WO2009049125A1

WO2009049125A1 - Method and apparatus for electrochemical corrosion monitoring

Info

Publication number: WO2009049125A1
Application number: PCT/US2008/079477
Authority: WO
Inventors: David A. Eden
Original assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
Priority date: 2007-10-12
Filing date: 2008-10-10
Publication date: 2009-04-16
Also published as: CN101896809B; CN101896809A; US7719292B2; EP2198266B1; EP2198266A1; EP2198266A4; US20090096471A1; JP2011501131A

Abstract

A method and apparatus for simultaneously and continuously monitoring both the general and localized corrosion of a working metallic electrode is provided, wherein a low frequency, low amplitude periodic potential excitation is used to perturb the electrode around its free corrosion potential. The potential is controlled with respect to a reference electrode by means of a potentiostat, and an auxiliary electrode used to stimulate current flow. The current response of the working electrode is monitored and analyzed continuously for general and localized corrosion activity. Means are provided for validation of the integrity of the current response to the applied potential excitation. Simultaneous and continuous outputs for both general and localized corrosion activity are also provided.

Description

METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL CORROSION MONITORING

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention relates generally to a method and apparatus for monitoring electrochemical corrosion, and in a particular though non-limiting embodiment, to a method and apparatus for monitoring the electrochemical corrosion of a working electrode.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] It is previously known that the corrosion of a metallic material can be studied using an electrochemical monitoring means such as Linear Polarization Resistance or Electrochemical Impedance. The theoretical basis for the use of electrochemical methods is usually founded in the Butler- Vo lmer relationship for a corroding material. The Butler- Volmer equation relates the current response of a system to an applied over- potential as a function of the corrosion current and the anodic and cathodic activation coefficients. [0003] Another technique that has previously been used to study general corrosion processes is the Harmonic Distortion Analysis (HDA) method, which utilizes a low frequency sinusoidal voltage perturbation, and involves analysis of the current response in terms of the distortion due to the non-linearity of the current response. This technique involves further expansion of the Butler- Volmer equation, and facilitates analysis of the corrosion current, the anodic and cathodic activation coefficients and the so-called Stern- Geary constant. [0004] While the above methods find wide usage for the study of general corrosion processes, those of skill in the appropriate arts have found that these techniques are generally unsuitable for the study of localized corrosion processes such as pitting corrosion. [0005] For localized corrosion processes, a variety of other methods collectively termed "Electrochemical Noise" (EN) have been attempted. These techniques, which essentially involve analyzing the response of a corroding interface at the free corrosion potential with no applied perturbation, are used to evaluate the spontaneous changes in the corrosion processes, and are observed as current and potential fluctuations of a corroding specimen. Analysis of these potential and current noise signals may be in either the time or frequency domains.

[0006] During the measurement of low frequency impedance or when using the Harmonic Distortion technique, it is common practice to apply a high purity sine wave voltage perturbation and to measure the current at the fundamental frequency, and, in the case of Harmonic Distortion, to analyze the harmonic current content at integral multiples of the fundamental frequency. Since the applied voltage sinusoid is a periodic function, the current response at the fundamental frequency will be highly correlated with itself if the corrosion processes are stationary (in other words, when the processes do not change substantially during the period of measurements). Under these conditions, the self- correlation of the current response can be polled to validate the measurement, and also to serve as an indicator that further analysis (for example, harmonic distortion analysis) should be conducted to evaluate the corrosion processes for the anodic and cathodic activation coefficients. If, on the other hand, the corrosion processes are non-stationary, then the degree of self-correlation is substantially reduced, and will generally indicate a high probability for localized corrosion.

[0007] However, spontaneous changes occurring in the corrosion processes as a function of time can influence the current response to an applied potential perturbation, the extent of the influence depending on the relative magnitudes of the spontaneous variations in the corrosion potential, corrosion current and the activation coefficients.

Thus, the stability of the response to an applied perturbation has often been viewed as a nuisance factor, with system and adventitious noise degrading the required response.

Consequently, previously known electrochemical corrosion monitoring systems have been designed to reject noise, rather than analyze it in order to separate the deterministic response of the applied perturbation and any associated noise components.

[0008] There is, therefore, a longstanding and heretofore unmet need for an improved method and apparatus for continuously monitoring the corrosion of a working electrode, which provides simultaneous analysis for both the general corrosion and the localized corrosion processes, and which provides a reliable means for validation of the integrity of associated measurements.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0009] A method of monitoring corrosion of a working electrode is provided, the method including: applying a low frequency, low amplitude, sinusoidal voltage perturbation signal to said working electrode; monitoring a current response returned from said working electrode; and analyzing said current response for periodic components in phase with said applied sinusoidal voltage perturbation signal and determining the degree of correlation of the signal with itself.

[0010] An apparatus for monitoring the corrosion of a working electrode is also provided, the apparatus including: a signal generator for supplying a low frequency, low amplitude, sinusoidal voltage perturbation signal to said working electrode; a monitor for monitoring a current response returned from said working electrode; and a current analyzer for analyzing said current response for periodic components in phase and 90° out of phase with said applied sinusoidal voltage perturbation signal, and for determining the degree of correlation of the signal with itself.

BRIEF DECRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0011] FIG 1 is a schematic representation of a first example embodiment of the invention.

[0012] FIG 2 is a schematic representation of a second example embodiment of the invention.

[0013] FIG 3 is a graphical representation of the current response of a corroding electrode with only a small amount of electrochemical noise, representing principally general corrosion.

[0014] FIG 4 is a graphical representation of the continuous output of the general corrosion current depicted in FIG 3, further considered as a function of time.

[0015] FIG 5 is a graphical representation of the current correlation function derived from the general corrosion depicted in FIG 3.

[0016] FIG 6 is a graphical representation of the current response of a corroding electrode associated with substantial electrochemical noise. [0017] FIG 7 is a graphical representation of the continuous output of the general corrosion parameters obtained from the example embodiment depicted in FIG 6.

[0018] Figure 8 is a graphical representation of the current correlation function obtained from the example embodiment depicted in FIG 6. Note that the localized corrosion events result in substantial shifts in the autocorrelation function.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0019] Referring now to the example embodiment depicted in FIG 1, a pipeline 1 has an array of three electrodes 2, 3 and 4 representing a working electrode, a reference electrode and an auxiliary electrode, respectively. The electrodes are electrically isolated, from one another, and also from the pipeline 1 , by means of a non-conducting seal 5.

[0020] The working electrode 2 comprises a metallic material of interest. The reference electrode 3 comprises, in one example, a calomel electrode. In other embodiments, reference electrode 3 instead comprises a pseudo-reference electrode fabricated from approximately the same material as the working electrode. In further embodiments, auxiliary electrode 4 comprises a chemically inert material (for example, platinum), which will not corrode substantially in the subject environment. In still further embodiments, auxiliary electrode 4 instead comprises approximately the same material as the working electrode. [0021] In the depicted embodiment, the electrodes 2, 3 and 4 are connected by disposing a plurality of conductive members 9, 10 and 11 in electrical communication with a potentiostat 6. In a presently preferred embodiment, a signal generator 7 is used to supply a low frequency sinusoidal voltage to the working electrode via the potentiostat 6. The current flowing through the working electrode 2 can be analyzed using a current analyzer 8. [0022] According to one example method, a low frequency sinusoidal potential perturbation is generated by signal generator 7 and applied by potentiostat 6 to working electrode 2, and then the signal representing the current response of the working electrode is monitored. The monitored signal is then analyzed using current analyzer 8 on a continuous basis over an integral number of periods of the sine wave, the method further including one or more of the following steps, which may be performed in any logical sequence or order:

(1) Analyzing the current for the total root mean square amplitude representative of the total response of the electrode;

(2) Analyzing the current to determine the mean or average component;

(3) Differentiating the current to remove the mean value;

(4) Integrating the differentiated current obtained in step 3 to reconstitute the original signal minus the mean value; (5) Processing the output from step 4 to determine the autocorrelation function;

(6) Analyzing the output from step 4 to determine the root mean square amplitude;

(7) Analyzing the output from step 4 to determine the component in phase with the applied voltage sinusoidal perturbation;

(8) Analyzing the output from step 4 to determine the component 90° out of phase with the applied voltage sinusoidal perturbation;

(9) Using the outputs of steps 7 and 8 to calculate the modulus of the current;

(10) Determining whether the output from step 5 indicates a high degree of correlation, and if so, then analyzing the output from step 4 to determine harmonic components at twice and three times the applied frequency; (11) Analyzing the output from step 7 to discern an indication of the general corrosion current of the working electrode according to the Linear Polarization Resistance method;

(12) Analyzing the outputs from steps 7 and 10 to discern an indication of the general corrosion current according to the Harmonic Distortion Analysis method;

(13) Analyzing the outputs from steps 7 and 10 according to the Harmonic Distortion Analysis method to determine values for the anodic and cathodic activation coefficients and the Stern-Geary constant;

(14) Examining the output from step 5 to discern an indication of the propensity of the corrosion processes to general or localized corrosion. If the value is close to 1 , then the corrosion processes are deemed to be general; if the value approaches 0, the corrosion processes are deemed localized;

(15) Analyzing the difference between outputs from steps 6 and 9 to discern an indication of the localized corrosion processes; (16) Analyzing the ratio of the output from step 15 to the output of step 9 to discern an indication of the propensity for localized corrosion;

(17) Comparing the output from steps 1 and 6 to discern an indication of stable pitting or crevice corrosion. [0023] In one example embodiment, the electrode system 2-4 comprises a working electrode 2, a saturated calomel electrode (SCE) which functions as a reference electrode 3, and an insert type auxiliary electrode 4. In this arrangement, the potential of the working electrode 2 is maintained at an observed free corrosion potential by means of a DC bias present in the system. A low frequency sine wave potential perturbation is applied so as to polarize the working electrode 2 around the free corrosion potential. The current response is then monitored and analyzed according to the steps above. [0024] Using the same basic arrangement of electrodes, the above method can be used for evaluating the current response at potentials substantially removed from the free corrosion potential by means of application of a DC bias, for example, for evaluation of the propensity of a material to pitting corrosion using anodic polarization. [0025] In another example embodiment, three identical electrodes are used for the working, reference and auxiliary electrodes. Such an arrangement is more convenient for monitoring systems where a reference electrode such as the SCE may be prone to deterioration, for example, as in operating pipelines and plants. In addition, since all three electrodes are basically identical, the necessity for the application of a DC bias is avoided.

[0026] In a further embodiment, two identical electrodes are used, one serving as the working electrode 2, with the other serving as a combined reference and auxiliary electrode 3-4. In a variation of this embodiment, working electrode 2 is substantially smaller in area (e.g., < 10%) than the combined auxiliary/reference electrode 3-4 in order to better facilitate the analysis described above.

[0027] In a still further embodiment (for example, as would be especially suitable for an operating pipeline or plant), the probe comprises a single working electrode 2 formed of the same material as the pipeline or plant, and the plant itself is used as the combined reference/auxiliary electrode 3-4.

[0028] Referring now to FIG 2, another example embodiment is depicted, in which the numbering scheme used in FIG 1 is maintained for clarity. This arrangement differs from the embodiment depicted in FIG 1 in that it comprises only a single electrode 2 (the working electrode) inserted into the pipeline. The pipeline itself acts as a combined reference and auxiliary electrode, which has a substantially greater surface area than the working electrode. Thus, the response of the system is governed by the smaller of the electrodes (the working electrode).

[0029] The electrodes are disposed in electrical communication with potentiostat 6 by means of conducting members 9, 10 and 11, which can simply be wires or any other type of electrical communication member suitable for the functions described herein. A signal generator 7 applies a low frequency sinusoidal voltage to the working electrode via the potentiostat 6, and the current flowing through the working electrode is analyzed using the current analyzer 8 in a manner consistent with the analysis method outlined above. [0030] In the embodiments depicted in FIGs 1 and 2, separate signal generators, potentiostats and current analyzers are depicted. Those of ordinary skill in the art, however, will readily appreciate that in practice, these components could be incorporated into a single device or composite device coupled with a computer or logic system that will perform the waveform generation, voltage and current monitoring, and digital signal processing techniques required to provide the outputs described above. [0031] FIG 3 illustrates the current response as a function of time of a working electrode having a low rate of general corrosion perturbed by a low amplitude, low voltage sinuoisoid at a frequency of around 0.01Hz.

[0032] FIG 4 illustrates the analyzed output of the signal illustrated in FIG 3 in terms of the general corrosion current density as a function of time over successive integral periods of the sine wave. [0033] FIG 5 illustrates the analyzed output of the signal illustrated in FIG 3 in terms of the autocorrelation function, the values of which are very close to 1 , indicating that the processes are stationary during the measurement process.

[0034] FIG 6 illustrates the current response as a function of time of a working electrode having a low rate of general corrosion, similar to that in FIG 3, but having random noise signals representative of localized corrosion events.

[0035] FIG 7 illustrates the analyzed output of the signal illustrated in FIG 6 in terms of the general corrosion current density as a function of time, which is indicative of instability in the corrosion processes. [0036] FIG 8 illustrates the analyzed output of the signal illustrated in FIG 6 in terms of the autocorrelation function. Comparing FIG 8 to FIG 5 (for the general corrosion example), it is apparent that the autocorrelation function deviates significantly from the value of 1 during the periods of random corrosion activity, indicating that the corrosion processes are localized during these periods. [0037] The above figures are representative, though certainly not exhaustive, of the types of outputs that can be obtained from the analysis steps described. Any, or indeed all, of the outputs may be selected in order to obtain data of relevance in a particular operational environment. [0038] The foregoing specification is provided for illustrative purposes only, and is not intended to describe all possible aspects of the present invention. Moreover, while the invention has been shown and described in detail with respect to several exemplary embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the pertinent arts will appreciate that minor changes to the description, and various other modifications, omissions and additions may also be made without departing from either the spirit or scope thereof.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring corrosion of a working electrode, said method comprising: applying a low frequency, low amplitude, sinusoidal voltage perturbation signal to said working electrode; monitoring a current response returned from said working electrode; and analyzing said current response for periodic components in phase and 90° out of phase with said applied sinusoidal voltage perturbation signal and determining the degree of correlation of the current signal with itself.

2. The method of monitoring corrosion of a working electrode of claim 1, wherein general corrosion of said working electrode is indicated by the amplitude of the in-phase sinusoidal components of the current, and the propensity to localized corrosion by the degree of correlation of the current response with itself.

3. The method of monitoring corrosion of a working electrode of claim 1 , wherein a difference between the total root mean square of the current response and the modulus of the current response is related to the propensity for localized corrosion on the working electrode.

4. The method of monitoring corrosion of a working electrode of claim 1, where the perturbation signal is continuously applied and analyzed to provide a continuous output of the general corrosion and the degree of correlation.

5. The method of monitoring corrosion of a working electrode of claim 1, wherein the propensity for localized corrosion is indicated by the ratio of the difference between the total observed current response and the modulus of the current response divided by the modulus of the current response.

6. An apparatus for monitoring the corrosion of a working electrode, said apparatus comprising: a signal generator for supplying a low frequency, low amplitude, sinusoidal voltage perturbation signal to said working electrode; a monitor for monitoring a current response returned from said working electrode; and a current analyzer for analyzing said current response for periodic components in phase with said applied sinusoidal voltage perturbation signal, and for determining the degree of correlation of the signal with itself.

7. The apparatus for monitoring corrosion of a working electrode of claim 6, further comprising means for indicating when general corrosion of said working electrode is indicated by the amplitude of the in-phase sinusoidal components of the current, and the propensity to localized corrosion by the degree of correlation of the current response with itself.

8. The apparatus for monitoring corrosion of a working electrode of claim 6, further comprising means for indicating when a difference between the total root mean square of the modulus of current response is related to the propensity for localized corrosion on the working electrode.

9. The apparatus for monitoring corrosion of a working electrode of claim 6, further comprising means for continuously applying the perturbation signal, and means for analyzing a return signal obtained from said working electrode in order to provide a continuous output of the general corrosion and the degree of correlation.

10. The apparatus for monitoring corrosion of a working electrode of claim 6, further comprising means for indicating the propensity for localized corrosion by comparing the ratio of the difference between the total observed current response and the modulus of the current response divided by the modulus of the current response; and means for validating further analysis of the current response in terms of higher harmonic components at integral multiples of the applied sinusoid for the purposes of deriving a further corrosion rate from harmonic distortion analysis using the degree of correlation of the current response with itself.