WO2010102202A2 - Composition for controlling fish - Google Patents

Abstract

The present invention relates to a composition for controlling fish. In particular, the composition may be an incitant, functioning as either a fish attractant or a fish repellent. The composition may be prepared by extracting bacteria from a source fish, culturing the bacteria in an appropriate media, and subsequently combining the cultured bacteria with a substrate to form the composition.

Description

COMPOSITION FOR CONTROLLING FISH

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefit of US provisional application Serial No. 61/158121 filed March 6, 2009.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is based on the development of a technology related to controlling the behavior of non-plant aquatic life. In particular, the technology may be used as an incitant to modify the feeding activities of fish. The present invention provides bacterial preparations that may be used to alter the feeding propensity of fish. The preparations may be useful for enhancing and or altering the diet preference of fish. The invention may include compositions that act as feeding incitants.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Compositions for modifying fish behavior are well known in the art. Typically, such compositions include a liquid or particulate odor and/or taste or light attractant dispersed within a carrier material (see for example US Patent Nos. 5,097,616 and 5,393,537). Commonly used attractants include fish oils such as cod oil, herring oil, and salmon oil; extracts of various fishes and fish by-products including particulate fish parts; extracts and residues of earthworms; grubs and insects; anise oil; certain amino acids; fish egg extract; fish meal homogenate; morpholine; mineral oil; fragrances; fish scent; garlic oil; and extracts from shrimp, crabs, clams or artificial equivalents. Steroidal hormones have also been demonstrated to influence feeding behavior in fish (US 7,335,349). Further, peptides, free amino acids, carbohydrates, organic nitrogen bases, nucleotides and nucleosides, and fatty acids may all be chemical cues/signals capable of eliciting and regulating behaviors of animals in aquatic environments (Zimmer 2008, Howe and Sheikh 1975; Pawlik 1992; Painter et al. 1998; Krug and Manzi 1999; Hardege et al. 2004; Cummins et al. 2005; Kicklighter et al. 2007).

Much research has been performed on coating compositions used as odor/taste attractants. For example, new forms of fish attracting compositions are disclosed in Meyers, U.S. Patent No. 4,505,936, relating to an odor/taste attractant formed from shellfish waste and processed with certain additives, which prevent spoilage of the attractant; Valentincic, U.S. Patent No. 5,185,164 relates to a catfish bait composition having at least one of a selected group of isolated amino acids; and Rittschof, U.S. Patent No. 4,704,286 disclosing an attractant made of ground fish and certain other additives, which encourage a fish not to release bait once it has bitten it.

In addition, certain types of bacteria have been used with differing bait compositions. For instance, Ott, U.S. Patent No. 4,369,176 relates to an insect bait composition that includes spore-producing bacteria of the genera Bacillus, selected because the bacterium secrets enzymes that ferment exogenous sugars yielding metabolic byproducts with insect- attractant values. Moreover, Asai, U.S. Patent No. 4,202,905, attracts fish using luminous bait comprising a light producing bacteria.

Although many differing compositions have previously been used in attempts to attract fish, the specific use of bacteria related to or corresponding to a natural fish taste or smell has not previously been described or proposed. In addition, there is a growing need for a composition that controls specific species of fish with respect to specific dietary requirements (Naylor, Goldburg et al. 2000). Farming of carnivore/predator fishes places additional demands on the source of fish meal (e.g. marine feeder fish), and so a composition that could specifically incite feeding behavior in fishes, even in the absence of the preferred feeder fish, would be highly desirable. The present invention addresses this unmet need by providing compositions and methods to incite feeding behavior in fishes even when the preferred feeder fish is not present, either in whole or in part (i.e. fish homogenates, extracts, and the like).

Citation or identification of any document in this application is not admission that such document is available as prior art to the present invention.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to methods for obtaining bacteria from source aquatic animals and to methods of using said bacteria to elicit specific behaviors in target aquatic animals. Bacteria obtained according to said methods are specifically associated with, and released by, the source aquatic animals, and are responsible for the behaviors exhibited by the target aquatic animals in response to the presence of the source aquatic animals. The behavior- eliciting bacteria tend to be distinct from the bacteria commonly found in the surrounding water. The present invention further relates to behavior-eliciting compositions comprising said behavior-eliciting bacteria, which can be used to control aquatic non-plant life, including fish, crustaceans, larvae (hereinafter collectively referred to as fish), avians, and marine mammals. More particularly, the present invention provides compositions that can be incitants and/or attractants and/or repellents for fish, avians, and marine mammals depending upon the target species of fish, avian, and marine mammal and upon the composition used.

The present invention further relates to a method for preparing the behavior-eliciting compositions. The method may comprise extracting behavior-eliciting bacteria from a source fish, culturing the bacteria, then adding an effective amount of the bacteria to a substrate or carrier to produce the compositions. The compositions may comprise bacteria and may be used to modify the behavior of fish, avians, or marine mammals. Both live and inactivated bacteria may be used to produce the behavior-eliciting compositions. The bacteria may be prepared according to the methods disclosed herein, which includes the steps of extracting said bacteria from a source fish and culturing them in a suitable medium. The bacteria may be obtained from Fat Head Minnows (FHM) and be used to elicit feeding behavior in Largemouth Bass. The behavior-eliciting bacteria obtained from several common, commercially relevant source fish include those of the family Aeromonadaceae, Comamonadaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Moraxcellaceae, and of the genus Acinetobacter, Aemmonas, Acidovorax, and Entembacter, though it will be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art that the methods according to the present invention can be used to obtain and identify behavior-eliciting bacteria from any number of different source fish varieties. Any behavior-eliciting composition prepared according to the methods disclosed herein may be within the scope of the present invention.

The specific strain of the bacteria produced, such as the specific strain of Acidovorax, may be dependent on the type of fish from which the bacteria is extracted. Now that the methods and compositions of the present invention have been disclosed in great detail, an ordinarily skilled person or team will find it obvious to identify bacteria that may incite very specific feeding responses in specific target fish, avians, or marine mammals. For example, specific fish or feeder fish may be associated with specific strains of bacteria, and said strains may be responsible for the feeding behavior exhibited by a carnivore/predator fish, avian, or marine mammal. The extracted bacteria may be cultured in a dark environment in a minimal medium. The minimal medium may comprise organic compounds having carbon sources that may be simple and clearly defined.

Still another feature of the present invention may be that different bacterial strains may be selected based upon their ability to elicit different behavioral responses in fish, avians, or marine mammals. For example, the selected bacterial strain may either elicit feeding or avoidance behavior in a species of fish, avian, or marine mammal. Thus, the present invention provides for compositions that may be applied to artificial baits and/or incorporated into food to elicit feeding behavior in game fish, avians, or marine mammals. It will be immediately appreciated by a skilled person that with the appropriate selection of a source/feeder fish, the compositions according to the present invention may be used as a shark repellant. In addition, the compositions can be introduced into paint, and a composition-painted surface (for example, the hull of a boat or ship) may protect a boat, ship, or other vessel from, for example, barnacle attachment. Composition-painted surfaces could also cause marine mammals to avoid boats, ships or other vessels, thereby reducing injury to said mammals. In addition, the present compositions may be used to relocate spawning grounds or to alter migratory patterns. To summarize, the present application fully discloses and describes an invention which addresses significant and long-felt needs, particularly in the field of aquaculture. Compositions according to the present application may be used to reduce or even eliminate the use of fish meal to feed fish, which addresses regulatory agency concerns of depleting wild small/feeder fish populations. The compositions may also reduce the cost of fish feed by encouraging fish to feed upon inexpensive, high quality protein sources which the fish would normally avoid due to lack of appropriate odor/taste signals. The compositions may reduce early stage mortality and optimize early stage growth, which would increase the profitability of aquaculture/f arming. The compositions may also enable the farming of fish that normally would only eat "live" feed, thus producing new market opportunities. And finally, but not exhaustively, because the behavior- eliciting compositions comprise bacteria which are derived from fish already found in nature, environmental concerns are kept to a minimum, and organic labeling of fish fed the compositions should be fully supported.

It is noted that in this disclosure and particularly in the claims and/or paragraphs, terms such as "comprises", "comprised", "comprising" and the like can have the meaning attributed to it in U.S. Patent law; e.g., they can mean "includes", "included", "including", and the like; and that terms such as "consisting essentially of and "consists essentially of have the meaning ascribed to them in U.S. Patent law, e.g., they allow for elements not explicitly recited, but exclude elements that are found in the prior art or that affect a basic or novel characteristic of the invention.

Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a careful reading of the Detailed Description of a Preferred Embodiment presented below.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following detailed description, given by way of examples, but not intended to limit the invention solely to the specific embodiments described, may best be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a diagram of the test chamber used to quantify fish response to introduced stimuli: A = Y-shaped inflow channel; B = plastic tubing leading from water source; C = chamber with grid lines; D = drain/overflow port; E = hypodermic syringe; F = drain plug; FIG. 2 is a graph depicting the movements of hungry largemouth bass in response to fathead minnow odor/taste;

FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the movements of recently fed largemouth bass in response to fathead minnow odor/taste;

FIG. 4 is a graph illustrating the percent weight gain of hybrid striped bass fingerlings on four diets (TC) Trout Chow; (C) a 40/60 Trout Chow-casein mixture; (Kl) Trout Chow-casein mixture coated with a low level of the behavior-eliciting composition; and (K2) Trout Chow- casein mixture coated with a high level of the present composition;

FIG. 5 is a graph illustrating the percent weight gain (g) of hybrid striped bass fingerlings in three diets: (C) casein; (Cl) casein coated with a low level of the behavior-eliciting composition; and (C2) casein coated with a high level of the present composition;

FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the percent weight gain of hybrid striped bass fingerlings on three diets: (P) and uncoated poultry diet; (Pl) a poultry diet coated with low level of the present composition; and (P2) a poultry diet coated with a high level of the behavior-eliciting composition; FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the percent weight gain of hybrid striped bass fry after 17 days of feeding on three diets: (C) a casein diet; (Cl) casein coated with a low level of the present composition containing fathead minnow bacteria; and (C2) casein coated with a high level of the present composition containing fathead minnow bacteria;

FIG. 8 is a graph illustrating the percent weight gain of the same hybrid striped bass fry as shown in FIG. 6, but weights shown are after 28 days of feeding the three diets: (C) a casein diet; (Cl) casein coated with a low level of the present composition containing fathead minnow bacteria; (C2) casein coated with a high level of the present composition containing fathead minnow bacteria;

FIG. 9 is a listing of the SEQ ID NOs present in the sequence listing;

FIG. 10 is an EM photomicrograph of fish food coated with compositions according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Unless otherwise explained, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. The singular terms "a," "an," and "the" include plural referents unless context clearly indicates otherwise. Similarly, the word "or" is intended to include "and" unless the context clearly indicate otherwise.

Fish in general have sensitive chemoreceptors that contribute to their feeding and social behavior (Fisknes and Doving 1982; Hara 1992). In addition, different types of fish release distinct odor/taste to their surrounding waters. The distinctive odor/taste released by fish induce different responses in other nearby fish (Reutter, Boudriot et al. 2000). For example, the odor/taste of a minnow elicits a different response from surrounding fish than does that of a bass.

Therefore, when a bass senses the stimulating odor/taste of a minnow, the bass will exhibit a predatory response, darting at the source of the odor/taste. In comparison, when a minnow senses the odor/taste released by a bass, the minnow responds with a fright response. The present invention is founded upon these responses to incitant stimuli i.e. odor/taste to control fish avians, or marine mammals.

In an embodiment of the present invention, certain bacteria determined to be associated with a given fish species are responsible for a distinctive odor/taste of that fish. Furthermore, such a distinctive odor/taste is normally released into the natural habitat of said fish. Upon isolation and presentation to fish, the olfactory and/or taste stimulating bacteria have been shown to affect the behavior of fish. These naturally occurring bacteria elicit responses depending on the bacterium used as the source odor/taste, and the species of the fish, avians, or marine mammal sensing the odor/taste. For example, introduction of certain bacterial strains into an environment causes a rapid, overt feeding reaction in one species of fish, while causing the opposite reaction (such as an escape reaction) in another species of fish. As expected, a fish exposed to an odor/taste of potential prey exhibit characteristic feeding behavior whereas a fish exposed to the odor/taste of a potential predator fish are repelled by the odor/taste.

As used herein, a "source fish" is hereby defined as a fish from which the bacteria are extracted. A source fish is customarily chosen because of the response it elicits from a second fish, avian, or marine mammal species. The "second species" hereby defined as the target (fish, avian, or marine mammal) is a species in which a desired response is elicited. For example, the target is the species of fish, avian, or marine mammal that is subject to incitant activity, i.e. the target is incited by the bacterial composition to exhibit either feeding or avoidance behavior. When water is used as a carrier, a mixture in the form of a suspension is formed with the bacteria. The concentration of the bacteria in the mixture is preferably at least approximately 1 x 10¹² bacteria per milliliter of water. This mixture can then be used, for example, to spray coat low-cost high quality protein sources to make said protein attractive to carnivore/predator fish.

It is believed that the bacteria responsible for the signal sent to carnivore/predator fish, whether it is smell, taste or both, may be largely of the genera Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Acidovorax, and Enterobacter. The Fat Head Minnow (FHM) source fish were determined to largely harbor bacteria of the genus Acidovorax, though other behavior-eliciting bacteria may be associated with FHM. The data indicates that the carnivore/predator fish sense the odor/taste of these bacteria. The present invention suggests that different fish species harbor inherently different strains of Acinetobacter, Aeromonas, Acidovorax, and Enterobacter that emit different odors or tastes or signals from one another. Therefore, the specific bacteria used in the present invention are dependent on the fish species from which the bacteria are extracted. The specific bacteria are also dependent upon the desired behavior: if one wants to elicit feeding behavior, the bacteria will likely be isolated from source/feeder fish; if one wants to elicit avoidance behavior, the bacteria will likely be isolated from predator fish. In some embodiments, the behavior-eliciting compositions may include a pharmaceutically or veterinarily acceptable carrier and/or diluent and/or excipient and bacteria. The bacteria used in the composition according to the present invention may be of the Aeromonadaceae, Comamonadaceae, Enter obacteriaceae, or Moraxcellaceae family, or of the Acinetobacter, Aquamonas, Aeromonas, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Erwina, Escherichia, Plesiomonas, and Salmonella genus, or of the Acidovorax genus. The compositions may comprise bacteria which possess specific properties that stimulate a specific, desired response or behavior in fish, avians, or marine mammals.

In some embodiments, the compositions may include bacteria from TABLE 4 which lists the names and other characteristic information of bacteria which share significant sequence homology with bacteria isolated from Bluegills (BR), Golden Shiners (GS), Fathead Minnows (FHM), and Mosquitofish (Gam). Each of these fish species {supra) are appropriate feeder/source fish for the farming of economically useful predator fish.

In some embodiments, behavior-eliciting compositions made according to the instant application may comprise Acinetobacter sp. WH084, Acinetobacter sp. WH374, Acinetobacter tjernbergiae, Aeromonas jandaei, Aeromonas jandaei (T), Aeromonas sp. &#039, Aeromonas sp. DH 14, Aeromonas sp. DH46, Aeromonas sp. DH57, Aeromonas sp. Lgg5.7, Aeromonas sp. MCCB 141, Aeromonas sp. RC278, Aeromonas veronii, bacterium SL2.12, or other "equivalent bacteria" which may be associated with and released by source fish, for example BR, GS, FHM, or Gam, to elicit behaviors in fish, avians, or marine mammals. As used herein "equivalent bacteria" means bacteria that possess an inherent odor/taste that allows them to elicit a reasonably equivalent response in a fish, avian, or marine mammals. The compositions may comprise bacteria having nucleotide sequences that have greater than 80% sequence homology with the nucleotide sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOs: 1-23.

In other embodiments, the behavior-eliciting compositions may comprise Acidovorax facilis, Acidovorax sp. &#039, Acidovorax sp. 12M7, Acidovorax sp. g32, Acidovorax sp. MG61, Acidovorax sp. R-24667, Acidovorax sp. Z022, Aeromonas jandaei, Aeromonas jandaei (T), Aeromonas sp., Aeromonas sp. &#039, Aeromonas sp. DH14, Aeromonas sp. DH54, Aeromonas sp. DH57, Aeromonas sp. DH58, Aeromonas sp. DH69, Aeromonas sp. Lgg5.7, Aeromonas sp. MBRG 4.2, Aeromonas sp. RC278, Aeromonas veronii, bacterium 2ATl, bacterium cO7-4b, bacterium CYB24, bacterium E8, bacterium E8, bacterium G2, bacterium SL2.12, bacterium SNR2-1, Buttiauxella agrestis, Buttiauxella sp. 01WB03.2-68, Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter sp. 1101-10, Citrobacter sp. T40, endophytic bacterium HA04, endophytic bacterium HB02, Enterobacter asburiae, Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae, Enterobacter sp. 196, Enterobacter sp. DH40-2, Enterobacter sp. DW56, Enterobacter sp. Mn2, Enterobacter sp. ZXM215, Enterobacteriaceae bacterium R-31537, filamentous bacterium J8, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Microbacterium sp. KlO, Pantoea agglomerans, Pantoea sp. DW39, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Salmonella enterica, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, Serratia sp. R-17665, uncultured Acidovorax sp., uncultured beta proteobacterium, uncultured Citrobacter sp., uncultured Comamonadaceae bacterium, uncultured Enterobacter sp., uncultured Enterobacteriaceae bacterium, uncultured gamma proteobacterium, uncultured Klebsiella sp., uncultured proteobacterium, uncultured Serratia sp., or other "equivalent bacteria". The compositions may comprise bacteria having nucleotide sequences that have greater than 80% sequence homology with the nucleotide sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOs:24-37.

In yet other embodiments, the behavior-eliciting compositions may comprise Aeromonas jandaei, Aeromonas jandaei (T), Aeromonas sp., Aeromonas sp. &#039, Aeromonas sp. DH14, Aeromonas sp. DH25, Aeromonas sp. DH46, Aeromonas sp. DH54, Aeromonas sp. DH57, Aeromonas sp. DH58, Aeromonas sp. DH69, Aeromonas sp. Lgg5.7, Aeromonas sp. MBRG 4.2, Aeromonas sp. RC278, Aeromonas veronii, bacterium 2ATl, bacterium cO7-4b, bacterium G2, bacterium SL2.12, bacterium SNR2-1, Citrobacter freundii, Citrobacter sp. 1101-10, Citrobacter sp. T40, endophytic bacterium HA04, endophytic bacterium HB02, Enterobacter asburiae, Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae, Enterobacter sp. 196, Enterobacter sp. DH40-2, Enterobacter sp. DW 56, Enterobacter sp. Mn2, Enterobacter sp. ZXM215, Enterobacteriaceae bacterium R-31537, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Microbacterium sp. KlO, Pantoea agglomerans, Pantoea sp. DW39, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Salmonella enterica, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Dublin, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhi, Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium, Serratia sp. R-17665, uncultured Citrobacter sp., uncultured Enterobacter sp., uncultured Enterobacteriaceae bacterium, uncultured gamma proteobacterium, uncultured Klebsiella sp., uncultured proteobacterium, uncultured Serratia sp., or other equivalent bacteria. The compositions may comprise bacteria having nucleotide sequences that have greater than 80% sequence homology with the nucleotide sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOs:38-76.

In other embodiments, the compositions may comprise bacterium E8, Buttiauxella agrestis, Buttiauxella sp. 01WB03.2-68, Enterobacteriaceae bacterium R-31537, Serratia sp. R- 17665, uncultured Citrobacter sp., uncultured Enterobacter sp., uncultured proteobacterium, uncultured Serratia sp., or other equivalent bacteria. The compositions may comprise bacteria having nucleotide sequences that have greater than 80% sequence homology with the nucleotide sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOs:77-81.

As used herein, the terms "pharmaceutically or veterinarily acceptable carrier" and "pharmaceutically or veterinarily acceptable vehicle" and "pharmaceutically or veterinarily acceptable excipient" are interchangeable and refer to a substrate that can be consumed by a target species without significant adverse effects. Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable carriers known in the art include, but are not limited to, sterile water, saline, glucose, or buffered solutions. Carriers may include auxiliary agents including, but not limited to feed, diluents, stabilizers {i.e., sugars and amino acids), preservatives, wetting agents, emulsifying agents, pH buffering agents, viscosity enhancing additives, colors and the like. The pharmaceutically or veterinarily acceptable carriers or vehicles or excipients are well known to the one skilled in the art. For example, a pharmaceutically or veterinarily acceptable carrier or vehicle or excipient can be a NaCl (e.g., saline) solution or a phosphate buffer. In another example, the excipient, carrier or vehicle may be fish, avian or marine mammal food such as, but not limited to, meal, pellets, or slurries. Amounts and volumes are herein discussed in the general description and can also be determined by the skilled artisan from this disclosure read in conjunction with the knowledge in the art, without any undue experimentation.

In one embodiment, the bacteria of the behavior-eliciting compositions may be prepared by isolating bacteria from a species of fish (source fish) by removing an aliquot of conditioned water (water from the aquaria that the source fish have inhabited, for example, for > 30 minutes), inoculating growth media with a portion of said aliquot, propagating said bacteria in growth media, streaking said bacteria to form single colony isolates on nutrient agar plates/slants, and subsequently subculturing such isolates in growth media.

To obtain a composition having a certain odor/taste, a specific species of source/feeder fish, such as fathead minnows, are placed in a container of water and allowed to swim for a sufficient amount of time, reasonably at least ten minutes. To prevent any undesirable contaminants, i.e. algae, bacteria, parasites, etc. in the final composition, the aquaria water used is initially chlorinated and is subsequently dechlorinated and passed through a 0.45 μm filter prior to the addition of subject fish. The fish will release bacteria into the dechlorinated water immediately, however, the longer the fish is exposed to the water the greater the amount of bacteria that will be released ultimately yielding the conditioned water. After a sufficient amount of time (10 minutes to 1.0 hour), a culturing medium is inoculated with an aliquot of the conditioned water.

Any suitable growth medium capable of culturing the bacteria released by the fish may be used; however a minimal medium is may be more effective. Minimal media contains the minimum nutrients possible for colony growth, generally without the presence of amino acids, and typically contains: 1) a carbon source for bacterial growth, which may be a sugar such as glucose, or a less energy-rich source like citrate; 2) various salts, which may vary amongst the specific bacterium of the composition and growing conditions; these salts generally provide essential elements such as magnesium, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur to allow the bacteria to synthesize protein and nucleic acid; 3) water (Davis, Dulbecco et al. 1990). For the present invention, a suitable minimal medium may comprise: potassium phosphate-dibasic, potassium phosphate-monobasic, ammonium sulfate, sodium citrate, magnesium sulfate and deionized water. The entire volume of prepared minimal medium is then sterilized by passage through a 0.45 μm filter. The citrate of the sodium citrate is the carbon source in that particular minimal medium. In another embodiment, sterile glucose (autoclaved or sterile-filtered) is added to the above mentioned minimal medium as a carbon source. In another embodiment of the present invention the minimal medium may comprise: potassium phosphate-dibasic, present in an amount of approximately 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1.0%, 1.1%, 1.2%, 1.3%, 1.4%, 1.5%, 1.6%, 1.7%, 1.8%, 1.9%, or 2.0%, frequently 0.7% by weight; potassium phosphate-monobasic, present in an amount of approximately 0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, or 1.0%, frequently 0.3% by weight; ammonium sulfate, present in an amount of approximately 0.01%, 0.02%, 0.03%, 0.04%, 0.05%, 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.08%, 0.09%, 0.10%, 0.20%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, or 0.8%, frequently 0.1% by weight; sodium sulfatecitrate, present in an amount of approximately 0.005%, 0.15%, 0.20%, 0.25%, 0.30%, 0.35%, 0.40%, 0.45%, 0.50%, or 0.55%, frequently 0.051% by weight; magnesium sulfate, present in an amount between approximately 0.001% , 0.002%, 0.003%, 0.004%, 0.005%, 0.006%, 0.007%, 0.008%, 0.009%, 0.010%, 0.020%, or 0.03%, frequently 0.01% by weight; distilled water, present in an amount of approximately 70%, 71%, 72%, 73%, 74%, 75%, 76% 78%, 79%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 85%, 86% 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96% 97%, 98%, or 99%, most frequently 94% by weight; and a concentrated solution of sterile glucose (about 10 to 70% w/v) diluted in the final medium to a weight volume concentration of approximately 1.0%, 2.0%, 3.0%, 4.0%, 5.0%, 6.0%, 7.0%, 8.0%, 9.0% or 10.0 %, frequently 5,0%.

The bacteria (isolated as described above) were cultured in a dark environment to reduce the growth of algae that may be present in the initial sample. Bacterial growth began immediately upon inoculation of the culture medium and continued through logarithmic phase until stationary phase was reached, at approximately 48 hours post inoculation (Davis, Dulbecco et al. 1990). No adverse effects were experienced from culturing for times periods greater or less than 48 hours. Culturing for fewer than 48 hours decreased the quantity of the composition produced and culturing for more than 48 hours had little or no effect on the concentration of the final composition.

Bacteria were grown in minimal culture media for approximately 48 hours to achieve stationary phase (Davis, Dulbecco et al. 1990). Subsequently, the bacteria were killed by adding 37% formaldehyde to the culture to a final concentration of 1.0% (v/v). The bacteria were separated (pelleted) from the medium by centrifugation at 7,000 x G for 10 minutes at 20⁰C. To ensure adequate removal of formaldehyde, the supernatant is separated from the bacterial cell pellet by filtering, decanting, or aspiration, and the pelleted bacteria were resuspended in a volume of distilled water equivalent to the volume of the initial culture. The resuspended bacteria were pelleted again using the same centrifugation parameters. The bacterial cell pellet was resuspended in distilled water. This process was repeated two (2) more times, discarding the supernatant obtained from the centrifugation step. The final cell pellet was then mixed with an appropriate volume of desired solution or excipient to form a bacterial suspension (i.e. a behavior-eliciting composition).

In another embodiment, the bacteria are resuspended with an appropriate volume of distilled water to form a composition with a bacterial concentration of approximately 1.0 x 10⁷, 1.5 x 10⁷ , 1.0 x 10⁸ , 1.5 x 10⁸, 1.0 x 10⁹ , 1.5 x 10⁹ , 1.0 x 10¹⁰, 1.5 x 10¹⁰ , or 1.0 x 10¹¹ bacteria per milliliter. In one embodiment, the water/composition mixture is applied to an object of interest, such as fish food. Application of the mixture may be accomplished by any means known in the art, such as spraying, soaking, mixing etc. When used to enhance the attractiveness of fish food, the amount of the composition applied on, mixed with, or associated with one pound of fish food is approximately 1.0 x 10⁹ , 1.5 x 10⁹ , 1.0 x 10¹⁰, 1.5 x 10¹⁰ , or 1.0 x 10¹¹ , 1.0 x 10¹⁰ , 1.5 x 10¹⁰ , 1.0 x 10¹¹, 1.5 x 10¹¹ , 1.0 x 10¹² , 1.5 x 10¹² , 1.0 x 10¹³, or 1.5 x 10¹³ bacteria. Alternative substrates can be used depending on the purpose of the composition. For example, the composition can be mixed with food at the time of formulation, and solutions/substrates compatible with the formulation process as necessary.

Feed is the largest production cost for commercial aquaculture (for example, most farming of salmon, other marine finfish and shrimp), and thus improving feed efficiency in industrial systems is a priority (Naylor, Goldberg et al. 2000). A primary advantage of the present invention is that the behavior-eliciting compositions can be incorporated into low cost, high protein food for fish, avians, or marine mammals. There are a number of commercial food suppliers (Purinamills, AquaMax, Gray Summit MO; Cargill, Aquaxcel, Franklinton LA; Zeigler Bros., Gardners PA) that offer low cost fish foods. Typically, such low cost high protein foods are efficient, and economically viable, (Lim and Webster 2001) but unfortunately they are usually unpalatable (Subcommittee-Fish-Nutrition 1993). For example, many types of fish refuse to eat inexpensive high protein food sources containing casein. In fact, certain bass fish will starve rather than eat casein. However, when a composition comprising cultured bacteria extracted from a normal bass prey fish, such as minnow source fishes, is applied to casein-based food, the bass will eat and sustain a reasonable amount of growth on the casein diet. Therefore, behavior-eliciting compositions according to the present invention inexpensively transform otherwise unpalatable high protein food sources into efficient palatable food sources. A further aspect of the present invention is that the bacterial compositions additionally possess inherent nutritional value.

Another feature of the present invention is the combination of the cultured bacteria and particular carriers. By combining the bacteria with low-cost protein sources, for example, fish will consume the protein whereas without the bacteria, said fish would find it unpalatable, and in some cases, they would starve. This aspect is particularly important during the process of weaning fish to commercially available fish food, where mortality can exceed 60%. Behavior- eliciting compositions according to the present invention may dramatically reduce fish mortality, thus significantly reducing aquaculture costs.

All documents cited or referenced in herein cited documents, together with any manufacturer's instructions, descriptions, product specifications, and product sheets for any products mentioned herein or in any document incorporated by reference herein, are hereby incorporated herein by reference, and may be employed in the practice of the invention.

Having thus described in detail preferred embodiments of the present invention, it is to be understood that the invention defined by the above paragraphs is not to be limited to particular details set forth in the above description as many apparent variations thereof are possible without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention.

The invention will now be further described by way of the following non-limiting examples.

EXAMPLES

Without further elaboration, it is believed that one skilled in the art can, using the preceding descriptions, practice the present invention to its fullest extent. The following detailed examples are to be construed as merely illustrative, and not limitations of the preceding disclosure in any way whatsoever. Those skilled in the art will promptly recognize appropriate variations from the procedures both as to reactants and as to reaction conditions and techniques. Example 1: Test Chamber

In the present invention, a test chamber was designed and used for quantitative analysis of feeding, predator avoidance, and other behaviors of test subjects. The test chamber shown in FIG. 1 was constructed of clear poly(methyl 2-methylpropenoate) (PLEXIGLAS) and consists of a main chamber with a "Y-shaped" inflow channel. The chamber volume is 28 cm X 29 cm X 27 cm and has a capacity of -22.0 Liters. The inflow channel allows introduction of substrates and compositions of interest. Each section of the inflow channel is square in cross-section (13.69 cm²) and 30.0 cm in length.

During operation, dechlorinated tap water (prepared as described below) was continuously fed through both arms of the inflow channels. The two water streams from each inflow channel converge and enter the main chamber at the bottom/center of the main chamber. The water in the main chamber overflowed through an opening near the top of the main chamber on the side opposite the inflow channels. Lines marked on the two sides and bottom of the main chamber formed nine squares on each face of the apparatus. The lines delineate 27 virtual cubic "compartments" in the main chamber.

Fish were introduced to the main chamber through the open top of the apparatus. Each time a fish moved from one of the 27 virtual cubic compartments (see above) to another, the move was recorded as an event by the observer. Substances in solution were added to the incoming water stream by penetrating a rubber septum at the entry port of either inflow arm with a hypodermic needle. Solutions and compositions of interest were added as single injections via a syringe attached to the injection needle or continuously pumped into the water stream.

Dechlorination. A 20 Liter plastic carboy, with a bottom spigot, served as a dechlorinating vessel. Tap water flowed in to the top of the carboy through plastic tubing at a rate of 3.0 Liters per minute. A peristaltic pump was used to add 0.2 M sodium thiosulfate to the carboy at a rate of 2.5 milliliters per minute to remove the chlorine. Chlorine removal (Eaton, Clesceri et al. 1992) was monitored with a Hach Chlorine Test Kit (Hach Co., Loveland Colorado, Model CN-66F).

Flow dynamics for the apparatus were tested by injecting 1.0% methylene blue into one of the inflow arms through the designated port followed by visual observation of the distribution of blue color. The degree of dilution of test substances in each cubic grid compartment of the main chamber was assessed using pH measurements. Briefly, with water flowing through the chamber, 10.0 ml volumes of 1.0 N HCl were injected through one of the inflow arms of the apparatus. At intervals, 10.0 ml samples of water were removed from the center of each cubic grid compartment with a pipette. Measurement of pH in the samples allowed calculation of dilution factors in the various grid compartments.

Water temperatures in the test chamber were adjusted to be within 1°C of the source aquaria. Example 2. Use of the Test Chamber The test chamber described above (FIG. 1) was designed to allow monitoring of the swimming movements of fish in response to components in flowing water. Similar chambers have been used by others for quantitative and semi-quantitative evaluations of various kinds of fish behaviors evoked by components in solution. (Kleerekoper 1969; Bardach and Villars 1974; Pfeiffer 1982). In essence, hungry fish exhibit increased swimming movements in response to positive stimuli, i.e. natural and synthetic amino acids (Carr 1988) and extracts of prey fish specific to the fish species being observed. In all tests, individual fish were observed during three sequential 10 minute periods. The first 10 minutes in the test chamber served as an acclimation period. The second 10 minute interval served as a control period during which only dechlorinated tap water was injected and fish movements were recorded. At the beginning of the last period, the experimental period, the composition of interest was injected and fish movements were recorded.

Results from the test chamber consist of recordings of movements for each fish through the grids within the test chamber during the control period and the experimental period. Mean movements during control and experimental periods were accompanied by standard errors. Differences between means were tested using the t-test for paired comparisons (Sokal and Rohlf 1969). This test evaluates the significance of the difference between the two means obtained in experimental condition where a significance requires a p value < 0.05. Example 3. Determining the response of fish to another fish species "odor/taste"

The olfactometric/taste test chamber (FIG. 1) was used to determine how largemouth bass and several species of small fish react to each other's odor/taste (measurements as per Example 2, above). It was observed that small fish (yellow fin shiner, fathead minnow) often react to bass odor/taste by becoming motionless (fright response), whereas hungry bass responded to the odor/taste of the small fish with searching movements, also referred to as exploratory feeding behavior (FIG. T). Bass that had just been fed ignored the odor/taste of the small fish (see FIG. 3). Characterization of the avoidance odor/taste response. Water was taken from an aquarium which housed a largemouth bass for tests of avoidance by small fish (said water will be hereinafter referred to as "bass water" or "conditioned bass water"). The bass water was tested immediately after removal from the tank. In this embodiment, FHM and YFS were tested as described below. Conditioned bass water was obtained from aquaria in which bass had been 1) swimming, 2) housed, or from a 3) new tank that had housed bass fish for 30 minutes. The bass were removed by netting them, and the resulting 3 types of conditioned bass water were used as described below to determine the nature of the response said water would elicit in FHM.

Behavior. The response of each species to bass water appeared to depend on whether or not the test fish were hungry. Hungry FHM stopped swimming for between one (1) and two (2) minutes when exposed to bass water. The FHM slowly resumed swimming as the bass water was diluted. Satiated FHM exhibited a slight reduction in their swimming activity when exposed to bass water (P = 0.11). Hungry YFS responded to bass water with rapid darting, followed by entry into the inflow channel in 60% of the trials. This entry was delayed until the inflow channel had been flushed of the bass water (average 7.6 min). Satiated YFS did respond to bass water with moderate swimming activity, but did not enter the inflow channel.

Filtration removes the bass odor/taste. Conditioned bass water was sterile-filtered through a 0.45 μm filter (e.g., Millipore Corp., Billerica MA, # SJLIVM4710. 0.45 μm), and was then tested in the chamber as described above. After filtration, the FHM responses elicited by bass water were similar to those elicited by the dechlorinated control water, indicating that no avoidance. In this experiment, the FHM fish increased their movement similar to the dechlorinated tap water control. These results show that the odor/taste responsible for the avoidance behavior of FHM is particulate and can be removed by filtration.

Centrifugation. Thirty (30.0) ml of conditioned bass water was transferred to sterile conical centrifuge tubes. The tubes were centrifuged at room temperature for 10 minutes at 7,000 x G. An aliquot of the supernatant was removed from the centrifuge tube, and was used in a 'finger' bowl experiment in which one FHM fish was added to a small 'finger' bowl containing 230 ml of dechlorinated tap water. The fish was allowed to acclimate for 15 minutes and then 1.0 ml of conditioned bass water was added to the bowl and the fish motion was monitored. In the finger bowl experiments, the FHM fish increased their movement, similar to the response observed with the dechlorinated tap water controls and the 0.45 μm filtered water. Consequently, this result shows that the odor/taste responsible for the avoidance behavior in FHM can be removed from aqueous solution at low centrifugal forces that are typically used to pellet bacteria.

The odor/taste is bacteria. The experiments described above strongly suggested that bacteria were the odor/taste to which the FHM were responding. To explore this possibility, 1.0 ml of conditioned bass water was plated on sterile nutrient agar plates (agar solidified in 15 cm covered Petri dishes). Petri dishes were incubated at 25°C for 24 hours. Plating on nutrient agar generated -4,000 bacterial colonies per ml of conditioned bass water. Control dechlorinated tap water yielded < 100 colonies per ml. Using a sterile loop, bacteria from isolated colonies on nutrient agar plates were used to inoculate: agar slants (storage copies), nutrient broth medium, and minimal medium as described above. Growth in both nutrient medium (4 days at 25°C) and minimal medium (6 days at 25°C) yielded bacterial growth to levels of -1.0 x 10 bacterial per ml. Bacterial from nutrient broth and minimal medium were diluted to 1.0 x 10⁶ per ml. These bacteria were used in the finger bowl assay (described above) to determine the effect on FHM fish. Results showed that bacteria grown on nutrient broth had no effect on FHM response, similar to controls. More importantly, however, it was observed that in the presence of bacteria grown on minimal medium, the FHM fish froze in a typical avoidance behavior. The response was identical to that observed conditioned bass medium (described above). This finding showed that bacteria inherently associated with bass fish were sufficient to elicit the odor/taste response in FHM fish (i.e. the avoidance behavior). Typing of the bacterial (composition) as Citrobacter. Individual colonies that formed from streaking the minimal media agar plates were used to inoculate minimal growth medium, minimal medium agar slants, and minimal medium agar Petri dishes. The resultant bacterial cultures were used as a source for subsequent analyses. Gram staining of selected individual cultures as well as the starting culture exhibited gram-negative characteristics (Bergey 1994). Aliquots of liquid cultured material were microscopically observed using oil-immersion at IOOOX magnification. The bacteria were found to be rod-shaped and typically as attached duplets. Since the bacteria were Gram negative and rod shaped (bacillus), the diagnostic test employed for typing was the API 2OE test strip (BioMerieux, Inc., #20100 api 20E). The API 2OE system consists of a plastic strip of 20 individual, miniaturized tests tubes (cupules) each containing a different reagent used to determine the metabolic capabilities, and, ultimately, the genus and species of enteric bacteria in the family Enterobacteraceae. Single colonies from six different cultures were used to inoculate a 0.85% saline solution, and after mixing, the inoculated saline solution was applied to API 2OE strips rehydrating the dried reagent in each tube on the strip. Some of the tubes are completely filled (tests CIT, VP and GEL), whereas others were topped off with mineral oil so that the anaerobic reactions (reactions that occur in the absence of oxygen) could be carried out (tests ADH, LDC, ODC, H2S, URE). The strips were then incubated in a small, plastic humidity chamber for 18-24 hours at 37⁰C. Living bacteria produce metabolites and wastes as part of the business of being a functioning cell. The reagents in the cupules are specifically designed to test for the presence of products of bacterial metabolism specific to certain kinds of bacteria. After incubation, each tube (an individual test) was assessed for a specific color change indicating the presence of a metabolic reaction that sheds light on the microbe's identity. Some of the cupule contents changed color due to pH differences, others contained end products that must be identified using additional reagents. Interpretation of the 20 reactions, in addition to the oxidase reaction (which was done separately), was converted to a seven-digit code. Results of the analysis yielded an API code of 0604532 that corresponded to the bacterial identifier Citrobacter freundii.

Odor/taste is ubiquitous in fish species tested. In a manner similar to that described above, bacteria specific to a given fish species can be shown to be the causative agent for avoidance or attraction to a second fish, avian, or marine mammal. For example, FHM fish (prey fish) were found to harbor bacteria that elicit feeding behavior in bass fish (predator fish). As illustrated by FIG. 2, hungry largemouth bass moved significantly more in response to the fathead minnow (FHM) odor/taste, as compared to control water. In contrast, recently fed largemouth bass do not respond significantly differently to fathead minnow odor/taste, as compared to control water (FIG. 2). In sum, these results indicated that bass preferentially responded to FHM odor/taste only when they were hungry. Bass also responded equally well to formaldehyde-inactivated bacteria.

FHM responses were then tested using samples of the minimal medium containing bass bacteria (with appropriate controls) as well as formaldehyde-fixed, washed bacteria. Both kinds of samples caused fright responses in the minnows, just as fresh bass water had. These results showed that the bacteria did not have to be live to elicit behavioral responses from the minnows. Therefore, the present application is intended to encompass compositions which comprise bacteria that have been inactivated by any well-known method that still preserve the ability of the bacteria to elicit a desired behavior in a target fish, avian or marine mammal. The ability to use either live or inactivated bacteria offers a clear advantage to customers that may exhibit a preference for one over the other. Example 4. Preparation of the bacteria (composition).

The seed culture. The behavior-eliciting composition was obtained by allowing fathead minnows (FHM) to swim in a container of sterile dechlorinated tap water for between 15 minutes to one (1) hour. After this time period, a 1.0 ml aliquot of this water was removed using a sterile pipette and is subsequently transferred to 1.0 L of minimal medium (prepared according to the ingredients listed in TABLE 1) in a 3.0 L Erlenmeyer flask. TABLE 1 - components of the minimal medium.

The prepared medium was stored in covered 3.0 L Erlenmeyer flasks and was sterilized in a suitable apparatus, preferably an autoclave. After sterilization, 50.0 milliliters of a sterilized 4% glucose solution was aseptically added to the sterilized culture medium to form the preferred minimal medium.

Growth of the composition. A 1.0 ml aliquot of the seed bacteria (see above) was subsequently added to 1.0 L of the preferred minimal medium in a 3.0 L flask. The flask was placed in a dark environment at 20⁰C for 48 hours, to avoid or minimize any possible algal growth. After 48 hours of growth, the bacteria (composition) were fixed, centrifuged, and washed at least 2 times with an appropriate volume of distilled water. Bacteria were centrifuged a final time, the supernatant discarded, and the packed cells resuspended with water to form a behavior-eliciting composition having a bacterial concentration of 1.0 x 10¹² bacteria per milliliter. Example 5 In view of the response elicited by the fathead minnow, Example 5 demonstrates how bacteria extracted from prey fish might be useful in enhancing the acceptability of fish chows, potentially allowing a reduction in the cost of the chow without affecting the growth of the fish. Feeding experiments using hybrid striped bass fingerlings and fry were conducted using various mixtures of Trout Chow and casein. For all the feeding experiments, approximately 24 pounds of feed was coated in two 12 pound lots - one was to receive the high level of behavior-eliciting composition/coating, and the other would receive the low level of composition/coating. For the coating, 22 liters of FHM- derived bacterial culture was grown and then concentrated and washed to a final packed volume of 900 ml. The 900 ml was divided into 600 ml for the high coating and 300 ml for the low coating. Each aliquot was resuspended in about 1 liter and hand sprayed onto the pellets of feed using a standard garden-type sprayer. The pellets were carefully mixed and spread on aluminum foil to dry overnight. A representative micro-photograph of coated feed is presented in FIG. 10.

Four (4) different diets were tested. Three tanks of ten fish were fed Trout Chow (TC). Other groups of three tanks were fed the 60% casein/40% Trout Chow mixture without any top- coating (C) (see TABLE 2 for the contents of the casein formula), the 60% casein/40% Trout Chow mixture coated with a low level of the present composition (chosen arbitrarily and designated Kl); and the 60% casein/40% Trout Chow mixture coated with a high level of the present composition, which was twice the level of the low level (K2). It had already been determined that the hybrid striped bass did not gain much weight on the Trout Chow/Casein diet alone. The behavior-eliciting composition was prepared as described and comprised inactivated bacteria that had been extracted from fathead minnows (FHM).

One hundred-twenty hybrid striped bass fingerlings were distributed among twelve tanks supplied with recirculating water. The fish were fed 90 grams of food per day for 28 days. They were weighed at the beginning and end of the experiment. Fish eating the casein/TC diet with the high level of coating gained 14.13 + 2.83 g, compared to the weight gain on Trout Chow of 12.14 + 2.62 g. Weight gains on the uncoated and medium-level coated casein/TC diet were 10.36 + 1.47 g and 10.21 + 0.63 g, respectively. FIG. 4 shows the percent weight gains of the hybrid striped bass on each of the diets. This experiment illustrates that the fish eating the casein/TC diet with the high level of coating not only gained more weight than those on the uncoated diet, but also gained more weight than those fish eating Trout Chow. TABLE 2

^'^Experiments with 40/60 Trout Chow/Casein Diet

The above mentioned diets had a protein level of 35% and contained 3.5 kcal/g. Example 6

A casein diet (with no added Trout Chow) was coated with the fathead minnow (FHM) derived behavior-eliciting composition, and a poultry meal diet was coated similarly or with a 2- fold diluted FHM composition. Weight gains on these diets were compared to weight gains by fish eating uncoated diets. The ingredients of the poultry diet are listed in Table 3. Twenty four tanks of 10 hybrid striped bass fingerlings each were used. Three tanks of fish were fed Trout Chow (Purina Mills LLC, AQUAMAX). It should be noted that the fish had already become acclimated to a Trout Chow diet, so the latter three groups of fish did not require any time to adjust to a new diet. Groups of 3 tanks were fed the casein diet with no coating (C); an intermediate level of coating with the present invention (Cl); and a high level of coating with the present invention (C2). The coating levels were the same as those used in Example 5. The experiment was continued for 34 days. The results are shown in FIG. 5. Although the fish did quite well on the Trout Chow, as expected, the primary experiment was to determine the effect the behavior-eliciting composition coating had on the lower-cost, less-palatable casein and poultry diets. Three tanks of fish were fed Poultry pellets (Ziegler Brothers, Gardeners PA). Groups of 3 tanks were fed the Poultry diet with no coating (P); an intermediate level of coating with the present invention (Pl); and a high level of coating with the present invention (P2). The coating levels were the same as those used in Example 5. The experiment/feeding was continued for 34 days. There was significant filamentous growth in the tanks, likely the result of low-level fungal or bacterial contamination of the Poultry pellets not controlled in the manufacture of the pellets (Ziegler Brothers, Gardeners PA). However, as shown in FIG. 6, the fish did gain more weight on the poultry diet as a function of the behavior- eliciting coating the Poultry pellets with the composition. Fish eating the Poultry diet did gain slightly less weight on the diet with the high level of coating compared to those eating the Poultry diet with the lower level coating, but the difference was not significant. Both levels of coating exhibited -2% weight gains over uncoated diet. FIGs. 5 and 6 summarize the above mentioned data. TABLE 3

^amounts of poultry meal, salt and menhaden oil varied as a function of the protein, lipid and fiber levels of ingredients used

The above diet had a protein level of 35% and contained 3.5 kcal/g. Example 7

The tests of the casein diet used in Example 5 (no Trout Chow mixed with it) were repeated but with smaller fish (beginning weights about 0.6 g compared to the average beginning weight of about 10 g in Example 5. Ninety fish were weighed and distributed among 9 tanks.

Groups of 3 tanks were fed either the plain casein pellets (C) or top-coated pellets at low (Cl) and high levels (C2). Fish were weighed at the end of 17 days (FIG. 7) and 28 days (FIG. 8).

The experiment was terminated at the end of 28 days because the fish were beginning to appear unhealthy on this diet. The coated casein pellets allowed greater weight gain at 17 days (FIG. 7) and greater weight retention at 28 days (FIG. 8). In contrast, those fish on the uncoated diet lost almost all the weight they had gained previously.

Example 8 - sequences encoding portions of 16S RNA obtained from bacteria isolated according to the present invention

Bacteria were isolated from Bluegills (BR), Fathead Minnows (FHM), Mosquitofish (Gam), and Golden Shiners (GS) in accordance with the techniques described in the instant application. DNA was amplified and PCR products were sequenced essentially as previously described (see Bano et al., 2007). Briefly, bacteria were collected from incubations by filtration through 0.22 μm pore size Sterivex cartridge filters (Millipore; Billerica, MA). DNA extraction was completed using the MoBio PowerSoil DNA Extraction Kit. DNA was amplified using Bacteria-specific 16S rRNA primers 27F/1492R (Baker et al., 2003), cloned with the TOPO TA cloning kit (Invitrogen; Carlsbad, CA) using vector and E. coli competent cells. Clones were selected randomly and sequenced by Genewiz (South Plainfield, NJ).

Results were compared to the sequences available at the Ribosomal Database Project website (http ://rdp . cme . msu . edu/, Cole et al., 2008)

TABLE 4 presents summary data for the bacteria that were associated with the indicated fish. SEQ ID NOs: 1-23 are sequences obtained from "Br" or bluegill- associated bacteria. SEQ ID NOs:24-37 are from "FHM" or fathead minnow-associated bacteria. SEQ ID NOs:38-76 are from "Gam" or mosquitofish, or Gαmbαszα-associated bacteria. SEQ ID NOs:77-81 are from "GS" is golden shiner- associated bacteria. For each SEQ ID NO, the names and accession numbers for 10 of the closest matching 16S RNA sequences are indicated.

TABLE 4

TABLE 5 summarizes the bacterial Family and Genus dominance that may be concluded in view of the TABLE 4 results. "Br" is bluegill; "FHM" is fathead minnow; "Gam" is mosquitofish, or Gambusia; and "GS" is golden shiner.

TABLE 5

Behavior-eliciting compositions according to the present invention may include bacteria of the dominant families and genera indicated in TABLE 5. For example, if a predator fish preferentially exhibits feeding behavior in the presence of Bruegills, adding bacteria of the family Aeromonαdαceαe and the genus Aeromonαs to compositions in accordance with the present invention may be effective in eliciting feeding behavior in said predator fish. Now that the inventors have disclosed the association between the source fish (Br, FHM, Gam, and GS) and the dominant bacterial families and genera, skilled artisans will instantly appreciate that it may be advantageous to add specific bacteria to compositions in order to influence the behavior of fish, avians, or marine mammals.

In another embodiment, compositions according to the present invention may include non-dominant bacteria. The methods disclosed by the instant application enable one of skill to isolate and test novel bacteria for their ability to elicit feeding responses in fish, avians, and marine mammals. The fish, avians, and marines animals may be responding to the dominant bacteria, or they may be responding to less well-represented bacteria. In either case, routine experimentation, as fully disclosed and described by the instant application, can be used to establish a correlation between specific bacteria (isolated from a source fish) and a feeding response exhibited by said fish, avians, or marine mammals.

It will be clear to those skilled in the art of fish modifying compositions that many modifications and substitutions can be made to the composition and its various methods of preparation and use described above without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims. Cited References

Baker GC, Smith JJ, Cowan DA. Review and re-analysis of domain- specific 16S primers. J Microbiol Methods. 2003 Dec;55(3):541-55.

Bano, N., W.A. Bennett, A. deR. Smith, L. Vasquez and J. T. Hollibaugh. 2007. Dominance of Mycoplasma in the guts of the Long-Jawed Mudsucker, Gillichthys mirabilis, from five

California salt marshes. Environmental Microbiology 9: 2636-2631.

Bardach, J. E. and T. Villars (1974). The chemical senses of fishes. Chemoreception in Marine Organisms. P. T. Grant and A. M. Mackie. New York, Academic Press. 1: 49-104.

Bergey, D. H. (1994). Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Baltimore, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Carr, W. E. S. (1988). The molecular nature of chemical stimuli in the aquatic environment. Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals. J. Atema. New York, Springer- Verlag: 3-27.

COLE et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009 Jan;37 (Database issue) :D141-5. Epub 2008 Nov 12.

CUMMINS, S. E., SCHEIN, C. H.. XU. Y., BRAUN, W.. and NAGLE, G. T. 2005. Molluscan attractins: A family of water-borne protein pheroraones with interspecific attractiveness.

Peptides 26: 121 - 129. Davis, B. D., R. Dulbecco, et al. (1990). Microbiology. Philadelphia, Lippencott Williams &

Wilkins.

Eaton, A. D., L. S. Clesceri, et al. (1992). Method 4500-Cl. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water & Wastewater, American Public Health Association.

Fisknes, B. and K. Doving (1982). "Olfactory sensitivity to group- specific substances in Atlantic salmon." Journal of Chemical Ecology 8(8): 1083-1091. Hara, T. J. (1992). Fish Chemoreception. London, Chapman & Hall.

HARDEGE₅ J., BARTELS-HARDEGE, H., MULLER₅ C. T., and BECKMANN, M. 2004. Peptide pheromones in female Nereis succinea. Peptides 9: 1517-1522,

HOWE. N. R., and SHEIKH, Y. M. 1975. Anthopleurine: A sea anemone alarm pheromone.

Science 189:386-388.

KICKLIGHTER, C. E., GERMANN₅ M., KAMIO. M.. and DERBY. C. D. 2007. Molecular identification of alarm cues in the defensive secretions of the sea hare Aplysia califoraica. Anim. Behav. 74:1481-1492. Kleerekoper, H. (1969). Olfaction in Fishes. Bloomington, Indiana University Press. KRUG, P. J., and MANZI, A. E. 1999. Waterborne and surface-associated carbohydrates as settlement cues for larvae of the specialist marine herbivore, Alderia modesta. Biol. Bull.

197: 94-103. Lim, C. and C. D. Webster (2001). Nutrition and Fish Health. Philadelphia, Haworth Press.

Naylor, R. L., R. J. Goldberg, et al. (2000). "Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies."

Nature 405(6790): 1017-1024. PAINTER, S. D., CLOUGH, B.. GARDEN, R. W., SWEEDLER, J. V., and NAGLE, G. T.

1998. Characterization of Aplysia attractin, the first waterborne peptide pherornone in invertebrates. Biol. Bull. 194:120-131.

PAWLlK, J. R., and BUTMAN, C. A. 1993. Settlement of a marine tube worm as a function of current velocity: Interacting effects of hydrodynamics and behavior, Limnol. Oceanogr.

38:1730-1740.

Pfeiffer, W. (1982). Chemical signals in communication. Chemorecption in Fishes. T. J. Hara. New York, Elsevier Sci. Publ. Co.: 307-326.

Reutter, K., F. Boudriot, et al. (2000). "Heterogeneity of Fish Taste Bud Ultrastructure as

Demonstrated in the Holosteans Amia calva and Lepisosteus oculatus." Philosophical

Transactions: Biological Sciences 355(1401): 1225-1228.

Sokal, R. F. and F. J. Rohlf (1969). Biometry. San Francisco, W. H. Freeman & Co. Subcommittee-Fish-Nutrition (1993). Nutrient Requirements of Fish. Washington, D.C., The

National Academies Press. Zimmer and Zimmer. (2008) Dynamic Scaling in Chemical Ecology. J Chem Ecol 34:822-836.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:

1. A composition for eliciting a feeding or avoidance behavior in a target fish, avian, or marine mammal comprising: i) at least one behavior-eliciting bacterial species derived from or associated with a source fish or fishes, wherein said source fish or fishes are known to stimulate or elicit one or more desired feeding or avoidance behaviors in said target fish, avian, or marine mammal; ii) a pharmaceutically or veterinarily acceptable excipient, diluent or vehicle; and wherein said target fish, avian, or marine mammal exhibits the same feeding or avoidance behavior whether said target fish, avian, or marine mammal is in the presence of said source fish or fishes, or is in the presence of said composition.

2. The composition of claim 1, wherein said excipient, diluent or vehicle is water.

3. The composition of claim 1 or 2, wherein said excipient, diluent or vehicle is fish, avian, or marine mammal food.

4. The composition of any one of claims 1-3, wherein said bacterial species are at a concentration of at least 1 x 10¹² bacteria per milliliter prior to being applied to said fish, avian, or marine mammal food, and wherein the final concentration of bacteria on said food is effective to elicit feeding behavior in said target fish.

5. The composition according to any one of claims 1-4, wherein said excipient, diluent or vehicle is fish, avian or marine mammal food and wherein said composition is applied to said food so that said composition contains 2.5 x 10¹² bacteria per pound.

6. The composition of any one of claims 1-5, wherein said bacterial species is of the family Enter obacteriaceae, Comamonadaceae, Aeromonadaceae, or Moraxcellaceae.

7. The composition of any one of claims 1-6, wherein said bacterial species is of the genus Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Acidovorax, or Acinetobacter.

Al

8. The composition of any one of claims 1-7, wherein said bacterial species is cultured in a minimal medium.

9. The composition of claim any one of claims 1-8, wherein said bacterial species is cultured in a dark environment.

10. The composition of any one of claims 1-9, wherein said bacterial species is cultured in a medium that comprises potassium phosphate-dibasic, potassium phosphate-monobasic, ammonium sulfate, sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, distilled water, and glucose.

11. A method for preparing a composition for eliciting a feeding or avoidance behavior in a target fish, avian or marine mammal comprising the steps of: i) extracting at least one behavior-eliciting bacterial species is from a source fish or fishes, wherein said source fish are selected for their ability to elicit feeding or avoidance behaviors in said target fish, avian or marine mammal; ii) culturing said bacterial species in a suitable medium; and iii) combining said cultured bacterial species with a pharmaceutically or veterinarily acceptable excipient, diluent or vehicle to form said behavior-eliciting composition, wherein said target fish will respond to said composition with the same feeding or avoidance behavior as compared to how said target fish responds to said source fish.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein said behavior-eliciting bacterial species is of the Aeromonas, Enterobacter, Acinetobacter or Acidovorax genus.

13. The method of claim 11 or 12, wherein said culturing step takes place in a dark environment.

14. The method of any one of claims 11-13, wherein said bacteria are cultured in a minimal medium.

15. The method of any one of claims 11-14, wherein said medium comprises a mixture of potassium phosphate-dibasic, potassium phosphate-monobasic, ammonium sulfate, sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, and distilled water.

16. The method of any one of claims 11-15, wherein said medium comprises a mixture of potassium phosphate-dibasic, potassium phosphate-monobasic, ammonium sulfate, sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate, distilled water, and glucose.

17. The method of any one of claims 11-16, wherein said medium comprises: potassium phosphate-dibasic, present in an amount between approximately 0.1% to 2.0% by weight; potassium phosphate-monobasic, present in an amount between approximately 0.1% to 1.0%, by weight; ammonium sulfate, present in an amount between approximately 0.01% to 0.8% by weight; sodium sulfate citrate, present in an amount between approximately 0.005% to 0.55% by weight; magnesium sulfate, present in an amount between approximately 0.001% to 0.03% by weight; distilled water, present in an amount between approximately 70% to 99% by weight; and a concentrated solution of sterile glucose between approximately 1.0% to 10.0 % by weight.

18. The method of any one of claims 11-17, wherein said culturing continues until there is a substantial increase of the bacterial biomass or until the end of the bacterial growth cycle, or is performed for approximately 48 hours.

19. A culture of behavior-eliciting bacteria, wherein said bacteria are isolated from a source fish and wherein said culture comprises more than 50% bacteria of a single genus.

20. The culture of claim 19 wherein the source fish is fathead minnow (FHM) and the genus is Acidovorax, the source fish is bluegill and the genus is Aeromonas/Acinetobacter, the source fish is golden shiner and the genus is Enterobacter, the source fish is mosquito fish and the genus is Aeromonas/Enterobacter and/or the bacteria have 16S RNA nucleic acid sequences that are at least 80% homologous to at least one of the nucleic acid sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NOs:l-81.