WO2007082733A1

WO2007082733A1 - Method for diagnosing polycystic kidney disease

Info

Publication number: WO2007082733A1
Application number: PCT/EP2007/000384
Authority: WO
Inventors: Gerd Walz
Original assignee: Universitaetsklinikum Freiburg
Priority date: 2006-01-17
Filing date: 2007-01-17
Publication date: 2007-07-26
Also published as: ES2356481T3; EP1974210A1; ES2475540T3; DK2341344T3; DE602007011566D1; EP2341344A1; US20110229895A1; EP2341344B1; PL2341344T3; PL1974210T3; DK1974210T3; EP1974210B1; EP1808694A1; ATE493649T1

Abstract

The present invention relates to the diagnosis of renal disorders, in particular of polycystic kidney disease (PKD). The invention provides methods for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of PKD and test kits useful in those methods.

Description

Method for Diagnosing Polycystic Kidney Disease

The present invention relates to the diagnosis of renal disorders, in particular of cystic kidney diseases. The invention provides methods for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of cystic kidney diseases and test kits useful in those methods.

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is a common hereditary disease associated with renal failure. Although cyst growth and compression of surrounding tissue may account for some loss of renal tissue, the nature of the progressive renal failure in patients with PKD is unknown.

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) occurs in approximately 1 of 1000 humans, and causes end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in more than 50% of all affected patients. Cyst formation initiates during embryogenesis, but typically does not compromise renal function until later in life. Mutations of either PKD1 or PKD2 cause the disease, but why cysts present in less than one percent of all nephrons cause renal failure remains elusive. Although persistent proliferation, fluid secretion and cyst expansion may damage the surrounding tissue by reactive changes of the extracellular matrix, increased apoptosis of healthy parenchyma appears to be the main culprit of progressive renal failure. Epithelial cells isolated from cystic kidneys show increased levels of proto-oncogene expression, a mis-localization of integral membrane proteins and active fluid secretion, but these alterations do not explain the accelerated tissue loss in vivo.

Medicaments are being developed for which a therapeutic effect in the treatment of PKD can be expected (e.g., vasopressin-2 receptor antagonists and mTOR inhibitors). Clinical phase ll/lll studies for these substances will be launched next year. It is not yet known, however, how the short term therapeutic efficiency could be monitored (i.e. within a period of about one to about four years). As the disease develops over many years, it is difficult to determine whether or not a therapeutic intervention efficiently inhibits the progression of the disease. Currently, the measurement of the amount of creatinine in serum (creatinine clearance) as a marker of renal function is the only method available. This method, however, has the disadvantage that renal function remains normal although the cysts have already developed dramatically over years. As a consequence, measurement of creatinine in serum is not suitable for monitoring the progression of PKD or for determining the therapeutic efficiency of a medicament.

It is therefore one object of the present invention to provide a method for determining the efficiency of a therapeutic treatment of PKD. Another object of this invention is to provide a method for diagnosing PKD.

It has surprisingly been found that cyst formation is associated with increased production and accumulation of secreted frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4). sFRP4 is a member of an evolving family of soluble molecules that bind both Wnt and frizzled molecules. sFRP4 is a soluble factor that antagonizes Wnt signaling and causes apoptosis. In addition, it has unexpectedly been found that sFRP4 and other members of the family of secreted frizzled related proteins are present in the serum and excreted in the urine of patients with cystic kidney disease and that the sFRP4 production correlates with the extent of cyst volume and stage of renal failure. Furthermore, sFRP5 can be specifically detected in the urine of PKD patients.

The present invention therefore relates to a method for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of a renal disorder, comprising detecting at least one secreted frizzled related protein in a sample from an individual suffering from the renal disease or suspected of suffering from the renal disease. The renal disease is preferably a cystic kidney disease, which may be acquired or inherited. More preferably the renal disorder is polycystic kidney disease (PKD). The PKD may be associated with or caused by mutations in the gene(s) PKD1 and/or PKD2. Accordingly, in a preferred embodiment the present invention relates to a method for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of PKD, comprising detecting at least one secreted frizzled related protein in a sample from an individual suffering from PKD or suspected of suffering from PKD. In another embodiment, the renal disorder is drug-induced nephrotoxicity, renal failure, urinary obstruction or renal injury.

Donauer et al. (2003), Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 14, Abstracts issue, page 106A describe that sFRP4 mRNA is upregulated in kidneys removed from patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD). However, only mRNA was detected, but not protein. In many cases, verification of microarray data has revealed that the mRNA of upregulated genes does not necessarily translate into increased production of protein. Second, the kidneys examined in that paper were removed from patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The findings on this population are not necessarily reflective of the changes in gene expression and production of functioning ADPKD kidneys. Third, the detection of sFRP4 by RT-PCR does not involve antibody-antigen complexes, but is entirely based on reverse transcription of mRNA into cDNA, and detection of this cDNA by PCR and gel electrophoresis, lmmunochemistry was not performed for sFRP4. The present invention does not relate to the discovery that mRNA is upregulated in PKD patients with end-stage renal disease, but is based on increased production of sFRP4 in PKD patients with functioning kidneys. Numerous genes are likely to be induced by uremia and/or renal replacement therapy, and specificity remains questionable. The finding that sFRP4 as well as other members of the sFRP family are detectable in the urine and the blood of patients with functioning kidneys has not been reported in the prior art.

Berndt et al. (2003) The Journal of Clinical Investigation 112(5), 785 describe studies on the phospaturic activity of sFRP4. These studies, however, were not related to PKD. Furthermore, this document does not disclose that sFRP4 may be present in the serum or urine of subjects suffering from a renal disease.

Zheng et al. (J.Am.Soc.Nephrol. 14: 2588-2595, 2003) describe studies on urinary excretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1 ) in ADPKD. This publication does not disclose the detection of sFRP4 or sFRP5. WO 02/05857 A2 discloses the human FRP-4 amino acid sequence and describes a possible role of this protein in phosphate homeostasis and transport. It does not teach detecting sFRP4 or sFRP5 for monitoring or diagnosing PKD.

The terms "secreted frizzled related protein" and "sFRP" are used interchangeably herein. sFRPs include, but are not limited to, sFRP1, sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4, and sFRP5. The sFRP is preferably capable of binding both Wnt and one or more frizzled molecules.

The term "secreted frizzled related protein-1" or "sFRPV denotes a protein having substantially the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:1 (Figure 7). Preferably, sFRP1 is a protein substantially consisting of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:1. sFRP1 also includes protein variants of the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:1 , for example due to allelic variation. The variants may have mutations relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:1 , e.g. substitutions, additions and/or deletions. One to 30, or one to 20, or one to ten, or one to five, or one to three amino acids may be substituted, deleted and/or added relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:1.

The term "secreted frizzled related protein-2" or "sFRP2" denotes a protein having substantially the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:2 (Figure 7). Preferably, sFRP2 is a protein substantially consisting of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:2. sFRP2 also includes protein variants of the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:2, for example due to allelic variation. The variants may have mutations relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:2, e.g. substitutions, additions and/or deletions. One to 30, or one to 20, or one to ten, or one to five, or one to three amino acids may be substituted, deleted and/or added relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:2.

The term "secreted frizzled related protein-3" or "sFRP3" denotes a protein having substantially the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:3 (Figure 7). Preferably, sFRP3 is a protein substantially consisting of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:3. sFRP3 also includes protein variants of the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:3, for example due to allelic variation. The variants may have mutations relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:3, e.g. substitutions, additions and/or deletions. One to 30, or one to 20, or one to ten, or one to five, or one to three amino acids may be substituted, deleted and/or added relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:3. The term "secreted frizzled related protein-4" or "sFRP4" denotes a protein having substantially the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:4 (Figure 7). Preferably, sFRP4 is a protein substantially consisting of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:4. sFRP4 also includes protein variants of the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:4, for example due to allelic variation. The variants may have mutations relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:4, e.g. substitutions, additions and/or deletions. One to 30, or one to 20, or one to ten, or one to five, or one to three amino acids may be substituted, deleted and/or added relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:4.

The term "secreted frizzled related protein-5" or "sFRP5" denotes a protein having substantially the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:5 (Figure 7). Preferably, sFRP5 is a protein substantially consisting of the amino acid sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:5. sFRP5 also includes protein variants of the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:5, for example due to allelic variation. The variants may have mutations relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:5, e.g. substitutions, additions and/or deletions. One to 30, or one to 20, or one to ten, or one to five, or one to three amino acids may be substituted, deleted and/or added relative to the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:5.

In one embodiment, the method of the invention comprises detecting one sFRP in the sample. Alternatively, the method may comprise detecting at least two different sFRPs in the sample. In further embodiments, the method comprises detecting at least three, at least four or at least five different sFRPs in the sample. Preferably, the method comprises detecting human sFRP4 in the sample. In another preferred embodiment, the method comprises detecting sFRP5 in the sample, or detecting sFRP4 and sFRP5 in the sample.

The term "sample" as used herein designates a composition which is derived from the body of an individual. Usually, the individual has functioning kidneys. In a specific embodiment, the individual does not have end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Preferred samples are blood samples, urine samples and tissue samples from the individual. The sample may be a composition which has been processed to be in a condition suitable for the method according to the invention. For example, a blood sample may be subject to centrifugation such that serum is obtained, or a urine sample may be diluted prior to analysis (e.g. by 1 :2 to 1 :100, or by 1 :5 or 1 :50 or by 1 :10 to 1 :20). The processing may include centrifugation, precipitation, concentration, filtration, dialysis and/or dilution. The type of processing may depend on the technique which is used for detecting the sFRP in the sample.

In one embodiment, the method of the invention comprises only steps which are carried out in vitro. In that embodiment, the step of obtaining the sample from the body of the individual is not encompassed by the present invention. In another embodiment, the step of obtaining the sample from the body of the individual is encompassed by the present invention.

The step of detecting an sFRP (e.g. sFRP4 or sFRP5) in the sample may include determining the presence or absence of the sFRP (e.g. of sFRP4 or sFRP5) in the sample in a qualitative manner. The step of detecting an sFRP (e.g. sFRP4 or sFRP5), however, may also include determining the amount or concentration of the sFRP (e.g. of sFRP4 or sFRP5) in the sample in a quantitative or semiquantitative manner. The step of detecting sFRP4 or sFRP5 includes detecting fragments of sFRP4 or sFRP5, respectively.

The amount of sFRP4 in the urine of a healthy individual is not detectable by Western blot analysis. The amount of sFRP4 in the urine of a patient suffering from PKD ranges from < 10 ng/ml to > 50 μg/ml, for example from about 10 ng/ml to about 50 μg/ml. Thus, a patient with PKD may excrete between < 1 μg and > 50 mg per day, for example from about 1 μg to about 50 mg per day. Since the urine concentration varies, the amount of sFRP4 excreted per day may correlate more precisely with the stage of the disease. In renal cystic disease, most cysts become disconnected from the draining tubular system. Thus, measurements of sFRP4 in the serum rather than in the urine may provide a more accurate estimate of cyst volumen and disease progression. In the serum, the sFRP4 concentration can range from < 10 ng/ml to > 100 ng/ml, e.g. from about 10 ng/ml to about 100 ng/ml, in patients suffering from PKD, and is not detectable in patients without kidney disease.

In one aspect of the invention the detection of an elevated level of at least one sFRP, e.g. of sFRP4, in the sample from the individual relative to control samples indicates a diagnosis of PKD. Likewise, the extent of elevation of the sFRP, e.g. of sFRP4, in the sample from the individual relative to control samples may correlate to the progression of PKD in the individual. The control samples have been obtained from individuals not suffering from renal diseases such as PKD. Concentrations of sFRP4 in the sample > 50 ng/ml are typically associated with renal cysts independent of the etiology. The concentration ranges mentioned hereinabove with respect to sFRP4 may be applied to sFRP5 as well.

The method of the invention preferably comprises at least one direct or indirect immunoassay. These assays include but are not limited to competitive binding assays, noncompetitive binding assays, radioimmunoassays, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), sandwich assays, precipitin reactions, gel diffusion immunodiffusion assays, agglutination assays, fluorescence immunoassays, chemoluminescence immunoassays, immunoPCR immunoassays, protein A or protein G immunoassays and Immunoelectrophoresis assays. Among all, enzyme immunoassay, in particular, enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) is appropriately used in hospitals, etc., since sFRP4 can be detected with high sensitivity and a number of specimens can be automatically assayed thereby.

The immunoassay comprises the use of a polyclonal or monoclonal antibody capable of binding to a human sFRP, e.g. to human sFRP4 or sFRP5. As used herein, the term "antibody" designates an immunoglobulin or a derivative thereof having the same binding specificity. The antibody according to the invention may be a monoclonal antibody or an antibody derived from or comprised in a polyclonal antiserum, monoclonal antibodies are preferred. The term "antibody", as used herein, further comprises derivatives such as Fab, F(ab')₂, Fv or scFv fragments: see, for example Harlow and Lane, "Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual" CSH Press 1988, Cold Spring Harbor N. Y. Fab, F(ab')₂ and Fv fragments fragments can be obtained by digesting a complete antibody with papain, pepsin, etc. in the conventional manner. The antibody or the derivative thereof may be of natural origin or may be (semi)synthetically produced. Such synthetic products also comprises non- proteinaceous or semi-proteinaceous material that has the same or essentially the same binding specificity as the antibody of the invention. Such products may, for example be obtained by peptidomimetics.

The antibody may be capable of binding to one or more of sFRP1 , sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4 and SFRP5.

The antibody against an sFRP (e.g. against sFRP4 or sFRP5) to be used in the present invention can be produced by immunizing an animal such as rabbit, rat, goat, sheep or mouse with the sFRP (e.g. sFRP4 or sFRP5) or a fragment thereof or a derivative thereof by a method well known by those skilled in the art (Harlow and Lane, "Antibodies, A Laboratory Manual" CSH Press 1988, Cold Spring Harbor N.Y.). The antigen to be used for immunization is preferably human sFRP4 or a fragment thereof or a derivative thereof. sFRP4 from other species, however, may also be used. The antigen may be prepared by recombinant expression in a host, e.g. in bacteria, insect cells, or mammalian cells, or it may be prepared by chemical synthesis by the solid phase method. Techniques for producing monoclonal antibodies are known to those skilled in the art.

The antibody to be used in accordance with this invention may recognize only one of sFRP1 , sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4 and sFRP5. For example, the antibody may be capable of binding to sFRP4 but does not bind to sFRP1 , sFRP2, sFRP3 or sFRP5. Alternatively, the antibody may recognize only two, only three, or only four of sFRP1 , sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4 and sFRP5. In yet another embodiment, the antibody is a pan-reactive antibody which recognizes each of sFRP1 , sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4 and sFRP5. The present invention relates to such antibodies described above.

The antibody to be used in accordance with this invention may be specific to human sFRP4, i.e. it does not recognize other proteins in the sample. Most preferably, the antibody does not recognize other proteins in human urine. The sFRP4-specific antibody may bind to an epitope in one of the following regions of the sFRP4 molecule: carboxy-terminal peptide of sFRP4 - (amino acids 307 - 326): RTSRSNPPKPKGKPPAPKPA (SEQ ID NO:6), (amino acids 328 - 343): PKKNIKTRSARKRTNP (SEQ ID NO:7), and amino terminal peptide of SFRP4 - (amino acids 110-124): PLMKMYNHSWPESLA (SEQ ID NO: 14).

In the ELISA method, an antibody, preferably a monoclonal antibody, or a fragment thereof against sFRP is usually first immobilized on a carrier as a primary antibody. Preferred carrier is a solid carrier, such as an ELISA plate container molded from a carrier polymer such as styrene or polystyrene. The monoclonal antibody or its fragment can be immobilized by, for example, dissolving the monoclonal antibody or its fragment in a buffer such as a carbonate buffer or a borate buffer followed by the adsorption onto the carrier.

Separately, an antibody (a monoclonal antibody or a polyclonal antibody, or a fragment thereof) used as the secondary antibody is labeled preferably with a non-radioactive label. Enzyme labels, fluorescent labels, light emission labels, etc. can be used as the non- radioactive label. It is preferred that an enzyme label such as alkaline phosphatase, β- galactosidase or horse radish peroxidase be used.

In one aspect of the invention, at least two samples, or at least 3 samples, or at least 4 samples, or at least 5 samples obtained from the same individual at different points of time are tested for the presence or the amount of sFRP (e.g. of sFRP4 or sFRP5). This may include collecting data over a period of time. Samples from a patient may be taken at regular intervals. The interval may range from about 2 to about 12 months, preferably it ranges from about 4 to about 8 months, more preferably it ranges from about 5 to about 7 months (e.g. about 6 months). This allows the monitoring of the progression of PKD over various periods of time.

Another aspect of the present invention is the use of a means for the detection of an sFRP (e.g. of sFRP4 or sFRP5) or its expression for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of PKD. Suitable means for the detection of an sFRP include but are not limited to antibodies against sFRP, nucleic acid molecules capable of hybridizing to a nucleic acid encoding sFRP, and the like. The antibodies according to this embodiment correspond to those described supra.

Suitable nucleic acid molecules (DNA or RNA) capable of hybridizing with a nucleic acid encoding sFRP4 or sFRP5 can be designed by one of ordinary skill using the published nucleotide sequence of the sFRP4 gene (Abu-Jawdeh G, Cornelia N, Tomita Y, Brown LF₁ Tognazzi K, Sokol SY, Kocher O. Differential expression of frpHE: a novel human stromal protein of the secreted frizzled gene family, during the endometrial cycle and malignancy.Lab Invest. 1999 Apr;79(4):439-47.). Usually suitable nucleic acid molecules have a length of at least ten nucleotides, preferably of at least 15 nucleotides, more preferably of at least 20 nucleotides, even more preferably of at least 25 nucleotides. The nucleic acid molecule may be about 15 to 35 nucleotides in length. The nucleic acid molecule may be used as a primer in a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or as a probe in a hybridization assay. A nucleic acid molecule is "hybridizable" to another nucleic acid molecule, such as a cDNA, genomic DNA₁ or RNA, when a single stranded form of the nucleic acid molecule can anneal to the other nucleic acid molecule under the appropriate conditions of temperature and solution ionic strength. Hybridization and washing conditions are well known and exemplified in Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (1989), particularly Chapter 11 therein. A specific example of stringent hybridization conditions is overnight incubation at 42° C in a solution comprising: 50% formamide, 5xSSC (150 mM NaCI, 15 mM trisodium citrate), 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH7.6), 5xDenhardt's solution, 10% dextran sulfate, and 20 micrograms/ml of denatured, sheared salmon sperm DNA, followed by washing the hybridization support in 0. IxSSC at about 65° C. In one aspect of the invention, RT-PCR could be used to monitor expression of sFRP4 in tubular epithelial cells present in the urine of patients with cystic renal disease. These embodiments described with respect sFRP4 apply to other sFRPs such as sFRP1 , SFRP2, SFRP3 and sFRP5.

Another aspect of the invention is the use of at least one sFRP as a marker for the progression of a renal disorder described herein, e.g. of a cystic kidney disease such as PKD. The preferred embodiments of this aspect correspond to the preferred embodiments of the method and the use described supra. According to a preferred aspect of the invention, sFRP4 or sFRP5 is used as a marker for the progression of PKD.

Yet another aspect of the present invention is a diagnostic kit for diagnosing a renal disorder described herein (e.g. PKD) or for monitoring the progression of the renal disorder, comprising at least one antibody capable of specifically binding to one or more sFRP(s), e.g. to sFRP4 or sFRP5. Preferably, the test kit is an ELISA test kit. In one embodiment, the antibody does not crossreact with other proteins present in human urine. The preferred antibodies of this kit have been described supra in connection with the method of the invention. In one embodiment, the antibody in the test kit recognizes the sFRP (e.g. sFRP4 or sFRP5) both in its native and in its denaturated form. In another embodiment, the antibody in the kit recognizes sFRP (e.g. sFRP4 or sFRP5) in the sample in an ELISA assay and on Western blots. In another embodiment, the binding capacity or specificity of the antibody is not significantly dependent on the glycosylation state of the sFRP (e.g. sFRP4 or sFRP5). In another embodiment, the antibody recognizes sFRP (e.g. sFRP4 or sFRP5) in human urine or human serum in an ELISA assay (e.g. a typical sandwich ELISA). The antibody may be immobilized on a solid phase such as a microtiter plate or a test strip. The kit may comprise a further antibody capable of specifically binding to said one or more sFRP(s) (e.g. to sFRP4 or sFRP5). Usually, the second antibody is directed against the same protein as the first antibody (especially in case of an ELISA test kit). This second antibody may be used in a sandwich ELISA as known per se in the art. The second antibody (a monoclonal or a polyclonal antibody) may be labeled with a non-radioactive label. Enzyme labels, fluorescent labels, light emission labels, etc. can be used as the nonradioactive label. It is preferred that an enzyme label such as alkaline phosphatase, β- galactosidase or horse radish peroxidase be used. In one specific embodiment, the kit does not contain the antibody mAb 3.1 or 3.4 mentioned in Berndt et al. (2003). It is also possible that the second antibody recognizes the first antibody in the test kit, or that the second antibody recognizes an sFRP other than the sFRP recognized by the first antibody in the test kit.

The diagnostic kit may further comprise other components such as a wash buffer concentrate, a composition comprising an sFRP such as sFRP4 or sFRP5 as a standard, a stop solution (e.g. HCI solution) and the like. The composition comprising the sFRP as a standard usually comprises substantially pure sFRP. The kit may further comprise information material regarding the use of the kit, e.g. in the form of a sheet, a leaflet or a booklet. The information material may provide information on the kit materials, the sample preparation and/or the assay procedure. In particular, the information material may contain directions as to how the urine sample has to be prepared for the assay to be carried out. Preferably, the parts contained in the kit are arranged in a container which can be closed.

The invention further relates to members of the sFRP gene family (see Figures 7 and 8). Currently, at least five closely related sFRP proteins have been described. All of these proteins are expressed in the kidney, and are potentially upregulated in cystic kidney disease. As shown in Figure 6, several different species of secreted frizzled releated proteins are present in the urine of patients with cystic kidney disease. All five sFRP proteins contain overlapping conserved protein sequences (see Figure 8: Alignment of sFRPI-5). Hence, another aspect of the invention is the development of pan-reactive monoclonal antibodies and detection system(s) (as described above) that detect all five (and potentially more) secreted frizzled-related proteins and/or defined combination of sFRP proteins. In some instances (for example to detect subtypes of polycystic kidney diseases or other diseases associated with expression of sFRP proteins), it might also be useful to develop monoclonal antibodies and detection kits that specifically recognize sFRP1 , sFRP2, SFRP3, or sFRP5.

The invention relates to a screening method for identifying compounds effective in the treatment of PKD, comprising (a) contacting a test compound with a cell; and (b) determining the expression by the cell of one or more genes that are induced by cyst fluid or upregulated in kidneys of ADPKD patients, or determining the promoter activity of the promoters) of said gene(s).

The genes induced by cyst fluid or upregulated in kidneys of ADPKD patients may be selected from the genes listed in table 1 infra. In the screening method of this invention the expression or promoter activity of at least 2, or at least 5, or at least 10, or at least 20, or at least 50 genes listed in table 1 may be determined.

The invention further relates to a screening method for identifying compounds effective in the treatment of PKD, comprising (a) contacting a test compound with a cell; and (b) determining the expression by the cell of sFRP4 or sFRP5 (and/or other sFRP proteins), or determining the promoter activity of the sFRP4 or sFRP5 promoter (or other sFRP promoter) in the cell.

Suitable cells that may be used in the screening method of the invention include, but are not limited to HEK 293 cells, COS, HeLa, etc.

The screening method may further comprise the step of selecting the test compound, if the test compound inhibits the expression by the cell of at least one sFRP or the promoter activity of the promoter of at least one sFRP. By way of example, the screening method may further comprise the step of selecting the test compound, if the test compound inhibits the expression by the cell of sFRP4 or the promoter activity of the sFRP4 promoter. Methods for determining the level of expression or the promoter activity are known to those of skill in the art and described in Wong et al. (2003).

A test compound may be regarded as inhibiting the expression by the cell of the sFRP, if the expression by the cell of the sFRP in the presence of the test compound is reduced by at least 10%, preferably at least 20%, more preferably at least 30%, even more preferably at least 40%, still more preferably at least 50%, most preferably at least 75%, relative to the expression by the cell of the sFRP in the absence of the test compound.

A test compound may be regarded as inhibiting the expression by the cell of sFRP4, if the expression by the cell of sFRP4 in the presence of the test compound is reduced by at least 10%, preferably at least 20%, more preferably at least 30%, even more preferably at least 40%, still more preferably at least 50%, most preferably at least 75%, relative to the expression by the cell of sFRP4 in the absence of the test compound.

A test compound may be regarded as inhibiting the expression by the cell of sFRP5, if the expression by the cell of sFRP5 in the presence of the test compound is reduced by at least 10%, preferably at least 20%, more preferably at least 30%, even more preferably at least 40%, still more preferably at least 50%, most preferably at least 75%, relative to the expression by the cell of sFRP5 in the absence of the test compound.

The embodiments described herein with respect to PKD can be applied to other renal disorders or other cystic kidney diseases. The embodiments described herein with respect to sFRP4 can be applied to other members of the sFRP family of proteins.

The present invention further relates to the following embodiments:

(1 ) A method for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of polycystic kidney disease (PKD), comprising detecting a secreted frizzled related protein (sFRP) in a sample from an individual suffering from PKD or suspected of suffering from PKD.

(2) A method according to item (1 ), wherein the sample contains urine or serum obtained from the individual suffering from PKD or suspected of suffering from PKD.

(3) A method according to item (1 ) or (2), wherein the detection of an elevated level of the sFRP in the sample from the individual relative to control samples indicates a diagnosis of PKD, or wherein the extent of elevation of the sFRP in the sample from the individual relative to control samples correlates to the progression of PKD in the individual.

(4) A method according any one of items (1 ) to (3), wherein the detection comprises contacting the sample with at least one antibody capable of binding to the sFRP to allow the formation of antibody-antigen complexes and detecting the presence of antibody-antigen complexes formed. (5) A method according to any one of items (1 ) to (4), wherein the method comprises at least one direct or indirect immunoassay selected from the group consisting of a competitive binding assay, a non-competitive binding assay, a radioimmunoassay, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a sandwich assay, a precipitin reaction, a gel diffusion immunodiffusion assay, an agglutination assay, a fluorescent immunoassay, chemiluminescence immunoassay, immunoPCR immunoassay, a protein A or protein G immunoassay, and an Immunoelectrophoresis assay.

(6) A method according to any one of items (1 ) to (5), wherein at least two samples obtained from the same individual at different times are screened for the presence of the sFRP.

(7) A method according to any one of items (1 ) to (6), wherein said sFRP is secreted frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4).

(8) The use of means for the detection of a secreted frizzled related protein (sFRP) for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of PKD.

(9) The use according to item (8), wherein the means for the detection of sFRP is an antibody capable of binding to the sFRP.

(10) The use of a secreted frizzled-related protein (sFRP) as a marker for the progression of PKD.

(11 ) The use according to any one of items (8) to (10), wherein said sFRP is secreted frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4).

(12) A diagnostic kit for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of PKD, comprising at least one antibody capable of specifically binding to one or more secreted frizzled related proteins (sFRPs).

(13) A diagnostic kit according to item (12), wherein the antibody does not crossreact with other proteins present in human urine. (14) A diagnostic kit according to item (12), wherein the antibody is capable of binding to SFRP1 , sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4 and sFRP5.

(15) A diagnostic kit according to any one of items (12) to (14), wherein the antibody is immobilized on a solid phase.

(16) A diagnostic kit according to item (15), wherein the solid phase is a test strip.

(17) A diagnostic kit according to any one of items (12) to (16), further comprising a second antibody capable of specifically binding to said one or more sFRPs.

(18) A diagnostic kit according to any one of items (12) to (17), further comprising a wash buffer concentrate and/or a composition comprising sFRP.

(19) A screening method for identifying compounds effective in the treatment of PKD, comprising

(a) contacting a test compound with a cell; and

(b) determining the expression by the cell of an sFRP or determining the promoter activity of the promoter of an sFRP.

(20) A screening method according to item (19), further comprising the step of selecting the test compound if the test compound inhibits the expression by the cell of sFRP or the promoter activity of the sFRP promoter.

Figure 1

A. sFRP4 expression in normal kidneys and tissue from patients with ADPK. The upper part depicts the relative expression obtained by microarray analysis. B. Semiquantitative RT- PCR was performed to confirm the microarray data (lower part). C. sFRP4 immunoreactivity in normal and ADPKD kidneys. Note that sFRP4 is present in some but not all tubular epithelial cells lining the depicted cysts. D. Cyst fluid stimulates expression of sFRP4 in differentiated IMCD cells (5-day culture) (left panel), but not in senescent IMCD cells (10- day culture) (right panel). E. Cyst fluid stimulates sFRP4 in differentiated proximal tubular (PT) cells (5-day culture) (left panel), but not in senescent PT cells (10-day culture) (right panel). Figure 2

A. Cyst fluid from patients with ADPKD stimulates the sFRP4 promoter. B. Two sFRP4 promoter fragments, -238/+83 and 1417/+83, are activated by cyst fluid, while the fragment -144/+83 shows little response to cyst fluid. C. Cyst fluid of ADPKD patients contain large amounts of sFRP4. Cyst fluid was diluted as indicated and compared to recombinant sFRP4 to estimate the concentration. In some cysts, sFRP4 concentrations as high as 1 mg/ml were observed. D. The molecular weight of sFRP4 in cyst fluid is reduced by F- deglykosidase, indicating that the secreted sFRP4 is highly glycosylated. E. Cyst fluid blocks XWntδ-stimulated activation of the TOPFLASH reporter, suggesting that sFRP4 in cyst fluid retains its biological activity (left panel). Cyst fluid has no effect on disheveled- mediated TOPFLASH activation (right panel). F. Partial purification of cyst fluid reveals that the Xwntδ-inhibiting activity correlates with the immunoreactive fractions.

Figure 3

A. Microarray analysis separates IMCD treated with control media (n=3), and media containing 5 μg/ml recombinant sFRP4 (left panel: hierarchical clustering and dendogram; right panel: heatmap). B. GASP1 (left panel) and GASP9 (right panel) in IMCD cells treated either with control or with sFRP4-containing medium. The data of the left panel is derived from the microarray analysis, the right panel was generated using conditioned media from sFRP4-expressing HEK 293T cells. IMCD cells were either incubated with media of MOCK- transfected cells, or with the conditioned media for 24 hours. Semiquantitiate RT-PCR was performed, and the GASP9 signal was normalized for GAPDH expression. C. sFRP4 is excreted in the urine of patients with ADPKD. D. sFRP4 expression is upregulated in PKD2- deficient mice. RT-PCR and Western blot analysis was performed at E21 of either PKD2 (+/-) and PKD2 (-/-) mice. As shown in the left panel, there is a strong increase of sFRP4 in embryos, lacking PKD2. E. sFRP4 immunoreactivity is found in epithelial cells, lining the cysts of PKD2 (-/-) mice (left panel), while little sFRP4 can be found in wild-type mice, (right panel). F. INV mice revealed a similar upregulation of sFRP4, demonstrating that excessive sFRP4 production is not limited to the ADPKD, but likely accompanies cyst formation.

Figure 4

A. Upregulation of sFRP4 detected by RT-PCR 5 and 10 days following 5/6 nephrectomy of mice. B. The graph depicts the average of sFRP4 expression detected by RT-PCR and normalized for β-gal of two independent experiments, demonstrated that 5/6 nephrectomy induces sFRP4 expression. Figure 5

A. The -144/+83 sFRP4 fragment is not activated by either Ga subunits or Disheveled. B. The -238/+83 sFRP4 fragment can be activated by both Ga subunits and Dishevel. Since the short sFRP4 fragment does not contain a TCF-binding site, Wnt-mediated activation is likely mediated in part through G-protein dependent signaling.

Figure 6

A. Detection of sFRP4 in the urine of ESRD patients with cystic kidney disease in comparison to recombinant human sFRP4 (ng per lane as indicated). Sample A, B, C are control urines from healthy volunteers. No. 1-6 are urine samples from ESRD patients with either ADPKD₁ or acquired cystic kidney disease.

B. Detection of sFRP4 in the urine of patients with ADPKD and various degrees of renal failure in comparison to recombinant human sFRP4 (ng per lane as indicated). Note the different molecular weight sizes, indicating that patients with ADPKD secrete several closely related sFRP proteins.

C. Detection of of sFRP4 in the blood of patients with ADPKD. Lane 1 and 3 are urine and serum of a healthy volunteer, lane 2 and 4 are the urine and serum of a patient with ADPKD. To detect sFRP4 in the serum, sFRP4 was immunoprecipitated from 50 μl serum, using an sFRP4-specific polyclonal antiserum. The precipitated protein was subsequently detected by Western blot analysis.

Figure 7 shows the amino acid sequences of sFRP1 , sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4, and sFRP5. Via the accession numbers indicated, further information on the sFRPs can be obtained, which is incorporated herein by reference. In particular, the nucleic acid sequences encoding the sFRPs can be retrieved (e.g. from the indicated publication, or by way of a link to the cDNA sequence), allowing the design of suitable primers and probes.

Figure 8 shows an alignment of the amino acid sequences of sFRP1 , sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4, and sFRP5. The alignment shows conserved regions and unique regions of the sFRPs.

Figure 9 depicts the detection of human sFRP4 and sFRP5 in the urine of patients with polycystic kidney disease (PKD). Urine of healthy controls (A-C) do not contain detectable amounts of sFRP4 or sFRP5 in the urine. In contrast, PKD patients (1- 6) excrete elevated amounts of sFRP4 and sFRP5.

The following non-limiting examples further illustrate the invention. It should be understood, however, that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in the art are intended to be within the scope of the claims.

Methods

Materials. Patient samples (discarded material, serum, and urine) were obtained after approval of the study protocol by the local ethics committee. Kidney tissue specimen were either snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen for RNA isolation, or immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for immunohistochemistry. Cyst fluid was collected by aspiration, and stored at either 4⁰C (short-term) or -2O⁰C (long-term). Blood samples were collected in collecting tubes, and centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min at 1200 rpm to obtain serum. Serum and urine were stored at -20⁰C (long-term). For RNA isolation, frozen tissue was homogenized in 4 M guanidinium isothiocyanate/0.72%β-mercaptoethanol using a polytron (PT-MR2100, Kinematica AG, Lucerne, Switzerland). Total RNA was subsequently purified on a caesium chloride gradient. The sFRP-4 monoclonal antibody was recently described (1).

Gene expression profiling and semiquantative RT-PCR. Microarray analysis was performed as recently described (2). For semi quantitative RT-PCR, total RNA (1 μg) was purified with the RNase free DNase set (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and reverse transcribed into cDNAs using an oligo (dT) 12-18 primer and Superscript Il reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). For each PCR reaction, β-actin or GAPDH expression was used as an internal standard control (22). The following primers were used for sFRP4 amplification - 5' atcggtgcaagtgcaaaaag 3' (SEQ ID NO:8) and 5' tatgtggacactggcaggag 3' (SEQ ID NO:9), for GASP2 amplification -5' cttcaggtgtacatgaataaa 3' (SEQ ID NO: 10) and 5' gaggtcgtggtgatttgctaaggc 3' (SEQ ID NO:11 ) and GASP9 amplification - 5' gcctctgctaatggcggacaggc 3' (SEQ ID NO:12) and 5' gggaggcctcccaattggcgg 3' (SEQ ID NO: 13), respectively. The amplification cycle consisted of a hot start at 94°C for 2 min., followed by multiple cycles of denaturation at 94°C at 1 min., annealing at 58°C for 1 min and elongation at 72⁰C for 1 min. Cycle number was adjusted to mRNA expression level of the different genes. The PCR products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and analyzed in relation to the corresponding control band.

Cell culture. Conditionally immortalized proximal tubular epithelial (PT) cells from the SV40 immorto mouse (kindly provided by H. Pavenstadt, Mϋnster) were maintained at 33⁰C in DMEM-F12 supplemented with 2% calf serum. For differentiation of the PT cells, temperature was raised to 37⁰C. Immortalized mlMCD-3 cells (referred to as IMCD cells)

(ATCC) were grown in DMEM- F12 medium supplemented with 10% calf serum. Human embryonic kidney cells (referred to as HEK-293T cells) were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% calf serum.

Western blot analysis, lmmunoprecipitation and Western blot analysis were performed as described (3).

Immunochemistry. Tissue samples obtained from patient materials were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, dehydrated and paraffin embedded. Tissue sections (5 μ) were stained, using the Vectastain-ABC kit (Vector Labortories). Mice embryos were prepared, using the Technovit 7100 embedding-kit (Heraeus-Kulzer, Germany). All sections were examined using a Zeiss microscope.

Reporter Assays. HEK 293T cells were seeded into 12-well plates 24 hours prior to transfection. To determine luciferase or alkaline phosphatase activity, 2 μg TOPFLASH or pSEAP2B reporter constructs were transfected with 1 μg β-galactosidase plasmid, using the calcium phosphate method. Transfections were performed in triplicate. After 24 hours, cell lysates and supernatants were assayed for luciferase and alkaline phosphatase activity, respectively (Great EscAPe SEAP, BD Bioscience). The results are presented as relative luciferase or alkaline phosphatase activity, normalizated for β-galactosidase activity.

Column Chromatography. Cystfluid containing sFRP4 was concentrated at 5000 xg for 45 min, using a YM-30 Centricon Centrifugal Filter Device, followed by preclearing at 45000 RPM and 4°C for 30 minutes. Concentrated cyst fluid was dialysed overnight at 4°C against equilibration buffer (2OmM NaH₂PO₄, 30 mM NaCI, pH 7.5). One ml of the dialyzed cyst fluid was loaded onto a HighPrep 16/10 SP-FF Sephadex-Cation exchange column. After washing the column with 58 ml equilibration buffer, elution was carried out with a continuous gradient starting with 2OmM NaH₂PO₄, 30 mM NaCI₁ pH 7.5, and ending with 2OmM NaH₂PO₄, 1 M NaCI, pH 7.5. During elution, 2 ml fractions were collected, and dialyzed overnight at 4°C against PBS. Fractions were tested for the presence of sFRP4 by Western blot analysis.

Results

To understand the molecular mechanism associated with ESRD in ADPKD₁ we generated gene profiles of ADPKD kidneys, and identified sFRP4 as a differentially regulated gene (Fig. 1a). sFRP4 (secreted frizzled-related protein-4) is a member of an evolving family of soluble molecules that bind both Wnt and frizzled molecules (4). RT-PCR confirmed that most ADPKD kidneys expressed increased amounts of sFRP4 (Fig.1b). Immunoreactive sFRP4 was detectable in tubular epithelial cells lining the cysts in ADPKD kidneys, while tubular epithelial cells of normal kidneys expressed no sFRP4 (Fig. 1c). sFRP4 was not uniformly expressed in all cyst epithelial cells, and in vitro experiments using IMCD and MT1 cells, two tubular epithelial cell lines, suggested that cyst fluid triggers sFRP4 in less- than terminally differentiated cells (Figs. 1d and 1e).

Cyst fluid contains a lipophilic substance that stimulates generation of cAMP (5), as well as several growth factors and hormones such as vasopression. Since there are two cAMP- responsive elements present in the sFRP4-promoter (Fig. 2a) (6), we analyzed the cyst fluid-mediated activation of different sFRP4 promoter fragments. As shown in Fig. 2b, cyst fluid significantly activated the sFRP4 promoter -238/83 and -1417/83, but failed to stimulate sFRP4 -144/83 lacking the cAMP-responsive elements. Thus, the previously described cAMP-stimulating activity of cyst fluid seems to stimulate sFRP4 gene expression.

Since sFRP4 is a secreted protein, we tested whether this molecule accumulates in the cyst fluid. Western blot analysis revealed that cyst fluid contains large amounts of highly glycosylated sFRP4 (Figs. 2c and 2d). sFRP4 blocks canonical Wnt signaling, and prevents XWntδ-mediated double axis formation during early Xenopus development. As shown in Fig. 2e, cyst fluid, containing large amounts for sFRP4, very effectively blocked XWntδ- mediated activation of the Tcf-defendant TOPFLASH-reporter construct, but had very little effect on the cytoplasmic Wnt activator molecule disheveled (dsh). We partially purified sFRP4 to further demonstrate that cystic sFRP4 retains its bioactivity. As shown in Fig. 2e, fractions containing immunoreactive sFRP4 blocked XWnt8-mediated TOPFIash activation, while sFRP4-negative fractions had no significant effect. Taken together, these findings show that cysts contain large amounts of biologically active sFRP4. Several reports have linked increased expression of sFRP4 to accelerated apoptosis rates. Although the

mechanism of sFRP4-induced apoptosis are unknown, increased sFRP4 expression in ADPKD coincides with increased apoptosis of the surrounding normal renal tissue, indicating that cystic sFRP4 may contribute to the progression of renal failure.

To understand the effects of sFRP4 on renal tubular epithelial cells, we incubated IMCD cells with recombinant sFRP4, and determined the genes differentially regulated in sFRP4- treated cells by microarray analysis, using a 22.5 k murine cDNA chip. As demonstrated in Fig. 3a, sFRP4 treatment separated the gene profiles of the two culture sets, but yielded only a few significantly regulated genes (FDR < 0.05 and p < 0.05). One potential target of sFRP4 treatment was a GASP family member. To confirm differential regulation of GASP, we treated IMCD cells with sFRP4-conditioned media, and observed down-regulation of GASP9, a renal-specific GASP family member (Fig. 3b). GASP proteins mediate the endocytosis of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR), while the lack of GASP proteins causes accumulation of GPCRs at the cell surface. Thus, persistent exposure to sFRP4 could establish a detrimental feedback loop, in which cyst fluid activates sFRP4 that in turn prevents endocystosis of GPCRs through downregulation of GASP proteins.

Cysts typically loose their connection to the draining tubules. Nevertheless, we detected sFRP4 in the urine of patients with ADPKD. Fig. 3c shows that the extent of sFRP4 excretion correlates with stage of renal failure. These findings suggest that urinary sFRP4 excretion is a potential marker to monitor progression of renal disease in patients with ADPKD.

Since PKD2 is mutated in some patients with ADPKD, we examined sFRP4 expression in PKD2 (-/-) mice. Typically homocygote animals die between E15 and E20 of embryogenesis. As shown in Figs. 3d and 3e, increased levels of sFRP4 are detectable in PKD2 (-/-) , but not in PKD2 (+/-) or in wild-type mice. To determine whether sFRP4 upregulation is limited to ADPKD, we performed similar experiments in homocygote INV mice. These mice are deficient in NPH2 (Inversin), a gene mutated in autosomal recessive nephronophthisis type Il (infantile form). INV mice revealed a similar upregulation of sFRP4, demonstrating that excessive sFRP4 production is not limited to the ADPKD₁ but likely accompanies cyst formation (Fig. 3F). Since increased sFRP4 is also detectable after partial nephrectomy (see Figure 4), we postulate that sFRP4 expression is stimulated by compounds secreted into the cyst fluid, but are also produced during regenerative responses.

Taken together, our findings reveal that cyst formation is associated with increased production and accumulation of sFRP4, a frizzled-related Wnt antagonist implicated in increased apoptosis. sFRP4 downregulates GASP proteins in tubular epithelial cells, and thus, could confer increased susceptibility to ligands that bind and stimulate GPCRs. Since ADPKD is a slowly progressive disease, the success of therapeutic interventions has been difficult to monitor. Since sFRP4 is excreted in the urine of patients with ADPKD, it may represent a novel marker for disease progression, and help to monitor the response to therapeutic interventions aimed to slow cyst development.

In an additional microarray analysis, using a 38 k human cDNA chip, additional molecules that are highly upregulated in ADPKD kidney were identified. The gene products, in particular proteins and fragments thereof, of the genes upregulated in ADPKD are useful to detect or monitor patients with PKD or other renal disorders.

Table 1 : Significantly regulated genes in ADPKD. The listed genes are significantly upregulated in ADPKD kidneys. Fold increase is expressed as log 2. Peptides of genes shaded in grey have been identified in the urine of healthy individuals.

The invention relates to a method for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of a renal disorder, comprising detecting one or more of the gene products encoded by the genes listed in table 1 in a urine or serum sample from an individual suffering from the renal disorder or suspected of suffering from the renal disorder. The various embodiments of this method correspond to those described for sFRP4 and sFRP5 herein mutatis mutandis. The method may comprise detecting at least one, at least two, at least 5, at least 10, at least 20 or at least 50 gene products encoded by the respective genes listed in table 1. The term "gene product" includes proteins and fragments thereof.

References

1. Berndt T, Craig TA, Bowe AE, Vassiliadis J, Reczek D, Finnegan R, et al. Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 is a potent tumor-derived phosphaturic agent. J Clin Invest 2003;112(5):785-94.

2. Donauer J, Rumberger B, Klein M, Faller D, Wilpert J, Sparna T, et al. Expression profiling on chronically rejected transplant kidneys. Transplantation 2003;76(3):539- 47.

3. Benzing T, Gerke P, Hopker K, Hildebrandt F₁ Kim E, WaIz G. Nephrocystin interacts with Pyk2, p130(Cas), and tensin and triggers phosphorylation of Pyk2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001 ;98(17):9784-9.

4. Jones SE, Jomary C. Secreted Frizzled-related proteins: searching for relationships and patterns. Bioessays 2002;24(9):811-20.

5. Yamaguchi T, Nagao S, Takahashi H, Ye M, Grantham JJ. Cyst fluid from a murine model of polycystic kidney disease stimulates fluid secretion, cyclic adenosine monophosphate accumulation, and cell proliferation by Madin-Darby canine kidney cells in vitro. Am J Kidney Dis 1995;25(3):471-7.

6. Wong VK, Yam JW, Hsiao WL. Cloning and characterization of the promoter region of the mouse frizzled-related protein 4 gene. Biol Chem 2003;384(8):1147-54.

7. Donauer J. et al., Expression profiling of polycystic kidney disease. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2003; vol. 14, Abstracts issue, page 106A.

8. Zheng D. et al., Urinary excretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in ADPKD. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 2003; vol. 14, pages 2588 - 2595.

Claims

Universitatsklinikum FreiburgClaims:

1. A method for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of a renal disorder, comprising detecting a secreted frizzled related protein (sFRP) in a sample containing urine or serum obtained from an individual suffering from the renal disorder or suspected of suffering from the renal disorder, wherein said sFRP is selected from the group consisting of secreted frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4) and secreted frizzled related protein-5 (sFRP5).

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said sample is a urine sample.

3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said renal disorder is polycystic kidney disease (PKD).

4. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said renal disorder is selected from the group consisting of drug-induced nephrotoxicity, urinary obstruction and renal failure.

5. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said sample is a urine sample, and. said renal disorder is PKD.

6. A method according to claim 1 , wherein said sample is a serum sample, and said renal disorder is PKD.

7. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the detection of an elevated level of the sFRP in the sample from the individual relative to control samples indicates a diagnosis of the renal disorder, or wherein the extent of elevation of the sFRP in the sample from the individual relative to control samples correlates to the progression of the renal disorder in the individual.

8. A method according any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the detection comprises contacting the sample with at least one antibody capable of binding to the sFRP to allow the formation of antibody-antigen complexes and detecting the presence of antibody-antigen complexes formed.

9. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the method comprises at least one direct or indirect immunoassay selected from the group consisting of a competitive binding assay, a non-competitive binding assay, a radioimmunoassay, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a sandwich assay, a precipitin reaction, a gel diffusion immunodiffusion assay, an agglutination assay, a fluorescent immunoassay, chemiluminescence immunoassay, immunoPCR immunoassay, a protein A or protein G immunoassay, and an Immunoelectrophoresis assay.

10. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein at least two samples obtained from the same individual at different times are screened for the presence of the sFRP.

11. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein said sFRP is secreted frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4).

12. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein said sFRP is secreted frizzled related protein-5 (sFRP5).

13. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, which comprises detecting both sFRP4 and sFRP5 in said sample.

14. The use of means for the detection of a secreted frizzled related protein (sFRP) for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of a renal disorder, wherein said sFRP is selected from the group consisting of secreted frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4) and secreted frizzled related protein-5 (sFRP5).

15. The use according to claim 14, wherein the means for the detection of sFRP is an antibody capable of binding to the sFRP.

16. The use of a secreted frizzled-related protein (sFRP) as a marker for the progression of a renal disorder, wherein said sFRP is selected from the group consisting of secreted frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4) and secreted frizzled related protein-5 (sFRP5).

17. The use according to any one of claims 14 to 16, wherein said sFRP is secreted frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4).

18. The use according to any one of claims 14 to 16, wherein said sFRP is secreted frizzled related protein-5 (sFRP5).

19. The use according to any one of claims 14 to 18, wherein said renal disorder is PKD.

20. A diagnostic kit for diagnosing or monitoring the progression of a renal disorder, comprising at least one antibody capable of binding to one or more of sFRP4 and sFRP5.

21. A diagnostic kit according to claim 20, characterized in that said antibody is cabable of binding to sFRP4 or sFRP5 present in human urine.

22. A diagnostic kit according to claim 20 or 21 , wherein the antibody does not crossreact with other proteins present in human urine.

23. A diagnostic kit according to claim 22, wherein the antibody is specific for sFRP4.

24. A diagnostic kit according to claim 20 or 21 , wherein the antibody is capable of binding to sFRP1 , sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4 and sFRP5.

25. A diagnostic kit according to any one of claims 20 to 24, wherein the antibody is immobilized on a solid phase.

26. A diagnostic kit according to claim 25, wherein the solid phase is a test strip.

27. A diagnostic kit according to any one of claims 20 to 26, further comprising a second antibody capable of specifically binding to sFRP4 or sFRP5.

28. A diagnostic kit according to any one of claims 20 to 27, further comprising a wash buffer concentrate and/or a composition comprising sFRP4 or sFRP5.

29. A diagnostic kit according to any of claims 20 to 28 for use in a method according to any one of claims 1 to 13.

30. A screening method for identifying compounds effective in the treatment of PKD, comprising

(a) contacting a test compound with a cell; and

(b) determining the expression by the cell of one or more genes that are induced by cyst fluid or upregulated in kidneys of ADPKD patients, or determining the promoter activity of the promoter(s) of said gene(s).

31. A screening method according to claim 30, wherein said one or more genes encode protein(s) selected from the group consisting of sFRP4 and sFRP5.

32. A screening method according to claim 30 or 31 , further comprising the step of selecting the test compound if the test compound inhibits the expression by the cell of said gene(s) or said promoter activity.