WO2009093211A1 - Therapy assessment with ultrasonic contrast agents - Google Patents

Therapy assessment with ultrasonic contrast agents Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2009093211A1
WO2009093211A1 PCT/IB2009/050276 IB2009050276W WO2009093211A1 WO 2009093211 A1 WO2009093211 A1 WO 2009093211A1 IB 2009050276 W IB2009050276 W IB 2009050276W WO 2009093211 A1 WO2009093211 A1 WO 2009093211A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
contrast agent
time
parameter
wash
imaging system
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2009/050276
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Michalakis Averkiou
Marios Lampaskis
Konstantina Kyriakopoulou
Original Assignee
Michalakis Averkiou
Marios Lampaskis
Konstantina Kyriakopoulou
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=40488907&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=WO2009093211(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Michalakis Averkiou, Marios Lampaskis, Konstantina Kyriakopoulou filed Critical Michalakis Averkiou
Priority to CN200980102906.1A priority Critical patent/CN101969857B/en
Priority to EP09703315.3A priority patent/EP2237725B1/en
Priority to RU2010134892/14A priority patent/RU2492812C2/en
Priority to US12/864,262 priority patent/US8460194B2/en
Priority to JP2010543613A priority patent/JP2011509789A/en
Publication of WO2009093211A1 publication Critical patent/WO2009093211A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • G06T7/0012Biomedical image inspection
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/48Diagnostic techniques
    • A61B8/481Diagnostic techniques involving the use of contrast agent, e.g. microbubbles introduced into the bloodstream
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/08Detecting organic movements or changes, e.g. tumours, cysts, swellings
    • A61B8/0833Detecting organic movements or changes, e.g. tumours, cysts, swellings involving detecting or locating foreign bodies or organic structures
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B8/00Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
    • A61B8/54Control of the diagnostic device
    • A61B8/543Control of the diagnostic device involving acquisition triggered by a physiological signal
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2200/00Indexing scheme for image data processing or generation, in general
    • G06T2200/04Indexing scheme for image data processing or generation, in general involving 3D image data
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10016Video; Image sequence
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/10Image acquisition modality
    • G06T2207/10132Ultrasound image
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/20Special algorithmic details
    • G06T2207/20092Interactive image processing based on input by user
    • G06T2207/20104Interactive definition of region of interest [ROI]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T2207/00Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
    • G06T2207/30Subject of image; Context of image processing
    • G06T2207/30004Biomedical image processing
    • G06T2207/30096Tumor; Lesion

Definitions

  • This invention relates to ultrasonic diagnostic imaging systems and, in particular, to the use of ultrasonic diagnostic imaging systems to assess the progress of therapeutic treatment of tumors.
  • the inventors take advantage of the fact that the flow of blood to the liver comes from two sources, the hepatic artery and the portal vein. Since the flow of blood during the first, arterial phase of blood flow will perfuse HCC and metastatic liver lesions first, the inventors identify such lesions by detecting the times of arrival of contrast agent in the liver during the arterial and the later portal phase of blood flow. An area of early wash-in of contrast agent to the liver can be symptomatic of a lesion.
  • a treatment regimen is generally prescribed by a physician.
  • the therapy may involve hyper-/hypothermia, cytotoxic chemotherapy, or anti-angiogenesis agents, for example.
  • the therapy is usually not performed in a single session, but in several sessions over a period of weeks or months.
  • At each therapy session it is generally desirable for a physician to assess the progress of the therapy to determine its effectiveness for the patient.
  • the lesion or metastasis may be imaged diagnostically to see whether it is shrinking, for instance. But often the progress of treatment is slow and only small changes in the lesion or metastasis have occurred since the previous session. In such instances it is desirable to assess the progress of therapy quantitatively by measuring certain characteristics of the tumor.
  • One such measure is the regression of tumor angiogenesis. As a lesion or metastasis shrinks with the necrosis of its cells, the microvasculature which developed to nourish the lesion will provide a smaller supply of blood for the lesion and may itself begin to shrink.
  • One quantitative approach is to assess this regression of angiogenesis, the decline in performance of the lesion's microvasculature. It is desirable that such quantitative measures be repeatable and immune to variations from one imaging procedure to the next, such as variation of the bolus injection, patient cardiac output, and ultrasound machine settings which may differ from one examination day to another. Eliminating the effects of these variations enables the measurements to be comparable from one therapy session to another.
  • time-intensity curves of the wash-in and wash-out of ultrasonic contrast agents are produced and used to quantify the tumor angiogenesis resulting from therapy.
  • An image of a lesion or metastasis is acquired by an ultrasonic imaging system and the pathology is continuously imaged as contrast agent washes into and out of the tissue or organ being observed.
  • the effects of respiratory motion are removed by respiratory gating of the data acquisition for time-intensity curve production.
  • a preferred technique of respiratory gating is one performed by image analysis, in which the presence or absence of an anatomical landmark in the image, such as the diaphragm, is used to decide whether an image is or is not to be used for time- intensity curve processing.
  • a time-intensity curve is produced both for ultrasonic data from the tumor and for ultrasonic data from normal tissue.
  • a wash-in time (WIT) parameter is calculated for each time-intensity curve.
  • a wash-in time ratio (WITR) is formed of the two parameters, which reduces variations in wash-in time quantification due to factors such as bolus differences, cardiac output, and ultrasound system settings. The WITR thus provides an accurate and comparable indicator of the progress of the therapy.
  • the time-intensity curves of the tumor and normal tissue are subtracted from each other to form a differential time-intensity curve. The shape of the differential time-intensity curve and its variations over time are another indicator of the progress of the therapy.
  • FIGURE 1 illustrates in block diagram form an ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • FIGURES 2 and 3 illustrate details of the operation of the QLab processor of FIGURE 1 in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • FIGURE 4 illustrates respiratory gating through image processing in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • FIGURE 5 is an illustration of ROIs for time- intensity curves in accordance with the present invention in an image of the liver acquired during the arterial phase.
  • FIGURE 6 is an illustration of ROIs for time- intensity curves in accordance with the present invention in an image of the liver acquired during the late portal phase.
  • FIGURE 7 illustrates time-intensity curves for a metastatic lesion and normal parenchyma.
  • FIGURE 8 illustrates the identification of the diaphragm in an ultrasound image for respiratory gating in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • FIGURES 9a-9d illustrate the production and subtraction of time-intensity curves to form a differential time-intensity curve in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
  • FIGURE 10 illustrates the clinical results of assessments of therapeutic progress in accordance with the present invention.
  • an ultrasound system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention is shown in block diagram form. This system operates by scanning a two or three dimensional region of the body being imaged with ultrasonic transmit beams. As each beam is transmitted along its steered path through the body, the beam returns echo signals with linear and nonlinear (fundamental and harmonic frequency) components corresponding to the transmitted frequency components. The transmit signals are modulated by the nonlinear response of contrast agent microbubbles encountered by the beam, thereby generating echo signals with harmonic components.
  • the ultrasound system of FIGURE 1 utilizes a transmitter 16 which transmits waves or pulses of a selected modulation characteristic in a desired beam direction for the return of harmonic echo components from scatterers within the body.
  • the transmitter is responsive to a number of control parameters which determine the characteristics of the transmit beams, including the frequency components of the transmit beam, their relative intensities or amplitudes, and the phase or polarity of the transmit signals.
  • the transmitter is coupled by a transmit/receive switch 14 to the elements of an array transducer 12 of an ultrasound probe 10.
  • the array transducer can be a one dimensional array for planar (two dimensional) imaging or a two dimensional array for two dimensional or volumetric (three dimensional) imaging.
  • the transducer array 12 receives echoes from the body containing fundamental (linear) and harmonic (nonlinear) frequency components which are within the transducer passband. These echo signals are coupled by the switch 14 to a beamformer 18 which appropriately delays echo signals from the different transducer elements then combines them to form a sequence of linear and harmonic signals along the beam from shallow to deeper depths.
  • the beamformer is a digital beamformer operating on digitized echo signals to produce a sequence of discrete coherent digital echo signals from a near field to a far field depth of the image.
  • the beamformer may be a multiline beamformer which produces two or more sequences of echo signals along multiple spatially distinct receive scanlines in response to a single transmit beam, which is particularly useful for 3D imaging.
  • the beamformed echo signals are coupled to an ensemble memory 22
  • an ensemble memory 22 In the ultrasound system of FIGURE 1, multiple waves or pulses are transmitted in each beam direction using different modulation techniques, resulting in the reception of multiple echoes for each scanned point in the image field.
  • the echoes corresponding to a common spatial location are referred to herein as an ensemble of echoes, and are stored in the ensemble memory 22, from which they can be retrieved and processed together.
  • the echoes of an ensemble are combined in various ways by the nonlinear signal separator 24 to produce the desired nonlinear or harmonic signals. For example, two pulses with different phase or polarity modulation can be transmitted to each point in the image field.
  • the different modulation causes the fundamental frequency components of the echoes to cancel and the harmonic components to reinforce each other. This separates out the harmonic components of the echo signals .
  • the fundamental frequency components are reinforced and the harmonic components cancel. This separates out fundamental frequencies for construction of a standard B mode image.
  • This modulation is referred to as "pulse inversion, " and can be done by phase, polarity or amplitude modulation as described in US patents 5,706,819 (Hwang et al.), 5,951,478 (Hwang et al.), and 5,577,505 (Brock Fisher et al .
  • the separated signals are filtered by a filter 30 to further remove unwanted frequency components, then subjected to B mode or Doppler detection by a detector 32.
  • the detected signals are coupled to a nonlinear signal combiner 34 to reduce image speckle content.
  • the signals are then processed for the formation of two dimensional, three dimensional, spectral, parametric, or other desired image in image processor 36, and the image is then displayed on a display 38.
  • Detected fundamental (linear) signals which do not need speckle reduction processing are coupled directly to the image processor 36 for image formation and display.
  • the ultrasound image data is also coupled to a QLab image processor 40 for the production of time-intensity curves and contrast agent wash-in and wash-out characteristics.
  • the time-intensity curves and characteristics produced by the QLab processor are coupled back to the image processor where they may be displayed numerically or graphically on the display 38 along with the ultrasound images.
  • a standard QLab processor which is suitable for the production of time-intensity curves is available from Philips Healthcare of Andover, Massachusetts.
  • a standard QLab processor produces the well- known time-intensity curves, also referred to as perfusion curves or reperfusion curves .
  • a time-intensity curve can be formed of this build-up of contrast intensity and its subsequent decline during wash-out of the contrast agent for each point in the tissue which returns the time sequence of echoes frame-by-frame.
  • a qualitative presentation of the time-intensity curves for the entire tissue being viewed can be formed by coloring each pixel in an anatomical image with a color that represents a parameter of the time-intensity curves at each point in the image.
  • the Garg et al. application illustrates the formation of a parametric image of the myocardium where the color of each pixel in the image represents the peak level attained by the time-intensity curve at each point in the myocardium, for example. See also US patent 6,692,438 (Skyba et al.)
  • contrast agent perfusion echo data is acquired over a sequence of images as the contrast agent arrives at the location of a metastasis in the body, builds up, and then washes out.
  • the intensity values of the echoes will thus start from a baseline level of no contrast agent present, then rise, plateau, and decline as the contrast agent washes out.
  • a curve- fitting algorithm then fits this data variation to an error function defined as where I(t) is the linear intensity at time t, A is the maximum intensity over the baseline offset, T is wash-in time parameter which is linearly proportional to wash-in time (e.g., from 5%-95%) , I 0 is baseline offset, and t a is a time offset.
  • the wash-in time is preferably extracted from the fitted curve instead of the noisy image data.
  • the contrast agent echo data does not undergo data compression prior to this processing so that the data remains in its acquired linear relationship.
  • Another approach is to fit the whole time-intensity curve (instead of just the wash-in part) to appropriate mathematical models as the lognormal distribution for example defined as where ⁇ and ⁇ are the mean and standard deviation of the normal distribution from which the logarithmic transformation was obtained.
  • the curve can be scaled horizontally by varying • and changed in terms of skewness by varying • .
  • the area under the curve is A , J 0 is the time offset, and C is the baseline intensity offset.
  • the lognormal fitted curve is used to extract the wash-in time.
  • FIGURE 5 illustrates one pair of images in a sequence of image frames of a metastasis 50 in the surrounding liver tissue.
  • the pair of images are produced from the same echo data, with the left image being a second harmonic image which emphasizes the contrast agent and the right image being a fundamental frequency image of the same anatomy.
  • the perfused metastasis 50 stands out distinctly in the harmonic image and its border can be outlined by a tracing 52.
  • the tracing can be done manually or by automated or semi-automated processing such as border detection, a thresholding process, or a region- growing technique initiated by indication of a seed point on the border of the metastasis.
  • the border tracing 52 thus defines the region of interest (ROI) of the metastasis within its border. It is seen that the metastasis 50 is less distinct in the fundamental B mode image on the right because the harmonic response of the contrast agent is suppressed in this presentation. With the ROI of the metastasis delineated by the border tracing 52 , the contrast agent intensity of the metastasis at the time of acquisition of the image can be measured by combining the pixel values within the border 52 by integration, summation, averaging, or other selected combining technique.
  • FIGURE 5 The images of FIGURE 5 were acquired during the arterial phase of the blood flow to the liver.
  • FIGURE 6 is a pair of harmonic and fundamental images of the same tissue and metastasis 50 acquired in the late portal phase.
  • HCC and matastatic liver lesions generally receive most of their blood perfusion during the arterial phase, whereas normal parenchyma in the liver receives most of its blood perfusion during the portal phase, as seen by the greater shading of the liver in the left image of FIGURE 6.
  • the ultrasound images in this application are shown as a black-on-white grayscale rendering rather than the conventional white-on-black.
  • a parameter referred to herein as the wash-in time ratio is computed as a quantitative measure of the perfusion of the metastasis.
  • the WITR is computed as shown by the block diagram of FIGURE 2. From a temporal sequence of images of a metastasis or lesion during contrast agent wash-in and wash-out as shown by FIGURES 5 and 6, contrast agent intensity values are computed for the ROI Met of the metastasis 50 as indicated by box 72. As explained above, these values can be computed by combining the pixel values of the metastasis ROI for each image of the sequence. In box 74 intensity values are computed for an R0I Plir of normal parenchyma of the tissue.
  • FIGURE 7 is an illustration of two such time-intensity curves, curve T-I Met from the ROI of a metastasis and curve T- I Par for parenchyma.
  • a wash-in time parameter WIT is found for each curve, for example by use of the error function or lognormal distribution described above. This determines a wash-in time parameter for both the metastasis and normal parenchyma, WIT Met and WIT Par , respectively.
  • a wash-in time ratio WITR is then computed from the two wash-in parameters by dividing WIT Met by WIT Par .
  • the effect of normalizing WIT ⁇ by the wash-in time parameter of normal tissue is to reduce or eliminate the effects of variables in the procedure such as bolus size, cardiac output, and ultrasound system settings, which may differ from one therapy session to another.
  • variables in the procedure such as bolus size, cardiac output, and ultrasound system settings, which may differ from one therapy session to another.
  • comparable quantitative measures of the growth or shrinkage of the metastasis as indicated by its angiogenesis can be produced for each therapy session over the period of weeks or months that the patient is being treated.
  • FIGURE 3 A time-intensity curve is fitted for each of the ROIs of the metastasis and the parenchyma as shown in boxes 76 and 78.
  • boxes 82 and 84 the range of each time-intensity curve is normalized.
  • a convenient normalization scale is zero to one.
  • a difference curve ⁇ T-I Curve is computed as the difference between the two normalized curves T-I Curve Met and T-I Curve Par . This process and its results are illustrated in FIGURES 9a-9d.
  • FIGURE 9a illustrate the perfusion intensity values of a metastasis (T-I Met ) and normal parenchyma (T-I Par ) acquired over a one hundred second period of contrast agent wash-in and wash-out.
  • the two sets of values are normalized to the same scale of zero to one, where the peak intensity value of each data set is scaled to the one level.
  • These curves illustrate the characteristic early wash-in of contrast agent during the arterial phase for the metastasis and the later perfusion of the liver parenchyma during the portal phase.
  • a curve 92 (for example error function or lognormal distribution) is fitted to the perfusion values of the metastasis and a curve 94 is fitted to the perfusion values of the parenchyma.
  • FIGURE 9c shows the two curves 92 and 94 in darker lines without the acquired intensity data values.
  • FIGURE 9d shows a curve 90 which is the computed difference ⁇ T-I Curve of the two curves 92 and 94 of FIGURE 9c.
  • the ⁇ T-I Curve will show a progressive flattening and will approach a straight line. This is an expected result, for when the lesion has been dissipated its location in the body will respond like normal parenchyma, and the difference of the two (now virtually identical) curves for normal tissue and the lesion location will approach zero.
  • the difference curve could also be expressed as a parameter value such as the maximum slope of the difference curve. When the maximum slope value approaches zero (there is no slope) , this is an indication that the difference curve is approaching a straight line.
  • a typical period of contrast agent wash-in and wash-out can last for 100 seconds. This means that a clinician acquiring the image data must maintain the same image of the lesion steadily for 100 seconds so that each intensity value is of the same region of the lesion. If the probe moves during the acquisition, for instance, the lesion can move out of the image plane and the data acquired cannot be used. Even if the probe is held steady against the body of the patient, the lesion can still move relative to the probe field of view due to the respiratory motion of the patient.
  • One way to overcome the effect of respiratory motion is to gate the image acquisition to the respiratory cycle.
  • a respiratory signal can be acquired by known means such as an elastic band with strain or pressure sensors around the chest of the patient.
  • respiratory gating is performed by image processing as shown in the block diagram of FIGURE 4.
  • the fundamental frequency images on the right side of FIGURES 5 and 6 show a distinctly shaded region 60 at the bottom of each image (which would be bright regions in a standard white-on-black grayscale ultrasound image) .
  • This image landmark 60 is the diaphragm of the patient in these images.
  • FIGURE 8 the diaphragm in the image has been outlined by a tracing 62.
  • the tracing 62 is replicated in the same position on each image of the image frame sequence. If the anatomy in the image does not move relative to the probe as the image sequence is acquired, the diaphragm landmark 60 will be present in the tracing outline 62 in each image. However, respiratory motion may move the diaphragm 60 in and out of the tracing, particularly with deep breaths.
  • the image processor 100 of FIGURE 4 detects this change by looking for the diaphragm landmark in the same location, ROI D , which is the tracing 62 in the example of FIGURE 8. When the diaphragm landmark 60 is found in its expected location in the image ("Yes")/ the image is forwarded for processing and quantification.
  • the quantified measurements of the present invention have been used in a clinical environment to monitor the results of tumor treatment of eight patients over three to five therapy sessions.
  • a measurement of the WITR was computed for each patient for each therapy session. Results for a good responder and a bad responder are illustrated in FIGURE 10. As this graph shows, the WITR approached unity for the successfully treated patient with each therapy session. For the patient in the group who ultimately failed to respond to treatment (denoted as bad responder) the WITR stayed away from unity. It is seen by this graph that WITR measurement is well correlated with actual clinical results of therapy and may be used as a therapy biomarker.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Hematology (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Surgery (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Ultra Sonic Daignosis Equipment (AREA)

Abstract

An ultrasonic imaging apparatus and method are described for monitoring the progress of therapy for pathology such as lesions, tumors, and metastases by means of contrast agent imaging. A sequence of images are acquired as a bolus of contrast agent infuses the tissue containing the pathology. A contrast wash-in time parameter is calculated for both the tumor and normal tissue, and a ratio is calculated of the two wash-in time parameters (called WITR) which removes the effects of variations in the procedure from one therapy monitoring session to another. A difference curve of the time-intensity curves of the pathology and normal tissue is also produced, which is similarly immune to procedural variations. The motional effects of respiration can be taken into account by detecting the position of a landmark such as the diaphragm in each of the images of the sequence and discarding from processing those which exhibit a change in the position of the landmark relative to the probe.

Description

THERAPYASSESSMENTWITHULTRASONIC CONTRASTAGENTS
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application serial no. 61/022,888 filed January 23, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference.
This invention relates to ultrasonic diagnostic imaging systems and, in particular, to the use of ultrasonic diagnostic imaging systems to assess the progress of therapeutic treatment of tumors.
International patent publication WO 2006/090309 (Bruce et al.) describes an ultrasonic imaging technique for detecting lesions in the liver by use of an ultrasonic contrast agent. A bolus of contrast agent is introduced into the body and the time of arrival of the contrast agent in the liver is detected. When a bolus of contrast agent travels through the blood vessels of the body and begins to appear at a specific organ or location in the body, the build-up of contrast in the images is termed the "wash-in" of the contrast agent. As the infusion of contrast agent plateaus at the location in the body and then declines as it is carried away from the location by the flow of blood, the decline is termed the "wash-out" of the contrast agent. In the aforementioned patent publication the inventors take advantage of the fact that the flow of blood to the liver comes from two sources, the hepatic artery and the portal vein. Since the flow of blood during the first, arterial phase of blood flow will perfuse HCC and metastatic liver lesions first, the inventors identify such lesions by detecting the times of arrival of contrast agent in the liver during the arterial and the later portal phase of blood flow. An area of early wash-in of contrast agent to the liver can be symptomatic of a lesion.
Once a lesion or metastasis has been identified by this and/or other means, a treatment regimen is generally prescribed by a physician. The therapy may involve hyper-/hypothermia, cytotoxic chemotherapy, or anti-angiogenesis agents, for example. The therapy is usually not performed in a single session, but in several sessions over a period of weeks or months. At each therapy session it is generally desirable for a physician to assess the progress of the therapy to determine its effectiveness for the patient. The lesion or metastasis may be imaged diagnostically to see whether it is shrinking, for instance. But often the progress of treatment is slow and only small changes in the lesion or metastasis have occurred since the previous session. In such instances it is desirable to assess the progress of therapy quantitatively by measuring certain characteristics of the tumor. One such measure is the regression of tumor angiogenesis. As a lesion or metastasis shrinks with the necrosis of its cells, the microvasculature which developed to nourish the lesion will provide a smaller supply of blood for the lesion and may itself begin to shrink. One quantitative approach is to assess this regression of angiogenesis, the decline in performance of the lesion's microvasculature. It is desirable that such quantitative measures be repeatable and immune to variations from one imaging procedure to the next, such as variation of the bolus injection, patient cardiac output, and ultrasound machine settings which may differ from one examination day to another. Eliminating the effects of these variations enables the measurements to be comparable from one therapy session to another. It is an object of the present invention to provide new and improved techniques for assessing lesion or metastasis angiogenesis during a period of therapy for the tumor. In accordance with the principles of the present invention, time-intensity curves of the wash-in and wash-out of ultrasonic contrast agents are produced and used to quantify the tumor angiogenesis resulting from therapy. An image of a lesion or metastasis is acquired by an ultrasonic imaging system and the pathology is continuously imaged as contrast agent washes into and out of the tissue or organ being observed. For an accurate measurement of this process it is desirable to steadily acquire ultrasonic signals from the same location of the metastasis as the contrast agent washes in and out, so that the signal information for time-intensity curve computation continually emanates from the same point of the lesion. In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention, the effects of respiratory motion are removed by respiratory gating of the data acquisition for time-intensity curve production. A preferred technique of respiratory gating is one performed by image analysis, in which the presence or absence of an anatomical landmark in the image, such as the diaphragm, is used to decide whether an image is or is not to be used for time- intensity curve processing.
In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, a time-intensity curve is produced both for ultrasonic data from the tumor and for ultrasonic data from normal tissue. A wash-in time (WIT) parameter is calculated for each time-intensity curve. A wash-in time ratio (WITR) is formed of the two parameters, which reduces variations in wash-in time quantification due to factors such as bolus differences, cardiac output, and ultrasound system settings. The WITR thus provides an accurate and comparable indicator of the progress of the therapy. In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, the time-intensity curves of the tumor and normal tissue are subtracted from each other to form a differential time-intensity curve. The shape of the differential time-intensity curve and its variations over time are another indicator of the progress of the therapy.
In the drawings :
FIGURE 1 illustrates in block diagram form an ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIGURES 2 and 3 illustrate details of the operation of the QLab processor of FIGURE 1 in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIGURE 4 illustrates respiratory gating through image processing in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIGURE 5 is an illustration of ROIs for time- intensity curves in accordance with the present invention in an image of the liver acquired during the arterial phase.
FIGURE 6 is an illustration of ROIs for time- intensity curves in accordance with the present invention in an image of the liver acquired during the late portal phase.
FIGURE 7 illustrates time-intensity curves for a metastatic lesion and normal parenchyma.
FIGURE 8 illustrates the identification of the diaphragm in an ultrasound image for respiratory gating in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIGURES 9a-9d illustrate the production and subtraction of time-intensity curves to form a differential time-intensity curve in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
FIGURE 10 illustrates the clinical results of assessments of therapeutic progress in accordance with the present invention. Referring first to FIGURE 1, an ultrasound system constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention is shown in block diagram form. This system operates by scanning a two or three dimensional region of the body being imaged with ultrasonic transmit beams. As each beam is transmitted along its steered path through the body, the beam returns echo signals with linear and nonlinear (fundamental and harmonic frequency) components corresponding to the transmitted frequency components. The transmit signals are modulated by the nonlinear response of contrast agent microbubbles encountered by the beam, thereby generating echo signals with harmonic components.
The ultrasound system of FIGURE 1 utilizes a transmitter 16 which transmits waves or pulses of a selected modulation characteristic in a desired beam direction for the return of harmonic echo components from scatterers within the body. The transmitter is responsive to a number of control parameters which determine the characteristics of the transmit beams, including the frequency components of the transmit beam, their relative intensities or amplitudes, and the phase or polarity of the transmit signals. The transmitter is coupled by a transmit/receive switch 14 to the elements of an array transducer 12 of an ultrasound probe 10. The array transducer can be a one dimensional array for planar (two dimensional) imaging or a two dimensional array for two dimensional or volumetric (three dimensional) imaging.
The transducer array 12 receives echoes from the body containing fundamental (linear) and harmonic (nonlinear) frequency components which are within the transducer passband. These echo signals are coupled by the switch 14 to a beamformer 18 which appropriately delays echo signals from the different transducer elements then combines them to form a sequence of linear and harmonic signals along the beam from shallow to deeper depths. Preferably the beamformer is a digital beamformer operating on digitized echo signals to produce a sequence of discrete coherent digital echo signals from a near field to a far field depth of the image. The beamformer may be a multiline beamformer which produces two or more sequences of echo signals along multiple spatially distinct receive scanlines in response to a single transmit beam, which is particularly useful for 3D imaging. The beamformed echo signals are coupled to an ensemble memory 22 In the ultrasound system of FIGURE 1, multiple waves or pulses are transmitted in each beam direction using different modulation techniques, resulting in the reception of multiple echoes for each scanned point in the image field. The echoes corresponding to a common spatial location are referred to herein as an ensemble of echoes, and are stored in the ensemble memory 22, from which they can be retrieved and processed together. The echoes of an ensemble are combined in various ways by the nonlinear signal separator 24 to produce the desired nonlinear or harmonic signals. For example, two pulses with different phase or polarity modulation can be transmitted to each point in the image field. When the echoes resulting from the two pulses are received by the ultrasound system and additively combined, the different modulation causes the fundamental frequency components of the echoes to cancel and the harmonic components to reinforce each other. This separates out the harmonic components of the echo signals . Alternatively, when the two echoes are subtracted from each other, the fundamental frequency components are reinforced and the harmonic components cancel. This separates out fundamental frequencies for construction of a standard B mode image. This modulation is referred to as "pulse inversion, " and can be done by phase, polarity or amplitude modulation as described in US patents 5,706,819 (Hwang et al.), 5,951,478 (Hwang et al.), and 5,577,505 (Brock Fisher et al . ) The separated signals are filtered by a filter 30 to further remove unwanted frequency components, then subjected to B mode or Doppler detection by a detector 32. The detected signals are coupled to a nonlinear signal combiner 34 to reduce image speckle content. The signals are then processed for the formation of two dimensional, three dimensional, spectral, parametric, or other desired image in image processor 36, and the image is then displayed on a display 38. Detected fundamental (linear) signals which do not need speckle reduction processing are coupled directly to the image processor 36 for image formation and display.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, the ultrasound image data is also coupled to a QLab image processor 40 for the production of time-intensity curves and contrast agent wash-in and wash-out characteristics. The time-intensity curves and characteristics produced by the QLab processor are coupled back to the image processor where they may be displayed numerically or graphically on the display 38 along with the ultrasound images. A standard QLab processor which is suitable for the production of time-intensity curves is available from Philips Healthcare of Andover, Massachusetts. A standard QLab processor produces the well- known time-intensity curves, also referred to as perfusion curves or reperfusion curves . See US patent 5,833,613 (Averkiou et al.), international patent publication WO 2005/099579 (Rafter), and international patent publication WO 2005/054898 (Garg et al.) As these publications illustrate, the buildup of contrast agent at points in the tissue (points in the image) is monitored during the arrival of the contrast agent at locations in the body. The amount of contrast agent at a point is indicated by the intensity of echoes returned from contrast agent microbubbles at each point, and is present in a sequence of images acquired by low power (low MI) transmission as the contrast agent washes into the tissue. A time-intensity curve can be formed of this build-up of contrast intensity and its subsequent decline during wash-out of the contrast agent for each point in the tissue which returns the time sequence of echoes frame-by-frame. A qualitative presentation of the time-intensity curves for the entire tissue being viewed can be formed by coloring each pixel in an anatomical image with a color that represents a parameter of the time-intensity curves at each point in the image. The Garg et al. application illustrates the formation of a parametric image of the myocardium where the color of each pixel in the image represents the peak level attained by the time-intensity curve at each point in the myocardium, for example. See also US patent 6,692,438 (Skyba et al.)
In an implementation of the present invention, contrast agent perfusion echo data is acquired over a sequence of images as the contrast agent arrives at the location of a metastasis in the body, builds up, and then washes out. The intensity values of the echoes will thus start from a baseline level of no contrast agent present, then rise, plateau, and decline as the contrast agent washes out. A curve- fitting algorithm then fits this data variation to an error function defined as
Figure imgf000010_0001
where I(t) is the linear intensity at time t, A is the maximum intensity over the baseline offset, T is wash-in time parameter which is linearly proportional to wash-in time (e.g., from 5%-95%) , I0 is baseline offset, and ta is a time offset. The wash-in time is preferably extracted from the fitted curve instead of the noisy image data. Preferably the contrast agent echo data does not undergo data compression prior to this processing so that the data remains in its acquired linear relationship. Another approach is to fit the whole time-intensity curve (instead of just the wash-in part) to appropriate mathematical models as the lognormal distribution for example defined as
Figure imgf000010_0002
where μ and σ are the mean and standard deviation of the normal distribution from which the logarithmic transformation was obtained. The curve can be scaled horizontally by varying • and changed in terms of skewness by varying • . The area under the curve is A , J0is the time offset, and C is the baseline intensity offset. The lognormal fitted curve is used to extract the wash-in time. FIGURE 5 illustrates one pair of images in a sequence of image frames of a metastasis 50 in the surrounding liver tissue. The pair of images are produced from the same echo data, with the left image being a second harmonic image which emphasizes the contrast agent and the right image being a fundamental frequency image of the same anatomy. When the liver is perfused with the contrast agent the perfused metastasis 50 stands out distinctly in the harmonic image and its border can be outlined by a tracing 52. The tracing can be done manually or by automated or semi-automated processing such as border detection, a thresholding process, or a region- growing technique initiated by indication of a seed point on the border of the metastasis. The border tracing 52 thus defines the region of interest (ROI) of the metastasis within its border. It is seen that the metastasis 50 is less distinct in the fundamental B mode image on the right because the harmonic response of the contrast agent is suppressed in this presentation. With the ROI of the metastasis delineated by the border tracing 52 , the contrast agent intensity of the metastasis at the time of acquisition of the image can be measured by combining the pixel values within the border 52 by integration, summation, averaging, or other selected combining technique.
The images of FIGURE 5 were acquired during the arterial phase of the blood flow to the liver. FIGURE 6 is a pair of harmonic and fundamental images of the same tissue and metastasis 50 acquired in the late portal phase. As previously mentioned, HCC and matastatic liver lesions generally receive most of their blood perfusion during the arterial phase, whereas normal parenchyma in the liver receives most of its blood perfusion during the portal phase, as seen by the greater shading of the liver in the left image of FIGURE 6. For clarity of illustration the ultrasound images in this application are shown as a black-on-white grayscale rendering rather than the conventional white-on-black.
In accordance with the principles of the present invention, a parameter referred to herein as the wash-in time ratio (WITR) is computed as a quantitative measure of the perfusion of the metastasis. The WITR is computed as shown by the block diagram of FIGURE 2. From a temporal sequence of images of a metastasis or lesion during contrast agent wash-in and wash-out as shown by FIGURES 5 and 6, contrast agent intensity values are computed for the ROIMet of the metastasis 50 as indicated by box 72. As explained above, these values can be computed by combining the pixel values of the metastasis ROI for each image of the sequence. In box 74 intensity values are computed for an R0IPlir of normal parenchyma of the tissue. This may be done by tracing a region of normal tissue as shown by the tracing 54 in FIGURES 5 and 6, and using the normal tissue perfusion pixel values within this second tracing. These values are therefore perfusion values of normal tissue. In box 76 a time-intensity curve is fitted to the perfusion values of ROIMet, and in box 78 a time-intensity curve is fitted to the perfusion values of ROIPar. The fit is not always necessary but it gives a better estimation of WITR. While WITR can be measured directly from the data, noise in the data can interfere with the accuracy of the measurement, hence the preference for curve-fitting. FIGURE 7 is an illustration of two such time-intensity curves, curve T-IMet from the ROI of a metastasis and curve T- IPar for parenchyma. A wash-in time parameter WIT is found for each curve, for example by use of the error function or lognormal distribution described above. This determines a wash-in time parameter for both the metastasis and normal parenchyma, WITMet and WITPar, respectively. A wash-in time ratio WITR is then computed from the two wash-in parameters by dividing WITMet by WITPar. The effect of normalizing WIT^ by the wash-in time parameter of normal tissue is to reduce or eliminate the effects of variables in the procedure such as bolus size, cardiac output, and ultrasound system settings, which may differ from one therapy session to another. Thus, comparable quantitative measures of the growth or shrinkage of the metastasis as indicated by its angiogenesis can be produced for each therapy session over the period of weeks or months that the patient is being treated.
Another quantified measure of metastasis angiogenesis which reduces or removes the effects of bolus injection rate, cardiac output of the patient, or variation in machine settings is illustrated in
FIGURE 3. A time-intensity curve is fitted for each of the ROIs of the metastasis and the parenchyma as shown in boxes 76 and 78. In boxes 82 and 84, the range of each time-intensity curve is normalized. A convenient normalization scale is zero to one. In box 80 a difference curve ΔT-I Curve is computed as the difference between the two normalized curves T-I CurveMet and T-I CurvePar. This process and its results are illustrated in FIGURES 9a-9d. The dots in FIGURE 9a illustrate the perfusion intensity values of a metastasis (T-IMet) and normal parenchyma (T-IPar) acquired over a one hundred second period of contrast agent wash-in and wash-out. The two sets of values are normalized to the same scale of zero to one, where the peak intensity value of each data set is scaled to the one level. These curves illustrate the characteristic early wash-in of contrast agent during the arterial phase for the metastasis and the later perfusion of the liver parenchyma during the portal phase. In FIGURE 9b a curve 92 (for example error function or lognormal distribution) is fitted to the perfusion values of the metastasis and a curve 94 is fitted to the perfusion values of the parenchyma. FIGURE 9c shows the two curves 92 and 94 in darker lines without the acquired intensity data values. FIGURE 9d shows a curve 90 which is the computed difference ΔT-I Curve of the two curves 92 and 94 of FIGURE 9c. When the tumor therapy is successful and the angiogenesis of the metastasis declines with treatment, the ΔT-I Curve will show a progressive flattening and will approach a straight line. This is an expected result, for when the lesion has been dissipated its location in the body will respond like normal parenchyma, and the difference of the two (now virtually identical) curves for normal tissue and the lesion location will approach zero. The difference curve could also be expressed as a parameter value such as the maximum slope of the difference curve. When the maximum slope value approaches zero (there is no slope) , this is an indication that the difference curve is approaching a straight line.
It is seen from the time scale of the graphs of FIGURES 9a-9d that a typical period of contrast agent wash-in and wash-out can last for 100 seconds. This means that a clinician acquiring the image data must maintain the same image of the lesion steadily for 100 seconds so that each intensity value is of the same region of the lesion. If the probe moves during the acquisition, for instance, the lesion can move out of the image plane and the data acquired cannot be used. Even if the probe is held steady against the body of the patient, the lesion can still move relative to the probe field of view due to the respiratory motion of the patient. One way to overcome the effect of respiratory motion is to gate the image acquisition to the respiratory cycle. A respiratory signal can be acquired by known means such as an elastic band with strain or pressure sensors around the chest of the patient. Another technique is to transmit small signals between sensors across the chest of the patient and measure the patient's chest impedance variations . These and other techniques can produce cyclical signals of the respiratory cycle and can be used to gate the acquisition of images to the same phase of the respiratory cycle. In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, respiratory gating is performed by image processing as shown in the block diagram of FIGURE 4. The fundamental frequency images on the right side of FIGURES 5 and 6 show a distinctly shaded region 60 at the bottom of each image (which would be bright regions in a standard white-on-black grayscale ultrasound image) . This image landmark 60 is the diaphragm of the patient in these images. In FIGURE 8 the diaphragm in the image has been outlined by a tracing 62. In the illustrated example the tracing 62 is replicated in the same position on each image of the image frame sequence. If the anatomy in the image does not move relative to the probe as the image sequence is acquired, the diaphragm landmark 60 will be present in the tracing outline 62 in each image. However, respiratory motion may move the diaphragm 60 in and out of the tracing, particularly with deep breaths. The image processor 100 of FIGURE 4 detects this change by looking for the diaphragm landmark in the same location, ROID, which is the tracing 62 in the example of FIGURE 8. When the diaphragm landmark 60 is found in its expected location in the image ("Yes")/ the image is forwarded for processing and quantification. However, if respiratory motion causes the diaphragm landmark 60 to move from its expected ROID location in an image ("No"), that image is omitted from processing. This process is applied to all of the images in the sequence so that respiratory motional effects on the imaging of the metastasis, as indicated by movement of the diaphragm, are eliminated by discarding those images which are not consistently aligned to a constant location of the diaphragm. There are also other possible ways of conducting respiratory gating. For example, a time-intensity curve can be formed from an ROI that closely follows a part of the diaphragm and the threshold of the values are detected. Any image whose intensity value is below the threshold is then discarded. Other motion compensation-based algorithms can also detect respiratory motion and gate for it.
The quantified measurements of the present invention have been used in a clinical environment to monitor the results of tumor treatment of eight patients over three to five therapy sessions. A measurement of the WITR was computed for each patient for each therapy session. Results for a good responder and a bad responder are illustrated in FIGURE 10. As this graph shows, the WITR approached unity for the successfully treated patient with each therapy session. For the patient in the group who ultimately failed to respond to treatment (denoted as bad responder) the WITR stayed away from unity. It is seen by this graph that WITR measurement is well correlated with actual clinical results of therapy and may be used as a therapy biomarker.

Claims

WHAT IS CLAIMED IS:
1. An ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system for assessing the progress of tumor therapy comprising: an ultrasound probe for acquiring a sequence of ultrasound images of a tumor and its adjoining tissue as a contrast agent perfuses the tissue; a time-intensity parameter calculator which computes a wash-in parameter of the contrast agent for the tumor and for normal tissue; and a ratio calculator which computes a ratio of the wash-in parameter of the tumor and the wash-in parameter of the normal tissue.
2. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 1, wherein the sequence of ultrasound images contains contrast agent echo data; and wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator further fits a curve to the contrast agent echo data.
3. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 2, wherein the wash-in parameter is a curve parameter.
4. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 2, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator further fits the contrast agent echo data to an error function.
5. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 4, wherein the wash-in parameter is a parameter of the error function.
6. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 2, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator fits the contrast agent echo data to a mathematical model .
7. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 1, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator computes a wash-in parameter of the contrast agent for the tumor from a ROI in the sequence of images which is identified manually.
8. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 1, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator computes a wash-in parameter of the contrast agent for the tumor from a ROI in the sequence of images which is identified by image processing.
9. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 1, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator computes a wash-in parameter of the contrast agent for the normal tissue from a ROI in the sequence of images which is identified manually.
10. An ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system for assessing the progress of tumor therapy comprising: an ultrasound probe for acquiring a sequence of ultrasound images of a tumor and its adjoining tissue as a contrast agent perfuses the tissue; a time-intensity curve calculator which computes a time-intensity curve of the contrast agent for the tumor and for normal tissue; and a difference curve calculator which computes a difference curve of tumor and normal tissue time- intensity curves .
11. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 10, wherein the sequence of ultrasound images contains contrast agent echo data; and wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator further fits a curve to the contrast agent echo data.
12. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 11, wherein the wash-in parameter is a curve parameter.
13. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 11, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator further fits the contrast agent echo data to an error function.
14. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 13 , wherein the wash-in parameter is a parameter of the error function.
15. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 11, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator fits the contrast agent echo data to a mathematical model.
16. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 10, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator computes a wash-in parameter of the contrast agent for the tumor from a ROI in the sequence of images which is identified manually.
17. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 10, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator computes a wash-in parameter of the contrast agent for the tumor from a ROI in the sequence of images which is identified by image processing.
18. The ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system of Claim 10, wherein the time-intensity parameter calculator computes a wash-in parameter of the contrast agent for the normal tissue from a ROI in the sequence of images which is identified manually.
PCT/IB2009/050276 2008-01-23 2009-01-23 Therapy assessment with ultrasonic contrast agents WO2009093211A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN200980102906.1A CN101969857B (en) 2008-01-23 2009-01-23 Therapy assessment with ultrasonic contrast agents
EP09703315.3A EP2237725B1 (en) 2008-01-23 2009-01-23 Therapy assessment with ultrasonic contrast agents
RU2010134892/14A RU2492812C2 (en) 2008-01-23 2009-01-23 Estimation of treatment with application of ultrasound contrast substances
US12/864,262 US8460194B2 (en) 2008-01-23 2009-01-23 Therapy assessment with ultrasound contrast agents
JP2010543613A JP2011509789A (en) 2008-01-23 2009-01-23 Treatment evaluation using ultrasound contrast agent

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US2288808P 2008-01-23 2008-01-23
US61/022,888 2008-01-23

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2009093211A1 true WO2009093211A1 (en) 2009-07-30

Family

ID=40488907

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2009/050277 WO2009093212A1 (en) 2008-01-23 2009-01-23 Respiratory-gated therapy assessment with ultrasonic contrast agents
PCT/IB2009/050276 WO2009093211A1 (en) 2008-01-23 2009-01-23 Therapy assessment with ultrasonic contrast agents

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2009/050277 WO2009093212A1 (en) 2008-01-23 2009-01-23 Respiratory-gated therapy assessment with ultrasonic contrast agents

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (2) US8460194B2 (en)
EP (2) EP2237725B1 (en)
JP (2) JP2011509790A (en)
CN (2) CN101969857B (en)
AT (1) ATE523146T1 (en)
BR (1) BRPI0906934A2 (en)
RU (2) RU2492812C2 (en)
WO (2) WO2009093212A1 (en)

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011041244A1 (en) 2009-10-01 2011-04-07 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of liver blood flow for monitoring liver therapy
EP2679164A1 (en) * 2012-06-28 2014-01-01 GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company LLC Ultrasonic diagnosis apparatus and control program thereof
WO2016097320A1 (en) * 2014-12-18 2016-06-23 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Ultrasound imaging system and method
EP3153103A1 (en) * 2015-10-08 2017-04-12 Samsung Medison Co., Ltd. Ultrasound diagnosis method and apparatus for analyzing contrast enhanced ultrasound image
WO2018087198A1 (en) * 2016-11-14 2018-05-17 Koninklijke Philips N.V. System and method for characterizing liver perfusion of contrast agent flow
EP3378404A1 (en) * 2017-03-20 2018-09-26 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Ultrasonic diagnostic system and method for contrast enhanced liver diagnosis
EP2945544B1 (en) * 2013-01-17 2018-11-07 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Eliminating motion effects in medical images caused by physiological function
EP2371290B1 (en) * 2010-03-30 2020-07-01 Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus, ultrasonic image processing apparatus, and medical diagnostic imaging apparatus
WO2023025837A1 (en) * 2021-08-27 2023-03-02 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Method for use in analysing ultrasound image data of a subject

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5972279B2 (en) * 2010-12-14 2016-08-17 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェKoninklijke Philips N.V. Ultrasound imaging system and method with peak intensity detection
US10932739B2 (en) * 2011-03-18 2021-03-02 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Dynamic normalization of data for perfusion comparison and quantification
JP6222829B2 (en) * 2012-12-18 2017-11-01 東芝メディカルシステムズ株式会社 Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus, image processing apparatus, and image processing method
US10034657B2 (en) 2013-07-26 2018-07-31 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Motion artifact suppression for three-dimensional parametric ultrasound imaging
CN104545987A (en) * 2013-10-10 2015-04-29 深圳迈瑞生物医疗电子股份有限公司 Monitor for monitoring diaphragm motion conditions
JP6382995B2 (en) 2014-01-23 2018-08-29 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェKoninklijke Philips N.V. Evaluation of carotid plaque using contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging
EP3250941A1 (en) * 2015-01-29 2017-12-06 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Broadband blended fundamental and harmonic frequency ultrasonic diagnostic imaging
EP3253420A4 (en) * 2015-02-02 2018-10-10 Novadaq Technologies ULC Methods and systems for characterizing tissue of a subject
CN107438408B (en) 2015-04-03 2021-03-26 皇家飞利浦有限公司 Blood vessel identification ultrasonic system and method
JP2018527091A (en) 2015-09-16 2018-09-20 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェKoninklijke Philips N.V. Respiratory motion compensation of 4D computed tomography imaging using ultrasound
CA3021481A1 (en) 2016-07-29 2018-02-01 Novadaq Technologies ULC Methods and systems for characterizing tissue of a subject utilizing machine learning
KR101915254B1 (en) 2016-11-17 2018-11-05 삼성메디슨 주식회사 Ultrasound imaging apparatus and controlling method thereof
RU2713944C1 (en) * 2018-12-28 2020-02-11 Федеральное государственное бюджетное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Смоленский государственный медицинский университет" министерства здравоохранения Российской Федерации Method for prediction of clinical course of diffuse liver diseases
CN113616942B (en) * 2021-08-18 2024-06-14 苏州雷泰医疗科技有限公司 Method and device for tracking lung tumor in real time and radiotherapy equipment
CN114403924B (en) * 2022-01-19 2024-02-02 复旦大学附属中山医院 Method for evaluating AIP hormone treatment effect based on ultrasonic radiography

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6080107A (en) * 1999-01-26 2000-06-27 Hewlett-Packard Company Methods for the use of contrast agents in ultrasonic imaging
US20050033123A1 (en) * 2003-07-25 2005-02-10 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Region of interest methods and systems for ultrasound imaging
EP1674038A1 (en) 2004-12-23 2006-06-28 Bracco Research S.A. System for extracting morphological information through a perfusion assessment process
WO2006090309A2 (en) 2005-02-23 2006-08-31 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system and method for detecting lesions of the liver
WO2006108868A1 (en) * 2005-04-14 2006-10-19 Bracco Research Sa Perfusion assessment based on animated perfusion imaging
EP1884195A1 (en) * 2005-05-27 2008-02-06 Hitachi Medical Corporation Ultrasonograph and ultrasonic image display method

Family Cites Families (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US680107A (en) * 1900-06-01 1901-08-06 George Allen Furnace.
JPH0728869B2 (en) * 1986-05-23 1995-04-05 株式会社日立製作所 Ultrasonic device
DK0605477T4 (en) * 1991-09-17 2007-10-01 Ge Healthcare As Gaseous ultrasound contrast agents
JP3683945B2 (en) * 1995-07-13 2005-08-17 株式会社東芝 Ultrasonic diagnostic equipment
US5833613A (en) * 1996-09-27 1998-11-10 Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc. Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging with contrast agents
EP1067970A2 (en) * 1998-03-31 2001-01-17 Nycomed Imaging As Diagnostic imaging of vascular abnormalities using vasomodification
JP2001187052A (en) * 2000-01-04 2001-07-10 Ge Yokogawa Medical Systems Ltd Method for setting control region and ultrasonic diagnostic equipment
JP2001224594A (en) * 2000-02-15 2001-08-21 Olympus Optical Co Ltd Ultrasonic endoscope system
JP2003061959A (en) * 2001-08-22 2003-03-04 Toshiba Corp Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus
US6692438B2 (en) * 2001-12-18 2004-02-17 Koninklijke Philips Electronics Nv Ultrasonic imaging system and method for displaying tissue perfusion and other parameters varying with time
US6859953B1 (en) * 2002-09-13 2005-03-01 Steven E. Christensen Jet propulsion system for spa or jetted bath using control of air draw to Venturi jets with a three-way air control valve
US6659953B1 (en) * 2002-09-20 2003-12-09 Acuson Corporation Morphing diagnostic ultrasound images for perfusion assessment
JP4253494B2 (en) * 2002-11-08 2009-04-15 株式会社東芝 Ultrasonic diagnostic equipment
US20040120559A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-06-24 Hall Anne Lindsay Methods and apparatus for contrast agent time intensity curve analyses
US7731660B2 (en) * 2003-07-25 2010-06-08 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Phase selection for cardiac contrast assessment
RU2295297C2 (en) * 2003-12-02 2007-03-20 Александр Васильевич Жукоцкий Method for studying and predicting the state of biological object or its part
CA2573217C (en) * 2004-08-09 2013-04-09 Bracco Research Sa An image registration method and apparatus for medical imaging based on mulptiple masks
US20070016016A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2007-01-18 Gabriel Haras Interactive user assistant for imaging processes
JP6059414B2 (en) * 2005-09-13 2017-01-11 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エヌ ヴェKoninklijke Philips N.V. Multiple contrast agent injection for imaging
EP1772825A1 (en) 2005-10-06 2007-04-11 Esaote S.p.A. Method for registering images of a sequence of images, particularly ultrasound diagnostic images
JP5209213B2 (en) * 2006-01-10 2013-06-12 株式会社東芝 Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and ultrasonic image generation program

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6080107A (en) * 1999-01-26 2000-06-27 Hewlett-Packard Company Methods for the use of contrast agents in ultrasonic imaging
US20050033123A1 (en) * 2003-07-25 2005-02-10 Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. Region of interest methods and systems for ultrasound imaging
EP1674038A1 (en) 2004-12-23 2006-06-28 Bracco Research S.A. System for extracting morphological information through a perfusion assessment process
WO2006090309A2 (en) 2005-02-23 2006-08-31 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Ultrasonic diagnostic imaging system and method for detecting lesions of the liver
WO2006108868A1 (en) * 2005-04-14 2006-10-19 Bracco Research Sa Perfusion assessment based on animated perfusion imaging
EP1884195A1 (en) * 2005-05-27 2008-02-06 Hitachi Medical Corporation Ultrasonograph and ultrasonic image display method

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
KRIX MARTIN ET AL.: "INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY", vol. 39, 1 April 2004, LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, article "Low mechanical index contrast- enhanced ultrasound better reflects high arterial perfusion of liver metastases than arterial phase computed tomography", pages: 216 - 222
KRIX MARTIN ET AL: "Low mechanical index contrast-enhanced ultrasound better reflects high arterial perfusion of liver metastases than arterial phase computed tomography", INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, US, vol. 39, no. 4, 1 April 2004 (2004-04-01), pages 216 - 222, XP009116050, ISSN: 0020-9996 *
MARUYAMA ET AL.: "Sonographic shift of hypervascular liver tumor on blood pool harmonic images with definity: Time-related changes of contrast- enhanced appearance in rabbit VX2 tumor under extra-low acoustic power", EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, ELSEVIER SCIENCE, vol. 56, no. 1, 1 October 2005 (2005-10-01), pages 60 - 65, XP005076483, DOI: doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.04.004
MARUYAMA ET AL: "Sonographic shift of hypervascular liver tumor on blood pool harmonic images with definity: Time-related changes of contrast-enhanced appearance in rabbit VX2 tumor under extra-low acoustic power", EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, ELSEVIER SCIENCE, NL, vol. 56, no. 1, 1 October 2005 (2005-10-01), pages 60 - 65, XP005076483, ISSN: 0720-048X *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2011041244A1 (en) 2009-10-01 2011-04-07 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound assessment of liver blood flow for monitoring liver therapy
EP2371290B1 (en) * 2010-03-30 2020-07-01 Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus, ultrasonic image processing apparatus, and medical diagnostic imaging apparatus
EP2679164A1 (en) * 2012-06-28 2014-01-01 GE Medical Systems Global Technology Company LLC Ultrasonic diagnosis apparatus and control program thereof
EP2945544B1 (en) * 2013-01-17 2018-11-07 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Eliminating motion effects in medical images caused by physiological function
WO2016097320A1 (en) * 2014-12-18 2016-06-23 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Ultrasound imaging system and method
US10188370B2 (en) 2014-12-18 2019-01-29 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Ultrasound imaging system and method
EP3153103A1 (en) * 2015-10-08 2017-04-12 Samsung Medison Co., Ltd. Ultrasound diagnosis method and apparatus for analyzing contrast enhanced ultrasound image
US10646203B2 (en) 2015-10-08 2020-05-12 Samsung Medison Co., Ltd. Ultrasound diagnosis method and apparatus for analyzing contrast enhanced ultrasound image
WO2018087198A1 (en) * 2016-11-14 2018-05-17 Koninklijke Philips N.V. System and method for characterizing liver perfusion of contrast agent flow
EP3378404A1 (en) * 2017-03-20 2018-09-26 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Ultrasonic diagnostic system and method for contrast enhanced liver diagnosis
WO2023025837A1 (en) * 2021-08-27 2023-03-02 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Method for use in analysing ultrasound image data of a subject

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ATE523146T1 (en) 2011-09-15
US8460194B2 (en) 2013-06-11
CN101969857B (en) 2014-08-20
RU2494674C2 (en) 2013-10-10
EP2234544B1 (en) 2011-09-07
US8529453B2 (en) 2013-09-10
JP2011509789A (en) 2011-03-31
RU2010134895A (en) 2012-02-27
RU2010134892A (en) 2012-02-27
JP2011509790A (en) 2011-03-31
CN101969857A (en) 2011-02-09
US20100298706A1 (en) 2010-11-25
CN101951839B (en) 2013-11-06
EP2237725A1 (en) 2010-10-13
US20100298710A1 (en) 2010-11-25
WO2009093212A1 (en) 2009-07-30
EP2237725B1 (en) 2017-05-03
EP2234544A1 (en) 2010-10-06
CN101951839A (en) 2011-01-19
RU2492812C2 (en) 2013-09-20
BRPI0906934A2 (en) 2015-07-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8460194B2 (en) Therapy assessment with ultrasound contrast agents
EP2945544B1 (en) Eliminating motion effects in medical images caused by physiological function
JP5680654B2 (en) Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus and ultrasonic image display method
EP2696771B1 (en) Vascular characterization using ultrasound imaging
JP5015513B2 (en) Integrated ultrasound device for measurement of anatomical structures
US20060241461A1 (en) System and method for 3-D visualization of vascular structures using ultrasound
JP5627706B2 (en) Ultrasonic imaging device, ultrasonic imaging program
US11612381B2 (en) Method for tissue characterization by ultrasound wave attenuation measurements and ultrasound system for tissue characterization
Yeom et al. 3D reconstruction of a carotid bifurcation from 2D transversal ultrasound images
US10182793B2 (en) Ultrasonic diagnostic apparatus, image processing apparatus, and image processing method
WO2019192970A1 (en) Ultrasonic shear wave imaging with improved accuracy and reliability
Mohajery et al. Automated 3D velocity estimation of natural mechanical wave propagation in the myocardium
Loizou et al. Introduction to ultrasound imaging and speckle noise
Loizou et al. Introduction to Speckle Noise in Ultrasound Imaging and Video
Casero Cañas Tracking of myocardial walls and study of contractility and thickening
Timperley et al. Tracking of myocardial walls and study of contractility and thickening
NZ615910B2 (en) Vascular characterization using ultrasound imaging

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 200980102906.1

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 09703315

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

REEP Request for entry into the european phase

Ref document number: 2009703315

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2009703315

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2010543613

Country of ref document: JP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 12864262

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 5033/CHENP/2010

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2010134892

Country of ref document: RU