WO2006025968A2 - Multiple gas injection system for charged particle beam instruments - Google Patents

Multiple gas injection system for charged particle beam instruments Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006025968A2
WO2006025968A2 PCT/US2005/025906 US2005025906W WO2006025968A2 WO 2006025968 A2 WO2006025968 A2 WO 2006025968A2 US 2005025906 W US2005025906 W US 2005025906W WO 2006025968 A2 WO2006025968 A2 WO 2006025968A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
transfer
gas
tube
injection system
constituent
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2005/025906
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2006025968A3 (en
Inventor
Thomas M. Moore
Original Assignee
Moore Thomas M
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Moore Thomas M filed Critical Moore Thomas M
Priority to EP05810798A priority Critical patent/EP1774538A4/en
Publication of WO2006025968A2 publication Critical patent/WO2006025968A2/en
Publication of WO2006025968A3 publication Critical patent/WO2006025968A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J37/00Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
    • H01J37/30Electron-beam or ion-beam tubes for localised treatment of objects
    • H01J37/317Electron-beam or ion-beam tubes for localised treatment of objects for changing properties of the objects or for applying thin layers thereon, e.g. for ion implantation
    • H01J37/3178Electron-beam or ion-beam tubes for localised treatment of objects for changing properties of the objects or for applying thin layers thereon, e.g. for ion implantation for applying thin layers on objects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G21NUCLEAR PHYSICS; NUCLEAR ENGINEERING
    • G21KTECHNIQUES FOR HANDLING PARTICLES OR IONISING RADIATION NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; IRRADIATION DEVICES; GAMMA RAY OR X-RAY MICROSCOPES
    • G21K7/00Gamma- or X-ray microscopes
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J37/00Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
    • H01J37/30Electron-beam or ion-beam tubes for localised treatment of objects
    • H01J37/305Electron-beam or ion-beam tubes for localised treatment of objects for casting, melting, evaporating, or etching
    • H01J37/3053Electron-beam or ion-beam tubes for localised treatment of objects for casting, melting, evaporating, or etching for evaporating or etching
    • H01J37/3056Electron-beam or ion-beam tubes for localised treatment of objects for casting, melting, evaporating, or etching for evaporating or etching for microworking, e. g. etching of gratings or trimming of electrical components
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J2237/00Discharge tubes exposing object to beam, e.g. for analysis treatment, etching, imaging
    • H01J2237/006Details of gas supplies, e.g. in an ion source, to a beam line, to a specimen or to a workpiece
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J2237/00Discharge tubes exposing object to beam, e.g. for analysis treatment, etching, imaging
    • H01J2237/30Electron or ion beam tubes for processing objects
    • H01J2237/304Controlling tubes
    • H01J2237/30405Details
    • H01J2237/30411Details using digital signal processors [DSP]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J2237/00Discharge tubes exposing object to beam, e.g. for analysis treatment, etching, imaging
    • H01J2237/30Electron or ion beam tubes for processing objects
    • H01J2237/304Controlling tubes
    • H01J2237/30455Correction during exposure
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J2237/00Discharge tubes exposing object to beam, e.g. for analysis treatment, etching, imaging
    • H01J2237/30Electron or ion beam tubes for processing objects
    • H01J2237/31Processing objects on a macro-scale
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J2237/00Discharge tubes exposing object to beam, e.g. for analysis treatment, etching, imaging
    • H01J2237/30Electron or ion beam tubes for processing objects
    • H01J2237/317Processing objects on a microscale
    • H01J2237/3174Etching microareas
    • H01J2237/31742Etching microareas for repairing masks
    • H01J2237/31744Etching microareas for repairing masks introducing gas in vicinity of workpiece

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to the removal of specimens inside focused ion-beam (FIB) microscopes and the preparation of specimens for later analysis in the transmission electron microscope (TEM) 5 . and apparatus to facilitate these activities.
  • FIB focused ion-beam
  • TEM transmission electron microscope
  • in-situ lift-out for TEM sample preparation in the dual-beam FIB has become a popular and accepted technique.
  • the in-situ lift-out technique is a series of FIB milling and sample-translation steps used to produce a site-specific specimen for later observation in a TEM or other analytical instrument. Removal of the lift-out sample is typically performed using an internal nano-manipulator in conjunction with the ion-beam assisted chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process available with the FIB tool.
  • a suitable nano-manipulator system is the Omniprobe AutoProbe 200, manufactured by Omniprobe, Inc., of Dallas, Texas. Details on methods of in-situ lift- out may be found in the specifications of U.S. Patents Nos.
  • Gas injection in the FIB may be used for etching to speed the milling process, for ion or electron-beam assisted CVD of oxides, metals and other materials, for deposition of protective layers, and for deposition of planarizing material, such as silicon dioxide, to fill holes where lift-out samples have been excised.
  • gas injection systems mounted on the wall of the FIB vacuum chamber have become preferred.
  • Chamber-mounted injection systems also permit whole-wafer analysis and can be easily inserted near (within 50 mm) the position where the charged particle beam strikes the sample. After completion of the injection process, the system can be retracted to a safe position for normal FIB sample translation operations. There are a limited number of appropriate ports on a typical FIB, however, and a growing number of desired accessories and gas chemistries of interest.
  • a chamber- mounted injection system with only one gas source crucible is inefficient. What is needed is a multiple gas source chamber mounted injection system.
  • a gas injection system comprising at least one crucible, each crucible holding at least one deposition constituent; at least one transfer tube, the number of transfer tubes corresponding to the number of crucibles, each transfer tube being connected to a corresponding crucible.
  • At least one metering valve there is at least one metering valve, the number of metering valves corresponding to the number of transfer tubes, each metering valve being connected to a corresponding transfer tube so that the metering valve can measure and adjust vapor flow in the corresponding transfer tube.
  • a sensor is provided capable of sensing reactions between deposition constituents and a focused ion beam
  • a computer is connected to receive the output of the sensor; the computer is also connected to each metering valve to control the operation of the valve, and the computer is programmed to send control signals to each metering valve to control the operation of the valve; the control signals being computed responsive to feedback from the output of the sensor.
  • Figure 1 is a side view of a typical embodiment of a multiple gas injection device.
  • Figure 2 is a schematic view of the preferred embodiment of the multiple gas- inj ection system.
  • Figure 3 is a flow chart showing the preferred embodiment of the computer program that controls the multiple gas injection system.
  • Figure 4 shows schematically the computer control of the system.
  • Description Figure 1 shows the gas-injection system (100) of the preferred embodiment.
  • a plurality of crucibles (110) contain the gas sources.
  • the crucibles (110) that contains the gas source share the vacuum system with the FIB vacuum chamber.
  • the gasses exit through a single injection tube (120) that is inside the FIB chamber.
  • the system is supported by a housing (125) that seals to the FIB chamber, preferably by a threaded attachment (135).
  • a crucible isolation valve (240) regulates to flow of gas. Although three crucibles (110) are shown in the drawings, the system may have more or fewer.
  • the crucibles (110) typically hold metal compounds, such as carbonyls metals from the group of Pt or W. When heated, they are vaporized and in the vaporized state they enter the transfer tubes (130).
  • Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the preferred embodiment. As shown in Fig. 2, the source gasses pass through independently heated transfer tubes (130) on their way to the final mixing chamber (180) to avoid re-deposition or decomposition in the tubes (130).
  • a carrier or purge gas such as nitrogen or other inert gas
  • the carrier or purge gas also purges the appropriate transfer tube (130) after a change in the flow program to enable rapid transitions, and to avoid unwanted source gas mixing effects.
  • the source gasses from the transfer tubes (130) are combined in the final mixing chamber (140) before presenting the combination to the sample surface through the single injection tube (120). Feedback on the flow rates of each source gas and the carrier or purge gas and on the rate of beam-assisted reaction in the FIB is important for proper computer control of the gas injection system.
  • the first level of feedback is a flow sensor (170) connected to the mixing chamber (140).
  • the flow sensor (170) monitors the flow rate of the combined source gas that is injected into the FIB vacuum chamber, hi the preferred embodiment, the flow sensor (170) is a diaphragm-type pressure sensor connected to the final mixing chamber (140) which monitors small changes in pressure in the mixing chamber (140). These pressure changes are then converted into flow rates for the combined source gas in a programmed computer (210).
  • the programmed computer (210) will have a central-processing unit, a memory, and storage.
  • the gas injection system (100) can be operated automatically under the control of the computer (210).
  • Fig. 4 shows the connections of the system elements to they computer (210).
  • the second level of feedback involves detecting the byproducts of the beam- assisted chemical reactions in the FIB, and then using this feedback to adjust the amounts and flow rates of the source gases and carrier gas.
  • two systems are used for reaction by-product feedback. Both systems can be mounted on the FIB vacuum chamber independently of the system (100), or can be integrated with the gas injection system (100).
  • the first preferred system for detecting reaction by-products is a Residual Gas Analyzer (RGA) (180) which consists of an ionizer, quadrupole mass filter and a detector.
  • RGA Residual Gas Analyzer
  • a suitable RGA system is the RGA300 system from Stanford Research Systems, Inc. of Sunnyvale, CA.
  • the second preferred system for detecting reaction by-products is an external optical spectrometer (290) attached to the FIB vacuum chamber which uses a diffraction grating to generate a spectrum of the light emissions from the interaction of the charged particle beam, combined source gas and the sample surface.
  • a suitable system is the HR4000 system from Ocean Optics of Dunedin, Florida. This optical spectrum can be compared to reference spectra taken from known interactions of the charged particle beam, specific source gasses and the sample surface.
  • FIG. 3 shows the steps in the program running on the computer (210) of the preferred embodiment.
  • the computer (210) will have machine-readable instructions for carrying out the following steps.
  • the program begins.
  • the operator either creates a recipe or recalls one from storage.
  • a recipe is a form having editable fields that can be filled in, using a GUI interface executing on the computer (210)>
  • the program starts heating the crucibles (110) according to the recipe
  • the program adjusts the carrier gas flow and the source gas flow according to the recipe.
  • the transfer tubes (130) are heated according to the recipe.
  • the program analyzes the gas pressure in the mixing chamber (140); that is, its pressure is compared to the set of pressure values corresponding to the set of desired gas compositions in the recipe.
  • the system (100) is ready to begin the operation called for in the recipe, such as deposition or etching (step 355).
  • Step 360 checks to see if the gas pressure in the mixing chamber (140) is in compliance with the recipe. If it is, execution proceeds to step 375; else, the gas pressure is adjusted to the recipe at step 370, and execution proceeds to step 375.
  • the program checks to see if the gas mixture inside the FIB is in compliance with the recipe. If it is, execution proceeds to step 375; else, the flow of source or carrier gas is adjusted to the recipe at step 372, and execution proceeds to step 375.
  • the system (100) begins to carry our the selected recipe deposition or etching. The reaction rate is checked at step 380.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing the gas injection system (100) controlled by the computer (215) and the dedicated external processor (210).
  • the general-purpose computer (215) accomplishes the high-level control over the whole system, including the dedicated external processor (210).
  • the dedicated external processor (210) controls the carrier gas source (310), the temperature controller (200) for the crucibles (110), the pneumatic controller for the crucible isolation valves (190), and the heat source for the transfer tubes.
  • external processor (210) also controls the residual gas analyzer (180), the optical spectrometer (290) and the flow sensor (170).

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Chemical Vapour Deposition (AREA)
  • Physical Deposition Of Substances That Are Components Of Semiconductor Devices (AREA)

Abstract

We disclose a gas injection system having at least one crucible, each crucible holding at least one deposition constituent; at least one transfer tube, the number of transfer tubes corresponding to the number of crucibles, each transfer tube being connected to a corresponding crucible. There is at least one metering valve, the number of metering valves corresponding to the number of transfer tubes, each metering valve being connected to a corresponding transfer tube so that the metering valve can measure and adjust vapor flow in the corresponding transfer tube. A sensor is provided capable of sensing reactions between deposition constituents and a focused ion beam A computer is connected to receive the output of the sensor; the computer is also connected to each metering valve to control the operation of the valve, and the computer is programmed to send control signals to each metering valve to control the operation of the valve; the control signals being computed responsive to feedback from the output of the sensor.

Description

MULTIPLE GAS INJECTION SYSTEM FOR CHARGED PARTICLE BEAM
INSTRUMENTS
Patent Application of Thomas M. Moore
Claim for Priority
This application claims the priority of United States provisional application serial no. 60/592,103, filed July 29, 2004 and having the title of "Multiple gas injection system for charged particle beam instruments."
Technical Field
This disclosure relates to the removal of specimens inside focused ion-beam (FIB) microscopes and the preparation of specimens for later analysis in the transmission electron microscope (TEM)5. and apparatus to facilitate these activities.
Background
The use of in-situ lift-out for TEM sample preparation in the dual-beam FIB has become a popular and accepted technique. The in-situ lift-out technique is a series of FIB milling and sample-translation steps used to produce a site-specific specimen for later observation in a TEM or other analytical instrument. Removal of the lift-out sample is typically performed using an internal nano-manipulator in conjunction with the ion-beam assisted chemical vapor deposition (CVD) process available with the FIB tool. A suitable nano-manipulator system is the Omniprobe AutoProbe 200, manufactured by Omniprobe, Inc., of Dallas, Texas. Details on methods of in-situ lift- out may be found in the specifications of U.S. Patents Nos. 6,420,722 and 6,570,170. These patent specifications are incorporated into this application by reference, but are not admitted to be prior art with respect to the present application by their mention in the background. Gas chemistries plays an important role in in-situ lift-out. Gas injection in the FIB may be used for etching to speed the milling process, for ion or electron-beam assisted CVD of oxides, metals and other materials, for deposition of protective layers, and for deposition of planarizing material, such as silicon dioxide, to fill holes where lift-out samples have been excised. For a number of reasons, gas injection systems mounted on the wall of the FIB vacuum chamber have become preferred. This offers a safety advantage over injection systems using gas sources or bottled gasses that are external to the FIB vacuum chamber. Chamber-mounted injection systems also permit whole-wafer analysis and can be easily inserted near (within 50 mm) the position where the charged particle beam strikes the sample. After completion of the injection process, the system can be retracted to a safe position for normal FIB sample translation operations. There are a limited number of appropriate ports on a typical FIB, however, and a growing number of desired accessories and gas chemistries of interest. A chamber- mounted injection system with only one gas source crucible is inefficient. What is needed is a multiple gas source chamber mounted injection system. Not only would the use of existing ports improve, but with a multiple gas source chamber-mounted injection system, a complex and automated process flow, or schedule, involving different gas sources over a timed deposition period is possible. The individual sources could be maintained at different temperatures to maintain the desired vapor pressure in each tube, and ideally, feedback from sensors should be used to adjust the deposition parameters and maintain them within the correct limits. Summary We disclose a gas injection system, comprising at least one crucible, each crucible holding at least one deposition constituent; at least one transfer tube, the number of transfer tubes corresponding to the number of crucibles, each transfer tube being connected to a corresponding crucible. There is at least one metering valve, the number of metering valves corresponding to the number of transfer tubes, each metering valve being connected to a corresponding transfer tube so that the metering valve can measure and adjust vapor flow in the corresponding transfer tube. A sensor is provided capable of sensing reactions between deposition constituents and a focused ion beam A computer is connected to receive the output of the sensor; the computer is also connected to each metering valve to control the operation of the valve, and the computer is programmed to send control signals to each metering valve to control the operation of the valve; the control signals being computed responsive to feedback from the output of the sensor.
Drawings Figure 1 is a side view of a typical embodiment of a multiple gas injection device. Figure 2 is a schematic view of the preferred embodiment of the multiple gas- inj ection system. Figure 3 is a flow chart showing the preferred embodiment of the computer program that controls the multiple gas injection system. Figure 4 shows schematically the computer control of the system. Description Figure 1 shows the gas-injection system (100) of the preferred embodiment. A plurality of crucibles (110) contain the gas sources. The crucibles (110) that contains the gas source share the vacuum system with the FIB vacuum chamber. The gasses exit through a single injection tube (120) that is inside the FIB chamber. The system is supported by a housing (125) that seals to the FIB chamber, preferably by a threaded attachment (135). A crucible isolation valve (240) regulates to flow of gas. Although three crucibles (110) are shown in the drawings, the system may have more or fewer. The crucibles (110) typically hold metal compounds, such as carbonyls metals from the group of Pt or W. When heated, they are vaporized and in the vaporized state they enter the transfer tubes (130). Figure 2 is a schematic diagram of the preferred embodiment. As shown in Fig. 2, the source gasses pass through independently heated transfer tubes (130) on their way to the final mixing chamber (180) to avoid re-deposition or decomposition in the tubes (130). A carrier or purge gas, such as nitrogen or other inert gas, is metered from metering valves (150) into the transfer tubes (130) to both dilute and carry the source gasses to the final mixing chamber (140). The carrier or purge gas also purges the appropriate transfer tube (130) after a change in the flow program to enable rapid transitions, and to avoid unwanted source gas mixing effects. The source gasses from the transfer tubes (130) are combined in the final mixing chamber (140) before presenting the combination to the sample surface through the single injection tube (120). Feedback on the flow rates of each source gas and the carrier or purge gas and on the rate of beam-assisted reaction in the FIB is important for proper computer control of the gas injection system. The first level of feedback is a flow sensor (170) connected to the mixing chamber (140). The flow sensor (170) monitors the flow rate of the combined source gas that is injected into the FIB vacuum chamber, hi the preferred embodiment, the flow sensor (170) is a diaphragm-type pressure sensor connected to the final mixing chamber (140) which monitors small changes in pressure in the mixing chamber (140). These pressure changes are then converted into flow rates for the combined source gas in a programmed computer (210). The programmed computer (210) will have a central-processing unit, a memory, and storage. The gas injection system (100) can be operated automatically under the control of the computer (210). Fig. 4 shows the connections of the system elements to they computer (210). The second level of feedback involves detecting the byproducts of the beam- assisted chemical reactions in the FIB, and then using this feedback to adjust the amounts and flow rates of the source gases and carrier gas. In the preferred embodiment, two systems are used for reaction by-product feedback. Both systems can be mounted on the FIB vacuum chamber independently of the system (100), or can be integrated with the gas injection system (100). ' The first preferred system for detecting reaction by-products is a Residual Gas Analyzer (RGA) (180) which consists of an ionizer, quadrupole mass filter and a detector. A suitable RGA system is the RGA300 system from Stanford Research Systems, Inc. of Sunnyvale, CA. Spectra of the residual components in the atmosphere are gathered by the RGA (210) and compared with reference spectra of known beam- assisted reactions in the FIB. From this comparison the relative performance of the reaction can be determined, and adjustments to the flow rates and composition of the combined source gas can be made. The second preferred system for detecting reaction by-products is an external optical spectrometer (290) attached to the FIB vacuum chamber which uses a diffraction grating to generate a spectrum of the light emissions from the interaction of the charged particle beam, combined source gas and the sample surface. A suitable system is the HR4000 system from Ocean Optics of Dunedin, Florida. This optical spectrum can be compared to reference spectra taken from known interactions of the charged particle beam, specific source gasses and the sample surface. The results of this comparison can be used to make adjustments in the composition and flow rates of the source gasses. A fiber optic cable that transfers the targeted emissions to the spectrometer can be positioned close to the point where the charged particle beam strikes the surface to improve the collection efficiency. This fiber optic cable and the spectrometer can be physically independent of the gas injection system (100), or can be integrated into it. Figure 3 shows the steps in the program running on the computer (210) of the preferred embodiment. The computer (210) will have machine-readable instructions for carrying out the following steps. At step 320, the program begins. At step 325 the operator either creates a recipe or recalls one from storage. A recipe is a form having editable fields that can be filled in, using a GUI interface executing on the computer (210)> At step 330, the program starts heating the crucibles (110) according to the recipe At step 335 and 340, the program adjusts the carrier gas flow and the source gas flow according to the recipe. At step 345, the transfer tubes (130) are heated according to the recipe. Then, at step 350, the program analyzes the gas pressure in the mixing chamber (140); that is, its pressure is compared to the set of pressure values corresponding to the set of desired gas compositions in the recipe. At this point, the system (100) is ready to begin the operation called for in the recipe, such as deposition or etching (step 355). Step 360 checks to see if the gas pressure in the mixing chamber (140) is in compliance with the recipe. If it is, execution proceeds to step 375; else, the gas pressure is adjusted to the recipe at step 370, and execution proceeds to step 375. At step 365, the program checks to see if the gas mixture inside the FIB is in compliance with the recipe. If it is, execution proceeds to step 375; else, the flow of source or carrier gas is adjusted to the recipe at step 372, and execution proceeds to step 375. At step 375, the system (100) begins to carry our the selected recipe deposition or etching. The reaction rate is checked at step 380. If the reaction rate is proceeding as required by the recipe then the procedure continues at step 390; else, at step 385 the program checks for the correct FIB and performance settings and makes necessary corrections. The deposition or etch procedure continues at step 390. After the procedure is complete, the program checks at step 395 for a new recipe to execute. If none is present, then execution stops at 405. Else, step 400 purges the mixing chamber and adjusts the FIB vacuum. Execution then returns to step 325 to repeat the procedures. Figure 4 is a schematic diagram showing the gas injection system (100) controlled by the computer (215) and the dedicated external processor (210). The general-purpose computer (215) accomplishes the high-level control over the whole system, including the dedicated external processor (210). At the next level of control, the dedicated external processor (210) controls the carrier gas source (310), the temperature controller (200) for the crucibles (110), the pneumatic controller for the crucible isolation valves (190), and the heat source for the transfer tubes. As part of the feedback system, external processor (210) also controls the residual gas analyzer (180), the optical spectrometer (290) and the flow sensor (170). I claim:

Claims

1. A gas injection system, comprising: at least one crucible, each crucible holding at least one deposition constituent; at least one transfer tube, the number of transfer tubes corresponding to the number of crucibles, each transfer tube being connected to a corresponding crucible; at least one metering valve, the number of metering valves corresponding to the number of transfer tubes, each metering valve being connected to a corresponding transfer tube so that the metering valve can measure and adjust vapor flow in the corresponding transfer tube; a sensor capable of sensing reactions between deposition constituents and a focused ion beam, the sensor having an output; and a computer; the computer connected to receive the output of the sensor; the computer connected to each metering valve to control the operation of the valve; and, the computer programmed to send control signals to each metering valve to control the operation of the valve; the control signals being computed responsive to feedback from the output of the sensor.
2. The gas injection system of claim 1, where the sensor is a residual gas analyzer.
3. The gas injection system of claim 1, where the sensor is an external optical spectrometer.
4. The gas injection system of claim 3, where the external optical spectrometer further comprises a fiber optic cable disposed to transfer light emissions from reactions between deposition constituents and a focused ion beam to the spectrometer.
5. The gas injection system of claim 1, further comprising: at least one transfer tube heat source; the number of transfer tube heat sources corresponding to the number of transfer tubes; each transfer tube heat source being thermally connected to a corresponding transfer tube; 1 a transfer-tube temperature controller; the transfer-tube temperature controller
2 being connected to each of the transfer tube heat sources;
3 a transfer-tube temperature sensor for sensing the temperature of the each of the
4 transfer tubes;
5 the computer connected to receive the output of the transfer-tube temperature
6 sensor;
7 the computer connected to each transfer-tube temperature controller; and,
8 the computer programmed to send control signals to each transfer-tube
9 temperature controller, the signals being computed responsive to feedback from 10 the output of the transfer-tube sensor.
11
12 6. The gas injection system of claim 1, further comprising:
13 a purge-gas source;
14 a purge-gas transfer tube having a source end and at least one termination end,
15 the source end connected to the purge-gas source, the number of termination
16 ends corresponding to the number of transfer tubes, each of the termination ends
17 being connected to the corresponding transfer tube downstream of the
18 corresponding metering valve;
19 at least one purge-gas metering valve, the purge-gas metering valve being
20 connected to the purge-gas transfer tube so as to enable the purge-gas metering
21 valve to measure and adjust vapor flow in the purge-gas transfer tube;
22 the computer connected to control each of the purge-gas metering valves. 23
24 7. The gas injection system of claim 1, further comprising a mixing chamber; the
25 mixing chamber connected to each of transfer tubes. 26
27 8. The gas injection system of claim 7, where the mixing chamber has an injecting
28 tube for injecting mixed gasses from the mixing chamber into the chamber of a focused
29 ion-beam instrument. 30
31 9. The gas injection system of claim 1 , where the crucibles are removable.
32
33 10. A gas injection system, comprising: 1 at least one crucible; each crucible housing at least one deposition constituent;
2 a mixing chamber;
3 at least one transfer tube, the number of transfer tubes corresponding to the
4 number of crucibles, a first end of each the transfer tubes being connected to a
5 corresponding crucible, a second end of each of the transfer tubes being
6 connected to the mixing chamber;
7 an injection tube for injecting gases into the chamber of a focused ion-beam
8 instrument; the injection tube connected to the mixing chamber;
9 at least one metering valve; the number of metering valves corresponding to the
10 number of transfer tubes, each metering valve being connected to a
11 corresponding transfer tube so as to enable the metering valve to adjust vapor
12 flow in the corresponding transfer tube;
13 a computer;
14 the computer connected to control each metering valve. 15
16 11. A gas injection system, comprising:
17 at least one crucible, each crucible housing at least one deposition constituent;
18 at least one transfer tube, the number of transfer tubes corresponding to the
19 number of crucibles, each the transfer tubes being connected to a corresponding
20 crucible;
21 at least one transfer-tube heat source, the number of transfer-tube heat sources
22 corresponding to the number of transfer tubes; each transfer-tube heat source
23 being thermally connected to a corresponding transfer tube;
24 a transfer-tube temperature controller, the transfer tube temperature controller
25 connected to control each of the at least one transfer tube heat sources;
26 a computer;
27 the computer connected to control each transfer-tube temperature controller; and,
28 the computer connected to control each transfer tube temperature controller. 29
30 12. The gas injection system of claim 11, where the crucibles are removable.
31
32 13. The gas injection system of claim 11 , further comprising: 1 at least one crucible heat source, the number of crucible heat sources
2 corresponding to the number of crucibles, each crucible heat source being
3 thermally connected to a corresponding crucible;
4 a crucible temperature controller; the crucible temperature controller connected
5 to control each of the crucible heat sources;
6 the computer connected to control the crucible temperature controller. 7
8 14. The gas injection system of claim 11 further comprising:
9 at least one metering valve, the number of metering valves corresponding to the
10 number of transfer tubes, each metering valve being connected to a
11 corresponding transfer tube so that the metering valve can adjust vapor flow in
12 the corresponding transfer tube;
13 a sensor capable of sensing reactions between deposition constituents and a
14 focused ion beam, the sensor having an output; and
15 the computer connected to receive the output of the sensor;
16 the computer connected to each metering valve to control the operation of the
17 valve; and,
18 the computer programmed to send control signals to each metering valve to
19 control the operation of the valve; the control signals being computed
20 responsive to feedback from the output of the sensor.
21
22 15. The gas injection system of claim 11, further comprising a mixing chamber; the
23 mixing chamber connected to each of transfer tubes. 24
25 16. The gas injection system of claim 15, where the mixing chamber has an injecting
26 tube for injecting mixed gasses from the mixing chamber into the chamber of a focused
27 ion-beam instrument. 28
29 17. A gas injection system, comprising:
30 at least one crucible, each crucible housing at least one deposition constituent;
31 at least one constituent transfer tube, the number of constituent transfer tubes
32 corresponding to the number of crucibles, each the constituent transfer tubes
33 being connected to a corresponding crucible; 1 a purge-gas source;
2 a purge-gas transfer tube having a source end and at least one termination end;
3 the source end being connected to the purge-gas source; the number of
4 termination ends corresponding to the number of purge-gas transfer tubes; each
5 of the termination ends being connected to an intermediate portion of a
6 corresponding constituent transfer tube;
7 at least one purge-gas metering valve, the number of purge-gas metering valves
8 corresponding to the number of purge-gas transfer tubes; each purge-gas
9 metering valve being connected to a corresponding purge-gas transfer tube so as
10 to enable the purge-gas metering valve to adjust purge gas flow in the
11 corresponding purge-gas transfer tube;
12 a computer;
13 where the computer is connected to control each of the at least one purge-gas
14 metering valves. 15
16 18. The gas injection system of claim 17, further comprising:
17 a sensor capable of sensing reactions between deposition constituents and a
18 focused ion beam; the sensor having an output;
19 the computer connected to receive the output of the sensor;
20 the computer connected to each constituent metering valve to control the
21 operation of the valve; and,
22 the computer programmed to control signals to each metering valve to control
23 the operation of the valve; and,
24 the computer programmed to send control signals to each metering valve to
25 control the operation of the valve; the control signals being computed responsive
26 to feed from the output of the sensor. 27
28 19. The gas injection system of claim 18 where the sensor is a residual gas analyzer. 29
30 20. The gas injection system of claim 18 where the sensor is an external optical
31 spectrometer. 32
33 21. The gas injection system of claim 17 further comprising: 1 at least one constituent transfer-tube heat source; the number of constituent
2 transfer-tube heat sources corresponding to the number of constituent transfer
3 tubes; each constituent transfer-tube heat source being thermally connected to a
4 corresponding constituent transfer tube;
5 a constituent transfer-tube temperature controller; the constituent transfer-tube
6 controller being connected to each of the constituent transfer-tube heat sources;
7 a constituent transfer-tube sensor for sensing the temperature of each of the
8 transfer tubes;
9 the computer connected to each constituent transfer-tube temperature controller;
10 and,
11 the computer programmed to send control signals to each constituent transfer-
12 tube temperature controller, the signals being computed responsive to feedback
13 from the output of the constituent transfer-tube sensor. 14
15 22. The gas injection system of claim 17, further comprising a mixing chamber; the
16 mixing chamber connected to each of constituent transfer tubes. 17
18 23. The gas injection system of claim 22, where the mixing chamber has an injecting
19 tube for injecting mixed gasses from the mixing chamber into the chamber of a focused
20 ion-beam instrument. 21
22 24. A method of controlling a gas injection system performing a deposition
23 or etching operation; the gas injection system having at least one crucible for
24 holding a deposition constituent, means for heating and transferring the
25 deposition constituent to a mixing chamber, and means for sensing gas pressure,
26 gas flow, temperature, and reaction rate at a site for deposition or etching; the
27 method comprising the steps of:
28 creating or recalling a recipe;
29 heating the crucible according to the recipe;
30 adjusting carrier gas flow according to the recipe;
31 heating the means for transferring the deposition constituent according to the
32 recipe;
33 measuring the gas pressure in the mixing chamber; determining if the gas pressure in the mixing chamber is in compliance with the recipe; and, if not, adjusting the flow of deposition constituent or carrier gas to bring the gas pressure into compliance with the recipe; determining if the gas mixture at the operation site is in compliance with the recipe; and, if not, adjusting the flow of deposition constituent or carrier gas to bring the gas mixture at the operation site into compliance with the recipe; determining if the reaction rate at the operation site is in compliance with the recipe; and, if not, adjusting to bring the reaction rate into compliance with the recipe.
PCT/US2005/025906 2004-07-29 2005-07-21 Multiple gas injection system for charged particle beam instruments WO2006025968A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP05810798A EP1774538A4 (en) 2004-07-29 2005-07-21 Multiple gas injection system for charged particle beam instruments

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US59210304P 2004-07-29 2004-07-29
US60/592,103 2004-07-29

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006025968A2 true WO2006025968A2 (en) 2006-03-09
WO2006025968A3 WO2006025968A3 (en) 2007-06-14

Family

ID=36000483

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2005/025906 WO2006025968A2 (en) 2004-07-29 2005-07-21 Multiple gas injection system for charged particle beam instruments

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20060022136A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1774538A4 (en)
WO (1) WO2006025968A2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7923702B2 (en) 2007-11-13 2011-04-12 Carl Zeiss Nts Gmbh System and method for processing an object
DE102012001267A1 (en) * 2012-01-23 2013-07-25 Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh Particle jet system with supply of process gas to a processing location
US8939108B2 (en) 2008-02-18 2015-01-27 Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh Processing system
DE102021202941A1 (en) 2021-03-25 2022-09-29 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Gas injection subsystem for use in an assay system for assaying a sample using charged particles and assay system comprising such a gas injection subsystem
DE102022118006B3 (en) 2022-07-19 2023-11-16 Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh Method for processing a sample, particle beam system and computer program product

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7746451B1 (en) * 2006-01-18 2010-06-29 Louisiana Tech University Research Foundation, A Division of Louisiana Tech University Foundation On-chip microplasma systems
WO2009114112A2 (en) * 2008-03-08 2009-09-17 Omniprobe, Inc. Method and apparatus for precursor delivery system for irradiation beam instruments
US9275823B2 (en) 2012-03-21 2016-03-01 Fei Company Multiple gas injection system
WO2014011292A1 (en) * 2012-07-13 2014-01-16 Omniprobe, Inc. Gas injection system for energetic-beam instruments
CN114423884A (en) * 2019-08-12 2022-04-29 Meo工程股份有限公司 Method and apparatus for precursor gas injection

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US197851A (en) * 1877-12-04 Improvement in car-couplings
US3847115A (en) * 1973-05-02 1974-11-12 Nasa System for depositing thin films
US4058120A (en) * 1976-06-29 1977-11-15 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Vaporizer carousel for anesthesia machine
EP0199585B1 (en) * 1985-04-23 1990-07-04 Seiko Instruments Inc. Apparatus for depositing electrically conductive and/or electrically insulating material on a workpiece
JPH0262039A (en) * 1988-08-29 1990-03-01 Hitachi Ltd Fine processing of multilayer element and apparatus therefor
JP2708547B2 (en) * 1989-05-10 1998-02-04 株式会社日立製作所 Device porting method
US5182170A (en) * 1989-09-05 1993-01-26 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Method of producing parts by selective beam interaction of powder with gas phase reactant
US5683547A (en) * 1990-11-21 1997-11-04 Hitachi, Ltd. Processing method and apparatus using focused energy beam
US5288367A (en) * 1993-02-01 1994-02-22 International Business Machines Corporation End-point detection
WO1997038355A1 (en) * 1996-04-08 1997-10-16 Micrion Corporation Systems and methods for deposition of dielectric films
JP3544438B2 (en) * 1996-09-30 2004-07-21 セイコーインスツルメンツ株式会社 Processing equipment using ion beam
US5747818A (en) * 1996-10-21 1998-05-05 Schlumberger Technologies Inc. Thermoelectric cooling in gas-assisted FIB system
GB9709659D0 (en) * 1997-05-13 1997-07-02 Surface Tech Sys Ltd Method and apparatus for etching a workpiece
US20010000160A1 (en) * 1997-08-14 2001-04-05 Infineon Technologies Ag Method for treatment of semiconductor substrates
US6440615B1 (en) * 1999-02-09 2002-08-27 Nikon Corporation Method of repairing a mask with high electron scattering and low electron absorption properties
US6414307B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2002-07-02 Fei Company Method and apparatus for enhancing yield of secondary ions
JP3597761B2 (en) * 2000-07-18 2004-12-08 株式会社日立製作所 Ion beam device and sample processing method
US6751516B1 (en) * 2000-08-10 2004-06-15 Richardson Technologies, Inc. Method and system for direct writing, editing and transmitting a three dimensional part and imaging systems therefor
US6451692B1 (en) * 2000-08-18 2002-09-17 Micron Technology, Inc. Preheating of chemical vapor deposition precursors
US6638580B2 (en) * 2000-12-29 2003-10-28 Intel Corporation Apparatus and a method for forming an alloy layer over a substrate using an ion beam
US6492261B2 (en) * 2000-12-30 2002-12-10 Intel Corporation Focused ion beam metal deposition
WO2003065132A2 (en) * 2002-01-29 2003-08-07 Tokyo Electron Limited Method and apparatus for process monitoring and control
DE10208043B4 (en) * 2002-02-25 2011-01-13 Carl Zeiss Nts Gmbh Material processing system and material processing methods
EP1363164B1 (en) * 2002-05-16 2015-04-29 NaWoTec GmbH Procedure for etching of materials at the surface with focussed electron beam induced chemical reactions at said surface

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of EP1774538A4 *

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7923702B2 (en) 2007-11-13 2011-04-12 Carl Zeiss Nts Gmbh System and method for processing an object
US8939108B2 (en) 2008-02-18 2015-01-27 Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh Processing system
DE102012001267A1 (en) * 2012-01-23 2013-07-25 Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh Particle jet system with supply of process gas to a processing location
US8969835B2 (en) 2012-01-23 2015-03-03 Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh Particle beam system including a supply of process gas to a processing location
DE102021202941A1 (en) 2021-03-25 2022-09-29 Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh Gas injection subsystem for use in an assay system for assaying a sample using charged particles and assay system comprising such a gas injection subsystem
DE102022118006B3 (en) 2022-07-19 2023-11-16 Carl Zeiss Microscopy Gmbh Method for processing a sample, particle beam system and computer program product

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1774538A4 (en) 2012-06-06
US20060022136A1 (en) 2006-02-02
EP1774538A2 (en) 2007-04-18
WO2006025968A3 (en) 2007-06-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20060022136A1 (en) Multiple gas injection system for charged particle beam instruments
TWI459427B (en) "processing system for irradiating substrate with gas cluster ion beam and method of supplying gas in the same"
US9728375B2 (en) Multiple gas injection system
Machado et al. U-Pb dating and Hf isotopic composition of zircon by laser-ablation-MC-ICP-MS
CN102832151B (en) The method measuring concentration of dopant during Plasma ion implantation
US8796646B2 (en) Beam-induced deposition at cryogenic temperatures
US8512474B2 (en) Apparatus for precursor delivery system for irradiation beam instruments
EP0506012B1 (en) Apparatus for producing superconducting oxide film by MOCVD process
CN107709637B (en) High-throughput combined material experimental equipment for in-situ synthesis and real-time characterization and related method
US6987565B2 (en) Organometallic compound vaporizing/feeding system
EP1132504A1 (en) Thin film depositing process and device, ftir gas analyzer used in the thin film depositing process, and mixed gas supplying device used in the thin film depositing process
US20150318141A1 (en) Gas injection system for energetic-beam instruments
CN100348969C (en) Evaporating/ feeding system for liquid organic metal compound
Ploog et al. In situ characterization of MBE grown GaAs and Al x Ga 1− x As films using RHEED, SIMS, and AES techniques
Van Daele et al. Reaction mechanism of the Me 3 AuPMe 3–H 2 plasma-enhanced ALD process
US6881259B1 (en) In-situ monitoring and control of germanium profile in silicon-germanium alloy films and temperature monitoring during deposition of silicon films
EP1949069A2 (en) Ion source preparation system
US20240029996A1 (en) Method of processing a sample, particle beam system, and computer program product
Zaykova-Feldman et al. Feedback Control of Gas Chemistry Reactions in the FIB
WO2013071484A1 (en) Film deposition device and film deposition method
CN117660944B (en) Chemical vapor deposition automation equipment capable of realizing atomic precision manufacturing
JPH0515673B2 (en)
CN114199906A (en) Method for modifying microstructure of surface layer mineral of celestial body by simulating thermal environment of extraterrestrial space
JPS6278186A (en) Corpuscular ray epitaxial apparatus
CN1186974A (en) Sio probe for real-time monitoring and control of oxygen during czochralski growth of single crystal silicon

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DPE2 Request for preliminary examination filed before expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2005810798

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2005810798

Country of ref document: EP