WO2012161874A2 - Contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus - Google Patents
Contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2012161874A2 WO2012161874A2 PCT/US2012/032796 US2012032796W WO2012161874A2 WO 2012161874 A2 WO2012161874 A2 WO 2012161874A2 US 2012032796 W US2012032796 W US 2012032796W WO 2012161874 A2 WO2012161874 A2 WO 2012161874A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- contours
- segment
- contour
- defect
- image
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/26—Electron or ion microscopes; Electron or ion diffraction tubes
- H01J37/28—Electron or ion microscopes; Electron or ion diffraction tubes with scanning beams
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/26—Electron or ion microscopes; Electron or ion diffraction tubes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N23/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00
- G01N23/02—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material
- G01N23/04—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of wave or particle radiation, e.g. X-rays or neutrons, not covered by groups G01N3/00 – G01N17/00, G01N21/00 or G01N22/00 by transmitting the radiation through the material and forming images of the material
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T5/00—Image enhancement or restoration
- G06T5/50—Image enhancement or restoration using two or more images, e.g. averaging or subtraction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0004—Industrial image inspection
- G06T7/001—Industrial image inspection using an image reference approach
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/02—Details
- H01J37/04—Arrangements of electrodes and associated parts for generating or controlling the discharge, e.g. electron-optical arrangement or ion-optical arrangement
- H01J37/05—Electron or ion-optical arrangements for separating electrons or ions according to their energy or mass
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/02—Details
- H01J37/22—Optical, image processing or photographic arrangements associated with the tube
- H01J37/222—Image processing arrangements associated with the tube
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/02—Details
- H01J37/244—Detectors; Associated components or circuits therefor
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H10—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES; ELECTRIC SOLID-STATE DEVICES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- H10P—GENERIC PROCESSES OR APPARATUS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF DEVICES COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H10P74/00—Testing or measuring during manufacture or treatment of wafers, substrates or devices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30108—Industrial image inspection
- G06T2207/30148—Semiconductor; IC; Wafer
Definitions
- the present invention relates to inspection and review of substrates, such as, for example, semiconductor wafers and reticles for lithography.
- a manufactured substrate such as a silicon wafer or a reticle
- a focused beam of electrons which results in the emission of secondary electrons from the substrate surface.
- the emitted electrons are detected, and the detection data is typically converted into images of the surface of the specimen. These images are then analyzed numerically to detect abnormalities (referred to as defects) in the manufactured substrate.
- the detected defects may be subsequently reviewed by further imaging.
- the detected defects may also be classified, either manually or automatically, into different classes or categories.
- the classification of a defect may be used to determine its cause such that appropriate adjustments may be made in the manufacturing process so as to improve its yield. It is highly desirable to improve methods and apparatus for the detection and classification of defects imaged by electron beam instrumentation.
- One embodiment relates to a method of inspecting a site location on a target substrate. Contours are obtained, the contours having been generated from a reference image using a design clip. A target image of the site location is acquired. The contours are aligned to the target image, and contrast values are computed for pixels on the contours. A threshold is applied to the contrast values to determine contour-based defect blobs.
- the apparatus includes at least a source, a scanning system, a detection system, and a control and processing system.
- the source is configured for generating an incident electron beam.
- the scanning system is configured to controllably deflect the incident electron beam such that the incident electron beam is scanned over a target region such that secondary electrons are emitted therefrom.
- the detection system is configured for detection of the secondary electrons so as to generate an image data frame of the target region.
- the control and processing system is configured to obtain contours which are generated from a reference image using a design clip, acquire a target image of the site location, align the contours to the target image, compute contrast values for pixels on the contours; and apply a threshold to the contrast values to determine contour-based defect blobs.
- Another embodiment relates to a method of generating contours for use in inspecting a site location for defects.
- a reference image is acquired of a reference site that corresponds to the site location.
- a design clip of the site location is retrieved.
- the design clip is aligned to the reference image.
- the contours are extracted from the reference image using the design clip.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an e-beam apparatus in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a method for generating an image-extracted reference contour in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of a method for contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a method of extracting a reference contour using a design clip in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 5 shows an example of a target image and corresponding reference contours in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 6 shows the contours of FIG. 5 as segmented into foreground, background, and contour pixel segments in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- FIG. 7 shows a detected defect in the target image of FIG. 5 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- Methods and apparatus for contour-based defect detection and classification using an e-beam apparatus are disclosed herein. These methods and apparatus may be employed to substantially improve the sensitivity of defect detection when compared against a conventional die-to-die approach.
- FIG. 1 provides a cross-sectional diagram of the e-beam inspection apparatus 100 which may be utilized in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- a source 101 generates an incident electron beam (primary electron beam) 102.
- the incident electron beam 102 passes through a Wien filter 104.
- the Wien filter 104 is an optical element configured to generate electrical and magnetic fields which cross each other.
- Scanning deflectors 106 and focusing electron lenses 107 are utilized.
- the scanning deflectors 106 are utilized to scan the e-beam across the surface of the target substrate 110.
- the target substrate 110 may be, for example, a patterned substrate, such as an integrated circuit being manufactured or a reticle for lithography.
- the focusing electron lenses 107 are utilized to focus the incident electron beam 102 into a beam spot on the surface of the wafer or other substrate sample 110.
- the focusing lenses 107 may operate by generating electric and/or magnetic fields.
- the target substrate 110 which may be, for example, a semiconductor wafer or a reticle.
- the target substrate 110 may be held by a movable stage 111.
- the secondary electrons are then extracted from the target substrate 110 by exposure to the electromagnetic field of the objective (final) lens 108.
- the electromagnetic field acts to confine the emitted electrons to within a relatively small distance from the incident electron beam optic axis and to accelerate these electrons up into the column. In this way, a secondary e-beam 112 is formed from the secondary electrons.
- the Wien filter 104 deflects the secondary e-beam 112 from the optic axis of the incident electron beam 102 to a detection axis (the optic axis for the detection system 114 of the apparatus). This serves to separate the scattered e- beam 1 2 from the incident electron beam 102.
- the detection system 114 detects the secondary e-beam 112 and generates data signals that may be utilized to create images of the surface of the target substrate.
- An instrument control and data processing (control/processing) system 150 may include one or more processors (i.e. microprocessors or microcontrollers) 152, data storage (including, for example, hard disk drive storage and memory chips) 154, a user interface 156 and a display system 158.
- the data storage 154 may be configured to store or hold computer-readable program code (instructions) 155 and data
- the processor 152 may be configured to execute the program code 155 and process the data.
- the user interface 156 may be configured to receive user inputs.
- the display system 158 may be configured to display views of the substrate surface to a user.
- the control/processing system 150 may be connected to, and may be used to control, various components of the e-beam column so as to implement procedures disclosed herein.
- the movement of the stage 111 , and the scanning by the deflectors 106 may be controlled by computer-readable program code 155 executed by the control/processing system 150.
- control/processing system 150 may be configured to receive and process the electron image data from the detection system 114.
- computer-readable program code 155 in the control/processing system 150 may be used to implement procedures relating to the contour-baseed defect detection technique which is described herein.
- the control/processing system 150 may be configured to interface with a design server 170.
- the design server 170 may be configured to store pre-OPC (optical proximity correction) design patterns 172, post-OPC design patterns 174, and image-extracted pattern contour data 176.
- the design server 170 may provide said data in design clips in real time at the request of the control/processing system 150 of the e-beam inspection apparatus 100.
- FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a method for generating an image-extracted reference contour in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The method
- 200 may be performed using the e-beam inspection apparatus 100, for example, and may be performed as a preliminary method to set up.
- the site location information (i.e. the locations of the sites to be inspected) may be loaded by the data processing system from a source.
- the site location information may be, for example, hots spots of a design rule check.
- the site location information may comprise inspection results from a previous inspection by the e-beam inspection apparatus 00 or by another inspection apparatus.
- a contour data generation procedure may be performed per block 204. As shown, the contour data generation procedure may involve performing the following steps (206 through 220) in order to generate and record the image-extracted reference contours and associated images for each site.
- a reference image of a reference site may be loaded into a data processing system, such as the control/processing system 150, for example.
- the reference site is preferably a known good (defect free) site that corresponds to an inspection site.
- the reference image may be a SEM image that is acquired from the reference site by an imaging apparatus, such as the e-beam inspection apparatus 100, for example.
- the reference image is preferably acquired at a higher resolution than the resolution of the target images subsequently acquired during the inspection process.
- a pre-OPC design clip may be retrieved for the site.
- the pre-OPC design clip may be retrieved from the design server 170 or from another source.
- the pre-OPC design clip provides a rendered image of the design pattern before the application of optical proximity correction.
- the design clip is aligned to the reference image.
- contours are extracted from the reference image. These contours are design-extracted reference-image contours and may be referred to herein as "reference contours".
- reference contours design-extracted reference-image contours and may be referred to herein as "reference contours".
- the extraction of a reference contour using a design clip may be
- the reference contours may be displayed by superimposing them over the reference image, and the reference contours may be edited, if desired, via a user interface per step 216.
- the reference contours may be validated per step 218. The validation may be performed using additional reference images collected from another die on a wafer, for example.
- the reference contours may then be saved or recorded in relation to an inspection (defect detection) recipe.
- the inspection recipe may be subsequently applied by the inspection apparatus 100 so as to inspect the site locations on a target substrate.
- FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a method 300 for contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- the method 300 may be performed using the control/processing system 150 of the e-beam inspection apparatus 100, for example.
- the reference contours may be read from storage for all inspection sites indicated by an inspection recipe.
- these reference contours and associated reference images may be loaded from data storage into memory of the control/processing system 150 of the e-beam inspection apparatus 100.
- a defect detection procedure may be performed per block 304. As shown, the defect detection procedure may involve performing the following steps (306 through 334) in order to detect and classify defects in a target substrate that is being inspected for defects.
- an image of an inspection site on the target substrate may be collected or acquired.
- the target image may be a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image and may be collected using the e-beam inspection apparatus 100, for example.
- SEM scanning electron microscope
- An example of a target image 500 and a corresponding reference contour 510 is shown in FIG. 5.
- the reference contour for the inspection site may be aligned with the target image.
- the reference contour extracted previously from the reference site per the method 200 of FIG. 2 may be aligned to the target image of the corresponding inspection site on the target substrate.
- a local contrast value may be computed at each image pixel.
- the local contrast value for a pixel represents a difference (i.e. a contrast) between the value of the pixel in the target image and the value of the corresponding pixel from the image-extracted reference contour.
- the image pixels may be segmented into foreground, background, and contour pixel segments based on the reference contour.
- the contour segment is made up of the pixels of the contours themselves.
- the procedure to distinguish foreground from background may start with seeds placed in the foreground based on the reference contour. Growing the regions from the seeds determines the foreground segment. The remaining pixels that are not part of the contour or foreground segments, may be determined to be the background segment.
- corners may be detected using the curvature of the contours per step 314, and the corner regions (pixels in a local region surrounding the corner) may be removed from the previously-determined segments and put into a separate corner segment per step 316.
- a bending of a contour of approximately ninety degrees may be determined to be a corner.
- Applicants have determined that placing the corner regions in a separate segment is advantageous because corners in a manufactured integrated circuit tend to have pattern variability.
- automatic thresholding may be performed on the local contrast values for pixels in each image segment (foreground segment, background segment, contour segment and corner segment) to generate a contour-based defect pixel list per segment.
- the defect pixel list indicates the pixels in that segment which have local contrast above a threshold contrast value.
- Contour-based defect blobs groups of adjacent defect pixels may be determined from the contour-based defect pixel lists.
- one or more secondary defect detection procedures may be run in each image segment (foreground segment, background segment, and corner segment) .
- the secondary defect detection procedure(s) may utilize conventional die-to-die or cell-to-cell defect detection procedures, such as a segmented automatic threshold procedure or a multiple-die automatic threshold procedure.
- Each secondary defect detection procedure may generate a secondary defect pixel list for each segment. Secondary defect blobs may be determined from the secondary defect pixel lists.
- the contour-based and the secondary defect blobs may be merged to create merged defect blobs.
- the merged defect blobs may be ranked per step 324.
- the ranking may depend, for example, on the local contrast and size of the defect blobs.
- an "energy" value may be computed which may be a sum of squares of the local contrast of the pixels of a defect blob. The ranking may then be done based on the energy values of the defect blobs.
- Geometric attributes relating to each defect blob may then be extracted per step 326.
- the geometric attributes may be based on the location of the defect blob in relation to the contour pattern.
- the geometric attribute may indicate the geometric shape (such as a square, or other polygon) in the contour pattern that the defect blob lies within.
- Other geometric attributes may be extracted.
- the defect blobs may then be classified per step 328.
- the defect classification may use the segment information and the geometric attributes of the defect blobs.
- the segment information and geometric attributes may be used to classify the defect blobs into the following classes: short; open; bridging; necking; protrusion; intrusion; void; particle; and others.
- a relative critical dimension (CD) measure may be computed.
- the relative CD measure may be computed by comparing the edges of the target image with the image-extracted reference contours.
- pattern fidelity metrics may be computed per step 332.
- the detected defects may be validated by using the defect pathes of a reticle inspection result per step 334.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram of a method 400 of extracting a reference contour using a design clip in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- an SEM image 402 of the site location and a design clip 404 are input.
- the design clip may be aligned to the SEM image, and a mask for the SEM image may then be created from the aligned design clip.
- a skeleton and clean procedure may be applied per step 408. This may involve obtaining an individual line segment for each individual region in the mask. The individual line segments may be separated at branch points so as to form the skeleton. The skeleton may be cleaned by removing line segments which are smaller than a pre-defined value.
- Seed points may then be created per step 410.
- the seed point may be created by shrinking the remaining line segments into single seed points.
- a single region may have more than one seed point.
- gradients may be obtained from the SEM image and cleaned-up per step 412. During the clean-up, gradients that lie within a dilated region of the masks may be retained so as to prevent leaks towards stronger gradients.
- the seed points may be used to grow "minima" pools or
- watershed regions Boundaries of each seed initiated pool or watershed region may be marked.
- the watershed regions may be merged, and final contours may be created based on the boundaries of the merged regions.
- the merging effectively fills holes that may be created by multiple seed points for a single region.
- the final contours may be given by "Sobel" edges.
- FIG. 5 shows an example of a target image 510 and corresponding reference contours 520 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. As seen, the reference contours 520 provide an expected outline for the regions of the target image 510.
- FIG. 6 shows the contours of FIG. 5 as segmented into foreground 602, background 604, and edge (contour) 606 pixel segments in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
- the foreground segment 602 has the dark pixels
- the edge segment 606 has the light pixels
- the background segment 604 has the medium-dark pixels.
- FIG. 7 shows a detected defect in the target image of FIG. 5 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. As shown, the defect is within the rectangle 702 and appears to be a necking type defect.
- the contour-based approach disclosed herein has substantially improved accuracy.
- the contour-based approach disclosed herein has substantially increased sensitivity.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
- Testing Or Measuring Of Semiconductors Or The Like (AREA)
- Image Processing (AREA)
- Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2014512836A JP6099635B2 (en) | 2011-05-25 | 2012-04-09 | Contour-based defect detection using inspection equipment |
| KR1020137032756A KR101947843B1 (en) | 2011-05-25 | 2012-04-09 | Contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US201161489871P | 2011-05-25 | 2011-05-25 | |
| US61/489,871 | 2011-05-25 | ||
| US13/410,506 US8669523B2 (en) | 2011-05-25 | 2012-03-02 | Contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus |
| US13/410,506 | 2012-03-02 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2012161874A2 true WO2012161874A2 (en) | 2012-11-29 |
| WO2012161874A3 WO2012161874A3 (en) | 2013-03-21 |
Family
ID=47217950
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2012/032796 Ceased WO2012161874A2 (en) | 2011-05-25 | 2012-04-09 | Contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US8669523B2 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP6099635B2 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR101947843B1 (en) |
| TW (1) | TWI548872B (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2012161874A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016507058A (en) * | 2013-01-29 | 2016-03-07 | ケーエルエー−テンカー コーポレイション | Contour-based array inspection of patterned defects |
Families Citing this family (16)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8669523B2 (en) * | 2011-05-25 | 2014-03-11 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus |
| US8946630B2 (en) | 2013-03-29 | 2015-02-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic filtering of SEM images |
| US8987010B1 (en) * | 2013-08-29 | 2015-03-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Microprocessor image correction and method for the detection of potential defects |
| US10127652B2 (en) | 2014-02-06 | 2018-11-13 | Kla-Tencor Corp. | Defect detection and classification based on attributes determined from a standard reference image |
| KR20160087600A (en) | 2015-01-14 | 2016-07-22 | 한화테크윈 주식회사 | Apparatus for inspecting defect and method thereof |
| US10008364B2 (en) | 2015-02-27 | 2018-06-26 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Alignment of multi-beam patterning tool |
| US9501830B2 (en) * | 2015-03-18 | 2016-11-22 | Intel Corporation | Blob detection in noisy images |
| US9996942B2 (en) | 2015-03-19 | 2018-06-12 | Kla-Tencor Corp. | Sub-pixel alignment of inspection to design |
| KR102810067B1 (en) * | 2017-10-02 | 2025-05-21 | 어플라이드 머티리얼즈 이스라엘 리미티드 | Determining a critical dimension variation of a pattern |
| WO2021140866A1 (en) | 2020-01-10 | 2021-07-15 | 株式会社ニューフレアテクノロジー | Pattern inspection device and pattern inspection method |
| US11379972B2 (en) * | 2020-06-03 | 2022-07-05 | Applied Materials Israel Ltd. | Detecting defects in semiconductor specimens using weak labeling |
| US20230298158A1 (en) * | 2020-08-19 | 2023-09-21 | Asml Netherlands B.V. | Apparatus and method for selecting high quality images from raw images automatically |
| JP7501272B2 (en) * | 2020-09-18 | 2024-06-18 | 富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | Inspection device, image forming device, and inspection program |
| KR102859867B1 (en) * | 2022-05-02 | 2025-09-16 | (주)알티엠 | Apparatus for semi-auto labeling of image data based on machine vision and method thereof |
| CN117011297B (en) * | 2023-10-07 | 2024-02-02 | 惠州市凯默金属制品有限公司 | Aluminum alloy automobile accessory die defect detection method based on image processing |
| KR20250159807A (en) * | 2024-05-03 | 2025-11-11 | 서울대학교산학협력단 | Device and method for training contour extraction model to detect the outlines of semiconductor lithography pattern |
Family Cites Families (24)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5923430A (en) * | 1993-06-17 | 1999-07-13 | Ultrapointe Corporation | Method for characterizing defects on semiconductor wafers |
| JP4076644B2 (en) | 1997-12-05 | 2008-04-16 | 株式会社ルネサステクノロジ | Pattern distortion detection apparatus and detection method |
| US6999183B2 (en) * | 1998-11-18 | 2006-02-14 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Detection system for nanometer scale topographic measurements of reflective surfaces |
| US6538249B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2003-03-25 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Image-formation apparatus using charged particle beams under various focus conditions |
| JP2003016463A (en) * | 2001-07-05 | 2003-01-17 | Toshiba Corp | Method for extracting outline of figure, pattern inspection method, pattern inspection apparatus, program, and computer-readable recording medium storing the same |
| US7126699B1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2006-10-24 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. | Systems and methods for multi-dimensional metrology and/or inspection of a specimen |
| WO2006017160A2 (en) * | 2004-07-09 | 2006-02-16 | Ade Corporation | System and method for searching for patterns of semiconductor wafer features in semiconductor wafer data |
| US7676077B2 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2010-03-09 | Kla-Tencor Technologies Corp. | Methods and systems for utilizing design data in combination with inspection data |
| US8331637B2 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2012-12-11 | Medic Vision-Brain Technologies Ltd. | System and method of automatic prioritization and analysis of medical images |
| JP4943304B2 (en) | 2006-12-05 | 2012-05-30 | 株式会社 Ngr | Pattern inspection apparatus and method |
| US7904845B2 (en) * | 2006-12-06 | 2011-03-08 | Kla-Tencor Corp. | Determining locations on a wafer to be reviewed during defect review |
| US20080277591A1 (en) * | 2007-05-08 | 2008-11-13 | Orbotech Medical Solutions Ltd. | Directional radiation detector |
| KR100877105B1 (en) | 2007-06-27 | 2009-01-07 | 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 | Pattern Verification Method for Semiconductor Devices |
| JP4659004B2 (en) | 2007-08-10 | 2011-03-30 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Circuit pattern inspection method and circuit pattern inspection system |
| JP5425779B2 (en) * | 2007-08-20 | 2014-02-26 | ケーエルエー−テンカー・コーポレーション | A computer-implemented method for determining whether an actual defect is a potential systematic defect or a potentially random defect |
| US8355562B2 (en) | 2007-08-23 | 2013-01-15 | Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation | Pattern shape evaluation method |
| JP5202071B2 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2013-06-05 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Charged particle microscope apparatus and image processing method using the same |
| US9710903B2 (en) * | 2008-06-11 | 2017-07-18 | Kla-Tencor Corp. | System and method for detecting design and process defects on a wafer using process monitoring features |
| JP5414215B2 (en) * | 2008-07-30 | 2014-02-12 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Circuit pattern inspection apparatus and circuit pattern inspection method |
| JP2010145800A (en) * | 2008-12-19 | 2010-07-01 | Elpida Memory Inc | Phase shift mask, manufacturing method thereof, and method for manufacturing integrated circuit |
| US8055059B2 (en) * | 2008-12-23 | 2011-11-08 | Hermes Microvision Inc. | Method and system for determining a defect during sample inspection involving charged particle beam imaging |
| JP5379571B2 (en) * | 2009-06-19 | 2013-12-25 | 株式会社アドバンテスト | Pattern inspection apparatus and pattern inspection method |
| JP5501161B2 (en) * | 2010-08-31 | 2014-05-21 | 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ | Image processing apparatus and computer program |
| US8669523B2 (en) * | 2011-05-25 | 2014-03-11 | Kla-Tencor Corporation | Contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus |
-
2012
- 2012-03-02 US US13/410,506 patent/US8669523B2/en active Active
- 2012-04-09 KR KR1020137032756A patent/KR101947843B1/en active Active
- 2012-04-09 WO PCT/US2012/032796 patent/WO2012161874A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2012-04-09 JP JP2014512836A patent/JP6099635B2/en active Active
- 2012-04-16 TW TW101113517A patent/TWI548872B/en active
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2016507058A (en) * | 2013-01-29 | 2016-03-07 | ケーエルエー−テンカー コーポレイション | Contour-based array inspection of patterned defects |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP6099635B2 (en) | 2017-03-22 |
| JP2014517523A (en) | 2014-07-17 |
| KR20140033400A (en) | 2014-03-18 |
| TWI548872B (en) | 2016-09-11 |
| WO2012161874A3 (en) | 2013-03-21 |
| US8669523B2 (en) | 2014-03-11 |
| TW201300769A (en) | 2013-01-01 |
| KR101947843B1 (en) | 2019-02-13 |
| US20120298862A1 (en) | 2012-11-29 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8669523B2 (en) | Contour-based defect detection using an inspection apparatus | |
| JP6173487B2 (en) | Contour-based array inspection of patterned defects | |
| TWI805857B (en) | System and method for characterizing a specimen | |
| JP5225297B2 (en) | Method for recognizing array region in die formed on wafer, and setting method for such method | |
| US7792351B1 (en) | Defect review using image segmentation | |
| US8237119B2 (en) | Scanning type charged particle beam microscope and an image processing method using the same | |
| US8885950B2 (en) | Pattern matching method and pattern matching apparatus | |
| JP6188695B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for classifying wrinkles using surface height attributes | |
| US9727047B2 (en) | Defect detection using structural information | |
| US8213705B2 (en) | Methods for accurate identification of an edge of a care area for an array area formed on a wafer and methods for binning defects detected in an array area formed on a wafer | |
| CN112740383B (en) | System, computer-implemented method, and readable medium for detecting defects on a wafer | |
| TWI708155B (en) | Methods and systems for providing feature classification for inspection of a photolithographic mask | |
| KR20150003270A (en) | Defect analysis assistance device, program executed by defect analysis assistance device, and defect analysis system | |
| JP2011174858A (en) | Defect detection method and semiconductor device manufacturing method | |
| TWI611162B (en) | Methods and apparatus for measurement of relative critical dimensions | |
| JP3722757B2 (en) | Defect imaging device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 12789710 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2014512836 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20137032756 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 12789710 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |