WO2011059770A2 - Smart client routing - Google Patents
Smart client routing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2011059770A2 WO2011059770A2 PCT/US2010/054568 US2010054568W WO2011059770A2 WO 2011059770 A2 WO2011059770 A2 WO 2011059770A2 US 2010054568 W US2010054568 W US 2010054568W WO 2011059770 A2 WO2011059770 A2 WO 2011059770A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- policy
- local
- connectivity
- cloud
- host
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/50—Network services
- H04L67/60—Scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions using the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources
- H04L67/63—Routing a service request depending on the request content or context
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L2101/00—Indexing scheme associated with group H04L61/00
- H04L2101/60—Types of network addresses
- H04L2101/686—Types of network addresses using dual-stack hosts, e.g. in Internet protocol version 4 [IPv4]/Internet protocol version 6 [IPv6] networks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L45/00—Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
- H04L45/12—Shortest path evaluation
Definitions
- Routing between two hosts is typically handled based on the IP (Internet Protocol) addresses assigned to the hosts.
- IP Internet Protocol
- the route chosen is determined using the IP addresses of the hosts involved. This technique may not be problem when the hosts are on the same network; however, this can be very problematic as requiring more administrative interaction when the hosts are on different networks.
- the inability to conveniently interconnect hosts on the Internet is a technical and administrative challenge.
- the disclosed architecture facilitates communications between two network nodes of the different networks using alternative modalities driven entirely by policies that are authored and stored in the cloud and enforced on the client and/or outside the cloud, as desired.
- This allows the selection of one network path over another path based on criteria such as, physical location of the hosts and service level agreements (SLAs) to be provided, for example.
- SLAs service level agreements
- This can be facilitated at least by a virtual layer employed over the physical layer in the network stack and supporting programs to provide smart client capability in routing selection between hosts.
- a packet can be routed through a peer-to-peer connection or a relay connection.
- SLAs there may be different SLAs available to different clients. For clients with the highest bandwidth/uptime or other guarantees, a network path different from one for other types of clients can be selected. Additionally, connectivity can be allowed or disallowed based on other kinds of policy rules such as a virtual circle to which the hosts may belong.
- FIG. 1 illustrates computer-implemented connectivity system in accordance with the disclosed architecture.
- FIG. 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a connectivity system that includes an authoring component.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a local node system that utilizes a virtual adapter to facilitate path selection as defined according to the policy received from the computing cloud.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a computer-implemented host connectivity method in accordance with the disclosed architecture.
- FIG. 5 illustrates additional aspects of the method of FIG. 4.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an alternative host connectivity method.
- FIG. 7 illustrates additional aspects of the method of FIG. 6.
- FIG. 8 illustrates yet another an alternative host connectivity method.
- FIG. 9 illustrates a block diagram of a computing system operable to execute cloud-based connectivity in accordance with the disclosed architecture.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a schematic block diagram of a computing environment in which cloud-based connectivity is deployed.
- the disclosed architecture is smart network switching based on policies. Network switching is employed in conjunction with cloud computing to enable on-premise connectivity with cloud-based resources. Note, however, this is just one scenario for smart routing, in that smart routing is applicable generally to any two or more endpoints irrespective of whether the endpoints are in the cloud or a corpnet.
- the architecture provides a combination of policy authoring of connectivity rules, name service resolution hooks, as well as dynamic routing on the client, that allow the selection of the most appropriate path through which two host machines can connect to each other. This allows flexibility in terms of guaranteeing the lowest operations cost for a vendor, providing the highest service level agreement (SLA) for the customer, or a combination of both.
- SLA service level agreement
- Policies can be utilized to determine various connectivity rules that are applied to determine the order in which the routing will be performed.
- a policy manifest can indicate that for a client connecting to another client: the two clients shall exist in the same circle and that the connections will first attempt tunneling (e.g., Teredo-based) in peer-to-peer (P2P) connectivity, if available, before attempting a cloud-mediated connectivity method such as SSTP (secure socket tunneling protocol).
- tunneling e.g., Teredo-based
- P2P peer-to-peer
- SSTP secure socket tunneling protocol
- policies can be defined at various levels. For example, policies can be defined to, determine a connection between two specific hosts, and in the context of circles and links determine a connection between two different hosts within the same circle, linked circles, or even to define connectivity between any two machines without the machines being part of the same circle and not linked in any way. (Circles can be described as associations of users or organizations over networks and the links are the relationships between the users or organizations.) These policies can be determined a priori, such as statically, or generated based on a set of rules the inputs of which include, and are not limited to, geolocation, SLA, desired costs, circle membership, etc.
- FIG. 1 illustrates computer-implemented connectivity system 100 in accordance with the disclosed architecture.
- the system 100 includes a resolution component 102 of a local node 104 that attempts resolution of identification information 106 of a remote node 108 to which connectivity is intended, using a resolution call 110.
- a translation component 112 of the local node 104 intercepts the resolution call 110 and translates the resolution call 110 into a web service call 114 to a resource 116 of a computing cloud 118.
- a policy component 120 of the local node 104 receives a policy 122 from the computing cloud 118 and establishes a connection 124 between the local node 104 and the remote node 108 based on the policy 122.
- the policy 122 received from the computing cloud 118 can be selected based on the identification information 106, which is a name of the remote node 108 and the resolution call 110 which is a name resolution call.
- the policy 122 also facilitates creation of the connection 124 by selection of one network path over another network path. Still further, the policy 122 facilitates creation of the connection 124 based on at least one of physical location of the local node 104 or physical location of the remote node 108 relative to a datacenter. Additionally, the policy 122 facilitates creation of the connection 124 based on a service level agreement. The policy 122 also facilitates creation of the connection 124 based on a virtual circle to which at least one of the local node 104 or the remote node 108 is associated. The policy component 120 configures the connection 124 to the remote node 108 through a relay server.
- a host e.g., local node 104 attempting to connect to another host (e.g., remote node 108, which can be client or server) first attempts to resolve the name of the other node (e.g., remote node 108).
- the name resolution call (e.g., resolution call 110) is interpreted on the client (local node 104) and translated into a cloud-based web service call (web service call 114) to an implementation of name resolution in the cloud 118.
- web service call 114 web service call to an implementation of name resolution in the cloud 118.
- This is just one example of an interception technique, since interception can be performed using various implementations such as local-based and/or cloud-based.
- the implementation uses policies (e.g., policy 122) to determine the network costs for the various networks and then sends this to the aforementioned host.
- the host uses the information obtained from the cloud-based service to inform the name resolver of the local node 104 the address to be used for the connection 124, configure the appropriate connectivity to a relay server (e.g., SSTP, etc.), and sets a routing table on a virtual adapter of the local node 104 to enable use of the desired connection.
- a relay server e.g., SSTP, etc.
- the instant architecture enables connectivity between any two network endpoints irrespective of endpoint location.
- the architecture can be applied more generally.
- One or more of these steps can be performed at client initialization time (e.g., when the machine boots up or the correct user logs on to the machine), while other steps can be performed at actual connection set up time.
- FIG. 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment of a connectivity system 200 that includes an authoring component 202.
- the authoring component 202 for authoring the policy that includes connectivity rules for establishing communications between the local and remote nodes, and storing the policy in the cloud.
- the system 200 also includes the entities and components described in FIG. 1.
- the system 200 includes the resolution component 102 of the local node 104 that attempts resolution of identification information 106 of a remote node 108 to which connectivity is intended, using the resolution call 110, which is a name resolution call.
- the translation component 112 of the local node 104 intercepts the resolution call 110 (e.g., name resolution call) and translates the resolution call 110 into the web service call 114 (e.g., cloud-based) to the resource 116 (one of many possible cloud resources) of the computing cloud 118.
- the policy component 120 of the local node 104 receives the policy 122 from the computing cloud 118 and establishes the connection 124 between the local node 104 and the remote node 108 based on the policy 122.
- the remote node 108 can include the same components as the local node 104 when attempting connectivity to the local node 104 and/or another node.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a local node system 300 that utilizes a virtual adapter 302 to facilitate path selection as defined according to the policy received from the computing cloud.
- the cloud is designed to be an IPv6-only infrastructure, although the applicability of the disclosed architecture is not so limited.
- a well-written application 304 will process all the returned addresses from the cloud until the application 304 succeeds in connecting to the remote node. Based on a policy received from the cloud, the application 304 will pick the IPv6 destination address (of the remote node), and IPv6 source address (of the local node) exposed by a virtual adapter 302 of the local node.
- the virtual adapter 302 is created, as further illustrated, to include IPv4 and IPv6 addresses associated with an IPv4/IPv6 adapter 306 that interfaces to an SSTP IPv6 adapter 308 and a Teredo IPv6 adapter 310. Based on which transport (Teredo vs. SSTP) is available the virtual adapter 302 encapsulate the IPv4/IPv6 packet in an appropriate IPv6 packet and inject the packet back into the client stack to be handled by SSTP or Teredo. As illustrated, the virtual adapter 302 can be designed to overlay the physical layer 312.
- the local node can talk to the cloud service to reserve an IPv4 address. This IP address is assigned to the virtual adapter.
- a prefixed IPv6 address will be generated from this IPv4 address and assigned to the same interface.
- the Teredo IPv6 address is assigned to the local node.
- an SSTP server can hand out an IPv6 address by combining the reserved IPv4 address and site ID.
- the local node uploads all these IP addresses belonging to the cloud service.
- the virtual adapter addresses are exposed to the applications (e.g., application 304). Domain name service (DNS) name query from the node resolve these two addresses.
- DNS Domain name service
- Sets of related addresses can be maintained as a tuples, for example, ⁇ virtual adapter IPv4 address, Teredo IPv6 address, relay IPv6 address>. Then, given a destination IPv4 address, routing can be performed accordingly. Another variant is if the source and/or destination have global IPv4/IPv6 connectivity, the system is bypassed. If the global IPv6 address is added to this tuple, then the global IPv6 addresses can be leveraged as well.
- the four addresses associated with the destination can be cached. Connectivity processing can be according to a predetermined order. For example, connectivity to the destination can be attempted in the following order: first, the Teredo IPv6 address, followed by the SSTP IPv6 address, the adapter IPv4 address and then encapsulation in the adapter SSTP IPv6. A Teredo connection is attempted on a peer IPv6 Teredo address. If this connection succeeds, then the virtual adapter 302
- Teredo adapter 310 encapsulates the IPv6 traffic inside the Teredo IPv6 address, and sends the encapsulated IPv6 traffic out on the Teredo interface (Teredo adapter 310).
- the virtual adapter 302 attempts to reach the destination (remote node) using SSTP IPv6 address. The reachability can be verified by a ping mechanism. If this connection succeeds, the virtual adapter 302 encapsulates the traffic in SSTP IPv6 packets and sends the encapsulated traffic out on the SSTP interface (SSTP adapter 308).
- the application 304 can pick the remote node IPv4 address and attempt to connect. This connection has a high probability in succeeding, as most, if not all, applications will be listening on IPv4.
- the virtual adapter 302 encapsulates the traffic in SSTP IPv6 and sends the encapsulated traffic over the SSTP interface (SSTP adapter 308).
- the virtual adapter 302 can be implemented as an NDIS (network drive interface specification) miniport driver.
- the virtual adapter 302 can be configured to be selected for IPv4 communications. This way, the virtual adapter 302 can intercept all IPv4 traffic.
- IPv6 address (e.g., SSTP versus Teredo) is used for encapsulation can be determined as follows. If the Teredo interface is connected, an attempt is made to ping the Teredo IP of the peer. The teredo IPv6 address of peer can be determined by combining the destination IPv4 address, Teredo prefix, and site ID. If the ping succeeds on Teredo IPv6 address, the Teredo IPv6 addresses can be used for encapsulation. If the above fails, then retry on SSTP IPv6 address of the peer. If successful, use the SSTP IPv6 addresses for encapsulation.
- IPv6 address e.g., SSTP versus Teredo
- the virtual adapter 302 inserts the packet back into the TCP/IP stack so that the packet can be correctly picked up by SSTP or Teredo. To make this happen, extra information (set a flag) can be added in the IPv6 header during encapsulation at the virtual adapter 302.
- the receiver looks at the flag and decides if the IPv6 packet needs to be decapsulated by the virtual adapter 302 or to simply bypass the virtual adapter 302.
- One option is to set the next header field in the outer IPv6 header to four, thereby indicating that the IPv4 packet is encapsulated inside this IPv6 packet. Other options can also be applied.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a computer-implemented host connectivity method in accordance with the disclosed architecture.
- a local host an attempt is made to resolve identification information of a remote host to which connectivity is intended, using a resolution call.
- the identification information is sent to a cloud-based resource of a computing cloud.
- policy information is received from the cloud-based resource.
- the local host is connected to the remote host based on the policy information.
- FIG. 5 illustrates additional aspects of the method of FIG. 4.
- the resolution call is intercepted on the local host for transmission to the cloud-based resource.
- the resolution call is translated into a cloud-based web service call at the local host for transmission to the cloud-based resource.
- network costs are defined in the policy information for utilizing specific networks for processing by the local host.
- a routing path to the remote host is selected based on the policy information.
- a routing path is obtained from the policy information.
- connectivity to a protocol service is enabled based on the routing path.
- the local host is assigned to a virtual circle in the computing cloud on which the remote host is a part.
- a routing table in the local host is configured that enables use of the connectivity.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an alternative host connectivity method.
- resolve of a name of a remote host to which connectivity is intended is attempted using a name resolution call.
- the name resolution call is intercepted.
- the name resolution call is translated into a cloud-based web service call.
- the cloud-based web service call is submitted. The submission can be to a computing cloud.
- policy information is received in response to the cloud-based web service call.
- the local host is connected to the remote host based on the policy information.
- FIG. 7 illustrates additional aspects of the method of FIG. 6.
- the local host is assigned to a virtual circle on which the remote host is a part.
- routing information to the remote host is obtained from the policy information.
- the connectivity is configured to a protocol service.
- a routing table in the local host is configured that enables use of the connectivity.
- FIG. 8 illustrates yet another an alternative host connectivity method.
- a local client attempts to open a website on a remote client.
- a local client application performs a domain name service (DNS) lookup for the name of the remote client.
- DNS domain name service
- the local client application receives two addresses: an IPv4 address for the remote client and an IPv6 address for the remote client.
- a well-written application will process all the returned addresses until it succeeds.
- the DNS resolution call is intercepted and translated into web service call to the cloud.
- a policy received from the cloud is processed to obtain the associated routing rule(s). For example, based on the policy, the application will pick the IPv6 remote (destination) address and IPv6 local (source) address exposed by a virtual adapter of the local client.
- the addresses are processed according to a predetermined order. For example, the rules can indicate to process IPv6 address before IPv4 addresses and then according to one protocol (e.g., Teredo) over another protocol (e.g., SSTP).
- the connection to the destination is established based on the first successful attempt.
- a component can be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, a hard disk drive, multiple storage drives (of optical, solid state, and/or magnetic storage medium), an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer.
- a component can be, but is not limited to being, a process running on a processor, a processor, a hard disk drive, multiple storage drives (of optical, solid state, and/or magnetic storage medium), an object, an executable, a thread of execution, a program, and/or a computer.
- an application running on a server and the server can be a component.
- One or more components can reside within a process and/or thread of execution, and a component can be localized on one computer and/or distributed between two or more computers.
- the word "exemplary” may be used herein to mean serving as an example, instance, or illustration. Any aspect or design described herein as "exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous
- FIG. 9 there is illustrated a block diagram of a computing system 900 operable to execute cloud-based connectivity in accordance with the disclosed architecture.
- FIG. 9 and the following description are intended to provide a brief, general description of the suitable computing system 900 in which the various aspects can be implemented. While the description above is in the general context of computer-executable instructions that can run on one or more computers, those skilled in the art will recognize that a novel embodiment also can be implemented in combination with other program modules and/or as a combination of hardware and software.
- the computing system 900 for implementing various aspects includes the computer 902 having processing unit(s) 904, a computer-readable storage such as a system memory 906, and a system bus 908.
- the processing unit(s) 904 can be any of various commercially available processors such as single-processor, multi-processor, single-core units and multi-core units.
- processors such as single-processor, multi-processor, single-core units and multi-core units.
- those skilled in the art will appreciate that the novel methods can be practiced with other computer system configurations, including minicomputers, mainframe computers, as well as personal computers (e.g., desktop, laptop, etc.), hand-held computing devices, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, and the like, each of which can be operatively coupled to one or more associated devices.
- the system memory 906 can include computer-readable storage such as a volatile (VOL) memory 910 (e.g., random access memory (RAM)) and non-volatile memory (NON-VOL) 912 (e.g., ROM, EPROM, EEPROM, etc.).
- VOL volatile
- NON-VOL non-volatile memory
- BIOS basic input/output system
- the volatile memory 910 can also include a high-speed RAM such as static RAM for caching data.
- the system bus 908 provides an interface for system components including, but not limited to, the memory subsystem 906 to the processing unit(s) 904.
- the system bus 908 can be any of several types of bus structure that can further interconnect to a memory bus (with or without a memory controller), and a peripheral bus (e.g., PCI, PCIe, AGP, LPC, etc.), using any of a variety of commercially available bus architectures.
- the computer 902 further includes machine readable storage subsystem(s) 914 and storage interface(s) 916 for interfacing the storage subsystem(s) 914 to the system bus 908 and other desired computer components.
- the storage subsystem(s) 914 can include one or more of a hard disk drive (HDD), a magnetic floppy disk drive (FDD), and/or optical disk storage drive (e.g., a CD-ROM drive DVD drive), for example.
- the storage interface(s) 916 can include interface technologies such as EIDE, ATA, SATA, and IEEE 1394, for example.
- One or more programs and data can be stored in the memory subsystem 906, a machine readable and removable memory subsystem 918 (e.g., flash drive form factor technology), and/or the storage subsystem(s) 914 (e.g., optical, magnetic, solid state), including an operating system 920, one or more application programs 922, other program modules 924, and program data 926.
- a machine readable and removable memory subsystem 918 e.g., flash drive form factor technology
- the storage subsystem(s) 914 e.g., optical, magnetic, solid state
- an operating system 920 e.g., one or more application programs 922, other program modules 924, and program data 926.
- the one or more application programs 922, other program modules 924, and program data 926 can include the local node 104, policy 122 and entities/components of the local node 104 of FIG. 1, the virtual adapter layer 302 of FIG. 3, and the methods represented by the flow charts of Figures 4-8, for example.
- programs include routines, methods, data structures, other software components, etc., that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. All or portions of the operating system 920, applications 922, modules 924, and/or data 926 can also be cached in memory such as the volatile memory 910, for example. It is to be appreciated that the disclosed architecture can be implemented with various
- the storage subsystem(s) 914 and memory subsystems (906 and 918) serve as computer readable media for volatile and non-volatile storage of data, data structures, computer-executable instructions, and so forth.
- Computer readable media can be any available media that can be accessed by the computer 902 and includes volatile and non- volatile internal and/or external media that is removable or non-removable. For the computer 902, the media accommodate the storage of data in any suitable digital format. It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer readable media can be employed such as zip drives, magnetic tape, flash memory cards, flash drives, cartridges, and the like, for storing computer executable instructions for performing the novel methods of the disclosed architecture.
- a user can interact with the computer 902, programs, and data using external user input devices 928 such as a keyboard and a mouse.
- Other external user input devices 928 can include a microphone, an IR (infrared) remote control, a joystick, a game pad, camera recognition systems, a stylus pen, touch screen, gesture systems (e.g., eye movement, head movement, etc.), and/or the like.
- the user can interact with the computer 902, programs, and data using onboard user input devices 930 such a touchpad, microphone, keyboard, etc., where the computer 902 is a portable computer, for example.
- I/O device interface(s) 932 are connected to the processing unit(s) 904 through input/output (I/O) device interface(s) 932 via the system bus 908, but can be connected by other interfaces such as a parallel port, IEEE 1394 serial port, a game port, a USB port, an IR interface, etc.
- the I/O device interface(s) 932 also facilitate the use of output peripherals 934 such as printers, audio devices, camera devices, and so on, such as a sound card and/or onboard audio processing capability.
- One or more graphics interface(s) 936 (also commonly referred to as a graphics processing unit (GPU)) provide graphics and video signals between the computer 902 and external display(s) 938 (e.g., LCD, plasma) and/or onboard displays 940 (e.g., for portable computer).
- graphics interface(s) 936 can also be manufactured as part of the computer system board.
- the computer 902 can operate in a networked environment (e.g., IP-based) using logical connections via a wired/wireless communications subsystem 942 to one or more networks and/or other computers.
- the other computers can include workstations, servers, routers, personal computers, microprocessor-based entertainment appliances, peer devices or other common network nodes, and typically include many or all of the elements described relative to the computer 902.
- the logical connections can include
- LAN and WAN networking environments are commonplace in offices and companies and facilitate enterprise-wide computer networks, such as intranets, all of which may connect to a global communications network such as the Internet.
- the computer 902 connects to the network via a wired/wireless communication subsystem 942 (e.g., a network interface adapter, onboard transceiver subsystem, etc.) to communicate with wired/wireless networks, wired/wireless printers, wired/wireless input devices 944, and so on.
- the computer 902 can include a modem or other means for establishing communications over the network.
- programs and data relative to the computer 902 can be stored in the remote memory/storage device, as is associated with a distributed system. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers can be used.
- the computer 902 is operable to communicate with wired/wireless devices or entities using the radio technologies such as the IEEE 802.xx family of standards, such as wireless devices operatively disposed in wireless communication (e.g., IEEE 802.11 over- the-air modulation techniques) with, for example, a printer, scanner, desktop and/or portable computer, personal digital assistant (PDA), communications satellite, any piece of equipment or location associated with a wirelessly detectable tag (e.g., a kiosk, news stand, restroom), and telephone.
- PDA personal digital assistant
- the communications can be a predefined structure as with a conventional network or simply an ad hoc networks
- Wi-Fi networks use radio technologies called IEEE 802.1 lx (a, b, g, etc.) to provide secure, reliable, fast wireless connectivity.
- IEEE 802.1 lx a, b, g, etc.
- a Wi-Fi network can be used to connect computers to each other, to the Internet, and to wire networks (which use IEEE 802.3-related media and functions).
- the environment 1000 includes one or more client(s) 1002.
- the client(s) 1002 can be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices).
- the client(s) 1002 can house cookie(s) and/or associated contextual information, for example.
- the environment 1000 also includes one or more server(s) 1004.
- the server(s) 1004 can also be hardware and/or software (e.g., threads, processes, computing devices).
- the servers 1004 can house threads to perform transformations by employing the architecture, for example.
- One possible communication between a client 1002 and a server 1004 can be in the form of a data packet adapted to be transmitted between two or more computer processes.
- the data packet may include a cookie and/or associated contextual information, for example.
- the environment 1000 includes a communication framework 1006 (e.g., a global communication network such as the Internet) that can be employed to facilitate communications between the client(s) 1002 and the server(s) 1004.
- a communication framework 1006 e.g., a global communication network such as the Internet
- Communications can be facilitated via a wire (including optical fiber) and/or wireless technology.
- the client(s) 1002 are operatively connected to one or more client data store(s) 1008 that can be employed to store information local to the client(s) 1002 (e.g., cookie(s) and/or associated contextual information).
- the server(s) 1004 are operatively connected to one or more server data store(s) 1010 that can be employed to store information local to the servers 1004.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
- Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/877,247 US20140220690A1 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2010-10-28 | Mammalian genes involved in infection |
EP10830471.8A EP2499787B1 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2010-10-28 | Smart client routing |
JP2012538844A JP5711754B2 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2010-10-28 | Smart client routing |
CN2010800509721A CN102598592A (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2010-10-28 | Smart client routing |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/616,157 | 2009-11-11 | ||
US12/616,157 US8650326B2 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2009-11-11 | Smart client routing |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2011059770A2 true WO2011059770A2 (en) | 2011-05-19 |
WO2011059770A3 WO2011059770A3 (en) | 2011-10-20 |
Family
ID=43974982
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2010/054568 WO2011059770A2 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2010-10-28 | Smart client routing |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8650326B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2499787B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5711754B2 (en) |
CN (2) | CN102598592A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011059770A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8405499B2 (en) * | 2009-08-07 | 2013-03-26 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security services |
US8937658B2 (en) | 2009-10-15 | 2015-01-20 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security services |
US20110239039A1 (en) * | 2010-03-26 | 2011-09-29 | Dieffenbach Devon C | Cloud computing enabled robust initialization and recovery of it services |
WO2012044248A1 (en) * | 2010-09-28 | 2012-04-05 | Empire Technology Development Llc | Data filtering for communication devices |
US8626210B2 (en) | 2010-11-15 | 2014-01-07 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security systems |
US8675669B2 (en) * | 2011-01-05 | 2014-03-18 | Alcatel Lucent | Policy homomorphic network extension |
US8817777B2 (en) * | 2011-08-10 | 2014-08-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Hybrid unified communications deployment between cloud and on-premise |
US20130185384A1 (en) * | 2011-09-12 | 2013-07-18 | Raghavan Menon | Unified Virtual Cloud |
US9516003B2 (en) | 2011-09-12 | 2016-12-06 | Cache Cloud Llc | Unified cloud computing network interface |
US9379915B2 (en) | 2011-11-10 | 2016-06-28 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security services |
US8847749B2 (en) | 2011-11-10 | 2014-09-30 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security services |
US9277381B2 (en) | 2011-11-10 | 2016-03-01 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security services |
US8692665B2 (en) | 2011-11-10 | 2014-04-08 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security services |
US9396634B2 (en) | 2011-11-10 | 2016-07-19 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security services |
US8902740B2 (en) | 2011-11-10 | 2014-12-02 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security services |
US9088570B2 (en) | 2012-03-26 | 2015-07-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Policy implementation in a networked computing environment |
US9621685B2 (en) * | 2013-04-21 | 2017-04-11 | Oliver Solutions Ltd. | Architecture for an access network system management protocol control under heterogeneous network management environment |
US10452450B2 (en) | 2015-03-20 | 2019-10-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimizing allocation of multi-tasking servers |
US10373453B2 (en) | 2015-09-15 | 2019-08-06 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for security services |
US10565840B2 (en) | 2015-11-12 | 2020-02-18 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Alarm reporting |
US10009235B2 (en) * | 2015-12-07 | 2018-06-26 | Bank Of America Corporation | Messaging queue spinning engine |
CN106294073B (en) * | 2016-08-15 | 2019-03-12 | 合一智能科技(深圳)有限公司 | Service calling method and device |
US20190253341A1 (en) | 2018-02-15 | 2019-08-15 | 128 Technology, Inc. | Service Related Routing Method and Apparatus |
US10979316B2 (en) * | 2019-05-31 | 2021-04-13 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Dynamic application SLA metric generation, distribution, and intent-based SD-WAN link selection |
US20210194916A1 (en) * | 2019-12-24 | 2021-06-24 | Infinite Group, Inc. | Methods for inventorying network hosts and devices thereof |
CN118740730A (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2024-10-01 | 瞻博网络公司 | Session monitoring using session establishment metrics |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020087707A1 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Stewart Daniel B. | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network |
US20060129665A1 (en) | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-15 | John Toebes | Arrangement in a server for providing dynamic domain name system services for each received request |
US20070255843A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-01 | Zubev Alexander I | Configuration of clients for multiple computer services |
WO2009092441A1 (en) | 2008-01-23 | 2009-07-30 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Selection of an edge node in a fixed access communication network |
Family Cites Families (29)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6134530A (en) * | 1998-04-17 | 2000-10-17 | Andersen Consulting Llp | Rule based routing system and method for a virtual sales and service center |
US6556659B1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2003-04-29 | Accenture Llp | Service level management in a hybrid network architecture |
SE517217C2 (en) * | 1999-12-29 | 2002-05-07 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Method and system for communication between different networks |
DE10123821A1 (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2001-12-20 | Ibm | Switched Ethernet network has a method for assigning priorities to user groups so that a quality of service guarantee can be provided by ensuring that packets for one or more groups are given priority over other groups |
US20020122547A1 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2002-09-05 | Hinchey Allan J. | Method and apparatus for telephony route selection |
US20030009585A1 (en) * | 2001-07-06 | 2003-01-09 | Brian Antoine | Dynamic policy based routing |
US20030055979A1 (en) * | 2001-09-19 | 2003-03-20 | Cooley William Ray | Internet domain name resolver |
US8661158B2 (en) * | 2003-12-10 | 2014-02-25 | Aventail Llc | Smart tunneling to resources in a network |
JP4600394B2 (en) * | 2004-03-01 | 2010-12-15 | 日本電気株式会社 | Network access router, network access method, program, and recording medium |
US7457855B2 (en) | 2004-04-30 | 2008-11-25 | Aol Llc | Network configuration management |
JP4403893B2 (en) * | 2004-06-21 | 2010-01-27 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Multicast packet forwarding device |
JP2006086800A (en) * | 2004-09-16 | 2006-03-30 | Fujitsu Ltd | Communication apparatus for selecting source address |
JP4600154B2 (en) * | 2005-05-26 | 2010-12-15 | 日本電気株式会社 | Portable communication terminal, communication route selection method and communication route selection program |
US8526463B2 (en) * | 2005-06-01 | 2013-09-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method to support data applications in a multi-homing, multi-mode communication device |
US8429630B2 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2013-04-23 | Ca, Inc. | Globally distributed utility computing cloud |
CN1937570A (en) | 2005-09-23 | 2007-03-28 | 株式会社日立制作所 | Route selective control apparatus, method and system |
US7769887B1 (en) * | 2006-02-03 | 2010-08-03 | Sprint Communications Company L.P. | Opportunistic data transfer over heterogeneous wireless networks |
US7801128B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2010-09-21 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing communications between computing nodes |
CN101094129A (en) | 2006-06-20 | 2007-12-26 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Method for accessing domain name, and client terminal |
US20080028445A1 (en) * | 2006-07-31 | 2008-01-31 | Fortinet, Inc. | Use of authentication information to make routing decisions |
KR100809260B1 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2008-03-03 | 포항공과대학교 산학협력단 | Method and apparatus for handover decision by using context information in a next-generation mobile communication networks |
JP2008219723A (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2008-09-18 | Nec Corp | Sip service system, apparatus, method and program used therefor |
US7688753B1 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2010-03-30 | Emc Corporation | Selection of a data path based on one or more performance characteristics of a computer system |
US8418222B2 (en) * | 2008-03-05 | 2013-04-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Flexible scalable application authorization for cloud computing environments |
GB2459433B (en) | 2008-03-07 | 2012-06-06 | Hewlett Packard Development Co | Distributed network connection policy management |
US9717042B2 (en) * | 2008-06-04 | 2017-07-25 | Nokia Solutions And Networks Oy | Network discovery and selection |
US8683545B2 (en) * | 2008-08-15 | 2014-03-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Federating policies from multiple policy providers |
US8161180B1 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2012-04-17 | Symantec Corporation | Method and apparatus for routing a data stream through a plurality of data movers independent of a network interface type |
US9755886B2 (en) * | 2009-09-30 | 2017-09-05 | Micro Focus Software Inc. | Techniques for conditional name resolution and configuration |
-
2009
- 2009-11-11 US US12/616,157 patent/US8650326B2/en active Active
-
2010
- 2010-10-28 WO PCT/US2010/054568 patent/WO2011059770A2/en active Application Filing
- 2010-10-28 JP JP2012538844A patent/JP5711754B2/en active Active
- 2010-10-28 CN CN2010800509721A patent/CN102598592A/en active Pending
- 2010-10-28 CN CN201510736556.1A patent/CN105430059A/en active Pending
- 2010-10-28 EP EP10830471.8A patent/EP2499787B1/en active Active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020087707A1 (en) | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Stewart Daniel B. | Network protocols for distributing functions within a network |
US20060129665A1 (en) | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-15 | John Toebes | Arrangement in a server for providing dynamic domain name system services for each received request |
US20070255843A1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-01 | Zubev Alexander I | Configuration of clients for multiple computer services |
WO2009092441A1 (en) | 2008-01-23 | 2009-07-30 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Selection of an edge node in a fixed access communication network |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See also references of EP2499787A4 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US8650326B2 (en) | 2014-02-11 |
JP2013511207A (en) | 2013-03-28 |
JP5711754B2 (en) | 2015-05-07 |
EP2499787A4 (en) | 2015-06-03 |
EP2499787B1 (en) | 2017-09-13 |
EP2499787A2 (en) | 2012-09-19 |
CN102598592A (en) | 2012-07-18 |
WO2011059770A3 (en) | 2011-10-20 |
US20110113142A1 (en) | 2011-05-12 |
CN105430059A (en) | 2016-03-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8650326B2 (en) | Smart client routing | |
US10454879B2 (en) | Methods and systems for processing a DNS request | |
US10541836B2 (en) | Virtual gateways and implicit routing in distributed overlay virtual environments | |
US9794215B2 (en) | Private tunnel network | |
US8121146B2 (en) | Method, apparatus and system for maintaining mobility resistant IP tunnels using a mobile router | |
US9083760B1 (en) | Dynamic cloning and reservation of detached idle connections | |
US10038665B2 (en) | Reducing broadcast flooding in a software defined network of a cloud | |
US9515988B2 (en) | Device and method for split DNS communications | |
US9692853B2 (en) | Methods and systems for processing a DNS request | |
US9231908B2 (en) | Ensuring symmetric routing to private network | |
US11032369B1 (en) | System and method for non-disruptive migration of software components to a public cloud system | |
US11595306B2 (en) | Executing workloads across multiple cloud service providers | |
CN107547665B (en) | Method, equipment and system for allocating DHCP (dynamic host configuration protocol) address | |
US10826725B1 (en) | System for scaling network address translation (NAT) and firewall functions | |
US9055117B1 (en) | Distributed network address translation | |
CN105591922B (en) | A kind of transmission method and device of message | |
JP2013126219A (en) | Transfer server and transfer program | |
CN112261165B (en) | Communication method, system, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201080050972.1 Country of ref document: CN |
|
REEP | Request for entry into the european phase |
Ref document number: 2010830471 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010830471 Country of ref document: EP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2012538844 Country of ref document: JP |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10830471 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 13877247 Country of ref document: US |