Fire Retarded Polyolefin Compositions
Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a composition consisting of fire-retarded
polyolefin polymers and copolymers, having excellent fire retardancy, no
corrosive gas and significantly reduced smoke emission on burning and
essentially no migration of the fire-retardant on the surface of the
polymer. In particular, the present invention relates to a halogen-free,
antimony-free and phosphorous-free, nitrogen-containing fire-retarded
composition comprising polyolefin polymers and copolymers. Polyolefin
polymers and copolymers include, inter alia, low density polyethylene
[LDPE], high density polyethylene [HDPE], linear low density
polyethylene [LLDPE], ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer [EVA], homo-
polypropylene [PP], block copolymer of propylene and ethylene, random
copolymer of propylene and ethylene.
Background of the Invention
It is desirable that polyolefin polymers and copolymers be flame-retarded
to prevent fire accident or fire spreading when used in various
applications, such as enclosures and internal small parts of electric,
electronic and office automation apparatus, sewage pipes and pipe fittings,
automotive, wire and cable industry, building materials, etc. Many
polyolefin polymer and copolymer materials for such uses are even
required to be fire-retarded by legislation. Known fire-retardant additives,
used in polyolefin polymer and copolymer materials include halogen-
containing fire-retardants, phosphorous- or phosphorous/nitrogen-
containing compounds and metal hydroxides. These additives, however,
have disadvantages.
The halogen-containing fire-retardants, which impart a higher level of fire
retardancy (for example, UL-94 N-0, V-1 or V-2) at relatively small
loadings, generate a large amount of soot or smoke upon burning.
Usually, polymer materials comprising halogen-containing fire-retardants
require synergistic additives such as antimony oxide, which is a toxic
material. Furthermore, the halogen-containing fire-retardants may emit
more or less acidic substances and antimony derivatives at the time of fire,
which may produce adverse effects on human health or apparatus in the
vicinity of a fire site.
Phosphorous- or phosphorous/nitrogen-containing fire-retardants, such as
red phosphorous, ammonium polyp hosphate [APP], melamine phosphate
[MP] or pyrophosphate [MPP] are effective in rather high amounts, and
only in combinations with other additives such as carbonization agents,
blowing agents, etc. Furthermore, these fire-retardants generate soot or
smoke on burning and emit acidic substances at the time of fire, which
produce adverse effects on human health or apparatus in the vicinity of a
fire site. Additionally, the phosphorous-based fire-retardants are known for their tendency to migrate to the polymer surface during the service life
of the product containing them.
Metal hydroxide containing fire-retardants, such as aluminum tri-hydrate [ATH] or magnesium hydroxide [MH], used for halogen-free, antimony-free
and phosphorous-free fire-retarded polyolefin polymer and copolymer
compositions, are effective but in very high amounts. Furthermore, metal
hydroxide fire-retardants have adverse effects on the properties of the fire- retarded polymer composition.
Consequently, there is a demand for halogen-free, antimony-free and phosphorous-free fire-retarded polyolefin polymer and copolymer
compositions, possessing highly effective fire retardancy, emit less or no
smoke and less or no corrosive gas, all these while using a smaller amount
of fire-retardant additive. A promising way to satisfy these requirements
is the use of a nitrogen-containing fire-retardant. Consequently,
techniques have been developed and disclosed in which both heat
expandable graphite (HEG) and nitrogen type fire-retardant are used in
combination with carbonization agents and phosphorous-containing fire-
retardant to yield flame retardancy in PE and PP.
Patents of Sumitomo Bakelite Co. (Japan) disclose both fire-retarded
polyolefin polymer compositions (JP 1997,059439, JP 1997,137008, JP
1997,111059, JP 1997,316257) and styrene polymer compositions (JP
1997,208768, JP 1997,151378). These fire-retarded polymer compositions contain phenol or cresol novolak resin as carbonization agent, a
phosphorous-containing fire-retardant (red phosphorous, APP, MP) as
acidic catalyst for the carbonization agent, HEG, and optionally, melamine
cyanurate as nitrogen-containing fire-retardant.
A patent of Nippon Kasei Chemicals (JP 03041164) discloses fire-retarded
polyethylene [PE] compositions containing metal hydroxide, oxide and/or
carbonate as fire-retardant and HEG. A paper of Z. Li and B. Qu
published in Polymer Degradation and Stability 81 (2003), pp 401-408,
describes fire-retarded ethylene vinyl acetate [EVA] compositions. These
fire-retarded polymer compositions contain magnesium hydroxide [MH] as
fire-retardant and HEG. A patent application of Bayer Polymers LLC, US
2003/0125447 Al, discloses fire-retarded EVA compositions containing
HEG and a mineral filler (metal oxides, hydroxides and/or carbonate),
which optionally may contain additives including phosphorous- or
halogen-containing fire retardants.
The present invention provides a highly effective fire-retardant polyolefin
polymer and copolymer which emit no corrosive gases and less smoke on
burning compared to halogen-containing flame -retardants and/or
phosphorous-based flame-retardants. The fire retardancy of said olefin-
containing polymer and copolymer is based solely on the presence and
activity of HEG and nitrogen-containing fire-retardant (N-FR). Optionally, a highly effective fire-retardant polyolefin polymer and copolymer
composition which emit no corrosive gases and less smoke on burning may
be achieved when nitrogen-containing FR and metal hydroxide are present
in a fire-retarded polymer composition but in amounts significantly lower
that those either conventionally used or known in the state of the art.
It is the object of the present invention to provide a fire-retarded polyolefin
polymer and copolymer, which possesses excellent fire retardancy
properties (emits less corrosive gas and less smoke on burning) applying
halogen-free, antimony-free and phosphorous-free fire-retarded
additive (s).
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a fire-retarded
polyolefin polymer and copolymer, which possesses excellent fire
retardancy properties, applying a nitrogen-containing fire-retarded
additive (s).
It is still a further object of present invention to provide a fire-retarded
polyolefin polymer and copolymer, which possesses excellent fire
retardancy properties, applying HEG and N-FR as additives.
It is yet a further object of present invention to provide a fire-retarded
polyolefin polymer and copolymer, which possesses excellent fire
retardancy properties, applying HEG and N-FR and, optionally, metal
hydroxide, as additives.
It is yet a further object of present invention to provide a fire-retarded
olefin-containing polymer composition, wherein the olefin-containing
polymer is selected from the group consisting of polyolefin polymers and
copolymers.
Other purposes and advantages of the present invention will appear as the
description proceeds.
Summary of Invention
The present invention provides a fire-retarded polymer composition
comprising heat expandable graphite (HEG) and at least one nitrogen-
containing fire-retardant (N-FR), and optionally, metal hydroxide, as
additives, wherein the polymer component of said composition is
selected from the group consisting of polyolefin polymer(s) and
copolymer (s).
Description of the Invention
The applicant has surprisingly found that a combination of heat
expandable graphite (HEG) and nitrogen-containing fire-retardant(s)
imparts highly effective fire retardancy to a composition of polyolefin
polymer(s) and copolymer(s).
More particularly, a high level of fire retardancy of polyolefin polymer and
copolymer is accomplished when using a fire-retardant combination
consisting of nitrogen-containing fire-retardant(s) (referred to herein as N-
FR) and HEG. Optionally, N-FR and metal hydroxide may be present in a
fire-retarded polymer composition but in amounts significantly lower that
those either conventionally used or known in the state of the art. No
additional, conventionally used FRs, such as carbonization agent and
phosphorous or phosphorous/nitrogen containing compounds, are
incorporated into the polyolefin polymer(s) and copolymer(s).
The invention, therefore, provides a fire-retarded composition comprising:
(a) One or more polymers selected from the group consisting of polyolefin polymer, copolymer and/or alloy thereof;
(b) Heat expandable graphite (HEG);
(c) Nitrogen-containing fire-retardant(s)(N-FR); and optionally
(d) Metal hydroxide.
The N-FR may be a single component or a mixture of components of the
same category. The heat expandable graphite should preferably be able to
change its specific volume by expanding 50 times or more on shock heating
from room temperature to 700°C. Metal hydroxide may be a single component or a mixture of components of the same category.
The invention therefore provides a fire-retarded olefin polymer(s) and co¬
polymers) composition comprising:
Component A: a polyolefin polymer and copolymer, preferably LDPE,
HDPE, LLDPE, EVA, PP, random and block co-PP, at a percent weight
which balances to 100% by weight the following fire-retarded combination;
Component B: 6 to 19% (preferably 8% to 10%) by weight of heat
expandable graphite;
Component C: up to 30% (preferably 15% to 25%) by weight of nitrogen-
containing fire-retardant, preferably melamine, cyanuric acid or melamine
cyanurate, and optionally;
Component D: up to 25% (preferably 10% to 20%) by weight of metal
hydroxide, preferably aluminum tri-hydrate or magnesium hydroxide.
The component A may consist of a single polyolefin polymer or a copolymer
or being a mixture of polyolefin polymer(s) and/or copolymer(s).
The olefin-containing polymers and copolymers used in the present invention are produced from a olefin-type monomer or co-monomers,
including ethylene, propylene, butadiene, hexadiene and octadiene, linear
or branched, and where the double bonds may be conjugated or not
conjugated and in different positions on the unit monomer chain. The
olefin-containing polymers and copolymers include, inter alia,
homopolymers of ethylene (hereinafter referred to as "LDPE", "HDPE",
"LLDPE"] or propylene (hereinafter referred to as "PP"), rubber modified
high-impact polypropylene (block co-polymer of propylene and ethylene or
ethylene-propylene rubber hereinafter referred to as "block co-PP"),
random propylene and ethylene copolymers (hereinafter referred to as
"random co-PP"), ethylene vinyl acetate copolymers (hereinafter referred
to as "EVA").
The component B of the fire-retarded olefin polymer and copolymer
composition of the present invention is heat expandable graphite which is
well-known in the art, and it is further described by Titelman, G.I.,
Gelman, V.N., Isaev, Yu.V and Novikov, Yu.N., in Material Science
Forum, Vols. 91-93, 213-218, (1992) and in US Patent 6,017,987.
The HEG decomposes thermally under fire into a char of expanded
graphite, providing a thermally insulating or otherwise protective barrier,
which resists further oxidation.
The heat expandable graphite is derived from natural graphite or artificial
graphite, and upon rapid heating from room temperature to high
temperature it expands in the c-axis direction of the crystal (by a process so-called exfoliation or expansion). In addition to expanding in the c-axis
direction of the crystal, the heat expandable graphite expands a little in
the a-axis and the b-axis directions as well. The exfoliation degree, or the
expandability of HEG depends on the rate of removing the volatile
compounds during rapid heating. The expandability value in the present
invention relates to the ratio of the specific volume obtained following
rapid heating to a temperature of 500-700°C, to the specific volume at
room temperature. A specific volume change of HEG in the present
invention is preferably not less than 50 times for that range of
temperature change (room temperature to 500-700°C). Such an
expandability is preferred because a HEG having a specific volume
increase by at least 50 times during rapid heating from room temperature
to 700°C, has been found to produce a much higher degree of fire
retardancy compared to a graphite that is heat expandable but has a
specific volume increase of less than 50 times in the aforesaid heating
conditions.
During rapid heating of HEG from room temperature to 700°C, a weight
loss is usually recorded. 10% to 35% (preferably 15% to 32%) weight loss of
HEG is usually due to volatile compounds removed in the aforesaid
heating conditions at the volume expandability of 50 times and more. A HEG grade having a weight loss of less than 10%, during rapid heating,
provides a specific volume increase of less than 50 times. A HEG grade
having a weight loss of more than 35%, during rapid heating, provides less
amount of a char of expanded graphite, and consequently the fire
retardancy of polymer composition may be achieved only at higher loading
of HEG.
The carbon content of heat expandable graphite that exhibits under
aforesaid heating conditions a volume expandability of 50 times or higher,
should be 65% to 87% (preferably 67.5% to 85%) by weight for serving as a
good carbonaceous barrier and for providing a high level of fire retardancy
in combination with N-containing flame-retardants.
The HEG having a carbon content of more than 87%, provides during
rapid heating a specific volume increase of less than 50 times. Decreasing
the carbon content in HEG to less than 65% under the aforesaid heating
conditions, provides less amount of a char of expanded graphite, and
consequently the fire retardancy of the polymer composition may be
achieved only at higher loading of HEG.
During rapid heating of HEG from room temperature to a rather lower
temperature (such as about 500°C) a specific volume change of HEG in the
present invention should be more than 50 and less than 100 times. A HEG grade having a too-high specific volume increase at a rather lower
temperature (such as about 500°C) provides too fast expansion of HEG
under burning and consequently the fire retardancy of polymer composition may be achieved only at higher loading of HEG.
The heat expandable graphite used in the present invention can be produced
in different processes and the choice of the process is not critical. It can be
obtained, for example, by an oxidation treatment of natural graphite or
artificial graphite. The oxidation is conducted, for example, by treatment
with an oxidizing agent such as hydrogen peroxide, nitric acid or another
oxidizing agent in sulfuric acid. Common conventional methods are
described in US Patent 3,404,061, or in SU Patents 1,657,473 and 1,657,474.
Also, the graphite can be anodically oxidized in an aqueous acidic or
aqueous salt electrolyte as described in US Patent 4,350,576. In practice,
most commercial grades of the heat expandable graphite are usually
manufactured via an acidic technology.
The heat expandable graphite, which is produced by oxidation in sulfuric
acid or a similar process as described above, can be slightly acidic
depending on the process conditions. When the heat expandable graphite
is acidic, a corrosion of the apparatus for production of the polymeric
composition may occur. For preventing such corrosion heat expandable
graphite should be neutralized with a basic material (alkaline substance,
ammonium hydroxide, etc.).
The particle size of the heat expandable graphite used in the present invention affects the expandability degree of the HEG and, in turn, the
fire retardancy of the resulting polymer composition.
The heat expandable graphite of a preferred particle size distribution
contains up to 25%, more preferably from 1% to 25%, by weight particles
passing through a 75-mesh sieve. The HEG containing more than 25% by
weight particles passing through a 75-mesh sieve, will not provide the
required increase in specific volume and consequently, will not provide the
sufficient fire retardancy. The heat expandable graphite containing the
above particles at a content which is lower than 1% by weight may slightly
impair the mechanical properties of the resulting polymer composition.
The dimensions of the largest particles of HEG, beyond 75-mesh, should
be as known in the art in order to avoid the deterioration of the properties
of the polymer composition. In a preferred embodiment, the surface of the
heat expandable graphite particles may be surface-treated with a coupling
agent such as a silane -coupling agent, or a titanate-coupling agent in
order to prevent the adverse effects of larger particles on the properties of
the fire-retarded polymer composition. A coupling agent can be separately
added to the composition as well.
Component C in the present invention may be either any commonly used
nitrogen-containing fire-retardant or a triazine-based FR compound. A
suitable nitrogen-containing fire-retardant may be, for example:
(a) Melamine {l,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, C3H6N6 [108-78-1]} and related triazine-based compounds such as, for example, melam {(N- 4,6-diamino-l,3,5-triazine-2-yl)-l,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine, CβHgNn [3576-88-3]}, melem {2,5,8-triamino-l,3,4,6,7,9,9b- heptaazaphenalene, CβHβNio [1502-47-2]}, benzoguanamine {2,4- diamino-6-phenyl-l,3,5-triazine, C9H9N5 [91-76-9]} and acetoguanamine {2,4-diamino-6-methyl-l,3,5-triazine, C4H Ns [542- 02-9]}.
(b) Cyanuric acid {l,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triol, C3H3N3O3 [108-80-5]} and related triazine-based compounds such as, for example, ammeline {l,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine-6-ol, C3H5N5O [645-92-1]}, ammelide {l,3,5-triazine-2-amine-4,6-diol, C3H N O2 [645-93-2]}, melamine cyanurate {cyanuric acid, compound with melamine [37640-57-6]}.
(c) In addition to (tri) substituted isocyanurates or cyanurates other nitrogen-containing compounds may serve as component C, such as , for example: non-cyclic precursors of cyanuric acid biuret {NH2- C(=O)NH-C(=O)-NH2, [108-19-1]} or triuret {NH2-C(=O)-NH-C(=O)-
NH-C(=O)-NH2, [556-99-0]}; guanidine -based compounds such as guanidine carbonate {[NH2-C(=NH)-NH2]2CO3, [593-85-1]} and guanidine nitrate { NH2-C(=NH)-NH2NO3, [506-93-4]}.
The numbers in square brackets are Chemical Abstracts Registry
Numbers.
According to the present invention said Component C may consist of a
single N-FR material or it may consist of a mixture of two or more
different nitrogen-containing fire-retardants as herein before mentioned
that may be suitable for obtaining the desired properties of the polyolefin
polymer, copolymer and/or alloy thereof. Furthermore, said component C
may be a mixture comprising at least one nitrogen-containing fire-
retardant and halogen-free and phosphorous-free fire- retardants of other
types.
Component D in the present invention may be any commonly used metal
hydroxide fire-retardant. The addition of small amounts of such metal
hydroxides have beneficial effects in reducing smoke, improving specific
mechanical properties (e.g. impact strength) and allowing to reduce the
loading of other FR additives. A suitable metal hydroxide fire-retardant
may be, for example, aluminum tri-hydrate [ATH] and magnesium
hydroxide.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention said
Component D may consist of a single metal hydroxide or it may consist of
a mixture of two or more different metal hydroxide fire-retardants as
herein before mentioned that may be suitable for obtaining the desired
properties of the polyolefin polymer and copolymer. Furthermore, said
component D may be a mixture comprising at least one metal hydroxide
fire-retardant and halogen-free and phosphorous-free fire-retardants of
other types. In a preferred embodiment, the surface of the metal hydroxide
particles may be surface-treated with a coupling agent such as a silane
coupling agent, or a fatty acid coupling agent in order to prevent/reduce
the adverse effects metal hydroxide may have on the properties of the fire-
retarded polymer composition. A coupling agent can be separately added
to the composition as well.
According to another preferred embodiment of the present invention,
Component B and Component C are used together in the amount from
20% to 40% (preferably 23% to 33%) by weight in a composition containing
one or more polyolefin polymer(s) and/or copolymer(s) (Component A) in an
amount balancing the composition to 100 wt %.
With a total amount of less than 23 wt % of Components B and C together,
the polymer composition exhibits still flame retardancy (a relatively high
LOI value) although it has not been classified any more in UL-94 terms.
On the other hand, an increase of the total amount of Components B and
C to more than 40 wt % in the composition does not lead practically to a
further increase in fire retardancy but may deteriorate the properties of
the polymer composition.
According to a preferred embodiment of the present invention, Component
B, Component C and Component D are used together in the amount from
26% to 50% (preferably 30% to 40%) by weight in a composition containing
one or more polyolefin polymer(s) and/or copolymer(s) (Component A) in an
amount balancing the composition to 100 wt %.
With a total amount of Components B, C and D together, of less than 26
wt %, the polymer composition exhibits still flame retardancy (a relatively
high LOI value) although it has not been classified any more in UL-94
terms. On the other hand, an increase of total amount of Components B
and C to more than 50 wt % in composition does not lead practically to a
further increase in fire retardancy but may deteriorate the properties of
the polymer composition.
The polymer composition may contain other types of additives such as
colorants, antioxidants, light stabilizers, light absorbing agents,
processing additives, coupling agents and lubricants, blowing agents, anti-
dripping agents, cross-linking agents, and fillers.
The above -de scribed fire retardation technique of the present invention produces a polymer material having excellent fire retardancy, no emission
of corrosive gases and less smoke on burning.
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments
The present invention will be further illustrated below more with reference to specific examples which are not intended to limit the
invention in any way.
Non-limitative examples of Components A, B, C and D are set forth below:
Component A:
(Al) PP homo-polymer (Capilene; G86E, Carmel Olefins)
(A2) PP co-polymer (Capilene; SG50, Carmel Olefins)
(A3) LDPE (Ipethine 320, Carmel Olefins)
(A4) EVA (ELVAX 3175 LG, DU PONT)
Component B:
Commercially available grades used in the following examples are:
(Bl) Heat expandable graphite (GREP-EG, Tosoh)
(B2) Heat expandable graphite (GRAFGuard 220-80N, UCAR Carbon)
(B3) Heat expandable graphite synthesized by applicant
(B4) Heat expandable graphite synthesized by applicant
The properties of components Bl to B4 are shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Component C:
(CI) Melamine cyanurate (Aldrich catalog #C9,545-51)
(C2) Cyanuric acid (Aldrich catalog #M265-9)
(C3) Melamine (Melapur MC-15, D98<15μm, DSM,)
(C4) Melamine cyanurate (Melapur MC-50, D98<50μm, DSM, )
The nitrogen-containing FR (Component C) can be used either as a
powder, or as a previously melt mixed in polyolefin polymer (master
batching).
Component D:
(Dl) Magnesium hydroxide (FR-20, DSBG)
(D2) Aluminum tri-hydrate (SF4-25, Baco)
In order to compare the composition of the present invention with
conventional compositions or compositions known in the art, comparative
examples (Ref.) were prepared and hereinafter provided.
Examples 1-40 and Comparative Examples Ref. 1-5
Either PP or PE or EVA were used as Component A. Various amounts of
(B), (C) and (D) as shown in Tables 2-6, were admixed with the Component
A in a granulated form. Mixing was done in a Brabender mixer of 55 cm3
volume capacity at 50 rotations per minute for a desired time and at a
desired temperature, specific for each polymer (190°C for PP and PE,
165°C for EVA). Specimens of 3.2 mm thickness were prepared by
compression molding in a hot press at 200°C (PP, PE) and at 165°C (EVA),
cooling to room temperature and cutting to standard test specimens.
The flammability was tested by limiting oxygen index (hereinafter
referred to as "LOI") method, according to ASTM D-2863 and by UL-94
test (Underwriters Laboratories) with bottom ignition by a standard
burner flame for two successive 10-second intervals. Five test-pieces of
each composition were tested and the burning time, given in each
example, are averages of all five tested pieces.
Table 2 demonstrates in the Comparative examples marked as Refs. 1, 2
and 3, that the fire-retarded polymer compositions show a high fire
retardancy (V-0, V-1 rating and high LOI value for PP and PE; very high
LOI value for EVA) at 60%-62% by weight of magnesium hydroxide
content (Component Dl). In the Comparative Examples marked as Refs. 4
and 5 the single use of Component D at 35%-40% by weight resulted in
very low fire retardancy (NR rating according to the UL-94 burning test
and low LOI value 21.0-21.2 %02).
Table 2 Comparative Example
Additive: antioxidant (0.3%) or antioxidant (0.3%) and lubricant (0.2%)
Tables 3 and 4 summarize the fire-retarded polyolefin based compositions,
with a high level of fire retardancy (V-0 or V-1). A total amount of fire- retardant combination containing Components B and C in a loading range
from 20 to 40 wt % is used for polyolefins (Tables 3-4). Examples 1-11 (Table 3) and Examples 12-24 (Table 4) clearly show the effect of fire-
retardant synergism obtained when a combination of Components B and C
is applied. A LOI increase and a burning time decrease are measured for all fire-retarded PP, PE and EVA compositions.
Table 3
ΝR - no rating indicates that no UL-94 rating (V-0, V-1 or V-2) was achieved
Additive: antioxidant (0.3%) and lubricant (0.2%)
Examples 1-11 (Table 3) summarize the fire-retarded PP or PE based
compositions, with a high level of fire retardancy (V-0 or V-1). A total
amount of fire-retardant combination containing Components B and C in a
loading range from 30 to 40 wt % (preferably 33-35 wt %) is used for PP or
PE based fire-retardant compositions. Examples 1, 2, 8 and 10 (Table 3)
demonstrate that a high level of fire retardancy (UL-94 rating V-0 or V-1,
high LOI) can be achieved when the content of Component B in the fire-
retarded composition is 8 to 15 wt % while the content of Component C is
loaded at 15 to 30 wt % to balance the total amount of the fire-retardant
combination (Components B + C) in the polymer composition to 30-40 wt %.
Examples 10 and 11 demonstrate that when the content of Components B
and C in the composition is 15 wt %, (and, correspondingly, total amount of
fire-retardants 30 wt %) the LOI value increases to 24.0% - 25.7%, but with
no UL-94 rating. The highest level of fire retardancy is achieved when the
amount of fire-retardant combination (Components B + C) in the polymer
composition is 33-35 wt %, wherein the content of Component B is 8-10 wt
% and the content of Component C is 25 wt %.
Examples 2-4 clearly demonstrate that fire-retardant combinations
containing Components B and C provide a high level of fire retardancy
independently on polymer type (homo-PP, co-PP or PE).
Examples 2 and 5-7 demonstrate that any of the used types of heat
expandable graphite (Component B) may be used successfully to impart
flame retardancy to the tested polymers and copolymers. Example 5 demonstrates that the HEG grade having a too-high specific volume
increase at a rather lower temperature (such as about 500°C) provides too
fast expansion of HEG under burning and consequently results in an
increased value of LOI of the fire-retarded polymer composition to 25.0 %O2, however with no UL-94 rating as compared to HEG with a specific
volume increase of 50-100 times in the aforesaid heating conditions (Examples 2, 6 and 7).
Table 4
Additive: antioxidant (0.3%)
Examples 12-24 (Table 4) summarize the fire-retarded EVA based
compositions, with a high level of fire retardancy (V-0 or V-1, high LOI). A
total amount of fire-retardant combination containing Components B and
C in a loading range from 20 to 30 wt % (preferably 23-25 wt %) is used for
EVA based fire-retardant compositions. Examples 12, 15 and 21-24 (Table
4) demonstrate that a high level of fire retardancy (UL-94 rating V-0 or V-
1, high LOI) can be achieved when the content of Component B in the fire-
retarded composition is 6 to 19 wt % while the content of Component C is
loaded at 1 to 20 wt % to balance the total amount of the fire-retardant combination (Components B + C) in the polymer composition to 20-30 wt
%. Examples 22-24 demonstrate that when a total amount of fire-
retardants is less than 23 wt % and the content of Components B in the
composition is 6 to 10 wt % and Component C is 10 to 15 wt %, the LOI
values increase to 27.0%-27.4%, but with no UL-94 rating. Only at 19 wt % content of Component B in the composition and a total amount of fire-
retardant of 20 wt %, a high level of fire retradancy can be achieved (V-0
rating and high LOI value), but the electrically insulating properties of
EVA may be affected. The highest level of fire retardancy is achieved
when the amount of fire-retardant combination (Components B + C) in the
polymer composition is 23-25 wt %, wherein the content of Component B is
8-10 wt % and the content of Component C is 15 wt %.
Examples 12-14 clearly demonstrate that fire-retardant combination
containing Components B and C provide a high level of fire retardancy to
polymer composition independent of the molecular structure of the used
nitrogen-containing fire-retardant (Component C). Examples 15 and 16
clearly demonstrate that a high level of fire retardancy can be achieved
independent of particles size of the used nitrogen-containing fire-retardant
(Component C).
Examples 15 and 17-20 demonstrate that any of the used types of heat expandable graphite (Component B) may be used successfully to impart
flame retardancy to the tested polymers and copolymers. Examples 17 and
18 demonstrate that the HEG grade having a too-high specific volume
increase at a rather lower temperature (such as, about 500°C) provides a
too fast expansion of HEG under burning and consequently it results in
increasing the value of LOI to 27.0 %02, but without providing the
required UL-94 rating to the fire-retarded polymer composition as
compared to a HEG with a specific volume increase of 50-100 times in the
aforesaid heating conditions (Examples 15, 19 and 20) and may provide
the required high fire retardancy (both V-0 and LOI 29.0%) of the polymer
composition only at a higher loading of HEG (15 wt %) and a higher total
amount of fire-retardant combination (30 wt %).
Table 5 Examples of compositions containing metal hydroxide and
Additive: antioxidant (0.3%) and lubricant (0.2%)
Examples 25-32 (Table 5) summarize the fire-retarded PP or PE based
compositions containing the fire-retardant combination of Components B,
C and D that allows to reduce the content of Component C and of Component D, while providing a high level of fire retardancy of the
polymer material (V-0 or V-1). A total amount of fire-retardant
combination containing Components B, C and D in a loading range from
30 to 50 wt % (preferably 40-45 wt %) is used for PP or PE based fire-
retardant compositions. Examples 25-27 and 29-32 (Table 5) demonstrate that a high level of fire retardancy (UL-94 rating V-0 or V-1, high LOI)
can be achieved when the content of Component B in the fire-retarded
composition is 6 to 10 wt % while the content of Component C is loaded at
12 to 20 wt % and the content of Component D is loaded at 10 to 25 wt %
to balance the total amount of the fire-retardant combination (Components
B + C + D) in the polymer composition to 30-50 wt %. Example 31 and 32
demonstrate that when a total content of fire-retardants of less than 33 wt
% and the composition consists of 8 wt % of Components B, 12 wt % of
Component C and 10 wt % of Component D (Example 31), a high level of
fire retardancy can still be achieved, while remaining at the same total
amount of the fire-retardant combination. When the composition of the
fire-retardants contains Components B at 6 wt %, Component C at 14 wt
% and Component D at 10 wt % (Example 32), the LOI value increases to
24.4 %O2 but without providing the required UL-94 rating. The highest
level of fire retardancy is achieved when the amount of fire-retardant
combination (Components B + C + D) in the polymer composition is 40-45
wt %, wherein the content of Component B is 10 wt %, the content of
Component C is 15-20 wt % and' the content of Component D is 10 to 20 wt
%.
Examples 27 and 28 clearly demonstrate that fire-retardant combination
containing Components B, C and D provide a high level of fire retardancy
independent of the molecular structure of metal hydroxide (Component D).
Table 6 Examples of compositions containing metal hydroxide and reduced content of Component C
achieved Additive: antioxidant (0.3%)
Examples 33-40 (Table 6) summarize the fire-retarded EVA based
compositions containing the fire-retardant combination of Components B,
C and D that allows to reduce the content of Component C and of
Component D, while providing a high level of fire retardancy of the
polymer material (V-0 or V-1, high LOI). A total amount of fire-retardant
combination containing Components B, C and D in a loading range from
24 to 40 wt % (preferably 30-35 wt %) is used for EVA based fire-retardant
compositions. Examples 33, 36, 37, 39 and 40 (Table 6) demonstrate that a
high level of fire retardancy (UL-94 rating V-0 or V-1, high LOI) can be
achieved when the content of Component B in the fire-retarded
composition is 6 to 10 wt % while Component C is loaded at 8 wt % to 10
wt% and the content of Component D is 10 to 20 wt% to balance the total
amount of the fire-retardant combination (Components B + C + D) in the
polymer composition to 24-40 wt %. Example 40 demonstrates that when
the total amount of fire-retardants is less than 26 wt % and the content of
Components B is 6 wt %, Component C is 8 wt % and Component D is 10
wt %, the LOI value increases to of 27.6%, but without providing the
required UL-94 rating. The highest level of fire retardancy is achieved
when the amount of fire-retardant combination (Components B + C + D) in
the polymer composition is 30-35 wt %, wherein the content of Component
B is 10 wt %, the content of Component C is 10 wt % and the content of
Component D is 10 wt %.
Examples 33-35 clearly demonstrate that fire-retardant combination
containing Components B, C and D provide a high level of fire retardancy
to polymer composition independent of the molecular structure of the used
nitrogen-containing fire-retardant (Component C). Examples 37 and 38
clearly demonstrate that fire-retardant combination containing Components B, C and D provide a high level of fire retardancy
independent of molecular structure of metal hydroxide (Component D).
All the above description and examples have been provided for the purpose
of illustration and are not meant to limit the invention in any way. As will
be apparent to a skilled person, the invention can be carried out in many
variations, using different materials and methods, all without exceeding
the scope of the invention.