WO2010065607A2 - Anisotropic depth velocity model estimation above the receiver array in walkaway or 3d vsp data - Google Patents

Anisotropic depth velocity model estimation above the receiver array in walkaway or 3d vsp data Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010065607A2
WO2010065607A2 PCT/US2009/066363 US2009066363W WO2010065607A2 WO 2010065607 A2 WO2010065607 A2 WO 2010065607A2 US 2009066363 W US2009066363 W US 2009066363W WO 2010065607 A2 WO2010065607 A2 WO 2010065607A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
seismic
receivers
velocity model
borehole
location
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2009/066363
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2010065607A3 (en
Inventor
Emanouil Blias
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Baker Hughes Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
Baker Hughes Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Baker Hughes Inc filed Critical Baker Hughes Inc
Priority to CA2745254A priority Critical patent/CA2745254A1/en
Priority to GB1108363.1A priority patent/GB2476783B/en
Publication of WO2010065607A2 publication Critical patent/WO2010065607A2/en
Publication of WO2010065607A3 publication Critical patent/WO2010065607A3/en
Priority to NO20110799A priority patent/NO20110799A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01VGEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
    • G01V1/00Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/40Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging
    • G01V1/42Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging using generators in one well and receivers elsewhere or vice versa

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to a method of geophysical prospecting which improves the accuracy of depth velocity model building and seismic migration. Specifically, the disclosure uses a zero-offset and walkaway VSP, multi-azimuth or 3D VSP survey for determination of anisotropy parameters characterizing subsurface velocities that may be used for imaging of reflections.
  • Description of the Related Art [0002] In surface seismic exploration, energy imparted into the earth by a seismic source reflects from subsurface geophysical features and is recorded by a multiplicity of receivers. This process is repeated numerous times, using source and receiver configurations which may either form a line (2-D acquisition) or cover an area (3-D acquisition). The data which results is processed to produce an image of the reflector using a procedure known as migration.
  • VSP Walkaway Vertical Seismic Profile
  • the present disclosure addresses the problem of determining anisotropic formation velocities using a walkaway VSP survey, multi-azimuth walkaways or 3D VSP survey.
  • a walkaway VSP survey measurements are made using a plurality of receivers in a borehole responsive to excitation of at least one seismic source at a plurality of distances from the wellbore.
  • the estimated velocities may then be used for migration of the walkaway(s)/3D VSP data or of surface seismic data and depth velocity model building.
  • This method is particularly useful in the drilling of offset wells where an initial well that may or may not be productive has been drilled.
  • One embodiment of the disclosure is a method of evaluating an earth formation.
  • the method includes: deploying an array of seismic receivers in a borehole and recording seismic signals in the array of receivers responsive to an activation at least one seismic source on the surface of the earth at at least one location offset from the borehole; estimating, from travel times of seismic waves from the at least one location that have been reflected at an interface in the earth formation and the surface of the earth to the plurality of receivers, a velocity model including velocities of vertically propagating seismic waves in a plurality of intervals, and an anellipticity parameter related to a normal moveout velocity of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals; and using the estimated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation.
  • Another embodiment of the disclosure is a system configured to evaluate an earth formation.
  • the system includes: a plurality of seismic receivers configured to be conveyed in a borehole and recording seismic signals responsive to an activation at least one seismic source on the surface of the earth at at least one location offset from the borehole; and at least one processor configured to: estimate, from travel times of seismic waves from the at least one location that have been reflected at an interface in the earth formation and the surface of the earth to the plurality of receivers, a velocity model including velocities of vertically propagating seismic waves in a plurality of intervals, and an anellipticity parameter related to a normal moveout velocity of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals; and use the estimated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation.
  • Another embodiment of the disclosure is a computer-readable medium product having stored thereon instructions that when read by at least one processor cause the at least one processor to execute a method, the method comprising: estimating, from first travel times of seismic waves from at least one location offset from a borehole that have been reflected at an interface in the earth formation and the surface of the earth to a plurality of receivers in the borehole and second travel times of seismic waves to the plurality of receivers from at least one additional location near the borehole, a velocity model including at least two anisotropy parameters related to a normal moveout curve of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals; and using the estimated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates the geometry of data acquisition of a walkaway VSP according to the present disclosure
  • FIG. 2 illustrates the simulated geometry of a surface seismic reflection survey using a walkaway VSP survey
  • FIG. 3 shows a flow chart illustrating how the method of the present disclosure may be used for processing seismic data
  • FIG. 4 shows the simulated geometry of a surface reflection survey including multiples using a walkaway VSP survey
  • FIG. 5 shows an exemplary VSP showing reflections and surface multiples
  • FIG. 6 shows sectors created from 3D VSP geometry to determine VTI parameters in each sector.
  • FIG. 1 Shown therein is the surface of the earth 123 with a rig 121 thereon. This may be a drilling rig or it may be a mast rig which conveys a wireline into a borehole 101. The borehole 101 penetrates layers 103, 105...
  • Each of the sensors may include a hydrophone, a single-component geophone or a multi-component geophone.
  • Data for a single offset VSP is typically acquired using a single seismic source such as 125a at the surface (or within a body of water at the surface). Exemplary raypath which depicts the propagation of seismic energy from the source 125a to the detectors IHa and Hid are shown.
  • FIG. 2 shows the simulated geometry of a surface seismic survey derived from the walkaway VSP survey of FIG. 1.
  • a vertical borehole has been assumed, the sources have been "reflected" in the borehole to simulated receiver locations on the surface 225a, 225b, 225c... similarly, the raypaths have also been reflected to give simulated raypaths on the left side of the borehole.
  • t m -i M (x,z) be time arrival for downgoing P wave reflected from the interface "m-1" between the surface and the receiver array, blue arrows in FIG. 4.
  • x is the offset
  • z is a receiver depth.
  • Let t m ⁇ (x,z) be time arrival for downgoing P wave reflected from the next interface "m” between the surface and the receiver array and the surface, blue arrows in FIG. 4; n is the number of the layers above the receiver.
  • the traveltimes t mM of the wave, reflected from the boundary "m" and the surface, are approximated by a shifted hyperbola approximation.
  • S k is Thomsen's anisotropy parameter related to NMO velocity. Thomsen defined the parameters ⁇ and ⁇ as
  • V DIX is a an estimate for the interval velocity through Dix formula. Assuming that ⁇ is relatively small ( ⁇ k ⁇ 0.25, that is weak anisotropy), eqn. (5) can be written as:
  • zero offset VSP With the receiver array that covers the layers of interest.
  • This zero offset VSP data is also used to tie downgoing events on the walkaway VSP data to the multiple reflections by using the same zero-offset times on both sets of data.
  • zero-offset VSP data should be acquired at as shallow a depth as possible. Then estimated values of ⁇ and ⁇ may be averaged to provide a final estimate and its standard deviation that provides the information about estimation reliability.
  • Tsvankin's notations may be used to describe orthorhombic anisotropy.
  • Tsvankin's notation includes vertical velocity and five dimensionless parameters: the VTI Thomsen's parameters ⁇ 2 and ⁇ 2 for [xi, x 3 ] symmetry plane, ⁇ i and ⁇ i for [x 2 , x 3 ] symmetry plane and parameter ⁇ 3 for in the horizontal symmetry plane [X 19 X 3 ].
  • Multi-azimuthal walkaway geometry may include at least 6 walkaway lines through the well, preferably at 30° increment. For stable and more reliable estimates, it's better to have 12 walkaway lines with 15° degrees increment or even 18 walkaway lines with 10° increment, depending on noise level.
  • 3D VSP data provides azimuthal estimates with many sectors. Modeling shows that 12 sectors with 15 degrees each provide stable estimates of five anisotropic orthorhombic parameters ⁇ i, ⁇ 2 , ⁇ ls ⁇ 2 and ⁇ 3 .
  • FIG. 6 illustrates the division the circle into 12 azimuths and added times with symmetrical offsets Si and S 2 to eliminate influence of velocity gradient.
  • Number of sectors that we divide the 3D VSP survey circle may vary from 6 (30° each) to 18 (10° each).
  • the number of azimuths to calculate VTI parameters are the same as the number of walkaway lines.
  • Acquisition of the data may be done using the multi level receiver (MLR) of Baker Hughes Incorporated that can be configured from 1 to 100 levels.
  • MLR multi level receiver
  • a 300-channel SERCEL equipment with three-component hundred level borehole tool may be used. This is for exemplary purposes only and not to be construed as a limitation. Use of such a system speeds up the data acquisition.
  • the downhole receivers can be run in combination with other logging services, either wireline or pipe-conveyed, reducing the number of trips into the well and saving rig time.
  • the downhole receiver can be conveyed on drill pipe or coiled tubing and also run in combination with a variety of openhole logging services greatly reducing rig time.
  • the zero-offset VSP survey is run up to the possible shallowest level. This provides vertical velocities above the receivers that are used to calculate interval parameter ⁇ above the walkaway-3D receivers.
  • Inversion procedure can be run for each walkaway(s)/3D VSP receiver. Then the result anisotropic parameters can be averaged. This provides much more stable estimates of anisotropic parameters and also uncertainty of these estimates by calculating standard deviation.
  • the inversion and migration methodology described above may be implemented on a general purpose digital computer. As would be known to those versed in the art, instructions for the computer reside on a machine readable memory device such as ROMs, EPROMs, EAROMs, Flash Memories and Optical disks. These may be part of the computer or may be linked to the computer by suitable communication channels, and may be even at a remote location.
  • seismic data of the type discussed above may be stored on the computer or may be linked through suitable communication channels to the computer.
  • the communication channels may include the Internet, enabling a user to access data from one remote location and get the instructions from another remote location to process the data.
  • the instructions on the machine readable memory device enable the computer to access the VSP data and process the data according to the method described above.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Geology (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geophysics (AREA)
  • Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)

Abstract

A walkaway VSP survey is carried out using a receiver array. Using a vertical VSP survey and arrival times of surface multiples on the walkaway VSP, vertical interval velocities and the anisotropy parameters d and e are estimated. This may then be used to process surface seismic data to do a prestack depth migration of surface seismic data and used for interpretation. For multi-azimuthal walkaway or 3D VSP data, we determine two VTI parameters e and d for multi-azimuth vertical planes. Then we determine five anisotropic interval parameters that describe P- wave kinematics for orthorhombic layers. These orthorhombic parameters may then be used to process surface seismic data to give a stacked image in true depth and for the interpretation purposes.

Description

ANISOTROPIC DEPTH VELOCITY MODEL ESTIMATION ABOVE THE RECEIVER ARRAY IN WALKAWAY OR 3D VSP DATA
Inventor: Emanouil Blias
BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE
Field of the Disclosure
[0001] This disclosure relates to a method of geophysical prospecting which improves the accuracy of depth velocity model building and seismic migration. Specifically, the disclosure uses a zero-offset and walkaway VSP, multi-azimuth or 3D VSP survey for determination of anisotropy parameters characterizing subsurface velocities that may be used for imaging of reflections. Description of the Related Art [0002] In surface seismic exploration, energy imparted into the earth by a seismic source reflects from subsurface geophysical features and is recorded by a multiplicity of receivers. This process is repeated numerous times, using source and receiver configurations which may either form a line (2-D acquisition) or cover an area (3-D acquisition). The data which results is processed to produce an image of the reflector using a procedure known as migration. [0003] Conventional reflection seismology utilizes surface sources and receivers to detect reflections from subsurface impedance contrasts. The obtained image often suffers in spatial accuracy, resolution and coherence due to the long and complicated travel paths between source, reflector, and receiver. [0004] Prior art methods have used a walkaway Vertical Seismic Profile (VSP) survey to estimate formation velocities within and below the receiver array.
Common to the prior art methods is an assumption that the earth is isotropic. It has been recognized for several years that the earth is anisotropic, i.e., that the velocity of compressional waves depends upon the direction of propagation. [0005] P-wave anisotropy is manifested by a change in the compressional wave velocity with direction of propagation in earth formations due to combined effects of sedimentary layering and the intrinsic anisotropy of the rock. Shales, in particular, could exhibit more than a 20% difference in P-wave velocities parallel to bedding and P-wave velocities perpendicular to bedding. Sandstones and limestones usually show smaller differences in velocity with direction of propagation. Postma (1955) showed that a type of anisotropy called transverse isotropy could be exhibited by seismic waves propagating through a thin layering of isotropic materials.
[0006] Determination of anisotropic velocities from surface seismic data is difficult due to the relatively poor data quality and the relatively low frequencies of surface seismic data. Nevertheless, there is prior art on the determination of an anisotropic velocity model for depth imaging of seismic data. See, for example, U.S. Patent No. 6,864,890 to Meek et al.
[0007] The present disclosure addresses the problem of determining anisotropic formation velocities using a walkaway VSP survey, multi-azimuth walkaways or 3D VSP survey. In a walkaway VSP survey, measurements are made using a plurality of receivers in a borehole responsive to excitation of at least one seismic source at a plurality of distances from the wellbore. The estimated velocities may then be used for migration of the walkaway(s)/3D VSP data or of surface seismic data and depth velocity model building. This method is particularly useful in the drilling of offset wells where an initial well that may or may not be productive has been drilled. Using the method of the present disclosure, it is possible to image the subsurface of the earth away from the initial well.
SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0008] One embodiment of the disclosure is a method of evaluating an earth formation. The method includes: deploying an array of seismic receivers in a borehole and recording seismic signals in the array of receivers responsive to an activation at least one seismic source on the surface of the earth at at least one location offset from the borehole; estimating, from travel times of seismic waves from the at least one location that have been reflected at an interface in the earth formation and the surface of the earth to the plurality of receivers, a velocity model including velocities of vertically propagating seismic waves in a plurality of intervals, and an anellipticity parameter related to a normal moveout velocity of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals; and using the estimated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation. [0009] Another embodiment of the disclosure is a system configured to evaluate an earth formation. The system includes: a plurality of seismic receivers configured to be conveyed in a borehole and recording seismic signals responsive to an activation at least one seismic source on the surface of the earth at at least one location offset from the borehole; and at least one processor configured to: estimate, from travel times of seismic waves from the at least one location that have been reflected at an interface in the earth formation and the surface of the earth to the plurality of receivers, a velocity model including velocities of vertically propagating seismic waves in a plurality of intervals, and an anellipticity parameter related to a normal moveout velocity of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals; and use the estimated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation. [0010] Another embodiment of the disclosure is a computer-readable medium product having stored thereon instructions that when read by at least one processor cause the at least one processor to execute a method, the method comprising: estimating, from first travel times of seismic waves from at least one location offset from a borehole that have been reflected at an interface in the earth formation and the surface of the earth to a plurality of receivers in the borehole and second travel times of seismic waves to the plurality of receivers from at least one additional location near the borehole, a velocity model including at least two anisotropy parameters related to a normal moveout curve of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals; and using the estimated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] The present disclosure is best understood by reference to the attached figures in which like numerals refer to like elements, and in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates the geometry of data acquisition of a walkaway VSP according to the present disclosure; FIG. 2 illustrates the simulated geometry of a surface seismic reflection survey using a walkaway VSP survey;
FIG. 3 shows a flow chart illustrating how the method of the present disclosure may be used for processing seismic data; FIG. 4 shows the simulated geometry of a surface reflection survey including multiples using a walkaway VSP survey; FIG. 5 (prior art) shows an exemplary VSP showing reflections and surface multiples; and
FIG. 6 shows sectors created from 3D VSP geometry to determine VTI parameters in each sector.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE
[0012] For the present disclosure, the acquisition geometry of a walkaway VSP is illustrated in FIG. 1. Shown therein is the surface of the earth 123 with a rig 121 thereon. This may be a drilling rig or it may be a mast rig which conveys a wireline into a borehole 101. The borehole 101 penetrates layers 103, 105...
Positioned in the borehole 101 are seismic sensors denoted by Ilia, 111b, 111c, IHd... Each of the sensors may include a hydrophone, a single-component geophone or a multi-component geophone. Data for a single offset VSP is typically acquired using a single seismic source such as 125a at the surface (or within a body of water at the surface). Exemplary raypath which depicts the propagation of seismic energy from the source 125a to the detectors IHa and Hid are shown.
[0013] FIG. 2 shows the simulated geometry of a surface seismic survey derived from the walkaway VSP survey of FIG. 1. A vertical borehole has been assumed, the sources have been "reflected" in the borehole to simulated receiver locations on the surface 225a, 225b, 225c... similarly, the raypaths have also been reflected to give simulated raypaths on the left side of the borehole. [0014] Let tm-iM(x,z) be time arrival for downgoing P wave reflected from the interface "m-1" between the surface and the receiver array, blue arrows in FIG. 4. Here x is the offset and z is a receiver depth. Let t(x,z) be time arrival for downgoing P wave reflected from the next interface "m" between the surface and the receiver array and the surface, blue arrows in FIG. 4; n is the number of the layers above the receiver.
[0015] In one embodiment of the disclosure, the traveltimes tmM of the wave, reflected from the boundary "m" and the surface, are approximated by a shifted hyperbola approximation.
Figure imgf000006_0001
where
Figure imgf000006_0002
m U " h \ = *=' Vk *="÷1 Vk m y,Mo^ 3∑AAvA(l + 2^) + ∑hkvk(l + 2δt )
A=I k=m+l
Here
Figure imgf000006_0003
is the vertical P velocity of the k-th layer, Sk is Thomsen's anisotropy parameter related to NMO velocity. Thomsen defined the parameters δ and ε as
Figure imgf000006_0004
C - C 1C
where the elastic modulii for the TI material are given by the matrix
Figure imgf000007_0001
[0016] The coefficient Bk is given by:
Figure imgf000007_0002
The ratio
Figure imgf000007_0003
eqn (4) can gives:
Figure imgf000007_0004
This relation has a relative error less than 1%. [0017] Similar formulae can be written for the time t^,,,(x), corresponding to the multiple wave, generated by the free surface and boundary number m-1. This is done by replacing m by m-1 in eqna. (l)-(4). Surface multiples are easy to identify on common offset gathers with the smallest offset or zero-offset VSP. An example is seen in FIG. 5 that shows an exemplary zero-offset VSP. On this gather, the downgoing first arrival is indicated by 500, exemplary reflected signals are indicated by 501 and 503 and a surface multiple of 501 is indicated by 501'. [0018] After that, knowing zero-offset times, to find parameters VNMO and A in eqn (1), a semblance coherence three-term NMO analysis for common receiver gather is carried out that gives the NMO function t(x) (parameters VNMO and A). To determine three parameters for NMO function, we can use any of equations, considered by Blias (2007a) discussed above.
[0019] Knowing to, VNMO and A for two boundaries m-1 and m, gives a formula for coefficient Bm n calculation: /,r\
Figure imgf000008_0001
Depending upon whether or not zero offset VSP data are available for layer m, different approaches may be taken.
[0020] When such zero-offset data are not available, the following relation is known in the art:
(7).
where VDIX is a an estimate for the interval velocity through Dix formula. Assuming that δ is relatively small (δk < 0.25, that is weak anisotropy), eqn. (5) can be written as:
£* = 1 + 8/7* (8), where
Figure imgf000008_0003
is an unellipticity parameter introduced by Tsvankin and Akhalifah. It is thus possible to calculate the interval anellipticity parameter ηm and the product
Ken m ΛΛ + ^m ^oτ ea<^ receiver n. It is not possible to estimate the vertical velocity, δ and ε. However, if an assumption is made about a relation between δ and ε, it is possible to estimate values of the vertical velocity, δ and ε. For example, if elliptical anisotropy is assumed, then δ = ε, η =0, B=I . Using estimated values of the vertical velocity, δ and ε with these simplifying assumptions makes it possible to perform a prestack depth migration of surface seismic data.
[0021] When zero offset VSP that covers layer m is available, then it is possible to estimate both anisotropic parameters ε and δ. From first breaks in zero offset
VSP data the vertical velocity Vven can be estimated. Then δ can be estimated from eqn (7):
Figure imgf000009_0001
giving ε m = δn n ,, +^ 8M-^ ^- (11),
where
Figure imgf000009_0002
[0022] This implies that to determine all three parameters Vvert, ε and δ above the walkaway receiver array, it is desirable to acquire additional set of data: zero offset VSP with the receiver array that covers the layers of interest. This zero offset VSP data is also used to tie downgoing events on the walkaway VSP data to the multiple reflections by using the same zero-offset times on both sets of data. To determine both anisotropic parameters ε and δ in VTI subsurface above the shallowest walkaway receiver and use them for imaging of surfaces seismic data, zero-offset VSP data should be acquired at as shallow a depth as possible. Then estimated values of δ and ε may be averaged to provide a final estimate and its standard deviation that provides the information about estimation reliability. [0023] Another embodiment of the disclosure is directed towards a VTI medium with vertical fracturing. This is a particular example of an Orthorhombic horizontally-layered medium with a horizontal symmetry plane. Tsvankin's notations (Tsvankin, 1997) may be used to describe orthorhombic anisotropy. For P-wave, Tsvankin's notation includes vertical velocity and five dimensionless parameters: the VTI Thomsen's parameters δ2 and ε2 for [xi, x3] symmetry plane, δi and εi for [x2, x3] symmetry plane and parameter δ3 for in the horizontal symmetry plane [X19X3]. Knowing vertical velocity from zero-offset VSP, it is possible to estimate anisotropic coefficients δi and δ2 and symmetry azimuth θ from NMO ellipse obtained from multi-azimuth first breaks (Blias, CSEG Recorder, May 2007). [0024] Coefficients εl 5 ε2, and δ3 can be estimated through first breaks non- hyperbolic approximations assuming weak anisotropy with respect to these parameters. In this case, each vertical plane with azimuth α can be considered as VTI plane (Tsvankin, 1997). Coefficients ε(α) and δ(α) in the vertical plane with azimuth α are estimated using Dix type inversion described for VTI layered model. To estimate parameter S1 , ε2 and δ3, ab equation derived by Tsvankin (1997) is used: ε(ak ) = εt sin4t - Θ) + ε2 cos4 (ak ~ θ) + (2ε2 + δ3) sin2 (ak - Θ)cos2(ak - θ) Using the least-square method, these parameters are estimated by minimizing quadratic function/fε/, ε2, S3) : n „
F(£ι2i) = ∑[ε(ak)-ει sm4(ak -θ)-ε2 cos4(ak -θ)-(2ε23)sin2(ak -θ)cos2(ak -#)]
A=I
To estimate ε(α) and δ(α) for several azimuths α, multi-azimuthal walkaway survey or 3D VSP data are needed. Multi-azimuthal walkaway geometry may include at least 6 walkaway lines through the well, preferably at 30° increment. For stable and more reliable estimates, it's better to have 12 walkaway lines with 15° degrees increment or even 18 walkaway lines with 10° increment, depending on noise level. 3D VSP data provides azimuthal estimates with many sectors. Modeling shows that 12 sectors with 15 degrees each provide stable estimates of five anisotropic orthorhombic parameters εi, ε2, δls δ2 and δ3.
[0025] FIG. 6 illustrates the division the circle into 12 azimuths and added times with symmetrical offsets Si and S2 to eliminate influence of velocity gradient. We also stack opposite (symmetrical) offsets to simulate surface seismic NMO curve T(x) for further Dix-type inversion for interval anisotropic parameters. Number of sectors that we divide the 3D VSP survey circle may vary from 6 (30° each) to 18 (10° each). For multi-azimuthal walkaway geometry, the number of azimuths to calculate VTI parameters are the same as the number of walkaway lines. [0026] Acquisition of the data may be done using the multi level receiver (MLR) of Baker Hughes Incorporated that can be configured from 1 to 100 levels. For 3D VSP data, a 300-channel SERCEL equipment with three-component hundred level borehole tool (one vertical and two horizontal components) may be used. This is for exemplary purposes only and not to be construed as a limitation. Use of such a system speeds up the data acquisition. The downhole receivers can be run in combination with other logging services, either wireline or pipe-conveyed, reducing the number of trips into the well and saving rig time. In high-angle wells, the downhole receiver can be conveyed on drill pipe or coiled tubing and also run in combination with a variety of openhole logging services greatly reducing rig time. In one embodiment, the zero-offset VSP survey is run up to the possible shallowest level. This provides vertical velocities above the receivers that are used to calculate interval parameter ε above the walkaway-3D receivers.
Inversion procedure can be run for each walkaway(s)/3D VSP receiver. Then the result anisotropic parameters can be averaged. This provides much more stable estimates of anisotropic parameters and also uncertainty of these estimates by calculating standard deviation. [0027] The inversion and migration methodology described above may be implemented on a general purpose digital computer. As would be known to those versed in the art, instructions for the computer reside on a machine readable memory device such as ROMs, EPROMs, EAROMs, Flash Memories and Optical disks. These may be part of the computer or may be linked to the computer by suitable communication channels, and may be even at a remote location.
Similarly, seismic data of the type discussed above may be stored on the computer or may be linked through suitable communication channels to the computer. The communication channels may include the Internet, enabling a user to access data from one remote location and get the instructions from another remote location to process the data. The instructions on the machine readable memory device enable the computer to access the VSP data and process the data according to the method described above.
[0028] While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the preferred embodiments of the disclosure, various modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all such variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be embraced by the foregoing disclosure.

Claims

What is claimed is: 1. A method of evaluating an earth formation, the method comprising: deploying an array of seismic receivers in a borehole and recording seismic signals in the array of receivers responsive to an activation at least one seismic source on the surface of the earth at at least one location offset from the borehole; estimating, from travel times of seismic waves from the at least one location that have been reflected at an interface in the earth formation and the surface of the earth to the plurality of receivers, a velocity model including velocities of vertically propagating seismic waves in a plurality of intervals, and an anellipticity parameter related to a normal moveout velocity of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals; and using the estimated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one location further comprises at least one additional location close to the borehole, the method further comprising: using travel times of seismic waves to the plurality of receivers from at least one additional location and the velocity model to provide an updated velocity model including at least two anisotropy parameters related to a normal moveout curve of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals. 3. The method of claim 1 further comprising using the produced image for drilling operations. 4. The method of claim 2 further comprising: using the updated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation; and using the produced image for drilling operations. 5. The method of claim 2 wherein the at least one location comprises a plurality of locations defining a multi-azimuthal walkaway geometry, and the at least two anisotropy parameters further comprise five orthorhombic anisotropy parameters εls S1, δ1? δ2 and δ3 related to a normal moveout velocity of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals. 6. The method of claim 1 further comprising, using, for at least one of the plurality of seismic receivers, 3-component receivers. 7. The method of claim 1 further comprising deploying the plurality of seismic receivers on a conveyance device selected from: (i) a wireline, (ii) a pipe, and (iii) coiled tubing. 8. The method of claim 2 further comprising estimating one of the at least two anisotropy parameters by approximating a moveout function representing the travel times by a shifted parabola. 9. A system configured to evaluate an earth formation, the system comprising: a plurality of seismic receivers configured to be conveyed in a borehole and recording seismic signals responsive to an activation at least one seismic source on the surface of the earth at at least one location offset from the borehole; and at least one processor configured to: (i) estimate, from travel times of seismic waves from the at least one location that have been reflected at an interface in the earth formation and the surface of the earth to the plurality of receivers, a velocity model including velocities of vertically propagating seismic waves in a plurality of intervals, and an anellipticity parameter related to a normal moveout velocity of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals; and (ii) use the estimated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation. 10. The system of claim 9 wherein the at least one location further comprises at least one additional location close to the borehole, and wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: use travel times of seismic waves to the plurality of receivers from the at least one additional location and the velocity model to provide an updated velocity model including at least two anisotropy parameters related to a normal moveout curve of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals. 11. The system of claim 9 wherein the at least one processor is further configured to use the produced image for drilling operations. 12. The system of claim 10 wherein the at least one processor is further configured to: use the updated velocity model to produce an image of the earth formation; and use the produced image for drilling operations. 13. The system of claim 10 wherein the at least one location comprises a plurality of locations defining a multi-azimuthal walkaway geometry, and the at least two anisotropy parameters further comprise five orthorhombic anisotropy parameters εl s εj, δi, δ2 and δ3 related to a normal moveout velocity of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals. 14. The system of claim 9 wherein at least one of the plurality of seismic receivers further comprises a 3 -component receiver. 15. The system of claim 9 further comprising a conveyance device configured to deploy the plurality of seismic receivers, the conveyance device selected from: (i) a wireline, (ii) a pipe, and (iii) coiled tubing. 16. The system of claim 10 wherein the at least one processor is further configured to estimate at least one of the at least two anisotropy parameters by approximating a moveout function representing the travel times by a shifted parabola. 17. A computer-readable medium product having stored thereon instructions that when read by at least one processor cause the at least one processor to execute a method, the method comprising: estimating, from first travel times of seismic waves from at least one location offset from a borehole that have been reflected at an interface in the earth formation and the surface of the earth to a plurality of receivers in the borehole and second travel times of seismic waves to the plurality of receivers from at least one additional location near the borehole, a velocity model including at least two anisotropy parameters related to a normal moveout curve of compressional waves for the plurality of intervals; and using the estimated velocity model for producing an image of the earth formation. 18. The computer-readable medium product of claim 17 further comprising at least one of: (i) a ROM, (ii) an EPROM, (iii) an EAROM, (iv) a flash memory, and (v) an optical disks
PCT/US2009/066363 2008-12-02 2009-12-02 Anisotropic depth velocity model estimation above the receiver array in walkaway or 3d vsp data Ceased WO2010065607A2 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2745254A CA2745254A1 (en) 2008-12-02 2009-12-02 Anisotropic depth velocity model estimation above the receiver array in walkaway or 3d vsp data
GB1108363.1A GB2476783B (en) 2008-12-02 2009-12-02 Anisotropic depth velocity model estimation above the receiver array in walkaway or 3D VSP data
NO20110799A NO20110799A1 (en) 2008-12-02 2011-06-01 Anisotropic depth velocity model estimation over the receiver array in walkaway or 3D VSP data

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11923008P 2008-12-02 2008-12-02
US61/119,230 2008-12-02
US12/625,152 US8407007B2 (en) 2008-12-02 2009-11-24 Anisotropic depth velocity model estimation above the receiver array in walkaway or 3D VSP data
US12/625,152 2009-11-24

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010065607A2 true WO2010065607A2 (en) 2010-06-10
WO2010065607A3 WO2010065607A3 (en) 2010-09-16

Family

ID=42221780

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2009/066363 Ceased WO2010065607A2 (en) 2008-12-02 2009-12-02 Anisotropic depth velocity model estimation above the receiver array in walkaway or 3d vsp data

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US8407007B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2745254A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2476783B (en)
NO (1) NO20110799A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2010065607A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2506039A3 (en) * 2011-03-28 2013-08-14 Conocophillips Company Methods for Seismic Fracture Parameter Estimation and Gas Filled Fracture Identification From Vertical Well Log Data
US8644110B2 (en) * 2011-05-20 2014-02-04 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and systems for spurious cancellation in seismic signal detection
WO2014164354A1 (en) * 2013-04-02 2014-10-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Anisotropy analysis using direct and reflected arrivals in seismic survey data
US20140362661A1 (en) * 2013-04-23 2014-12-11 Westerngeco L.L.C. Unmanned vehicle-based seismic surveying
US20150331122A1 (en) * 2014-05-16 2015-11-19 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Waveform-based seismic localization with quantified uncertainty
US9684089B2 (en) * 2014-12-23 2017-06-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Determining P-wave azimuthal anisotropy from walkaround VSP with offset dependent slowness corrections
US9983323B2 (en) * 2015-01-14 2018-05-29 Schlumberger Technology Corporaton Performing tomography to build orthorhombic models
US9959339B2 (en) * 2015-07-13 2018-05-01 International Business Machines Corporation Journey time estimation
WO2017048285A1 (en) * 2015-09-18 2017-03-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Global inversion based estimation of anisotropy parameters for orthorhombic media
US10118603B2 (en) * 2015-10-30 2018-11-06 Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. Systems and methods for traffic learning
GB2561486B (en) * 2016-01-15 2021-09-01 Landmark Graphics Corp Semblance-based anisotropy parameter estimation using isotropic depth-migrated common image gathers
AU2016403404A1 (en) * 2016-04-19 2018-08-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture and stress characterization using layer thickness variation
AU2016428142A1 (en) * 2016-10-25 2019-03-14 Landmark Graphics Corporation Estimating interval anisotropy parameter for pre-stack depth migration using a least-squares method
US11467305B2 (en) * 2017-06-09 2022-10-11 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Anisotropic NMO correction and its application to attenuate noises in VSP data
CN109581499A (en) * 2018-11-08 2019-04-05 成都捷科思石油天然气技术发展有限公司 A method of structural map is generated using anisotropy pre-stack depth migration
CN111596355B (en) * 2020-06-02 2022-04-01 中国石油集团东方地球物理勘探有限责任公司 Zero offset VSP time frequency analysis stratum division and layer velocity determination method
WO2022106406A1 (en) * 2020-11-23 2022-05-27 Shell Internationale Research Maatschappij B.V. Method of updating a velocity model of seismic waves in an earth formation
CN112925022B (en) * 2021-01-28 2022-03-29 大庆油田有限责任公司 Prediction method for anisotropy parameters of shale VTI medium
CN117849864A (en) * 2022-09-30 2024-04-09 中国石油天然气股份有限公司 VSP well driving seismic imaging method and device while drilling

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2739696B1 (en) * 1995-10-06 1997-11-21 Elf Aquitaine METHOD FOR PROCESSING RECORDED SEISMIC REFLECTION TRACES FOR VARIABLE DEPORTS
GB9607764D0 (en) * 1996-04-15 1996-06-19 Geco As Inversion method for seismic data
US6714873B2 (en) * 2001-12-17 2004-03-30 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for estimating subsurface principal stresses from seismic reflection data
US6864890B2 (en) * 2002-08-27 2005-03-08 Comoco Phillips Company Method of building and updating an anisotropic velocity model for depth imaging of seismic data
US6985405B2 (en) * 2003-10-23 2006-01-10 Pgs Americas, Inc. Method for stable estimation of anisotropic parameters for P-wave prestack imaging
US7508735B2 (en) * 2006-09-21 2009-03-24 Shell Oil Company Method of analyzing vertical seismic profile data, method of producing a hydrocarbon fluid, and a computer readable medium
US7508736B2 (en) * 2007-03-09 2009-03-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Vector migration of 1st order free-surface related downgoing multiples from VSP data

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO20110799A1 (en) 2011-06-28
US8407007B2 (en) 2013-03-26
GB2476783A (en) 2011-07-06
WO2010065607A3 (en) 2010-09-16
GB2476783B (en) 2013-03-20
CA2745254A1 (en) 2010-06-10
GB201108363D0 (en) 2011-06-29
US20100133010A1 (en) 2010-06-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8407007B2 (en) Anisotropic depth velocity model estimation above the receiver array in walkaway or 3D VSP data
US8750074B2 (en) Anisotropic parameter determination
US9829590B2 (en) Extracting SV shear data from P-wave marine data
US9784863B2 (en) S-wave anisotropy estimate by automated image registration
US8547794B2 (en) Extending the coverage of VSP/CDP imaging by using first-order downgoing multiples
EP0796441B1 (en) Processing surface-reflected shear-wave signatures from an azimuthally-anisotropic geological formation
US6864890B2 (en) Method of building and updating an anisotropic velocity model for depth imaging of seismic data
US8395967B2 (en) Vector migration of virtual source VSP data
US6067275A (en) Method of analyzing pre-stack seismic data
US8243548B2 (en) Extracting SV shear data from P-wave seismic data
US20140058678A1 (en) True-Amplitude Layer-Stripping in Fractured Media
Byun et al. Seismic traveltime inversion for transverse isotropy
EP2823337B1 (en) Extracting sv shear data from p-wave marine data
Leaney et al. Analysis of multiazimuthal VSP data for anisotropy and AVO
AU2012332757B2 (en) Extracting SV shear data from P-wave seismic data
Stewart et al. Converted-wave seismic exploration: a tutorial
Nebrija et al. Fracture characterization using transmitted shear waves in a 3C azimuthal offset VSP
Johns et al. Multicomponent OBC (4C) Time Imaging over Pamberi, LRL Block, Offshore Trinidad
Sun et al. 3-D reverse VSP
Johns et al. Multicomponent OBC (4C) Time Imaging over Pamberi, Offshore Trinidad
Johns et al. Multicomponent OBC (4C) imaging over Pamberi, offshore Trinidad
Lesnikov et al. AVO and Anisotropy Analysis of Walkaway VSP Data from the Oselvar Discovery

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09831028

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 1108363

Country of ref document: GB

Kind code of ref document: A

Free format text: PCT FILING DATE = 20091202

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1108363.1

Country of ref document: GB

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2745254

Country of ref document: CA

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 09831028

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2