WO2013017385A1

WO2013017385A1 - Method of operating a transmitter and transmitter

Info

Publication number: WO2013017385A1
Application number: PCT/EP2012/063592
Authority: WO
Inventors: Thorsten Wild
Original assignee: Alcatel Lucent SAS
Current assignee: Alcatel Lucent SAS
Priority date: 2011-08-03
Filing date: 2012-07-11
Publication date: 2013-02-07
Anticipated expiration: 2014-02-03
Also published as: EP2555445A1

Abstract

The invention relates to a method of operating a transmitter (100) of a radio communications system, wherein a process of horizontal beam forming of an antenna characteristic of an antenna system (110) of the transmitter (100) is performed by applying (300) predetermined sets of weight factors (w_1_1,.., w_8_4) to signals associated with different antenna elements ( 110_1_1,.., 110_8_4) of said antenna system (110) for controlling the antenna characteristic in a horizontal direction, wherein at least one of said weight factors (w1l_1,.., w_8_4 ) is modified (310) so as to control said antenna characteristic in a vertical direction.

Description

Method of Operating a Transmitter and Transmitter

Specification

Field of the invention

The present invention relates to a method of operating a transmitter of a radio communications system, wherein a process of horizontal beam forming of an antenna

characteristic of an antenna system of the transmitter is performed by applying predetermined sets of weight factors to signals associated wi enna elements of said antenna system for controlling the antenna

characteristic in a horizontal direction.

The present invention further relates to a transmitter of the aforementioned type.

Ttis piTGSsnt nvsntion cil so ^*Gl3,t©s to 3. tnsthod. of opsircitirij a receiver and to a receiver. Background

From EP 2 161 783 Al, it is already known to perform beamforming of an antenna characteristic in a horizontal direction. Thus, different receivers distributed in a horizontal plane around a transmitter can optimally be served by horizontally directing a main lobe of the antenna characteristic to the individual receivers.

It is also known to use so-called codebooks for the process of horizontal beamforming, wherein the codebooks comprise one or more codebook entries, each of which represents a predetermined set of weight factors . The weight factors are e.g. complex numbers which may be arranged in a matrix form, wherein the matrix elements may directly correspond with respective antenna elements of an antenna system the codebook entry is applied to. Thus, by applying different codebook entries to signals that are to be transmitted, different shapes of the ant ~_*L L-«-_L etX^"JL

achieved, because the weight factors effect a modification of a phase and/or amplitude of signal portions associated with individual antenna elements. Presently, radio communications systems do not comprise any mechanisms for efficiently performing a process of vertical beamformmg or a combination of horizontal and vertical beamforming . Summary

Thus, it is an object of the present invention to provide an improved method of operating a transmitter and an

ement vertical beamforming and/or a combination of horizontal and vertical beamforming. It is a further object of the present invention to provide an improved method of operating a receiver and an improved receiver which enable to

efficiently implement vertical beamforming and/or a

combination of horizontal and vertical beamforming.

Regarding the method of operating a transmitter of a radio communications system, this object is achieved by modifying at least one of said weight factors so as to control said antenna characteristic in a vertical direction.

The inventive principle advantageously enables to (also) perform vertical beamforming based on already existing sets of weight factors, i.e. codebooks, designed for horizontal beamforming. Thus, there is no requirement to calculate additional codebooks for being able to implement vertical beamforming. The transmitter according to the embodiments may rather choose a suitable existing codebook, or codebook entry, respectively, as far as horizontal beamforming is concerned, which may e.g. be done by employing conventional algorithms known to the skilled man or implemented in communications standards such as the LTE / LTE-A standard. Once a codebook entry which is suitable for the currently required horizontal beamforming situation is determined, the transmitter according to the embodiments may modify the codebook entry so as to effect a change of the antenna *1 jtiTSl (Z-"t C_* ^* ZL£_*t> d- t«IflC ^"V _*~t- ZL d- S 1 d 3 *t>ion. I.e., according to an embodiment, a transmitter may first determine a suitable codebook entry which represents a desired horizontal antenna characteristic by employing conventional algorithms. After that, the transmitter may modify one or more elements, i.e. weight factors, of the5 codebook entry to implement the modification of the antenna characteristic in the vertical direction.

The principle according to the embodiments advantageously enables to avoid a severe drawback which comes into effect 0 if a straightforward extension of codebooks for purely

horizontal beamforming to vertical beamforming is made. For

1riSt SIHC _/ i f t el ITS JLdjt^"!t d f f nt

5rt 1Gs foitr . o~X~ 3~ 2C^rit c3.1 IDd* cLITlf 51TTT1.1 IT J _f - tit d» * d^ · £ ί IZtclks1 _* C 1^jt t> ¾ 1 £ ^*d_*Π.t- horizontal beam patterns, an extension of each of said El) C__*■_£-. - l L_- I_* d^ Zl CI» Z^d U U HZ^* ZL CI_* d- _* Jt ^ Ut_* -t-7 I ZL -lZ » ϋ d-Π TH ^""Vd_* Jt ^* i - IL _* t1 beam patterns would result in thirty-two codebook entries. Thus, such a "straightforward" extension would tremendously increase a conventional codebook' s size. Moreover, the codebook grows exponentially with the number of antenna elements. I.e., 8-times the number of antenna elements result in 2 8 = 256-times the number of precoding /

beamforming codebook entries. This is a fundamental

disadvantage for the search of the best codebook entry at a receiver in terms of complexity and requiring also much higher feedback overhead for signalling the index of the best weight vector between receiver and transmitter.

In contrast to said "straightforward" extension, the inventive approach advantageously enables to rely on existing horizontal beamforming codebooks and only requires comparatively few extra steps and hardware resources, since existing codebook entries are modified to obtain an altered vertical antenna pattern. Signaling effort which is related to different vertical antenna patterns may also be kept very small, since vertical signaling, too, may simply rely on established signaling mechanisms for horizontal

beamforming based on existing codebooks. Only comparatively few additional information may be required to be exchanged for indicating the type of modification of the existing codebook entry, i.e. the information on which tilt angle has been attained by the modification or the like.

E.g., some number of predefined modifications to existing codebook entries may be defined which characterize an alteration of the tilt angle with respect to the original tilt angle that is effected by the existing codebook entries. Exemplarily, three different modifications may be l cCLG 6umiricd ¾?hnc-h. s · cj · ^^IGIGL 3LH 9.11s2.Γ3.tiΟΧΊ. Of ttxs tilt angle by 2 degrees each. Signaling information for defining which of the three different modifications or the default tilt angle (as implemented by the existing codebook entry or codebook, respectively) has been used may comprise two bit. I.e., by using two more bits of signaling information, a conventional feedback signaling for horizontal beamformlng may be extended by the inventive principle thus additionally enabling vertical beamformlng. Advantageously,

L-» t h-- --T t_* -X- ^ Jt^' T C_» CJ\JL X. ϋ-Γ C^TTliC_" ϋ L-* l__* D » X^' t_*ETC^ixXC* f> XJL T t_* tic* -t- dc** t) D CD^

entries, i.e., whole matrices of weight factors, because new tilt angle an existing codebook entry has been modified according to the embodiments.

According to an embodiment, a plurality of predetermined sets of weight factors is provided at the transmitter and, J3 ^*€i f (5 ^*3.Jb y 1 SO afc at iea S t ^*€ϋ CG ^"VS ^* hat 1 S

corif ^xxisd to 3sc "vs s cfnais f ΪΓΟΤΓΙ saxd tx^*aiT«STnitt€iijC^" » This may e.g. be achieved by employing conventional sets of weight factors for horizontal beamforming, which may already be defined by one or more communications standards.

According to a further preferred embodiment, which

facilitates deployment of the technique according to the mjt od me* ixt_*£5 _/ 23GLXd jjDlxxxc.il

fac t oi s is

a) a codebook as defined by al) the long term evolution, LTE, and/or a2) LTE-Advanced, LTE-A, standard, and/or a3) another standard common to the transmitter and said at least one receiver, or b) a modified codebook which has been derived from said codebook. According to a further preferred embodiment, said step of modifying comprises multiplying one or more of said weight factors with a factor depending on a desired tilt angle corresponding with said vertical direction. preferred embodiment, said

transmitter transmits at least two pilot signals, which are known at the transmitter and at least one receiver that is configured to receive signals from said transmitter, wherein each of said pilot signals is associated with a different tilt angle, which enables the receiver to assess an optimum tilt angle.

According to a further preferred embodiment, said pilot signals are transmitted a) simultaneously within al) different spatial streams and/or a2) different spreading codes and/or a3) different frequency sub-channels, and/or b) consecutively. According to a further preferred embodiment, different pilot signals, which are associated with different tilt angles, are transmitted with different transmit power levels. This embodiment advantageously enables to reduce the effect of a plurality of pilot signals with different tilt angles on the overall communications operation.

According to a particularly preferred embodiment, one or more pilot signals are transmitted at a "default tilt angle", i.e. a tilt angle implemented by an existing conventional codebook entry or determined according to the requirements of the involved radio cell. Especially in those cases, where a conventional codebook entry only defines phase relationships in horizontal direction, a vertical beamforming process may additionally be applied which defines said default tilt angle. This pilot signal is primarily used for conventional communications quality feedback processes and horizontal beamforming optimization, e.g. by using CQI (channel quality indicator) feedback from the receiver to the transmitter. At least one further pilot signal which is transmitted by means of a modified codebook entry, i.e. by using a non-standard tilt angle, which is different from the default tilt angle, i.e. by a predetermined increment (e.g. +/- 1 degree) , may be transmitted with a lower transmit power as compared to the first pilot signal at the default tilt angle. Thus, it is guaranteed, that the further pilot signal, which may e.g. be used to optimize a tilt angle, only has a reduced impact on the further communications processes. Moreover, since the precision of a channel estimation, which is performed depending on the pilot signals in a per se known manner, depends on a signal to noise plus interference ratio, SINR, of the received pilot signals, it is also guaranteed, that by using the first, strongest pilot signal (with the highest

transmission power) , for channel estimation, a maximum precision regarding channel estimation can be attained, whereas the further pilot signals which serve to find an optimized tilt angle are not required to have the same high

12T¾riSffl t pOWS ^* .

According to a particularly preferred embodiment, there is a continuous adaptation of tilt angle between transmitter (i.e., base station) and receiver (i.e., terminal) .

Preferably, after a specific pilot signal has been

transmitted using a irst tilt tilt angle, in a first transmission cycle, a subsequent transmission cycle may comprise a new, adapted tilt angle for cific pilot signal . For instance, the adapted tilt angle may be derived from the first tilt angle by means of an increment or depending on signal quality

G^'VciT lf¾t"^*.. ΟΙΊs _*

According to a further preferred embodiment, said

transmitter is configured to receive feedback information comprising information on a quality measure associated with at least one transmission of said transmitter at a specific tilt angle. Such feedback information may e.g. be

determined by one or more receivers that have received pilot signals from the transmitter. Preferably, the

feedback information is associated with a specific tilt angle, i.e. includes information on which receive quality (e.g., SINR) has been achieved by which tilt angle, i.e. which type of modified codebook entry that has been used by the transmitter for transmitting the respective pilot signal. Advantageously, for the feedback information, existing quality reporting mechanisms such as CQI may be employed, which may be extended by adding further feedback information indicating e.g. the respective tilt angles or some kind of index information which enables the

transmitter to determine which piece of feedback

information relates to which pilot signal . In order to reduce the required feedback rate further, the

CQI per tilt may be indicated relative to the CQI of the default tilt (in case this value is always available) . So the base station can extract the actual CQI as a sum of default-tilt-CQI and relative-CQI -per-tilt . Thus, from evaluating the feedback information, the transmitter may advantageously determine an optimum tilt angle which may be used for future transmissions to the receiver, but also for receiving signals from the receiver. I.e., if the transmitter according to the embodiments is implemented in a base transceiver station of a cellular communications network, both uplink and downlink

transmissions may make use of an optimized tilt angle determined according to the embodiments.

The determination of an optimized tilt angle may be

performed only once, but preferably periodically, in the sense of an iterative process, to continuously adapt a vertical beam pattern of the transmitter's antenna system to actual operating conditions such as e.g. a vertical position of a receiver.

A further solution to the object of the present invention is given by a transmitter according to claim 9. The

transmitter is configured to perform a process of

horizontal beam forming of an antenna characteristic of an antenna system of the transmitter by applying predetermined sets of weight factors to signals associated with different antenna elements of said antenna system for controlling the antenna characteristic in a horizontal direction, wherein said transmitter is configured to modify at least one of said weight factors so as to control said antenna

characteristic in a vertical direction.

Advantageously, said transmitter is configured to perform the method according the embodiments. A further solution to the object of the present invention is given by a method of operating a receiver according to claim 11. The method proposes that said receiver receives at least two pilot signals from a transmitter, which are known at the transmitter and at the receiver, wherein each of said pilot signals is associated with a different tilt angle corresponding with a vertical direction of an antenna characteristic of an antenna system of the transmitter.

According to an embodiment, said pilot signals are received a) simultaneously within al) different spatial streams and/or a2 ) different spreading codes and/or a3) different frequency sub-channels, and/or b) consecutively.

According to a further embodiment, said receiver evaluates said pilot signals to determine a quality measure

associated with said pilot signals, and returns feedback information comprising information on said quality measure to the transmitter.

Yet another solution to the object of the present invention is given by a receiver of a radio communications system, wherein said receiver is configured to receive at least two pilot signals from a transmitter, which are known at the transmitter and at the receiver, wherein each of said pilot signals is associated with a different tilt angle.

Preferably, the receiver is configured to perform the method according to the embodiments .

Brief description of the figures Further features, aspects and advantages of the present invention are given in the following detailed description with reference to the drawings in which:

Figure 1 depicts a schematic block diagram of a

transmitter according to an embodiment, Figure 2 schematically depicts a top view of a horizontal beamforming scenario, Figure 3 schematically depicts an antenna system of a transmitter according to an embodiment,

Figure 4 depicts a beamforming matrix that can be applied to signals transmitted via the antenna system according to Fig. 4 for beamforming,

Figure 5 schematically depicts a side view of a vertical beamforming scenario,

Figure 6 depicts a simplified flow chart of a method

according to the embodiments,

Figure 7 depicts a simplified block diagram of a method according to the embodiments, and

Figure 8 depicts a communications diagram according to an embodiment .

Description of the embodiments

Figure 1 depicts a schematic block diagram of a transmitter 100 according to an embodiment. The transmitter 100 may e.g. form part of a radio communications system,

particularly a cellular radio communications system such as according to the LTE or LTE-A standard.

The transmitter 100 comprises an antenna system 110 an exemplary embodiment of which is depicted in Fig. 3. The antenna system 110 comprises a plurality of individual antenna elements 110_1_1, .., 110_8_4 which are arranged in a matrix form comprising eight columns and four rows. Other arrangements of antenna elements are also possible

(including antenna elements with different polarizations, By individually supplying the various antenna elements 110_1_1, .., 110_8_4 with a respective instance of a signal to be transmitted, a resulting antenna characteristic of said antenna system 110 can be influenced in a per se known manner ("phased array antenna"). Preferably, the various antenna elements 110_1_1, .., 110_8_4 may be supplied with phase-shifted instances of the same transmit signal to alter the beam pattern of the antenna system 110 both in a horizontal and/or vertical direction.

Fig. 4 depicts a matrix W each element w_l_l , .., w_8_4 of which represents a weight factor characterizing a phase shift and/or amplitude modification that may be applied to a corresponding antenna element 110_1_1 , .., 110_8_4 of the antenna system 110 (Fig. 3) . I.e., by choosing w_l_l=1 , it is determined that the antenna element 110_1_1 is supplied with the non-phase-shifted instance of the transmit signal and that no amplitude modification is applied. Usually, the weight factors w_l_l, .., w_8_4 are represented by complex numbers.

For facilitating an efficient horizontal beamforming, conventional transmitters as e.g. provided within LTE base stations comprise at least one so-called code book, which is a collection of a plurality of matrices similar to the matrix W depicted by Fig. 4. Each of said matrices of the code book is also referred to as "codebook entry" . For a given antenna system 110, the matrix elements of each codebook entry are determined so as to provide a plurality of different horizontal beam patterns. I.e., a codebook may comprise eight different entries each of which - when being applied to the transmit signal in the sense of a weighting operation - effects a different horizontal beam pattern of the antenna system 110. Thus, by picking one entry from the codebook, a transmitter may efficiently reconfigure the beam pattern of its antenna system 110 without performing complex calculations. The beamforming matrix is employed in a per se known manner in a signal processing chain and may e.g. be multiplied with a signal vector that comprises data symbols to be transmitted by the transmitter 100. Note that according to an embodiment, existing antenna calibration algorithms and procedures can be required and/or used in order to ensure that the phase and amplitude relationships at the output of the digital baseband signal processing are preserved at the output of the transmit antennas.

The transmitter 100 (Fig. 1) according to the embodiments also comprises a codebook 130, which may contain several codebook entries W_i , W_i+1, _i+2, .., i.e. beamforming matrices.

According to another embodiment, the dimensions of

precoding matrices might differ from the dimensions of antenna elements depicted in Fig.3, as this codebook can be intended for horizontal beamforming/precoding only, e.g. as defined in 3GPP TS36.211 (release 8,9,10). Thus this codebook describes amplitude and phase relations between the element columns of Fig. 3 for a given fixed downtilt . The latter one again may be created by mechanically tilting the antenna array or modifying the amplitudes and phases per column, as known from classical beamforming technology for generalized array configuration, as e.g. in "Phased Array Antenna Handbook", R.J. Mailloux, Artech House, Boston/London, 1993.

An operation of the transmitter 100 is controlled by the control device 120 that may comprise processor means such as a microcontroller, a digital signal processor (DSP) or a programmable logic circuit and the like. The control device 120 is configured to perform the method according to the embodiments as explained below. Particularly, the control device 120 is configured to S616Ct 1.T1. ULS6 cl. S Lf-LC

beamforming matrix from the codebook 130 depending on a

I on t3 JL I 9Lm j cit1€5 to 3.1L s€t d Joy tns s unt nn¾ system 110.

Figure 2 schematically depicts a top view of a horizontal beamforming scenario comprising the transmitter 100 of Fig. 1 and its antenna system 110. For implementing a horizontal beam pattern of the antenna system 110 which exhibits a main lobe in a first direction characterized by a first azimuth angle cpl with respect to a reference angle (i.e., the dashed line of Fig. 2, which defines an azimuth angle of φ=0) , the transmitter 100 under the control of the control device 120 selects a corresponding first

beamforming matrix W_i+1 (Fig. 1) . As can be seen from Fig. 2, the resulting horizontal beam pattern is ideal for data transmissions to the first receiver 210, which may be a terminal ("User Equipment") served by the LTE base station comprising the transmitter 100. However, for optimizing data transmissions to the second receiver 220, as far as an azimuth (horizontal) direction is concerned, the transmitter 100 may - again under the control of the control device 120 - select another

beamforming matrix W_i+2 (Fig. 1) from its codebook 130 which ensures that the main lobe of the resulting beam

^jj^3L i≠ E_*t in. ci)f» I.nc* cL-f.L_*d - χη^- £5^"^^ί31» c# x JL JL(3 i> »~m JL ULΐ^"£_· JLt*lr t*lnc^ direction de f ined by the s econd a z imuth angle cp2.

According to the embodiments, the above explained technique of horizontal beamforming by using the codebook 130 is extended to vertical beamforming. More specifically, in order to alter a beam pattern of the antenna system 110 in vertical direction, the embodiments propose not to provide extra beamforming matrices "from scratch" , but rather to modify at least one of said weight factors w_l_l , .., w_8_4 (Fig. 4) of a suitable existing beamforming matrix from the codebook 130 so as to control said antenna characteristic in a vertical direction.

Optionally, if there is only an existing beamforming vector, e.g. comprising the elements w_l_l to w_8_l, (i.e., -L IX€_-

phase relationships as used for conventional horizontal beamforming, this existing beamforming vector may suitably be expanded prior to applying the further steps according to the inventive principle. Such expansion may e.g.

comprise providing three further line vectors w_l_2 , .., w_8_2 ; w_l_3, .., w_8_3 ; w_l_4 , .., w_8_4 , which may be identical to the existing beamforming vector w_l_l to w_8_l. Alternatively, the different line vectors may also be modified individually with respect to each other to define a specific tilt angle, which may e.g. constituted the default tilt angle referred to above.

The inventive principle, according to which an existing codebook entry, i.e. beamforming matrix (which may also be obtained by the above explained step of expansion from an existing line vector) , is used as a basis for vertical beamforming, has the significant advantage that existing codebooks 130 and well-established feedback mechanisms e.g. for closed-loop feedback processes aimed at horizontal beamforming between the transmitter 100 and the receiver 210 may be relied upon. I.e., initially, for a first transmission of signals to the receiver 210, the transmitter 100 may employ the already existing codebook entry _i+1, which may e.g. be defined by the L E standard and as such well known by the transmitter and LTE compatible terminals 210, 220.

Obviously, the already existing codebook entry W_i+1 is also associated with a specific tilt angle (also:

"downtilt" because most operational scenarios require negative tilt angles with respect to a virtual horizontal reference plane) that correlates with a vertical antenna pattern that is established when using the existing

codebook entry _i+1 for beamforming . Such default downtilt angle may e.g. amount to about -10° with reference to a virtual horizontal plane. I.e., by default, all codebook entries of the codebook 130 may provide the default tilt angle of about - 10°. According to a preferred embodiment, cell-specific reference symbols (CRS) , also called common pilots or training symbols, which are used over the entire cell for measurements, e.g. for handover, are always transmitted wi

To improve communications with a specific receiver 210, the transmitter 100 according to the embodiments may - apart from performing conventional horizontal beamforming by means of the codebook 130 - advantageously also take into account a vertical position of the receiver 210 with respect to the transmitter 100.

This may e.g. be achieved by transmitting several reference signals (also known as training or pilot symbols) , which are preferably known both at the transmitter 100 and the receiver 210 from the transmitter 110 to the receiver 210, wherein different reference signals are transmitted with different tilt angles each. According to a further

preferred embodiment, those reference symbols can be user- specific. Thus they are transmitted with the same antenna weights than corresponding time- frequency neighboured data- symbols for a particular user. In analogy to the LTE

can be called demodulation reference symbols (DMRS) .

Upon receiving said different reference signals at said different downtilts, the receiver 210 may assess a quality measure which may e.g. comprise a SINR associated with the different reference signals received at said different downtilts. For each reference signal, a corresponding quality measure may be forwarded from the receiver 210 to the transmitter 100 either directly (uplink direction) or via other devices/feedback channels.

According to an embodiment, which is e.g. applicable to LTE / LTE-Advanced systems, the following measures may be applied: While for default downtilt measurements, the receiver still relies on the CRS, which use a constant downtilt, for the offered deviating downtilts, the SINR / CQI / CQI relative to default downtilt measurements may now be based on the DMRS. Here pilot sets may be used which were designed for additional spatial streams / layers and are currently unused.

Upon receiving the feedback data comprising the different quality measures, the transmitter 100 may determine which of the previously used downtilts yields optimal values of the quality measure and may in future use the so determined optimal downtilt for downlink and/or uplink transmissions.

Iteratively optimizing the downtilt is also possible. This may be achieved by repeating the above explained procedure continuously . Fig. 5 schematically depicts a side view of the transmitter 100 an a receiver 210.

A main lobe of a first vertical antenna pattern as

implemented by the transmitter 100 is aligned horizontally. This vertical antenna pattern may e.g. be attained by employing the first beamforming matrix W_i+1 of the

codebook 130 (Fig. 1) .

As is obvious from Fig. 5, the main lobe of a further vertical antenna pattern drawn wi line would be better su

the first main lobe, which is due to the vertical

displacement of the components 100, 210 with respect to each other.

Generally, for implementing a vertical antenna pattern which deviates from the standard shape as defined by the conventional codebook 130, the present embodiments propose to alter one or more weight factors, i.e. matrix elements, of the respective beamforming matrix.

Preferably, the following approach is done: The

conventional codebook is decomposed into precoding vectors per spatial stream/layer. Each element of the vector corresponds to the conventional horizontal weight used as input for an entire antenna element column. In order to expand this conventional codebook vector into the larger 2- D array weight vector matrix of Fig. 4, each element of the conventional vector is repeated in an entire column of the

2-D array. In order to create the default downtilt or any other new alternative tilt.

The objective of this modification is to preserve the original horizontal pattern of the conventional codebook vector, while creating a desired downtilt, thus steering the main lobe of the beam in the desired horizontal and

"\^C»ϋ^* ZLC9.1 Lire_*C_*t- ZL.Oil■ ( I Π t>tic_* esse when also different polarization directions are used, the precoding

vector/matrix from the codebook has to be expanded to the overall weights in fig.4 such, that the original resulting horizontal directivity pattern of the element columns is preserved per polarization direction and the phase

relations between the different polarization directions are also preserved as much as possible.) For instance, each weight factor w_l_l, w_2_l , .., w_8_l that is associated with an antenna element of a specific row of the matrix configuration of Fig. 3, may be

multiplied by a (same) factor depending on the desired tilt angle and the vertical position of the respective antenna element row in the matrix (Fig. 3) . Thus, the vertical beam pattern may be influenced so as to alter the tilt angle, e _* cj _* t-o titiGi ^"V^"c¾1u.e of th.€» des1ired 1 ZL11 ciricj e Θ2 (ϊ*¹1cj■ 5 ^ _* J¾. suitable factor for modifying individual weight factors w_l_l, w_2_l, .., w_8_l particularly regarding their phase may e.g. be described by: exp ( -j *k*z*cos (Θ) ) , wherein exp ( . ) is the exponential function, j is the imaginary τ_ιη t k_f z irepieseritz cjeometIT1c9. [ 3.33.rnete ^*s d f 9.

vertical position of an antenna element, and Θ is a desired resulting tilt angle of a main lobe of the antenna pattern that is to be effected by the modified beamforming matrix.

By using existing codebook entries as a basis for the modification according to the embodiments, the existing horizontal beamforming feedback techniques may still be

Z*H-L ZL XZL ~f-~ JCZ T C^*!. tZ* -X.or « Additionally, only predefined manipulations to the existing codebook entries must be defined and associated with some additional signaling information so that a defined reconfiguration of the vertical beam pattern may be

performed and signalled between the involved components 100, 210.

according to an embodiment. In a first step 300, the transmitter 100 selects and applies a predetermined set of weight factors w_l_l, .., w_8_4, e.g. the first beamforming matrix W_i+1, to a

ZT€^ f 63·^* 65 IXCe S .X. jri .1 tO ^"T .X S1TI 11Od ¾/h.1Ch. ΧΓίΞΐ S^"l_X11 S 1 X a.

well-defined antenna characteristic in a horizontal

direction for the respective transmission. Also, the defined in that a specific vertical beam pattern is defined by the first beamforming matrix W_i+1. For instance, the application of the first beamforming matrix W_i+1 results as cLeipi tΌd k^y Fi » 1 ixd t tnei txoxrιzoxxta.11^ a.JLu.cjred ^"veIT11 a1 main lobe of Fig. 5. Using this antenna beam pattern, a first reference signal is sent to the receiver 210.

After that, in step 310, the first beamforming matrix W_i+1 or at least one weight factor thereof, is modified in order to alter the resulting vertical beam pattern, for example to attain the desired shape which is symbolized by a dashed ellipse in Fig. 5. Preferably, the horizontal beam pattern is not altered by said modification, since it is already optimal, cf . Fig. 1. Using this further antenna beam pattern, which comprises an increased downtilt angle with respect to the previously used beam pattern, a second reference signal is sent to the receiver 210. in s ep 320, the re iver 210 Θ lu es k>oth, received reference signals and derives respec ive quality measures (i.e., SINR) therefrom which may be returned to the transmitter 100 in an uplink communication (not shown) to provide feedback information on which tilt angle to use in future .

According to further preferred embodiments, said plurality of predetermined sets of weight factors w_l_l, .., w_8_4 the embodiments are based on is a) a codebook 130 as defined by al) the long term evolution, LTE, and/or a2) LTE-Advanced, LTE-A, standard, and/or a3 ) another standard common to the transmitter 100 and said at least one

receiver 210, or b) a modified codebook which has been derived from said codebook 130, i.e. in the course of further codebook adaptations, which may be combined with the embodiments.

In any case, since the embodiments are directed to modify existing beamforming matrices W_i , W_i+1 , .. (Fig. 1) which are already known to both involved components 100, 210, comparatively few additional signaling is required. The modification 310 (Fig. 3) of an existing beamforming matrix or its weight factor elements, respectively, may e.g. be performed by multiplication with a factor depending on a desired tilt angle. However other modifications such as addition or the like is also possible. According to a further preferred embodiment, said

transmitter 100 transmits at least two pilot signals PSl, PS2, which are known at the transmitter 100 and at least one receiver 210 that is configured to receive signals from said transmitter 100, cf . the communications diagram of Fig. 8, step 500. The pilot signals PS1, PS2 may e.g. be the OMRS dedicated pilot signals as defined by the LTE and LTE-A standards, and may be associated wi

tilt angle each as explained above.

In LTE-A, there are so-called demodulation reference symbols which offer orthogonal pilot sequences PS1, PS2 , .. for at least 4 spatial streams. They may be inserted into physical resource blocks (PRB) dedicated to the respective receiver 210 and are precoded/beamformed (in a mathematical sense, precoding is equivalent to beamforming, because both ion of a signal vector/matrix by a respective precoding or beamforming matrix) by means of a conventional and/or the modified beamforming matrix, cf . the steps 300, 310 of Fig. 6, so that an overall precoded/beamformed transmission of one stream can be seen from receiver perspective as a transmission from a single virtual antenna with a specific horizontal and vertical beam pattern. Thus, advantageously, the transmission 500 of pilot signals PS1, PS2, .. (Fig. 8) may be performed on a per-user basis so tticit ths optimi stfcίon of ct vsirtiC¾ tG9.rn pcittern

according to the embodiments may also be effected for individual users/receivers 210, 220 (Fig. 2) . According to a further embodiment, said pilot signals PS1 , PS2 are transmitted simultaneously wi

streams as enabled e.g. according to the LTE-A standard.

Alternatively or in addition, said pilot signals PS1, PS2 may also be transmitted simultaneously, i.e. at the same time, within different frequency sub-channels that may be employed by the transmitter 100, e.g. different subcarriers of an LTE time/frequency radio resource configuration.

According to a further embodiment, it is also possible to transmit said pilot signals PS1, PS2 consecutively, i.e. after the other. After receiving 510 (Fig. 8) the pilot signals PS1, PS2 , the receiver 210 may evaluate them and provide respective feedback information FBI, FB2 to the transmitter 100. After .Κ€ϊc€i JL 520 s ctici f sc¾l33.ck. FB1 JFIB2 tt© t itrcLi sTTiifct© 21^* 100 may control further transmissions to the receiver 210 depending on the feedback information FBI, FB2. For

example, the transmitter 100 may perform further

modifications of existing or previously modified

beamforming matrices, to evaluate feedback information for other tilt angles or vertical beam patterns, respectively. Generally, horizontal and vertical beamforming may also be mixed according to the embodiments. E.g., it is possible to first determine a suitable existing beamforming matrix from the codebook 130 (Fig. 1) to optimize horizontal

beamforming. After that, the so chosen existing beamforming matrix may be modified according to the embodiments to adjust the vertical beam pattern.

Alternatively, during an (iterative) adjustment of the vertical beam pattern by modification according to the embodiments, it is also possible to "change" the underlying existing codebook entry, e.g. if horizontal beamforming has to be adjusted due to a comparatively large change in the horizontal position of the receiver 210. However, the new codebook entry, which addresses the change in the

horizontal configuration, may also be modified according to the embodiments, e.g. by means of those factors which have before been used to modify the previous codebook entry. Thus, a vertical beam pattern adjustment process is not substantially interrupted even if the underlying basis, i.e. existing beamforming matrix, is changed.

According to a further preferred embodiment, different pilot signals PS1, PS2 (Fig. 8), which are associated with are transmitted with different transmit power levels. This embodiment advantageously

__L 3 ^"t l ~-L f- L*> signals PS1, PS2 with different tilt angles on the overall communications operation. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, one or more pilot signals PS1 are transmitted at a "default tilt angle", i.e. a tilt angle implemented by an existing conventional codebook entry _i+1 (Fig. 1) . This pilot signal PS1 is primarily used for conventional communications quality feedback processes and horizontal beamforming optimization, e.g. by using CQI

(channel quality indicator) feedback from the receiver 210 to the transmitter 100. At least one further pilot signal PS2 (Fig. 8) which is transmitted by means of a modified codebook entry W_i+1', i.e. by using a non-standard tilt angle, which is different from the default tilt angle, i.e. by a predetermined increment (e.g. +/- 1 degree), may be transmitted with a lower transmit power as compared to the first pilot signal PS1 at the default tilt angle. Thus, it is guaranteed, that the further pilot signal PS2, which may e.g. be used to optimize the tilt angle, only has a reduced impact on the further communications processes. Moreover, since the precision of a channel estimation, which is performed depending on the pilot signals PS1, PS2 in a per se known manner, depends on a signal to noise plus

interference ratio, SINR, of the received pilot signals, it is also guaranteed, that by using the first, strongest pilot signal PS1 (with the highest transmission power) , for channel estimation, a maximum precision regarding channel estimation can be attained, whereas the further pilot signals PS2 which serve to find an optimized tilt angle are not required to have the same high transmit power.

Fig. 7 depicts a simplified block diagram of a method according to the embodiments. An existing codebook entry, e.g. beamforming matrix, W_i+1 is retrieved by the control device 120 (Fig. 1) from

block 400, the functionality of which may also be

implemented within the control device 120, the ret

beamforming matrix W_i+1 is modified according to the embodiments to alter a resulting vertical beam pattern, whereby a modified beamforming matrix W'_i+1 is obtained.

As already explained above, if there is only an existing beamforming vector, e.g. comprising the elements w_l_l to w_8_l, (i.e., a line vector) which is sufficient for defining horizontal phase relationships as used for

conventional horizontal beamforming, this existing

beamforming vector may suitably be expanded in order to provide the existing codebook entry prior to applying the further steps according to the inventive principle. This modified beamforming matrix W'_i+1 may be employed for transmission of one or more pilot signals PS2 to the receiver 210, cf. the processing block 410 of Fig. 7. The processing block of Fig. 7 further includes a receiving process of the pilot signal PS2 at the receiver 210 and an evaluation at the receiver 210, e.g. of a quality measure associated with the pilot signal PS2, which finally yields an SINR value associated with the pilot signal PS2. Based on this SINR value associated with the modified beamforming matrix W'_i+1 that has been employed for transmitting the pilot signal PS2 to the receiver 210, the transmitter 100 may determine whether using the modified beamforming matrix W'_i+1 yielded any advantages regarding transmission quality e.g. as compared to a transmission of a pilot signal PS1 with a standard beamforming matrix _i+1. From this θ''θ-ΐίΐο.ΐΐ·ion, it can be derived whether the non-standard downtilt as implemented by said modified beamforming matrix W'_i+1 is better suited for transmissions to the receiver 210 than the standard downtilt as implied by the standard beamforming matrix W_i+1. Of course, according to further embodiments, relative improvements of transmission quality (comparison between different non-standard downtilts) may also be assessed. Advantageously, according to an embodiment, the transmitter 100 is configured to receive 520 (Fig. 8) feedback

information FBI, FB2 comprising information on a quality measure associated with at least one transmission of said t»m^*¾IX£31X11t>^"tG3. L00 c¾t- c¾ £3J3^iiC»«X. if_* lC t> 11t cL-CC}¹1C · Generally, the principle according to the embodiments is based on a reuse of existing codebooks 130 (Fig. 1) , as well as of existing, i.e. standardized, pilot signals and feedback mechanisms provided for the horizontal dimension.

According to a further embodiment, vertical beamforming of common pilot signals (cell-specific reference symbols) and transmission to new users 210, 220 may be done with a default downtilt (e.g. the same as optimized for static downtilt, which is implied by existing codebooks 130) .

According to a further embodiment, existing orthogonal sets of dedicated pilot signals are used to do user-individual downtilt measurements, e.g. when there is data transmission towards a user (receiver 210) . In this case, the

transmitter 100 may use orthogonal dedicated pilot patterns of unused spatial streams of a communications process between transmitter 100 and receiver 210 to offer alternative downtilts to the mobile. The alternative downtilts may advantageously be obtained by employing modified beamforming matrices on the basis of the existing codebook 130_» as explained above. Further, the receiver 210 may estimate a receive SINR of the pilot signals PS1, PS2 (Fig. 8) with different downtilts used for transmission, said different downtilts also comprising alternative downtilts as obtained by modification of existing codebook entries. In case one of the alternative downtilts (or the associated beamforming matrix, i.e. codebook entry)

achieves a better SINR, this is indicated by the receiver 2 0 to the tnTcinsm GIT XOO in. the sense of 3. £e dbcLC.ki oop ·

Advantageously, according to some embodiments, the

transmitter 100 uses knowledge obtained from the receiver 210 by means of the feedback information FBI, FB2 (Fig. 8) . If there is a better alternative downtilt, the transmitter 100 may make use of it for the next transmission (s) . When making these decisions, the transmitter 100 may also take into account global optimizing criteria, i.e. whether the alternative downtilt , which yields a better SINR at one specific receiver 210, is also considered advantageous for the overall system such as a radio cell operated by said transmitter 100. The above mentioned step of offering alternative downtilts, which can be incremental changes, is preferably repeated constantly in the sense of an iterative optimization process, which allows converging to the knowledge of optimal downtilt. As already mentioned above, a vertical beam pattern optimization according to the embodiments may also be combined with a (conventional) horizontal beam pattern optimization process. A major advantage of the embodiments is the fact that existing codebooks 130, pilot signal and feedback

mechanisms for the horizontal dimension may be reused. E.g., for LTE / LTE-A, cell-specific reference symbols are used in conjunction with PMI (precoding matrix indicator) and CQI (channel quality indicator) feedback. This

standardized information may be extended according to the embodiments by signaling information which characterizes modifications to the existing codebook entries according to the embodiments.

Per se, according to a further embodiment, vertical

beamforming of common pilots (i.e., pilot signals) and transmission to new users/receivers 210 may be done with a default downtilt: This means that each per-antenna cell- specific reference symbol, e.g. representing a whole

,^"V^"c_-_' 1>_* c¾»-l* --L Χ- Τ Ί Ίι J

4» (Fig. 3) , is already beamformed with a predetermined default downtilt. Generally, three-dimensional (3-D) beamforming (also referred to as "beamsteering" ) can be done as follows: wherein wi

represents a weight factor for antenna element i at

position (yi, zi) and elevation Θ and azimuth φ. According to another embodiment, the antenna system 110 (Fig. 3) may only be steered, i.e. controlled, on a per- column-basis in a default elevation direction Θ, which can be done by providing weighting factors of the form:

to another embodiment, a default downtilt, which is associated with a default vert

used when initially transmitting data to a receiver for the first time, i.e. when the receiver 220 joins a radio cell provided by said transmitter 100. The default downtilt may e.g. be chosen with the same value as an optimized static downtilt for classical 2-D beamforming systems. While each column of an existinq beamforming matrix can be weighted based on the weighting factors wi as defined above,

relative weights between the columns of said matrix can be identical to the 2-D solutions, i.e. existing codebook entries, provided by the existing PMI -based feedback reporting. Thereby, the horizontal beamforming process is not influenced by the vertical beamforming extension according to the embodiments. A further preferred embodiment is explained below. When there is data transmission from the transmitter 100 to a receiver 210, usually dedicated pilots (i.e., dedicated pilot signals, which can also be called user specific reference symbols, training symbols with user-specific antenna weights, ...) can be used for demodulation purposes. In LTE / LTE-A, there are dedicated pilots (from release 9 on, there are more than one set of dedicated pilots, which are orthogonal) . In LTE-A there are so-called demodulation reference symbols which offer orthogonal pilot sequences for at least 4 spatial streams. They are inserted into the physical resource blocks ( PRB ) dedicated to the respective user and are precoded/beamformed, so that the overall precoded/beamformed transmission of one stream can be seen from receiver perspective as a transmission from a single virtual antenna.

With K many available orthogonal sets of dedicated

reference symbols, if now N spatial streams are used by a certain receiver 210, there are K-N many spatial streams or sequences which are unused. According to a preferred embodiment, at least a part of the K-N many "remaining sequences", i.e. the presently unused spatial streams, may be employed for precoding/beamforming with alternative downtilts. For example, up to K-N many presently unused spatial streams may be used by the transmitter 100 to transmit different pilot signals PS1, PS2 with different downtilts (attained by providing modified beamforming matrices) to the D_t t>C- tz»i.ncj' whether these different downtilts lead to better SINR values .

According to an embodiment, if a default downtilt (e.g., as provided by an existing codebook entry) is at 0d=lO2° and a receiver 210 is served with one spatial stream with this downti11 by the transmitter 100, a first pilot sequence PS1 is precoded with 0d=lO2° (in conj unction with the

azimuthal weights from the existing 2-D codebook based on PMI - feedback) . In addition to that, a second pilot sequence PS2 is transmitted with another downtilt of 0d=99° (so uptilted by 3°), and a third pilot sequence is transmitted with Od-105° (so downtilted by 3°) .

According to a further embodiment, in case of dual stream wherein a receiver 210 is simultaneously supplied with two spatial streams by the transmitter 100 ; 1^st / 2^nd stream and sequence are transmitted with 0d=lO2° (together with the two azimuthal PMI -based weight vectors) . A 3^rd / 4^th sequence, which may comprise pilot signals, are now transmitted with downtilts of 0d=99° / 105°, i.e.

alternative downtilts with respect to the first and second

S-D* c_¾. t-- c¾ X- ft -i ^"I- ^_** ci.W _* IS -JL1ΓΧC__* I_* t» ]ΠιίΕ« ^"t_* ΙΤ «L> ¾. ^"JL _1 ~£ -^J. Jt- t l 3 ^-^- L --L C¾. X. i— - It-T i cS-TYlti iS are only required for "test purposes", i.e. the

determination of an optimized downtilt, and no user data has to be transmitted via the third and fourth spatial streams, just a first azimuthal PMI-based weight vector may be employed for the transmission via the third and fourth spatial streams . As already mentioned above, according to a further

embodiment, the transmit power of the additional sequences may be lowered in order to keep as low impact as possible on a channel estimation quality of an actual data

transmission e.g. employing a first pilot sequence PS1 which is transmitted using an existing codebook entry. The transmit power of the additional sequences may either be lowered by a default value (also known at the receiver 210) or it could be an adaptive choice by the transmitter 100 which has to be indicated by forward signalling, i.e. in the downlink direction. This lowered transmit power value has to be taken into account at the receiver 210 for SINR eSt TTlctt 10Π -

According to a further embodiment, e.g. in (the unlikely) case the data transmission requires all K many available spatial streams, alternative downtilt sequences may be transmitted in a consecutive time slot / subframe with less than K used spatial streams .

According to a further embodiment, the provisioning and transmission or

alternative downtilts preferably has to follow a set of (configurable) rules known at both ends 100, 210 of the link. Changes of the configuration could be indicated by higher layer signalling.

Example for such rules could be: If i many sequences (i.e., Spctticl SfclT€i<3.ffl,S) Sed nd t-tSITG cilCQ. t le st 2

remaining sequences, then sequence i+1 is assigned a z_* C-nct> in lne ie*nrit li-a.1 u.j t-_~L1^*t

o£ t>Inc* t-11t»

(also ^«. "downtilt angle") by a predetermined angle offset), while sequence i+2 is a certain incremental downtilt. If there is only one remaining sequence, then this sequence is an incremental uptilt in evenly numbered time-slots and an incremental downtilt in odd ones, i.e. positive and

negative alterations of an currently used or standard downtilt are provided alternately.

According to an embodiment, having received the above mentioned sequences or pilot signals, the receiver 210 can

CZ» C?TT |Z)^"L1 t _*€ϊ Ε ΐ ^ Si Z! tZ- ZL"VC- 3Z^*S- £31-11 ^"t ZL Γ10 ί3 ZL.CjT o,1 ^*"^* t O ZL JTltZ C- HZ^*ft- IT -JX C C_* . t ZL £3

(SINRs) , e.g. at a decoder input (after receive combining) . The receiver 210 may then compare the SINR of the downtilt used for transmission and the receive SINRs of all other alternative downtilts and find the best solution. This solution is now indicated via uplink feedback signalling FBI, FB2 (Fig. 8) . A particularly simple indicator could be ternary: *-l"; uptilt (=increase of tilt angle) is better; ^w0" : keep tilt used for transmission; "1" : downtilt

(=decrease of tilt angle) is better.

According to a further embodiment, the feedback FBI, FB2 also includes information on an improvement in SINR between a reference tilt (or default tilt) and the best alternative

3. S c3.6t .S3TTn,iriGd, -by^{^} t- tlG 3T€! C G ΐνθ IT 2 0 _* This c¾.11ows taking into account SINR gains at the link adaptation. E.g., it might be necessary to correct reported CQI values, which are based on cell-specific reference symbols, using the default tilt.

According to a further embodiment, the transmitter 100 uses the knowledge obtained from the feedback FBI, FB2 of the receiver 210: If there is a better alternative downtilt, the transmitter 100 makes use of it for the next

transmission, in case it is considered advantageous for the overall system. E.g., the transmitter keeps the modified beamforming matrix W'_i+1 (Fig . 7) for the future

transmissions . However, since increasing a tilt angle, i.e. rising the elevation of a main lobe of an antenna beam pattern, usually leads to higher interference caused to neighbour cells in the case of cellular radio networks, the

transmitter 100 may decide whether it will use a new, increased tilt angle or

may coordinate its operation with transmitters of

neighboring base stations, e.g. via backhaul, to make such decision.

The embodiments advantageously enable 3-D beamforming by providing a simple and yet efficient feedback extension which does not require changes to existing and/or

standardized codebooks 130 and reference symbols. Rather, the basic mechanisms of established systems like LTE / LTE- A may be relied upon and extended as explained above. Simulations have shown, that a user-specific downtilt in conjunction with coordinated interference avoidance in a beneficial scenario, can achieve a lOdB gain in the

cumulative distribution function ( CDF ) of per-user-SINR and thus a much higher system performance. In order to obtain such gains, the optimal user-specific downtilts have to be known at the transmitter side, which may be achieved by employing the method according to the embodiments.

The description and drawings merely illustrate the

principles of the invention. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements that, although not explicitly

described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and are included within its spirit and scope. Furthermore, all examples recited herein are principally intended expressly to be only for pedagogical purposes to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the invention and the concepts contributed by the inventor (s) to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the invention, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass equivalents thereof.

Claims

Method of operating a transmitter (100) of a radio communications system, wherein a process of horizontal beam forming of an antenna characteristic of an antenna system (110) of the transmitter (100) is performed by applying (300) predetermined sets of weight factors (w_l_l, .., w_8_4) to signals

iated with different antenna elements (110 1 1,

.., 110_8_4) of said antenna system (110) for

controlling the antenna characteristic in a horizontal direction, wherein at least one of said weight factors

(w_l_l, .. , w_8_4 ) is modified (310) so as to control said antenna characteristic in a vertical direction.

Method according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of predetermined sets of weight factors (w_l_l, .., w_8_4) is provided at the transmitter (100) and, preferably, also at at least one receiver (210) that

X S Onf X^UICGCi tO ITGCeiVe S X CJXlclX S f 2 ΟΤΠ Scixd t XTct-QSTTlXttex

(100) .

Method according to claim 2, wherein said plurality of j5 rsd.G S!CTn nsd set s of G jh f .c oi s (w i 1 , . · / w_8_4 ) is a) a codebook (130) as defined by !-L> $ t--IT --- JLC-^_*-X^»~ term evolution, LTE, release 8, 9, 10, and/or a2) LTE-Advanced, LTE-A, standard, release 8, 9, 10 , and/or another standard common to the transmitter (100) and said at least one receiver (210) , or b) a modified codebook which has been derived from said codebook (130) .

Method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein said step of modifying (310) comprises

multiplying one or more of said weight factors (w_l_l, .., _8_4) with a factor depending on a desired tilt angle corresponding with said vertical direction.

Method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein said transmitter (100) transmits at least two pilot signals (PS1, PS2) , which are known at the transmitter (100) and at least one receiver (210) that is configured to receive signals from said transmitter (100), wherein each of said pilot signals (PS1, PS2) is associated with a different tilt angle.

Method according to claim 5, wherein said pilot signals (PS1, PS2) are transmitted a) simultaneously within al) different spatial streams and/or a2) different spreading codes and/or a3) different

frequency sub-channels, and/or b) consecutively.

Method according to one of the claims 5 to 6, wherein different pilot signals (PS1, PS2) , which are

associated with different tilt angles, are transmitted with different transmit power levels.

Method according to one of the preceding claims, wherein said transmitter (100) is configured to receive (520) feedback information (FBI, FB2)

comprising information on a quality measure associated with at least one transmission of said transmitter (100) at a specific tilt angle. Transmitter (100) of a radio communications system, wherein said transmitter (100) is configured to perform a process of horizontal beam forming of an antenna characteristic of an antenna system (110) of er (100) by applying (300) predetermined sets of weight factors (w_l_l, .., w_8_4) to signals associated with different antenna elements (110_1_1, .., 110_8_4) of said antenna system (110) for

controlling the antenna characteristic in a horizontal direction, wherein said transmitter (100) is

configured to modify (310) at least one of said weight factors (w_l_l, .., w_8_4) so as to control said antenna characteristic in a vertical direction.

Transmitter (100) according to claim 9, wherein said transmitter (100) is configured to perform the method according to one of the claims 2 to 8.

Method of operating a receiver (210) of a radio communications system, wherein said receiver (210) receives (510) at least two pilot signals (PS1, PS2) from a transmitter (100) , which are known at the transmitter (100) and at the receiver (210) , wherein each of said pilot signals (PS1, PS2) is associated with a different tilt angle corresponding with a vertical direction of an antenna characteristic of an antenna system (110) of the transmitter (100) .

Method according to claim 11, wherein said pilot signals (PS1, PS2) are received a ) simultaneously within al) different spatial streams and/or a2) different spreading codes and/or a3) different

frequency sub-channels, and/or b) consecutively. 13. Method according to one of the claims 11 to 12,

wherein said receiver (210) evaluates said pilot signals (PS1, PS2) to determine a quality measure associated with said pilot signals (PS1, PS2), and returns feedback information (FBI, FB2) comprising information on said quality measure to the transmitter (100) . 14. Receiver (210) of a radio communications system,

wherein said receiver (210) is configured to receive (510) at least two pilot signals (PS1, PS2) from a transmitter (100) , which are known at the transmitter (100) and at the receiver (210) , wherein each of said pilot signals (PS1, PS2) is associated with a

different tilt angle.

15. Receiver (210) according to claim 14, wherein said

receiver is configured to perform the method according to one of the claims 12 to 13.