WO2012092006A2 - Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof - Google Patents

Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012092006A2
WO2012092006A2 PCT/US2011/066016 US2011066016W WO2012092006A2 WO 2012092006 A2 WO2012092006 A2 WO 2012092006A2 US 2011066016 W US2011066016 W US 2011066016W WO 2012092006 A2 WO2012092006 A2 WO 2012092006A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
metal
precursor
catalyst
slurry catalyst
group
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2011/066016
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2012092006A3 (en
Inventor
Alexander E. Kuperman
Axel Brait
Bo Kou
Bruce Edward Reynolds
Christopher Paul DUNCKLEY
Erin P. MARIS
Joseph V. Nguyen
Julie Chabot
Kenneth KWIK
Ling JIAO
Oleg Mironov
Rahul Shankar Bhaduri
Shuwu Yang
Modinat KOTUN
Original Assignee
Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. filed Critical Chevron U.S.A. Inc.
Priority to CA2817986A priority Critical patent/CA2817986C/en
Priority to MX2013007317A priority patent/MX2013007317A/en
Priority to EP11853753.9A priority patent/EP2658647B1/en
Priority to EA201390997A priority patent/EA201390997A1/en
Priority to JP2013547537A priority patent/JP6097224B2/en
Priority to FIEP11853753.9T priority patent/FI2658647T3/en
Priority to SG2013041074A priority patent/SG190910A1/en
Priority to CN2011800600490A priority patent/CN103260749A/en
Priority to BR112013009690A priority patent/BR112013009690A2/en
Priority to ES11853753T priority patent/ES2981864T3/en
Priority to KR1020137020290A priority patent/KR101927396B1/en
Priority to DK11853753.9T priority patent/DK2658647T3/en
Publication of WO2012092006A2 publication Critical patent/WO2012092006A2/en
Publication of WO2012092006A3 publication Critical patent/WO2012092006A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/16Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/24Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • B01J23/28Molybdenum
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/76Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/84Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/85Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • B01J23/88Molybdenum
    • B01J23/883Molybdenum and nickel
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J19/00Chemical, physical or physico-chemical processes in general; Their relevant apparatus
    • B01J19/24Stationary reactors without moving elements inside
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/16Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/24Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/16Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/24Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • B01J23/30Tungsten
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/74Iron group metals
    • B01J23/755Nickel
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/76Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/84Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/85Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/76Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/84Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/85Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • B01J23/88Molybdenum
    • B01J23/887Molybdenum containing in addition other metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/8872Alkali or alkaline earth metals
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/70Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper
    • B01J23/76Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/84Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of the iron group metals or copper combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36 with arsenic, antimony, bismuth, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, polonium, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, technetium or rhenium
    • B01J23/85Chromium, molybdenum or tungsten
    • B01J23/88Molybdenum
    • B01J23/887Molybdenum containing in addition other metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/8873Zinc, cadmium or mercury
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J27/00Catalysts comprising the elements or compounds of halogens, sulfur, selenium, tellurium, phosphorus or nitrogen; Catalysts comprising carbon compounds
    • B01J27/02Sulfur, selenium or tellurium; Compounds thereof
    • B01J27/04Sulfides
    • B01J27/047Sulfides with chromium, molybdenum, tungsten or polonium
    • B01J27/051Molybdenum
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J27/00Catalysts comprising the elements or compounds of halogens, sulfur, selenium, tellurium, phosphorus or nitrogen; Catalysts comprising carbon compounds
    • B01J27/02Sulfur, selenium or tellurium; Compounds thereof
    • B01J27/04Sulfides
    • B01J27/047Sulfides with chromium, molybdenum, tungsten or polonium
    • B01J27/051Molybdenum
    • B01J27/0515Molybdenum with iron group metals or platinum group metals
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/30Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their physical properties
    • B01J35/396Distribution of the active metal ingredient
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/20Sulfiding
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G49/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00
    • C10G49/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00 characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G49/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00 characterised by the catalyst used containing nickel, cobalt, chromium, molybdenum, or tungsten metals, or compounds thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G49/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00
    • C10G49/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00 characterised by the catalyst used
    • C10G49/06Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00 characterised by the catalyst used containing platinum group metals or compounds thereof
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G49/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00
    • C10G49/10Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00 with moving solid particles
    • C10G49/12Treatment of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds, not provided for in a single one of groups C10G45/02, C10G45/32, C10G45/44, C10G45/58 or C10G47/00 with moving solid particles suspended in the oil, e.g. slurries
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/61Surface area
    • B01J35/615100-500 m2/g
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/61Surface area
    • B01J35/617500-1000 m2/g
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/63Pore volume
    • B01J35/6350.5-1.0 ml/g
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/63Pore volume
    • B01J35/638Pore volume more than 1.0 ml/g
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J35/00Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J35/60Catalysts, in general, characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J35/66Pore distribution
    • B01J35/695Pore distribution polymodal
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/10Feedstock materials
    • C10G2300/107Atmospheric residues having a boiling point of at least about 538 °C
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/10Feedstock materials
    • C10G2300/1077Vacuum residues
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/20Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
    • C10G2300/201Impurities
    • C10G2300/205Metal content
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/20Characteristics of the feedstock or the products
    • C10G2300/30Physical properties of feedstocks or products
    • C10G2300/301Boiling range
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/70Catalyst aspects
    • C10G2300/701Use of spent catalysts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/70Catalyst aspects
    • C10G2300/703Activation
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G2300/00Aspects relating to hydrocarbon processing covered by groups C10G1/00 - C10G99/00
    • C10G2300/80Additives
    • C10G2300/802Diluents
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P10/00Technologies related to metal processing
    • Y02P10/20Recycling

Definitions

  • the invention relates generally to catalysts for use in the conversion of heavy oils and residua and methods for making thereof.
  • Catalysts commonly used for these hydroprocessing reactions include materials such as cobalt molybdate on alumina, nickel on alumina, cobalt molybdate promoted with nickel, nickel tungstate, etc.
  • US Patent Nos. 4,824,821 and 5,484,755 and US Patent Publication No. 2006/0054535 disclose hydroprocessing catalysts in the form of high activity slurry. The catalyst is produced from Group VIB metal compounds by sulfiding an aqueous mixture of the metal compounds with hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) gas at a pressure of up to 5,000 psi (340 atm).
  • H 2 S hydrogen sulfide
  • 7,754,645 and 7,410,928 discloses a hydroprocessing catalyst and methods for making the catalysts, by reacting at least a Group VIB metal compound with a Promoter metal compound, sulfiding the intermediate mixture with a sulfiding agent, then mixing the sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to make a bulk slurry type catalyst.
  • a hydroprocessing catalyst and methods for making the catalysts by reacting at least a Group VIB metal compound with a Promoter metal compound, sulfiding the intermediate mixture with a sulfiding agent, then mixing the sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to make a bulk slurry type catalyst.
  • the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
  • the process comprises: providing at least an inorganic metal precursor solution comprising at least one of a Group VIB metal precursor and a Group VIII metal precursor; mixing at least a polar aprotic solvent with the inorganic metal precursor solution to form an oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor, at a weight ratio of solvent to inorganic metal precursor solution of 1 : 1 to 100: 1; and providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor forming the slurry catalyst.
  • the invention relates to a process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
  • the process comprises: providing a slurry catalyst prepared from at least a Group VIB metal precursor compound and optionally at least a Promoter metal precursor compound selected from Group VIII, Group IIB, Group IIA, Group IV A metals and combinations thereof, wherein the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium having an particle size ranging from 1 to 300 ⁇ ; providing a hydrogen feed; treating the slurry catalyst by mixing with the hydrogen feed at a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MP a) and a temperature from 200°F to 800°F at a rate of from 500 to 15,000 scf hydrogen per bbl of slurry catalyst for a minute to 20 hours, wherein the slurry catalyst is saturated with hydrogen providing an increase of k- values in terms of HDS, HDN, and HDMCR of at least 15%
  • the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst with the use of rework materials.
  • the process comprises: providing at least a metal precursor comprising at least a Group VIB metal, the metal precursor is a rework material obtained from a process of making hydroprocessing catalysts, wherein the rework material has an average particle size of less than 300 ⁇ ; mixing the rework material with at least a diluent forming a slurried metal precursor; and providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the slurried metal precursor forming the slurry catalyst.
  • the sulfidation is in-situ with the heavy oil feedstock providing the sulfiding agent for the sulfidation.
  • the invention relates to a process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock, using a pressure leach solution obtained from a metal recovery process as one of the metal precursor feed.
  • the process comprises: providing at least a metal precursor solution comprising at least a Primary metal precursor in an aqueous solution, wherein the metal precursor solution is a pressure leach solution obtained from a metal recovery process and where the at least a Primary metal precursor was previously leached into the pressure leach solution in a leaching step; mixing the at least a metal precursor solution with at least a hydrocarbon diluent forming a catalyst precursor; and providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the catalyst precursor forming the slurry catalyst.
  • the invention in another aspect, relates to an improved process for forming a slurry catalyst.
  • the process comprises: providing a metal precursor solution comprising a mixture of at least two different water-soluble metal salts selected from Group VIB, Group VIII, Group IVB, Group IIB metals and mixtures thereof; mixing the metal precursor solution with a hydrocarbon diluent under high shear mixing to generate an emulsion with droplet sizes ranging from 0.1 to 300 ⁇ ; and sulfiding the emulsion with at least a sulfiding agent to form the slurry catalyst.
  • the invention relates to an improved slurry catalyst composition.
  • the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium, wherein the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 ⁇ .
  • the catalyst has a polymodal pore distribution with at least 80% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter.
  • the catalyst is prepared from sulfiding and dispersing a metal precursor solution in a hydrocarbon diluent, the metal precursor comprising at least a Primary metal precursor, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of Primary metal in solution.
  • the invention relates to an improved slurry catalyst.
  • the catalyst a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium, wherein the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 ⁇ , the slurry catalyst has a BET total surface area of at least 100 m 2 /g, and the slurry catalyst is prepared from sulfiding and dispersing a metal precursor solution in a hydrocarbon diluent, the metal precursor comprising at least a Primary metal precursor and optionally a Promoter metal precursor, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of Primary metal in solution.
  • the invention relates to a process for preparing an improved slurry catalyst for the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
  • the process comprises: providing at least a metal precursor solution comprising at least a Primary metal precursor, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt.
  • a slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 ⁇ , a BET total surface area of at least 100 m 2 /g, a polymodal pore distribution with at least 80% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter, and a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
  • the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
  • the process comprises: providing at least a metal precursor solution comprising at least two different metal cations in its molecular structure, with at least one of the metal cations is a Group VIB metal cation; sulfiding the metal precursor with a sulfiding agent forming a catalyst precursor; and
  • the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a single-metal slurry catalyst.
  • the invention relates to another improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst.
  • the process comprises: providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble molybdenum compound and a water-soluble metal zinc compound; mixing the metal precursor solution with a hydrocarbon diluent under
  • the invention relates to yet another improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
  • the process comprises: providing at least a first metal precursor comprising at least a metal salt of at least one of a non-noble Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; sulfiding the first metal precursor with a first sulfiding agent to form a sulfided catalyst precursor; sulfiding the sulfided catalyst precursor with a second sulfiding agent at a molar ratio of sulfur to metal in the sulfided catalyst precursor of at least 1.5 to 1 for an enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor; and mixing the enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent forming a slurry catalyst having an average particle size of 1 to 300 ⁇ .
  • the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
  • the process to be improved comprises: providing a first metal precursor comprising at least a Group VIB metal and a promoter metal precursor comprising at least a promoter metal selected from Group IVB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals and combinations thereof, for a promoter metal to a Group VIB metal weight ratio ranging from 1 :30 to 5 : 1 ; sulfiding the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor separately, concurrently, or together, forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor; and mixing the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent forming a slurry catalyst having an average particle size of 1 to 300 ⁇ .
  • the improvement comprises: apportioning at least one of the metal precursor into a first portion and a second portion at a ratio of first portion to second portion ranging from 1 : 10 to 10: 1; employing the first portion in the sulfidation step to form the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor; and mixing the second portion with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor before, during, or after the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent to form the slurry catalyst.
  • Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for preparing the slurry catalyst with at least two metal precursor feeds and with the co-sulfiding of the metal precursors in the continuous mode.
  • Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating another embodiment to prepare the slurry catalyst with a double salt metal precursor as a feed, with in-situ sulfidation of the metal precursor.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment to prepare the slurry catalyst, wherein a pressure leach solution (PLS) or a leach slurry is used as a feed.
  • PLS pressure leach solution
  • Figure 4 is a block diagram illustrating another embodiment to prepare the slurry catalyst with the PLS as a feed.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating another embodiment to make a slurry catalyst with a hydrogen treatment step (prior to heavy oil upgrade).
  • Figure 6 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst wherein metal precursors are mixed directly with a heavy oil feedstock under high shear mixing.
  • Figure 7 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment to make slurry catalyst with the use of a solvent and at least an inorganic metal precursor for an oil dispersible metal precursor.
  • Figure 8 is a block diagram illustrating a variation of the embodiment in Figure 7 for making a promoted catalyst, with the use of an aprotic solvent for an oil dispersible metal precursor which is subsequently sulfided.
  • Figure 9 is a block diagram illustrating yet another variation of the embodiment in Figure 8 with the use of an aprotic solvent.
  • Figure 10 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst with high shear mixing, forming an emulsion catalyst.
  • Figure 11 illustrates a variation of the embodiment in Figure 10 to prepare a slurry catalyst with high shear mixing.
  • Figure 12 illustrates another embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst with high shear mixing, forming an emulsion, wherein the emulsion undergoes in-situ sulfidation.
  • Figure 13 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst using rework material or ground residuum catalyst fines.
  • Figure 14 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a promoted slurry catalyst from an oil soluble organometallic compound as metal precursor feed, which subsequently thermally decomposes generating the sulfided slurry catalyst.
  • Figure 15 illustrates a variation of the embodiment in Figure 14, wherein the sulfiding is in-situ by mixing the oil soluble organometallic compound with a heavy oil feed.
  • Figure 16 illustrates an embodiment with a second sulfiding step for a slurry catalyst with enhanced amount of sulfur (double sulfiding).
  • Figure 17 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a catalyst with Ti as a promoter.
  • Figure 18 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a single metal catalyst, e.g., with the use of nickel as the single metal.
  • Figure 19 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a Zn-Mo slurry catalyst.
  • Figure 20 illustrates an embodiment for preparing a slurry catalyst with a split feeding of at least a Promoter metal precursor feedstock.
  • Figure 21 illustrates an embodiment for preparing a slurry catalyst from ground / rework catalyst.
  • Bind catalyst may be used interchangeably with “slurry catalyst” or “unsupported catalyst” or “self-supported catalyst,” meaning that the catalyst composition is NOT of the conventional catalyst form with a preformed, shaped catalyst support which is then loaded with metals via impregnation or deposition catalyst.
  • the bulk catalyst is formed through precipitation.
  • the bulk catalyst has a binder incorporated into the catalyst composition.
  • the bulk catalyst is formed from metal compounds and without any binder.
  • the bulk catalyst comprises dispersed particles in a liquid mixture such as hydrocarbon oil (“slurry catalyst”).
  • Heavy oil feed or feedstock refers to heavy and ultra-heavy crudes, including but not limited to resids, coals, bitumen, tar sands, oils obtained from the thermo- decomposition of waste products, polymers, biomasses, oils deriving from coke and oil shales, etc.
  • Heavy oil feedstock may be liquid, semi-solid, and / or solid. Examples of heavy oil feedstock include but are not limited to Canada Tar sands, vacuum resid from Brazilian Santos and Campos basins, Egyptian Gulf of Suez, Chad, Venezuelan Zulia, Malaysia, and Indonesia Sumatra.
  • heavy oil feedstock examples include residuum left over from refinery processes, including “bottom of the barrel” and “residuum” (or “resid”), atmospheric tower bottoms, which have a boiling point of at least 650°F(343°C), or vacuum tower bottoms, which have a boiling point of at least 975°F (524°C), or "resid pitch” and “vacuum residue” which have a boiling point of 975°F (524°C ) or greater.
  • Properties of heavy oil feedstock may include, but are not limited to: TAN of at least 0.1, at least 0.3, or at least 1; viscosity of at least 10 cSt; API gravity at most 15 in one embodiment, and at most 10 in another embodiment.
  • a gram of heavy oil feedstock contains at least 0.0001 grams of Ni/V/Fe; at least 0.005 grams of heteroatoms; at least 0.01 grams of residue; at least 0.04 grams C5 asphaltenes; at least 0.002 grams of micro residue (MCR); per gram of crude; at least 0.00001 grams of alkali metal salts of one or more organic acids; and at least 0.005 grams of sulfur.
  • the heavy oil feedstock has a sulfur content of at least 5 wt. % and an API gravity ranging from -5 to +5.
  • a heavy oil feed such as Athabasca bitumen (Canada) typically has at least 50% by volume vacuum reside.
  • a Boscan (Venezuela) heavy oil feed may contain at least 64 % by volume vacuum residue.
  • a Borealis Canadian bitumen may contain about 5% sulfur, 19% of asphaltenes and insoluble THFi (tetrahydrofuran) of less than 1 kg/ton.
  • “Treatment,” “treated,” “upgrade,” “upgrading” and “upgraded,” when used in conjunction with a heavy oil feedstock describes a heavy oil feedstock that is being or has been subjected to hydroprocessing, or a resulting material or crude product, having a reduction in the molecular weight of the heavy oil feedstock, a reduction in the boiling point range of the heavy oil feedstock, a reduction in the concentration of asphaltenes, a reduction in the concentration of hydrocarbon free radicals, and/or a reduction in the quantity of impurities, such as sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, halides, and metals.
  • impurities such as sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, halides, and metals.
  • hydroprocessing The upgrade or treatment of heavy oil feeds is generally referred herein as "hydroprocessing" (hydrocracking, or hydroconversion).
  • Hydroprocessing is meant as any process that is carried out in the presence of hydrogen, including, but not limited to, hydroconversion, hydrocracking, hydrogenation, hydrotreating, hydrodesulfurization, hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodemetallation, hydrodearomatization, hydroisomerization, hydrodewaxing and hydrocracking including selective hydrocracking.
  • the products of hydroprocessing may show improved viscosities, viscosity indices, saturates content, low temperature properties, volatilities and depolarization, etc.
  • Hydrogen refers to hydrogen, and / or a compound or compounds that when in the presence of a heavy oil feed and a catalyst react to provide hydrogen.
  • “Surfactant” can be used interchangeably with “surface active agent,” “stabilizer,” or “surface modifier,” referring generally to any material that operates to lower the surface tension of a liquid or to reduce the liquid droplet size, thus improving the wetting at the interface between the dispersed catalyst particles and the hydrocarbon oil.
  • Catalyst precursor refers to a compound containing one or more
  • catalytically active metals from which compound the slurry catalyst is eventually formed, and which compound may be catalytically active as a hydroprocessing catalyst.
  • An example is a water-based catalyst prior to the transformation step with a hydrocarbon diluent, another example is a sulfided metal precursor.
  • One or more of or "at least one of when used to preface several elements or classes of elements such as X, Y and Z or Xi-X n , Yi-Y n and Zi-Z n is intended to refer to a single element selected from X or Y or Z, a combination of elements selected from the same common class (such as Xi and X 2 ), as well as a combination of elements selected from different classes (such as X ls Y 2 and Z n ).
  • SCF / BBL refers to a unit of standard cubic foot of gas (N 2 , H 2 , etc.) per barrel of hydrocarbon feed, or slurry catalyst, depending on where the unit is used.
  • Metal refers to reagents in their elemental, compound, or ionic form.
  • Metal precursor refers to the metal compound feed to the process.
  • metal or metal precursor in the singular form is not limited to a single metal or metal precursor, e.g., a Group VIB or a Promoter metal, but also includes the plural references for mixtures of metals. "In the solute state” means that the metal component is in a protic liquid form.
  • Group VIB metal refers to chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, and combinations thereof in their elemental, compound, or ionic form.
  • Group VIII metal refers iron, cobalt, nickel, ruthenium, rhenium, palladium, osmium, iridium, platinum, and combinations thereof.
  • Primary metal refers to a metal in its elemental, compound, or ionic form selected from any of Group VIB (IUPAC nomenclature Group 6), Group VIII metals (IUPAC nomenclature Group s 8-10), Group IIB metals, and combinations thereof, in its sulfided form functions as a catalyst in a hydroprocessing process.
  • the Primary metal is present in a catalyst in a larger amount than other metals.
  • Promoter metal refers to a metal in its elemental, compound, or ionic form selected from any of Group IVB (IUPAC nomenclature Group 4), Group VIB, Group VIII, Group IIB metals (IUPAC nomenclature Group 12), and combinations thereof, added to increase the catalytic activity of the Primary metal. Promoter metal is present in a smaller amount than the Primary metal, in a range from 1 - 50 wt. % (Promoter metal to Primary metal) in one embodiment, and from 2-30 wt.% in a second embodiment.
  • Free of Promoter metal or “substantially free of Promoter metal” means that in making the catalyst, no Promoter metal in their elemental, compound, or ionic form, is added. Traces of Promoter metals can be present, in an amount of less than 1% of the Primary metal (wt. %).
  • 1000°F+ conversion rate refers to the conversion of a heavy oil feedstock having a boiling point of greater than 1000°F+ to less than 1000° F (538°C) boiling point materials in a hydroconversion process, computed as: 100% * (wt. % boiling above 1000°F materials in feed - wt. % boiling above 1000°F materials in products) / wt. % boiling above 1000°F materials in feed).
  • Pressure leach solution or PLS, also known as “pregnant leach solution,” “pregnant leach liquor,” or “leach solution” refers to a composition obtained from recovery of metals from metallurgical wastes, mineral ores and / or concentrates, spent batteries, or spent catalysts, wherein a leaching step under pressure and temperature is employed to dissolve or cause the leaching of certain metal component(s) into the aqueous phase, giving a pressure leach solution.
  • Pressure leach slurry also known as “leach slurry,” refers to a slurry resulting from the dissolution of metals such as Group VIB metals, Promoter metals, and the like, from a spent catalyst.
  • the pressure leach slurry may contain coke in an amount of 1 to 20 wt. %.
  • Dispossion also known as “emulsion” refers to two immiscible fluids in which one fluid (e.g., catalyst precursor, metal precursor, etc.) is suspended or dispersed in the form of droplets in the second fluid phase (e.g., heavy oil feedstock or hydrocarbon diluent) as the continuous phase.
  • the droplets are in the range of 0.1 to 300 ⁇ . In another embodiment, from 1 to 10 ⁇ . In a third embodiment, the droplets are in the range of 0.5 to 50 ⁇ in size. The droplets can subsequently coalesce to be larger in size. Droplet size can be measured by methods known in the art, including particle video microscope and focused beam reflectance method, as disclosed in Ind. Eng. Chem.
  • Rework may be used interchangeably with “rework materials” or "catalyst fines,” refering to catalyst products, scrap pieces, fines, or rejected materials obtained from the process of making any of a supported catalyst, a self-supported catalyst, and a catalyst precursor, reduced in size to fines or powdered materials containing one or more catalytic materials.
  • the catalyst fines can be generated from a catalyst product, or from the rejected materials / scrap pieces containing catalytic materials generated in the process of making the catalyst product.
  • the catalyst fines can be sulfided or unsulfided.
  • the rework is from making unsupported catalyst precursor, wherein the rework is generated from final products, catalyst fines, broken pieces, scrap pieces and the like, and before the catalyst precursor is sulfided.
  • the rework is generated from of fines, final products, scrap pieces, etc., generated from the process of forming / shaping a catalyst precursor and before the sulfidation step.
  • the rework is in the form of fines generated from grinding any of supported catalyst products, unsupported catalyst products, scrap pieces, fines, and combinations thereof, generated in a process to make a supported catalyst or an unsupported catalyst.
  • Reaction rate constants for reactions such as HDN, HDS, and HDMCR refer to the constant of proportionality which relates the rate of conversion of a particular fraction (VGO, VR, etc.), or of particular class of compounds in the feed (sulfur- containing or HDS, nitrogen containing or HDN), to the appropriate functions of the process, such as the concentration of the reactants, process pressure, flow rate, and other process- specific variables.
  • the total volumetric flow rate to the system includes the fresh VR stream is corrected to account for the effect of gas hold-up.
  • Pore porosity and pore size distribution in one embodiment are measured using mercury intrusion porosimetry, designed as ASTM standard method D 4284. Unless indicated otherwise, pore porosity is measured via the nitrogen adsorption method.
  • the invention relates to methods for making slurry catalysts having improved properties including but not limited to high surface area and large pore volume.
  • the invention also relates to a method for the hydroconversion or upgrade of heavy oils, by sending the heavy oil feed to the upgrade process in the presence of the improved slurry catalyst, operating under conditions to get at least 30% 1000°F+ conversion in one embodiment, at least 50% 1000°F+ in another embodiment.
  • the catalyst is prepared from at least a Primary metal component (e.g., a Group VIB metal precursor) and at least one Promoter metal precursor (e.g., a Group VIII metal precursor, a Group IIB metal precursor, or a Group VIII metal precursor such as Ni and a Group IVA metal precursor such as Ti).
  • the catalyst is prepared from at least a Primary metal precursor with no Promoter metal added.
  • the catalyst is prepared from at least a Group VIII metal such as a nickel compound as the Primary metal component, with or without the subsequent addition of other metals as Promoter metals.
  • the catalyst is prepared from a double salt precursor containing at least two different metal cations, e.g., prepared from at least two different metal precursor feeds.
  • Promoter metal precursors can be used as the feedstock, e.g., different Group VIII metal precursors are used such as Ni and Co.
  • Multiple Primary metal precursors can be used as co-catalyst, e.g., Mo and W.
  • the weight ratio of the Promoter metal component to the Primary metal component is in the range of 1 to 90%. In a second embodiment, the ratio ranges from 2 to 50%. In a third embodiment, from 5 to 30%. In a fourth embodiment, from 10 to 20%.
  • At least one of the metal precursors may be oil soluble, oil dispersible, water soluble and / or water dispersible.
  • the metal precursors can be provided as an elemental metal or as a metal compound.
  • the metal precursors can be added in the solid state.
  • one of the metal precursors can be added in the solid state, while the second metal precursor can be added in the solute state.
  • the metal precursors can be the same or different, e.g., all organic compounds, all inorganic compounds, or one organic and one inorganic.
  • the metal precursors in one embodiment can be catalytically active, e.g., a reagent grade metal sulfide or a beneficiated ore.
  • At least one of the metal precursors is an organic compound selected from metal salts of organic acids, such as acyclic and alicyclic aliphatic, carboxylic acids containing two or more carbon atoms.
  • organic acids such as acyclic and alicyclic aliphatic, carboxylic acids containing two or more carbon atoms.
  • Non- limiting examples include acetates, oxalates, citrates, naphthenate and octoates.
  • the metal precursors are selected from salts of organic amines.
  • the metal precursors are selected from organometallic compounds, e.g., chelates such as 1,3-diketones, ethylene diamine, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, phthalocyanines and mixtures thereof.
  • the organic metal precursors are selected from salts of dithiolate, dithiocarbamate, and mixtures thereof.
  • An example is a Group VIII metal precursor such as a dithiocarbamate complex.
  • Another example of a Group VIB metal precursor is a soluble molybdenum-containing organophosphorodithioate such as molybdenum dialkyl dithiophosphate.
  • the metal precursors can also be sulfur-containing organic compounds, e.g., a chelate compound with sulfur as a coordinating atom such as sulfhydryl S-H, or a molybdenum oxysulfide dithiocarbamate complex (Molyvan A).
  • the Group VIB metal precursor (as a Primary metal or a Promoter metal) is selected from the group of alkali metal or ammonium metallates of molybdenum in organic solvents such as a normal alkane, hydrocarbons, or petroleum products such as distillate fractions wherein the molybdenum compound is allowed to subsequently decompose under pressure and temperature, prior to or concurrent with the addition of the Promoter metal precursor.
  • the Group VIB metal precursor feed is a water-soluble salt, e.g., oxides and polyanions such as molybdates, tungstates, chromates, dichromates, etc.
  • the Group VIB metal precursor is selected from the group of alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates,
  • the Group VIB metal compound is an organometallic complex, e.g., oil soluble compound or complex of transition metal and organic acid, selected from naphthenates, pentanedionates, octoates, acetates, and the like. Examples include molybdenum
  • the at least one of Group VIII metal precursor (as a Promoter metal or as a Primary metal component) is selected from inorganic compounds, including but not limited to sulfates, nitrates, carbonates, sulfides, oxysulfides, oxides and hydrated oxides, ammonium salts and heteropoly acids thereof.
  • the Group VIII metal precursor is a water-soluble compound such as acetate, carbonate, chloride, nitrate, acetylacetone, citrate, sulfate, and oxalate, e.g., nickel nitrate, nickel sulfate, nickel acetate, nickel chloride, etc., and mixtures thereof.
  • the metal precursor is a compound which is at least partly in the solid state, e.g., a water-insoluble nickel compound such as nickel carbonate, nickel hydroxide, nickel phosphate, nickel phosphite, nickel formate, nickel sulfide, nickel molybdate, nickel tungstate, nickel oxide, nickel alloys such as nickel-molybdenum alloys, Raney nickel, or mixtures thereof.
  • a water-insoluble nickel compound such as nickel carbonate, nickel hydroxide, nickel phosphate, nickel phosphite, nickel formate, nickel sulfide, nickel molybdate, nickel tungstate, nickel oxide, nickel alloys such as nickel-molybdenum alloys, Raney nickel, or mixtures thereof.
  • a Group IIB metal precursor such as zinc is employed as a Promoter metal (instead of a Group VIII metal precursor).
  • Zinc is a less expensive material and more environmentally friendly than other metal precursors such as nickel. Examples include but are not limited Group IIB inorganic compounds such as zinc sulfate, zinc nitrate, zinc carbonate, zinc sulfide, zinc oxysulfide, zinc oxide and zinc hydrated oxide, zinc ammonium salts and heteropoly acids thereof.
  • Other examples of zinc as a Promoter metal precursor include oil soluble organic acid salts such as zinc acetate, zinc oxylate, zinc citrate, zinc napthanate and zinc octoates.
  • the Promoter metal precursor is selected from zinc salts of organic amines such as aliphatic amines, aromatic amines, quaternary ammonium compounds, and mixtures thereof.
  • the zinc metal precursors are selected from organometallic compounds such as chelates including chelate compounds with sulfur as a coordinating atom,e.g., thiols such as
  • dialkyldithiophosphates dialkyldithiophosphates, thio- or dithiocarbamates, phosporothioates, thiocarbonates, trimercaptotriazine, thiophenates, mercaptans, thiol carboxylic acids RC(0)SH, dithio acids RC(S)SH, and related compounds.
  • Organic Solvent Feed In one embodiment with the use of organometallic compounds as metal precursors, the solubility of the catalyst precursor in oil is increased, which may lead to higher dispersion and more active catalyst particularly if the catalyst precursor is to be sulfided directly in a heavy oil feedstock. Organometallic compounds can be expensive compared to inorganic compounds, but inorganic metal precursors are not soluble in oil. In one embodiment, polar aprotic solvents are used in conjunction with inorganic metal precursors for the preparation of the precursor feed. The organic solvent, e.g., an organosulfur compound which is compatible with both the inorganic metal precursor and the oil feedstock, acts as a solvent to dissolve the inorganic metal precursor.
  • organosulfur compound which is compatible with both the inorganic metal precursor and the oil feedstock
  • the inorganic metal precursor With the use of the organic solvent, the inorganic metal precursor becomes dispersible in the heavy oil feedstock, thus alleviating the need for a transforming step.
  • a separate sulfiding step can be eliminated as the metal precursor can be sulfided with sulfur sources inherently present in the heavy oil feedstock.
  • the organic solvent is selected from the group of polar aprotic solvents such as N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethylacetamide (DMAC), hexamethylphosphortriamide (HMPA), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tetrahydrofuran, propylene carbonate, dimethyl sulfite, N-nitrosodimethylamine, ⁇ - butyrolactone, N:N dimethyl formamide, dimethyl carbonate, methyl formate, butyl formate and mixtures thereof.
  • NMP N-Methylpyrrolidone
  • DMF dimethylformamide
  • DMAC dimethylacetamide
  • HMPA hexamethylphosphortriamide
  • DMSO dimethyl sulfoxide
  • propylene carbonate dimethyl sulfite
  • N-nitrosodimethylamine N-nitrosodimethylamine
  • ⁇ - butyrolactone N:N dimethyl formamide
  • inorganic metal precursors for use with the organic solvent include but are not limited to molybdenum oxide, sulfide, or oxysulfide of the general formula MoO x S y wherein x ⁇ 0, y ⁇ 0.
  • the Group VIB inorganic metal precursor is molybdenum trioxide.
  • the inorganic metal precursor is ammonium heptamolybdate.
  • oil soluble metal precursors are formed by the interaction of precursors such as ammonium paramolybdate with higher alcohols, glycols, and
  • alkylsalicylic acids alkylsalicylic acids.
  • ammonium paramolybdate is added to concentrated ammonia, at least an oil soluble dispersant, and aromatic solvent such as toluene or xylene.
  • an oil soluble metal precursor can be prepared from by reacting inorganic metal precursors with polyamides, succinimides and sulfonates.
  • an oil- soluble sulfur containing metal precursor is prepared by treating with hydrogen sulfide a mixture of ammonium paramolybdate and succinimide.
  • the oil- soluble metal precursors prepared from inorganic salts are commercially available products including but not limited to OLOA 11007 and OLOA 378, available from Chevron Oronite and MolyvanTM A from RT Vanderbilt Company.
  • MolyvanTM A additive is used by itself for the preparation of Mo-only catalyst.
  • MolyvanTM A additive is used in conjunction with nickel naphthenate for the preparation of Ni-promoted slurry catalyst.
  • the inorganic metal precursor is dissolved in the organic solvent in a weight ratio of l :4 to 4: l; a weight ratio of 1 : 3 to 2 : 1 in a second embodiment; and a weight ratio of 1 :5 to 1 : 1 in a third embodiment.
  • a pressure leach solution (PLS) from a metal recovery process can be used as the metal precursor feedstock or part of the metal precursor feedstock.
  • the metal recovery process can be part of a mining / ore operation, an electroplating operation, or recovery of metals from spent catalysts, and the like.
  • a PLS composition may contain a single metal precursor in aqueous solution, or a mixture of metal components such as Group VIB metal and at least another metal precursor.
  • PLS pressure leach solution
  • AHM ammonium heptamolybdate
  • nickel sulfate nickel amine sulfate
  • ammonium metavanadate ammonium sulfamate
  • a PLS stream containing 50 to 90 gpL (grams per liter) molybdenum, 3 to 10 gpL nickel, 0.1 to 1 gpL vanadium, 100 to 500 gpL ammoninum sulfate, and 5 to 30 gpL ammonium sulfamate can be used as the metal precursor feed.
  • the PLS stream contains 20 to 100 gpL (grams per liter) molybdenum, 5 to 20 gpL nickel, 0.10 to 1.0 gpL vanadium, 100 to 500 gpL ammonium sulfate, and 5 to 20-gpL ammonium sulfamate.
  • the pressure leach solution in the form of a slurry contains 1-20 wt. % coke and 0.2-4 wt% partially insoluble ammonium metavanadate, which can be filtered out before the solution can be used as metal precursor feedstock.
  • Double Salt as a Metal Precursor Feedstock In one embodiment, instead of or in addition to single metal precursor feeds, at least one of the metal precursors is a double salt precursor.
  • a double salt metal precursor is a metal precursor having at least two different metal cations in the molecular structure, with at least one of metal cations being a Primary metal cation and at least one Promoter metal cation, e.g., ammonium nickel molybdate (formed from ammonium molybdate with nickel sulfate). It should be noted that the term "double” is not limited to two metal cations.
  • the double salt precursor can be formed from at least three different metal cations.
  • one of the metal cations in the double salt precursor is a Group VIB cation such as molybdenum and the other metal cation is a different cation metal such as nickel or zinc.
  • the double salt precursor is characterized has having three different metal cations, with two of metal cations are different Group VIB metal cations such as molybdenum and tungsten, and the third cation is a Group VIII metal cation such as nickel or zinc.
  • the double salt precursor comprises three different metal cations, with two of metal cations are different Promoter metal cations such as nickel and titanium, and the third cation is a Primary metal cation such as molybdenum.
  • Promoter metal(s) being in the same molecular structure, in close proximity with the Primary metal component when the double salt metal precursor is sulfided, either in-situ or in a separate sulfidation step.
  • the double salt precursor is a water-soluble salt, e.g., prepared from crystallizing an aqueous solution of a mixture of at least a Group VIB metal salt and a Group VIII or Group IIB metal salt, e.g., ammonium molybdate and nickel sulfate, ammonium molybdate and zinc sulfate, ammonium octamolybdate and a double salt of nickel ammonium sulfate, potassium molybdate and iron sulfate, potassium chromium sulfate and ammonium para-molybdate, etc.
  • a Group VIB metal salt e.g., ammonium molybdate and nickel sulfate, ammonium molybdate and zinc sulfate, ammonium octamolybdate and a double salt of nickel ammonium sulfate, potassium molybdate and iron sulfate, potassium chromium sulfate and ammoni
  • the pH of the aqueous solution of the salt mixture is adjusted with the addition of an acid and / or a base to a pre-selected pH for the double salt to crystallize out of solution.
  • a double salt precipitates out. The formation of the precipitate ensures that the different metals constituting the catalyst precursor are well dispersed together in the solid phase.
  • the double salt metal precursor is prepared from a pressure leach solution or a leach slurry from a metal recovery process, optionally with the adjustment of the pH and / or the addition of a metal salt in aqueous solution form to cause the precipitate of the double salt for use as a metal precursor feed.
  • the double salt is an oil-soluble salt prepared by the reaction of at least a Group VIII metal precursor or a Group IIB metal precursor, and at least a Group VIB organometallic complex.
  • the double salt is prepared by the reaction of an oil soluble molybdenum salt and an oil soluble transition metal salt.
  • the reaction to form the oil-soluble double salt precursor is in the presence of a strong reducing agent such as hydrogen.
  • the Primary metal oil soluble compound is selected from naphthenates, pentanedionates, octoates, acetates, and mixtures thereof. Examples include but are not limited to molybdenum naphthenate and molybdenum hexacarbonyl.
  • the reaction to form the oil-soluble double salt is carried out at a temperature of at least 100°C for a sufficient length of time, e.g., between 2 hours and 48 hours.
  • the reaction to form the oil-soluble double agent is carried out in a reducing environment and in the presence of an inert, water-immiscible, organic solvent.
  • organic solvents include but are not limited to aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons or chlorinated hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, dipentene, turpentine, petroleum products such as gasoline, mineral spirits, kerosene, mineral oil, fuel oil, aromatic naphthas, and chlorinated hydrocarbons as CC1 4 , o-dichlorobenzene, monochlorotoluene, ethylene dichloride, perchloroethylene, and mixtures thereof.
  • aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons or chlorinated hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, dipentene, turpentine, petroleum products such as gasoline, mineral spirits, kerosene, mineral oil, fuel oil, aromatic naphthas, and chlorinated hydrocarbons as CC1 4 , o-dichlorobenzene, monochloro
  • the reaction to form the double salt precursor is carried out under conditions that exceed the boiling point of water such that water is removed as it is formed during the reaction.
  • the water is allowed to escape from the reaction vessel as water vapor.
  • chemical drying agents such as calcium chloride or an azeotropic agent can be employed to remove water from the reaction product to form the oil- soluble double salt, although this is usually not necessary.
  • Any known solid separation techniques can also be used such as filtering and the like.
  • Promoter metal precursor is in solution at a concentration of less than 10 wt. % with the addition of appropriate diluent, e.g., water for a water-soluble metal precursor or a hydrocarbon diluent such as an olefmic diluent or a cycle oil for an oil-based metal precursor, forming a metal precursor solution, suspension, or emulsion.
  • appropriate diluent e.g., water for a water-soluble metal precursor or a hydrocarbon diluent such as an olefmic diluent or a cycle oil for an oil-based metal precursor, forming a metal precursor solution, suspension, or emulsion.
  • one or more criteria may be used, including, but not limited to: the flash point of the diluent, the inert nature of the diluent under certain conditions as related to the catalytic process in which the metal precursor is used, the ability of the diluent to cause the metal precursor to be fluid-like and moveable at the appropriate temperatures and pressures, and/or the ability of the diluent to present certain processing advantages in subsequent processes. For example, it may be advantageous to select a diluent that does not react with the metal precursor at standard storage and transportation
  • a sufficient amount of diluent is added to the metal precursor feedstock for the solution to have a pH of at least 4.
  • the precursor feedstock has a pH of at least 5.
  • the precursor feedstock has a pH of at least 6.
  • the metal precursor feedstock is in solution with a concentration of metal between 1 - 5 wt. % in one embodiment; between 0.1 - 10 wt.% in another
  • the metal concentration in at least one of the metal precursor solution is between 5 - 8 wt. %.
  • at least one of the metal precursor feedstock is a solution with a pH of at least 4 and a metal concentration of 5 to 8 wt. %.
  • the metal precursor comprises at least a Primary metal in an aqueous solution with a concentration of 0.25 - 10 wt. %.
  • the Promoter metal concentration is also in aqueous solution with a concentration of less than 10 wt. % metal.
  • at least one of the metal precursor feedstock is in solution at a concentration between 0.1 and 8 wt. %.
  • Rework Materials as Metal Precursor Feedstock In one embodiment, at least a portion of the metal precursor feedstock is in a solid form, more specifically in the form of "rework.” Examples include rework materials generated in the making of supported and unsupported (mixed Group VIII and Group VIB metal) catalyst precursors used for hydroconversion processes known in the art.
  • the rework materials are prepared from a supported catalyst, e.g., a metal precursor or catalyst precursor such as a metal oxide or metal hydroxide, affixed onto a porous refractory base ("a carrier") comprising one or more of alumina, silica, magnesia, titania, zeolite, silica-aluminate, carbon, phosphorous or various combinations of these.
  • a carrier e.g., a metal precursor or catalyst precursor such as a metal oxide or metal hydroxide
  • a carrier e.g., a metal precursor or catalyst precursor such as a metal oxide or metal hydroxide
  • a carrier porous refractory base
  • the alumina in the base can be in several forms including amorphous, alpha, gamma, theta, boehmite, pseudo-boehmite, gibbsite, diaspore, bayerite, nordstrandite and corundum.
  • the alumina is boehmite or pseudo-boehmite.
  • the rework materials are prepared from an unsupported or bulk catalyst with or without the use of a diluent or binder material (e.g., cellulose), such as catalyst precursor comprising a metal oxide or metal hydroxide.
  • a diluent or binder material e.g., cellulose
  • the metals that are used in the supported catalyst going into rework materials include base metals or compounds thereof, selected from Group VIB metals or Group VIII metals of the Periodic Table, or combinations thereof.
  • rework materials for use as metal precursor feed comprise scrap / discarded / unused materials generated in any step of the preparation of (unsulfided) catalyst / catalyst precursor.
  • Rework can be generated from any of the forming, drying, or shaping of the catalyst / catalyst precursor, or formed upon the breakage or handling of the catalyst / catalyst precursor in the form of pieces or particles, e.g., fines, powder, and the like.
  • Rework material is generated.
  • Rework materials can also be generated from commercially available catalyst products, including supported and self-supported catalyst from such as ICRTM supported catalyst from Advanced Refining Technologies LLC, NebulaTM bulk catalyst from Albermale, or CRITM NiMo alumina supported catalyst from Criterion Catalyst & Technologies, reduced to a size of less than 300 ⁇ .
  • ICRTM supported catalyst from Advanced Refining Technologies LLC
  • NebulaTM bulk catalyst from Albermale or CRITM NiMo alumina supported catalyst from Criterion Catalyst & Technologies
  • rework material consists essentially of unsulfided catalysts, made with or without the use of diluents or binders such as alumina, silica alumina, cellulose and the like.
  • the rework material is prepared in a method as described in US Patent Application No. 20110306490, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • the support material e.g., alumina, iron oxide, silica, magnesia, titania, zeolite, etc.
  • the support material is first ground to particles of less than 300 ⁇ .
  • Catalytic materials e.g., double metal precursors or single metal precursors such as ammonium heptamolybdate, or any soluble form of molybdenum, etc. are then deposited (impregnated) onto the ground base.
  • the impregnated base is dried, then ground to a particle size of 1 to 300 ⁇ .
  • the deposition of catalytic materials is followed by calcination so the catalytic materials sinter with the metal in the support to effect loading.
  • the deposition of catalytic materials can be carried out more than once to maximize the catalyst loading, or different metal precursors can be deposited onto the ground support base at the same time or as different layers for multi- metallic catalyst fines.
  • the rework material for use as metal precursor feed has an average particle size of less than 250 ⁇ and greater than 1 ⁇ . In a second embodiment, the average particle size is less than 75 ⁇ . In a third embodiment, an average particle size in the range of 2 to 50 ⁇ . In a fourth embodiment, an average particle size of less than 20 ⁇ . In a fifth embodiment, less than 10 ⁇ .
  • the rework material can be ground or crushed to the desired particle size using techniques known in the art, e.g., via wet grinding or dry grinding, and using equipment known in the art including but not limited to hammer mill, roller mill, ball mill, jet mill, attrition mill, grinding mill, media agitation mill, etc.
  • a sulfided slurry catalyst is formed with the addition of at least a sulfiding agent to inorganic metal precursors.
  • the sulfiding agent is elemental sulfur by itself.
  • the sulfiding agent is a sulfur-containing compound which under prevailing conditions, is decomposable into hydrogen sulphide H 2 S.
  • the sulfiding agent is H 2 S by itself or in a hydrocarbon mixture.
  • a sulfided slurry catalyst is formed in-situ by mixing the metal precursor feed with a heavy oil feedstock which releases a sulfiding agent under sufficient conditions, generating a sulfided slurry catalyst in- situ.
  • the sulfiding agent is present in an amount in excess of the stoichiometric amount required to form the slurry catalyst.
  • the metal precursor component e.g., metal precursor is a sulfur-containing organic compound
  • the total amount of sulfur-containing compound is generally selected to correspond to any of about 50-300%, 70-200%, and 80-150%), of the stoichiometric sulfur quantity necessary to convert the Primary metal and the Promoter metals, if any, into for example, CogSg, MoS 2 , WS 2 , Ni 3 S 2 , etc.
  • the amount of sulfiding agent represents a sulfur to the Primary metal mole ratio of at least 1.5 to 1 to produce a sulfided catalyst from the metal precursor(s).
  • the molar ratio of S to the Primary metal is at least 3 to 1.
  • the sulfiding agent is an aqueous solution of ammonium sulfide.
  • the solution can be synthesized from hydrogen sulfide and ammonia - common refinery off-gases.
  • sour water after treatment is employed as the sulfiding source. Sour water is commonly and cheaply available as wastewater from refineries, which may contain anywhere between 1 to 50 wt. % ammonium bisulfide.
  • recycled H 2 S from process streams can also be used for the sulfiding process.
  • Recycled H 2 S stream is first concentrated / treated in gas removal units, using amine treating gases known in the art including but not limited to monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), Diisopropylamine (DIP A), and mixtures thereof.
  • amine treating gases known in the art including but not limited to monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), Diisopropylamine (DIP A), and mixtures thereof.
  • recycled H 2 S is treated / recovered in a
  • Synthesized ammonium sulfide and / or sour water can be stored in tanks prior to use. Since ammonium sulfide solution is more dense than resid, it can be separated easily in a settler tank after reaction.
  • Hydrocarbon Transforming Medium (Diluent): In some embodiments with in-situ sulfidation of metal precursors in a heavy oil feedstock, the slurry catalyst is transformed into an oil based slurry catalyst with the in-situ sulfidation. In other words,
  • a hydrocarbon transforming medium (used interchangeably with “diluent” or “carrier") is employed to transform a sulfided water-based catalyst (hydrophilic) to an oil based active catalyst (hydrophobic).
  • hydrocarbon is not critical, and can generally include any hydrocarbon compound, acyclic or cyclic, saturated or unsaturated, un-substituted or inertly substituted, and mixtures thereof, which is liquid at ordinary temperatures.
  • the weight ratio of the water-based catalyst to the hydrocarbon diluent ranges from 1 :50 to 10: 1. In a second embodiment, the weight ratio of the water based catalyst to the hydrocarbon diluent ranges from 1 : 10 to 5 : 1. In a third embodiment, from 1 :5 to 1 : 1. In one embodiment with a continuous transformation step, the ratio of catalyst to hydrocarbon diluent ranges from 2: 1 to 5 : 1. In another embodiment with a batch transformation step, the ratio ranges from 1 :1 to 2: 1.
  • the hydrocarbon compound is derived from petroleum, including mixtures of petroleum hydrocarbons characterized as virgin naphthas, cracked naphthas, Fischer-Tropsch naphtha, light cat cycle oil, heavy cat cycle oil, and the like, typically those containing from about 5 to about 30 carbon atoms.
  • the hydrocarbon compound is a vacuum gas oil (VGO).
  • VGO vacuum gas oil
  • the diluent is a mixture of heavy oil and VGO.
  • the diluent is selected from the group of gasoline, distillate, naphtha, light cycle oil, benzene, toluene, xylene, etc.
  • the hydrocarbon compound has a kinetic viscosity ranging from 2 cSt to 15 cSt @ 10 0o C.
  • the hydrocarbon oil has a kinematic viscosity of at least 2 cSt at 10 0o C.
  • the transformation of the catalyst precursor results in catalyst particles agglomerating or otherwise not mixing.
  • the slurry catalyst in one embodiment may optionally comprise other components including but not limited to pore forming agents, emulsifier agents, surfactants, sulfur additives, sulfiding agents, stabilizers, binder materials, phosphorus compounds, boron compounds, additional transition metals, rare earth metals or mixtures thereof, depending on the envisaged catalytic application.
  • the optional components can be added in any process step in the making of the slurry catalyst, depending on the nature of the optional components and the desired effect.
  • binders are added directly to the metal precursors prior to the sulfidation.
  • emulsifiers they are added after the sulfidation of the metal precursors forming a sulfided catalyst.
  • the optional components are added to the sulfidation step, e.g., sulfiding agents.
  • optional components such as surfactants and the like are added to the transformation step, or directly to the metal precursors or diluents prior to the sulfidation of the metal precursors.
  • phosphorous-containing promoters, etc. can be added separately or in a mixture with the sulfiding agent and the metal precursors to increase the incorporation of sulfur in the sulfidation step.
  • the slurry catalyst is prepared from at least a Primary metal component, e.g., a Group VIB metal precursor and at least a Promoter metal precursor.
  • the catalyst is essentially free of Promoter metal with no Promoter metal purposely added, e.g., prepared from Group VIB metal precursor reagent(s).
  • the slurry catalyst is prepared from at least Group VIII metal precursor reagent such as nickel sulfate as the sole starting feed.
  • the metal precursors can be added to the reaction mixture in solution, suspension or as such. If soluble salts are added as such, they will dissolve in the reaction mixture and subsequently be precipitated. In one embodiment, the solution is heated optionally under vacuum to effect precipitation and evaporation of the water.
  • aqueous ammonia is brought into contact with at least a Primary metal compound, such as molybdenum oxide or tungsten oxide, forming a water soluble oxygen-containing compound such as ammonium molybdate or tungstate.
  • the Primary metal component in solution is brought into contact with at least a Promoter metal component in solution, optionally with the adjustment of the pH to a preselected pH by the addition of an acid, a base, or a suitable compound which decomposes upon temperature increase into hydroxide ions or H + ions that respectively increase or decrease the pH, facilitating the formation of the double salt metal precursor.
  • the pH is controlled such that the pH at the beginning of the reaction differs from the final pH after precipitation.
  • the formation of the double salt metal precursor is via the reaction of oil-soluble Primary metal compound and Promoter metal compound(s) in an organic solvent under H 2 -containing gas pressure, with the organic solvent being a hydrocarbon mixture of alkanes and aromatic compounds.
  • the reaction of Primary metal and Promoter metal components to form the double salt precursor is carried out at a weight ratio of Promoter metal to Primary metal from 0.01 :1 to 1 :2 in one embodiment; from 0.05: 1 to 0.3: 1 in another embodiment; 0.10: 1 to 0.25:1 in yet another embodiment.
  • the Primary metal is a Group VIB metal and the Promoter metal is a Group VIII metal in a weight ratio of Promoter metal to Primary metal ranging from 1 to 49 wt. %.
  • the slurry mixture is optionally isolated from the liquid using methods known in the art such as filtration, centrifugation, decantation, or combinations thereof.
  • the double salt metal precursor After the double salt metal precursor is formed, it undergoes sulfidation and / or transformation into an oil-based catalyst either in-situ upon contact with a hydrocarbon feed, or in a separate sulfiding step and prior to a transformation step upon contact with a hydrocarbon diluent such as VGO.
  • Sulfidation of the metal precursor feed(s) can be done various ways.
  • the Primary metal component is first sulfided prior to addition of the Promoter metal precursor (unsulfided), generating a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor.
  • the Primary metal precursor (unsulfided) is brought into contact with a sulfided Promoter metal precursor and the mixture may or may not be sulfided again to form a catalyst precursor.
  • the Primary metal precursor is co-sulfided in the same step with the Promoter metal precursor, and the sulfided catalyst precursor may or may not be sulfided again for an enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor.
  • the Primary metal precursor and the Promoter metal precursor(s) are separately sulfided and combined, and the sulfided (combined) catalyst precursor may or may not be sulfided again for an enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor.
  • the Primary metal precursor feed is sulfided before transformation with a
  • the double salt metal precursor feed is sulfided generating a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor.
  • Enhanced sulfiding refers to the sulfidation of a metal precursor (or mixtures thereof) comprising at least one sulfided metal precursor again, for an enhanced sulfidation scheme, resulting in a relatively high ratio of S to Primary / Promoter metal(s) with improved catalytic performance.
  • at least one of the Primary metal precursor and the Promoter metal precursor is first sulfided at a sulfur to metal mole ratio of at least 1.5 to 1 , then combined with the second metal precursor (un-sulfided or sulfided).
  • the mixture is then sulfided again at a sulfur to metal mole ratio of at least 1.5 to 1, generating a promoted and enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor.
  • the sulfiding agent can be the same or different in the different sulfiding steps, and the amount of sulfiding agent (molar ratio of S to metal precursor) can be the same or different in the first sulfiding steps.
  • the Primary metal precursor feedstock and /or the Promoter metal precursor feed can be fed into the system all at once, or any of the metal precursor feedstock can be portioned and fed in stages.
  • the Promoter metal precursor can be provided all at once, intermittently, or split into portions and fed in stages.
  • a portion means at least 10% in one embodiment, at least 20% in a second
  • the feed is split into two portions, with a ratio of first to second staged feeding ranging from 1 : 10 to 10: 1.
  • a portion of the Primary metal precursor is first sulfided prior to addition of a portion (or all of) the Promoter metal precursor (unsulfided), generating a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor.
  • a second charge of the Primary metal precursor is added to the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor before or during the transformation step.
  • the Promoter metal precursor is also split, with a portion of the Promoter metal precursor feed for the co-sulfiding step with the Primary metal precursor, a second charge of the Promoter metal precursor feed is added after the sulfiding step, and another charge of the Promoter metal precursor feed is made in the transformation step with a hydrocarbon diluent.
  • the promoter metal precursor comprises at least a promoter metal salt selected from an acetate, carbonate, chloride, nitrate, sulfate, actylacetonate, citrate, and oxalate of a Group VIII metal, for promoter metal to primary metal ratio from 1 :30 to 5 : 1.
  • the split feed scheme in one embodiment reduces deposit build-up in the process of making the slurry catalyst.
  • a portion (or all) of Primary metal precursor and a portion (or all) of the Promoter metal precursor(s) are combined and co-sulfided together, with the remainder of the metal precursor feed being subsequently combined with the co-sulfided catalyst precursor, or to be charged in the transformation step to produce the final catalyst.
  • a portion of the Primary and / or Promoter metal precursor feed is added in the subsequent sulfidation step.
  • a portion of the Primary and / or Promoter metal precursor feed is added to a sulfided catalyst precursor along with a hydrocarbon diluent in the transformation step, transforming the water-based catalyst precursor to a slurry catalyst for heavy oil upgrade.
  • at least 30% of the Promoter metal precursors is combined with all the Primary metal precursor to form a double salt metal precursor, with the remainder of the Promoter metal precursor(s) being added in subsequent stages, e.g., in the sulfidation step and / or in the transformation step.
  • the Primary metal precursor is combined with one of the Promoter metal precursors in a co-sulfiding step.
  • the second (remaining) Promoter metal precursor is then combined with the co-sulfided catalyst precursor in a subsequent (additional) sulfiding step, or mixed in with a hydrocarbon diluent in a transformation step.
  • the sulfidation is carried out at a temperature ranging from room temperature to 760°F and for a period of up to 24 hours, forming a sulfided catalyst precursor.
  • the sulfidation completes in 10 minutes or less.
  • the sulfidation is at 50-450°F.
  • the sulfidation is between 50-300°F.
  • the sulfidation is between 60-150°F.
  • the sulfidation is at 0 - 3000 psig. In a second embodiment, between 100 - 1000 psig.
  • the sulfidation pressure is less than 500 psig. If the sulfidation temperature is below the boiling point of the sulfiding agent, such as 60-70°F in the case of ammonium sulfide, the process is generally carried out at atmospheric pressure. Above the boiling temperature of the sulfiding agent / optional components, the reaction is generally carried out at an increased pressure, such as in an autoclave.
  • the sulfidation step optionally includes blending sulfiding additives, optional metal sulfide powders, and the like, into the catalyst precursor mixture to further enhance the activity of the catalyst.
  • the resultant product of the sulfiding step is a slurry in an aqueous solution.
  • analyses show that the catalyst precursor product of the sulfiding step is catalytically active, although not in optimum form for use in hydroprocessing operations.
  • the catalyst precursor is optionally isolated from the liquid using methods known in the art such as drying, filtration, centrifugation, decantation, or combinations thereof, under an inert atmosphere comprising any of nitrogen, refinery gas, a gas having little or no oxygen, and mixtures thereof.
  • the sulfided catalyst precursor is subject to reduction with a reducing agent at temperatures ranging from below ambient to above ambient.
  • the reducing temperature ranges from ambient to 200°F in one embodiment; less than 500°F in a second embodiment; and from 70 - 200°F in a third embodiment.
  • reducing agents include but are not limited to hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, carbon monooxide, finely divided carbon, coke, sulfur, etc.
  • active metals are converted into a more active state.
  • M0S 3 with an oxidation state of 6+ may change its oxidation state to MoS 2 with an oxidation state of 4+ and become a slurry.
  • any metal precursor present also changes its oxidation state, e.g., Mo 6+ and Mo 5+ may change its oxidation state to Mo 4+ .
  • the reduced form of active metals may or may not be chemically bonded with sulfur.
  • the reduction step can be before or after the transformation step, or it can occur con-currently in the transformation under reducing conditions and with a reducing agent present (e.g., H 2 ).
  • the catalyst precursor is subject to an ammonia removal step before the transformation step.
  • ammonia removal is concurrent with the transformation, as ammonia is removed with the water in the transformation.
  • the sulfided water based slurry from the sulfiding step is subject to a simple aqueous phase ammonia flashing step by cooling and depressurizing the slurry stream. Ammonia can be flashed off together with any generated hydrogen sulfide and hydrogen present in the system.
  • the sulfided catalyst precursor (as prepared from water- soluble metal precursor as feedstock) is mixed with a hydrocarbon compound (diluent) and transformed into an oil based catalyst wherein it is transformed from a hydrophilic to an oil based active catalyst (hydrophobic).
  • a hydrocarbon compound such as H 2
  • reduction also takes place for a sulfided Primary metal such as molybdenum to change its oxidation state.
  • the transformation is at a temperature of 50 - 760°F in one embodiment; at a temperature of 100 - 500°F in a second embodiment; at 150 -450°F in a third embodiment.
  • the pressure of the transformation step is maintained in the range of 0 - 3000 psig in one embodiment; between 300 - 500 psig in a second embodiment. In a third embodiment, from 1000 - 2500 psig.
  • the transformation residence time ranges from 30 minutes to 3 hours. In another embodiment, from 1 to 2 hrs. In yet another embodiment, the residence time is less than 1 hour. [0119] In one embodiment, the process conditions in the transformation / reduction step are sufficient to form the final slurry catalyst. In one embodiment, after the
  • the slurry catalyst contains less than 5 wt. % water in one embodiment; less than 3 wt. % water in another embodiment; between 0.01 to 2.5 wt. % water in a third embodiment; and between 0.025 to 2 wt. % water in a fourth embodiment.
  • transformation step is carried out at a pressure in the range of about 2,175 psig to about 2,900 psig.
  • a pressure in the range of about 2,175 psig to about 2,900 psig.
  • the transformation is under an inert atmosphere comprising any of nitrogen, refinery gas, a gas having little or no oxygen, and mixtures thereof.
  • the mixing is under a H2-containing gas pressure.
  • hydrogen gas is added before and after the reactor in which the hydrocarbon / catalyst precursor mixing takes place.
  • the H 2 flow to the transformation step is kept at 100 to 2000 SCFB ("Standard Cubic Feet per Barrel" of hydrocarbon compound feed to the reactor).
  • the H 2 flow ranges from 300 to 1000 SCFB.
  • the H 2 flow ranges from 200 to 500 SCFB.
  • ammonia / water removal from the oil based slurry catalyst can be carried out after the transformation step.
  • the catalyst stream in one embodiment is heated prior to depressurization and vaporization of ammonia / water.
  • the resultant slurry mixture can go directly to a hydroprocessing reactor without the need for ammonia / water removal, but the presence of water will take up unnecessary room in a hydroprocessing reactor.
  • the oil based slurry catalyst mixture is passed to high pressure separator to remove water from the slurry catalyst prior to entering a hydroprocessing reactor. Hydrogen may be added following reactor or directly into the high pressure separator to flash off water and residual H 2 S in the slurry catalyst.
  • ex-situ sulfiding and / or the transformation step(s) can be eliminated by mixing a solution containing metal precursor(s) directly with a heavy oil feed stock, a hydrocarbon diluent (carrier), or a hydrocarbon diluent / heavy oil feedstock mixture at a high shear rate and under hydrogen pressure for a dispersion of at least a portion of the metal precursors in the hydrocarbon as an emulsion.
  • the emulsion mixing step is carried out with the addition of at least a sulfiding agent.
  • at least a sulfiding agent is added to the emulsion after the high shear mixing.
  • the metal precursor feed can be any of a PLS feed stream, a double salt metal precursor in solution, a water-soluble metal precursor in solution, or a mixture of water-soluble metal precursors in solution, e.g., a molybdate solution, a zinc sulfate solution, a mixture of molybdate and nickel sulfate, etc.
  • the emulsion in one embodiment is a hydrophobic, oil- dispersed catalyst precursor.
  • the emulsion particles are formed as droplets and of micron sizes, e.g., from 0.1 to 300 ⁇ in one embodiment, at least 2 ⁇ in a second embodiment, from 1 to 10 ⁇ in a third embodiment, and between 0.5 and 50 ⁇ in a fourth embodiment.
  • the structure and droplet size of the emulsion can be optimized based on process performance requirement and operation cost.
  • There are several ways to form the water-oil emulsion using techniques and / or high shear equipment known to those of ordinary skill in the art, such as nozzles, in-line static mixers, impellers, turbolators, fluidizers, etc.
  • Surfactants or other additives may be added to form a stable emulsion having the desired structure and droplet size.
  • at least a portion (e.g., at least 30%) of the aqueous metal / catalyst precursor is present as fine droplets dispersed in the hydrocarbon diluent (medium).
  • the hydrocarbon diluent is present as fine droplets dispersed in the aqueous catalyst precursor, which may subsequently go through emulsion inversion forming fine dispersion of the aqueous catalyst precursor in hydrocarbon diluent / heavy oil.
  • the emulsion of oil-dispersed catalyst precursor can be provided directly to a reactor for heavy oil upgrade with in-situ sulfiding upon mixing with a heavy oil feedstock forming a slurry catalyst.
  • a heavy oil feedstock as the feedstock has available sulfur source for sulfidation and under reaction conditions for the desulfurization / release of the sulfur source (e.g., H 2 S), the emulsion catalyst precursor can be sulfided in-situ.
  • the in-situ sulfidation occurs under hydroprocessing conditions, e.g., at a temperature ranging from 752°F (400°C) to 1112°F (600°C), and a pressure ranging from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
  • the emulsified mixture is optionally sulfided with the use of a sulfiding agent such as hydrogen sulfide or other sulfiding agents.
  • a sulfiding agent such as hydrogen sulfide or other sulfiding agents.
  • the sulfiding agent is in gaseous or solid form, as aqueous sulfiding media can interfere with the emulsion droplet size.
  • additional sulfiding agents can be added at the beginning of the high shear mixing process to get the sulfidation of the emulsion started.
  • the sulfiding agents can be continuously or intermittently added to the high shear mixing process. In one embodiment, the sulfidation takes from 10 minutes to 1 day. In another embodiment, from 30 minutes to 4 hours. After the sulfiding step, the temperature is raised to remove water / transform the emulsion into a slurry catalyst.
  • the emulsion prior to injection into a reactor for heavy oil upgrade, undergoes a reduction step in the presence of a reducing agent.
  • the temperature of the emulsion is raised to remove water.
  • the water removal / transformation is under hydrogen pressure and at a temperature of 50 - 600°F in one embodiment; at a temperature of 100 - 500°F in a second embodiment; at 150 - 50°F in a third embodiment.
  • the emulsion catalyst can be reduced and dewatered on a continuous or batch basis at a pressure up to 3000 psig with the addition of a hydrogen source at a rate of 0.10 to 2 ft 3 H2 l o 100 g of Primary metal in the emulsion catalyst to remove at least 20% of the water.
  • high shear mixing is also employed during the transformation step with the choice of appropriat 6 internals in the equipment, e.g., the use of impellers.
  • an inorganic metal precursor such as ammonium heptamolybdate (AHM) is brought into contact with an organic solvent at a ratio of 15 to 50 wt. % metal precursor.
  • the contact is at an elevated temperature of at least 140°F (60°C).
  • the organic solvent is a sulfur-containing compound, e.g., DMSO
  • the sulfiding step can be skipped.
  • the mixture can be brought into contact directly with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feed stock under the presence of hydrogen, and optionally with a sulfiding agent, for a final concentration of 200 ppm to 2 wt. % Mo (as a wt. % of heavy oil feedstock), wherein a sulfided active slurry catalyst is generated in-situ for use in heavy oil upgrade.
  • organometallic compounds as metal precursors, e.g., an oil soluble organo-molybdenum complex such as molybdenum
  • the transformation step can be omitted.
  • the slurry catalyst can be prepared directly from the metal precursors by dispersing the oil soluble organometallic compounds (with or without a Promoter) directly into the heavy oil feedstock, or a mixture of heavy oil feedstock and a diluent such as VGO. The mixture is allowed to soak under sufficient conditions to in-situ thermally decompose the organometallic complex, and / or for the heavy oil to release H 2 S needed for sulfidation, converting the metal precursors into a finely dispersed sulfided catalyst in the heavy oil.
  • the sulfidation of the oil soluble organo-molybdenum complex can also be carried out ex-situ.
  • the sulfiding agent is elemental sulfur by itself.
  • the sulfiding agent is a sulfur-containing compound which under prevailing conditions, is decomposable into hydrogen sulphide.
  • the sulfiding agent is H 2 S by itself or in H 2 .
  • the oil soluble organo-molybdenum complex can also be carried out ex-situ.
  • the sulfiding agent is elemental sulfur by itself.
  • the sulfiding agent is a sulfur-containing compound which under prevailing conditions, is decomposable into hydrogen sulphide.
  • the sulfiding agent is H 2 S by itself or in H 2 .
  • the oil soluble organo-molybdenum complex can also be carried out ex-situ.
  • the sulfiding agent is elemental sulfur by itself.
  • the sulfiding agent is
  • organometallic compound(s) are dispersed in a hydrocarbon diluent such as VGO (instead of heavy oil feedstock), then allowed to soak under sufficient condition for the metal precursors to thermally decompose forming a finely dispersed sulfided catalyst.
  • a hydrocarbon diluent such as VGO (instead of heavy oil feedstock)
  • the sulfided catalyst can be subsequently mixed with heavy oil feedstock for upgrade.
  • the metal precursor feedstock is optionally "pre-soaked" in the heavy oil feedstock for a sufficient amount of time, e.g., from 15 minutes to 4 hours, to enhance the catalyst dispersion as well as the sulfidation, resulting in increased catalytic activity in terms of the conversion rate as well as the resulting API of the overhead product.
  • the pre-soaking is at a temperature from 200 to 800°F. In a second embodiment, from 350 to 750°F.
  • the pre-soak tank in one embodiment is maintained at the same pressure as that of the hydrocracking process for the upgrade of the heavy oil feedstock.
  • hydrogen sulfide in the reaction zone resulting from the desulfurization of the feed can be used as a suitable sulfur source for the sulfidation forming an active sulfided catalyst in-situ.
  • additional sulfur compounds can be used to assist with the in-situ catalyst sulfidation.
  • a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur is added to the catalyst precursor (in the form of an emulsion) for molar ratio of elemental sulfur to Primary metal ranging from 3: 1 to 100: 1; and from 2: 1 to 80: 1 in another embodiment.
  • the rework material can be used by itself without additional metal precursor feedstock.
  • the rework material can be used as part of the catalyst feed system and combined with a slurry catalyst formed by other means.
  • the rework material is combined with a hydrocarbon carrier (diluent), forming an unsulfided slurry catalyst that can be subsequently sulfided in-situ upon contact with a heavy oil feedstock.
  • the rework is slurried in water as a carrier.
  • a sulfiding agent e.g., H 2 S, elemental sulfur, or ammonium sulfide
  • H 2 S hydrogen
  • elemental sulfur or ammonium sulfide
  • the rework material can be slurried directly in a heavy oil feedstock, or a mixture of a heavy oil feedstock and a hydrocarbon diluent, for subsequent in-situ sulfidation forming a slurry catalyst.
  • a sufficient amount of rework material is employed as a solid in an amount sufficient for the formation of a slurry catalyst, and to provide a catalyst dosage of 20 to 5000 ppm Primary metal (e.g., Mo) to heavy oil feedstock.
  • the amount of rework materials (in a powder form) ranges from 2 to 60 wt. % of total weight of the hydrocarbon diluent and / or heavy oil feedstock. In a second embodiment, the amount ranges from 5 to 40 wt. %.
  • a sufficient amount of rework material is used for a dosage ranging from 20 to 1000 ppm of Primary metal to heavy oil feedstock.
  • a sufficient amount of rework material is used for a dosage of 5 to 100 ppm Primary metal to heavy oil feedstock.
  • the slurry (rework) catalyst can be used directly in a hydrocracking unit. In another embodiment, it is mixed with a heavy oil feedstock prior to heavy oil upgrade. In yet another embodiment, the slurry (rework) catalyst can be combined with a fresh catalyst, e.g., a slurry catalyst made from a metal precursor feed or PLS (not made from rework materials) as catalyst feed to a hydrocracking unit for heavy oil upgrade.
  • a fresh catalyst e.g., a slurry catalyst made from a metal precursor feed or PLS (not made from rework materials
  • the amount of slurry (rework) catalyst ranges from 5 to 100 wt. % of the total slurry catalyst needed for heavy oil upgrade. In a second embodiment, the amount of slurry (rework) catalyst ranges from 10 to 70 wt. %.
  • the slurry (rework) catalyst accounts for less than 50 wt. % of the total amount of slurry catalyst.
  • the weight ratio may vary depending on a number of factors, including the type of heavy oil feedstock to be processed, operating conditions of the system, availability of supplies (availability of rework materials), etc.
  • the PLS stream can be mixed with at least another metal precursor feedstock, forming a precursor mixture for a subsequent sulfiding step / transformation step.
  • the PLS is used as the sole feedstock.
  • the PLS stream is combined with a sulfiding agent e.g., H 2 S, elemental sulfur, or ammonium sulfide, etc., under sulfiding conditions to generate a sulfided water-based catalyst precursor, then subsequently transformed to an oil-based catalyst upon mixing with a hydrocarbon diluent.
  • a sulfiding agent e.g., H 2 S, elemental sulfur, or ammonium sulfide, etc.
  • the PLS is combined with a hydrocarbon carrier under shear mixing conditions with a hydrogen source to generate an oil-dispersed emulsion.
  • a sulfiding agent such as H 2 S, elemental sulfur, or ammonium sulfide, etc.
  • the PLS is mixed with a heavy oil feedstock or a mixture of heavy oil and hydrocarbon carrier (diluent) such as VGO under high shear mixing to generate an oil-dispersed emulsion.
  • the volume ratio of PLS to hydrocarbon diluent ranges from 1 to 50 vol. %, depending on the concentration of metal precursors in the PLS as well as the hydrocarbon carrier employed.
  • the emulsion catalyst (sulfided or unsulfided) formed with a PLS feedstock can be provided directly to a hydroprocessing system for heavy oil upgrade.
  • the temperature of the emulsion catalyst is raised to remove water / transform the emulsion into a hydrophobic, oil-dispersed slurry catalyst.
  • Optional Hydrogen Pretreatment In one embodiment before the heavy oil upgrade, the slurry catalyst is optionally treated with hydrogen. In one embodiment, the saturation / pre-soak with hydrogen improves the catalyst activity and reduces the formation of coke in the upgrade process. The pre-treatment is expected to enrich the surface of the slurry catalyst with hydrogen and thus enable the reactions to happen quicker, and thus reduces coke formation. In another embodiment, the pre-treatment enhances the catalyst area and porosimetry.
  • the optional hydrogen pre-treatment can be carried out in a pre-mixing vessel and / or in the transfer line.
  • a small amount of water can be injected into the pre-mixing vessel along with hydrogen during the pre-treatment process.
  • the pre- treatment (or pre-conditioning) temperature in one embodiment ranges from 200°F to 800°F. In a second embodiment, from 300°F to 750°F. In a third embodiment, from 400°F to 600°F.
  • the pre-treatment time ranges from a minute to 20 hours in one embodiment; from 1 to 10 hours in another embodiment; and from 2 to 5 hours in a third embodiment.
  • the hydrogen rate ranges from 500 to 15,000 scf per bbl of slurry catalyst in hydrocarbon diluent (standard cubic foot / barrel).
  • the pre-treatment pressure ranges from 1435 psig (10 MP a) to 3610 psig (25 MP a).
  • the hydrocarbon diluent in one embodiment contains at least 10 wt. % of a light oil such as VGO, cycle oil, gasoline, distillate, naphtha, light cycle oil, benzene, toluene, xylene, and mixture thereof.
  • the slurry catalyst with hydrogen pre-treatment in one embodiment provides an increase in reaction rate constant k- values in terms of HDS (hydrodesulfurization), HDN (hydrodenitrification), and HDMCR (hydrodemicrocarbon resid) of at least 10% compared to a slurry catalyst without the hydrogen pre-treatment step.
  • the increase in reaction rate constant is at least 15%.
  • the slurry catalyst with hydrogen pre-treatment provides an improvement in porosimetry properties in terms of surface area, for an increase in surface area and total pore volume (TPV) of at least 10% compared to a slurry catalyst without the hydrogen pre-treatment step. In another embodiment, the increase in surface area and TPV is at least 15%.
  • any of the process steps can be operated in any of continuous, batch mode, or combinations thereof.
  • the steps can be carried out in any of batch, semi-batch, or continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs), and can be a vessel equipped heating means having a mechanical stirrer, or a static mixer, or by means of a recirculating pump.
  • the components (feed streams) can be introduced simultaneously, or sequentially in any order to the reactor or vessel.
  • feed stream refers to both continuous and batch processed.
  • some of the process steps are carried out in a batch mode, and some of the process steps, e.g., the sulfidation step, are carried out in the continuous mode.
  • both the sulfiding and transformation steps are carried out in continuous mode.
  • the sulfidation is in batch mode, while the transformation is in continuous mode. Continuous operation can eliminate the need of holding tanks for some of the feedstock, particularly some that requires careful handling.
  • the mixing of the components can be done within a continuous stirred tank, or it can be done by other means including an in-line static mixer (e.g., with a plurality of internal baffles or other elements), a dynamic high-shear mixer (vessel with propeller for very high turbulent, high shear mixing), or any device capable of ensuring turbulent mixing known in the art. It is desirable to obtain a high degree of dispersion of the metal precursors and / or the sulfided catalyst precursors in the heavy oil feedstock to achieve highly active catalyst.
  • hydrogen sulfide is generated in-situ in the reaction zone, from feed desulfurization.
  • the generated H 2 S can be used as a suitable sulfur source for the sulfidation of the metal precursors.
  • the components are mixed under conditions sufficient for a flow with a Reynolds number of at least 2000.
  • the mixing is sufficient for a Reynolds number of at least 3000.
  • a Reynolds number ranging from 3200 to 7200.
  • Figure 1 illustrates the steps involved in one embodiment of the process.
  • a Primary metal precursor 11 such as ammonium heptamolybdate is co- sulfided with at least a Promoter metal precursor 13 such as nickel sulfate in aqueous solution, forming a sulfided catalyst precursor with the addition of the sulfiding agent 12.
  • a Promoter metal precursor 13 such as nickel sulfate in aqueous solution
  • additional Promoter metal precursor 13 is added after the co- sulfiding step.
  • the co-sulfiding can be in batch mode, continuous mode, or semi-batch mode. In one embodiment, the sulfidation is continuous to allow for smaller equipment and more stable operations.
  • the reaction time in the mixing tank 10 ranges from about 1 hour to 10 hours.
  • the temperature in one embodiment is maintained at 30°C to 100°C at a pressure ranging from 100 to 3000 psig.
  • the weight ratio of Promoter metal nickel (or cobalt) to a Primary metal precursor e.g., a Group VIB precursor such as a molybdenum compound ranges from about 1 : 100 to about 1 :2.
  • Promoter metal precursor 23 is added to the sulfided a Primary metal precursor after the sulfidation step 10.
  • the catalyst precursor from reactor 10 is moved to the next reactor / mixing tank 20, wherein the catalyst precursor is transformed with the addition of a carrier oil such as VGO 21 for a period of time 5 minutes to 2 hours and at a temperature from room temperature to 70°C.
  • Hydrogen 22 is continuously added to the mixture reaction zone, in one embodiment ranging from 300 SCFB ("Standard Cubic Feet per Barrel," meaning per barrel of hydrocarbon feed) to about 2000 SCFB.
  • the pressure of the reaction zone generally ranges from about 0 psig to about 3000 psig.
  • Temperature of the reactor generally ranges from 150 to 300°C.
  • the reactor 20 is a CSTR with high shear mixing to maintain homogenous slurry in the reactor.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating another embodiment to prepare the catalyst composition with a double salt metal precursor as a starting feed.
  • At least an acid or base 24 is added to the at least a Primary metal (e.g., Group VIB) metal precursor 11, e.g., ammonium heptamolybdate solution, and the Promoter metal precursor 13, e.g., nickel sulfate in aqueous solution, to adjust the pH to a pre-selected level to promote the formation of the double salt metal precursor slurry 14.
  • a Primary metal (e.g., Group VIB) metal precursor 11 e.g., ammonium heptamolybdate solution
  • the Promoter metal precursor 13 e.g., nickel sulfate in aqueous solution
  • water is optionally removed from the metal precursor slurry 14 using methods known in the art, e.g., a filter 40, a decanter or the like, generating crystals or concentrated slurry 41.
  • Double salt metal precursor crystals 41 is mixed with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock 41, e.g., in a mixing tank, static mixer 41 or the like, under high shear mixing generating an emulsion catalyst that can be used directly for heavy oil upgrade, e.g., in a hydrocracker.
  • a pressure leach solution (PLS) or a leach slurry 17 is used to provide the metal precursors needed to make the slurry catalyst.
  • additional Group VIB metal precursor feed such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution, nickel sulfate, and the like, can also be added in addition to the PLS in the sulfiding step.
  • the PLS feedstock can also be added directly to the heavy oil feedstock for in- situ sulfidation, generating a sulfided slurry catalyst.
  • Sulfiding agent 16 is added to mixing tank 30 (continuously or for a batch mode operation).
  • the sulfided catalyst precursor is transformed into an oil-based sulfided catalyst in the transformation step 60 with the addition of a hydrocarbon transforming medium 51, which can be a heavy oil feed itself.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates another embodiment to make the slurry catalyst with a PLS.
  • a pressure leach solution 17 from a metal recovery process e.g., recovering metals from a spent catalyst
  • various metal salts is used as the feed to mixing tank 30 with the addition of a hydrocarbon carrier, or a heavy oil feedstock 51 under high shear mixing.
  • additional sulfiding agents 16 can also be added.
  • additional metal precursors can also be added to this step, and with the emulsion catalyst being subsequently sent to heavy oil upgrade.
  • a Primary metal precursor 11 in solution e.g., an inorganic molybdenum compound such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution or a nickel compound
  • a Primary metal precursor 11 in solution e.g., an inorganic molybdenum compound such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution or a nickel compound
  • the sulfided water- based catalyst is transformed into an oil-based sulfided catalyst in the transformation step with the addition of a hydrocarbon transforming medium 51, which can be a heavy oil feed itself.
  • the slurry catalyst undergoes H 2 treatment with hydrogen saturation, prior to heavy oil upgrade.
  • a Group VIB metal precursor 11 e.g., an organic molybdenum compound or an inorganic molybdenum compound such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution is mixed directly with the Promoter metal precursor 13, e.g., nickel sulfate in aqueous solution, and a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock 51 in mixing tank 30, and optionally with a sulfiding agent, wherein sulfidation of the metal precursors takes place forming a sulfided slurry catalyst.
  • the mixing is via the use of a high shear mixing equipment and under hydrogen pressure forming an emulsion catalyst.
  • the catalyst is further homogenized via in-line static mixer 60.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates another embodiment to make slurry catalyst.
  • AHM solution 17 ix mixed with DMSO solvent 18 and optionally a sulfiding agent 16 in mixing tank 30.
  • a nickel salt promoter 13 is added to the oil-dispersible metal precursor, and optionally with a sulfiding agent 16, wherein a sulfided slurry catalyst is formed.
  • the slurry catalyst is added to the heavy oil feed 51 forming an emulsion with the use on in-line mixer 60, prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
  • the nickel promoted catalyst precursor undergoes a reducing step in the presence of a reducing agent, e.g., H 2 , wherein the sulfided Mo changes its oxidation state.
  • a reducing agent e.g., H 2
  • Figure 8 illustrates a variation of the embodiment in Figure 7, with a separate promotion step, and with the addition of a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock mixture 81 to the oil dispersible emulsion in step 80 for to form an active slurry catalyst prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
  • Figure 9 illustrates yet another variation of the embodiment in Figure 7, wherein a heavy oil feedstock / hydrocarbon transforming medium 51 is added to directly to the emulsion mixture of inorganic metal precursor, e.g., AHM solution 11 and DMSO solvent 18, for the sulfidation / formation of a slurry catalyst prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
  • a heavy oil feedstock / hydrocarbon transforming medium 51 is added to directly to the emulsion mixture of inorganic metal precursor, e.g., AHM solution 11 and DMSO solvent 18, for the sulfidation / formation of a slurry catalyst prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
  • a Group VIB metal precursor 11 e.g., an inorganic molybdenum compound such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution is mixed with a hydrocarbon diluent 19, e.g., VGO, under high shear mixing in step 30, forming a water-in- oil emulsion.
  • a hydrocarbon diluent 19 e.g., VGO
  • temperature in sulfiding tank 70 is subsequently raised to transform the sulfided emulsion / slurry catalyst 32 to a hydrophobic, oil-dispersed slurry catalyst.
  • the slurry catalyst is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock 51 prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
  • Figure 11 illustrates another embodiment for making an emulsion catalyst with a pre-sulfiding step.
  • a Group VIB metal precursor 11 e.g., an inorganic molybdenum compound such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution
  • a hydrocarbon diluent 19 e.g., VGO
  • the mixture is optionally sulfided with the addition of sulfiding agent (H 2 S or elemental sulfur) 16.
  • the slurry catalyst is mixed with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock 51 prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
  • Figure 12 illustrates another variation embodiment for making an emulsion catalyst with no pre-sulfiding step.
  • an emulsion of inorganic metal precursor(s) 11 in a hydrocarbon diluent, e.g., VGO 19 is formed.
  • the emulsion mixture is mixed directly with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock / hydrocarbon diluent mixture 51 under appropriate conditions prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
  • temperature in tank 70 is subsequently raised to transform the sulfided emulsion / slurry catalyst 32 to a hydrophobic, oil-dispersed slurry catalyst.
  • the slurry catalyst in one embodiment is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock 51 in prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
  • FIG. 13 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst using rework material or ground residuum catalyst fines.
  • ground catalyst material (rework) 11 is slurried in VGO diluent 18 to generate a slurry catalyst precursor.
  • a sulfiding agent 16 is added to the process to pre-sulfide the slurry precursor.
  • the mixture can be subsequently mixed with a heavy oil feedstock 51 for upgrade in a hydrocracker unit.
  • Figure 14 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a promoted slurry catalyst from an oil soluble organometallic compound. Quantities of organometallic metal precursor 11, nickel promoter 13, and a blend of hydrocarbon diluent 18 are mixed together in mixing tank 30. The mixture was subsequently allowed to thermally decompose in tank 70, generating a sulfided slurry catalyst, which can be subsequently mixed with a heavy oil feedstock for upgrade. In one embodiment, additional sulfiding agent may be optionally added to the tank 70.
  • the organometallic metal precursor 11 is mixed directly with a heavy oil feedstock 51 and optionally a Promoter precursor 13. The mixture is allowed to soak under hydroprocessing conditions for in-situ sulfidation to take place, generating a sulfided slurry catalyst for subsequent heavy oil upgrade.
  • Figure 16 illustrates an embodiment with at least an additional sulfiding step for a slurry catalyst with an enhanced amount of sulfur.
  • a Primary metal source 11 such as Mo, e.g., an aqueous molybdate solution (2 to 15% Mo concentration) is charged in the reactor vessel 30 and brought up to reaction conditions, e.g., temperature ranging from ambient to 300°F and pressure up to 3000 psig.
  • a sulfiding agent 16 is added for the first sulfidation step (at a molar ratio of S / Primary metal of less than 4: 1), generating an aqueous based molybdenum oxysulfide catalyst precursor.
  • the sulfidation can be carried out on a continuous basis or batch basis.
  • the catalyst precursor is promoted with a second / different metal , e.g., a Group VIII metal as Promoter metal source 13, at a ratio of Promoter to Primary metal of 1 to 49 wt. %.
  • the promoted aqueous based catalyst precursor is subjected to an additional sulfiding step with the addition of the same or different sulfiding agent feed 16.
  • the additional sulfiding step can be in the same or different equipment (mixing tank 70), and at the same or different sulfiding feed ratio from the first sulfiding step (a molar ratio of S / Primary metal of less than 4:1).
  • the resulting sulfur enhanced water base catalyst is emulsified with a hydrocarbon diluent 51 in step 80 at an oil to water base catalyst wt. ration ranging from 1 : 10 to 10:1.
  • the transformation step can be done on either batch or continuous basis, and it can be carried out in the same equipment or different equipment from the sulfiding step.
  • the sulfided catalyst is subsequently reduced and dewatered (on a continuous or batch basis) at a temperature from ambient to 300°F and pressure up to 3000 psig with the addition of a hydrogen source at a rate of 0.10 to 2 ft 3 3 ⁇ 4 to 100 g of Primary metal in the catalyst, generating sour water and an oil based catalyst.
  • the slurry catalyst in one embodiment is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock 51 in prior to the heavy oil upgrade step 60.
  • Figure 17 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a catalyst with Ti as a promoter.
  • a primary metal source 11 such as Mo, e.g., an aqueous molybdate solution (2 to 15% Mo concentration) is charged in the reactor vessel 30 and brought up to reaction conditions.
  • a sulfiding agent 16 is added for the sulfidation step.
  • the catalyst precursor is promoted with a second different metal , e.g., a Group VIII metal as Promoter metal source 13.
  • the promoted aqueous based catalyst precursor is subjected to a transformation step with the addition of a hydrocarbon diluent 51 in mixing tank 70.
  • a sufficient amount of a Ti metal source 85 such as titanium naphthenate solution is added to the transformed catalyst, generating a Ti-Ni-Mo slurry catalyst for use in heavy oil upgrade step 60.
  • Figure 18 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a single metal catalyst, e.g., with the use of nickel as the single metal.
  • a Ni precursor 11 is sulfided with a sulfur source such an ammonium sulfide solution.
  • the water-based catalyst is transformed with a hydrocarbon diluent 51 in mixing tank 60, generating a nickel-based slurry catalyst for use in heavy oil upgrade step 80.
  • FIG 19 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a Zn-Mo slurry catalyst.
  • a Mo source 11 such as Mo, e.g., an aqueous molybdate solution is charged in the reactor vessel 30 along with a Zn source, e.g., a zinc sulfate heptahydrade, under high shear condition and hydrogen pressure and brought up to reaction conditions.
  • the promoted catalyst precursor is mixed directly with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock 51 in mixing tank 70.
  • a sulfiding agent 16 is optionally added (dotted line), generating an aqueous based catalyst precursor which can be
  • Figure 20 illustrates an embodiment for preparing a slurry catalyst with splitting feeding of the Promoter metal precursor feed.
  • a Primary metal source 11 such as Mo, e.g., an aqueous molybdate solution is charged in the reactor vessel 30 and brought up to reaction conditions with the addition of a portion of Promoter metal source 13, and a sulfiding agent 16 for a co-sulfiding step, generating an aqueous based catalyst precursor.
  • the sulfidation can be carried out on a continuous basis or batch basis.
  • Promoter metal source 14 is optionally added for a post-promotion step, wherein the Promoter metal source 14 can be the same or different from Promoter metal source 13 (or fed at the same or different rate).
  • the water-based catalyst precursor is subsequently transformed into a slurry catalyst with a hydrocarbon diluent 51.
  • the Primary metal precursor 11 is first sulfided, then subsequently promoted with a Promoter metal source 14 . Additionally Promoter metal precursor 15 (which can be the same or different from Promoter metal source 14) is added along with a hydrocarbon diluent 51 in the transformation step.
  • Figure 21 illustrates an embodiment for preparing a slurry catalyst from ground / rework catalyst.
  • a ground commercially available catalyst 11 is mixed with a sufficient amount of VGO for a slurried catalyst having about 250 ppm to 4.0 wt. % Mo in VGO.
  • the slurried catalyst is mixed with a heavy oil feedstock and optionally, a fresh slurry catalyst 24 for use in hydrocracker for heavy oil upgrade.
  • the slurry catalyst comprises a dispersed suspension of particles in a hydrocarbon medium.
  • the hydrocarbon medium can be a heavy oil feedstock itself; a hydrocarbon transforming medium such as gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet and fuel oils, and mixtures thereof; or a mixture of heavy oil feedstock and a hydrocarbon transforming medium.
  • the hydrocarbon medium is the hydrocarbon transforming medium.
  • the slurry catalyst is characterized as having improved morphology and dispersion characteristics, particularly useful for the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
  • the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of suspended or dispersed droplets in oil ("emulsion catalyst") with the droplets having a mean size of 0.1 to 300 ⁇ .
  • the dispersed particles or droplets have an average droplet size of 0.5 to 150 ⁇ .
  • the droplet size is less than 20 ⁇ .
  • the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium, wherein the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 ⁇ . In another embodiment, the particles have an average particle size ranging from 2 to 150 ⁇ . In yet another embodiment, an average particle size of at least 5 ⁇ . In a fourth embodiment, an average particle size of less than 50 ⁇ .
  • the slurry catalyst is characterized as having a polymodal pore distribution with at least a first mode having at least about 80% pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter, a second mode having at least about 70%> of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 1 ,000 Angstroms in diameter, and a third mode having at least 20% of pore sizes of at least 100 Angstroms in diameter.
  • polymodal includes bimodal and higher modal.
  • at least 30% of pore sizes are >100 Angstroms in diameter.
  • at least 70% of pore sizes are >100 Angstroms in diameter.
  • at least 50% are in the range of 50 to 5000 Angstrom in diameter.
  • at least 75 % of the pore volume ranging from 100 to 1000 Angstroms.
  • the slurry catalyst has a total pore volume (TPV) of at least 0.4 cc/g (per gram of catalyst in a solid form) in one embodiment; at least 0.6 cc/g in a second embodiment; at least 0.8 cc/g in a third embodiment; at least 1 cc/g in a fourth embodiment; and less than 3 cc/g in a fifth embodiment.
  • the slurry catalyst is characterized as having a relatively high total surface determined by the nitrogen BET method, of at least 100 m 2 /g.
  • the surface area is at least 100 m 2 /g.
  • the surface area is in the range of 200 to 900 m 2 /g.
  • the surface area is in the range of 50 to 800 m 2 /g. In a fifth embodiment, the surface area is in the range of 100 to 300 m 2 /g. In a sixth embodiment, the slurry catalyst is essentially free of Promoter metals and has a surface area is in the range of 300 to 800 m 2 /g. In a seventh embodiment, the slurry catalyst has a surface area of at least 300 m 2 /g.
  • the Primary metal M is molybdenum and the Promoter metals are nickel and titanium.
  • M is molybdenum and L is zinc.
  • the Primary metal M of the single metallic slurry catalyst is molybdenum.
  • the single metal catalyst formula can also be written as: wherein M is at least one of a non-noble Group VIII (IUPAC nomenclature groups 8-10) metal, a Group VIB metal (IUPAC nomenclature group 6), a Group IVB metal (IUPAC nomenclature group 4), and a Group IIB metal (IUPAC
  • the catalyst composition can be used in virtually all hydroprocessing processes to treat a plurality of heavy oil feedstock under wide-ranging reaction conditions such as temperatures from 752°F to 1112 °F, pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa), and liquid hourly space velocities from 0.05 to 10 h "1 .
  • the hydroprocessing (or hydrocracking) can be practiced in one or more reaction zones and can be practiced in either countercurrent flow or co-current flow mode.
  • counter-current flow mode is meant a process wherein the feed stream flows counter- current to the flow of hydrogen-containing treat gas.
  • the hydroprocessing also includes slurry and ebullated bed hydroprocessing processes for the removal of sulfur and nitrogen compounds and the hydrogenation of aromatic molecules present in light fossil fuels such as petroleum mid-distillates, e.g., hydroprocessing a heavy oil employing a circulating slurry catalyst.
  • the catalyst can be applied in any reactor type.
  • the slurry catalyst is applied to a fixed bed reactor.
  • the slurry catalyst is used as part of a catalyst feed system in an ebullating bed reactors, a slurry reactor, a recirculating reactor, or a fluidized bed reactor used in the H-Oil process, the LC-Fining process, the H- Coal process, the heavy oil upgrade process as well as others.
  • two or more reactors containing the catalyst may be used in series with no catalyst recycle.
  • the hydroprocessing reactors are used in parallel, also with no catalyst recycle.
  • the slurry catalyst is added to the feedstock (catalyst to oil ratio) at a rate of 0.01 to 3 wt. %. In a second embodiment, at a rate of 0.25 to 2 wt. %. In a third embodiment, at a rate of 100 to 20000 ppm active metals, e.g., Group VIB metals. In a fourth embodiment, the catalyst is added to the feedstock at a sufficient rate for the total amount of Mo in the reaction zone of 0.005 to 0.5 wt. % (based on the total weight of the feedstock).
  • the catalyst load to the hydrocracking unit for heavy oil upgrade can be reduced at least 10% compared to a catalyst that is not sulfided more than once. In another embodiment, the catalytic load can be reduced at least 20%.
  • the slurry catalyst characterized as giving excellent conversion rates in the upgrades of heavy oil, i.e., giving a 1000°F+ conversion rate of at least 50% in the upgrade of a heavy oil having an API of at most 15, when applied at a rate of less than 1 wt. % active Group VIB metal (relative to heavy oil feedstock), a 1000°F+ conversion rate of at least 75% in a second embodiment, a 1000°F+ conversion rate of at least 80% in a third embodiment, and at least 90% in a fourth embodiment.
  • the conversion rate is at least 99%. In a fourth embodiment, the conversion rate is at least 95%. In a fifth embodiment, the conversion rate is at least 80%. As used herein, conversion rate refers to the conversion of heavy oil feedstock to less than 1000° F (538°C) boiling point materials.
  • EXAMPLES The following illustrative examples are intended to be non- limiting. Unless specified otherwise, the catalytic activity of the catalysts prepared in the examples are tested for hydrodenitrogenation (HDN), hydrodesulfurization (HDS), vanadium removal activity (HDV), and hydrodemicrocarbon residue (HDMCR). VR refers to "vacuum resid" or a particular heavy oil feedstock.
  • HDN hydrodenitrogenation
  • HDS hydrodesulfurization
  • HDV vanadium removal activity
  • HDMCR hydrodemicrocarbon residue
  • VR#1 refers to a heavy oil feedstock having 29.9 wt. % Microresidue tester (MCRT), 25.7 wt. % hot heptane asphaltenes (HHA), 5.12 wt. % sulfur, 672 ppm vanadium, and API at 60°F of 2.7.
  • VR#2 refers to a heavy oil feedstock having 21.8 wt. % MCRT, 11.01 wt. % HHA, 5.07 wt. % sulfur, 125 ppm vanadium, and API at 60°F of 4.9.
  • % Mo /VR refers to the amount of molybdenum metal (in the catalyst) as a percent (in weight) of the heavy oil feedstock.
  • cycle oil a mixture of medium and heavy cycle oil, MCO or HCO
  • VR refers to the amount of the heavy oil feedstock excluding the cycle oil.
  • the transformation of water-based catalyst is carried out in vacuum gas oil at a wt. ratio of oil to water-based catalyst of 1.5 to 1.
  • Comparative Example 1 In this example, a slurry catalyst with a Ni:Mo ratio of about 10% was made. 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate
  • Comparative Example 1A The procedure is to make a slurry catalyst of a similar Ni:Mo ratio of 10% as in Comparative Example 1.
  • 9000 grams of ammonium dimolybdate (ADM) solution (12% Mo) was heated to the following conditions 750 RPM, 150°F and 400 PSIG.
  • ADM ammonium dimolybdate
  • a gas stream comprising H 2 S, 20%) CH 4 , 60%
  • an appropriate amount of nickel sulfate solution 8% Ni was added to the mixture for a Ni/Mo wt% of ⁇ 10%.
  • the product can be transformed to an oil base catalyst as in Comparative Example 1 on a batch basis, or a continuous basis.
  • Comparative Example 2 The procedure is similar to Comparative Example 1, except with a higher Ni:Mo ratio of ⁇ 23%, using 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate to dissolve in 100 g of water mixed with 5 g of concentrated ammonia solution, in a glass vessel fitted with an overhead mechanical stirrer. A solution of 16.2 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate in 32 g water was added to the first solution, all at ambient temperature, producing a green suspension. This suspension was heated to 70°C under atmospheric pressure, and 100 g of ammonium sulfide solution (44 wt. %) was added slowly, over the course of 45 minutes. After that, the mixture was heated with stirring for an additional 60 minutes. The rest of the procedures were as in Comparative Example 1.
  • Comparative Example 3 This example is to make a Mo only slurry catalyst.
  • Comparative Example 3A The Example was to make a Mo only catalyst similar to Comparative Example 3.
  • 9000 grams of ammonium dimolybdate solution (12% Mo) was heated under the conditions of 750 RPM, 150°F and 400 PSIG.
  • a gas stream comprising 20 volume % H 2 S, 20% CH 4 , 60%> H 2 was bubbled through the solution until the S/Mo atomic is about 3.4.
  • the product can be transformed to an oil base catalyst as in Comparative Example 1 on a batch basis, or a continuous basis.
  • Example 4 5.63 g of ammonium dimolybdate solution (12 wt. % Mo) was mixed with 0.84 g of nickel sulfate solution (8 wt. % Ni), yielding a double salt metal precursor in solution. A sufficient amount of the double salt precursor was mixed with 112.5 g of heavy oil feedstock (VR#1 mixed with cycle oil at a wt. ratio of 60:40) for a
  • Mo-Ni double salt is composed of highly crystallized hydrogen ammonium molybdenum nickel oxide hydrate H 6 (NH 4 ) 4 Mo6Ni0 24 *4H 2 0.
  • Example 5 Example 4 was repeated except that a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the in a 1L batch hydrocracking unit containing heavy oil feedstock and double salt metal precursor mixture, for a molar ratio of S to Mo of 3 : 1.
  • Example 6 Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1A with the catalysts of Examples 4-5. Sufficient amounts of the catalysts were added to separate batch units containing 112.5 g of 60:40 VR#1 to MCO for a final concentration of 1 wt.% Mo. The three batch hydrocracking units were tested under hydroprocessing conditions of 805°F temperature, 1600 psig hydrogen pressure, and for 2 hours reaction time. Results are presented in Table 1, showing that Example 4with double salt metal precursor feedstock showed better catalytic performance and spent catalyst properties, suggesting that nickel promotion has improved, and a low temperature sulfur source for sulfiding would improve vanadium removal. Table 1
  • Example 7 A sufficient amount of ammonium heptamolybdate (AHM) solution (12 wt. % Mo) was added to about 170 g of heavy oil feedstock in a 1 liter batch hydrocracking unit for 1 wt. % Mo to VR.
  • Example 8 Example 7 was repeated, except that a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. % of 0.7: 1.
  • Example 9 Example 8 was repeated, except that a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. % of 5 : 1.
  • Example 10 Example 9 was repeated, and the unit was heated up to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours.
  • Example 11 Example 8 was repeated, and the unit was heated to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours under mixing conditions.
  • Example 12 5.63 g of ammonium dimolybdate solution (12 wt. % Mo) was mixed with 0.84 g of nickel sulfate solution (8 wt. % Ni) and about 170 g of heavy oil feedstock in a 1 liter batch hydrocracking unit (for 1 wt. % Mo to VR).
  • the heavy oil feedstock containing a mixture of VR#1 as the vacuum resid (VR) and medium cycle oil at a weight ratio of 60:40.
  • Elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. ratio of 5: 1.
  • the unit was heated up to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours under mixing conditions.
  • Example 13 Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1 with the in-situ sulfided catalysts made from metal precursor feed in aqueous solutions of Examples 7-13.
  • the starting conditions of the batch units included 1400 psig pressure at 160°F.
  • the batch hydrocracking units were heated to 805°F temperature and held at that temperature for 2 hours reaction time, with sufficient catalyst for a concentration of 1 wt. % Mo in VR. Results are presented in Table 2, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after. Table 2
  • Example 14 1.78 g of ammonium dimolybdate crystal was dissolved in 98.22 g of DI water to prepare the molybdenum molybdate solution. A sufficient amount of ammonium hydroxide was added to the solution for the pH to be at least 4. The solution was sulfided in an autoclave at 140°F and 400 psig with the injection of hydrogen sulfide to Mo at a molar ratio of about 3.4 to 1.
  • the sulfided aqueous slurry was sent to a second autoclave and mixed with VGO as a carrier oil for emulsification and transformation purpose with supplemental H 2 at 400°F and 400 psig so that Mo sulfide compound formed could be reduced to Mo disulfide suspended in VGO.
  • VGO a carrier oil for emulsification and transformation purpose
  • supplemental H 2 400°F and 400 psig
  • Mo sulfide compound formed could be reduced to Mo disulfide suspended in VGO.
  • the water / carrier oil / solid slurry mixture was sent to the third autoclave at elevated temperature (470°F) with
  • the post-transformation slurry catalyst was delivered to a high pressure separator, where the slurry oil based catalyst collected on the bottom, and water steam as well as other gases including H 2 , H 2 S, CH4, and NH3 were removed for water, gas, and residual oil separation.
  • the sulfided aqueous slurry was sent to a second autoclave and mixed with vacuum gas oil (VGO) as a carrier oil for emulsification and transformation at 400°F and 400 psig, reducing Mo sulfide compound Mo disulfide suspended in VGO.
  • VGO vacuum gas oil
  • the water / carrier oil / solid slurry mixture was sent to the third autoclave at elevated temperature (470°F) with supplemental H 2 to boil off water.
  • the post-transformation slurry catalyst was delivered to a high pressure separator, where the slurry oil based catalyst collected at the bottom, and water steam as well as other gases including H 2 , H 2 S, CH4, and NH 3 were removed for water, gas, and residual oil separation.
  • Example 15A A sufficient amount of ammonium hydroxide was added to the ammonium dimolybdate solution as prepared in Example 14 for the pH to be at least 4. The solution was sulfided in an autoclave at 140°F and 400 psig with the injection of hydrogen sulfide at a molar ratio of S/Mo about 3.4 to 1. After sulfidation of ammonium dimolybdate solution, a sufficient amount of the nickel sulfate solution as prepared in
  • Example 16 BET characterization, pore porosity and pore size distribution were carried out with slurry catalysts from Example 14 and Comparative Examples 1 A - 3 A.
  • the wt. % of Mo in the post transformation slurry catalyst of the Examples are shown in Table 3.
  • the surface area values are 65 m 2 /g for Comparative Example 3 A; 75 m 2 /g for Example 1 A; 120 m 2 /g for Example 2A; and 370 m 2 /g for Example 14.
  • Total pore volume in cc/g for Example 3A is 0.15; 0.22 for Example 1A; 0.33 for Example 2A, and 0.86 for Example 14.
  • Mesapore volume (PV of 25-1000 A) is 0.11 cc/g for Example 3 A; 0.18 cc/g for Example 1 A; 0.25 for Example 2A; and 0.68 for Example 14.
  • Example 17 As the slurry catalyst of Example 14 shows significantly better surface area and porosity properties compared to the catalysts of the prior art, hydrocracking tests were conducted to evaluate the catalyst performance. In this example, different catalyst dosages were added to about 112.5 g of heavy oil feedstock to 1 liter batch hydrocracking units, heated up to a temperature of 805°F and kept at a pressure of 1600 psig for 2 hours. The heavy oil feedstock containing a mixture of VR#1 and medium cycle oil at a weight ratio of 60:40. Results of the batch hydrocracking test are shown in Table 4.
  • Example 18 Heavy oil upgrade was carried out in a continuous unit operated with two reactors in series, operating in once-through mode, i.e., with the effluent stream from the first reactor comprising upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, hydrogen containing gas, and unconverted heavy oil feedstock being sent to the second reactor for further heavy oil conversion.
  • the reactor pressure varied between 2400 to 2500 psig.
  • the reactor temperature was kept at about 815 to 818°F.
  • Hydrogen rate as scf per bbl VR was set at about 3000.
  • LHSV was kept at about 0.125 hr "1 .
  • the results of the Comparative Examples are shown in Table 5.
  • the slurry in Example 14 performed much better than the
  • the slurry catalyst provides surface area of 359 m 2 /g catalyst, available surface area of 1741 m 2 /kgVR, TPV of 0.864 cc/g, mesapore volume of 0.864 cm 3 /g, and ASPH of 6.1 %.
  • the slurry catalyst provides surface area of 359 m 2 /g catalyst, available surface area of 1741 m 2 /kgVR, TPV of 0.864 cc/g, mesapore volume of 0.864 cm 3 /g, and ASPH of 6.1 %.
  • the slurry catalyst provides ASPH of 8.9 %.
  • Example 19 Example 18 was repeated except that VR#2 was used instead of VR#1, comparing the catalysts from Examples 14 and 15 with the slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 2 A. Results are shown in Table 6. With respect to porosimetry, Comparative 2A slurry catalyst provides a surface area (SA) of 157 m 2 /g, TPV of 0.358 cc/g; PV ( ⁇ 100 A) of 0.1324cc/g; PV (>100 A) of 0.2256 cc/g; and PV (25-1000 A) of 0.264 cc/g.
  • SA surface area
  • the results show a surface area of 373m 2 /g; TPV of 0.864 cc/g, PV ( ⁇ 100A) of 0.4949 cc/g, PV (> 100A) of 0.3691cc/g; and PV (25-1000A) of 0.683 cc/g.
  • Example 20 1.78 g of ammonium dimolybdate crystal was dissolved in 98.22 g of DI water to prepare the molybdenum molybdate solution. A sufficient amount of ammonium hydroxide was added to the solution for the pH to be at least 4. The solution was sulfided in an autoclave at 140°F and 400 psig with the injection of hydrogen sulfide at a molar ratio of S/Mo of about 3.4: 1. The slurry was then transformed at 400°F and 400 psig with VGO, reducing water-based Mo sulfide to Mo disulfide suspended in VGO.
  • the water / carrier oil / solid slurry mixture was sent to another autoclave at elevated temperature (470°F) with supplemental H 2 so that water could be boiled off.
  • the post- transformation slurry catalyst was delivered to a high pressure separator, where the slurry oil based catalyst collected on the bottom, and water along with H 2 , H 2 S, CH4, and NH3 were removed for water, gas, and residual oil separation.
  • Example 21 BET characterization, pore porosity and pore size distribution were carried out with slurry catalysts from Example 20 and Comparative Examples 1 A and 3 A. Results of the Comparative Examples are presented in Table 7.
  • Example 10 slurry catalyst provides a surface area of 319 m 2 /g, and a TPV of 0.55 cc/g.
  • Example 22 Heavy oil upgrade was carried out under conditions similar to Example 18 with a continuous unit operated with two reactors in series. The results of the Comparative Examples are shown in Table 8.
  • Example 20 with a concentration of 3018 ppm Mo gives a surface area of 281 m 2 /g, and a PV of 0.862 cm 3 /g.
  • Example 23 A pressure leach solution was prepared according to the disclosure in US Patent No. 7837960 for the separation and recovery of base metals from spent catalyst.
  • the composition has a starting pH of about 3, containing 33 gpL free NH3, 80.9 gpL Mo, 7.9 gpL Ni, 0.17 gpL V, 277 gpL ammonium sulfate (Amsul) and 10-gpL ammonium sulfamate.
  • Example 24 A sufficient amount of PLS solution from Example 23 was added to about 170 g of heavy oil feedstock in a 1 liter batch hydrocracking unit for 0.2 wt. %
  • the unit was heated up to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours.
  • Example 25 Example 24 was repeated, and the pre-soaked mixture was homogenized in a high shear mixer.
  • Example 26 Example 24 was repeated with the addition of 3 wt. % of sorbitan monooleate (SpanTM 80) as a wt. % of the PLS solution, before pre-soak and homogenizing in a static mixer for an emulsified mixture.
  • sorbitan monooleate SpanTM 80
  • Example 27 Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1 , with the in-situ sulfided catalysts made from the pressure leach solution of Examples 23-26.
  • the starting conditions of the batch units included 1400 psig pressure at 160°F.
  • the batch hydrocracking units were heated to 805°F temperature and held at that temperature for 2 hours reaction time, with sufficient catalyst for a concentration of Mo in VR as specified. Results are presented in Table 9, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after.
  • Example 28 Ammonium heptamolybdate was mixed with a hot (70°C)
  • DMSO to prepare a solution containing 11 wt. % Mo.
  • the oil-soluble metal precursor was mixed with a preheated feed. It is noted that DMSO forms H 2 S on heating with H, therefore sulfur addition is optional.
  • Example 29 Example 28 was repeated with the addition of elemental sulfur to the feed for a 0.7:1 S to Mo (wt. ratio).
  • Example 30 Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalysts made in Comparative Examples and the slurry catalysts made with the oil-soluble metal precursors formed from DMSO. A sufficient amount of slurry catalyst was added to batch hydrocracking units for a concentration of 1 wt. % Mo in VR (VR#1 used). The units were tested under hydroprocessing conditions. Standard resid protocol tests were performed thereafter: initial 1400 psig H 2 (160°F), then 90 min ramp followed by 2 fir soak at 805°F. Results are presented in Table 10, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after. The sulfur amount in the table (wt. %) indicates product characterization (indicative ofHDS). Table 10
  • Example 31 A sufficient amount of Promoter metal precursor nickel sulphate was added to the sulfided oil-based catalyst precursor of Comparative Example 3 A for a slurry catalyst having a Ni to Mo weight ratio of 10%.
  • Example 32 A sufficient amount of Promoter metal precursor nickel naphthenate was added to the sulfided oil-based catalyst precursor of Comparative Example 3 A for a slurry catalyst having a Ni to Mo weight ratio of 10%. The mixture was heated to a temperature of 475°F for 2 hours with the addition of hydrogen.
  • Example 33 Example 32 is repeated, but nitrogen was used instead of hydrogen.
  • Example 34 A sample of Group VIB metal precursor molybdenum naphthenate 6% Mo was provided.
  • Example 35 A sample of MolyvanTM A, a molybdenum oxysulfide dithiocarbamate complex, was provided.
  • Example 36 A sufficient amount of Promoter metal precursor nickel naphthenate was added to a sample of MolyvanTM A in Example 35 for a catalyst precursor having a Ni to Mo weight ratio of 10%.
  • Example 37 The mixture of Example 36 was heated to a temperature of 475°F for 2 hours.
  • Example 38 A sample of OLOA-011007, a lubricant oil additive based on succinimide chemistry, commercially available from Chevron Oronite of San Ramon, CA, was provided.
  • Example 39 To a 500 mL 3 neck round bottom flask, diethylene triamine (148.04g, 1.435 mol), and elemental sulfur (73.62g, 2.296mol) were charged. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir and heat at 80°C for 2.5hrs. Ammonium dimolybdate (97.55g, 0.287 mol) was then charged, and the reaction mixture was allowed to heat and stir for another 2 hours at 120°C. 116g of product was collected, and the rest was treated in Example 40.
  • diethylene triamine 148.04g, 1.435 mol
  • elemental sulfur 73.62g, 2.296mol
  • Example 40 To the remaining reaction mixture from example 39, H 2 0 (300 mL) was charged, and it was allowed to stir for 1 hour. The reaction mixture was then allowed to cool to room temperature. The precipitate was filtered, and washed with H 2 0, ethanol, carbon disulfide, and diethyl ether.
  • Example 41 Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalysts made in Comparative Examples and the catalysts / precursors made in Examples 31 - 39. A sufficient amount of precursors / catalysts from the Examples was added to batch hydrocracking units for a concentration of 1 wt. % Mo in VR. The units were tested under hydroprocessing conditions. Standard resid protocol tests were performed thereafter: initial 1400 psig H 2 (160°F), then 90 min ramp followed by 2 fir soak at 805°F. Results are presented in Table 11 , with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after.
  • Example 42 Rework was obtained by grinding a commercially available catalyst precursor (e.g., ICR 131 from ART Catalyst) to an average particle size of 40 microns or less (average particle size was 37 microns). The rework was mixed with a sufficient amount of VGO for a slurried rework having a Mo and Ni content similar to the slurry catalyst of Comparative Example 1 (about 1.5 wt. % Mo in VGO).
  • a commercially available catalyst precursor e.g., ICR 131 from ART Catalyst
  • VGO a slurried rework having a Mo and Ni content similar to the slurry catalyst of Comparative Example 1 (about 1.5 wt. % Mo in VGO).
  • Example 43 Slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 1 A was compared with the slurried rework metal precursor in Example 42. The materials were mixed with a heavy oil feedstock VR#1.
  • Heavy oil upgrade was carried out in a continuous unit operated with three reactors in series, operating in once-through mode, i.e., with the effluent stream from the first reactor comprising upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, hydrogen containing gas, and unconverted heavy oil feedstock being sent to the second and third reactors for further heavy oil conversion.
  • the reactor pressure varied between 2475 to 2525 psig.
  • the reactor temperature was kept at about 802 - 803°F.
  • Hydrogen rate as scf per bbl VR per reactor was about 4500.
  • LHSV was kept at about 0.09 hr "1 . The results are shown in Table 12.
  • Comparative Example 1 A provides a surface value of 74.2 m 2 /g; a TPV of 0.232 cc/g; and a PV (> 100 A) of 0.1647 cc/g.
  • Example 42 provides a surface value of 113 m 2 /g; a TPV of 0.382 cc/g; and a PV (> 100 A) of 0. 2002 cc/g.
  • Table 12
  • Example 44 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate
  • Example 45 A sufficient amount of titanium napthanate solution was added to the catalyst from Comparative Example 1A for a Ti Mo ratio of 10% (by weight) under the following reaction conditions: 725°F, 500 psig H 2 and 3 hour soak, during heating titanium naphthenate decomposes to produce a Ti / Ni / Mo / S catalyst, produced by ex-situ synthesis.
  • Example 46 Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalysts made in Comparative Example 1A and the catalyst made in Example 45. A sufficient amount of catalyst from the two Examples were added to VR#1 in 1 liter autoclaves for a 1.25% Mo / VR wt. ratio.
  • the autoclaves were pressurized to 1600 psig H 2 , heat to 825°F for 2.5 hours then allowed to soak at 825°F for 5 hours. At the end of the soak, the reaction was quenched, the liquid products recovered, and conversions were calculated.
  • Example 47 Appropriate quantity of nickel naphthenate oil soluble catalyst was mixed with a heavy oil feedstock blend of VR#1 and cycle oil (HCO / MCO) at a 60:40 wt. ratio for a 0.75 wt. % Ni to feedstock, and charged into a 1 liter autoclave. The autoclave was pressurized to 1600 Psig H 2 , heated to 825 °F in 2.5 hours, and then allowed to soak at 825°F for 2 hours. A nickel sulfide slurry catalyst is generated from the thermal
  • Example 48 218 mL of water, 89.5 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate, and 29.15 g of concentrated ammonium hydroxide solution in water (28 wt. % NH 3 ) were combined in a glass flask fitted with an overhead stirrer and a nitrogen line to maintain inert atmosphere during reaction. The mixture was stirred until complete dissolution. The resulting solution was sulfided using 60 g of 40 wt. % ammonium sulfide solution in water, at 70°C under nitrogen blanket for 1 hour. The product was transferred into another flask, allowed to settle, and decanted to separate the solids.
  • Example 49 Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1 A (a standard Ni Mo catalyst) and the catalyst made in Example 47, which have compositions as shown in Table 14:
  • the slurry catalysts were mixed with a heavy oil feed (a blend of VR#3 / HCO and MCO) at a rate of 0.75% Ni to heavy oil feed for Example 47, and 1.25% Mo to heavy oil feed for Comparative Example 1 A, and charged into 1 liter autoclaves.
  • the autoclaves were pressurized to 1600 Psig H 2 , heated to 825°F in 2.5 hours, and then allowed to soak at 825°F for 2 hours. At the end of the soak, the reaction was immediately quenched, the liquid products were recovered, and conversions were calculated from resulting liquid hydrocarbon product analyses. It should be noted that nickel was charged on an equal molar basis to the slurry catalyst in the Comparative Example.
  • Table 15 compares the hydrocracking results of the slurry catalysts of Examples 47, 48, and Comparative Example 1A, showing comparable results under the same reaction condition. It is further noted that Examples 47 and 48 employ 60%) less metals in the catalyst, and with less metal deposits (e.g., contaminants such as vanadium) the reactor, for a more effective vanadium trapping effect.
  • the reactor was cooled to about 70°F and depressurized. 300 g of toluene was added to the reactor and mixture was agitated for 15 minutes at 750 RPM.
  • the slurry catalyst was deoiled by centrifugation. 82 g of VGO was added to the decanted slurry catalyst, and the slurry catalyst composition was analyzed.
  • the ex-situ catalyst has an average particle size of 3 microns, and shows an atomic S/Mo ratio of ⁇ 2, suggesting an active catalyst phase of MoS 2 promoted with nickel.
  • Example 51 In this example, in-situ promoted slurry catalyst is prepared. Appropriate quantities of Molyvan A and nickel naphthenate oil soluble catalyst precursors were mixed with a blend of VR#l/HCO /MCO (60:40 ratio) to provide a wt. % of 1.25 Mo / VR (at 10% Ni/Mo wt.). The mixture was charged into a 1 liter autoclave. The autoclave was then pressurized to 1600 PSIG H 2 , heated to 825°F in 2.5 hours. Slurry catalyst was generated from the thermal decomposition products of Molyvan A, nickel naphthenate, and H 2 S during the initial ramp to 825°F.
  • Example 52 In this example, in-situ slurry catalyst is prepared without any promoter. Example 51 was repeated except without any nickel precursor, and slurry catalyst was generated from the thermal decomposition products of Molyvan A and H 2 S during the initial ramp to 825°F.
  • Example 53 Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalysts made in Comparative Example 1 A and the catalysts made in Examples 50-52. Catalysts from Comparative Example 1 A and Example 50 were added to 1 liter autoclave units for a concentration of 1.25 wt. % Mo in VR#1. The catalysts were tested under hydroprocessing conditions. The autoclaves were then pressurized to 1600 psig hydrogen, heated to 825° F in 2.5 hours, and then allowed to soak at 825 °F for 2 hours. For the catalysts of Examples 51 - 52, they were allowed to continue soaking in the autoclave at 825°F for 2 hours (after heating up to 825°F in 2.5 hours). At the end of the soak, the reaction was immediately quenched, the liquid products were recovered from the autoclave units, and conversions were calculated from resulting liquid hydrocarbon product analyses. Results are presented in Table 16, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after.
  • Example 54 The slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 3A was treated with a small stream of H 2 (6800 SCF per BBL of catalyst feed) for about 3 firs., and at 350°F.
  • Example 55 The pre-treated slurry catalyst from Example 54 was compared with the untreated slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 3 A. With preconditioning, the surface area of the slurry catalyst increased by 17% from 69 to 81 m 2 /g, total pore volume increased by 23% from 0.142 to 0.175 cc/g, and mesopore volume increased by 25% from 0.105 to 0.131 cc/g.
  • Example 56 The slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 1A was treated with a small stream of H 2 (6800 SCF per BBL of catalyst feed) for about 10 firs., at a temperature of 350°F.
  • Example 57 The slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 1 A was treated with a small stream of H 2 (6800 SCF per BBL of catalyst feed) for about 10 firs., and at a higher temperature of 600°F.
  • Example 58 Continuous heavy oil upgrade experiments were carried out to compare the slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 1 A (not pre-treated) with the hydrogen treated catalysts from Examples 54, 56, and 57 (with hydrogen treatment).
  • the continuous hydrocracking unit was operated in "recycle mode," i.e., with at least a portion of the non-volatile fractions recovered from a flash separator in the unit was recycled back to one of the reactors in the unit.
  • the unit was operated with an average reactor temperature of about 820°F.
  • the reactor pressure varied between 2400 to 2550 psig.
  • the heavy oil feedstock was a VR#1 : MCO mixture at a rate of 60:40.
  • Slurry catalyst was supplied to the unit at a rate equivalent to about 4000 ppm Mo / VR.
  • Each unit has 3 reactors in series, with an interstage flash separator (IFS) located between the 2 n and the 3 r reactor, and the 2 n flash separator located after the last (3 rd ) reactor.
  • IFS interstage flash separator
  • the non-volatile fractions from the first IFS are supplied as feed to the second reactor, and a portion of the non- volatile fractions from the 2 nd flash separator is recycled / sent back to the 1st reactor, with a small portion being removed as bleed (equivalent to about 8% of the heavy oil feedstock).
  • the recycle stream is equivalent to about 20-30% of the total heavy oil feed to the first reactor.
  • Table 17 summarizes the results of the runs, showing 8-43% improvement in k-values due to the effect of the catalyst pre-treatment with hydrogen.
  • Example 59 9.04 g of stock 11 wt. % Mo ammonium heptamolybdate solution (equivalent to 1 g Mo) was mixed with 0.45 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate
  • hydrocracking unit for a Mo:Ni ratio of 10: 1 by weight and a catalyst concentration as Mo:VR of 1 wt. %).
  • the heavy oil feedstock containing a mixture of VR#1 as the vacuum resid (VR) and cycle oil at a weight ratio of 60:40, for API 0 of 2.5 at 60°F, MCR in wt. % of 18.46 and 5500 ppm of nitrogen.
  • Elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. ratio of 5: 1.
  • the unit was heated up to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours under mixing conditions to pre-disperse the catalyst precursor in heavy oil.
  • % Mo ammonium heptamolybdate solution (equivalent to 1 g Mo) was mixed with 0.44 g of zinc sulfate heptahydrate (equivalent to 0.1 g Zn) for a Mo:Zn ratio of 10: 1 by weight, in a sufficient amount of the same heavy oil feedstock as in Example 62 for a catalyst concentration of 1 wt. % Mo:VR.
  • Example 61 Example 60 was repeated except with 6.84 g of 15 wt. % Mo ammonium heptamolybdate solution (equivalent to 1 g Mo) and 2.2 g of zinc sulfate heptahydrate (equivalent to 0.5 g Zn), for a Mo:Zn ratio of 2: 1 by weight, and the same catalyst concentration of 1 wt. % Mo:VR.
  • Example 62 Example 59 was repeated, except that the amount of heavy oil feedstock was sufficient for a Mo:VR ratio of 0.2 wt. %, and a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. ratio of 25:1.
  • Example 63 Example 60 was repeated, except that the amount of heavy oil feedstock was sufficient for a Mo:VR ratio of 0.2 wt. % and a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. ratio of 25:1.
  • Example 64 A number of batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1 with the in-situ sulfided catalysts made from metal precursor feed in aqueous solutions of Examples 59-63.
  • the starting conditions of the batch units included 1800 psig pressure at 180°F.
  • the batch hydrocracking units were heated to 805°F temperature and held at that temperature for 2 hours reaction time. Results are presented in Table 18, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after. Liquid yield means amount of liquid obtained as a % of heavy oil feed.
  • Example 65 9000 grams of ADM solution (12% Mo) was heated to the 750 RPM at 150°F and 400 PSIG. To this heated ADM solution, a gas stream comprising 20 vol. % H 2 S, 20% CH 4 , 60% H 2 was bubbled through the solution for 4 hours. After the H 2 S addition, then an appropriate amount of nickel sulfate solution (8% Ni) was added to the mixture for a Ni/Mo wt% of ⁇ 23%. The mixture was then subjected to a second sulfiding step for 30 minutes with the gas stream comprising 20 vol. % H 2 S, 20% CH 4 , and 60% H 2 ⁇ _ The water based catalyst precursor was then drained from the reactor.
  • ADM solution 12% Mo
  • the water-based catalyst precursor slurry was transformed (continuous basis) at 400°F and 400 psig with VGO, resulting in an H 2 S enhanced oil based catalyst.
  • the water / carrier oil / solid slurry mixture was sent to another autoclave at elevated temperature (470°F) with supplemental H 2 so that water could be boiled off.
  • the post- transformation slurry catalyst was delivered to a high pressure separator, where the slurry oil based catalyst collected on the bottom, and water along with H 2 , H 2 S, CH4, and NH3 were removed for water, gas, and residual oil separation.
  • Example 66 A number of hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 2A (catalyst with 23% Ni/Mo level) with the H 2 S enhanced oil based catalyst of Examples 65 at different levels of Mo to VR#2 as shown. Table 19 summarizes the characteristics of the Comparative catalyst after a continuous transformation step.
  • Example 67 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate
  • Example 68 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate
  • Example 69 A number of hydrocracking tests are carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1A (catalyst with 10% Ni/Mo level) with the co- sulfided catalyst, and the catalyst made with a split Ni feed.
  • Table 21 summarizes the characteristics of the catalysts after a transformation step and table 22 summarizes the performance in hydrocracking test.
  • the catalyst made with the split Ni feed has similar posimetry to the co-sulfided catalyst, but higher catalytic activity compared to the co-sulfided catalyst.
  • the catalyst made with a split Ni feed had a reduced vanadium trapping in the hydrocracking reactor by at least 5% compared to the Comparative Example 1A, and surface area of 147 m 2 /g and 140 m 2 /g respectively for Examples 67 and 68 compared to 77 m 2 /g for Comparative Example 1A; a TPV of 0.411 cc/g and 0.400 cc/g respectively for Examples 67 and 68 compared to 0.241 cc/g for Comparative Example 1A.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for the heavy oil upgrade is provided. The slurry catalyst has a BET total surface area of at least 100 m2?/g, a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g and a polymodal pore distribution with at least 80% of pore sizes from 5 to 2,000 Angstroms. In one embodiment, a polar aprotic solvent is mixed with the metal precursor feed to form an oil-dispersible precursor. In another embodiment, the precursor feedstock is selected from any of a pressure leach solution from metal recovery, a rework material, a double metal salt precursor, a single metal precursor. In one embodiment, high shear mixing is employed to generate an emulsion. In another embodiment, sulfiding is carried out at least twice for enhanced sulfiding. In another embodiment, at least a metal precursor feedstock is split into portions for addition in various stages of the process.

Description

Hydroprocessing Catalysts and Methods for Making Thereof
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[001] This application claims benefit under 35 USC 119 of US Provisional Patent Application No. 61/428,599 with a filing date of December 30, 2010. This application claims priority to and benefits from the foregoing, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[002] The invention relates generally to catalysts for use in the conversion of heavy oils and residua and methods for making thereof.
BACKGROUND
[003] The petroleum industry is increasingly turning to heavy crudes, resids, coals and tar sands as sources for feedstocks. Feedstocks derived from these heavy materials contain more sulfur and nitrogen than feedstocks derived from more conventional crude oils, requiring a considerable amount of upgrading in order to obtain usable products therefrom. The upgrading or refining is accomplished by hydroprocessing processes, i.e., treating with hydrogen of various hydrocarbon fractions, or whole heavy feeds, or feedstocks, in the presence of hydrotreating catalysts to effect conversion of at least a portion of the feeds, or feedstocks to lower molecular weight hydrocarbons, or to effect the removal of unwanted components, or compounds, or their conversion to innocuous or less undesirable compounds.
[004] Catalysts commonly used for these hydroprocessing reactions include materials such as cobalt molybdate on alumina, nickel on alumina, cobalt molybdate promoted with nickel, nickel tungstate, etc. US Patent Nos. 4,824,821 and 5,484,755 and US Patent Publication No. 2006/0054535 disclose hydroprocessing catalysts in the form of high activity slurry. The catalyst is produced from Group VIB metal compounds by sulfiding an aqueous mixture of the metal compounds with hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas at a pressure of up to 5,000 psi (340 atm). US Patent Nos. 7,754,645 and 7,410,928 discloses a hydroprocessing catalyst and methods for making the catalysts, by reacting at least a Group VIB metal compound with a Promoter metal compound, sulfiding the intermediate mixture with a sulfiding agent, then mixing the sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to make a bulk slurry type catalyst. [005] There is still a need for improved catalysts with optimum morphology, structure and improved catalytic activity. There is also a need for improved processes to prepare catalysts for use in the conversion of heavy oils and residua.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[006] In one aspect, the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock. The process comprises: providing at least an inorganic metal precursor solution comprising at least one of a Group VIB metal precursor and a Group VIII metal precursor; mixing at least a polar aprotic solvent with the inorganic metal precursor solution to form an oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor, at a weight ratio of solvent to inorganic metal precursor solution of 1 : 1 to 100: 1; and providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor forming the slurry catalyst.
[007] In one aspect, the invention relates to a process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock. The process comprises: providing a slurry catalyst prepared from at least a Group VIB metal precursor compound and optionally at least a Promoter metal precursor compound selected from Group VIII, Group IIB, Group IIA, Group IV A metals and combinations thereof, wherein the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium having an particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη; providing a hydrogen feed; treating the slurry catalyst by mixing with the hydrogen feed at a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MP a) and a temperature from 200°F to 800°F at a rate of from 500 to 15,000 scf hydrogen per bbl of slurry catalyst for a minute to 20 hours, wherein the slurry catalyst is saturated with hydrogen providing an increase of k- values in terms of HDS, HDN, and HDMCR of at least 15% compared to a slurry catalyst that is not treated with hydrogen.
[008] In one aspect, the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst with the use of rework materials. The process comprises: providing at least a metal precursor comprising at least a Group VIB metal, the metal precursor is a rework material obtained from a process of making hydroprocessing catalysts, wherein the rework material has an average particle size of less than 300 μιη; mixing the rework material with at least a diluent forming a slurried metal precursor; and providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the slurried metal precursor forming the slurry catalyst. In one embodiment, the sulfidation is in-situ with the heavy oil feedstock providing the sulfiding agent for the sulfidation. [009] In one aspect, the invention relates to a process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock, using a pressure leach solution obtained from a metal recovery process as one of the metal precursor feed. The process comprises: providing at least a metal precursor solution comprising at least a Primary metal precursor in an aqueous solution, wherein the metal precursor solution is a pressure leach solution obtained from a metal recovery process and where the at least a Primary metal precursor was previously leached into the pressure leach solution in a leaching step; mixing the at least a metal precursor solution with at least a hydrocarbon diluent forming a catalyst precursor; and providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the catalyst precursor forming the slurry catalyst.
[010] In another aspect, the invention relates to an improved process for forming a slurry catalyst. The process comprises: providing a metal precursor solution comprising a mixture of at least two different water-soluble metal salts selected from Group VIB, Group VIII, Group IVB, Group IIB metals and mixtures thereof; mixing the metal precursor solution with a hydrocarbon diluent under high shear mixing to generate an emulsion with droplet sizes ranging from 0.1 to 300 μιη; and sulfiding the emulsion with at least a sulfiding agent to form the slurry catalyst.
[011] In one aspect, the invention relates to an improved slurry catalyst composition. The slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium, wherein the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη. The catalyst has a polymodal pore distribution with at least 80% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter. The catalyst is prepared from sulfiding and dispersing a metal precursor solution in a hydrocarbon diluent, the metal precursor comprising at least a Primary metal precursor, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of Primary metal in solution.
[012] In another aspect, the invention relates to an improved slurry catalyst. The catalyst a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium, wherein the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη, the slurry catalyst has a BET total surface area of at least 100 m2/g, and the slurry catalyst is prepared from sulfiding and dispersing a metal precursor solution in a hydrocarbon diluent, the metal precursor comprising at least a Primary metal precursor and optionally a Promoter metal precursor, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of Primary metal in solution. [013] In one aspect, the invention relates to a process for preparing an improved slurry catalyst for the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock. The process comprises: providing at least a metal precursor solution comprising at least a Primary metal precursor, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of the Primary metal in solution; sulfiding the at least a metal precursor solution with a sulfiding agent, forming a sulfided catalyst precursor; and mixing the sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to form the slurry catalyst wherein a slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη, a BET total surface area of at least 100 m2/g, a polymodal pore distribution with at least 80% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter, and a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
[014] In one aspect, the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock. The process comprises: providing at least a metal precursor solution comprising at least two different metal cations in its molecular structure, with at least one of the metal cations is a Group VIB metal cation; sulfiding the metal precursor with a sulfiding agent forming a catalyst precursor; and
mixing the catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to form the slurry catalyst.
[015] In one aspect, the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a single-metal slurry catalyst. The process comprises: providing at least a Primary metal precursor, the Primary metal is selected from one of at least one of a non-noble Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; sulfiding the Primary metal precursor with a sulfiding agent forming a catalyst precursor; and mixing the catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to form a slurry catalyst having a particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη; and a general formula of (M^^M ^H^/O^N2),,, wherein M is at least one of a non-noble Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; 0.5a <= d <= 4a; 0 <= e <= l la; 0 <=/<= 18a; 0 <= g <= 2a; 0 <= h <= 3a; t, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, S, C, H, O, and N; and ta+vd+we+xf+yg+z h=0.
[016] In another aspect, the invention relates to another improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst. The process comprises: providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble molybdenum compound and a water-soluble metal zinc compound; mixing the metal precursor solution with a hydrocarbon diluent under
sufficiently high shear mixing to generate an emulsion with droplet sizes ranging from 0.1 to 300 μιη; sulfiding the emulsion precursor with at least a sulfiding agent to form a slurry catalyst having a particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη; and wherein the zinc compound is present in the slurry catalyst in a sufficient amount for a zinc to molybdenum weight ratio ranging from 1 : 10 to 10: 1.
[017] In one aspect, the invention relates to yet another improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock. The process comprises: providing at least a first metal precursor comprising at least a metal salt of at least one of a non-noble Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; sulfiding the first metal precursor with a first sulfiding agent to form a sulfided catalyst precursor; sulfiding the sulfided catalyst precursor with a second sulfiding agent at a molar ratio of sulfur to metal in the sulfided catalyst precursor of at least 1.5 to 1 for an enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor; and mixing the enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent forming a slurry catalyst having an average particle size of 1 to 300 μιη.
[018] In one aspect, the invention relates to an improved process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock. The process to be improved comprises: providing a first metal precursor comprising at least a Group VIB metal and a promoter metal precursor comprising at least a promoter metal selected from Group IVB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals and combinations thereof, for a promoter metal to a Group VIB metal weight ratio ranging from 1 :30 to 5 : 1 ; sulfiding the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor separately, concurrently, or together, forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor; and mixing the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent forming a slurry catalyst having an average particle size of 1 to 300 μιη. The improvement comprises: apportioning at least one of the metal precursor into a first portion and a second portion at a ratio of first portion to second portion ranging from 1 : 10 to 10: 1; employing the first portion in the sulfidation step to form the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor; and mixing the second portion with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor before, during, or after the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent to form the slurry catalyst. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[019] Figure 1 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment for preparing the slurry catalyst with at least two metal precursor feeds and with the co-sulfiding of the metal precursors in the continuous mode. [020] Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating another embodiment to prepare the slurry catalyst with a double salt metal precursor as a feed, with in-situ sulfidation of the metal precursor.
[021] Figure 3 illustrates an embodiment to prepare the slurry catalyst, wherein a pressure leach solution (PLS) or a leach slurry is used as a feed.
[022] Figure 4 is a block diagram illustrating another embodiment to prepare the slurry catalyst with the PLS as a feed.
[023] Figure 5 is a block diagram illustrating another embodiment to make a slurry catalyst with a hydrogen treatment step (prior to heavy oil upgrade).
[024] Figure 6 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst wherein metal precursors are mixed directly with a heavy oil feedstock under high shear mixing.
[025] Figure 7 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment to make slurry catalyst with the use of a solvent and at least an inorganic metal precursor for an oil dispersible metal precursor.
[026] Figure 8 is a block diagram illustrating a variation of the embodiment in Figure 7 for making a promoted catalyst, with the use of an aprotic solvent for an oil dispersible metal precursor which is subsequently sulfided.
[027] Figure 9 is a block diagram illustrating yet another variation of the embodiment in Figure 8 with the use of an aprotic solvent.
[028] Figure 10 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst with high shear mixing, forming an emulsion catalyst.
[029] Figure 11 illustrates a variation of the embodiment in Figure 10 to prepare a slurry catalyst with high shear mixing.
[030] Figure 12 illustrates another embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst with high shear mixing, forming an emulsion, wherein the emulsion undergoes in-situ sulfidation.
[031] Figure 13 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst using rework material or ground residuum catalyst fines.
[032] Figure 14 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a promoted slurry catalyst from an oil soluble organometallic compound as metal precursor feed, which subsequently thermally decomposes generating the sulfided slurry catalyst.
[033] Figure 15 illustrates a variation of the embodiment in Figure 14, wherein the sulfiding is in-situ by mixing the oil soluble organometallic compound with a heavy oil feed. [034] Figure 16 illustrates an embodiment with a second sulfiding step for a slurry catalyst with enhanced amount of sulfur (double sulfiding).
[035] Figure 17 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a catalyst with Ti as a promoter.
[036] Figure 18 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a single metal catalyst, e.g., with the use of nickel as the single metal.
[037] Figure 19 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a Zn-Mo slurry catalyst.
[038] Figure 20 illustrates an embodiment for preparing a slurry catalyst with a split feeding of at least a Promoter metal precursor feedstock.
[039] Figure 21 illustrates an embodiment for preparing a slurry catalyst from ground / rework catalyst.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[040] The following terms will be used throughout the specification and will have the following meanings unless otherwise indicated.
[041] "Bulk catalyst" may be used interchangeably with "slurry catalyst" or "unsupported catalyst" or "self-supported catalyst," meaning that the catalyst composition is NOT of the conventional catalyst form with a preformed, shaped catalyst support which is then loaded with metals via impregnation or deposition catalyst. In one embodiment, the bulk catalyst is formed through precipitation. In another embodiment, the bulk catalyst has a binder incorporated into the catalyst composition. In yet another embodiment, the bulk catalyst is formed from metal compounds and without any binder. In one embodiment, the bulk catalyst comprises dispersed particles in a liquid mixture such as hydrocarbon oil ("slurry catalyst").
[042] "Heavy oil" feed or feedstock refers to heavy and ultra-heavy crudes, including but not limited to resids, coals, bitumen, tar sands, oils obtained from the thermo- decomposition of waste products, polymers, biomasses, oils deriving from coke and oil shales, etc. Heavy oil feedstock may be liquid, semi-solid, and / or solid. Examples of heavy oil feedstock include but are not limited to Canada Tar sands, vacuum resid from Brazilian Santos and Campos basins, Egyptian Gulf of Suez, Chad, Venezuelan Zulia, Malaysia, and Indonesia Sumatra. Other examples of heavy oil feedstock include residuum left over from refinery processes, including "bottom of the barrel" and "residuum" (or "resid"), atmospheric tower bottoms, which have a boiling point of at least 650°F(343°C), or vacuum tower bottoms, which have a boiling point of at least 975°F (524°C), or "resid pitch" and "vacuum residue" which have a boiling point of 975°F (524°C ) or greater.
[043] Properties of heavy oil feedstock may include, but are not limited to: TAN of at least 0.1, at least 0.3, or at least 1; viscosity of at least 10 cSt; API gravity at most 15 in one embodiment, and at most 10 in another embodiment. In one embodiment, a gram of heavy oil feedstock contains at least 0.0001 grams of Ni/V/Fe; at least 0.005 grams of heteroatoms; at least 0.01 grams of residue; at least 0.04 grams C5 asphaltenes; at least 0.002 grams of micro residue (MCR); per gram of crude; at least 0.00001 grams of alkali metal salts of one or more organic acids; and at least 0.005 grams of sulfur. In one embodiment, the heavy oil feedstock has a sulfur content of at least 5 wt. % and an API gravity ranging from -5 to +5. A heavy oil feed such as Athabasca bitumen (Canada) typically has at least 50% by volume vacuum reside. A Boscan (Venezuela) heavy oil feed may contain at least 64 % by volume vacuum residue. A Borealis Canadian bitumen may contain about 5% sulfur, 19% of asphaltenes and insoluble THFi (tetrahydrofuran) of less than 1 kg/ton.
[044] "Treatment," "treated," "upgrade," "upgrading" and "upgraded," when used in conjunction with a heavy oil feedstock, describes a heavy oil feedstock that is being or has been subjected to hydroprocessing, or a resulting material or crude product, having a reduction in the molecular weight of the heavy oil feedstock, a reduction in the boiling point range of the heavy oil feedstock, a reduction in the concentration of asphaltenes, a reduction in the concentration of hydrocarbon free radicals, and/or a reduction in the quantity of impurities, such as sulfur, nitrogen, oxygen, halides, and metals.
[045] The upgrade or treatment of heavy oil feeds is generally referred herein as "hydroprocessing" (hydrocracking, or hydroconversion). Hydroprocessing is meant as any process that is carried out in the presence of hydrogen, including, but not limited to, hydroconversion, hydrocracking, hydrogenation, hydrotreating, hydrodesulfurization, hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodemetallation, hydrodearomatization, hydroisomerization, hydrodewaxing and hydrocracking including selective hydrocracking. The products of hydroprocessing may show improved viscosities, viscosity indices, saturates content, low temperature properties, volatilities and depolarization, etc.
[046] Hydrogen refers to hydrogen, and / or a compound or compounds that when in the presence of a heavy oil feed and a catalyst react to provide hydrogen.
[047] "Surfactant" can be used interchangeably with "surface active agent," "stabilizer," or "surface modifier," referring generally to any material that operates to lower the surface tension of a liquid or to reduce the liquid droplet size, thus improving the wetting at the interface between the dispersed catalyst particles and the hydrocarbon oil.
[048] "Catalyst precursor" refers to a compound containing one or more
catalytically active metals, from which compound the slurry catalyst is eventually formed, and which compound may be catalytically active as a hydroprocessing catalyst. An example is a water-based catalyst prior to the transformation step with a hydrocarbon diluent, another example is a sulfided metal precursor.
[049] "One or more of or "at least one of when used to preface several elements or classes of elements such as X, Y and Z or Xi-Xn, Yi-Yn and Zi-Zn, is intended to refer to a single element selected from X or Y or Z, a combination of elements selected from the same common class (such as Xi and X2), as well as a combination of elements selected from different classes (such as Xls Y2 and Zn).
[050] SCF / BBL (or scf / bbl) refers to a unit of standard cubic foot of gas (N2, H2, etc.) per barrel of hydrocarbon feed, or slurry catalyst, depending on where the unit is used.
[051] The Periodic Table referred to herein is the Table approved by IUPAC and the
U.S. National Bureau of Standards, an example is the Periodic Table of the Elements by Los Alamos National Laboratory's Chemistry Division of October 2001.
[052] "Metal" refers to reagents in their elemental, compound, or ionic form.
"Metal precursor" refers to the metal compound feed to the process. The term "metal" or "metal precursor" in the singular form is not limited to a single metal or metal precursor, e.g., a Group VIB or a Promoter metal, but also includes the plural references for mixtures of metals. "In the solute state" means that the metal component is in a protic liquid form.
[053] "Group VIB metal" refers to chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, and combinations thereof in their elemental, compound, or ionic form.
[054] "Group VIII metal" refers iron, cobalt, nickel, ruthenium, rhenium, palladium, osmium, iridium, platinum, and combinations thereof.
[055] "Primary metal" refers to a metal in its elemental, compound, or ionic form selected from any of Group VIB (IUPAC nomenclature Group 6), Group VIII metals (IUPAC nomenclature Group s 8-10), Group IIB metals, and combinations thereof, in its sulfided form functions as a catalyst in a hydroprocessing process. The Primary metal is present in a catalyst in a larger amount than other metals.
[056] "Promoter metal" refers to a metal in its elemental, compound, or ionic form selected from any of Group IVB (IUPAC nomenclature Group 4), Group VIB, Group VIII, Group IIB metals (IUPAC nomenclature Group 12), and combinations thereof, added to increase the catalytic activity of the Primary metal. Promoter metal is present in a smaller amount than the Primary metal, in a range from 1 - 50 wt. % (Promoter metal to Primary metal) in one embodiment, and from 2-30 wt.% in a second embodiment.
[057] "Free of Promoter metal" or "substantially free of Promoter metal" means that in making the catalyst, no Promoter metal in their elemental, compound, or ionic form, is added. Traces of Promoter metals can be present, in an amount of less than 1% of the Primary metal (wt. %).
[058] 1000°F+ conversion rate refers to the conversion of a heavy oil feedstock having a boiling point of greater than 1000°F+ to less than 1000° F (538°C) boiling point materials in a hydroconversion process, computed as: 100% * (wt. % boiling above 1000°F materials in feed - wt. % boiling above 1000°F materials in products) / wt. % boiling above 1000°F materials in feed).
[059] "Pressure leach solution" or PLS, also known as "pregnant leach solution," "pregnant leach liquor," or "leach solution" refers to a composition obtained from recovery of metals from metallurgical wastes, mineral ores and / or concentrates, spent batteries, or spent catalysts, wherein a leaching step under pressure and temperature is employed to dissolve or cause the leaching of certain metal component(s) into the aqueous phase, giving a pressure leach solution.
[060] "Pressure leach slurry," also known as "leach slurry," refers to a slurry resulting from the dissolution of metals such as Group VIB metals, Promoter metals, and the like, from a spent catalyst. In one embodiment wherein the leach slurry is from a metal recovery process, e.g., recovery of metals from spent slurry catalyst, the pressure leach slurry may contain coke in an amount of 1 to 20 wt. %.
[061] "Dispersion" also known as "emulsion" refers to two immiscible fluids in which one fluid (e.g., catalyst precursor, metal precursor, etc.) is suspended or dispersed in the form of droplets in the second fluid phase (e.g., heavy oil feedstock or hydrocarbon diluent) as the continuous phase. In one embodiment, the droplets are in the range of 0.1 to 300 μιη. In another embodiment, from 1 to 10 μιη. In a third embodiment, the droplets are in the range of 0.5 to 50 μιη in size. The droplets can subsequently coalesce to be larger in size. Droplet size can be measured by methods known in the art, including particle video microscope and focused beam reflectance method, as disclosed in Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2010, 49, 1412-1418, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated in its entirety by reference. [062] "Rework" "may be used interchangeably with "rework materials" or "catalyst fines," refering to catalyst products, scrap pieces, fines, or rejected materials obtained from the process of making any of a supported catalyst, a self-supported catalyst, and a catalyst precursor, reduced in size to fines or powdered materials containing one or more catalytic materials. The catalyst fines can be generated from a catalyst product, or from the rejected materials / scrap pieces containing catalytic materials generated in the process of making the catalyst product. The catalyst fines can be sulfided or unsulfided. In one embodiment, the rework is from making unsupported catalyst precursor, wherein the rework is generated from final products, catalyst fines, broken pieces, scrap pieces and the like, and before the catalyst precursor is sulfided. In another embodiment, the rework is generated from of fines, final products, scrap pieces, etc., generated from the process of forming / shaping a catalyst precursor and before the sulfidation step. In another embodiment, the rework is in the form of fines generated from grinding any of supported catalyst products, unsupported catalyst products, scrap pieces, fines, and combinations thereof, generated in a process to make a supported catalyst or an unsupported catalyst.
[063] Reaction rate constants ("k-values") for reactions such as HDN, HDS, and HDMCR refer to the constant of proportionality which relates the rate of conversion of a particular fraction (VGO, VR, etc.), or of particular class of compounds in the feed (sulfur- containing or HDS, nitrogen containing or HDN), to the appropriate functions of the process, such as the concentration of the reactants, process pressure, flow rate, and other process- specific variables. As computed herein, the total volumetric flow rate to the system (LHSV) includes the fresh VR stream is corrected to account for the effect of gas hold-up.
[064] Pore porosity and pore size distribution in one embodiment are measured using mercury intrusion porosimetry, designed as ASTM standard method D 4284. Unless indicated otherwise, pore porosity is measured via the nitrogen adsorption method.
[065] In one embodiment, the invention relates to methods for making slurry catalysts having improved properties including but not limited to high surface area and large pore volume. The invention also relates to a method for the hydroconversion or upgrade of heavy oils, by sending the heavy oil feed to the upgrade process in the presence of the improved slurry catalyst, operating under conditions to get at least 30% 1000°F+ conversion in one embodiment, at least 50% 1000°F+ in another embodiment.
[066] Metal Precursor(s) Feed: In one embodiment, the catalyst is prepared from at least a Primary metal component (e.g., a Group VIB metal precursor) and at least one Promoter metal precursor (e.g., a Group VIII metal precursor, a Group IIB metal precursor, or a Group VIII metal precursor such as Ni and a Group IVA metal precursor such as Ti). In another embodiment, the catalyst is prepared from at least a Primary metal precursor with no Promoter metal added. In yet another embodiment, the catalyst is prepared from at least a Group VIII metal such as a nickel compound as the Primary metal component, with or without the subsequent addition of other metals as Promoter metals. In yet another embodiment, the catalyst is prepared from a double salt precursor containing at least two different metal cations, e.g., prepared from at least two different metal precursor feeds.
Multiple Promoter metal precursors can be used as the feedstock, e.g., different Group VIII metal precursors are used such as Ni and Co. Multiple Primary metal precursors can be used as co-catalyst, e.g., Mo and W.
[067] In embodiments with the addition of at least a Promoter metal, the weight ratio of the Promoter metal component to the Primary metal component is in the range of 1 to 90%. In a second embodiment, the ratio ranges from 2 to 50%. In a third embodiment, from 5 to 30%. In a fourth embodiment, from 10 to 20%.
[068] In one embodiment, at least one of the metal precursors may be oil soluble, oil dispersible, water soluble and / or water dispersible. The metal precursors can be provided as an elemental metal or as a metal compound. The metal precursors can be added in the solid state. In one embodiment, one of the metal precursors can be added in the solid state, while the second metal precursor can be added in the solute state. The metal precursors can be the same or different, e.g., all organic compounds, all inorganic compounds, or one organic and one inorganic. The metal precursors in one embodiment can be catalytically active, e.g., a reagent grade metal sulfide or a beneficiated ore.
[069] In one embodiment, at least one of the metal precursors is an organic compound selected from metal salts of organic acids, such as acyclic and alicyclic aliphatic, carboxylic acids containing two or more carbon atoms. Non- limiting examples include acetates, oxalates, citrates, naphthenate and octoates. In another embodiment, the metal precursors are selected from salts of organic amines. In yet another embodiment, the metal precursors are selected from organometallic compounds, e.g., chelates such as 1,3-diketones, ethylene diamine, ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, phthalocyanines and mixtures thereof. In another embodiment, the organic metal precursors are selected from salts of dithiolate, dithiocarbamate, and mixtures thereof. An example is a Group VIII metal precursor such as a dithiocarbamate complex. Another example of a Group VIB metal precursor is a soluble molybdenum-containing organophosphorodithioate such as molybdenum dialkyl dithiophosphate. The metal precursors can also be sulfur-containing organic compounds, e.g., a chelate compound with sulfur as a coordinating atom such as sulfhydryl S-H, or a molybdenum oxysulfide dithiocarbamate complex (Molyvan A).
[070] In one embodiment, the Group VIB metal precursor (as a Primary metal or a Promoter metal) is selected from the group of alkali metal or ammonium metallates of molybdenum in organic solvents such as a normal alkane, hydrocarbons, or petroleum products such as distillate fractions wherein the molybdenum compound is allowed to subsequently decompose under pressure and temperature, prior to or concurrent with the addition of the Promoter metal precursor.
[071] In one embodiment, the Group VIB metal precursor feed is a water-soluble salt, e.g., oxides and polyanions such as molybdates, tungstates, chromates, dichromates, etc. In one embodiment, the Group VIB metal precursor is selected from the group of alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates,
phosphomolybdic acid, and mixtures thereof. In another embodiment, it is selected from the group of molybdenum (di- and tri) oxide, molybdenum carbide, molybdenum nitride, aluminum molybdate, molybdic acid (e.g. H2M0O4), or mixtures thereof. In yet another embodiment, the Group VIB metal compound is an organometallic complex, e.g., oil soluble compound or complex of transition metal and organic acid, selected from naphthenates, pentanedionates, octoates, acetates, and the like. Examples include molybdenum
naphthenate and molybdenum hexacarbonyl.
[072] In one embodiment, the at least one of Group VIII metal precursor (as a Promoter metal or as a Primary metal component) is selected from inorganic compounds, including but not limited to sulfates, nitrates, carbonates, sulfides, oxysulfides, oxides and hydrated oxides, ammonium salts and heteropoly acids thereof. In one embodiment, the Group VIII metal precursor is a water-soluble compound such as acetate, carbonate, chloride, nitrate, acetylacetone, citrate, sulfate, and oxalate, e.g., nickel nitrate, nickel sulfate, nickel acetate, nickel chloride, etc., and mixtures thereof. In another embodiment, the metal precursor is a compound which is at least partly in the solid state, e.g., a water-insoluble nickel compound such as nickel carbonate, nickel hydroxide, nickel phosphate, nickel phosphite, nickel formate, nickel sulfide, nickel molybdate, nickel tungstate, nickel oxide, nickel alloys such as nickel-molybdenum alloys, Raney nickel, or mixtures thereof.
[073] In one embodiment, a Group IIB metal precursor such as zinc is employed as a Promoter metal (instead of a Group VIII metal precursor). Zinc is a less expensive material and more environmentally friendly than other metal precursors such as nickel. Examples include but are not limited Group IIB inorganic compounds such as zinc sulfate, zinc nitrate, zinc carbonate, zinc sulfide, zinc oxysulfide, zinc oxide and zinc hydrated oxide, zinc ammonium salts and heteropoly acids thereof. Other examples of zinc as a Promoter metal precursor include oil soluble organic acid salts such as zinc acetate, zinc oxylate, zinc citrate, zinc napthanate and zinc octoates. In another embodiment, the Promoter metal precursor is selected from zinc salts of organic amines such as aliphatic amines, aromatic amines, quaternary ammonium compounds, and mixtures thereof. In yet another embodiment, the zinc metal precursors are selected from organometallic compounds such as chelates including chelate compounds with sulfur as a coordinating atom,e.g., thiols such as
dialkyldithiophosphates, thio- or dithiocarbamates, phosporothioates, thiocarbonates, trimercaptotriazine, thiophenates, mercaptans, thiol carboxylic acids RC(0)SH, dithio acids RC(S)SH, and related compounds.
[074] Organic Solvent Feed: In one embodiment with the use of organometallic compounds as metal precursors, the solubility of the catalyst precursor in oil is increased, which may lead to higher dispersion and more active catalyst particularly if the catalyst precursor is to be sulfided directly in a heavy oil feedstock. Organometallic compounds can be expensive compared to inorganic compounds, but inorganic metal precursors are not soluble in oil. In one embodiment, polar aprotic solvents are used in conjunction with inorganic metal precursors for the preparation of the precursor feed. The organic solvent, e.g., an organosulfur compound which is compatible with both the inorganic metal precursor and the oil feedstock, acts as a solvent to dissolve the inorganic metal precursor. With the use of the organic solvent, the inorganic metal precursor becomes dispersible in the heavy oil feedstock, thus alleviating the need for a transforming step. In one embodiment with the use of an organic solvent to help disperse the inorganic metal precursor in the heavy oil feedstock, a separate sulfiding step can be eliminated as the metal precursor can be sulfided with sulfur sources inherently present in the heavy oil feedstock.
[075] In one embodiment, the organic solvent is selected from the group of polar aprotic solvents such as N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethylacetamide (DMAC), hexamethylphosphortriamide (HMPA), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tetrahydrofuran, propylene carbonate, dimethyl sulfite, N-nitrosodimethylamine, γ- butyrolactone, N:N dimethyl formamide, dimethyl carbonate, methyl formate, butyl formate and mixtures thereof. The organic solvent can be used as neat liquids, or in combination with other inexpensive solvents such as water or methanol. Examples of inorganic metal precursors for use with the organic solvent include but are not limited to molybdenum oxide, sulfide, or oxysulfide of the general formula MoOxSy wherein x≥0, y≥0. In one embodiment, the Group VIB inorganic metal precursor is molybdenum trioxide. In another embodiment, the inorganic metal precursor is ammonium heptamolybdate.
[076] In one embodiment, oil soluble metal precursors are formed by the interaction of precursors such as ammonium paramolybdate with higher alcohols, glycols, and
alkylsalicylic acids. In one example, ammonium paramolybdate is added to concentrated ammonia, at least an oil soluble dispersant, and aromatic solvent such as toluene or xylene. In another example, an oil soluble metal precursor can be prepared from by reacting inorganic metal precursors with polyamides, succinimides and sulfonates. In another example, an oil- soluble sulfur containing metal precursor is prepared by treating with hydrogen sulfide a mixture of ammonium paramolybdate and succinimide. In another embodiment, the oil- soluble metal precursors prepared from inorganic salts are commercially available products including but not limited to OLOA 11007 and OLOA 378, available from Chevron Oronite and Molyvan™ A from RT Vanderbilt Company. In one embodiment, Molyvan™ A additive is used by itself for the preparation of Mo-only catalyst. In another embodiment, Molyvan™ A additive is used in conjunction with nickel naphthenate for the preparation of Ni-promoted slurry catalyst.
[077] In one embodiment, the inorganic metal precursor is dissolved in the organic solvent in a weight ratio of l :4 to 4: l; a weight ratio of 1 : 3 to 2 : 1 in a second embodiment; and a weight ratio of 1 :5 to 1 : 1 in a third embodiment.
[078] Pressure Leach Solution as a Metal Precursor Feed In yet embodiment, a pressure leach solution (PLS) from a metal recovery process can be used as the metal precursor feedstock or part of the metal precursor feedstock. The metal recovery process can be part of a mining / ore operation, an electroplating operation, or recovery of metals from spent catalysts, and the like. A PLS composition may contain a single metal precursor in aqueous solution, or a mixture of metal components such as Group VIB metal and at least another metal precursor. An example of a pressure leach solution (PLS) may contain any of ammonium heptamolybdate (AHM), nickel sulfate, nickel amine sulfate, ammonium metavanadate, ammonium sulfamate and the like. In one embodiment, a PLS stream containing 50 to 90 gpL (grams per liter) molybdenum, 3 to 10 gpL nickel, 0.1 to 1 gpL vanadium, 100 to 500 gpL ammoninum sulfate, and 5 to 30 gpL ammonium sulfamate can be used as the metal precursor feed. In another embodiment, the PLS stream contains 20 to 100 gpL (grams per liter) molybdenum, 5 to 20 gpL nickel, 0.10 to 1.0 gpL vanadium, 100 to 500 gpL ammonium sulfate, and 5 to 20-gpL ammonium sulfamate.
[079] In one embodiment and depending on the pH of the pressure leach solution (PLS), some of the metals in the PLS may precipitate wherein the PLS is in the form of a slurry, which can also be used directly as a feed to the process. Details regarding a metal recovery process, and leach stream compositions, and pressure leach slurry compositions from the recovery of metals in spent catalysts can be found in US Patent Nos. 7837960, 7846404 and 7658895, and US Patent Application Serial No. 13/156,589, the relevant disclosures are included herein by reference. In one embodiment, the pressure leach solution in the form of a slurry contains 1-20 wt. % coke and 0.2-4 wt% partially insoluble ammonium metavanadate, which can be filtered out before the solution can be used as metal precursor feedstock.
[080] Double Salt as a Metal Precursor Feedstock: In one embodiment, instead of or in addition to single metal precursor feeds, at least one of the metal precursors is a double salt precursor. A double salt metal precursor is a metal precursor having at least two different metal cations in the molecular structure, with at least one of metal cations being a Primary metal cation and at least one Promoter metal cation, e.g., ammonium nickel molybdate (formed from ammonium molybdate with nickel sulfate). It should be noted that the term "double" is not limited to two metal cations. The double salt precursor can be formed from at least three different metal cations.
[081] In one embodiment, one of the metal cations in the double salt precursor is a Group VIB cation such as molybdenum and the other metal cation is a different cation metal such as nickel or zinc. In another embodiment, the double salt precursor is characterized has having three different metal cations, with two of metal cations are different Group VIB metal cations such as molybdenum and tungsten, and the third cation is a Group VIII metal cation such as nickel or zinc. In yet another embodiment, the double salt precursor comprises three different metal cations, with two of metal cations are different Promoter metal cations such as nickel and titanium, and the third cation is a Primary metal cation such as molybdenum. The use of a double salt as a precursor reagent, particularly in crystal form or in concentrated form as a slurry, can reduce cost in terms of transport to the site to make the slurry catalyst.
Additionally, better catalyst performance is possible with the Promoter metal(s) being in the same molecular structure, in close proximity with the Primary metal component when the double salt metal precursor is sulfided, either in-situ or in a separate sulfidation step.
[082] In one embodiment, the double salt precursor is a water-soluble salt, e.g., prepared from crystallizing an aqueous solution of a mixture of at least a Group VIB metal salt and a Group VIII or Group IIB metal salt, e.g., ammonium molybdate and nickel sulfate, ammonium molybdate and zinc sulfate, ammonium octamolybdate and a double salt of nickel ammonium sulfate, potassium molybdate and iron sulfate, potassium chromium sulfate and ammonium para-molybdate, etc. In one embodiment, the pH of the aqueous solution of the salt mixture is adjusted with the addition of an acid and / or a base to a pre-selected pH for the double salt to crystallize out of solution. At the pre-select pH which does not favor the solubility of the multi-metallic bimetallic compound, a double salt precipitates out. The formation of the precipitate ensures that the different metals constituting the catalyst precursor are well dispersed together in the solid phase.
[083] In one embodiment, the double salt metal precursor is prepared from a pressure leach solution or a leach slurry from a metal recovery process, optionally with the adjustment of the pH and / or the addition of a metal salt in aqueous solution form to cause the precipitate of the double salt for use as a metal precursor feed.
[084] In one embodiment, the double salt is an oil-soluble salt prepared by the reaction of at least a Group VIII metal precursor or a Group IIB metal precursor, and at least a Group VIB organometallic complex. In another embodiment, the double salt is prepared by the reaction of an oil soluble molybdenum salt and an oil soluble transition metal salt. In one embodiment, the reaction to form the oil-soluble double salt precursor is in the presence of a strong reducing agent such as hydrogen. In one embodiment, the Primary metal oil soluble compound is selected from naphthenates, pentanedionates, octoates, acetates, and mixtures thereof. Examples include but are not limited to molybdenum naphthenate and molybdenum hexacarbonyl.
[085] In one embodiment, the reaction to form the oil-soluble double salt is carried out at a temperature of at least 100°C for a sufficient length of time, e.g., between 2 hours and 48 hours. In another embodiment, the reaction to form the oil-soluble double agent is carried out in a reducing environment and in the presence of an inert, water-immiscible, organic solvent. Examples of organic solvents include but are not limited to aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons or chlorinated hydrocarbons such as benzene, toluene, xylene, ethylbenzene, dipentene, turpentine, petroleum products such as gasoline, mineral spirits, kerosene, mineral oil, fuel oil, aromatic naphthas, and chlorinated hydrocarbons as CC14, o-dichlorobenzene, monochlorotoluene, ethylene dichloride, perchloroethylene, and mixtures thereof.
[086] In one embodiment, the reaction to form the double salt precursor is carried out under conditions that exceed the boiling point of water such that water is removed as it is formed during the reaction. The water is allowed to escape from the reaction vessel as water vapor. In yet another embodiment, chemical drying agents such as calcium chloride or an azeotropic agent can be employed to remove water from the reaction product to form the oil- soluble double salt, although this is usually not necessary. Any known solid separation techniques can also be used such as filtering and the like.
[087] In one embodiment, at least half of the Primary metal precursor feedstock and
/ or Promoter metal precursor is in solution at a concentration of less than 10 wt. % with the addition of appropriate diluent, e.g., water for a water-soluble metal precursor or a hydrocarbon diluent such as an olefmic diluent or a cycle oil for an oil-based metal precursor, forming a metal precursor solution, suspension, or emulsion. In selecting the appropriate diluent for the metal precursor feedstock, one or more criteria may be used, including, but not limited to: the flash point of the diluent, the inert nature of the diluent under certain conditions as related to the catalytic process in which the metal precursor is used, the ability of the diluent to cause the metal precursor to be fluid-like and moveable at the appropriate temperatures and pressures, and/or the ability of the diluent to present certain processing advantages in subsequent processes. For example, it may be advantageous to select a diluent that does not react with the metal precursor at standard storage and transportation
temperatures, but provides for a stable solution of metal precursor that may be stored or shipped over long distances to a facility that further prepares and/or uses the metal precursor/diluents composition to make the slurry catalyst.
[088] In one embodiment, a sufficient amount of diluent is added to the metal precursor feedstock for the solution to have a pH of at least 4. In a second embodiment, the precursor feedstock has a pH of at least 5. In a third embodiment, the precursor feedstock has a pH of at least 6. The metal precursor feedstock is in solution with a concentration of metal between 1 - 5 wt. % in one embodiment; between 0.1 - 10 wt.% in another
embodiment; between 0.1 to 2 wt. % in a third embodiment. In one embodiment, the metal concentration in at least one of the metal precursor solution is between 5 - 8 wt. %. In another embodiment, at least one of the metal precursor feedstock is a solution with a pH of at least 4 and a metal concentration of 5 to 8 wt. %. In one embodiment, the metal precursor comprises at least a Primary metal in an aqueous solution with a concentration of 0.25 - 10 wt. %. In another embodiment, the Promoter metal concentration is also in aqueous solution with a concentration of less than 10 wt. % metal. In yet another embodiment, at least one of the metal precursor feedstock is in solution at a concentration between 0.1 and 8 wt. %.
[089] Rework Materials as Metal Precursor Feedstock: In one embodiment, at least a portion of the metal precursor feedstock is in a solid form, more specifically in the form of "rework." Examples include rework materials generated in the making of supported and unsupported (mixed Group VIII and Group VIB metal) catalyst precursors used for hydroconversion processes known in the art. In one embodiment, the rework materials are prepared from a supported catalyst, e.g., a metal precursor or catalyst precursor such as a metal oxide or metal hydroxide, affixed onto a porous refractory base ("a carrier") comprising one or more of alumina, silica, magnesia, titania, zeolite, silica-aluminate, carbon, phosphorous or various combinations of these. The alumina in the base can be in several forms including amorphous, alpha, gamma, theta, boehmite, pseudo-boehmite, gibbsite, diaspore, bayerite, nordstrandite and corundum. In one embodiment, the alumina is boehmite or pseudo-boehmite. In another embodiment, the rework materials are prepared from an unsupported or bulk catalyst with or without the use of a diluent or binder material (e.g., cellulose), such as catalyst precursor comprising a metal oxide or metal hydroxide. The metals that are used in the supported catalyst going into rework materials include base metals or compounds thereof, selected from Group VIB metals or Group VIII metals of the Periodic Table, or combinations thereof.
[090] Examples of supported and unsupported catalyst precursors and process for making thereof are as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,238,851; 4,113,661; 4,066,574;
4,341,625; 5,841,013; 6,156,695; 6,566,296; 6,860,987; 7,544,285; 7,615,196; 6,635,599; 6,635,599; 6,652,738; 7,229,548; 7,288,182; 6,162,350; 6,299,760; 6,620,313; 6,758,963; 6,783,663; 7,232,515; 7,179,366; 6,274,530; 7803266; 7185870; 7449103; 8024232;
7618530; 6589908; 6667271; 7642212; 7560407, 6030915, 5980730, 5968348, 5498586; and US Patent Publication Nos. US2009/0112011A1, US2009/0112010A1, US2009/0111686A1, US2009/0111685A1, US2009/0111683A1, US2009/0111682A1, US2009/0107889A1, US2009/0107886A1, US2009/0107883A1, US2011/0226667, US2009/0310435,
US2011/0306490A1, and US2007/090024, the relevant disclosures are included herein by reference.
[091] In one embodiment, rework materials for use as metal precursor feed comprise scrap / discarded / unused materials generated in any step of the preparation of (unsulfided) catalyst / catalyst precursor. Rework can be generated from any of the forming, drying, or shaping of the catalyst / catalyst precursor, or formed upon the breakage or handling of the catalyst / catalyst precursor in the form of pieces or particles, e.g., fines, powder, and the like. In the process of making catalyst precursors, e.g., by spray drying, pelleting, pilling, granulating, beading, tablet pressing, bricketting, using compression method via extrusion or other means known in the art or by the agglomeration of wet mixtures, forming shaped catalyst precursors, rework material is generated. Rework materials can also be generated from commercially available catalyst products, including supported and self-supported catalyst from such as ICR™ supported catalyst from Advanced Refining Technologies LLC, Nebula™ bulk catalyst from Albermale, or CRI™ NiMo alumina supported catalyst from Criterion Catalyst & Technologies, reduced to a size of less than 300 μιη. In one
embodiment, rework material consists essentially of unsulfided catalysts, made with or without the use of diluents or binders such as alumina, silica alumina, cellulose and the like.
[092] In one embodiment, the rework material is prepared in a method as described in US Patent Application No. 20110306490, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The support material, e.g., alumina, iron oxide, silica, magnesia, titania, zeolite, etc., is first ground to particles of less than 300 μιη. Catalytic materials, e.g., double metal precursors or single metal precursors such as ammonium heptamolybdate, or any soluble form of molybdenum, etc. are then deposited (impregnated) onto the ground base. The impregnated base is dried, then ground to a particle size of 1 to 300 μιη. In one embodiment, the deposition of catalytic materials is followed by calcination so the catalytic materials sinter with the metal in the support to effect loading. The deposition of catalytic materials can be carried out more than once to maximize the catalyst loading, or different metal precursors can be deposited onto the ground support base at the same time or as different layers for multi- metallic catalyst fines.
[093] In one embodiment, the rework material for use as metal precursor feed has an average particle size of less than 250 μιη and greater than 1 μιη. In a second embodiment, the average particle size is less than 75 μιη. In a third embodiment, an average particle size in the range of 2 to 50 μιη. In a fourth embodiment, an average particle size of less than 20 μιη. In a fifth embodiment, less than 10 μιη. The rework material can be ground or crushed to the desired particle size using techniques known in the art, e.g., via wet grinding or dry grinding, and using equipment known in the art including but not limited to hammer mill, roller mill, ball mill, jet mill, attrition mill, grinding mill, media agitation mill, etc.
[094] Sulfiding Agent Component: In one embodiment, a sulfided slurry catalyst is formed with the addition of at least a sulfiding agent to inorganic metal precursors. In one embodiment, the sulfiding agent is elemental sulfur by itself. In another embodiment, the sulfiding agent is a sulfur-containing compound which under prevailing conditions, is decomposable into hydrogen sulphide H2S. In yet a third embodiment, the sulfiding agent is H2S by itself or in a hydrocarbon mixture. In another embodiment, a sulfided slurry catalyst is formed in-situ by mixing the metal precursor feed with a heavy oil feedstock which releases a sulfiding agent under sufficient conditions, generating a sulfided slurry catalyst in- situ.
[095] In one embodiment, the sulfiding agent is present in an amount in excess of the stoichiometric amount required to form the slurry catalyst. In another embodiment and depending on the metal precursor component (e.g., metal precursor is a sulfur-containing organic compound), the total amount of sulfur-containing compound is generally selected to correspond to any of about 50-300%, 70-200%, and 80-150%), of the stoichiometric sulfur quantity necessary to convert the Primary metal and the Promoter metals, if any, into for example, CogSg, MoS2, WS2, Ni3S2, etc. In yet another embodiment, the amount of sulfiding agent represents a sulfur to the Primary metal mole ratio of at least 1.5 to 1 to produce a sulfided catalyst from the metal precursor(s). In another embodiment, the molar ratio of S to the Primary metal is at least 3 to 1.
[096] In one embodiment, the sulfiding agent is an aqueous solution of ammonium sulfide. The solution can be synthesized from hydrogen sulfide and ammonia - common refinery off-gases. In another embodiment, sour water after treatment is employed as the sulfiding source. Sour water is commonly and cheaply available as wastewater from refineries, which may contain anywhere between 1 to 50 wt. % ammonium bisulfide. In yet another embodiment, recycled H2S from process streams can also be used for the sulfiding process. Recycled H2S stream is first concentrated / treated in gas removal units, using amine treating gases known in the art including but not limited to monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), methyldiethanolamine (MDEA), Diisopropylamine (DIP A), and mixtures thereof. In another embodiment, recycled H2S is treated / recovered in a
SELEXOL™ process. Synthesized ammonium sulfide and / or sour water can be stored in tanks prior to use. Since ammonium sulfide solution is more dense than resid, it can be separated easily in a settler tank after reaction.
[097] Hydrocarbon Transforming Medium (Diluent): In some embodiments with in-situ sulfidation of metal precursors in a heavy oil feedstock, the slurry catalyst is transformed into an oil based slurry catalyst with the in-situ sulfidation. In other
embodiments with a water-based catalyst (with inorganic / water-soluble metal precursor starting feed), a hydrocarbon transforming medium (used interchangeably with "diluent" or "carrier") is employed to transform a sulfided water-based catalyst (hydrophilic) to an oil based active catalyst (hydrophobic).
[098] The nature of the hydrocarbon is not critical, and can generally include any hydrocarbon compound, acyclic or cyclic, saturated or unsaturated, un-substituted or inertly substituted, and mixtures thereof, which is liquid at ordinary temperatures.
[099] In one embodiment, the weight ratio of the water-based catalyst to the hydrocarbon diluent ranges from 1 :50 to 10: 1. In a second embodiment, the weight ratio of the water based catalyst to the hydrocarbon diluent ranges from 1 : 10 to 5 : 1. In a third embodiment, from 1 :5 to 1 : 1. In one embodiment with a continuous transformation step, the ratio of catalyst to hydrocarbon diluent ranges from 2: 1 to 5 : 1. In another embodiment with a batch transformation step, the ratio ranges from 1 :1 to 2: 1.
[0100] In one example, the hydrocarbon compound is derived from petroleum, including mixtures of petroleum hydrocarbons characterized as virgin naphthas, cracked naphthas, Fischer-Tropsch naphtha, light cat cycle oil, heavy cat cycle oil, and the like, typically those containing from about 5 to about 30 carbon atoms. In one embodiment, the hydrocarbon compound is a vacuum gas oil (VGO). In yet another embodiment, the diluent is a mixture of heavy oil and VGO. In another embodiment, the diluent is selected from the group of gasoline, distillate, naphtha, light cycle oil, benzene, toluene, xylene, etc. In one embodiment, the hydrocarbon compound has a kinetic viscosity ranging from 2 cSt to 15 cSt @ 100oC. In a second embodiment, the hydrocarbon oil has a kinematic viscosity of at least 2 cSt at 100oC. In a third embodiment, from 5 cSt to 8 cSt at 100oC. In one embodiment with the kinematic viscosity of the hydrocarbon transforming medium being below 2 cSt @ 100oC or above about 15 cSt @ 100oC, the transformation of the catalyst precursor results in catalyst particles agglomerating or otherwise not mixing.
[0101] Optional Components: The slurry catalyst in one embodiment may optionally comprise other components including but not limited to pore forming agents, emulsifier agents, surfactants, sulfur additives, sulfiding agents, stabilizers, binder materials, phosphorus compounds, boron compounds, additional transition metals, rare earth metals or mixtures thereof, depending on the envisaged catalytic application.
[0102] Details regarding the description of metal precursor feed, optional components, other sulfiding agents, and other hydrocarbon transforming media are described in a number of patent applications and patents, including US Patent Publication No. 2010- 0234212, US Patent Nos. 7,754,645 and 7,410,928, the relevant disclosures are included herein by reference.
[0103] It should be noted that the optional components can be added in any process step in the making of the slurry catalyst, depending on the nature of the optional components and the desired effect. In one embodiment, binders are added directly to the metal precursors prior to the sulfidation. In one embodiment with the use of emulsifiers, they are added after the sulfidation of the metal precursors forming a sulfided catalyst. In another embodiment, the optional components are added to the sulfidation step, e.g., sulfiding agents. In a third embodiment, optional components such as surfactants and the like are added to the transformation step, or directly to the metal precursors or diluents prior to the sulfidation of the metal precursors. In yet another embodiment, phosphorous-containing promoters, etc., can be added separately or in a mixture with the sulfiding agent and the metal precursors to increase the incorporation of sulfur in the sulfidation step.
[0104] Methods for Forming Slurry Catalysts: In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst is prepared from at least a Primary metal component, e.g., a Group VIB metal precursor and at least a Promoter metal precursor. In another embodiment, the catalyst is essentially free of Promoter metal with no Promoter metal purposely added, e.g., prepared from Group VIB metal precursor reagent(s). In another embodiment, the slurry catalyst is prepared from at least Group VIII metal precursor reagent such as nickel sulfate as the sole starting feed.
[0105] The metal precursors can be added to the reaction mixture in solution, suspension or as such. If soluble salts are added as such, they will dissolve in the reaction mixture and subsequently be precipitated. In one embodiment, the solution is heated optionally under vacuum to effect precipitation and evaporation of the water.
[0106] In one embodiment, aqueous ammonia is brought into contact with at least a Primary metal compound, such as molybdenum oxide or tungsten oxide, forming a water soluble oxygen-containing compound such as ammonium molybdate or tungstate. In the next step, the Primary metal component in solution is brought into contact with at least a Promoter metal component in solution, optionally with the adjustment of the pH to a preselected pH by the addition of an acid, a base, or a suitable compound which decomposes upon temperature increase into hydroxide ions or H+ ions that respectively increase or decrease the pH, facilitating the formation of the double salt metal precursor. In one embodiment, the pH is controlled such that the pH at the beginning of the reaction differs from the final pH after precipitation. In another embodiment, the formation of the double salt metal precursor is via the reaction of oil-soluble Primary metal compound and Promoter metal compound(s) in an organic solvent under H2-containing gas pressure, with the organic solvent being a hydrocarbon mixture of alkanes and aromatic compounds.
[0107] The reaction of Primary metal and Promoter metal components to form the double salt precursor is carried out at a weight ratio of Promoter metal to Primary metal from 0.01 :1 to 1 :2 in one embodiment; from 0.05: 1 to 0.3: 1 in another embodiment; 0.10: 1 to 0.25:1 in yet another embodiment. In one embodiment, the Primary metal is a Group VIB metal and the Promoter metal is a Group VIII metal in a weight ratio of Promoter metal to Primary metal ranging from 1 to 49 wt. %. After the double salt metal precursor is formed, the slurry mixture is optionally isolated from the liquid using methods known in the art such as filtration, centrifugation, decantation, or combinations thereof. After the double salt metal precursor is formed, it undergoes sulfidation and / or transformation into an oil-based catalyst either in-situ upon contact with a hydrocarbon feed, or in a separate sulfiding step and prior to a transformation step upon contact with a hydrocarbon diluent such as VGO.
[0108] Sulfidation of the metal precursor feed(s) can be done various ways. In one embodiment, the Primary metal component is first sulfided prior to addition of the Promoter metal precursor (unsulfided), generating a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor. In another embodiment, the Primary metal precursor (unsulfided) is brought into contact with a sulfided Promoter metal precursor and the mixture may or may not be sulfided again to form a catalyst precursor. In a third embodiment, the Primary metal precursor is co-sulfided in the same step with the Promoter metal precursor, and the sulfided catalyst precursor may or may not be sulfided again for an enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor. In yet another embodiment, the Primary metal precursor and the Promoter metal precursor(s) are separately sulfided and combined, and the sulfided (combined) catalyst precursor may or may not be sulfided again for an enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor. In another embodiment without any Promoter metals, the Primary metal precursor feed is sulfided before transformation with a
hydrocarbon diluent. In yet another embodiment with the use of double salt metal precursor(s) as feed, the double salt metal precursor feed is sulfided generating a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor.
[0109] "Enhanced sulfiding" refers to the sulfidation of a metal precursor (or mixtures thereof) comprising at least one sulfided metal precursor again, for an enhanced sulfidation scheme, resulting in a relatively high ratio of S to Primary / Promoter metal(s) with improved catalytic performance. In one embodiment of enhanced sulfiding (or "double sulfiding" or two-step sulfiding), at least one of the Primary metal precursor and the Promoter metal precursor is first sulfided at a sulfur to metal mole ratio of at least 1.5 to 1 , then combined with the second metal precursor (un-sulfided or sulfided). The mixture is then sulfided again at a sulfur to metal mole ratio of at least 1.5 to 1, generating a promoted and enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor. The sulfiding agent can be the same or different in the different sulfiding steps, and the amount of sulfiding agent (molar ratio of S to metal precursor) can be the same or different in the first sulfiding steps.
[0110] In the various configurations as described above, the Primary metal precursor feedstock and /or the Promoter metal precursor feed (if any present) can be fed into the system all at once, or any of the metal precursor feedstock can be portioned and fed in stages. In one embodiment with a Promoter metal precursor feed, the Promoter metal precursor can be provided all at once, intermittently, or split into portions and fed in stages. As used herein, a portion means at least 10% in one embodiment, at least 20% in a second
embodiment, at least 40% in a third embodiment; and at least 60% in a third embodiment. In one embodiment, the feed is split into two portions, with a ratio of first to second staged feeding ranging from 1 : 10 to 10: 1.
[0111] In one embodiment, a portion of the Primary metal precursor is first sulfided prior to addition of a portion (or all of) the Promoter metal precursor (unsulfided), generating a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor. A second charge of the Primary metal precursor is added to the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor before or during the transformation step. In one embodiment, the Promoter metal precursor is also split, with a portion of the Promoter metal precursor feed for the co-sulfiding step with the Primary metal precursor, a second charge of the Promoter metal precursor feed is added after the sulfiding step, and another charge of the Promoter metal precursor feed is made in the transformation step with a hydrocarbon diluent. The promoter metal precursor comprises at least a promoter metal salt selected from an acetate, carbonate, chloride, nitrate, sulfate, actylacetonate, citrate, and oxalate of a Group VIII metal, for promoter metal to primary metal ratio from 1 :30 to 5 : 1.
[0112] The split feed scheme in one embodiment reduces deposit build-up in the process of making the slurry catalyst. In one embodiment in the co-sulfiding embodiment, a portion (or all) of Primary metal precursor and a portion (or all) of the Promoter metal precursor(s) are combined and co-sulfided together, with the remainder of the metal precursor feed being subsequently combined with the co-sulfided catalyst precursor, or to be charged in the transformation step to produce the final catalyst.
[0113] In one embodiment with enhanced sulfiding, a portion of the Primary and / or Promoter metal precursor feed is added in the subsequent sulfidation step. In another embodiment, a portion of the Primary and / or Promoter metal precursor feed is added to a sulfided catalyst precursor along with a hydrocarbon diluent in the transformation step, transforming the water-based catalyst precursor to a slurry catalyst for heavy oil upgrade. In yet another embodiment, at least 30% of the Promoter metal precursors is combined with all the Primary metal precursor to form a double salt metal precursor, with the remainder of the Promoter metal precursor(s) being added in subsequent stages, e.g., in the sulfidation step and / or in the transformation step. In one embodiment with a multi-metallic slurry catalyst with at least a Primary metal and at least two Promoter metals, the Primary metal precursor is combined with one of the Promoter metal precursors in a co-sulfiding step. The second (remaining) Promoter metal precursor is then combined with the co-sulfided catalyst precursor in a subsequent (additional) sulfiding step, or mixed in with a hydrocarbon diluent in a transformation step.
[0114] In the sulfiding step, the sulfidation is carried out at a temperature ranging from room temperature to 760°F and for a period of up to 24 hours, forming a sulfided catalyst precursor. In one embodiment, the sulfidation completes in 10 minutes or less. In one embodiment, the sulfidation is at 50-450°F. In yet another embodiment, the sulfidation is between 50-300°F. In another embodiment, the sulfidation is between 60-150°F. In one embodiment, the sulfidation is at 0 - 3000 psig. In a second embodiment, between 100 - 1000 psig. In a third embodiment, the sulfidation pressure is less than 500 psig. If the sulfidation temperature is below the boiling point of the sulfiding agent, such as 60-70°F in the case of ammonium sulfide, the process is generally carried out at atmospheric pressure. Above the boiling temperature of the sulfiding agent / optional components, the reaction is generally carried out at an increased pressure, such as in an autoclave.
[0115] In one embodiment, the sulfidation step optionally includes blending sulfiding additives, optional metal sulfide powders, and the like, into the catalyst precursor mixture to further enhance the activity of the catalyst. In one embodiment with the sulfiding step being carried out with water-based metal precursor(s), the resultant product of the sulfiding step is a slurry in an aqueous solution. In one embodiment, analyses show that the catalyst precursor product of the sulfiding step is catalytically active, although not in optimum form for use in hydroprocessing operations.
[0116] In one embodiment after sulfiding, the catalyst precursor is optionally isolated from the liquid using methods known in the art such as drying, filtration, centrifugation, decantation, or combinations thereof, under an inert atmosphere comprising any of nitrogen, refinery gas, a gas having little or no oxygen, and mixtures thereof. In another embodiment, the sulfided catalyst precursor is subject to reduction with a reducing agent at temperatures ranging from below ambient to above ambient. The reducing temperature ranges from ambient to 200°F in one embodiment; less than 500°F in a second embodiment; and from 70 - 200°F in a third embodiment. Examples of reducing agents include but are not limited to hydrogen, hydrogen sulfide, carbon monooxide, finely divided carbon, coke, sulfur, etc. In a reduction step, active metals are converted into a more active state. For example, in one embodiment with Mo as a Primary metal, M0S3 with an oxidation state of 6+ may change its oxidation state to MoS2 with an oxidation state of 4+ and become a slurry. In the reduction step, any metal precursor present also changes its oxidation state, e.g., Mo 6+ and Mo5+ may change its oxidation state to Mo4+. The reduced form of active metals may or may not be chemically bonded with sulfur. The reduction step can be before or after the transformation step, or it can occur con-currently in the transformation under reducing conditions and with a reducing agent present (e.g., H2).
[0117] In one embodiment after sulfiding, the catalyst precursor is subject to an ammonia removal step before the transformation step. In another embodiment, ammonia removal is concurrent with the transformation, as ammonia is removed with the water in the transformation. In one embodiment, the sulfided water based slurry from the sulfiding step is subject to a simple aqueous phase ammonia flashing step by cooling and depressurizing the slurry stream. Ammonia can be flashed off together with any generated hydrogen sulfide and hydrogen present in the system.
[0118] In one embodiment, the sulfided catalyst precursor (as prepared from water- soluble metal precursor as feedstock) is mixed with a hydrocarbon compound (diluent) and transformed into an oil based catalyst wherein it is transformed from a hydrophilic to an oil based active catalyst (hydrophobic). In one embodiment of the transformation step, and in the presence of a reducing agent such as H2, reduction also takes place for a sulfided Primary metal such as molybdenum to change its oxidation state. The transformation is at a temperature of 50 - 760°F in one embodiment; at a temperature of 100 - 500°F in a second embodiment; at 150 -450°F in a third embodiment. The pressure of the transformation step is maintained in the range of 0 - 3000 psig in one embodiment; between 300 - 500 psig in a second embodiment. In a third embodiment, from 1000 - 2500 psig. In a fourth
embodiment, less than 2000 psig. In one embodiment, the transformation residence time ranges from 30 minutes to 3 hours. In another embodiment, from 1 to 2 hrs. In yet another embodiment, the residence time is less than 1 hour. [0119] In one embodiment, the process conditions in the transformation / reduction step are sufficient to form the final slurry catalyst. In one embodiment, after the
transformation step, the slurry catalyst contains less than 5 wt. % water in one embodiment; less than 3 wt. % water in another embodiment; between 0.01 to 2.5 wt. % water in a third embodiment; and between 0.025 to 2 wt. % water in a fourth embodiment.
[0120] In one embodiment with the use of a light oil such as naphtha (with a boiling point above the boiling point of water) as the hydrocarbon transforming medium, to keep the oil at liquid at a high temperature, e.g., a temperature above 392°F (200°C), the
transformation step is carried out at a pressure in the range of about 2,175 psig to about 2,900 psig. With the use of naphtha, after the transformation step, the light oil can be conveniently vaporized in order to obtain the concentrated slurry catalyst.
[0121] In one embodiment, the transformation is under an inert atmosphere comprising any of nitrogen, refinery gas, a gas having little or no oxygen, and mixtures thereof. In another embodiment, the mixing is under a H2-containing gas pressure. In another embodiment, hydrogen gas is added before and after the reactor in which the hydrocarbon / catalyst precursor mixing takes place. In one embodiment, the H2 flow to the transformation step is kept at 100 to 2000 SCFB ("Standard Cubic Feet per Barrel" of hydrocarbon compound feed to the reactor). In a second embodiment, the H2 flow ranges from 300 to 1000 SCFB. In a third embodiment, the H2 flow ranges from 200 to 500 SCFB.
[0122] In one embodiment, ammonia / water removal from the oil based slurry catalyst can be carried out after the transformation step. The catalyst stream in one embodiment is heated prior to depressurization and vaporization of ammonia / water. The resultant slurry mixture can go directly to a hydroprocessing reactor without the need for ammonia / water removal, but the presence of water will take up unnecessary room in a hydroprocessing reactor. In one embodiment, the oil based slurry catalyst mixture is passed to high pressure separator to remove water from the slurry catalyst prior to entering a hydroprocessing reactor. Hydrogen may be added following reactor or directly into the high pressure separator to flash off water and residual H2S in the slurry catalyst.
[0123] In one embodiment, ex-situ sulfiding and / or the transformation step(s) can be eliminated by mixing a solution containing metal precursor(s) directly with a heavy oil feed stock, a hydrocarbon diluent (carrier), or a hydrocarbon diluent / heavy oil feedstock mixture at a high shear rate and under hydrogen pressure for a dispersion of at least a portion of the metal precursors in the hydrocarbon as an emulsion. In one embodiment, the emulsion mixing step is carried out with the addition of at least a sulfiding agent. In another embodiment, at least a sulfiding agent is added to the emulsion after the high shear mixing. The metal precursor feed can be any of a PLS feed stream, a double salt metal precursor in solution, a water-soluble metal precursor in solution, or a mixture of water-soluble metal precursors in solution, e.g., a molybdate solution, a zinc sulfate solution, a mixture of molybdate and nickel sulfate, etc. The emulsion in one embodiment is a hydrophobic, oil- dispersed catalyst precursor.
[0124] In one embodiment of the high shear mixing, the emulsion particles are formed as droplets and of micron sizes, e.g., from 0.1 to 300 μιη in one embodiment, at least 2 μιη in a second embodiment, from 1 to 10 μιη in a third embodiment, and between 0.5 and 50 μιη in a fourth embodiment. The structure and droplet size of the emulsion can be optimized based on process performance requirement and operation cost. There are several ways to form the water-oil emulsion, using techniques and / or high shear equipment known to those of ordinary skill in the art, such as nozzles, in-line static mixers, impellers, turbolators, fluidizers, etc. Surfactants or other additives, e.g., emulsifiers, may be added to form a stable emulsion having the desired structure and droplet size. In one embodiment, at least a portion (e.g., at least 30%) of the aqueous metal / catalyst precursor is present as fine droplets dispersed in the hydrocarbon diluent (medium). In another embodiment, the hydrocarbon diluent is present as fine droplets dispersed in the aqueous catalyst precursor, which may subsequently go through emulsion inversion forming fine dispersion of the aqueous catalyst precursor in hydrocarbon diluent / heavy oil.
[0125] In one embodiment, the emulsion of oil-dispersed catalyst precursor can be provided directly to a reactor for heavy oil upgrade with in-situ sulfiding upon mixing with a heavy oil feedstock forming a slurry catalyst. With a heavy oil feedstock, as the feedstock has available sulfur source for sulfidation and under reaction conditions for the desulfurization / release of the sulfur source (e.g., H2S), the emulsion catalyst precursor can be sulfided in-situ. In one embodiment, the in-situ sulfidation occurs under hydroprocessing conditions, e.g., at a temperature ranging from 752°F (400°C) to 1112°F (600°C), and a pressure ranging from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
[0126] In one embodiment, after at least a portion of the inorganic metal precursor(s) is dispersed in a hydrocarbon medium forming an emulsion, the emulsified mixture is optionally sulfided with the use of a sulfiding agent such as hydrogen sulfide or other sulfiding agents. In one embodiment, the sulfiding agent is in gaseous or solid form, as aqueous sulfiding media can interfere with the emulsion droplet size. In another embodiment, additional sulfiding agents can be added at the beginning of the high shear mixing process to get the sulfidation of the emulsion started. In another embodiment, the sulfiding agents can be continuously or intermittently added to the high shear mixing process. In one embodiment, the sulfidation takes from 10 minutes to 1 day. In another embodiment, from 30 minutes to 4 hours. After the sulfiding step, the temperature is raised to remove water / transform the emulsion into a slurry catalyst.
[0127] In one embodiment prior to injection into a reactor for heavy oil upgrade, the emulsion (with or without the addition of a sulfiding agent) undergoes a reduction step in the presence of a reducing agent. In yet another embodiment, during or after the high shear mixing or sulfidation step(s), the temperature of the emulsion is raised to remove water. The water removal / transformation is under hydrogen pressure and at a temperature of 50 - 600°F in one embodiment; at a temperature of 100 - 500°F in a second embodiment; at 150 - 50°F in a third embodiment. The emulsion catalyst can be reduced and dewatered on a continuous or batch basis at a pressure up to 3000 psig with the addition of a hydrogen source at a rate of 0.10 to 2 ft3 H2 lo 100 g of Primary metal in the emulsion catalyst to remove at least 20% of the water. In one embodiment, high shear mixing is also employed during the transformation step with the choice of appropriat6 internals in the equipment, e.g., the use of impellers.
[0128] In one embodiment with the formation of an oil-dispersible metal precursor, an inorganic metal precursor such as ammonium heptamolybdate (AHM) is brought into contact with an organic solvent at a ratio of 15 to 50 wt. % metal precursor. In one embodiment, the contact is at an elevated temperature of at least 140°F (60°C). In one embodiment wherein the organic solvent is a sulfur-containing compound, e.g., DMSO, the sulfiding step can be skipped. The mixture can be brought into contact directly with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feed stock under the presence of hydrogen, and optionally with a sulfiding agent, for a final concentration of 200 ppm to 2 wt. % Mo (as a wt. % of heavy oil feedstock), wherein a sulfided active slurry catalyst is generated in-situ for use in heavy oil upgrade.
[0129] In another embodiment with the use of organometallic compounds as metal precursors, e.g., an oil soluble organo-molybdenum complex such as molybdenum
naphthenate and molybdenum dithiocarbamate, the transformation step can be omitted. The slurry catalyst can be prepared directly from the metal precursors by dispersing the oil soluble organometallic compounds (with or without a Promoter) directly into the heavy oil feedstock, or a mixture of heavy oil feedstock and a diluent such as VGO. The mixture is allowed to soak under sufficient conditions to in-situ thermally decompose the organometallic complex, and / or for the heavy oil to release H2S needed for sulfidation, converting the metal precursors into a finely dispersed sulfided catalyst in the heavy oil.
[0130] The sulfidation of the oil soluble organo-molybdenum complex can also be carried out ex-situ. In one embodiment, the sulfiding agent is elemental sulfur by itself. In another embodiment, the sulfiding agent is a sulfur-containing compound which under prevailing conditions, is decomposable into hydrogen sulphide. In yet a third embodiment, the sulfiding agent is H2S by itself or in H2. In another embodiment, the oil soluble
organometallic compound(s) are dispersed in a hydrocarbon diluent such as VGO (instead of heavy oil feedstock), then allowed to soak under sufficient condition for the metal precursors to thermally decompose forming a finely dispersed sulfided catalyst. The sulfided catalyst can be subsequently mixed with heavy oil feedstock for upgrade.
[0131] In one embodiment, the metal precursor feedstock is optionally "pre-soaked" in the heavy oil feedstock for a sufficient amount of time, e.g., from 15 minutes to 4 hours, to enhance the catalyst dispersion as well as the sulfidation, resulting in increased catalytic activity in terms of the conversion rate as well as the resulting API of the overhead product. In one embodiment, the pre-soaking is at a temperature from 200 to 800°F. In a second embodiment, from 350 to 750°F. The pre-soak tank in one embodiment is maintained at the same pressure as that of the hydrocracking process for the upgrade of the heavy oil feedstock.
[0132] In one embodiment with the use of high sulfur feeds, hydrogen sulfide in the reaction zone resulting from the desulfurization of the feed can be used as a suitable sulfur source for the sulfidation forming an active sulfided catalyst in-situ. In another embodiment, additional sulfur compounds (including elemental sulfur) can be used to assist with the in-situ catalyst sulfidation. In one embodiment, a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur is added to the catalyst precursor (in the form of an emulsion) for molar ratio of elemental sulfur to Primary metal ranging from 3: 1 to 100: 1; and from 2: 1 to 80: 1 in another embodiment.
[0133] In one embodiment with the use of rework material, the rework material can be used by itself without additional metal precursor feedstock. In another embodiment, the rework material can be used as part of the catalyst feed system and combined with a slurry catalyst formed by other means. In one embodiment, the rework material is combined with a hydrocarbon carrier (diluent), forming an unsulfided slurry catalyst that can be subsequently sulfided in-situ upon contact with a heavy oil feedstock. In another embodiment, instead of using a hydrocarbon diluent, the rework is slurried in water as a carrier. In another embodiment, a sulfiding agent, e.g., H2S, elemental sulfur, or ammonium sulfide, is added to the rework materials in a hydrocarbon carrier under sulfiding conditions to form a slurry catalyst. In yet another embodiment, the rework material can be slurried directly in a heavy oil feedstock, or a mixture of a heavy oil feedstock and a hydrocarbon diluent, for subsequent in-situ sulfidation forming a slurry catalyst.
[0134] In all embodiments, a sufficient amount of rework material is employed as a solid in an amount sufficient for the formation of a slurry catalyst, and to provide a catalyst dosage of 20 to 5000 ppm Primary metal (e.g., Mo) to heavy oil feedstock. In one embodiment, the amount of rework materials (in a powder form) ranges from 2 to 60 wt. % of total weight of the hydrocarbon diluent and / or heavy oil feedstock. In a second embodiment, the amount ranges from 5 to 40 wt. %. In a third embodiment, a sufficient amount of rework material is used for a dosage ranging from 20 to 1000 ppm of Primary metal to heavy oil feedstock. In another embodiment, a sufficient amount of rework material is used for a dosage of 5 to 100 ppm Primary metal to heavy oil feedstock.
[0135] In one embodiment, the slurry (rework) catalyst can be used directly in a hydrocracking unit. In another embodiment, it is mixed with a heavy oil feedstock prior to heavy oil upgrade. In yet another embodiment, the slurry (rework) catalyst can be combined with a fresh catalyst, e.g., a slurry catalyst made from a metal precursor feed or PLS (not made from rework materials) as catalyst feed to a hydrocracking unit for heavy oil upgrade. In one embodiment, the amount of slurry (rework) catalyst ranges from 5 to 100 wt. % of the total slurry catalyst needed for heavy oil upgrade. In a second embodiment, the amount of slurry (rework) catalyst ranges from 10 to 70 wt. %. In a third embodiment, from 15 to 45 wt %. In a fourth embodiment, the slurry (rework) catalyst accounts for less than 50 wt. % of the total amount of slurry catalyst. The weight ratio may vary depending on a number of factors, including the type of heavy oil feedstock to be processed, operating conditions of the system, availability of supplies (availability of rework materials), etc.
[0136] In one embodiment with a PLS stream as a feedstock, the PLS stream can be mixed with at least another metal precursor feedstock, forming a precursor mixture for a subsequent sulfiding step / transformation step. In another embodiment, the PLS is used as the sole feedstock. In one embodiment, the PLS stream is combined with a sulfiding agent e.g., H2S, elemental sulfur, or ammonium sulfide, etc., under sulfiding conditions to generate a sulfided water-based catalyst precursor, then subsequently transformed to an oil-based catalyst upon mixing with a hydrocarbon diluent. In another embodiment, the PLS is combined with a hydrocarbon carrier under shear mixing conditions with a hydrogen source to generate an oil-dispersed emulsion. In one embodiment, a sulfiding agent such as H2S, elemental sulfur, or ammonium sulfide, etc., is optionally provided at a molar ratio of sulfur to Primary metal in the range of 2: 1 to 4: 1 to convert the oil-dispersed emulsion to a slurry catalyst. In yet another embodiment, the PLS is mixed with a heavy oil feedstock or a mixture of heavy oil and hydrocarbon carrier (diluent) such as VGO under high shear mixing to generate an oil-dispersed emulsion. The volume ratio of PLS to hydrocarbon diluent ranges from 1 to 50 vol. %, depending on the concentration of metal precursors in the PLS as well as the hydrocarbon carrier employed. The emulsion catalyst (sulfided or unsulfided) formed with a PLS feedstock can be provided directly to a hydroprocessing system for heavy oil upgrade. In another embodiment, the temperature of the emulsion catalyst is raised to remove water / transform the emulsion into a hydrophobic, oil-dispersed slurry catalyst.
[0137] Optional Hydrogen Pretreatment: In one embodiment before the heavy oil upgrade, the slurry catalyst is optionally treated with hydrogen. In one embodiment, the saturation / pre-soak with hydrogen improves the catalyst activity and reduces the formation of coke in the upgrade process. The pre-treatment is expected to enrich the surface of the slurry catalyst with hydrogen and thus enable the reactions to happen quicker, and thus reduces coke formation. In another embodiment, the pre-treatment enhances the catalyst area and porosimetry.
[0138] The optional hydrogen pre-treatment can be carried out in a pre-mixing vessel and / or in the transfer line. In one embodiment, a small amount of water can be injected into the pre-mixing vessel along with hydrogen during the pre-treatment process. The pre- treatment (or pre-conditioning) temperature in one embodiment ranges from 200°F to 800°F. In a second embodiment, from 300°F to 750°F. In a third embodiment, from 400°F to 600°F. The pre-treatment time ranges from a minute to 20 hours in one embodiment; from 1 to 10 hours in another embodiment; and from 2 to 5 hours in a third embodiment. The hydrogen rate ranges from 500 to 15,000 scf per bbl of slurry catalyst in hydrocarbon diluent (standard cubic foot / barrel). In one embodiment, the pre-treatment pressure ranges from 1435 psig (10 MP a) to 3610 psig (25 MP a). The hydrocarbon diluent in one embodiment contains at least 10 wt. % of a light oil such as VGO, cycle oil, gasoline, distillate, naphtha, light cycle oil, benzene, toluene, xylene, and mixture thereof.
[0139] It is believed that with hydrogen pre-treatment prior to being introduced into an upgrade system with a heavy oil feedstock, the catalyst surface is enriched with hydrogen which improves catalytic activity for faster reaction and reduced coke / sediment formation. The slurry catalyst with hydrogen pre-treatment (or pre-conditioning) in one embodiment provides an increase in reaction rate constant k- values in terms of HDS (hydrodesulfurization), HDN (hydrodenitrification), and HDMCR (hydrodemicrocarbon resid) of at least 10% compared to a slurry catalyst without the hydrogen pre-treatment step. In another embodiment, the increase in reaction rate constant is at least 15%. In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst with hydrogen pre-treatment provides an improvement in porosimetry properties in terms of surface area, for an increase in surface area and total pore volume (TPV) of at least 10% compared to a slurry catalyst without the hydrogen pre-treatment step. In another embodiment, the increase in surface area and TPV is at least 15%.
[0140] It should be noted that any of the process steps can be operated in any of continuous, batch mode, or combinations thereof. The steps can be carried out in any of batch, semi-batch, or continuously stirred tank reactors (CSTRs), and can be a vessel equipped heating means having a mechanical stirrer, or a static mixer, or by means of a recirculating pump. The components (feed streams) can be introduced simultaneously, or sequentially in any order to the reactor or vessel. The term "feed stream" refers to both continuous and batch processed. In one embodiment, some of the process steps are carried out in a batch mode, and some of the process steps, e.g., the sulfidation step, are carried out in the continuous mode.
[0141] In one embodiment, both the sulfiding and transformation steps are carried out in continuous mode. In another embodiment, the sulfidation is in batch mode, while the transformation is in continuous mode. Continuous operation can eliminate the need of holding tanks for some of the feedstock, particularly some that requires careful handling.
[0142] The mixing of the components can be done within a continuous stirred tank, or it can be done by other means including an in-line static mixer (e.g., with a plurality of internal baffles or other elements), a dynamic high-shear mixer (vessel with propeller for very high turbulent, high shear mixing), or any device capable of ensuring turbulent mixing known in the art. It is desirable to obtain a high degree of dispersion of the metal precursors and / or the sulfided catalyst precursors in the heavy oil feedstock to achieve highly active catalyst. In embodiments with the use of a high sulfur heavy oil feedstock, hydrogen sulfide is generated in-situ in the reaction zone, from feed desulfurization. The generated H2S can be used as a suitable sulfur source for the sulfidation of the metal precursors.
[0143] In one embodiment and depending on the type of equipment used, the components are mixed under conditions sufficient for a flow with a Reynolds number of at least 2000. In a second embodiment, the mixing is sufficient for a Reynolds number of at least 3000. In a third embodiment, a Reynolds number ranging from 3200 to 7200.
[0144] Reference will be made to the figures with block diagrams schematically illustrating different embodiments of a process for making slurry catalysts for heavy oil upgrade.
[0145] Figure 1 illustrates the steps involved in one embodiment of the process. In reactor 10, at least a Primary metal precursor 11 such as ammonium heptamolybdate is co- sulfided with at least a Promoter metal precursor 13 such as nickel sulfate in aqueous solution, forming a sulfided catalyst precursor with the addition of the sulfiding agent 12. Optionally in one embodiment, additional Promoter metal precursor 13 (same or different from the Promoter metal precursor added to the co-sulfiding step) is added after the co- sulfiding step. The co-sulfiding can be in batch mode, continuous mode, or semi-batch mode. In one embodiment, the sulfidation is continuous to allow for smaller equipment and more stable operations.
[0146] In one embodiment, the reaction time in the mixing tank 10 ranges from about 1 hour to 10 hours. The temperature in one embodiment is maintained at 30°C to 100°C at a pressure ranging from 100 to 3000 psig. In one embodiment, the weight ratio of Promoter metal nickel (or cobalt) to a Primary metal precursor, e.g., a Group VIB precursor such as a molybdenum compound ranges from about 1 : 100 to about 1 :2. In one embodiment, instead of feeding the Promoter metal precursor directly to the co-sulfiding step 10, Promoter metal precursor 23 is added to the sulfided a Primary metal precursor after the sulfidation step 10.
[0147] The catalyst precursor from reactor 10 is moved to the next reactor / mixing tank 20, wherein the catalyst precursor is transformed with the addition of a carrier oil such as VGO 21 for a period of time 5 minutes to 2 hours and at a temperature from room temperature to 70°C. Hydrogen 22 is continuously added to the mixture reaction zone, in one embodiment ranging from 300 SCFB ("Standard Cubic Feet per Barrel," meaning per barrel of hydrocarbon feed) to about 2000 SCFB. The pressure of the reaction zone generally ranges from about 0 psig to about 3000 psig. Temperature of the reactor generally ranges from 150 to 300°C. In one embodiment, the reactor 20 is a CSTR with high shear mixing to maintain homogenous slurry in the reactor. Optional components (not shown) can be added to reactor 20 to increase the incorporation of sulfur in the catalyst precursor formed in this step. The oil-based slurry catalyst 24 is sent to storage tanks, or directly to a hydrocracking process. Vapor stream 24 comprising flashed-off water, methane, ammonia, H2S, etc. is collected for subsequent recycle / scrubbing. [0148] Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating another embodiment to prepare the catalyst composition with a double salt metal precursor as a starting feed. In the reactor 10, at least an acid or base 24 is added to the at least a Primary metal (e.g., Group VIB) metal precursor 11, e.g., ammonium heptamolybdate solution, and the Promoter metal precursor 13, e.g., nickel sulfate in aqueous solution, to adjust the pH to a pre-selected level to promote the formation of the double salt metal precursor slurry 14. In one embodiment as shown, water is optionally removed from the metal precursor slurry 14 using methods known in the art, e.g., a filter 40, a decanter or the like, generating crystals or concentrated slurry 41.
Double salt metal precursor crystals 41 is mixed with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock 41, e.g., in a mixing tank, static mixer 41 or the like, under high shear mixing generating an emulsion catalyst that can be used directly for heavy oil upgrade, e.g., in a hydrocracker.
[0149] In Figure 3, a pressure leach solution (PLS) or a leach slurry 17 is used to provide the metal precursors needed to make the slurry catalyst. Although not shown, additional Group VIB metal precursor feed such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution, nickel sulfate, and the like, can also be added in addition to the PLS in the sulfiding step. In one embodiment (not shown), the PLS feedstock can also be added directly to the heavy oil feedstock for in- situ sulfidation, generating a sulfided slurry catalyst. Sulfiding agent 16 is added to mixing tank 30 (continuously or for a batch mode operation). The sulfided catalyst precursor is transformed into an oil-based sulfided catalyst in the transformation step 60 with the addition of a hydrocarbon transforming medium 51, which can be a heavy oil feed itself.
[0150] Figure 4 illustrates another embodiment to make the slurry catalyst with a PLS. In this process, a pressure leach solution 17 from a metal recovery process (e.g., recovering metals from a spent catalyst) containing various metal salts is used as the feed to mixing tank 30 with the addition of a hydrocarbon carrier, or a heavy oil feedstock 51 under high shear mixing. Optionally, additional sulfiding agents 16 can also be added. In one embodiment (not shown), additional metal precursors can also be added to this step, and with the emulsion catalyst being subsequently sent to heavy oil upgrade.
[0151] In Figure 5, at least a Primary metal precursor 11 in solution, e.g., an inorganic molybdenum compound such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution or a nickel compound, is sulfided with the addition of the sulfiding agent 16 in mixing tank 30. The sulfided water- based catalyst is transformed into an oil-based sulfided catalyst in the transformation step with the addition of a hydrocarbon transforming medium 51, which can be a heavy oil feed itself. In the next step 51, the slurry catalyst undergoes H2 treatment with hydrogen saturation, prior to heavy oil upgrade.
[0152] In Figure 6, at least a Group VIB metal precursor 11, e.g., an organic molybdenum compound or an inorganic molybdenum compound such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution is mixed directly with the Promoter metal precursor 13, e.g., nickel sulfate in aqueous solution, and a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock 51 in mixing tank 30, and optionally with a sulfiding agent, wherein sulfidation of the metal precursors takes place forming a sulfided slurry catalyst. In one embodiment, the mixing is via the use of a high shear mixing equipment and under hydrogen pressure forming an emulsion catalyst. In one embodiment, the catalyst is further homogenized via in-line static mixer 60.
[0153] Figure 7 illustrates another embodiment to make slurry catalyst. In this process, AHM solution 17 ix mixed with DMSO solvent 18 and optionally a sulfiding agent 16 in mixing tank 30. A nickel salt promoter 13 is added to the oil-dispersible metal precursor, and optionally with a sulfiding agent 16, wherein a sulfided slurry catalyst is formed. The slurry catalyst is added to the heavy oil feed 51 forming an emulsion with the use on in-line mixer 60, prior to the heavy oil upgrade step. In another embodiment (not shown), the nickel promoted catalyst precursor (unsulfided or unsulfided) undergoes a reducing step in the presence of a reducing agent, e.g., H2, wherein the sulfided Mo changes its oxidation state.
[0154] Figure 8 illustrates a variation of the embodiment in Figure 7, with a separate promotion step, and with the addition of a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock mixture 81 to the oil dispersible emulsion in step 80 for to form an active slurry catalyst prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
[0155] Figure 9 illustrates yet another variation of the embodiment in Figure 7, wherein a heavy oil feedstock / hydrocarbon transforming medium 51 is added to directly to the emulsion mixture of inorganic metal precursor, e.g., AHM solution 11 and DMSO solvent 18, for the sulfidation / formation of a slurry catalyst prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
[0156] In Figure 10, at least a Group VIB metal precursor 11, e.g., an inorganic molybdenum compound such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution is mixed with a hydrocarbon diluent 19, e.g., VGO, under high shear mixing in step 30, forming a water-in- oil emulsion. Although not shown, temperature in sulfiding tank 70 is subsequently raised to transform the sulfided emulsion / slurry catalyst 32 to a hydrophobic, oil-dispersed slurry catalyst. The slurry catalyst is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock 51 prior to the heavy oil upgrade step. [0157] Figure 11 illustrates another embodiment for making an emulsion catalyst with a pre-sulfiding step. In this process, at least a Group VIB metal precursor 11, e.g., an inorganic molybdenum compound such as ammonium heptamolybdate solution is mixed with a hydrocarbon diluent 19, e.g., VGO, under high shear mixing in step 30, forming a water-in- oil emulsion. The mixture is optionally sulfided with the addition of sulfiding agent (H2S or elemental sulfur) 16. In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst is mixed with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock 51 prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
[0158] Figure 12 illustrates another variation embodiment for making an emulsion catalyst with no pre-sulfiding step. In this process, an emulsion of inorganic metal precursor(s) 11 in a hydrocarbon diluent, e.g., VGO 19 is formed. The emulsion mixture is mixed directly with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock / hydrocarbon diluent mixture 51 under appropriate conditions prior to the heavy oil upgrade step. Although not shown, temperature in tank 70 is subsequently raised to transform the sulfided emulsion / slurry catalyst 32 to a hydrophobic, oil-dispersed slurry catalyst. The slurry catalyst in one embodiment is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock 51 in prior to the heavy oil upgrade step.
[0159] Figure 13 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a slurry catalyst using rework material or ground residuum catalyst fines. In this process, ground catalyst material (rework) 11 is slurried in VGO diluent 18 to generate a slurry catalyst precursor. Optionally in one embodiment, a sulfiding agent 16 is added to the process to pre-sulfide the slurry precursor. The mixture can be subsequently mixed with a heavy oil feedstock 51 for upgrade in a hydrocracker unit.
[0160] Figure 14 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a promoted slurry catalyst from an oil soluble organometallic compound. Quantities of organometallic metal precursor 11, nickel promoter 13, and a blend of hydrocarbon diluent 18 are mixed together in mixing tank 30. The mixture was subsequently allowed to thermally decompose in tank 70, generating a sulfided slurry catalyst, which can be subsequently mixed with a heavy oil feedstock for upgrade. In one embodiment, additional sulfiding agent may be optionally added to the tank 70.
[0161] In Figure 15, the organometallic metal precursor 11 is mixed directly with a heavy oil feedstock 51 and optionally a Promoter precursor 13. The mixture is allowed to soak under hydroprocessing conditions for in-situ sulfidation to take place, generating a sulfided slurry catalyst for subsequent heavy oil upgrade.
[0162] Figure 16 illustrates an embodiment with at least an additional sulfiding step for a slurry catalyst with an enhanced amount of sulfur. In one embodiment, a Primary metal source 11 such as Mo, e.g., an aqueous molybdate solution (2 to 15% Mo concentration) is charged in the reactor vessel 30 and brought up to reaction conditions, e.g., temperature ranging from ambient to 300°F and pressure up to 3000 psig. A sulfiding agent 16 is added for the first sulfidation step (at a molar ratio of S / Primary metal of less than 4: 1), generating an aqueous based molybdenum oxysulfide catalyst precursor. The sulfidation can be carried out on a continuous basis or batch basis. In the same (or the next) step, the catalyst precursor is promoted with a second / different metal , e.g., a Group VIII metal as Promoter metal source 13, at a ratio of Promoter to Primary metal of 1 to 49 wt. %. The promoted aqueous based catalyst precursor is subjected to an additional sulfiding step with the addition of the same or different sulfiding agent feed 16. The additional sulfiding step can be in the same or different equipment (mixing tank 70), and at the same or different sulfiding feed ratio from the first sulfiding step (a molar ratio of S / Primary metal of less than 4:1). The resulting sulfur enhanced water base catalyst is emulsified with a hydrocarbon diluent 51 in step 80 at an oil to water base catalyst wt. ration ranging from 1 : 10 to 10:1. The transformation step can be done on either batch or continuous basis, and it can be carried out in the same equipment or different equipment from the sulfiding step. In one embodiment, (not shown), the sulfided catalyst is subsequently reduced and dewatered (on a continuous or batch basis) at a temperature from ambient to 300°F and pressure up to 3000 psig with the addition of a hydrogen source at a rate of 0.10 to 2 ft3 ¾ to 100 g of Primary metal in the catalyst, generating sour water and an oil based catalyst. The slurry catalyst in one embodiment is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock 51 in prior to the heavy oil upgrade step 60.
[0163] Figure 17 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a catalyst with Ti as a promoter. A primary metal source 11 such as Mo, e.g., an aqueous molybdate solution (2 to 15% Mo concentration) is charged in the reactor vessel 30 and brought up to reaction conditions. A sulfiding agent 16 is added for the sulfidation step. The catalyst precursor is promoted with a second different metal , e.g., a Group VIII metal as Promoter metal source 13. The promoted aqueous based catalyst precursor is subjected to a transformation step with the addition of a hydrocarbon diluent 51 in mixing tank 70. A sufficient amount of a Ti metal source 85 such as titanium naphthenate solution is added to the transformed catalyst, generating a Ti-Ni-Mo slurry catalyst for use in heavy oil upgrade step 60.
[0164] Figure 18 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a single metal catalyst, e.g., with the use of nickel as the single metal. A Ni precursor 11 is sulfided with a sulfur source such an ammonium sulfide solution. The water-based catalyst is transformed with a hydrocarbon diluent 51 in mixing tank 60, generating a nickel-based slurry catalyst for use in heavy oil upgrade step 80.
[0165] Figure 19 illustrates an embodiment to prepare a Zn-Mo slurry catalyst. A Mo source 11 such as Mo, e.g., an aqueous molybdate solution is charged in the reactor vessel 30 along with a Zn source, e.g., a zinc sulfate heptahydrade, under high shear condition and hydrogen pressure and brought up to reaction conditions. In one embodiment, the promoted catalyst precursor is mixed directly with a hydrocarbon diluent or a heavy oil feedstock 51 in mixing tank 70. In another embodiment, a sulfiding agent 16 is optionally added (dotted line), generating an aqueous based catalyst precursor which can be
subsequently transformed with the hydrocarbon diluent 51, forming an emulsion catalyst for subsequent heavy oil upgrade.
[0166] Figure 20 illustrates an embodiment for preparing a slurry catalyst with splitting feeding of the Promoter metal precursor feed. In one embodiment, a Primary metal source 11 such as Mo, e.g., an aqueous molybdate solution is charged in the reactor vessel 30 and brought up to reaction conditions with the addition of a portion of Promoter metal source 13, and a sulfiding agent 16 for a co-sulfiding step, generating an aqueous based catalyst precursor. The sulfidation can be carried out on a continuous basis or batch basis. In the next step, additional Promoter metal source 14 is optionally added for a post-promotion step, wherein the Promoter metal source 14 can be the same or different from Promoter metal source 13 (or fed at the same or different rate). The water-based catalyst precursor is subsequently transformed into a slurry catalyst with a hydrocarbon diluent 51.
[0167] In another embodiment, the Primary metal precursor 11 is first sulfided, then subsequently promoted with a Promoter metal source 14 . Additionally Promoter metal precursor 15 (which can be the same or different from Promoter metal source 14) is added along with a hydrocarbon diluent 51 in the transformation step.
[0168] Figure 21 illustrates an embodiment for preparing a slurry catalyst from ground / rework catalyst. A ground commercially available catalyst 11 is mixed with a sufficient amount of VGO for a slurried catalyst having about 250 ppm to 4.0 wt. % Mo in VGO. The slurried catalyst is mixed with a heavy oil feedstock and optionally, a fresh slurry catalyst 24 for use in hydrocracker for heavy oil upgrade.
[0169] It should be noted that any of the process steps in the Figures can be carried out in either a batch and / or continuous mode. In one embodiment, high shear mixing is desirable to prevent any of the metal precursor / catalyst from settling or forming thick gel. [0170] Characterization of the Slurry Catalyst: The slurry catalyst comprises a dispersed suspension of particles in a hydrocarbon medium. The hydrocarbon medium can be a heavy oil feedstock itself; a hydrocarbon transforming medium such as gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet and fuel oils, and mixtures thereof; or a mixture of heavy oil feedstock and a hydrocarbon transforming medium. In another embodiment, the hydrocarbon medium is the hydrocarbon transforming medium. In one embodiment with the use of at least a metal precursor having a pH of at least 4, the slurry catalyst is characterized as having improved morphology and dispersion characteristics, particularly useful for the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
[0171] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of suspended or dispersed droplets in oil ("emulsion catalyst") with the droplets having a mean size of 0.1 to 300 μτα. In a second embodiment, the dispersed particles or droplets have an average droplet size of 0.5 to 150 μπι. In a third embodiment, an average droplet size of 1 to 100 μπι. In a fourth embodiment, an average droplet size of 1 to 50 μπι. In a fifth embodiment, the droplet size is less than 20 μτα.
[0172] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium, wherein the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μπι. In another embodiment, the particles have an average particle size ranging from 2 to 150 μπι. In yet another embodiment, an average particle size of at least 5 μπι. In a fourth embodiment, an average particle size of less than 50 μπι.
[0173] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst is characterized as having a polymodal pore distribution with at least a first mode having at least about 80% pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter, a second mode having at least about 70%> of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 1 ,000 Angstroms in diameter, and a third mode having at least 20% of pore sizes of at least 100 Angstroms in diameter. As used herein, polymodal includes bimodal and higher modal. In one embodiment, at least 30% of pore sizes are >100 Angstroms in diameter. In another embodiment, at least 40%. In another embodiment, at least 70% of pore sizes are >100 Angstroms in diameter. In one embodiment, at least 50% are in the range of 50 to 5000 Angstrom in diameter. In another embodiment, at least 75 % of the pore volume ranging from 100 to 1000 Angstroms.
[0174] The slurry catalyst has a total pore volume (TPV) of at least 0.4 cc/g (per gram of catalyst in a solid form) in one embodiment; at least 0.6 cc/g in a second embodiment; at least 0.8 cc/g in a third embodiment; at least 1 cc/g in a fourth embodiment; and less than 3 cc/g in a fifth embodiment. [0175] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst is characterized as having a relatively high total surface determined by the nitrogen BET method, of at least 100 m2/g. In one embodiment, the surface area is at least 100 m2/g. In another embodiment, the surface area is in the range of 200 to 900 m2/g. In a fourth embodiment, the surface area is in the range of 50 to 800 m2/g. In a fifth embodiment, the surface area is in the range of 100 to 300 m2/g. In a sixth embodiment, the slurry catalyst is essentially free of Promoter metals and has a surface area is in the range of 300 to 800 m2/g. In a seventh embodiment, the slurry catalyst has a surface area of at least 300 m2/g.
[0176] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst (as a multi-metallic or single metal catalyst) is of the formula
Figure imgf000044_0001
wherein M is a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals, non-noble Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is a metal that is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= \ \(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5(a + b); 0 <= h <= 3(a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0. In one embodiment of a multimetallic slurry catalyst (b > 0), the Primary metal M is molybdenum and the Promoter metals are nickel and titanium. In an embodiment of a bi-metallic slurry catalyst, M is molybdenum and L is zinc.
[0177] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst is single metallic (b=0) with nickel as the Primary metal M. In yet another embodiment, the Primary metal M of the single metallic slurry catalyst is molybdenum. The single metal catalyst formula can also be written as:
Figure imgf000044_0002
wherein M is at least one of a non-noble Group VIII (IUPAC nomenclature groups 8-10) metal, a Group VIB metal (IUPAC nomenclature group 6), a Group IVB metal (IUPAC nomenclature group 4), and a Group IIB metal (IUPAC
nomenclature group 12); t, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of the component (M, S, C, H, O, and N); ta+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0; 0.5a <= d <= 4a; 0 <= e <= Ma; 0 <=/<= 18a; 0 <= g <= 2a; and 0 <= h <= 3a.
[0178] Use of the catalyst. The catalyst composition can be used in virtually all hydroprocessing processes to treat a plurality of heavy oil feedstock under wide-ranging reaction conditions such as temperatures from 752°F to 1112 °F, pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa), and liquid hourly space velocities from 0.05 to 10 h"1.
[0179] The hydroprocessing (or hydrocracking) can be practiced in one or more reaction zones and can be practiced in either countercurrent flow or co-current flow mode. By counter-current flow mode is meant a process wherein the feed stream flows counter- current to the flow of hydrogen-containing treat gas. The hydroprocessing also includes slurry and ebullated bed hydroprocessing processes for the removal of sulfur and nitrogen compounds and the hydrogenation of aromatic molecules present in light fossil fuels such as petroleum mid-distillates, e.g., hydroprocessing a heavy oil employing a circulating slurry catalyst.
[0180] The catalyst can be applied in any reactor type. In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst is applied to a fixed bed reactor. In another embodiment, the slurry catalyst is used as part of a catalyst feed system in an ebullating bed reactors, a slurry reactor, a recirculating reactor, or a fluidized bed reactor used in the H-Oil process, the LC-Fining process, the H- Coal process, the heavy oil upgrade process as well as others. In another embodiment, two or more reactors containing the catalyst may be used in series with no catalyst recycle. In a third embodiment, the hydroprocessing reactors are used in parallel, also with no catalyst recycle. Details regarding operations of the hydroprocessing reactors in heavy oil upgrade, other sulfiding agents, and other hydrocarbon transforming media can be found in US Patent Applications Serial Nos. 12/506,885; 12/506840; 12/506987; and 12/506,885, all with a filing date of July 21, 2009; and US Patent Applications Serial Nos. 12/232,327; 12/233,439; 12/233,393; and 12-233,171, all with a filing date of September 18, 2008, the relevant disclosures are included herein by reference.
[0181] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst is added to the feedstock (catalyst to oil ratio) at a rate of 0.01 to 3 wt. %. In a second embodiment, at a rate of 0.25 to 2 wt. %. In a third embodiment, at a rate of 100 to 20000 ppm active metals, e.g., Group VIB metals. In a fourth embodiment, the catalyst is added to the feedstock at a sufficient rate for the total amount of Mo in the reaction zone of 0.005 to 0.5 wt. % (based on the total weight of the feedstock).
[0182] In one embodiment with the use of a slurry catalyst that has been sulfided more than once (e.g., double sulfiding) and with a catalyst concentration of at least 2000 ppm (wt. % Primary metal to heavy oil feedstock), the catalyst load to the hydrocracking unit for heavy oil upgrade can be reduced at least 10% compared to a catalyst that is not sulfided more than once. In another embodiment, the catalytic load can be reduced at least 20%.
[0183] In one embodiment, the slurry catalyst characterized as giving excellent conversion rates in the upgrades of heavy oil, i.e., giving a 1000°F+ conversion rate of at least 50% in the upgrade of a heavy oil having an API of at most 15, when applied at a rate of less than 1 wt. % active Group VIB metal (relative to heavy oil feedstock), a 1000°F+ conversion rate of at least 75% in a second embodiment, a 1000°F+ conversion rate of at least 80% in a third embodiment, and at least 90% in a fourth embodiment.
[0184] In one embodiment with the use of the slurry catalyst of the invention, at least 98.5%) of heavy oil feed is converted to lighter products. In a third embodiment, the conversion rate is at least 99%. In a fourth embodiment, the conversion rate is at least 95%. In a fifth embodiment, the conversion rate is at least 80%. As used herein, conversion rate refers to the conversion of heavy oil feedstock to less than 1000° F (538°C) boiling point materials.
[0185] EXAMPLES: The following illustrative examples are intended to be non- limiting. Unless specified otherwise, the catalytic activity of the catalysts prepared in the examples are tested for hydrodenitrogenation (HDN), hydrodesulfurization (HDS), vanadium removal activity (HDV), and hydrodemicrocarbon residue (HDMCR). VR refers to "vacuum resid" or a particular heavy oil feedstock.
[0186] VR#1 refers to a heavy oil feedstock having 29.9 wt. % Microresidue tester (MCRT), 25.7 wt. % hot heptane asphaltenes (HHA), 5.12 wt. % sulfur, 672 ppm vanadium, and API at 60°F of 2.7.
[0187] VR#2 refers to a heavy oil feedstock having 21.8 wt. % MCRT, 11.01 wt. % HHA, 5.07 wt. % sulfur, 125 ppm vanadium, and API at 60°F of 4.9.
[0188] % Mo /VR refers to the amount of molybdenum metal (in the catalyst) as a percent (in weight) of the heavy oil feedstock. In examples that cycle oil (a mixture of medium and heavy cycle oil, MCO or HCO) is added to the heavy oil feedstock (in an amount of 40 wt. % cycle oil to heavy oil feedstock), "VR" refers to the amount of the heavy oil feedstock excluding the cycle oil.
[0189] Unless specified otherwise in the examples, the transformation of water-based catalyst is carried out in vacuum gas oil at a wt. ratio of oil to water-based catalyst of 1.5 to 1.
[0190] Comparative Example 1 : In this example, a slurry catalyst with a Ni:Mo ratio of about 10% was made. 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate
((ΝΗ4)6Μθ7θ24) was dissolved in 100 g of water in a glass vessel fitted with an overhead mechanical stirrer, and 14.1 g of concentrated ammonia solution (28 wt.% NH4OH in H20) was added. A solution of 8.1 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NiS04'6H20) in 32 g of water was added to the first solution, all at ambient temperature, producing an emerald-green suspension. This suspension was heated to 70°C under atmospheric pressure, and 101 g of ammonium sulfide ((NH4)2S) solution in water (40-44 wt. %) was added slowly, over the course of 45 minutes. After that, the mixture was heated with stirring for an additional 60 minutes. The volume of the reaction mixture was reduced in half on a rotary evaporator. The resulting water-based catalyst precursor was transformed to a final oil-based catalyst with VGO and hydrogen in a pressure test autoclave.
[0191] Comparative Example 1A: The procedure is to make a slurry catalyst of a similar Ni:Mo ratio of 10% as in Comparative Example 1. In this example, 9000 grams of ammonium dimolybdate (ADM) solution (12% Mo) was heated to the following conditions 750 RPM, 150°F and 400 PSIG. To this heated ADM solution, a gas stream comprising H2S, 20%) CH4, 60%) H2 was bubbled through the solution until the S/Mo atomic = 3.4. After the H2S addition, then an appropriate amount of nickel sulfate solution (8% Ni) was added to the mixture for a Ni/Mo wt% of ~ 10%. The product can be transformed to an oil base catalyst as in Comparative Example 1 on a batch basis, or a continuous basis.
[0192] Comparative Example 2: The procedure is similar to Comparative Example 1, except with a higher Ni:Mo ratio of ~ 23%, using 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate to dissolve in 100 g of water mixed with 5 g of concentrated ammonia solution, in a glass vessel fitted with an overhead mechanical stirrer. A solution of 16.2 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate in 32 g water was added to the first solution, all at ambient temperature, producing a green suspension. This suspension was heated to 70°C under atmospheric pressure, and 100 g of ammonium sulfide solution (44 wt. %) was added slowly, over the course of 45 minutes. After that, the mixture was heated with stirring for an additional 60 minutes. The rest of the procedures were as in Comparative Example 1.
[0193] Comparative Example 2A: The procedure is to make a slurry catalyst of a similarly high Ni:Mo ratio as in Comparative Example 2, wherein 9000 grams of ADM solution (12% Mo) was heated to the following conditions 750 RPM, 150 F and 400 PSIG. To this heated solution, a gas stream comprising 20%>v H2S, 20%> CH4, 60%> H2 was bubbled through the solution until the S/Mo atomic = 3.4. After the H2S addition, then an appropriate amount of nickel sulfate solution (8% Ni) was added to the mixture for a Ni/Mo wt% of ~ 23%. The product can be transformed to an oil base catalyst as in Comparative Example 1 on a batch basis, or a continuous basis.
[0194] Comparative Example 3: This example is to make a Mo only slurry catalyst.
33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate ((ΝΗ4)6Μθ7θ24) was dissolved in 100 g of water in a glass vessel fitted with an overhead mechanical stirrer, and 14.1 g of
concentrated ammonia solution (28 wt.% NH4OH in H20) was added. This mixture was heated to 70°C under atmospheric pressure, and 101 g of ammonium sulfide ((NH4)2S) solution in water (40 - 44 wt. %) was added slowly, over the course of 45 minutes. After that, the mixture was heated with stirring for an additional 60 minutes. The volume of the reaction mixture was reduced in half on a rotary evaporator. The rest of the procedures were as in Comparative Example 1.
[0195] Comparative Example 3A: The Example was to make a Mo only catalyst similar to Comparative Example 3. In this example, 9000 grams of ammonium dimolybdate solution (12% Mo) was heated under the conditions of 750 RPM, 150°F and 400 PSIG. To this heated solution, a gas stream comprising 20 volume % H2S, 20% CH4, 60%> H2 was bubbled through the solution until the S/Mo atomic is about 3.4. The product can be transformed to an oil base catalyst as in Comparative Example 1 on a batch basis, or a continuous basis.
[0196] Example 4: 5.63 g of ammonium dimolybdate solution (12 wt. % Mo) was mixed with 0.84 g of nickel sulfate solution (8 wt. % Ni), yielding a double salt metal precursor in solution. A sufficient amount of the double salt precursor was mixed with 112.5 g of heavy oil feedstock (VR#1 mixed with cycle oil at a wt. ratio of 60:40) for a
concentration of 1 wt. % Mo (Mo metal as a wt% of VR#1) in a 1L batch hydrocracking unit. The cycle oil is a HCO:MCO blend at a ratio of 1 : 1. X-ray diffraction pattern shows that the Mo-Ni double salt is composed of highly crystallized hydrogen ammonium molybdenum nickel oxide hydrate H6(NH4)4Mo6Ni024*4H20.
[0197] Example 5: Example 4 was repeated except that a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the in a 1L batch hydrocracking unit containing heavy oil feedstock and double salt metal precursor mixture, for a molar ratio of S to Mo of 3 : 1.
[0198] Example 6: Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1A with the catalysts of Examples 4-5. Sufficient amounts of the catalysts were added to separate batch units containing 112.5 g of 60:40 VR#1 to MCO for a final concentration of 1 wt.% Mo. The three batch hydrocracking units were tested under hydroprocessing conditions of 805°F temperature, 1600 psig hydrogen pressure, and for 2 hours reaction time. Results are presented in Table 1, showing that Example 4with double salt metal precursor feedstock showed better catalytic performance and spent catalyst properties, suggesting that nickel promotion has improved, and a low temperature sulfur source for sulfiding would improve vanadium removal. Table 1
Figure imgf000049_0001
[0199] Example 7: A sufficient amount of ammonium heptamolybdate (AHM) solution (12 wt. % Mo) was added to about 170 g of heavy oil feedstock in a 1 liter batch hydrocracking unit for 1 wt. % Mo to VR. The heavy oil feedstock containing a mixture of VR#1 as the vacuum resid (VR) and medium cycle oil at a weight ratio of 60:40.
[0200] Example 8: Example 7 was repeated, except that a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. % of 0.7: 1.
[0201] Example 9: Example 8 was repeated, except that a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. % of 5 : 1.
[0202] Example 10: Example 9 was repeated, and the unit was heated up to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours.
[0203] Example 11 : Example 8 was repeated, and the unit was heated to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours under mixing conditions.
[0204] Example 12: 5.63 g of ammonium dimolybdate solution (12 wt. % Mo) was mixed with 0.84 g of nickel sulfate solution (8 wt. % Ni) and about 170 g of heavy oil feedstock in a 1 liter batch hydrocracking unit (for 1 wt. % Mo to VR). The heavy oil feedstock containing a mixture of VR#1 as the vacuum resid (VR) and medium cycle oil at a weight ratio of 60:40. Elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. ratio of 5: 1. The unit was heated up to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours under mixing conditions.
[0205] Example 13: Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1 with the in-situ sulfided catalysts made from metal precursor feed in aqueous solutions of Examples 7-13. The starting conditions of the batch units included 1400 psig pressure at 160°F. The batch hydrocracking units were heated to 805°F temperature and held at that temperature for 2 hours reaction time, with sufficient catalyst for a concentration of 1 wt. % Mo in VR. Results are presented in Table 2, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after. Table 2
Figure imgf000050_0001
[0206] Example 14: 1.78 g of ammonium dimolybdate crystal was dissolved in 98.22 g of DI water to prepare the molybdenum molybdate solution. A sufficient amount of ammonium hydroxide was added to the solution for the pH to be at least 4. The solution was sulfided in an autoclave at 140°F and 400 psig with the injection of hydrogen sulfide to Mo at a molar ratio of about 3.4 to 1. The sulfided aqueous slurry was sent to a second autoclave and mixed with VGO as a carrier oil for emulsification and transformation purpose with supplemental H2 at 400°F and 400 psig so that Mo sulfide compound formed could be reduced to Mo disulfide suspended in VGO. After transformation, the water / carrier oil / solid slurry mixture was sent to the third autoclave at elevated temperature (470°F) with
supplemental H2 so that water could be boiled off. The post-transformation slurry catalyst was delivered to a high pressure separator, where the slurry oil based catalyst collected on the bottom, and water steam as well as other gases including H2, H2S, CH4, and NH3 were removed for water, gas, and residual oil separation.
[0207] Example 15: 35.82 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate crystal was dissolved into 64.18 g of DI water for the nickel sulfate solution. A sufficient amount of the ammonium dimolybdate solution as prepared in Example 14 was mixed with the nickel sulfate solution for a wt% ratio of Ni/Mo=23%. A sufficient amount of ammonium hydroxide was added to the solution for the pH to be at least 4. The solution was sulfided in an autoclave at 14 °F and 400 psig with the injection of hydrogen sulfide at a molar ratio of S/Mo of about 3.4 to 1. The sulfided aqueous slurry was sent to a second autoclave and mixed with vacuum gas oil (VGO) as a carrier oil for emulsification and transformation at 400°F and 400 psig, reducing Mo sulfide compound Mo disulfide suspended in VGO. After transformation, the water / carrier oil / solid slurry mixture was sent to the third autoclave at elevated temperature (470°F) with supplemental H2 to boil off water. The post-transformation slurry catalyst was delivered to a high pressure separator, where the slurry oil based catalyst collected at the bottom, and water steam as well as other gases including H2, H2S, CH4, and NH3 were removed for water, gas, and residual oil separation.
[0208] Example 15A A sufficient amount of ammonium hydroxide was added to the ammonium dimolybdate solution as prepared in Example 14 for the pH to be at least 4. The solution was sulfided in an autoclave at 140°F and 400 psig with the injection of hydrogen sulfide at a molar ratio of S/Mo about 3.4 to 1. After sulfidation of ammonium dimolybdate solution, a sufficient amount of the nickel sulfate solution as prepared in
Example 4 was injected in and mixed with the post-sulfided aqueous slurry at a wt% ratio of Ni/Mo=23%. The slurry was then transformed at 400°F and 400 psig with VGO, reducing Mo sulfide to Mo disulfide suspended in VGO. After transformation, the water / carrier oil / solid slurry mixture was sent to another autoclave at elevated temperature (470°F) with supplemental H2 so that water could be boiled off. The post-transformation slurry catalyst was delivered to a high pressure separator, where the slurry oil based catalyst collected on the bottom, and water along with H2, H2S, CH4, and NH3 were removed for water, gas, and residual oil separation.
[0209] Example 16: BET characterization, pore porosity and pore size distribution were carried out with slurry catalysts from Example 14 and Comparative Examples 1 A - 3 A. The wt. % of Mo in the post transformation slurry catalyst of the Examples are shown in Table 3. The surface area values are 65 m2/g for Comparative Example 3 A; 75 m2/g for Example 1 A; 120 m2/g for Example 2A; and 370 m2/g for Example 14. Total pore volume in cc/g for Example 3A is 0.15; 0.22 for Example 1A; 0.33 for Example 2A, and 0.86 for Example 14. Mesapore volume (PV of 25-1000 A) is 0.11 cc/g for Example 3 A; 0.18 cc/g for Example 1 A; 0.25 for Example 2A; and 0.68 for Example 14. Table 3
Figure imgf000052_0001
[0210] Example 17: As the slurry catalyst of Example 14 shows significantly better surface area and porosity properties compared to the catalysts of the prior art, hydrocracking tests were conducted to evaluate the catalyst performance. In this example, different catalyst dosages were added to about 112.5 g of heavy oil feedstock to 1 liter batch hydrocracking units, heated up to a temperature of 805°F and kept at a pressure of 1600 psig for 2 hours. The heavy oil feedstock containing a mixture of VR#1 and medium cycle oil at a weight ratio of 60:40. Results of the batch hydrocracking test are shown in Table 4.
Table 4
Figure imgf000052_0002
[0211] Example 18: Heavy oil upgrade was carried out in a continuous unit operated with two reactors in series, operating in once-through mode, i.e., with the effluent stream from the first reactor comprising upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, hydrogen containing gas, and unconverted heavy oil feedstock being sent to the second reactor for further heavy oil conversion. The reactor pressure varied between 2400 to 2500 psig. The reactor temperature was kept at about 815 to 818°F. Hydrogen rate as scf per bbl VR was set at about 3000. LHSV was kept at about 0.125 hr"1. The results of the Comparative Examples are shown in Table 5. The slurry in Example 14 performed much better than the
comparative slurry catalysts. For a catalyst concentration of 2909 ppm, the slurry catalyst provides surface area of 359 m2/g catalyst, available surface area of 1741 m2/kgVR, TPV of 0.864 cc/g, mesapore volume of 0.864 cm3/g, and ASPH of 6.1 %. For a catalyst
concentration of 1540 ppm, the slurry catalyst provides ASPH of 8.9 %.
Table 5
Figure imgf000053_0001
[0212] Example 19: Example 18 was repeated except that VR#2 was used instead of VR#1, comparing the catalysts from Examples 14 and 15 with the slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 2 A. Results are shown in Table 6. With respect to porosimetry, Comparative 2A slurry catalyst provides a surface area (SA) of 157 m2/g, TPV of 0.358 cc/g; PV (< 100 A) of 0.1324cc/g; PV (>100 A) of 0.2256 cc/g; and PV (25-1000 A) of 0.264 cc/g. For the slurry catalyst of Example 14 at a concentration of Mo/VR of 1500 ppm, the results show a surface area of 373m2/g; TPV of 0.864 cc/g, PV (<100A) of 0.4949 cc/g, PV (> 100A) of 0.3691cc/g; and PV (25-1000A) of 0.683 cc/g. For the slurry catalyst of Example 15 at a concentration of Mo/VR of 1500 ppm, the results show a surface area of 221 m2/g; TPV of 0.836 cc/g, PV (<100A) of 0.1892 cc/g, PV (> 100A) of 0.6468 cc/g; and PV (25-1000A) of 0.71 cc/g. Table 6
Figure imgf000054_0001
[0213] Example 20: 1.78 g of ammonium dimolybdate crystal was dissolved in 98.22 g of DI water to prepare the molybdenum molybdate solution. A sufficient amount of ammonium hydroxide was added to the solution for the pH to be at least 4. The solution was sulfided in an autoclave at 140°F and 400 psig with the injection of hydrogen sulfide at a molar ratio of S/Mo of about 3.4: 1. The slurry was then transformed at 400°F and 400 psig with VGO, reducing water-based Mo sulfide to Mo disulfide suspended in VGO. After transformation, the water / carrier oil / solid slurry mixture was sent to another autoclave at elevated temperature (470°F) with supplemental H2 so that water could be boiled off. The post- transformation slurry catalyst was delivered to a high pressure separator, where the slurry oil based catalyst collected on the bottom, and water along with H2, H2S, CH4, and NH3 were removed for water, gas, and residual oil separation.
[0214] Example 21 : BET characterization, pore porosity and pore size distribution were carried out with slurry catalysts from Example 20 and Comparative Examples 1 A and 3 A. Results of the Comparative Examples are presented in Table 7. Example 10 slurry catalyst provides a surface area of 319 m2/g, and a TPV of 0.55 cc/g.
Table 7
Figure imgf000054_0002
[0215] Example 22: Heavy oil upgrade was carried out under conditions similar to Example 18 with a continuous unit operated with two reactors in series. The results of the Comparative Examples are shown in Table 8. Example 20 with a concentration of 3018 ppm Mo gives a surface area of 281 m2/g, and a PV of 0.862 cm3/g.
Table 8
Figure imgf000055_0001
[0216] Example 23 : A pressure leach solution was prepared according to the disclosure in US Patent No. 7837960 for the separation and recovery of base metals from spent catalyst. The composition has a starting pH of about 3, containing 33 gpL free NH3, 80.9 gpL Mo, 7.9 gpL Ni, 0.17 gpL V, 277 gpL ammonium sulfate (Amsul) and 10-gpL ammonium sulfamate.
[0217] Example 24: A sufficient amount of PLS solution from Example 23 was added to about 170 g of heavy oil feedstock in a 1 liter batch hydrocracking unit for 0.2 wt. %
Mo to VR. The heavy oil feedstock containing a mixture of VR#1 as the vacuum resid (VR) and medium cycle oil at a weight ratio of 60:40. A sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo molar ratio of 75 : 1. The unit was heated up to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours.
[0218] Example 25 : Example 24 was repeated, and the pre-soaked mixture was homogenized in a high shear mixer.
[0219] Example 26: Example 24 was repeated with the addition of 3 wt. % of sorbitan monooleate (Span™ 80) as a wt. % of the PLS solution, before pre-soak and homogenizing in a static mixer for an emulsified mixture.
[0220] Example 27: Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1 , with the in-situ sulfided catalysts made from the pressure leach solution of Examples 23-26. The starting conditions of the batch units included 1400 psig pressure at 160°F. The batch hydrocracking units were heated to 805°F temperature and held at that temperature for 2 hours reaction time, with sufficient catalyst for a concentration of Mo in VR as specified. Results are presented in Table 9, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after.
Table 9
Figure imgf000056_0001
[0221] Example 28: Ammonium heptamolybdate was mixed with a hot (70°C)
DMSO to prepare a solution containing 11 wt. % Mo. The oil-soluble metal precursor was mixed with a preheated feed. It is noted that DMSO forms H2S on heating with H, therefore sulfur addition is optional.
[0222] Example 29: Example 28 was repeated with the addition of elemental sulfur to the feed for a 0.7:1 S to Mo (wt. ratio).
[0223] Example 30: Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalysts made in Comparative Examples and the slurry catalysts made with the oil-soluble metal precursors formed from DMSO. A sufficient amount of slurry catalyst was added to batch hydrocracking units for a concentration of 1 wt. % Mo in VR (VR#1 used). The units were tested under hydroprocessing conditions. Standard resid protocol tests were performed thereafter: initial 1400 psig H2 (160°F), then 90 min ramp followed by 2 fir soak at 805°F. Results are presented in Table 10, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after. The sulfur amount in the table (wt. %) indicates product characterization (indicative ofHDS). Table 10
Figure imgf000057_0001
[0224] Example 31 : A sufficient amount of Promoter metal precursor nickel sulphate was added to the sulfided oil-based catalyst precursor of Comparative Example 3 A for a slurry catalyst having a Ni to Mo weight ratio of 10%.
[0225] Example 32: A sufficient amount of Promoter metal precursor nickel naphthenate was added to the sulfided oil-based catalyst precursor of Comparative Example 3 A for a slurry catalyst having a Ni to Mo weight ratio of 10%. The mixture was heated to a temperature of 475°F for 2 hours with the addition of hydrogen.
[0226] Example 33: Example 32 is repeated, but nitrogen was used instead of hydrogen.
[0227] Example 34: A sample of Group VIB metal precursor molybdenum naphthenate 6% Mo was provided.
[0228] Example 35 : A sample of Molyvan™ A, a molybdenum oxysulfide dithiocarbamate complex, was provided.
[0229] Example 36: A sufficient amount of Promoter metal precursor nickel naphthenate was added to a sample of Molyvan™ A in Example 35 for a catalyst precursor having a Ni to Mo weight ratio of 10%.
[0230] Example 37 : The mixture of Example 36 was heated to a temperature of 475°F for 2 hours.
[0231] Example 38: A sample of OLOA-011007, a lubricant oil additive based on succinimide chemistry, commercially available from Chevron Oronite of San Ramon, CA, was provided.
[0232] Example 39: To a 500 mL 3 neck round bottom flask, diethylene triamine (148.04g, 1.435 mol), and elemental sulfur (73.62g, 2.296mol) were charged. The reaction mixture was allowed to stir and heat at 80°C for 2.5hrs. Ammonium dimolybdate (97.55g, 0.287 mol) was then charged, and the reaction mixture was allowed to heat and stir for another 2 hours at 120°C. 116g of product was collected, and the rest was treated in Example 40.
[0233] Example 40: To the remaining reaction mixture from example 39, H20 (300 mL) was charged, and it was allowed to stir for 1 hour. The reaction mixture was then allowed to cool to room temperature. The precipitate was filtered, and washed with H20, ethanol, carbon disulfide, and diethyl ether.
[0234] Example 41 : Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalysts made in Comparative Examples and the catalysts / precursors made in Examples 31 - 39. A sufficient amount of precursors / catalysts from the Examples was added to batch hydrocracking units for a concentration of 1 wt. % Mo in VR. The units were tested under hydroprocessing conditions. Standard resid protocol tests were performed thereafter: initial 1400 psig H2 (160°F), then 90 min ramp followed by 2 fir soak at 805°F. Results are presented in Table 11 , with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after.
Table 11
Figure imgf000058_0001
[0235] Example 42: Rework was obtained by grinding a commercially available catalyst precursor (e.g., ICR 131 from ART Catalyst) to an average particle size of 40 microns or less (average particle size was 37 microns). The rework was mixed with a sufficient amount of VGO for a slurried rework having a Mo and Ni content similar to the slurry catalyst of Comparative Example 1 (about 1.5 wt. % Mo in VGO).
[0236] Example 43 : Slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 1 A was compared with the slurried rework metal precursor in Example 42. The materials were mixed with a heavy oil feedstock VR#1.
[0237] Heavy oil upgrade was carried out in a continuous unit operated with three reactors in series, operating in once-through mode, i.e., with the effluent stream from the first reactor comprising upgraded products, the slurry catalyst, hydrogen containing gas, and unconverted heavy oil feedstock being sent to the second and third reactors for further heavy oil conversion. The reactor pressure varied between 2475 to 2525 psig. The reactor temperature was kept at about 802 - 803°F. Hydrogen rate as scf per bbl VR per reactor was about 4500. LHSV was kept at about 0.09 hr"1. The results are shown in Table 12. With respect to porosimetry, Comparative Example 1 A provides a surface value of 74.2 m2/g; a TPV of 0.232 cc/g; and a PV (> 100 A) of 0.1647 cc/g. Example 42 provides a surface value of 113 m2/g; a TPV of 0.382 cc/g; and a PV (> 100 A) of 0. 2002 cc/g. Table 12
Figure imgf000059_0001
[0238] Example 44: 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate
((ΝΗ4)6Μθ7θ24) is dissolved in 100 g of water in a glass vessel fitted with an overhead mechanical stirrer, and 14.1 g of concentrated ammonia solution (28 wt.% NH4OH in H20) is added. A solution of 8.1 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NiS04-6H20) in 32 g of water is added to the first solution, all at ambient temperature, forming a mixture having a Ni/Mo ratio of 10% (by weight). The mixture is heated to 70°C under atmospheric pressure, and 101 g of ammonium sulfide ((NH4)2S) solution in water (40-44 wt. %>) was added slowly, over the course of 45 minutes. A sufficient amount of titanium napthanate solution is added to the mixture for a Ti/Mo ratio of 10% (by weight) and stirred at 825°F. During heating, titanium naphthenate decomposes to produce a Ti / Ni / Mo / S catalyst. The product can be transformed to an oil-base catalyst as in Comparative Example 1 A.
[0239] Example 45 : A sufficient amount of titanium napthanate solution was added to the catalyst from Comparative Example 1A for a Ti Mo ratio of 10% (by weight) under the following reaction conditions: 725°F, 500 psig H2 and 3 hour soak, during heating titanium naphthenate decomposes to produce a Ti / Ni / Mo / S catalyst, produced by ex-situ synthesis. [0240] Example 46: Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalysts made in Comparative Example 1A and the catalyst made in Example 45. A sufficient amount of catalyst from the two Examples were added to VR#1 in 1 liter autoclaves for a 1.25% Mo / VR wt. ratio. The autoclaves were pressurized to 1600 psig H2, heat to 825°F for 2.5 hours then allowed to soak at 825°F for 5 hours. At the end of the soak, the reaction was quenched, the liquid products recovered, and conversions were calculated.
Results are presented in Table 13, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after.
Table 13
Figure imgf000060_0001
[0241] Example 47: Appropriate quantity of nickel naphthenate oil soluble catalyst was mixed with a heavy oil feedstock blend of VR#1 and cycle oil (HCO / MCO) at a 60:40 wt. ratio for a 0.75 wt. % Ni to feedstock, and charged into a 1 liter autoclave. The autoclave was pressurized to 1600 Psig H2, heated to 825 °F in 2.5 hours, and then allowed to soak at 825°F for 2 hours. A nickel sulfide slurry catalyst is generated from the thermal
decomposition products of nickel naphthenate and H2S during the initial ramp to 825 °F. At the end of the soak, the reaction was immediately quenched, the liquid products were recovered, and conversions were calculated from resulting liquid hydrocarbon product analyses.
[0242] Example 48: 218 mL of water, 89.5 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate, and 29.15 g of concentrated ammonium hydroxide solution in water (28 wt. % NH3) were combined in a glass flask fitted with an overhead stirrer and a nitrogen line to maintain inert atmosphere during reaction. The mixture was stirred until complete dissolution. The resulting solution was sulfided using 60 g of 40 wt. % ammonium sulfide solution in water, at 70°C under nitrogen blanket for 1 hour. The product was transferred into another flask, allowed to settle, and decanted to separate the solids. To a portion of these solids, containing -10 g of nickel, 200 g of VGO was added, and the remaining water was evaporated in a reactor at 204-232 °C (400-450 °F) in a flow of nitrogen under 400 psig pressure, yielding a black slurry product, containing the active catalyst component.
[0243] Example 49: Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1 A (a standard Ni Mo catalyst) and the catalyst made in Example 47, which have compositions as shown in Table 14:
Table 14
Figure imgf000061_0001
[0244] The slurry catalysts were mixed with a heavy oil feed (a blend of VR#3 / HCO and MCO) at a rate of 0.75% Ni to heavy oil feed for Example 47, and 1.25% Mo to heavy oil feed for Comparative Example 1 A, and charged into 1 liter autoclaves. The autoclaves were pressurized to 1600 Psig H2, heated to 825°F in 2.5 hours, and then allowed to soak at 825°F for 2 hours. At the end of the soak, the reaction was immediately quenched, the liquid products were recovered, and conversions were calculated from resulting liquid hydrocarbon product analyses. It should be noted that nickel was charged on an equal molar basis to the slurry catalyst in the Comparative Example. Table 15 compares the hydrocracking results of the slurry catalysts of Examples 47, 48, and Comparative Example 1A, showing comparable results under the same reaction condition. It is further noted that Examples 47 and 48 employ 60%) less metals in the catalyst, and with less metal deposits (e.g., contaminants such as vanadium) the reactor, for a more effective vanadium trapping effect.
Table 15
Figure imgf000061_0002
[0245] Example 50: In this example, ex-situ slurry catalyst was prepared by thermal decomposition of organometallic metal precursors (Molybdenum dithiocarbamate = Molyvan A - 28% Mo and Nickel naphthenate - 7% Ni in VGO). 82 g of VGO , 35.7 g of Molyvan A, and 14.3 g of nickel naphthenate were combined and homogenized. The mixture was added to 1 L autoclave and pressurized with 400 psig H2, agitated at 300 RPM, and heated to 725°F for an hour. The catalyst precursor thermally decomposed in-situ under soaking condition of 725°F for 3 hours. The reactor was cooled to about 70°F and depressurized. 300 g of toluene was added to the reactor and mixture was agitated for 15 minutes at 750 RPM. The slurry catalyst was deoiled by centrifugation. 82 g of VGO was added to the decanted slurry catalyst, and the slurry catalyst composition was analyzed. The ex-situ catalyst has an average particle size of 3 microns, and shows an atomic S/Mo ratio of ~2, suggesting an active catalyst phase of MoS2 promoted with nickel.
[0246] Example 51 : In this example, in-situ promoted slurry catalyst is prepared. Appropriate quantities of Molyvan A and nickel naphthenate oil soluble catalyst precursors were mixed with a blend of VR#l/HCO /MCO (60:40 ratio) to provide a wt. % of 1.25 Mo / VR (at 10% Ni/Mo wt.). The mixture was charged into a 1 liter autoclave. The autoclave was then pressurized to 1600 PSIG H2, heated to 825°F in 2.5 hours. Slurry catalyst was generated from the thermal decomposition products of Molyvan A, nickel naphthenate, and H2S during the initial ramp to 825°F.
[0247] Example 52: In this example, in-situ slurry catalyst is prepared without any promoter. Example 51 was repeated except without any nickel precursor, and slurry catalyst was generated from the thermal decomposition products of Molyvan A and H2S during the initial ramp to 825°F.
[0248] Example 53: Batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalysts made in Comparative Example 1 A and the catalysts made in Examples 50-52. Catalysts from Comparative Example 1 A and Example 50 were added to 1 liter autoclave units for a concentration of 1.25 wt. % Mo in VR#1. The catalysts were tested under hydroprocessing conditions. The autoclaves were then pressurized to 1600 psig hydrogen, heated to 825° F in 2.5 hours, and then allowed to soak at 825 °F for 2 hours. For the catalysts of Examples 51 - 52, they were allowed to continue soaking in the autoclave at 825°F for 2 hours (after heating up to 825°F in 2.5 hours). At the end of the soak, the reaction was immediately quenched, the liquid products were recovered from the autoclave units, and conversions were calculated from resulting liquid hydrocarbon product analyses. Results are presented in Table 16, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after.
Table 16
Figure imgf000063_0001
[0249] Example 54: The slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 3A was treated with a small stream of H2 (6800 SCF per BBL of catalyst feed) for about 3 firs., and at 350°F.
[0250] Example 55: The pre-treated slurry catalyst from Example 54 was compared with the untreated slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 3 A. With preconditioning, the surface area of the slurry catalyst increased by 17% from 69 to 81 m2/g, total pore volume increased by 23% from 0.142 to 0.175 cc/g, and mesopore volume increased by 25% from 0.105 to 0.131 cc/g.
[0251] Example 56: The slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 1A was treated with a small stream of H2 (6800 SCF per BBL of catalyst feed) for about 10 firs., at a temperature of 350°F.
[0252] Example 57: The slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 1 A was treated with a small stream of H2 (6800 SCF per BBL of catalyst feed) for about 10 firs., and at a higher temperature of 600°F.
[0253] Example 58: Continuous heavy oil upgrade experiments were carried out to compare the slurry catalyst from Comparative Example 1 A (not pre-treated) with the hydrogen treated catalysts from Examples 54, 56, and 57 (with hydrogen treatment). The continuous hydrocracking unit was operated in "recycle mode," i.e., with at least a portion of the non-volatile fractions recovered from a flash separator in the unit was recycled back to one of the reactors in the unit. The unit was operated with an average reactor temperature of about 820°F. The reactor pressure varied between 2400 to 2550 psig. The heavy oil feedstock was a VR#1 : MCO mixture at a rate of 60:40. Slurry catalyst was supplied to the unit at a rate equivalent to about 4000 ppm Mo / VR. Each unit has 3 reactors in series, with an interstage flash separator (IFS) located between the 2n and the 3r reactor, and the 2n flash separator located after the last (3rd) reactor. The non-volatile fractions from the first IFS are supplied as feed to the second reactor, and a portion of the non- volatile fractions from the 2nd flash separator is recycled / sent back to the 1st reactor, with a small portion being removed as bleed (equivalent to about 8% of the heavy oil feedstock). The recycle stream is equivalent to about 20-30% of the total heavy oil feed to the first reactor. Table 17 summarizes the results of the runs, showing 8-43% improvement in k-values due to the effect of the catalyst pre-treatment with hydrogen.
Table 17
Figure imgf000064_0001
[0254] Example 59: 9.04 g of stock 11 wt. % Mo ammonium heptamolybdate solution (equivalent to 1 g Mo) was mixed with 0.45 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate
(equivalent to 0.1 g Ni), and about 170 g of heavy oil feedstock in a 1 liter batch
hydrocracking unit (for a Mo:Ni ratio of 10: 1 by weight and a catalyst concentration as Mo:VR of 1 wt. %). The heavy oil feedstock containing a mixture of VR#1 as the vacuum resid (VR) and cycle oil at a weight ratio of 60:40, for API0 of 2.5 at 60°F, MCR in wt. % of 18.46 and 5500 ppm of nitrogen. Elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. ratio of 5: 1. The unit was heated up to 180°C under hydrogen pressure of 1800 - 1900 psig for 2 hours under mixing conditions to pre-disperse the catalyst precursor in heavy oil. [0255] Example 60: 6.84 g of 15 wt. % Mo ammonium heptamolybdate solution (equivalent to 1 g Mo) was mixed with 0.44 g of zinc sulfate heptahydrate (equivalent to 0.1 g Zn) for a Mo:Zn ratio of 10: 1 by weight, in a sufficient amount of the same heavy oil feedstock as in Example 62 for a catalyst concentration of 1 wt. % Mo:VR.
[0256] Example 61 : Example 60 was repeated except with 6.84 g of 15 wt. % Mo ammonium heptamolybdate solution (equivalent to 1 g Mo) and 2.2 g of zinc sulfate heptahydrate (equivalent to 0.5 g Zn), for a Mo:Zn ratio of 2: 1 by weight, and the same catalyst concentration of 1 wt. % Mo:VR.
[0257] Example 62: Example 59 was repeated, except that the amount of heavy oil feedstock was sufficient for a Mo:VR ratio of 0.2 wt. %, and a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. ratio of 25:1.
[0258] Example 63 : Example 60 was repeated, except that the amount of heavy oil feedstock was sufficient for a Mo:VR ratio of 0.2 wt. % and a sufficient amount of elemental sulfur was added to the unit for a S to Mo wt. ratio of 25:1.
[0259] Example 64: A number of batch hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1 with the in-situ sulfided catalysts made from metal precursor feed in aqueous solutions of Examples 59-63. The starting conditions of the batch units included 1800 psig pressure at 180°F. The batch hydrocracking units were heated to 805°F temperature and held at that temperature for 2 hours reaction time. Results are presented in Table 18, with analyses of the heavy oil in the batch reactors before and after. Liquid yield means amount of liquid obtained as a % of heavy oil feed.
Table 18
Figure imgf000065_0001
[0260] Example 65: 9000 grams of ADM solution (12% Mo) was heated to the 750 RPM at 150°F and 400 PSIG. To this heated ADM solution, a gas stream comprising 20 vol. % H2S, 20% CH4, 60% H2 was bubbled through the solution for 4 hours. After the H2S addition, then an appropriate amount of nickel sulfate solution (8% Ni) was added to the mixture for a Ni/Mo wt% of ~ 23%. The mixture was then subjected to a second sulfiding step for 30 minutes with the gas stream comprising 20 vol. % H2S, 20% CH4, and 60% H2^_ The water based catalyst precursor was then drained from the reactor.
[0261] The water-based catalyst precursor slurry was transformed (continuous basis) at 400°F and 400 psig with VGO, resulting in an H2S enhanced oil based catalyst. After transformation, the water / carrier oil / solid slurry mixture was sent to another autoclave at elevated temperature (470°F) with supplemental H2 so that water could be boiled off. The post- transformation slurry catalyst was delivered to a high pressure separator, where the slurry oil based catalyst collected on the bottom, and water along with H2, H2S, CH4, and NH3 were removed for water, gas, and residual oil separation.
[0262] Example 66: A number of hydrocracking tests were carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 2A (catalyst with 23% Ni/Mo level) with the H2S enhanced oil based catalyst of Examples 65 at different levels of Mo to VR#2 as shown. Table 19 summarizes the characteristics of the Comparative catalyst after a continuous transformation step.
Table 19
Figure imgf000066_0001
[0263] In the Example, the reactors were operated in series for a continuous test employing the catalysts in Table 19. Results of the runs are presented in Table 20 including the reactor conditions. It is observed that the catalyst with enhanced sulfur level (in a second sulfiding step) provides better performance in heavy oil upgrade, in some embodiment, of at least 5% increase in desulfurization rate, among other improvements. Table 20
Figure imgf000067_0001
[0264] Example 67: 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate
((ΝΗ4)6Μθ7θ24) is dissolved in 100 g of water in a glass vessel, and 14.1 g of concentrated ammonia solution (28 wt.% NH4OH in H20) is added. A solution of -8.1 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NiS04-6H20) in 32 g of water is added to the first solution, all at ambient temperature, forming a mixture having a Ni/Mo ratio of 5% (by weight). The mixture is heated to 70°C under atmospheric pressure, and 101 g of ammonium sulfide ((NH4)2S) solution in water (40-44 wt. %) is added slowly, over the course of 45 minutes for a co- sulfided catalyst precursor having a Ni/Mo ratio of 10% (by weight) . The resulting water- based catalyst precursor is transformed to a final oil-based catalyst with VGO and hydrogen in a pressure test autoclave in situ
[0265] Example 68: 33.12 g of ammonium heptamolybdate tetrahydrate
((ΝΗ4)6Μθ7θ24) is dissolved in 100 g of water in a glass vessel, and 14.1 g of concentrated ammonia solution (28 wt.% NH4OH in H20) is added. A solution of -4.051 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NiS04-6H20) in 16 g of water is added to the first solution, all at ambient temperature. The mixture is heated to 70°C under atmospheric pressure, and 101 g of ammonium sulfide ((NH4)2S) solution in water (40-44 wt. %) is added slowly, over the course of 45 minutes forming a co-sulfided catalyst precursor with a Ni/Mo ratio of 5% (by weight). Another solution of -4.051 g of nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NiS04-6H20) in 16 g of water is mix into the co-sulfided mixture for a final Ni/Mo ratio of 10% (by weight). The resulting water-based catalyst precursor with split Ni metal precursor feed is transformed to a final oil-based catalyst with VGO and hydrogen in a pressure test autoclave in situ.
[0266] Example 69: A number of hydrocracking tests are carried out to compare the catalyst made in Comparative Example 1A (catalyst with 10% Ni/Mo level) with the co- sulfided catalyst, and the catalyst made with a split Ni feed. Table 21 summarizes the characteristics of the catalysts after a transformation step and table 22 summarizes the performance in hydrocracking test. The catalyst made with the split Ni feed has similar posimetry to the co-sulfided catalyst, but higher catalytic activity compared to the co-sulfided catalyst. It was also noted that the catalyst made with a split Ni feed had a reduced vanadium trapping in the hydrocracking reactor by at least 5% compared to the Comparative Example 1A, and surface area of 147 m2/g and 140 m2/g respectively for Examples 67 and 68 compared to 77 m2/g for Comparative Example 1A; a TPV of 0.411 cc/g and 0.400 cc/g respectively for Examples 67 and 68 compared to 0.241 cc/g for Comparative Example 1A.
Table 21
Figure imgf000068_0001
Table 22
Figure imgf000068_0002

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least an inorganic metal precursor comprising at least a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals, Group IIB metals and Group VIII metals;
mixing at least a polar aprotic solvent with the inorganic metal precursor to form an oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor, at a weight ratio of solvent to inorganic metal precursor of 1 : 1 to 10: 1;
providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor forming the slurry catalyst.
2. The process of claim 1, further comprising:
subjecting the oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor to a reduction step for the Primary metal to change its oxidation state.
3. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the mixing of the polar aprotic solvent with the inorganic metal precursor is under high shear mixing forming to generate an emulsion with droplet sizes ranging from 0.1 to 300 μιη.
4. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the weight ratio of solvent to inorganic metal precursor ranges from 2: 1 to 5 : 1.
5. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor is mixed with a hydrocarbon diluent comprising a heavy oil feedstock for the heavy oil feedstock to provide the sulfiding agent needed to sulfide the oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor.
6. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor is mixed with a hydrocarbon diluent containing the heavy oil feedstock at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F under a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
7. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared thereof has the formula
Figure imgf000069_0001
wherein M is the Primary metal and selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= \ \(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5(a + b); 0 <= h <= 3(a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
8. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the sulfiding agent is selected from the group of elemental sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, ammonium sulfide, ammonium polysulfide ((NH4)2SX), ammonium thiosulfate ((NH4)2S203), sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203), thiourea (CSN2H4), carbon disulfide, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), tertiarybutyl polysulfide (PSTB) and tertiarynonyl polysulfide (PSTN), and mixtures thereof.
9. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, further comprising the step of mixing the slurry catalyst with a heavy oil feedstock for heavy oil upgrade.
10. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, further comprising the step of mixing the oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent prior to the sulfiding step.
1 1. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the sulfiding is in-situ upon contact with a heavy oil feedstock under hydroprocessing conditions for the heavy oil feedstock to provide the at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the oil-dispersible inorganic metal precursor.
12. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the polar aprotic solvent is selected from the group of N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP), dimethylformamide (DMF),
dimethylacetamide (DMAC), hexamethylphosphortriamide (HMPA), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tetrahydrofuran, propylene carbonate, dimethyl sulfite, N-nitrosodimethylamine, γ- butyrolactone, N:N dimethyl formamide, dimethyl carbonate, methyl formate, butyl formate and mixtures thereof.
13. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the polar aprotic solvent is used as neat liquid.
14. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the polar aprotic solvent is dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).
15. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the inorganic metal precursor is selected from the group of molybdenum oxide, molybdenum sulfide, molybdenum oxysulfide, molybdenum trioxide, ammonium heptamolybdate, and mixtures thereof.
16. The process of any of claims 1 - 2, wherein the at least an inorganic metal precursor feed comprising at least a Group VIB metal is selected from the group of molybdenum oxide, molybdenum sulfide, molybdenum oxysulfide, molybdenum trioxide, ammonium heptamolybdate, and mixtures thereof.
17. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least an inorganic metal precursor comprising at least a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals and Group VIII metals;
providing at least an inorganic metal precursor comprising at least a Promoter metal selected from Group IVB metals, Group VIII metals, and Group IIB metals, wherein the Primary metal is different from the Promoter metal;
mixing at least a polar aprotic solvent with the inorganic metal precursors to form an oil-dispersible mixture, at a weight ratio of polar aprotic solvent to inorganic metal precursor feed of 1 : 1 to 10: 1;
mixing the oil-dispersible mixture with a heavy oil feed under in-situ sulfidation conditions, forming the slurry catalyst.
18. The process of claim 17, wherein the weight ratio of polar aprotic solvent to the inorganic metal precursors ranges from 2: 1 to 5 : 1.
19. The process of any of claims 17 - 18, wherein the oil-dispersible mixture is mixed with the heavy oil feed at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F under a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa) for in-situ sulfiding to take place.
20. The process of any of claims 17 - 18, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total surface area of at least 100 m2/g.
21. The process of any of claims 17 - 18, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.4 cc/g and a polymodal pore distribution with at least 90% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 1 ,000 Angstroms in diameter.
22. The process of any of claims 17 - 18, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
23. The process of any of claims 17 - 18, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom comprises a plurality of dispersed particles with the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
24. The process of any of claims 17 - 18, wherein the polar aprotic solvent is selected from the group of N-Methylpyrrolidone (NMP), dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethylacetamide (DMAC), hexamethylphosphortriamide (HMPA), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), tetrahydrofuran, propylene carbonate, dimethyl sulfite, N-nitrosodimethylamine, γ- butyrolactone, N:N dimethyl formamide, dimethyl carbonate, methyl formate, butyl formate and mixtures thereof.
25. The process of any of claims 17 - 18, wherein the polar aprotic solvent is dimethyl sulfoxide.
26. The process of any of claims 17 - 18, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared thereof has the formula
Figure imgf000072_0001
wherein M is a Primary metal selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= \ \(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5(a + b); 0 <= h <= 3(a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
27. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst with improved catalytic activities in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a slurry catalyst prepared from a solution comprising at least a water- soluble metal precursor salt of a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals and Group VIII metals and optionally at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Promoter metal selected from Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals, Group IIA metals, Group IVA metals and combinations thereof, and sulfided by a sulfiding agent under sulfiding conditions at a molar ratio of sulfur to metal of at least 1.5: 1, wherein the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium having an particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη;
providing a hydrogen feed;
treating the slurry catalyst by mixing with the hydrogen feed at a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa) and a temperature from 200°F to 800°F at a rate of from 500 to 15,000 scf hydrogen per bbl of slurry catalyst for a minute to 20 hours, wherein the slurry catalyst treated with hydrogen provides an increase of rate constant k-values in terms of HDS, HDN, and HDMCR of at least 10% compared to a slurry catalyst that is not treated with hydrogen.
28. The process of claim 1, wherein the hydrogen feed is mixed with the slurry catalyst for a sufficient amount of time for the slurry catalyst to have an increase in surface area of at least 10% compare to a slurry catalyst that is not mixed with the hydrogen feed.
29. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the hydrogen feed is mixed with the slurry catalyst for a sufficient amount of time for the slurry catalyst to have an increase in total pore volume of at least 10% compare to a slurry catalyst that is not mixed with the hydrogen feed.
30. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the slurry catalyst treated with hydrogen provides an increase of rate constant k-values in terms of HDS, HDN, and HDMCR of at least 15% compared to a slurry catalyst that is not treated with hydrogen.
31. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the hydrogen feed is mixed with the slurry catalyst in a transfer line prior to being fed to a hydrocracker for the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
32. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the hydrogen feed is mixed with the slurry catalyst in a pre-mixing vessel prior to being fed to a hydrocracker for the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock.
33. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the hydrogen feed is mixed with the slurry catalyst at a temperature of 350°F to 750°F.
34. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the hydrogen feed is mixed with the slurry catalyst for at least an hour.
35. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the hydrogen feed is mixed with the slurry catalyst for 2 to 5 hours.
36. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the slurry catalyst composition prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.4 cc/g and a polymodal pore distribution with at least 70% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter.
37. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the slurry catalyst composition prepared therefrom has a total surface area of at least 100 m2/g.
38. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the slurry catalyst treated with hydrogen further provides an increase in surface area and total pore volume of at least 10% compared to a slurry catalyst that is not treated with hydrogen.
39. The process of claim 38, wherein the slurry catalyst treated with hydrogen further provides an increase in surface area and total pore volume of at least 15% compared to a slurry catalyst that is not treated with hydrogen.
40. The process of any of claims 27 - 28, wherein the slurry catalyst has the formula
Figure imgf000074_0001
wherein M is a Primary metal selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a
+ b); 0 <= e <= 1 l(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5 a + b); 0 <= h <= 3 a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
41. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst having improved catalytic activities for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least a solution comprising at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of at least a Group VIB metal, the solution having a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of the at least Group VIB metal in the solution;
sulfiding the at least a solution with a sulfiding agent, forming a sulfided catalyst precursor;
mixing the sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to form a slurry catalyst;
mixing a hydrogen feed with the slurry catalyst at a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa) and a temperature from 200°F to 800°F at a rate of from 500 to 15,000 scf hydrogen per bbl of slurry catalyst for a minute to 20 hours ,
wherein the slurry catalyst is saturated with hydrogen providing an increase of k- values in terms of HDS, HDN, and HDMCR of at least 15% compared to a slurry catalyst that is not saturated with hydrogen.
42. The process of claim 41 , further comprising
promoting the sulfided catalyst precursor with at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Promoter metal selected from Group VIII, Group IIB, Group IIA, Group IVA metals and combinations thereof.
43. The process of any of claims 41 - 42, wherein the solution has a pH of at least
4.
44. The process of any of claims 41 - 42, wherein the solution has a concentration of 5 to 8 wt. % of the Group VIB metal in the solution.
45. The process of any of claims 41 - 42, wherein the slurry catalyst composition prepared therefrom has a total surface area of at least 100 m2/g.
46. The process of any of claims 41 - 42, wherein the slurry catalyst composition prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.4 cc/g and a polymodal pore distribution with at least 70% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter.
47. The process of any of claims 41 - 42, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
48. The process of any of claims 41 - 42, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
49. The process of any of claims 41 - 42, wherein the slurry catalyst composition prepared therefrom has an average particle size ranging from 2 to 150 μιη.
50. A method for improving the porosimetry of a slurry catalyst, comprising: providing a slurry catalyst having an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη, prepared from a solution comprising at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of any of a Group VIB metal and a Group VIII metal, and sulfided by a sulfiding agent under sulfiding conditions at a molar ratio of sulfur to metal of at least 1.5: 1;
treating the slurry catalyst by mixing with the hydrogen feed at a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa) and a temperature from 200°F to 800°F at a rate of from 500 to 15,000 scf hydrogen per bbl of slurry catalyst for a minute to 20 hours,
wherein the slurry catalyst treated with hydrogen provides an increase of rate constant k- values in terms of HDS, HDN, and HDMCR of at least 10% compared to a slurry catalyst that is not treated with hydrogen.
51. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least a precursor feed comprising at least a Group VIB metal, the precursor feed is a rework material obtained from a process of making hydroprocessing catalysts, wherein the rework material has an average particle size of less than 300 μιη;
mixing the rework material with at least a diluent forming a slurried precursor;
providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the slurried precursor forming the slurry catalyst.
52. The process of claim 51 , wherein the rework material is mixed with the diluent in an amount of 5 to 40 wt. % of total weight of the diluent.
53. The process of any of claims 51 - 52, wherein the slurried precursor is mixed with a heavy oil feedstock in a reactor under hydroprocessing conditions at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F under a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
54. The process of claim 53, wherein under hydroprocessing conditions the heavy oil feedstock provides the sulfiding agent needed to sulfide the slurried precursor in-situ.
55. The process of any of claims 51 - 52, where the sulfidation of the slurried precursor occurs ex-situ prior to a heavy oil upgrade.
56. The process of claim 55, wherein the sulfiding agent is selected from the group of elemental sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, ammonium sulfide, ammonium polysulfide
((NH4)2SX), ammonium thiosulfate ((NH4)2S203), sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203), thiourea (CSN2H4), carbon disulfide, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), tertiarybutyl polysulfide (PSTB) and tertiarynonyl polysulfide (PSTN), and mixtures thereof.
57. The process of any of claims 51 - 52, wherein the diluent is selected from water, VGO, cycle oil, gasoline, distillate, naphtha, light cycle oil, benzene, toluene, xylene, and mixtures thereof.
58. The process of any of claims 51 - 52, wherein the rework material has an average particle size of at least 1 μιη.
59. The method of claim 58, wherein the rework material has an average particle size of 2- 150 μιη.
60. The process of any of claims 51 - 52, wherein the rework material has an average particle size of less than 100 μιη.
61. The process of any of claims 51 - 52, wherein the rework material is obtained from a process of making an unsupported catalyst.
62. The process of any of claims 51 - 52, wherein the rework material is obtained from a process of making a supported catalyst.
63. The process of any of claims 51 - 52, wherein the rework material is ground to an average particle size of less than 300 μιη by any of wet grinding and dry grinding.
64. The process of any of claims 51 - 52, wherein the rework material comprises at least one of a metal oxide, a metal hydroxide, a metal sulfide and combinations thereof, affixed onto a carrier comprising one or more of alumina, iron oxide, silica, magnesia, titania, zeolite, silica-aluminate, carbon, phosphorous, and combinations thereof, and ground to an average particle size of less than 300 μιη.
65. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing catalyst fines comprising at least one of an oxide, a hydroxide, a sulfide, and combinations thereof of at least a Primary metal selected from Group IVB metals and Group VIII metals, affixed onto a carrier comprising one or more of alumina, iron oxide, silica, magnesia, titania, zeolite, silica-aluminate, carbon, phosphorous, and combinations thereof, wherein the catalyst fines has an average particle size of less than 300 μιη;
mixing the catalyst fines with at least a diluent forming a slurried precursor;
mixing the slurried precursor with at least a heavy oil feedstock for heavy oil upgrade, wherein the heavy oil feedstock releases a sufficient amount of at least a sulfiding agent under in-situ sulfidation conditions to form the slurry catalyst.
66. The process of claim 65, wherein the in-situ sulfidation conditions by the heavy oil feedstock occurs at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F and a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
67. The process of any of claims 65 - 66, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared from the catalyst fines has a total surface area of at least 100 m2/g.
68. The process of any of claims 65 - 66, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared from the catalyst fines has a total pore volume of at least 0.3 cc/g and a polymodal pore distribution with at least 70% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 1 ,000 Angstroms in diameter.
69. The process of any of claims 65 - 66, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared from the catalyst fines comprises a plurality of dispersed particles with the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
70. The process of any of claims 65 - 66, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared from the catalyst fines has an average particle size ranging from 2 to 150 μιη.
71. The process of any of claims 65 - 66, wherein the catalyst fines are obtained from a process of making a supported catalyst.
72. The process of any of claims 65 - 66, wherein the catalyst fines are obtained by grinding a supported catalyst to an average particle size of less than 300 μιη.
73. The process of any of claims 65 - 66, wherein the catalyst fines are mixed with a diluent selected from water, VGO, cycle oil, gasoline, distillate, naphtha, light cycle oil, benzene, diesel oil, heptane, toluene, xylene, and mixtures thereof.
74. The process of any of claims 65 - 66, wherein the catalyst fines are provided at a rate of about 10 ppm to about 500 ppm Primary metal per total weight of the heavy oil feedstock.
75. The process of any of claims 65 - 66, wherein providing the catalyst fines comprises: a) grinding a support base material to an average particle size of less than 300 μιη; b) impregnating the reduced particle sized support base material with at least a metal precursor; c) drying the impregnated support base material; and d) grinding the impregnated support base material to a particle size of less than 300 μιη.
76. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a pressure leach solution obtained from a metal recovery process, the pressure leach solution comprising at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Primary metal, wherein the water-soluble metal precursor salt was previously leached into the pressure leach solution in a leaching step;
mixing the solution with at least a hydrocarbon diluent forming a catalyst precursor; providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the catalyst precursor forming the slurry catalyst.
77. The process of claim 76, further comprising:
subjecting the catalyst precursor to reduction at a temperature above ambient.
78. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the Primary metal is any of a Group VIB metal, a Group IIB metal, and a Group VIII metal.
79. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the mixing of the pressure leach solution with the at least a hydrocarbon diluent is under high shear mixing to generate an emulsion with droplet sizes ranging from 0.1 to 300 μιη.
80. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the catalyst precursor is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock under in-situ sulfiding conditions for the heavy oil feedstock to provide the sulfiding agent needed for the sulfidation forming the slurry catalyst.
81. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, where the sulfidation of the catalyst precursor forming the slurry catalyst occurs ex-situ prior to the heavy oil upgrade.
82. The process of claim 81 , wherein the sulfiding agent is selected from the group of elemental sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, ammonium sulfide, ammonium polysulfide ((NH4)2SX), ammonium thiosulfate ((NH4)2S203), sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203), thiourea (CSN2H4), carbon disulfide, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), tertiarybutyl polysulfide (PSTB) and tertiarynonyl polysulfide (PSTN), and mixtures thereof.
83. The process of claim 81, wherein the hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
84. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the pressure leach solution is mixed with the hydrocarbon diluent in an amount of 5 to 50 wt. % of total weight of the hydrocarbon diluent.
85. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the pressure leach solution is prepared from a pressure leach slurry containing up to 10 wt. % coke and up-to 2 wt% insoluble ammonium metavanadate in the coke by filtering the pressure leach slurry to remove the coke and the ammonium metavanadate.
86. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the pressure leach solution is from a metal recovery process for recovering metals from a spent catalyst.
87. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the pressure leach solution is from a metal recovery process for recovering metals from mineral ores.
88. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the pressure leach solution is from a metal recovery process for recovering metals from metallurgical wastes.
89. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the pressure leach solution contains a mixture of at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Primary metal and at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Promoter metal.
90. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the pressure leach solution contains a mixture of ammonium heptamolybdate and nickel sulfate.
91. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the pressure leach solution contains at least 50 to 90 gpL (grams per liter) molybdenum and 3 to 10 gpL nickel.
92. The process of any of claims 76 - 77, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total surface area of at least 100 m2/g, a total pore volume of at least 0.4 cc/g and a polymodal pore distribution with at least 90% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 1,000 Angstroms in diameter.
93. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a pressure leach solution containing a mixture of at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Primary metal and at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Promoter metal obtained from a metal recovery process and wherein the metal precursor salts were previously leached into the pressure leach solution in a leaching step;
mixing the at least a metal precursor solution with at least a hydrocarbon diluent forming a catalyst precursor;
mixing the at least a catalyst precursor with at least a heavy oil feedstock under in-situ sulfiding conditions for the heavy oil feedstock to provide at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the catalyst precursor forming a slurry catalyst.
94. The process of claim 93, wherein the pressure leach solution is from a metal recovery process for recovering metals from a spent catalyst.
95. The process of any of claims 93 - 94, wherein the at least a metal precursor was mixed with the heavy oil feedstock at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F under a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa) for in-situ sulfiding to take place.
96. The process of any of claims 93 - 94, wherein the hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
97. The process of any of claims 93 - 94, wherein the pressure leach solution contains a mixture of ammonium heptamolybdate and nickel sulfate.
98. The process of any of claims 93 - 94, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
99. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a pressure leach solution obtained from a metal recovery process, the pressure leach solution comprising at least a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Primary metal, wherein the water-soluble metal precursor salt was previously leached into the pressure leach solution in a leaching step;
providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the pressure leach solution forming a catalyst precursor; mixing the catalyst precursor with at least a hydrocarbon diluent under reducing conditions forming the slurry catalyst.
100. The process of claim 99, wherein the slurry catalyst is of the formula
Figure imgf000083_0001
wherein the Primary metal M is selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= \ \(a+b); 0 <=/<= l S(a+b); 0 <= g <= 5(a + b); 0 <= h <= 3(a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and
Figure imgf000083_0002
101. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a metal precursor solution comprising a mixture of at least two different water-soluble metal salts in a water solvent of at least two different metals selected from Group VIB, Group VIII, Group IVB, Group IIB metals and mixtures thereof;
mixing the metal precursor solution with a hydrocarbon diluent under high shear mixing to generate an emulsion with droplet sizes ranging from 0.1 to 300 μιη;
sulfiding the emulsion with at least a sulfiding agent to form the slurry catalyst having an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
102. The process of claim 101 , further comprising:
subjecting the emulsion to reduction in the presence of a reducing agent at a temperature above ambient.
103. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, wherein the emulsion is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock in a reactor under in-situ sulfiding condition for the heavy oil feedstock to provide the sulfiding agent needed for to sulfide the emulsion forming the slurry catalyst.
104. The process of claim 103, wherein the in-situ sulfiding condition is at a temperature from 752°F to 1 1 12 °F and a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
105. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, where the sulfidation of the emulsion forming the slurry catalyst occurs ex-situ prior to the heavy oil upgrade.
106. The process of claim 105, wherein the sulfiding agent is selected from the group of elemental sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, ammonium sulfide, ammonium polysulfide
((NH4)2SX), ammonium thiosulfate ((NH4)2S203), sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203), thiourea (CSN2H4), carbon disulfide, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), tertiarybutyl polysulfide (PSTB) and tertiarynonyl polysulfide (PSTN), and mixtures thereof.
107. The process of claim 105, wherein the hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
108. The process of claim 105, further comprising
subjecting the slurry catalyst after ex-situ sulfidation to reduction at a temperature above ambient.
109. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, wherein the emulsion precursor comprises droplets having a size of less than 100 μιη.
1 10. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, wherein the emulsion droplets contain metal precursor solution in a hydrocarbon diluent.
1 1 1. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, wherein the emulsion droplets contain hydrocarbon diluent in a metal precursor solution.
1 12. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, wherein the slurry prepared therefrom has a general formula (M%(Lu)b(S (Cw)e(Hx)j(Oy)g(Nz)h, wherein M is a Primary metal selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= \ \(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5(a + b); 0 <= h <= 3(a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
113. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total surface area of at least 100 m2/g.
114. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.4 cc/g and a polymodal pore distribution with at least 70% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 1 ,000 Angstroms in diameter.
115. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
116. The process of any of claims 101 - 102, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
117. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble Group VIB metal salt and a water-soluble Group VIII metal salt in a water solvent;
mixing the at least a metal precursor solution with a hydrocarbon diluent under high shear mixing to generate an emulsion precursor comprising droplets having a size of 0.1 to 300 μιη, the hydrocarbon diluent selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof;
mixing the emulsion with a heavy oil feedstock under in-situ sulfiding condition for the heavy oil feedstock to provide the sulfiding agent needed for to sulfide the emulsion forming a slurry catalyst having an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
118. The process of claim 117, wherein the mixing of the emulsion precursor with the heavy oil feedstock is at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F under a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
119. The process of any of claims 117 - 1 18, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total surface area of at least 100 m2/g.
120. The process of any of claims 1 17 - 1 18, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.4 cc/g and a polymodal pore distribution with at least 70% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 1 ,000 Angstroms in diameter.
121. The process of any of claims 1 17 - 1 18, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
122. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble Group VIB metal salt and a water-soluble Group VIII metal salt in a water solvent;
sulfiding the metal precursor solution with at least a sulfiding agent forming a water- based catalyst precursor;
mixing the water-based catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil, cycle oil, jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and
subjecting the mixture of water-based catalyst precursor and hydrocarbon diluent to reduction in the presence of a reducing agent at a temperature above ambient forming a slurry catalyst of the formula
Figure imgf000086_0001
wherein M is a Primary metal selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= \ \(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5(a + b); 0 <= h <= 3(a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
123. The process of claim 122, wherein the mixing of the water-based catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent is in the presence of a reducing agent and under reduction conditions.
124. The process of any of claims 122 - 123, wherein the mixing the water-based catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent the hydrocarbon diluent is at a high shear rate for at least a portion of the water-based catalyst precursor to be in emulsion having droplets with particle sizes ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
125. A slurry catalyst for use in hydroprocessing a heavy oil feedstock, wherein: the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium, wherein the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη,
the slurry catalyst has a polymodal pore distribution with at least 80% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter, and
the slurry catalyst is prepared from sulfiding and dispersing a metal precursor solution in a hydrocarbon diluent, the metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble salt of a Primary metal selected from Group VIB, Group IIB metals and Group VIII metals, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of the Primary metal in solution.
126. The slurry catalyst of claim 125, wherein the slurry catalyst has a BET surface area ranging from 200 to 800 m2/g.
127. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein the Primary metal is molybdenum and wherein the water-soluble metal salt is selected from the group of molybdates, alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates, phosphomolybdic acid, molybdenum oxide, molybdenum carbide, molybdenum nitride, aluminum molybdate, molybdic acid, and mixtures thereof.
128. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein the metal precursor solution further comprises at least a water-soluble salt of a Promoter metal selected from any of Group IVB metals, Group VIII metals, and Group IIB metals, wherein the Promoter metal is different from the Primary metal, and the Promoter metal is present in a weight ratio of 1- 50 wt. %. Promoter metal to Primary metal.
129. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein the Promoter metal is nickel and wherein the water-soluble metal salt of the Promoter metal is selected from the group of nickel acetate, nickel carbonate, nickel chloride, nickel sulfate, nickel nitrate, nickel acetylacetone, nickel citrate, nickel oxalate, and mixtures thereof.
130. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein at least 70% of the pore sizes are in the range of 5 to 1000 Angstroms in diameter.
131. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein at least 50% of the pore sizes are in the range of 5 to 5000 Angstroms in diameter.
132. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein at least 30% of the pore sizes are at least 100 Angstroms in diameter.
133. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein the slurry catalyst has a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
134. The slurry catalyst of claim 6, wherein the slurry catalyst has a total pore volume of at least 0.8 cc/g.
135. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein the catalyst has an average particle size ranging from 2 to 100 μιη.
136. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of at least 0.1 wt. % of the Primary metal in solution.
137. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 5.
138. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein the slurry catalyst has a general formula
Figure imgf000088_0001
wherein M is a Primary metal selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, and Group IIB metals; L is optional as a
Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= \ \(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5(a + b); 0 <= h <= 3(a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
139. The slurry catalyst of claim 138, wherein M is selected from molybdenum, tungsten, and mixtures thereof and L is selected from nickel, cobalt, and mixture thereof.
140. The slurry catalyst of claim 138, wherein the Group VIB metal is molybdenum and the slurry catalyst is essentially free of Promoter metals.
141. The slurry catalyst of claim 16, wherein b=0, and the Primary metal M is nickel.
142. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein the slurry catalyst has a 1000°F+ conversion rate of at least 50% for the upgrade of a heavy oil feedstock having an API gravity of at most 15, when the slurry catalyst is applied at a rate of less than 2 wt. % active Group VIB metal relative to the total weight of the heavy oil feedstock,
143. The slurry catalyst of claim 138, wherein the slurry catalyst has an X-ray powder diffraction pattern with a first broad diffraction peak at Bragg angle of 8 to 18° and a second broad diffraction peak at Bragg angle of 32 to 40° (from 0 to 70° 2Θ scale).
144. The slurry catalyst of any claims 125 - 126, wherein the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil, cycle oil, jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
145. A slurry catalyst for use in hydroprocessing a heavy oil feedstock, wherein: the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium, wherein the dispersed particles have an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη,
the slurry catalyst has a BET total surface area of at least 100 m2/g, and
the slurry catalyst is prepared from sulfiding and dispersing a metal precursor solution in a hydrocarbon diluent, the metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble salt of a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals, Group IIB metals, and Group VIII metals, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of Primary metal in solution.
146. The slurry catalyst of claim 145, wherein at least 70% of the pore sizes are in the range of 5 to 1000 Angstroms in diameter.
147. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the slurry catalyst has BET surface area ranging from 200 to 800 m2/g.
148. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein at least 50% of the pore sizes are in the range of 5 to 5000 Angstroms in diameter.
149. The slurry catalyst of claim 148, wherein at least 30% of the pore sizes are at least 100 Angstroms in diameter.
150. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the slurry catalyst has total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
151. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the slurry catalyst has total pore volume of at least 0.8 cc/g.
152. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the catalyst has an average particle size ranging from 2 to 100 μιη.
153. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the metal precursor solution further comprises at least a water-soluble salt of a Promoter metal selected from any of Group IVB metals, Group VIII metals, and Group IIB metals, wherein the Promoter metal is different from the Primary metal, and the Promoter metal is present in a weight ratio of 1- 50 wt. %. Promoter metal to Primary metal.
154. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the metal precursor solution has a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of at least 0.1 wt. % of Primary metal in solution.
155. The slurry catalyst of claim 154, wherein the metal precursor solution has a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of 5 - 10 wt. % Primary metal in solution.
156. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the Primary metal precursor is a water-soluble Group VIB metal salt.
157. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the slurry catalyst comprises a plurality of dispersed particles in a hydrocarbon medium selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
158. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the catalyst is prepared from a metal precursor consisting essentially of a least a Group VIB metal compound.
159. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 145 - 146, wherein the slurry catalyst has a general formula
Figure imgf000091_0001
wherein the Primary metal M is selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= 1 l(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5 a + b); 0 <= h <= 3 a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
160. A slurry catalyst for use in hydroprocessing a heavy oil feedstock, wherein: the slurry catalyst is prepared from at least a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble salt of a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals and a water- soluble salt of a Promoter metal selected from Group VIII, Group IIB, Group IIA, Group IVA metals and combinations thereof, the slurry catalyst is prepared from sulfiding and dispersing the metal precursor solution in a hydrocarbon diluent, , the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of the Primary metal in solution; and wherein
the slurry catalyst has an average particle size of 1 - 300 μιη and a BET total surface area of at least 100 m2/g.
161. The slurry catalyst composition of claim 160, wherein the slurry catalyst is characterized as having a 1000°F+ conversion rate of at least 50% for the upgrade of a heavy oil feedstock having an API gravity of at most 15, when applied at a rate of less than 1 wt. % Primary metal relative to the total weight of the heavy oil feedstock,
162. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 160 - 161, wherein the metal precursor solution has a concentration of 5 - 10 wt. % Primary metal in solution.
163. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 160 - 161, wherein the Primary metal is molybdenum and wherein the water-soluble metal precursor salt is selected from the group of molybdates, alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates, phosphomolybdic acid, molybdenum oxide, molybdenum carbide, molybdenum nitride, aluminum molybdate, molybdic acid, and mixtures thereof.
164. The slurry catalyst of any of claims 160 - 161, wherein the Promoter metal is nickel and wherein the water-soluble metal salt of the Promoter metal is selected from the group of nickel acetate, nickel carbonate, nickel chloride, nickel sulfate, nickel nitrate, nickel acetylacetone, nickel citrate, nickel oxalate, and mixtures thereof.
165. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in the upgrade of heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water soluble salt of a Primary metal selected from any of a Group VIB metal and a Group VIII metal in a water diluent, the metal precursor solution having a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of the Primary metal in solution;
sulfiding the metal precursor solution with a sulfiding agent, forming a sulfided catalyst precursor; and
mixing the sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to form the slurry catalyst wherein a slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη, a BET total surface area of at least 100 m2/g, a polymodal pore
distribution with at least 80% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter, and a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
166. The process of claim 165, wherein the the sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent is in the presence of a reducing agent and under reducing conditions.
167. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the metal precursor solution further comprises at least a water-soluble salt of a Promoter metal selected from any of Group
IVB metals, Group VIII metals, and Group IIB metals, wherein the Promoter metal is different from the Primary metal, and the Promoter metal is present in a weight ratio of 1-50 wt. %. Promoter metal to Primary metal.
168. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a BET surface area from 200 to 800 m2/g.
169. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has at least 70% of pore sizes of 5 to 1000 Angstroms in diameter.
170. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has at least 50% of the pore sizes of 5 to 5000 Angstroms in diameter.
171. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has at least 30% of the pore sizes of at least 100 Angstroms in diameter.
172. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g.
173. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the slurry catalyst has a total pore volume of at least 0.8 cc/g.
174. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has an average particle size from 2 to 100 μιη.
175. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the metal precursor solution has a concentration of 5 - 10 wt. % of the Primary metal in solution.
176. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the metal precursor solution has a concentration of at least 0.1 wt. % of the Primary metal in solution.
177. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the Primary metal is molybdenum and wherein the water-soluble metal precursor salt is selected from the group of molybdates, alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates, phosphomolybdic acid, molybdenum oxide, molybdenum carbide, molybdenum nitride, aluminum molybdate, molybdic acid, and mixtures thereof.
178. The process of claim 167, wherein the Promoter metal is nickel and wherein the water-soluble metal salt of the Promoter metal is selected from the group of nickel acetate, nickel carbonate, nickel chloride, nickel sulfate, nickel nitrate, nickel acetylacetone, nickel citrate, nickel oxalate, and mixtures thereof.
179. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, further comprising:
mixing at least a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble salt of a Promoter metal selected from any of Group IVB metals, Group VIII metals, and Group IIB metals into the sulfided catalyst precursor, prior to mixing the sulfided catalyst precursor with the hydrocarbon diluent.
180. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, further comprising:
providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble salt of a
Promoter metal selected from any of Group IVB metals, Group VIII metals, and Group IIB metals;
sulfiding the at least a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble salt of a Promoter metal with a sulfiding agent, forming a sulfided Promoter metal precursor; and mixing the sulfided Promoter metal precursor into the sulfided catalyst precursor prior to mixing the sulfided catalyst precursor with the hydrocarbon diluent.
181. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the hydrocarbon diluent comprises a heavy oil feedstock and wherein the metal precursor solution is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock under in-situ sulfiding condition for the heavy oil feedstock to provide the sulfiding agent needed to form the slurry catalyst.
182. The process of claim 181, wherein the in-situ sulfiding condition is at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F and a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
183. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, where the sulfidation of the metal precursor solution occurs ex-situ prior to the heavy oil upgrade.
184. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the sulfiding agent is selected from the group of elemental sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, ammonium sulfide, ammonium polysulfide ((NH4)2SX), ammonium thiosulfate ((NH4)2S203), sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203), thiourea (CSN2H4), carbon disulfide, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), tertiarybutyl polysulfide (PSTB) and tertiarynonyl polysulfide (PSTN), and mixtures thereof.
185. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
186. The process of any of claims 165 - 166, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared thereform has a general formula (M^^L^^S^^C^^H^/O^iN2)^ wherein M is a Primary metal selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= \ \(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5(a + b); 0 <= h <= 3(a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
187. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst composition, comprising:
sulfiding a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Group VIB metal in a water diluent with at least a sulfiding agent forming a sulfided Group VIB metal compound;
combining and reacting the sulfided Group VIB metal compound with a water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Promoter metal selected from Group VIII, Group IIB, Group IIA, and Group IVA metals and combinations thereof in a water diluent to form a catalyst precursor;
mixing the catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to form a slurry catalyst composition having an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη, a BET total surface area of at least 100 m2/g, a polymodal pore distribution with at least 80% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter, and a total pore volume of at least 0.5 cc/g;
wherein at least one of the water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Group VIB metal in a water diluent and the water-soluble metal precursor salt of a Promoter metal in a water diluent has a pH of at least 4 and a concentration of less than 10 wt. % of metal in solution.
188. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least a metal precursor in solution comprising at least two different metal cations in its molecular structure, with at least one of the metal cations is a Group VIB metal cation;
sulfiding the metal precursor with a sulfiding agent forming a catalyst precursor; and mixing the catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to form a slurry catalyst having an average particle size of 1 - 300 μιη.
189. The process of claim 1 , wherein
the mixing of the catalyst precursor with the hydrocarbon diluent is in the presence of a reducing agent and under reducing conditions.
190. The process of any of claims 188 - 189, wherein
the mixing of the catalyst precursor with the hydrocarbon diluent is under high shear mixing forming an emulsion having droplets with particle sizes ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
191. The process of any of claims 188 - 189, wherein providing the at least a metal precursor comprising at least two different metal cations comprises combining and reacting at least a Group VIB metal compound with at least a Promoter metal compound selected from Group VIII, Group IIB, Group IIA, Group IVA metals and combinations thereof.
192. The process of claim 191, wherein the at least one Group VIB metal compound is a water-soluble Group VIB metal salt in solution and the Promoter metal compound is a water-soluble Group VIII metal salt in solution.
193. The process of claim 192, wherein the water-soluble Group VIB metal salt in solution is selected from the group of ammonium dimolybdate, ammonium heptamolybdate, ammonium octamolybdate, potassium molybdate, potassium chromium sulfate, ammonium para-molybdate and mixtures thereof.
194. The process of claim 192, wherein the water-soluble Group VIII metal salt in solution is selected from the group of nickel sulfate, nickel ammonium sulfate, iron sulfate, and mixtures thereof.
195. The process of claim 191, wherein the Group VIB metal compound is an oil soluble molybdenum salt and the Promoter metal compound is an oil soluble Group VIII metal salt.
196. The process of claim 191, wherein the at least one Group VIB metal compound is ammonium dimolybdate and the Promoter metal compound is nickel sulfate.
197. The process of any of claims 188 - 189, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total pore volume of at least 0.4 cc/g.
198. The process of any of claims 188 - 189, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a polymodal pore distribution with at least 80% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 2,000 Angstroms in diameter.
199. The process of any of claims 188 - 189, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has polymodal pore distribution with at least at least 80% of the pore sizes are in the range of 5 to 1000 Angstroms in diameter.
200. The process of any of claims 188 - 189, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total surface area of at least 100 m2/g.
201. The process of any of claims 188 - 189, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has an average particle size ranging from 2 to 100 μιη.
202. The process of claim 192, wherein the water-soluble Group VIB metal salt in solution has a concentration of 5 - 8 wt. % of Group VIB metal.
203. The process of claim 202, wherein the water-soluble Group VIB metal salt in solution has a pH of at least 4.
204. The process of claim 192, wherein the water-soluble Group VIII metal salt in solution has a pH of at least 4.
205. The process of claim 204, wherein the water-soluble Group VIII metal salt in solution has a concentration of 5 - 8 wt. % of Group VIB metal.
206. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least a metal precursor in solution comprising at least two different metal cations in its molecular structure, with at least one of the metal cations is a Group VIB metal cation and at least one of the metal cations is a Promoter metal cation selected from Group VIII, Group IIB, Group IIA, Group IVA metals and combinations thereof;
sulfiding the metal precursor with a sulfiding agent in solution forming a catalyst precursor; and
mixing the catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to form the slurry catalyst.
207. The process of claim 206, wherein at least one of the Group VIB water-soluble salt in a water diluent and the Group VIII water-soluble salt in a water diluent has a pH of at least 4.
208. The process of any claims 206 - 207, wherein at least one of the Group VIB water-soluble salt in a water diluent and the Group VIII water-soluble salt in a water diluent has a metal concentration of 4 to 8 wt. %.
209. The process of any claims 206 - 207, wherein providing the at least a metal precursor comprising at least two different metal cations comprises combining and reacting: a Group VIB water-soluble salt in a water diluent, the Group VIB water soluble salt is selected from the group of ammonium dimolybdate, ammonium heptamolybdate, ammonium octamolybdate, potassium molybdate, potassium chromium sulfate, ammonium para- molybdate and mixtures thereof; and a Group VIII water-soluble salt in a water diluent, the Group VIII water soluble salt is selected from the group of nickel sulfate, nickel ammonium sulfate, iron sulfate, and mixtures thereof.
210. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least a metal precursor of a Primary metal, the Primary metal is selected from a Group VIII metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; sulfiding the Primary metal precursor with a sulfiding agent forming a catalyst precursor; and
mixing the catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent to form a slurry catalyst having a particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη; and a general formula of
Figure imgf000099_0001
wherein M is any of a Group VIII metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; 0.5a <= d <= 4a; 0 <= e <= l la; 0 <=/<= 18a; 0 <= g <= 2a; 0 <= h <= 3a; t, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, S, C, H, O, and N; and ta+vd+we+xf+yg+z h=0.
211. The process of claim 210, wherein
the mixing of the catalyst precursor with the hydrocarbon diluent is in the presence of a reducing agent and under reducing conditions.
212. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein
the mixing of the catalyst precursor with the hydrocarbon diluent is under high shear mixing forming an emulsion having droplets with particle sizes ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
213. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein the Primary metal precursor is a water soluble metal salt selected from the group of acetates, carbonates, chlorides, nitrates, sulfates, citrates, oxalates, and mixtures thereof.
214. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein the hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
215. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein the sulfiding agent is selected from the group of elemental sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, ammonium sulfide, ammonium polysulfide ((NH4)2SX), ammonium thiosulfate ((NH4)2S203), sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203), thiourea (CSN2H4), carbon disulfide, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), tertiarybutyl polysulfide (PSTB) and tertiarynonyl polysulfide (PSTN), and mixtures thereof.
216. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein the Primary metal is nickel and the Primary metal precursor is selected from the group of nickel naphthenate, nickel acetate, nickel oxalate, nickel citrate, nickel octotate, nickel dithiocarbamate, and mixtures thereof.
217. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein the sulfidation of the Primary metal precursor and the mixing with a hydrocarbon diluent occurs concurrently.
218. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein the Primary metal precursor is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock under in-situ sulfiding conditions for the heavy oil feedstock to provide the sulfiding agent needed for the sulfidation forming the slurry catalyst.
219. The process of claim 218, wherein the mixing of the Primary metal precursor with the heavy oil feedstock is at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F under a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
220. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein the concentration of the Primary metal in the Primary metal precursor solution is less than 10 wt. %.
221. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein the Primary metal precursor solution has a pH of at least 4.
222. The process of any claims 210 - 211, wherein the concentration of the Primary metal in the Primary metal precursor solution is between 4 - 8 wt. %.
223. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least a water-soluble nickel salt in solution, wherein the nickel salt is selected from the group of nickel nitrate, nickel sulfate, nickel acetate, nickel chloride, and mixtures thereof;
providing at least a hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil, cycle oil, jet oil, diesel, naphtha, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof; mixing the water-soluble nickel salt in solution with the hydrocarbon diluent under high shear mixing condition forming an emulsion comprising droplets having a size of 0.1 to 300 μιη;
mixing the emulsion with a heavy oil feedstock under in-situ sulfiding condition to form the slurry catalyst.
224. The process of claim 223, wherein the mixing under high shear mixing condition forms an emulsion comprising droplets having a size of less than 50 μιη.
225. The process of any of claims 223 - 224, wherein the mixing of the emulsion with the heavy oil feedstock is at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F under a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
226. The process of any claims 223 - 224, wherein the nickel salt solution has a pH of at least 4.
227. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least an organic nickel complex;
mixing the organic nickel complex with the hydrocarbon diluent under high shear mixing condition forming an emulsion comprising droplets having a size of 0.1 to 300 μιη; sulfiding the emulsion with at least a sulfiding agent to form a slurry catalyst having a particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη; and a general formula of
Figure imgf000101_0001
wherein M is any of a non-noble Group VIII metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; 0.5a <= d <= 4a; 0 <= e <= l la; 0 <=/<= 18a; 0 <= g <= 2a; 0 <= h <= 3a; t, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, S, C, H, O, and N; and ta+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
228. The process of claim 227, wherein the hydrocarbon diluent comprises a heavy oil feedstock and wherein the organic nickel complex is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock under in-situ sulfiding conditions for the heavy oil feedstock to provide the sulfiding agent needed for the sulfidation forming the slurry catalyst.
229. The process of claim 227, wherein the mixing of the nickel salt with the heavy oil feedstock is at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F under a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
230. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising: providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble molybdenum compound and a water-soluble metal zinc compound in water;
mixing the metal precursor solution with a hydrocarbon diluent under sufficiently high shear mixing to generate an emulsion with droplet sizes ranging from 0.1 to 300 μιη; sulfiding the emulsion with at least a sulfiding agent to form a slurry catalyst having a particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη;
wherein the zinc compound is present in the slurry catalyst in a sufficient amount for a zinc to molybdenum weight ratio ranging from 1 : 10 to 10: 1.
231. The process of claim 230, further comprising:
subjecting the emulsion to reduction at a temperature above ambient before or after the sulfiding step.
232. The process of claims 230 - 231 , wherein the emulsion is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock in a reactor under in-situ sulfiding condition for the heavy oil feedstock to provide the sulfiding agent needed for to sulfide the emulsion forming the slurry catalyst.
233. The process of claim 3, wherein the in-situ sulfiding condition is at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F and a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa).
234. The process of claims 230 - 231, where the sulfidation of the emulsion forming the slurry catalyst occurs ex-situ prior to the heavy oil upgrade.
235. The process of claim 234, wherein the sulfiding agent is selected from the group of elemental sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, ammonium sulfide, ammonium polysulfide ([(NH4)2SX), ammonium thiosulfate ((NH4)2S203), sodium thiosulfate Na2S203), thiourea CSN2H4, carbon disulfide, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), tertiarybutyl polysulfide (PSTB) and tertiarynonyl polysulfide (PSTN), and mixtures thereof.
236. The process of claims 230 - 231 , wherein the hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil, cycle oil, jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
237. The process of claim 5, wherein a sufficient amount of sulfiding agent is provided a molar ratio of sulfur to molybdenum of at least 1.5 to 1 to sulfide the emulsion to form the slurry catalyst.
238. The process of claims 230 - 231 , wherein the hydrocarbon diluent comprises a mixture of heavy oil feedstock and at least one of a VGO, MCO, HCO, and mixtures thereof.
239. The process of claims 230 - 231, wherein the emulsion comprises droplets having a size of 0.5 to 200 μιη.
240. The process of claims 230 - 231, wherein the emulsion comprises droplets having a size of less than 100 μιη.
241. The process of claims 230 - 231 , wherein providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble molybdenum compound and a water-soluble metal zinc compound in water comprises providing a solution having a concentration of molybdenum in solution of less than 10 wt. %.
242. The process of claims 230 - 231 , wherein the metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble molybdenum compound and a water-soluble metal zinc compound in water has a concentration of zinc in solution of less than 10 wt. %.
243. The process of claims 230 - 231, wherein the metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble molybdenum compound and a water-soluble metal zinc compound in water has pH of at least 4.
244. The process of claims 230 - 231 , wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a total surface area of at least 100 cm3/g.
245. The process of claims 230 - 231 , wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has a has a total pore volume of at least 0.4 cc/g and a polymodal pore distribution with at least 70% of pore sizes in the range of 5 to 1,000 Angstroms in diameter.
246. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble molybenum salt selected from molybdates, alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates, phosphomolybdic acid, molybdenum oxide, molybdenum carbide, molybdenum nitride, aluminum molybdate, molybdic acid, and mixtures thereof, and a water-soluble zinc salt, at a zinc to molybdenum weight ratio ranging from 1 :30 to 5 : 1 ; mixing the metal precursor solution with a hydrocarbon diluent under high shear mixing and under reducing conditions to generate an emulsion comprising droplets having a size of 0.1 to 300 μιη, the hydrocarbon diluent selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof; mixing the emulsion with at least a heavy oil feedstock under in-situ sulfiding conditions for the heavy oil feedstock to provide at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the emulsion forming a slurry catalyst.
247. The process of claim 246, wherein the slurry catalyst prepared therefrom has an average particle size ranging from 1 to 300 μιη.
248. The process of any claims 246 - 247, wherein the emulsion is mixed with the heavy oil feedstock at a temperature from 752°F to 1112 °F under a pressure from 1435 psig (10 MPa) to 3610 psig (25 MPa) for in-situ sulfiding to take place.
249. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a metal precursor solution comprising at least a water-soluble molybenum salt selected from molybdates, alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates, phosphomolybdic acid, molybdenum oxide, molybdenum carbide, molybdenum nitride, aluminum molybdate, molybdic acid, and mixtures thereof, and a water-soluble zinc salt, at a zinc to molybdenum weight ratio ranging from 1 :30 to 5 : 1 ; providing at least a sulfiding agent to sulfide the metal precursor solution forming a catalyst precursor at a molar ratio of sulfur to molybdenum of at least 1.5 to 1 ; and
mixing the catalyst precursor with at least a hydrocarbon diluent under reducing conditions forming a slurry catalyst.
250. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing at least a first metal precursor comprising a metal salt of a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, and Group IIB metals;
sulfiding the first metal precursor with a first sulfiding agent at a sulfur to Primary metal of at least 1.5 to 1 to form a sulfided catalyst precursor;
sulfiding the sulfided catalyst precursor with a second sulfiding agent at a molar ratio of sulfur to metal in the sulfided catalyst precursor of at least 1.5 to 1 for an enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor;
mixing the enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent forming a slurry catalyst having an average particle size of 1 to 300 μιη.
251. The process of claim 250, further comprising:
providing a second metal precursor comprising at least a metal salt of a Promoter metal selected from the group of Group IVB, Group VIB, Group VIII, Group IIB metals and combinations thereof, wherein the Promoter metal is different from the Primary metal;
combining the sulfided catalyst precursor with the second metal precursor for the sulfided catalyst precursor to be promoted with the Promoter metal prior to sulfiding the sulfided catalyst precursor with a second sulfiding agent.
252. The process of claim 251 , wherein the Promoter metal is nickel, cobalt, and mixtures thereof.
253. The process of claim 251 , wherein the second metal precursor is selected from acetates, carbonates, chlorides, nitrates, actylacetonates, citrates, and oxalates of Group VIII metals.
254. The process of any claims 250 - 251 , wherein first metal precursor comprising at least a water-soluble metal salt of a Group VIB metal.
255. The process of any claims 250 - 251 , wherein Primary metal is molybdenum the metal salt is selected from the group of molybdates, alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates, phosphomolybdic acid, molybdenum oxide, molybdenum carbide, molybdenum nitride, aluminum molybdate, molybdic acid, and mixtures thereof.
256. The process of claim 250, further comprising:
providing a second metal precursor comprising at least a metal salt of a Promoter metal selected from Group IVB, Group VIII, Group IIB metals and combinations thereof; combining the second metal precursor into the first metal precursor prior to sulfiding the metal precursor with a first sulfiding agent to form a sulfided catalyst precursor.
257. The process of claim 256, wherein the Promoter metal is selected from nickel, cobalt, and mixtures thereof.
258. The process of any claims 250 - 251 , wherein the Promoter metal is nickel and the Promoter metal salt is selected from the group of nickel acetate, nickel carbonate, nickel chloride, nickel sulfate, nickel nitrate, nickel acetylacetone, nickel citrate, nickel oxalate, and mixtures thereof.
259. The process of any claims 250 - 251 , wherein the first sulfiding agent and the second sulfiding agent are selected from the group of elemental sulfur, H2S, ammonium sulfide, ammonium polysulfide ((NH4)2SX), ammonium thiosulfate ((NH4)2S203), sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203), thiourea (CSN2H4), carbon disulfide, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), tertiarybutyl polysulfide (PSTB) and tertiarynonyl polysulfide (PSTN), and mixtures thereof.
260. The process of any claims 250 - 251 , wherein the first sulfiding agent is the same as the second sulfiding agent.
261. The process of any claims 250 - 251 , wherein the first sulfiding agent is different from the second sulfiding agent.
262. The process of any claims 250 - 251 , wherein the hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil (VGO), cycle oil (MCO or HCO), jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
263. The process of claim 250, wherein the slurry catalyst formed has a general formula of (M (L (Sv)^Cw)e(Hx)XOy)g(Nz)A, wherein M is a Primary metal selected from group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals; L is optional as a Promoter metal and L is different from M, L is at least one of a Group VIII metal, a Group VIB metal, a Group IVB metal, and a Group IIB metal; b >= 0; 0 =< b I a =< 5; 0.5(a + b) <= d <= 5(a + b); 0 <= e <= 1 l(a+b); 0 <=/<= 18(a+6); 0 <= g <= 5 a + b); 0 <= h <= 3 a + b); t, u, v, w, x, y, z, each representing total charge for each of: M, L, S, C, H, O and N, respectively; and ta+ub+vd+we+xf+yg+zh=0.
264. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a first metal precursor comprising water-soluble salt of a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals, Group VIII metals, and Group IIB metals;
sulfiding the metal precursor with a first sulfiding agent to form a first sulfided precursor;
combining the first sulfided precursor with a second metal precursor comprising a metal salt of a Promoter metal selected from the group of Group VIII metals, Group VIB metals, Group IVB metals, and Group IIB metals, and mixtures thereof wherein the
Promoter metal is different from the Primary metal, for a promoted sulfided precursor;
sulfiding the promoted sulfided precursor with a second sulfiding agent at a molar ratio of sulfur to total metals in the promoted sulfided precursor of at least 1.5 to 1 for an enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor;
mixing the enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent forming a slurry catalyst having an average particle size of 1 to 300 μιη.
265. The process of claim 264, further comprising subjecting the enhanced sulfided catalyst precursor to reduction at a temperature above ambient.
266. The process of any claims 264 - 265, wherein the Primary metal is
molybdenum and the water-soluble salt is selected from the group of molybdates, alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates,
phosphomolybdic acid, molybdenum oxide, molybdenum carbide, molybdenum nitride, aluminum molybdate, molybdic acid, and mixtures thereof.
267. The process of any claims 264 - 265, wherein the Promoter metal is nickel and the Promoter metal salt is selected from the group of nickel acetate, nickel carbonate, nickel chloride, nickel sulfate, nickel nitrate, nickel acetylacetone, nickel citrate, nickel oxalate, and mixtures thereof.
268. The process of any claims 264 - 265, wherein the hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil, cycle oil, jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
269. The process of any claims 264 - 265, wherein the first sulfiding agent and the second sulfiding agent are selected from the group of elemental sulfur, H2S, ammonium sulfide, ammonium polysulfide ( (NH4)2SX), ammonium thiosulfate ((NH4)2S203), sodium thiosulfate (Na2S203), thiourea (CSN2H4), carbon disulfide, dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), dimethyl sulfide (DMS), tertiarybutyl polysulfide (PSTB) and tertiarynonyl polysulfide (PSTN), and mixtures thereof.
270. In a process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock comprising: providing a first metal precursor comprising a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals and a promoter metal precursor comprising at least a Promoter metal selected from Group IVB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals and combinations thereof, for a Promoter metal to a Primary metal weight ratio ranging from 1 - 50 wt. %; sulfiding the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor separately, concurrently, or together, forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor; and mixing the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent forming a slurry catalyst having an average particle size of 1 to 300 μιη, the improvement comprising:
apportioning at least one of the metal precursors into a first portion and a second portion at a ratio of first portion to second portion ranging from 1 : 10 to 10: 1;
employing the first portion in the sulfidation step to form the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor; and
mixing the second portion with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor before, during, or after the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent to form the slurry catalyst.
271. The process of claim 270, wherein:
the at least one of the metal precursors apportioned into the first portion and the second portion is the promoter metal precursor.
272. The process of claim 271, wherein:
the second portion of the promoter metal precursor is mixed with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor after the sulfidation step and prior to the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent.
273. The process of claim 271 , wherein:
the second portion of the promoter metal precursor is mixed with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor during the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent.
274. The process of claim 271, wherein:
the second portion of the promoter metal precursor is mixed with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor after to the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent.
275. The process of claim 271, wherein the sulfiding of the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor comprises: sulfiding a mixture of the first metal precursor and the first portion of the promoter metal precursor with at least a sulfiding agent to form the promoted sulfided metal precursor.
276. The process of claim 271, wherein the sulfiding of the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor comprises: sulfiding the first portion of the promoter metal precursor with at least a sulfiding agent to form a sulfided metal precursor; and
combining the first metal precursor with the sulfided metal precursor to form the promoted sulfided metal precursor.
277. The process of claim 271, wherein the sulfiding of the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor comprises: sulfiding the first metal precursor with at least a sulfiding agent to form a sulfided metal precursor; and combining the first portion of the promoter metal precursor with the sulfided metal precursor to form the promoted sulfided metal precursor.
278. The process of claim 270, wherein:
the at least one of the metal precursors is the first metal precursor.
279. The process of claim 278, wherein:
the second portion of the first metal precursor is mixed with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor after the sulfidation step and prior to the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent.
280. The process of claim 278, wherein:
the second portion of the first metal precursor is mixed with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor during the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent.
281. The process of claim 278, wherein:
the second portion of the first metal precursor is mixed with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor prior to the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent.
282. The process of claim 278, wherein the sulfiding of the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor comprises: sulfiding a mixture of the first portion of the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor with at least a sulfiding agent to form the promoted sulfided metal precursor.
283. The process of claim 278, wherein the sulfiding of the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor comprises: sulfiding the promoter metal precursor with at least a sulfiding agent to form a sulfided promoter metal precursor; and
combining the first portion of the first metal precursor with the sulfided promoter metal precursor metal precursor to form the promoted sulfided metal precursor.
284. The process of claim 278, wherein the sulfiding of the first metal precursor and the promoter metal precursor forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor comprises: sulfiding the first portion of the first metal precursor with at least a sulfiding agent to form a sulfided metal precursor; and
combining the promoter metal precursor with the sulfided metal precursor metal precursor to form the promoted sulfided metal precursor.
285. The process of claim 270, wherein the hydrocarbon diluent is selected from gasoline, diesel, vacuum gas oil, cycle oil, jet oil, fuel oil, heavy oil feedstock, and mixtures thereof.
286. The process of claim 270, wherein the improvement further comprises:
sulfiding the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor with a sulfiding agent for an enhanced sulfiding step before mixing the second portion with the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor before, during, or after the mixing step with a hydrocarbon diluent to form the slurry catalyst.
287. The process of claim 270, wherein the Primary metal is molybdenum and the first metal precursor is selected from the group of molybdates, alkali metal heptamolybdates, alkali metal orthomolybdates, alkali metal isomolybdates, phosphomolybdic acid, molybdenum oxide, molybdenum carbide, molybdenum nitride, aluminum molybdate, molybdic acid, and mixtures thereof.
288. The process of claim 270, wherein the Promoter metal is nickel and the promoter metal precursor is selected from the group of nickel acetate, nickel carbonate, nickel chloride, nickel sulfate, nickel nitrate, nickel acetylacetone, nickel citrate, nickel oxalate, and mixtures thereof.
289. A process for preparing a slurry catalyst for use in upgrading heavy oil feedstock, comprising:
providing a first metal precursor comprising a water-soluble salt of a Primary metal selected from Group VIB metals;
providing a promoter metal precursor comprising at least a water-soluble salt of a Promoter metal selected from Group IVB metals, Group VIII metals, Group IIB metals and combinations thereof, for a Promoter metal to Primary metal weight ratio from 1 to 49 wt.
%; apportioning the promoter metal precursor into a first portion and a second portion at a ratio of first portion to second portion ranging from 1 : 10 to 10: 1;
sulfiding the first metal precursor and the first portion of the promoter metal precursor with a sulfiding agent forming a sulfided catalyst precursor; and
mixing the second portion of the promoter metal precursor with the sulfided catalyst precursor forming a promoted sulfided catalyst precursor;
mixing the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent forming a slurry catalyst having an average particle size of 1 to 300 μιη.
290. The process of claim 289, wherein the mixing of the promoted sulfided catalyst precursor with a hydrocarbon diluent is under reducing conditions in the presence of a reducing agent.
PCT/US2011/066016 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof WO2012092006A2 (en)

Priority Applications (12)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2817986A CA2817986C (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof
MX2013007317A MX2013007317A (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof.
EP11853753.9A EP2658647B1 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof
EA201390997A EA201390997A1 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 CATALYSTS OF HYDRAULIC PROCESSING AND METHODS OF THEIR RECEPTION
JP2013547537A JP6097224B2 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Method for making a hydrotreating catalyst
FIEP11853753.9T FI2658647T3 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof
SG2013041074A SG190910A1 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof
CN2011800600490A CN103260749A (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof
BR112013009690A BR112013009690A2 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for preparing them
ES11853753T ES2981864T3 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for their preparation
KR1020137020290A KR101927396B1 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing Catalysts and Methods for Making Thereof
DK11853753.9T DK2658647T3 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydrotreating catalysts and methods of making the same

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201061428599P 2010-12-30 2010-12-30
US61/428,599 2010-12-30

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012092006A2 true WO2012092006A2 (en) 2012-07-05
WO2012092006A3 WO2012092006A3 (en) 2013-01-17

Family

ID=46379803

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2011/066016 WO2012092006A2 (en) 2010-12-30 2011-12-20 Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof

Country Status (15)

Country Link
US (13) US9018124B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2658647B1 (en)
JP (1) JP6097224B2 (en)
KR (1) KR101927396B1 (en)
CN (1) CN103260749A (en)
BR (1) BR112013009690A2 (en)
CA (2) CA3164929A1 (en)
DK (1) DK2658647T3 (en)
EA (1) EA201390997A1 (en)
ES (1) ES2981864T3 (en)
FI (1) FI2658647T3 (en)
MX (1) MX2013007317A (en)
PT (1) PT2658647T (en)
SG (1) SG190910A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2012092006A2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023187732A1 (en) 2022-04-01 2023-10-05 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Renewable biomass feed slurry hydroprocessing
WO2023248198A1 (en) 2022-06-24 2023-12-28 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Renewable solid biomass slurry hydroconversion catalyst, method of making, and slurry hydroconversion process

Families Citing this family (77)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SG190910A1 (en) * 2010-12-30 2013-07-31 Chevron Usa Inc Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof
US20140166541A1 (en) * 2012-12-14 2014-06-19 Julie Chabot Hydroprocessing co-catalyst compositions and methods of introduction thereof into hydroprocessing units
US9687823B2 (en) * 2012-12-14 2017-06-27 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Hydroprocessing co-catalyst compositions and methods of introduction thereof into hydroprocessing units
RU2517188C1 (en) * 2013-01-09 2014-05-27 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Москаз-Ойл" Method of producing nanostructured phthalocyanine catalyst for demercaptanisation of oil and gas condensate
CN104043473B (en) * 2013-03-13 2016-10-05 中国石油化工股份有限公司 A kind of hydrocracking catalyst and application thereof
US9404053B2 (en) 2013-04-11 2016-08-02 Shell Oil Company Low-pressure process utilizing a stacked-bed system of specific catalysts for the hydrotreating of a gas oil feedstock
US9546327B2 (en) 2013-04-11 2017-01-17 Shell Oil Company Process for upgrading a high endpoint gas oil containing high concentrations of thiophenes and nitrogen and providing for a reduced hydrogen consumption rate
KR102216537B1 (en) 2013-04-23 2021-02-17 쉘 인터내셔날 리써취 마트샤피지 비.브이. Process for preparing a sulphided catalyst
KR102297213B1 (en) * 2013-05-31 2021-09-02 쉘 인터내셔날 리써취 마트샤피지 비.브이. A hydroprocessing catalyst composition containing a heterocyclic polar compound, a method of making such a catalyst, and a process of using such catalyst
CN104277876B (en) * 2013-07-05 2016-04-13 任相坤 A kind of two-stage slurry bed system hydrogenation technique of poor quality oil
CN104789252B (en) * 2014-01-21 2018-06-12 北京金菲特能源科技有限公司 A kind of universal heavy charge catalysis slurry hyd lightening method and device
US10584294B2 (en) * 2014-12-23 2020-03-10 Rhodia Operations Slurry suspension comprising torrefied wood particles
FR3033797B1 (en) * 2015-03-16 2018-12-07 IFP Energies Nouvelles IMPROVED PROCESS FOR CONVERTING HEAVY HYDROCARBON LOADS
RU2608035C1 (en) * 2015-07-30 2017-01-12 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Институт нефтехимического синтеза им. А.В. Топчиева Российской академии наук (ИНХС РАН) Method of hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbon raw material (versions)
CN105327700A (en) * 2015-11-18 2016-02-17 华南理工大学 Method for preparing electrocatalysts through liquid-phase reduction of hydrogen at room temperature
US10046315B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2018-08-14 Uop Llc Crystalline transition metal molybdotungstate
US10052616B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2018-08-21 Uop Llc Crystalline ammonia transition metal molybdotungstate
US10399065B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2019-09-03 Uop Llc Crystalline transition metal tungstate
US10233398B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2019-03-19 Uop Llc Crystalline transition metal oxy-hydroxide molybdotungstate
US10053637B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2018-08-21 Uop Llc Transition metal tungsten oxy-hydroxide
US10322404B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2019-06-18 Uop Llc Crystalline transition metal oxy-hydroxide molybdate
US10449523B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2019-10-22 Uop Llc Crystalline bis-ammonia transition metal molybdotungstate
US10005812B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2018-06-26 Uop Llc Transition metal molybdotungsten oxy-hydroxide
US10052614B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2018-08-21 Uop Llc Mixed metal oxides
US10399063B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2019-09-03 Uop Llc Mixed metal oxides
US10232357B2 (en) 2015-12-15 2019-03-19 Uop Llc Crystalline ammonia transition metal molybdate
US10400181B2 (en) * 2015-12-15 2019-09-03 Uop Llc Crystalline bis-ammonia metal molybdate
CN118496683A (en) * 2016-01-08 2024-08-16 伊诺弗斯公司 Scavenger composition for sulfur species
CN107774146B (en) * 2016-08-24 2020-05-05 北京华石联合能源科技发展有限公司 Equipment for preparing catalyst slurry and application
CN107774145A (en) * 2016-08-24 2018-03-09 北京华石联合能源科技发展有限公司 A kind of technique for preparing catalyst slurry
CN106423220B (en) * 2016-11-16 2018-10-02 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 A kind of preparation method of hydrofining catalyst carrier
WO2018117339A1 (en) * 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 고려대학교 산학협력단 Method for preparing light crude oil from extra heavy crude oil using sulfurized nickel-molybdenum-tungsten dispersion type catalyst without use of carrier
US9993808B1 (en) * 2017-04-10 2018-06-12 Kuwait Institute For Scientific Research Method for preparing nanosized sulfide catalysts
CN107055893B (en) * 2017-04-28 2021-02-02 浙江奇彩环境科技股份有限公司 Method for treating wastewater containing low-concentration DMF
US11439998B2 (en) 2017-07-26 2022-09-13 Chem32, Llc Methods of treating and sulfiding hydroconversion catalysts
CN107570152A (en) * 2017-08-17 2018-01-12 孟庆桓 A kind of catalyst and hydrotreating method for high calcium content heavy crude oil hydrocracking
US10882030B2 (en) 2017-08-25 2021-01-05 Uop Llc Crystalline transition metal tungstate
US10773245B2 (en) 2017-08-25 2020-09-15 Uop Llc Crystalline transition metal molybdotungstate
RU2652122C1 (en) * 2017-09-08 2018-04-25 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Институт нефтехимического синтеза им. А.В. Топчиева Российской академии наук (ИНХС РАН) Method of obtaining the suspension of the heavy oil raw material hydroconversion catalyst
US11078088B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2021-08-03 Uop Llc Highly active multimetallic materials using short-chain alkyl quaternary ammonium compounds
US10822247B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2020-11-03 Uop Llc Highly active trimetallic materials using short-chain alkyl quaternary ammonium compounds
US11034591B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2021-06-15 Uop Llc Highly active quaternary metallic materials using short-chain alkyl quaternary ammonium compounds
US10995013B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2021-05-04 Uop Llc Mixed transition metal tungstate
US10875013B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2020-12-29 Uop Llc Crystalline oxy-hydroxide transition metal molybdotungstate
US11117811B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2021-09-14 Uop Llc Highly active quaternary metallic materials using short-chain alkyl quaternary ammonium compounds
US11007515B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2021-05-18 Uop Llc Highly active trimetallic materials using short-chain alkyl quaternary ammonium compounds
US10843176B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2020-11-24 Uop Llc Highly active quaternary metallic materials using short-chain alkyl quaternary ammonium compounds
CN110237861A (en) * 2018-03-07 2019-09-17 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Preparation method of hydrocracking catalyst and inferior heavy oil/residual oil slurry bed hydrogenation reaction method
CN108855200A (en) * 2018-05-30 2018-11-23 中南大学 A kind of preparation method of the support type black titanium dioxide of high catalytic activity
US10737248B2 (en) 2018-06-26 2020-08-11 Uop Llc Crystalline transition metal tungstate
US10737249B2 (en) 2018-06-26 2020-08-11 Uop Llc Crystalline transition metal molybdotungstate
US10688479B2 (en) 2018-06-26 2020-06-23 Uop Llc Crystalline transition metal tungstate
US11033883B2 (en) 2018-06-26 2021-06-15 Uop Llc Transition metal molybdotungstate material
US10682632B2 (en) 2018-06-26 2020-06-16 Uop Llc Transition metal tungstate material
US10737246B2 (en) 2018-06-29 2020-08-11 Uop Llc Poorly crystalline transition metal tungstate
US10981151B2 (en) 2018-06-29 2021-04-20 Uop Llc Poorly crystalline transition metal molybdotungstate
RU2675249C1 (en) * 2018-08-06 2018-12-18 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Институт нефтехимического синтеза им. А.В. Топчиева Российской академии наук (ИНХС РАН) Method for obtaining suspension of molybden-containing composite catalyst for hydroconversion of heavy oil stock
RS63555B1 (en) * 2018-09-25 2022-09-30 Eni Spa Process for the hydroconversion of heavy oil products with recycling
US11213803B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2022-01-04 Uop Llc Ammonia-free synthesis for Al or Si based multimetallic materials
US10933407B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2021-03-02 Uop Llc Ammonia-free synthesis for Al or Si based multimetallic materials
JP6630458B1 (en) * 2019-05-15 2020-01-15 日本ケッチェン株式会社 Hydrotreating catalyst for hydrocarbon oil and method for hydrotreating hydrocarbon oil using the catalyst
RU2699065C1 (en) * 2019-05-16 2019-09-03 Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки "Федеральный исследовательский центр "Институт катализа им. Г.К. Борескова Сибирского отделения Российской академии наук" (ИК СО РАН) Catalyst for heavy crude oil refining process and method of its preparation (versions)
US11426711B2 (en) 2019-05-22 2022-08-30 Uop Llc Method of making highly active metal oxide and metal sulfide materials
MX2019008622A (en) * 2019-07-19 2021-01-20 Mexicano Inst Petrol Hydroprocessing of heavy crudes by catalysts in homogenous phase.
CN112742429A (en) * 2019-10-29 2021-05-04 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Preparation method of hydrotreating catalyst
US11118121B2 (en) 2019-12-19 2021-09-14 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Catalyst and process of upgrading heavy oil in the presence of steam
CN111841662B (en) * 2020-06-11 2023-01-20 宁波博汇化工科技股份有限公司 Pre-sulfurization process of hydrorefining catalyst
CN111841630A (en) * 2020-06-24 2020-10-30 中国石油大学(华东) Fatty acid nickel oil-soluble catalyst for coal/heavy oil hydrogenation co-refining and application thereof
CN114433232B (en) * 2020-10-16 2023-07-28 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Hydrogenation carbon residue removal catalyst and preparation method and application thereof
CN114425448B (en) * 2020-10-16 2023-09-01 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Hydrodesulfurization catalyst and preparation method and application thereof
CN114425449B (en) * 2020-10-16 2023-09-01 中国石油化工股份有限公司 Hydrodesulfurization catalyst and preparation method and application thereof
CN112371138A (en) * 2020-11-12 2021-02-19 中国石油大学(华东) Preparation and application method of self-vulcanized oil-soluble molybdenum-based multi-metal synergistic catalyst
CN113528146B (en) * 2021-08-19 2022-01-28 河南大学 Preparation and application of surface-modified silicon dioxide-doped ferrous sulfide soil heavy metal passivator
CN115028249B (en) * 2022-01-04 2023-06-20 北华大学 Synthesis method of nano reactor for degrading perfluoro caprylic acid
WO2023154077A1 (en) 2022-02-14 2023-08-17 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Metals recovery from spent supported catalyst
US20230383198A1 (en) * 2022-05-26 2023-11-30 Hydrocarbon Technology & Innovation, Llc Method and system for introducing catalyst precursor into heavy oil using parallel mixer lines and bypass line
US20230381727A1 (en) * 2022-05-26 2023-11-30 Hydrocarbon Technology & Innovation, Llc Method and system for mixing catalyst precursor into heavy oil using a high boiling hydrocarbon diluent

Citations (47)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2238851A (en) 1938-07-16 1941-04-15 Standard Catalytic Co Thermal treatment of carbonaceous materials
US4066574A (en) 1973-08-09 1978-01-03 Chevron Research Company Hydrocarbon hydrotreating catalyst composition
US4341625A (en) 1973-08-09 1982-07-27 Chevron Research Company Method for preparing a catalyst carrier, a catalyst containing the carrier, and a hydrocarbon hydrodesulfurization process using the catalyst
US4824821A (en) 1983-08-29 1989-04-25 Chevron Research Company Dispersed group VIB metal sulfide catalyst promoted with Group VIII metal
US5484755A (en) 1983-08-29 1996-01-16 Lopez; Jaime Process for preparing a dispersed Group VIB metal sulfide catalyst
US5498586A (en) 1993-02-19 1996-03-12 Texaco Inc. Catalyst with specified pore size distribution
US5841013A (en) 1994-05-17 1998-11-24 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Aromatics hydrogenation with a new class of metal oxides
US5968348A (en) 1994-05-16 1999-10-19 Texaco Inc. Hydroconversion process employing a phosphorus loaded NiMo catalyst with specified pore size distribution
US5980730A (en) 1996-10-02 1999-11-09 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for converting a heavy hydrocarbon fraction using an ebullated bed hydrodemetallization catalyst
US6030915A (en) 1996-03-11 2000-02-29 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for preparing a large pore hydroprocessing catalyst
US6156695A (en) 1997-07-15 2000-12-05 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Nickel molybdotungstate hydrotreating catalysts
US6162350A (en) 1997-07-15 2000-12-19 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts (HEN-9901)
US6274530B1 (en) 1997-03-27 2001-08-14 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Fluid hydrocracking catalyst precursor and method
US6299760B1 (en) 1999-08-12 2001-10-09 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Nickel molybodtungstate hydrotreating catalysts (law444)
US6566296B2 (en) 2000-07-12 2003-05-20 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for preparing an additive-based mixed metal catalyst, its composition and use
US6589908B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2003-07-08 Shell Oil Company Method of making alumina having bimodal pore structure, and catalysts made therefrom
US6620313B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2003-09-16 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroconversion process using bulk group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US6635599B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2003-10-21 Exxonmobil Research & Engineering Company Mixed metal catalyst, its preparation by co-precipitation, and its use
US6652738B2 (en) 1999-01-15 2003-11-25 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for preparing a mixed metal catalyst composition
US6667271B2 (en) 2000-08-30 2003-12-23 Haldor Topsoe A/S Hydrotreating catalyst particles
US6758963B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-07-06 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk group VIII/group vib catalysts
US20040132614A1 (en) 2002-08-01 2004-07-08 Virginie Harle Catalyst based on a group VI metal and a group VIII metal at least partially present in the form of heteropolyanions in the oxide precursor
US6783663B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-08-31 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydrotreating using bulk multimetallic catalysts
US20060054535A1 (en) 2004-09-10 2006-03-16 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for upgrading heavy oil using a highly active slurry catalyst composition
US7185870B2 (en) 2003-03-07 2007-03-06 Lite-On Technology Corporation Positioning mechanism for reflectors in scanner
US20070090024A1 (en) 2005-10-26 2007-04-26 Soled Stuart L Hydroprocessing using bulk bimetallic catalysts
US7229548B2 (en) 1997-07-15 2007-06-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Process for upgrading naphtha
US7232515B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2007-06-19 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydrofining process using bulk group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US7288182B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2007-10-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US7410928B2 (en) 2004-09-10 2008-08-12 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Highly active slurry catalyst composition
US20080223755A1 (en) 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Magalie Roy-Auberger Process for hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbon feeds in a slurry reactor in the presence of a heteropolyanion-based catalyst
US7449103B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2008-11-11 Headwaters Heavy Oil, Llc Ebullated bed hydroprocessing methods and systems and methods of upgrading an existing ebullated bed system
US20090054225A1 (en) 2004-09-10 2009-02-26 Oleg Mironov Hydroprocessing Bulk Catalyst and Uses Thereof
US20090107889A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Theodorus Ludovicus Michael Maesen Hydroconversion Processes Employing Multi-Metallic Catalysts and Method for Making Thereof
US7544285B2 (en) 2003-02-24 2009-06-09 Shell Oil Company Catalyst composition preparation and use
US7560407B2 (en) 2003-11-20 2009-07-14 Advanced Refining Technologies, Llc Hydroconversion catalysts and methods of making and using same
US7615196B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2009-11-10 Shell Oil Company Systems for producing a crude product
US7618530B2 (en) 2006-01-12 2009-11-17 The Boc Group, Inc. Heavy oil hydroconversion process
US20090310435A1 (en) 2004-04-28 2009-12-17 Headwaters Heavy Oil, Llc Mixing systems for introducing a catalyst precursor into a heavy oil feedstock
US7658895B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2010-02-09 Chevron U.S.A. Inc Process for recovering base metals from spent hydroprocessing catalyst
US7754645B2 (en) 2004-09-10 2010-07-13 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for preparing hydroprocessing bulk catalysts
US20100234212A1 (en) 2004-09-10 2010-09-16 Axel Brait Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and uses thereof
US7803266B2 (en) 2004-03-23 2010-09-28 IFP Energies Nouvelles Doped spherically-shaped supported catalyst and process for hydrotreating and hydroconverting metal-containing oil fractions
US7837960B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2010-11-23 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for separating and recovering base metals from used hydroprocessing catalyst
US7846404B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2010-12-07 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for separating and recovering base metals from used hydroprocessing catalyst
US8024232B2 (en) 2009-07-24 2011-09-20 Hitachi Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd. Recording and reproducing apparatus for content
US20110306490A1 (en) 2010-06-10 2011-12-15 Uop Llc Composition of supported molybdenum catalyst for slurry hydrocracking

Family Cites Families (139)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BE759284A (en) 1969-11-24 1971-05-24 Shell Int Research METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTACT OF A LIQUID WITH SOLID PARTICLES
US4014821A (en) * 1974-02-07 1977-03-29 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Heavy crude conversion catalyst
US4087354A (en) 1976-11-18 1978-05-02 Uop Inc. Integrated heat exchange on crude oil and vacuum columns
US4244839A (en) * 1978-10-30 1981-01-13 Exxon Research & Engineering Co. High surface area catalysts
US4424839A (en) * 1980-01-22 1984-01-10 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Inlet for a fuel tank
US4440868A (en) 1981-12-07 1984-04-03 Ashland Oil, Inc. Carbo-metallic oil conversion catalysts
US4485004A (en) 1982-09-07 1984-11-27 Gulf Canada Limited Catalytic hydrocracking in the presence of hydrogen donor
US4491639A (en) * 1982-09-30 1985-01-01 Gas Research Institute Methods of making high activity transition metal catalysts
US4592827A (en) 1983-01-28 1986-06-03 Intevep, S.A. Hydroconversion of heavy crudes with high metal and asphaltene content in the presence of soluble metallic compounds and water
US5162282A (en) 1983-08-29 1992-11-10 Chevron Research And Technology Company Heavy oil hydroprocessing with group VI metal slurry catalyst
US4970190A (en) 1983-08-29 1990-11-13 Chevron Research Company Heavy oil hydroprocessing with group VI metal slurry catalyst
US5178749A (en) 1983-08-29 1993-01-12 Chevron Research And Technology Company Catalytic process for treating heavy oils
US5164075A (en) 1983-08-29 1992-11-17 Chevron Research & Technology Company High activity slurry catalyst
US4710486A (en) 1983-08-29 1987-12-01 Chevron Research Company Process for preparing heavy oil hydroprocessing slurry catalyst
US4684456A (en) 1985-12-20 1987-08-04 Lummus Crest Inc. Control of bed expansion in expanded bed reactor
US4853106A (en) 1987-08-19 1989-08-01 Mobil Oil Corporation Delayed coking process
CA1296670C (en) 1988-04-15 1992-03-03 Anil K. Jain Use of antifoam to achieve high conversion in hydroconversion of heavy oils
US5041404A (en) 1988-09-13 1991-08-20 Cri Ventures, Inc. Method of presulfiding a hydrotreating, hydrocracking or tail gas treating catalyst
US4943547A (en) 1988-09-13 1990-07-24 Seamans James D Method of presulfiding a hydrotreating catalyst
US4961840A (en) 1989-04-13 1990-10-09 Amoco Corporation Antifoam process for delayed coking
US4991639A (en) * 1989-12-06 1991-02-12 Whiting Roll-Up Door Mfg. Corp. Guard members for preventing shifting cargo from intefering with the operation of a roll-up door
US5039392A (en) 1990-06-04 1991-08-13 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Hydroconversion process using a sulfided molybdenum catalyst concentrate
US5298152A (en) 1992-06-02 1994-03-29 Chevron Research And Technology Company Process to prevent catalyst deactivation in activated slurry hydroprocessing
CA2104044C (en) 1992-08-25 2004-11-02 Johan W. Gosselink Process for the preparation of lower olefins
US5286691A (en) 1992-10-26 1994-02-15 Mobil Oil Coproration Demetallation in FCC regenerator
US5527473A (en) 1993-07-15 1996-06-18 Ackerman; Carl D. Process for performing reactions in a liquid-solid catalyst slurry
US6270654B1 (en) 1993-08-18 2001-08-07 Ifp North America, Inc. Catalytic hydrogenation process utilizing multi-stage ebullated bed reactors
US5374348A (en) 1993-09-13 1994-12-20 Energy Mines & Resources - Canada Hydrocracking of heavy hydrocarbon oils with heavy hydrocarbon recycle
US6139723A (en) 1996-02-23 2000-10-31 Hydrocarbon Technologies, Inc. Iron-based ionic liquid catalysts for hydroprocessing carbonaceous feeds
US5871638A (en) 1996-02-23 1999-02-16 Hydrocarbon Technologies, Inc. Dispersed anion-modified phosphorus-promoted iron oxide catalysts
US6190542B1 (en) 1996-02-23 2001-02-20 Hydrocarbon Technologies, Inc. Catalytic multi-stage process for hydroconversion and refining hydrocarbon feeds
US5914010A (en) 1996-09-19 1999-06-22 Ormat Industries Ltd. Apparatus for solvent-deasphalting residual oil containing asphaltenes
DE69708829T2 (en) 1996-12-27 2002-04-04 Inst Francais Du Petrol Hydrogen treatment and hydrocracking catalyst containing a mixed sulfide with sulfur, at least one element from group 5B and at least one element from group 6B
ZA98586B (en) 1997-02-20 1999-07-23 Sasol Tech Pty Ltd "Hydrogenation of hydrocarbons".
US5925238A (en) 1997-05-09 1999-07-20 Ifp North America Catalytic multi-stage hydrodesulfurization of metals-containing petroleum residua with cascading of rejuvenated catalyst
US6755963B2 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-06-29 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Hydrogenation process for hydrocarbon resins
US6712955B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-03-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Slurry hydroprocessing using bulk multimetallic catalysts
US5935418A (en) 1997-08-29 1999-08-10 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Slurry hydroprocessing
WO1999017874A1 (en) 1997-10-08 1999-04-15 Corning Incorporated Method of making activated carbon-supported catalysts
DE69920489T2 (en) 1998-07-29 2005-12-01 Texaco Development Corp. INTEGRATED SOLVENT TASTE PACKAGING AND GASIFICATION PROCESS
US6852214B1 (en) 1998-08-31 2005-02-08 Mobil Oil Corporation Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US6846403B2 (en) 1998-12-28 2005-01-25 Mobil Oil Corporation Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US6974787B2 (en) 1998-08-31 2005-12-13 Exxonmobil Corporation Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US20020153283A1 (en) 1998-12-28 2002-10-24 Arthur W Chester Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US6156693A (en) 1998-10-09 2000-12-05 Penn State Research Foundation Method for preparing a highly active, unsupported high-surface-area ub. MoS.s2 catalyst
US6291391B1 (en) 1998-11-12 2001-09-18 Ifp North America, Inc. Method for presulfiding and preconditioning of residuum hydroconversion catalyst
US5977192A (en) 1998-11-13 1999-11-02 Exxon Research And Engineering Co. Small catalyst particle addition to slurry reactor
US7803267B2 (en) 1998-12-28 2010-09-28 W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US6630066B2 (en) 1999-01-08 2003-10-07 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Hydrocracking and hydrotreating separate refinery streams
US6554994B1 (en) 1999-04-13 2003-04-29 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Upflow reactor system with layered catalyst bed for hydrotreating heavy feedstocks
US6241855B1 (en) 1999-08-24 2001-06-05 Petro-Chem Development Co. Inc. Upflow delayed coker charger heater and process
AU779963B2 (en) 1999-09-20 2005-02-24 Mobil Oil Corporation Gasoline sulfur reduction in fluid catalytic cracking
US6635169B1 (en) 1999-09-20 2003-10-21 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for reducing gasoline sulfur in fluid catalytic cracking
US6277895B1 (en) 1999-09-21 2001-08-21 Hydrocarbon Technologies, Inc. Skeletal iron catalyst having improved attrition resistance and product selectivity in slurry-phase synthesis processes
US6451729B1 (en) 1999-10-06 2002-09-17 The Penn State Research Foundation Method for preparing a highly active, unsupported high surface-area MoS2 catalyst
US20030129109A1 (en) 1999-11-01 2003-07-10 Yoram Bronicki Method of and apparatus for processing heavy hydrocarbon feeds description
JP4863540B2 (en) 2000-07-31 2012-01-25 ソニー株式会社 Recording / playback apparatus and content management method
US6726832B1 (en) 2000-08-15 2004-04-27 Abb Lummus Global Inc. Multiple stage catalyst bed hydrocracking with interstage feeds
CN1098337C (en) 2000-11-02 2003-01-08 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 Novel normal-pressure heavy oil suspension bed hydrogenation process adopting multi-metal liquid catalyst
US7166209B2 (en) 2001-03-01 2007-01-23 Intevep, S.A. Hydroprocessing process
US6755962B2 (en) 2001-05-09 2004-06-29 Conocophillips Company Combined thermal and catalytic treatment of heavy petroleum in a slurry phase counterflow reactor
ITMI20011438A1 (en) 2001-07-06 2003-01-06 Snam Progetti PROCEDURE FOR THE CONVERSION OF HEAVY CHARGES SUCH AS HEAVY FATS AND DISTILLATION RESIDUES
JP3724438B2 (en) 2002-03-08 2005-12-07 株式会社日立製作所 Method and apparatus for treating heavy oil with supercritical water, and power generation system equipped with heavy oil treatment apparatus
US7922894B2 (en) 2002-12-06 2011-04-12 Albemarle Netherlands, B.V. HPC process using a mixture of catalysts
US8123932B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2012-02-28 Eni S.P.A. Process for the conversion of heavy feedstocks such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues
AU2003300217B2 (en) 2002-12-20 2010-07-22 Eni S.P.A. Process for the conversion of heavy feedstocks such as heavy crude oils and distillation residues
US7214308B2 (en) 2003-02-21 2007-05-08 Institut Francais Du Petrole Effective integration of solvent deasphalting and ebullated-bed processing
FR2851569B1 (en) 2003-02-21 2007-04-20 Inst Francais Du Petrole TWO-STAGE HYDROCRACKING PROCESS USING AMORPHOUS CATALYST BASED ON PLATINUM AND PALLADIUM
WO2005023416A1 (en) 2003-04-07 2005-03-17 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Molybdenum sulfide/carbide catalysts
JP4091871B2 (en) * 2003-04-16 2008-05-28 アルパイン株式会社 Data processing device
US7150823B2 (en) 2003-07-02 2006-12-19 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Catalytic filtering of a Fischer-Tropsch derived hydrocarbon stream
JP4098181B2 (en) 2003-08-05 2008-06-11 株式会社日立製作所 Heavy oil treatment method and heavy oil treatment system
US7435330B2 (en) 2003-10-07 2008-10-14 Hitachi, Ltd. Heavy oil reforming method, an apparatus therefor, and gas turbine power generation system
DE10351085A1 (en) 2003-10-31 2005-06-16 Inventa-Fischer Gmbh & Co. Kg Tower reactor and its use for the continuous production of high molecular weight polyester
US20060289340A1 (en) 2003-12-19 2006-12-28 Brownscombe Thomas F Methods for producing a total product in the presence of sulfur
US20070000810A1 (en) 2003-12-19 2007-01-04 Bhan Opinder K Method for producing a crude product with reduced tan
US20070000808A1 (en) 2003-12-19 2007-01-04 Bhan Opinder K Method and catalyst for producing a crude product having selected properties
US20070012595A1 (en) 2003-12-19 2007-01-18 Brownscombe Thomas F Methods for producing a total product in the presence of sulfur
US7402547B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2008-07-22 Shell Oil Company Systems and methods of producing a crude product
EP1737571B1 (en) 2004-01-20 2016-06-22 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. A method of restoring catalytic activity of a spent hydroprocessing catalyst
US7413669B2 (en) 2004-04-06 2008-08-19 Intevep, S.A. Separator for liquids and/or multiphase fluids
KR101399811B1 (en) 2004-04-28 2014-05-27 헤드워터스 헤비 오일, 엘엘씨 Fixed bed hydroprocessing methods and systems and methods for upgrading an existing fixed bed system
EP1753844B1 (en) 2004-04-28 2016-06-08 Headwaters Heavy Oil, LLC Hydroprocessing method and system for upgrading heavy oil
US7358413B2 (en) 2004-07-14 2008-04-15 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Process for reducing fouling from flash/separation apparatus during cracking of hydrocarbon feedstocks
DK1794264T3 (en) 2004-09-08 2020-08-24 Shell Int Research COMPOSITION OF HYDRO CRACKING CATALYST
US7214309B2 (en) * 2004-09-10 2007-05-08 Chevron U.S.A. Inc Process for upgrading heavy oil using a highly active slurry catalyst composition
US7678732B2 (en) * 2004-09-10 2010-03-16 Chevron Usa Inc. Highly active slurry catalyst composition
US7678731B2 (en) * 2004-09-10 2010-03-16 Chevron Usa Inc. Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and uses thereof
US7972499B2 (en) * 2004-09-10 2011-07-05 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for recycling an active slurry catalyst composition in heavy oil upgrading
FR2875509B1 (en) 2004-09-20 2006-11-24 Inst Francais Du Petrole METHOD OF HYDROCONVERSION OF HEAVY LOAD WITH DISPERSED CATALYST
US7544632B2 (en) 2004-09-22 2009-06-09 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Bulk Ni-Mo-W catalysts made from precursors containing an organic agent
US7591942B2 (en) 2004-09-22 2009-09-22 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Bulk bi-metallic catalysts made from precursors containing an organic agent
US7648941B2 (en) 2004-09-22 2010-01-19 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Bulk bimetallic catalysts, method of making bulk bimetallic catalysts and hydroprocessing using bulk bimetallic catalysts
ITMI20042446A1 (en) 2004-12-22 2005-03-22 Eni Spa PROCEDURE FOR CONVERSION OF PESANTYI CHARGES SUCH AS HEAVY CRATES AND DISTILLATION RESIDUES
ITMI20042445A1 (en) 2004-12-22 2005-03-22 Eni Spa PROCEDURE FOR THE CONVERSION OF HEAVY CHARGES WHICH WEIGHING AND DISTILLATION WASTE
US7918992B2 (en) 2005-04-11 2011-04-05 Shell Oil Company Systems, methods, and catalysts for producing a crude product
CN100513520C (en) 2005-07-05 2009-07-15 中国石油大学(北京) Method for realizing heavy oil deep-step separation by coupled residue granulating
EP1754770B1 (en) 2005-08-16 2017-01-18 Research Institute of Petroleum Process for hydroconverting of a heavy hydrocarbonaceous feedstock
US7947165B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2011-05-24 Yeda Research And Development Co.Ltd Method for extracting and upgrading of heavy and semi-heavy oils and bitumens
WO2007050635A2 (en) 2005-10-26 2007-05-03 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using hydrothermally-prepared bulk multimetallic catalysts
US7897537B2 (en) 2005-11-23 2011-03-01 University Of Calgary Ultradispersed catalyst compositions and methods of preparation
JP5057262B2 (en) 2005-12-12 2012-10-24 東海カーボン株式会社 Method for producing surface-modified carbon black
US7943036B2 (en) * 2009-07-21 2011-05-17 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Systems and methods for producing a crude product
US8048292B2 (en) * 2005-12-16 2011-11-01 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Systems and methods for producing a crude product
US7842635B2 (en) 2006-01-06 2010-11-30 Headwaters Technology Innovation, Llc Hydrocarbon-soluble, bimetallic catalyst precursors and methods for making same
US7670984B2 (en) 2006-01-06 2010-03-02 Headwaters Technology Innovation, Llc Hydrocarbon-soluble molybdenum catalyst precursors and methods for making same
CN101007966A (en) * 2006-01-12 2007-08-01 波克股份有限公司 Heavy oil hydroconversion process
DK1996677T3 (en) 2006-01-17 2015-08-03 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co PROCESS FOR THE PREPARATION OF A catalyst for the hydrodesulfurization of naphtha
US20070284285A1 (en) 2006-06-09 2007-12-13 Terence Mitchell Stepanik Method of Upgrading a Heavy Oil Feedstock
US20070295646A1 (en) 2006-06-22 2007-12-27 Bhan Opinder K Method for producing a crude product with a long-life catalyst
CA2655576A1 (en) 2006-06-22 2007-12-27 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Methods for producing a total product with selective hydrocarbon production
WO2007149913A1 (en) 2006-06-22 2007-12-27 Shell Oil Company Methods for producing a total product with minimal uptake of hydrogen
RU2009101916A (en) 2006-06-22 2010-07-27 Шелл Интернэшнл Рисерч Маатсхаппий Б.В. (NL) METHODS FOR PRODUCING UNCLEANED PRODUCT FROM SELECTED RAW MATERIALS
US20080087575A1 (en) 2006-10-06 2008-04-17 Bhan Opinder K Systems and methods for producing a crude product and compositions thereof
FR2906814B1 (en) 2006-10-06 2012-09-21 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR CONVERTING DESASPHALTEE OIL
US7744743B2 (en) 2006-10-30 2010-06-29 Exxonmobil Chemical Patents Inc. Process for upgrading tar
US20080099377A1 (en) 2006-10-31 2008-05-01 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for upgrading heavy hydrocarbon oils
US9764314B2 (en) 2006-11-07 2017-09-19 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Control of fluid catalytic cracking process for minimizing additive usage in the desulfurization of petroleum feedstocks
US8372264B2 (en) 2006-11-17 2013-02-12 Roger G. Etter System and method for introducing an additive into a coking process to improve quality and yields of coker products
EP2097498A4 (en) 2006-11-17 2012-09-05 Roger G Etter Selective cracking and coking of undesirable components in coker recycle and gas oils
FR2910352B1 (en) * 2006-12-21 2010-10-08 Inst Francais Du Petrole PROCESS FOR HYDROCONVERSION IN THE SLURRY PHASE OF HEAVY HYDROCARBON LOADS AND / OR CHARCOAL USING A SUPPORTED CATALYST
US7745552B2 (en) 2007-06-29 2010-06-29 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Fouling prevention in polymerization reactors
US7638057B2 (en) 2007-10-22 2009-12-29 Syncrude Canada Ltd. Method of treating water using petroleum coke
US8034232B2 (en) * 2007-10-31 2011-10-11 Headwaters Technology Innovation, Llc Methods for increasing catalyst concentration in heavy oil and/or coal resid hydrocracker
KR20100105611A (en) 2007-11-28 2010-09-29 사우디 아라비안 오일 컴퍼니 Process to upgrade highly waxy crude oil by hot pressurized water
EP2234710A2 (en) 2007-11-28 2010-10-06 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Process for catalytic hydrotreating of sour crude oils
WO2009086107A2 (en) * 2007-12-20 2009-07-09 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Heavy oil upgrade process including recovery of spent catalyst
US7906447B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2011-03-15 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Regeneration and rejuvenation of supported hydroprocessing catalysts
US8128811B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2012-03-06 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using rejuvenated supported hydroprocessing catalysts
US8206577B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2012-06-26 Kuperman Alexander E System and method for pretreatment of solid carbonaceous material
US8123934B2 (en) * 2008-06-18 2012-02-28 Chevron U.S.A., Inc. System and method for pretreatment of solid carbonaceous material
US7931797B2 (en) * 2009-07-21 2011-04-26 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Systems and methods for producing a crude product
CN102413933B (en) * 2009-04-29 2016-09-14 雪佛龙美国公司 Hydro-conversion multimetal reforming catalyst and preparation method thereof
US8551323B2 (en) * 2009-08-31 2013-10-08 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Systems and methods for hydroprocessing a heavy oil feedstock
US8389433B2 (en) * 2009-11-24 2013-03-05 Chevron U.S.A. Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and methods of making thereof
US8431511B2 (en) * 2009-11-24 2013-04-30 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and methods of making thereof
US8420565B2 (en) * 2009-11-24 2013-04-16 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and methods of making thereof
US8372776B2 (en) * 2009-11-24 2013-02-12 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and methods of making thereof
SG190910A1 (en) * 2010-12-30 2013-07-31 Chevron Usa Inc Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof

Patent Citations (60)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2238851A (en) 1938-07-16 1941-04-15 Standard Catalytic Co Thermal treatment of carbonaceous materials
US4066574A (en) 1973-08-09 1978-01-03 Chevron Research Company Hydrocarbon hydrotreating catalyst composition
US4113661A (en) 1973-08-09 1978-09-12 Chevron Research Company Method for preparing a hydrodesulfurization catalyst
US4341625A (en) 1973-08-09 1982-07-27 Chevron Research Company Method for preparing a catalyst carrier, a catalyst containing the carrier, and a hydrocarbon hydrodesulfurization process using the catalyst
US5484755A (en) 1983-08-29 1996-01-16 Lopez; Jaime Process for preparing a dispersed Group VIB metal sulfide catalyst
US4824821A (en) 1983-08-29 1989-04-25 Chevron Research Company Dispersed group VIB metal sulfide catalyst promoted with Group VIII metal
US5498586A (en) 1993-02-19 1996-03-12 Texaco Inc. Catalyst with specified pore size distribution
US5968348A (en) 1994-05-16 1999-10-19 Texaco Inc. Hydroconversion process employing a phosphorus loaded NiMo catalyst with specified pore size distribution
US5841013A (en) 1994-05-17 1998-11-24 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Aromatics hydrogenation with a new class of metal oxides
US6030915A (en) 1996-03-11 2000-02-29 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for preparing a large pore hydroprocessing catalyst
US5980730A (en) 1996-10-02 1999-11-09 Institut Francais Du Petrole Process for converting a heavy hydrocarbon fraction using an ebullated bed hydrodemetallization catalyst
US6274530B1 (en) 1997-03-27 2001-08-14 Bp Corporation North America Inc. Fluid hydrocracking catalyst precursor and method
US6162350A (en) 1997-07-15 2000-12-19 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts (HEN-9901)
US6783663B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-08-31 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydrotreating using bulk multimetallic catalysts
US6156695A (en) 1997-07-15 2000-12-05 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Nickel molybdotungstate hydrotreating catalysts
US7288182B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2007-10-30 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk Group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US6620313B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2003-09-16 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroconversion process using bulk group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US6635599B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2003-10-21 Exxonmobil Research & Engineering Company Mixed metal catalyst, its preparation by co-precipitation, and its use
US7232515B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2007-06-19 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydrofining process using bulk group VIII/Group VIB catalysts
US6758963B1 (en) 1997-07-15 2004-07-06 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Hydroprocessing using bulk group VIII/group vib catalysts
US7229548B2 (en) 1997-07-15 2007-06-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Process for upgrading naphtha
US6652738B2 (en) 1999-01-15 2003-11-25 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for preparing a mixed metal catalyst composition
US6299760B1 (en) 1999-08-12 2001-10-09 Exxon Research And Engineering Company Nickel molybodtungstate hydrotreating catalysts (law444)
US6566296B2 (en) 2000-07-12 2003-05-20 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for preparing an additive-based mixed metal catalyst, its composition and use
US6860987B2 (en) 2000-07-12 2005-03-01 Akzo Nobel N.V. Process for the hydroprocessing of hydrocarbon feedstocks
US6667271B2 (en) 2000-08-30 2003-12-23 Haldor Topsoe A/S Hydrotreating catalyst particles
US6589908B1 (en) 2000-11-28 2003-07-08 Shell Oil Company Method of making alumina having bimodal pore structure, and catalysts made therefrom
US7179366B2 (en) 2002-08-01 2007-02-20 Institut Francais Du Petrole Catalyst based on a group VI metal and a group VIII metal at least partially present in the form of heteropolyanions in the oxide precursor
US20040132614A1 (en) 2002-08-01 2004-07-08 Virginie Harle Catalyst based on a group VI metal and a group VIII metal at least partially present in the form of heteropolyanions in the oxide precursor
US7544285B2 (en) 2003-02-24 2009-06-09 Shell Oil Company Catalyst composition preparation and use
US7185870B2 (en) 2003-03-07 2007-03-06 Lite-On Technology Corporation Positioning mechanism for reflectors in scanner
US7642212B2 (en) 2003-11-20 2010-01-05 Advanced Refining Technologies Llc Hydroconversion catalysts and methods of making and using same
US7560407B2 (en) 2003-11-20 2009-07-14 Advanced Refining Technologies, Llc Hydroconversion catalysts and methods of making and using same
US7615196B2 (en) 2003-12-19 2009-11-10 Shell Oil Company Systems for producing a crude product
US7803266B2 (en) 2004-03-23 2010-09-28 IFP Energies Nouvelles Doped spherically-shaped supported catalyst and process for hydrotreating and hydroconverting metal-containing oil fractions
US7449103B2 (en) 2004-04-28 2008-11-11 Headwaters Heavy Oil, Llc Ebullated bed hydroprocessing methods and systems and methods of upgrading an existing ebullated bed system
US20110226667A1 (en) 2004-04-28 2011-09-22 Headwaters Technology Innovation, Llc Methods for hydrocracking a heavy oil feedstock using an in situ colloidal or molecular catalyst and recycling the colloidal or molecular catalyst
US20090310435A1 (en) 2004-04-28 2009-12-17 Headwaters Heavy Oil, Llc Mixing systems for introducing a catalyst precursor into a heavy oil feedstock
US20090054225A1 (en) 2004-09-10 2009-02-26 Oleg Mironov Hydroprocessing Bulk Catalyst and Uses Thereof
US20100234212A1 (en) 2004-09-10 2010-09-16 Axel Brait Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and uses thereof
US7754645B2 (en) 2004-09-10 2010-07-13 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for preparing hydroprocessing bulk catalysts
US7410928B2 (en) 2004-09-10 2008-08-12 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Highly active slurry catalyst composition
US20060054535A1 (en) 2004-09-10 2006-03-16 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for upgrading heavy oil using a highly active slurry catalyst composition
US20070090024A1 (en) 2005-10-26 2007-04-26 Soled Stuart L Hydroprocessing using bulk bimetallic catalysts
US7618530B2 (en) 2006-01-12 2009-11-17 The Boc Group, Inc. Heavy oil hydroconversion process
US20080223755A1 (en) 2007-03-16 2008-09-18 Magalie Roy-Auberger Process for hydroconversion of heavy hydrocarbon feeds in a slurry reactor in the presence of a heteropolyanion-based catalyst
US20090112010A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Theodorus Maesen Hydroconversion Processes Employing Multi-Metallic Catalysts and Method for Making Thereof
US20090112011A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Hydroconversion process employing multi-metallic catalysts and method for making thereof
US20090111686A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Alexander Kuperman Hydroconversion Processes Employing Multi-Metallic Catalysts and Method for Making Thereof
US20090111682A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Theodorus Maesen Hydroconversion Processes Employing Multi-Metallic Catalysts and Method for Making Thereof
US20090111685A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Theodorus Maesen Hydroconversion Processes Employing Multi-Metallic Catalysts and Method for Making Thereof
US20090107889A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Theodorus Ludovicus Michael Maesen Hydroconversion Processes Employing Multi-Metallic Catalysts and Method for Making Thereof
US20090107886A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Theodorus Maesen Hydroconversion Processes Employing Multi-Metallic Catalysts and Method for Making Thereof
US20090111683A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Bi-Zeng Zhan Hydroconversion Processes Employing Multi-Metallic Catalysts and Method for Making Thereof
US20090107883A1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Theodorus Maesen Hydroconversion Processes Employing Multi-Metallic Catalysts and Method for Making Thereof
US7837960B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2010-11-23 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for separating and recovering base metals from used hydroprocessing catalyst
US7846404B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2010-12-07 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Process for separating and recovering base metals from used hydroprocessing catalyst
US7658895B2 (en) 2007-11-28 2010-02-09 Chevron U.S.A. Inc Process for recovering base metals from spent hydroprocessing catalyst
US8024232B2 (en) 2009-07-24 2011-09-20 Hitachi Consumer Electronics Co., Ltd. Recording and reproducing apparatus for content
US20110306490A1 (en) 2010-06-10 2011-12-15 Uop Llc Composition of supported molybdenum catalyst for slurry hydrocracking

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
IND. ENG. CHEM. RES., vol. 49, 2010, pages 1412 - 1418

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2023187732A1 (en) 2022-04-01 2023-10-05 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Renewable biomass feed slurry hydroprocessing
WO2023248198A1 (en) 2022-06-24 2023-12-28 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Renewable solid biomass slurry hydroconversion catalyst, method of making, and slurry hydroconversion process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20120168350A1 (en) 2012-07-05
JP2014506831A (en) 2014-03-20
CA2817986A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US8809223B2 (en) 2014-08-19
US8846560B2 (en) 2014-09-30
US20120172199A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US20120168351A1 (en) 2012-07-05
KR20140006857A (en) 2014-01-16
EP2658647B1 (en) 2024-04-10
US8778828B2 (en) 2014-07-15
US20120172204A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US20120172198A1 (en) 2012-07-05
PT2658647T (en) 2024-07-15
SG190910A1 (en) 2013-07-31
US20120172203A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US8802586B2 (en) 2014-08-12
US8697594B2 (en) 2014-04-15
US20120172201A1 (en) 2012-07-05
EP2658647A4 (en) 2015-01-21
US8809222B2 (en) 2014-08-19
CA3164929A1 (en) 2012-07-05
EA201390997A1 (en) 2014-03-31
BR112013009690A2 (en) 2016-07-19
WO2012092006A3 (en) 2013-01-17
KR101927396B1 (en) 2018-12-11
DK2658647T3 (en) 2024-07-15
US20120172200A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US20120172206A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US8703637B2 (en) 2014-04-22
JP6097224B2 (en) 2017-03-15
US20120172207A1 (en) 2012-07-05
CN103260749A (en) 2013-08-21
US20120172202A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US9018124B2 (en) 2015-04-28
MX2013007317A (en) 2013-07-22
ES2981864T3 (en) 2024-10-10
US20120172197A1 (en) 2012-07-05
FI2658647T3 (en) 2024-07-10
US20120172205A1 (en) 2012-07-05
US9040446B2 (en) 2015-05-26
EP2658647A2 (en) 2013-11-06
US9040447B2 (en) 2015-05-26
US8802587B2 (en) 2014-08-12
CA2817986C (en) 2022-09-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8697594B2 (en) Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof
US9169449B2 (en) Hydroprocessing catalysts and methods for making thereof
JP5566896B2 (en) Hydrotreating bulk catalyst and use thereof
US7678731B2 (en) Hydroprocessing bulk catalyst and uses thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11853753

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2011853753

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2817986

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: MX/A/2013/007317

Country of ref document: MX

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2013547537

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 201390997

Country of ref document: EA

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 20137020290

Country of ref document: KR

Kind code of ref document: A

REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: BR

Ref legal event code: B01A

Ref document number: 112013009690

Country of ref document: BR

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 112013009690

Country of ref document: BR

Kind code of ref document: A2

Effective date: 20130419