WO2012069472A1 - Eliminating turbulence in wall bounded flows - Google Patents
Eliminating turbulence in wall bounded flows Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2012069472A1 WO2012069472A1 PCT/EP2011/070680 EP2011070680W WO2012069472A1 WO 2012069472 A1 WO2012069472 A1 WO 2012069472A1 EP 2011070680 W EP2011070680 W EP 2011070680W WO 2012069472 A1 WO2012069472 A1 WO 2012069472A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- flow
- bounding wall
- section
- moved
- bounding
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15D—FLUID DYNAMICS, i.e. METHODS OR MEANS FOR INFLUENCING THE FLOW OF GASES OR LIQUIDS
- F15D1/00—Influencing flow of fluids
- F15D1/02—Influencing flow of fluids in pipes or conduits
- F15D1/06—Influencing flow of fluids in pipes or conduits by influencing the boundary layer
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F17—STORING OR DISTRIBUTING GASES OR LIQUIDS
- F17D—PIPE-LINE SYSTEMS; PIPE-LINES
- F17D1/00—Pipe-line systems
- F17D1/20—Arrangements or systems of devices for influencing or altering dynamic characteristics of the systems, e.g. for damping pulsations caused by opening or closing of valves
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F15—FLUID-PRESSURE ACTUATORS; HYDRAULICS OR PNEUMATICS IN GENERAL
- F15D—FLUID DYNAMICS, i.e. METHODS OR MEANS FOR INFLUENCING THE FLOW OF GASES OR LIQUIDS
- F15D1/00—Influencing flow of fluids
- F15D1/002—Influencing flow of fluids by influencing the boundary layer
- F15D1/0065—Influencing flow of fluids by influencing the boundary layer using active means, e.g. supplying external energy or injecting fluid
- F15D1/007—Influencing flow of fluids by influencing the boundary layer using active means, e.g. supplying external energy or injecting fluid comprising surfaces being moved by external supplied energy
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/0318—Processes
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T137/00—Fluid handling
- Y10T137/8593—Systems
Definitions
- the flow may be laminar or turbulent, the drag in a boundary layer being much higher with a turbulent flow than with a laminar flow.
- a laminar flow often has big advantages over a turbulent flow in that it saves energy, like for example in pumping a liquid through a pipe or channel.
- Hof et al. point out, that a distortion of the velocity profile at the turbulent laminar interface cannot be as readily implemented in practice as in simulations.
- the present invention relates to an apparatus for eliminating turbulence in a wall bounded flow, the apparatus comprising a drive unit moving a section of the flow-bounding wall in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall.
- Fig. 1 illustrates the general concept of the new method
- Fig. 3 is a graph of further measurement data obtained at a higher Reynolds-number than Fig. 2 and also indicating the effect of the new method;
- Fig. 4 shows a first embodiment of an apparatus for implementing the control region of Fig. 1 ;
- the moved section of the flow-bounding wall preferably essentially includes the full flow-bounding wall bounding the flow over a length of the flow. I. e., over this length of the flow there are preferably no parts of the flow-bounding wall which are not moved in the direction of the flow.
- the moved section of the flow-bounding wall is a liner of a section of this lumen.
- This liner may be moved in the direction of the flow out of an initial position into an end position, and afterwards be retracted back into its initial position. This retracting may take place at a time at which the flow is not flowing over the flow-bounding wall or it may take place at much lower velocity against the direction of the flow than in the direction of the flow when turbulence in the flow is to be laminarized.
- This embodiment of the invention is well-suited for such cases in which the turbulence in the flow to be re-laminarized does not permanently occur.
- the new method easily works with high Reynolds-numbers above 3000, 4000 or even above 5000.
- the new apparatus for eliminating turbulence in a wall bounded flow comprises a drive unit moving a section of the flow-bounding wall in the direction of the flow over the flow- bounding wall. Most of the details of the new apparatus correspond to the details of the new method already described.
- the present invention is applicable to flows only bounded by the flow-bounding wall in one direction like a flow over a surface of an aeroplane or submarine.
- the invention is of particular interest with flows through pipes and channels.
- the moved section may be a partial liner of the pipe or channel.
- this partial liner may be a film tube or consist of a plurality of film bands lining a part of the pipe or channel.
- Fig. 1 shows a pipe 1 through which a fluid 2 flows in a flow direction 3.
- the fluid 2 displays a turbulent flow 6.
- this turbulent flow 6 is laminarized such that a laminar flow 7 leaves the control region 5 and stays laminar with the typical parabolic velocity profile 8 over the cross section of the pipe 1 in a part 9 of the pipe 1 downstream of the control region 5 as long as the laminar flow 7 is not disturbed for turbulence again.
- the method according to the present invention laminarizing the flow in the control region 5 of Fig. 1 is not yet active ("Control off”). Then the method is started ("Control on”). As a result, the drag of the flow indicated by the normalized pressure difference drops to the drag or pressure difference of a laminar flow.
- laminarizing the flow in the control region 5 reduces the drag of the flow through the downstream part 9 of the pipe 1 by more than a factor of two.
- Fig. 3 is another graph of a pressure difference ⁇ measured over a length of the part 9 of the pipe 1 according to Fig. 1 and normalized to the pressure difference Api am inar Of a laminar flow through the part 9.
- the further details of the measurent and the basic result are the same as in Fig. 2.
- the effect of the present invention at the higher Reynolds-number is even higher: Laminarizing the flow in the control region 5 reduces the drag of the flow through the downstream part 9 of the pipe 1 by a factor of 3,5 here.
- Fig. 4 shows the particular set up of the control region 5 with which the data according to Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 have been obtained.
- a pipe section 10 partially lining the pipe 1 is moved along the axis of the pipe 1 in the flow direction 3.
- the wall 1 1 of the pipe section 10 fully encloses the fluid 2 within the pipe 1 in radial direction, i.e., the wall 11 is the entire flow-bounding wall 12 in the area of the pipe section 10.
- the liner 10 defines that section 13 of the flow-bounding wall 12 which is moved in the flow direction 3 through the pipe 1 according to the present invention, and it may also be designated as a liner 14 of the pipe 1 .
- the relative length of the section 13 indicated in Fig. 4 is too short. In the experiment producing the results indicated in Fig. 2 the length of the section 13 was about 60 times the diameter of the pipe 1.
- Fig. 5 shows another embodiment of the control section 5 in the pipe 1.
- the liner 14 of the pipe 1 is made of film bands 15 running as closed loops 16 around rollers 17 which are located outside the pipe 1.
- the moved section 13 of the flow- bounding wall 12 stays in place, i. e., it does not move along the pipe 1 , although the parts of the film bands 15 in contact with the fluid 2 move in the flow direction 3.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Pipe Accessories (AREA)
- Extrusion Moulding Of Plastics Or The Like (AREA)
Abstract
For eliminating turbulence in a wall bounded flow a section of the flow-bounding wall is moved in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall.
Description
ELIMINATING TURBULENCE IN WALL BOUNDED FLOWS
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention generally relates to a method of and an apparatus for eliminating turbulence in a wall bounded flow.
In a wall bounded flow, i.e. in a flow of a fluid over a wall, the wall exerts shear forces onto the fluid, and, as a result, a boundary layer of the flow is formed at the flow-bounding wall in which the flow is affected by the wall.
In such a boundary layer, depending on the actual conditions, the flow may be laminar or turbulent, the drag in a boundary layer being much higher with a turbulent flow than with a laminar flow. Thus, a laminar flow often has big advantages over a turbulent flow in that it saves energy, like for example in pumping a liquid through a pipe or channel.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In Bjorn Hof et al.: Eliminating turbulence in spatially intermittent flows, Science 19, March 2010: Vol. 327, No. 5972, pp. 1491-1494, which in its entirety is incorporated herein by reference, the inventor of the present invention and co-authors disclosed a method of eliminating turbulence in a spatially intermittent flow through a pipe in that the parabolic velocity profile of a laminar flow is distorted to a plug like velocity profile upstream of a turbulent puff. The distortion of the velocity profile reduces the sudden change of the axial velocity across the rear of the turbulent puff. In numerical simulations, this proposal is reported to be successful in eliminating turbulence. Once having eliminated the turbulent puff, a forcing needed to distort the parabolic velocity profile may even be switched off, and the flow continues to re-laminarize. However, Hof et al. point out, that a distortion of the velocity profile at the turbulent laminar interface cannot be as readily implemented in practice as in simulations. Thus, they
proposed to use a second turbulent puff upstream of the original one to distort the velocity profile at the rear end of the original puff. When the second turbulent puff is induced at a short distance upstream of the original puff, the short distance between the two puffs is insufficient to allow a parabolic velocity profile to fully develop, despite the fact that the flow is not turbulent between the two puffs. Hof et al. could show that introducing the additional puff allows for keeping the flow in a pipe laminar downstream of the additional puff, even in the area of the original puff. However, they pointed out that their simple strategy only works well fur sufficiently small Reynolds-numbers of Re < 2000 in pipes, Re < 1400 in channels and Re < 1800 in ducts, and that it becomes less efficient as Re increases, and once the regime of spatially expanding turbulence is reached (Re > 2500 in pipes) it fails. On the other hand, in their numerical simulations, the basic concept of distorting the velocity profile to re-laminarize a turbulence proved successful even with larger Reynolds-numbers and reduced the drag more than by a factor of two.
There still remains a need of having a practicable method of and an apparatus for eliminating turbulence in wall bounded flows which also work at larger Reynolds-numbers.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In an aspect, the present invention relates to a method of eliminating turbulence in a wall bounded flow, the method comprising the step of moving a section of the flow-bounding wall in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall.
In another aspect, the present invention relates to an apparatus for eliminating turbulence in a wall bounded flow, the apparatus comprising a drive unit moving a section of the flow-bounding wall in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and the detailed description. It is
intended that all such additional features and advantages be included herein within the scope of the present invention, as defined by the claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present invention. In the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Fig. 1 illustrates the general concept of the new method;
Fig. 2 is a graph of measurement data indicating the effect of the new method;
Fig. 3 is a graph of further measurement data obtained at a higher Reynolds-number than Fig. 2 and also indicating the effect of the new method;
Fig. 4 shows a first embodiment of an apparatus for implementing the control region of Fig. 1 ; and
Fig. 5 shows a second embodiment of an apparatus for implementing the control region of Fig. 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The Reynolds-number as used here is defined as Re=ClD/v, where LI is the mean flow speed or average flow velocity, D is the pipe diameter and v is the kinematic viscosity (so far as a flow through a pipe is concerned; otherwise a corresponding definition of Re for a flow through a channel or over a flow-bounding wall is to be applied).
In the new method, a part or section of the flow-bounding wall is moved in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall. In the area of this moved section of the flow-bounding wall, the fluid in the boundary layer of the flow which is located close to the flow-bounding wall is accelerated as compared to its velocity of zero with a fixed flow-
bounding wall. With a constant average velocity of the flow, this results in a distortion of the velocity profile in that the maximum difference in velocity between the fluid in the boundary layer directly adjacent to the flow-bounding wall and the fluid in the centre of the flow or even outside the boundary layer is reduced. As a direct consequence, the shearing forces in the boundary layer feeding turbulence are reduced. In fact, the new method is not only able to avoid the occurrence of turbulence but also to re-laminarize an already turbulent flow. If the flow is not disturbed again downstream of the point at which the new method is executed, it may stay laminar indefinitely (Reynolds-number permitting). Thus, a local application of the new method may reduce the drag of a flow over a very long distance, like for example an entire pipe or channel. In this way, the new method may be used to strongly decrease the energy spent for pumping fluids like gases and liquids.
In the new method the moved section of the flow-bounding wall preferably essentially includes the full flow-bounding wall bounding the flow over a length of the flow. I. e., over this length of the flow there are preferably no parts of the flow-bounding wall which are not moved in the direction of the flow.
The suitable length of the flow over which the moved section should include the full flow-bounding wall will depend on the velocity at which the section of the flow-bounding wall is moved. Generally, this length of the flow should be at least about 20, preferably at least about 25 and more preferably at least about 30 boundary layer thicknesses long. In this context the boundary thickness layer may be defined as the thickness over which the flow- bounding wall affects the flow. If the flow-bounding wall encloses a lumen through which the flow flows, like in case of a pipe or a channel, the moved section of the flow-bounding wall generally is at least about 20, preferably at least about 25 and more preferably at least about 30 diameters of this lumen long.
At the downstream end of the section of the flow-bounding wall moved in the
direction of the flow, care should be taken to not induce any new turbulence in the laminar flow leaving the section. This may be achieved by a smooth transit between the moved section and the adjacent fixed section of the flow-bounding wall. Such a smooth transit may be achieved in that the moved section only includes a part of the flow-bounding wall at its downstream end. Another means of avoiding turbulences at the downstream end of the moved section is to keep a free flow cross section through which the flow flows constant or to slightly increase this free flow cross section to decelerate the flow.
In the new method, other sections of the flow-bounding wall than the moved section are not moving in the direction of the flow but are fixed. Such fixed sections of the flow- bounding wall may be arranged both upstream and downstream of the moved section.
It has already been indicated that the length of the flow over which the section of the flow-bounding wall which is moved in the direction of the flow according to the invention should extend may depend on the velocity at which the section is moved. Generally, this velocity should be at least about 40 %, preferably at least about 50 % and most preferably at least about 60 % of an average flow velocity of the flow over the unmoved flow-bounding wall. However, even with lower velocities of the moved section of the flow-bounding wall than 40 % of an average flow velocity of the flow the laminarization effect may be achieved.
On the other hand, the velocity of the moved section of the flow-bounding wall may, in principle, even be higher than the average flow velocity over the unmoved flow-bounding wall. Preferably, however, this velocity is at maximum about the same as the average flow velocity over the unmoved flow-bounding wall which makes implementation of the present invention much easier with very quick flows.
In particular, the moved section of the flow-bounding wall may be a partial cover of the overall flow-bounding wall. For example, it may be a film covering a part of the flow- bounding wall. Such a film can be circulated in a closed loop, a feed back branch of the film
loop running outside the area of the flow.
I n a particular embodiment of the new method, wherein the flow-bounding wall encloses a lumen through which the flow flows, the moved section of the flow-bounding wall is a liner of a section of this lumen. This liner may be moved in the direction of the flow out of an initial position into an end position, and afterwards be retracted back into its initial position. This retracting may take place at a time at which the flow is not flowing over the flow-bounding wall or it may take place at much lower velocity against the direction of the flow than in the direction of the flow when turbulence in the flow is to be laminarized. This embodiment of the invention is well-suited for such cases in which the turbulence in the flow to be re-laminarized does not permanently occur.
The new method easily works with high Reynolds-numbers above 3000, 4000 or even above 5000.
The new apparatus for eliminating turbulence in a wall bounded flow comprises a drive unit moving a section of the flow-bounding wall in the direction of the flow over the flow- bounding wall. Most of the details of the new apparatus correspond to the details of the new method already described.
The present invention is applicable to flows only bounded by the flow-bounding wall in one direction like a flow over a surface of an aeroplane or submarine. The invention, however, is of particular interest with flows through pipes and channels. Here, the moved section may be a partial liner of the pipe or channel. Particularly, this partial liner may be a film tube or consist of a plurality of film bands lining a part of the pipe or channel.
Now referring in greater details to the drawings, Fig. 1 shows a pipe 1 through which a fluid 2 flows in a flow direction 3. In a part 4 of the pipe 1 located upstream of a control region 5, the fluid 2 displays a turbulent flow 6. In the control region 5 this turbulent flow 6 is laminarized such that a laminar flow 7 leaves the control region 5 and stays laminar with the
typical parabolic velocity profile 8 over the cross section of the pipe 1 in a part 9 of the pipe 1 downstream of the control region 5 as long as the laminar flow 7 is not disturbed for turbulence again.
Fig. 2 is a graph of a pressure difference Δρ measured over a length of the part 9 of the pipe 1 according to Fig. 1 and normalized to the pressure difference Apiaminar Of a laminar flow through the part 9. This normalized pressure difference is plotted over the time for a flow of a Reynolds-number Re=3240. At the beginning, the method according to the present invention laminarizing the flow in the control region 5 of Fig. 1 is not yet active ("Control off"). Then the method is started ("Control on"). As a result, the drag of the flow indicated by the normalized pressure difference drops to the drag or pressure difference of a laminar flow. Thus, laminarizing the flow in the control region 5 reduces the drag of the flow through the downstream part 9 of the pipe 1 by more than a factor of two.
Fig. 3 is another graph of a pressure difference Δρ measured over a length of the part 9 of the pipe 1 according to Fig. 1 and normalized to the pressure difference Apiaminar Of a laminar flow through the part 9. This normalized pressure difference is plotted over the time for a flow of a Reynolds-number Re=5900. The further details of the measurent and the basic result are the same as in Fig. 2. However, the effect of the present invention at the higher Reynolds-number is even higher: Laminarizing the flow in the control region 5 reduces the drag of the flow through the downstream part 9 of the pipe 1 by a factor of 3,5 here.
Fig. 4 shows the particular set up of the control region 5 with which the data according to Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 have been obtained. A pipe section 10 partially lining the pipe 1 is moved along the axis of the pipe 1 in the flow direction 3. The wall 1 1 of the pipe section 10 fully encloses the fluid 2 within the pipe 1 in radial direction, i.e., the wall 11 is the entire flow-bounding wall 12 in the area of the pipe section 10. Further, the liner 10 defines
that section 13 of the flow-bounding wall 12 which is moved in the flow direction 3 through the pipe 1 according to the present invention, and it may also be designated as a liner 14 of the pipe 1 . The relative length of the section 13 indicated in Fig. 4 is too short. In the experiment producing the results indicated in Fig. 2 the length of the section 13 was about 60 times the diameter of the pipe 1.
Fig. 5 shows another embodiment of the control section 5 in the pipe 1. Here, the liner 14 of the pipe 1 is made of film bands 15 running as closed loops 16 around rollers 17 which are located outside the pipe 1. In this embodiment, the moved section 13 of the flow- bounding wall 12 stays in place, i. e., it does not move along the pipe 1 , although the parts of the film bands 15 in contact with the fluid 2 move in the flow direction 3.
Many variations and modifications may be made to the preferred embodiments of the invention without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of the present invention, as defined by the following claims.
LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS pipe
fluid
flow direction
part
control region
turbulent flow
laminar flow
parabolic velocity profile
part
pipe section
wall
flow-bounding wall
moved section
liner
film band
closed loop
roller
Claims
1. A method of eliminating turbulence in a wall bounded flow, the method comprising the step of moving a section of the flow-bounding wall in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the moved section essentially includes the full flow- bounding wall bounding the flow over a length of the flow.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the flow-bounding wall affects the flow over a boundary layer thickness, and wherein the moved section essentially includes the full flow- bounding wall bounding the flow over a length of the flow which is at least about 20, preferably at least about 25, and more preferably at least about 30 boundary layer thicknesses long.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the flow-bounding wall encloses a lumen through which the flow flows, and wherein the moved section essentially includes the full flow- bounding wall bounding the flow over a length of the flow which is at least about 20, preferably at least about 25, and more preferably at least about 30 diameters of the lumen long.
5. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein, at its downstream end, the moved section only includes a part of the flow-bounding wall.
6. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the flow-bounding wall bounds a free flow cross section through which the flow flows, and wherein the free flow cross section is kept constant or increased in downstream direction at the downstream end of the moved section of the flow-bounding wall.
7. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein sections of the flow-bounding wall upstream and/or downstream of the moved section of the flow-bounding wall are not moving in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall.
8. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the moved section of the flow- bounding wall is moved at a velocity of at least about 40 %, preferably at least about 50 %, and more preferably at least about 60 % of an average flow velocity of the flow over the unmoved flow-bounding wall.
9. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the moved section of the flow- bounding wall is moved at a velocity of at maximum about 100 % of an average flow velocity over the unmoved flow-bounding wall.
10. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the moved section of the flow- bounding wall is a partial cover of the flow-bounding wall.
1 1. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the moved section of the flow- bounding wall is a film covering a part of the flow-bounding wall.
12. The method of claim 1 1 , wherein the film is circulated in a closed loop, a feed back branch of the film loop running outside the flow.
13. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the flow-bounding wall encloses a lumen through which the flow flows, and wherein the moved section of the flow-bounding wall is a liner of a section of the lumen.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the liner is moved in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall out of an initial position at a velocity over a length of the flow, when turbulence is detected, and afterwards retracted at a lower velocity against the direction of the flow back into its initial position.
15. The method of any of the preceding claims, wherein the Reynolds-number of the flow is above 3000, 4000 or 5000.
16. An apparatus for eliminating turbulence in a wall bounded flow, the apparatus comprising a drive unit moving a section of the flow-bounding wall in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall.
17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the moved section essentially includes the full flow-bounding wall bounding the flow over a length of the flow.
18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the flow-bounding wall affects the flow over a boundary layer thickness, and wherein the moved section essentially includes the full flow- bounding wall bounding the flow over a length of the flow which is at least about 20, preferably at least about 25, and more preferably at least about 30 boundary layer thicknesses long.
19. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the flow-bounding wall encloses a lumen through which the flow flows, and wherein the moved section essentially includes the full flow- bounding wall bounding the flow over a length of the flow which is at least about 20, preferably at least about 25, and more preferably at least about 30 diameters of the lumen long.
20. The apparatus of any of the preceding claims 16 to 19, wherein, at its downstream end, the moved section only includes a part of the flow-bounding wall.
21. The apparatus of any of the preceding claims 16 to 20, wherein the flow-bounding wall bounds a free flow cross section through which the flow flows, and wherein the free flow cross section is kept constant or increased in downstream direction at the downstream end of the moved section of the flow-bounding wall.
22. The apparatus of any of the preceding claims 16 to 21 , wherein sections of the flow- bounding wall upstream and/or downstream of the moved section of the flow-bounding wall are fixed in the direction of the flow over the flow-bounding wall.
23. The apparatus of any of the preceding claims 16 to 22, wherein drive unit moves the moved section of the flow-bounding wall at a velocity of at least about 40 %, preferably at least about 50 %, and more preferably at least about 60 % of an average flow velocity of the flow over the unmoved flow-bounding wall.
24. The apparatus of any of the preceding claims 16 to 23, wherein drive unit moves the moved section of the flow-bounding wall at a velocity of at maximum about 100 % of an average flow velocity over the unmoved flow-bounding wall.
25. The apparatus of any of the preceding claims 16 to 24, wherein the moved section of the flow-bounding wall is a partial cover of the flow-bounding wall.
26. The apparatus of any of the preceding claims 16 to 25, wherein the moved section of the flow-bounding wall is a film covering a part of the flow-bounding wall.
27. The apparatus of any of the preceding claims 16 to 26, wherein the drive unit circulates the film in a closed loop, a feed back branch of the film loop running outside the flow.
28. The apparatus of any of the preceding claims 16 to 27, wherein the flow-bounding wall encloses a lumen through which the flow flows, and wherein the moved section of the flow-bounding wall is a liner of a section of the lumen.
29. The apparatus of any of claim 28, wherein the moved section of the flow-bounding wall is a partial liner of a pipe or channel having the lumen.
30. The apparatus of any of claim 29, wherein the moved section of the flow-bounding wall is a film tube or consist of film bands lining a part of the pipe or channel.
Priority Applications (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN201180061350.3A CN103270321B (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2011-11-22 | Method for eliminating turbulence in wall bounded flows |
US13/988,841 US9261119B2 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2011-11-22 | Eliminating turbulence in wall bounded flows |
EP11794422.3A EP2643597A1 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2011-11-22 | Eliminating turbulence in wall bounded flows |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP2010067959 | 2010-11-22 | ||
EPPCT/EP2010/067959 | 2010-11-22 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2012069472A1 true WO2012069472A1 (en) | 2012-05-31 |
Family
ID=45319073
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2011/070680 WO2012069472A1 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2011-11-22 | Eliminating turbulence in wall bounded flows |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9261119B2 (en) |
CN (1) | CN103270321B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012069472A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3118468A1 (en) | 2015-07-14 | 2017-01-18 | Institute of Science and Technology Austria | Re-laminarization of a turbulent flow in a duct |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101737382A (en) * | 2009-11-13 | 2010-06-16 | 邹立松 | Fluid resistance reducing method and resistance-reduction propulsion unit |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE723718C (en) * | 1939-06-14 | 1942-08-10 | Aerodynamische Versuchsanstalt | Arrangement to reduce corner losses in channels and pipelines |
GB2223821A (en) * | 1982-01-22 | 1990-04-18 | Secr Defence | Apparatus and method for modifying the dynamic interaction between a fluid and a object |
WO2007012267A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2007-02-01 | Lisong Zou | Methods for reducing fluid resistance and an apparatus for the same |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN1145781C (en) | 2000-12-26 | 2004-04-14 | 孟继安 | Cross elliptic-section heat exchange pipe |
-
2011
- 2011-11-22 CN CN201180061350.3A patent/CN103270321B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2011-11-22 US US13/988,841 patent/US9261119B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2011-11-22 WO PCT/EP2011/070680 patent/WO2012069472A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE723718C (en) * | 1939-06-14 | 1942-08-10 | Aerodynamische Versuchsanstalt | Arrangement to reduce corner losses in channels and pipelines |
GB2223821A (en) * | 1982-01-22 | 1990-04-18 | Secr Defence | Apparatus and method for modifying the dynamic interaction between a fluid and a object |
WO2007012267A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2007-02-01 | Lisong Zou | Methods for reducing fluid resistance and an apparatus for the same |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
BJORN HOF ET AL.: "Eliminating turbulence in spatially intermittent flows", SCIENCE, vol. 327, no. 5972, 19 March 2010 (2010-03-19), pages 1491 - 1494, XP055133778, DOI: doi:10.1126/science.1186091 |
See also references of EP2643597A1 * |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3118468A1 (en) | 2015-07-14 | 2017-01-18 | Institute of Science and Technology Austria | Re-laminarization of a turbulent flow in a duct |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9261119B2 (en) | 2016-02-16 |
CN103270321A (en) | 2013-08-28 |
US20130284272A1 (en) | 2013-10-31 |
CN103270321B (en) | 2015-06-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Morita et al. | Equilibrium radial positions of neutrally buoyant spherical particles over the circular cross-section in Poiseuille flow | |
Matas et al. | Lateral force on a rigid sphere in large-inertia laminar pipe flow | |
Schubring et al. | A model for pressure loss, film thickness, and entrained fraction for gas–liquid annular flow | |
US9261119B2 (en) | Eliminating turbulence in wall bounded flows | |
Avcı et al. | Laminar forced convection slip-flow in a micro-annulus between two concentric cylinders | |
EP2971802B1 (en) | Eliminating turbulence in wall-bounded flows by distorting the flow velocity distribution in a direction perpendicular to the wall | |
Huang et al. | Experimental study of geysers through a vent pipe connected to flowing sewers | |
Scarselli et al. | Relaminarising pipe flow by wall movement | |
EP2643597A1 (en) | Eliminating turbulence in wall bounded flows | |
KR101959101B1 (en) | System for reducing the wiping gas consumption in an air knife | |
Henriquez et al. | Reconfiguration of flexible plates in sheared flow | |
EP3118468B1 (en) | Re-laminarization of a turbulent flow in a duct | |
Van Eckeveld et al. | Mitigation of whistling in vertical corrugated pipes by liquid addition | |
Melnikova et al. | Stability of a Laminar Flow at the Boundary of Uniform and Decelerating Flows | |
RU93527U1 (en) | TURBINE FLOW METER | |
JP2008051718A (en) | Nozzle for tunnel, and tunnel device | |
Chong et al. | On the momentum and thermal structures of turbulent spots in a favorable pressure gradient | |
Zanoun et al. | Flow transition and development in pipe facilities | |
CN105587959A (en) | Cross section changing method for controlling flow separation of U-shaped bent tube with low Reynolds number | |
CN106931310A (en) | Oil pipeline oil leak method for determination of amount and device | |
Grandchamp et al. | Centreline velocity decay characterisation in low-velocity jets downstream from an extended conical diffuser | |
US20190321935A1 (en) | Mandrels and methods for abrasive flow machining | |
CN210739585U (en) | Special-shaped seamless steel pipe | |
Manoj Prabakar et al. | Experimental Investigations of a Diffuser Start/Unstart Characteristics for Two Stream Supersonic Wind Tunnel | |
Miyagi et al. | Jet Diffusion Control Using Plasma Actuators: Influence of Plasma-Induced Flow Instability on Jet Diffusion |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 11794422 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2011794422 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011794422 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 13988841 Country of ref document: US |