WO2013173394A2

WO2013173394A2 - Method for increasing accuracy in quantitative detection of polynucleotides

Info

Publication number: WO2013173394A2
Application number: PCT/US2013/041031
Authority: WO
Inventors: Chunlin Wang; Jian Han
Original assignee: Cb Biotechnologies, Inc.
Priority date: 2012-05-14
Filing date: 2013-05-14
Publication date: 2013-11-21
Also published as: PT2850211T; CA2873585C; CA2873585A1; EP2850211B1; EP2850211A2; WO2013173394A3; EP2850211A4; US20150132754A1; ES2899687T3

Abstract

Disclosed is a method for improving the sensitivity and accuracy of quantitative detection of polynucleotides in a sample, such a clinical specimen, by a method that utilizes a two- or three-step process of tagging/labeling target molecules and adding an adapter sequence for adding a universal primer for efficient amplification of targets while decreasing target amplification bias. When combined with the step of statistically correcting for sequencing errors, the method can significantly increase the accuracy of quantitative detection of polynucleotides in a sample.

Description

METHOD FOR INCREASING ACCURACY IN QUANTITATIVE DETECTION OF

POLYNUCLEOTIDES

Field of the Invention

[0001] The invention relates to methods for quantitative detection of polynucleotides in a mixed sample of polynucleotides. More particularly, the invention relates to methods for increasing accuracy of quantitation of PCR amplification products. Background of the Invention

[0002] Quantitation of DNA, RNA, and gene products is important in a variety of applications— most notably in the areas of microbial and viral detection in clinical samples and in analyzing clinical samples for immunodiversity. Determining the relative numbers of a potentially disease-causing bacteria, for example, could be useful in the clinical setting for providing information regarding patient status, disease progression, likelihood of progression to disease, etc. Quantitation of T cell receptor expression, B cell antibody production, etc., may provide insight into the status of an individual's immune system, the presence or absence of disease, and the progression of change that may be indicative of disease— or even lead to disease.

[0003] When evaluating the immune system, researchers are faced with a vast array of diversity and potentially very low copy numbers of targets. Determining the relative amounts of each target (e.g., T cell receptor, B cell antibody) can be a daunting task. Antigen receptors displayed by B cells and T cells have two major parts: B cells have heavy and light chains, and most T cells have a and β chains. Estimates are that the human body contains approximately 10¹⁰ lymphocytes, each with a unique combination of gene segments that specify the variable region, the part of the receptor that binds antigen. Each person has an individualized immune repertoire, shaped by three key factors: (1) the genetic polymorphism at the MHC loci; (2) the antigen exposure history; and (3) the constant regulation and modulation of the immune system. Humans are capable of generating 10¹⁵ or more different B and T cells, although not all of these 10¹⁵ B or T cells are present at any given time, due to the history of exposure to various antigens and the process of negative selection during the maturation of immune cells.

[0004] Random recombination of heavy-chain segments {V_H, D_H, and J_H) and light- chain segments {V_K and or ν_λ and Λ) produces V_HDH)_H (heavy chain) and V _K or\/_K}_K (light chain) coding units in B cells, and a similar process occurs in T cells. Adding to variable- region diversity is the random deletion of nucleotides at V, D and J segments in the junction position and the random insertion of nucleotides into the regions between the DJ and VD segments in heavy chain or the regions between the VJ segments in light chain.

[0005] One method for quantitating gene expression is to isolate RNA from the samples to be compared, quantitate the RNA by UV spectrophotometry or with a fluorescent dye, and then use equal mass amounts of RNA in real-time RT-PCR. However, RNA quantitation is prone to error from machine or pipette mis-calibration, or dilution, and these methods often require sample dilution for accurate measurement. For samples in which there is already a very low copy number, or at least a relatively low copy number, given the overall numbers of targets, this is very problematic. Furthermore, spectrophotometry cannot be used to detect such small quantities of RNA. It generally takes at least 10⁴ cells to produce enough RNA for accurate quantitation by this method. Using a fluorescent dye can increase sensitivity up to 100-fold, but for many applications even that level of sensitivity is not enough. [0006] Next-generation sequencing technologies have provided opportunities to significantly increase the sensitivity of quantifying DNA and/or RNA targets. Various methods have been developed to improve increasing accuracy of quantification of different polynucleotides in a sample with mixed polynucleotides, including such methods as competitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), described in U.S. Patent Number 5,213,961 and deep barcode sequencing using unique molecular identifiers (UMI), as described by Smith et al. (Smith, A.M., "Quantitative Phenotyping via Deep Barcode Sequencing," Genome Research (2009) 19: 1836-1842).

[0007] Unique molecular identifiers, or molecular barcodes, provide an advantage in quantifying copy numbers in a sample. However, if UMI are involved in more than the first round of PCR, the same UMI may be introduced into different targets, resulting in counting errors. Also, the UMI method works based on an ideal, but unrealistic, situation— that is, where both PCR and sequencing technologies are both perfect and no errors are introduced. The UMI strategy operates on the assumption that both PCR and sequencing steps report the underlying targets and UMI fragments free-of-error. However, this is an erroneous assumption because those errors in both PCR and sequencing are inevitable. However, every current sequencing platform is subject to sequencing errors. Two very popular platforms each have error rates of around one percent. When large numbers of sequences are obtained, this sequencing error can create a significant number of artificial targets.

[0008] What are needed are methods for improving accuracy of quantification of different polynucleotides in a sample with mixed polynucleotides. Summary of the Invention

[0009] The present invention relates to a method for increasing accuracy and sensitivity of quantitative detection of target polynucleotides in a sample with different polynucleotides, the method comprising the steps of (a) labeling a target polynucleotide with a unique molecular identifier and a universal primer binding site to produce at least one labeled target polynucleotide; and (b) amplifying the at least one labeled polynucleotide using at least one universal primer to produce multiple copies of the labeled target polynucleotide. The method may be performed by incorporating into a substantial number of individual target sequences in a pool of target sequences at least one randomly- generated sequence comprising from about 4 to about 15 randomly-generated nucleotides, the at least one randomly-generated sequence forming a unique molecular identifier for an individual target sequence, and a universal adapter sequence (i.e., a primer binding site for a universal primer) to form a target /UMI/adapter polynucleotide; attaching the U Ml/universal adapter sequence to the target in a reverse transcription (RT) reaction at 50-60 degree Celsius for RNA targets (A), a primer extension reaction at 50-60 degree Celsius for DNA targets (B), or a ligation reaction for pre-selected DNA targets (C); and attaching a second universal adapter to the product of the previous step (A) or (B) by a DNA extension reaction at approximately 70 degree Celsius, and amplifying, with universal primer, products with the universal primer binding site attached at both ends at a temperature of approximately 70 degree Celsius.

[0010] In various aspects of the method, the first step of attaching to a target sequence a unique molecular identifier and an adapter sequence is performed by ligation, DNA extension or reverse transcription. In various aspects, the first step using DNA extension or reverse transcription is performed at a temperature of from about 50 to about 60 degrees Celsius. In various aspects, the second step of the method is performed at a temperature of from about 65 to about 75 degrees Celsius.

[0011] Aspects of the invention involve performing the first step of the method by reverse transcription or DNA extension, using a target-specific primer which comprises a unique molecular identifier sequence of from about 4 to about 15 nucleotides and an adapter sequence. In other aspects, a unique molecular identifier of from about 4 to about 15 nucleotides and a universal binding site are added to a target sequence by ligation.

[0012] In various aspects of the invention, the method is performed as an automated method in a closed cassette. The method may also further comprise the steps of sequencing the products produced the amplification step and removing artifacts through statistical filtering. The statistical filtering includes estimating the context-specific error rate based on control DNA sequencing, grouping sequences differing in a single position, assessing the error rate based on the context of the different position, applying a Poisson model to estimate the probability of the sequence with smaller count to be random error and removing those with a probability greater than 0.001 of being random error.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0013] Figure 1 is a plot of the coding capacity of random sequences of various length allowing 0.5% of targets labeled with the same random sequence. The plot is based on data from 10 simulation experiments.

[0014] Figure 2 is a diagram of steps to label a target with a unique molecular identifier (UMI), and subsequent amplification steps. For an RNA target (Left panel A), the UMI is introduced by reverse-transcriptase through a reverse-transcription (RT) step where the gene-specific primer is designed with melting temperature (Tm) at between 50 and 60 degrees Celsius. For double-stranded DNA molecules, if specific regions of DNA molecules only are the targets, a UMI (center panel B) is introduced through chain-extension by DNA polymerase with gene-specific primers, which are designed with Tm at between about 50 and about 60 degrees Celsius. After a first step of labeling, a second gene-specific primer and universal primers are added to the reaction with thermostable DNA polymerase. Both the second gene-specific primer and universal primers are designed with Tm greater than 70 degrees Celsius. For pre-selected DNA targets, UMIs are introduced through ligation, where a double adaptor with UMI is ligated to target molecules and UMIs are introduced to a target at both ends. The UMI-labeled targets are then amplified before sequencing.

[0015] Figure 3 is a context-specific error pattern derived from control DNA sequences determined by the Illumina hiSeq2000 platform. For each row, the height (width) of pattern -filled blocks show the error rate of the last of the triplet changed to either A, C, G or T.

[0016] Figure 4 Panel A shows the formula for estimating the odds of whether a minor sequence is generated through artifact, where n is the count of minor sequence in a group, and N the count of major sequence in the same group, λ is the expected mean number of sequences identical to the minor sequence, which is computed as λ= Ν*μ, where μ is the estimated error rate from GCA-GCT in panel B and GCA-GCG in panel C. If the value of P is less than 0.001, it is unlikely that the minor sequence is due to artifacts. Panel B gives an example of a minor sequence with the count 878 being considered as artifact as the value of P is 0.989, which is beyond the 0.001 probability/random error threshold. And panel C gives an example of minor sequences with the count 2698 being considered as authentic as the value of P is 7.4e-12, less than 0.001. [0017] Figures 5A and 5B are photographs of gels containing PCR amplification products produced by the method of the invention. The first four lanes of Figure 4A contain products generated using universal primers and the 2^nd four lanes contain products generated using primers for adding a UMI sequence and adapter sequence during RT-PCR, but under the higher temperature conditions of the 2^nd/3^rd steps of the method. This illustrates that contamination by UMI tagging primers may be avoided using the 3-step method of the invention. The lanes of Figure 4B contain amplification products generated using primers designed for amplification under higher-temperature conditions of the 2^nd and 3^rd steps of the method.

[0018] Figure 6 is a drawing illustrating the steps of adding to a target sequence a unique molecular identifier and an adapter sequence (A); performing a first amplification step using at least one forward primer which comprises an adapter sequence and a universal primer binding site sequence (B); and performing a second amplification step using at least one universal primer (C).

[0019] Figure 7 illustrates the benefit of UMI labeling of targets using the method of the invention. Targets in the pool of amplification produced by the present method are sequenced, generally using high-throughput, next-generation sequencing methods. In an ideal situation, each original template (I.A) is labeled with unique UMI (II.A) and sequenced free-of-error (III.A), where the count of the original templates is the same as the count of the combination of target and UMI. If UMIs are too short and with limited coding capacity, the same UMI might be attached to different templates, which will inevitably result in underestimation of the count of the original templates (II.B). If UMIs are attached to targets as they have been amplified, the number of UMIs attached targets is greater than the count of original templates, resulting in over-estimation of the count of certain targets (II. C). If sequencing is not free of error, error could occur in targets, UMI or both. Error occurring in targets results in over-estimation of the count of distinct templates. Error occurring in the UMI region results in over-estimation of the count of certain targets (III. B). With the inventors' statistical filtering technique, those sequencing errors can be detected and removed, which will restore the correct count of distinct targets and the count of each target.

Detailed Description

[0020] The inventors have developed a method for increasing the accuracy of detecting the numbers of polynucleotides of substantially the same sequence in a mixed sample of polynucleotides, which may be used in analyses as diverse as those of the immune repertoire, microbiome, gene expression profiling, miRNA profiling, copy number variations, and even prenatal diagnosis of trisomies and drug resistance mutation detections (such as low copy number HIV drug resistance mutation detections).

[0021] The invention provides a method for increasing accuracy of quantitative detection of polynucleotides, the method comprising the steps of (a) labeling a target polynucleotide with a unique molecular identifier and a universal primer binding site to produce at least one labeled target polynucleotide; and (b) amplifying the at least one labeled polynucleotide using at least one universal primer to produce multiple copies of the labeled target polynucleotide. The method may be performed by incorporating into a substantial number of individual target sequences in a pool of target sequences at least one randomly-generated sequence comprising from about 4 to about 15 randomly-generated nucleotides, the at least one randomly-generated sequence forming a unique molecular identifier for an individual target sequence, and a universal adapter sequence (i.e., a primer binding site for a universal primer) to form a target /U Ml/adapter polynucleotide; attaching the U Ml/universal adapter sequence to the target in a reverse transcription (RT) reaction at 50-60 degree Celsius for RNA targets (A), a primer extension reaction at 50-60 degree Celsius for DNA targets (B), or a ligation reaction for pre-selected DNA targets (C); and attaching a second universal adapter to the product of the previous step (A) or (B) by a DNA extension reaction at approximately 70 degree Celsius, and amplifying, with universal primer, products with the universal primer binding site attached at both ends at a temperature of approximately 70 degree Celsius.

[0022] Accurate determination of the composition and quantification of different polynucleotides of varying frequencies in a complex genetic pool is important in a variety of applications— most notably in the areas of microbial and viral detection in clinical samples and in analyzing clinical samples for immunodiversity. Recently, a new method based on deep barcoding or unique molecular identifiers (UMI), as described by Smith et al. (Smith, A.M., "Quantitative Phenotyping via Deep Barcode Sequencing," Genome Research (2009) 19: 1836-1842), has shown promise for decreasing the counting bias introduced during amplification and sequencing. Briefly, each target in a pool is labeled with a unique barcode by covalently attaching a random sequence of a certain length (barcode) to a target polynucleotide before amplification and sequencing. The combination of barcode and target then works as a proxy for the target during amplification and is ultimately sequenced together. At the final step, the unique combination of barcode and target is counted only once. By doing so, the bias introduced during both the amplification stage and the sequencing stage can be suppressed due to the large coding capacity of random sequences of a certain length, which is about 4^N (if N is the length of barcode (UMI), for example, the coding capacity of random sequences of the length of 10 is 4¹⁰= 1048576). However, there are three prerequisites for the success of this approach: 1) UMIs have to be long enough to provide sufficient coding capacity so that no two identical targets are labeled with the same UMI; 2) UMIs have to be introduced to target sequences before the amplification steps; and 3) both UMIs and target sequences have to be sequenced without errors. The first requirement can be met by using longer UMIs. The inventors have addressed the second requirement by developing a method that incorporates UMIs in a two-step PCR reaction. The inventors address the third requirement by introducing a new statistical approach to correct for sequencing errors. By combining both methods, they make the UMI strategy more practically useful and increase the accuracy for profiling polynucleotides in a complex genetic pool.

[0023] For an RNA target, a UMI is introduced into a target through reverse- transcription (RT) using reverse-transcriptase (Figure 2, left panel A). A gene-specific primer, UMI, and a universal adaptor are synthesized to form one single molecule, where the annealing temperature between the gene-specific primer and a target is designed to be between 50 and 60 Celsius degree. After the RT step, a second gene-specific primer attaching to a second universal adaptor, universal primer is added to reaction, where the annealing temperature between the second gene-specific primer and targets is designed beyond 70 Celsius degree. The second annealing and extension temperature is set to 70 Celsius degree. After this step, a PCR reaction is performed at 95 degrees C for 15 seconds, and 72 degrees for 30-40 cycles.

[0024] For DNA targets embedded in large DNA molecules, a UMI is introduced into the target through a regular primer extension step with DNA polymerase (Figure 2, center panel B). A gene-specific primer UMI and a universal adaptor are synthesized in one single molecule, where the annealing temperature between the gene-specific primer and targets is designed between 50 and 60 degrees Celsius. After the primer extension reaction, a second gene-specific primer attaches to a second universal adaptor, and universal primer is added to reaction, the annealing temperature between the second gene-specific primer and targets designed to be above 70 degrees Celsius. The second annealing and extension temperature is set at about 70 degrees Celsius. After this step, a PCR reaction is performed at 95 degrees C for 15 seconds, and 72 degrees C for 30-40 cycles.

[0025] For fragmented DNA targets, UMI may be added using a ligation reaction. Double-stranded UMI and universal adaptors are ligated to targets directly. Universal primers are then added to the reaction and a PCR reaction is performed at 95 degrees C for 15 seconds, and 72 degrees C for 30-40 cycles. Universal primers are designed to bind 4-6 bases away from the completely random UMI sequences as our pilot study showed that the first 4 bases after the primer region are important for PCR efficiency.

[0026] The UMI strategy, when used in the absence of the added steps provided by the inventors, operates on the assumption that both PCR and sequencing steps report the underlying target and UMI fragment free of error. However, this is an incorrect assumption because errors in both PCR and sequencing are inevitable. It is commonly known that the three popular next-generation sequencing platforms on the market today (Illumina HiSeq, Life Technologies Ion Torrent PGM and 454 FLX system) produce sequences with significant numbers of sequencing errors. Figure 3 plots the error pattern of the bench-top version of the three platforms.

[0027] For profiling sequences in a complex genetic pool such as 16S rRNA sequencing and immunodiversity studies, the distribution of templates in a sample varies. Sequencing artifacts inevitably distort the result of profiling of nucleic acids in a genetic pool by sequencing. For instance, errors in the UMI region cause an over-estimation of the count of corresponding targets and those errors in the target sequences cause an over-estimation of the number of different targets in the genetic pool. After studying the error patterns of multiple sequencing attempts, several patterns stand out. First,the error rate of any next- generation sequencing platforms is in the range between 0.1% and 5%. Second, errors occur differently in different contexts (i.e., errors are context-specific). Figure 3 shows a context- specific error pattern by the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform.

[0028] To suppress artifacts introduced by both PCR and sequencing, the inventors developed a statistical method for identifying those artifacts. This method comprises the steps of 1) estimating error rates by mixing with amplification products of UMI-labeled targets a small amount of control DNA, the sequence of which has been previously determined, sequencing both target and control together, and comparing sequences amplified from control DNA with known sequences, to estimate context-specific pattern of error; 2) organizing target sequences by counting the distribution of unique sequences, where any two unique sequences are grouped if the two sequences differ in a single position; and 3) estimating the odds of the minor sequence in a group of artifacts according to the Poison model (figure 4A).

[0029] The inventors noted that if the random label segment is 15 nucleotides in length, it can randomly create about 10756894 unique molecular identifiers to label about 99.5% of around 10⁷the target polynucleotides.

[0030] The term "a target polynucleotide" is used often herein, but it is to be understood that multiple target polynucleotides generally exist within any clinical sample. These may represent sequences derived from, for example, the same or different bacteria, T cells, B cells, viruses, etc. The term, therefore, encompasses labeling of as many single target polynucleotides as can effectively be labeled within a sample. In some cases, such as in the case of immunorepertoire analysis, target polynucleotides may easily number in the millions. Ultimately, UMI-labeled target polynucleotides comprising copies of the same DNA sequences will be individually labeled with different barcodes, each barcode being counted only once to provide a more accurate representation of the numbers of copies of target polynucleotides in a sample. It is therefore important to introduce the UMI label into the method so that it will not be utilized to prime subsequent amplifications and introduce amplification bias into the sample.

[0031] The method of the invention may be performed very effectively using a closed cassette and automated methods such as those described in United States Patent

Application Publication Number 20100291668A1. The type of quantitation for which the method of the invention is especially useful (/.e., highly diverse targets, low copy numbers in samples) is also especially sensitive to the risk of contamination, which will negatively impact accurate quantitation. The closed system created by the cassette disclosed in United States Patent Application Publication Number 20100291668A1 significantly reduces the risk of contamination, while increasing the efficiency with which many samples may be processed.

[0032] When using the automated method described in United States Patent Application Publication Number 20100291668A1, a cassette is insertable into a base machine ("base unit") that operably interfaces with the cassette to provide the necessary movement of a series of parts designed to provide up-and-down vertical movement, horizontal back-and- forth movement, and fluid handling by a cassette pipette which operates within the confines of the area bounded by the top, bottom, ends, and sides of the cassette, these parts being referred to as a cam bar, a lead screw, and a pipette pump assembly, respectively. It is also possible to provide a mechanism that allows the movement of the cassette pipette in any direction in the x-y-z plane, or to allow for circular/rotary movement throughout the enclosed cassette.

[0033] At least one of the reagent chambers in the cassette may form a PCR reaction chamber for performing the desired first amplification step (PCRl) and second amplification step (PCR2) of the present invention. Such a reaction chamber may be constructed of different diameter, depth, and wall thickness than other reagent chambers. For example, a reaction chamber preferably will be a thin-walled chamber to aid in thermal conduction between external thermocyclers located in the base unit and the fluid within the reaction chamber. The walls should be tapered so as to easily fit into the thermocycler and make thermal contact with thermocycler without adhering to its surface. The reaction chamber should be of a depth and shape that allows for its fluid volume to be positioned inside the thermocycler. The depth of the PCR chamber should be compatible with the vertical motion of the cassette pipette. Preferably, the chamber will also be accessible to a user's pipette tip if inserted into the chamber through the casette's fill port, and the material used to form the PCR chamber may be optically clear so that the user can see when the pipette tip has reached the bottom of the chamber.

[0034] Barcodes, or Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs), allow quantitation of PCR products. However, the inventors' experiments with simple addition of UMI sequences in controlled assays in which the number of beginning targets and the relative concentrations of each were known demonstrated that simply adding the UMIs does not give an accurate assessment of the number of targets in, for example, a clinical sample obtained from a human or animal. They hypothesized that utilization of the primers needed for incorporation of the UMI sequences into target-derived polynucleotides could result in additional rounds of amplification in which certain UMIs were added to more than one target. This could result in UMIs representing multiple targets, but being counted as part of a single target, artificially inflating the numbers of some targets. They proposed to develop a method in which tagging/labeling of the target molecules would be performed in a first step, with subsequent steps being designed to limit the influence of the UMI-containing primers so that any primers that remained in the mix would not label additional molecules to an appreciable extent. Counting of products occurs as shown in Fig. 7, where targets may be separated according to their respective sequences and may be quantitated by the numbers of UMIs associated with them in the resulting sequencing results.

[0035] The method they designed utilizes primers comprising target-specific sequences for promoting binding to targets to initiate primer extension, as well as randomly- generated UMIs and adapters. The purpose of the adapters is to form a binding site for primers used in next steps, those primers being used to add to resulting polynucleotides nucleotide sequences that form binding sites for universal primers, those primers being chosen for their ability to effectively promote amplification at temperatures of from about 65 to about 75 degrees C. When the primers comprising target-specific sequences are designed for use at lower temperatures, their influence can be limited in the subsequent amplification steps. By using universal primers in the third step (2^nd amplification step), amplification bias may be further limited.

[0036] Methods for designing primers having desired annealing temperatures are known to those of skill in the art. Methods for generating random nucleotide sequences that may be used as unique molecular identifiers have been described previously and are also known to those of skill in the art.

[0037] The present method may also comprise the step of removing a portion of the reaction mix, which contains the products of reverse transcription from the first step of the method, and using that portion for the second amplification reaction. This step may be used to further decrease the influence of the target-specific, UMI-labeled primers in the next two steps.

[0038] Sequencing methods, including next-generation high-throughput sequencing methods, are prone to errors, which may be limited to a small percentage— but may produce a significant and unacceptable level of variance when large numbers of nucleotides are sequenced. The method may also further comprise the steps of sequencing the products produced by steps a through c and correcting for sequencing errors using a statistical filtering step using formula I:

Particularly when used in the analysis of a human or animal immunorepertoire or the microbial population of, for example, the human intestine, the combination of individually labeling target molecules, semi-quantitatively amplifying those labeled molecules using the two-step amplification of the present invention, using universal primers to decrease amplification bias and improve amplification efficiency, and statistically correcting the sequencing results, will give a much more accurate result and allow a researcher to better determine the types and numbers of immune system cells, antibodies, bacteria, etc. that are present in a given sample.

[0039] The invention may be further described by means of the following non- limiting examples. Examples

[0040] The following primers were used to incorporating into each target sequence a unique molecular identifier: miIgHC_l: ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT NNNNNNNNNNNNNNTCTGACGTCAGTGGGTAGATGGTGGG (SEQ ID NO: 1); miIgHC_2: ACACTCTTTCCCTACACG ACGCTCTTCCG ATCTN NNNNNNNNNNNN NTCTG ACTGGATAG ACTG ATGGGGGTG (SEQ ID NO: 2); miIgHC_3: ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTT

CCGATCTNNNNNNNNNNN NN NTCTG ACGTGGATAGACAGATGGGGGT (SEQ ID NO: 3); m ilg HC_4: AC ACTCTTTCCCTAC ACG ACGCTCTTCCG ATCTN NNNNNNNNNNN N NTCTG ACAAGGGGTAGAGCTGAGGGTT (SEQ ID NO: 4); miIgHC_5:

ACACTCTTTCCCTACACG ACGCTCTTCCG ATCTN NNNNNNNNNNNN NTCT

GACTGGATAGACCGATGGGGCTG (SEQ ID NO: 5); miIgHC_6: ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGAC GCTCTTCCG ATCTN N NNNNNNNNNNN NTCTGACGGGGAAGACATTTGGG AAGG (SEQ ID NO: 6);

miIgHC_7:

ACACTCTTTCCCTACACG ACGCTCTTCCG ATCTN NNNNNNNNNNNN NTCTG ACAG A

GGAGGAACATGTCAGGT (SEQ ID NO: 7); and miIgHC_8: ACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTT CCGATCTN NNNNNNNNNNNN NTCTG ACGGGATAGACAGATGGGGCTG (SEQ ID NO: 8).

[0041] TMs of UMI segments targeted for use as annealing sequences were evaluated. Results are listed in Table 1, in order from lowest to highest TM.

Table 1

Templates containing UMIs were generated using reagents as shown in Table 2, under conditions as shown in Table 3.

Table 2

Table 3

[0042] A first primer sequence was synthesized (SEQ ID NO: 9:

AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTTCCCTACACGACGCTCTTCC, with bold print indicating the adapter sequence). A second primer sequence was also synthesized (SEQ ID NO: 10: CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATCGGTCTCGGCATTCCTGCTGAAC CGCTCTTCC (with bold print indicating the adapter sequence).

[0043] Illumina primers (SEQ ID NO: 11:

AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACACTCTTT CCCTACACGACGCTCTTCCGATCT and SEQ ID NO: 12: CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGATCGGT

CTCGGCATTCCTGCTGAACCGCTCTTCCGATCT) served as universal primers.

[0044] Primers were tested in both 2-step and 3-step PCR to determine how well they would perform in the method of the invention. Reaction conditions are shown in Tables 4, 5, and 6. Results are shown in Fig. 4A.

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

[0045] Universal primers were tested using the following combinations: (1) Sequence ID NO: 12 as forward primer, SEQ ID NO: 11 as reverse primer; (2) Sequence ID NO: 12 as forward primer, UMI primer 1 with SEQ ID NO: 11 as reverse primer; (3) Sequence ID NO: 12 as forward primer, UMI primer 2 with SEQ ID NO: 11 as reverse primer; (4) Sequence ID NO: 12 as forward primer, UMI primer 3 with SEQ ID NO: 11 as reverse primer; and (5) Sequence ID NO: 12 as forward primer, UMI primer 5 with SEQ ID NO: 11 as reverse primer. Results are shown in Fig. 4B.

Clear Errors Exist in Current Technology

[0046] The inventors began with 4 distinct clones, which were then spiked into a background sample at different concentrations. Following amplification and sequencing, results indicated that there were actually about 50,000 different clones in the sample, a 12,500-fold increase— and a very unacceptable result if the purpose of the work is to quantitate the amount of target DNA in order to evaluate a clinical sample.

Example of Use of Formula I for Evaluating Results

[0047] For VDJ sequencing, (1-5%) control DNA (e.g., PhiX DNA) was mixed with VDJ amplicons and all were sequenced together. Extract reads for control DNA were based on matches between reads and reference sequence for control DNA. Control DNA sequences were aligned to corresponding reference sequences. The context of specific error patterns were summarized by counting the difference in the alignment between reads and reference (control) DNA, estimating context-specific error rate. For example, if for a small (three nucleotide) fragment GCA, there are 1000 GCA's in all alignments: 991 GCA->GCA, 3GCA- >GCC, 2 GCA->GCG, 2 GCA->GCT, 1 GCA->GC- (deletion) and 1 GCA->GCAx (insertion, x is any one of A, C, G and T), then the error rate for GCA->GCC is 0.003, GCA- >GCG is 0.002 and GCA->GCT is 0.002, GCA->GC- is 0.001 and GCA->GCAx is 0.001.

[0048] For any two pairs of CDR3's (nucleotide sequences, for example A and B, and frequency(A) > frequency(B)) that are different in a single position (due to either mismatch, insertion or deletion), one can look up to the error rate calculated above according to the context of this difference. Assuming the sequence error is generated through a Poisson distribution, frequency(A) =N and frequency(B) = n, the probability that such B would occur n or more times if it were a sequencing error may be calculated using Formula I.

Formula I

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A method for increasing accuracy of quantitative detection of polynucleotides, the method comprising the steps of

a) labeling a target polynucleotide with a unique molecular identifier and a universal primer binding site to produce at least one labeled target polynucleotide; and

b) amplifying the at least one labeled polynucleotide using at least one universal primer to produce multiple copies of the labeled target polynucleotide.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein step a) is performed at a temperature of from about 50 to about 60 degrees Celsius.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein step b) is performed at a temperature of from about 65 to about 75 degrees Celsius.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of labeling is performed by reverse transcription.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of labeling is performed by ligation.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of

c) estimating error rates by amplifying a small amount of control DNA in step (b), sequencing both labeled target polynucleotide and control DNA together, and comparing sequences for control DNA with known sequences, to estimate a context-specific pattern of error;

d) counting the distribution of unique labeled target polynucleotide sequences, where any two unique sequences are grouped if the two sequences differ in a single position; and e) estimating the odds of detecting the presence of a minor sequence in a group of artifacts according to the Poison model using Formula I

Formula I where λ is the expected number of errors given N reads and is computed by λ = N · μ, and μ is the error rate per site estimated from the sequences of control DNA, with variants that give P < 0.001 considered unlikely to be sequencing errors.