WO2008108787A2 - Surface contact override landing scheme for a fbw rotary-wing aircraft - Google Patents

Surface contact override landing scheme for a fbw rotary-wing aircraft Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008108787A2
WO2008108787A2 PCT/US2007/012890 US2007012890W WO2008108787A2 WO 2008108787 A2 WO2008108787 A2 WO 2008108787A2 US 2007012890 W US2007012890 W US 2007012890W WO 2008108787 A2 WO2008108787 A2 WO 2008108787A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
flight control
recited
control law
surface contact
collective
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2007/012890
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2008108787A3 (en
Inventor
Todd Fanciullo
Paul Morphy
Lorren Stiles
Alex Faynberg
Original Assignee
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation filed Critical Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
Priority to EP07873878.8A priority Critical patent/EP2033059B1/en
Publication of WO2008108787A2 publication Critical patent/WO2008108787A2/en
Publication of WO2008108787A3 publication Critical patent/WO2008108787A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C23/00—Combined instruments indicating more than one navigational value, e.g. for aircraft; Combined measuring devices for measuring two or more variables of movement, e.g. distance, speed or acceleration
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
    • G05D1/04—Control of altitude or depth
    • G05D1/06—Rate of change of altitude or depth
    • G05D1/0607—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft
    • G05D1/0653—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing
    • G05D1/0676—Rate of change of altitude or depth specially adapted for aircraft during a phase of take-off or landing specially adapted for landing
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
    • G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
    • G05D1/08—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw
    • G05D1/0808—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for aircraft
    • G05D1/0858—Control of attitude, i.e. control of roll, pitch, or yaw specially adapted for aircraft specially adapted for vertical take-off of aircraft

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a fly by wire flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, and more particularly to a full authority fly by wire flight control system which accommodates an emergency landing scenario.
  • FBW flight control systems are increasingly state of the art in the control of rotary-wing aircraft.
  • the highly specialized control laws in a FBW flight control system provide functionality for all states of aircraft operation including ground state operation.
  • Rotary-wing aircraft with a partial authority flight control augmentation system do not require mode changes when the aircraft is on the ground, because there is little potential for unwanted feedback into the control system.
  • a full authority FBW flight control system requires a specific surface contact mode to prevent undesired feedback into the control system. The surface contact mode transitions between a fully augmented normal flight control state and a ground state once the majority of the aircraft weight is supported on the ground.
  • the surface contact mode is initiated through weight-on-wheels switches on the landing gear. As the aircraft touches the ground, landing gear struts compress, and switches activate the ground contact state. There are, however, landing scenarios where the weight-on-wheels switches will not function such as when the landing gear cannot be extended due to a malfunction, or when the aircraft must be landed in water, e.g., ditched.
  • a FBW flight control system provides a control law structure that satisfied military handling qualities and civil certification requirements.
  • a surface contact transition function of the flight control system controls the transition from a relatively complex augmented response flight state to a controlled ground operation state.
  • the surface contact override transition function is enabled by pilot action such as a through a cockpit switch. Once the surface contact override transition function is active, the control laws transition through three different states. These states are the fully augmented flight state, augmentation deactivation state and the surface contact state.
  • the normal flight state includes augmented full authority flight control laws. This augmentation is what must be disabled when the aircraft becomes constrained by the landing surface.
  • This state is dedicated to disabling the augmentation in the flight control system and transitioning to a proportional surface contact control scheme.
  • the transition is initiated by identification of pilot intent to descend and accomplished through a relationship to lagged collective stick position.
  • the collective position is lagged to be certain that the pilot actually intends to descend.
  • a predetermined threshold is compared to the current collective position relative to the position at surface function transition function engagement or a predetermined absolute position. As the threshold is breached, the augmentation is disabled over an associated time period so that upon surface contact little or no augmentation remains.
  • the collective position is also employed to determine when the aircraft is "heavy" - the majority of aircraft weight supported upon a surface.
  • a comparator determines when the collective stick position is low enough, by comparing lagged stick position to a predetermined threshold relative to the position at surface contact transition function engagement or a predetermined absolute position to signal the "heavy" state such that the rotor control system may then be transitioned to a neutral condition.
  • the present invention therefore provides a fly-by-wire flight control system which can transition into ground contact state during an emergency landing scenario in which weight-on-wheel sensors may not be usable.
  • Figure 1 is a flow diagram of a surface contract transition function for a FBW flight control system
  • Figure 3 is a graphical representation of the surface contact transition function related to WOW switch references.
  • FIG 1 illustrates a flow diagram for an emergency surface contact transition function for use with a fly-by-wire (FBW) flight control system 10 (illustrated schematically in Figure 2).
  • the flight control system 10 is represented by, but not limited to, a Primary Flight Control System (PFCS).
  • PFCS Primary Flight Control System
  • AFCS automatic modes
  • the PFCS provides feed-forward and feedback paths to achieve the desired response characteristics and to compensate for disturbances acting on the aircraft. It should be understood that the surface contact transition function is primarily utilized for control of a main rotor system of a rotary-wing aircraft, however, other aircraft such as tilt- rotor aircraft will also benefit herefrom.
  • Pilot inputs are interpreted by the command model and are converted into commanded rate and feed forward commands.
  • the PFCS receives the commanded rates and "other inputs," such as airspeed, altitude, vertical velocity, angular rates, altitude and such like. Commanded rate is compared with actual rate and rate error is generated.
  • Commanded rate also generates commanded attitude.
  • Commanded attitude is compared with actual attitude and attitude error is generated.
  • the "other inputs" may be utilized for scheduling and other functionality.
  • the PFCS operates on the error signals and produces proportional and integral commands.
  • the proportional commands are represented by the rate feedback and attitude feedback signals.
  • the integral commands are represented by trim command. It should be understood that various active flight control systems will be usable with the methodology of the present invention.
  • the fly-by-wire flight control system 10 typically includes swashplate controllers for pitch and roll control which are described as "unique trim” controllers.
  • Unique trim permits a flight control system (stick) which need not be proportional to the swashplate controller position but remains in a center (detent) position unless a maneuver is being commanded.
  • the flight control computer provides unique trim with a trim follow-up function that activates when the stick is out of detent.
  • the FCC trim follow-up function controls the swashplate angle when the stick is moved out of detent and holds the swashplate in that position until another pilot stick input is applied. This differs from proportional control in which the stick position corresponds directly to swashplate angle, and the pilot's control stick may be physically retained in place by a retention system such as a magnetic brake mechanism which the pilot may selectively activate/release.
  • trim follow-up operates well because the aircraft responds to the change in swashplate angle - causing the flight path to change correspondingly. Trim follow-up typically acts on the attitude of the aircraft so the aircraft stays where it is put after a control input. Workload for the pilot is reduced because there is no longer a requirement to push a button to cause a maneuver and find the proper location to maintain the new state (attitude). The total amount of control travel is also reduced because proportionality is not required.
  • weight-on-wheels switches on the landing selectively disable the trim follow-up functions.
  • the trim follow-up functions are disabled as appropriate by axis.
  • the aircraft flight control system then essentially operates with pseudo proportional control laws such that the pilot receives essentially direct feedback between stick input and control displacement. That is, the pilot receives direct feedback as to, for example, commanded swashplate angle as related to the amount of stick input applied out of detent.
  • the WOW switches and disablement by axis assures ground contact transition is not affected too early so that the features of trim follow-up are minimally impacted while the aircraft is still in flight such that pilot workload is not unnecessarily increased.
  • the feed forward command changes based on mode of operation, i.e., the dynamics which calculate feed forward are different for flight and ground control laws.
  • the surface contact transition function assures that the trim follow-up functions as well as other systems may still be properly controlled to facilitate safe ground operation.
  • the surface contact transition function (illustrated graphically) emulates the functions of the WOW switches.
  • the surface contact transition function utilizes a lagged collective position to estimate where in the landing profile transition away from trim follow-up should occur such as normally performed via WOW switches.
  • the flight mode override switch is activated. After the flight mode override switch is activated and collective reduction is identified thereafter, trim follow-up is disabled, attitude feedback is turned off, and control system sensitivity begins to be reduced.
  • the emergency surface contact transition function emulates the WOW switch system when there is any weight on any gear. That is, as collective is reduced after the flight mode override switch is activated, the system emulates an ANYWOW condition. Under an ANYWOW condition, SWl is open ( Figure 2) which removes commanded rate and switches in the damped mode (commanded rate equal to zero). Feed forward is still operable and operates in a "stick to head" pseudo-proportional mode while attitude feedback and trim command are disconnected.
  • Switch SW3 operates to control the automatic trim follow-up integrator.
  • Switch SW4 remains open.
  • the automatic trim follow-up integrator is held to its last fly state value, unless the direction of movement of the trim follow-up integrator is toward the ground state neutral position. When the integrator moves toward ground state neutral position, a lower rate of trim follow-up is used.
  • the movement of the integration is axis dependent in response to a pilot command (i.e., stick out of detent).
  • feed forward shaping changes to proportional control on all three axes.
  • the AFCS attitude hold commands and trim transfer may also be inhibited.
  • the remaining control law augmentation becomes only the rate feedbacks contained in the PFCS control laws. Pitch and roll rate damping are preferably only enabled when AFCS is engaged.
  • Point #2 emulates an axis constrained condition which generally emulates when an aircraft axis is constrained by two gear touching down.
  • Switch SW2 Figure 2 is now opened and rate feedback is gradually eliminated. Now, the flight control system will operate in "stick to head” mode (true proportional) with no rate damping. Switch SW3 still operates as described above. Switch SW4 is still open.
  • the surface contact transition function ( Figure 1) of the flight control system 10 transitions the flight control laws to a neutral state which emulates an ALLWOW condition which essentially equates to contact on all WOW switches.
  • Point #3 occurs essentially when collective is lowered to the "heavy state” which is typically just prior to flat pitch.
  • Switch SW4 ( Figure 2) is now closed to drive the rotor system to the neutral ground state position.
  • all transitions performed by the surface contact transition function are "faded" over a relatively short period of time- typically 5-10 seconds - such that the automatic trim follow-up integrators are slowly and fully transitioned to the ground state neutral position to provide a smooth transition therebetween.
  • the surface contact transition function may be utilized with other identification systems such as water contact sensors to further refine the response.
  • other flight control laws may be integrated into the surface control transition function by, for example only, reducing authority of the FBW control laws to be comparable with the authority of a proportional surface contact control scheme.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)

Abstract

A method of transitioning from a complex response flight state to a ground operation control state. Pilot intent is determined through collective position information to control the transition. An independent cockpit switch activates an emergency surface contact transition function for use with a fly-by-wire (FBW) flight control system. Once the surface contact transition function is active, FBW control laws transition from a fully augmented flight state, through an augmentation deactivation state and into the surface contact state.

Description

SURFACE CONTACT OVERRIDE LANDING SCHEME FOR A FBW ROTARY- WING AIRCRAFT
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a fly by wire flight control system for a rotary-wing aircraft, and more particularly to a full authority fly by wire flight control system which accommodates an emergency landing scenario.
[0002] Fly By Wire [FBW] flight control systems are increasingly state of the art in the control of rotary-wing aircraft. The highly specialized control laws in a FBW flight control system provide functionality for all states of aircraft operation including ground state operation. Rotary-wing aircraft with a partial authority flight control augmentation system do not require mode changes when the aircraft is on the ground, because there is little potential for unwanted feedback into the control system. A full authority FBW flight control system, however, requires a specific surface contact mode to prevent undesired feedback into the control system. The surface contact mode transitions between a fully augmented normal flight control state and a ground state once the majority of the aircraft weight is supported on the ground.
[0003] The surface contact mode is initiated through weight-on-wheels switches on the landing gear. As the aircraft touches the ground, landing gear struts compress, and switches activate the ground contact state. There are, however, landing scenarios where the weight-on-wheels switches will not function such as when the landing gear cannot be extended due to a malfunction, or when the aircraft must be landed in water, e.g., ditched.
[0004] Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a fly-by-wire flight control system which can transition into a ground contact state during an emergency landing scenario when weight-on-wheel switches may not be usable. This state would be referred to as a surface contact override transition mode.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] A FBW flight control system according to the present invention provides a control law structure that satisfied military handling qualities and civil certification requirements. A surface contact transition function of the flight control system controls the transition from a relatively complex augmented response flight state to a controlled ground operation state. [0006] The surface contact override transition function is enabled by pilot action such as a through a cockpit switch. Once the surface contact override transition function is active, the control laws transition through three different states. These states are the fully augmented flight state, augmentation deactivation state and the surface contact state.
[0007] Fully Augmented Flight State
[0008] The normal flight state includes augmented full authority flight control laws. This augmentation is what must be disabled when the aircraft becomes constrained by the landing surface.
[0009] Augmentation Deactivation State
[0010] This state is dedicated to disabling the augmentation in the flight control system and transitioning to a proportional surface contact control scheme. The transition is initiated by identification of pilot intent to descend and accomplished through a relationship to lagged collective stick position. The collective position is lagged to be certain that the pilot actually intends to descend. A predetermined threshold is compared to the current collective position relative to the position at surface function transition function engagement or a predetermined absolute position. As the threshold is breached, the augmentation is disabled over an associated time period so that upon surface contact little or no augmentation remains.
[0011] Surface Contact and "Heavy" State
[0012] The collective position is also employed to determine when the aircraft is "heavy" - the majority of aircraft weight supported upon a surface. A comparator determines when the collective stick position is low enough, by comparing lagged stick position to a predetermined threshold relative to the position at surface contact transition function engagement or a predetermined absolute position to signal the "heavy" state such that the rotor control system may then be transitioned to a neutral condition.
[0013] The present invention therefore provides a fly-by-wire flight control system which can transition into ground contact state during an emergency landing scenario in which weight-on-wheel sensors may not be usable.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014] The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the currently preferred embodiment. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows:
[0015] Figure 1 is a flow diagram of a surface contract transition function for a FBW flight control system;
[0016] Figure 2 is a schematic representation of a FBW flight control system for use with the surface contact transition function; and
[0017] Figure 3 is a graphical representation of the surface contact transition function related to WOW switch references.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0018] Figure 1 illustrates a flow diagram for an emergency surface contact transition function for use with a fly-by-wire (FBW) flight control system 10 (illustrated schematically in Figure 2). The flight control system 10 is represented by, but not limited to, a Primary Flight Control System (PFCS). Other automatic modes, (AFCS) can be added as requirements dictate.
[0019] The PFCS provides feed-forward and feedback paths to achieve the desired response characteristics and to compensate for disturbances acting on the aircraft. It should be understood that the surface contact transition function is primarily utilized for control of a main rotor system of a rotary-wing aircraft, however, other aircraft such as tilt- rotor aircraft will also benefit herefrom.
[0020] Pilot inputs are interpreted by the command model and are converted into commanded rate and feed forward commands. The PFCS receives the commanded rates and "other inputs," such as airspeed, altitude, vertical velocity, angular rates, altitude and such like. Commanded rate is compared with actual rate and rate error is generated.
[0021] Commanded rate also generates commanded attitude. Commanded attitude is compared with actual attitude and attitude error is generated. The "other inputs" may be utilized for scheduling and other functionality. The PFCS operates on the error signals and produces proportional and integral commands. The proportional commands are represented by the rate feedback and attitude feedback signals. The integral commands are represented by trim command. It should be understood that various active flight control systems will be usable with the methodology of the present invention.
[0022] The fly-by-wire flight control system 10 typically includes swashplate controllers for pitch and roll control which are described as "unique trim" controllers. Unique trim permits a flight control system (stick) which need not be proportional to the swashplate controller position but remains in a center (detent) position unless a maneuver is being commanded. The flight control computer (FCC) provides unique trim with a trim follow-up function that activates when the stick is out of detent. The FCC trim follow-up function controls the swashplate angle when the stick is moved out of detent and holds the swashplate in that position until another pilot stick input is applied. This differs from proportional control in which the stick position corresponds directly to swashplate angle, and the pilot's control stick may be physically retained in place by a retention system such as a magnetic brake mechanism which the pilot may selectively activate/release.
[0023] In flight, trim follow-up operates well because the aircraft responds to the change in swashplate angle - causing the flight path to change correspondingly. Trim follow-up typically acts on the attitude of the aircraft so the aircraft stays where it is put after a control input. Workload for the pilot is reduced because there is no longer a requirement to push a button to cause a maneuver and find the proper location to maintain the new state (attitude). The total amount of control travel is also reduced because proportionality is not required.
[0024] When in contact with the ground, however, trim follow-up may hinder control of the aircraft because the ground resists aircraft motion. In other words, if the trim follow-up control laws are of the type that change attitude, and the ground resists that attitude change, the trim follow-up function tends to "run away" trying to satisfy the pilot's input. This may result in excessive control movement, for example, excessive swashplate angle. If allowed to "run away" enough, structural problems may occur or the aircraft may upset while on the ground, e.g. dynamic rollover.
[0025] To convey that the aircraft is in a ground contact state to the aircraft flight control system, weight-on-wheels (WOW) switches on the landing selectively disable the trim follow-up functions. Preferably, the trim follow-up functions are disabled as appropriate by axis. The aircraft flight control system then essentially operates with pseudo proportional control laws such that the pilot receives essentially direct feedback between stick input and control displacement. That is, the pilot receives direct feedback as to, for example, commanded swashplate angle as related to the amount of stick input applied out of detent. The WOW switches and disablement by axis assures ground contact transition is not affected too early so that the features of trim follow-up are minimally impacted while the aircraft is still in flight such that pilot workload is not unnecessarily increased. Furthermore, the feed forward command changes based on mode of operation, i.e., the dynamics which calculate feed forward are different for flight and ground control laws.
[0026] Should a situation occur where the WOW switches are unavailable, such as when the landing gear cannot be extended due to a malfunction or when the aircraft must be landed in the water, e.g., ditched, the surface contact transition function assures that the trim follow-up functions as well as other systems may still be properly controlled to facilitate safe ground operation.
[0027] Referring to Figure 3, the surface contact transition function (illustrated graphically) emulates the functions of the WOW switches. The surface contact transition function utilizes a lagged collective position to estimate where in the landing profile transition away from trim follow-up should occur such as normally performed via WOW switches.
[0028] During an emergency landing situation where the WOW switches are not expected to be available, the pilot will manually initiate a ground transition by activation of a flight mode override switch in the cockpit (point #1) which initiates operation of the surface contact transition function. Prior to point #1 the aircraft is not in contact with the ground, and all flight control laws operate in their normal fully augmented flight state.
[0029] In order to reduce pilot workload, instead of simply dropping the flight controls laws into the ground state immediately upon activation of the flight mode override switch, the lagged collective position is utilized to estimate proximity to the ground. A gradual transition to the ground control laws during landing (collective reduction) is then performed to retain as much of the workload-reducing flight control law functions as possible until the last possible moment in the landing profile.
[0030] At point #1, the flight mode override switch is activated. After the flight mode override switch is activated and collective reduction is identified thereafter, trim follow-up is disabled, attitude feedback is turned off, and control system sensitivity begins to be reduced. Between Point #1 and point #2, the emergency surface contact transition function emulates the WOW switch system when there is any weight on any gear. That is, as collective is reduced after the flight mode override switch is activated, the system emulates an ANYWOW condition. Under an ANYWOW condition, SWl is open (Figure 2) which removes commanded rate and switches in the damped mode (commanded rate equal to zero). Feed forward is still operable and operates in a "stick to head" pseudo-proportional mode while attitude feedback and trim command are disconnected. Switch SW3 operates to control the automatic trim follow-up integrator. Switch SW4 remains open. Preferably, the automatic trim follow-up integrator is held to its last fly state value, unless the direction of movement of the trim follow-up integrator is toward the ground state neutral position. When the integrator moves toward ground state neutral position, a lower rate of trim follow-up is used. The movement of the integration is axis dependent in response to a pilot command (i.e., stick out of detent).
[0031] In addition, feed forward shaping changes to proportional control on all three axes. The AFCS attitude hold commands and trim transfer may also be inhibited. The remaining control law augmentation becomes only the rate feedbacks contained in the PFCS control laws. Pitch and roll rate damping are preferably only enabled when AFCS is engaged.
[0032] As collective is further reduced, all rate feedback is disabled at point #2. Point #2 emulates an axis constrained condition which generally emulates when an aircraft axis is constrained by two gear touching down. Switch SW2 (Figure 2) is now opened and rate feedback is gradually eliminated. Now, the flight control system will operate in "stick to head" mode (true proportional) with no rate damping. Switch SW3 still operates as described above. Switch SW4 is still open.
[0033] As the collective is still further reduced from point #2 toward point #3, the surface contact transition function (Figure 1) of the flight control system 10 transitions the flight control laws to a neutral state which emulates an ALLWOW condition which essentially equates to contact on all WOW switches. Point #3 occurs essentially when collective is lowered to the "heavy state" which is typically just prior to flat pitch. Switch SW4 (Figure 2) is now closed to drive the rotor system to the neutral ground state position. Preferably, all transitions performed by the surface contact transition function are "faded" over a relatively short period of time- typically 5-10 seconds - such that the automatic trim follow-up integrators are slowly and fully transitioned to the ground state neutral position to provide a smooth transition therebetween.
[0034] It should be understood that the surface contact transition function may be utilized with other identification systems such as water contact sensors to further refine the response. Furthermore, other flight control laws may be integrated into the surface control transition function by, for example only, reducing authority of the FBW control laws to be comparable with the authority of a proportional surface contact control scheme.
[0035] It should be understood that relative positional terms such as "forward," "aft," "upper," "lower," "above," "below," and the like are with reference to the normal operational attitude of the vehicle and should not be considered otherwise limiting. [0036] Although particular step sequences are shown, described, and claimed, it should be understood that steps may be performed in any order, separated or combined unless otherwise indicated and will still benefit from the present invention.
[0037] The foregoing description is exemplary rather than defined by the limitations within. Many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. The preferred embodiments of this invention have been disclosed, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would recognize that certain modifications would come within the scope of this invention. It is, therefore, to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For that reason the following claims should be studied to determine the true scope and content of this invention.

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. A method of transitioning a Fly-By- Wire flight control system to a ground state comprising the steps of:
(A) reducing a flight control augmentation in response to a reduction in a collective pitch position.
2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
(B) identifying a pilot input which initiates a surface contact transition function prior to said step (A).
3. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising the steps of:
(a) identifying a pilot input which initiates a surface contact transition function;
(b) identifying a first collective position which is less than a collective position at said step (a); and
(c) disabling a trim follow-up flight control law function in response to said step (b).
4. The method as recited in claim 3, further comprising the steps of:
(d) identifying a second collective position; and
(e) reducing a rate feedback flight control law function in response to said step (d).
5. The method as recited in claim 4, further comprising the steps of:
(f) identifying a third collective position less than the second collective position; and
(g) transitioning the flight control law to a neutral state in response to said step (T).
6. A method of transitioning a Fly-By- Wire flight control system to a ground state comprising the steps of:
(A) identifying a pilot input which initiates a surface contact transition function;
(B) monitoring a collective pitch position; and
(C) reducing a flight control augmentation in a lagged manner in response to a reduction in the collective pitch position.
7. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein said step (C) further comprises: (a) transitioning a flight control law to a proportional response.
8. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein said step (C) further comprises: (a) transiting a flight control law to a damped mode.
9. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein said step (C) further comprises:
(a) transiting a feed forward command for a flight control law to a pseudo- proportional mode.
10. The method as recited in claim 6, wherein said step (C) further comprises: (a) reducing a trim follow-up function of a flight control law.
11. A method of transitioning a Fly-By- Wire flight control system to a ground state comprising the steps of:
(A) initiating a surface contact transition function;
(B) identifying a first collective position which is less than a collective position at said step (A);
(C) reducing a trim follow-up function of a control law in response to said step (B);
(D) identifying a second collective pitch position less than the first collective pitch position;
(E) reducing a rate feedback of the control law in response to said step (D)
(F) identifying a third collective pitch position less than the second collective pitch position; and
(G) transitioning the flight control law to a neutral state in response to said step (F).
12. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein said step (B) further comprises:
(a) holding an integrator of the trim follow-up function to a state at said step (A).
13. The method as recited in claim 12, wherein said step (B) further comprises:
(b) reducing attitude feedback of the control law until disabled after a period of time.
14. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein said step (C) further comprises: (a) transitioning the flight control law to a proportional response.
15. The method as recited in claim 11, wherein said step (E) further comprises:
(a) reducing the rate feedback of the control law until disabled after a period of time.
16. The method as recited in claim 15, wherein said step (E) further comprises:
(b) operating the control law in a proportional mode with no rate feedback.
PCT/US2007/012890 2006-06-02 2007-05-31 Surface contact override landing scheme for a fbw rotary-wing aircraft WO2008108787A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07873878.8A EP2033059B1 (en) 2006-06-02 2007-05-31 Surface contact override landing scheme for a fbw rotary-wing aircraft

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/446,464 US7742846B2 (en) 2006-06-02 2006-06-02 Surface contact override landing scheme for a FBW rotary-wing aircraft
US11/446,464 2006-06-02

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008108787A2 true WO2008108787A2 (en) 2008-09-12
WO2008108787A3 WO2008108787A3 (en) 2008-11-13

Family

ID=38791348

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2007/012890 WO2008108787A2 (en) 2006-06-02 2007-05-31 Surface contact override landing scheme for a fbw rotary-wing aircraft

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US7742846B2 (en)
EP (1) EP2033059B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008108787A2 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3091412A1 (en) 2015-05-04 2016-11-09 Airbus Helicopters Rotorcraft control system, associated rotorcraft and corresponding control method
EP3193230A1 (en) * 2016-01-13 2017-07-19 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Pilot activated trim for fly-by-wire aircraft

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8165733B2 (en) * 2007-09-04 2012-04-24 Embraer S.A. Stall, buffeting, low speed and high attitude protection system
US7988089B2 (en) * 2008-03-27 2011-08-02 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Swashplate trajectory control
ITTO20090079U1 (en) * 2009-06-10 2010-12-11 Agusta Spa SYSTEM FOR THE MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL OF THE SPEED OF ONE OR MORE ROTORS OF AN AIRCRAFT SUITABLE FOR FLYING AT A FIXED POINT
DE102010012071B4 (en) * 2010-03-19 2013-04-04 Airbus Operations Gmbh Method and system for controlling an aircraft component during a water landing
US9304516B2 (en) 2011-01-14 2016-04-05 Textron Innovations Inc. Flight control laws for vertical flight path
US8914165B2 (en) 2011-03-29 2014-12-16 Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation Integrated flight control and cockpit display system
US8862377B2 (en) 2011-03-31 2014-10-14 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Method and system for detecting forces on aircraft
US9354635B2 (en) 2012-06-05 2016-05-31 Textron Innovations Inc. Takeoff/landing touchdown protection management system
US9308985B2 (en) 2014-04-11 2016-04-12 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Deceleration to hover modulation
US10562609B2 (en) 2016-04-12 2020-02-18 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation High trim demand relief
US10099802B2 (en) * 2017-02-14 2018-10-16 Honeywell International Inc. Methods and systems to detect and alert a dynamic rollover condition for an aircraft
US10766613B2 (en) * 2017-11-28 2020-09-08 Textron Innovations Inc. System and method for rotorcraft-weight-on-wheels flight state transition control
US11435762B1 (en) * 2021-08-17 2022-09-06 Beta Air, Llc System and method for the autonomous transition of an electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft

Family Cites Families (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3938320A (en) * 1974-07-17 1976-02-17 General Motors Corporation Starting system for a helicopter power plant control
US4032083A (en) * 1976-04-12 1977-06-28 United Technologies Corporation Automatic gain control for stability augmentation systems
IL57402A (en) * 1978-09-20 1982-05-31 Israel Aircraft Ind Ltd Excessive descent-rate warning system
GB2073887B (en) * 1980-03-15 1984-04-26 British Aerospace Aircraft thrust controller
US4355294A (en) * 1980-05-02 1982-10-19 Automation Industries, Inc. Altitude alert system
US4379678A (en) * 1980-10-07 1983-04-12 Textron, Inc. Individual blade control
CA1243119A (en) * 1985-02-22 1988-10-11 Michael M. Grove Aircraft terrain warning system with configuration modified warning and improved mode switching
US4767085A (en) * 1986-10-27 1988-08-30 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Synthetic speed stability flight control system
US4956780A (en) * 1988-12-08 1990-09-11 The Boeing Company Flight path angle command flight control system for landing flare
US5001646A (en) * 1988-12-19 1991-03-19 Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation Automated helicopter flight control system
US5327161A (en) * 1989-08-09 1994-07-05 Microtouch Systems, Inc. System and method for emulating a mouse input device with a touchpad input device
CA2026331A1 (en) * 1989-10-03 1991-04-04 William D. Ramsey Self-adjusting slide assembly for weight on gear switch
US5124938A (en) * 1990-07-23 1992-06-23 Recon/Optical, Inc. Gyroless platform stabilization techniques
US5156363A (en) * 1991-02-28 1992-10-20 United Technologies Corporation Helicopter collective stick of the displacement type occupying a minimum space envelope yet whose grip generates an arc of large radius
US5209429A (en) * 1991-05-16 1993-05-11 United Technologies Corporation Helicopter with retractable rotor for transport
US5222691A (en) * 1991-08-28 1993-06-29 United Technologies Corporation Automatic turn coordination trim control for rotary wing aircraft
ES2099832T3 (en) * 1991-08-28 1997-06-01 United Technologies Corp VERTICAL CONTROL SYSTEM FOR HELICOPTER.
FR2714883B1 (en) * 1994-01-12 1996-03-29 Bernard Durand Autopilot for air-speed objective helicopters.
US5418858A (en) * 1994-07-11 1995-05-23 Cooper Tire & Rubber Company Method and apparatus for intelligent active and semi-active vibration control
FR2728541A1 (en) * 1994-12-22 1996-06-28 Eurocopter France CYCLIC SLEEVE SYSTEM WITH GRADIENT FOR HELICOPTER
US5666110A (en) * 1995-03-09 1997-09-09 Paterson; Noel S. Helicopter enhanced descent after take-off warning for GPWS
US5826833A (en) * 1995-05-15 1998-10-27 The Boeing Company System for providing an air/ground signal to aircraft flight control systems
US5722620A (en) * 1995-05-15 1998-03-03 The Boeing Company Aircraft pitch-axis stability and command augmentation
US5615119A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-03-25 Aurora Flight Sciences Corporation Fault tolerant automatic control system utilizing analytic redundancy
WO1997020734A2 (en) * 1995-12-06 1997-06-12 Mc Donnell Douglas Corporation Flight control system for jet powered tri-mode aircraft
US5713438A (en) * 1996-03-25 1998-02-03 Lord Corporation Method and apparatus for non-model based decentralized adaptive feedforward active vibration control
US5777871A (en) * 1996-06-04 1998-07-07 William L. Wise Method and apparatus for compensation for operator in a closed-loop control system
US6043759A (en) * 1996-07-29 2000-03-28 Alliedsignal Air-ground logic system and method for rotary wing aircraft
US6189836B1 (en) * 1998-09-25 2001-02-20 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model-following control system using acceleration feedback
US6961445B1 (en) * 2001-05-04 2005-11-01 Rockwell Collins Image processing warning system
US7095488B2 (en) * 2003-01-21 2006-08-22 Rosemount Aerospace Inc. System for profiling objects on terrain forward and below an aircraft utilizing a cross-track laser altimeter
US7946528B2 (en) * 2005-04-15 2011-05-24 Urban Aeronautics, Ltd. Flight control system especially suited for VTOL vehicles
US7751976B2 (en) * 2005-08-26 2010-07-06 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Rotary wing aircraft flight control system with a proximity cueing and avoidance system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of EP2033059A4 *

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3091412A1 (en) 2015-05-04 2016-11-09 Airbus Helicopters Rotorcraft control system, associated rotorcraft and corresponding control method
US9915954B2 (en) 2015-05-04 2018-03-13 Airbus Helicopters Rotorcraft control system, associated rotorcraft, and corresponding control method
EP3193230A1 (en) * 2016-01-13 2017-07-19 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Pilot activated trim for fly-by-wire aircraft
US10618635B2 (en) 2016-01-13 2020-04-14 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Pilot activated trim for fly-by-wire aircraft

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20070282493A1 (en) 2007-12-06
EP2033059A4 (en) 2013-04-24
EP2033059A2 (en) 2009-03-11
WO2008108787A3 (en) 2008-11-13
EP2033059B1 (en) 2014-05-14
US7742846B2 (en) 2010-06-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7742846B2 (en) Surface contact override landing scheme for a FBW rotary-wing aircraft
CN108536159B (en) Rotorcraft control mode transition smoothing
CA2816318C (en) Takeoff/landing touchdown protection management system
EP3136197B1 (en) Aircraft stall protection system
US9405295B2 (en) Flight control system
CA2824932C (en) Flight control laws for vertical flight path control
US7770842B2 (en) Aircraft flight control surface actuation system communication architecture
US7433765B2 (en) Fly by wire static longitudinal stability compensator system
EP3101505B1 (en) Flight control laws for a rotary aircraft
US7840316B2 (en) Limited authority and full authority mode fly-by-wire flight control surface actuation control system
US20020030142A1 (en) Semiautonomous flight director
US20090187292A1 (en) Integrated pitch, roll, and yaw inceptor
WO2009030005A2 (en) Stall, buffeting, low speed and high attitude protection systems
US5036469A (en) Pitch attitude command flight control system for landing flare
EP2506108B1 (en) Flight trajectory compensation system for airspeed variations
JP2024508420A (en) Pilot interface for aircraft autothrottle control
EP3929073A1 (en) Longitudinal trim control movement during takeoff rotation
JP2017077882A (en) Roll attitude-dependent roll rate limit
KR102194239B1 (en) Control method and system of aircraft weight on wheel signal based on multi sensor data
US10562609B2 (en) High trim demand relief
WO1980001557A1 (en) Desensitizing helicopter control response to in advertent pilot input
CN110116799A (en) Flight control system and method for aircraft
GB2621823A (en) Method and apparatus for controlling aircraft ground manoeuvres
Kendall The design and development of flying qualities for the C-17 military transport airplane
EP3613671B1 (en) Rotorcraft control mode transition smoothing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07873878

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2007873878

Country of ref document: EP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: RU