WO2010086782A2 - Methods for the subclassification of breast tumours - Google Patents
Methods for the subclassification of breast tumours Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2010086782A2 WO2010086782A2 PCT/IB2010/050316 IB2010050316W WO2010086782A2 WO 2010086782 A2 WO2010086782 A2 WO 2010086782A2 IB 2010050316 W IB2010050316 W IB 2010050316W WO 2010086782 A2 WO2010086782 A2 WO 2010086782A2
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- methylation
- feature
- seq
- sequences
- subject
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6813—Hybridisation assays
- C12Q1/6827—Hybridisation assays for detection of mutation or polymorphism
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q1/00—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
- C12Q1/68—Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving nucleic acids
- C12Q1/6876—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes
- C12Q1/6883—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material
- C12Q1/6886—Nucleic acid products used in the analysis of nucleic acids, e.g. primers or probes for diseases caused by alterations of genetic material for cancer
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G16—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR SPECIFIC APPLICATION FIELDS
- G16B—BIOINFORMATICS, i.e. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR GENETIC OR PROTEIN-RELATED DATA PROCESSING IN COMPUTATIONAL MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- G16B30/00—ICT specially adapted for sequence analysis involving nucleotides or amino acids
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2537/00—Reactions characterised by the reaction format or use of a specific feature
- C12Q2537/10—Reactions characterised by the reaction format or use of a specific feature the purpose or use of
- C12Q2537/165—Mathematical modelling, e.g. logarithm, ratio
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/112—Disease subtyping, staging or classification
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12Q—MEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
- C12Q2600/00—Oligonucleotides characterized by their use
- C12Q2600/154—Methylation markers
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10T—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
- Y10T436/00—Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
- Y10T436/14—Heterocyclic carbon compound [i.e., O, S, N, Se, Te, as only ring hetero atom]
- Y10T436/142222—Hetero-O [e.g., ascorbic acid, etc.]
- Y10T436/143333—Saccharide [e.g., DNA, etc.]
Definitions
- This invention pertains in general to the field of biology and bioinformatics. More particularly the invention relates to the field of categorization of cancer tumours and even more particularly to identifying methylated sites, which may aid in categorization of cancer tumours.
- breast cancer is the fifth most common cause of cancer death, after lung cancer, stomach cancer, liver cancer, and colon cancer.
- breast cancer is the most common cancer and the most common cause of cancer death.
- Breast cancer is diagnosed by the pathological examination of surgically removed breast tissue. Following diagnosis, it is important to analyze the tumour type in order to aid clinicians when choosing the right therapy. Within the art, such analysis is performed according to two categories.
- the first category involves the use of immuno-histopathological variables, such as tumour size, ER/PR status, lymph node negativity, etc. to define a clinical prognostic index such as the Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI).
- NPI Nottingham Prognostic Index
- the problem with such an index is that it has been shown to be very conservative, thus typically causing patients to receive aggressive therapy even when they are a low risk of disease recurrence.
- the second category involves the measurement of the expression levels of a large number of genes, typically around 500, and calculating probability of a subtype based on the relative expression levels of the genes. This method is very costly in terms of tissue handling requirements. It is also hard to perform in a clinical setting, due to the demand of laboratory equipment.
- DNA methylation a type of chemical modification of DNA that can be inherited and subsequently removed without changing the original DNA sequence, is the most well studied epigenetic mechanism of gene regulation. There are areas in DNA where a cytosine nucleotide occurs next to a guanine nucleotide in the linear sequence of bases called CpG islands.
- CpG islands are generally heavily methylated in normal cells. However, during tumorigenesis, hypomethylation occurs at these islands, which may result in the expression of certain repeats. These hypomethylation events also correlate to the severity of some cancers. Under certain circumstances, which may occur in pathologies such as cancer, imprinting, development, tissue specificity, or X chromosome inactivation, gene associated islands may be heavily methylated. Specifically, in cancer, methylation of islands proximal to tumour suppressors is a frequent event, often occurring when the second allele is lost by deletion (Loss of Heterozygosity, LOH). Some tumour suppressors commonly seen with methylated islands are pi 6, Rassfla, and BRCAl.
- the present invention preferably seeks to mitigate, alleviate or eliminate one or more of the above-identified deficiencies in the art and disadvantages singly or in any combination and solves at least the above mentioned problems by providing a method for the analysis of breast cancer disorders according to the appended patent claims.
- a method for analysis of breast cancer disorders comprises determining the genomic methylation status of one or more CpG dinucleotides in a sequence selected from the group of sequences consisting of SEQ ID NO. 1 to SEQ ID NO. 600.
- the method provides for improved abilities to characterize cancer tumours using methylation patterns.
- the regions of interest of the sequences SEQ ID NO. 1 to 600 are designated in table 1 (as "start” and “end” on respective "chromosome”).
- a computer program product is disclosed.
- the computer program product is stored on a computer-readable medium comprising software code adapted to perform the steps of the method according to an aspect when executed on a data-processing apparatus.
- a device in an aspect a device is disclosed.
- the device comprises means adapted to carry out methods according to som embodiments.
- An advantage with this is to support a clinician.
- sequences claimed also encompass the sequences, which are reverse complement to the sequences designated.
- Fig. 1 is a schematic illustration of a method according to some embodiments
- Fig. 2 is a schematic illustration of a dataset 20 of five measurements 1 to 5;
- Fig. 3 is a schematic illustration of a first subset 30 of five measurements 1 to 5;
- Fig. 4 is a schematic illustration of a second subset 40 of five measurements 1 to 5;
- Fig. 5 is an illustration of clusters 51, 52, 53, where Fig. 5 A is a first cluster 51 , Fig. 5B is a second cluster 52 and Fig. 5C is a third cluster 53.
- Fig. 6 is a schematic illustration of a computer program product according to an embodiment.
- Fig. 7 is a schematic illustration of a device according to an embodiment.
- An idea according to some embodiments is a method using a small selection of DNA sequences to analyze breast cancer disorders.
- the analysis is done by determining genomic methylation status of one or more CpG dinucleotides, in either sequence disclosed herein, or its reverse complement. It was surprisingly found that some DNA sequences, SEQ ID NO: 1 to
- SEQ ID NO: 600 act as epigenetic markers that may be used to analyze breast cancer by subtyping tumours.
- the DNA SEQ ID NO: 1 to SEQ ID NO: 600 were identified by analysing 150 000 individual genomic loci for methylation, across a set of 83 breast tumours. The availability of clinical information regarding tumour specimens allowed for an investigation of DNA methylation in the context of breast cancer subtypes, histology and tumour aggressiveness. The five major breast cancer molecular subtypes
- a method 10 is provided, according to Fig. 1.
- Said method 10 comprises selecting 100 a feature subset comprising at least one post from the methylation classification list according to SEQ ID NO. 1 to SEQ ID NO. 600.
- Hi 1 of N values where In 1J provides the methylation status for the i-th sample and the j-th probe.
- some statistical analysis of the measured signal will produce a set of probes (features) to be input to the hierarchical clustering method above.
- the feature subset selection 100 uses a Genetic Algorithm (GA), which repetitively evaluate feature subsets based on a fitness function that in some way characterizes some property of the feature subset.
- GA Genetic Algorithm
- hierarchical clustering with Pearson correlation and complete linkage is used as the fitness function to assess how good a feature subset is.
- Fig. 2 show a dataset 20 of measurements, in this case 5 samples, which are displayed as 1 to 5 are characterized with 8 features, which are displayed as letters A to H.
- Figs. 3 and 4 show two feature subsets, generated from the measurements dataset by selecting rows (features) from the dataset.
- Fig. 3 shows a first feature subset 30 with the 5 samples, which are displayed as 1 to 5, but only four of the features.
- Fig. 4 shows a second subset 40 with the 5 samples, which are displayed as 1 to 5, but only six of the features.
- Fig. 5 show clusters, or dendrograms, based on the datasets from Figs. 2 to 4, when subjected to hierarchical clustering with
- Fig. 5 A shows a first cluster 51 based on the total dataset 20.
- Fig. 5B shows a second cluster 52 based on the first feature subset 30 and
- Fig. 5C shows a third cluster 53 based on the second feature subset 40.
- a ranking of all clustering results is performed.
- a cluster analysis method is used for the ranking. For example, it is possible to characterize and rank individual clusters based on their validity, for example in terms of cluster cohesion or separation. This may be done in one of multiple ways well known to a person skilled in the art. Thus, it is possible to rank two or more feature subsets based on the quality of the clusters they generate when used to cluster the samples.
- the second subset 40 represented by Fig. 5C, is clearly better compared to the first feature subset 30 or the clustering based on the entire dataset 20, since it correctly cluster the subtypes together.
- two clustering outputs Di and D 2 are compared based on the clusters.
- N (Ci, C 2 , ... C N ) clusters are obtained based on the dendrogram, produced by the clustering.
- a property is computed based on the clusters, such as the popular method of silhouette width - SIL(C 1 ).
- a single-number characterization of a clustering is obtained by the formula:
- AVGSIL(Di) and AVGSIL(D 2 ) it may be determined which clustering is preferable.
- AVGUNIFORMITY D I
- AVGUNIFORMITY D 2
- all evaluated features subsets can be further filtered based on their performance during the GA execution.
- feature subsets are sorted by the average clustering performance in stratification of the clinical samples.
- feature subsets, in addition to the average performance are filtered based on their persistent re-evaluation. In other words, feature subsets that are repeatedly selected for further evaluation are preferred to feature subsets that are dropped from consideration only after a few iterations.
- the final output of a GA feature subset selection is to run multiple instances with different initial conditions, and merge the filtered feature subsets from each of these instances.
- Feature subsets from one such evaluation are listed in Table 3 A. Furthermore, a cumulative characterization of a collection of GA runs can be obtained and used to generate feature subsets that aggregate the feature subsets in single set of subsets. In one embodiment, the appearance of each feature in feature subsets is counted and a total histogram is obtained giving the degree of utilization of each of the 600 features. Based on this information and for example in one embodiment the frequencies of the pairwise occurrences of the 600 features are used to build feature subsets that summarize the GA run in a single set of subsets, a so called trend pattern. Table 3B provides such feature subset of lengths 45 and 60.
- the feature subset comprises the CpG dinucleotides according to one of the selections listed in Table 2.
- Each subset comprise a selection of sequences indicated by numbers corresponding to the FragID:s in table 1. 10 152494, 55649, 158649, 33381, 129193, 38485, 86866, 1601, 153363, 158646, 72675, 128850, 13583, 4109, 38815, 63267, 19926, 103295, 79123, 4823, 80726, 115442, 25715, 71104,92237, 152496, 134481, 1359,65610,55215,11111, 114219, 118132, 149792,757, 27685, 71089, 120745, 3535, 36661, 52666, 148458, 56504, 87210, 110848, 39760, 152716, 94345, 47510, 87185, 156306, 71105, 89865, 54424, 95724, 153087, 42953, 71090, 57442, 76797, 7053
- the feature subset comprises the CpG dinucleotides according to one of the selections listed in Table 3 A.
- Table 3 A Feature subsets. Each subset comprise a selection of sequences indicated by numbers corresponding to the FragID:s in table 1.
- the feature subset comprises the CpG dinucleotides according to one of the selections listed in Table 3B.
- Table 3B Feature subsets. Each subset comprise a selection of sequences indicated by numbers corresponding to the FragID:s in table 1.
- the method 10 comprises determining 120 the methylation status of one or more CpG dinucleotides in a sequence selected from the group of sequences corresponding to the marker panel, resulting in a methylation classification list. There are numerous methods for determining 120 the methylation status of a DNA molecule of a subject, corresponding to the feature subset.
- the DNA may be obtained by any method for purifying DNA known to a person skilled in the art.
- the methylation status is determined 110 by means of one or more of the methods selected form the group of, bisulfite sequencing, pyrosequencing, methylation-sensitive single-strand conformation analysis (MS-SSCA), high resolution melting analysis (HRM), methylation-sensitive single nucleotide primer extension (MS- SnuPE), base-specific cleavage/MALDI-TOF, methylation-specific PCR (MSP), microarray-based methods, msp I cleavage.
- the methods selected form the group of, bisulfite sequencing, pyrosequencing, methylation-sensitive single-strand conformation analysis (MS-SSCA), high resolution melting analysis (HRM), methylation-sensitive single nucleotide primer extension (MS- SnuPE), base-specific cleavage/MALDI-TOF, methylation-specific PCR (MSP), microarray-based methods, msp I cleavage.
- the method 10 also comprises statistically analyzing 120 the methylation classification list, thus obtaining a category of the breast cancer of the subject. This may be done by jointly clustering the subject methylation data and the samples from the clinical study. The resulting clustering is then split in N groups (e.g. by cutting the clustering dendrogram into N sub-trees). The sub-tree containing the subject is evaluated for the categories of breast cancer present in the study samples and the subject sample is assigned the category of the majority samples in the sub-tree. In an embodiment, the method 10 further comprises classifying (130) the subject as belonging to one of the five major subtypes of breast cancers.
- a computer program product 60 is provided.
- the computer program product 60 is stored on a computer-readable medium, which comprises a first 61, second 62, third 63 and forth 64 code segments arranged, when run by an apparatus having computer-processing properties, for performing all of the method steps defined in some embodiments.
- a device 70 for supporting a clinician comprising means for selecting 700 a feature subset comprising at least one post from the methylation classification list according to SEQ ID NO. 1 to SEQ ID NO. 600. Furthermore, the device 70 comprises means for determining 710 the methylation status of one or more CpG dinucleotides in DNA of a subject, corresponding to the feature subset. Furthermore, the device 70 comprises means for statistically analyzing 720 the methylation classification list, thus obtaining a category of the breast cancer of the subject. Furthermore, the device 70 comprises means for classifying 730 the subject as belonging to one of the five major subtypes of breast cancers. Said means 700, 710, 720, 730 may be operatively connected to each other.
- the invention may be implemented in any suitable form including hardware, software, firmware or any combination of these. However, preferably, the invention is implemented as computer software running on one or more data processors and/or digital signal processors.
- the elements and components of an embodiment of the invention may be physically, functionally and logically implemented in any suitable way. Indeed, the functionality may be implemented in a single unit, in a plurality of units or as part of other functional units. As such, the invention may be implemented in a single unit, or may be physically and functionally distributed between different units and processors.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Hospice & Palliative Care (AREA)
- Oncology (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Evolutionary Biology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Computational Biology (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Apparatus Associated With Microorganisms And Enzymes (AREA)
- Medical Treatment And Welfare Office Work (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP10705647A EP2391735A2 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-01-25 | Methods for the subclassification of breast tumours |
US13/147,105 US20120004118A1 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-01-25 | Methods for the subclassification of breast tumours |
CN2010800052379A CN102549165A (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-01-25 | Methods for the subclassification of breast tumours |
JP2011547032A JP2012517215A (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-01-25 | Methods for subclassification of breast tumors |
BRPI1005306A BRPI1005306A2 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-01-25 | method for breast cancer analysis and computer program product |
RU2011135955/10A RU2011135955A (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-01-25 | METHODS FOR CLASSIFICATION OF BREAST TUMORS WITH DIVIDING |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US14841309P | 2009-01-30 | 2009-01-30 | |
US61/148,413 | 2009-01-30 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2010086782A2 true WO2010086782A2 (en) | 2010-08-05 |
WO2010086782A3 WO2010086782A3 (en) | 2010-11-25 |
WO2010086782A8 WO2010086782A8 (en) | 2011-12-08 |
Family
ID=42224291
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2010/050316 WO2010086782A2 (en) | 2009-01-30 | 2010-01-25 | Methods for the subclassification of breast tumours |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20120004118A1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP2391735A2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2012517215A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20110113642A (en) |
CN (1) | CN102549165A (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI1005306A2 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2011135955A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2010086782A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6054750B2 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2016-12-27 | 国立研究開発法人国立がん研究センター | Risk assessment method for hepatocellular carcinoma |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110229913B (en) * | 2019-07-19 | 2022-10-11 | 上海奕谱生物科技有限公司 | Broad-spectrum marker for detecting tumor based on methylation level and application thereof |
CN116121371A (en) * | 2022-07-06 | 2023-05-16 | 武汉艾米森生命科技有限公司 | Application of reagent for detecting methylation level of target region in TLX1 gene in preparation of esophageal cancer diagnosis product |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050021240A1 (en) | 2000-11-02 | 2005-01-27 | Epigenomics Ag | Systems, methods and computer program products for guiding selection of a therapeutic treatment regimen based on the methylation status of the DNA |
Family Cites Families (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8076063B2 (en) * | 2000-02-07 | 2011-12-13 | Illumina, Inc. | Multiplexed methylation detection methods |
ATE429511T1 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2009-05-15 | Epigenomics Ag | METHOD FOR DEVELOPING GENE SETS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC PURPOSES BASED ON THE EXPRESSION AND METHYLATION STATUS OF THE GENES |
JP2004033210A (en) * | 2002-02-20 | 2004-02-05 | Ncc Technology Ventures Pte Ltd | Substance and method relating to diagnosing cancer |
US7991557B2 (en) * | 2004-06-19 | 2011-08-02 | Genenews Corporation | Computer system and methods for constructing biological classifiers and uses thereof |
WO2005123945A2 (en) * | 2004-06-21 | 2005-12-29 | Epigenomics Ag | Epigenetic markers for the treatment of breast cancer |
EP2281902A1 (en) * | 2004-07-18 | 2011-02-09 | Epigenomics AG | Epigenetic methods and nucleic acids for the detection of breast cell proliferative disorders |
CA2612021A1 (en) * | 2005-06-13 | 2006-12-28 | The Regents Of The University Of Michigan | Compositions and methods for treating and diagnosing cancer |
WO2007019670A1 (en) * | 2005-07-01 | 2007-02-22 | Graham, Robert | Method and nucleic acids for the improved treatment of breast cancers |
JPWO2007026960A1 (en) * | 2005-08-31 | 2009-03-12 | リンク・ジェノミクス株式会社 | Therapeutic or diagnostic use of MOCS3 gene |
EP2024515B1 (en) * | 2006-05-31 | 2012-08-22 | Orion Genomics, LLC | Gene methylation in cancer diagnosis |
EP2052355A2 (en) * | 2006-08-11 | 2009-04-29 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Methods and apparatus to integrate systematic data scaling into genetic algorithm-based feature subset selection |
EP2097538A4 (en) * | 2006-12-07 | 2011-11-30 | Switchgear Genomics | Transcriptional regulatory elements of biological pathways, tools, and methods |
US20090203011A1 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2009-08-13 | Epigenomics Ag | Methods and nucleic acids for analyses of cell proliferative disorders |
CN101861398A (en) * | 2007-09-17 | 2010-10-13 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | The method that is used for analysis of breast cancer disorders |
EP2279478A1 (en) * | 2008-05-12 | 2011-02-02 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | A medical analysis system |
WO2010070572A1 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2010-06-24 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N. V. | Method for the detection of dna methylation patterns |
US20120004855A1 (en) * | 2008-12-23 | 2012-01-05 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Methylation biomarkers for predicting relapse free survival |
WO2011036604A2 (en) * | 2009-09-22 | 2011-03-31 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and compositions for assisting in diagnosing and/or monitoring breast cancer progression |
-
2010
- 2010-01-25 KR KR1020117020012A patent/KR20110113642A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2010-01-25 WO PCT/IB2010/050316 patent/WO2010086782A2/en active Application Filing
- 2010-01-25 EP EP10705647A patent/EP2391735A2/en not_active Ceased
- 2010-01-25 JP JP2011547032A patent/JP2012517215A/en active Pending
- 2010-01-25 BR BRPI1005306A patent/BRPI1005306A2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2010-01-25 US US13/147,105 patent/US20120004118A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2010-01-25 RU RU2011135955/10A patent/RU2011135955A/en unknown
- 2010-01-25 EP EP15172901.9A patent/EP2955235A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-01-25 CN CN2010800052379A patent/CN102549165A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050021240A1 (en) | 2000-11-02 | 2005-01-27 | Epigenomics Ag | Systems, methods and computer program products for guiding selection of a therapeutic treatment regimen based on the methylation status of the DNA |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP6054750B2 (en) * | 2011-01-28 | 2016-12-27 | 国立研究開発法人国立がん研究センター | Risk assessment method for hepatocellular carcinoma |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2010086782A8 (en) | 2011-12-08 |
EP2955235A3 (en) | 2016-03-02 |
EP2391735A2 (en) | 2011-12-07 |
RU2011135955A (en) | 2013-03-10 |
KR20110113642A (en) | 2011-10-17 |
WO2010086782A3 (en) | 2010-11-25 |
EP2955235A2 (en) | 2015-12-16 |
JP2012517215A (en) | 2012-08-02 |
CN102549165A (en) | 2012-07-04 |
US20120004118A1 (en) | 2012-01-05 |
BRPI1005306A2 (en) | 2019-03-19 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lee-Six et al. | The landscape of somatic mutation in normal colorectal epithelial cells | |
Quackenbush | Microarray analysis and tumor classification | |
Tam et al. | Robust global microRNA expression profiling using next-generation sequencing technologies | |
US7711492B2 (en) | Methods for diagnosing lymphoma types | |
US20020137086A1 (en) | Method for the development of gene panels for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes based on the expression and methylation status of the genes | |
CN106795562A (en) | Tissue methylation patterns analysis in DNA mixtures | |
EP2050035A2 (en) | Methods for identifying, diagnosing, and predicting survival of lymphomas | |
JP2007502113A (en) | Methods and compositions for differentiating tissue or cell types using epigenetic markers | |
JP2004528837A (en) | Method and nucleic acid for analyzing abnormal proliferation of hematopoietic cells | |
JP2022514879A (en) | Cell-free DNA terminal characteristics | |
CA3178302A1 (en) | Methods and systems for detecting colorectal cancer via nucleic acid methylation analysis | |
Goldsmith et al. | The microrevolution: applications and impacts of microarray technology on molecular biology and medicine | |
JP2014519319A (en) | Methods and compositions for detecting cancer through general loss of epigenetic domain stability | |
US20230178181A1 (en) | Methods and systems for detecting cancer via nucleic acid methylation analysis | |
US20120004118A1 (en) | Methods for the subclassification of breast tumours | |
CN102348809B (en) | Methylation biomarkers for predicting relapse free survival | |
US20140206565A1 (en) | Esophageal Cancer Markers | |
JP2012517215A5 (en) | ||
Rosa et al. | Cluster center genes as candidate biomarkers for the classification of Leukemia | |
US20130090257A1 (en) | Pathway analysis for providing predictive information | |
EP4234720A1 (en) | Epigenetic biomarkers for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer | |
Vaidya et al. | A review of bioinformatics application in breast cancer research | |
Tsai et al. | Intelligent DNA methylation biomarker selection for colorectal cancer | |
Wang et al. | Heritable Clustering Algorithms for Recapturing Epigenetic Progression in Breast Cancer | |
Khalid et al. | Microarrays: Rise of Novel Technology |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 201080005237.9 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application |
Ref document number: 10705647 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: A2 |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2010705647 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011547032 Country of ref document: JP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 6015/CHENP/2011 Country of ref document: IN |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: 20117020012 Country of ref document: KR Kind code of ref document: A |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2011135955 Country of ref document: RU |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 13147105 Country of ref document: US |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: PI1005306 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20110727 |