WO2008024447A2 - Differentiation of progenitor cells into fibroblasts - Google Patents

Differentiation of progenitor cells into fibroblasts Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2008024447A2
WO2008024447A2 PCT/US2007/018670 US2007018670W WO2008024447A2 WO 2008024447 A2 WO2008024447 A2 WO 2008024447A2 US 2007018670 W US2007018670 W US 2007018670W WO 2008024447 A2 WO2008024447 A2 WO 2008024447A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
ctgf
hmscs
differentiation
fibroblast
progenitor cells
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US2007/018670
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2008024447A3 (en
Inventor
Jeremy Mao
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Columbia University in the City of New York
Original Assignee
Columbia University in the City of New York
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Columbia University in the City of New York filed Critical Columbia University in the City of New York
Publication of WO2008024447A2 publication Critical patent/WO2008024447A2/en
Publication of WO2008024447A3 publication Critical patent/WO2008024447A3/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N5/00Undifferentiated human, animal or plant cells, e.g. cell lines; Tissues; Cultivation or maintenance thereof; Culture media therefor
    • C12N5/06Animal cells or tissues; Human cells or tissues
    • C12N5/0602Vertebrate cells
    • C12N5/0652Cells of skeletal and connective tissues; Mesenchyme
    • C12N5/0656Adult fibroblasts
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N2501/00Active agents used in cell culture processes, e.g. differentation
    • C12N2501/10Growth factors

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates differentiation of progenitor cells into fibroblasts.
  • hMSCs human mesenchymal cells
  • CGF recombinant human connective tissue growth factor
  • One aspect of the invention provides a method of inducing fibroblast differentiation. Such method includes the steps of providing a fibroblast progenitor cell; contacting the fibroblast progenitor cell with a recombinant human connective tissue growth factor (CTGF); and culturing the fibroblast progenitor cell under conditions allowing differentiation to a fibroblast cell.
  • CGF human connective tissue growth factor
  • the fibroblast progenitor cell is a mesenchymal stem cell (e.g., a human mesenchymal stem cell).
  • the CTGF is present at about 1 to about 1000 ng/ml (e.g, about 100 ng/ml). In various embodiments, culturing can occur for about 2 to about 4 weeks. In various embodiments, the cultured fibroblast progenitor cell contacted with CTGF produce substantially more collagen than a cultured fibroblast progenitor cell not contacted with CTGF and ascorbic acid.
  • FIG. 1 is a series of images depicting trichrome staining of tissue sections.
  • the trichrome staining shows marked collagen synthesis upon CTGF for 4 wks.
  • Figure 2 is a bar graph depicting collagen type I contents with or without CTGF treatment.
  • FIG. 3 is a series of images depicitng Tn-C contents with CTGF treatment.
  • hMSCs human mesenchymal cells
  • CTGF connective tissue growth factor
  • ascorbic acid recombinant human connective tissue growth factor
  • monlolayer-cultured hMSCs treated with CTGF cocktail showed significant increases in markers for fibroblastic differentiation (see Example 2).
  • the inducement of ex vivo differentiation of hMSCs into fibroblasts, as described herein, can be applied to tissue engineering and tissue regeneration of interstitial fibrous tissue, tendons, ligaments, cranial sutures, fascia, periosteum, and any internal organs with interstitial fibrous tissue.
  • One aspect of the invention provides an ex vivo culturing protocol for fibroblastic differentiation of tissue progenitor cells (e.g., human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs)) using bioactive factors such as connective tissue growth factor (CTGF).
  • tissue progenitor cells e.g., human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs)
  • CGF connective tissue growth factor
  • Fibroblastic differentiation from stem cells can be employed in engineering of tissues including, but not limited to, tendons, ligaments, periodontal ligament, cranial sutures and as interstitial filler of all organs.
  • CTGF connective tissue growth factor
  • the tissue progenitor cell is a precursor to tissue of interest and differentiates in the presence of CTGF.
  • Such cells can be isolated, purified, and/or cultured by a variety of means known to the art Methods for the isolation and culture of tissue progenitor cells are discussed in, for example, Vunjak- Novakovic and Freshney (2006) Culture of Cells for Tissue Engineering, Wiley-Liss, ISBN 0471629359.
  • the tissue progenitor cells can be derived from the same or different species as the transplant recipient.
  • the progenitor cells can be derived from an animal, including, but not limited to, mammals, reptiles, and avians, more preferably horses, cows, dogs, cats, sheep, pigs, and chickens, and most preferably human.
  • Connective tissue growth factor is available from a variety of commercial sources (e.g., BioVendor Laboratory Medicine, Inc., Candler, NC).
  • the connective tissue growth factor is preferably human connective tissue growth factor (e.g., Accession No. NP_001892).
  • Connective tissue growth factor can be supplied at, for example, a concentration of about 0 to 1000 ng/mL.
  • the growth factor can be present at a concentration of about 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, or 1000 ng/mL.
  • the fibroblast progenitor cell contacted with the connective tissue growth factor is incubated under conditions allowing differentiation to a fibroblast cell.
  • Methods of culturing progenitor cells are generally known in the art and such methods can be adapted so as to provide optimal conditions for differentiation of progenitor cells contacted with connective tissue growth factor.
  • Human bone marrow samples taken from healthy donors ranging from 18 to 45 years of age were purchased from AIICeIIs (Berkeley, CA). The bone marrows were prepared to isolate hMSCs per previous methods (Alhadlaq and Mao (2004) Stem Cells Dev. 13, 436-448; Marion ET AL. (2005) Mech. Adv. Mat. Struct. 12, 1-8). Briefly, the whole bone marrow sample was incubated with mesenchymal cell enrichment cocktail (RosetteSepTM; StemCell Technologies, Inc., Vancouver, Canada). After incubation, the marrow sample was diluted with PBS containing 2% FBS and 1 mM EDTA.
  • mesenchymal cell enrichment cocktail RosetteSepTM
  • a density gradient solution (Ficoll-Paque®; StemCell Technologies, Inc., Vancouver, Canada). Following centrifugation, enriched cells were removed and resuspended in cell culture media consisting of 89% DMEM, 10% FBS, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (basal cell culture media). Cells were passaged up to two times each time upon confluency. Upon the second passage, the isolated hMSCs were grown in monolayer (5,000 cells/well) in 12-well culture plates in basal cell culture media, with fresh medium change every 3-4 days.
  • hMSCs were treated with DMEM supplemented with 0 and 100 ng/ml of recombinant human CTGF (BioVendor, .Candler, NC) and 50 ⁇ g/ml ascorbic acid, with conditioned medium change every third day.
  • CTGF recombinant human CTGF
  • Tn-C tenascin-C
  • IBL-America IBL-America, Minneapolis, MN
  • selected markers for ligament fibroblasts Altman et al. (2002) FASEB J. 16, 270-272
  • the lysis of the selected extracellular matrix was performed using 0.5 M acetic acid solution. Collagen deposition was visualized using Trichrome staining.
  • hMSCs were separately induced to differentiate into osteoblasts and chondrocytes to serve as controls for the above-described fibroblastic differentiation.
  • Chondrogenic medium contained a supplement of 10 ng/ml TGF- ⁇ 3 (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN), whereas osteogenic medium contained 100 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM ⁇ -glycerophosphate, and 0.05 mM ascorbic acid-2- phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Lois, MO) per prior methods with osteogenic or chondrogenic supplemented medium (Alhadlaq and Mao (2004) Stem Cells Dev. 13, 436-448; Marion et al. (2005) Mech. Adv. Mat.
  • Results showed that CTGF-treated hMSCs fail to show osteogenic or chondrogenic differentiation.
  • hMSCs cultured in chondrogenic or osteogenic supplemented medium showed corresponding chondrogenic or osteogenic differentiation (see e.g., Figure 5C and Figure 6C, respectively).
  • neither hMSCs nor hMSCs treated with 100 ng/ml of CTGF showed any positive label of chondrogenic or osteogenic differentiation (see e.g., Figure 5A; Figure 5B; Figure 6A; Figure 6B).
  • GAG content of hMSC-derived chondrocytes was significantly higher than hMSCs with or without CTGF (Fig. 7A).
  • Calcium content of hMSC- derived osteoblasts was significantly higher than hMSCs with or without CTGF (Fig.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Rheumatology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

Disclosed herein is a new approach towards differentiation of progenitor cells, for example human mesenchymal cells (hMSCs), into fibroblasts using chemical factors, such as by the treatment of recombinant human connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and ascorbic acid. One aspect of the invention provides an ex vivo culturing protocol for fibroblastic differentiation of tissue progenitor cells (e.g., human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs)) using bioactive factors such as connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). Approaches described herein can provide for significant increases in collagen production from cultured fibroblast progenitor cells.

Description

DIFFERENTIATION OF PROGENITOR CELLS INTO FIBROBLASTS
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[oooi] This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Serial No. 60/823,250 filed August 22, 2006, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
[0002] This invention was made in part with Government support under National Institutes of Health Grant Nos. R01 DE 15291 and R01EB02332. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED ON A COMPACT DISC
[0003] Not Applicable.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[oo 04] The present invention generally relates differentiation of progenitor cells into fibroblasts.
BACKGROUND
[0005] Currently, there exists no reliable and convenient way to differentiate progenitor cells or stems cells into fibroblasts. One prior study shows the use of cyclic mechanical stimulus to induce fibroblastic differentiation. Thus, there exists the need for a non-mechanical protocol for the differentiation of tissue progenitor cells to fibroblasts.
SUMMARY
[0006] Disclosed herein is a new approach towards differentiation of progenitor cells, for example human mesenchymal cells (hMSCs), into fibroblasts using chemical factors, such as by the treatment of recombinant human connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). [0007 ] One aspect of the invention provides a method of inducing fibroblast differentiation. Such method includes the steps of providing a fibroblast progenitor cell; contacting the fibroblast progenitor cell with a recombinant human connective tissue growth factor (CTGF); and culturing the fibroblast progenitor cell under conditions allowing differentiation to a fibroblast cell.
[0008] In various embodiments, the fibroblast progenitor cell is a mesenchymal stem cell (e.g., a human mesenchymal stem cell). In various embodiments, the CTGF is present at about 1 to about 1000 ng/ml (e.g, about 100 ng/ml). In various embodiments, culturing can occur for about 2 to about 4 weeks. In various embodiments, the cultured fibroblast progenitor cell contacted with CTGF produce substantially more collagen than a cultured fibroblast progenitor cell not contacted with CTGF and ascorbic acid.
[0009] Other objects and features will be in part apparent and in part pointed out hereinafter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[ooio] Those of skill in the art will understand that the drawings, described below, are for illustrative purposes only. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings in any way.
[ooil] Figure 1 is a series of images depicting trichrome staining of tissue sections. The trichrome staining shows marked collagen synthesis upon CTGF for 4 wks. Treatment with 100 ng/ml of CTGF induced an increase in collagen deposition (scale=50 μm). Further details regarding methodology are presented in Example 2.
[0012] Figure 2 is a bar graph depicting collagen type I contents with or without CTGF treatment. Type I collagen contents in monolayer cultured hMSCs were significantly increased by the treatment with 100 ng/ml CTGF and 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid by 2 & 4 wks (n=3, *: p<0.01, **: p<0.001). Further details regarding methodology are presented in Example 2.
[0013] Figure 3 is a series of images depicitng Tn-C contents with CTGF treatment. Tn-C contents, a maker for ligament fibroblasts, were significantly increased by the treatment with 100 ng/ml CTGF and 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid by 2 & 4wks (n=3, *: p<0.01, **: p<0.001). Further details regarding methodology are presented in Example 2.
[0014] Figure 4 is a series of images depicitng morphology of hMSCs with or without CTGF treatment. Both hMSCs and CTGF-treated hMSCs showed fibroblast-like spindle shape. However, there were no significant differences in cellular morphology caused by CTGF-treatment by 2 & 4 wks (scale = 200 μm). Further details regarding methodology are presented in Example 2.
[0015] Figure 5 is a series of images depicting safranin O staining of hMSCs treated without CTGF (Figure 5A), with CTGF (Figure 5B), and with chondrogenic medium (FIGURE 5C) for 4 wks (scale = 100 μm). Further details regarding methodology are presented in Example 3.
[0016] Figure 6 is a series of images depicting von Kossa staining of hMSCs treated without CTGF (Figure 6A), with CTGF (Figure 6B), and with chondrogenic medium (FIGURE 6C) for 4 wks (scale = 100 μm). Further details regarding methodology are presented in Example 3.
[0017] Figure 7 is a series of bar graphs depicitng GAG (Figure 7A) and calcium deposition (Figure 7B) in hMSCs monolayer treated with CTGF or corresponding differentiation medium. GAG content and calcium deposition were not affected by the treatment with 100 ng/ml of CTGF by 2 & 4 wks (n=3, *: p<0.01 , **: p<0.001). Further details regarding methodology are presented in Example 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0018] Disclosed herein is a new approach towards differentiation of progenitor cells, for example human mesenchymal cells (hMSCs), into fibroblasts using chemical factors, such as by the treatment of recombinant human connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and ascorbic acid. As demonstrated herein, monlolayer-cultured hMSCs treated with CTGF cocktail showed significant increases in markers for fibroblastic differentiation (see Example 2). The inducement of ex vivo differentiation of hMSCs into fibroblasts, as described herein, can be applied to tissue engineering and tissue regeneration of interstitial fibrous tissue, tendons, ligaments, cranial sutures, fascia, periosteum, and any internal organs with interstitial fibrous tissue. [0019] One aspect of the invention provides an ex vivo culturing protocol for fibroblastic differentiation of tissue progenitor cells (e.g., human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs)) using bioactive factors such as connective tissue growth factor (CTGF). Fibroblastic differentiation from stem cells can be employed in engineering of tissues including, but not limited to, tendons, ligaments, periodontal ligament, cranial sutures and as interstitial filler of all organs. As demonstrated herein, the treatment with recombinant human CTGF on cultured hMSCs showed significant increases in type I collagen and tenascin-C (Tn-C) contents by 2 and 4 wks (see e.g., Example 2). In addition, CTGF-treated hMSCs failed to show osteogenic or chondrogenic differentiation (see e.g., Example 3). Thus is demonstrated that CTGF is an effective induction factor for fibroblastic differentiation of hMSCs.
[0020] Generally, the tissue progenitor cell is a precursor to tissue of interest and differentiates in the presence of CTGF. Such cells can be isolated, purified, and/or cultured by a variety of means known to the art Methods for the isolation and culture of tissue progenitor cells are discussed in, for example, Vunjak- Novakovic and Freshney (2006) Culture of Cells for Tissue Engineering, Wiley-Liss, ISBN 0471629359. The tissue progenitor cells can be derived from the same or different species as the transplant recipient. For example, the progenitor cells can be derived from an animal, including, but not limited to, mammals, reptiles, and avians, more preferably horses, cows, dogs, cats, sheep, pigs, and chickens, and most preferably human.
[0021] Connective tissue growth factor is available from a variety of commercial sources (e.g., BioVendor Laboratory Medicine, Inc., Candler, NC). Preferably, the connective tissue growth factor is preferably human connective tissue growth factor (e.g., Accession No. NP_001892). Connective tissue growth factor can be supplied at, for example, a concentration of about 0 to 1000 ng/mL. For example, the growth factor can be present at a concentration of about 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 500, 550, 600, 700, 750, 800, 850, 900, 950, or 1000 ng/mL.
[0022] The fibroblast progenitor cell contacted with the connective tissue growth factor is incubated under conditions allowing differentiation to a fibroblast cell. Methods of culturing progenitor cells are generally known in the art and such methods can be adapted so as to provide optimal conditions for differentiation of progenitor cells contacted with connective tissue growth factor. [0023] Having described the invention in detail, it will be apparent that modifications, variations, and equivalent embodiments are possible without departing the scope of the invention defined in the appended claims. Furthermore, it should be appreciated that all examples in the present disclosure are provided as non-limiting examples.
EXAMPLES
[0024] The following non-limiting examples are provided to further illustrate the present invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples that follow represent approaches the inventors have found function well in the practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute examples of modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can be made in the specific embodiments that are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It shall be understood that any method described in an example may or may not have been actually performed, or any composition described in an example may or may not have been actually been formed, regardless of verb tense used.
Example 1: Isolation and Culture-expansion ofhMSCs
[0025] Human bone marrow samples taken from healthy donors ranging from 18 to 45 years of age were purchased from AIICeIIs (Berkeley, CA). The bone marrows were prepared to isolate hMSCs per previous methods (Alhadlaq and Mao (2004) Stem Cells Dev. 13, 436-448; Marion ET AL. (2005) Mech. Adv. Mat. Struct. 12, 1-8). Briefly, the whole bone marrow sample was incubated with mesenchymal cell enrichment cocktail (RosetteSep™; StemCell Technologies, Inc., Vancouver, Canada). After incubation, the marrow sample was diluted with PBS containing 2% FBS and 1 mM EDTA. Diluted sample was then layered on top of a density gradient solution (Ficoll-Paque®; StemCell Technologies, Inc., Vancouver, Canada). Following centrifugation, enriched cells were removed and resuspended in cell culture media consisting of 89% DMEM, 10% FBS, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (basal cell culture media). Cells were passaged up to two times each time upon confluency. Upon the second passage, the isolated hMSCs were grown in monolayer (5,000 cells/well) in 12-well culture plates in basal cell culture media, with fresh medium change every 3-4 days.
Example 2: Treatment with Connective Tissue Growth Factor
[0026] Upon near confluence, hMSCs were treated with DMEM supplemented with 0 and 100 ng/ml of recombinant human CTGF (BioVendor, .Candler, NC) and 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid, with conditioned medium change every third day. Two to 4 weeks following CTGF and ascorbic acid treatment, the following molecular markers were assayed by ELISA: collagen type I (Chondrex, Redmond, WA) and tenascin-C (Tn-C; IBL-America, Minneapolis, MN), selected markers for ligament fibroblasts (Altman et al. (2002) FASEB J. 16, 270-272). The lysis of the selected extracellular matrix was performed using 0.5 M acetic acid solution. Collagen deposition was visualized using Trichrome staining.
[0027] Results showed that collagen and tenascin-C synthesis increases when hMSCs are treated with CTGF. Exposure of 100 ng/ml recombinant human CTGF and 50 μg/ml ascorbic acid to hMSCs induced remarkable increases in collagen deposition in 4 wks as revealed by Trichrome straining (see e.g., Figure 1 B), in comparison with hMSCs without CTGF and ascorbic acid supplements. These qualitative data were substantiated by quantitative analysis of collagen content. By 2 wks, collagen content of hMSCs treated with 100 ng/ml of CTGF increased significantly by approx. 4.5 fold in comparison with hMSCs without CTGF (p<0.01). By 4 wks, this increase was approx. 9.5 fold (p<0.001) (see e.g., Figure 2). Tn-C content, another indication of fibroblastic differentiation, in hMSCs treated with CTGF was approx. 2 folds higher than hMSCs without CTGF by 2 wks (Fig. 3). By 4 wks of CTGF treatment, Tn-C content of hMSCs treated with CTGF remained approx. 1.8 folds higher than hMSCs without CTGF.
[0028] Thus, the parallel increases in type I collagen and Tn-C contents suggest that hMSCs treated by CTGF have differentiated into cells that synthesize abundant type I collagen even though there were no significant changes in cellular morphology (see e.g., Figure 4). However, one must at least rule out the possibility of osteogenic differentiation of these CTGF-treated hMSCs, given that osteoblasts also synthesize abundant type I collagen (see Example 3). Example 3: Osteogenic and Chondrogenic Differentiation
[0029] hMSCs were separately induced to differentiate into osteoblasts and chondrocytes to serve as controls for the above-described fibroblastic differentiation. Chondrogenic medium contained a supplement of 10 ng/ml TGF-β3 (R&D Systems Inc., Minneapolis, MN), whereas osteogenic medium contained 100 nM dexamethasone, 10 mM β-glycerophosphate, and 0.05 mM ascorbic acid-2- phosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Lois, MO) per prior methods with osteogenic or chondrogenic supplemented medium (Alhadlaq and Mao (2004) Stem Cells Dev. 13, 436-448; Marion et al. (2005) Mech. Adv. Mat. Struct. 12, 1-8). At Days 14 and 28, von Kossa staining and calcium content assay (Calcium reagents, Raichem, Columbia, MD) were performed to evaluate osteogenic differentiation, whereas safranin O straining and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) assay were performed to evaluate chondrogenic differentiation (BlyscanTM, Biocolor, UK).
[0030] Results showed that CTGF-treated hMSCs fail to show osteogenic or chondrogenic differentiation. hMSCs cultured in chondrogenic or osteogenic supplemented medium showed corresponding chondrogenic or osteogenic differentiation (see e.g., Figure 5C and Figure 6C, respectively). However, neither hMSCs nor hMSCs treated with 100 ng/ml of CTGF showed any positive label of chondrogenic or osteogenic differentiation (see e.g., Figure 5A; Figure 5B; Figure 6A; Figure 6B). GAG content of hMSC-derived chondrocytes was significantly higher than hMSCs with or without CTGF (Fig. 7A). Calcium content of hMSC- derived osteoblasts was significantly higher than hMSCs with or without CTGF (Fig.

Claims

CLAIMSWhat is claimed is:
1. A method of inducing fibroblast differentiation comprising: providing a fibroblast progenitor cell; contacting the fibroblast progenitor cell with a recombinant human connective tissue growth factor (CTGF); and culturing the fibroblast progenitor cell under conditions allowing differentiation to a fibroblast cell.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the fibroblast progenitor cell is a mesenchymal stem cell.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the fibroblast progenitor cell is a human mesenchymal stem cell.
4. The method of any one of claims 1-3, wherein the CTGF is present at about 1 to about 1000 ng/ml.
5. The method of claims 4 wherein the CTGF is present at about 100 ng/ml.
6. The method of any one of claims 1-5, wherein culturing occurs for about 2 to about 4 weeks.
7. The method of any one of claims 1-6, wherein the cultured fibroblast progenitor cell contacted with CTGF produce substantially more collagen than a cultured fibroblast progenitor cell not contacted with CTGF and ascorbic acid.
PCT/US2007/018670 2006-08-22 2007-08-22 Differentiation of progenitor cells into fibroblasts Ceased WO2008024447A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US82325006P 2006-08-22 2006-08-22
US60/823,250 2006-08-22

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2008024447A2 true WO2008024447A2 (en) 2008-02-28
WO2008024447A3 WO2008024447A3 (en) 2008-12-11

Family

ID=39107417

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2007/018670 Ceased WO2008024447A2 (en) 2006-08-22 2007-08-22 Differentiation of progenitor cells into fibroblasts

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2008024447A2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102711799A (en) * 2009-11-10 2012-10-03 纽约市哥伦比亚大学理事会 Compositions and methods for wound treatment

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5837258A (en) * 1991-08-30 1998-11-17 University Of South Florida Induction of tissue, bone or cartilage formation using connective tissue growth factor

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102711799A (en) * 2009-11-10 2012-10-03 纽约市哥伦比亚大学理事会 Compositions and methods for wound treatment

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2008024447A3 (en) 2008-12-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US12215352B2 (en) Cell culture method for mesenchymal stem cells
Nimura et al. Increased proliferation of human synovial mesenchymal stem cells with autologous human serum: comparisons with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and with fetal bovine serum
Bi et al. Identification of tendon stem/progenitor cells and the role of the extracellular matrix in their niche
Lozito et al. Lizard tail skeletal regeneration combines aspects of fracture healing and blastema-based regeneration
McCarthy et al. The comparison of equine articular cartilage progenitor cells and bone marrow-derived stromal cells as potential cell sources for cartilage repair in the horse
Rikkers et al. The clinical potential of articular cartilage-derived progenitor cells: a systematic review
Giovannini et al. Micromass co-culture of human articular chondrocytes and human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells to investigate stable neocartilage tissue formation in vitro
Li et al. Chondrogenic properties of collagen type XI, a component of cartilage extracellular matrix
DE60028666T2 (en) Use of adipose-derived stromal cells for differentiation into chondrocytes and their use to repair cartilage tissue
Tapp et al. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells from the sand rat: transforming growth factor beta and 3D co-culture with human disc cells stimulate proteoglycan and collagen type I rich extracellular matrix
Sanjurjo-Rodríguez et al. Ovine mesenchymal stromal cells: morphologic, phenotypic and functional characterization for osteochondral tissue engineering
Zhang et al. Effect of autogenous growth factors released from platelet concentrates on the osteogenic differentiation of periodontal ligament fibroblasts: a comparative study
Iwasaki et al. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 stimulates osteogenesis but does not affect chondrogenesis in osteochondrogenic differentiation of periosteum‐derived cells
Gothard et al. Regionally-derived cell populations and skeletal stem cells from human foetal femora exhibit specific osteochondral and multi-lineage differentiation capacity in vitro and ex vivo
JP7285520B2 (en) Method for producing skin-derived pluripotent progenitor cells
Hejazian et al. Augmenting peripheral nerve regeneration using hair follicle stem cells in rats
Murphy et al. Inducing articular cartilage phenotype in costochondral cells
WO2008024447A2 (en) Differentiation of progenitor cells into fibroblasts
Fang et al. N-CAM is not required for initiation of secondary chondrogenesis: the role of N-CAM in skeletal condensation and differentiation
US20100003754A1 (en) Methods of differentiating stem cells
Gadomski et al. Time-and cell-specific activation of BMP signaling restrains chondrocyte hypertrophy
Chiu et al. Direct and indirect co-culture of bone marrow stem cells and adipose-derived stem cells with chondrocytes in 3D scaffold-free culture
Sun et al. Chondrogenic differentiation and three dimensional chondrogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells induced by engineered cartilage-derived conditional media
Oberley et al. Kidney glomerular explants in serum-free media: sequential morphologic and quantitative analysis of cell outgrowths
Lucena et al. Plasticity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Mouse Bone Marrow in the Presence of Conditioned Medium of the Facial Nerve and Fibroblast Growth Factor‐2

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 07837264

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: RU

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 07837264

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2