WO2005117704A1 - Tool for estimating of working ability of a person - Google Patents

Tool for estimating of working ability of a person Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005117704A1
WO2005117704A1 PCT/FI2005/000259 FI2005000259W WO2005117704A1 WO 2005117704 A1 WO2005117704 A1 WO 2005117704A1 FI 2005000259 W FI2005000259 W FI 2005000259W WO 2005117704 A1 WO2005117704 A1 WO 2005117704A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
tool
person
working
task
pieces
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/FI2005/000259
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Päivi MÄKISALO-KAUHANEN
Päivi VENEHSALO
Original Assignee
Invalidiliiton Kuopion Työklinikka
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Invalidiliiton Kuopion Työklinikka filed Critical Invalidiliiton Kuopion Työklinikka
Publication of WO2005117704A1 publication Critical patent/WO2005117704A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Measuring for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/16Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a tool for estimating of working ability of a person which tool comprises at least two layers, which have been formed of different kind of removable pieces.
  • An initial mapping task is a practical task typifying work, which task a person client carries out in the initial phase of studying or rehabilitation period related to a vocational rehabilitation, for example.
  • the purpose of initial mapping tasks is to gather a good general picture of practical working ability and functional capacity of a person. On these grounds following tasks are given in the future and suitability of different tasks to the person is estimated.
  • Another task for initial mapping task is drawing, disconnecting and connecting of a series of wires following oral instructions.
  • the oral instructions are given with similar content to all rehabilitants. Additional instructions are given while needed also in the wire task.
  • a person draws a diagram of connections on a cross-ruled paper using a ruler. After the person has finished drawing, a working test instructor checks the drawing, after which the person disconnects the wires from the diagram. After this, the person starts to connect the wires according to his own drawing. In this task, the time spent for the task and the tidiness of the work are estimated.
  • the used tasks are light tasks in terms of physical stress to be carried out in sitting or in standing position at a table plane.
  • the tasks have been taken into use over 20 years ago.
  • the objective of the invention is to provide a tool for estimating of working ability of a person with the use of which improvements to methods and devices today in use are created.
  • the objective of the invention is to provide a tool, with which it is possible to versatile estimate the working ability and functioning capacity of a person in terms of physical, cognitive and psychosocial components.
  • the tool in accordance with the invention comprises a removable attaching tool lo- eating between layers placed one on top of the other for connecting the layers together.
  • the attaching tool must be removed, which must be carried out in a way differing from the way of removing the pieces in the layers and the functioning is versatile and complicated.
  • the estimating task is more difficult and working ability may be measured more versatile than while using two layers.
  • the area of the upper layer of the tool is smaller than the area of the pieces of the layer located lower than it. Therefore, the area of the upper most layer is smaller than that of the next layer and so on, in which case, all layers are partly visible when the tool is assembled. Due to the shape of the tool, more versatility is gained for the task.
  • the tool has been placed on a plane to be vertically adjusted.
  • the functional capacity pyramid con- taines in this case, physical stress and the task must be carried out in standing posi- tion and it is possible for the person to adjust the working plane to needed height and thus on one's own initiave to change the working position.
  • the functioning of the person may be monitored and studied, for example, if he adjusts the plane to the suitable working height to himself.
  • the tool in accordance with the invention is a tool for estimating of working ability, so-called functional capacity tool or pyramid, by means of which the working ability and functional capacity of a person are estimated as a part of vocational rehabilitation.
  • the functional capacity pyramid is aimed for estimating of working ability of adult population of working age. Based on it the tasks given in the future for the person are chosen and the suitability of various tasks for the person is estimated.
  • the tool i.e. the functional capacity pyramid is used, for example, as follows:
  • the person is given oral instructions in the beginning, on grounds of which he starts working.
  • the person has an assembled pyramid in front of him, for example, a three-layer tool, which he draws and takes into pieces in the first phase.
  • the person takes off the pieces of the first layer to a marked box.
  • the person takes off the attaching tool placed on the middle layer, for example, a metal frame by means of a tool (such as a hex wrench, for example).
  • a tool such as a hex wrench, for example
  • the person removes the attaching tool i.e. the frame placed on the bottom layer again using tools, after which the person draws the pattern drawing of the bottom layer and removes the pieces on the floor.
  • the working test instructor checks the pattern drawings done by the person as well as that the pieces on the floor are mixed.
  • the person In the second phase, the person assembles the two lowest layers of the pyramid in accordance with the drawing done by himself. For assembling the upper most layer, the person is given a ready pattern drawing of the figure formed of the pieces.
  • the table plane, on which the person is working, is adjustable. The person is given in- structions for adjusting the table plane in the beginning, but no instructions for er- gonomic working, because in this case it is possible to monitor which kind of working positions the person himself chooses.
  • the person In the beginning of the task, the person is given a follow-up form, in which the person marks the time spent to different working phases and the problems or other feelings experienced during the task. In addi- tion, breaks and their reasons are also marked on the form.
  • sensomotory Various kinds of components, such as sensomotory, cognitive and phychososiologi- cal components may be monitored by means of the tool in accordance with the invention.
  • Sensomotor components may be monitored in various ways. Dynamic motion and recurrence as parts of gross motor are monitored by following the picking up and moving of pieces in the taking off and assembling phases. Eye-hand-coordination and finger dexterity as parts of fine motor are monitored by following drawing, dismounting of the frames and handling of the pieces of the upper layer. Strength is monitored by following the picking up and moving of the pieces of the bottom layer. Endurance is monitored by studying the overall performance of the task. Controlled handling of pieces gives the picture of the person's coordination and the overall performance of balance.
  • Cognitive components are followed and monitored in various ways. Orientation, thinking and memory are needed for understanding the task and receiving the in- structions. By following the functioning of the person after the instructions have been given it is possible to study the initiative of the person and the ability to follow given instructions. Observation and attention are needed to avoid mistakes. There will be problem situations, in which case the problem solving ability is monitored as well as the ability to ask for instructions/help. While following the accuracy of working, drawing, attaching of frames, forming of layers and forming of the picture, information about the person's accuracy, spatial outlining ability as well as ability of forming a picture are gathered. In addition, the overall performance of the task expresses about the ability to concentrate, about persistence and vitality of working.
  • the overall perform- ance tells about the endurance of motivation, ability to stand the stress caused by the task, about self-confidence and the belief on one's own abilities.
  • Interpersonal skills and the ability to express feelings can be observed by monitoring the communication ability, stress tolerance and by examining personal experiences about carrying out the task.
  • Decision-making, problem handling and meeting of challenges may be monitored by examining the way the person reacts in problem situations.
  • attitude to monitoring the work and feedback given about it tells about person's ability to approve monitoring and valuation.
  • a functional capacity pyramid By means of a functional capacity pyramid overall managing, ability to concentrate, persistency, using of hands and finger dexterity, motor of hands, eye-hand coordina- tion, outlining ability, orientation to new tasks, commitment to work, flexibility, interest, motivation, initiative, activity, temporal accomplishment, qualitative accomplishment, ability to understand, follow and adapt oral instructions as well as physical accomplishment of the task are examined and monitored.
  • a person is able to carry out the task independently in accordance with the given in- structions without continuous control.
  • the task is long enough, in which case by means of it, it is possible to evaluate the commitment to work and persistency.
  • the tool may be applied to both men and women and does not require any special professional skill.
  • the task may be interrupted in between and continue after a while which is also an advantage.
  • figure 1 illustrates a functional capacity pyramid viewed diagonally from above
  • figure 2 illustrates a functional capacity pyramid in accordance with figure 1 viewed diagonally from above the upper layer removed
  • figure 3 illustrates the middle layer of a functional capacity pyramid viewed straight from above;
  • figure 4 illustrates a functional capacity pyramid in accordance with figure 1 viewed diagonally from above the upper and the middle layer removed, and
  • figure 5 illustrates the lowest layer viewed straight from above.
  • the estimating tool in accordance with figures presented in this application is a three-layer construction resembling a pyramid, the bottom layer 1 of which measures 120 cm x 120 cm x 20 cm.
  • the tool has been placed on a table 9 acting as a base, which table is advantageously adjustable in vertical direction. Adjusting is carried out in recognized way, for example, changing the height of the legs of the table, but it is not presented here.
  • the bottom layer 1 in this application, there are in total 17 pieces 4 of different size and shape, the weight of which varies between 2-4 kilos.
  • On the bottom layer there is an attaching tool 7 to be attached by bolts to it, which attaching tool is a metal frame. This defines the place for the middle layer 2.
  • the middle layer 2 is, in this application, 80 cm x 80 cm x 10 cm by size. There are 14 pieces 5 of different size and shape in the layer, the weight of which varies between 1-2 kilos. The pieces of the middle layer are of different shape than the pieces of the bottom layer but by material, the pieces of both layers are wood. There is a metal frame acting as an attaching tool 8 to be adjusted by bolts on the middle layer, which metal frame defines the place for the upper most layer 3.
  • the upper most layer is 40 cm x 40 cm x 5 cm by size.
  • the cubes of the upper most layer form a figure, which is in this case the symbol of Invalidiliitto (Finnish Association of People with Mobility Disabili- ties) (a figure of a hand).
  • the material of the upper most layer is some heavy material such as steatite.
  • the invention is not limited to the presented advantageous application but it can vary within the frames of the idea of the invention formed in the claims. Therefore, the size of the tool, the number of layers, parameters of parts and pieces, location and used materials may differ in various applications from the earlier presented.

Abstract

The objective of the invention is a tool for estimating of working ability of a person, which tool comprises at least two layers (1, 2, 3), which have been formed mostly of different, removable from each other pieces (4, 5, 6). The tool in accordance with the invention comprises a removable attaching tool (7, 8) placed between the layers for joining the layers together.

Description

TOOL FOR ESTIMATING OF WORKING ABILITY OF A PERSON
The present invention relates to a tool for estimating of working ability of a person which tool comprises at least two layers, which have been formed of different kind of removable pieces.
Great changes happen in working life nowadays and many people have to change working places more often than earlier during their working life. In addition, more physical, psychological and/or social stress than earlier is directed to people in work as well as during their leisure time. Therefore, for estimating of working ability of a person more comprehensive studies and research are needed as well as tools for those. In studies, physical, psychological, social and vocational qualifications of a person in coping with work are estimated.
There are very few estimating methods for versatile measuring of practical working ability. The methods in use have the main stress on separate estimations of physical working ability and psychological tests. In the first phase of studies, so-called ini- tial mapping tasks are applied. An initial mapping task is a practical task typifying work, which task a person client carries out in the initial phase of studying or rehabilitation period related to a vocational rehabilitation, for example. The purpose of initial mapping tasks is to gather a good general picture of practical working ability and functional capacity of a person. On these grounds following tasks are given in the future and suitability of different tasks to the person is estimated.
For initial mapping of working ability, technically oriented initial mapping tasks have been used. One of the tasks is assembling of a lock. In the task, a person works following written instructions assembling a whole padlock out of parts. In case problems appear during the work, more instructions will be given to the per- son. The person practises assembling first for about an hour and after this he assembles ten locks as fast as he can. Temporally a performance of less than seven and a half minutes is estimated as good or excellent. A performance of over twelve minutes is estimated as poor.
Another task for initial mapping task is drawing, disconnecting and connecting of a series of wires following oral instructions. The oral instructions are given with similar content to all rehabilitants. Additional instructions are given while needed also in the wire task. A person draws a diagram of connections on a cross-ruled paper using a ruler. After the person has finished drawing, a working test instructor checks the drawing, after which the person disconnects the wires from the diagram. After this, the person starts to connect the wires according to his own drawing. In this task, the time spent for the task and the tidiness of the work are estimated.
The used tasks are light tasks in terms of physical stress to be carried out in sitting or in standing position at a table plane. The tasks have been taken into use over 20 years ago. Along with general changes related to work, there is also a need to develop methods estimating more versatile working ability.
The objective of the invention is to provide a tool for estimating of working ability of a person with the use of which improvements to methods and devices today in use are created. In addition, the objective of the invention is to provide a tool, with which it is possible to versatile estimate the working ability and functioning capacity of a person in terms of physical, cognitive and psychosocial components.
The objective of the invention is accomplished by a tool, the characteristics of which are presented in the claims.
The tool in accordance with the invention comprises a removable attaching tool lo- eating between layers placed one on top of the other for connecting the layers together. In this case, to be able to disconnect the layers also the attaching tool must be removed, which must be carried out in a way differing from the way of removing the pieces in the layers and the functioning is versatile and complicated.
In an advantageous application of the invention, there are three or more layers in the tool. In this case, the estimating task is more difficult and working ability may be measured more versatile than while using two layers.
In the next advantageous additional application of the invention, the area of the upper layer of the tool is smaller than the area of the pieces of the layer located lower than it. Therefore, the area of the upper most layer is smaller than that of the next layer and so on, in which case, all layers are partly visible when the tool is assembled. Due to the shape of the tool, more versatility is gained for the task.
In the next advantageous additional application of the invention, the tool has been placed on a plane to be vertically adjusted. The functional capacity pyramid con- taines, in this case, physical stress and the task must be carried out in standing posi- tion and it is possible for the person to adjust the working plane to needed height and thus on one's own initiave to change the working position. The functioning of the person may be monitored and studied, for example, if he adjusts the plane to the suitable working height to himself. The tool in accordance with the invention is a tool for estimating of working ability, so-called functional capacity tool or pyramid, by means of which the working ability and functional capacity of a person are estimated as a part of vocational rehabilitation. The functional capacity pyramid is aimed for estimating of working ability of adult population of working age. Based on it the tasks given in the future for the person are chosen and the suitability of various tasks for the person is estimated.
The tool i.e. the functional capacity pyramid is used, for example, as follows: The person is given oral instructions in the beginning, on grounds of which he starts working. The person has an assembled pyramid in front of him, for example, a three-layer tool, which he draws and takes into pieces in the first phase. The person takes off the pieces of the first layer to a marked box. After removing the pieces the person takes off the attaching tool placed on the middle layer, for example, a metal frame by means of a tool (such as a hex wrench, for example). After removing the frame the person draws a pattern drawing on a cross-ruled paper of the middle layer using a desired scale (for example, 1 square = 5 cm). After this, the person takes off the pieces and places them on the floor. Next, the person removes the attaching tool i.e. the frame placed on the bottom layer again using tools, after which the person draws the pattern drawing of the bottom layer and removes the pieces on the floor. Before the second phase the working test instructor checks the pattern drawings done by the person as well as that the pieces on the floor are mixed.
In the second phase, the person assembles the two lowest layers of the pyramid in accordance with the drawing done by himself. For assembling the upper most layer, the person is given a ready pattern drawing of the figure formed of the pieces. The table plane, on which the person is working, is adjustable. The person is given in- structions for adjusting the table plane in the beginning, but no instructions for er- gonomic working, because in this case it is possible to monitor which kind of working positions the person himself chooses. In the beginning of the task, the person is given a follow-up form, in which the person marks the time spent to different working phases and the problems or other feelings experienced during the task. In addi- tion, breaks and their reasons are also marked on the form.
Various kinds of components, such as sensomotory, cognitive and phychososiologi- cal components may be monitored by means of the tool in accordance with the invention.
Sensomotor components may be monitored in various ways. Dynamic motion and recurrence as parts of gross motor are monitored by following the picking up and moving of pieces in the taking off and assembling phases. Eye-hand-coordination and finger dexterity as parts of fine motor are monitored by following drawing, dismounting of the frames and handling of the pieces of the upper layer. Strength is monitored by following the picking up and moving of the pieces of the bottom layer. Endurance is monitored by studying the overall performance of the task. Controlled handling of pieces gives the picture of the person's coordination and the overall performance of balance.
Cognitive components are followed and monitored in various ways. Orientation, thinking and memory are needed for understanding the task and receiving the in- structions. By following the functioning of the person after the instructions have been given it is possible to study the initiative of the person and the ability to follow given instructions. Observation and attention are needed to avoid mistakes. There will be problem situations, in which case the problem solving ability is monitored as well as the ability to ask for instructions/help. While following the accuracy of working, drawing, attaching of frames, forming of layers and forming of the picture, information about the person's accuracy, spatial outlining ability as well as ability of forming a picture are gathered. In addition, the overall performance of the task expresses about the ability to concentrate, about persistence and vitality of working.
Psychososiological components are followed in various ways. The overall perform- ance tells about the endurance of motivation, ability to stand the stress caused by the task, about self-confidence and the belief on one's own abilities. Interpersonal skills and the ability to express feelings can be observed by monitoring the communication ability, stress tolerance and by examining personal experiences about carrying out the task. Decision-making, problem handling and meeting of challenges may be monitored by examining the way the person reacts in problem situations. In addition, attitude to monitoring the work and feedback given about it tells about person's ability to approve monitoring and valuation.
In planning of the functional capacity pyramid the fact that casual accomplishment of the task is very unlikely has been taken into account. There are not many pieces of the same size and the same shape in the tool i.e. functional capacity pyramid. The shape, constructions and the way of use of the tool may, naturally, vary in various applications of the invention. The parts of the functional capacity pyramid are mostly of moderate large size (the biggest parts, for example 60 cm long) and the material such that the pieces are relatively heavy (the heaviest may weight for ex- ample 5 kg). Therefore, adults may handle the parts but handling requires physical strength. In addition, dismounting of a functional capacity pyramid is a relatively long task or valuation act, it takes about two hours for a normal person at working age to carry out the task.
By means of a functional capacity pyramid overall managing, ability to concentrate, persistency, using of hands and finger dexterity, motor of hands, eye-hand coordina- tion, outlining ability, orientation to new tasks, commitment to work, flexibility, interest, motivation, initiative, activity, temporal accomplishment, qualitative accomplishment, ability to understand, follow and adapt oral instructions as well as physical accomplishment of the task are examined and monitored.
A person is able to carry out the task independently in accordance with the given in- structions without continuous control. In addition, the task is long enough, in which case by means of it, it is possible to evaluate the commitment to work and persistency. In addition, the tool may be applied to both men and women and does not require any special professional skill. The task may be interrupted in between and continue after a while which is also an advantage.
Advantages in regard with earlier initial mapping tasks are the possibilities of differentiation and variation of the task as well as realization of versatile working positions and the part with physical stress.
To rehabilitants of mental health different kinds of things in practical functional capacity tasks cause problems than, for example, to persons having rheumatic diseases and diseases of organs of motion. Therefore, it is practical and advantageous that the functional capacity pyramid task may be changed and differentiated while needed. The versatile construction of the tool makes this possible. If it is suspected that a person will have difficulties in some specific functions/tasks, only those parts of the functional capacity pyramid can be used during carrying out of which the problems are revealed. Alternatively, those parts of which earlier is known that the person will not cope, may be left undone.
Next, the invention will be explained in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which,
figure 1 illustrates a functional capacity pyramid viewed diagonally from above;
figure 2 illustrates a functional capacity pyramid in accordance with figure 1 viewed diagonally from above the upper layer removed; figure 3 illustrates the middle layer of a functional capacity pyramid viewed straight from above;
figure 4 illustrates a functional capacity pyramid in accordance with figure 1 viewed diagonally from above the upper and the middle layer removed, and
figure 5 illustrates the lowest layer viewed straight from above.
The estimating tool in accordance with figures presented in this application is a three-layer construction resembling a pyramid, the bottom layer 1 of which measures 120 cm x 120 cm x 20 cm. The tool has been placed on a table 9 acting as a base, which table is advantageously adjustable in vertical direction. Adjusting is carried out in recognized way, for example, changing the height of the legs of the table, but it is not presented here. In the bottom layer 1, in this application, there are in total 17 pieces 4 of different size and shape, the weight of which varies between 2-4 kilos. On the bottom layer there is an attaching tool 7 to be attached by bolts to it, which attaching tool is a metal frame. This defines the place for the middle layer 2. The middle layer 2 is, in this application, 80 cm x 80 cm x 10 cm by size. There are 14 pieces 5 of different size and shape in the layer, the weight of which varies between 1-2 kilos. The pieces of the middle layer are of different shape than the pieces of the bottom layer but by material, the pieces of both layers are wood. There is a metal frame acting as an attaching tool 8 to be adjusted by bolts on the middle layer, which metal frame defines the place for the upper most layer 3. The upper most layer is 40 cm x 40 cm x 5 cm by size. There are in total 64 pieces 6 on the upper most layer in this application and each piece is cubical and 5 cm x 5 cm x 5 cm by size. The cubes of the upper most layer form a figure, which is in this case the symbol of Invalidiliitto (Finnish Association of People with Mobility Disabili- ties) (a figure of a hand). The material of the upper most layer is some heavy material such as steatite.
The invention is not limited to the presented advantageous application but it can vary within the frames of the idea of the invention formed in the claims. Therefore, the size of the tool, the number of layers, parameters of parts and pieces, location and used materials may differ in various applications from the earlier presented.

Claims

1. A tool for estimating of working ability of a person, which comprises at least two layers (1, 2, 3) which have been formed mostly of different, removable pieces (4, 5, 6), characterized in that the tool comprises a removable attaching tool (7, 8) placed between the layers for joining the layers together.
2. A tool in accordance with claim 1, characterized in that there are three or more layers.
3. A tool in accordance with claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the area of the upper layer is smaller than the area of the layer lower than it.
4. A tool in accordance with any of claims 1-3, characterized in that the tool has been placed on a base (9) adjustable in vertical direction.
PCT/FI2005/000259 2004-06-04 2005-06-06 Tool for estimating of working ability of a person WO2005117704A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI20040767 2004-06-04
FI20040767A FI120076B (en) 2004-06-04 2004-06-04 Tools for assessing work ability

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005117704A1 true WO2005117704A1 (en) 2005-12-15

Family

ID=32524447

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/FI2005/000259 WO2005117704A1 (en) 2004-06-04 2005-06-06 Tool for estimating of working ability of a person

Country Status (2)

Country Link
FI (1) FI120076B (en)
WO (1) WO2005117704A1 (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3578330A (en) * 1968-05-01 1971-05-11 Irving Brambier Jigsaw puzzle of a size requiring large muscle exercise
US3811203A (en) * 1973-04-12 1974-05-21 S Mayfield Puzzle for psychological testing
US4469331A (en) * 1982-09-29 1984-09-04 Rinker James K Three dimensional jigsaw puzzle
US4815742A (en) * 1986-10-09 1989-03-28 Augustine Lee A Multi-layered puzzle
BR9505341A (en) * 1995-12-01 1997-10-28 Luiz Alberto Fernandes Game
DE19958449A1 (en) * 1999-12-03 2001-06-21 Kerstin Lorenz Multi-piece puzzle has one plane consisting of adjoining segments and one or more further segments fitting on or in same and projecting beyond same

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3578330A (en) * 1968-05-01 1971-05-11 Irving Brambier Jigsaw puzzle of a size requiring large muscle exercise
US3811203A (en) * 1973-04-12 1974-05-21 S Mayfield Puzzle for psychological testing
US4469331A (en) * 1982-09-29 1984-09-04 Rinker James K Three dimensional jigsaw puzzle
US4815742A (en) * 1986-10-09 1989-03-28 Augustine Lee A Multi-layered puzzle
BR9505341A (en) * 1995-12-01 1997-10-28 Luiz Alberto Fernandes Game
DE19958449A1 (en) * 1999-12-03 2001-06-21 Kerstin Lorenz Multi-piece puzzle has one plane consisting of adjoining segments and one or more further segments fitting on or in same and projecting beyond same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FI20040767A (en) 2005-12-05
FI20040767A0 (en) 2004-06-04
FI120076B (en) 2009-06-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11033776B2 (en) Method and system for athletic motion analysis and instruction
US10456676B2 (en) Method and system for athletic motion analysis and instruction
US9656121B2 (en) Methods for analyzing and providing feedback for improved power generation in a golf swing
KR102113221B1 (en) Rehabilitation training device and method of this
CN110232963A (en) A kind of upper extremity exercise functional assessment system and method based on stereo display technique
Mitchell et al. Reliability analysis of time to complete the obstacle course portion of the load effects assessment program (LEAP)
CN111388968B (en) Gait balance training device and system based on virtual reality
McDaniel Prediction of acceptable lift capacity
Katić et al. Phylogenetically conditioned possibilities of the realization and of the development of complex movements at the age of 7 years
WO2005117704A1 (en) Tool for estimating of working ability of a person
Frossard et al. Applied biomechanics for evidence-based training of Australian elite seated throwers
Baranyi et al. MyDailyRoutine-a serious game to support people suffering from a cerebral dysfunction
Pan et al. The effect of drywall lifting method on workers' balance in a laboratory-based simulation
Wagner et al. Predicting foot positions for manual materials handling tasks
Gąsior Kinesthetic differentiation, kinematic and dynamic parameters in sports climbing competitors of varying ability levels
DE202007012415U1 (en) exerciser
O'Riordan The interaction between the seated shot-putter and their throwing frame
Ward An analysis of kinetic and kinematic factors of the standup and the preferred crouch starting techniques with respect to sprint performance.
Eke Agility quantification using body worn inertial sensors
Bayley et al. Chapter IV: Motor Development and Decline
Luna et al. Volting, a Novel Dancing Wheelchair with Augmented Mobility: Pushing Lateral Inclinations
CN109256064A (en) A kind of analog simulation wheelchair and its working method
CN103371903B (en) A kind of physical sensing therapeutic bed
Smail et al. The Relationship of muscular strength and balance on work performance measures in high school students with mental retardation
Evans Hip circle to handstand on the uneven parallel bars

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DPEN Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase