WO2010126656A1 - System and method for effecting communications among devices in different domains employing different operating protocols - Google Patents
System and method for effecting communications among devices in different domains employing different operating protocols Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2010126656A1 WO2010126656A1 PCT/US2010/027489 US2010027489W WO2010126656A1 WO 2010126656 A1 WO2010126656 A1 WO 2010126656A1 US 2010027489 W US2010027489 W US 2010027489W WO 2010126656 A1 WO2010126656 A1 WO 2010126656A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- domain
- domains
- agent
- situated
- communications
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Ceased
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L45/00—Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L45/00—Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
- H04L45/02—Topology update or discovery
- H04L45/04—Interdomain routing, e.g. hierarchical routing
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L65/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
- H04L65/80—Responding to QoS
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/24—Negotiation of communication capabilities
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L63/00—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
- H04L63/02—Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
- H04L63/0281—Proxies
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/104—Peer-to-peer [P2P] networks
- H04L67/1059—Inter-group management mechanisms, e.g. splitting, merging or interconnection of groups
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L69/00—Network arrangements, protocols or services independent of the application payload and not provided for in the other groups of this subclass
- H04L69/08—Protocols for interworking; Protocol conversion
Definitions
- the present disclosure may be directed to managing communications among networks, and especially to agent-based Quality of Service (QoS) based network management of a heterogeneous networked system of systems.
- QoS Quality of Service
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a representative employment of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a hierarchic relation among agents that may be employed with the present disclosure.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of communications that may be effected in exercising the present disclosure.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the method of the present disclosure.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a representative employment of the present disclosure.
- a network system 10 may include a first network 12, a second network 14, and a pth network 16.
- the indicator "p" is employed to signify that there can be any number of networks in network system 10.
- the inclusion of three networks 12, 14, 16 in FIG. 1 is illustrative only and does not constitute any limitation regarding the number of networks that may be included in a network system in which the present disclosure may be employed.
- a source 20 may initiate messages, instructions, or other communications for use by a destination 22.
- Each network 12, 14, 16 may have internally situated devices operating according to a respective network protocol.
- the terms "network” and "domain” may be used interchangeably.
- Operating protocols for networks 12, 14, 16 may not be the same.
- network 12 may have internal devices 30, 32 operating according to a first network protocol.
- Network 14 may have internal devices 40, 42 operating according to a second network protocol.
- Network 16 may have internal devices 50, 52 operating according to a pth network protocol.
- a network administrator not shown in FIG. 1
- Such communication by or management of a plurality of networks may have consumed significant amounts of an administrator's time, labor and resources and may have been error prone.
- FIG. 1 illustrates elements of the system of the present disclosure that may permit managing networks such as networks 12, 14, 16 using agent-based units to accommodate differing operating protocols employed by networks 12, 14, 16.
- Agent based units embodied in frameworks designed for accepting industry standard parameters may be employed to permit trans-network communications.
- Quality of Service is an IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers) standard protocol that may be advantageously employed in exercising the present disclosure.
- a topology agent providing unit or topology agent 24 may be employed in cooperation with source 20 to establish a QoS policy for managing a configuration.
- a QoS policy may include at least one of a bandwidth limit and a priority level for employment in complying with the policy.
- Source 20 and destination 22 need not necessarily interact with topology agent 24 (or any other agent such as, by way of example and not by way of limitation, negotiator agents 60, 62; described below). Lack of source-to-agent interaction may exist, by way of example and not by way of limitation, in legacy systems to which the present disclosure may be adapted; in such legacy systems agents 24, 60 62 may be unknown to source 20.
- agent may be taken to mean a unit that acts for a user in a relationship of agency.
- the "action on behalf of aspect of the agency relationship may imply an authority to decide whether action is appropriate and, if so, which action is appropriate.
- An “agent” may be configured as a software agent, and may act for another software program in an agency relationship.
- An agent may be invoked not only for accomplishing a task, but may be empowered to activate itself to accomplish a predetermined goal as allowed by a policy, such as, by way of example and not by way of limitation, a QoS policy.
- An agent may exhibit some aspects of artificial intelligence, such as learning and reasoning.
- An agent may be capable of autonomous action such as, by way of example and not by way of limitation, modifying how it achieves objectives.
- An agent may be distributive; capable of being executed or operating on physically distinct platforms.
- An agent may be collaborative in that an agent not having a capability to achieve an objective operating alone may cooperate with other agents to achieve the objective.
- Agents may be mobile in that an agent may have an ability to relocate its execution onto different platforms or processors.
- the system of the present disclosure may operationally bridge a plurality of networks 12, 14, 16 by wrapping each network 12, 14, 16 with the system at an ingress or egress of the respective network 12, 14, 16 by establishing an abstract operating level by employing a industry standard, such as QoS. This may be carried out using a proxy agent operating unit or proxy agent at an ingress or an egress of each respective network 12, 14, 16.
- proxy agent operating units 34, 36 may be coupled with network 12 appropriately to be involved in communications entering or leaving network 12.
- Proxy agent operating units 44, 46 may be coupled with network 14 appropriately to be involved in communications entering or leaving network 14.
- Proxy agent operating units 54, 56 may be coupled with network 16 appropriately to be involved in communications entering or leaving network 16.
- Negotiator agent operating units or negotiator agents 60, 62 may be employed between source 20 and networks 12, 14, 16 to effect implementing QoS policies provided by topology agent 24 to convey communications from source 20 to destination 22 via one or more of networks 12, 14, 16, as desired or required.
- a negotiator agent 60 may be configured for selectively coupling topology agent 24 with one or more of proxy agents 34, 36, 44, 46, 54, 56.
- a negotiator agent 62 may also be configured for selectively coupling topology agent 24 with one or more of proxy agents 34, 36, 44, 46, 54, 56.
- Negotiator agents 60, 62 may communicate directly with topology agent 24 to determine available paths from source 20 to destination 22.
- Negotiator agents 60, 62 may communicate with each other to "negotiate" a QoS policy and determine whether each network 12, 14, 16 can support the policy.
- the system of the present disclosure may be employed in network system 10 for effecting communications among devices 30, 32, 40, 42, 50, 52 situated in networks or domains 12, 14, 16.
- Network 12 may alternately be referred to as "Domain 1".
- Devices 30, 32 may alternately be identified with a two-digit naming protocol: the first digit ("1") may refer to a device in Domain 1 ; the second digit may refer to a respective device within Domain 1.
- Device 11 may be a first device in Domain 1 ;
- Device 12 may be a second device in Domain 1.
- the "zig-zag" connection between devices 30, 32 is intended to indicate that devices 30, 32 may represent a significant number (greater than two) of various devices within network or domain 12.
- Network 14 may alternately be referred to as "Domain 2".
- Devices 40, 42 may alternately be identified with a two-digit naming protocol: the first digit ("2") may refer to a device in Domain 2; the second digit may refer to a respective device within Domain 2.
- Device 21 may be a first device in Domain 2;
- Device 22 may be a second device in Domain 2.
- the "zig-zag" connection between devices 40, 42 is intended to indicate that devices 40, 42 may represent a significant number (greater than two) of various devices within network or domain 14.
- Network 16 may alternately be referred to as "Domain p".
- Devices 50, 52 may alternately be identified with a two-digit naming protocol: the first digit ("p") may refer to a device in Domain p; the second digit may refer to a respective device within Domain p.
- p the first digit
- Device p1 may be a first device in Domain p
- Device p2 may be a second device in Domain p.
- the "zig-zag" connection between devices 50, 52 is intended to indicate that devices 50, 52 may represent a significant number (greater than two) of various devices within network or domain 16.
- Topology agent 24 may be configured for effecting operation of the system among the plurality of domains.
- negotiator agents 60, 62 may effect selective coupling with topology agent 24 for implementing industry standard parameters such as, by way of example and not by way of limitation, QoS parameters embodied in a QoS policy, provided by topology agent 24 to convey communications from source 20 to destination 22.
- Selected proxy agents among proxy agents 34, 36, 44, 46, 54, 56 may be situated in each network or domain 12, 14, 16 and configured for implementing the QoS parameters received from a respective negotiator agent 60, 62 to participate in presenting the communications to destination 22.
- the system of the present disclosure may manage networks 12, 14, 16 to provide QoS policy negotiation utilizing agent-based software deployed on physical network devices (e.g., proxy agents 34, 36, 44, 46, 54, 56 and negotiator agents 60, 62) to negotiate QoS contracts over multiple underlying network management technologies to provide an ability to effect end-to-end QoS over domain, technology, operational, management, and vendor boundaries by providing a hierarchy of agents (e.g., topology agent, negotiator agents 60, 62 and proxy agents 34, 36, 44, 46, 54, 56) to abstract underlying systems details which may otherwise hinder management of network systems.
- agent-based software deployed on physical network devices e.g., proxy agents 34, 36, 44, 46, 54, 56 and negotiator agents 60, 62
- the system of the present disclosure is illustrated representatively in FIG. 1.
- the system of the present disclosure may be carried out by creating and deploying agents - topology agents, negotiator agents and proxy agents - as may be required by a particular system.
- frameworks may be prepositioned within network system 10 to accommodate agents conveyed to the frameworks in exercising the system of the present disclosure as they are required. Agents may be removed from frameworks when no longer needed.
- the frameworks may be installed in various devices within various networks or domains in network system 10 including, by way of example and not by way of limitation, gateways, routers, and similar devices.
- FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating a hierarchic relation among agents that may be employed with the present disclosure.
- a hierarchy 70 of agent units or agents may be displayed ranging, as indicated by an arrow 72, from most general tier74 of agents, through an intermediate tier 76 of agents to a most specific level, a gateway tier 78.
- Most general tier 74 may include a topology agent 80 (represented as topology agent 24; FIG. 1 ) and a negotiator agent 82. There may be more than one negotiator agent employed in a network system, as may be represented by negotiator agents 60, 62 in network system 10 (FIG. 1 ).
- Intermediate tier 76 may include proxy agents 84i, 84 2 , 84 3 , 84 n .
- the indicator "n" is employed to signify that there can be any number of proxy agents in hierarchy 70.
- the inclusion of four proxy agents 84i, 84 2 , 84 3 , 84 n in FIG. 2 is illustrative only and does not constitute any limitation regarding the number of proxy agents that may be included in the hierarchy 70 of the present disclosure .
- Gateway tier 78 may indicate devices situated internally of networks or domains serviced by proxy agents 84 n .
- Gateway tier 78 may include gateways 861, 86 2 , 863, 86 m .
- Gateways 86 m may be included among devices 30, 32 within network or domain 12 in FIG. 1.
- Gateways 86 m may be included among devices 40, 42 within network or domain 14 in FIG. 1.
- Gateways 86 m may be included among devices 50, 52 within network or domain 16 in FIG. 1.
- the indicator "m" is employed to signify that there can be any number of gateways in hierarchy 70. The inclusion of four gateways 86 1 , 86 2 , 863, 86 m in FIG.
- proxy agent 84 n in describing FIG. 2 may be taken to mean that any proxy agent - 84i, 84 2 , 84 3 or 84 n (FIG. 2) - may be regarded as capable of employment as described.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of communications that may be effected in exercising the present disclosure.
- a routing of a communication from a source e.g., source 20; FIG. 1
- a destination e.g., destination 22; FIG. 1
- a first hop negotiator 62 (referred to as a previous hop negotiator in FIG. 3) may initiate the communication by requesting a next hop from a topology agent 24, as indicated by an arrow 100.
- Topology agent 24 may identify a next hop to first hop negotiator 62, as indicated by an arrow 102.
- Topology agent 24 may employ an industry standard format, such as by way of example and not by way of limitation, a quality of service (QoS) format in establishing and communicating identity of the next hop.
- First hop negotiator 62 may use information identified by topology agent 24 to create an agent at a second hop negotiator 64 (referred to as a current hop negotiator in FIG. 3), as indicated by an arrow 104.
- Second hop negotiator 64 may use information identified by topology agent 24 create an agent at a current hop proxy 34, as indicated by an arrow 106.
- current hop proxy 34 may exercise independent judgment, learned responses or similar independent action to participate in identifying a next step in conveying a communication.
- first hop negotiator 62 may employ a quality of service (QoS) format to insert a reservation with second hop negotiator 64 (indicated by an arrow 108), and second hop negotiator 64 may insert a reservation with current hop proxy 34 (indicated by an arrow 1 10).
- QoS quality of service
- Such a reservation may be recognized by second hop negotiator 64 and current hop proxy 34 and may be used by second hop negotiator 64 and current hop proxy 34 to configure for handling communications.
- Current hop proxy 34 may employ a quality of service (QoS) format to insert a reservation with a device 30 (indicated by an arrow 1 12).
- Device 30 may be situated in a network (e.g., network or domain 12; FIG. 1 ).
- Device 30 may insert a success with current hop proxy 34 indicating a successful creation of an agent in a selected device (i.e., device 30) in network 12, as indicated by an arrow 1 14.
- Current hop proxy 34 may employ a quality of service (QoS) format to insert a reservation with a device 32 (indicated by an arrow 1 16).
- Device 32 may be situated in network or domain 12 (FIG. 1 ).
- Device 32 may insert a success with current hop proxy 34 indicating a successful creation of an agent in a selected device (i.e., device 32) in network 12, as indicated by an arrow 1 18.
- QoS quality of service
- the creation of agents in selected devices within network or domain 12 may continue until agents appropriate for participation in a communication path or link traversing network or domain 12 may be established. Only two devices 30, 32 are illustrated in FIG. 3, but more than two devices may be involved.
- Current hop proxy 34 may pass an indication of success in creating agents in appropriate devices for participation in a communication path or link traversing network or domain 12 back to second hop negotiator 64 (indicated by an arrow 120), and second hop negotiator 64 may pass the indication of success to first hop negotiator 62 (indicated by an arrow 122).
- FIG. 3 may indicate that destination 22 (not shown in FIG. 3) is not in network or domain 12. That is, another hop traversing another network or domain must be effected to reach or communicate with destination 22. Accordingly, second hop negotiator 64 may request a next hop from a topology agent 24, as indicated by an arrow 124.
- Topology agent 24 may identify a next hop to second hop negotiator 64, as indicated by an arrow 126.
- Topology agent 24 may employ an industry standard format, such as by way of example and not by way of limitation, a quality of service (QoS) format in establishing and communicating identity of the next hop.
- Second hop negotiator 64 may use information identified by topology agent 24 to create an agent at a third hop negotiator 65 (referred to as a next hop negotiator in FIG. 3), as indicated by an arrow 128.
- Third hop negotiator 65 may use information identified by topology agent 24 create an agent at a next hop proxy 44, as indicated by an arrow 130.
- next hop proxy 44 may exercise independent judgment, learned responses or similar independent action to participate in identifying a next step in conveying a communication.
- second hop negotiator 64 may employ a quality of service (QoS) format to insert a reservation with third hop negotiator 65 (indicated by an arrow 132), and third hop negotiator 65 may insert a reservation with next hop proxy 44 (indicated by an arrow 134).
- QoS quality of service
- Such a reservation may be recognized by third hop negotiator 65 and next hop proxy 44 and may be used by third hop negotiator 65 and next hop proxy 44 to configure for handling communications.
- Next hop proxy 44 may employ a quality of service (QoS) format to insert reservations with devices in a network served by next hop proxy 44 (e.g., network or domain 14, FIG.
- QoS quality of service
- Next hop proxy 44 may provide an indication of success in creating agents in appropriate devices for participation in a communication path or link traversing network or domain 14 back to third hop negotiator 65, and third hop negotiator 65 may pass the indication of success to second hop negotiator 64 (not shown in FIG. 3).
- FIG. 3 In order to avoid prolixity and avoid cluttering FIG. 3, only a portion of an operation to establish communication between source 20 and destination 22 (source 20 and destination 22 are not shown in FIG 3; see FIG. 1 ) is illustrated in FIG. 3. Once all hop negotiators 62, 64, 65 and others not illustrated in FIG. 3 are successful the operation may propagate back to the first hop negotiator 62 and the reservation or QoS policy may be set up to effect the desired communication.
- One skilled in the art of network system design may apply the teaching of the present disclosure iteratively among a plurality of networks to effect communications between source 20 and destination 22.
- FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the method of the present disclosure.
- a method 200 for effecting communications among a plurality of devices situated in a plurality of domains may begin at a START locus 202.
- Respective domains of the plurality of domains employ differing operating protocols.
- Method 200 may continue with, in no particular order: (1 ) providing at least one topology agent providing unit situated in a source domain of the plurality of domains and configured for effecting operation of the system among the plurality of domains, as indicated by a block 204; (2) providing at least one negotiator agent operating unit situated between the source domain and a respective other domain of the plurality of domains than the source domain and configured for selective coupling with a respective topology agent providing unit of the at least one topology agent providing unit, as indicated by a block 206; and (3) providing a plurality of proxy agent operating units; at least one proxy agent operating unit of the plurality of proxy agent operating units being situated in each the respective other domain, as indicated by a block 208.
- Method 200 may continue with operating the at least one negotiator agent operating unit to effect implementing quality of service parameters provided by the respective topology agent providing unit to convey communications from the source domain to the respective other domain, as indicated by a block 210.
- Method 200 may continue with operating selected proxy agent operating units of the plurality of proxy agent operating units to effect implementing quality of service policies received from the respective negotiator agent operating unit to effect communications within the respective other domain, as indicated by a block 212. Method 200 may terminate at an END locus 214.
- Prior art solutions may not meet the need of mobile or ad hoc networks.
- Prior art solution may be prone to network isolation and may be human intensive with a small set of knowledgeable administrators.
- the present disclosure may abstract networking management to an operational context and may allow end users to insert, modify and remove Quality of Service contracts.
- the system and method of the present disclosure may distribute business logic for configuration of devices onto the physical devices they manage as opposed to a central monolithic software controller.
- the system and method of the present disclosure may employ abstraction to remove the necessity of programming point solutions for each vendor or equipment manufacturer.
- the system and method of the present disclosure may provide management and setup using an industry standard such as, by way of example and not by way of limitation, quality of service (QoS) to bridge multiple industry standards through abstraction.
- QoS quality of service
- the system and method of the present disclosure may employ QoS policy to bridge over networks out of the reach of a network administrator by allowing the wrapping of the network with the system at the ingress to and egress from the network.
- the system and method of the present disclosure may componentize distributed logic to allow running on devices from various manufacturers.
- the system and method of the present disclosure may componentized distributed logic to allow running on devices of various resource availability and constraints.
- QoS may be implemented in more than one technology.
- QoS may be implemented in INTSERV (Internet Services) technology or DIFFSERV (Differential Services) technology.
- INTSERV Internet Services
- DIFFSERV Differential Services
- the system and method of the present disclosure may allow a single network administrator to insert, modify and remove QoS contracts across multiple networks and across different QoS technologies with a single interface.
- the system and method of the present disclosure may enable network administrators to insert, modify and remove Quality of Service contracts without a need for a centralized server so that network isolation may not interfere in network management.
- the system and method of the present disclosure may permit managing heterogeneous networks to provide QoS policy negotiation utilizing agent-based software deployed on physical network devices to negotiate QoS contracts over multiple underlying network management technologies.
- the system and method of the present disclosure may provide an ability to provide end-to-end QoS over domain, technology, operational, management, and vendor boundaries by providing a hierarchy of agents to abstract underlying systems details which may currently hinder management of network systems.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
- Communication Control (AREA)
- Computer And Data Communications (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB1119389.3A GB2481777B (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2010-03-16 | System and method for effecting communications among devices in different domains employing different operating protocols |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US12/431,048 | 2009-04-28 | ||
| US12/431,048 US8972596B2 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2009-04-28 | System and method for effecting communications among devices in different domains employing different operating protocols |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| WO2010126656A1 true WO2010126656A1 (en) | 2010-11-04 |
Family
ID=42289386
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2010/027489 Ceased WO2010126656A1 (en) | 2009-04-28 | 2010-03-16 | System and method for effecting communications among devices in different domains employing different operating protocols |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US8972596B2 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB2481777B (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2010126656A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US9418040B2 (en) * | 2005-07-07 | 2016-08-16 | Sciencelogic, Inc. | Dynamically deployable self configuring distributed network management system |
| US8276010B2 (en) * | 2009-02-12 | 2012-09-25 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Network based system to control and monitor power consumption of networked elements |
| US8972596B2 (en) * | 2009-04-28 | 2015-03-03 | The Boeing Company | System and method for effecting communications among devices in different domains employing different operating protocols |
| US9389922B2 (en) | 2011-03-11 | 2016-07-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Declarative service domain federation |
| US11018926B2 (en) * | 2018-02-14 | 2021-05-25 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Redundant layer 2 domain interconnection |
Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1059792A2 (en) * | 1999-06-11 | 2000-12-13 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for wireless QoS agent for all-IP network |
| EP1250021A1 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2002-10-16 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Providing quality of service in telecommunications systems such as UMTS or other third generation systems |
| EP1841144A1 (en) * | 2006-03-27 | 2007-10-03 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Method and system for coordination of admission control in transport networks |
Family Cites Families (36)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6046980A (en) * | 1996-12-09 | 2000-04-04 | Packeteer, Inc. | System for managing flow bandwidth utilization at network, transport and application layers in store and forward network |
| GB2332288A (en) * | 1997-12-10 | 1999-06-16 | Northern Telecom Ltd | agent enabling technology |
| US20050027870A1 (en) * | 1998-04-14 | 2005-02-03 | Trebes Harold Herman | System and method for providing peer-oriented control of telecommunication services |
| US6154778A (en) * | 1998-05-19 | 2000-11-28 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Utility-based multi-category quality-of-service negotiation in distributed systems |
| US6535507B1 (en) * | 1998-07-06 | 2003-03-18 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method of address resolution for the transfer of synchronous transfer mode calls through multiple domains in a broadband data network |
| US6487206B1 (en) * | 1999-05-24 | 2002-11-26 | 3Com Corporation | Method and apparatus for adjusting the local service policy within an ATM switch based on non-ATM protocol service parameters |
| US6556659B1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2003-04-29 | Accenture Llp | Service level management in a hybrid network architecture |
| US6621895B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2003-09-16 | Nortel Networks Limited | Enhanced communication services for data networks |
| JP3751783B2 (en) * | 1999-11-12 | 2006-03-01 | 富士通株式会社 | Communication network management system |
| JP3617406B2 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2005-02-02 | 日本電気株式会社 | Quality assurance type communication service providing method and service providing method corresponding to multi-domain and service mediating apparatus |
| ATE262244T1 (en) * | 2000-04-13 | 2004-04-15 | Operax Ab | NETWORK OPTIMIZATION METHOD |
| EP1176766A1 (en) * | 2000-07-24 | 2002-01-30 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Telecommunications network having prioritised quality of service arrangements |
| WO2002015481A2 (en) * | 2000-08-17 | 2002-02-21 | Trendium, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for managing a service provided by a network |
| EP1248431B1 (en) * | 2001-03-27 | 2007-10-31 | Sony Deutschland GmbH | Method for achieving end-to-end quality of service negotiation for distributed multimedia applications |
| JP2002300181A (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-11 | Nec Corp | Integrated network QoS control method |
| EP1251669A1 (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2002-10-23 | BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company | Communications network |
| US7065053B2 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2006-06-20 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method, system and agent for third generation partnership project (3GPP) technical specification (TS) document number exchange |
| US20030079056A1 (en) * | 2001-10-18 | 2003-04-24 | Taylor Scott E. | Managing network connections in a system |
| JP2003173301A (en) * | 2001-12-07 | 2003-06-20 | Hitachi Ltd | Network, server and storage policy server |
| EP1331785B1 (en) * | 2002-01-23 | 2005-04-20 | Sony International (Europe) GmbH | A method for enabling the negotiation of end-to-end QoS by using the end-to-end negotiation protocol (E2ENP) |
| US7747730B1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2010-06-29 | Netfuel, Inc. | Managing computer network resources |
| US7096022B2 (en) * | 2002-10-08 | 2006-08-22 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | System and method for supporting quality of service in vertical handovers between heterogeneous networks |
| EP1458148A1 (en) * | 2003-03-10 | 2004-09-15 | Sony International (Europe) GmbH | Quality of Service (QoS) -aware handover procedure for Ad-Hoc networks |
| WO2005122493A1 (en) * | 2004-06-07 | 2005-12-22 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | A method for realizing route transmitting in the network |
| US7574595B2 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2009-08-11 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Transparent session initiated protocol |
| CN1756186B (en) * | 2004-09-30 | 2010-04-28 | 华为技术有限公司 | A Realization Method of Resource Management |
| CN100505639C (en) * | 2005-01-12 | 2009-06-24 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method of implementing resource application for multi-service streams |
| US7889636B2 (en) * | 2005-05-24 | 2011-02-15 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System and method for implementing a mid-call policy in a RSVP environment |
| US8683078B2 (en) * | 2006-03-07 | 2014-03-25 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and system for quality of service control for remote access to universal plug and play |
| EP1892882A1 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2008-02-27 | Alcatel Lucent | Method of providing QoS for a flow |
| EP2456143A1 (en) * | 2007-02-14 | 2012-05-23 | Entropic Communications Inc. | Parameterized quality of service in a network |
| US7974204B2 (en) * | 2007-11-07 | 2011-07-05 | The Boeing Company | Quality of service management for message flows across multiple middleware environments |
| US20090122707A1 (en) * | 2007-11-13 | 2009-05-14 | At&T Services, Inc. | Multi-layer cascading network bandwidth control |
| US7924715B2 (en) * | 2008-05-12 | 2011-04-12 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for discovering, negotiating, and provisioning end-to-end SLAs between multiple service provider domains |
| US8301744B2 (en) * | 2008-08-08 | 2012-10-30 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for QoS provisioning and assurance for point-to-point SIP sessions in DiffServ-enabled MPLS networks |
| US8972596B2 (en) * | 2009-04-28 | 2015-03-03 | The Boeing Company | System and method for effecting communications among devices in different domains employing different operating protocols |
-
2009
- 2009-04-28 US US12/431,048 patent/US8972596B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-03-16 GB GB1119389.3A patent/GB2481777B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2010-03-16 WO PCT/US2010/027489 patent/WO2010126656A1/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP1059792A2 (en) * | 1999-06-11 | 2000-12-13 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system for wireless QoS agent for all-IP network |
| EP1250021A1 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2002-10-16 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Providing quality of service in telecommunications systems such as UMTS or other third generation systems |
| EP1841144A1 (en) * | 2006-03-27 | 2007-10-03 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Method and system for coordination of admission control in transport networks |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| GB201119389D0 (en) | 2011-12-21 |
| US8972596B2 (en) | 2015-03-03 |
| US20100274898A1 (en) | 2010-10-28 |
| GB2481777A (en) | 2012-01-04 |
| GB2481777B (en) | 2015-04-08 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US9450817B1 (en) | Software defined network controller | |
| TWI245524B (en) | Method and arrangement in an IP network | |
| US8599852B2 (en) | Open service discovery and routing mechanism for configuring cross-domain telecommunication services | |
| US8873436B2 (en) | Routing and quality decision in mobile IP networks | |
| US20130100809A1 (en) | System and Method for End-to-End Automatic Configuration of Network Elements Using a Link-Level Protocol | |
| US8972596B2 (en) | System and method for effecting communications among devices in different domains employing different operating protocols | |
| CN111245715B (en) | Message transmission method and system | |
| WO2007132469A2 (en) | Rpr representation in ospf-te | |
| WO2021013338A1 (en) | Integration of communication network in time sensitive networking system | |
| CN116647501A (en) | Computing system, service chain processing method and storage medium | |
| EP2553870B1 (en) | An operations, administrations and management proxy and a method for handling operations, administrations and management messages | |
| CN112769614B (en) | Automatic management method of VPN (virtual private network) on demand and intercommunication system of heterogeneous network | |
| WO2021219227A1 (en) | Mechanism for stream reservation control in communication network for time sensitive networking system | |
| CN111615812A (en) | Configuration methods intended to be implemented in networks using dynamic routing protocols | |
| CN119172815A (en) | A satellite network deterministic networking arrangement method and system | |
| US7567560B1 (en) | System and method for securing a communication network | |
| US8238265B2 (en) | Auto-binding SDP RSVP LSP tunnel | |
| JP2001211175A (en) | System for managing internet connection | |
| CN103188163A (en) | Load balancing method and device | |
| EP3267623B1 (en) | System and method for topology management in local area network | |
| CN109639502B (en) | Return source control method and content distribution network | |
| CN103765818B (en) | Method and system for troubleshooting in an internal network | |
| EP3432518B1 (en) | Remote management method and circuitry for mobile broadband router | |
| EP1751935B1 (en) | Open service discovery and routing mechanism for configuring cross-domain telecommunication services | |
| CN109618022A (en) | Method and device for peer-to-peer negotiation dynamic addressing based on IP subnet |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10718354 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |
|
| NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
| ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 1119389 Country of ref document: GB Kind code of ref document: A Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20100316 |
|
| WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 1119389.3 Country of ref document: GB |
|
| 122 | Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase |
Ref document number: 10718354 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A1 |