WO2012027187A1 - Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine - Google Patents
Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2012027187A1 WO2012027187A1 PCT/US2011/048227 US2011048227W WO2012027187A1 WO 2012027187 A1 WO2012027187 A1 WO 2012027187A1 US 2011048227 W US2011048227 W US 2011048227W WO 2012027187 A1 WO2012027187 A1 WO 2012027187A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- chamber
- cleaning
- fluorine
- molecular fluorine
- molecular
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B7/00—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B7/00—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass
- B08B7/0035—Cleaning by methods not provided for in a single other subclass or a single group in this subclass by radiant energy, e.g. UV, laser, light beam or the like
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B3/00—Cleaning by methods involving the use or presence of liquid or steam
- B08B3/04—Cleaning involving contact with liquid
- B08B3/10—Cleaning involving contact with liquid with additional treatment of the liquid or of the object being cleaned, e.g. by heat, by electricity or by vibration
- B08B3/12—Cleaning involving contact with liquid with additional treatment of the liquid or of the object being cleaned, e.g. by heat, by electricity or by vibration by sonic or ultrasonic vibrations
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B08—CLEANING
- B08B—CLEANING IN GENERAL; PREVENTION OF FOULING IN GENERAL
- B08B9/00—Cleaning hollow articles by methods or apparatus specially adapted thereto
- B08B9/08—Cleaning containers, e.g. tanks
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C16/00—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes
- C23C16/44—Chemical coating by decomposition of gaseous compounds, without leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, i.e. chemical vapour deposition [CVD] processes characterised by the method of coating
- C23C16/4401—Means for minimising impurities, e.g. dust, moisture or residual gas, in the reaction chamber
- C23C16/4405—Cleaning of reactor or parts inside the reactor by using reactive gases
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32431—Constructional details of the reactor
- H01J37/32798—Further details of plasma apparatus not provided for in groups H01J37/3244 - H01J37/32788; special provisions for cleaning or maintenance of the apparatus
- H01J37/32853—Hygiene
- H01J37/32862—In situ cleaning of vessels and/or internal parts
Definitions
- the present invention relates to new methods for the cleaning deposition chambers and to apparatus therefore.
- Amorphous and microcrystalline thin films are used to fabricate photovoltaic devices and are generally deposited using chemical vapor deposition techniques; including plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) methods. These processes deposit thin films from a gas state to a solid state onto the surface of a substrate by injecting precursor reacting gases into a reactor chamber and then activating the gases using a plasma created by radio frequency (RF) power.
- RF radio frequency
- the manufacture of devices using chemical deposition methods include the depositing of thin films of silicon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, metals oxides, and others. These deposition processes leave deposits in the chamber that must be periodically cleaned.
- Known methods for cleaning reactor chambers include in-situ activation of a cleaning gas containing fluorine, such as NF 3 , SF 6 , C 2 F6, or other fluoro carbon molecules.
- the cleaning gas is introduced into the chamber and a plasma is ignited to create fluorine ions and radicals that react with silicon deposits on the sidewalls and parts of the chamber.
- the energy required to dissociate such fluorine containing molecules is high, therefore requiring an energy source in the chamber, such as RF power. This increases the risk of plasma induced damage to the chamber and equipment resulting in shortened lifetime of parts.
- the fluorine containing gases have high global warming potentials causing detriment to the environment when the gases are not fully dissociated.
- Another chamber cleaning method uses a remote plasma source to activate the fluorine containing cleaning gas.
- the cleaning gas first passes through a plasma source situated outside of the chamber where the cleaning gas is dissociated and radicals enter the chamber to perform the cleaning.
- Remote plasma activation can provide higher gas dissociation than in-situ activation and therefore improved cleaning efficiency.
- using a remote plasma source requires additional equipment that adds considerable to operations cost.
- gas flow is often limited by the parameters of the remote plasma source thereby increasing cleaning time and cost.
- remote plasma activation generally requires use of argon to start the plasma, because argon does not dissociate and is easily ignited. This use of argon reduces the gas flow of cleaning gas and therefore increases cleaning time cost.
- the fluorine containing cleaning gases have high global warming potentials causing detriment to the environment when the gases are not fully dissociated.
- Other chamber cleaning methods include high temperature or high pressure cleaning. These methods require temperatures or pressures much higher than the temperatures used during deposition processes. Therefore, the temperature or pressure of the chamber must be adjusted prior to cleaning resulting in increased cleaning cycle time and greater cost of operation. Further, increased pressure cleaning may require additional pumping systems therefore adding equipment and operational costs. In addition, high pressure cleaning can lead to convection phenomena in the chamber which increases the risk of parts deformation.
- the present invention provides improved methods and apparatus for the cleaning reaction chambers that overcome the disadvantages of the prior art methods and apparatus.
- the present invention utilizes molecular fluorine for cleaning of the chamber.
- Figure 1 is a graph showing the pressure curve during an in-situ activation cleaning process using molecular fluorine with no pressure regulation
- Figure 2 is a graph showing the influence of RF power for in-situ activation cleaning of reaction chambers.
- Figure 3 is a graph showing the influence of fluorine flow rate on cleaning time of reaction chambers.
- Figure 4 is a graph showing the cleaning efficiency of the present invention.
- Figure 5 is a mass spectrometry result showing the cleaning efficiency of the present invention.
- Figure 6 is a graph comparing pressure stabilization in the chamber for remote plasma activation and in situ activation.
- the present invention uses molecular fluorine for reaction chamber cleaning.
- the reaction chambers are used to deposit a variety of thin layers, including silicon (both amorphous and microcrystalline).
- plasma activation is necessary to dissociate the precursor materials and deposit the desired molecules onto the surface of a substrate.
- material also accumulates on the walls and internal equipment surfaces of the reaction chamber. These deposits must be periodically removed by cleaning with a cleaning gas.
- fluorine radicals created by dissociation of molecular fluorine have been shown to be very efficient as a cleaning gas.
- the dissociation energy required for molecular fluorine is relatively low and therefore can be carried out using the RF power source already in place within the reaction chamber, i.e. the RF power source used for dissociation of the deposition precursors. No remote plasma activation is necessary and therefore no additional equipment is needed beyond what is already in place in the reaction chamber. Further, the present invention can be carried out at relatively low pressures and RF energy. In addition, when using molecular fluorine, the addition of oxygen or argon for plasma ignition purposes is not necessary.
- FIG. 1 is a graph showing the pressure curve during an in-situ activation cleaning process using molecular fluorine with no pressure regulation.
- the pressure stabilizes at a certain pressure range, often referred to as the lower plateau.
- the silicon deposits throughout the chamber are etched by fluorine in the form of both radicals and molecules.
- the silicon has been removed from the larger parts of the chamber, e.g. the showerhead, a larger amount of fluorine remains in the chamber but has nothing left to react with. This leads to a sharp increase in pressure which rises to a second plateau during which time fluorine continues to react with silicon remaining in more remote areas of the chamber.
- an inert gas such as argon.
- F 2 has lower dissociation energy than NF 3 or SF 6 that allows for higher flow rates to be used while still achieving good dissociation rates and fast cleaning times.
- NF 3 or SF 6 a remote plasma source is necessary and the flow rate of fluorine into the chamber is therefore limited by the maximum power of the remote plasma source.
- Using molecular fluorine with in situ activation does not require a remote plasma source and therefore the desired higher flow rates can be used. This makes the process according to the present invention more economical as large, powerful and costly remote plasma sources are not needed.
- Figure 2 is a graph showing the influence of RF power for in-situ activation cleaning of reaction chamber.
- Figure 2 compares chamber cleaning results using molecular fluorine dissociated using the RF power source of the chamber in accordance with the present invention and chamber cleaning results using a remote plasma assisted cleaning with molecular fluorine, all at the same fluorine gas flow.
- the in- situ activation of the present invention provides for a faster overall cleaning time.
- the sharp increase in pressure of all of the cleaning plots indicates when silicon has been removed from the large portions of the chamber, e.g. the showerhead. While this occurs slightly faster for the remote plasma activation, the overall cleaning time is faster for the in situ process.
- full dissociation of the molecular fluorine is not achieved when using the reactor chamber RF power source at 3000W because of the lower pressure that is reached as compared to using a remote plasma source for the same gas flow rate.
- FIG. 3 shows the effect of fluorine flow rate on cleaning time. In particular, good results were achieved by increasing fluorine flow rate while maintaining relatively low RF power (5000 W or less). By increasing the flow rate of fluorine into the chamber, a greater amount of fluorine is present in the chamber for cleaning purposes and therefore cleaning rates can be increased and cleaning times reduced.
- the results for flow rates of 9 slm, 18 slm and 24.5 slm are shown in Figure 3 wherein it is clear that higher flow rates result in faster cleaning times.
- an increase in RF activation power may result in faster cleaning times, at least for a flow rate of 18 slm.
- FIG. 4 shows a plot of chamber pressure when an in situ activation according to the present invention is performed followed by a standard remote plasma source activation cleaning.
- the in situ cleaning cycle shows the typical pressure graph with lower and second plateaus.
- a standard remote plasma source cleaning cycle is begun and as shown in Figure 4, the pressure immediately rises to the second plateau and stabilizes. This indicates that silicon has been efficiently removed from the chamber during the in situ activation cleaning process.
- Figure 5 again shows the efficiency of the present invention using mass spectrometry results.
- the same cleaning sequence was followed, i.e. in situ cleaning followed by remote plasma source cleaning.
- no trace of silicon fluoride compounds are detected during the remote plasma source cleaning, indicating that the in situ activation cleaning efficiently removed the silicon from the chamber.
- molecular fluorine is beneficial at least in part because it is an extremely reactive material. Therefore, molecular fluorine will react with silicon even without dissociation. In other words, using molecular fluorine provides the benefit that both dissociated fluorine and molecular fluorine participate in the cleaning process. Further, because molecular fluorine expands readily to remote parts of the chamber, the result is that large central portions of the chamber, e.g. the showerhead, as well as remote parts of the chamber, e.g. sidewalls, are cleaned simultaneously.
- Figure 6 is a graph comparing pressure stabilization in the chamber for remote plasma activation and in situ activation. This graph shows that during the upper plateau phase of the cleaning, i.e. once the main parts of the chamber have been cleaned of silicon, that the pressure varies significantly less for the in situ process than for the remote plasma source process. This indicates that most of the silicon has already been removed during the main cleaning phase of the in situ process, i.e. the remote portions of the chamber are cleaning simultaneously with the main portions. This results in the overall faster cleaning times achieved by the present invention.
- molecular fluorine in accordance with the present invention provides several advantages over the use of fluorine containing cleaning gases, such as NF 3 and SF 6 .
- fluorine containing cleaning gases such as NF 3 and SF 6
- the dissociation of these fluorine containing gases requires much greater RF power and therefore if only the reactor chamber RF power source is used, there is a significant risk of plasma induced damage to the reactor, such as by arcing.
- use of a remote plasma source is not required when using molecular fluorine according to the present invention.
- the fluorine containing compounds normally need such a remote plasma source to avoid the risk of plasma induced chamber damage and therefore require additional equipment that adds to operational complexity and cost.
- fluorine containing compounds often requires the addition of oxygen or argon as an aid to plasma ignition.
- additional gases e.g. oxygen or argon
- the present invention using molecular fluorine overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art chamber cleaning methods, in particular, there is less limitation on the gas flow and chamber pressure. Lower RF power can be used resulting in less risk of plasma induced damage. Molecular fluorine has no global warming potential.
- the present invention provides complete cleaning of the chamber in significantly less time than required when using a remote plasma source.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Chemical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
- Drying Of Semiconductors (AREA)
- Physical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020127033203A KR20130105308A (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2011-08-18 | Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine |
US13/701,959 US20130239988A1 (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2011-08-18 | Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine |
EP11820408.0A EP2608899A4 (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2011-08-18 | Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine |
CN2011800314319A CN103037989A (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2011-08-18 | Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine |
JP2013526001A JP2013536322A (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2011-08-18 | Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine |
SG2012092334A SG186363A1 (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2011-08-18 | Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US37678010P | 2010-08-25 | 2010-08-25 | |
US61/376,780 | 2010-08-25 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2012027187A1 true WO2012027187A1 (en) | 2012-03-01 |
Family
ID=45723745
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2011/048227 WO2012027187A1 (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2011-08-18 | Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20130239988A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2608899A4 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2013536322A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20130105308A (en) |
CN (1) | CN103037989A (en) |
SG (1) | SG186363A1 (en) |
TW (1) | TW201233461A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2012027187A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN109585248B (en) * | 2013-12-02 | 2021-04-20 | 应用材料公司 | Method and apparatus for in-situ cleaning of a process chamber |
US20190382889A1 (en) * | 2018-06-15 | 2019-12-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Technique to enable high temperature clean for rapid processing of wafers |
CN112871891A (en) * | 2021-01-13 | 2021-06-01 | 哈尔滨科友半导体产业装备与技术研究院有限公司 | Method for cleaning quartz tube of silicon carbide crystal growth furnace |
US20240035154A1 (en) * | 2022-07-27 | 2024-02-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Fluorine based cleaning for plasma doping applications |
CN115491658B (en) * | 2022-09-26 | 2024-03-12 | 江苏筑磊电子科技有限公司 | F dissociated in plasma 2 Method for performing CVD chamber cleaning |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7479191B1 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2009-01-20 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Method for endpointing CVD chamber cleans following ultra low-k film treatments |
US20090047447A1 (en) * | 2005-08-02 | 2009-02-19 | Sawin Herbert H | Method for removing surface deposits and passivating interior surfaces of the interior of a chemical vapor deposition reactor |
US7569111B2 (en) * | 2006-04-19 | 2009-08-04 | United Microelectronics Corp. | Method of cleaning deposition chamber |
US20090289270A1 (en) * | 2008-05-23 | 2009-11-26 | Showa Denko K.K. | Group iii nitride semiconductor multilayer structure and production method thereof |
Family Cites Families (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH1072672A (en) * | 1996-07-09 | 1998-03-17 | Applied Materials Inc | Non-plasma type chamber cleaning method |
US20030010354A1 (en) * | 2000-03-27 | 2003-01-16 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Fluorine process for cleaning semiconductor process chamber |
JP2003158123A (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2003-05-30 | Research Institute Of Innovative Technology For The Earth | Plasma cleaning gas and method therefor |
JP4801709B2 (en) * | 2003-03-14 | 2011-10-26 | キヤノンアネルバ株式会社 | Film forming method using CVD apparatus |
JP4385086B2 (en) * | 2003-03-14 | 2009-12-16 | パナソニック株式会社 | CVD apparatus cleaning apparatus and CVD apparatus cleaning method |
JP4264479B2 (en) * | 2003-03-14 | 2009-05-20 | キヤノンアネルバ株式会社 | Cleaning method for CVD apparatus |
US20060016459A1 (en) * | 2004-05-12 | 2006-01-26 | Mcfarlane Graham | High rate etching using high pressure F2 plasma with argon dilution |
GB0516054D0 (en) * | 2005-08-04 | 2005-09-14 | Trikon Technologies Ltd | A method of processing substrates |
US7479460B2 (en) * | 2005-08-23 | 2009-01-20 | Asm America, Inc. | Silicon surface preparation |
US20070079849A1 (en) * | 2005-10-12 | 2007-04-12 | Richard Hogle | Integrated chamber cleaning system |
EP2494088A1 (en) * | 2009-10-30 | 2012-09-05 | Solvay Fluor GmbH | Method for removing deposits |
JP2011228546A (en) * | 2010-04-21 | 2011-11-10 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Plasma cvd apparatus and cleaning method therefor |
-
2011
- 2011-08-18 JP JP2013526001A patent/JP2013536322A/en active Pending
- 2011-08-18 CN CN2011800314319A patent/CN103037989A/en active Pending
- 2011-08-18 EP EP11820408.0A patent/EP2608899A4/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2011-08-18 WO PCT/US2011/048227 patent/WO2012027187A1/en active Application Filing
- 2011-08-18 US US13/701,959 patent/US20130239988A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-08-18 SG SG2012092334A patent/SG186363A1/en unknown
- 2011-08-18 KR KR1020127033203A patent/KR20130105308A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2011-08-25 TW TW100130543A patent/TW201233461A/en unknown
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7479191B1 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2009-01-20 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Method for endpointing CVD chamber cleans following ultra low-k film treatments |
US20090047447A1 (en) * | 2005-08-02 | 2009-02-19 | Sawin Herbert H | Method for removing surface deposits and passivating interior surfaces of the interior of a chemical vapor deposition reactor |
US7569111B2 (en) * | 2006-04-19 | 2009-08-04 | United Microelectronics Corp. | Method of cleaning deposition chamber |
US20090289270A1 (en) * | 2008-05-23 | 2009-11-26 | Showa Denko K.K. | Group iii nitride semiconductor multilayer structure and production method thereof |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP2608899A4 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN103037989A (en) | 2013-04-10 |
EP2608899A4 (en) | 2016-04-20 |
JP2013536322A (en) | 2013-09-19 |
US20130239988A1 (en) | 2013-09-19 |
KR20130105308A (en) | 2013-09-25 |
SG186363A1 (en) | 2013-01-30 |
EP2608899A1 (en) | 2013-07-03 |
TW201233461A (en) | 2012-08-16 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20070107750A1 (en) | Method of using NF3 for removing surface deposits from the interior of chemical vapor deposition chambers | |
KR101146063B1 (en) | A remote plasma clean process with cycled high and low pressure clean steps | |
US10679830B2 (en) | Cleaning process for removing boron-carbon residuals in processing chamber at high temperature | |
US20090047447A1 (en) | Method for removing surface deposits and passivating interior surfaces of the interior of a chemical vapor deposition reactor | |
KR100448291B1 (en) | Method and system for in situ cleaning of semiconductor manufacturing equipment using combination chemistries | |
US5882424A (en) | Plasma cleaning of a CVD or etch reactor using a low or mixed frequency excitation field | |
US20060144820A1 (en) | Remote chamber methods for removing surface deposits | |
US20080087642A1 (en) | Method for removing surface deposits in the interior of a chemical vapor deposition reactor | |
WO2007027350A2 (en) | Method of removing surface deposits and passivating interior surfaces of the interior of a chemical vapour deposition (cvd) chamber | |
US10892143B2 (en) | Technique to prevent aluminum fluoride build up on the heater | |
US20130239988A1 (en) | Deposition chamber cleaning using in situ activation of molecular fluorine | |
CN110140193B (en) | Method for implementing high temperature processing without chamber drift | |
WO2004082008A1 (en) | Cvd apparatus and method for cleaning cvd apparatus | |
US20130276820A1 (en) | Chemical vapor deposition chamber cleaning with molecular fluorine | |
KR101416172B1 (en) | Cleaning method for chamber of thin film deposition apparatus | |
KR20080062112A (en) | Cleaning method for thin film deposition apparatus | |
US20130220364A1 (en) | Reactor box chamber cleaning using molecular fluorine | |
US20220319858A1 (en) | Method and system for forming patterned structures including silicon nitride | |
KR20220093499A (en) | Dry cleaning method of a semiconductor and display chemical vapor deposition chamber using F3NO gas |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201180031431.9 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 11820408 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2011820408 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011820408 Country of ref document: EP |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 2013526001 Country of ref document: JP Kind code of ref document: A |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20127033203 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 13701959 Country of ref document: US |