WO2012170135A1 - Method and apparatus for mitigating an effect of user movement in motion detecting radar - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for mitigating an effect of user movement in motion detecting radar Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012170135A1
WO2012170135A1 PCT/US2012/036872 US2012036872W WO2012170135A1 WO 2012170135 A1 WO2012170135 A1 WO 2012170135A1 US 2012036872 W US2012036872 W US 2012036872W WO 2012170135 A1 WO2012170135 A1 WO 2012170135A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
doppler
return
notch
radar
doppler frequency
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2012/036872
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Kerry D. FROHLING
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Raytheon Co
Original Assignee
Raytheon Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Raytheon Co filed Critical Raytheon Co
Publication of WO2012170135A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012170135A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S13/00Systems using the reflection or reradiation of radio waves, e.g. radar systems; Analogous systems using reflection or reradiation of waves whose nature or wavelength is irrelevant or unspecified
    • G01S13/02Systems using reflection of radio waves, e.g. primary radar systems; Analogous systems
    • G01S13/50Systems of measurement based on relative movement of target
    • G01S13/52Discriminating between fixed and moving objects or between objects moving at different speeds
    • G01S13/522Discriminating between fixed and moving objects or between objects moving at different speeds using transmissions of interrupted pulse modulated waves
    • G01S13/524Discriminating between fixed and moving objects or between objects moving at different speeds using transmissions of interrupted pulse modulated waves based upon the phase or frequency shift resulting from movement of objects, with reference to the transmitted signals, e.g. coherent MTi
    • G01S13/5242Discriminating between fixed and moving objects or between objects moving at different speeds using transmissions of interrupted pulse modulated waves based upon the phase or frequency shift resulting from movement of objects, with reference to the transmitted signals, e.g. coherent MTi with means for platform motion or scan motion compensation, e.g. airborne MTI
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S7/00Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00
    • G01S7/02Details of systems according to groups G01S13/00, G01S15/00, G01S17/00 of systems according to group G01S13/00
    • G01S7/36Means for anti-jamming, e.g. ECCM, i.e. electronic counter-counter measures

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates in general to motion detecting radar and, more particularly, to techniques for mitigating the effects of user movement in motion detecting radar systems.
  • Motion sensing radar provides one promising solution. For instance, motion sensing radar can be used to sense motion on the other side of a wall or barrier, which provides a good indicator of location of a person who may be optically obscured. However, one technical issue that remains is how to mitigate the effects of user movement when a motion detecting radar system is in the field.
  • a method includes receiving a reflection of Radio Frequency (RF) radar energy, mapping the RF radar energy by Doppler frequency and range, analyzing the RF radar energy at each range for a highest return aligning the highest return with a Doppler notch, and searching for targets within the RF radar return only outside of the Doppler notch.
  • RF Radio Frequency
  • the method can further include one or more of the following features: aligning the highest return with the Doppler notch comprises: centering the highest return at a zero Doppler frequency, aligning the highest return with the Doppler notch comprises: moving the Doppler notch within a Doppler frequency space to align with the highest return, the method is performed in a handheld radar system, the highest return corresponds to stationary clutter, mapping the RF radar energy comprises: generating a plurality of Doppler filter bins, each of the Doppler filter bins being arranged by range and Doppler frequency, the Doppler notch
  • the radar system also includes a user interface unit adapted to provide output indicating the target.
  • the system can further include one or more of the following features: the system comprises a handheld radar system, the processor unit is adapted to re-center the largest amplitude return to a zero Doppler frequency value, and/or the processor unit is adapted to move the Doppler frequency notch to be centered upon the largest amplitude return.
  • a computer program product has a computer readable medium tangibly recording computer program logic for processing radar data.
  • the computer program product includes code to create the radar data from received RF signals, code to identify a largest amplitude return within a Doppler frequency space in the radar data at a non-zero Doppler frequency value, and code to align the largest amplitude return and a Doppler filter notch to define a target exclusion zone in the Doppler frequency space and a target search zone in the Doppler frequency space.
  • the computer program product can further include one or more of the following features: the largest amplitude return is defined as stationary clutter, the code to identify a largest amplitude return comprises: code to analyze range bins within the radar data to identify one or more peak amplitudes within the range bins, the code to align comprises: code to center the Doppler filter notch at the non-zero Doppler frequency, the code to align comprises: code to normalize the radar data within the Doppler frequency space so that the largest amplitude return is at a normalized zero Doppler frequency value, and/or the Doppler filter notch corresponds to an integer number of Doppler filter bins within a range of interest.
  • Figure 1 is an illustration of an exemplary method for mitigating the effects of device or user movement, according to one embodiment.
  • Figure 2 is an illustration of an exemplary range-Doppler map.
  • Figure 3 is an illustration of an exemplary cross-section at given range across Doppler frequencies of interest.
  • Figure 4 is an illustration of a deployment scenario for a radar system adapted according to one embodiment.
  • Various embodiments provide techniques to mitigate the effects of user or device movement on a motion detecting radar system. Specifically, various embodiments are directed to handheld radar systems for use in military and law enforcement applications, but the scope of embodiments is not so limited.
  • Various embodiments may be adapted for use in applications other than for military and law enforcement (e.g., for commercial use). Furthermore, various embodiments may be directed to radar systems that are not handheld but nevertheless experience movement by the unit that may cause undesired false alarms or missed targets.
  • a motion detecting radar system provides a user interface that alerts a human user to movement within the system's field of view. For instance, the radar system uses an algorithm to analyze radar returns and detect movement of objects.
  • the user interface may provide a visual and/or audible indication of the movement, including an approximate direction and range of the movement.
  • the radar emits Radio
  • Frequency (RF) radiation and receives a return as the RF energy is reflected.
  • the system processes the return to create an arrangement of data that provides a relationship between Doppler frequency and range.
  • the data is arranged as a plurality of Doppler filter bins, where each of the Doppler filter bins is associated with a range.
  • the system looks for the largest amplitude return within the Doppler filter bins for the ranges of interest.
  • the present embodiment assumes that the largest amplitude return over a given range corresponds to stationary clutter.
  • Stationary clutter can be caused by a variety of objects, but usually encompasses large objects, such as walls, trees, and signs that reflect a large amount of energy.
  • clutter is typically a hindrance.
  • the Doppler frequency of the object's return should be zero.
  • the clutter return may appear to be at a Doppler frequency other than zero, which may trigger a false detection or mask legitimate targets. It is desirable to identify as many legitimate targets as possible, as well as to eliminate as many false alarms as possible.
  • the radar system analyzes the return to identify the largest amplitude return within the Doppler filter bins over the range of interest.
  • the system then aligns the Doppler filter notch and the highest return.
  • the Doppler filter notch is fixed to be centered at zero Doppler frequency, and the system re-centers the data so that the highest return corresponds to a zero Doppler frequency.
  • the system shifts the Doppler filter notch within the Doppler frequency space to align with the highest return. Whichever process is used, the highest return is aligned with a center of a Doppler filter notch.
  • the Doppler filter notch can be any appropriate width, but in some embodiments is ten Doppler filter bins wide or less.
  • the system eliminates portions of the return that fall within the Doppler filter notch. The remaining data is then processed to identify moving targets. Accordingly, the Doppler filter notch may sometimes be referred to as a "target exclusion zone,” whereas Doppler filter bins outside of the Doppler filter notch may sometimes be referred to as a "target search zone.”
  • the above-described processes are performed many times per second.
  • a single two-dimensional arrangement of Doppler filter bins corresponding to a single time value can be referred to as a frame.
  • the above-described processes may be performed for each frame, where the system may generate multiple frames per second.
  • a smoothing process is performed frame-to-frame before the highest returns are identified in order to diminish noise within the clutter return.
  • Fig. 1 is an illustration of exemplary method 100, adapted according to one embodiment.
  • Method 100 may be performed by one or more modules in a radar system, where such modules may execute computer-readable code providing functionality described herein.
  • the radar system emits RF energy.
  • the RF energy radiates outwardly and is reflected by objects.
  • some of the reflections may be from background clutter, such as walls, buildings, trees, signs, etc., whereas other reflections may be from targets, such as people or machines that are moving within the scene.
  • the radar system detects reflections of the RF energy.
  • data is generated from the reflected RF energy.
  • the data includes a multitude of Doppler filter bins, each of the Doppler filter bins being associated with a Doppler frequency and a range.
  • Each Doppler filter bin includes a portion of data that indicates a strength (or amplitude) of the return.
  • An example data structure with multiple Doppler bins is shown in Fig. 2.
  • Fig. 2 is an illustration of exemplary range-Doppler map 200.
  • the y-axis is a range axis.
  • the x-axis is a Doppler frequency axis, and it is centered at zero. The magnitude of Doppler frequency increases in either direction from zero.
  • Each of the rectangles, such as rectangle 210, represents a Doppler filter bin.
  • Each row of map 200 includes a plurality of Doppler bins for a particular range value.
  • Fig. 2 is a mere llxll matrix, and it is understood that data in a real-life example may include many more Doppler filter bins for a given frame.
  • map 200 of Fig. 2 is a visual representation of the data stored in memory and manipulated by one or more processors in the radar system, and map 200 is shown to provide an understanding of Doppler bin data.
  • a real-life radar system may not actually produce a visual representation of the Doppler bins, such as shown in Fig. 200.
  • the range-Doppler map of Fig. 2 is illustrative of a single frame and that various embodiments may produce many frames per second.
  • the data is analyzed to identify the largest amplitude returns for the ranges of interest.
  • data in every range is analyzed, and in other examples, data from only a portion (e.g., every other range) is analyzed. As mentioned above, it is assumed in these embodiments that the largest amplitude returns are associated with stationary clutter.
  • range bins 220 show a high return over a range of Doppler frequencies and may be indicative of, e.g., a wall or other clutter.
  • Range 300 includes a y-axis indicating a radar return amplitude and an x-axis indicating Doppler frequency.
  • Range 300 may represent one of the rows of range-Doppler map 200 of Fig. 2.
  • Curve 301 is a plot of the amplitude of the return at a given Doppler frequency value.
  • blocks 1 10 and 1 12 provide alternative operations for mitigating the effect of device movement in a motion detecting radar system.
  • the data is re-centered in the ranges so that the largest amplitude returns are shifted to zero Doppler frequency.
  • the operation of block 1 10 may be associated with an embodiment that has a fixed Doppler notch, and the data is shifted to fit the Doppler notch. In other words, it is possible to normalize the data within the frequency space to account for an observed phenomenon-in this case, a Doppler frequency shift for clutter returns.
  • the Doppler filter notch is shifted so that the notch is centered over the highest returns.
  • a Doppler filter notch itself may be adaptively moved as appropriate to account for the Doppler frequency shift in the clutter returns.
  • Some embodiments may perform the operation of block 1 0, whereas other embodiments may perform the operation of block 1 12.
  • Some embodiments may even be able to perform both.
  • the scope of embodiments is not limited to the operations of blocks 1 10 and 1 12. In fact, any technique now known or later developed to ensure alignment of a high amplitude return with a Doppler filter notch may be included in some embodiments.
  • the data within the Doppler filter notch is eliminated.
  • the data within the Doppler filter notch is erased from memory, though the scope of embodiments is not so limited.
  • the data within the Doppler filter notch may simply be ignored for the purpose of searching for targets.
  • the remaining data is processed to search for targets. For instance, some returns outside of the Doppler filter notch may have a Doppler frequency and amplitude indicative of a moving person or machine. More advanced processing (not described further herein) may be used to analyze returns within the target search areas to distinguish targets from non-target objects.
  • More advanced processing (not described further herein) may be used to analyze returns within the target search areas to distinguish targets from non-target objects.
  • the method 100 is repeated again. Otherwise, process 00 quits.
  • Various embodiments are not limited to the exact process shown in Fig. 1. Rather, some embodiments may add, omit, rearrange, or modify one or more actions as appropriate for a given application. For instance, some embodiments include a filter that smoothes the data from frame to frame (e.g., over five consecutive frames) to ameliorate the effects of noise. Furthermore, some embodiments include additional steps not described in detail above, such as providing an indication to a human user of detected movement.
  • some embodiments may include a more adaptable Doppler filter notch.
  • some embodiments allow the Doppler filter notch shape to adaptively change depending on the clutter conditions. Adaptively narrowing the Doppler filter notch may increase sensitivity to slower moving targets than would be otherwise possible. Adaptively widening the Doppler filter notch where clutter shows high dispersion due to wide angle scatterers or multipath may reduce the false alarm rate.
  • Fig. 4 is an illustration of an exemplary field deployment scenario for one embodiment.
  • Human user 410 operates handheld radar system 401 to search for target 420.
  • target 420 is behind wall 430.
  • Radar system 401 uses a process, such as method 100 of Fig. 1 , to ameliorate the effects of movement of radar system 401 .
  • Radar system 401 includes transceiver unit 402, which emits RF radiation 408 and detects reflected RF radiation 409.
  • Processing unit 403 includes one or more processor-based devices that generate and analyze data from the detected RF radiation 409.
  • Processing unit 403 compensates for Doppler clutter shift, as explained in more detail above.
  • User interface unit 404 receives commands from user 410 and provides audio or video output for user 410.
  • various elements of some embodiments are in essence the software code defining the operations of such various elements.
  • the executable instructions or software code may be obtained from a tangible readable medium (e.g., a hard drive media, optical media, RAM, EPROM, EEPROM, tape media, cartridge media, flash memory, ROM, memory stick, network storage device, and/or the like).
  • a tangible readable medium e.g., a hard drive media, optical media, RAM, EPROM, EEPROM, tape media, cartridge media, flash memory, ROM, memory stick, network storage device, and/or the like.
  • readable media can include any medium that can store information.
  • Processing unit 403 may include, for example, a general purpose CPU, which may execute the various logical instructions according to embodiments of the present disclosure. For example, one or more CPUs may execute
  • embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented on application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) digital signal processors (DSPs), or other specialized processing circuits.
  • ASICs application specific integrated circuits
  • DSPs digital signal processors
  • persons of ordinary skill in the art may utilize any number of suitable structures capable of executing logical operations according to the embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • Various embodiments include one or more advantages. For instance, some implementations do not perform complex mathematical operations on the data, instead simply identifying the largest magnitude returns and ensuring that the largest returns are aligned with a Doppler filter notch. Such features makes a software, firmware, or hardware implementation of method 100 (Fig. 1 ) relatively "lightweight.” Thus, some embodiments may be implemented into motion detecting radar systems without overburdening the processing capabilities. With this in mind, however, it is noted that the scope of embodiments does not exclude processes with a higher degree of computational complexity.
  • various embodiments may be especially adaptable to handheld radar systems. Preliminary simulations show a noticeable increase in an amount of user movement that can be tolerated when using the method of Fig. 1 . Thus, such embodiments may add value to radar systems deployed in missions where user movement is expected. While the previous example discusses handheld radar systems, the scope of embodiments may include radar systems that are vehicle mounted or are otherwise expected to experience movement that may cause a Doppler frequency shift for clutter.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

A method includes receiving a reflection of Radio Frequency (RF) radar energy, mapping the RF radar energy by Doppler frequency and range, analyzing the RF radar energy for a highest return, aligning the highest return with a Doppler notch over a range of interest, and searching for targets within the RF radar energy only outside of the Doppler notch.

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MITIGATING AN EFFECT
OF USER MOVEMENT IN MOTION DETECTING RADAR
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This disclosure relates in general to motion detecting radar and, more particularly, to techniques for mitigating the effects of user movement in motion detecting radar systems.
BACKGROUND
Various government agencies, such as law-enforcement agencies and homeland security agencies, as well as militaries are involved in operations where it would be desirable to be able to see through a wall or other barrier. For instance, if a law enforcement agent is planning to break down a door, it would be helpful if the law enforcement agent knew what was behind the door.
Motion sensing radar provides one promising solution. For instance, motion sensing radar can be used to sense motion on the other side of a wall or barrier, which provides a good indicator of location of a person who may be optically obscured. However, one technical issue that remains is how to mitigate the effects of user movement when a motion detecting radar system is in the field.
SUMMARY
According to one embodiment, a method includes receiving a reflection of Radio Frequency (RF) radar energy, mapping the RF radar energy by Doppler frequency and range, analyzing the RF radar energy at each range for a highest return aligning the highest return with a Doppler notch, and searching for targets within the RF radar return only outside of the Doppler notch.
The method can further include one or more of the following features: aligning the highest return with the Doppler notch comprises: centering the highest return at a zero Doppler frequency, aligning the highest return with the Doppler notch comprises: moving the Doppler notch within a Doppler frequency space to align with the highest return, the method is performed in a handheld radar system, the highest return corresponds to stationary clutter, mapping the RF radar energy comprises: generating a plurality of Doppler filter bins, each of the Doppler filter bins being arranged by range and Doppler frequency, the Doppler notch
corresponds to an integer number of Doppler filter bins in each range, performing the receiving, mapping, analyzing, aligning, and searching for a plurality of frames, the highest filter return is aligned with the Doppler filter notch for each frame, and/or performing a smoothing algorithm for consecutive ones of the frames.
According to another embodiment, a radar system that mitigates an effect of device movement or user movement includes a transceiver unit adapted to emit Radio Frequency (RF) signals and to detect reflected RF signals and a processor unit adapted to: indentify a largest amplitude return of the reflected RF signals within a Doppler frequency space for a plurality of ranges, align a Doppler filter notch and the largest amplitude return for the plurality of ranges, and identify targets using data outside of the Doppler frequency notch. The radar system also includes a user interface unit adapted to provide output indicating the target.
The system can further include one or more of the following features: the system comprises a handheld radar system, the processor unit is adapted to re-center the largest amplitude return to a zero Doppler frequency value, and/or the processor unit is adapted to move the Doppler frequency notch to be centered upon the largest amplitude return.
According to yet another embodiment, a computer program product has a computer readable medium tangibly recording computer program logic for processing radar data. The computer program product includes code to create the radar data from received RF signals, code to identify a largest amplitude return within a Doppler frequency space in the radar data at a non-zero Doppler frequency value, and code to align the largest amplitude return and a Doppler filter notch to define a target exclusion zone in the Doppler frequency space and a target search zone in the Doppler frequency space.
The computer program product can further include one or more of the following features: the largest amplitude return is defined as stationary clutter, the code to identify a largest amplitude return comprises: code to analyze range bins within the radar data to identify one or more peak amplitudes within the range bins, the code to align comprises: code to center the Doppler filter notch at the non-zero Doppler frequency, the code to align comprises: code to normalize the radar data within the Doppler frequency space so that the largest amplitude return is at a normalized zero Doppler frequency value, and/or the Doppler filter notch corresponds to an integer number of Doppler filter bins within a range of interest.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A better understanding of the present invention will be realized from the detailed description that follows, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is an illustration of an exemplary method for mitigating the effects of device or user movement, according to one embodiment.
Figure 2 is an illustration of an exemplary range-Doppler map.
Figure 3 is an illustration of an exemplary cross-section at given range across Doppler frequencies of interest.
Figure 4 is an illustration of a deployment scenario for a radar system adapted according to one embodiment.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Various embodiments provide techniques to mitigate the effects of user or device movement on a motion detecting radar system. Specifically, various embodiments are directed to handheld radar systems for use in military and law enforcement applications, but the scope of embodiments is not so limited.
Various embodiments may be adapted for use in applications other than for military and law enforcement (e.g., for commercial use). Furthermore, various embodiments may be directed to radar systems that are not handheld but nevertheless experience movement by the unit that may cause undesired false alarms or missed targets.
In one example embodiment, a motion detecting radar system provides a user interface that alerts a human user to movement within the system's field of view. For instance, the radar system uses an algorithm to analyze radar returns and detect movement of objects. The user interface may provide a visual and/or audible indication of the movement, including an approximate direction and range of the movement. Continuing with the example embodiment, the radar emits Radio
Frequency (RF) radiation and receives a return as the RF energy is reflected. The system processes the return to create an arrangement of data that provides a relationship between Doppler frequency and range. The data is arranged as a plurality of Doppler filter bins, where each of the Doppler filter bins is associated with a range. The system then looks for the largest amplitude return within the Doppler filter bins for the ranges of interest.
The present embodiment assumes that the largest amplitude return over a given range corresponds to stationary clutter. Stationary clutter can be caused by a variety of objects, but usually encompasses large objects, such as walls, trees, and signs that reflect a large amount of energy. For the purposes of motion detecting radar, such clutter is typically a hindrance. In a scenario wherein a radar unit is perfectly still and wherein a clutter object is perfectly still, the Doppler frequency of the object's return should be zero. However, if the radar unit moves, the clutter return may appear to be at a Doppler frequency other than zero, which may trigger a false detection or mask legitimate targets. It is desirable to identify as many legitimate targets as possible, as well as to eliminate as many false alarms as possible.
The present example embodiment provides features that help to mitigate the effects of movement. As mentioned above, the radar system analyzes the return to identify the largest amplitude return within the Doppler filter bins over the range of interest. The system then aligns the Doppler filter notch and the highest return. In one process, the Doppler filter notch is fixed to be centered at zero Doppler frequency, and the system re-centers the data so that the highest return corresponds to a zero Doppler frequency. In another process, the system shifts the Doppler filter notch within the Doppler frequency space to align with the highest return. Whichever process is used, the highest return is aligned with a center of a Doppler filter notch.
The Doppler filter notch can be any appropriate width, but in some embodiments is ten Doppler filter bins wide or less. The system eliminates portions of the return that fall within the Doppler filter notch. The remaining data is then processed to identify moving targets. Accordingly, the Doppler filter notch may sometimes be referred to as a "target exclusion zone," whereas Doppler filter bins outside of the Doppler filter notch may sometimes be referred to as a "target search zone."
The above-described processes, in this example embodiment, are performed many times per second. A single two-dimensional arrangement of Doppler filter bins corresponding to a single time value can be referred to as a frame. The above-described processes may be performed for each frame, where the system may generate multiple frames per second. In some embodiments, a smoothing process is performed frame-to-frame before the highest returns are identified in order to diminish noise within the clutter return.
The above-identified example embodiment is for illustration purposes only, and the scope of embodiments is not limited to the details described above. The following figures are used to describe another embodiment for a handheld radar system.
Fig. 1 is an illustration of exemplary method 100, adapted according to one embodiment. Method 100 may be performed by one or more modules in a radar system, where such modules may execute computer-readable code providing functionality described herein.
In block 102, the radar system emits RF energy. The RF energy radiates outwardly and is reflected by objects. For instance, some of the reflections may be from background clutter, such as walls, buildings, trees, signs, etc., whereas other reflections may be from targets, such as people or machines that are moving within the scene.
In block 104, the radar system detects reflections of the RF energy. In block 106, data is generated from the reflected RF energy. The data includes a multitude of Doppler filter bins, each of the Doppler filter bins being associated with a Doppler frequency and a range. Each Doppler filter bin includes a portion of data that indicates a strength (or amplitude) of the return. An example data structure with multiple Doppler bins is shown in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2 is an illustration of exemplary range-Doppler map 200. The y-axis is a range axis. The x-axis is a Doppler frequency axis, and it is centered at zero. The magnitude of Doppler frequency increases in either direction from zero. Each of the rectangles, such as rectangle 210, represents a Doppler filter bin.
Some of the bins around zero are shaded, indicating in this example a high amplitude return. Each row of map 200 includes a plurality of Doppler bins for a particular range value.
Fig. 2 is a mere llxll matrix, and it is understood that data in a real-life example may include many more Doppler filter bins for a given frame.
Furthermore, the map 200 of Fig. 2 is a visual representation of the data stored in memory and manipulated by one or more processors in the radar system, and map 200 is shown to provide an understanding of Doppler bin data. A real-life radar system may not actually produce a visual representation of the Doppler bins, such as shown in Fig. 200. It is also understood that the range-Doppler map of Fig. 2 is illustrative of a single frame and that various embodiments may produce many frames per second.
Returning to the example of Fig. 1 , in block 108, the data is analyzed to identify the largest amplitude returns for the ranges of interest. In some examples, data in every range is analyzed, and in other examples, data from only a portion (e.g., every other range) is analyzed. As mentioned above, it is assumed in these embodiments that the largest amplitude returns are associated with stationary clutter.
Returning to Fig. 2, bins around the center are shaded, indicating a higher return, which is a common scenario. Further in this example, range bins 220 show a high return over a range of Doppler frequencies and may be indicative of, e.g., a wall or other clutter.
Moving to Fig. 3, an exemplary cross-section across Doppler frequencies of interest for range 300 is shown, such range data may be analyzed in block 108 of Fig. 1 . Range 300 includes a y-axis indicating a radar return amplitude and an x-axis indicating Doppler frequency. Range 300 may represent one of the rows of range-Doppler map 200 of Fig. 2. Curve 301 is a plot of the amplitude of the return at a given Doppler frequency value.
It should be noted that in both Fig. 2 and Fig. 3, the highest amplitude returns are centered around zero Doppler frequency. Such a scenario is possible when the radar unit (and its user) are completely still and when large clutter objects are also completely still. However, in many field use scenarios, such as when a human user carries or otherwise moves the radar unit, such movement will cause the highest amplitude returns to deviate from a zero-Doppler frequency center. The embodiment of Fig. 1 provides features to mitigate this effect of device movement.
Returning to Fig. 1 , blocks 1 10 and 1 12 provide alternative operations for mitigating the effect of device movement in a motion detecting radar system. In block 1 10, the data is re-centered in the ranges so that the largest amplitude returns are shifted to zero Doppler frequency. The operation of block 1 10 may be associated with an embodiment that has a fixed Doppler notch, and the data is shifted to fit the Doppler notch. In other words, it is possible to normalize the data within the frequency space to account for an observed phenomenon-in this case, a Doppler frequency shift for clutter returns.
In block 1 12, the Doppler filter notch is shifted so that the notch is centered over the highest returns. Thus, in block 1 12, a Doppler filter notch itself may be adaptively moved as appropriate to account for the Doppler frequency shift in the clutter returns. Some embodiments may perform the operation of block 1 0, whereas other embodiments may perform the operation of block 1 12. Some embodiments may even be able to perform both. The scope of embodiments is not limited to the operations of blocks 1 10 and 1 12. In fact, any technique now known or later developed to ensure alignment of a high amplitude return with a Doppler filter notch may be included in some embodiments.
In block 1 14, the data within the Doppler filter notch is eliminated. In some embodiments, the data within the Doppler filter notch is erased from memory, though the scope of embodiments is not so limited. In some embodiments, the data within the Doppler filter notch may simply be ignored for the purpose of searching for targets. Further in block 1 14, the remaining data is processed to search for targets. For instance, some returns outside of the Doppler filter notch may have a Doppler frequency and amplitude indicative of a moving person or machine. More advanced processing (not described further herein) may be used to analyze returns within the target search areas to distinguish targets from non-target objects. In block 1 16 if the method 100 continues with further frames, then at block 1 18 the method 100 is repeated again. Otherwise, process 00 quits.
Various embodiments are not limited to the exact process shown in Fig. 1. Rather, some embodiments may add, omit, rearrange, or modify one or more actions as appropriate for a given application. For instance, some embodiments include a filter that smoothes the data from frame to frame (e.g., over five consecutive frames) to ameliorate the effects of noise. Furthermore, some embodiments include additional steps not described in detail above, such as providing an indication to a human user of detected movement.
Moreover, some embodiments may include a more adaptable Doppler filter notch. For instance, some embodiments allow the Doppler filter notch shape to adaptively change depending on the clutter conditions. Adaptively narrowing the Doppler filter notch may increase sensitivity to slower moving targets than would be otherwise possible. Adaptively widening the Doppler filter notch where clutter shows high dispersion due to wide angle scatterers or multipath may reduce the false alarm rate.
Fig. 4 is an illustration of an exemplary field deployment scenario for one embodiment. Human user 410 operates handheld radar system 401 to search for target 420. However, target 420 is behind wall 430.
As explained above, it is expected that the return associated with wall 430 will be a high-amplitude return that is centered close to zero Doppler frequency. However, if human user 410 causes movement of radar system 401 , then the return for wall 430 may deviate somewhat from zero Doppler frequency. Radar system 401 uses a process, such as method 100 of Fig. 1 , to ameliorate the effects of movement of radar system 401 .
Radar system 401 includes transceiver unit 402, which emits RF radiation 408 and detects reflected RF radiation 409. Processing unit 403 includes one or more processor-based devices that generate and analyze data from the detected RF radiation 409. Processing unit 403 compensates for Doppler clutter shift, as explained in more detail above. User interface unit 404 receives commands from user 410 and provides audio or video output for user 410. When implemented via computer-executable instructions, various elements of some embodiments are in essence the software code defining the operations of such various elements. The executable instructions or software code may be obtained from a tangible readable medium (e.g., a hard drive media, optical media, RAM, EPROM, EEPROM, tape media, cartridge media, flash memory, ROM, memory stick, network storage device, and/or the like). In fact, readable media can include any medium that can store information.
Processing unit 403 may include, for example, a general purpose CPU, which may execute the various logical instructions according to embodiments of the present disclosure. For example, one or more CPUs may execute
machine-level instructions according to the exemplary operational flows described above in conjunction with FIGURE 1. Moreover, embodiments of the present disclosure may be implemented on application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) digital signal processors (DSPs), or other specialized processing circuits. In fact, persons of ordinary skill in the art may utilize any number of suitable structures capable of executing logical operations according to the embodiments of the present disclosure.
Various embodiments include one or more advantages. For instance, some implementations do not perform complex mathematical operations on the data, instead simply identifying the largest magnitude returns and ensuring that the largest returns are aligned with a Doppler filter notch. Such features makes a software, firmware, or hardware implementation of method 100 (Fig. 1 ) relatively "lightweight." Thus, some embodiments may be implemented into motion detecting radar systems without overburdening the processing capabilities. With this in mind, however, it is noted that the scope of embodiments does not exclude processes with a higher degree of computational complexity.
Additionally, various embodiments may be especially adaptable to handheld radar systems. Preliminary simulations show a noticeable increase in an amount of user movement that can be tolerated when using the method of Fig. 1 . Thus, such embodiments may add value to radar systems deployed in missions where user movement is expected. While the previous example discusses handheld radar systems, the scope of embodiments may include radar systems that are vehicle mounted or are otherwise expected to experience movement that may cause a Doppler frequency shift for clutter.
Although selected embodiments have been illustrated and described in detail, it should be understood that a variety of substitutions and alterations are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, as defined by the claims that follow.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1 . A method comprising:
receiving a reflection of Radio Frequency (RF) radar energy;
mapping the RF radar energy by Doppler frequency and range;
analyzing the RF radar energy for a highest return;
aligning the highest return with a Doppler notch; and
searching for targets within the RF radar energy only outside of the Doppler notch.
2. The method according to Claim 1 , in which aligning the highest return with the Doppler notch comprises:
centering the highest return at a zero Doppler frequency.
3. The method according to Claim 1 , in which aligning the highest return with the Doppler notch comprises:
moving the Doppler notch within a Doppler frequency space to align with the highest return.
4. The method according to Claim 1 , performed in a handheld radar system.
5. The method according to Claim 1 , in which the highest return corresponds to stationary clutter.
6. The method according to Claim 1 , in which mapping the RF radar energy comprises:
generating a plurality of Doppler filter bins, each of the Doppler filter bins being arranged by range and Doppler frequency.
7. The method according to Claim 6, in which the Doppler notch corresponds to an integer number of Doppler filter bins in each range.
8. The method according to Claim 1 , further comprising: performing the receiving, mapping, analyzing, aligning, and searching for a plurality of frames.
9. The method according to Claim 8, in which the highest filter return is aligned with the Doppler filter notch for each frame.
10. The method according to Claim 8, further comprising: performing a smoothing algorithm for consecutive ones of the frames.
1 1 . A radar system that mitigates an effect of device movement or user movement, the radar system comprising:
a transceiver unit adapted to emit Radio Frequency (RF) signals and to detect reflected RF signals;
a processor unit adapted to:
indentify a largest amplitude return of the reflected RF signals within a Doppler frequency space for a plurality of ranges;
align a Doppler filter notch and the largest amplitude return for the plurality of ranges; and
identify a target using data outside of the Doppler frequency notch; and
a user interface unit adapted to provide output indicating the target.
12. The radar system according to Claim 1 1 , comprising a handheld radar system.
13. The radar system according to Claim 1 1 , in which the processor unit is adapted to re-center the largest amplitude return to a zero Doppler frequency value.
14. The radar system according to Claim 1 1 , in which the processor unit is adapted to move the Doppler frequency notch to be centered upon the largest amplitude return.
15. A computer program product having a computer readable medium tangibly recording computer program logic for processing radar data, the computer program product comprising:
code to create the radar data from received RF signals;
code to identify a largest amplitude return within a Doppler frequency space in the radar data at a non-zero Doppler frequency value; and
code to align the largest amplitude return and a Doppler filter notch to define a target exclusion zone in the Doppler frequency space and a target search zone in the Doppler frequency space.
16. The computer program product of claim 15 in which the largest amplitude return is defined as stationary clutter.
17. The computer program product of claim 15 in which the code to identify a largest amplitude return comprises:
code to analyze range bins within the radar data to identify one or more peak amplitudes within the range bins.
18. The computer program product of claim 15 in which the code to align comprises:
code to center the Doppler filter notch at the non-zero Doppler frequency.
19. The computer program product of claim 15 in which the code to align comprises:
code to normalize the radar data within the Doppler frequency space so that the largest amplitude return is at a normalized zero Doppler frequency value.
20. The computer program product of claim 15 in which the Doppler filter notch corresponds to an integer number of Doppler filter bins within a range of interest.
PCT/US2012/036872 2011-06-08 2012-05-08 Method and apparatus for mitigating an effect of user movement in motion detecting radar Ceased WO2012170135A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/156,185 US20120313808A1 (en) 2011-06-08 2011-06-08 Method and Apparatus for Mitigating an Effect of User Movement in Motion Detecting Radar
US13/156,185 2011-06-08

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012170135A1 true WO2012170135A1 (en) 2012-12-13

Family

ID=46262319

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2012/036872 Ceased WO2012170135A1 (en) 2011-06-08 2012-05-08 Method and apparatus for mitigating an effect of user movement in motion detecting radar

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20120313808A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012170135A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015102557B4 (en) 2015-02-23 2023-02-02 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. vision system
RU217618U1 (en) * 2022-12-26 2023-04-07 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Рязанский государственный радиотехнический университет имени В.Ф. Уткина" COMPUTER FOR REJECTION OF PASSIVE INTERFERENCE

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10393869B2 (en) * 2012-11-05 2019-08-27 Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd. Sub-Nyquist radar processing using doppler focusing
RU2551448C1 (en) * 2013-11-15 2015-05-27 Открытое Акционерное Общество "Уральское проектно-конструкторское бюро "Деталь" Pulsed-phase radar altimeter system
US9429945B2 (en) * 2014-10-22 2016-08-30 Honeywell International Inc. Surveying areas using a radar system and an unmanned aerial vehicle
DE102018123383A1 (en) * 2017-10-13 2019-04-18 Infineon Technologies Ag Radar detection with interference suppression
US11073610B2 (en) 2019-01-31 2021-07-27 International Business Machines Corporation Portable imager
US11506754B2 (en) 2019-06-19 2022-11-22 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Radar based pattern code identification

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3267468A (en) * 1965-01-15 1966-08-16 Jr Keefer S Stull Pulse doppler clutter rejection system
US4034373A (en) * 1973-11-08 1977-07-05 Rca Corporation Airborne moving-target indicating radar system
US4035799A (en) * 1975-11-04 1977-07-12 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Digital mean clutter doppler compensation system
US5304940A (en) * 1991-06-28 1994-04-19 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Unwanted signal suppression device
US5546085A (en) * 1994-12-05 1996-08-13 Loral Corporation Separating coherent radio-frequency interference from synthetic aperture data
JPH10227851A (en) * 1997-02-18 1998-08-25 Tech Res & Dev Inst Of Japan Def Agency Clutter suppression device

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3267468A (en) * 1965-01-15 1966-08-16 Jr Keefer S Stull Pulse doppler clutter rejection system
US4034373A (en) * 1973-11-08 1977-07-05 Rca Corporation Airborne moving-target indicating radar system
US4035799A (en) * 1975-11-04 1977-07-12 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Digital mean clutter doppler compensation system
US5304940A (en) * 1991-06-28 1994-04-19 Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha Unwanted signal suppression device
US5546085A (en) * 1994-12-05 1996-08-13 Loral Corporation Separating coherent radio-frequency interference from synthetic aperture data
JPH10227851A (en) * 1997-02-18 1998-08-25 Tech Res & Dev Inst Of Japan Def Agency Clutter suppression device

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
KLEMM R: "ADAPTIVE AIRBORNE MTI WITH TWO-DIMENSIONAL MOTION COMPENSATION", IEE PROCEEDINGS F. COMMUNICATIONS, RADAR & SIGNALPROCESSING, INSTITUTION OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS. STEVENAGE, GB, vol. 138, no. 6 PART F, 1 December 1991 (1991-12-01), pages 551 - 558, XP000271800, ISSN: 0956-375X *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015102557B4 (en) 2015-02-23 2023-02-02 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. vision system
RU217618U1 (en) * 2022-12-26 2023-04-07 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Рязанский государственный радиотехнический университет имени В.Ф. Уткина" COMPUTER FOR REJECTION OF PASSIVE INTERFERENCE
RU2809737C1 (en) * 2023-07-11 2023-12-15 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Рязанский государственный радиотехнический университет имени В.Ф. Уткина" Computing device for interference rejection
RU222245U1 (en) * 2023-09-12 2023-12-15 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Рязанский государственный радиотехнический университет имени В.Ф. Уткина" INTERFERENCE COMPENSATION COMPUTER

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20120313808A1 (en) 2012-12-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20120313808A1 (en) Method and Apparatus for Mitigating an Effect of User Movement in Motion Detecting Radar
US8314732B2 (en) Adaptive radar
US11360207B2 (en) Apparatus and method for tracking object based on radar image reconstruction
CN103197290B (en) Method for suppressing multipath clutters of through-the-wall radar
CN102313884B (en) Target track-before-detect (TBD) method based on multi-frame coherent integration
US10429500B2 (en) Tracking apparatus, tracking method, and computer-readable storage medium
CN105528796B (en) A kind of through-wall detection radar is under multiple mobile object scene to the method for false target real-time eliminating
US8976059B2 (en) Identification and removal of a false detection in a radar system
CN110780289A (en) Multi-target vehicle tracking method and device based on scene radar
EP3982160A1 (en) Method and system for indoor multipath ghosts recognition
CN108872977B (en) Life body double-station cooperative detection method based on single-channel ultra-wideband radar
JP2018531532A6 (en) Adaptive processing in time
CN104569963A (en) Moving target one-dimensional detecting and tracking method for ultra-wideband through-wall radar
WO2017069680A1 (en) Method and system for resolving range ambiguity
RU2470318C1 (en) Method of tracking target path and radar station for realising said method
Kocur et al. Imaging method: an efficient algorithm for moving target tracking by UWB radar
RU2514154C1 (en) Method for recognition of false targets caused by self-generated noise of mobile carrier
KR20170054168A (en) Method and apparatus for processing signal based CFAR in radar system
KR20150141359A (en) Method for preprocessing abnormal input multi-tracking frequency automatically in Target Motion Analysis
CN105708471B (en) Partition wall body movement detection method based on Short Time Fourier Transform
KR102211844B1 (en) Method and apparatus for estimating behind wall Multi-target in an IR-UWB Radar system
CN118483695B (en) Pre-detection tracking method and device for reducing the probability of missed detection by airborne cognitive radar
Aristov Distance localization of the moving object by applying the Karhunen–Loeve transform to ultra-wideband impulse signals
CN112946621A (en) Target detection method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
KR101898128B1 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting target in time-varying clutter channels

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12727181

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12727181

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1