WO2009070167A1 - Content based routing with high assurance mls - Google Patents

Content based routing with high assurance mls Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2009070167A1
WO2009070167A1 PCT/US2007/085968 US2007085968W WO2009070167A1 WO 2009070167 A1 WO2009070167 A1 WO 2009070167A1 US 2007085968 W US2007085968 W US 2007085968W WO 2009070167 A1 WO2009070167 A1 WO 2009070167A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
content
metadata
requesting system
security level
recited
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2007/085968
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Robert J. Winig
Original Assignee
The Boeing Company
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Boeing Company filed Critical The Boeing Company
Priority to CA2664928A priority Critical patent/CA2664928C/en
Priority to EP07864920.9A priority patent/EP2225865B1/en
Priority to PCT/US2007/085968 priority patent/WO2009070167A1/en
Publication of WO2009070167A1 publication Critical patent/WO2009070167A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/10Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
    • H04L63/102Entity profiles
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/10Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for controlling access to devices or network resources
    • H04L63/105Multiple levels of security
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/50Network services
    • H04L67/60Scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions using the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources
    • H04L67/63Routing a service request depending on the request content or context

Definitions

  • the present disclosure relates to content based routing with high assurance MLS (multilevel security).
  • Providing specific content to a requesting system, such as any system that requires inputs from an external source, over a network in a timely and secure manner requires knowledge of the interests of the requesting system, the security level of the information being sent over the network, and the security level of the network on which the requesting system resides.
  • Conventional network communications are problematic because they can not provide specific metadata or content to a requesting system even if the requesting system is at the appropriate security level.
  • Conventional network communications can only provide the entire data packets of information classified at the highest security level of any content contained within the entire data packets.
  • Conventional network communications also can not individually classify the metadata or content within data packets at a specific security level to provide the requesting system with the specific content requested.
  • a security component receives content from a content provider.
  • the security component identifies a security level of content metadata located within the content received from the content provider.
  • a content router receives a content descriptor from the content provider and an interest profile from a requesting system.
  • the content router utilizes algorithms to create routing tables based on metadata in the content descriptor, and the interest profile.
  • the content router provides the content metadata to the requesting system based on the interest profile.
  • a content filter filters or sanitizes the content metadata according to a security level of the requesting system before providing the content metadata to the requesting system.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates an example system in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented.
  • Fig. 2 illustrates another example system in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented.
  • Fig. 3 illustrates exemplary method(s) for content based routing with high assurance
  • Fig. 4 illustrates am example computing-based device in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented.
  • Content Based Routing with High Assurance MLS multi-level security methods and systems are described in which embodiments provide communication of content from a content provider to a requesting system, such as any system that requires inputs from an external source.
  • Embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can also be implemented to assist in providing content to the requesting system from the content provider.
  • a security component receives content from a content provider.
  • the security component can identify a security level of content metadata located within the content received from the content provider.
  • a content router receives a content descriptor from the content provider and an interest profile from a requesting system.
  • the content router can utilize algorithms to create routing tables based on metadata in the content descriptor, and the interest profile.
  • the content router can provide the content metadata to the requesting system based on the interest profile.
  • a content filter can filter and/or sanitize the content metadata according to a security level of the requesting system before providing the content metadata to the requesting system.
  • Fig. 1 illustrates an example system 100 in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented.
  • the system 100 includes a requesting system 102, such as any system that requires inputs from an external source like a data fusion engine, a content provider 104, a MLS guard 106, a security component 108, a content router 110, and a content filter 112 to filter and/or sanitize content metadata 122 located within the content 114 and provide the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102.
  • the content router 110 can receive an interest profile 120 from the requesting system 102, and a content descriptor 116 from the content provider 104.
  • the requesting system 102 can communicate an interest profile 120 to the content router 110.
  • the requesting system 102 can receive content metadata 122 from the content filter 112 after it is filtered and/or sanitized according to a security level of the requesting system 102.
  • the security level of the requesting system 102 is equivalent to the security level of a network on which the requesting system 102 is located.
  • the interest profile 120 defines the desired content and/or metadata.
  • the content router 110 can provide the content metadata 122 directly to the requesting system 102 in an event that the security level of the content metadata 122 is not higher than the security level of the requesting system 102.
  • the requesting system 102 can be a subscriber in a service oriented architecture environment.
  • the requesting system 102 can receive the content 114 and/or the content metadata 122.
  • the content provider 104 can communicate a content descriptor 116 to the content router 110, and communicate content 114 to the security component 108.
  • the content 114 can be at least one of readable text, XML data or binary data.
  • the content descriptor defines the provided content and/or metadata.
  • the content descriptor is a publisher in a service oriented architecture environment.
  • at least one additional content provider can communicate a content descriptor to the content router 110, and communicate content 114 to the security component 108.
  • the security component 108 can receive content 114 from the content provider 104 and can identify a security level of the content metadata 122 received from the content provider 104.
  • the security component 108 can identify the security level of the content metadata 122 based on a security classification that is defined in a classification guide.
  • the security component 108 can identify or tag the content metadata 122 manually, or use a variety of identifiers or taggers that can place a security classification on the content metadata 122.
  • the security component 108 can utilize a security protocol to communicate the content metadata 122 to the content router 110.
  • the content router 110 can receive the content descriptor 116 from the content provider 104 and the interest profile 120 from the requesting system 102.
  • the content router can utilize algorithms to create routing tables based on the metadata in the content descriptor 116, and the interest profile 120, and provide the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102 based on the interest profile 120. Further, in this embodiment, the content metadata 122 will be multicast to interested requesting systems 102 or subscribers whose interest profile 120 matches the metadata content 122 in the content descriptor 116.
  • the content filter 112 can filter and/or sanitize the content metadata 122 according to a level of security of the requesting system 102 before providing the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102.
  • the content filter 112 can utilize MLS guard policies to filter and/or sanitize the content metadata 122 according to the security level of the requesting system 102.
  • the security component 108, content router 110, and content filter 112 can be housed within a multi-level security hardware system, such as an MLS Guard 106.
  • the MLS guard 106 can provide two-way communications and can communicate content metadata 122 from a content provider 104 at a low security level to a requesting system 102 at a high security level, and from a content provider 104 at a high security level to requesting system 102 at a low security level. Further, in this embodiment, the MLS guard 106 can operate at the highest level of assurance or the highest evaluation accreditation level such as common criteria EAL7.
  • Fig. 2 further illustrates an example system 200 in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented.
  • the system 200 includes the requesting system 102, the content provider 104, the MLS guard 106, the security component 108, the content router 110, at least one additional requesting system 202, and the content filter 112 as described above with reference to Fig. 1 to filter and/or sanitize content metadata 122 and provide the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102.
  • the at least one additional requesting system 202 can communicate an interest profile 204 to the content router 110.
  • the content router 110 can create routing tables based on the interest profile of the at least one additional requesting system 202 and the metadata in the content descriptor 116 of each content provider 104, and provide content metadata 206 to the at least one additional requesting system 202 based on the interest profile 204. Further, in this embodiment, the content filter 112 can filter and/or sanitize the content metadata 206 according to a security level of the at least one additional requesting system 202 before the content metadata 206 is received by the at least one additional requesting system 202. Also, in this embodiment, these operations described can be simultaneously performed with the functions as described in figure 1.
  • any of the functions and methods described herein can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware (e.g., fixed logic circuitry), manual processing, or any combination thereof.
  • a software implementation represents program code that performs specified tasks when executed on a computing-based processor.
  • Example method 300 described with reference to Fig. 3 may be described in the general context of computer executable instructions.
  • computer executable instructions can include services, applications, routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, procedures, modules, functions, and the like that perform particular functions or implement particular abstract data types.
  • Fig. 3 illustrates an exemplary method 300 for content based routing with high assurance MLS and is described with reference to the exemplary environment 100 shown in Fig. 1.
  • the order in which the method is described is not intended to be construed as a limitation, and any number of the described method blocks can be combined in any order to implement the method, or an alternate method.
  • the method can be implemented in any suitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof.
  • a content descriptor 116 is received from a content provider 104.
  • the content router 110 receives the content descriptor 116 from the content provider 104.
  • an interest profile 120 is received from a requesting system 102.
  • the content router 110 receives the interest profile 120 from the requesting system 102.
  • content 114 is received from the content provider 104.
  • the security component 108 receives the content 114 from the content provider 104.
  • the security level of the content metadata 122 located within the content 114 is identified.
  • the security component 108 identifies the security level of the content metadata 122.
  • the security component 108 identifies the security level of the content metadata 122 based on a security classification that is defined in a classification guide.
  • the content metadata 122 is directly received by the requesting system 102 in an event that a security level of the content metadata 122 is not higher than the security level of the requesting system 102.
  • routing tables are created based on metadata in the content descriptor 116, and the interest profile 120.
  • the content router 110 creates routing tables based on the metadata in the content descriptor 116, and the interest profile 120.
  • the content metadata 122 is filtered and/or sanitized according to a security level of the requesting system 102.
  • the content filter 112 filters and/or sanitizes the content metadata 122 according to the security level of the requesting system 102.
  • the content metadata 122 is routed to the requesting system 102 according to the security level of the requesting system 102.
  • the content filter 112 routes the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102 according to the security level of the requesting system 102.
  • Fig. 4 illustrates an example computing-based device 400 which can be implemented as any form of computing or electronic device in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented.
  • the computing- based device 400 can be implemented to include any one or combination of devices described with reference to the system shown in Fig. 1.
  • the computing-based device 400 includes an input interface 402 by which data inputs can be received.
  • Device 400 further includes communication interface(s) 404 which can be implemented as any one or more of a wireless interface, any type of network interface, and as any other type of communication interface.
  • the computing-based device 400 also includes one or more processors 406 (e.g., any of microprocessors, controllers, and the like) which process various computer executable instructions to control the operation of computing-based device 400, to communicate with other electronic and computing devices, and to implement embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS.
  • processors 406 e.g., any of microprocessors, controllers, and the like
  • Computing-based device 400 can also be implemented with computer readable media 408, such as one or more memory components, examples of which include random access memory (RAM), non-volatile memory (e.g., any one or more of a read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, EPROM, EEPROM, etc.), and a disk storage device.
  • a disk storage device can include any type of magnetic or optical storage device, such as a hard disk drive, a recordable and/or rewriteable compact disc (CD), a DVD, a DVD+RW, and the like.
  • Computer readable media 408 provides data storage mechanisms to store various information and/or data such as software applications and any other types of information and data related to operational aspects of computing-based device 400.
  • an operating system 410 and/or other application programs 412 can be maintained as software applications with the computer readable media 408 and executed on processor(s) 406 to implement embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS.
  • the security component 108, the content router 110, and the content filter 112 can each be implemented as a software application and/or component in various embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS.
  • security component 108 can each be implemented as separate application components, each of the components can themselves be implemented as several component modules or applications distributed to each perform one or more functions in a content based routing with high assurance MLS system. Further, any combination of the security component 108, content router 110, and content filter 112 can be implemented in an alternate embodiment.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)

Abstract

A content based routing system which is able to route content contained within data packets according to content metadata located within the respective content is disclosed. The content router receives a content descriptor from the provider and an interest profile from the requesting system. Based on metadata in the content descriptors and the interest profile, the content router creates routing tables and provides the content metadata to the requesting system based on the interest profile. The content metadata is filtered or sanitized according to a security level of the requesting system before the content metadata is provided to the requesting system.

Description

CONTENT BASED ROUTING WITH HIGH ASSURANCE MLS
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present disclosure relates to content based routing with high assurance MLS (multilevel security).
BACKGROUND
Providing specific content to a requesting system, such as any system that requires inputs from an external source, over a network in a timely and secure manner requires knowledge of the interests of the requesting system, the security level of the information being sent over the network, and the security level of the network on which the requesting system resides. Conventional network communications are problematic because they can not provide specific metadata or content to a requesting system even if the requesting system is at the appropriate security level. Conventional network communications can only provide the entire data packets of information classified at the highest security level of any content contained within the entire data packets. Conventional network communications also can not individually classify the metadata or content within data packets at a specific security level to provide the requesting system with the specific content requested.
SUMMARY
This summary introduces simplified features and concepts of content based routing with high assurance MLS (multi-level security) which are further described below in the Detailed Description. This summary is not intended to identify essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended for use in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
In an embodiment of content based routing with high assurance MLS, a security component receives content from a content provider. The security component identifies a security level of content metadata located within the content received from the content provider. A content router receives a content descriptor from the content provider and an interest profile from a requesting system. The content router utilizes algorithms to create routing tables based on metadata in the content descriptor, and the interest profile. The content router provides the content metadata to the requesting system based on the interest profile. A content filter filters or sanitizes the content metadata according to a security level of the requesting system before providing the content metadata to the requesting system.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS (multi-level security) are described with reference to the following drawings. The same numbers are used throughout the drawings to reference like features and components:
Fig. 1 illustrates an example system in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented.
Fig. 2 illustrates another example system in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented.
Fig. 3 illustrates exemplary method(s) for content based routing with high assurance
MLS.
Fig. 4 illustrates am example computing-based device in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Content Based Routing with High Assurance MLS (multi-level security) methods and systems are described in which embodiments provide communication of content from a content provider to a requesting system, such as any system that requires inputs from an external source. Embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can also be implemented to assist in providing content to the requesting system from the content provider.
In one embodiment, a security component receives content from a content provider. The security component can identify a security level of content metadata located within the content received from the content provider. A content router receives a content descriptor from the content provider and an interest profile from a requesting system. The content router can utilize algorithms to create routing tables based on metadata in the content descriptor, and the interest profile. The content router can provide the content metadata to the requesting system based on the interest profile. A content filter can filter and/or sanitize the content metadata according to a security level of the requesting system before providing the content metadata to the requesting system.
While features and concepts of the described systems and methods for content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented in any number of different environments, systems, and/or other configurations, embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS are described in the context of the following exemplary environment and system architectures.
Fig. 1 illustrates an example system 100 in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented. The system 100 includes a requesting system 102, such as any system that requires inputs from an external source like a data fusion engine, a content provider 104, a MLS guard 106, a security component 108, a content router 110, and a content filter 112 to filter and/or sanitize content metadata 122 located within the content 114 and provide the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102. In this example, the content router 110 can receive an interest profile 120 from the requesting system 102, and a content descriptor 116 from the content provider 104.
The requesting system 102, such as any system that requires inputs from an external source, can communicate an interest profile 120 to the content router 110. The requesting system 102 can receive content metadata 122 from the content filter 112 after it is filtered and/or sanitized according to a security level of the requesting system 102. In this example, the security level of the requesting system 102 is equivalent to the security level of a network on which the requesting system 102 is located. Further, in this example, the interest profile 120 defines the desired content and/or metadata. In an embodiment, the content router 110 can provide the content metadata 122 directly to the requesting system 102 in an event that the security level of the content metadata 122 is not higher than the security level of the requesting system 102. In another example, the requesting system 102 can be a subscriber in a service oriented architecture environment. In another embodiment, the requesting system 102 can receive the content 114 and/or the content metadata 122.
The content provider 104 can communicate a content descriptor 116 to the content router 110, and communicate content 114 to the security component 108. In this example, the content 114 can be at least one of readable text, XML data or binary data. Further, in this example, the content descriptor defines the provided content and/or metadata. In another example, the content descriptor is a publisher in a service oriented architecture environment. In an embodiment, at least one additional content provider can communicate a content descriptor to the content router 110, and communicate content 114 to the security component 108.
The security component 108 can receive content 114 from the content provider 104 and can identify a security level of the content metadata 122 received from the content provider 104. The security component 108 can identify the security level of the content metadata 122 based on a security classification that is defined in a classification guide. The security component 108 can identify or tag the content metadata 122 manually, or use a variety of identifiers or taggers that can place a security classification on the content metadata 122. The security component 108 can utilize a security protocol to communicate the content metadata 122 to the content router 110.
The content router 110 can receive the content descriptor 116 from the content provider 104 and the interest profile 120 from the requesting system 102. The content router can utilize algorithms to create routing tables based on the metadata in the content descriptor 116, and the interest profile 120, and provide the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102 based on the interest profile 120. Further, in this embodiment, the content metadata 122 will be multicast to interested requesting systems 102 or subscribers whose interest profile 120 matches the metadata content 122 in the content descriptor 116. The content filter 112 can filter and/or sanitize the content metadata 122 according to a level of security of the requesting system 102 before providing the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102. The content filter 112 can utilize MLS guard policies to filter and/or sanitize the content metadata 122 according to the security level of the requesting system 102.
In an embodiment, the security component 108, content router 110, and content filter 112 can be housed within a multi-level security hardware system, such as an MLS Guard 106. The MLS guard 106 can provide two-way communications and can communicate content metadata 122 from a content provider 104 at a low security level to a requesting system 102 at a high security level, and from a content provider 104 at a high security level to requesting system 102 at a low security level. Further, in this embodiment, the MLS guard 106 can operate at the highest level of assurance or the highest evaluation accreditation level such as common criteria EAL7.
Fig. 2 further illustrates an example system 200 in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented. The system 200 includes the requesting system 102, the content provider 104, the MLS guard 106, the security component 108, the content router 110, at least one additional requesting system 202, and the content filter 112 as described above with reference to Fig. 1 to filter and/or sanitize content metadata 122 and provide the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102. In this example, the at least one additional requesting system 202 can communicate an interest profile 204 to the content router 110. The content router 110 can create routing tables based on the interest profile of the at least one additional requesting system 202 and the metadata in the content descriptor 116 of each content provider 104, and provide content metadata 206 to the at least one additional requesting system 202 based on the interest profile 204. Further, in this embodiment, the content filter 112 can filter and/or sanitize the content metadata 206 according to a security level of the at least one additional requesting system 202 before the content metadata 206 is received by the at least one additional requesting system 202. Also, in this embodiment, these operations described can be simultaneously performed with the functions as described in figure 1. Generally, any of the functions and methods described herein can be implemented using hardware, software, firmware (e.g., fixed logic circuitry), manual processing, or any combination thereof. A software implementation represents program code that performs specified tasks when executed on a computing-based processor. Example method 300 described with reference to Fig. 3 may be described in the general context of computer executable instructions. Generally, computer executable instructions can include services, applications, routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, procedures, modules, functions, and the like that perform particular functions or implement particular abstract data types.
Fig. 3 illustrates an exemplary method 300 for content based routing with high assurance MLS and is described with reference to the exemplary environment 100 shown in Fig. 1. The order in which the method is described is not intended to be construed as a limitation, and any number of the described method blocks can be combined in any order to implement the method, or an alternate method. Furthermore, the method can be implemented in any suitable hardware, software, firmware, or combination thereof. At block 302, a content descriptor 116 is received from a content provider 104. For example, the content router 110 receives the content descriptor 116 from the content provider 104. At block 304, an interest profile 120 is received from a requesting system 102. For example, the content router 110 receives the interest profile 120 from the requesting system 102. At block 306, content 114 is received from the content provider 104. For example, the security component 108 receives the content 114 from the content provider 104. At block 308, the security level of the content metadata 122 located within the content 114 is identified. For example, the security component 108 identifies the security level of the content metadata 122. In an embodiment, the security component 108 identifies the security level of the content metadata 122 based on a security classification that is defined in a classification guide. In another embodiment, the content metadata 122 is directly received by the requesting system 102 in an event that a security level of the content metadata 122 is not higher than the security level of the requesting system 102. At block 310, routing tables are created based on metadata in the content descriptor 116, and the interest profile 120. For example, the content router 110 creates routing tables based on the metadata in the content descriptor 116, and the interest profile 120. At block 312, the content metadata 122 is filtered and/or sanitized according to a security level of the requesting system 102. For example, the content filter 112 filters and/or sanitizes the content metadata 122 according to the security level of the requesting system 102. At block 314, the content metadata 122 is routed to the requesting system 102 according to the security level of the requesting system 102. For example, the content filter 112 routes the content metadata 122 to the requesting system 102 according to the security level of the requesting system 102.
Fig. 4 illustrates an example computing-based device 400 which can be implemented as any form of computing or electronic device in which embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS can be implemented. For example, the computing- based device 400 can be implemented to include any one or combination of devices described with reference to the system shown in Fig. 1. The computing-based device 400 includes an input interface 402 by which data inputs can be received. Device 400 further includes communication interface(s) 404 which can be implemented as any one or more of a wireless interface, any type of network interface, and as any other type of communication interface. The computing-based device 400 also includes one or more processors 406 (e.g., any of microprocessors, controllers, and the like) which process various computer executable instructions to control the operation of computing-based device 400, to communicate with other electronic and computing devices, and to implement embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS. Computing-based device 400 can also be implemented with computer readable media 408, such as one or more memory components, examples of which include random access memory (RAM), non-volatile memory (e.g., any one or more of a read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, EPROM, EEPROM, etc.), and a disk storage device. A disk storage device can include any type of magnetic or optical storage device, such as a hard disk drive, a recordable and/or rewriteable compact disc (CD), a DVD, a DVD+RW, and the like.
Computer readable media 408 provides data storage mechanisms to store various information and/or data such as software applications and any other types of information and data related to operational aspects of computing-based device 400. For example, an operating system 410 and/or other application programs 412 can be maintained as software applications with the computer readable media 408 and executed on processor(s) 406 to implement embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS. For example, the security component 108, the content router 110, and the content filter 112 can each be implemented as a software application and/or component in various embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS. In addition, although the security component 108, content router 110, and content filter 112 can each be implemented as separate application components, each of the components can themselves be implemented as several component modules or applications distributed to each perform one or more functions in a content based routing with high assurance MLS system. Further, any combination of the security component 108, content router 110, and content filter 112 can be implemented in an alternate embodiment.
Although embodiments of content based routing with high assurance MLS have been described in language specific to structural features and/or methods, it is to be understood that the subject of the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or methods described. Rather, the specific features and methods are disclosed as exemplary implementations of content based routing with high assurance MLS.

Claims

1. A content based routing system, comprising: a security component (108) configured to receive content (114) from a content provider (104) and identify a security level of content metadata (122) located within the content (114) received from the content provider (104); a content router (110) configured to receive a content descriptor (116) from the content provider (104) and an interest profile (120) from a requesting system (102), the content router (110) is further configured to utilize algorithms to create routing tables based on metadata in the content descriptors (116), and the interest profile (120), and provide the content metadata (122) to the requesting system (102) based on the interest profile (120); and a content filter (112) configured to filter or sanitize the content metadata (122) according to a security level of the requesting system (102) before providing the content metadata (122) to the requesting system (102).
2. A content based routing system as recited in claim 1, wherein the content router (110) is further configured to provide the content metadata (122) directly to the requesting system (102) in an event that the security level of the content metadata (122) is not higher than the security level of the requesting system (102).
3. A content based routing system as recited in claim 1, wherein the security component (108) is further configured to identify the security level of the content metadata (122) based on a security classification that is defined in a classification guide.
4. A content based routing system as recited in claim 1, wherein the security component (108) utilizes a security protocol to communicate the content (114) to the content router (110).
5. A content based routing system as recited in claim I5 wherein the content filter (112) is further configured to utilize MLS guard (106) policies to filter or sanitize the content metadata (122) according to the security level of the requesting system (102).
6. A content based routing system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising at least one additional requesting system (202) configured to communicate an interest profile (120) to the content router (110), the content router (110) configured to create routing tables based on the interest profile (120) of the at least one additional requesting system (202) and the metadata in content descriptor (116) and provide the content metadata (122) to the at least one additional requesting system (202) based on the interest profile (120) of the at least one additional requesting system (202), the content filter (112) configured to filter or sanitize the content metadata (122) according to a security level of the at least one additional requesting system (202) before the content metadata (122) is received by the at least one additional requesting system (202).
7. A content based routing system as recited in claim I5 further comprising at least one additional content provider (104) configured to communicate the content descriptor (116) to the content router (110), and communicate the content (114) to the security component (108).
8. A content based routing system as recited in claim 1, wherein the requesting system (102) is any system that requires inputs from an external source.
9. A content based routing system as recited in claim 1, wherein the content descriptor (116) and the interest profile (120) defines the content (114) and the metadata.
10. A content based routing system as recited in claim 1, wherein the content (114) and the content metadata (122) is at least one of readable text or XML data.
11. A method, comprising: receiving a content descriptor (116) from a content provider (104); receiving an interest profile (120) from a requesting system (102); receiving content (114) from the content provider (104); creating routing tables based on metadata in the content descriptor (116), and the interest profile (120); filtering or sanitizing the content metadata (122) located within the content (114) according to a security level of the requesting system (102); and routing the content metadata (122) to the requesting system (102) according to the security level of the requesting system (102).
12. A method as recited in claim 11, further comprising identifying a security level of the content metadata (122) located within the content (114).
13. A method as recited in claim 12, wherein identifying the content metadata (122) based on a security level that is defined in a classification guide.
14. A method as recited in claim 11, further comprising receiving the content metadata (122) directly in an event that a security level of the content metadata (122) is not higher than the security level of the requesting system (102).
15. A method as recited in claim 11, wherein the requesting system (102) is any system that requires inputs from an external source.
PCT/US2007/085968 2006-11-29 2007-11-29 Content based routing with high assurance mls WO2009070167A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2664928A CA2664928C (en) 2006-11-29 2007-11-29 Content based routing with high assurance mls
EP07864920.9A EP2225865B1 (en) 2007-11-29 2007-11-29 Content based routing with high assurance mls
PCT/US2007/085968 WO2009070167A1 (en) 2007-11-29 2007-11-29 Content based routing with high assurance mls

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/US2007/085968 WO2009070167A1 (en) 2007-11-29 2007-11-29 Content based routing with high assurance mls

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2009070167A1 true WO2009070167A1 (en) 2009-06-04

Family

ID=40377698

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2007/085968 WO2009070167A1 (en) 2006-11-29 2007-11-29 Content based routing with high assurance mls

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2225865B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2009070167A1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2510429A (en) * 2013-02-05 2014-08-06 Ibm Assessing response routes in a network

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0375138A2 (en) * 1988-12-22 1990-06-27 International Business Machines Corporation Restricting electronic message traffic
WO2003098409A1 (en) * 2002-05-17 2003-11-27 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Secure content sharing in digital rights management
US20060112188A1 (en) * 2001-04-26 2006-05-25 Albanese Michael J Data communication with remote network node

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004105297A2 (en) * 2003-05-19 2004-12-02 Network Security Technologies, Inc. Method and system for providing secure one-way transfer of data

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0375138A2 (en) * 1988-12-22 1990-06-27 International Business Machines Corporation Restricting electronic message traffic
US20060112188A1 (en) * 2001-04-26 2006-05-25 Albanese Michael J Data communication with remote network node
WO2003098409A1 (en) * 2002-05-17 2003-11-27 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Secure content sharing in digital rights management

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2510429A (en) * 2013-02-05 2014-08-06 Ibm Assessing response routes in a network
US9813331B2 (en) 2013-02-05 2017-11-07 International Business Machines Corporation Assessing response routes in a network

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2225865B1 (en) 2016-05-11
EP2225865A1 (en) 2010-09-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20080126799A1 (en) Content based routing with high assurance mls
US10917417B2 (en) Method, apparatus, server, and storage medium for network security joint defense
US8032529B2 (en) Enhanced bloom filters
US7987496B2 (en) Automatic application of information protection policies
US9305302B2 (en) Weighting sentiment information
TWI650669B (en) Malware removal action content data management device and method
US20190188804A1 (en) Platform for automated social media regulatory compliance monitoring
CN103650436A (en) Service path distribution method, router and service execution entity
CN111448787B (en) System and method for providing a secure in-vehicle network
US9813357B2 (en) Filtration of network traffic using virtually-extended ternary content-addressable memory (TCAM)
US20190268377A1 (en) Platform for automated regulatory compliance monitoring of messaging services
Solaimani et al. Online anomaly detection for multi‐source VMware using a distributed streaming framework
EP2225865B1 (en) Content based routing with high assurance mls
US20140181945A1 (en) Single-point login system and method
CN112953841B (en) Message distribution method and system
EP3613228A1 (en) Regulation based switching system for electronic message routing
US10666738B2 (en) Managing topic updates for a distributed data system
CA2664928C (en) Content based routing with high assurance mls
US7636711B2 (en) Extensible workflows
US20130007248A1 (en) Policy driven dynamic composition of service dataflows
US20140372460A1 (en) Trusted download toolkit
JP2021532440A (en) Security policy and audit log bidirectional query, collation, tracking system and its method {SECURITY POLICY AND AUDIO LOG BI-DIRECTIONAL LOOKUP, COMPARIING AND TRACKING SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF}
US10481836B2 (en) Machine learning method and system for predicting file controls
Ćirić et al. Input splits design techniques for network intrusion detection on Hadoop cluster
CN105376167A (en) Distributed packet stream inspection and processing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2664928

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2007864920

Country of ref document: EP

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07864920

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE