WO2013017683A1 - Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte - Google Patents

Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2013017683A1
WO2013017683A1 PCT/EP2012/065237 EP2012065237W WO2013017683A1 WO 2013017683 A1 WO2013017683 A1 WO 2013017683A1 EP 2012065237 W EP2012065237 W EP 2012065237W WO 2013017683 A1 WO2013017683 A1 WO 2013017683A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
plant
rootstock
polynucleotide molecules
nucleic acid
scion
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/EP2012/065237
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Friedrich Kragler
Gregor Kollwig
Robert Hélène Ghislain DIRKS
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel BV
Original Assignee
Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel BV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to KR1020147004869A priority Critical patent/KR20140056294A/en
Priority to CA2842706A priority patent/CA2842706A1/en
Priority to EP12750554.3A priority patent/EP2739132B1/en
Priority to ES12750554.3T priority patent/ES2567290T3/en
Priority to CN201280038025.XA priority patent/CN103763917A/en
Priority to AU2012291976A priority patent/AU2012291976B2/en
Priority to BR112014002643A priority patent/BR112014002643A8/en
Priority to NZ619960A priority patent/NZ619960B2/en
Application filed by Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel BV filed Critical Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel BV
Priority to JP2014523340A priority patent/JP2014527406A/en
Publication of WO2013017683A1 publication Critical patent/WO2013017683A1/en
Priority to US13/774,584 priority patent/US20130219558A1/en
Priority to IL230493A priority patent/IL230493A/en
Priority to ZA2014/00434A priority patent/ZA201400434B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8287Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for fertility modification, e.g. apomixis
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8201Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
    • C12N15/8202Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation by biological means, e.g. cell mediated or natural vector
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8216Methods for controlling, regulating or enhancing expression of transgenes in plant cells
    • C12N15/8218Antisense, co-suppression, viral induced gene silencing [VIGS], post-transcriptional induced gene silencing [PTGS]
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8216Methods for controlling, regulating or enhancing expression of transgenes in plant cells
    • C12N15/8222Developmentally regulated expression systems, tissue, organ specific, temporal or spatial regulation
    • C12N15/823Reproductive tissue-specific promoters
    • C12N15/8231Male-specific, e.g. anther, tapetum, pollen

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for interfering with processes in the male meiocytes of a plant.
  • haploid gametes occurs via two meiotic divisions, during which the two parental genomes of the gamete-producing organism are recombined;
  • the first stage is most important: the formation of gametes, in particular male gametes, from meiocytes.
  • meiocytes In angiosperms the male gametes or microspores are formed inside anthers. They originate from diploid pollen mother cells (a type of meiocyte) that undergo meiosis, which encompasses two rounds of meiotic division.
  • diploid pollen mother cells a type of meiocyte
  • meiosis which encompasses two rounds of meiotic division.
  • the final result of meiosis is a set of four haploid microspores for each pollen mother cell, and these microspores each develop further by undergoing two mitotic divisions. The first of these divisions is
  • the timing of the second mitotic division varies greatly in the plant kingdom, and the second pollen mitosis can either occur prior to anthesis (as is the case in e.g. Arabidopsis and rice) , or after anthesis during pollen tube growth (e.g. in tomato and tobacco) .
  • angiosperm flowers can thus shed either tricellular (containing one vegetative nucleus plus two generative nuclei) or bicellular pollen grains (containing one
  • vegetative nucleus plus one generative nucleus .
  • Meiotic cell division is of fundamental importance during gamete formation, as it provides a means for
  • RNA-based silencing signals spread systemically to distant organs.
  • flowering plants use a specialized vascular system named phloem.
  • the phloem facilitates the directional transfer of small molecules such as ions, sugars, nucleotides, hormones, amino acids, and proteins from source (producing) tissues to sink (consuming) tissues.
  • small polynucleotide molecules typically RNA molecules with a size of 18 to 27 nucleotides
  • derived from specific gene products were shown to be present in the phloem sap and suggested to relocate following the source-sink flow.
  • PTGS - associated with siRNA - is reset by an unknown mechanism and is re-established in the following generation. PTGS-resetting seems to take place during meiosis and can be established again in gametes, as shown in studies on transposon activity in male gametophytes .
  • siRNAs targeting transposable element transcripts are activated in the vegetative nucleus and transferred into fertilizing sperm cells, where they down-regulate transposon activity.
  • an siRNA-mediated silencing machinery is active within pollen grains and fertilizing pollen tubes.
  • the PTGS mechanism is also functional in sporophytic tissues, as anther-specific genes could be silenced.
  • siRNA signals into strong sink tissues such as newly forming leaves.
  • meiocytes can be targeted with systemic polynucleotide signals from a transgenic rootstock, without rendering transgenic the shoot grafted thereon
  • scion or the meiocytes or microspores produced by the scion, or plants derived from these microspores.
  • the present inventors found how to interfere with
  • meiocytes (Dirks R et al, 2009, Plant Biotechnol J 7: 837- 845; Reverse Breeding: WO03/017753) .
  • a considerable drawback of this approach is the fact that the organism producing the male meiocytes, as well as at least 50% of the microspores produced after meiosis, are transgenic.
  • Such microspores can e.g. be used for the production of transgene-free doubled haploid plants (DHs) .
  • DHs transgene-free doubled haploid plants
  • haploid plants from microspores, such as in vitro microspore culture (regeneration of haploid plantlets from microspores, and subsequent genome doubling with e.g. colchicine), and the method disclosed in WO2011044132, which involves pollination of a haploid-inducer line, which after fertilisation eliminates the maternal chromosomes from the zygote, leading to the formation of viable seeds containing a haploid embryo that is genetically identical to the microspore used for pollination and fertilisation.
  • in vitro microspore culture regeneration of haploid plantlets from microspores, and subsequent genome doubling with e.g. colchicine
  • WO2011044132 which involves pollination of a haploid-inducer line, which after fertilisation eliminates the maternal chromosomes from the zygote, leading to the formation of viable seeds containing a haploid embryo that is genetically identical to the microspore used for pollination and fertilisation.
  • siRNA signals generated in a mature rootstock, can systemically penetrate and be active in apical sporogenic cells, in particular meiocytes. This was demonstrated by grafting a non-transgenic scion onto a transgenic rootstock harbouring an RNAi construct and producing siRNA molecules, and by observing silencing phenotypes of genes in the male meiocytes formed by the non- transgenic scion. Such systemic siRNA molecules targeting meiotic tissue can thus affect gene expression in the progeny .
  • siRNA molecules generated from the RNAi construct in the transgenic rootstock, can thus be
  • RNA molecules generated from these constructs can subsequently be forced to enter into the male meiocytes and effect gene silencing therein, or interfere in another way with transcripts or genomic material in these meiocytes.
  • siRNA polynucleotide
  • siRNA molecules are preferentially targeted towards the anthers and the
  • meiocytes therein whereas the female meiocytes (megaspore mother cells contained in the ovary) do not receive the siRNA signal.
  • This invention can be applied to interfere with all molecular processes that take place in male meiocytes, such as meiosis, chromosome recombination, and homologous recombination, and also to interfere with the physiology of microspores, such as e.g. the responsiveness to androgenetic stimuli of microspores derived from these meiocytes.
  • Interference can either refer to suppression or blocking of these processes, or to enhancement thereof. It also allows specific alteration of the genetic material that is transferred to the next generation, e.g. through site- directed mutagenesis (during the stage in which homologous recombination takes place spontaneously in meiocytes) in genes and/or regulatory (cis-acting) sequences.
  • application of this invention does not render the male meiocytes, the microspores developing therefrom or the scion transgenic, as only the root stock harbours a transgene.
  • the microspores and the scion only contain transiently expressed transgene-derived molecules, which are not passed on to the next generation. Only the molecular effects brought about by the transgene-derived molecules are transmitted to the next generation.
  • transgenes expressing dominant-negative factors that can systemically move across graft junctions into transgene-free plant material allows researchers to take full advantage of transgene technology to impose novel traits onto crop plants, without rendering them stably transgenic.
  • oligonucleotide-based mutation induction (Oh TJ and May GD, 2001, Curr Opin Biotechnol 12: 169-172; KeyBase technology: WO2010074562, EP2167660, W02007073149 ) .
  • the method of this invention can be used for plant breeding purposes.
  • Current breeding methods are slow and take >5-10 years for cultivar development.
  • One of the disadvantages is the inefficiency of trait selection in early generations. This problem can be overcome by inducing doubled-haploid production in non-transgenic scions by grafting them onto compatible transgenic root stocks, as illustrated by example 3 below.
  • Crop species on which this invention can be practised include e.g. tobacco, poplar, maize, wheat, barley, rice, sorghum, sugar beet, oilseed rape, ryegrass, sunflower, soybean, tomato,
  • the present invention thus relates to a method for interfering with processes in the male meiocytes of a plant, by combining a first plant comprising a rootstock, which transgenically harbours a nucleic acid sequence, with a scion from a second plant grafted onto the rootstock of the said first plant, whereby the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence generates polynucleotide molecules in the rootstock of the first plant, which polynucleotide molecules are transported systemically across the graft junction to enter the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant, and wherein the said polynucleotide molecules are at least partially complementary to a transcript expressed in the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant .
  • transgenic nucleic acid sequence in the first plant is achieved by operably linking the said nucleic acid sequence to a promoter sequence that confers a ubiquitous or systemic expression profile, or a tissue- or cell-type-specific expression profile onto the said
  • transgenic nucleic acid sequence is cloned into a transgenic construct, downstream (at the 3' end) of a promoter sequence that has the ability to drive the expression of the said nucleic acid sequence in plants.
  • Promoter sequences differ in their expression patterns in plant tissues, and some have the ability to drive gene expression in all tissues
  • promoter sequences that confer a ubiquitous expression profile onto a transgenic nucleic acid sequence are e.g. the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (CaMV 35S) , selected ubiquitin promoters, selected actin promoters, and many others. Examples of tissue- or cell- type-specific promoters are also known to the skilled person .
  • the promoter sequence confers onto the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence an expression profile that encompasses the
  • the rootstock encompasses the source tissues from which phloem sap is transported to the sink tissues, and more specifically to the sink tissues of the scion.
  • a rootstock comprises the roots and may in addition comprise a part of the stem and some (mature) leaves.
  • the expression product of the transgenic nucleic acid sequence can be produced in the complete rootstock or in a part thereof, for example by using a root-, leaf- or stem-specific promoter.
  • the expression of the transgenic nucleic acid sequence in the rootstock of the first plant is constitutive. In another embodiment, the expression of the transgenic nucleic acid sequence in the rootstock of the first plant is transient.
  • Transient expression can e.g. be achieved by use of an inducible promoter, selected from the group comprising heat-inducible promoters, chemical- inducible promoters, steroid-inducible promoters and alcohol-inducible promoters.
  • Transient expression can be achieved by using an inducible promoter or by transiently introducing the transgenic construct (with a strong
  • transient transformation can for example be achieved by Agrobacterium infiltration via the stomata of the leaves that remain attached to the rootstock after grafting of the scion onto the rootstock.
  • interfering with processes in the male meiocytes consists of the suppression or blocking of processes in the male meiocytes.
  • interfering with processes in the male meiocytes consists of the enhancement of processes in the male meiocytes.
  • the polynucleotide molecules can be selected from the group comprising miRNA, antisense RNA, RNAi molecules, siRNA molecules, Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) molecules, co-suppressor molecules or RNA oligonucleotides.
  • the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence is stably integrated into the genome of the first plant. In another embodiment the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence is transiently present in the rootstock of the first plant.
  • the said polynucleotide molecules are generated and expressed constitutively in the first plant, preferably in an expression domain that
  • polynucleotide molecules The properties of the promoter sequence to which the transgenic nucleic acid sequence is operably linked determine the temporal and spatial pattern of the generation and expression of the polynucleotide molecules .
  • the said polynucleotide molecules are generated and expressed transiently in the first plant, preferably in an expression domain that
  • the transient expression of the polynucleotide molecules in the first plant is achieved by use of an inducible promoter, selected from the group comprising heat-inducible promoters, chemical-inducible promoters, steroid-inducible promoters and alcohol-inducible promoters.
  • an inducible promoter selected from the group comprising heat-inducible promoters, chemical-inducible promoters, steroid-inducible promoters and alcohol-inducible promoters.
  • inducible promoter such as a heat shock or heat treatment, specific chemicals, specific steroids such as dexamethasone, or alcohol
  • activates the inducible promoter which results in the transient expression of the polynucleotide molecules in the first plant, preferably in an expression domain that comprises the roots.
  • polynucleotide molecules derived from the transgenic nucleic acid sequence are at least partially complementary to a transcript expressed in the male
  • the polynucleotide molecules are at least partially complementary to the transcript (transcribed nucleic acid sequence or mRNA) of a gene that is involved in chromosome recombination.
  • the gene is suitably selected from the group comprising SPOll, MER1,
  • the polynucleotide molecules that are generated by the transgenic nucleic acid sequence in the rootstock of the first plant and that are transported systemically across the graft junction to enter the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant are DNA polynucleotides.
  • These DNA polynucleotides typically have the same size as the RNA polynucleotides of the previous embodiments, i.e. between about 18 nucleotides and about 27 nucleotides.
  • These DNA polynucleotides can be derived from nuclear DNA, from plasmid DNA, from chloroplast DNA, from mitochondrial DNA, or from other DNA molecules.
  • This invention further relates to a method for specifically altering the genome sequence of male meiocytes of a plant, by combining a first plant comprising a
  • transgenic nucleic acid sequence generates polynucleotide molecules in the rootstock of the first plant, which
  • polynucleotide molecules are transported systemically across the graft junction to enter the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant, and wherein the said
  • polynucleotide molecules are at least partially homologous to a DNA fragment contained in the genome of the second plant .
  • advantage is taken of homologous recombination in the male meiocyte, to effect targeted nucleotide exchange in the genome sequence of the male meiocyte. This can e.g. be achieved through the
  • Biotechnol 12 169-172; KeyBase technology: WO2010074562, EP2167660, W02007073149 ) .
  • the polynucleotides used for this purpose are essentially homologous to a genomic sequence, except for one or more mismatches located essentially in the middle of the targeted sequence in the genome intended to create a targeted nucleotide-exchange or point-mutation in the genome .
  • Figure 1 Representative photograph of grafted tobacco plant. A non-transgenic scion was grafted onto a transgenic rootstock, and all leaves were removed from the scion, to force the phloem-mobile silencing signal from source tissues (the rootstock) into the scion's apical region (sink tissues) .
  • source tissues the rootstock
  • sink tissues the sink tissues
  • DMCl siRNA transgenic scions reverse graft
  • wild-type scions grafted on DMCl siRNA lines true graft
  • the numbers refer to representative images of scion anthers forming: male sterile flowers producing no or low quantities of aberrant pollen (numbers 1 and 2), and anthers with regular pollen production (number 3) .
  • Figure 2 Microscopic images of DAPI stained nuclei (blue) in microspore tetrads isolated from scion flowers. Note the appearance of unbalanced tetrads (arrowhead) on DMCl siRNA-producing scions (middle image) and on wild-type plants grafted onto DMCl silencing lines (right image) .
  • FIG. 3 Schematic drawing of the observed spread of the DMCl silencing signal in 35S::YFP-AN DMCl flower buds, both in color (left) and black-and-white (right) .
  • Green or dotted parts indicate parts of the plant where no silencing of the YFP reporter construct was observed.
  • Transgenic Nicotiana tabacum var SRI plants were obtained by leaf disc transformation with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LB4004, harbouring a binary vector, with the method described by Horsch RB et al, 1985, Science 227: 1229-1231.
  • interfering RNA interfering RNA molecules, which are delivered into the male meiocytes that are produced by a scion grafted on top of the transgenic rootstock.
  • siRNA interfering RNA
  • RNAi hairpin construct for the DMCl gene (DISRUPTED MEIOTIC cDNAl) from Arabidopsis thaliana (TAIR: AT3G22880; expression driven by a constitutive promoter) were produced following the method of example 1.
  • DMCl is a meiotic cell-cycle-specific factor and a member of the highly conserved RecA-type recombinase family (DNA dependent ATP-ases) present in meiocytes, such as pollen mother cells in anthers and megaspore mother cells in ovules (Doutriaux MP et al, 1998, Mol Gen Genet 257: 283-291).
  • DMCl was shown to be crucial for inter-homolog recombination and bivalent formation, and, consequently, for proper pollen and ovule development. Lack of a functional DMCl gene product induces achiasmatic meiosis, resulting in formation of anomalous pollen grains, which contain an aberrant number of chromosomes. The chromosome number in spores depends on an orderly meiotic separation of sister chromatids occurring in the second meiotic phase.
  • This silencing phenotype comprises consistently low levels of endogenous DMCl mRNA, the
  • irregularly shaped (aneuploid) pollen which are indicative for a dysfunctional meiosis, caused by the presence of siRNA molecules targeting the DMCl transcript in the male
  • incisions were made at an angle of 45° with a razor blade, usually between the third and fourth leaf.
  • a razor blade usually between the third and fourth leaf.
  • the scion stem was shortly submerged in water, until the graft junction was aligned.
  • a toothpick served as space holder between the parafilm and wrapped stem to assist some evaporation from the graft junction.
  • silencing phenotype of DMC1 In the former case this was not surprising, as the entire scion was transgenic, and inside the meiocytes siRNA molecules directed against DMC1 were thus produced. In the latter case, however, it implied that - as taught by the current invention - siRNA molecules generated by the RNAi hairpin construct directed against DMC1 were mobilized from the transgenic rootstock and transported systemically into the scion with the phloem sap, and delivered into the male meiocytes that were produced inside sporogenic tissues of the flower buds of the scion.
  • the male sterility phenotype was also observed in the first flowers that developed on secondary shoots.
  • DMCl is also active in the female reproductive organs
  • no evidence of DMCl silencing was apparent in the female reproductive organs of wildtype scions grafted onto transgenic rootstocks.
  • pollinated with wildtype pollen they produced a normal number of viable seeds, indicating a normal female fertility.
  • Example 2 To further investigate the DMCl silencing in male meiocytes through systemic transport of RNAi signals, another set of transgenic tobacco plants was generated, using the method described in Example 1. These plants harboured a 35S: : YFP-.AN-DMCl transgenic reporter construct, containing a dysfunctional, truncated DMCl cDNA of
  • YFP Yellow Fluorescent Protein
  • CaMV 35S constitutive cauliflower mosaic 35S promoter
  • Non-transgenic Reverse Breeding in Brassica mediated by systemic silencing signals
  • Example 2 The experimental approach outlined in Example 2 was applied to Brassica oleracea, resulting in transgenic rootstocks harbouring an ectopically expressed hairpin RNAi silencing construct against the SDS (SOLO DANCERS) gene.
  • wildtype hybrid scions were grafted from an interspecific Fl hybrid (Raphanus sativus x Brassica oleracea) , and the silencing signal was forced into male meiocytes by removing all scion leaves, as described in Example 2.
  • the first flower buds produced by the scions contained a significant proportion of aberrant microspore tetrads, and these flowers were largely male sterile.
  • microspores were purified from these buds, and they were given a stress treatment of two days at 32 °C, which is optimal to induce sporophytic development of the haploid spores.
  • Raphanus sativus and Brassica oleracea the parents of the Fl hybrid that was used as a scion in the graft.
  • DH plants regenerated from microspores collected from anthers of the scion were screened to identify individuals that were genetically complementary, i.e. containing sets of parental chromosomes that when combined in an Fl correspond to the exact set of chromosomes present in the hybrid used as a scion for grafting. Crossing of these complementary
  • This example thus illustrates how the current invention can be used to exactly reconstruct a hybrid genotype. Importantly, this was achieved without rendering the reconstructed hybrid plant transgenic, as suppression of chromosome recombination prior to DH production had been achieved through a transient siRNA signal in the male meiocytes .
  • This invention could be used to seed-propagate specific traits in such crops, and transgene-free elite lines can be produced much faster, and several years of traditional breeding efforts can be avoided.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
  • Pregnancy & Childbirth (AREA)
  • Reproductive Health (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for interfering with processes in the male meiocytes of a plant, by combining a first plant comprising a rootstock, which transgenically harbours a nucleic acid sequence, with a scion from a second plant grafted onto the rootstock of the said first plant, whereby the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence generates polynucleotide molecules in the rootstock of the first plant, which polynucleotide molecules are transported systemically across the graft junction to enter the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant, and wherein the said systemically transported polynucleotide molecules are at least partially complementary to a transcript expressed in the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant.

Description

METHOD FOR SYSTEMICALLY INFLUENCING PROCESSES IN THE MALE
MEIOCYTE
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a method for interfering with processes in the male meiocytes of a plant.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Sexual reproduction is arguably the most fundamental process in a flowering plant's life cycle. It provides a next generation of organisms, and through
recombination (reshuffling) of the genetic features of the father and mother organism it allows the creation of genetic diversity. This diversity in the next generation allows plants to e.g. adapt better and more readily to changes in their biotic and abiotic environment.
Biological studies have led to a thorough understanding of the processes and factors that play
important roles in sexual reproduction in angiosperms.
Essential stages are:
- the formation and ripening of male gametes
(microspores, pollen grains) and female gametes (egg cell inside an embryo sac inside an ovule) from diploid
meiocytes. The formation of haploid gametes occurs via two meiotic divisions, during which the two parental genomes of the gamete-producing organism are recombined;
- pollination (the deposition of male gametes on the female reproductive organs/stigma), which can e.g. be mediated by wind, insects or other specialised pollinators, or simply by gravity, proximity or active pollination mechanisms when it concerns a self-fertilising species;
- the germination of pollen grains and the subsequent transfer of male nuclei (sperm cells) towards receptive and chemically attracting egg cells through a pollen tube;
- the release of sperm nuclei inside a receptive embryo sac, leading to double fertilisation, in which one sperm cell fuses with the egg cell to give rise to a diploid embryo, and the other sperm cell fuses with the diploid central cell, to give rise to triploid endosperm;
- mitotic divisions and developmental patterning of the zygote, leading to the formation of an embryo.
For the purpose of this invention the first stage is most important: the formation of gametes, in particular male gametes, from meiocytes. In angiosperms the male gametes or microspores are formed inside anthers. They originate from diploid pollen mother cells (a type of meiocyte) that undergo meiosis, which encompasses two rounds of meiotic division. The final result of meiosis is a set of four haploid microspores for each pollen mother cell, and these microspores each develop further by undergoing two mitotic divisions. The first of these divisions is
asymmetric, and it gives rise to a vegetative cell and a generative cell, while the second mitosis concerns the division of the generative cell. The result is a pollen grain that contains two sperm cells, in a unique
constellation, as the sperm cells are both located inside the cytoplasm of the vegetative cell.
The timing of the second mitotic division varies greatly in the plant kingdom, and the second pollen mitosis can either occur prior to anthesis (as is the case in e.g. Arabidopsis and rice) , or after anthesis during pollen tube growth (e.g. in tomato and tobacco) . Depending on the species, angiosperm flowers can thus shed either tricellular (containing one vegetative nucleus plus two generative nuclei) or bicellular pollen grains (containing one
vegetative nucleus plus one generative nucleus) .
Meiotic cell division is of fundamental importance during gamete formation, as it provides a means for
reshuffling the parental genetic information so that new genetic combinations arise, and a means for "undoubling" the genome in haploid gametes. Meiocytes have received
considerable research attention, because if one would be able to influence the molecular, physiological and/or developmental processes that take place inside a meiocyte, one could potentially have a huge impact on sexual
reproduction, on the transmission of genetic material to the next generation, and even on evolution.
It is known that in plants RNA-based silencing signals spread systemically to distant organs. For long¬ distance transport of such RNA-based signals, flowering plants use a specialized vascular system named phloem. The phloem facilitates the directional transfer of small molecules such as ions, sugars, nucleotides, hormones, amino acids, and proteins from source (producing) tissues to sink (consuming) tissues. In a number of plant species small polynucleotide molecules (typically RNA molecules with a size of 18 to 27 nucleotides) , derived from specific gene products, were shown to be present in the phloem sap and suggested to relocate following the source-sink flow.
It is known from the literature that a long¬ distance transport pathway allows plants to induce systemic post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) associated with small interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules.
PTGS - associated with siRNA - is reset by an unknown mechanism and is re-established in the following generation. PTGS-resetting seems to take place during meiosis and can be established again in gametes, as shown in studies on transposon activity in male gametophytes .
siRNAs targeting transposable element transcripts are activated in the vegetative nucleus and transferred into fertilizing sperm cells, where they down-regulate transposon activity. Thus, within pollen grains and fertilizing pollen tubes an siRNA-mediated silencing machinery is active. The PTGS mechanism is also functional in sporophytic tissues, as anther-specific genes could be silenced. Studies conducted with transgenic GFP-expressing lines, in which siRNA- associated spread of silencing was induced by over- expression of transcripts containing GFP sequences,
suggested systemic spread of siRNA signals into strong sink tissues such as newly forming leaves.
However, it seems that not all sink tissues can receive PTGS signals. Systemic siRNA-mediated GFP-silencing was reported to be very limited in growing flower buds, and silencing of GFP in the meiotic (sporogenic) tissues of anthers or carpels has never been observed.
In the prior art it is thus presumed that meiocytes are inaccessible for long-distance mobile signals, and that a barrier exists that protects the future
microspores in their earliest stages of development.
In the research that led to the present invention it was however found how meiocytes can be targeted with systemic polynucleotide signals from a transgenic rootstock, without rendering transgenic the shoot grafted thereon
(scion) , or the meiocytes or microspores produced by the scion, or plants derived from these microspores.
The present inventors found how to interfere with
(molecular) processes in the male meiocytes, through the said polynucleotide signals that are transported into the male meiocytes as a systemic signal. In the prior art it is also known that the over- expression of RNAi constructs with constitutive promoters can lead to silencing of gene expression in the male
meiocytes (Dirks R et al, 2009, Plant Biotechnol J 7: 837- 845; Reverse Breeding: WO03/017753) . However, a considerable drawback of this approach is the fact that the organism producing the male meiocytes, as well as at least 50% of the microspores produced after meiosis, are transgenic. For regulatory, efficiency and practical reasons it is very desirable to develop a method for producing transgene-free plants from spores that originated from meiocytes in which molecular recombination processes have been interfered with. Such microspores can e.g. be used for the production of transgene-free doubled haploid plants (DHs) .
The prior art discloses various methods for the production of haploid plants from microspores, such as in vitro microspore culture (regeneration of haploid plantlets from microspores, and subsequent genome doubling with e.g. colchicine), and the method disclosed in WO2011044132, which involves pollination of a haploid-inducer line, which after fertilisation eliminates the maternal chromosomes from the zygote, leading to the formation of viable seeds containing a haploid embryo that is genetically identical to the microspore used for pollination and fertilisation.
In the research leading to this invention it was thus surprisingly found that siRNA signals, generated in a mature rootstock, can systemically penetrate and be active in apical sporogenic cells, in particular meiocytes. This was demonstrated by grafting a non-transgenic scion onto a transgenic rootstock harbouring an RNAi construct and producing siRNA molecules, and by observing silencing phenotypes of genes in the male meiocytes formed by the non- transgenic scion. Such systemic siRNA molecules targeting meiotic tissue can thus affect gene expression in the progeny .
The siRNA molecules, generated from the RNAi construct in the transgenic rootstock, can thus be
transmitted through long-distance transport across a graft junction, and throughout the scion. The current research demonstrated that the polynucleotide (siRNA) molecules generated from these constructs can subsequently be forced to enter into the male meiocytes and effect gene silencing therein, or interfere in another way with transcripts or genomic material in these meiocytes. Until now it was deemed impossible to import molecules into early developing
meiocytes or microspores through long-distance transport. Surprisingly, within a flower the siRNA molecules are preferentially targeted towards the anthers and the
meiocytes therein, whereas the female meiocytes (megaspore mother cells contained in the ovary) do not receive the siRNA signal.
This invention can be applied to interfere with all molecular processes that take place in male meiocytes, such as meiosis, chromosome recombination, and homologous recombination, and also to interfere with the physiology of microspores, such as e.g. the responsiveness to androgenetic stimuli of microspores derived from these meiocytes.
"Interference" can either refer to suppression or blocking of these processes, or to enhancement thereof. It also allows specific alteration of the genetic material that is transferred to the next generation, e.g. through site- directed mutagenesis (during the stage in which homologous recombination takes place spontaneously in meiocytes) in genes and/or regulatory (cis-acting) sequences.
Importantly, application of this invention does not render the male meiocytes, the microspores developing therefrom or the scion transgenic, as only the root stock harbours a transgene. The microspores and the scion only contain transiently expressed transgene-derived molecules, which are not passed on to the next generation. Only the molecular effects brought about by the transgene-derived molecules are transmitted to the next generation. The use of transgenes expressing dominant-negative factors that can systemically move across graft junctions into transgene-free plant material allows researchers to take full advantage of transgene technology to impose novel traits onto crop plants, without rendering them stably transgenic.
Specific mutations can be introduced into a plant genome through homologous recombination (Paszkowski J et al, 1988, EMBO J 7: 4021-4026; Mengiste T and Paszkowski J, 1999, Biol Chem 380: 749-758; Vergunst AC and Hooykaas PJJ, 1999, Crit Rev Plant Sci 18: 1-31) or through
oligonucleotide-based mutation induction (Oh TJ and May GD, 2001, Curr Opin Biotechnol 12: 169-172; KeyBase technology: WO2010074562, EP2167660, W02007073149 ) .
The method of this invention can be used for plant breeding purposes. Current breeding methods are slow and take >5-10 years for cultivar development. One of the disadvantages is the inefficiency of trait selection in early generations. This problem can be overcome by inducing doubled-haploid production in non-transgenic scions by grafting them onto compatible transgenic root stocks, as illustrated by example 3 below.
The present invention can be applied to all plant species that can be grafted and transformed. Crop species on which this invention can be practised include e.g. tobacco, poplar, maize, wheat, barley, rice, sorghum, sugar beet, oilseed rape, ryegrass, sunflower, soybean, tomato,
cucumber, gherkin, corn salad, spinach, pepper, petunia, potato, eggplant, melon, carrot, radish, lettuce, vegetable Brassica species (cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli, kohlrabi, Brussels sprouts) , leek, bean, pea, endive, chicory, onion, strawberry, fennel, table beet, celery, celeriac, asparagus, sunflower, and grape vine.
The present invention thus relates to a method for interfering with processes in the male meiocytes of a plant, by combining a first plant comprising a rootstock, which transgenically harbours a nucleic acid sequence, with a scion from a second plant grafted onto the rootstock of the said first plant, whereby the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence generates polynucleotide molecules in the rootstock of the first plant, which polynucleotide molecules are transported systemically across the graft junction to enter the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant, and wherein the said polynucleotide molecules are at least partially complementary to a transcript expressed in the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant .
Expression of the transgenic nucleic acid sequence in the first plant is achieved by operably linking the said nucleic acid sequence to a promoter sequence that confers a ubiquitous or systemic expression profile, or a tissue- or cell-type-specific expression profile onto the said
transgenic nucleic acid sequence. For this purpose the transgenic nucleic acid sequence is cloned into a transgenic construct, downstream (at the 3' end) of a promoter sequence that has the ability to drive the expression of the said nucleic acid sequence in plants. Promoter sequences differ in their expression patterns in plant tissues, and some have the ability to drive gene expression in all tissues
(ubiquitous expression) , while others have a (spatio- temporally) more narrow expression pattern, or a very specific expression pattern that is restricted to a specific tissue type or cell type.
Examples of promoter sequences that confer a ubiquitous expression profile onto a transgenic nucleic acid sequence are e.g. the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter (CaMV 35S) , selected ubiquitin promoters, selected actin promoters, and many others. Examples of tissue- or cell- type-specific promoters are also known to the skilled person .
For the purpose of this invention, the promoter sequence confers onto the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence an expression profile that encompasses the
rootstock. This is desired because only the rootstock is used from the said first plant harbouring the transgenic nucleic acid sequence, and therefore the said nucleic acid sequence should be expressed at least in the rootstock of the said first plant. The rootstock encompasses the source tissues from which phloem sap is transported to the sink tissues, and more specifically to the sink tissues of the scion. A rootstock comprises the roots and may in addition comprise a part of the stem and some (mature) leaves.
According to the invention, the expression product of the transgenic nucleic acid sequence can be produced in the complete rootstock or in a part thereof, for example by using a root-, leaf- or stem-specific promoter.
In one embodiment the expression of the transgenic nucleic acid sequence in the rootstock of the first plant is constitutive. In another embodiment, the expression of the transgenic nucleic acid sequence in the rootstock of the first plant is transient. Transient expression can e.g. be achieved by use of an inducible promoter, selected from the group comprising heat-inducible promoters, chemical- inducible promoters, steroid-inducible promoters and alcohol-inducible promoters. Transient expression can be achieved by using an inducible promoter or by transiently introducing the transgenic construct (with a strong
promoter) into the root stock instead of stably integrating the transgene in the rootstock genome. Such transient transformation can for example be achieved by Agrobacterium infiltration via the stomata of the leaves that remain attached to the rootstock after grafting of the scion onto the rootstock.
In one embodiment, interfering with processes in the male meiocytes consists of the suppression or blocking of processes in the male meiocytes. In another embodiment, interfering with processes in the male meiocytes consists of the enhancement of processes in the male meiocytes. When interfering consists of the suppression or blocking of processes in the male meiocytes, this can be achieved by destabilizing the target gene mRNA by means of
polynucleotide molecules that are at least partially
complementary to the target gene mRNA or transcript and that have been generated from the transgenic nucleic acid
sequence. The polynucleotide molecules can be selected from the group comprising miRNA, antisense RNA, RNAi molecules, siRNA molecules, Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) molecules, co-suppressor molecules or RNA oligonucleotides.
In one embodiment the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence is stably integrated into the genome of the first plant. In another embodiment the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence is transiently present in the rootstock of the first plant.
In one embodiment the said polynucleotide molecules are generated and expressed constitutively in the first plant, preferably in an expression domain that
comprises the roots. This implies that no external treatment is required for the generation and expression of the
polynucleotide molecules. The properties of the promoter sequence to which the transgenic nucleic acid sequence is operably linked determine the temporal and spatial pattern of the generation and expression of the polynucleotide molecules .
In another embodiment the said polynucleotide molecules are generated and expressed transiently in the first plant, preferably in an expression domain that
comprises the roots. This implies that external factors or treatments can be used to induce and/or modulate the
temporal and/or spatial pattern of the generation and expression of the polynucleotide molecules, by virtue of the effect these external factors or treatments have on the activity of the promoter sequence to which the transgenic nucleic acid sequence is operably linked.
In this embodiment the transient expression of the polynucleotide molecules in the first plant is achieved by use of an inducible promoter, selected from the group comprising heat-inducible promoters, chemical-inducible promoters, steroid-inducible promoters and alcohol-inducible promoters. Treatment of the rootstock with the agent (s) and/or condition (s) that induce the activity of the
inducible promoter (such as a heat shock or heat treatment, specific chemicals, specific steroids such as dexamethasone, or alcohol) activates the inducible promoter, which results in the transient expression of the polynucleotide molecules in the first plant, preferably in an expression domain that comprises the roots.
The polynucleotide molecules derived from the transgenic nucleic acid sequence are at least partially complementary to a transcript expressed in the male
meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant. In one embodiment, the polynucleotide molecules are at least partially complementary to the transcript (transcribed nucleic acid sequence or mRNA) of a gene that is involved in chromosome recombination. In this embodiment, the gene is suitably selected from the group comprising SPOll, MER1,
MER2, MRE2, MEI4, REC102, REC104, REC114, MEK1/MRE4, RED1 , HOP1, RAD50, MRE11 , XRS2, PRD1 , PRD2, PRD3, PHS1, NBS1, COM1, RHD54/ TID1 , DMC1 , SAE3, RED1 , HOP1, HOP2, MND1 , REC8, MEI5, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, RAD55, RAD57, ΡΡΛ1, 5MC3, SCCl, M5H2, M5H3, PMS1, 5OLODANCERS, CHK2, SGS1, MSH4,
M5H5, MER3/RCK, ZIP1, ZIP2, ZIP3, ZIP4 , PTD, SHOC1 , ZYP1, MLH1, MLH3, or their functional homologues.
In another embodiment, the polynucleotide molecules that are generated by the transgenic nucleic acid sequence in the rootstock of the first plant and that are transported systemically across the graft junction to enter the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant, are DNA polynucleotides. These DNA polynucleotides typically have the same size as the RNA polynucleotides of the previous embodiments, i.e. between about 18 nucleotides and about 27 nucleotides. These DNA polynucleotides can be derived from nuclear DNA, from plasmid DNA, from chloroplast DNA, from mitochondrial DNA, or from other DNA molecules.
This invention further relates to a method for specifically altering the genome sequence of male meiocytes of a plant, by combining a first plant comprising a
rootstock, which transgenically harbours a nucleic acid sequence, with a scion from a second plant grafted onto the rootstock of the said first plant, whereby the said
transgenic nucleic acid sequence generates polynucleotide molecules in the rootstock of the first plant, which
polynucleotide molecules are transported systemically across the graft junction to enter the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant, and wherein the said
polynucleotide molecules are at least partially homologous to a DNA fragment contained in the genome of the second plant .
In this embodiment advantage is taken of homologous recombination in the male meiocyte, to effect targeted nucleotide exchange in the genome sequence of the male meiocyte. This can e.g. be achieved through the
presence of small DNA polynucleotides in the male meiocytes during the stage in which chromosome recombination occurs, and in which the chromosomes are more easily accessible. Specific mutations can be introduced into a plant genome through homologous recombination (Paszkowski J et al, 1988, EMBO J 7: 4021-4026; Mengiste T and Paszkowski J, 1999, Biol Chem 380: 749-758; Vergunst AC and Hooykaas PJJ, 1999, Crit Rev Plant Sci 18: 1-31) or through oligonucleotide-based mutation induction (Oh TJ and May GD, 2001, Curr Opin
Biotechnol 12: 169-172; KeyBase technology: WO2010074562, EP2167660, W02007073149 ) . The polynucleotides used for this purpose are essentially homologous to a genomic sequence, except for one or more mismatches located essentially in the middle of the targeted sequence in the genome intended to create a targeted nucleotide-exchange or point-mutation in the genome .
The invention will be further illustrated in the
Examples that follow and that are not intended to limit the invention in any way. In the Examples, reference is made to the following figures.
Figure 1 : Representative photograph of grafted tobacco plant. A non-transgenic scion was grafted onto a transgenic rootstock, and all leaves were removed from the scion, to force the phloem-mobile silencing signal from source tissues (the rootstock) into the scion's apical region (sink tissues) . (b) A schematic drawing of the graft combinations used in the cytometric (FACS) analysis of pollen harvested from grafted plants. The histograms
indicate the size (scattered light) and fluorescence
intensity of Propidium Iodide-stained pollen coat and nuclei. The numbers obtained by control grafts (wild
type/wild type) are highly reproducible. In contrast, the size and DNA content of pollen from DMCl siRNA transgenic scions (reverse graft) or wild-type scions grafted on DMCl siRNA lines (true graft) is significantly altered. The numbers refer to representative images of scion anthers forming: male sterile flowers producing no or low quantities of aberrant pollen (numbers 1 and 2), and anthers with regular pollen production (number 3) .
Figure 2: (Upper panel) Microscopic images of DAPI stained nuclei (blue) in microspore tetrads isolated from scion flowers. Note the appearance of unbalanced tetrads (arrowhead) on DMCl siRNA-producing scions (middle image) and on wild-type plants grafted onto DMCl silencing lines (right image) . (Lower panel) Scanning electron microscopy images of pollen harvested from scion flowers. Pollen grains from control grafts (wild type/wild type) were normal in shape and size. In contrast, wild-type scions grafted on transgenic DMCl silencing lines produced misshaped pollen grains that varied in size. Note that within one shoot the number of misshaped pollen was higher in primary flowers than in late flowers. This observation correlated with the sterile anther phenotype appearing on the first flower formed on wild-type scions grafted on DMCl siRNA lines.
Figure 3: Schematic drawing of the observed spread of the DMCl silencing signal in 35S::YFP-AN DMCl flower buds, both in color (left) and black-and-white (right) .Green or dotted parts indicate parts of the plant where no silencing of the YFP reporter construct was observed. Blue or striped parts indicate the presence of DMC1 silencing (=disappearance of YFP signals) . DMC1 silencing
(blue/dotted) was observed in the epidermis of sepals and carpels, and in the sporogenic tissue of anthers. No
silencing of the YFP reporter construct was observed in female organs such as pistils, carpels or ovules
(green/striped), or in later forming flower buds on an inflorescence. Note that the observed spread of DMC1
silencing reiterated within primary flower buds appearing in inflorescences emerging from secondary shoots.
EXAMPLES EXAMPLE 1
Stable transformation of tobacco plants
Transgenic Nicotiana tabacum var . SRI plants were obtained by leaf disc transformation with the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LB4004, harbouring a binary vector, with the method described by Horsch RB et al, 1985, Science 227: 1229-1231.
EXAMPLE 2
Suppression of chromosome recombination in vivo through long-distance transport of siRNA across a graft j unction in tobacco
An important example of a process that typically occurs in the male meiocytes of a plant is meiotic
chromosome recombination. This invention allows the
interference with meiotic chromosome recombination by means of a transgene in a rootstock that generates short
interfering RNA (siRNA) molecules, which are delivered into the male meiocytes that are produced by a scion grafted on top of the transgenic rootstock. To provide evidence for this, transgenic tobacco plants (Nicotiana tabacum var. SRI) harbouring an
ectopically expressed RNAi hairpin construct for the DMCl gene (DISRUPTED MEIOTIC cDNAl) from Arabidopsis thaliana (TAIR: AT3G22880; expression driven by a constitutive promoter) were produced following the method of example 1. DMCl is a meiotic cell-cycle-specific factor and a member of the highly conserved RecA-type recombinase family (DNA dependent ATP-ases) present in meiocytes, such as pollen mother cells in anthers and megaspore mother cells in ovules (Doutriaux MP et al, 1998, Mol Gen Genet 257: 283-291). DMCl was shown to be crucial for inter-homolog recombination and bivalent formation, and, consequently, for proper pollen and ovule development. Lack of a functional DMCl gene product induces achiasmatic meiosis, resulting in formation of anomalous pollen grains, which contain an aberrant number of chromosomes. The chromosome number in spores depends on an orderly meiotic separation of sister chromatids occurring in the second meiotic phase.
The plants were grown in soil in greenhouse conditions (16 hours of light, 25°C day temperature and 20°C night temperature) , and three transgenic lines clearly showing the silencing phenotype of DMCl were selected for further experiments. This silencing phenotype comprises consistently low levels of endogenous DMCl mRNA, the
formation of unbalanced microspore tetrads after meiosis, at least partial male sterility and the production of
irregularly shaped (aneuploid) pollen, which are indicative for a dysfunctional meiosis, caused by the presence of siRNA molecules targeting the DMCl transcript in the male
meiocytes .
Scions from wildtype plants were grafted onto 3- to 4-week-old plants from these selected transgenic lines (with the first leaf being about 10 cm in length) . Two plants are thus combined, in which the bottom part
(transgenic rootstock) of the one plant supports the upper part (wildtype scion) of the other plant. The graft
incisions were made at an angle of 45° with a razor blade, usually between the third and fourth leaf. During the transfer the scion stem was shortly submerged in water, until the graft junction was aligned. A toothpick served as space holder between the parafilm and wrapped stem to assist some evaporation from the graft junction.
After grafting, newly emerging leaves on the scion and secondary shoots appearing on the rootstock were cut off, to force the delivery of phloem-mediated molecules towards the apical region of the scion. A successful graft namely leads to the formation of a vascular connection between the rootstock and the scion, and phloem transport is directed towards sink tissues (such as meristematic regions and newly emerging leaves) . By ensuring that the apical region of the scion is the only remaining above-ground sink tissue in the plant, phloem transport can be effectively directed towards that apical region, where flowers will be formed. Control grafts were included in the experiment, namely wildtype scions grafted onto wildtype rootstocks, and transgenic scions grafted onto transgenic or wildtype rootstocks.
Bolting of the scions occurred approximately 3 weeks after grafting. Preliminary examination of the anthers revealed a deficiency in pollen production in all grafts in which either the scion or the rootstock were transgenic
(Figure IB) . This phenotype was consistent with the
silencing phenotype of DMC1. In the former case this was not surprising, as the entire scion was transgenic, and inside the meiocytes siRNA molecules directed against DMC1 were thus produced. In the latter case, however, it implied that - as taught by the current invention - siRNA molecules generated by the RNAi hairpin construct directed against DMC1 were mobilized from the transgenic rootstock and transported systemically into the scion with the phloem sap, and delivered into the male meiocytes that were produced inside sporogenic tissues of the flower buds of the scion.
In control grafts in which the scion itself was transgenic this male sterility was observed in all flowers, while in grafts in which the scion was wildtype (grafted onto a transgenic rootstock) the effect was limited to the first flowers. First flowers were nearly sterile, while later flowers were fully fertile. The phloem-mediated siRNA signal thus preferentially entered the initially produced flowers, being the first sink tissue the phloem sap
encountered on its way towards the scion's apex. The male sterility phenotype was also observed in the first flowers that developed on secondary shoots.
A more thorough examination of the first flowers from wildtype scions grafted onto a transgenic rootstock was conducted, and - based on a highly reproducible relation between size distribution and fluorescence emission from wildtype pollen - fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis revealed a much higher variability in pollen size (irregular distribution) , as compared to pollen from
wildtype flowers (Figure IB) .
This observation was confirmed with scanning electron microscopy, and pollen produced by the first flowers of wildtype scions supported by a DMC1 siRNA- producing transgenic rootstock appeared misshapen and smaller. Pollen from later flowers was normal (Figure 2) . Table 1 Statistics of DMCl siRNA phenotypes observed after grafting .
Stock / scion DMCl phenotype/Grafts tested a wild type/wild type 0/13 (0%)
wild type/DMCl siRNA 15/15 (100%)
DMCl siRNA/wild type 6/13 (46%)
wild type/ YFP- DMCl 0/8 (0%)
YFP-ΔΝ DMCl1DMCl siRNA 5/5 (100%)
DMCl siRNA/ YFP-ΔΝ DMCl 3/5 (60%) b
a evaluated by sterility, aberrant pollen production, appearance of unbalanced tetrads, FACS, cytological inspection of meiosis, qPCR, and presence of DMC1- specific siRNA molecules.
b verified by lack of YFP-ΔΝ DMCl fluorescence in scion leaves and primary buds.
To further address this phenotype, an earlier stage in pollen development was investigated. In control grafts (wildtype scion onto wildtype rootstock) microspore tetrads were all normal-looking and balanced (n=100) . In wildtype scions grafted onto transgenic rootstocks, however, the overall number of tetrads was lower in first (early) flowers, and a significant number of these tetrads (up to 10%, with n>100) was unbalanced, as indicated by the
appearance of a small nucleus in one tetradic cell (figure 2) . Unbalanced tetrad formation is one of the typical phenotypes associated with the loss of DMCl activity during meiosis.
While DMCl is also active in the female reproductive organs, no evidence of DMCl silencing was apparent in the female reproductive organs of wildtype scions grafted onto transgenic rootstocks. When pollinated with wildtype pollen they produced a normal number of viable seeds, indicating a normal female fertility.
To further investigate the DMCl silencing in male meiocytes through systemic transport of RNAi signals, another set of transgenic tobacco plants was generated, using the method described in Example 1. These plants harboured a 35S: : YFP-.AN-DMCl transgenic reporter construct, containing a dysfunctional, truncated DMCl cDNA of
Arabidopsis thaliana lacking the first 276 bp (i.e. leading to deletion of 92 amino acids at the N-terminus) , fused to the Yellow Fluorescent Protein (YFP) which serves as a visual reporter, and driven by the constitutive cauliflower mosaic 35S promoter (CaMV 35S) .
Shoots from these transgenic plants - which normally show a ubiquitous fluorescent signal due to the overexpression of the fusion protein - were subsequently grafted onto transgenic rootstocks harbouring the DMCl silencing construct. The flower buds emerging on the scion were examined, and in the first (early) flower buds the YFP fluorescence signal was strong in carpels and stigma, but absent inside anthers. This demonstrated that in primary flower buds the systemic silencing signal is preferably delivered into anthers (Figure 3) .
Thus, this example teaches how chromosome
recombination can be efficiently suppressed in male
meiocytes of tobacco, without rendering these meiocytes or the male gametes resulting thereof transgenic. This
invention allows the application of Reverse Breeding
(WO03017753) in a preferred embodiment, namely with non- transgenic progeny. This concept is further explained in Example 3.
While in this example the DMCl gene was targeted, any other gene that is functionally involved in any of the steps of meiotic chromosome recombination could be targeted with comparable results. EXAMPLE 3
Non-transgenic Reverse Breeding in Brassica , mediated by systemic silencing signals
The experimental approach outlined in Example 2 was applied to Brassica oleracea, resulting in transgenic rootstocks harbouring an ectopically expressed hairpin RNAi silencing construct against the SDS (SOLO DANCERS) gene. Onto these transgenic rootstocks wildtype hybrid scions were grafted from an interspecific Fl hybrid (Raphanus sativus x Brassica oleracea) , and the silencing signal was forced into male meiocytes by removing all scion leaves, as described in Example 2. The first flower buds produced by the scions contained a significant proportion of aberrant microspore tetrads, and these flowers were largely male sterile.
When the first flower buds produced on the scion were about 3 mm in size, the microspores developing therein had reached the optimal stage for microspore regeneration in vitro (androgenesis) . Microspores were purified from these buds, and they were given a stress treatment of two days at 32 °C, which is optimal to induce sporophytic development of the haploid spores. Balanced (euploid) microspores were regenerated into haploid plantlets using methods known to the person skilled in the art (for example Swanson EB et al., Plant Cell Rep 6: 94-97; Takahata Y and Keller WA, Plant Sci 74: 235-242), and colchicine treatment was subsequently used for genome doubling, leading to haploid or doubled haploid (DH) plantlets with a full complement of chromosomes .
Due to the suppression of chromosome recombination by DMC1 silencing in the male meiocytes, the chromosomes in the DH plants obtained by this method had not been
recombined, and they had the exact genetic constitution as the chromosomes of the parental lines of the hybrid plant that had been used as a scion for grafting. This was
confirmed with molecular markers (two per chromosome, i.e. one per chromosome arm) that are polymorphic between
Raphanus sativus and Brassica oleracea, the parents of the Fl hybrid that was used as a scion in the graft.
Using the same set of molecular markers, DH plants regenerated from microspores collected from anthers of the scion were screened to identify individuals that were genetically complementary, i.e. containing sets of parental chromosomes that when combined in an Fl correspond to the exact set of chromosomes present in the hybrid used as a scion for grafting. Crossing of these complementary
individuals resulted in the exact reconstruction of the hybrid genotype (Raphanus sativus x Brassica oleracea) .
This example thus illustrates how the current invention can be used to exactly reconstruct a hybrid genotype. Importantly, this was achieved without rendering the reconstructed hybrid plant transgenic, as suppression of chromosome recombination prior to DH production had been achieved through a transient siRNA signal in the male meiocytes .
The approach outlined in the previous examples can also be applied in other plant species. It is also
particularly useful to apply it in crop species with long life cycles, such as trees (for example poplar, and fruit trees such as apple, pear, cherry, peach, plum, banana, citrus fruits, papaya, fig, etc.) and grape vines. This invention could be used to seed-propagate specific traits in such crops, and transgene-free elite lines can be produced much faster, and several years of traditional breeding efforts can be avoided.

Claims

1. Method for interfering with processes in the male meiocytes of a plant, by combining a first plant comprising a rootstock, which transgenically harbours a nucleic acid sequence, with a scion from a second plant grafted onto the rootstock of the said first plant, whereby the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence generates
polynucleotide molecules in the rootstock of the first plant, which polynucleotide molecules are transported systemically across the graft junction to enter the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant, and wherein the said systemically transported polynucleotide molecules are at least partially complementary to a
transcript expressed in the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant.
2. Method as claimed in claim 1, wherein expression of the transgenic nucleic acid sequence in the first plant is achieved by operably linking the said nucleic acid sequence to a promoter sequence that confers a
ubiquitous expression profile, or a tissue- or cell-type- specific expression profile, onto the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence.
3. Method as claimed in claim 2, wherein the promoter sequence confers onto the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence an expression profile that encompasses roots.
4. Method as claimed in claims 1-3, wherein interfering with processes in the male meiocytes consists of the suppression or blocking of processes in the male
meiocytes.
5. Method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the suppression or blocking of processes in the male meiocytes is achieved by destabilizing the target gene mRNA by means of polynucleotide molecules that are at least partially complementary to the target gene mRNA or transcript and that have been generated from the transgenic nucleic acid
sequence .
6. Method as claimed in claim 5, wherein the polynucleotide molecules are selected from the group
comprising miRNA, antisense RNA, RNAi molecules, siRNA molecules, Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) molecules, co-suppressor molecules or RNA oligonucleotides.
7. Method as claimed in claims 1-3, wherein influencing of processes in the male meiocytes of plants consists of the enhancement of processes in the male
meiocytes of plants.
8. Method as claimed in claims 1-7, wherein the polynucleotide molecules are transiently expressed in the first plant.
9. Method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the transient expression of the polynucleotide molecules in the first plant is achieved by use of an inducible promoter, selected from the group comprising heat-inducible promoters, chemical-inducible promoters, steroid-inducible promoters and alcohol-inducible promoters.
10. Method as claimed in claim 8, wherein the transient expression of the polynucleotide molecules is effected by expression from a construct encoding the
polynucleotide molecules that is not integrated in the genome of the rootstock cells.
11. Method as claimed in claim 10, wherein
construct is delivered to the rootstock cells by
infiltration of leaves on the rootstock with Agrobacterium .
12. Method as claimed in claims 1-11, wherein the polynucleotide molecules are at least partially complementary to the transcript of a gene that is involved in chromosome recombination.
13. Method as claimed in claim 12, wherein the gene is selected from the group comprising SPOll, MER1, MER2, MRE2, MEI4, REC102, REC104, REC114, MEK1/MRE4, RED1 , HOP1, RAD50, MRE11, XRS2, PRD1 , PRD2, PRD3, PHS1, NBS1, COM1, RHD54/TID1, DMC1, SAE3, RED1 , HOPI , HOP2, MND1 , REC8, MEI5, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, RAD55, RAD57, RPA1 , SMC3, SCC1, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, PMS1, SOLODANCERS, HIM6, CHK2, SGS1, MSH4, MSH5, MER3/RCK, ZIP1, ZIP2, ZIP3, ZIP4 , PTD, SHOC1 , ZYP1, MLH1, MLH3, or their functional homologues.
14. Method as claimed in any one of the claims 1- 13, wherein the polynucleotide is a DNA polynucleotide.
15. Method for specifically altering the genome sequence of male meiocytes of a plant, by combining a first plant comprising a rootstock, which transgenically harbours a nucleic acid sequence, with a scion from a second plant grafted onto the rootstock of the said first plant, whereby the said transgenic nucleic acid sequence generates
polynucleotide molecules in the rootstock of the first plant, which polynucleotide molecules are transported systemically across the graft junction to enter the male meiocytes produced by the scion of the second plant, and wherein the said polynucleotide molecules are at least partially homologous to a DNA fragment contained in the genome of the second plant.
PCT/EP2012/065237 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte Ceased WO2013017683A1 (en)

Priority Applications (12)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
BR112014002643A BR112014002643A8 (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 methods for interfering with processes in male plant myocytes, and specifically altering the genome sequence of male plant myocytes
EP12750554.3A EP2739132B1 (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
ES12750554.3T ES2567290T3 (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 Method to systemically influence processes in the male meiocyte
CN201280038025.XA CN103763917A (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 Method for systemically affecting processes in androblasts
AU2012291976A AU2012291976B2 (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
NZ619960A NZ619960B2 (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
JP2014523340A JP2014527406A (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 A method for osmotic interference processes in male meiotic cells
KR1020147004869A KR20140056294A (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
CA2842706A CA2842706A1 (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
US13/774,584 US20130219558A1 (en) 2011-08-04 2013-02-22 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
IL230493A IL230493A (en) 2011-08-04 2014-01-16 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
ZA2014/00434A ZA201400434B (en) 2011-08-04 2014-01-20 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP11176591.3 2011-08-04
EP11176591A EP2554045A1 (en) 2011-08-04 2011-08-04 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/774,584 Continuation-In-Part US20130219558A1 (en) 2011-08-04 2013-02-22 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2013017683A1 true WO2013017683A1 (en) 2013-02-07

Family

ID=46724361

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2012/065237 Ceased WO2013017683A1 (en) 2011-08-04 2012-08-03 Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (1) US20130219558A1 (en)
EP (2) EP2554045A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2014527406A (en)
KR (1) KR20140056294A (en)
CN (1) CN103763917A (en)
AU (1) AU2012291976B2 (en)
BR (1) BR112014002643A8 (en)
CA (1) CA2842706A1 (en)
ES (1) ES2567290T3 (en)
IL (1) IL230493A (en)
WO (1) WO2013017683A1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA201400434B (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017178633A1 (en) 2016-04-14 2017-10-19 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel B.V. Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mrna
WO2023105017A1 (en) * 2021-12-10 2023-06-15 Keygene N.V. Method to increase pollen fertility

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NZ748603A (en) * 2016-05-26 2025-11-28 Nunhems Bv Seedless fruit producing plants
CN109836481B (en) * 2017-11-24 2022-01-14 湖南杂交水稻研究中心 Gene for regulating fertility of female organ of rice, and coding protein and application thereof
CN109402169A (en) * 2018-11-01 2019-03-01 湖南文理学院 A kind of knockout technique of spo11 gene
US20240279669A1 (en) * 2020-10-07 2024-08-22 Cibus Us Llc Grafted plant for delivery of genome editing reagents

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003017753A2 (en) 2001-08-23 2003-03-06 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel B.V. Reverse breeding
WO2007073149A1 (en) 2005-12-22 2007-06-28 Keygene N.V. Alternative nucleotides for improved targeted nucleotide exchange
EP2167660A1 (en) 2007-06-22 2010-03-31 Keygene N.V. Targeted nucleotide exchange with improved modified oligonucleotides
WO2010074562A1 (en) 2008-12-22 2010-07-01 Keygene N.V. Use of double stranded rna to increase the efficiency of targeted gene alteration in plant protoplasts
WO2011044132A1 (en) 2009-10-06 2011-04-14 The Regents Of The University Of California Generation of haploid plants and improved plant breeding

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5432068A (en) * 1990-06-12 1995-07-11 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Control of male fertility using externally inducible promoter sequences

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2003017753A2 (en) 2001-08-23 2003-03-06 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel B.V. Reverse breeding
WO2007073149A1 (en) 2005-12-22 2007-06-28 Keygene N.V. Alternative nucleotides for improved targeted nucleotide exchange
EP2167660A1 (en) 2007-06-22 2010-03-31 Keygene N.V. Targeted nucleotide exchange with improved modified oligonucleotides
WO2010074562A1 (en) 2008-12-22 2010-07-01 Keygene N.V. Use of double stranded rna to increase the efficiency of targeted gene alteration in plant protoplasts
WO2011044132A1 (en) 2009-10-06 2011-04-14 The Regents Of The University Of California Generation of haploid plants and improved plant breeding

Non-Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
DAVID TWELL: "Male gametogenesis and germline specification in flowering plants", SEXUAL PLANT REPRODUCTION, SPRINGER, BERLIN, DE, vol. 24, no. 2, 20 November 2010 (2010-11-20), pages 149 - 160, XP019906743, ISSN: 1432-2145, DOI: 10.1007/S00497-010-0157-5 *
DINANT S ET AL: "The phloem pathway: New issues and old debates", COMPTES RENDUS - BIOLOGIES, ELSEVIER, PARIS, FR, vol. 333, no. 4, 1 April 2010 (2010-04-01), pages 307 - 319, XP026991617, ISSN: 1631-0691, [retrieved on 20100401] *
DIRKS R ET AL., PLANT BIOTECHNOL J, vol. 7, 2009, pages 837 - 845
DOUTRIAUX MP ET AL., MOL GEN GENET, vol. 257, 1998, pages 283 - 291
HARADA ET AL: "Grafting and RNA transport via phloem tissue in horticultural plants", SCIENTIA HORTICULTURAE, ELSEVIER SCIENCE PUBLISHERS, XX, vol. 125, no. 4, 26 July 2010 (2010-07-26), pages 545 - 550, XP027130979, ISSN: 0304-4238, [retrieved on 20100619] *
HORSCH RB ET AL., SCIENCE, vol. 227, 1985, pages 1229 - 1231
J. KEHR ET AL: "Long distance transport and movement of RNA through the phloem", JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, vol. 59, no. 1, 18 December 2007 (2007-12-18), pages 85 - 92, XP055013845, ISSN: 0022-0957, DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm176 *
KRAGLER ET AL: "RNA in the phloem: A crisis or a return on investment?", PLANT SCIENCE, ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, IE, vol. 178, no. 2, 1 February 2010 (2010-02-01), pages 99 - 104, XP026876947, ISSN: 0168-9452, [retrieved on 20100127] *
M N UDDIN ET AL: "Non-cell-autonomous RNA silencing spread in plants", BOTANICAL STUCIES, vol. 52, 1 April 2011 (2011-04-01), pages 129 - 136, XP055013922 *
MENGISTE T; PASZKOWSKI J, BIOL CHEM, vol. 380, 1999, pages 749 - 758
OH TJ; MAY GD, CURR OPIN BIOTECHNOL, vol. 12, 2001, pages 169 - 172
PASZKOWSKI J ET AL., EMBO J, vol. 7, 1988, pages 4021 - 4026
SWANSON EB ET AL., PLANT CELL REP, vol. 6, pages 94 - 97
TAKAHATA Y; KELLER WA, PLANT SCI, vol. 74, pages 235 - 242
VERGUNST AC; HOOYKAAS PJJ, CRIT REV PLANT SCI, vol. 18, 1999, pages 1 - 31
WIJNKER E ET AL: "Managing meiotic recombination in plant breeding", TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, ELSEVIER SCIENCE, OXFORD, GB, vol. 13, no. 12, 1 December 2008 (2008-12-01), pages 640 - 646, XP025694256, ISSN: 1360-1385, [retrieved on 20081126], DOI: 10.1016/J.TPLANTS.2008.09.004 *
YOO B-C ET AL: "A Systemic Small RNA Signaling System in Plants", THE PLANT CELL, AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLANT BIOLOGISTS, US, vol. 16, 1 August 2004 (2004-08-01), pages 1979 - 2000, XP002997405, ISSN: 1040-4651, DOI: 10.1105/TPC.104.023614 *
ZHU-YUN DENG ET AL: "OsDMC1 is required for homologous pairing in Oryza sativa", PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS, DORDRECHT, NL, vol. 65, no. 1-2, 12 June 2007 (2007-06-12), pages 31 - 42, XP019532703, ISSN: 1573-5028, DOI: 10.1007/S11103-007-9195-2 *

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2017178633A1 (en) 2016-04-14 2017-10-19 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel B.V. Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mrna
US10351865B2 (en) 2016-04-14 2019-07-16 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel B.V. Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mRNA
US11142771B2 (en) 2016-04-14 2021-10-12 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel B.V. Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mRNA
EP4282967A2 (en) 2016-04-14 2023-11-29 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V. Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mrna
EP4282967A3 (en) * 2016-04-14 2024-03-20 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V. Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mrna
US11981901B2 (en) 2016-04-14 2024-05-14 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel B.V. Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mRNA
EP4397765A2 (en) 2016-04-14 2024-07-10 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V. Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mrna
EP4397765A3 (en) * 2016-04-14 2024-12-04 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt en Zaadhandel B.V. Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mrna
IL261833B1 (en) * 2016-04-14 2025-03-01 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel Bv Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mrna
IL303427B2 (en) * 2016-04-14 2025-04-01 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel Bv Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mrna
IL261833B2 (en) * 2016-04-14 2025-07-01 Rijk Zwaan Zaadteelt En Zaadhandel Bv Method for changing the intercellular mobility of an mrna
WO2023105017A1 (en) * 2021-12-10 2023-06-15 Keygene N.V. Method to increase pollen fertility

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20130219558A1 (en) 2013-08-22
JP2014527406A (en) 2014-10-16
ES2567290T3 (en) 2016-04-21
EP2739132A1 (en) 2014-06-11
KR20140056294A (en) 2014-05-09
ZA201400434B (en) 2014-11-26
CN103763917A (en) 2014-04-30
AU2012291976B2 (en) 2016-12-01
BR112014002643A8 (en) 2017-06-20
EP2554045A1 (en) 2013-02-06
CA2842706A1 (en) 2013-02-07
IL230493A0 (en) 2014-03-31
BR112014002643A2 (en) 2017-06-13
AU2012291976A1 (en) 2014-02-06
IL230493A (en) 2017-07-31
EP2739132B1 (en) 2016-03-23
NZ619960A (en) 2016-03-31

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20230242926A1 (en) Methods and hybrids for targeted nucleic acid editing in plants using crispr/cas systems
Weinhold et al. Progressive 35S promoter methylation increases rapidly during vegetative development in transgenic Nicotiana attenuata plants
EP2574234A1 (en) Quartet breeding
Schmülling et al. Restoration of fertility by antisense RNA in genetically engineered male sterile tobacco plants
JP2019536443A (en) Compositions and methods for altering flowering and architecture for increasing productivity
CN102724865A (en) Modified transgene encoding a growth and/or development related protein in plants
AU2012291976B2 (en) Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
ES2750530T3 (en) Means and procedures to produce yield in plants
JP2005500069A (en) Reverse breeding
Yan et al. Functional identification and characterization of the Brassica Napu s transcription factor gene BnAP2, the ortholog of Arabidopsis thaliana APETALA2
US12460219B2 (en) Methods and systems for targeted modification of plant genes via meristem modulation and plants having engineered meristem modifications and other mutations
JP2019515693A (en) CONSTRUCTS AND VECTORS FOR TRANSGENIC PLANT TRANSFORMATION
Jáquez-Gutiérrez et al. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of tomato mutants provides new insights into leaf development and its relationship to agronomic traits
US12473563B2 (en) Immature inflorescence meristem editing
US20180223301A1 (en) Overexpression of plant genes involved in programmed cell death for yield increase
NZ619960B2 (en) Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
HK1195218A (en) Method for systemically influencing processes in the male meiocyte
Hunt Developing genetic components for a dominant restorable male sterility system in plants
Galliani Plant lateral organs: development, growth and ufe span
Ruiu Functional characterization of the parthenocarpic fruit mutation in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
WO2014210607A1 (en) Bms1 compositions and methods of use
CN116456824A (en) Parthenogenesis factors and methods of use thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12750554

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2842706

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2012750554

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2014523340

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2012291976

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20120803

Kind code of ref document: A

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20147004869

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112014002643

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112014002643

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20140203