WO2013106143A1 - Activity classification in a multi-axis activity monitor device - Google Patents
Activity classification in a multi-axis activity monitor device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2013106143A1 WO2013106143A1 PCT/US2012/068253 US2012068253W WO2013106143A1 WO 2013106143 A1 WO2013106143 A1 WO 2013106143A1 US 2012068253 W US2012068253 W US 2012068253W WO 2013106143 A1 WO2013106143 A1 WO 2013106143A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- activity
- activities
- motion sensors
- computer
- processor
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1113—Local tracking of patients, e.g. in a hospital or private home
- A61B5/1114—Tracking parts of the body
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1116—Determining posture transitions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1118—Determining activity level
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/112—Gait analysis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1123—Discriminating type of movement, e.g. walking or running
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1124—Determining motor skills
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
- G01R33/00—Arrangements or instruments for measuring magnetic variables
- G01R33/02—Measuring direction or magnitude of magnetic fields or magnetic flux
- G01R33/028—Electrodynamic magnetometers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0002—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to monitoring devices using sensors and more specifically to classifying activities utilizing such devices.
- Devices for providing inertial activity classification are utilized in a variety of environments. These devices can comprise of accelerometers. Typically the devices record or transmit data that are used for classifying activity based on features derived from accelerometer to a host device for processing.
- the present invention discloses a device.
- the device comprises one or more motion sensors and a memory configured to receive signals from the one or more motion sensors.
- the device further includes a processor in communication with the memory.
- the device includes a classification algorithm executed by the processor, the classification algorithm for identifying activities.
- the device also may include a memory unit to record data such as activity log and calorie count among other data.
- the sensor may include (Radio Frequency) RF module to wirelessly transmit the recorded data to the host either upon request or continuously.
- Figure 1 is a block diagram of a system that utilizes an activity classification algorithm in accordance with an embodiment.
- Figure 2A is a diagram of an activity classification system wherein more than one processor is operating in accordance with an embodiment.
- Figure 2B is a diagram of an activity classification system wherein more than one sensor is utilized in a wireless environment in accordance with an embodiment.
- Figure 3 illustrates an embodiment of an activity classification device to be worn as if it were a wrist watch.
- Figure 4 illustrates an example of an algorithm for a decision tree generation that is utilized to identify a plurality of activities.
- Figure 5 illustrates the power management process for accelerometer variance tracking in accordance with an embodiment.
- the present invention relates generally to monitoring devices and more specifically to classifying activities utilizing such devices.
- the following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements.
- Various modifications to the preferred embodiments and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.
- the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
- a system and method in accordance with the present invention describes an inertial activity classification device, comprising of any combination of sensors, such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, temperature sensor, pressure sensor, magnetometer, or microphone, and a method for classifying an activity based on features derived from inertial data, and the ability to continually report an activity derived from physical activity.
- sensors such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, temperature sensor, pressure sensor, magnetometer, or microphone
- the system and method improves the long-term viability of a multi-sensor inertial activity classification device by offering a decision scheme for power management, allowing the usage of relatively higher power devices, such as a gyroscope, for more accurate sensing and activity classification without the associated reduction in battery life.
- a system and method in accordance with an embodiment also provides an improvement in the accuracy of a device by being able to identify walking, jogging, and running phases of motion, for the purpose of increasing the relevance of the reported data for calorie counting purposes, and also to reject false positive "steps" in the counted number of steps.
- the identification of activities allows the device to more accurately track steps when walking, running, etc., while rejecting "steps" recorded during shaking, driving, or other inactive movements. Accordingly motion tracking information, such as number of steps to be reported at an appropriate time is allowed based on an activity.
- Figure 1 is a block diagram of a system 10 that utilizes an activity
- the system 10 includes a device 1 1 .
- the device 1 1 may include any type of mobile device including but not limited to, a eel! phone, a tablet PC, or other type of portable electronic device.
- the device 1 1 receives input data from a plurality of sensors such as one or more magnetometers 12, one or more acceierometers 14 and one or more gyroscopes 16.
- a plurality of sensors such as one or more magnetometers 12, one or more acceierometers 14 and one or more gyroscopes 16.
- the sensors 12, 14 and 16 are shown external to the device 1 1 , one of ordinary skill in the art readily recognizes that those sensors could be internal to the device 1 1 and that would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
- the device 1 1 includes memory 18 for storing data.
- sensors refer to magnetometer 12, accelerometer 14 or gyroscope 16.
- Data 20 stores data from the one or more sensors.
- Memory 18 also includes algorithm 100 in accordance with the present invention.
- Algorithm 100 may include software code for, but not limited to activity classification and sensor fusion.
- sensor fusion may include consolidating data from magnetometer 12, accelerometer 14 and gyroscope 16 and generating sensor fusion data.
- a processor 24 executes the algorithm 100 which operates on the data received from the sensors .
- the processor 24 provides the sensor fusion data 19 .
- the sensor fusion data 19 provides orientation information of the device.
- a system that utilizes an activity classification algorithm 100 in accordance with the present invention can take the form of an entirely hardware implementation, an entirely software implementation, or an implementation containing both hardware and software elements.
- this activity classification algorithm is implemented in software, which includes, but is not limited to, application software, firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
- the activity classification algorithm 100 can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system.
- a computer-usable or computer-readable medium can be any apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
- the medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium.
- Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk, and an optical disk.
- Current examples of optical disks include DVD, compact disk-read-only memory (CD-ROM), and compact disk - read/write (CD-R/W).
- an inertial activity classification device includes any combination of sensors, such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, temperature sensor, pressure sensor, magnetometer, or microphone, and an algorithm for classifying an activity based on features derived from inertial data, and the ability to continually report an activity derived from physical activity.
- sensors such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, temperature sensor, pressure sensor, magnetometer, or microphone
- an algorithm for classifying an activity based on features derived from inertial data and the ability to continually report an activity derived from physical activity.
- a system in accordance with an embodiment relies on multiple sensors and an activity classification algorithm in order to improve accuracy of the activity recognition results. The inclusion of a sensor has the effect of improving accuracy, stability, or algorithm performance.
- Figure 2A is a diagram of an activity classification system 100 wherein more than one processor is operating in accordance with an embodiment.
- components include one or more sensors 102, raw data 104, the activity classification algorithm 100, and one or more processors 108a-108n.
- the set of sensors could be any combination of a 1 , 2, or 3-axis accelerometer, a 1 , 2, or 3-axis gyroscope, a 1 , 2, or 3-axis magnetometer, a pressure sensor, a temperature sensor, and a microphone.
- FIG. 2B is a diagram of an activity system 150 wherein one or more sensors are utilized in a wireless environment in accordance with an embodiment.
- the activity stem includes two sensor systems 160a and 160b that communicate wirelessly to a host system 165.
- Host system 165 can be connected wirelessly to any number of sensor systems.
- sensor system 160a could be attached to an arm of a user and sensor system 160b could be could be coupled to a leg of the user.
- Each of the sensor systems 160a and 160b include a sensor 170a and 170b respectively for receiving activity data.
- Each of the sensors 170a and 170b is coupled to a processor 172a and 172b respectively which receives the activity data from the sensor.
- Each of the processors 172a and 172b then provides the data to its respective radio 174a and 174b.
- the radios 174a and 174b transmit the data wirelessly to the host system 165.
- the host system 165 comprises a wireless receiver 176 which receives the data from radios 174a and 174b and a processor 178 which executes the activity classification algorithm 100'.
- sensor systems and the host system can be connected by wires.
- the host system can reside on a sensor system and connect to other sensor systems.
- FIG. 3 illustrates an activity classification device 200 to be worn as if it were a wrist watch.
- Activity classification device 200 is strapped to a user and is designed for portable media devices.
- microcontroller within the device 200 collects data from the inertial sensors, such as a gyroscope and or accelerometer within the device 200, calculating a set of features from each data.
- a signal mean, standard deviation, energy, and entropy as calculated from signal sources; raw accelerometer magnitude, raw gyroscope magnitude, and calculated signals resulting from a set of libraries that provide data for motion processing, such as: linear world-frame acceleration (X, Y, Z), linear body-frame acceleration (X, Y, Z), angular world frame rate (X, Y, Z), angular body frame rate (X, Y, Z), utilizing the following calculators.
- Mean and standard deviation are simple measures of the average value, and typical variance of the source signal.
- Energy and Entropy are the result of measures of a frequency space transformation, using an FFT.
- Energy is a measure of the "energy” of a signal which results from frequency information (i.e. steady state or DC signals have energy of 0)
- Entropy also called “spectral entropy”
- these features can be calculated over a 10 second data collection period (approximately 1024 data points @ 100Hz data collection rate), using the following equations:
- signal features calculated within the device, or raw data 104 can be transmitted to a host device 108a-108n or other microcontroller based system, where the features can be calculated in real time.
- the processing power required is largely dominated by the ability to take an FFT of the signal. While not required for the present invention, the inclusion of the FFT based features improve the accuracy of the system and improve the
- Additional features may be added, based on the FFT results, or other transformations, i.e. Wavelet Transforms (used commonly in image compression technology), run length-encoding, differentiation, integration, or a combination of those techniques.
- Wavelet Transforms used commonly in image compression technology
- activities can be differentiated from one another for analyzing whether the user is wearing the device (or not), and detecting what activity the user is engaged in. For example, when the activity transitions between standing, to walking, to running, the values of features increase, and a simple rule can be created for a feature. If an accelerometer standard deviation is above some threshold A, then the user is assumed to be running; otherwise, if the
- FIG. 4 illustrates an example of an algorithm for a decision tree 400 generation that is utilized to identify a plurality of activities. To improve the performance and accuracy of the approach, modern machine learning and statistical processing techniques can be applied.
- the algorithm can be applied to previously classified sets of data collected during “walking ,” “running,” “stair climbing,” or a number of other activities that would not be associated with a step, such as “waving ,” “shaking ,” “sitting ,” “driving a car,” etc.
- algorithms such as C4.5 which uses a technique of choosing features to classify the data based on maximizing the information entropy gained by using a specific feature.
- a decision tree 400 can be generated to classify the current sensed features, calculated from the inertial sensor values, with a high degree of accuracy (typically above 95%).
- the decision tree 400 may be calculated on the device itself, or as a post or pre-process in which the decision tree 400 is classified based on previously collected data, then programmed or "hard coded” into the device itself.
- a user will have been "trained” into the classifier set, to maximize the performance and accuracy of user activity classification, although with a sufficient sample of similar users, "training” is not required. Including a multitude of users within a training set creates a generalized classifier, which improves performance of un-trained users.
- Clustering techniques involve computing the likelihood a current set of features matches a specific activity by comparing the relative "distance" between the feature groups. Such techniques have been successfully applied and tested in accordance with an embodiment.
- the system and method improves the long-term viability of a multi-sensor inertial activity classification device by offering a decision scheme for power management, allowing the usage of relatively higher power devices, such as a gyroscope, for more accurate sensing and activity classification without the associated reduction in battery life.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the power management process 500 for low power mode sensor variance tracking in accordance with an embodiment.
- the power management process 500 resides within the activity classification algorithm.
- the power management process 500 utilizes the set of sensors and their derived features that can be utilized to correctly classify activities with a high degree of accuracy.
- the power management process 500 can then be put in a low power mode until the low power mode sensors measure an activity transition.
- a low power mode refers to reducing the sampling data rate of sensors or placing the device in standby or shutting off one or more sensors that are being fed into the algorithm.
- low power is accomplished by placing the gyroscope in a standby mode.
- Sensor output magnitude, linear world frame acceleration, linear body acceleration, angular world frame rate, and angular body frame rate, are used for the activity classification step.
- the activity classification device operates in "Full Power Mode" where a gyroscope, an accelerometer, and a magnetometer (if present) collect data, and a microcontroller processes all relevant features. The device then performs activity classification based on clustering, decision tree, or other some other model with confidence, via step 502 where the activity is recognized.
- the device can store the current accelerometer values in 506 and then shut off the gyroscope, v, to enter a "Low Power Mode.” Confidence may be computed, via step 502 as the percentage of feature sets/samples identified as the current activity during a predetermined time period such as the last 10 seconds, or by distance from the current sample to the appropriate generated cluster, or other method.
- step 506 when in "Low Power Mode" the accelerometer is still active and collecting data.
- the values and associated features stored in step 506 are compared as to whether transitioning to a new activity, by comparing the variance between the current data and stored values when sensor fusion is turned off, via step 508.
- the value of the variance of accelerometer derived features is evaluated. If the variance is sufficiently large, the device will transition back to "full power mode", to classify the current (assumed to be different) activity, via step 510.lt is possible, and perhaps desirable, to also trigger the reclassification if the activity transitions to sub-activities (slower running/jogging as compared to sprint running), so levels can be chosen which allow for the activity transitions while maintaining a reasonable range of values where the sensor will remain off, thus saving power.
- sub-activities slower running/jogging as compared to sprint running
- the power management process is the equivalent of storing the low power mode features of an activity e.g. "running,” detecting a change in the low power mode features which would indicate a new activity. By comparing each feature independently, the likelihood of detecting a new trained activity with the power management process is high.
- the device By utilizing the power management process, the device will save power according to the amount of time a specific activity is maintained. "Sitting,”
- the activity classification process When the activity classification process is applied to a device, it allows a device carried by the user (attached to wrist, foot, hip, chest, etc., through various attachment techniques) to track different phases of activity, from stopped/standing to a slow walk, fast walk, jog, run, sprint, etc. and report them via an on-screen display or other indicator, as well as report analytically the calories burned for each of those activities.
- an application may run on the data, analyzing the step frequency and event.
- the application may choose to increment a step counter when a user is classified as "walking" or “running,” but may reject a user standing and shaking the pedometer up and down, or a device jostling loosely in the back of a vehicle, for example.
- the application of machine learning and activity classification allows an activity classification device to utilize a set of sensors, including accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, microphones, etc. by implementing a power management methodology based on the measured feature-space variance of any sensor, or combination of sensors.
- a lower power sensor or combination of sensors
- a larger set of sensors may be used for a short period of time to classify the activity.
- the application of machine learning and activity classification allow a typical digital pedometer to increase its level of accuracy and improve functionality, particularly for long-term data collection.
- An implementation in accordance with an embodiment requires certain training steps to be performed with the device, in recognizing the user (or a representative set of users) to analyze walking, running, standing, etc. For best results, a training step should be included to allow the end user to "classify" their own activities, so that their specific motion features might be correctly identified.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Physiology (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Condensed Matter Physics & Semiconductors (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Measurement Of The Respiration, Hearing Ability, Form, And Blood Characteristics Of Living Organisms (AREA)
Abstract
An activity classification device is disclosed. The activity classification device comprises one or more motion sensors and a memory configured to receive signals from the one or more motion sensors. The device further includes a processor in communication with the memory. Finally, the device includes a classification algorithm executed by the processor, the classification algorithm for identifying activities that a user is engaged in. The memory may also record a user's activity log, calorie count and an RF module, which transmits the recorded data to a host either upon request or continuously.
Description
ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION IN A MULTI-AXIS ACTIVITY MONITOR DEVICE CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001 ] This application claims the benefit under 35 USC 1 19(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61 /584,710, filed on January 9, 2012, entitled "ACTIVITY CLASSIFICATION IN A MULTI-AXIS ACTIVITY MONITOR DEVICE," which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates generally to monitoring devices using sensors and more specifically to classifying activities utilizing such devices.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Devices for providing inertial activity classification are utilized in a variety of environments. These devices can comprise of accelerometers. Typically the devices record or transmit data that are used for classifying activity based on features derived from accelerometer to a host device for processing.
[0004] However, it is important for power consumption to be limited in portable device applications such as laptops, tablets, smartphones and the like. Therefore what is desired is a system and method to provide an activity classification in a monitoring device that is accurate, low power, and cost effective. The present invention addresses such a need.
[0005] The present invention discloses a device. The device comprises one or more motion sensors and a memory configured to receive signals from the one or more motion sensors. The device further includes a processor in communication with the memory. Finally, the device includes a classification algorithm executed by the processor, the classification algorithm for identifying activities. The device also may include a memory unit to record data such as activity log and calorie count among other data. In an embodiment, the sensor may include (Radio Frequency) RF module to wirelessly transmit the recorded data to the host either upon request or continuously.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0006] Figure 1 is a block diagram of a system that utilizes an activity classification algorithm in accordance with an embodiment.
[0007] Figure 2A is a diagram of an activity classification system wherein more than one processor is operating in accordance with an embodiment.
[0008] Figure 2B is a diagram of an activity classification system wherein more than one sensor is utilized in a wireless environment in accordance with an embodiment.
[0009] Figure 3 illustrates an embodiment of an activity classification device to be worn as if it were a wrist watch.
[0010] Figure 4 illustrates an example of an algorithm for a decision tree generation that is utilized to identify a plurality of activities.
[001 1 ] Figure 5 illustrates the power management process for accelerometer variance tracking in accordance with an embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0012] The present invention relates generally to monitoring devices and more specifically to classifying activities utilizing such devices. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention and is provided in the context of a patent application and its requirements. Various modifications to the preferred embodiments and the generic principles and features described herein will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features described herein.
[0013] A system and method in accordance with the present invention describes an inertial activity classification device, comprising of any combination of sensors, such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, temperature sensor, pressure sensor, magnetometer, or microphone, and a method for classifying an activity based on features derived from inertial data, and the ability to continually report an activity derived from physical activity.
[0014] In an embodiment the system and method improves the long-term viability of a multi-sensor inertial activity classification device by offering a decision scheme for power management, allowing the usage of relatively higher power devices, such as a gyroscope, for more accurate sensing and activity classification without the associated reduction in battery life.
[0015] A system and method in accordance with an embodiment also provides an improvement in the accuracy of a device by being able to identify walking, jogging,
and running phases of motion, for the purpose of increasing the relevance of the reported data for calorie counting purposes, and also to reject false positive "steps" in the counted number of steps. The identification of activities allows the device to more accurately track steps when walking, running, etc., while rejecting "steps" recorded during shaking, driving, or other inactive movements. Accordingly motion tracking information, such as number of steps to be reported at an appropriate time is allowed based on an activity.
[0016] To describe the features of the present invention in more detail refer now to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying Figures.
[0017] Figure 1 is a block diagram of a system 10 that utilizes an activity
classification algorithm 100 in accordance with an embodiment. The system 10 includes a device 1 1 . The device 1 1 may include any type of mobile device including but not limited to, a eel! phone, a tablet PC, or other type of portable electronic device. The device 1 1 receives input data from a plurality of sensors such as one or more magnetometers 12, one or more acceierometers 14 and one or more gyroscopes 16. Although the sensors 12, 14 and 16 are shown external to the device 1 1 , one of ordinary skill in the art readily recognizes that those sensors could be internal to the device 1 1 and that would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
[0018] The device 1 1 includes memory 18 for storing data. In the described embodiment, sensors refer to magnetometer 12, accelerometer 14 or gyroscope 16. Data 20 stores data from the one or more sensors.. Memory 18 also includes algorithm 100 in accordance with the present invention. Algorithm 100 may include software code for, but not limited to activity classification and sensor fusion. In the
described embodiments, sensor fusion may include consolidating data from magnetometer 12, accelerometer 14 and gyroscope 16 and generating sensor fusion data. A processor 24 executes the algorithm 100 which operates on the data received from the sensors . The processor 24 provides the sensor fusion data 19 . The sensor fusion data 19 provides orientation information of the device.
[0019] A system that utilizes an activity classification algorithm 100 in accordance with the present invention can take the form of an entirely hardware implementation, an entirely software implementation, or an implementation containing both hardware and software elements. In one implementation, this activity classification algorithm is implemented in software, which includes, but is not limited to, application software, firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
[0020] Furthermore, the activity classification algorithm 100 can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer-readable medium can be any apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
[0021 ] The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk, and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include DVD, compact disk-read-only memory (CD-ROM),
and compact disk - read/write (CD-R/W). To describe the features of the present invention in more detail, refer now to the following description in conjunction with the accompanying Figures,
[0022] In an embodiment an inertial activity classification device includes any combination of sensors, such as an accelerometer, gyroscope, temperature sensor, pressure sensor, magnetometer, or microphone, and an algorithm for classifying an activity based on features derived from inertial data, and the ability to continually report an activity derived from physical activity. A system in accordance with an embodiment relies on multiple sensors and an activity classification algorithm in order to improve accuracy of the activity recognition results. The inclusion of a sensor has the effect of improving accuracy, stability, or algorithm performance.
[0023] Figure 2A is a diagram of an activity classification system 100 wherein more than one processor is operating in accordance with an embodiment. In an embodiment, components include one or more sensors 102, raw data 104, the activity classification algorithm 100, and one or more processors 108a-108n. The set of sensors could be any combination of a 1 , 2, or 3-axis accelerometer, a 1 , 2, or 3-axis gyroscope, a 1 , 2, or 3-axis magnetometer, a pressure sensor, a temperature sensor, and a microphone.
[0024] Such an activity could also be utilized in an embodiment where there are one or more sensors worn by a user on various parts of the body. Figure 2B is a diagram of an activity system 150 wherein one or more sensors are utilized in a wireless environment in accordance with an embodiment.
[0025] As is seen, the activity stem includes two sensor systems 160a and 160b that communicate wirelessly to a host system 165. Host system 165 can be
connected wirelessly to any number of sensor systems. In an example, sensor system 160a could be attached to an arm of a user and sensor system 160b could be could be coupled to a leg of the user. Each of the sensor systems 160a and 160b include a sensor 170a and 170b respectively for receiving activity data. Each of the sensors 170a and 170b is coupled to a processor 172a and 172b respectively which receives the activity data from the sensor. Each of the processors 172a and 172b then provides the data to its respective radio 174a and 174b. The radios 174a and 174b transmit the data wirelessly to the host system 165. The host system 165 comprises a wireless receiver 176 which receives the data from radios 174a and 174b and a processor 178 which executes the activity classification algorithm 100'.
[0026] In another embodiment, sensor systems and the host system can be connected by wires. In another embodiment, the host system can reside on a sensor system and connect to other sensor systems.
[0027] Figure 3 illustrates an activity classification device 200 to be worn as if it were a wrist watch. Activity classification device 200 is strapped to a user and is designed for portable media devices. In operation, a wearable module's
microcontroller within the device 200 collects data from the inertial sensors, such as a gyroscope and or accelerometer within the device 200, calculating a set of features from each data. In an implementation, included are a signal mean, standard deviation, energy, and entropy, as calculated from signal sources; raw accelerometer magnitude, raw gyroscope magnitude, and calculated signals resulting from a set of libraries that provide data for motion processing, such as: linear world-frame acceleration (X, Y, Z), linear body-frame acceleration (X, Y, Z),
angular world frame rate (X, Y, Z), angular body frame rate (X, Y, Z), utilizing the following calculators.
Accelerometer/Gyro Magnitude Equation 1
[0028] Mean and standard deviation are simple measures of the average value, and typical variance of the source signal. Energy and Entropy are the result of measures of a frequency space transformation, using an FFT. Energy is a measure of the "energy" of a signal which results from frequency information (i.e. steady state or DC signals have energy of 0), while Entropy (also called "spectral entropy") is a measure of how spread apart the signal frequencies are (lower value indicate fewer frequencies, while higher values indicate multiple frequencies present in the source signal. For example, these features can be calculated over a 10 second data collection period (approximately 1024 data points @ 100Hz data collection rate), using the following equations:
Mean =∑?=1— Equation 2
Energy Equation 4
Entropy =
Equation 5
[0029] Where n = number of samples within the collection period, and FFTx contains the elements of a Fast Fourier Transform of the original signal.
[0030] Referring back to Figure 2, in an embodiment, signal features calculated within the device, or raw data 104 can be transmitted to a host device 108a-108n or other microcontroller based system, where the features can be calculated in real time. The processing power required is largely dominated by the ability to take an FFT of the signal. While not required for the present invention, the inclusion of the FFT based features improve the accuracy of the system and improve the
performance of the pedometer feature.
[0031 ] Additional features may be added, based on the FFT results, or other transformations, i.e. Wavelet Transforms (used commonly in image compression technology), run length-encoding, differentiation, integration, or a combination of those techniques.
[0032] Using the features, activities can be differentiated from one another for analyzing whether the user is wearing the device (or not), and detecting what activity the user is engaged in. For example, when the activity transitions between standing, to walking, to running, the values of features increase, and a simple rule can be created for a feature. If an accelerometer standard deviation is above some threshold A, then the user is assumed to be running; otherwise, if the
accelerometer standard deviation is above threshold B, the user is assumed to be walking, else the user is assumed to be standing, and therefore no "steps" should be recorded, as they likely occur from another type of activity. With a collection of independent features for every 10 seconds of data collected, numerous rules can be created which identify an activity into one of those categories.
[0033] Figure 4 illustrates an example of an algorithm for a decision tree 400 generation that is utilized to identify a plurality of activities. To improve the performance and accuracy of the approach, modern machine learning and statistical processing techniques can be applied. For example, the algorithm can be applied to previously classified sets of data collected during "walking ," "running," "stair climbing," or a number of other activities that would not be associated with a step, such as "waving ," "shaking ," "sitting ," "driving a car," etc. There are published algorithms such as C4.5 which uses a technique of choosing features to classify the data based on maximizing the information entropy gained by using a specific feature.
[0034] Using the C4.5, a decision tree 400 can be generated to classify the current sensed features, calculated from the inertial sensor values, with a high degree of accuracy (typically above 95%). The decision tree 400 may be calculated on the device itself, or as a post or pre-process in which the decision tree 400 is classified based on previously collected data, then programmed or "hard coded" into the device itself. Ideally a user will have been "trained" into the classifier set, to maximize the performance and accuracy of user activity classification, although with a sufficient sample of similar users, "training" is not required. Including a multitude of users within a training set creates a generalized classifier, which improves performance of un-trained users.
[0035] Alternate algorithms exist (ID3, See5, K-means clustering, HMM's, etc.) which could be applied instead of the C4.5 technique to generate the decision tree. Clustering techniques involve computing the likelihood a current set of features matches a specific activity by comparing the relative "distance" between the feature
groups. Such techniques have been successfully applied and tested in accordance with an embodiment.
[0036] In an embodiment the system and method improves the long-term viability of a multi-sensor inertial activity classification device by offering a decision scheme for power management, allowing the usage of relatively higher power devices, such as a gyroscope, for more accurate sensing and activity classification without the associated reduction in battery life.
[0037] Figure 5 illustrates the power management process 500 for low power mode sensor variance tracking in accordance with an embodiment. In an embodiment, the power management process 500 resides within the activity classification algorithm. The power management process 500 utilizes the set of sensors and their derived features that can be utilized to correctly classify activities with a high degree of accuracy. The power management process 500 can then be put in a low power mode until the low power mode sensors measure an activity transition. In the described embodiments, a low power mode refers to reducing the sampling data rate of sensors or placing the device in standby or shutting off one or more sensors that are being fed into the algorithm. Typically, low power is accomplished by placing the gyroscope in a standby mode.
[0038] Sensor output magnitude, linear world frame acceleration, linear body acceleration, angular world frame rate, and angular body frame rate, are used for the activity classification step.
[0039] Referring back to Figure 5, first the activity classification device operates in "Full Power Mode" where a gyroscope, an accelerometer, and a magnetometer (if present) collect data, and a microcontroller processes all relevant features. The
device then performs activity classification based on clustering, decision tree, or other some other model with confidence, via step 502 where the activity is recognized.
[0040] Second, when the confidence level of the reported activity is sufficiently high, the device can store the current accelerometer values in 506 and then shut off the gyroscope, v, to enter a "Low Power Mode." Confidence may be computed, via step 502 as the percentage of feature sets/samples identified as the current activity during a predetermined time period such as the last 10 seconds, or by distance from the current sample to the appropriate generated cluster, or other method.
[0041 ] Third, when in "Low Power Mode" the accelerometer is still active and collecting data. The values and associated features stored in step 506 are compared as to whether transitioning to a new activity, by comparing the variance between the current data and stored values when sensor fusion is turned off, via step 508.
[0042] Fourth, the value of the variance of accelerometer derived features is evaluated. If the variance is sufficiently large, the device will transition back to "full power mode", to classify the current (assumed to be different) activity, via step 510.lt is possible, and perhaps desirable, to also trigger the reclassification if the activity transitions to sub-activities (slower running/jogging as compared to sprint running), so levels can be chosen which allow for the activity transitions while maintaining a reasonable range of values where the sensor will remain off, thus saving power.
[0043] The power management process is the equivalent of storing the low power mode features of an activity e.g. "running," detecting a change in the low power
mode features which would indicate a new activity. By comparing each feature independently, the likelihood of detecting a new trained activity with the power management process is high.
[0044] By utilizing the power management process, the device will save power according to the amount of time a specific activity is maintained. "Sitting,"
"Sleeping," "Standing," "Driving," or "Walking" can be assumed to last for several hours throughout the day, while short periods of heavy activity, such as: "Making dinner" or "Getting into the car" would be expected to require the gyroscope to be "on" for correct identification, but would last for much shorter amounts of time.
[0045] When the activity classification process is applied to a device, it allows a device carried by the user (attached to wrist, foot, hip, chest, etc., through various attachment techniques) to track different phases of activity, from stopped/standing to a slow walk, fast walk, jog, run, sprint, etc. and report them via an on-screen display or other indicator, as well as report analytically the calories burned for each of those activities.
[0046] Once the activity has successfully been classified, an application may run on the data, analyzing the step frequency and event. In an embodiment, the application may choose to increment a step counter when a user is classified as "walking" or "running," but may reject a user standing and shaking the pedometer up and down, or a device jostling loosely in the back of a vehicle, for example.
[0047] The application of machine learning and activity classification allows an activity classification device to utilize a set of sensors, including accelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers, pressure sensors, temperature sensors, microphones, etc. by implementing a power management methodology based on the measured
feature-space variance of any sensor, or combination of sensors. With the activity classification device, a lower power sensor (or combination of sensors) can be used to detected transitions between activities, while a larger set of sensors may be used for a short period of time to classify the activity.
[0048] The application of machine learning and activity classification allow a typical digital pedometer to increase its level of accuracy and improve functionality, particularly for long-term data collection. An implementation in accordance with an embodiment requires certain training steps to be performed with the device, in recognizing the user (or a representative set of users) to analyze walking, running, standing, etc. For best results, a training step should be included to allow the end user to "classify" their own activities, so that their specific motion features might be correctly identified.
[0049] Although the present invention has been described in accordance with the embodiments shown, one of ordinary skill in the art will readily recognize that there could be variations to the embodiments and those variations would be within the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, many modifications may be made by one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention.
Claims
1 . A device comprising:
one or more motion sensors;
a memory configured to receive signals from the one or more motion sensors;
a processor in communication with the memory; and
a classification algorithm executed by the processor; the classification algorithm for identifying activities that a user is engaged in.
2. The device of claim 1 , wherein the one or more motion sensors comprises any or any combination of one or more accelerometers, one or more gyroscopes, one or more magnetometers, one or more pressure sensors, one or more temperature sensors, one or more microphones, and one or more heart rate monitors.
3. The device of claim 1 , wherein the one or more of motion sensors is an integrated module on a single substrate.
4. The device of claim 2, wherein the processor executes a power management algorithm that utilizes the one or more accelerometers when the device is in a low power mode, and turns on at least one other motion sensor for accurate activity based on a signal from the one or more accelerometers.
5. The device of claim 1 , further comprising a step counter based on any combination of the identified activity or identified activity transitions, and reporting a number of steps.
6. The device of claim 1 , wherein the memory is configured to store an activity data.
7. The device of claim 6, further comprising a circuit which wirelessly transmits the activity data to a second device.
8. The device of claim 1 , wherein the classification algorithm includes estimating a calorie burn rate based on the identified activities.
9. The device of claim 1 , wherein the identified activities include any of sleeping, driving a car, bicycling, jogging, playing tennis, golfing, sitting, standing, walking, running, swim strokes, waving motions and moving hand in circles.
10. The device of claim 9, wherein the swim strokes comprise any of a breaststroke, a backstroke, and freestyle and the waving motions include any of a handshake, dribbling.
1 1 . A computer-implemented method for identifying activities of a device, the method comprising:
utilizing one or more motion sensors on the device to identify activities ; and utilizing a set of one or more motion sensors which operate in a low power mode to identify transitions between activities.
12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 1 , wherein set of one or more motion sensors comprises an accelerometer.
13. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 1 , wherein the utilizing one or more motion sensors comprises executing a classification algorithm to identify activities.
14. The computer implemented method of claim 13, which includes estimating a calorie burn rate based on the identified activities by the classification algorithm.
15. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, which includes utilizing the accelerometer in a low power setting to monitor user activity, and turning on at least one other motion sensor for accurate activity classification when a change of activity is detected by the accelerometer.
16. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 1 , wherein the identified activities include any of sitting, standing, walking, running, swim strokes, waving motions and moving hand in circles.
17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16, wherein the swim strokes comprise any of a breaststroke, a backstroke, and freestyle and the waving motions include any of a handshake, dribbling.
18. A computer program product containing program instructions for identifying activities of a device, the program instructions to be executed by a processor, the program instructions when executed comprising:
utilizing one or more motion sensors on the device to identify activities of the device; and
utilizing a set of one or more motion sensors which operate in a low power mode to identify transitions between activities.
19. The computer program product of claim 18, wherein the lower power set of motion sensors comprises an accelerometer.
20. The computer program product of claim 19, which includes utilizing the accelerometer in a low power setting to monitor user activity, and turning on at least one other motion sensor for accurate activity classification when a change of activity is detected by the accelerometer.
21 . The computer program product of claim 18, further comprising repeating the utilizing one or more motion sensors step to improve confidence level, accuracy, and performance of the device.
22. A system comprising:
at least one host device comprising a first processor; a first memory; a first wireless communication module; and a classification algorithm executed by the processor; the classification algorithm for identifying activities that a user is engaged in; and
a plurality of devices, each of the plurality of devices comprising one or more motion sensors; a second memory configured to receive signals from the one or more motion sensors; a second processor in communication with the second memory; and a second wireless communication module to communicate with the at least one host device via the first wireless communication module.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201280070591.9A CN104135911B (en) | 2012-01-09 | 2012-12-06 | Activity classification in multi-axial cord movement monitoring device |
EP12864829.2A EP2802255B1 (en) | 2012-01-09 | 2012-12-06 | Activity classification in a multi-axis activity monitor device |
KR1020147022152A KR101690649B1 (en) | 2012-01-09 | 2012-12-06 | Activity classification in a multi-axis activity monitor device |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201261584710P | 2012-01-09 | 2012-01-09 | |
US61/584,710 | 2012-01-09 | ||
US13/648,963 US11026600B2 (en) | 2012-01-09 | 2012-10-10 | Activity classification in a multi-axis activity monitor device |
US13/648,963 | 2012-10-10 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2013106143A1 true WO2013106143A1 (en) | 2013-07-18 |
Family
ID=48744499
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2012/068253 WO2013106143A1 (en) | 2012-01-09 | 2012-12-06 | Activity classification in a multi-axis activity monitor device |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11026600B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2802255B1 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101690649B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN104135911B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013106143A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101579380B1 (en) * | 2014-07-01 | 2015-12-22 | 한국과학기술원 | Method and System for Real-time Detection of Personalization Swimming Type |
Families Citing this family (59)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20160051167A1 (en) * | 2012-10-10 | 2016-02-25 | Invensense, Inc. | System and method for activity classification |
US9792836B2 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2017-10-17 | Truinject Corp. | Injection training apparatus using 3D position sensor |
EP2915157B1 (en) | 2012-10-30 | 2019-05-08 | Truinject Corp. | System for injection training |
WO2014085602A1 (en) * | 2012-11-29 | 2014-06-05 | Abbott Diabetes Care Inc. | Methods, devices, and systems related to analyte monitoring |
PL2967879T3 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2022-05-16 | Canary Medical Inc. | Devices, systems and methods for monitoring hip replacements |
US20150127298A1 (en) * | 2013-11-04 | 2015-05-07 | Invensense, Inc. | Activity detection and analytics |
TWI493334B (en) * | 2013-11-29 | 2015-07-21 | Pegatron Corp | Poewr saving method and sensor management system implementing the same |
US10517522B2 (en) * | 2013-12-18 | 2019-12-31 | Yang Soo Lee | System for measuring lower extremity muscle strength |
US9506761B2 (en) | 2014-01-10 | 2016-11-29 | Alcatel Lucent | Method and apparatus for indoor position tagging |
EP3111438B1 (en) | 2014-01-17 | 2018-12-19 | Truinject Medical Corp. | Injection site training system |
US10290231B2 (en) | 2014-03-13 | 2019-05-14 | Truinject Corp. | Automated detection of performance characteristics in an injection training system |
US9894424B2 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2018-02-13 | Scott Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for converting between protocols |
US10580281B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2020-03-03 | PB, Inc. | Tracking device system |
US10937286B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2021-03-02 | Pb Inc. | Radiobeacon data sharing by forwarding low energy transmissions to a cloud host |
US9892626B2 (en) * | 2014-06-10 | 2018-02-13 | Pb Inc. | Tracking device program |
US10979862B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2021-04-13 | Pb Inc. | Tracking device system |
US11799573B2 (en) * | 2014-06-10 | 2023-10-24 | PB, Inc. | Radiobeacon data sharing by forwarding low energy transmissions to a cloud host |
US9564774B2 (en) * | 2014-06-10 | 2017-02-07 | Pb Inc. | Reduced thickness tracking device |
US11792605B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2023-10-17 | PB, Inc. | Tracking device systems |
US11145183B2 (en) * | 2014-06-10 | 2021-10-12 | PB, Inc | Tracking device programs, systems and methods |
US9582080B1 (en) * | 2014-06-25 | 2017-02-28 | Rithmio, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for learning sensor data patterns for gesture-based input |
US10568549B2 (en) | 2014-07-11 | 2020-02-25 | Amer Sports Digital Services Oy | Wearable activity monitoring device and related method |
FI125723B (en) * | 2014-07-11 | 2016-01-29 | Suunto Oy | Portable activity monitoring device and associated process |
CN104167079A (en) * | 2014-08-01 | 2014-11-26 | 青岛歌尔声学科技有限公司 | Rescue method and device applied to multiple scenes |
WO2016047494A1 (en) * | 2014-09-22 | 2016-03-31 | 株式会社 東芝 | Device and system for measuring biological information |
US9683845B2 (en) * | 2014-09-26 | 2017-06-20 | Intel Corporation | Virtual gyroscope using dual magnetometers for electronic devices |
CN104463201B (en) * | 2014-11-28 | 2018-01-19 | 杭州华为数字技术有限公司 | A kind of identification driving condition, the method and device of driver |
CN107111963B (en) | 2014-12-01 | 2020-11-17 | 特鲁因杰克特公司 | Injection training tool emitting omnidirectional light |
CN106999106A (en) * | 2014-12-02 | 2017-08-01 | 皇家飞利浦有限公司 | The system and method for generating health data for the measurement result using wearable device |
EP3032455A1 (en) * | 2014-12-09 | 2016-06-15 | Movea | Device and method for the classification and the reclassification of a user activity |
US10197416B2 (en) | 2015-01-21 | 2019-02-05 | Quicklogic Corporation | Multiple axis wrist worn pedometer |
KR102390876B1 (en) | 2015-03-27 | 2022-04-26 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for recognizing a uers’s activity by using a accelerometer |
US10180339B1 (en) | 2015-05-08 | 2019-01-15 | Digimarc Corporation | Sensing systems |
WO2017051269A1 (en) * | 2015-09-26 | 2017-03-30 | Intel Corporation | Low power activity monitoring with adaptive duty cycle in a sensor hub |
KR20180107076A (en) | 2015-10-20 | 2018-10-01 | 트루인젝트 코프 | Injection system |
CN105534527B (en) * | 2015-12-01 | 2018-07-13 | 深圳还是威健康科技有限公司 | The recognition methods of intelligent wearable device special state and intelligent wearable device |
US9589219B1 (en) * | 2015-12-09 | 2017-03-07 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for magnetic stripe reading using mobile magnetometers |
ITUB20160119A1 (en) * | 2016-02-04 | 2017-08-04 | Teseo Srl | Private monitoring and assistance system for people, particularly the elderly or people with special or cognitive problems |
US20170232299A1 (en) * | 2016-02-13 | 2017-08-17 | Marquette Trishaun | Body Movement Tracking System |
US10552219B2 (en) | 2016-02-19 | 2020-02-04 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Computing resource management of computing devices |
US9986625B2 (en) | 2016-02-22 | 2018-05-29 | Hubbell Incorporated | Configurable lighting system |
WO2017151441A2 (en) | 2016-02-29 | 2017-09-08 | Truinject Medical Corp. | Cosmetic and therapeutic injection safety systems, methods, and devices |
US10648790B2 (en) | 2016-03-02 | 2020-05-12 | Truinject Corp. | System for determining a three-dimensional position of a testing tool |
WO2017151963A1 (en) | 2016-03-02 | 2017-09-08 | Truinject Madical Corp. | Sensory enhanced environments for injection aid and social training |
KR102455911B1 (en) * | 2016-03-23 | 2022-10-19 | 카나리 메디칼 아이엔씨. | Portable Reporting Processor for Alert Implants |
US10564177B2 (en) | 2016-08-01 | 2020-02-18 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System and method for user activity recognition using accelerometer |
JP6629485B2 (en) * | 2016-08-09 | 2020-01-15 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェKoninklijke Philips N.V. | Processing apparatus and method for determining walking motion of subject |
US10478703B2 (en) * | 2016-09-05 | 2019-11-19 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Information processing method, wearable apparatus, content reproduction device, content reproduction system, and content reproduction method |
KR102424320B1 (en) * | 2016-12-09 | 2022-07-25 | 아주대학교 산학협력단 | Method and apparatus for classifying user activities |
US10650703B2 (en) | 2017-01-10 | 2020-05-12 | Truinject Corp. | Suture technique training system |
US10269266B2 (en) | 2017-01-23 | 2019-04-23 | Truinject Corp. | Syringe dose and position measuring apparatus |
CN108245869B (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2020-03-06 | 北京顺源开华科技有限公司 | Swimming information detection method and device and electronic equipment |
US10559088B2 (en) | 2018-05-01 | 2020-02-11 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Extending previously trained deep neural networks |
US10901529B2 (en) * | 2018-07-19 | 2021-01-26 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | Double-tap event detection device, system and method |
US11678141B2 (en) | 2018-09-18 | 2023-06-13 | Pb Inc. | Hybrid cellular Bluetooth tracking devices, methods and systems |
US11184858B2 (en) | 2018-09-18 | 2021-11-23 | PB, Inc. | Bluecell devices and methods |
CN109907736A (en) * | 2019-04-25 | 2019-06-21 | 蔡文贤 | A kind of application method for distinguishing step counting type of sports and intensity on step counting software |
US20220236120A1 (en) * | 2019-06-24 | 2022-07-28 | Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg | Tactile Sensor and Method for Operating a Tactile Sensor |
US11006859B2 (en) | 2019-08-01 | 2021-05-18 | Toyota Motor North America, Inc. | Methods and systems for disabling a step-counting function of a wearable fitness tracker within a vehicle |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030226695A1 (en) * | 2000-05-25 | 2003-12-11 | Mault James R. | Weight control method using physical activity based parameters |
US20070293374A1 (en) | 2006-06-20 | 2007-12-20 | Idt Technology Limited | Swimming lap counter |
US20080171922A1 (en) * | 2002-10-09 | 2008-07-17 | Eric Teller | Method and apparatus for auto journaling of body states and providing derived physiological states utilizing physiological and/or contextual parameter |
US20080234935A1 (en) | 2007-03-23 | 2008-09-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | MULTI-SENSOR DATA COLLECTION and/or PROCESSING |
US20090233770A1 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2009-09-17 | Stephen Michael Vincent | Sports Electronic Training System With Electronic Gaming Features, And Applications Thereof |
US20100079291A1 (en) * | 2008-09-26 | 2010-04-01 | Muve, Inc. | Personalized Activity Monitor and Weight Management System |
US20100214216A1 (en) | 2007-01-05 | 2010-08-26 | Invensense, Inc. | Motion sensing and processing on mobile devices |
US20100305480A1 (en) | 2009-06-01 | 2010-12-02 | Guoyi Fu | Human Motion Classification At Cycle Basis Of Repetitive Joint Movement |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2003001340A2 (en) | 2001-06-22 | 2003-01-03 | Motion Sense Corporation | Gesture recognition system and method |
WO2004039462A1 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2004-05-13 | M.B.T.L. Limited | Monitoring sports |
US7715982B2 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2010-05-11 | M.B.T.L. Limited | Monitoring sports |
US7752544B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2010-07-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and apparatus for remote interactions |
US7606552B2 (en) | 2005-11-10 | 2009-10-20 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for activating an electronic device |
EP1785808B1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2014-10-01 | BlackBerry Limited | System and method for activating an electronic device |
JP4822208B2 (en) | 2006-02-08 | 2011-11-24 | セイコーインスツル株式会社 | Motion measurement device |
JP4918285B2 (en) * | 2006-05-24 | 2012-04-18 | シスメックス株式会社 | Biological organ function simulation system and program thereof |
WO2008143738A1 (en) * | 2007-05-18 | 2008-11-27 | Ultimate Balance, Inc. | Newtonian physical activity monitor |
CN101520815B (en) | 2008-07-05 | 2013-09-25 | 杭州义盛祥通信技术有限公司 | Individual sports management system and management method |
US8187182B2 (en) * | 2008-08-29 | 2012-05-29 | Dp Technologies, Inc. | Sensor fusion for activity identification |
CN101458739A (en) | 2008-11-21 | 2009-06-17 | 杭州义盛祥通信技术有限公司 | Student sport statistic evaluating and managing system and method |
WO2010083562A1 (en) * | 2009-01-22 | 2010-07-29 | National Ict Australia Limited | Activity detection |
-
2012
- 2012-10-10 US US13/648,963 patent/US11026600B2/en active Active
- 2012-12-06 CN CN201280070591.9A patent/CN104135911B/en active Active
- 2012-12-06 KR KR1020147022152A patent/KR101690649B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2012-12-06 WO PCT/US2012/068253 patent/WO2013106143A1/en active Application Filing
- 2012-12-06 EP EP12864829.2A patent/EP2802255B1/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20030226695A1 (en) * | 2000-05-25 | 2003-12-11 | Mault James R. | Weight control method using physical activity based parameters |
US20080171922A1 (en) * | 2002-10-09 | 2008-07-17 | Eric Teller | Method and apparatus for auto journaling of body states and providing derived physiological states utilizing physiological and/or contextual parameter |
US20070293374A1 (en) | 2006-06-20 | 2007-12-20 | Idt Technology Limited | Swimming lap counter |
US20100214216A1 (en) | 2007-01-05 | 2010-08-26 | Invensense, Inc. | Motion sensing and processing on mobile devices |
US20080234935A1 (en) | 2007-03-23 | 2008-09-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | MULTI-SENSOR DATA COLLECTION and/or PROCESSING |
US20090233770A1 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2009-09-17 | Stephen Michael Vincent | Sports Electronic Training System With Electronic Gaming Features, And Applications Thereof |
US20100079291A1 (en) * | 2008-09-26 | 2010-04-01 | Muve, Inc. | Personalized Activity Monitor and Weight Management System |
US20100305480A1 (en) | 2009-06-01 | 2010-12-02 | Guoyi Fu | Human Motion Classification At Cycle Basis Of Repetitive Joint Movement |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR101579380B1 (en) * | 2014-07-01 | 2015-12-22 | 한국과학기술원 | Method and System for Real-time Detection of Personalization Swimming Type |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2802255B1 (en) | 2020-08-05 |
EP2802255A4 (en) | 2015-12-16 |
KR101690649B1 (en) | 2016-12-28 |
KR20140116481A (en) | 2014-10-02 |
US20130179110A1 (en) | 2013-07-11 |
EP2802255A1 (en) | 2014-11-19 |
US11026600B2 (en) | 2021-06-08 |
CN104135911A (en) | 2014-11-05 |
CN104135911B (en) | 2017-06-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US11026600B2 (en) | Activity classification in a multi-axis activity monitor device | |
US10506990B2 (en) | Devices and methods for fall detection based on phase segmentation | |
US20220125322A1 (en) | Methods and Systems for Determining Abnormal Cardiac Activity | |
Reddy et al. | Using mobile phones to determine transportation modes | |
JP6445539B2 (en) | Dynamic sampling | |
EP3058443B1 (en) | Calculating pace and energy expenditure from athletic movement attributes | |
US10653339B2 (en) | Time and frequency domain based activity tracking system | |
CN105446480A (en) | Movement measure generation in a wearable electronic device | |
US10768196B2 (en) | Determine wearing position of a wearable device | |
WO2012119126A2 (en) | Apparatus, system, and method for automatic identification of sensor placement | |
KR101418333B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for recognizing user activity | |
CN112057066A (en) | Heart rate detection method, wearable device and computer storage medium | |
CN105574471B (en) | The recognition methods of the method for uploading, user behavior of user behavior data and device | |
Stewart et al. | Practical automated activity recognition using standard smartphones | |
US20220322999A1 (en) | Systems and Methods for Detecting Sleep Activity | |
Yamansavaşçılar et al. | Activity recognition on smartphones: Efficient sampling rates and window sizes | |
Sun et al. | Actdetector: Detecting daily activities using smartwatches | |
CN114341947A (en) | System and method for exercise type recognition using wearable devices | |
WO2018014432A1 (en) | Voice application triggering control method, device and terminal | |
Guiry et al. | Classification techniques for smartphone based activity detection | |
US11280634B2 (en) | System, method and article for counting steps using an accelerometer | |
Dimroci | AN ELECTRONIC SYSTEM TO ASSESS SLEEP DISORDERS | |
Wang et al. | Research on ensemble learning algorithm for fall detection | |
Sun | Achieving Smart Health with Mobile Devices |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 12864829 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2012864829 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20147022152 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |