WO2010068243A1 - A process for supplying developer - Google Patents

A process for supplying developer Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010068243A1
WO2010068243A1 PCT/US2009/006278 US2009006278W WO2010068243A1 WO 2010068243 A1 WO2010068243 A1 WO 2010068243A1 US 2009006278 W US2009006278 W US 2009006278W WO 2010068243 A1 WO2010068243 A1 WO 2010068243A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
developer
previous
maximum value
feed
development roller
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2009/006278
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Kenneth Joseph Brown
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Eastman Kodak Co
Original Assignee
Eastman Kodak Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Eastman Kodak Co filed Critical Eastman Kodak Co
Publication of WO2010068243A1 publication Critical patent/WO2010068243A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G03PHOTOGRAPHY; CINEMATOGRAPHY; ANALOGOUS TECHNIQUES USING WAVES OTHER THAN OPTICAL WAVES; ELECTROGRAPHY; HOLOGRAPHY
    • G03GELECTROGRAPHY; ELECTROPHOTOGRAPHY; MAGNETOGRAPHY
    • G03G15/00Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern
    • G03G15/06Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing
    • G03G15/08Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer
    • G03G15/0806Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer on a donor element, e.g. belt, roller
    • G03G15/0812Apparatus for electrographic processes using a charge pattern for developing using a solid developer, e.g. powder developer on a donor element, e.g. belt, roller characterised by the developer regulating means, e.g. structure of doctor blade

Definitions

  • This invention concerns a way of improving flat field uniformity in images produced by an image development system having a development roller interposed between a supply of developer and an imaging element.
  • developer flow is the common metric used to describe the amount of developer delivered to the toning zone per unit time. Flow measurement is accomplished by lowering a gate (2 inches wide) into the developer stream and collecting developer for a specified amount of time (0.5 seconds). This developer is then weighed, and developer flow is reported in units of grams/inch/second. Developer flow has been correlated against certain imaging properties of the developer, such as toning contrast, background, and so on. This measurement method, although useful, needs to be made with the developer station removed from the machine, requires a scale, and thus is not well - , suited for a real time application.
  • a process of adjusting flat field uniformity in images produced by an image development system having a development roller interposed between a supply of developer and an imaging element is proposed.
  • a raw feed of developer is supplied to the development roller, and both a metered feed and an overfeed of developer, which overfeed is returned to the supply, are produced from the raw feed.
  • a plurality of mass densities of developer used in the system are determined, as are a plurality of developer velocities through the system.
  • Respective product values of the developer mass densities and the developer velocities are then determined, and a maximum value of the respective product values is identified.
  • the image development system is then operated so as to produce the maximum value.
  • the metered feed is produced by way of a gap between a metering element and said development roller, and the metering element is a skive or gate.
  • the metered feed can be made adjustable by modifying the gap mentioned.
  • Identification of the maximum value can be performed by adjusting the metered feed, the overfeed, or both, as well as by adjusting a rotational speed of the development roller. Since the measurement of developer flow aggregates effects of developer mass density and developer velocity, this measurement is also proportional to the product of independently measured developer mass density, which is also referred to as nap density, and developer velocity, which is also referred to as nap velocity. Flat field uniformity can be improved by maximizing the product of the developer mass density and the developer velocity.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of elements of an image development system used to supply developer to an imaging cylinder and depicts factors of interest in characterizing the effect of developer properties on the development of flat fields.
  • Figure 2 is a table summarizing results of an experiment examining the effects of metered developer feed and developer overfeed on resulting flat field image quality.
  • Figure 3 shows the depletion metric plotted against values of products of developer mass density (nap density) and developer velocity (nap velocity).
  • Figure 4a is a plot of developer flow versus nap density.
  • Figure 4b is a plot of developer flow versus nap velocity.
  • Figures 5a-5c show parameters considered in determining a depletion metric. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Figure 1 schematically illustrates certain elements of an image development system.
  • developer including toner (for example, dry ink composed of 8 ⁇ m particle size polymeric marking powder at 5%-10% by weight) and a carrier (for example, permanently magnetized 30 ⁇ m particle size ferrite powder at 90%-95% by weight), is fed from a sump (not shown) to a conventional rotatable development roller 10 by way of a conventional rotatable feed roller 12.
  • the feed roller 12 uses a combination of positive displacement grooves, magnetics, and rotation, in a conventional manner, to deliver developer to the development roller 10.
  • the amount of developer that resides on the development roller 10 before that developer reaches a metering skive or gate 14 is referred to here as raw feed RF.
  • the metering skive 14 allows only a prescribed amount of developer, referred to here as metered feed MF, to pass through a gap or spacing 16 defined between the metering skive 14 and the development roller 10.
  • the raw feed RF generally exceeds the metered feed MF.
  • the metered feed MF passing through the gap 16 is then transported by way of the development roller 10 to another gap or spacing 18 defined between the development roller 10 and an imaging cylinder 20.
  • the toner is selectively removed from the developer and deposited on charged areas of the imaging cylinder 20 or other appropriate photoreceptive element in conventional fashion to render an electrostatic latent image on that imaging cylinder or other element.
  • the latent image can then be transferred by electric field application to a paper sheet or another desired substrate, again in conventional fashion, and then permanently affixed to the paper or other substrate through application of heat and pressure.
  • the excess or remaining developer is removed from the development roller 10 at a strip area 22, and the removed developer can be replenished with more toner in the sump.
  • Figure 2 is a table of data representing a correlation between metered feed MF (grams/inch/second), overfeed OF (grams/inch/second), and the product (ND- NV) of the developer mass density, or nap density, ND (grams/(inches) ) and the developer velocity, or nap velocity, NV (inches/second).
  • the far right column in that table shows the calculated product (ND- NV) values based on models developed from earlier experimentation.
  • the developer mass density is readily ascertainable, for example by weighing a selected volume of developer, and the developer velocity is similarly readily ascertainable, for example from the rotational speed of the development roller 10.
  • the metric used to evaluate flat field image quality in this experiment is that of "depletion.”
  • the dimensionless depletion metric is obtained by way of the following relationship
  • Dr 1 is the reflection density at a particular crosstrack position /; and X is the average reflection density of all crosstrack positions. Reflection density thus is utilized to calculate the density differences between a specific area on each sheet and a best fit line for all the sheets. The sum of squares of this area correlates quite well to subjective evaluation of flat field uniformity. For this experiment, a change in uniformity between the first sheet and the twenty-ninth sheet was used as the final metric.
  • Figure 3 shows the depletion metric plotted against ND- NV product values; in this case, the ND- NV product values are those ND- NV product values set out in Figure 2.
  • the change in reflection density uniformity may be ascertained by way of a densitometer, such as that described in prior, commonly assigned U.S. Patent 4,847,659 to Resch, III.
  • a densitometer such as that described in prior, commonly assigned U.S. Patent 4,847,659 to Resch, III.
  • the entire disclosure of prior U.S. Patent 4,847,659 to Resch, III is incorporated herein by reference as non-essential subject matter.
  • flat field uniformity can be improved by maximizing the product (ND- NV) of the developer mass density or nap density ND and the developer velocity or nap velocity NV. The reason for this effect has to do with the mechanics of compressive metering.
  • Figure 4a illustrates RF and MF data on a graph of developer mass density, or nap density, as a function of developer flow.
  • Figure 4b shows RF and MF data on a graph of developer velocity, or nap velocity, as a function of developer flow.
  • measuring ND- NV reveals different aspects of the developer that can be varied (such as velocity) that improve developer ND- NV without the negative side effects of developer over- compression.
  • the measurement of ND- NV is well suited for real time, non-contact measurements (such as conventional capacitive methods) that can be used for feedback control of feed parameters to optimize image quality.
  • Figure 5 a provides a schematic illustration of an imaged page and its associated crosstrack position
  • Figure 5b provides a schematic illustration of a chosen region of interest on that page
  • Figure 5c shows a plot of reflection density recorded as a function of crosstrack position in a process of obtaining the depletion metric noted previously.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Dry Development In Electrophotography (AREA)

Abstract

Flat field uniformity can be improved in images produced by an image development system having a development roller interposed between a supply of developer and an imaging element. A raw feed of developer is supplied from the developer supply to the development roller to produce both a metered feed of developer and an overfeed of developer, which is returned to the supply, from the raw feed. A plurality of mass densities of developer used in the system and a plurality of developer velocities through the system are determined, and respective product values of those developer mass densities and those developer velocities are thereafter calculated or otherwise determined. A maximum value of the respective product values is identified, and the image development system is then operated so that the maximum product value is produced.

Description

A METHOD OF IMPROVING DEVELOPED FLAT FIELD UNIFORMITY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention concerns a way of improving flat field uniformity in images produced by an image development system having a development roller interposed between a supply of developer and an imaging element.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION In a two-component development system, the ability to apply sufficient developer (toner and carrier) to develop a latent image on a photoconductor is critical to the creation of images with high fidelity and quality. In general practice, developer "flow" is the common metric used to describe the amount of developer delivered to the toning zone per unit time. Flow measurement is accomplished by lowering a gate (2 inches wide) into the developer stream and collecting developer for a specified amount of time (0.5 seconds). This developer is then weighed, and developer flow is reported in units of grams/inch/second. Developer flow has been correlated against certain imaging properties of the developer, such as toning contrast, background, and so on. This measurement method, although useful, needs to be made with the developer station removed from the machine, requires a scale, and thus is not well - , suited for a real time application.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION According to the present invention, therefore, a process of adjusting flat field uniformity in images produced by an image development system having a development roller interposed between a supply of developer and an imaging element is proposed. In this process, a raw feed of developer is supplied to the development roller, and both a metered feed and an overfeed of developer, which overfeed is returned to the supply, are produced from the raw feed. A plurality of mass densities of developer used in the system are determined, as are a plurality of developer velocities through the system. Respective product values of the developer mass densities and the developer velocities are then determined, and a maximum value of the respective product values is identified. The image development system is then operated so as to produce the maximum value.
In one preferred configuration, the metered feed is produced by way of a gap between a metering element and said development roller, and the metering element is a skive or gate. The metered feed can be made adjustable by modifying the gap mentioned.
Identification of the maximum value can be performed by adjusting the metered feed, the overfeed, or both, as well as by adjusting a rotational speed of the development roller. Since the measurement of developer flow aggregates effects of developer mass density and developer velocity, this measurement is also proportional to the product of independently measured developer mass density, which is also referred to as nap density, and developer velocity, which is also referred to as nap velocity. Flat field uniformity can be improved by maximizing the product of the developer mass density and the developer velocity.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of elements of an image development system used to supply developer to an imaging cylinder and depicts factors of interest in characterizing the effect of developer properties on the development of flat fields.
Figure 2 is a table summarizing results of an experiment examining the effects of metered developer feed and developer overfeed on resulting flat field image quality.
Figure 3 shows the depletion metric plotted against values of products of developer mass density (nap density) and developer velocity (nap velocity).
Figure 4a is a plot of developer flow versus nap density. Figure 4b is a plot of developer flow versus nap velocity. Figures 5a-5c show parameters considered in determining a depletion metric. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Experiments were performed to understand the properties of the developer that influenced the development uniformity of flat fields. Flat field uniformity is a critical part of the quality of the output images of a printer. These experiments first concentrated on developing relationships between certain adjustments made to regulate the flow (grams/inch/second) of developer into the toning zone and the resulting changes in the physical properties of the developer.
Figure 1 schematically illustrates certain elements of an image development system. The arrangement illustrated in Figure 1 will be used, together with the following description, to facilitate an understanding of factors considered to be of interest in characterizing effects of developer properties on the development of flat fields, hi the illustrated arrangement, developer, including toner (for example, dry ink composed of 8 μm particle size polymeric marking powder at 5%-10% by weight) and a carrier (for example, permanently magnetized 30 μm particle size ferrite powder at 90%-95% by weight), is fed from a sump (not shown) to a conventional rotatable development roller 10 by way of a conventional rotatable feed roller 12. The feed roller 12 uses a combination of positive displacement grooves, magnetics, and rotation, in a conventional manner, to deliver developer to the development roller 10. The amount of developer that resides on the development roller 10 before that developer reaches a metering skive or gate 14 is referred to here as raw feed RF.
The metering skive 14 allows only a prescribed amount of developer, referred to here as metered feed MF, to pass through a gap or spacing 16 defined between the metering skive 14 and the development roller 10. The raw feed RF generally exceeds the metered feed MF. Excess developer, resulting from the difference between the raw feed RF and the metered feed MF, is referred to here as overfeed OF. This excess developer is returned back to the sump for future metering.
The metered feed MF passing through the gap 16 is then transported by way of the development roller 10 to another gap or spacing 18 defined between the development roller 10 and an imaging cylinder 20. The toner is selectively removed from the developer and deposited on charged areas of the imaging cylinder 20 or other appropriate photoreceptive element in conventional fashion to render an electrostatic latent image on that imaging cylinder or other element. The latent image can then be transferred by electric field application to a paper sheet or another desired substrate, again in conventional fashion, and then permanently affixed to the paper or other substrate through application of heat and pressure. The excess or remaining developer is removed from the development roller 10 at a strip area 22, and the removed developer can be replenished with more toner in the sump.
Figure 2 is a table of data representing a correlation between metered feed MF (grams/inch/second), overfeed OF (grams/inch/second), and the product (ND- NV) of the developer mass density, or nap density, ND (grams/(inches) ) and the developer velocity, or nap velocity, NV (inches/second). The far right column in that table shows the calculated product (ND- NV) values based on models developed from earlier experimentation. The developer mass density is readily ascertainable, for example by weighing a selected volume of developer, and the developer velocity is similarly readily ascertainable, for example from the rotational speed of the development roller 10. The metric used to evaluate flat field image quality in this experiment is that of "depletion." The dimensionless depletion metric is obtained by way of the following relationship
DepletionMetric = £ [Dr1 - X ) ,
where Dr1 is the reflection density at a particular crosstrack position /; and X is the average reflection density of all crosstrack positions. Reflection density thus is utilized to calculate the density differences between a specific area on each sheet and a best fit line for all the sheets. The sum of squares of this area correlates quite well to subjective evaluation of flat field uniformity. For this experiment, a change in uniformity between the first sheet and the twenty-ninth sheet was used as the final metric. Figure 3 shows the depletion metric plotted against ND- NV product values; in this case, the ND- NV product values are those ND- NV product values set out in Figure 2. The change in reflection density uniformity, for example between the first sheet and the twenty-ninth sheet, may be ascertained by way of a densitometer, such as that described in prior, commonly assigned U.S. Patent 4,847,659 to Resch, III. The entire disclosure of prior U.S. Patent 4,847,659 to Resch, III is incorporated herein by reference as non-essential subject matter. As is apparent from Figure 3, flat field uniformity can be improved by maximizing the product (ND- NV) of the developer mass density or nap density ND and the developer velocity or nap velocity NV. The reason for this effect has to do with the mechanics of compressive metering. In general, because of the compressibility of the developer, the metering skive compresses (densities) the developer and reduces its velocity. Attention is directed to Figure 4a, which illustrates RF and MF data on a graph of developer mass density, or nap density, as a function of developer flow.
Figure 4b shows RF and MF data on a graph of developer velocity, or nap velocity, as a function of developer flow. This confirms the anecdotal observation that images made without metering (images produced using raw feed only) looked much smoother and had better uniformity. The raw feed can run at higher flow rates before it reaches maximum density, since it does not densify as greatly as the metered feed does.
The data indicate that the measure of ND- NV is superior to the measurement of developer flow in different ways. First, because there is a limit on maximum developer density (over-compression can lead to catastrophic release of the developer from the toning station), measuring ND- NV reveals different aspects of the developer that can be varied (such as velocity) that improve developer ND- NV without the negative side effects of developer over- compression. Second, the measurement of ND- NV is well suited for real time, non-contact measurements (such as conventional capacitive methods) that can be used for feedback control of feed parameters to optimize image quality.
Figure 5 a provides a schematic illustration of an imaged page and its associated crosstrack position, Figure 5b provides a schematic illustration of a chosen region of interest on that page, and Figure 5c shows a plot of reflection density recorded as a function of crosstrack position in a process of obtaining the depletion metric noted previously.
PARTS LIST development roller feed roller metering skive or gate gap or spacing gap or spacing imaging cylinder strip area

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. A process of supplying developer to an imaging element (20) of an image development system having a development roller (10) interposed between a supply of developer and said imaging element (20), comprising: producing a metered feed (MF) of developer to the development roller (10) and an overfeed (OF) of developer returned to the supply from a raw feed (RF) of developer fed from the supply, determining a plurality of mass densities (ND) of developer used in the system, determining a plurality of developer velocities (NV) through the system, determining respective product values (ND- NV) of the developer mass densities (ND) and the developer velocities (NV), identifying a maximum value of said respective product values (ND- NV), and operating said image development system so that the maximum value is produced.
2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the metered feed is produced by way of a gap between a metering element and the development roller.
3. The process as in the previous claims, the metered feed characterized in that the metering element is a skive or gate.
4. The process as in the previous claims, characterized in that the metered feed is adjustable by modifying said gap.
5. The process as in the previous claims, characterized in that maximum value is identified by adjusting at least one of the metered feed and the overfeed.
6. The process as in the previous claims, characterized in that the maximum value is identified by adjusting a rotational speed of the development roller.
7. The process as in the previous claims, characterized in that the maximum value is identified by adjusting at least one of the metered feed and said overfeed.
8. The process as in the previous claims, characterized in that the maximum value is identified by adjusting a rotational speed of the development roller.
9. The process as in the previous claims, characterized in that the metered feed is adjustable by modifying the gap.
10. An image development system for performing the process of claim 1.
11. A process of adjusting flat field uniformity in images produced by an image development system having a development roller (10) interposed between a supply of developer and an imaging element (20), comprising: supplying a raw feed (RF) of developer from the supply to the development roller (10), producing a metered feed (MF) of developer and an overfeed (OF) of developer that is returned to the supply from the raw feed (RF), determining a plurality of mass densities (ND) of developer used in the system, determining a plurality of developer velocities (NV) through the system, determining respective product values (ND- NV) of the developer mass densities (ND) and the developer velocities (NV), identifying a maximum value of the respective product values (ND- NV), and
operating the image development system so that the maximum value is produced.
12. The process as in one of the previous claims, characterized in that the metered feed is produced by way of a gap between a metering element and the development roller.
13. The process as in one of the previous claims, the metered feed characterized in that said metering element is a skive or gate.
14. The process as in one of the previous claims, characterized in that the metered feed is adjustable by modifying the gap.
15. The process as in one of the previous claims, characterized in that the maximum value is identified by adjusting at least one of the metered feed and the overfeed.
16. The process as in one of the previous claims, characterized in that the maximum value is identified by adjusting a rotational speed of the development roller.
17. The process as in one of the previous claims, characterized in that the maximum value is identified by adjusting at least one of the metered feed and the overfeed.
18. The process as in one of the previous claims, characterized in that the maximum value is identified by adjusting a rotational speed of the development roller.
19. The process as in one of the previous claims, characterized in that the metered feed is adjustable by modifying said gap.
20. An image development system for performing the process of one of the previous claims.
PCT/US2009/006278 2008-12-12 2009-11-25 A process for supplying developer Ceased WO2010068243A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/333,355 2008-12-12
US12/333,355 US7970304B2 (en) 2008-12-12 2008-12-12 Method of improving developed flat field uniformity

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010068243A1 true WO2010068243A1 (en) 2010-06-17

Family

ID=41682333

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2009/006278 Ceased WO2010068243A1 (en) 2008-12-12 2009-11-25 A process for supplying developer

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US7970304B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2010068243A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120027430A1 (en) 2010-07-30 2012-02-02 Brown Kenneth J Measuring developer density in an electrophotographic system
US20120027432A1 (en) 2010-07-30 2012-02-02 Brown Kenneth J Electrophotographic developer flow rate measurement
US8358942B2 (en) 2010-07-30 2013-01-22 Eastman Kodak Company Electrophotographic developer toner concentration measurement
US8380091B2 (en) 2010-07-30 2013-02-19 Eastman Kodak Company Resonant-frequency measurement of electrophotographic developer density
US8369717B2 (en) 2010-08-27 2013-02-05 Eastman Kodak Company Determining developer toner concentration in electrophotographic printer

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4227796A (en) * 1979-05-29 1980-10-14 Eastman Kodak Company Electrographic apparatus having improved developer metering construction

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4847659A (en) * 1987-05-21 1989-07-11 Eastman Kodak Company Apparatus for controlling toner replenishment in electrostatographic printer
IT1268121B1 (en) * 1993-10-15 1997-02-20 Seiko Epson Corp IMAGE FORMATION EQUIPMENT
JPH09212144A (en) * 1995-11-28 1997-08-15 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd Image display method and device
US5815768A (en) * 1997-02-28 1998-09-29 Hewlett-Packard Company Detection of toner depletion in an electrophotographic printing system
US6416916B1 (en) * 2000-03-07 2002-07-09 Xerox Corporation Toner and developer for magnetic brush development system
US6580879B2 (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-06-17 Xerox Corporation Method and system for managing replenishment of toners
KR100449726B1 (en) * 2002-06-11 2004-09-22 삼성전자주식회사 Toner end detecting method of image forming apparatus
US6810226B2 (en) * 2003-01-31 2004-10-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Electrophotographic toner containment apparatus and methods
US7701595B2 (en) * 2005-12-29 2010-04-20 Eastman Kodak Company Print job cost estimate method and system
US7995939B2 (en) * 2007-09-25 2011-08-09 Lexmark International, Inc. Toner calibration measurement

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4227796A (en) * 1979-05-29 1980-10-14 Eastman Kodak Company Electrographic apparatus having improved developer metering construction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7970304B2 (en) 2011-06-28
US20100150592A1 (en) 2010-06-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7970304B2 (en) Method of improving developed flat field uniformity
US10775727B2 (en) Image forming apparatus with a charging amount acquisition unit that performs a charging amount acquisition operation for forming a measurement toner image on an image carrier
US8688014B2 (en) Image forming apparatus
CN102799089B (en) Management and control parts, developing apparatus and handle box
US10788771B2 (en) Image forming apparatus with charging amount acquisition unit
US6798999B2 (en) Image forming apparatus
DE10206425A1 (en) Electrophotographic measuring system
CN100543604C (en) image forming device
US8331816B2 (en) Printer control system to minimize two-dimensional image quality defects
US6374064B1 (en) Xerographic development system, method for determining when the developer material supply should be replenished
JP5375366B2 (en) Image forming apparatus
DE102015107938B4 (en) Method and developer station for adjusting the coloration of an image carrier of a toner-based digital printer
KR101863412B1 (en) Image forming apparatus
EP0946905B1 (en) Developer unit for an electrographic printer or copier
JP5974904B2 (en) Wet image forming apparatus, image forming condition adjusting method, and image noise determining method
US10775712B2 (en) Image forming apparatus with a charging amount acquisition unit that performs a charging amount acquisition operation for forming a measurement toner image on an image carrier
EP2443522A1 (en) Developer system and method for providing variable flow rate of developer in an electrographic printer
US6895194B2 (en) Xerographic development system where a gap between a donor member and a photoreceptor is estimated
JP2004264732A (en) How to measure toner charge
JP5635820B2 (en) Image quality improvement method
US20100316416A1 (en) System and method for providing a stable and high flow rate of developer in an electrographic printer
Mitsuya et al. Measurement of temperature and heat flux changes during the fixing process in electrophotographic machines
US5600409A (en) Optimal toner concentration sensing system for an electrophotographic printer
US11320761B2 (en) Charge roller voltage determination
KR100485863B1 (en) Voltage regulator for picture processor, and voltage controlling method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09801836

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 09801836

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1