WO2014079601A1 - Optimisation de familles d'équipement - Google Patents

Optimisation de familles d'équipement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014079601A1
WO2014079601A1 PCT/EP2013/069087 EP2013069087W WO2014079601A1 WO 2014079601 A1 WO2014079601 A1 WO 2014079601A1 EP 2013069087 W EP2013069087 W EP 2013069087W WO 2014079601 A1 WO2014079601 A1 WO 2014079601A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
quality criterion
families
setup
printed circuit
circuit board
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2013/069087
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Alexander Pfaffinger
Christian Royer
Original Assignee
Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft filed Critical Siemens Aktiengesellschaft
Publication of WO2014079601A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014079601A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05K—PRINTED CIRCUITS; CASINGS OR CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OF ELECTRIC APPARATUS; MANUFACTURE OF ASSEMBLAGES OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
    • H05K13/00—Apparatus or processes specially adapted for manufacturing or adjusting assemblages of electric components
    • H05K13/08—Monitoring manufacture of assemblages
    • H05K13/085—Production planning, e.g. of allocation of products to machines, of mounting sequences at machine or facility level

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an automatic assembly line for the assembly of printed circuit boards with components.
  • the invention relates to the determination of an assignment of PCB types to Studst breed.
  • An assembly line is set up to assemble a printed circuit board with a number of components. It is possible to differentiate between a variant production and a Festrüstungsfertigung.
  • the PCBs to be produced are divided into setup families ("clusters") for a short planning horizon (about 1-5 days) .
  • a setup family is a quantity of printed circuit boards that can be produced with a predetermined number of components on the assembly line The amount of component types needed for this will be
  • Armor called and is usually included in a set of shuttle tables.
  • a changing table is usually upgraded in the pre-equipment for the assembly of printed circuit boards with components matching types of components and subsequently disarmed.
  • the removal and subsequent upgrading of all changeover tables of a production line in the pre-assembly area requires processing times in the range of about 6-10 hours.
  • Variant production is used in particular for so-called "high mix low volume" assembly, ie when frequently changing printed circuit boards are to be populated in short runs.
  • a subset that is assigned to a set-up family is selected from a number of jobs each relating to the loading of a predetermined number of boards of a board type.
  • the corresponding armor is upgraded and the circuit boards are populated while already the Setup family is determined, which is then to be populated. It happens that the placement line is finished with the placement of the current setup family before the armor upgrade for the following setup family has been completed. In this case, the placement line must be stopped, which can be associated with additional costs.
  • the object of the invention is to perform an assignment of PCB types to Jost pregnancy such that production stoppages of the assembly line are minimized.
  • the invention solves this problem by means of a method, a computer program product and a control device having the features of the independent claims. Subclaims give preferred embodiments again.
  • a method for assigning circuit board types to setup families comprises steps of detecting setup families, detecting circuit board types, detecting an assignment of the circuit board types to the setup families, the assignment being optimized with respect to a first quality criterion, determining a second quality criterion of the assignment wherein the second quality criterion is different from the first quality criterion, and changing the assignment of the board types to the setup families to optimize the association with respect to a second quality criterion.
  • an assignment of PCB types to Jost pregnancy that has already been created by conventional means with respect to a first quality criterion can be optimized in a separate step. Processing problems that can arise while optimizing both quality criteria, in particular excessive complexity of the problem or processing, can be avoided in this way.
  • the separate optimization with respect to the second quality criterion can be based on an already proven optimization method with respect to the first quality criterion can be built so that proven processing means or sub-methods can be used.
  • the modification is performed such that the first quality criterion is at least met. This can ensure that a real improvement of the assignment can be achieved by the described change. Changing the assignment with regard to the second quality criterion is thus possible without risk.
  • the first quality criterion may involve a minimization of the number of setup families.
  • a minimized set-up family is a common optimization criterion.
  • the setup families can be re-optimized with regard to their production times.
  • the second quality criterion relates to a maximization of the production times for a subset of the set-up families.
  • the production times of selected setup families can be maximized. Since the sum of production times remains unchanged across all set-up families, production times of other set-up families must be reduced.
  • a set-up family with a long production time can advantageously be realized as a fixed-arm set-up family for which armor remains firmly equipped on a number of changeover tables. Expenses and costs when changing the set-up can be reduced.
  • the second quality criterion relates to an exceeding of a predetermined threshold value by the production times of each set-up family.
  • the production times of the set-up families can thus be better balanced. In particular, it can be ensured that the production time of each set-up family is longer than it usually takes to upgrade the armament of a time-dependent set-up family. A standstill of the assembly line to wait for the completion of the set-up work can be avoided.
  • the second quality criterion relates to maximizing the number of jobs in a subset of setup families. This can improve the formation of festivals.
  • quantities for mounting the printed circuit boards of the printed circuit board types of the setup families are again recorded and the second quality criterion relates to maximizing the number of printed circuit boards to be loaded in a subset of the setup families.
  • the circuit boards of the thus maximized setup families can be equipped more efficiently.
  • quantities of printed circuit boards of the printed circuit board types of the setup families and, in addition, placement positions of all printed circuit boards to be assembled are also detected.
  • the second quality criterion relates to a maximization of the placement positions in a subset of the set-up families.
  • the changing comprises a pairwise exchange of board types between setup families. lien. Properties of the original set-up families can remain unchanged. In particular, the number of setup families can remain the same. In a further embodiment, the changing comprises remapping a board type to another setup family.
  • changing the assignment comprises optimizing with respect to the second quality criterion by means of a mixed integer optimization model.
  • a mixed integer optimization model is also called an IP model.
  • IP model it is characterized by the fact that not only a local, but a global optimization can be carried out with it, so that a found assignment can not be surpassed by another, not found assignment.
  • the assignment of at least one circuit board type to a set-up family is fixed for optimizing with regard to the second quality criterion.
  • the complexity of the optimization with regard to the second quality criterion can thereby be reduced.
  • a deemed beneficial assignment can be made immutable in this way.
  • a computer program product comprises program code means for carrying out the method described, when it runs on an execution device or is stored on a computer-readable medium.
  • a control device for the assignment of printed circuit board types to a set-up family is set up to carry out the method described above.
  • Fig. 1 an assembly system
  • Fig. 2 is an illustration of the formation of setup families for the placement line of Fig. 1;
  • 3 is a flowchart of a method for allocating
  • FIG. 1 shows an equipping system 100.
  • the equipping system 100 comprises one or more equipping lines 110 and a control device 115.
  • the control device 115 allocates circuit board types 122, whose associated circuit boards 120 are to be loaded on the equipping line 110, to a setup family 124.
  • a set-up family 124 is a set of circuit board types 122 whose printed circuit boards 120 can be populated on a placement line 110 without requiring a change in the configuration of the assembly line 110, particularly with respect to blanked components.
  • Each placement line 110 includes an optional transport system 125 and one or more placement machines 130.
  • Each placement machine 130 includes one or more placement heads 135.
  • Each placement machine 130 has a number of change tables 140, each of which includes a predetermined number of feeders 150. Instead of a shuttle table 140, another swap body can be used, such as a change car.
  • the changing tables 140 each include a plurality of feeders 150, of which only one is shown by way of example in FIG. Each feeder 150 maintains a supply of devices 155 of a predetermined type of device 160.
  • the shuttle table 140 has a capacity that is usually expressed in tracks.
  • a track is usually 8 mm wide and the number of tracks of each shuttle table 140 is limited, for example to 40.
  • Components 155 of the same type of component 160 are usually provided in a belt, on a tray or in a tube.
  • Each component type 160 comprises a plurality of components 155 which are interchangeable with respect to the printed circuit board 120, for example resistors having the same resistance value, the same load carrying capacity and the same design.
  • the components 155 are arranged in their respective packaging in a suitable feeder 150.
  • Each type of device 160 requires a mating feed device 150 that requires a predetermined number of tracks on the change table 140, which tracks are usually required to be adjacent to each other.
  • Each feeder 150 may be configured to maintain different components 155 and, typically, different feeders 150 may be attached to a shuttle table 140.
  • Each placement head 130 is configured to receive a component 155 from a shuttle table 140 and deposit it at a predetermined position on the circuit board 120.
  • the printed circuit board 120 is usually stationary on the transport system 125 with respect to the automatic placement machine 130. If a printed circuit board 120 is required which requires a component 155 of a type of component 160 which is not present on one of the shuttle tables 140, it is customary not to provide a feed device 150 on one of the mounted shuttle tables 140 with the required components 155, but rather the shuttle table 140 is completely replaced by another, already equipped with the appropriate components 155 shuttle table 140.
  • the changeover table 140 to be loaded must have been previously upgraded accordingly with components 155. This process is called pre-installation and may require an hourly processing time. Since a change of change tables 140 on the placement line 110 is usually associated with a production stoppage, the aim is to carry out the changeover tables 140 that is as rare as possible. For equipping a predetermined amount of printed circuit boards
  • armor 165, 170 may be formed, each containing inventories of devices 155 of predetermined device types 160, such that each circuit board 120 of the set may be fully populated with components 155 of the armor 165, 170.
  • An armor 165, 170 may be realized by a number of shuttle tables 140 having predetermined supplies of components 155. In the illustration of FIG. 1, a hardshell 165, whose shuttle tables 140 are mounted on the line of delivery 110, and a variant arm 170, whose shuttle tables 140 are arranged separately in a Vorrüst Scheme of the production line 110 provided.
  • the armor 165, 170 are wholly or partially interchangeable on the placement line 110. There may also be other armor 165, 170 may be provided.
  • FIG. 2 shows an illustration 200 of the formation of
  • Each job 205 is associated with a board type 122. Furthermore, further indications may optionally be provided, in particular a quantity 210 of printed circuit boards 120 of the printed circuit board type 122, a production time 215 of a printed circuit board 120 on the assembly line 110 of FIG. 1 or a number of placement positions 220 indicating how many components 155 are represented by the placement line 110 are to be loaded on each circuit board 120.
  • a number of set-up families 124 are formed, in the representation of FIG. 2, by way of example, three set-up families 124.
  • the assignment of printed-circuit board types 122 to set-up families 124 takes place with respect to a first quality criterion.
  • the first quality criterion relates to the number of setup families 124. The fewer set-up families 124 are formed, the better the assignment with respect to the first quality criterion is optimized.
  • the assignment with respect to the first quality criterion is at least not worsened. In the given example, therefore, after the change in the assignment, no more than three setup families should be indicated, to which the printed circuit board types 122 of all jobs 205 are assigned.
  • the second quality criterion is determined on the basis of production times.
  • the second quality criterion can be found in a first may be formed to represent maximizing the production times of a subset of setup families 124.
  • the second quality criterion can reflect whether the production times of all setup families 124 exceed a predetermined threshold; these two variants can also be combined, so that the production times of a subset of setup families 124 are maximized as long as the production times of all Set-up families 124 are at least as large as the predetermined threshold.
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow diagram of a method 300 for assigning circuit board types 122 to setup families 124.
  • the method 300 is set up in particular for running on the processing device 115 in FIG.
  • a first step 305 jobs 205 corresponding to the representation of FIG. 2 are detected.
  • a subsequent step 310 an assignment of printed circuit board types 122 to setup families 124 is determined according to a first quality criterion.
  • a subsequent step 315 the particular allocation and optionally further information is provided.
  • the steps 305 to 315 may be performed, for example, by means of an allocation device provided for this purpose. Alternatively, the steps may be performed integrated with the subsequent steps, in particular on the same allocation device 115.
  • step 320 the information provided in step 315 is captured.
  • further information can be acquired in a subsequent step 325, in particular those that are included in the orders 205.
  • a second quality criterion is determined for each of the setup families acquired in step 320.
  • the assignment of board types 122 to setup families 124 is optimized with respect to a second quality criterion.
  • the second quality criterion differs from the first quality criterion and can be formed in several different ways. In one embodiment, the second quality criterion may be formed based on production times 215 of setup families 124.
  • the second quality criterion may also include maximizing the sum of the numbers 210 of populating boards 120 or the placement positions 220 for a subset of the setup families 124.
  • the modification in step 335 is performed such that the first quality criterion is at least no worse than the allocation after step 310.
  • one or more constraints may be considered. For example, properties of the shuttle tables 140 that are to carry an armor 165, 170 of the setup families 124 may be taken into account.
  • a step 340 for example, a fixed assignment of a predetermined component type 160 to a predetermined changeover table 140 can be taken into account.
  • a maximum filling level of a shuttle table can be taken into account.
  • a step 350 it may further be considered that a subset of board types 122 should be assigned to the same setup family 124. Conversely, it may also be considered in a step 355 that a subset of circuit boards 122 should be assigned to different setup families 124.
  • Changing the assignment in step 335 is preferably done by means of a mixed integer program (integer program).
  • individual board types 122 are selectively swapped between the existing setup families 124 to change the association, or from a make family 124 reassigned to another. If the second quality criterion improves as a result, it is possible to further optimize on the basis of the changed assignment, otherwise it can be discarded in order to carry out a different confidence.
  • step 360 it is checked whether the second quality criterion with respect to the assignment changed in step 335 exceeds a threshold value. As long as this is not the case, step 335 can be iterated again until a sufficiently good association has been found. Changing the assignment can also be scheduled in order to prevent overoptimization, which may not be solved.
  • an assignment of component types 160 to changeover tables 140 can be determined. This association can also be performed implicitly in step 335.
  • the changed assignment of board types 122 to setup families 124 is output.
  • an automatic optimization can be used, for example on the basis of a local search method or a metaheuristic algorithm.
  • an IP model Integer Program or Mixed Integer Optimization Model
  • linear optimization deals with the optimization of linear objective functions over a set that is constrained by linear equations and inequalities.
  • the linear optimization is the basis of the solution methods of the (mixed) integer linear optimization.
  • Width c Space consumption of a type of building element c in tracks Cap d Number of traces of device types used in the
  • VxodTime r Production time of the module type in the planning time
  • Assign rcl has the value 1 if a board type r is the
  • Setup c cl has the value 1, if the component type c in the
  • Setup families 124 can be performed as follows maximize Z - ⁇ ProdTime r Assign r cl

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Microelectronics & Electronic Packaging (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Factory Administration (AREA)

Abstract

Procédé de classement de types de cartes de circuits imprimés en familles d'équipement, qui comporte les étapes consistant à recenser des familles d'équipement, à recenser un classement des types de cartes de circuits imprimés en familles d'équipement, ledit classement étant optimisé en fonction d'un premier critère de qualité, à déterminer un deuxième critère de qualité du classement, le deuxième critère de qualité étant différent du premier critère de qualité, et à modifier le classement des types de cartes de circuits imprimés en familles d'équipement, pour optimiser le classement en fonction d'un deuxième critère de qualité, le premier critère de qualité étant respecté.
PCT/EP2013/069087 2012-11-21 2013-09-16 Optimisation de familles d'équipement WO2014079601A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102012221259.0A DE102012221259A1 (de) 2012-11-21 2012-11-21 Optimieren von Rüstfamilien
DE102012221259.0 2012-11-21

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014079601A1 true WO2014079601A1 (fr) 2014-05-30

Family

ID=49182255

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2013/069087 WO2014079601A1 (fr) 2012-11-21 2013-09-16 Optimisation de familles d'équipement

Country Status (2)

Country Link
DE (1) DE102012221259A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2014079601A1 (fr)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016074851A1 (fr) * 2014-11-11 2016-05-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Équipement de cartes à circuit imprimé
WO2018036622A1 (fr) * 2016-08-24 2018-03-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Procédé et dispositif de détermination de tailles de lots optimales
CN110495264A (zh) * 2017-03-31 2019-11-22 西门子股份公司 用于在多条拾取和放置线上以优化产量的方式生产印刷电路板的方法和控制装置
US11363750B2 (en) 2017-01-31 2022-06-14 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and control device for the throughput-optimised production of printed circuit boards on a pick-and-place line

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107114007B (zh) 2014-12-26 2019-12-17 株式会社富士 电子元件供给系统
DE102015206741A1 (de) 2015-04-15 2016-10-20 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Bildung von Rüstfamilien für ein Bearbeitungssystem mit einer Werkzeugmaschine
JP6660959B2 (ja) * 2015-11-04 2020-03-11 株式会社Ｆｕｊｉ 部品実装システムおよび部品実装装置
CN112785100B (zh) * 2019-11-05 2023-10-31 富联精密电子(天津)有限公司 产品检测阈值设定装置、方法及计算机可读存储介质

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10047381A1 (de) * 2000-09-25 2002-04-18 Siemens Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betreiben einer Anlage der Grundstoffindustrie
DE102009013353B3 (de) * 2009-03-16 2010-10-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Verfahren zur Bestimmung von Rüstungen für konstante Tische von Bestückautomaten
DE102011076565B4 (de) * 2011-05-26 2014-06-12 Siemens Ag Zuordnung von Leiterplatten auf Bestücklinien

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
EPO: "Mitteilung des Europäischen Patentamts vom 1. Oktober 2007 über Geschäftsmethoden = Notice from the European Patent Office dated 1 October 2007 concerning business methods = Communiqué de l'Office européen des brevets,en date du 1er octobre 2007, concernant les méthodes dans le domaine des activités", JOURNAL OFFICIEL DE L'OFFICE EUROPEEN DES BREVETS.OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE.AMTSBLATTT DES EUROPAEISCHEN PATENTAMTS, OEB, MUNCHEN, DE, vol. 30, no. 11, 1 November 2007 (2007-11-01), pages 592 - 593, XP007905525, ISSN: 0170-9291 *

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016074851A1 (fr) * 2014-11-11 2016-05-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Équipement de cartes à circuit imprimé
US10327370B2 (en) 2014-11-11 2019-06-18 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Population of printed circuit boards
WO2018036622A1 (fr) * 2016-08-24 2018-03-01 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Procédé et dispositif de détermination de tailles de lots optimales
CN109844794A (zh) * 2016-08-24 2019-06-04 西门子股份公司 用于确定最优的批量大小的方法和设备
US11157840B2 (en) 2016-08-24 2021-10-26 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and device for determining optimum batch sizes
US11363750B2 (en) 2017-01-31 2022-06-14 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and control device for the throughput-optimised production of printed circuit boards on a pick-and-place line
CN110495264A (zh) * 2017-03-31 2019-11-22 西门子股份公司 用于在多条拾取和放置线上以优化产量的方式生产印刷电路板的方法和控制装置
CN110495264B (zh) * 2017-03-31 2021-11-16 西门子股份公司 用于以优化产量的方式生产印刷电路板的方法和控制装置
US11395448B2 (en) 2017-03-31 2022-07-19 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Method and control device for the throughput-optimized production of printed circuit boards on a plurality of pick-and-place lines

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102012221259A1 (de) 2014-05-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2014079601A1 (fr) Optimisation de familles d'équipement
EP2829166B1 (fr) Formation de groupes d'installation sur des lignes de placement
EP2893791B1 (fr) Formation de familles d'ensembles de composants fixes à monter sur des circuits imprimés
EP2842402B1 (fr) Affectation de cartes de circuits imprimés sur des lignes de montage
EP2829165B1 (fr) Affectation de cartes de circuits imprimes sur des lignes de montage
EP2839727B1 (fr) Affectation de cartes de circuits imprimes sur des lignes de montage
EP3180969B1 (fr) Équipement de cartes à circuit imprimé
EP3170378B1 (fr) Équipement de cartes à circuit imprimé
WO2014079600A1 (fr) Optimisation de familles d'équipement
DE102011076565A1 (de) Zuordnung von Leiterplatten auf Bestücklinien
EP3207778B1 (fr) Procédé et systeme d'équipement de cartes de circuit imprimé et produit programme d'ordinateur pour mettre en uvre le procédé
DE102015200420A1 (de) Verfahren und System zur Bestückung von Leiterplatten
EP3616482B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande pour la production à durée de passage optimisée de cartes de circuits imprimés sur une ligne de montage
EP3556191B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande pour la production à rendement optimisé de cartes de circuits imprimés sur une ligne de montage
DE10044516A1 (de) Prozeßausrüstungsauswahlsystem und Auswahlverfahren für Prozeßausrüstung
EP3474650B1 (fr) Procédé d'élaboration d'un ensemble d'adaptation pour une machine de montage de composants
DE102015212327B4 (de) Verfahren, Vorrichtung und Computerprogrammprodukt für eine Bestückungslinie
EP3375270A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif d'attribution de modules à des lignes de placement
EP3581006B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande pour la production à rendement optimisé de cartes de circuits imprimés sur plusieurs ligne de montage
EP4309477A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande pour identifier au moins une installation fixe pour une ligne de montage
WO2023160904A1 (fr) Procédé mis en oeuvre par ordinateur pour déterminer un sous-ensemble de types d'assemblage d'un ensemble prédéterminé de types d'assemblage et configuration fixe modifiée associée
EP4228386A1 (fr) Procédé mis en uvre par ordinateur destiné à la détermination d'au moins une famille d'équipement fixe de types carte de circuit imprimé pour un nombre prédéterminé de groupes d'au moins une ligne d'assemblage
EP4228385A1 (fr) Procédé mis en uvre par ordinateur de détermination d'une affectation optimale des types de module à une ligne de montage sélectionnée en fonction de son performance de montage
EP3871480A1 (fr) Procédé de détermination de familles d'équipement d'une ligne d'équipement destinée à l'équipement de cartes de circuits imprimés avec des composants électroniques

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 13762821

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 13762821

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1