 25%, by at least 30%, by at least 35%, by at least 40%, by at least 45%, by at least 50%, by at least 55%, by at least 60%, by at least 65%, by at least 70%, by at least 75%, by at least 80%, by at least 85%, by at least 90%, by at least 95%, by at least 100%, by at least 110%, by at least 120%, by at least 130%, by at least 140%, by at least 150%, or more; or is generally present at a level that is decreased by at least 5%, by at least 10%, by at least 15%, by at least 20%, by at least 25%, by at least 30%, by at least 35%, by at least 40%, by at least 45%, by at least 50%, by at least 55%, by at least 60%, by at least 65%, by at least 70%, by at
  • a biomarker is preferably differentially present at a level that is statistically significant (i.e., a p-value less than 0.05 and/or a q- alue of less than 0.10 as determined using either Welch's T-test or
  • the "level" of one or more biomarkers means the absolute or relative amount or concentration of the biomarker measured in the sample.
  • sample or “biological sample” means biological material isolated from a subject.
  • the biological sample may contain any biological material suitable for detecting the desired biomarkers, and may comprise cellular and/or non-cellular material from the subject.
  • the sample can be isolated from any suitable biological tissue or fluid such as, for example, kidney tissue, blood, blood plasma (plasma), blood serum (serum), urine, or cerebral spinal fluid (CSF).
  • plasma blood plasma
  • serum serum
  • CSF cerebral spinal fluid
  • Subject means any animal, but is preferably a mammal, such as, for example, a human, monkey, mouse, rabbit or rat.
  • a “reference level” of a biomarker means a level of the biomarker that is indicative of a particular disease state, phenotype, or lack thereof, as well as combinations of disease states, phenotypes, or lack thereof.
  • a “reference level” of a biomarker may be an absolute or relative amount or concentration of the biomarker, a presence or absence of the biomarker, a range of amount or concentration of the biomarker, a minimum and/or maximum amount or concentration of the biomarker, a mean amount or concentration of the biomarker, and/or a median amount or concentration of the biomarker; and, in addition, "reference levels" of combinations of biomarkers may also be ratios of absolute or relative amounts or concentrations of two or more biomarkers with respect to each other.
  • Appropriate reference levels of biomarkers for a particular disease state, phenotype, or lack thereof may be determined by measuring levels of desired biomarkers in one or more appropriate subjects, and such reference levels may be tailored to specific populations of subjects (e.g., a reference level may be age-matched so that comparisons may be made between biomarker levels in samples from subjects of a certain age and reference levels for a particular disease state, phenotype, or lack thereof in a certain age group).
  • a "positive" reference level of a biomarker means a level that is indicative of a particular disease state or phenotype.
  • a “negative" reference level of a biomarker means a level that is indicative of a lack of a particular disease state or phenotype.
  • CKD-positive reference level of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of a positive diagnosis of CKD in a subject
  • CKD- negative reference level of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of a negative diagnosis of CKD in a subject (i.e., normal kidney function, absence of CKD).
  • a “kidney function reference level” may indicate the degree of kidney function present in a subject.
  • a "normal kidney function reference level" of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of normal kidney function in a subject
  • a “moderately reduced kidney function reference level” of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of moderately reduced kidney function
  • a “severely reduced kidney function reference level” of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of severely reduced kidney function in a subject.
  • Non-biomarker compound means a compound that is not differentially present in a biological sample from a subject or a group of subjects having a first phenotype (e.g., having a first disease) as compared to a biological sample from a subject or group of subjects having a second phenotype (e.g., not having the first disease).
  • Such non-biomarker compounds may, however, be biomarkers in a biological sample from a subject or a group of subjects having a third phenotype (e.g., having a second disease) as compared to the first phenotype (e.g., having the first disease) or the second phenotype (e.g., not having the first disease).
  • Metal means organic and inorganic molecules which are present in a cell.
  • the term does not include large macromolecules, such as large proteins (e.g., proteins with molecular weights over 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 6,000, 7,000, 8,000, 9,000, or 10,000), large nucleic acids (e.g., nucleic acids with molecular weights of over 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 6,000, 7,000, 8,000, 9,000, or 10,000), or large polysaccharides (e.g., polysaccharides with a molecular weights of over 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 6,000, 7,000, 8,000, 9,000, or 10,000).
  • the small molecules of the cell are generally found free in solution in the cytoplasm or in other organelles, such as the mitochondria, where they form a pool of intermediates which can be metabolized further or used to generate large molecules, called
  • small molecules includes signaling molecules and intermediates in the chemical reactions that transform energy derived from food into usable forms. Examples of small molecules include sugars, fatty acids, amino acids, nucleotides, intermediates formed during cellular processes, and other small molecules found within the cell.
  • GFR Glomerular filtration rate
  • the GFR is a metric of kidney function whereby GFR at or above a certain threshold indicates normal kidney function and GFR below the threshold value indicates kidney function is compromised or impaired. Generally, a high GFR value indicates better kidney function while a low GFR indicates kidney function impairment (e.g., chronic kidney disease, acute kidney injury).
  • Estimatimated glomerular filtration rate or "eGFR” means a calculated estimate of the actual glomerular filtration rate based on serum creatinine
  • eGFR 186 x (S cr ) 1 154 ⁇ (Age)- 0.203 x (0.742 if female) ⁇ (1.212 if Black), where Scr is serum creatinine (mg/dL).
  • Urine albumin is a test measuring the amount of albumin in the urine and is also used to detect kidney disease.
  • Serum creatinine or “SCr” refers to the measurement of creatinine in serum and is commonly used to estimate GFR.
  • BUN Blood urea nitrogen
  • BUN refers to the measurement of the amount of nitrogen in the blood in the form of urea. BUN is a test used to measure kidney function.
  • Chronic Kidney Disease or “CKD” includes conditions that damage kidneys resulting in decreased ability of the kidney to remove wastes from the body resulting in high levels of the wastes in the body and leading to increased risk of illness and development of complications such as high blood pressure, anemia, poor nutritional health and nerve damage. Patients with abnormalities in kidney function for at least three months may be diagnosed with CKD. Kidney damage due to CKD is permanent.
  • Acute kidney injury or "AKI” refers to a condition in which there is a rapid loss of kidney function. Kidney damage due to AKI may be reversible.
  • Kidney Disease Stages or "CKD Stages” means the degree of kidney damage as currently assessed using the measured or estimated glomerular filtration rate (mGFR, eGFR).
  • 5 stages of CKD are generally recognized with kidney function regarded as normal in Stage 1 (GFR>90), minimally reduced in Stage 2 (GFR 60-89), moderately reduced in Stages 3 A and 3B (GFR 30-59), severely reduced in Stage 4 (GFR 15-29) and very severe or endstage kidney failure, also referred to as established renal failure at Stage 5 (GFR ⁇ 15, or on dialysis).
  • Kidney function stages may be used to refer to kidney damage present for any amount of time (i.e., kidney damage due to AKI or CKD).
  • metabolic profiles were generated from biological samples collected from human subjects with a range of kidney function as determined by eGFR, as calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR equation and/or the MDRD eGFR equation.
  • Biomarkers of kidney function were identified by analyzing the levels of metabolites measured in serum and urine samples from the subjects and correlating the levels with eGFR; those molecules that correlated significantly with eGFR were selected as biomarkers of kidney function.
  • the biomarkers are discussed in more detail herein.
  • the identified biomarkers may be used to assess kidney function in a subject, to monitor a subject to detect changes in kidney function (e.g., decreases in function which may indicate acute kidney injury or incipient CKD), to classify subjects according to the degree of kidney function (e.g., normal, mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced, end-stage kidney failure) and to distinguish subjects having CKD vs. control subjects not diagnosed with CKD (see Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4).
  • changes in kidney function e.g., decreases in function which may indicate acute kidney injury or incipient CKD
  • the degree of kidney function e.g., normal, mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced, end-stage kidney failure
  • biomarkers may be used to monitor changes in kidney function over time or in response to drug treatment, disease (e.g., type II diabetes), or lifestyle interventions (e.g., diet, exercise) and to identify or rule-out subjects as suitable candidates for drug therapies and/or kidney transplant.
  • disease e.g., type II diabetes
  • lifestyle interventions e.g., diet, exercise
  • the kidney function biomarkers can be used to assess (or aid in the assessment of) kidney function in a subject. It will be understood that the identified biomarkers can be used to assess kidney function in any subject and includes the assessment of kidney function in an asymptomatic subject, in a subject at risk of CKD or AKI due to the presence of symptoms, or risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, family history of CKD, exposure to certain chemical/environmental conditions, etc.), and in a subject in response to a composition or to a therapeutic intervention (e.g., kidney transplant, lifestyle modification). It is further understood that a subject may undergo one or more assessments of kidney function.
  • risk factors e.g., hypertension, diabetes, family history of CKD, exposure to certain chemical/environmental conditions, etc.
  • a subject may undergo one or more assessments of kidney function.
  • assessing kidney function in a subject comprises (1) analyzing a biological sample obtained from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample and (2) comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to reference level(s) of the one or more biomarkers to assess kidney function in a subject and determine if kidney function is normal or impaired as well as to determine the level of kidney function impairment.
  • the one or more biomarkers may be selected from Tables 1 , 2, 3, and/or 4 and/or from the group consisting of the following biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N- acetylalanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl- methyladenosine, 3 -methyl glutarylcamitine (C6), S-adenosylhomo cysteine (SAH), N- acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, ynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N-form
  • the results of the method may be used along with other methods (or the results thereof) and/or patient metadata useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has normal kidney function or impaired kidney function (which can result from an acute kidney injury (AKI) or CKD) as well as the level of kidney function (e.g., normal, mildly impaired, moderately impaired, severely impaired, end-stage kidney failure).
  • AKI acute kidney injury
  • CKD CKD-based kidney function
  • Any suitable method may be used to analyze the biological sample in order to determine the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample. Suitable methods include chromatography (e.g., HPLC, gas chromatography, liquid chromatography), mass spectrometry (e.g., MS, MS-MS), enzyme-linked
  • the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers may be measured indirectly, for example, by using an assay that measures the level of a compound (or compounds) that correlates with the level of the biomarker(s) that are desired to be measured.
  • biomarkers selected from the listed biomarkers pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N-acetyl alanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyl adenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl - methyladenosine, 3-methylglutarylcarnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N- acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N-formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol
  • Phenylacetylglutamine, N2,N5-diacetylornithine, creatinine may be determined in the described methods.
  • Determining levels of combinations of the biomarkers may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in the described methods. For example, pair-wise analysis of two biomarkers or ratios of the levels of certain biomarkers (and non- biomarker compounds) in biological samples may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in assessing kidney function and aiding in the assessment of kidney function. For example, the ratio of myo-inositol to glycerophosphocholine (GPC), tryptophan to kynurenine, tryptophan to 3-indoxyl sulfate, and/or tryptophan to indoleacetate may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
  • GPC myo-inositol to glycerophosphocholine
  • tryptophan to kynurenine tryptophan to 3-indoxyl sulfate
  • tryptophan to indoleacetate may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
  • determining levels of combinations of two or more, three or more, four or more, and /or five or more biomarkers may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in the methods described herein.
  • the levels of pseudouridine, C- glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
  • the levels of pseudouridine, N- acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
  • the levels of N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, C- glycosyltryptophan, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
  • the levels of N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, kynurenine, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
  • the levels of pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and myo-inositol may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
  • the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers may be compared to kidney function reference levels using various techniques, including a simple comparison (e.g., a manual comparison).
  • the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the biological sample may also be compared to reference levels using one or more statistical analyses (e.g., t-test, Welch's T-test, Wilcoxon's rank sum test, correlation analysis, Random Forest, T-score, Z-score) or using a mathematical model (e.g., algorithm, statistical model).
  • a mathematical model comprising a single algorithm or multiple algorithms may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
  • the results of the method may be used along with other methods and measurements (or the results thereof) useful in the assessment of kidney function in a subject.
  • clinical parameters such as BUN, SCr, and/or urine albumin measurements
  • markers of kidney function such as ⁇ -2 microglobulin, ⁇ -TRACE, 2- mannopyranosyl tryptophan (2-MPT)
  • patient information such as, for example, family history of CKD or other risk factors can be used with the biomarkers.
  • the identification of biomarkers for kidney function allows for the assessment of (or for aiding in the assessment of) kidney function in patients undergoing imaging tests using contrast agents where the contrast imaging agents may be toxic and, as a result, may cause kidney injury.
  • a patient with reduced kidney function e.g., Stage 2 CKD or Stage 3 or Stage 3 A CKD
  • an accurate measure of kidney function will help patients and clinicians assess the risk to benefit ratio of imaging tests and will allow for more informed decisions.
  • the identification of biomarkers for kidney function allows for the assessment of (or for aiding in the assessment of) kidney function to detect incipient CKD before CKD can be diagnosed using the current standards for determining kidney function (e.g., SCr, eGFR, cystatin C urine albumin and/or BUN measurements).
  • Clinical measures may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect early changes in kidney function or may be inaccurate in certain subjects due to, for example, chronic illness, obesity, advanced age, vegetarian diet and/or generally reduced muscle mass.
  • the biomarkers described herein may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD. Accurate and early diagnosis of CKD may allow earlier therapeutic intervention which could delay or prevent the development of further kidney damage and more severe CKD.
  • an accurate assessment of kidney function in a subject who is a potential kidney donor will aid a physician in determining whether the potential donor is suitable for donating a kidney.
  • the biomarkers provided allow for a method of assessing kidney function in a subject being treated with a composition.
  • the composition may be any composition, drug or therapeutic agent given to a subject to treat any disease or condition.
  • the composition additionally may be any composition given to a patient having a disease or condition, for example, a contrast imaging agent.
  • the identification of biomarkers for kidney function also allows for assessment of the subject's response to a composition that alters kidney function as well as the assessment of the relative patient response to two or more compositions that alter kidney function.
  • assessments may be used, for example, to select compositions for treating cancer for certain subjects, or to select subjects for a course of treatment or inclusion in clinical trial.
  • Such assessments may also be used to monitor kidney function in response to a composition prior to, throughout and/or following (i.e., post-launch) the drug development process.
  • the instant invention allows for a metabolite biomarker test to provide an accurate determination of kidney function in patients with eGFR values that are borderline normal thus enabling a clinician to select a certain treatment or modify treatment of the patients to reduce the risk of further kidney damage.
  • a biomarker test overcomes limitations of current kidney function tests which do not accurately assess all patient populations, (often leading to false positive or false negative diagnoses), and do not detect early kidney function impairment (which may be indicative of AKI or incipient CKD).
  • Figure 1 illustrated in Figure 1 is an example clinical practice algorithm (flow chart) that depicts best practices for screening, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and management of clinical symptoms to diagnose CKD.
  • kidney function biomarkers test based on analyzing the levels of a panel of biomarkers for kidney function selected from the listed biomarkers: pseudouridine, N- acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N-acetylalanine, N6- carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl-methyladenosine, 3- methylglutarylcarnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N-acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N- formy
  • a patient with no symptoms of CKD may initially have kidney function assessed by measuring SCr, and eGFR and/or urine albumin as recommended by current clinical practice guidelines.
  • CKD stages of G2-G3a as measured by eGFR and/or CKD stage Al as measured by urine albumin often result in false positive or false negative diagnoses; confirmatory testing is recommended.
  • Patients with these scores would receive the novel metabolite biomarker test to aid in diagnosing CKD (hashed box).
  • Levels of kidney function biomarkers that are normal are indicative that the patient has normal kidney function.
  • Patients diagnosed as Normal using the metabolite biomarker test would be monitored periodically to assess kidney function. A result for which the metabolite biomarkers levels at baseline are significantly above or below normal range indicate that a patient has CKD. Patients diagnosed as having CKD by using the metabolite biomarker test would receive appropriate treatment.
  • the biomarkers provided herein can be used in a mathematical or statistical model or formula to provide a physician with a numerical score ("Kidney Function Score") indicating the level of kidney function and/or the probability that a subject has compromised kidney function which may indicate AKI or CKD.
  • the score is based upon clinically significantly changed reference level(s) for a biomarker and/or combination of biomarkers.
  • the reference level can be derived from an algorithm or computed from indices for impaired GFR.
  • Methods for determining a subject's Kidney Function Score may comprise comparing the level(s) of the one or more kidney function biomarkers in the sample to kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to determine the subject's Kidney Function Score.
  • the method may employ any number of markers selected from the following list: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N- acetylserine, N-acetylalanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4- acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2- dimethylguanosine, Nl-methyladenosine, 3 -methyl glutarylcarnitine (C6), S- adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N-acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinylcamitine, ribose, xylonite, N-formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylc
  • the Kidney Function Score can be used to place the subject in the range of kidney function from normal (i.e. no kidney function impairment) to mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced, or end-stage kidney failure.
  • Non- limiting example uses of the Kidney Function Score include: assessment of kidney function; classification of kidney function; susceptibility to developing CKD;
  • the methods may be used assess kidney function over time, thereby enabling kidney function to be monitored.
  • the change (if any) in the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers over time i.e., in a first sample from a subject at a first time point compared to a second sample obtained from the subject at a second time point
  • the change (if any) in the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers over time may be indicative of altered kidney function in the patient over time.
  • the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the first sample, the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the second sample, and/or the results of the comparison of the levels of the biomarkers in the first and second samples may be compared to reference levels of the one or more biomarkers.
  • the comparisons indicate that the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers are increasing or decreasing over time (e.g., in the second sample as compared to the first sample) to become more similar to the low kidney function reference levels (or less similar to the high kidney function reference levels), then the results are indicative of declining kidney function. If the comparisons indicate that the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers are increasing or decreasing over time to become more similar to the high kidney function reference levels (or less similar to the low kidney function reference levels), then the results are indicative of normal kidney function.
  • a subject may have normal kidney function at a first time point (e.g., biomarker(s) is similar to the high kidney function reference level or dissimilar to the low kidney function reference level) and remains in the normal range at a second time point (e.g., remains similar to the high kidney function reference level(s) or dissimilar to the low kidney function reference level(s)), indicating no change in kidney function.
  • the kidney function may be normal at a first time point (e.g., biomarker(s) is similar to the high kidney function reference level(s) or dissimilar to the low kidney function reference level(s)) then decreases at a second time point yet remains in the normal range of kidney function, indicating that although still in the normal range, the kidney function decreased.
  • a subject with borderline normal kidney function at a first time point may be diagnosed with CKD based on the level(s) of the biomarker(s) at the second time point indicating a worsening of kidney function in the subject.
  • the difference between the relative amount of the biomarker and the reference level may also be used to assess kidney function over time. For example, if the comparisons indicate that there is a larger difference between the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers and the high kidney function reference levels (or a smaller difference between the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers and the low kidney function reference levels) over time, then the results are indicative of the patient developing declining kidney function.
  • one or more additional samples may be obtained from the subject at a later point in time.
  • the one or more additional samples are obtained 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or more days after the first sample.
  • the one or more samples is obtained 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more weeks after the first sample or after the initiation of treatment with the composition.
  • the one or more additional samples may be obtained 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1, 12, or more months after the first sample or after the initiation of treatment with the composition.
  • the methods could be used to monitor kidney function in subjects having CKD or subjects suspected of being predisposed to developing CKD (e.g., at risk subjects due to family history of CKD, drug therapy, chronic illness, etc.).
  • the biomarkers disclosed herein may be used to monitor kidney function in subjects not having CKD.
  • the biomarkers described herein may be used to monitor the development of CKD.
  • biomarkers disclosed herein may be used to monitor kidney function in kidney transplant recipients.
  • a biomarker algorithm could be used to monitor a patient's kidney function. Using the results of the biomarker algorithm in combination with current kidney function test results (e.g., SCr, eGFR, BUN, urine albumin, cystatin C) a clinician could assess the risk-benefit ratio of the drug treatment in the patient. Additionally, a biomarker algorithm could be used by clinicians treating any patient at risk for developing loss of kidney function (e.g., diabetics, hypertensive, elderly, family history, smokers, chronically ill, kidney transplant recipient, etc.). The drug therapy may be any agent used to treat any disease or condition.
  • FIG. 2 Illustrated in Figure 2 is an example of a biomarker algorithm (flow chart). Levels of kidney function biomarkers that are normal at baseline and remain within normal range during therapy, are indicative that the patient has normal kidney function.
  • a result for which the levels of metabolite biomarkers at baseline or the changes in these levels during therapy are outside the normal range but not excessively so would indicate that a patient has mild to moderate loss of kidney function. These patients represent those whose results would be borderline with current kidney function tests. Based on the result of the metabolite biomarker test, the treating clinician may elect to re-assess the risk-benefit of the current treatment regimen (e.g., therapeutic agent, dose) in the patient and change the patient's management.
  • the current treatment regimen e.g., therapeutic agent, dose
  • biomarkers for kidney function also allows for the diagnosis of (or for aiding in the diagnosis of) CKD in a subject. It will be understood that the identified biomarkers can be used to diagnose or aid in diagnosing CKD in any subject, including asymptomatic subjects, those subjects presenting with one or more symptoms consistent with the presence of CKD and/or those subjects where CKD is probable (e.g., chronic illness, drug treatments, use of contrast imaging agents, etc.).
  • diagnosing (or aiding in diagnosing) whether a subject has CKD comprises (1) analyzing a biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers of kidney function in the sample and (2) comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to CKD- positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to diagnose (or aid in the diagnosis of) whether the subject has CKD.
  • the one or more biomarkers may be selected from Table 1.
  • the results of the method may be used along with other methods and measurements (or the results thereof) and/or patient metadata useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has C D.
  • Methods useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has CKD are known in the art.
  • methods useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has CKD include, for example, SCr, BUN, eGFR, mGFR, urine albumin, and cystatin C.
  • Other measurements useful in determining whether a subject has CKD include, for example, ⁇ -2 microglobulin, ⁇ -TRACE, and/or 2-mannopyranosyl tryptophan (2-MPT).
  • Patient metadata useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has CKD include, for example, age, weight, gender, and race.
  • Any suitable method may be used to analyze the biological sample in order to determine the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample. Suitable methods include chromatography (e.g., HPLC, gas chromatography, liquid
  • the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers may be measured indirectly, for example, by using an assay that measures the level of a compound (or compounds) that correlates with the level of the biomarker(s) that are desired to be measured.
  • the level of one or more of the biomarkers of Table 1 may be determined in the methods of assessing and methods of aiding in the assessment of kidney function in a subject. For example, the level(s) of one biomarker, two or more biomarkers, three or more biomarkers, four or more biomarkers, five or more biomarkers, six or more biomarkers, seven or more biomarkers, eight or more biomarkers, nine or more biomarkers, ten or more biomarkers, etc., including a combination of any or all of the biomarkers in Table 1 or any fraction thereof, may be determined and used in such methods.
  • Determining levels of combinations of the biomarkers may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing CKD and aiding in the diagnosis of CKD.
  • pair-wise analysis of two biomarkers or ratios of the levels of certain biomarkers (and non-biomarker compounds) in biological samples may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing CKD and aiding in the diagnosis of CKD.
  • the ratio of myo-inositol to glycerophosphocholine (GPC), tryptophan to kynurenine, tryptophan to 3-indoxyl sulfate, and/or tryptophan to indoleacetate may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject.
  • determining levels of combinations of two or more, three or more, four or more, and/or five or more biomarkers may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in the methods described herein.
  • pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and creatinine may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject.
  • the levels of pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, and creatinine may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject.
  • the levels of N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, C-glycosyltryptophan, and creatinine may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject.
  • the levels of N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, kynurenine, and creatinine may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject.
  • the levels of pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and myo-inositol may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject.
  • the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample are determined, the level(s) are compared to CKD-positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels to diagnose or to aid in diagnosing whether the subject has CKD.
  • Levels of the one or more biomarkers in a sample matching the CKD-positive reference levels are indicative of a diagnosis of CKD in the subject.
  • Levels of the one or more biomarkers in a sample matching the CKD-negative reference levels are indicative of a diagnosis of no CKD in the subject.
  • levels of the one or more biomarkers that are differentially present (especially at a level that is statistically significant) in the sample as compared to CKD-negative reference levels are indicative of a diagnosis of CKD in the subject.
  • Levels of the one or more biomarkers that are differentially present (especially at a level that is statistically significant) in the sample as compared to CKD-positive reference levels are indicative of a diagnosis of no CKD in the subject.
  • the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers may be compared to CKD- positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels using various techniques, including a simple comparison (e.g., a manual comparison) of the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the biological sample to CKD-positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels.
  • the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the biological sample may also be compared to CKD-positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels using one or more statistical analyses (e.g., t-test, Welch's T-test, Wilcoxon's rank sum test, correlation analysis, Random Forest, T-score, Z-score) or using a mathematical model (e.g., algorithm, statistical model).
  • statistical analyses e.g., t-test, Welch's T-test, Wilcoxon's rank sum test, correlation analysis, Random Forest, T-score, Z-score
  • a mathematical model e.g., algorithm, statistical model
  • a mathematical model comprising a single algorithm or multiple algorithms may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
  • a mathematical model may also be used to determine whether a subject has CKD.
  • a mathematical model may also be used to distinguish between CKD stages.
  • An exemplary mathematical model may use the measured levels of any number of biomarkers (for example, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc.) from a subject to determine, using an algorithm or a series of algorithms based on mathematical relationships between the levels of the measured biomarkers, whether a subject has normal kidney function or CKD, whether a subject is predisposed to developing CKD, whether CKD is progressing in a subject, whether a subject has high stage (severe or very severe kidney function reduction), mid-stage (moderately reduced function) or low stage (mildly reduced function) CKD, etc.
  • a different exemplary mathematical model may use the measured levels of any number of biomarkers (for example, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc.) from a subject to classify a subject based on the level or stage of kidney function (e.g., high, moderate, low).
  • the identification of biomarkers for CKD allows for the diagnosis of CKD in a subject not previously diagnosed with CKD.
  • a subject with risk factors for CKD e.g., age over 60 years, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and/or a family history of CKD, etc.
  • the biomarkers described herein may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD.
  • the identification of biomarkers for CKD allows for early detection and diagnosis before CKD can be diagnosed using the current standards for determining kidney function (e.g., SCr, eGFR, urine albumin, cystatin C and/or BUN measurements).
  • the early diagnosis of CKD may allow earlier therapeutic intervention which could delay or prevent the development of further kidney damage and more severe CKD.
  • the biomarkers disclosed herein may be used to diagnose or aid in diagnosing CKD in patients where the current standards for determining CKD (e.g., SCr, urine albumin, cystatin C, and/or BUN measurements) in subjects are inaccurate due to, for example, chronic illness, obesity, advanced age, vegetarian diet, and/or generally reduced muscle mass in the subject.
  • the biomarkers described herein may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD.
  • kits may further comprise appropriate controls, standards and/or detection reagents.
  • the kit may include tools and reagents for the analysis of a blood-based sample.
  • the kit may comprise a sample collection element and a vessel for storing the sample.
  • the kit may comprise a sample collection element, a retrieved serum collection receptacle, sample labels, sample barcodes, and instruction protocol.
  • the instruction protocol may be provided as a printed form or booklet or on an electronic medium, such as, for example, a computer disk or other computer readable medium.
  • the kit may be used in accordance with the following exemplary method.
  • a serum sample may be collected from the subject using a needle and syringe.
  • the serum can then be extruded into a collection receptacle (e.g., a vial, a conical tube, etc.).
  • the sample in the collection receptacle may then be subjected to biochemical analysis. Barcodes and labels enable the sample identity and the analyses results to be tracked through the biochemical analysis.
  • each sample was analyzed to determine the concentration of several hundred metabolites.
  • Analytical techniques such as GC-MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) and LC-MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) were used to analyze the metabolites. Multiple aliquots were simultaneously, and in parallel, analyzed, and, after appropriate quality control (QC), the information derived from each analysis was recombined. Every sample was characterized according to several thousand characteristics, which ultimately amount to several hundred chemical species. The techniques used were able to identify novel and chemically unnamed compounds.
  • Example 1 Metabolites were extracted and proteins were precipitated from the samples (1 ⁇ ) by the addition of 450 ⁇ 1 of methanol. Two separate UPLC methods were utilized, one in acidic conditions and the other in basic conditions. The precipitated extract was split into four aliquots and dried under nitrogen and then in vacuo. One aliquot was reconstituted in 50 ⁇ of 0.1% formic acid in water (for use in the acidic method), and another aliquot was reconstituted in 50 ⁇ of 6.5 mM ammonium bicarbonate in water, pH 8 (for use in the basic method).
  • ammonium bicarbonate in water, pH 8, and solvent B 6.5mM ammonium bicarbonate in 95/5 methanol/water (gradient profile: 0%B to 70 %B in 4 min, 70 to 98 %B in 0.5 min, 98% B for 0.9 min).
  • MS ThermoFisher Corporation
  • ESI electrospray ionization
  • the acidic method monitored for positive ions and the basic method monitored for negative ions in independent injections using separate acid/base dedicated columns heated to 40°C.
  • the MS interface capillary was maintained at 350°C, with a sheath gas flow of 40 (arbitrary units) and aux gas flow of 5 (arbitrary units) for both positive and negative injections.
  • the spray voltage for the positive ion injection was 4.5 kV and 3.75 kV for the negative ion injection.
  • the instrument scanned 99-1000 m/z and alternated between MS and MS/MS scans. The scan speed was approximately 6 scans/sec (3 MS and 3 MS/MS scans).
  • MS/MS normalized collision energy was set to 40, activation Q 0.25, and activation time 30 ms, with a 3 m/z isolation
  • MS/MS scans were collected using dynamic exclusion with an exclusion time of 3.5 sec. Isotopically labeled compounds were spiked into every sample and were used to assess instrument performance and suitability, including retention time, mass and sensitivity stability over the course of the run (usually 20 hours). In addition, a quality control sample, which consisted of a pooled aliquot from all samples, was analyzed every 8 injections to ensure technical reproducibility.
  • MS peak detection was used for the detection and integration of MS peaks. Briefly, extracted ion chromatograms were binned by mass in a given range, baseline noise was determined, peak areas were calculated, and various user-defined peak thresholds including minimum height, signal-to-noise, width, symmetry, and area were applied to detected MS peaks. MS peaks passing above threshold criteria were assembled into lists that were then inserted into a relational database for storage and further analysis. Finally, individual MS peaks were grouped based on peak apex retention time for ease of viewing similarly retained ion features. All samples were aligned based on retention time (RT) markers present throughout the chromatogram using a retention index (RI).
  • RT retention time
  • RI retention index
  • the retention index of a sample component is a number, obtained by interpolation (usually logarithmic), relating the adjusted retention volume (time) or the retention factor of the sample component to the adjusted retention volumes (times) of two standards eluted before and after the peak of the sample component.
  • the resulting data were searched against a chemical library generated specifically for each method (e.g. UPLC positive ion data was searched against a library specific for UPLC positive ion mode).
  • Biochemical identifications were based on three criteria: retention index within 75 RI units of the proposed identification (or approximately 5 s), experimental precursor mass match to the library within 0.4 m/z, and the MS/MS forward and reverse scores. The MS/MS scores were based on a comparison of the ions present in the experimental spectrum to the ions present in the library spectrum. Biochemical identification was performed by a software program, and the computer generated identification was verified by a human analyst.
  • biochemical was not identified (because an authentic chemical standard was not available in the library), the properities or behavior of the biochemical that were obtained from the analysis method were indicated, without indicating the specific chemical composition or structure of the biochemical (referred to as unnamed biochemicals).
  • Unnamed biochemicals represent entities for which the "ion fragmentation signature" has been established but for which no known standard is available in the chemical library.
  • the unnamed biochemicals have been sufficiently characterized by analytical techniques (described above) for unique identification.
  • the unnamed biochemicals are designated herein by the nomenclature "X -" followed by a specific five digit number. Identifying analytical information for the unnamed biochemical small molecules listed in Table 1 is described. For example, for unnamed metabolite X- 17299, the retention time was 1.2, the retention index was 1265.9, the quant mass was 229.2, and the polarity of the quantitative ion using the analytical methods described above was positive as measured on the LC-MS/MS optimized for acidic species.
  • the data were analyzed using t-tests to identify molecules (either known, named metabolites or unnamed metabolites) present at differential levels in a definable population or subpopulation (e.g., biomarkers for subjects with kidney function impairment compared to subjects without kidney function impairment) useful for distinguishing between the definable populations (e.g., kidney function impairment and no kidney function impairment).
  • molecules either known, named metabolites or unnamed metabolites
  • Other molecules either known, named metabolites or unnamed metabolites in the definable population or subpopulation were also identified.
  • the data were also analyzed using correlation analysis to identify molecules (either known, named metabolites or unnamed metabolites) that correlate with eGFR calculations (e.g., CKD-EPI eGFR, MDRD eGFR).
  • molecules either known, named metabolites or unnamed metabolites
  • eGFR calculations e.g., CKD-EPI eGFR, MDRD eGFR.
  • ROC receiver operating characteristic
  • the samples used for the analysis were serum samples collected from 281 diabetic individuals.
  • Patient kidney function was evaluated using two equations for estimating GFR, 1) MDRD eGFR and 2) CKD-EPI eGFR.
  • a total of 46 patients were classified as having CKD, and 235 patients were classified as Normal at the time of sample collection.
  • Biomarkers for kidney function were identified by comparing CKD vs. Normal samples. As listed in Table 1 below, the analysis resulted in the identification of biomarkers that are differentially present between CKD and Normal patient serum samples. All biomarkers in Table 1 are statistically significant (p ⁇ 0.1).
  • a correlation analysis was performed between biomarker levels and eGFR calculations (i.e., MDRD eGFR and CKD-EPI eGFR). The correlation value for each biomarker is shown in Table 1.
  • Table 1 includes, for each biomarker, the biochemical name of the biomarker, the correlation value of the biomarker with MDRD, the correlation value of the biomarker with CKD-EPI, the fold change of the biomarker in subjects with CKD compared to Normal subjects (CKD/Normal) which is the ratio of the mean level of the biomarker in CKD samples as compared to the Normal mean level, and the p-value determined in the statistical analysis of the data concerning the biomarkers.
  • Table 1 also lists the following: the internal identifier for the biomarker compound in the in-house chemical library of authentic standards (CompID); the identifier for the biomarker compound in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), if available; and the identifier for the biomarker compound in the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), if available.
  • CompID the internal identifier for the biomarker compound in the in-house chemical library of authentic standards
  • KEGG Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes
  • HMDB Human Metabolome Database
  • propionylcarnitine -0.3266 -0.3629 1.3841 0.0001 32452 C03017 HMDB00824
  • biomarkers to assess kidney function and identify individuals with CKD were selected from Table 1 and evaluated for diagnostic performance. These models are intended to be non-limiting and are presented to exemplify the invention.
  • the biomarkers identified were present at levels that differed between patient samples from individuals with normal kidney function and samples from individuals with CKD. For example, C- glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and pesudouridine were significant biomarkers for distinguishing subjects with CKD from normal subjects.
  • the samples used for the analysis were serum samples collected from 281 diabetic individuals. Patient kidney function was evaluated using the DRD equation to estimate GFR. Patients with MDRD eGFR values of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m were classified as having CKD, and patients with eGFR values of 60 ml/min/1.73 m or greater were classified as Normal. A total of 46 patients were classified as having CKD, and 235 patients were classified as Normal at the time of sample collection.
  • the biomarkers identified in Example 1 , Table 1 for diagnosing or aiding in the diagnosis of CKD were evaluated for diagnostic performance using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve modeling.
  • ROC Receiver Operator Characteristic
  • FIG. 3 A shows the distribution of patient samples based on the level of C-glycosyltryptophan measured in the samples.
  • the x-axis shows the diagnosis group (Normal or CKD), and the y-axis shows the level of C- glycosyltryptophan.
  • the levels of C-glycosyltryptophan were used in a mathematical model to determine the diagnostic performance of the biomarker.
  • FIG. 3B shows the ROC curve for C-glycosyltryptophan.
  • the ROC curve has an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8721. Based on this ROC curve, it was determined that by measuring the level of C-glycosyltryptophan, CKD subjects were
  • FIG. 4A shows the distribution of patient samples based on the level of N-acetylthreonine measured in the samples.
  • the x-axis shows the diagnosis group (Normal or CKD), and the y-axis shows the level of N- acetylthreonine.
  • the levels of N-acetylthreonine were used in a mathematical model to determine the diagnostic performance of the biomarker.
  • Figure 4B shows the ROC curve for N-acetylthreonine.
  • the ROC curve has an AUC of 0.8801. Based on this ROC curve it was determined that by measuring the level of N- acetylthreonine, CKD subjects were distinguished from normal subjects with 83% sensitivity and 87% specificity.
  • FIG. 5 A shows the distribution of patient samples based on the level of pseudouridine measured in the samples.
  • the x-axis shows the diagnosis group (Normal or CKD), and the y-axis shows the level of pseudouridine.
  • the levels of pseudouridine were used in a mathematical model to determine the diagnostic performance of the biomarker.
  • Figure 5B shows the ROC curve for pseudouridine.
  • the ROC curve has an AUC of 0.9041. Based on this ROC curve it was determined that by measuring the level of pseudouridine, CKD subjects were distinguished from Normal subjects with 80% sensitivity and 93 % specificity.
  • the biomarkers pseudouridine, N-acetyl threonine, C- glycosyltryptophan, kynurenine, myo-inositol, and creatinine were measured in fasting serum samples collected from 258 diabetic individuals for whom the CKD- EPI equation to estimate GFR was used to evaluate kidney function.
  • Patients with CKD-EPI eGFR values of 60 ml/min/1.73 m or less were classified as having a "positive" diagnosis (i.e., compromised kidney function, CKD), and patients with eGFR values of greater than 60 ml/min/1.73 m were classified as having a "negative” (i.e., nomial kidney function).
  • a total of 40 patients were classified as a positive diagnosis for CKD and/or compromised kidney function, and 218 patients were classified as a negative diagnosis and/or normal kidney function based on CKD-EPI eGFR results.
  • Model 1 comprises the biomarkers pseudouridine, C- glvcosvltrvptophan, N-acetvlthreonine, and creatinine exerrmlarv
  • Model 2 comprises the biomarkers pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, and creatinine;
  • exemplary Model 3 comprises the biomarkers N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, C- glycosyltryptophan, and creatinine;
  • exemplary Model 4 comprises the biomarkers N- acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, kynurenine, and creatinine;
  • exemplary Model 5 comprises the biomarkers pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and myo-inositol.
  • ROC Receiver Operating Characteristic
  • Model 1 For exemplary Model 1, the GFR values calculated using Model 1 were significantly correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R 2 was 0.614 with an overall p-value of less than 0.001. The diagnostic performance of Model 1 based on the calculated AUC was 0.932. The results of the correlation analysis for Model 1 are displayed graphically in Figure 6A. The GFR calculated using Model 1 is plotted on the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y-axis.
  • Model 2 For exemplary Model 2, the GFR values calculated using Model 2 were correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R was 0.614 with an overall p-value of less than 0.0001. The diagnostic performance of Model 2 based on the calculated AUC was 0.932. Theresults of the correlation analysis for Model 2 are displayed graphically in Figure 6B. The GFR calculated using Model 2 is plotted on the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y- axis.
  • Model 3 For exemplary Model 3, the GFR values calculated using Model 3 were correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R was 0.594 with an overall p-value of less than 0.0001. The diagnostic performance of Model 3 based on the calculated AUC was 0.931. The results of the correlation analysis for Model 3 are displayed graphically in Figure 6C. The GFR calculated using Model 3 is plotted in the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y- axis.
  • Model 4 For exemplary Model 4, the GFR values calculated using Model 4 were significantly correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R was 0.613 with an overall p-value of less than 0.0001. The diagnostic performance of Model 4 based on the calculated AUC was 0.935. The results of the correlation analysis for Model 4 are displayed graphically in Figure 6D. The GFR calculated using Model 4 is plotted on the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y-axis.
  • Model 5 For exemplary Model 5, the GFR values calculated using Model 5 were significantly correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R was 0.563 with an overall p-value of less than 0.0001. The diagnostic performance of Model 5 based on the calculated AUC was 0.933. The results of the correlation analysis for Model 5 are displayed graphically in Figure 6E. The GFR calculated using Model 5 is plotted on the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y-axis.
  • Biomarkers useful for evaluating kidney function and estimating GFR were identified by measuring the level of the biomarkers in serum samples and urine samples from diabetic individuals with eGFR values of 40-80.
  • the biochemical name of the biomarker the correlation value of the biomarker with CKD-EPI eGFR, the p-value of the correlation of the biomarker with CKD-EPI eGFR, the correlation value of the biomarkcr with MDRD eGFR, and the p-value of the correlation of the biomarker with MDRD eGFR are displayed.
  • Table 1 Serum biomarkers for assessing kidney function in patients with eGFR of 40-80
  • SAH S-adenosylhomocysteine
  • N-acetylaspartate (NAA) -0.2128 0.0791 -0.1664 0.1455 mannitol -0.2122 0.08 -0.1826 0.1096 indolelactate -0.2054 0.0905 -0.1898 0.096
  • NAAG N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate
  • N-acetylhistidine 0.1707 0.1775 0.1738 0.1332 gamma-glutamylvaline 0.1732 0.1712 0.1248 0.2828 beta-hydroxyisovalerate 0.1747 0.1674 0.0821 0.481
  • N-acetylaspartate 0.2832 0.0234 0.1778 0.1245 xylitol 0.285 0.0225 0.1951 0.0913
  • samples with eGFR CKD-EPI values of 40-80 were further classified as having High or Low eGFR values.
  • Patient samples with eGFR values of 40-60 were classified as having Low eGFR; patient samples with eGFR values of 61-80 were classified as having High eGFR.
  • a total of 41 patients were classified as having Low eGFR, and 42 patients were classified as having High eGFR at the time of sample collection.
  • Table 4 includes, for each biomarker, the biochemical name of the biomarker, the fold change of the biomarker in subjects with High eGFR compared to subjects with Low eGFR (High/Low, is the ratio of the mean level of the biomarker in samples from patients with CKD-EPI eGFR of 61-80 compared to the mean level in samples from patients with CKD-EPI eGFR of 40-60), and the p-value and q-value determined in the statistical analysis of the data concerning the biomarkers.
  • Table 4 also lists the following: the internal identifier for the biomarker compound
  • CompID the identifier for the biomarker compound in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), if available; and the identifier for the biomarker compound in the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), if available.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Urology & Nephrology (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

Biomarkers of kidney function and methods for using said biomarkers for assessing kidney function, monitoring kidney function, diagnosing acute kidney injury, and diagnosing chronic kidney disease are provided. Also provided are suites of small molecule entities as biomarkers for chronic kidney disease.

Description

BIOMARKERS RELATED TO KIDNEY FUNCTION AND METHODS
USING THE SAME
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent
Application No. 61/822,965, filed May 14, 2013, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. FIELD
[0002] The invention generally relates to biomarkers for kidney function and methods based on the same biomarkers.
BACKGROUND
[0003] There is a significant unmet clinical need for a sensitive, accurate and convenient test to assess the excretory function of the kidneys (glomerular filtration rate, GFR). The most accurate measurement of renal function is the measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR), which requires the use of ideal filtration markers (e.g., inulin, iothalamate, iohexol). Due to its complexity, this measurement is expensive, difficult to perform in routine clinical practice, and is typically only used in research studies or for potential kidney donors. Consequently, alternative measures of kidney function based on markers such as serum creatinine are used in complex equations to derive an estimated GFR (eGFR). The advantage of this approach is its ease of use in routine clinical practice for the assessment of kidney function.
However, these methods of determining the GFR have limitations in truly assessing the kidney function; some equations under-estimate GFR and some over-estimate GFR, especially when it is in the "nonnal" range. Some of these limitations are likely due to the variability of serum creatinine levels which can be affected by muscle mass, diet, and some drugs, including antibiotics, which leads to variable levels among individuals and over time. The clinical consequence of this inaccuracy leads to the misdiagnosis of patients. In some cases, individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are not diagnosed by current methods and thus they do not receive appropriate treatment (false negative). In other cases, individuals may be diagnosed as having CKD when in fact they do not have CKD (false positive); these individuals are then treated for a disease they do not have. More recently serum levels of cystatin C have been used to assess kidney function, but the utility of this measure of kidney function is limited by the variability of cystatin C serum levels among individuals. Thus, there is a need for a convenient and more accurate test than the currently available kidney function assessment tests to reduce the number of false negative and false positive diagnoses.
[0004] Furthermore, current assessments of kidney function (e.g., serum creatinine, cystatin C and eGFR measurements, BUN, urine albumin) are not sufficiently sensitive and/or accurate to detect early kidney disease or to monitor its progression, especially at the earliest stages of CKD when individuals are
asymptomatic. Early detection of declining kidney function could prevent significant deterioration of kidney function that may occur before the problem is detected with currently available methods. A novel test with a sensitive readout that assesses and monitors an individual's kidney function would allow for earlier detection of CKD, before CKD can be detected with current methods. As a result, the overall cost of treating and managing CKD and associated complications would be reduced. With early detection of CKD, complications, including cardiovascular disease, anemia, malnutrition and bone disease, can be more effectively treated or possibly even prevented. Early detection of CKD would enable lifestyle modifications such as healthy diet, smoking cessation, weight loss, and treatment of high blood pressure, which could prevent or reduce further kidney injury, thereby reducing the need for dialysis and kidney transplant which are frequent outcomes associated with reduced kidney function and CKD.
[0005] A blood- or urine-based test to assess and/or monitor a patient's renal function by measuring the level of one or more biomarker metabolites in patients with risk factors for CKD (e.g., age over 60, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, family history of CKD) would be clinically useful. For example, the biomarkers could comprise a test that quantitatively measures the level of a panel of biomarker metabolites whereby the increase or decrease in the level of each biomarker in the panel relative to a standard reference level are indicative of kidney function. Such biomarker test panels could replace or supplement current kidney function test results and enable physicians to better assess kidney function initially and/or to monitor kidney function in patients over time. Such a test could also be useful in assessing the effect of therapeutic interventions to slow kidney function decline. SUMMARY
[0006] In one aspect, the present invention provides a method of assessing or aiding in the assessment of kidney function, comprising analyzing a biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from the listed biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N-acetylalanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl- methyladenosine, 3 -methyl glutaryl carnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N- acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N-formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine (C5), Phenyl acetylglutamine, N2,N5-diacetylornithine, creatinine, and comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to assess the kidney function of a subject.
[0007] In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of assessing kidney function in response to a composition, comprising analyzing a biological sample from a subject treated with a composition to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from the listed biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N-acetylalanine, N6- carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl-methyladenosine, 3- methylglutarylcarnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N-acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N- formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylcamitine (C5), phenylacetylglutamine, N2,N5-diacetylornithine, creatinine, and comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to assess kidney function. [0008] In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of classifying or aiding in the classification of a subject according to level of kidney function (e.g., normal, mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced, end- stage kidney failure) comprising analyzing a biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from the listed biomarkers:
pseudouridine, N- acetyl threonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N- acetylalanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl - methyladenosine, 3 -methyl glutaryl carnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N- acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, ynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N-formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine (C5), Phenylacetylglutamine, N2,N5-diacetylornithine, creatinine, and comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to determine the level of kidney function of a subject.
[0009] In another embodiment, the invention provides a method of monitoring kidney function in a subject, the method comprising: analyzing a first biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from the listed biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N- acetylalanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl- methyladenosine, 3-methylglutarylcarnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N- acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N-formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine (C5), Phenylacetylglutamine, N2,N5-diacetylornithine, creatinine, and the first sample is obtained from the subject at a first time point; analyzing a second biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers, where the second sample is obtained from the subject at a second time point; and comparing the level(s) of one or more biomarkers in the second sample to the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in (a) the first sample, (b) kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers, (c) CKD-positive reference levels of the one or more biomarkers, and/or (d) CKD-negative reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to monitor kidney function in the subject.
[0010] In a further embodiment, the invention provides a Kidney Function
Score to assess kidney function and/or to monitor kidney function.
[0011] In another aspect, the present invention provides a method of diagnosing or aiding in the diagnosis of CKD, comprising analyzing a biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1 , 2, 3, and/or 4 and comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to CKD-positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to determine whether the subject has CKD.
[0012] In another embodiment, the methods described herein may be used in combination with other methods (or the results thereof) useful in the assessment of kidney function in a subject. For example, clinical parameters such as BUN, SCr, and/or urine albumin measurements; markers of kidney function such as β-2 microglobulin, β-TRACE, 2-mannopyranosyl tryptophan (2-MPT); as well as patient information such as, for example, family history of CKD or other risk factors can be used with the biomarkers.
[0013] In another embodiment, the methods described herein may be used to assess kidney function and/or diagnose CKD in patients with GFR estimates of 40-80 ml/min/1.73 m2.
[0014] In one embodiment, a biomarker panel comprised of pseudouridine, C- glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function and/or diagnose CKD in a subject. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] FIG. 1 is an example of an algorithm for patient management illustrating where the metabolite biomarker test (Novel biomarker(s) test) would be useful to integrate into clinical practice. Patients with eGFR and/or urine albumin scores in the range for an uncertain diagnosis (as indicated in the hashed box) would receive the metabolite biomarker test. Novel Biomarker Test refers to a Metabolite
Biomarker Kidney Function Test. Gl : Stage 1 CKD, GFR >90; G2: Stage 2 CKD,
GFR 60-89; G3a: Stage 3 CKD, GFR 45-59; G3b: Stage 3 CKD, GFR 30-44; G4:
Stage 4 CKD, GFR 15-29; G5: Stage 5 CKD, GFR <15 or on dialysis. Al : albumin- to-creatinine ratio <30 mg/g; A2: albumin-to-creatinine ratio 30-300 mg/g; A3: albumin-to-creatinine ratio >300 mg/g. CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; SCr, serum creatinine.
[0016] FIG. 2 is an example of an algorithm for patient management when undergoing drug therapy showing the use of the metabolite biomarker test. The level of kidney function would be assessed using the metabolite biomarker test, and recommendations for the drug therapy regimen could be made based on the results. Biomarker Test refers to Metabolite Biomarker Kidney Function Test.
[0017] FIG. 3A is a graphical illustration of the distribution of patient serum samples based on the level of C-glycosyltryptophan measured in the sample as described in Example 2.
[0018] FIG. 3B is a graphical illustration of a ROC curve generated using the exemplary biomarker C-glycosyltryptophan to distinguish CKD from Normal as described in Example 2.
[0019] FIG, 4 A is a graphical illustration of the distribution of patient serum samples based on the level of N-acetyl threonine measured in the sample as described in Example 2.
[0020] FIG. 4B is a graphical illustration of a ROC curve generated using the exemplary biomarker N-acetylthreonine to distinguish CKD from Normal as described in Example 2.
[0021] FIG. 5A is a graphical illustration of the distribution of patient serum samples based on the level of pseudouridine measured in the sample as described in Example 2.
[0022] FIG. 5B is a graphical illustration of a ROC curve generated using the exemplary biomarker pseudouridine to distinguish CKD from Normal as described in Example 2.
[0023] FIG. 6 A is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 1 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
[0024] FIG. 6B is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 2 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
[0025] FIG. 6C is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 3 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
[0026] FIG. 6D is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 4 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
[0027] FIG. 6E is a graphical illustration of the correlation analysis of the estimated GFR calculated using Model 5 described in Example 3 with the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation. DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0028] Biomarkers of kidney function, methods of assessing or aiding in the assessment of kidney function, methods for diagnosing or aiding in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD); methods for classifying subjects according to level of kidney function; methods of monitoring kidney function; methods of determining susceptibility to CKD; methods of assessing kidney function in response to a
composition; as well as other methods based on biomarkers of kidney function are described herein.
[0029] In one embodiment, groups (also referred to as "panels") of biomarker metabolites that can be used to assess or aid in the assessment of kidney function are identified.
[0030] Prior to describing this invention in further detail, however, the following terms will be defined.
Definitions:
[0031] "Biomarker" means a compound, preferably a metabolite, that is differentially present (i.e., increased or decreased) in a biological sample from a subject or a group of subjects having a first phenotype (e.g., having a disease) as compared to a biological sample from a subject or group of subjects having a second phenotype (e.g., not having the disease). A biomarker may be differentially present at any level, but is generally present at a level that is increased by at least 5%, by at least 10%, by at least 15%, by at least 20%, by at least 25%, by at least 30%, by at least 35%, by at least 40%, by at least 45%, by at least 50%, by at least 55%, by at least 60%, by at least 65%, by at least 70%, by at least 75%, by at least 80%, by at least 85%, by at least 90%, by at least 95%, by at least 100%, by at least 110%, by at least 120%, by at least 130%, by at least 140%, by at least 150%, or more; or is generally present at a level that is decreased by at least 5%, by at least 10%, by at least 15%, by at least 20%, by at least 25%, by at least 30%, by at least 35%, by at least 40%, by at least 45%, by at least 50%, by at least 55%, by at least 60%, by at least 65%, by at least 70%, by at least 75%, by at least 80%, by at least 85%, by at least 90%, by at least 95%, or by 100% (i.e., absent). A biomarker is preferably differentially present at a level that is statistically significant (i.e., a p-value less than 0.05 and/or a q- alue of less than 0.10 as determined using either Welch's T-test or
Wilcoxon's rank-sum Test).
[0032] The "level" of one or more biomarkers means the absolute or relative amount or concentration of the biomarker measured in the sample.
[0033] "Sample" or "biological sample" means biological material isolated from a subject. The biological sample may contain any biological material suitable for detecting the desired biomarkers, and may comprise cellular and/or non-cellular material from the subject. The sample can be isolated from any suitable biological tissue or fluid such as, for example, kidney tissue, blood, blood plasma (plasma), blood serum (serum), urine, or cerebral spinal fluid (CSF).
[0034] "Subject" means any animal, but is preferably a mammal, such as, for example, a human, monkey, mouse, rabbit or rat.
[0035] A "reference level" of a biomarker means a level of the biomarker that is indicative of a particular disease state, phenotype, or lack thereof, as well as combinations of disease states, phenotypes, or lack thereof. A "reference level" of a biomarker may be an absolute or relative amount or concentration of the biomarker, a presence or absence of the biomarker, a range of amount or concentration of the biomarker, a minimum and/or maximum amount or concentration of the biomarker, a mean amount or concentration of the biomarker, and/or a median amount or concentration of the biomarker; and, in addition, "reference levels" of combinations of biomarkers may also be ratios of absolute or relative amounts or concentrations of two or more biomarkers with respect to each other. Appropriate reference levels of biomarkers for a particular disease state, phenotype, or lack thereof may be determined by measuring levels of desired biomarkers in one or more appropriate subjects, and such reference levels may be tailored to specific populations of subjects (e.g., a reference level may be age-matched so that comparisons may be made between biomarker levels in samples from subjects of a certain age and reference levels for a particular disease state, phenotype, or lack thereof in a certain age group). A "positive" reference level of a biomarker means a level that is indicative of a particular disease state or phenotype. A "negative" reference level of a biomarker means a level that is indicative of a lack of a particular disease state or phenotype. For example, a "CKD-positive reference level" of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of a positive diagnosis of CKD in a subject, and a "CKD- negative reference level" of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of a negative diagnosis of CKD in a subject (i.e., normal kidney function, absence of CKD). Likewise, a "kidney function reference level" may indicate the degree of kidney function present in a subject. For example, a "normal kidney function reference level" of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of normal kidney function in a subject, a "moderately reduced kidney function reference level" of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of moderately reduced kidney function, and a "severely reduced kidney function reference level" of a biomarker means a level of a biomarker that is indicative of severely reduced kidney function in a subject.
[0036] "Non-biomarker compound" means a compound that is not differentially present in a biological sample from a subject or a group of subjects having a first phenotype (e.g., having a first disease) as compared to a biological sample from a subject or group of subjects having a second phenotype (e.g., not having the first disease). Such non-biomarker compounds may, however, be biomarkers in a biological sample from a subject or a group of subjects having a third phenotype (e.g., having a second disease) as compared to the first phenotype (e.g., having the first disease) or the second phenotype (e.g., not having the first disease).
[0037] "Metabolite", or "small molecule", means organic and inorganic molecules which are present in a cell. The term does not include large macromolecules, such as large proteins (e.g., proteins with molecular weights over 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 6,000, 7,000, 8,000, 9,000, or 10,000), large nucleic acids (e.g., nucleic acids with molecular weights of over 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 6,000, 7,000, 8,000, 9,000, or 10,000), or large polysaccharides (e.g., polysaccharides with a molecular weights of over 2,000, 3,000, 4,000, 5,000, 6,000, 7,000, 8,000, 9,000, or 10,000). The small molecules of the cell are generally found free in solution in the cytoplasm or in other organelles, such as the mitochondria, where they form a pool of intermediates which can be metabolized further or used to generate large molecules, called
macromolecules. The term "small molecules" includes signaling molecules and intermediates in the chemical reactions that transform energy derived from food into usable forms. Examples of small molecules include sugars, fatty acids, amino acids, nucleotides, intermediates formed during cellular processes, and other small molecules found within the cell.
[0038] "Glomerular filtration rate" or "GFR" is the volume of fluid filtered from the renal glomerular capillaries into the Bowman's capsule per unit time. The GFR is a metric of kidney function whereby GFR at or above a certain threshold indicates normal kidney function and GFR below the threshold value indicates kidney function is compromised or impaired. Generally, a high GFR value indicates better kidney function while a low GFR indicates kidney function impairment (e.g., chronic kidney disease, acute kidney injury).
[0039] "Estimated glomerular filtration rate" or "eGFR" means a calculated estimate of the actual glomerular filtration rate based on serum creatinine
concentration. Generally, low eGFR values are associated with decreased kidney function.
[0040] "CKD-EPI eGFR" or "Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology
Collaboration" is an equation for calculating the eGFR. The equation is: GFR = 141 X min(SCr/K,l)a X max^Cr/ic,!)"1 '209 X 0.993Age X 1.018 [if female] X 1.159 [if black], where SCr is serum creatinine (mg/dL), κ is 0.7 for females and 0.9 for males, a is -0.329 for females and -0.41 1 for males, min indicates the minimum of SCr/κ or 1 , and max indicates the maximum of SCr/κ or 1.
[0041] "MDRD or "Modification of Diet in Renal Disease eGFR" is another equation for calculating the eGFR. The equation is: eGFR = 186 x (Scr) 1 154 χ (Age)- 0.203 x (0.742 if female) χ (1.212 if Black), where Scr is serum creatinine (mg/dL).
[0042] "Urine albumin" is a test measuring the amount of albumin in the urine and is also used to detect kidney disease.
[0043] "Serum creatinine" or "SCr" refers to the measurement of creatinine in serum and is commonly used to estimate GFR.
[0044] "Blood urea nitrogen" or "BUN" refers to the measurement of the amount of nitrogen in the blood in the form of urea. BUN is a test used to measure kidney function. [0045] "Chronic Kidney Disease" or "CKD" includes conditions that damage kidneys resulting in decreased ability of the kidney to remove wastes from the body resulting in high levels of the wastes in the body and leading to increased risk of illness and development of complications such as high blood pressure, anemia, poor nutritional health and nerve damage. Patients with abnormalities in kidney function for at least three months may be diagnosed with CKD. Kidney damage due to CKD is permanent.
[0046] "Acute kidney injury" or "AKI" refers to a condition in which there is a rapid loss of kidney function. Kidney damage due to AKI may be reversible.
[0047] "Chronic Kidney Disease Stages" or "CKD Stages" means the degree of kidney damage as currently assessed using the measured or estimated glomerular filtration rate (mGFR, eGFR). Clinically, 5 stages of CKD are generally recognized with kidney function regarded as normal in Stage 1 (GFR>90), minimally reduced in Stage 2 (GFR 60-89), moderately reduced in Stages 3 A and 3B (GFR 30-59), severely reduced in Stage 4 (GFR 15-29) and very severe or endstage kidney failure, also referred to as established renal failure at Stage 5 (GFR <15, or on dialysis). Kidney function stages may be used to refer to kidney damage present for any amount of time (i.e., kidney damage due to AKI or CKD). I. Biomarkers
[0048] Generally, metabolic profiles were generated from biological samples collected from human subjects with a range of kidney function as determined by eGFR, as calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR equation and/or the MDRD eGFR equation. Biomarkers of kidney function were identified by analyzing the levels of metabolites measured in serum and urine samples from the subjects and correlating the levels with eGFR; those molecules that correlated significantly with eGFR were selected as biomarkers of kidney function. Biomarkers of CKD, were identified by generating the metabolic profile for biological samples collected from a group of subjects having CKD (i.e., individuals with eGFR < 60) and comparing said profile to the metabolic profile for biological samples from subjects not having CKD (i.e., individuals with eGFR > or = 60). Those molecules differentially present, including those molecules differentially present at a level that is statistically significant (p<0.1), in the metabolic profile of serum samples from subjects with CKD as compared to the control group (e.g., subjects not diagnosed with CKD) were identified as biomarkers to diagnose CKD.
[0049] The biomarkers are discussed in more detail herein. The identified biomarkers may be used to assess kidney function in a subject, to monitor a subject to detect changes in kidney function (e.g., decreases in function which may indicate acute kidney injury or incipient CKD), to classify subjects according to the degree of kidney function (e.g., normal, mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced, end-stage kidney failure) and to distinguish subjects having CKD vs. control subjects not diagnosed with CKD (see Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4). Further, the biomarkers may be used to monitor changes in kidney function over time or in response to drug treatment, disease (e.g., type II diabetes), or lifestyle interventions (e.g., diet, exercise) and to identify or rule-out subjects as suitable candidates for drug therapies and/or kidney transplant. II. Methods
A. Assessing Kidney Function Using the Biomarkers
[0050] The kidney function biomarkers can be used to assess (or aid in the assessment of) kidney function in a subject. It will be understood that the identified biomarkers can be used to assess kidney function in any subject and includes the assessment of kidney function in an asymptomatic subject, in a subject at risk of CKD or AKI due to the presence of symptoms, or risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, family history of CKD, exposure to certain chemical/environmental conditions, etc.), and in a subject in response to a composition or to a therapeutic intervention (e.g., kidney transplant, lifestyle modification). It is further understood that a subject may undergo one or more assessments of kidney function.
[0051] In an exemplary method, assessing kidney function in a subject comprises (1) analyzing a biological sample obtained from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample and (2) comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to reference level(s) of the one or more biomarkers to assess kidney function in a subject and determine if kidney function is normal or impaired as well as to determine the level of kidney function impairment. The one or more biomarkers may be selected from Tables 1 , 2, 3, and/or 4 and/or from the group consisting of the following biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N- acetylalanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl- methyladenosine, 3 -methyl glutarylcamitine (C6), S-adenosylhomo cysteine (SAH), N- acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, ynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N-formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine (C5), Phenylacetylglutamine, N2,N5-diacetylornithine, creatinine and combinations thereof. When such a method is used to aid in assessing kidney function, the results of the method may be used along with other methods (or the results thereof) and/or patient metadata useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has normal kidney function or impaired kidney function (which can result from an acute kidney injury (AKI) or CKD) as well as the level of kidney function (e.g., normal, mildly impaired, moderately impaired, severely impaired, end-stage kidney failure).
[0052] Any suitable method may be used to analyze the biological sample in order to determine the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample. Suitable methods include chromatography (e.g., HPLC, gas chromatography, liquid chromatography), mass spectrometry (e.g., MS, MS-MS), enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA), antibody linkage, other immunochemical techniques, and combinations thereof. Further, the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers may be measured indirectly, for example, by using an assay that measures the level of a compound (or compounds) that correlates with the level of the biomarker(s) that are desired to be measured.
[0053] The level of one or more of the biomarkers selected from the listed biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N-acetyl alanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyl adenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl - methyladenosine, 3-methylglutarylcarnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N- acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N-formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine
(C5), Phenylacetylglutamine, N2,N5-diacetylornithine, creatinine, may be determined in the described methods. For example, the level(s) of one biomarker, two or more biomarkers, three or more biomarkers, four or more biomarkers, five or more biomarkers, six or more biomarkers, seven or more biomarkers, eight or more biomarkers, nine or more biomarkers, ten or more biomarkers, etc., including a combination of all of the listed biomarkers.
[0054] Determining levels of combinations of the biomarkers may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in the described methods. For example, pair-wise analysis of two biomarkers or ratios of the levels of certain biomarkers (and non- biomarker compounds) in biological samples may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in assessing kidney function and aiding in the assessment of kidney function. For example, the ratio of myo-inositol to glycerophosphocholine (GPC), tryptophan to kynurenine, tryptophan to 3-indoxyl sulfate, and/or tryptophan to indoleacetate may be used to assess kidney function in a subject. In further examples, determining levels of combinations of two or more, three or more, four or more, and /or five or more biomarkers may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in the methods described herein. In one example, the levels of pseudouridine, C- glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function in a subject. In another example, the levels of pseudouridine, N- acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function in a subject. In another example, the levels of N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, C- glycosyltryptophan, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function in a subject. In another example, the levels of N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, kynurenine, and creatinine may be used to assess kidney function in a subject. In another example, the levels of pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and myo-inositol may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
[0055] The level(s) of the one or more biomarkers may be compared to kidney function reference levels using various techniques, including a simple comparison (e.g., a manual comparison). The level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the biological sample may also be compared to reference levels using one or more statistical analyses (e.g., t-test, Welch's T-test, Wilcoxon's rank sum test, correlation analysis, Random Forest, T-score, Z-score) or using a mathematical model (e.g., algorithm, statistical model). For example, a mathematical model comprising a single algorithm or multiple algorithms may be used to assess kidney function in a subject.
[0056] The results of the method may be used along with other methods and measurements (or the results thereof) useful in the assessment of kidney function in a subject. For example, clinical parameters such as BUN, SCr, and/or urine albumin measurements; markers of kidney function such as β-2 microglobulin, β-TRACE, 2- mannopyranosyl tryptophan (2-MPT); as well as patient information such as, for example, family history of CKD or other risk factors can be used with the biomarkers.
[0057] In one example, the identification of biomarkers for kidney function allows for the assessment of (or for aiding in the assessment of) kidney function in patients undergoing imaging tests using contrast agents where the contrast imaging agents may be toxic and, as a result, may cause kidney injury. For example in a patient with reduced kidney function (e.g., Stage 2 CKD or Stage 3 or Stage 3 A CKD), an accurate measure of kidney function will help patients and clinicians assess the risk to benefit ratio of imaging tests and will allow for more informed decisions.
[0058] In another example, the identification of biomarkers for kidney function allows for the assessment of (or for aiding in the assessment of) kidney function to detect incipient CKD before CKD can be diagnosed using the current standards for determining kidney function (e.g., SCr, eGFR, cystatin C urine albumin and/or BUN measurements). Clinical measures may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect early changes in kidney function or may be inaccurate in certain subjects due to, for example, chronic illness, obesity, advanced age, vegetarian diet and/or generally reduced muscle mass. For example, in a subject with type 2 diabetes, the biomarkers described herein may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD. Accurate and early diagnosis of CKD may allow earlier therapeutic intervention which could delay or prevent the development of further kidney damage and more severe CKD.
[0059] In another example, an accurate assessment of kidney function in a subject who is a potential kidney donor will aid a physician in determining whether the potential donor is suitable for donating a kidney.
[0060] In another example, the biomarkers provided allow for a method of assessing kidney function in a subject being treated with a composition. The composition may be any composition, drug or therapeutic agent given to a subject to treat any disease or condition. The composition additionally may be any composition given to a patient having a disease or condition, for example, a contrast imaging agent. For example, the identification of biomarkers for kidney function also allows for assessment of the subject's response to a composition that alters kidney function as well as the assessment of the relative patient response to two or more compositions that alter kidney function. Such assessments may be used, for example, to select compositions for treating cancer for certain subjects, or to select subjects for a course of treatment or inclusion in clinical trial. Such assessments may also be used to monitor kidney function in response to a composition prior to, throughout and/or following (i.e., post-launch) the drug development process.
[0061] In another embodiment, the instant invention allows for a metabolite biomarker test to provide an accurate determination of kidney function in patients with eGFR values that are borderline normal thus enabling a clinician to select a certain treatment or modify treatment of the patients to reduce the risk of further kidney damage. Such a biomarker test overcomes limitations of current kidney function tests which do not accurately assess all patient populations, (often leading to false positive or false negative diagnoses), and do not detect early kidney function impairment (which may be indicative of AKI or incipient CKD). For example, illustrated in Figure 1 is an example clinical practice algorithm (flow chart) that depicts best practices for screening, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and management of clinical symptoms to diagnose CKD. Integrated into this flow chart is a kidney function biomarkers test based on analyzing the levels of a panel of biomarkers for kidney function selected from the listed biomarkers: pseudouridine, N- acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N-acetylalanine, N6- carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl-methyladenosine, 3- methylglutarylcarnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N-acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinylcarnitine, ribose, xylonite, N- formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine (C5),
Phenylacetylglutamine, N2,N5-diacetylornithine, and creatinine. In this example, a patient with no symptoms of CKD may initially have kidney function assessed by measuring SCr, and eGFR and/or urine albumin as recommended by current clinical practice guidelines. CKD stages of G2-G3a as measured by eGFR and/or CKD stage Al as measured by urine albumin often result in false positive or false negative diagnoses; confirmatory testing is recommended. Patients with these scores would receive the novel metabolite biomarker test to aid in diagnosing CKD (hashed box). Levels of kidney function biomarkers that are normal are indicative that the patient has normal kidney function. Patients diagnosed as Normal using the metabolite biomarker test would be monitored periodically to assess kidney function. A result for which the metabolite biomarkers levels at baseline are significantly above or below normal range indicate that a patient has CKD. Patients diagnosed as having CKD by using the metabolite biomarker test would receive appropriate treatment.
[0062] In one aspect, the biomarkers provided herein can be used in a mathematical or statistical model or formula to provide a physician with a numerical score ("Kidney Function Score") indicating the level of kidney function and/or the probability that a subject has compromised kidney function which may indicate AKI or CKD. The score is based upon clinically significantly changed reference level(s) for a biomarker and/or combination of biomarkers. The reference level can be derived from an algorithm or computed from indices for impaired GFR. Methods for determining a subject's Kidney Function Score may comprise comparing the level(s) of the one or more kidney function biomarkers in the sample to kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to determine the subject's Kidney Function Score. The method may employ any number of markers selected from the following list: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N- acetylserine, N-acetylalanine, N6-carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4- acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2- dimethylguanosine, Nl-methyladenosine, 3 -methyl glutarylcarnitine (C6), S- adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N-acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinylcamitine, ribose, xylonite, N-formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine (C5), Phenylacetylglutamine, N2,N5- diacetylornithine, and creatinine. Multiple biomarkers may be correlated with kidney function, by any method, including statistical methods such as regression analysis.
[0063] The Kidney Function Score can be used to place the subject in the range of kidney function from normal (i.e. no kidney function impairment) to mildly reduced, moderately reduced, severely reduced, or end-stage kidney failure. Non- limiting example uses of the Kidney Function Score include: assessment of kidney function; classification of kidney function; susceptibility to developing CKD;
susceptibility to developing AKI; diagnosis and stage of CKD; monitoring CKD progression by periodic determination and monitoring of the Kidney Function Score; monitoring the kidney function status of kidney transplant recipients; determining a response to therapeutic intervention; evaluating drug efficacy; and determining tolerance of therapeutic and/or contrast imaging agents.
[0064] In some embodiments, the methods may be used assess kidney function over time, thereby enabling kidney function to be monitored. The change (if any) in the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers over time (i.e., in a first sample from a subject at a first time point compared to a second sample obtained from the subject at a second time point) may be indicative of altered kidney function in the patient over time. To characterize the kidney function of a subject over time, the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the first sample, the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the second sample, and/or the results of the comparison of the levels of the biomarkers in the first and second samples may be compared to reference levels of the one or more biomarkers. If the comparisons indicate that the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers are increasing or decreasing over time (e.g., in the second sample as compared to the first sample) to become more similar to the low kidney function reference levels (or less similar to the high kidney function reference levels), then the results are indicative of declining kidney function. If the comparisons indicate that the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers are increasing or decreasing over time to become more similar to the high kidney function reference levels (or less similar to the low kidney function reference levels), then the results are indicative of normal kidney function. For example, a subject may have normal kidney function at a first time point (e.g., biomarker(s) is similar to the high kidney function reference level or dissimilar to the low kidney function reference level) and remains in the normal range at a second time point (e.g., remains similar to the high kidney function reference level(s) or dissimilar to the low kidney function reference level(s)), indicating no change in kidney function. In another instance, the kidney function may be normal at a first time point (e.g., biomarker(s) is similar to the high kidney function reference level(s) or dissimilar to the low kidney function reference level(s)) then decreases at a second time point yet remains in the normal range of kidney function, indicating that although still in the normal range, the kidney function decreased. In another illustration, a subject with borderline normal kidney function at a first time point may be diagnosed with CKD based on the level(s) of the biomarker(s) at the second time point indicating a worsening of kidney function in the subject.
[0065] The difference between the relative amount of the biomarker and the reference level may also be used to assess kidney function over time. For example, if the comparisons indicate that there is a larger difference between the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers and the high kidney function reference levels (or a smaller difference between the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers and the low kidney function reference levels) over time, then the results are indicative of the patient developing declining kidney function.
[0066] After the first sample is obtained one or more additional samples may be obtained from the subject at a later point in time. In one aspect, the one or more additional samples are obtained 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or more days after the first sample. In another aspect, the one or more samples is obtained 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more weeks after the first sample or after the initiation of treatment with the composition. In another aspect, the one or more additional samples may be obtained 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 1 1, 12, or more months after the first sample or after the initiation of treatment with the composition.
[0067] In another embodiment, the methods could be used to monitor kidney function in subjects having CKD or subjects suspected of being predisposed to developing CKD (e.g., at risk subjects due to family history of CKD, drug therapy, chronic illness, etc.). In one example, the biomarkers disclosed herein may be used to monitor kidney function in subjects not having CKD. For example, in a subject suspected of being predisposed to developing CKD, the biomarkers described herein may be used to monitor the development of CKD.
[0068] In another example, the biomarkers disclosed herein may be used to monitor kidney function in kidney transplant recipients.
[0069] In another embodiment, a biomarker algorithm could be used to monitor a patient's kidney function. Using the results of the biomarker algorithm in combination with current kidney function test results (e.g., SCr, eGFR, BUN, urine albumin, cystatin C) a clinician could assess the risk-benefit ratio of the drug treatment in the patient. Additionally, a biomarker algorithm could be used by clinicians treating any patient at risk for developing loss of kidney function (e.g., diabetics, hypertensive, elderly, family history, smokers, chronically ill, kidney transplant recipient, etc.). The drug therapy may be any agent used to treat any disease or condition.
[0070] Illustrated in Figure 2 is an example of a biomarker algorithm (flow chart). Levels of kidney function biomarkers that are normal at baseline and remain within normal range during therapy, are indicative that the patient has normal kidney function.
[0071] A result for which the levels of metabolite biomarkers at baseline or the changes in these levels during therapy are outside the normal range but not excessively so would indicate that a patient has mild to moderate loss of kidney function. These patients represent those whose results would be borderline with current kidney function tests. Based on the result of the metabolite biomarker test, the treating clinician may elect to re-assess the risk-benefit of the current treatment regimen (e.g., therapeutic agent, dose) in the patient and change the patient's management.
[0072] A result for which the levels of metabolite biomarkers at baseline or the changes in these levels during therapy are significantly and excessively outside normal range would indicate that a patient has severe loss of kidney function.
Changes to the patient's management would be strongly advised (e.g., discontinue treatment with particular drug, switch to another agent).
B. Diagnosing Chronic Kidney Disease Using the Biomarkers
[0073] The identification of biomarkers for kidney function also allows for the diagnosis of (or for aiding in the diagnosis of) CKD in a subject. It will be understood that the identified biomarkers can be used to diagnose or aid in diagnosing CKD in any subject, including asymptomatic subjects, those subjects presenting with one or more symptoms consistent with the presence of CKD and/or those subjects where CKD is probable (e.g., chronic illness, drug treatments, use of contrast imaging agents, etc.). In an exemplary method, diagnosing (or aiding in diagnosing) whether a subject has CKD comprises (1) analyzing a biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers of kidney function in the sample and (2) comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to CKD- positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to diagnose (or aid in the diagnosis of) whether the subject has CKD. The one or more biomarkers may be selected from Table 1. When such a method is used to aid in the diagnosis of CKD, the results of the method may be used along with other methods and measurements (or the results thereof) and/or patient metadata useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has C D. Methods useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has CKD are known in the art. For example, methods useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has CKD include, for example, SCr, BUN, eGFR, mGFR, urine albumin, and cystatin C. Other measurements useful in determining whether a subject has CKD include, for example, β-2 microglobulin, β-TRACE, and/or 2-mannopyranosyl tryptophan (2-MPT).
Patient metadata useful in the clinical determination of whether a subject has CKD include, for example, age, weight, gender, and race.
[0074] Any suitable method may be used to analyze the biological sample in order to determine the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample. Suitable methods include chromatography (e.g., HPLC, gas chromatography, liquid
chromatography), mass spectrometry (e.g., MS, MS-MS), enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA), antibody linkage, other immunochemical techniques, and combinations thereof. Further, the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers may be measured indirectly, for example, by using an assay that measures the level of a compound (or compounds) that correlates with the level of the biomarker(s) that are desired to be measured.
[0075] The level of one or more of the biomarkers of Table 1 may be determined in the methods of assessing and methods of aiding in the assessment of kidney function in a subject. For example, the level(s) of one biomarker, two or more biomarkers, three or more biomarkers, four or more biomarkers, five or more biomarkers, six or more biomarkers, seven or more biomarkers, eight or more biomarkers, nine or more biomarkers, ten or more biomarkers, etc., including a combination of any or all of the biomarkers in Table 1 or any fraction thereof, may be determined and used in such methods.
[0076] Determining levels of combinations of the biomarkers may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing CKD and aiding in the diagnosis of CKD. For example, pair-wise analysis of two biomarkers or ratios of the levels of certain biomarkers (and non-biomarker compounds) in biological samples may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing CKD and aiding in the diagnosis of CKD. For example, the ratio of myo-inositol to glycerophosphocholine (GPC), tryptophan to kynurenine, tryptophan to 3-indoxyl sulfate, and/or tryptophan to indoleacetate may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject. In another example, determining levels of combinations of two or more, three or more, four or more, and/or five or more biomarkers may allow greater sensitivity and specificity in the methods described herein. In one example, the levels of
pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and creatinine may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject. In another example, the levels of pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, and creatinine may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject. In another example, the levels of N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, C-glycosyltryptophan, and creatinine may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject. In another example, the levels of N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, kynurenine, and creatinine may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject. In another example, the levels of pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and myo-inositol may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD in a subject.
[0077] After the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample are determined, the level(s) are compared to CKD-positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels to diagnose or to aid in diagnosing whether the subject has CKD. Levels of the one or more biomarkers in a sample matching the CKD-positive reference levels (e.g., levels that are the same as the reference levels, substantially the same as the reference levels, slightly above and/or below the minimum and/or maximum of the reference levels, and/or within the range of the reference levels) are indicative of a diagnosis of CKD in the subject. Levels of the one or more biomarkers in a sample matching the CKD-negative reference levels (e.g., levels that are the same as the reference levels, substantially the same as the reference levels, slightly above and/or below the minimum and/or maximum of the reference levels, and/or within the range of the reference levels) are indicative of a diagnosis of no CKD in the subject. In addition, levels of the one or more biomarkers that are differentially present (especially at a level that is statistically significant) in the sample as compared to CKD-negative reference levels are indicative of a diagnosis of CKD in the subject. Levels of the one or more biomarkers that are differentially present (especially at a level that is statistically significant) in the sample as compared to CKD-positive reference levels are indicative of a diagnosis of no CKD in the subject.
[0078] The level(s) of the one or more biomarkers may be compared to CKD- positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels using various techniques, including a simple comparison (e.g., a manual comparison) of the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the biological sample to CKD-positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels. The level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the biological sample may also be compared to CKD-positive and/or CKD-negative reference levels using one or more statistical analyses (e.g., t-test, Welch's T-test, Wilcoxon's rank sum test, correlation analysis, Random Forest, T-score, Z-score) or using a mathematical model (e.g., algorithm, statistical model).
[0079] For example, a mathematical model comprising a single algorithm or multiple algorithms may be used to assess kidney function in a subject. A
mathematical model may also be used to determine whether a subject has CKD. A mathematical model may also be used to distinguish between CKD stages. An exemplary mathematical model may use the measured levels of any number of biomarkers (for example, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc.) from a subject to determine, using an algorithm or a series of algorithms based on mathematical relationships between the levels of the measured biomarkers, whether a subject has normal kidney function or CKD, whether a subject is predisposed to developing CKD, whether CKD is progressing in a subject, whether a subject has high stage (severe or very severe kidney function reduction), mid-stage (moderately reduced function) or low stage (mildly reduced function) CKD, etc. A different exemplary mathematical model may use the measured levels of any number of biomarkers (for example, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc.) from a subject to classify a subject based on the level or stage of kidney function (e.g., high, moderate, low).
[0080] In one example, the identification of biomarkers for CKD allows for the diagnosis of CKD in a subject not previously diagnosed with CKD. For example, in a subject with risk factors for CKD (e.g., age over 60 years, hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and/or a family history of CKD, etc.), the biomarkers described herein may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD.
[0081] In another example, the identification of biomarkers for CKD allows for early detection and diagnosis before CKD can be diagnosed using the current standards for determining kidney function (e.g., SCr, eGFR, urine albumin, cystatin C and/or BUN measurements). The early diagnosis of CKD may allow earlier therapeutic intervention which could delay or prevent the development of further kidney damage and more severe CKD. [0082] In another example, the biomarkers disclosed herein may be used to diagnose or aid in diagnosing CKD in patients where the current standards for determining CKD (e.g., SCr, urine albumin, cystatin C, and/or BUN measurements) in subjects are inaccurate due to, for example, chronic illness, obesity, advanced age, vegetarian diet, and/or generally reduced muscle mass in the subject. For example, in a subject with type 2 diabetes, the biomarkers described herein may be used to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD.
C. Compositions & Kits [0083] Any of the described methods, alone or in combination, may be performed using tools provided in the form of a kit. Kits may further comprise appropriate controls, standards and/or detection reagents. In an embodiment, the kit may include tools and reagents for the analysis of a blood-based sample. The kit may comprise a sample collection element and a vessel for storing the sample. For example, the kit may comprise a sample collection element, a retrieved serum collection receptacle, sample labels, sample barcodes, and instruction protocol. The instruction protocol may be provided as a printed form or booklet or on an electronic medium, such as, for example, a computer disk or other computer readable medium.
[0084] The kit may be used in accordance with the following exemplary method. A serum sample may be collected from the subject using a needle and syringe. The serum can then be extruded into a collection receptacle (e.g., a vial, a conical tube, etc.). The sample in the collection receptacle may then be subjected to biochemical analysis. Barcodes and labels enable the sample identity and the analyses results to be tracked through the biochemical analysis.
[0085] The invention will be further explained with the following examples which are offered by illustration and not limitation.
Examples
I. General Methods
A. Identification of Metabolic Profiles
[0086] Generally, each sample was analyzed to determine the concentration of several hundred metabolites. Analytical techniques such as GC-MS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) and LC-MS (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry) were used to analyze the metabolites. Multiple aliquots were simultaneously, and in parallel, analyzed, and, after appropriate quality control (QC), the information derived from each analysis was recombined. Every sample was characterized according to several thousand characteristics, which ultimately amount to several hundred chemical species. The techniques used were able to identify novel and chemically unnamed compounds.
[0087] Samples were collected from a cohort of patients as described in
Example 1. Metabolites were extracted and proteins were precipitated from the samples (1 ΟΟμΓ) by the addition of 450μ1 of methanol. Two separate UPLC methods were utilized, one in acidic conditions and the other in basic conditions. The precipitated extract was split into four aliquots and dried under nitrogen and then in vacuo. One aliquot was reconstituted in 50 μΐ of 0.1% formic acid in water (for use in the acidic method), and another aliquot was reconstituted in 50 μΐ of 6.5 mM ammonium bicarbonate in water, pH 8 (for use in the basic method).
[0088] Both methods used chromatography which was performed on 2.1 mm x 100 mm Acquity 1.7 urn CI 8 BEH columns (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) using an Acquity UPLC system. The mobile phase, at a flow rate of 350
μΐνηιίη, used solvent A, 0.1% formic acid in water, and solvent B, 0.1% formic acid in methanol (gradient profile: 0%B to 70 %B in 4 min, 70 to 98 %B in 0.5 min, 98% B for 0.9 min), for the acidic method. Sample aliquots processed for the basic method were gradient-eluted at a flow rate of 350 μΙ7ηιΐη using solvent A, 6.5mM
ammonium bicarbonate in water, pH 8, and solvent B, 6.5mM ammonium bicarbonate in 95/5 methanol/water (gradient profile: 0%B to 70 %B in 4 min, 70 to 98 %B in 0.5 min, 98% B for 0.9 min).
[0089] The sample eluents were analyzed using an LTQ mass spectrometer
(MS) (ThermoFisher Corporation) using electrospray ionization (ESI). The acidic method monitored for positive ions and the basic method monitored for negative ions in independent injections using separate acid/base dedicated columns heated to 40°C. The MS interface capillary was maintained at 350°C, with a sheath gas flow of 40 (arbitrary units) and aux gas flow of 5 (arbitrary units) for both positive and negative injections. The spray voltage for the positive ion injection was 4.5 kV and 3.75 kV for the negative ion injection. The instrument scanned 99-1000 m/z and alternated between MS and MS/MS scans. The scan speed was approximately 6 scans/sec (3 MS and 3 MS/MS scans). MS/MS normalized collision energy was set to 40, activation Q 0.25, and activation time 30 ms, with a 3 m/z isolation
window. MS/MS scans were collected using dynamic exclusion with an exclusion time of 3.5 sec. Isotopically labeled compounds were spiked into every sample and were used to assess instrument performance and suitability, including retention time, mass and sensitivity stability over the course of the run (usually 20 hours). In addition, a quality control sample, which consisted of a pooled aliquot from all samples, was analyzed every 8 injections to ensure technical reproducibility.
[0090] Software using standard industry approaches for MS peak detection was used for the detection and integration of MS peaks. Briefly, extracted ion chromatograms were binned by mass in a given range, baseline noise was determined, peak areas were calculated, and various user-defined peak thresholds including minimum height, signal-to-noise, width, symmetry, and area were applied to detected MS peaks. MS peaks passing above threshold criteria were assembled into lists that were then inserted into a relational database for storage and further analysis. Finally, individual MS peaks were grouped based on peak apex retention time for ease of viewing similarly retained ion features. All samples were aligned based on retention time (RT) markers present throughout the chromatogram using a retention index (RI). The retention index of a sample component is a number, obtained by interpolation (usually logarithmic), relating the adjusted retention volume (time) or the retention factor of the sample component to the adjusted retention volumes (times) of two standards eluted before and after the peak of the sample component.
[0091] The resulting data were searched against a chemical library generated specifically for each method (e.g. UPLC positive ion data was searched against a library specific for UPLC positive ion mode). Biochemical identifications were based on three criteria: retention index within 75 RI units of the proposed identification (or approximately 5 s), experimental precursor mass match to the library within 0.4 m/z, and the MS/MS forward and reverse scores. The MS/MS scores were based on a comparison of the ions present in the experimental spectrum to the ions present in the library spectrum. Biochemical identification was performed by a software program, and the computer generated identification was verified by a human analyst.
[0092] Computer software checked all ions that were not assigned to any library entry across a set of injections and within a specified chromatographic time window. By correlating ions across multiple injections, the natural biological variability of biochemicals was used to identify possible new authentic biochemicals that were not already included as an entry as part of the library. Any biochemicals that did not have a library match but were determined to be bona fide biochemicals based on the recurrent nature of the spectral pattern for that biochemical were added to the library so that the biochemical, although unnamed, could be tracked in current and future studies. Thus, although the biochemical was not identified (because an authentic chemical standard was not available in the library), the properities or behavior of the biochemical that were obtained from the analysis method were indicated, without indicating the specific chemical composition or structure of the biochemical (referred to as unnamed biochemicals).
[0093] Unnamed biochemicals represent entities for which the "ion fragmentation signature" has been established but for which no known standard is available in the chemical library. The unnamed biochemicals have been sufficiently characterized by analytical techniques (described above) for unique identification. The unnamed biochemicals are designated herein by the nomenclature "X -" followed by a specific five digit number. Identifying analytical information for the unnamed biochemical small molecules listed in Table 1 is described. For example, for unnamed metabolite X- 17299, the retention time was 1.2, the retention index was 1265.9, the quant mass was 229.2, and the polarity of the quantitative ion using the analytical methods described above was positive as measured on the LC-MS/MS optimized for acidic species. In an additional example, for unnamed metabolite X-l 1564, the retention time was 1.2, the retention index was 1188, the quant mass was 177.1, and the polarity of the quantitative ion using the analytical methods described above was negative as measured on the LC-MS/MS optimized for basic species. These analytical characteristics allow said biomarkers (X-l 7299 and X-l 1564) to be monitored even though an exact chemical identity (i.e., compound name) is not known.
B. Statistical Analysis:
[0094] The data were analyzed using t-tests to identify molecules (either known, named metabolites or unnamed metabolites) present at differential levels in a definable population or subpopulation (e.g., biomarkers for subjects with kidney function impairment compared to subjects without kidney function impairment) useful for distinguishing between the definable populations (e.g., kidney function impairment and no kidney function impairment). Other molecules (either known, named metabolites or unnamed metabolites) in the definable population or subpopulation were also identified.
[0095] The data were also analyzed using correlation analysis to identify molecules (either known, named metabolites or unnamed metabolites) that correlate with eGFR calculations (e.g., CKD-EPI eGFR, MDRD eGFR).
[0096] Multiple regression analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value for exemplary panels of biomarkers.
[0097] Based on the metabolite biomarker level, the sensitivity and specificity for the classification of the samples were calculated. Sensitivity is the ability to identify positives or the proportion of subjects classified as positive among all those that are tralv positive. Specificitv is the abilitv to identifv negatives or the proportion of the subjects classified as negative among all those that are truly negative. Using these data, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated. The ROC curve is a mathematical model and is a plot of the sensitivity vs. false positive rate (1 - specificity). The area under the curve (AUC) from this curve is the probability that a classifier will rank a randomly chosen positive instance higher than a randomly chosen negative one.
Example 1: Biomarkers to assess kidney function
[0098] The samples used for the analysis were serum samples collected from 281 diabetic individuals. Patient kidney function was evaluated using two equations for estimating GFR, 1) MDRD eGFR and 2) CKD-EPI eGFR. Using the MDRD eGFR estimates, patients with eGFR less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 were classified as having CKD, and the patients with eGFR = 60 ml/min/1.73 m or greater were classified as Normal. A total of 46 patients were classified as having CKD, and 235 patients were classified as Normal at the time of sample collection.
[0099] After the levels of metabolites were determined, the data were analyzed using t-tests. Biomarkers for kidney function were identified by comparing CKD vs. Normal samples. As listed in Table 1 below, the analysis resulted in the identification of biomarkers that are differentially present between CKD and Normal patient serum samples. All biomarkers in Table 1 are statistically significant (p<0.1). As another way to identify biomarkers for kidney function impairment, a correlation analysis was performed between biomarker levels and eGFR calculations (i.e., MDRD eGFR and CKD-EPI eGFR). The correlation value for each biomarker is shown in Table 1.
[00100] Table 1 includes, for each biomarker, the biochemical name of the biomarker, the correlation value of the biomarker with MDRD, the correlation value of the biomarker with CKD-EPI, the fold change of the biomarker in subjects with CKD compared to Normal subjects (CKD/Normal) which is the ratio of the mean level of the biomarker in CKD samples as compared to the Normal mean level, and the p-value determined in the statistical analysis of the data concerning the biomarkers. Table 1 also lists the following: the internal identifier for the biomarker compound in the in-house chemical library of authentic standards (CompID); the identifier for the biomarker compound in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), if available; and the identifier for the biomarker compound in the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), if available.
Table 1. Biomarkers to assess kidney function
Figure imgf000030_0001
Figure imgf000031_0001
trigonelline (Ν'- -0.3246 -0.3691 1.7038 pO.0001 32401 CO 1004 HMDB00875 methylnicotinate)
propionylcarnitine -0.3266 -0.3629 1.3841 0.0001 32452 C03017 HMDB00824
3 -methylxanthine -0.3153 -0.3558 1.6600 0.0051 32445 C16357 HMDB01886
1 ,3 ,7-trimethylurate -0.3243 -0.3426 1.9010 0.0041 34404 C16361 HMDB02123 glycerophosphorylcholin
e (GPC) 0.3754 0.3384 0.6102 pO.0001 15990 C00670 HMDB00086 tartarate -0.2925 -0.3371 2.7353 0.0088 15336 C00898 HMDB00956 phenylcarnitine -0.2847 -0.3328 2.1264 0.0358 43265
N-acetylphenylalanine -0.2945 -0.3318 1.3810 0.0002 33950 C03519 HMDB00512
3 -methyl catechol sulfate -0.3161 -0.3304 1.7389 0.0018 42494
1
4-hydroxyphenylacetate -0.2640 -0.3282 1.8160 0.0306 541 C00642 HMDB00020 cystine -0.2673 -0.3209 1.9586 0.0245 39512 C00491 HMDB00192 acetylcarnitine -0.2831 -0.3159 1.1845 0.0014 32198 C02571 HMDB00201 guanosine -0.2982 -0.3139 1.5370 pO.0001 1573 C00387 HMDB00133 furosemide -0.2481 -0.3057 2.0624 0.0185 43009 D00331 HMDB01933 tryptophan 0.2418 0.2986 0.8968 0.0002 54 C00078 HMDB00929
3-methylhistidine -0.2240 -0.2979 1.8903 0.0017 15677 C01152 HMDB00479 xanthine -0.2493 -0.2949 1.9277 0.0425 3147 C00385 HMDB00292
4-acetylphenol sulfate -0.2970 -0.2850 1.9232 0.0012 22115 C00548
cis-4-decenoyl carnitine -0.2656 -0.2831 1.3248 0.0028 38178
phenyllactate (PLA) -0.2415 -0.2804 1.5813 0.0447 22130 C05607 H DB00779 stachydrine -0.2190 -0.2628 1.6889 0.0059 34384 C10172 HMDB04827
N-delta-acetylornithine -0.1927 -0.2494 1.7173 0.0004 43249
5-acetylamino-6- -0.2297 -0.2439 2.4545 0.0179 34401 C16365 HMDB 1 1105 formylamino-3- methyluracil
2-aminophenol sulfate -0.2355 -0.2414 1.6228 0.0005 43266
chiro-inositol -0.1817 -0.2405 2.2202 0.0266 37112
mannitol -0.1836 -0.2397 3.0328 0.018 15335 C00392 HMDB00765 lathosterol 0.1904 0.2377 0.7393 0.0024 39864 C01 189 HMDB01170 taurocholenate sulfate -0.1990 -0.2297 1.9086 0.014 32807
indoleacetylglutamine -0.1830 -0.2200 1.6285 0.0023 42087
hydrochlorothiazide -0.1787 -0.2196 2.1933 0.0336 39625 C07041 HMDB01928
2-hydroxyhippurate -0.1561 -0.2047 5.3527 0.0145 18281 C07588 HMDB00840 (salicylurate)
1-linoleoylglycerol (1 - -0.1768 -0.1966 1.5333 0.0016 27447
monolinolein)
3-methyl-2-oxobutyrate 0.1499 0.1955 0.9085 0.0087 21047 C00141 HMDB00019 palmitoyl sphingomyelin 0.1465 0.1794 0.8685 0.0001 37506
4-methyl-2- oxopentanoate 0.1603 0.1732 0.9022 0.0474 221 16 C00233 HMDB00695 oleamide 0.2356 0.1621 0.1499 pO.0001 27408 HMDB021 17
3-methyl-2-oxovalerate 0.1222 0.1420 0.9061 0.0553776 15676 C00671 H DB03736 trans-4-hydroxyproline -0.1227 -0.1345 1.1241 0.1352345 32319 C01157 HMDB00725 stearoyl sphingomyelin 0.1230 0.1254 0.8587 0.0020 19503 C00550 HMDB01348 HXGXA 0.0716 0.1187 0.3912 0.002 31534
ADSGEGDFXAEGGG 0.0259 0.0269 0.3517 0.0181 33084
VR
histidylphenylalanine -0.0172 -0.0069 0.3352 0.0317 42084
Example 2: Diagnostic Performance of Individual Biomarkers for Kidney Function Assessment
[00101] In another example, three exemplary biomarkers to assess kidney function and identify individuals with CKD were selected from Table 1 and evaluated for diagnostic performance. These models are intended to be non-limiting and are presented to exemplify the invention. The biomarkers identified were present at levels that differed between patient samples from individuals with normal kidney function and samples from individuals with CKD. For example, C- glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and pesudouridine were significant biomarkers for distinguishing subjects with CKD from normal subjects.
[00102] The samples used for the analysis were serum samples collected from 281 diabetic individuals. Patient kidney function was evaluated using the DRD equation to estimate GFR. Patients with MDRD eGFR values of less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m were classified as having CKD, and patients with eGFR values of 60 ml/min/1.73 m or greater were classified as Normal. A total of 46 patients were classified as having CKD, and 235 patients were classified as Normal at the time of sample collection. The biomarkers identified in Example 1 , Table 1 , for diagnosing or aiding in the diagnosis of CKD were evaluated for diagnostic performance using Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve modeling.
[00103] The exemplary biomarker C-glycosyltryptophan was evaluated for diagnostic performance. Figure 3 A shows the distribution of patient samples based on the level of C-glycosyltryptophan measured in the samples. The x-axis shows the diagnosis group (Normal or CKD), and the y-axis shows the level of C- glycosyltryptophan. Next, the levels of C-glycosyltryptophan were used in a mathematical model to determine the diagnostic performance of the biomarker.
Figure 3B shows the ROC curve for C-glycosyltryptophan. The ROC curve has an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.8721. Based on this ROC curve, it was determined that by measuring the level of C-glycosyltryptophan, CKD subjects were
distinguished from Normal subjects with 85% sensitivity and 80% specificity.
[00104] The exemplary biomarker N-acetylthreonine was also evaluated for diagnostic performance. Figure 4A shows the distribution of patient samples based on the level of N-acetylthreonine measured in the samples. The x-axis shows the diagnosis group (Normal or CKD), and the y-axis shows the level of N- acetylthreonine. Next, the levels of N-acetylthreonine were used in a mathematical model to determine the diagnostic performance of the biomarker. Figure 4B shows the ROC curve for N-acetylthreonine. The ROC curve has an AUC of 0.8801. Based on this ROC curve it was determined that by measuring the level of N- acetylthreonine, CKD subjects were distinguished from normal subjects with 83% sensitivity and 87% specificity.
[00105] The exemplary biomarker pseudouridine was also evaluated for diagnostic performance. Figure 5 A shows the distribution of patient samples based on the level of pseudouridine measured in the samples. The x-axis shows the diagnosis group (Normal or CKD), and the y-axis shows the level of pseudouridine. Next, the levels of pseudouridine were used in a mathematical model to determine the diagnostic performance of the biomarker. Figure 5B shows the ROC curve for pseudouridine. The ROC curve has an AUC of 0.9041. Based on this ROC curve it was determined that by measuring the level of pseudouridine, CKD subjects were distinguished from Normal subjects with 80% sensitivity and 93 % specificity.
Example 3: Diagnostic Performance of Panels of Biomarkers for Kidney
Function Assessment [00106] In another example, mathematical models that provide an estimation of GFR were developed. These model GFR estimations were used to evaluate kidney function, and the performance of the estimations obtained using these models were compared to the eGFR calculated using the CKD-EPI equation ("CKD-EPI eGFR"). Five exemplary models were developed using combinations of the following biomarkers: pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, kynurenine, myo-inositol, creatinine. The exemplary biomarkers are also described in Example 1 as significant for distinguishing individuals with normal kidney function from those with CKD. These models are intended to be non-limiting and are presented to exemplify the invention.
[00107] The biomarkers pseudouridine, N-acetyl threonine, C- glycosyltryptophan, kynurenine, myo-inositol, and creatinine were measured in fasting serum samples collected from 258 diabetic individuals for whom the CKD- EPI equation to estimate GFR was used to evaluate kidney function. Patients with CKD-EPI eGFR values of 60 ml/min/1.73 m or less were classified as having a "positive" diagnosis (i.e., compromised kidney function, CKD), and patients with eGFR values of greater than 60 ml/min/1.73 m were classified as having a "negative" (i.e., nomial kidney function). A total of 40 patients were classified as a positive diagnosis for CKD and/or compromised kidney function, and 218 patients were classified as a negative diagnosis and/or normal kidney function based on CKD-EPI eGFR results.
[00108] In the present example, five models were generated using multiple regression analysis: exemplary Model 1 comprises the biomarkers pseudouridine, C- glvcosvltrvptophan, N-acetvlthreonine, and creatinine exerrmlarv Model 2 comprises the biomarkers pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, and creatinine;
exemplary Model 3 comprises the biomarkers N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, C- glycosyltryptophan, and creatinine; exemplary Model 4 comprises the biomarkers N- acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, kynurenine, and creatinine; and exemplary Model 5 comprises the biomarkers pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and myo-inositol. Each model was evaluated for its diagnostic performance using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) and by calculating the area under the curve (AUC).
[00109] For exemplary Model 1, the GFR values calculated using Model 1 were significantly correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R2 was 0.614 with an overall p-value of less than 0.001. The diagnostic performance of Model 1 based on the calculated AUC was 0.932. The results of the correlation analysis for Model 1 are displayed graphically in Figure 6A. The GFR calculated using Model 1 is plotted on the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y-axis.
[00110] For exemplary Model 2, the GFR values calculated using Model 2 were correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R was 0.614 with an overall p-value of less than 0.0001. The diagnostic performance of Model 2 based on the calculated AUC was 0.932. Theresults of the correlation analysis for Model 2 are displayed graphically in Figure 6B. The GFR calculated using Model 2 is plotted on the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y- axis.
[00111] For exemplary Model 3, the GFR values calculated using Model 3 were correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R was 0.594 with an overall p-value of less than 0.0001. The diagnostic performance of Model 3 based on the calculated AUC was 0.931. The results of the correlation analysis for Model 3 are displayed graphically in Figure 6C. The GFR calculated using Model 3 is plotted in the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y- axis.
[00112] For exemplary Model 4, the GFR values calculated using Model 4 were significantly correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R was 0.613 with an overall p-value of less than 0.0001. The diagnostic performance of Model 4 based on the calculated AUC was 0.935. The results of the correlation analysis for Model 4 are displayed graphically in Figure 6D. The GFR calculated using Model 4 is plotted on the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y-axis.
[00113] For exemplary Model 5, the GFR values calculated using Model 5 were significantly correlated with the values calculated using the CKD-EPI eGFR; the adjusted R was 0.563 with an overall p-value of less than 0.0001. The diagnostic performance of Model 5 based on the calculated AUC was 0.933. The results of the correlation analysis for Model 5 are displayed graphically in Figure 6E. The GFR calculated using Model 5 is plotted on the x-axis, and the CKD-EPI eGFR is plotted on the y-axis.
Example 4: Biomarkers to assess kidney function in patients with intermediate eGFR
[00114] For patients with eGFR in an intermediate (G2-G3a) range with eGFR between 45 and 74 mL/min per 1.63m2 and/or intermediate urine albumin scores, the assessment of kidney function and diagnosis of CKD is uncertain; such patients would benefit from a more precisely estimated GFR such as a metabolite biomarker test. The integration of such a novel biomarker test into a kidney function assessment and treatment algorithm is illustrated in Figure 1.
[00115] Biomarkers useful for evaluating kidney function and estimating GFR were identified by measuring the level of the biomarkers in serum samples and urine samples from diabetic individuals with eGFR values of 40-80.
[00116] Serum samples from 78 individuals for whom the MDRD eGFR and 69 individuals for whom the CKD-EPI eGFR values fell in this range were analyzed. The levels of the biomarkers were correlated with the MDRD eGFR and the CKD- EPI eGFR values. The results of the correlations are presented in Table 2. For each biomarker listed in Table 2 the biochemical name of the biomarker, the correlation value of the biomarker with CKD-EPI eGFR, the p-value of the correlation of the biomarker with CKD-EPI eGFR, the correlation value of the biomarkcr with MDRD eGFR, and the p-value of the correlation of the biomarker with MDRD eGFR are displayed. Table 1, Serum biomarkers for assessing kidney function in patients with eGFR of 40-80
Figure imgf000037_0001
2-methylbutyrylcamitine (C5) -0.4049 0.0006 -0.3792 0.0006 guanosine -0.4043 0.0006 -0.3719 0.0008 succinyicarnitine -0.3993 0.0007 -0.3941 0.0004 erythronate -0.396 0.0008 -0.3974 0.0003 kynurenine -0.3941 0.0008 -0.31 0.0058
N6-acetyllysine -0.3908 0.0009 -0.3466 0.0019 choline -0.3819 0.0012 -0.2876 0.0107 isobutyrylcarnitine -0.381 0.0012 -0.3827 0.0005 tryptophan 0.3738 0.0016 0.2994 0.0077 myo-inositol -0.3725 0.0016 -0.3579 0.0013 gamma-glutamylphenylalanine -0.3716 0.0017 -0.3651 0.001 phenylcarnitine -0.3711 0.0017 -0.3876 0.0005 palmitoyl sphingomyelin 0.3695 0.0018 0.3686 0.0009 salicyluric glucuronide -0.3689 0.0018 -0.3126 0.0053 glutarylcarnitine (C5) -0.367 0.0019 -0.3391 0.0024
S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) -0.3619 0.0022 -0.3438 0.0021 furosemide -0.3589 0.0025 -0.3332 0.0029
1-methylhistidine -0.3576 0.0026 -0.3374 0.0025
2-hydroxyisobutyrate -0.3555 0.0027 -0.3352 0.0027 p-cresol sulfate -0.3531 0.0029 -0.3042 0.0068
2-hydroxyhippurate (salicylurate) -0.3472 0.0035 -0.3223 0.004 chiro-inositol -0.3456 0.0036 -0.3141 0.0051 deoxycarnitine -0.3419 0.004 -0.287 0.0108
O-methylcatechol sulfate -0.3405 0.0042 -0.3567 0.0013 hydroxyisovaleroyl carnitine -0.3384 0.0045 -0.3166 0.0047
N-delta-acetylornithine -0.3322 0.0053 -0.398 0.0003
N2,N2-dimethylguanosine -0.3264 0.0062 -0.2851 0.0114 xylonate -0.3244 0.0065 -0.2949 0.0088
3-methylglutarylcarnitine (C6) -0.321 0.0072 -0.2833 0.012 gamma-glutamylvaline -0.3172 0.0079 -0.3666 0.001 kynurenate -0.3147 0.0084 -0.2818 0.0124
1- pentadecanoylglycerophosphocholine -0.3057 0.0106 -0.3231 0.0039 arabitol -0.3052 0.0108 -0.3268 0.0035 stachydrine -0.3045 0.011 -0.2543 0.0247 gamma-glutamylmethionine -0.3004 0.0122 -0.3254 0.0036 cystine -0.2994 0.0125 -0.2351 0.0383 fucose -0.2906 0.0154 -0.3022 0.0072
3-indoxyl sulfate -0.282 0.0189 -0.273 0.0156 threitol -0.2765 0.0214 -0.2583 0.0224
1-linoleoylglycerol (1-monolinolein) -0.2756 0.0219 -0.2561 0.0236 erythritol -0.2748 0.0223 -0.2691 0.0172
N2,N5-diacetylornithine -0.2673 0.0264 -0.2862 0.0111
N-formylmethionine -0.264 0.0284 -0.2501 0.0272 N-acetylcarnosine -0.2624 0.0294 -0.184 0.1069
1-oleoylglycerol (1-monoolein) -0.2607 0.0305 -0.2573 0.0229 pantothenate -0.2584 0.032 -0.2597 0.0217 gamma-glutamylglutamine -0.2546 0.0347 -0.2871 0.0108 arabonate -0.2527 0.0362 -0.2683 0.0176 gamma-glutamylleucine -0.2454 0.0421 -0.282 0.0124 tiglyl carnitine -0.2428 0.0444 -0.2551 0.0242 cysteine -0.2425 0.0447 -0.2447 0.0308 gamma-glutamyltyrosine -0.2367 0.0502 -0.2293 0.0434
2-aminophenol sulfate -0.2326 0.0545 -0.2402 0.0341
5-acetylamino-6-formylamino-3- methyluracil -0.2297 0.0576 -0.2185 0.0546 ranitidine -0.228 0.0595 -0.213 0.0611 salicylate -0.2224 0.0662 -0.1921 0.092 hippurate -0.221 0.068 -0.2139 0.06 catechol sulfate -0.2164 0.0741 -0.2564 0.0234
N-acetylaspartate (NAA) -0.2128 0.0791 -0.1664 0.1455 mannitol -0.2122 0.08 -0.1826 0.1096 indolelactate -0.2054 0.0905 -0.1898 0.096
N-acetyi-3-methylhistidine -0.2051 0.091 -0.188 0.0992 gamma-glutamylisoleucine -0.2039 0.0929 -0.2494 0.0276 phenol sulfate -0.2002 0.0991 -0.1723 0.1314 gluconate -0.1984 0.1022 -0.2148 0.059 trigonelline (N'-methylnicotinate) -0.1846 0.1289 -0.2241 0.0486
HWESASLLR -0.1778 0.1438 -0.2589 0.0221
N-acetylmethionine -0.1731 0.155 -0.206 0.0703 acetylcarnitine -0.1603 0.1883 -0.2195 0.0535 bilirubin (E,E) 0.1558 0.2011 0.2033 0.0743 theophylline 0.1624 0.1825 0.2186 0.0545 pregnen-diol disulfate 0.1662 0.1722 0.2034 0.0741
4-androsten-3beta,17beta-diol
disulfate 1 0.1689 0.1652 0.2002 0.0789 oleamide 0.1733 0.1544 0.2273 0.0453 azelate (nonanedioate) 0.1754 0.1494 0.2011 0.0775 dehydroisoandrosterone sulfate
(DHEA-S) 0.1913 0.1153 0.2143 0.0596
1-palmitoylplasmenylethanolamine 0.194 0.1101 0.214 0.0599
1- linoleoylglycerophosphoethanolamine 0.2017 0.0964 0.1173 0.3063
3-methyl-2-oxovalerate 0.2026 0.095 0.1736 0.1284
10-undecenoate (ll:lnl) 0.2033 0.0938 0.1418 0.2157
8-aminocaprylate 0.2069 0.088 -0.0025 0.9824
1-arachidonoylglycerophosphocholine 0.2081 0.0861 0.1601 0.1615 glutamine 0.21 0.0833 0.2145 0.0594 leucylphenylalanine 0.2105 0.0825 0.1874 0.1004 cholesterol 0.2152 0.0758 0.1885 0.0983
3-ethylphenylsulfate 0.2296 0.0577 0.1378 0.2289 iminodiacetate (IDA) 0.2313 0.0558 0.1771 0.1209 cotinine N-oxide 0.232 0.0551 0.136 0.2351 glycerol 0.233 0.0541 0.1679 0.1418
3-phosphoglycerate 0.2362 0.0507 0.1999 0.0792 campesterol 0.2369 0.0501 0.1938 0.0891 glycerol 2-phosphate 0.2438 0.0435 0.2105 0.0644 palmitate, methyl ester 0.2446 0.0428 0.1984 0.0817 octadecanedioate 0.2446 0.0428 0.2531 0.0254
2-aminooctanoate 0.2453 0.0422 0.2291 0.0436
1-linoleoylglycerophosphocholine 0.2466 0.0411 0.1776 0.1199 phosphate 0.2481 0.0399 0.2361 0.0374 pregnenolone sulfate 0.2543 0.035 0.2531 0.0253 glycerol 3-phosphate (G3P) 0.2547 0.0347 0.2504 0.027
2-linoleoylglycerophosphocholine 0.2611 0.0302 0.2151 0.0586 glycerate 0.2647 0.028 0.2837 0.0118 sebacate (decanedioate) 0.2733 0.0231 0.3051 0.0066 isoleucy!leucine 0.2735 0.023 0.2405 0.0339
EDTA 0.2759 0.0218 0.2173 0.056 beta-sitosterol 0.2791 0.0202 0.2697 0.017 pyrophosphate (PPi) 0.2804 0.0196 0.2215 0.0513 pregn steroid monosulfate 0.283 0.0185 0.2907 0.0098 eicosanodioate 0.2836 0.0182 0.237 0.0367 ethyl glucuronide 0.2904 0.0155 0.2254 0.0472
2-hydroxyoctanoate 0.2987 0.0127 0.2656 0.0187 stearoyl sphingomyelin 0.307 0.0103 0.3483 0.0018 pyruvate 0.3092 0.0097 0.2754 0.0147
8-hydroxyoctanoate 0.3287 0.0058 0.3082 0.0061 heptanoate (7:0) 0.3308 0.0055 0.3516 0.0016 adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) 0.3325 0.0053 0.3649 0.001 caproate (6:0) 0.3366 0.0047 0.3867 0.0005
[00117] Similarly, urine samples from 76 individuals for whom MDRD eGFR and 64 individuals for whom CKD-EPI eGFR values were in this range were analyzed. The measured levels of the biomarkers were correlated with MDRD eGFR and CKD-EPI eGFR values. The results of the correlations are presented in Table 3. For each biomarker, the biochemical name of the biomarker, the correlation value of the biomarker with CKD-EPI eGFR, the p-value of the correlation of the biomarker with CKD-EPI eGFR, the correlation value of the biomarker with MDRD eGFR, and the p-value of the correlation of the biomarker with MDRD eGFR is presented. Table 3. Urine biomarkers to assess kidney function in patients with eGFR of 40-
80
Figure imgf000041_0001
3-dehydrocarnitine -0.1541 0.224 -0.1272 0.2736 phenylcarnitine -0.1494 0.2388 -0.1504 0.1947 caffeine -0.1464 0.2485 -0.1437 0.2155 orotate -0.1425 0.2614 -0.0994 0.3932 arginylisoleucine -0.141 0.2663 -0.1034 0.3743
N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAG) 0.1428 0.2605 0.0904 0.4373 hypoxanthine 0.1436 0.2576 0.0962 0.4084
3-methylcytidine 0.1437 0.2574 0.1196 0.3033
N-acetylglycine 0.1461 0.2494 0.0563 0.6292 mandelate 0.1473 0.2454 0.0434 0.7094 androsterone sulfate 0.1484 0.2419 0.1093 0.3472
2,3-dihydroxyisovalerate 0.1489 0.2404 0.0527 0.651 taurine 0.149 0.24 0.0706 0.5442 dehydroisoandrosterone sulfate
(DHEA-S) 0.1494 0.2387 0.1481 0.2018
N-acetylthreonine 0.15 0.2369 0.0387 0.7401 itaconate (methylenesuccinate) 0.1503 0.2358 0.0151 0.8971 homoveratric acid 0.1522 0.2299 0.1318 0.2564 verapamil 0.1522 0.2299 0.2047 0.0761 j.-i i iC ti i y n i ionu i i lc; n 1 C/ n T -> 3 -! 0.0946 0.4161
3-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) 0.1557 0.2192 0.0518 0.6568 alanine 0.1557 0.2191 0.098 0.3999 pantothenate 0.1563 0.2173 0.1216 0.2953 methyl indole-3-acetate 0.1571 0.2151 0.0894 0.4422
N2-acetyllysine 0.1625 0.1996 0.286 0.0123
4-acetaminophen sulfate 0.1634 0.197 0.1829 0.1138 cis-aconitate 0.1638 0.196 0.0496 0.6706
5-hyd roxyhexa noate 0.1639 0.1957 0.0866 0.4569 allo-threonine 0.1646 0.1936 0.0796 0.4945
2-hydroxybutyrate (AHB) 0.1647 0.1933 0.062 0.5947 homocitrate 0.1649 0.1928 0.106 0.362 acisoga 0.1651 0.1924 0.141 0.2243 arabinose 0.1667 0.188 0.0469 0.6874 lactate 0.1682 0.184 0.0733 0.5292 gentisate 0.1701 0.1791 0.0824 0.4792
N-acetylhistidine 0.1707 0.1775 0.1738 0.1332 gamma-glutamylvaline 0.1732 0.1712 0.1248 0.2828 beta-hydroxyisovalerate 0.1747 0.1674 0.0821 0.481
N-acetylproline 0.1757 0.1649 0.0402 0.7303
7-methylguanine 0.1761 0.164 0.1013 . 0.3839 arabitol 0.177 0.1618 0.0695 0.551
Cortisol 0.1777 0.1601 0.1648 0.1547
4-methyl-2-oxopentanoate 0.1778 0.1598 0.0846 0.4673 putrescine 0.1788 0.1575 0.0585 0.6156 2-isopropylmalate 0.1789 0.1572 0.0691 0.5533 trans-urocanate 0.1803 0.154 0.1788 0.1222 tyrosine 0.1803 0.154 0.1657 0.1526 andro steroid monosulfate 2 0.1818 0.1505 0.1449 0.2117 sulforaphane 0.182 0.15 0.1276 0.272 glycine 0.1827 0.1484 0.2002 0.0829
4-androsten-3beta,17beta-diol
disulfate 1 0.1897 0.1332 0.1766 0.1271
7-ketodeoxycholate 0.1899 0.1328 0.2549 0.0263
3-ureidopropionate 0.1935 0.1255 0.1318 0.2563
3-methylglutaconate 0.1936 0.1252 0.0987 0.3963 cotinine 0.1968 0.119 0.0939 0.4197 tartarate 0.1973 0.1182 0.0788 0.4984 ethanolamine 0.2005 0.1122 0.2327 0.0431
Nl-methylguanosine 0.2015 0.1103 0.2281 0.0475 succinimide 0.2036 0.1066 0.0815 0.4839 malate 0.2083 0.0986 0.0894 0.4423
3-hydroxyglutarate 0.209 0.0974 0.1233 0.2884
3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)propionate 0.2093 0.097 0.142 0.221
m i 3 n 1 1 1 Q
-;-μιμει
3-hydroxyisobutyrate 0.214 0.0895 0.1118 0.3365 ibuprofen acyl glucuronide 0.2147 0.0885 0.1785 0.1229 pregnanediol-3-glucuronide 0.2163 0.086 0.0902 0.4384 lysine 0.2171 0.0848 0.2017 0.0806 adipate 0.2196 0.0813 0.1126 0.3326
3-methylglutarate 0.2197 0.0811 0.1089 0.3489 tetrahydrocortisone 0.2207 0.0797 0.1809 0.1178 proiylglycine 0.2215 0.0786 0.102 0.3808 o-cresol sulfate 0.223 0.0765 0.1157 0.3196
5alpha-pregnan-3beta,20alpha-diol
disulfate 0.224 0.0751 0.1073 0.3564 histidine 0.2267 0.0716 0.1705 0.1408
3-ethylphenylsulfate 0.2278 0.0703 0.1169 0.3145 gamma-glutamylisoleucine 0.2295 0.0681 0.1393 0.23 andro steroid monosulfate 1 0.2305 0.0669 0.1617 0.163 citramalate 0.2393 0.0568 0.0874 0.4526
2-hydroxyglutarate 0.2467 0.0494 0.1025 0.3782
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarate 0.2474 0.0488 0.1151 0.322
3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol 0.2487 0.0475 0.1276 0.2719 guanidinoacetate 0.2487 0.0475 0.3448 0.0023 ethyl glucuronide 0.2502 0.0461 0.1545 0.1826
3-hydroxypropanoate 0.2509 0.0455 0.1692 0.1439
N-acetylisoleucine 0.2511 0.0453 0.1146 0.3241 pregnen-diol disulfate 0.2515 0.045 0.1932 0.0944 thymol sulfate 0.2516 0.0449 0.2185 0.0579 citrate 0.252 0.0445 0.1569 0.1759
3-dehydrocholate 0.2537 0.0431 0.221 0.0551 sorbitol 0.2545 0.0424 0.1737 0.1334 argininosuccinate 0.2563 0.0409 0.1956 0.0905 glucosamine 0.2604 0.0377 0.1624 0.1611
N6-methyladenosine 0.2666 0.0332 0.1903 0.0996
S-methylcysteine 0.2688 0.0317 0.1516 0.1911
2-aminoadipate 0.2725 0.0294 0.2413 0.0357
5,6-dihydrouracil 0.2759 0.0273 0.2008 0.082
N-acetylaspartate (NAA) 0.2832 0.0234 0.1778 0.1245 xylitol 0.285 0.0225 0.1951 0.0913
Nl-methyladenosine 0.2859 0.022 0.2608 0.0229
N6-acetyllysine 0.2981 0.0167 0.2376 0.0388 uracil 0.305 0.0142 0.3646 0.0012
4-androsten-3beta,17beta-diol
disulfate 2 0.3071 0.0136 0.2664 0.02
21-hydroxypregnenolone disulfate 0.318 0.0104 0.219 0.0573 tryptophan 0.32 0.01 0.2654 0.0205
- -i ι ic u iyi"-"UAUva ici ale n n -)iQ 0.0082 n -) -> -: -! 0.0408
N2-methylguanosine 0.3307 0.0076 0.3335 0.0032 ribitol 0.3366 0.0065 0.2194 0.0568
N-acetyl-beta-alanine 0.338 0.0063 0.2264 0.0493 ribulose 0.3382 0.0063 0.2708 0.018 glycolate (hydroxyacetate) 0.3563 0.0039 0.3646 0.0012 gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) 0.3611 0.0034 0.2828 0.0133 thymine 0.3706 0.0026 0.3172 0.0052
[00118] In another example, using the patient serum samples described in Example 1 , samples with eGFR CKD-EPI values of 40-80 were further classified as having High or Low eGFR values. Patient samples with eGFR values of 40-60 were classified as having Low eGFR; patient samples with eGFR values of 61-80 were classified as having High eGFR. A total of 41 patients were classified as having Low eGFR, and 42 patients were classified as having High eGFR at the time of sample collection.
[00119] The levels of metabolites were measured and the results were analyzed using t-tests. Biomarkers for kidney function in patients with intermediate eGFR measurements (e.g., CKD-EPI eGFR calculations of 40-80) were analyzed by comparing High (eGFR calculation of 61-80) vs. Low (eGFR calculation of 40-60) samples. As listed in Table 4, the analysis resulted in the identification of biomarkers that were differentially present between patient serum samples with High eGFR and those with Low eGFR .
[00120] Table 4 includes, for each biomarker, the biochemical name of the biomarker, the fold change of the biomarker in subjects with High eGFR compared to subjects with Low eGFR (High/Low, is the ratio of the mean level of the biomarker in samples from patients with CKD-EPI eGFR of 61-80 compared to the mean level in samples from patients with CKD-EPI eGFR of 40-60), and the p-value and q-value determined in the statistical analysis of the data concerning the biomarkers. Table 4 also lists the following: the internal identifier for the biomarker compound
(CompID); the identifier for the biomarker compound in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), if available; and the identifier for the biomarker compound in the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), if available.
Table 4. Serum biomarkers to assess kidney function in patients with eGFR of 40-80
Figure imgf000045_0001
Figure imgf000046_0001
Figure imgf000047_0001
[00121] While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A method to assess or aid in the assessment of kidney function in a subject, the method comprising:
obtaining a biological sample from a subject;
analyzing the biological sample from the subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4; and
comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to assess kidney function.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from the group consisting of the following biomarkers pseudouridine, N- acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylserine, N-acetylalanine, N6- carbamoylthreonyladenosine, 4-acetamidobutanoate, Erythritol, myo-inositol, erythronate, urea, arabitol, N2,N2-dimethylguanosine, Nl-methyladenosine, 3- methylglutarylcarnitine (C6), S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), N-acetylmethionine, N6-acetyllysine, Kynurenine, arabonate, succinyl carnitine, ribose, xylonite, N- formylmethionine, O-methylcatechol sulfate, 2-methylbutyrylcarnitine (C5),
Phenylacetylglutamine, N2,N5-diacetylornithine, and creatinine.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample is analyzed using one or more techniques selected from the group consisting of mass spectrometry, ELISA, and antibody linkage.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample is obtained from a subject that has no symptoms of impaired kidney function.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the subject exhibits risk factors for developing chronic kidney disease.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the subject has been previously diagnosed with hypertension.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein the subject has been previously diagnosed with diabetes.
8. The method of claim 5, wherein the subject has a family history of chronic kidney disease.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject has symptoms of impaired kidney function.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the subject is one for whom kidney function assessment using conventional methods is difficult.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the subject is selected from the group consisting of the following: obese, very lean, vegetarian, chronically ill, and elderly.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the subject is a candidate to be a kidney donor.
13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject has been treated with or is being considered for treatment with an agent that may have a toxic effect on the kidneys.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the agent is a contrast imaging agent.
15. The method of claim 13, wherein the agent is a chemotherapeutic agent.
16. The method of claim 13, wherein the agent is an antibiotic.
17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sample is obtained from a subject that has no known risk factors for impaired kidney function.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample is obtained from a subject prior to treatment with a therapeutic agent.
19. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample is obtained from a subject prior to receiving a contrast imaging agent.
20. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample is obtained from a subject prior to treatment with an agent that allows direct measurement of glomular filtration rate.
21. The method of claim 1, wherein a Kidney Function Score is determined and used to assess kidney function.
22. The method of claim 1, wherein the results are used along with other methods useful in the clinical determination of the level of kidney function.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein the other methods comprise BUN, SCr, urine albumin measurements and family history of CKD.
24. A method of monitoring kidney function in a subject treated with a therapeutic agent, the method comprising:
analyzing the biological sample from the subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from
Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4; and
comparing the level (s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to monitor the kidney function in the subject.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the comparing step comprises generating a Kidney Function Score for the subject in order to monitor the progression or regression of kidney function impairment in the subject.
26. A method of determining predisposition to developing reduced kidney function in a subject, the method comprising:
analyzing a biological sample from the subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1 , 2, 3, and/or 4; and
comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to determine predisposition to developing reduced kidney function.
27. A method of classifying a subject as having low susceptibility to developing reduced kidney function, intermediate susceptibility to developing reduced kidney function or having high susceptibility to developing reduced kidney function, the method comprising:
analyzing the biological sample from the subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4; and
comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to classify the subject as having low susceptibility to developing reduced kidney function, intermediate susceptibility to developing reduced kidney function, or high susceptibility to developing reduced kidney function.
28. The method of claim 27, wherein the comparing step comprises generating Kidney Function Score for the subject in order to classify the subject as having high, intermediate or low susceptibility to nephrotoxicity.
29. The method of claim 27, wherein the subject has received treatment with a therapeutic agent.
30. The method of claim 27, wherein the subject has not received treatment with a therapeutic agent.
31. A method for diagnosing or aiding in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD), the method comprising: obtaining a biological sample from a subject;
analyzing the biological sample from the subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers of kidney function, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1 , 2, 3, and/or 4; and
comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to CKD- positive and/or CKD -negative reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to diagnose or aid in the diagnosis of CKD.
32. A method of monitoring CKD progression or regression in a subject, the method comprising:
analyzing a biological sample from a subject that has been diagnosed with CKD to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4; and
comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to CKD- progression and/or CKD-regression reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to monitor progression or regression of CKD in the subject.
33. A method of classifying or aiding in the classification of a subject according to level of kidney function, comprising
analyzing a biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1 , 2, 3, and/or 4, and
comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to determine the level of kidney function of a subject.
34. A method of assessing kidney function in response to a composition, comprising
analyzing a biological sample from a subject treated with a composition to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function in the sample, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1 , 2, 3, and/or 4, and comparing the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in the sample to kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to assess kidney function.
35. A method of monitoring kidney function in a subject, the method comprising:
analyzing a first biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers for kidney function, where the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1 , 2, 3, and/or 4 wherein the first sample is obtained from the subject at a first time point;
analyzing a second biological sample from a subject to determine the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers, where the second sample is obtained from the subject at a second time point; and
comparing the level(s) of one or more biomarkers in the second sample to the level(s) of the one or more biomarkers in (a) the first sample, (b) kidney function reference levels of the one or more biomarkers, (c) CKD-positive reference levels of the one or more biomarkers, and/or (d) CKD-negative reference levels of the one or more biomarkers in order to monitor kidney function in the subject.
36. A method to assess or aid in the assessment of kidney function in a subject, the method comprising:
obtaining a biological sample from a subject;
analyzing the biological sample from the subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4; and
using the determined levels of the one or more biomarkers in a mathematical model to assess kidney function.
37. A method to assess or aid in the assessment of kidney function in a subject, the method comprising:
obtaining a biological sample from a subject;
analyzing the biological sample from the subject to determine the level(s) of one or more biomarkers, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from Tables 1, 2, 3, and/or 4; using the determined levels of the one or more biomarkers in a mathematical model to calculate an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR); and
using the estimated GFR to assess kidney function
38. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the one or more biomarkers comprise pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, kynurenine, myo-inositol, or creatinine.
39. The method of any of the preceding claims, further comprising analyzing the biological sample from the subject to determine the level(s) of one or more additional biomarkers, wherein the one or more additional biomarkers are selected from X-17299 and X-l 1564; and
using the determined level(s) of the one or more additional biomarkers to assess kidney function.
40. The method of claim 36, wherein the one or more biomarkers are selected from the group consisting of pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, C-glycosyltryptophan, kynurenine, myo-inositol, and creatinine.
41. The method of claim 38, wherein the one or more biomarkers comprise pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and creatinine.
42. The method of claim 38, wherein the one or more biomarkers comprise pseudouridine, N-acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, and creatinine.
43. The method of claim 38, wherein the one or more biomarkers comprise N- acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, C-glycosyltryptophan, and creatinine.
44. The method of claim 38, wherein the one or more biomarkers comprise N- acetylthreonine, myo-inositol, kynurenine, and creatinine.
45. The method of claim 38, wherein the one or more biomarkers comprise pseudouridine, C-glycosyltryptophan, N-acetylthreonine, and myo-inositol.
46. The method of claim 36, wherein the one or more biomarkers comprise pseudouridine.
47. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the one or more biomarkers are used in combination with one or more clinical measures or other measures of kidney function selected from the group consisting of BUN, Serum creatinine, urine albumin, β-2 microglobulin, β-TRACE, and 2-mannopyranosyl tryptophan (2-MPT).
PCT/US2014/037762 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same WO2014186311A1 (en)

Priority Applications (14)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14/889,930 US10539575B2 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same
EP14797070.1A EP2997366B1 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same
EP18183240.3A EP3410115A1 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Tryptophan as a biomarkers for kidney function and methods using the same
EP19176215.2A EP3546940B1 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same
BR112015028253A BR112015028253A2 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 renal function-related biomarkers and methods for their use
CN201480027332.7A CN105209909B (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarker relevant to renal function and its application method
ES14797070T ES2702123T3 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods to use them
AU2014265669A AU2014265669B2 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same
JP2016514016A JP6595984B2 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers associated with renal function and methods of using the same
MX2015015561A MX365061B (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same.
CA2911204A CA2911204C (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same
HK16106343.3A HK1218331A1 (en) 2013-05-14 2016-06-03 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same
HK16110994.7A HK1222905A1 (en) 2013-05-14 2016-09-19 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same
US16/700,098 US20200103417A1 (en) 2013-05-14 2019-12-02 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201361822965P 2013-05-14 2013-05-14
US61/822,965 2013-05-14

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14/889,930 A-371-Of-International US10539575B2 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same
US16/700,098 Continuation US20200103417A1 (en) 2013-05-14 2019-12-02 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014186311A1 true WO2014186311A1 (en) 2014-11-20

Family

ID=51898805

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2014/037762 WO2014186311A1 (en) 2013-05-14 2014-05-13 Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (2) US10539575B2 (en)
EP (3) EP2997366B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6595984B2 (en)
CN (2) CN110196335A (en)
AU (1) AU2014265669B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112015028253A2 (en)
CA (2) CA3184836A1 (en)
ES (2) ES2702123T3 (en)
HK (2) HK1218331A1 (en)
MX (2) MX365061B (en)
WO (1) WO2014186311A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017059132A1 (en) * 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 The General Hospital Corporation Methods of treating and diagnosing disease using biomarkers for bcg therapy
WO2017062646A1 (en) * 2015-10-07 2017-04-13 Clearbridge Biophotonics Pte Ltd. Integrated visual morphology and cell protein expression using resonance-light scattering
WO2018022866A1 (en) 2016-07-28 2018-02-01 Metabolon, Inc. Diagnostic methods, therapeutic agents and uses thereof
WO2018118630A1 (en) 2016-12-19 2018-06-28 Metabolon, Inc. Mass spectrometry assay method for detection and quantitation of kidney function metabolites

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
MX365061B (en) * 2013-05-14 2019-05-22 Metabolon Inc Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same.
EP3242588B1 (en) * 2015-01-09 2019-10-16 Global Genomics Group, LLC Blood based biomarkers for diagnosing atherosclerotic coronary artery disease
WO2016115496A1 (en) * 2015-01-15 2016-07-21 Joslin Diabetes Center Metabolite biomarkers predictive of renal disease in diabetic patients
US12057228B1 (en) * 2015-12-30 2024-08-06 Cerner Innovation, Inc. Predicting newly incident chronic kidney disease
DK3552022T3 (en) * 2016-11-25 2021-08-23 Implexion AB METABOLIC DISORDERS
CN108956790A (en) * 2017-05-18 2018-12-07 中国人民解放军第二军医大学第二附属医院 Application of one group of amino acid tags object in acute kidney injury diagnostic kit
CN107132266A (en) * 2017-06-21 2017-09-05 佛山科学技术学院 A kind of Classification of water Qualities method and system based on random forest
EP3665705A1 (en) 2017-08-08 2020-06-17 Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. Systems and methods for treating and estimating progression of chronic kidney disease
CN107326093B (en) * 2017-09-04 2020-01-21 东南大学 Taqman probe-based fluorescent quantitative PCR (polymerase chain reaction) one-step kit for detecting genes related to chronic kidney diseases and application thereof
WO2019067699A1 (en) * 2017-09-28 2019-04-04 Metabolon, Inc. Compounds, reagents, and uses thereof
EP3740760B1 (en) * 2018-01-19 2023-05-31 Mars, Incorporated Biomarkers and classification algorithms for chronic kidney disease in cats
CN112714871B (en) * 2018-07-14 2024-08-23 马斯公司 Biomarkers and test models for chronic kidney disease
KR20210127945A (en) * 2019-02-20 2021-10-25 가부시키가이샤 파트너 펌 Solid-state reaction chip and measurement method using the same
CN114269722A (en) * 2019-07-26 2022-04-01 贝尔维奇生物医学研究所(伊迪贝尔) Ergothioneine, S-methyl-ergothioneine and uses thereof
CN112305089B (en) * 2019-07-26 2022-04-29 长沙都正生物科技股份有限公司 Biomarker for diagnosing chronic nephropathy and application thereof
CN111487338B (en) * 2020-04-16 2022-06-10 中南大学湘雅二医院 Non-invasive biomarker related to renal function and application thereof
WO2021232211A1 (en) * 2020-05-19 2021-11-25 深圳市中医院 Marker for diagnosing kidney disease and diagnostic method
CN114910587B (en) * 2022-05-12 2024-03-19 军科正源(上海)生物医药科技有限公司 High performance liquid-tandem mass spectrometry analysis method for urine detection

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5712084A (en) * 1995-09-08 1998-01-27 Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. Donor kidney viability test for improved preservation
US20100114064A1 (en) * 2008-11-03 2010-05-06 Medrad, Inc. Mitigation of contrast-induced nephropathy
US20120141378A1 (en) * 2009-06-08 2012-06-07 Elena Feinstein Methods for treating chronic kidney disease
WO2013048344A1 (en) * 2011-09-29 2013-04-04 National University Of Singapore Urinary metabolomic markers for renal insufficiency
US20130115649A1 (en) * 2010-05-19 2013-05-09 Jeffrey Richard Shuster Methods and Reagents for Metabolomics and Histology in a Biological Sample and a Kit for the Same

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH02196787A (en) * 1989-01-25 1990-08-03 Otsuka Pharmaceut Co Ltd Pseudouridine derivative
JPH0661278B2 (en) * 1990-09-18 1994-08-17 旭化成工業株式会社 Sensitive method for quantitative determination of myo-inositol and composition for quantitative determination
CN101377492B (en) 2007-08-29 2014-04-23 北京九强生物技术股份有限公司 Bladder chalone C determining reagent kit
WO2010025434A1 (en) * 2008-08-29 2010-03-04 Astute Medical, Inc. Methods and compositions for diagnosis and prognosis of renal injury and renal failure
MX2011005379A (en) * 2008-11-22 2011-06-09 Astute Medical Inc Methods and compositions for diagnosis and prognosis of renal injury and renal failure.
WO2010124269A1 (en) * 2009-04-24 2010-10-28 National Center For Genome Resources Methods for diagnosis of sepsis and risk of death
JP5197846B2 (en) * 2009-04-30 2013-05-15 紀陽 田仲 Method or apparatus for determining the severity of kidney disease or method for operating the same
WO2011027573A1 (en) * 2009-09-04 2011-03-10 国立大学法人東北大学 Novel renal disease marker substance in human
ES2592386T3 (en) * 2009-12-20 2016-11-29 Astute Medical, Inc. Methods and compositions for the diagnosis and prognosis of renal injury and renal insufficiency
JP5899213B2 (en) * 2010-08-06 2016-04-06 マイカーティス エヌ．ヴェ．ＭｙＣａｒｔｉｓ ＮＶ Pearlcan as a biomarker for renal dysfunction
JP5916058B2 (en) * 2011-08-26 2016-05-11 国立大学法人東北大学 Biomarkers of cellular stress state
JP2014530350A (en) * 2011-09-14 2014-11-17 ビーエーエスエフ ソシエタス・ヨーロピアＢａｓｆ Ｓｅ Means and methods for assessing nephrotoxicity
MX365061B (en) * 2013-05-14 2019-05-22 Metabolon Inc Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same.
ES2891088T3 (en) * 2016-07-28 2022-01-26 Metabolon Inc Diagnostic methods, therapeutic agents and uses thereof

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5712084A (en) * 1995-09-08 1998-01-27 Research Corporation Technologies, Inc. Donor kidney viability test for improved preservation
US20100114064A1 (en) * 2008-11-03 2010-05-06 Medrad, Inc. Mitigation of contrast-induced nephropathy
US20120141378A1 (en) * 2009-06-08 2012-06-07 Elena Feinstein Methods for treating chronic kidney disease
US20130115649A1 (en) * 2010-05-19 2013-05-09 Jeffrey Richard Shuster Methods and Reagents for Metabolomics and Histology in a Biological Sample and a Kit for the Same
WO2013048344A1 (en) * 2011-09-29 2013-04-04 National University Of Singapore Urinary metabolomic markers for renal insufficiency

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of EP2997366A4 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017059132A1 (en) * 2015-09-29 2017-04-06 The General Hospital Corporation Methods of treating and diagnosing disease using biomarkers for bcg therapy
US11266730B2 (en) 2015-09-29 2022-03-08 The General Hospital Corporation Methods of treating and diagnosing disease using biomarkers for BCG therapy
WO2017062646A1 (en) * 2015-10-07 2017-04-13 Clearbridge Biophotonics Pte Ltd. Integrated visual morphology and cell protein expression using resonance-light scattering
WO2018022866A1 (en) 2016-07-28 2018-02-01 Metabolon, Inc. Diagnostic methods, therapeutic agents and uses thereof
CN109563127A (en) * 2016-07-28 2019-04-02 麦特博隆股份有限公司 Diagnostic method, therapeutic agent and application thereof
US10865183B2 (en) 2016-07-28 2020-12-15 Metabolon, Inc. Compounds, reagents, and uses thereof
AU2017301949B2 (en) * 2016-07-28 2021-09-23 Metabolon, Inc. Compounds, reagents, and uses thereof
CN109563127B (en) * 2016-07-28 2024-01-05 麦特博隆股份有限公司 Compounds, agents and uses thereof
WO2018118630A1 (en) 2016-12-19 2018-06-28 Metabolon, Inc. Mass spectrometry assay method for detection and quantitation of kidney function metabolites
EP3555615A4 (en) * 2016-12-19 2020-11-04 Metabolon, Inc. Mass spectrometry assay method for detection and quantitation of kidney function metabolites
AU2017382744B2 (en) * 2016-12-19 2023-02-09 Metabolon, Inc. Mass spectrometry assay method for detection and quantitation of kidney function metabolites
US11619636B2 (en) 2016-12-19 2023-04-04 Metabolon, Inc. Mass spectrometry assay method for detection and quantitation of kidney function metabolites

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2911204A1 (en) 2014-11-20
MX2019005748A (en) 2019-08-12
BR112015028253A2 (en) 2017-07-25
ES2871823T3 (en) 2021-11-02
CN105209909A (en) 2015-12-30
CA2911204C (en) 2023-03-28
EP3546940A1 (en) 2019-10-02
EP2997366A1 (en) 2016-03-23
EP2997366B1 (en) 2018-10-10
US20160116486A1 (en) 2016-04-28
US10539575B2 (en) 2020-01-21
CA3184836A1 (en) 2014-11-20
JP6595984B2 (en) 2019-10-23
MX365061B (en) 2019-05-22
MX2015015561A (en) 2016-02-05
AU2014265669B2 (en) 2020-05-14
EP2997366A4 (en) 2017-04-12
US20200103417A1 (en) 2020-04-02
AU2014265669A1 (en) 2015-12-24
ES2702123T3 (en) 2019-02-27
EP3546940B1 (en) 2021-02-17
CN105209909B (en) 2019-06-07
EP3410115A1 (en) 2018-12-05
CN110196335A (en) 2019-09-03
HK1222905A1 (en) 2017-07-14
JP2016520192A (en) 2016-07-11
HK1218331A1 (en) 2017-02-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20200103417A1 (en) Biomarkers related to kidney function and methods using the same
Zhang et al. Metabolomics in diabetes
EP3129909B1 (en) Small molecule biochemical profiling of individual subjects for disease diagnosis and health assessment
EP3151665B1 (en) Methods and systems for determining autism spectrum disorder risk
US20170370954A1 (en) Biomarkers for Fatty Liver Disease and Methods Using the Same
Snowden et al. Application of metabolomics approaches to the study of respiratory diseases
CA2853202A1 (en) Biomarkers for kidney cancer and methods using the same
US20160091480A1 (en) Methods and systems for determining autism spectrum disorder risk
JP7179356B2 (en) Diagnosis of Behçet&#39;s disease using metabolite analysis
WO2013188333A1 (en) Biomarkers related to nephrotoxicity and methods using the same
Liang et al. Serum metabolomics uncovering specific metabolite signatures of intra-and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
JP6128631B2 (en) Marker for distinguishing diabetic nephropathy and use thereof
Pereira et al. Paper spray mass spectrometry combined with machine learning as a rapid diagnostic for chronic kidney disease
US20180252706A1 (en) Novel biomarkers for diagnosis and progression of primary progressive multiple sclerosis (ppms)
WO2014074821A1 (en) Metabolic profiling in tissue and serum is indicative of tumor differentiation in prostate cancer
CN115219727B (en) Metabolites associated with cushing&#39;s syndrome diagnosis
CA2875331A1 (en) Methods for diagnosing chronic valvular disease
CN116990405A (en) Marker for predicting curative effect of ketamine on treating depression, screening method and application thereof
WO2015050783A1 (en) Biomarkers for kidney cancer and methods using the same

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 14797070

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2911204

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 14889930

Country of ref document: US

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: MX/A/2015/015561

Country of ref document: MX

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2016514016

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112015028253

Country of ref document: BR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2014797070

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2014265669

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20140513

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112015028253

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20151110