WO2010056819A2 - Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation - Google Patents

Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2010056819A2
WO2010056819A2 PCT/US2009/064153 US2009064153W WO2010056819A2 WO 2010056819 A2 WO2010056819 A2 WO 2010056819A2 US 2009064153 W US2009064153 W US 2009064153W WO 2010056819 A2 WO2010056819 A2 WO 2010056819A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
sulfur
ultra
fuel
gas turbine
turbine engine
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2009/064153
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2010056819A3 (en
Inventor
Alan Epstein
Richard C. Miake-Lye
Original Assignee
United Technologies Corporation
Aerodyne Research, Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=42170686&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=WO2010056819(A2) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by United Technologies Corporation, Aerodyne Research, Inc. filed Critical United Technologies Corporation
Priority to JP2011536455A priority Critical patent/JP2012508848A/en
Priority to RU2011121440/06A priority patent/RU2505692C2/en
Priority to AU2009314114A priority patent/AU2009314114B2/en
Priority to EP09752677.6A priority patent/EP2364400B1/en
Priority to CN2009801453523A priority patent/CN102216591A/en
Priority to CA2743143A priority patent/CA2743143A1/en
Publication of WO2010056819A2 publication Critical patent/WO2010056819A2/en
Publication of WO2010056819A3 publication Critical patent/WO2010056819A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
    • F02C—GAS-TURBINE PLANTS; AIR INTAKES FOR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS; CONTROLLING FUEL SUPPLY IN AIR-BREATHING JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F02C3/00—Gas-turbine plants characterised by the use of combustion products as the working fluid
    • F02C3/20—Gas-turbine plants characterised by the use of combustion products as the working fluid using a special fuel, oxidant, or dilution fluid to generate the combustion products
    • F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F05—INDEXING SCHEMES RELATING TO ENGINES OR PUMPS IN VARIOUS SUBCLASSES OF CLASSES F01-F04
    • F05D—INDEXING SCHEME FOR ASPECTS RELATING TO NON-POSITIVE-DISPLACEMENT MACHINES OR ENGINES, GAS-TURBINES OR JET-PROPULSION PLANTS
    • F05D2270/00—Control
    • F05D2270/01—Purpose of the control system
    • F05D2270/08—Purpose of the control system to produce clean exhaust gases
    • F05D2270/082—Purpose of the control system to produce clean exhaust gases with as little NOx as possible
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00—Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/60—Efficient propulsion technologies, e.g. for aircraft

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to contrails made by the exhaust from aircraft engines.
  • Hot exhaust from aircraft engines causes visible trails of condensed water known as contrails under known temperature and humidity conditions. For instance, the hot exhaust mixes with the cooler, moist surrounding air and causes condensation/precipitation of water as minute droplets or ice crystals.
  • contrails contribute to changing the Earth's climate by containing outgoing radiation, either directly or as amplified by stimulating the formation of clouds, similar to greenhouse gases. Additionally, contrail formation may be a concern for aircraft operators that wish to minimize visible detection.
  • an aircraft may avoid producing contrails by avoiding flying into contrail-forming conditions.
  • flight pattern or other circumstances, it is not always possible to avoid contrail-forming conditions.
  • contrail avoidance flight patterns may be longer and/or require more total fuel to be burned, which would increase cost and produce more CO 2 with the effect of increasing rather than decreasing global warming.
  • Additives to the fuel or to the exhaust may be used to reduce contrail formation.
  • the additives influence the size of the condensed water droplets or ice crystals. Droplets or ice crystals of certain sizes may not be visible.
  • problems with using additives include the cost of the additives (effectively increasing the cost of the fuel which is already a significant concern in the aviation industry), the weight associated with the additives, and any reduction in engine life or performance caused by the additives.
  • An example method of managing contrail formation of a gas turbine engine includes delivering an ultra-low sulfur fuel to a combustor of a gas turbine engine to limit an amount of sulfur byproduct produced in an exhaust of the gas turbine engine.
  • Another example method of managing contrail formation of a gas turbine engine includes establishing a critical threshold of sulfur byproducts in an exhaust of a gas turbine engine such that below a critical threshold, the exhaust substantially reduces contrail formation when the gas turbine engine is flying in contrail-forming conditions.
  • An example ultra-low sulfur aviation fuel composition includes a concentration of sulfur that is less than one part per million.
  • Figure 1 illustrates an example gas turbine engine utilizing an ultra-low sulfur fuel while flying in contrail-forming conditions.
  • Figure 1 illustrates selected portions of an example gas turbine engine 20 that may be employed on an aircraft.
  • the gas turbine engine 20 includes a compressor section 22, a combustor 24 for receiving compressed air from the compressor section 22, and a turbine section 26 for receiving an exhaust 28 from the combustor 24. It is to be understood that there are various types of gas turbine engines, many of which can benefit from the disclosed examples, which are not limited to the disclosed design.
  • the gas turbine engine 20 utilizes an ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 to manage contrail formation from the gas turbine engine 20 while flying through contrail-forming conditions 32.
  • Typical aviation fuels include 30-3000 parts per million of sulfur.
  • the ultra- low sulfur fuel 30 of the disclosed example includes a concentration of sulfur that is less than about one part per million to limit an amount of sulfur byproduct produced in the exhaust 28.
  • the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may have a concentration of sulfur that is less than 300 parts per billion or concentration that is below detectable limits (i.e., nominally zero).
  • the sulfur byproducts e.g., including SO 3
  • Sulfur byproducts may act as nucleation sites for condensation of water under contrail-forming conditions.
  • sulfur byproducts are highly hydroscopic compared to carbon or other particles in an exhaust.
  • the sulfur byproducts including any sulfur byproduct associated with emitted soot particles, attract water vapor molecules more readily than other types of particles in the exhaust.
  • the sulfur byproduct may rapidly accumulate water and form droplets that lead to contrails.
  • the amount of sulfur byproduct in the exhaust 28 is limited by utilizing the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30.
  • the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 thereby limits or eliminates contrail formation because there is limited sulfur byproduct in the exhaust 28 to support nucleation and water droplet formation.
  • Reducing or eliminating contrail formation using the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 provides the benefits of reduced concern of aviation-induced climate change, no increase in effective fuel cost or aircraft weight from additives, no impact on fuel consumption, and reduction of particulate emission.
  • Desired concentrations of sulfur in the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 for reducing or eliminating contrail formation may be predetermined.
  • a critical threshold of sulfur byproducts in the exhaust 28 may be established such that below the critical threshold, the exhaust 28 substantially reduces contrail formation when the gas turbine engine 20 is flying in the contrail-forming condition 32.
  • the reduction in contrail formation may correspond to the degree of visibility of a contrail, average water droplet size or other parameter for judging contrail formation.
  • the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may be produced using any of a variety of methods.
  • the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may be a Fischer- Tropsch synthetic paraffin fuel that is made without adding sulfur or sulfur-containing additives.
  • the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may include a concentration of sulfur that is close to zero or undetectable.
  • the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may be produced by removing sulfur from an existing type of aviation fuel.
  • the existing fuel may be a synthetic fuel or a petroleum-based fuel, for example.
  • a sulfur-removing device could be used to remove sulfur from the existing fuel.
  • one concern with using the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 might be sulfur contamination from existing fuel supply chains.
  • aviation fuels are typically transported through a supply chain that may handle a variety of different types of fuels. Residual amounts of one type of fuel may remain in the supply chain and intermix with subsequently transported fuels. Normally, the intermixing is insignificant and does not influence engine performance. However, mixing even a small amount of a sulfur-containing fuel with the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may increase the sulfur concentration above a desired/threshold concentration for contrail formation.
  • the gas turbine engine 20 or the aircraft fuel system may include residual sulfur- containing fuel. Therefore, the supply chain, the aircraft, and gas turbine engine 20 may require cleaning to limit contamination.

Abstract

A method of managing contrail formation of a gas turbine engine includes delivering an ultra-low sulfur fuel to a combustor of a gas turbine engine to limit an amount of sulfur byproduct produced in an exhaust of the gas turbine engine.

Description

ULTRA-LOW SULFUR FUEL AND METHOD FOR REDUCED CONTRAIL FORMATION
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims priority to United States Application No. 12/614,640, filed on November 9, 2009, and United States Provisional No. 61/114,486, filed November 14, 2008.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This disclosure relates to contrails made by the exhaust from aircraft engines. Hot exhaust from aircraft engines causes visible trails of condensed water known as contrails under known temperature and humidity conditions. For instance, the hot exhaust mixes with the cooler, moist surrounding air and causes condensation/precipitation of water as minute droplets or ice crystals. There is speculation that contrails contribute to changing the Earth's climate by containing outgoing radiation, either directly or as amplified by stimulating the formation of clouds, similar to greenhouse gases. Additionally, contrail formation may be a concern for aircraft operators that wish to minimize visible detection.
[0003] In some instances, an aircraft may avoid producing contrails by avoiding flying into contrail-forming conditions. However, depending on the aircraft, flight pattern, or other circumstances, it is not always possible to avoid contrail-forming conditions. In addition, such contrail avoidance flight patterns may be longer and/or require more total fuel to be burned, which would increase cost and produce more CO2 with the effect of increasing rather than decreasing global warming.
[0004] Additives to the fuel or to the exhaust may be used to reduce contrail formation. For instance, the additives influence the size of the condensed water droplets or ice crystals. Droplets or ice crystals of certain sizes may not be visible. However, problems with using additives include the cost of the additives (effectively increasing the cost of the fuel which is already a significant concern in the aviation industry), the weight associated with the additives, and any reduction in engine life or performance caused by the additives. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] An example method of managing contrail formation of a gas turbine engine includes delivering an ultra-low sulfur fuel to a combustor of a gas turbine engine to limit an amount of sulfur byproduct produced in an exhaust of the gas turbine engine.
[0006] Another example method of managing contrail formation of a gas turbine engine includes establishing a critical threshold of sulfur byproducts in an exhaust of a gas turbine engine such that below a critical threshold, the exhaust substantially reduces contrail formation when the gas turbine engine is flying in contrail-forming conditions.
[0007] An example ultra-low sulfur aviation fuel composition includes a concentration of sulfur that is less than one part per million.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008] The various features and advantages of the disclosed examples will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
[0009] Figure 1 illustrates an example gas turbine engine utilizing an ultra-low sulfur fuel while flying in contrail-forming conditions.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0010] Figure 1 illustrates selected portions of an example gas turbine engine 20 that may be employed on an aircraft. In this example, the gas turbine engine 20 includes a compressor section 22, a combustor 24 for receiving compressed air from the compressor section 22, and a turbine section 26 for receiving an exhaust 28 from the combustor 24. It is to be understood that there are various types of gas turbine engines, many of which can benefit from the disclosed examples, which are not limited to the disclosed design.
[0011] The gas turbine engine 20 utilizes an ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 to manage contrail formation from the gas turbine engine 20 while flying through contrail-forming conditions 32. Typical aviation fuels include 30-3000 parts per million of sulfur. However, the ultra- low sulfur fuel 30 of the disclosed example includes a concentration of sulfur that is less than about one part per million to limit an amount of sulfur byproduct produced in the exhaust 28. In further examples, the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may have a concentration of sulfur that is less than 300 parts per billion or concentration that is below detectable limits (i.e., nominally zero). The sulfur byproducts (e.g., including SO3) may be in the form of particles, compounds, or other exhaust matter emitted in the exhaust 28.
[0012] Sulfur byproducts may act as nucleation sites for condensation of water under contrail-forming conditions. For instance, sulfur byproducts are highly hydroscopic compared to carbon or other particles in an exhaust. The sulfur byproducts, including any sulfur byproduct associated with emitted soot particles, attract water vapor molecules more readily than other types of particles in the exhaust. The sulfur byproduct may rapidly accumulate water and form droplets that lead to contrails. The amount of sulfur byproduct in the exhaust 28 is limited by utilizing the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30. The ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 thereby limits or eliminates contrail formation because there is limited sulfur byproduct in the exhaust 28 to support nucleation and water droplet formation.
[0013] Reducing or eliminating contrail formation using the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 provides the benefits of reduced concern of aviation-induced climate change, no increase in effective fuel cost or aircraft weight from additives, no impact on fuel consumption, and reduction of particulate emission.
[0014] Desired concentrations of sulfur in the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 for reducing or eliminating contrail formation may be predetermined. For instance a critical threshold of sulfur byproducts in the exhaust 28 may be established such that below the critical threshold, the exhaust 28 substantially reduces contrail formation when the gas turbine engine 20 is flying in the contrail-forming condition 32. In one example, the reduction in contrail formation may correspond to the degree of visibility of a contrail, average water droplet size or other parameter for judging contrail formation.
[0015] The ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may be produced using any of a variety of methods. In one example, the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may be a Fischer- Tropsch synthetic paraffin fuel that is made without adding sulfur or sulfur-containing additives. In this regard, the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may include a concentration of sulfur that is close to zero or undetectable.
[0016] In another example, the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may be produced by removing sulfur from an existing type of aviation fuel. The existing fuel may be a synthetic fuel or a petroleum-based fuel, for example. For instance, a sulfur-removing device could be used to remove sulfur from the existing fuel.
[0017] Regardless of the source of the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30, one concern with using the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 might be sulfur contamination from existing fuel supply chains. For instance, aviation fuels are typically transported through a supply chain that may handle a variety of different types of fuels. Residual amounts of one type of fuel may remain in the supply chain and intermix with subsequently transported fuels. Normally, the intermixing is insignificant and does not influence engine performance. However, mixing even a small amount of a sulfur-containing fuel with the ultra-low sulfur fuel 30 may increase the sulfur concentration above a desired/threshold concentration for contrail formation. Similarly, the gas turbine engine 20 or the aircraft fuel system may include residual sulfur- containing fuel. Therefore, the supply chain, the aircraft, and gas turbine engine 20 may require cleaning to limit contamination.
[0018] Although a combination of features is shown in the illustrated examples, not all of them need to be combined to realize the benefits of various embodiments of this disclosure. In other words, a system designed according to an embodiment of this disclosure will not necessarily include all of the features shown in any one of the Figures or all of the portions schematically shown in the Figures. Moreover, selected features of one example embodiment may be combined with selected features of other example embodiments.
[0019] The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this disclosure.

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. A method of managing contrail formation of a gas turbine engine, comprising: delivering an ultra-low sulfur fuel to a combustor of a gas turbine engine to limit an amount of sulfur byproduct produced in an exhaust of the gas turbine engine.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the gas turbine engine is flying in contrail- forming conditions.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein a concentration of sulfur in the ultra- low sulfur fuel is less than one parts per million.
4. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein a concentration of sulfur in the ultra- low sulfur fuel is less than 300 parts per billion.
5. An ultra-low sulfur aviation fuel composition comprising: an aviation fuel having a concentration of sulfur that is less than one part per million.
6. The ultra-low sulfur aviation fuel as recited in claim 5, wherein the concentration of sulfur is the less than 300 parts per billion.
7. The ultra-low sulfur aviation fuel as recited in claim 5, wherein the concentration of sulfur is nominally zero.
8. The ultra-low sulfur aviation fuel as recited in claim 5, wherein the aviation fuel is a synthetic paraffin fuel.
9. The ultra-low sulfur aviation fuel as recited in claim 5, wherein the aviation fuel is a petroleum-based fuel.
10. A method of managing contrail formation of a gas turbine engine, comprising: establishing a critical threshold of sulfur byproducts in an exhaust of a gas turbine engine such that below the critical threshold the exhaust substantially reduces contrail formation when the gas turbine engine is flying in contrail-forming conditions.
PCT/US2009/064153 2008-11-14 2009-11-12 Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation WO2010056819A2 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2011536455A JP2012508848A (en) 2008-11-14 2009-11-12 Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reducing contrail formation
RU2011121440/06A RU2505692C2 (en) 2008-11-14 2009-11-12 Fuel with super low content of sulfur and method of decreasing condensation trace
AU2009314114A AU2009314114B2 (en) 2008-11-14 2009-11-12 Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation
EP09752677.6A EP2364400B1 (en) 2008-11-14 2009-11-12 Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation
CN2009801453523A CN102216591A (en) 2008-11-14 2009-11-12 Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation
CA2743143A CA2743143A1 (en) 2008-11-14 2009-11-12 Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11448608P 2008-11-14 2008-11-14
US61/114,486 2008-11-14
US12/614,640 2009-11-09
US12/614,640 US20100122519A1 (en) 2008-11-14 2009-11-09 Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2010056819A2 true WO2010056819A2 (en) 2010-05-20
WO2010056819A3 WO2010056819A3 (en) 2011-04-07

Family

ID=42170686

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2009/064153 WO2010056819A2 (en) 2008-11-14 2009-11-12 Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US20100122519A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2364400B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2012508848A (en)
CN (1) CN102216591A (en)
AU (1) AU2009314114B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2743143A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2505692C2 (en)
WO (1) WO2010056819A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB201211058D0 (en) 2012-06-22 2012-08-01 Rolls Royce Plc Fuel system
GB201211064D0 (en) 2012-06-22 2012-08-01 Rolls Royce Plc Fuel system
GB201211061D0 (en) * 2012-06-22 2012-08-01 Rolls Royce Plc Fuel delivery system
GB201317732D0 (en) * 2013-10-08 2013-11-20 Rolls Royce Plc Aircraft engine fuel system
GB201317731D0 (en) 2013-10-08 2013-11-20 Rolls Royce Plc Fuel delivery system
GB2524772B (en) * 2014-04-02 2016-07-13 Rolls Royce Plc Aircraft vapour trail control system
GB201405894D0 (en) 2014-04-02 2014-05-14 Rolls Royce Plc Aircraft vapour trail control system
GB201506473D0 (en) 2015-04-16 2015-06-03 Rolls Royce Plc Aircraft propulsion system

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4766725A (en) * 1985-12-24 1988-08-30 Scipar, Inc. Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

Family Cites Families (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3517505A (en) * 1962-11-13 1970-06-30 Us Air Force Method and apparatus for suppressing contrails
US3804328A (en) * 1972-10-13 1974-04-16 Dow Chemical Co Fog abatement
US5005355A (en) * 1988-08-24 1991-04-09 Scipar, Inc. Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
RU2182163C2 (en) * 1995-06-07 2002-05-10 Уильям К. Орр Fuel composition
EP0833879A1 (en) * 1995-06-07 1998-04-08 ORR, William C. Vapor phase combustion method and compositions ii
US6162956A (en) * 1998-08-18 2000-12-19 Exxon Research And Engineering Co Stability Fischer-Tropsch diesel fuel and a process for its production
US20070187292A1 (en) * 2001-10-19 2007-08-16 Miller Stephen J Stable, moderately unsaturated distillate fuel blend stocks prepared by low pressure hydroprocessing of Fischer-Tropsch products
US7338541B2 (en) * 2001-11-20 2008-03-04 The Procter & Gamble Company Synthetic jet fuel and diesel fuel compositions and processes
US7179364B2 (en) * 2003-01-31 2007-02-20 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Production of stable olefinic Fischer-Tropsch fuels with minimum hydrogen consumption
DE10359868B3 (en) * 2003-12-18 2005-06-16 Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Detecting condensation trails forming behind aircraft involves comparing parts of camera-acquired image that should show condensation trail according to imaging geometry with image parts that cannot contain trail using image processing
RU2286588C2 (en) * 2005-02-18 2006-10-27 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Лётно-исследовательский институт им. М.М. Громова" Method of estimation of conditions of forming condensation trails by aircraft with different types of engines
FR2891525B1 (en) * 2005-09-30 2007-11-09 Airbus France Sas DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING A TOURBILLONARY WAKE GENERATED BY AN OBLONG ELEMENT ON THE EXTRADOS OF A CARRYING SURFACE OF AN AIRCRAFT.
RU2304293C1 (en) * 2005-12-13 2007-08-10 Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие "Летно-исследовательский институт им. М.М. Громова" System for aviation ecological monitoring of atmospheric pollution in cruising flight
US20110146282A1 (en) * 2009-12-18 2011-06-23 General Electric Company System and method for reducing sulfur compounds within fuel stream for turbomachine
JP5113230B2 (en) * 2010-01-04 2013-01-09 貴之 伊東 Rocket power generation engine and rocket power generation fan engine

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4766725A (en) * 1985-12-24 1988-08-30 Scipar, Inc. Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor

Non-Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Busen R. and Schumann U.: "Visible contrail formation from fuels with different sulfur contents", DLR, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 22, no. 11 1 June 1995 (1995-06-01), pages 1357-1360, XP002620003, ISSN: 0094-8534 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://elib.dlr.de/31966/1/gltt-22.pdf [retrieved on 2011-02-01] *
Hemighaus G. et al: "Alternative Jet Fuels", Chevron Corporation , 1 October 2006 (2006-10-01), XP002620000, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.chevronglobalaviation.com/docs/5719_Aviation_Addendum._webpdf.pdf [retrieved on 2011-02-01] *
Lamprecht D.: "Fischer-Tropsch fuel for use by the U.S. Military as Battlefield-Use Fuel for the future", Sasol Technology Research and Development Energy Fuels, vol. 21, no. 3 4 May 2007 (2007-05-04), pages 1448-1453, XP002620002, DOI: 10.1021/ef060607m Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ef060607m [retrieved on 2011-02-01] *
MUSHRUSH G W ET AL: "Stability studies of a jet fuel containing no organosulfur compounds", PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, MARCEL DEKKER, NEW YORK, NY, US, vol. 20, no. 5,6, 1 January 2002 (2002-01-01), pages 561-570, XP002967605, ISSN: 1091-6466, DOI: DOI:10.1081/LFT-120003580 *
SCHRÖDER ET AL: "Ultrafine particulate jet aircraft emissions depending on fuel sulfur content and contrail processing", JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, PERGAMON, vol. 29, 1 September 1998 (1998-09-01), pages S561-S562, XP005884471, ISSN: 0021-8502 *
SCHUMANN ET AL: "Formation, properties and climatic effects of contrails", COMPTES RENDUS - PHYSIQUE, ELSEVIER, PARIS, FR, vol. 6, no. 4-5, 1 May 2005 (2005-05-01), pages 549-565, XP025360243, ISSN: 1631-0705 [retrieved on 2005-05-01] *
SCHUMANN U. ET AL: "In situ observations of particles in jet aircraft exhausts and contrails for different sulfur-containing fuels", Deutsche Forschungsanstalt für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, vol. 101, no. D3 20 March 1996 (1996-03-20), pages 6853-6869, XP002620001, ISSN: 0148-0227 Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://elib.dlr.de/32127/1/jgr_101.pdf [retrieved on 2011-02-01] *
See also references of EP2364400A2 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2364400A2 (en) 2011-09-14
AU2009314114A1 (en) 2011-07-28
US20100122519A1 (en) 2010-05-20
CA2743143A1 (en) 2010-05-20
WO2010056819A3 (en) 2011-04-07
CN102216591A (en) 2011-10-12
RU2505692C2 (en) 2014-01-27
AU2009314114B2 (en) 2013-08-29
JP2012508848A (en) 2012-04-12
RU2011121440A (en) 2012-12-20
EP2364400B1 (en) 2016-08-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20100122519A1 (en) Ultra-low sulfur fuel and method for reduced contrail formation
Ntziachristos et al. Particle emissions characterization from a medium-speed marine diesel engine with two fuels at different sampling conditions
US8849541B2 (en) Fuel delivery system
WO2008059172A3 (en) Method for supplying an engine with exhaust gas, exhaust element, exhaust line and vehicle comprising means for supplying such an engine with exhaust gas
ATE462875T1 (en) METHOD FOR IMPROVEMENT OF AN ENGINE USING A COLLODIAL DISPERSION CONTAINING A RARE EARTH IN A LUBRICANT COMPOSITION TO CATALYZE THE COMBUSTION OF SOOT
Choi et al. Characterization of carbonaceous particulate matter emitted from marine diesel engine
Harrould-Kolieb Shipping impacts on climate
d Santos et al. Quantification and physical analysis of nanoparticle emissions from a marine engine using different fuels and a laboratory wet scrubber
Hudson et al. Cloud condensation nuclei measurements in the high troposphere and in jet aircraft exhaust
ATE462878T1 (en) METHOD FOR OPERATING A SCR CATALYST AND SCR CATALYST SYSTEM
Ponsonby et al. Jet aircraft lubrication oil droplets as contrail ice-forming particles
US8453425B2 (en) Soot reduction by combustor conditioning
Mulder et al. On the reduction of NOx emission levels by performing low NOx flights
Miake-Lye et al. Aviation and the changing climate
Kim et al. Physicochemical and optical properties of combustion-generated particles from Ship Diesel Engines
Johnson et al. Potential Reduction of Fugitive Methane Emissions at Compressor Stations and Storage Facilities Powered by Natural Gas Engines
Ćurguz et al. The impact of decarbonization on IC engine performance
Kuruppu et al. Enhancing air quality for a sustainable aviation
Thierheimer et al. REDUCING ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION FROM MOBILE SOURCES.
Dzhulisbekov et al. ESTIMATION OF DEMAGE CAUSED BY THE ROLLING STOCK OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Miyagasheva et al. Aviation pollution
Anderson et al. NASA Alternative Aviation Fuel Research
WO2011073529A1 (en) Piston engine
Gorchov Negron et al. A spatially resolved fuel-based inventory of Utah and Colorado oil and natural gas emissions
Ligterink et al. NOx emissions of modern diesel vehicles: the last mile? A summary

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200980145352.3

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09752677

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2009314114

Country of ref document: AU

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2858/DELNP/2011

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2743143

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2011536455

Country of ref document: JP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2009752677

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2009752677

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2011121440

Country of ref document: RU

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2009314114

Country of ref document: AU

Date of ref document: 20091112

Kind code of ref document: A