WO2004056325A1 - Dental formulation - Google Patents

Dental formulation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004056325A1
WO2004056325A1 PCT/AU2003/001713 AU0301713W WO2004056325A1 WO 2004056325 A1 WO2004056325 A1 WO 2004056325A1 AU 0301713 W AU0301713 W AU 0301713W WO 2004056325 A1 WO2004056325 A1 WO 2004056325A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
formulation
weight
polymer
gel
acid
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/AU2003/001713
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Dennis James Bannister
Original Assignee
Nsi Dental Pty Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nsi Dental Pty Limited filed Critical Nsi Dental Pty Limited
Priority to US10/540,171 priority Critical patent/US20060127325A1/en
Priority to AU2003289754A priority patent/AU2003289754A1/en
Publication of WO2004056325A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004056325A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/60Preparations for dentistry comprising organic or organo-metallic additives
    • A61K6/69Medicaments
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/80Preparations for artificial teeth, for filling teeth or for capping teeth
    • A61K6/884Preparations for artificial teeth, for filling teeth or for capping teeth comprising natural or synthetic resins
    • A61K6/887Compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bonds

Definitions

  • This invention relates to formulations for treating or reducing dentine hypersensitivity that causes pain arising from exposed dentine in the oral cavity.
  • Dentine sensitivity (or hypersensitivity, both terms being used in clinical dental practice interchangeably) is believed to be caused by rapid shifts, in either direction, of the fluids contained within dentinal tubules of teeth, following stimulus application, resulting in activation of sensory nerves in the pulp / inner dentine region of a tooth.
  • the pain producing stimuli can be thermal, tactile, osmotic, chemical or evaporative, but the cold stimulus appears to be the greatest problem.
  • Dentine hypersensitivity is characterized by short, sharp pain arising from the exposed dentine.
  • Physical materials and compounds which have been used for treating or preventing sensitivity in the oral cavity and which aim to block the sensitivity mechanism through tubule occlusion include compounds that interact with proteins of the tooth structure and block the ends of the dentinal tubules, light curable composites and resins, varnishes, glass ionomer cements, sealants and others.
  • Prior art formulations comprising physical "barrier” compounds are generally hard materials that often exhibit poor adhesion to tooth enamel by themselves and may require dentine bonding agents or surface primers. Also, some of the varnishes and resins employed will be brushed off in time with normal teeth cleaning regimes, resulting in re-opening of the dentinal tubules previously sealed off by the resin.
  • Preferred formulations should be easy to apply, be immediately effective and maintain dentinal tubule occlusion under normal teeth cleaning regimes that include regular tooth brushing.
  • Another aim is to provide a method of treating dentine sensitivity using physical (barrier) formulations that may be brushed (or otherwise applied) onto exposed dentine and provide longer term sensitivity reduction.
  • a formulation for reducing dentine sensitivity in the oral cavity which incorporates at least one physical desensitising agent in form of a light curable monomer that forms a resilient polymer gel upon curing.
  • a dentine sensitivity reducing formulation that includes a light-cured, form-stable, resilient gel polymer.
  • a formulation for topical application on dentine may include or be formed from (1 ) at least one multifunctional polymer or (2) at least one multifunctional polymer and at least one monomer or (3) more than one monomer.
  • a light sensitive polymerisation initiator is mixed with the multifunctional polymer(s) and/or monomer (s) to form a polymer premix in a suitable carrier liquid.
  • This premix can be stored in suitable, light-protected containers, and on demand then applied in the oral cavity to the surface of a painful or sensitive tooth, or to exposed dentine.
  • the premix and carrier liquid mixture should advantageously have a sufficiently low viscosity to allow fluid migration into exposed dentinal tubules by capillary action, where it forms a liquid plug within the tubule and seals off the tubule opening at the toot surface area.
  • Light in the wavelength range of 300 to 650nm which is the wave length at which most commercially available polymerisation initiators react to initiate polymerisation of suitable, gel-forming monomers employed in the invention, is then directed onto the area to which the mixture has been applied, which causes polymerisation of the monomer into a gel, thereby setting the desensitising polymer formulation within the tubules and forming relatively soft gel plugs that occlude access to the tubules.
  • the use of light-curing, gel-forming formulations for desensitising teeth has a number of advantages over known methods of physical desensitising.
  • the formulation once cured, forms a resilient, relatively soft gel plug within the dentinal tubules.
  • the gel plugs which undergo slight expansion during curing, form a slight resilient press fit within the tubules and thus act as an effective physical barrier to stimulus agents, including liquid ingress from the oral cavity and thermal stimuli.
  • the gel blocks the dentinal tubules and prevents fluid movement within the dentinal tubules. The result is a prevention or reduction of sensitivity or pain.
  • the resiliency and softness of the gel plug avoids creation of strains that are typically encountered with hard setting compounds previously used.
  • the formulation may include a hydrogel that swells in the presence of moisture in the mouth, causing the gel to resiliently tighten, i.e. form an improved press fit within the tubules compared to the press fit achieved upon curing of the mixture.
  • the gel polymer is advantageously selected such as to remain permeable to oxygen and electrolytes, just as would be the case with normal tubules.
  • a method of preventing or reducing sensitivity or pain in at least one tooth which method includes applying to said tooth a polymer premix of the invention and curing said premix by application of light.
  • Desensitising is to be taken as meaning reducing sensitivity or pain by physically blocking access to the interior of the dentinal tubules .
  • Cured/curing and grammatical variations thereof refers to the polymerisation process whereby the desensitising polymer plug is formed within the dentinal tubules.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION a description of preferred embodiments of the invention will be provided. Whilst specific chemical compounds are used in the preferred embodiments, it will be appreciated that other polymer compounds may be employed that form a resilient gel body once cured, in contrast with hard curing polymers.
  • a preferred multifunctional polymer used in a desensitising formulation according to the invention is a polycarboxylic acid polymer. The monomer is preferably an acrylate or allyl derivative.
  • the monomer is selected from hydroxy ethylmethacrylate, glycol dimethacrylate, diallyloxyacetic acid, poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate, 2-acrylamidoglycolic acid, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and itaconic acid.
  • the light sensitive polymerisation initiator is a quinone derivative in combination with a quaternary amine derivative.
  • a preferred formulation uses camphorquinone.
  • the quaternary amine derivative may be selected from N,N,3,5-tetramethyl aniline, poly(ethyleneimine), N,N,N,N- tetraethyldiethylenetriamine, and N,N-diethylethylenediamine, tetramethyl aniline being the most preferred quaternary amine.
  • the light sensitive initiator initiates the polymerisation of the monomer to form the desensitising polymer.
  • a ready to use formulation is prepared by dissolving the polymer(s) and/or monomer(s) and polymerisation initiator in water, together with a preservative (to improve shelf life).
  • a preservative to improve shelf life.
  • a typically used preservative is butylated hydroxy toluene, although other preservatives such as hydroquinone, and methyl hydroquinone may be used.
  • the relative amounts of the constituents of the formulation may vary within certain ranges. Broadly, the constituents may be present as follows:
  • Polycarboxylic acid polymer about 1 to about 50% by weight
  • Glycol dimethacrylate about 1 to about 50% by weight
  • Camphorquinone about 0.01 to about 5% by weight Tetramethyl aniline about 0.01 to about 5% by weight Butylated hydroxy toluene about 0.01 to about 5% by weight
  • Polycarboxylic acid polymer about 5 to about 15% by weight
  • Glycol dimethacrylate about 3 to about 9% by weight
  • Camphorquinone about 0.1 to about 1% by weight Tetramethyl aniline about 0.1 to about 1% by weight Butylated hydroxy toluene about 0.01 to about 0.1%byweight Excellent results in creating a soft, resilient gel after curing have been obtained with a formulation that comprises Polycarboxylic acid polymer about 7.5% by weight 2-Hydroxy ethylmethacrylate about 74.5% by weight Diallyloxyacetic acid, sodium salt about 6% by weight
  • a desensitising hydrogel formulation in accordance with the invention was prepared as follows: Ingredients
  • Tetramethyl aniline 0.22 grams Gantrez AN119BF is an alternating copolymer of vinyl methyl ether and maleic anhydride, HEMA is 2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate and BHT is butylated hydroxy toluene.
  • a clean glass beaker was placed on the balance and the balance tared.
  • To the glass beaker was added 7.5 grams of Gantrez AN119BF, 12.0 grams of deionised water, 74.5 grams of HEMA, and 6.0 grams of diallyloxyacetic acid sodium salt.
  • the mixture was stirred with a plastic spatula and then the beaker covered with plastic film.
  • Water was poured into the ultrasonic bath to a depth of about one centimeter, and then the beaker placed in the ultrasonic bath.
  • the ultrasonic bath was turned on to agitate the contents of the beaker until the mixture became clear, and there were no gel particles.
  • This premix can then be applied to a painful or sensitive tooth, or to exposed dentine. Naturally, the premix can also be applied to a tooth which has no pain, but in anticipation of pain, for example before a surgical procedure. Light is directed onto the area to which the premix is applied to cause polymerisation. The desensitising polymer so formed reduces or prevents pain.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (AREA)
  • Dental Preparations (AREA)
  • Medicinal Preparation (AREA)
  • Cosmetics (AREA)

Abstract

This invention relates to formulations for treating or reducing dentine hypersensitivity that causes pain arising from exposed dentine in the oral cavity. The present invention seeks to provide formulations for physical blockage of dentinal tubules that have long term effectiveness and cause minimal irritation (if any at all) to the tissues of the oral cavity. Preferred formulations should be easy to apply, be immediately effective and maintain dentinal tubule occlusion under normal teeth cleaning regimes that include regular tooth brushing. The invention provides a formulation for reducing dentine sensitivity in the oral cavity, which incorporates at least one physical desensitising agent in form of a light curable monomer that forms a resilient polymer gel upon curing.

Description

DENTAL FORMULATION FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to formulations for treating or reducing dentine hypersensitivity that causes pain arising from exposed dentine in the oral cavity. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Dentine sensitivity (or hypersensitivity, both terms being used in clinical dental practice interchangeably) is believed to be caused by rapid shifts, in either direction, of the fluids contained within dentinal tubules of teeth, following stimulus application, resulting in activation of sensory nerves in the pulp / inner dentine region of a tooth. The pain producing stimuli can be thermal, tactile, osmotic, chemical or evaporative, but the cold stimulus appears to be the greatest problem. Dentine hypersensitivity is characterized by short, sharp pain arising from the exposed dentine.
Conventional therapies for dentine hypersensitivity are based on using topical applied "desensitising" agents and formulations. These agents can be classified on the basis of their chemical and physical properties, ie there are chemical agents such as corticosteroids, benzalkonium chloride in hydroxy ethyl methacrylate, chlorhexidine, glutaraldehyde, potassium oxalate, fluorides and others that use chemical interaction with the sensory nerves, there are physical agents that act as a barrier to prevent dential tubule fluid contact with stimulus agents, and mixed chemical/physical agents. Physical materials and compounds which have been used for treating or preventing sensitivity in the oral cavity and which aim to block the sensitivity mechanism through tubule occlusion include compounds that interact with proteins of the tooth structure and block the ends of the dentinal tubules, light curable composites and resins, varnishes, glass ionomer cements, sealants and others.
For a more in depth look at the epidemiology, mechanisms of pain reduction and aetiological factors of dentine hypersensitivity reference should be had to the article by R.H. Dababneh, AT. Khouri and M. Addy, "Dentine hypersensitivity - an enigma? A review of terminology, epidemiology, mechanisms and management, in British Dental Journal, Vol.187, No.11 , Dec Prior art formulations comprising chemically active compounds have the disadvantage that they are generally short lived in effectiveness, and can cause irritation of the soft tissues, such as the gum line. Some active compounds, such as glutaraldehyde, can burn the skin or eyes. Prior art formulations comprising physical "barrier" compounds are generally hard materials that often exhibit poor adhesion to tooth enamel by themselves and may require dentine bonding agents or surface primers. Also, some of the varnishes and resins employed will be brushed off in time with normal teeth cleaning regimes, resulting in re-opening of the dentinal tubules previously sealed off by the resin.
It is an aim of the present invention to provide formulations for physical blockage of dentinal tubules that have long term effectiveness and cause minimal irritation (if any at all) to the tissues of the oral cavity. Preferred formulations should be easy to apply, be immediately effective and maintain dentinal tubule occlusion under normal teeth cleaning regimes that include regular tooth brushing.
Another aim is to provide a method of treating dentine sensitivity using physical (barrier) formulations that may be brushed (or otherwise applied) onto exposed dentine and provide longer term sensitivity reduction. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to a broad form of the invention there is provided a formulation for reducing dentine sensitivity in the oral cavity, which incorporates at least one physical desensitising agent in form of a light curable monomer that forms a resilient polymer gel upon curing. According to a further aspect of the invention there is provided a dentine sensitivity reducing formulation that includes a light-cured, form-stable, resilient gel polymer.
A formulation for topical application on dentine may include or be formed from (1 ) at least one multifunctional polymer or (2) at least one multifunctional polymer and at least one monomer or (3) more than one monomer. A light sensitive polymerisation initiator is mixed with the multifunctional polymer(s) and/or monomer (s) to form a polymer premix in a suitable carrier liquid. This premix can be stored in suitable, light-protected containers, and on demand then applied in the oral cavity to the surface of a painful or sensitive tooth, or to exposed dentine.
The premix and carrier liquid mixture should advantageously have a sufficiently low viscosity to allow fluid migration into exposed dentinal tubules by capillary action, where it forms a liquid plug within the tubule and seals off the tubule opening at the toot surface area.
Light in the wavelength range of 300 to 650nm, which is the wave length at which most commercially available polymerisation initiators react to initiate polymerisation of suitable, gel-forming monomers employed in the invention, is then directed onto the area to which the mixture has been applied, which causes polymerisation of the monomer into a gel, thereby setting the desensitising polymer formulation within the tubules and forming relatively soft gel plugs that occlude access to the tubules.
The use of light-curing, gel-forming formulations for desensitising teeth has a number of advantages over known methods of physical desensitising. The formulation, once cured, forms a resilient, relatively soft gel plug within the dentinal tubules. The gel plugs, which undergo slight expansion during curing, form a slight resilient press fit within the tubules and thus act as an effective physical barrier to stimulus agents, including liquid ingress from the oral cavity and thermal stimuli. The gel blocks the dentinal tubules and prevents fluid movement within the dentinal tubules. The result is a prevention or reduction of sensitivity or pain. The resiliency and softness of the gel plug avoids creation of strains that are typically encountered with hard setting compounds previously used. Whilst the polymer gel film that is also formed on the tooth surface will eventually be worn away as consequence of tooth brushing, the gel plugs will remain embedded within the tubules, as their resilient nature make them difficult to dislodge and extract from the tubule. Hence, desensitising formulations according to the invention have longer term effectiveness when compared with prior art formulations. Advantageously, the formulation may include a hydrogel that swells in the presence of moisture in the mouth, causing the gel to resiliently tighten, i.e. form an improved press fit within the tubules compared to the press fit achieved upon curing of the mixture. The gel polymer is advantageously selected such as to remain permeable to oxygen and electrolytes, just as would be the case with normal tubules.
In another aspect of the invention there is provided a method of preventing or reducing sensitivity or pain in at least one tooth, which method includes applying to said tooth a polymer premix of the invention and curing said premix by application of light.
There is further provided according to the invention the use of at least one multifunctional polymer and/or at least one monomer, together with a light sensitive polymerisation initiator, for the preparation of a formulation for desensitising a tooth.
As employed above and throughout this disclosure (including the claims), the following terms, unless otherwise indicated, shall be understood to have the following meanings:
"Desensitising" is to be taken as meaning reducing sensitivity or pain by physically blocking access to the interior of the dentinal tubules .
"Cured/curing" and grammatical variations thereof refers to the polymerisation process whereby the desensitising polymer plug is formed within the dentinal tubules. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION In the following, a description of preferred embodiments of the invention will be provided. Whilst specific chemical compounds are used in the preferred embodiments, it will be appreciated that other polymer compounds may be employed that form a resilient gel body once cured, in contrast with hard curing polymers. A preferred multifunctional polymer used in a desensitising formulation according to the invention is a polycarboxylic acid polymer. The monomer is preferably an acrylate or allyl derivative. The monomer is selected from hydroxy ethylmethacrylate, glycol dimethacrylate, diallyloxyacetic acid, poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate, 2-acrylamidoglycolic acid, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and itaconic acid.
The light sensitive polymerisation initiator is a quinone derivative in combination with a quaternary amine derivative. A preferred formulation uses camphorquinone. The quaternary amine derivative may be selected from N,N,3,5-tetramethyl aniline, poly(ethyleneimine), N,N,N,N- tetraethyldiethylenetriamine, and N,N-diethylethylenediamine, tetramethyl aniline being the most preferred quaternary amine. On application of light in the wavelength range 300 to 650nm, the light sensitive initiator initiates the polymerisation of the monomer to form the desensitising polymer.
A ready to use formulation is prepared by dissolving the polymer(s) and/or monomer(s) and polymerisation initiator in water, together with a preservative (to improve shelf life). A typically used preservative is butylated hydroxy toluene, although other preservatives such as hydroquinone, and methyl hydroquinone may be used.
The relative amounts of the constituents of the formulation may vary within certain ranges. Broadly, the constituents may be present as follows:
Polycarboxylic acid polymer about 1 to about 50% by weight
2-Hydroxy ethylmethacrylate about 10 to about 80% by weight
Glycol dimethacrylate about 1 to about 50% by weight
Water about 1 to about 70% by weight
Camphorquinone about 0.01 to about 5% by weight Tetramethyl aniline about 0.01 to about 5% by weight Butylated hydroxy toluene about 0.01 to about 5% by weight
Test batches of formulations in accordance with the invention have shown good tubule occlusion results where constituents were present in the formulation within the following ranges:
Polycarboxylic acid polymer about 5 to about 15% by weight
2-Hydroxy ethylmethacrylate about 50 to about 80% by weight
Glycol dimethacrylate about 3 to about 9% by weight
Water about 5 to about 25% by weight
Camphorquinone about 0.1 to about 1% by weight Tetramethyl aniline about 0.1 to about 1% by weight Butylated hydroxy toluene about 0.01 to about 0.1%byweight Excellent results in creating a soft, resilient gel after curing have been obtained with a formulation that comprises Polycarboxylic acid polymer about 7.5% by weight 2-Hydroxy ethylmethacrylate about 74.5% by weight Diallyloxyacetic acid, sodium salt about 6% by weight
Water about 12% by weight
Camphorquinone about 0.2% by weight Tetramethyl aniline about 0.22% by weight Butylated hydroxy toluene about 0.05% by weight In the above formulations, water could be replaced by another, suitable solvent that provides the initial swelling agent for the formulation; after curing into the soft, resilient gel plug, the solvent will diffuse out of the gel at a slow rate and saliva will then concurrently provide the moisture that is necessary to replace the solvent as swelling agent. A desensitising hydrogel formulation in accordance with the invention was prepared as follows: Ingredients
Gantrez AN119BF 7.5 grams Deionised water 12.0 grams HEMA 74.5 grams
Diallyloxyacetic acid, sodium salt 6.0 grams Camphorquinone 0.20 grams BHT 0.05 grams
Tetramethyl aniline 0.22 grams Gantrez AN119BF is an alternating copolymer of vinyl methyl ether and maleic anhydride, HEMA is 2-hydroxy ethyl methacrylate and BHT is butylated hydroxy toluene. Method
The equipment requirements were as follows: a) Balance weighing in grams and reading to two decimal places b) Pasteur pipettes c) Two clean 500ml beakers d) Plastic spatula e) Ultrasonic bath
A clean glass beaker was placed on the balance and the balance tared. To the glass beaker was added 7.5 grams of Gantrez AN119BF, 12.0 grams of deionised water, 74.5 grams of HEMA, and 6.0 grams of diallyloxyacetic acid sodium salt. The mixture was stirred with a plastic spatula and then the beaker covered with plastic film. Water was poured into the ultrasonic bath to a depth of about one centimeter, and then the beaker placed in the ultrasonic bath. The ultrasonic bath was turned on to agitate the contents of the beaker until the mixture became clear, and there were no gel particles. In an orange light production area, 0.20 grams of camphorquinone, 0.05 grams of BHT, and 0.22 grams of tetramethyl aniline was weighed into a clean glass beaker. Then the solution containing the Gantrez AN119BF was added to this beaker. The beaker was covered with plastic film and agitated in the ultrasonic bath until all the camphorquinone and BHT had dissolved. The resultant product (the "premix") was packaged, ready for delivery.
This premix can then be applied to a painful or sensitive tooth, or to exposed dentine. Naturally, the premix can also be applied to a tooth which has no pain, but in anticipation of pain, for example before a surgical procedure. Light is directed onto the area to which the premix is applied to cause polymerisation. The desensitising polymer so formed reduces or prevents pain.

Claims

CLAIMS:
1. Formulation for reducing dentine sensitivity in the oral cavity, which incorporates at least one physical desensitising agent in form of a light curable monomer that forms a resilient polymer gel upon curing.
2. Dentine sensitivity reducing formulation that includes a light-cured, form- stable, resilient gel polymer.
3. The formulation of claim 1 or 2, including a light sensitive polymerisation initiator and (1) at least one multifunctional polymer, or (2) at least one multifunctional polymer and at least one monomer, or (3) more than one monomer.
4. The formulation of claim 3 in a suitable carrier liquid.
5. The formulation of claim 4, wherein the carrier liquid includes water.
6. The formulation of claim 4 or 5 having a viscosity to allow fluid migration into exposed dentinal tubules by capillary action.
7. The formulation of any one of the preceding claims, including a gel polymer that swells in the presence of moisture.
8. The formulation of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the gel polymer is permeable to oxygen and electrolytes.
9. The formulation of any one of claims 3 to 8, including a polycarboxylic acid polymer.
10. The formulation of any one of claims 3 to 9, including an acrylate or allyl derivative.
11. The formulation of claim 10, wherein the monomer is selected from the group consisting of 2-hydroxy ethylmethacrylate, glycol dimethacrylate, diallyloxyacetic acid, poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate, 2-acrylamidoglycolic acid, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and itaconic acid.
12. The formulation of any one of claims 3 to 11 , wherein the light sensitive polymerisation initiator is a quinone derivative in combination with a quaternary amine derivative.
13. The formulation of claim 12, incorporating camphorquinone and a quaternary amine derivative selected from the group consisting of N,N,3,5- tetramethyl aniline, poly(ethyleneimine), N,N,N,N-tetraethyldiethylenetriamine, and N,N-diethylethylenediamine.
14. The formulation of any one of claims 3 to 13, further including a preservative such as butylated hydroxy toluene or hydroquinone, in particular methyl hydroquinone.
15. The formulation of any one of claims 3 to 14, having the following constituents in % values by weight: Polycarboxylic acid polymer about 1 to about 50, 2-hydroxy ethylmethacrylate about 10 to about 80, Glycol dimethacrylate about 1 to about 50, Water about 1 to about 70, Camphorquinone about 0.01 to about 5, Tetramethyl aniline about 0.01 to about 5, and Butylated hydroxy toluene about 0.01 to about 5.
16. The formulation of claim 15, wherein the constituents are present in the following amount in % by weight: Polycarboxylic acid polymer about 5 to about
15. 2-hydroxy ethylmethacrylate about 50 to about 80, Glycol dimethacrylate about 3 to about 9, Water about 5 to about 25, Camphorquinone about 0.1 to about 1 , Tetramethyl aniline about 0.1 to about 1 and Butylated hydroxy toluene about 0.01 to about 0.1.
17. The formulation of claim 16, wherein the constituents are present in the following amounts: Polycarboxylic acid polymer about 7.5% by weight 2-Hydroxy ethylmethacrylate about 74.5% by weight Diallyloxyacetic acid, sodium salt about 6% by weight Water about 12% by weight
Camphorquinone about 0.2% by weight Tetramethyl aniline about 0.22% by weight Butylated hydroxy toluene about 0.05% by weight
18. A method of preventing or reducing sensitivity or pain in teeth, which method includes applying a formulation in accordance with any one of claims 1 to 17 to exposed dentinal tubules of teeth, allowing said formulation to migrate into the tubules, and curing the formulation by application of light with a wave length in the range of 300 to 650nm, whereby soft resilient gel plugs are formed within the tubules.
PCT/AU2003/001713 2002-12-20 2003-12-22 Dental formulation WO2004056325A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/540,171 US20060127325A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2003-12-22 Dental formulation
AU2003289754A AU2003289754A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2003-12-22 Dental formulation

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AU2002953460 2002-12-20
AU2002953460A AU2002953460A0 (en) 2002-12-20 2002-12-20 Dental formulation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004056325A1 true WO2004056325A1 (en) 2004-07-08

Family

ID=30004545

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/AU2003/001713 WO2004056325A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2003-12-22 Dental formulation

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20060127325A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2002953460A0 (en)
WO (1) WO2004056325A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8292625B2 (en) * 2010-07-23 2012-10-23 Pulpdent Corporation Radically curable urethane dimethacrylates and compositions thereof for tougher dental prosthetics

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5133957A (en) * 1991-09-18 1992-07-28 Bisco, Inc. Composition and method for desensitizing dentin
US5797749A (en) * 1997-03-19 1998-08-25 Danville Materials Dental composition
WO1999020227A1 (en) * 1997-10-22 1999-04-29 Dentsply International Inc. Protective varnish for dentin
EP0976386A1 (en) * 1998-07-28 2000-02-02 Block Drug Company Inc. Polymeric desensitizing compositions

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5756559A (en) * 1992-02-06 1998-05-26 Dentsply Research & Development Method and composition for adhering to tooth structure

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5133957A (en) * 1991-09-18 1992-07-28 Bisco, Inc. Composition and method for desensitizing dentin
US5797749A (en) * 1997-03-19 1998-08-25 Danville Materials Dental composition
WO1999020227A1 (en) * 1997-10-22 1999-04-29 Dentsply International Inc. Protective varnish for dentin
EP0976386A1 (en) * 1998-07-28 2000-02-02 Block Drug Company Inc. Polymeric desensitizing compositions

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20060127325A1 (en) 2006-06-15
AU2002953460A0 (en) 2003-01-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Schwartz Adhesive dentistry and endodontics. Part 2: bonding in the root canal system—the promise and the problems: a review
Sanares et al. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites
Morphis et al. Fluoride pit and fissure sealants: a review
Perdigao et al. Fundamental concepts of enamel and dentin adhesion
Pashley Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material
Paqué et al. Apical sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany versus gutta‐percha/AH Plus: immediate and 16‐months leakage
Pegoraro et al. Cements for use in esthetic dentistry
US7128899B2 (en) Bleaching device comprising a barrier layer and a bleaching composition comprising polyvinylpyrrolidone
Poggio et al. Effects of dentin surface treatments on shear bond strength of glass-ionomer cements
WY et al. Effect of home-use fluoride gels on resin-modified glass-ionomer cements
EP0702948B1 (en) Tooth surface treating agent
WO2004060324A1 (en) Free-radical initiator systems containing enzymes
US9931281B2 (en) Multi-functional self-healing dental composites, methods of synthesis and methods of use
McLean The clinical use of glass-ionomer cements
Wang et al. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin‐modified glass ionomer cements
Thirawat et al. The sealing ability of materials used as retrograde root fillings in endodontic surgery
Foley et al. A comparison of in vitro enamel demineralization potential of 3 orthodontic cements
Ling et al. Physical, Mechanical, and Adhesive Properties of Novel Self‐Adhesive Resin Cement
JP4467672B2 (en) Curing method for dental glass ionomer cement
Zidan et al. Obturation of root canals using the single cone gutta‐percha technique and dentinal bonding agents
US20060127325A1 (en) Dental formulation
US20020082317A1 (en) Dental adhesive compositions with desensitizing agents
Demarco et al. Dyes for caries detection influence sound dentin bond strength
AU2003289754A1 (en) Dental formulation
JPH08119822A (en) Tacky root canal-fitting material for dentistry

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2003289754

Country of ref document: AU

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2006127325

Country of ref document: US

Kind code of ref document: A1

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10540171

Country of ref document: US

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase
WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 10540171

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: JP